criminal law research project

Words at Ease

35 Criminal Justice Research Topic Ideas

In the complex and ever-evolving field of criminal justice, selecting a topic for research is like navigating a labyrinth of legal, ethical, and societal issues. Each topic holds the potential to not only enhance our understanding of the legal system but also to shed light on the broader implications of crime and justice in our society.

In this article, we’ll explore 35 criminal justice research topic ideas, each offering a unique perspective on the intricacies of law enforcement, legal theory, and societal impact. These topics are not just academic inquiries; they are profound questions that probe the depths of fairness, equity, and human rights.

Criminal Justice Research Topic Ideas

Whether you are a student, a legal professional, or an avid researcher, these ideas will guide you to a topic that resonates with your interests and contributes to the vital discourse on justice and legality.

1. The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation in Prisons

Appropriate for : Studying correctional strategies. Examine how rehabilitation programs in prisons impact recidivism rates. Ideal for research focused on improving the correctional system.

2. Racial Disparities in Sentencing

Appropriate for : Exploring racial bias. Investigate the presence and impact of racial disparities in the sentencing process. Crucial for studies aiming to uncover and address biases in the legal system.

3. The Role of Forensic Science in Solving Crimes

Appropriate for : Analyzing scientific methods. Study the impact and accuracy of forensic science in criminal investigations. Suitable for research at the intersection of science and criminal justice.

4. The Ethics of Capital Punishment

Appropriate for : Debating moral implications. Explore the ethical considerations and effectiveness of the death penalty. Essential for discussions on human rights and legal ethics.

5. Cybercrime and Digital Forensics

Appropriate for : Understanding modern crimes. Examine the rise of cybercrime and the role of digital forensics in responding to these challenges. Ideal for research in contemporary criminal issues.

6. Police Brutality and Accountability

Appropriate for : Addressing law enforcement conduct. Investigate instances of police brutality and the systems in place for accountability. Critical for research focused on law enforcement ethics and reform.

7. Juvenile Delinquency and the Justice System

Appropriate for : Studying youth in crime. Analyze the factors contributing to juvenile delinquency and the effectiveness of juvenile justice systems. Important for research on youth crime and rehabilitation.

8. The Impact of Drug Legalization on Crime Rates

Appropriate for : Exploring drug policy effects. Research the implications of drug legalization on crime rates and public health. Suitable for studies in policy impact and societal change.

9. Human Trafficking: Causes and Prevention

Appropriate for : Tackling global crime. Examine the causes of human trafficking and effective measures for its prevention. Essential for research on international crime and human rights.

10. Mental Health and Criminal Behavior

Appropriate for : Understanding psychological aspects. Study the relationship between mental health issues and criminal behavior. Important for research aimed at integrating mental health considerations into the justice system.

11. The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Crime

Appropriate for : Analyzing societal factors. Investigate how socioeconomic status influences criminal behavior and justice outcomes. Crucial for studies on social inequality and crime.

12. White-Collar Crime and Legal Responses

Appropriate for : Exploring corporate crime. Examine the nature of white-collar crime and the effectiveness of legal responses. Ideal for research on economic crimes and legal accountability.

13. Domestic Violence: Legal and Social Perspectives

Appropriate for : Addressing intimate partner crime. Research the legal handling of domestic violence cases and their societal implications. Vital for studies on family law and social welfare.

14. The Role of Community Policing

Appropriate for : Improving police-community relations. Analyze the effectiveness of community policing strategies in reducing crime and building trust. Suitable for research on law enforcement practices and community relations.

15. Media Influence on Public Perception of Crime

Appropriate for : Studying media impact. Examine how media coverage affects public perceptions and attitudes towards crime. Important for understanding the interplay between media and criminal justice perceptions.

16. Prison Overcrowding and its Consequences

Appropriate for : Addressing correctional challenges. Investigate the causes and impacts of prison overcrowding. Crucial for research aimed at improving prison conditions and management.

17. The Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony

Appropriate for : Analyzing testimonial reliability. Study the reliability and factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimonies. Essential for research on evidence and trial processes.

18. Legal Representation and Justice Outcomes

Appropriate for : Exploring legal fairness. Examine the impact of legal representation quality on justice outcomes. Vital for discussions on legal equity and access to justice.

19. The Role of DNA Evidence in Criminal Trials

Appropriate for : Evaluating scientific evidence. Research the use and impact of DNA evidence in criminal trials. Suitable for studies on forensic science and legal proceedings.

20. Crime Prevention Strategies in Urban Areas

Appropriate for : Enhancing public safety. Analyze effective crime prevention strategies in urban settings. Important for urban studies and public safety research.

21. The Effectiveness of Parole Systems

Appropriate for : Studying post-incarceration. Examine the role and effectiveness of parole in the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders. Crucial for research on post-incarceration strategies.

22. The History and Evolution of Criminal Law

Appropriate for : Tracing legal development. Investigate the historical development of criminal law and its impact on modern legal systems. Ideal for studies in legal history and theory.

23. The Intersection of Immigration and Criminal Justice

Appropriate for : Exploring immigration issues. Research the impact of immigration policies on criminal justice practices. Essential for studies on immigration law and criminal justice intersections.

24. Victimology and Victim Rights

Appropriate for : Focusing on crime victims. Examine the study of victimology and the rights afforded to crime victims. Vital for research on victim support and legal rights.

25. The Psychology of Criminal Behavior

Appropriate for : Understanding criminal minds. Study the psychological factors that contribute to criminal behavior. Important for research in criminal psychology and behavior analysis.

26. Gender and Crime

Appropriate for : Exploring gender dynamics. Investigate the role of gender in both criminal behavior and justice system experiences. Crucial for research on gender issues in criminal justice.

27. The Effect of Social Media on Criminal Investigations

Appropriate for : Analyzing digital influences. Research how social media impacts criminal investigations and legal proceedings. Suitable for contemporary studies on technology and crime.

28. Environmental Crimes and Legal Responses

Appropriate for : Tackling ecological offenses. Examine the nature of environmental crimes and the effectiveness of legal responses. Essential for studies on environmental law and policy.

29. Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Appropriate for : Analyzing global perspectives. Study and compare criminal justice systems across different countries. Vital for research on international law and comparative justice.

30. The Role of Sentencing Guidelines in Justice Outcomes

Appropriate for : Understanding sentencing processes. Investigate the impact of sentencing guidelines on justice outcomes and disparities. Important for studies on legal fairness and sentencing practices.

31. The Ethics of Undercover Policing

Appropriate for : Debating covert operations. Examine the ethical considerations and effectiveness of undercover policing. Crucial for discussions on law enforcement methods and ethics.

32. Restorative Justice Practices

Appropriate for : Exploring alternative approaches. Research the principles and effectiveness of restorative justice practices. Suitable for studies on alternative justice models and conflict resolution.

33. The Impact of Drug Courts on Offender Rehabilitation

Appropriate for : Evaluating specialized courts. Study the role and effectiveness of drug courts in the rehabilitation of drug offenders. Important for research on judicial responses to drug-related crimes.

34. Terrorism and Counterterrorism Measures

Appropriate for : Addressing modern threats. Examine the nature of terrorism and the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies. Essential for studies on national security and international law.

35. Legal and Ethical Aspects of Surveillance

Appropriate for : Scrutinizing privacy concerns. Research the legal and ethical implications of surveillance in criminal investigations. Vital for discussions on privacy rights and law enforcement tactics.

Selecting a research topic in criminal justice is a journey into the depths of legal, ethical, and societal issues. Each of these 35 topics offers a unique opportunity to explore the many facets of crime and justice, encouraging a deeper understanding of the principles that govern our legal system and the societal implications of law and order.

Whether delving into the intricacies of forensic science, examining the social roots of criminal behavior, or debating the moral questions surrounding punishment and rehabilitation, your research has the power to contribute significantly to the field of criminal justice.

The Criminal Law & Justice Center is a hub for research, education and advocacy.

Blending a data-driven approach with zealous advocacy, the center offers empirical insights into the intricacies of the legal system and policy outcomes. we harness the wealth of perspectives, experiences and expertise that our students and faculty bring to bridge the gap between scholarship and real world impact. read more about our work., news & events, get involved, join our mailing list.

Your support is a direct investment into the transformation of the criminal legal system, enabling the center to carry out its mission through research, education and advocacy.

Larsen Justice Fellowship

Application Deadline: April 19, 2024

2023-2024 Annual Report

Take a Look at the First Year

Upcoming Events

• Sep 04 Meet-and-Greet: Criminal Law & Justice Center (CLJC) x Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law (BJCL)

• How It Works
• Prices & Discounts

30 Engaging Criminal Law Research Paper Topics, Essential Tools, and Effective Writing Strategies

Table of contents

Share this article

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assistance!

Crafted from Scratch for You.

Ensuring Your Work’s Originality.

Transform Your Draft into Excellence.

Perfecting Your Paper’s Grammar, Style, and Format (APA, MLA, etc.).

Calculate the cost of your paper

Get ideas for your essay

Criminal Law Research Paper Topics

This page provides a comprehensive list of criminal law research paper topics for students studying law. The page is divided into several categories including the history and evolution of criminal law, comparative analysis of criminal law systems, legal principles of criminal liability, and critiques of the criminal law system. The page also offers expert advice on choosing criminal law research paper topics and how to write a successful research paper. Finally, the page presents iResearchNet’s writing services for students who need assistance in writing a custom criminal law research paper.

Criminal Law Research Guide

Criminal law is an essential component of the legal system, which defines various types of criminal offenses and the corresponding punishments for these offenses. Criminal law research papers explore a wide range of topics related to crime and punishment, and the intersection of law and society. Students studying criminal law are often required to write research papers that examine various aspects of the criminal justice system, legal principles, and theories of criminal behavior.

Academic Writing, Editing, Proofreading, And Problem Solving Services

Get 10% off with 24start discount code.

As criminal law research papers require in-depth analysis and research, students must choose a topic that interests them and is relevant to current issues in the field. Additionally, it is important to choose a topic that aligns with the assignment guidelines and requirements. Therefore, this guide will provide students with a wide range of topic ideas, as well as guidance on selecting an appropriate topic, conducting research, and organizing their research paper.

100 Criminal Law Research Paper Topics

Criminal law is a crucial part of the legal system that defines the offenses and punishments for criminal behavior. The study of criminal law is a vast and fascinating field that offers numerous research paper topics for students. Understanding the various categories of criminal law research topics is crucial in choosing a suitable topic that aligns with the student’s interests and the assignment requirements. This section will provide a comprehensive list of ten categories of criminal law research paper topics that students can explore.

History and Evolution of Criminal Law

This category focuses on the historical development of criminal law. It explores the origins of criminal law, its evolution over time, and the ways in which criminal law has adapted to societal changes.

• Origins and development of criminal law in ancient societies
• The role of the Magna Carta in the evolution of criminal law
• The impact of the Enlightenment on criminal law
• Historical analysis of landmark criminal law cases
• The evolution of criminal law in the United States
• The impact of World War II on criminal law
• The influence of the civil rights movement on criminal law
• The role of international criminal law in shaping domestic criminal law
• The impact of terrorism on criminal law
• The future of criminal law: trends and challenges

Comparative Analysis of Criminal Law Systems in Different Countries

This category examines criminal law systems in different countries and regions, and the ways in which they differ. It considers the underlying principles of criminal law, how criminal law is enforced, and the implications of these differences for criminal justice.

• Comparative analysis of common law and civil law systems
• The criminal justice system in China: a comparative analysis
• The role of the European Court of Human Rights in shaping criminal law systems
• A comparative study of the criminal law systems of Germany and the United States
• The impact of colonialism on criminal law in Africa
• Comparative analysis of criminal law systems in the Middle East
• The influence of Islamic law on criminal law in Muslim-majority countries
• The criminal justice system in Japan: a comparative analysis
• Comparative analysis of the criminal law systems in Canada and the United States
• The role of international criminal law in harmonizing criminal law systems

Role of the Judiciary in Criminal Law Interpretation and Application

This category explores the role of the judiciary in interpreting and applying criminal law. It considers the challenges faced by judges in interpreting complex criminal laws, the ways in which judges approach the task of criminal law interpretation, and the implications of judicial decisions for the criminal justice system.

• The role of the Supreme Court in interpreting criminal law
• The impact of judicial activism on criminal law
• The role of juries in criminal law cases
• The influence of public opinion on criminal law interpretation and application
• The role of the prosecutor in criminal law cases
• The impact of plea bargaining on criminal law interpretation and application
• The role of defense attorneys in criminal law cases
• The impact of judicial discretion on criminal law interpretation and application
• The role of judges in shaping criminal law policy
• The influence of sentencing guidelines on criminal law interpretation and application

Legal Principles of Criminal Liability and Their Application in Practice

This category focuses on the legal principles that govern criminal liability. It examines the different types of criminal liability, including criminal intent, negligence, and strict liability, and considers how these principles are applied in practice.

• The concept of mens rea and its application in criminal law
• The principle of actus reus and its application in criminal law
• The role of causation in criminal law
• The impact of strict liability on criminal law
• The principle of proportionality in criminal law
• The influence of the Eighth Amendment on criminal law
• The principle of double jeopardy and its application in criminal law
• The impact of the insanity defense on criminal law
• The role of self-defense in criminal law cases
• The principle of conspiracy and its application in criminal law

The Concept of Mens Rea in Criminal Law

This category explores the concept of mens rea, or criminal intent, in criminal law. It considers the different levels of intent that can give rise to criminal liability, the challenges of proving mens rea, and the implications of mens rea for the criminal justice system.

• The evolution of the concept of mens rea in criminal law
• The relationship between mens rea and criminal intent
• The impact of mens rea on criminal liability
• The role of mens rea in determining criminal negligence
• The influence of mens rea on the burden of proof in criminal law
• The impact of strict liability on mens rea
• The role of the Model Penal Code in defining mens rea
• The influence of the Supreme Court on mens rea in criminal law
• The impact of mens rea on sentencing in criminal law
• The future of mens rea in criminal law: challenges and opportunities

Limits of Criminal Law in the Regulation of Conduct

This category considers the limits of criminal law in regulating conduct. It examines the ways in which criminal law can be used to control behavior, as well as its limitations in addressing certain types of conduct.

• Criminal Law and the Limits of Free Speech
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Religious Freedom
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Privacy
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Freedom of Assembly
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Property Rights
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Autonomy
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Punishment
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Retribution
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Rehabilitation
• Criminal Law and the Limits of Restitution

Use of Criminal Law to Address Societal Problems

This category explores the use of criminal law to address societal problems, such as drug addiction, domestic violence, and hate crimes. It considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of using criminal law to address these issues.

• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Domestic Violence
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Child Abuse and Neglect
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Animal Cruelty
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Hate Crimes
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Environmental Crimes
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Terrorism
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Cybercrime
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Human Trafficking
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Drug Addiction
• The Use of Criminal Law to Address Mental Illness

Relationship between Criminal Law and Civil Law

This category examines the relationship between criminal law and civil law. It considers the ways in which these two areas of law interact, the differences between criminal and civil law, and the implications of these differences for the legal system.

• Differences between criminal and civil law
• The impact of criminal law on civil law cases
• The role of civil law in addressing criminal behavior
• Historical development of criminal and civil law
• Current debates surrounding the relationship between criminal and civil law
• The intersection of criminal and civil law in white-collar crime cases
• Comparative analysis of criminal and civil law systems in different countries
• The use of civil law remedies to address criminal behavior
• The impact of criminal law on civil rights and liberties
• The effectiveness of civil law in providing redress for victims of criminal behavior

Impact of Technology on Criminal Law and Law Enforcement

This category explores the impact of technology on criminal law and law enforcement. It considers the challenges posed by new technologies, such as cybercrime and electronic surveillance, and the ways in which technology is changing the criminal justice system.

• The use of technology in criminal investigations
• The impact of social media on criminal behavior and the criminal justice system
• The use of surveillance technology in law enforcement
• The challenges of balancing privacy rights and law enforcement needs in the digital age
• The use of technology in forensic science and evidence collection
• The impact of technology on the prosecution and defense of criminal cases
• The use of technology in corrections and rehabilitation
• The role of technology in addressing cybercrime and other forms of digital criminal behavior
• The impact of artificial intelligence and machine learning on criminal law and law enforcement
• The ethical implications of using technology in criminal law and law enforcement

Critiques of the Criminal Law System and Proposals for Reform

This category considers critiques of the criminal law system and proposals for reform. It examines the ways in which the criminal justice system can be improved, the challenges of implementing reforms, and the potential benefits of reform for society as a whole.

• Racial disparities in the criminal justice system
• The impact of mandatory minimum sentencing laws
• The use of plea bargaining and its impact on the criminal justice system
• The role of money and wealth in the criminal justice system
• The impact of the War on Drugs on the criminal justice system
• The effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent to crime
• The impact of mass incarceration on individuals and society
• The use of private prisons and their impact on the criminal justice system
• Alternatives to traditional incarceration, such as restorative justice and community-based programs
• Proposals for reforming the criminal justice system to promote equity, fairness, and justice.

Criminal law research paper topics offer a diverse range of subject matter that students can delve into. This section highlighted ten categories of criminal law research paper topics that cover a broad range of legal issues, from the history and evolution of criminal law to the critiques of the criminal law system and proposals for reform. Choosing a research paper topic in criminal law requires careful consideration of the assignment requirements, personal interests, and available resources. Through thorough research, careful organization, and excellent writing skills, students can produce high-quality criminal law research papers.

Choosing a Criminal Law Research Paper Topic

Choosing from a multitude of criminal law research paper topics can be challenging, but there are several strategies you can use to help you make the best choice. Here are some expert tips to keep in mind:

• Consider your interests : Choose a topic that you are passionate about or find intriguing. This will not only make the research process more enjoyable, but it will also allow you to produce a more engaging and well-written paper.
• Look for current and relevant topics : Criminal law is a constantly evolving field, so it is important to choose a topic that is up-to-date and relevant. Look for recent court cases, legislative changes, or emerging issues in the field.
• Narrow your focus : Criminal law is a vast and complex subject, so it is important to narrow your focus to a specific aspect or issue within the broader topic. This will make your research more manageable and allow you to delve deeper into the subject matter.
• Conduct preliminary research : Before finalizing your topic, do some preliminary research to ensure that there is enough information available to support your argument. This will also help you identify any potential challenges or obstacles you may face during the research process.
• Consult with your instructor : Your instructor can provide valuable guidance and feedback on your chosen topic. They may also be able to suggest resources or provide additional support to help you succeed.
• Stay organized : Keep track of your sources and notes, and create an outline to guide your research and writing. This will help you stay on track and ensure that your paper is well-structured and coherent.
• Develop a strong thesis statement : Your thesis statement should clearly articulate the main argument or point of your paper. This will help you stay focused and ensure that your research is relevant and coherent.
• Brainstorm and outline your paper : Before you start writing, take the time to brainstorm ideas and create an outline. This will help you organize your thoughts and ensure that your paper flows logically and cohesively.
• Revise and edit : Once you have completed your paper, be sure to revise and edit it multiple times. This will help you catch any errors or inconsistencies, and ensure that your paper is clear, concise, and well-written.

By following these expert tips, you can choose a criminal law research paper topic that is both engaging and informative, and produce a high-quality paper that demonstrates your understanding of the subject matter.

Custom Writing Services by iResearchNet

At iResearchNet, we understand the challenges that students face when it comes to writing a criminal law research paper. That’s why we offer professional writing services that are tailored to your specific needs and requirements. Our team of expert writers holds advanced degrees in criminal law and has years of experience in the field. We guarantee that all of our work is 100% original and customized to meet your expectations.

Our services include:

• Expert degree-holding writers : Our team of writers consists of experts in the field of criminology, with advanced degrees and years of experience in writing and research.
• Custom written works : We provide custom written research papers that are tailored to your specific requirements. Our writers will work closely with you to ensure that your paper is unique, well-researched, and meets all of your requirements.
• In-depth research : Our writers conduct thorough research using credible sources to ensure that your paper is well-researched and based on reliable information.
• Custom formatting : We can format your paper according to any style guide you require, including APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, and Harvard.
• Top quality work with customized solutions : We guarantee that all of our work is of the highest quality and is customized to meet your specific needs.
• Flexible pricing options : We offer competitive pricing that is designed to fit any budget. We understand that students are often on a tight budget, so we offer flexible pricing options to ensure that our services are affordable for everyone.
• Short deadlines : We can work on short deadlines of up to 3 hours. If you need a paper done quickly, we can get it done for you.
• Timely delivery : We understand the importance of deadlines, so we guarantee timely delivery of your completed paper.
• 24/7 customer support : Our customer support team is available 24/7 to answer any questions you may have and to address any concerns.
• Absolute privacy and confidentiality : We take privacy and confidentiality seriously and guarantee that all of your personal and academic information will be kept confidential.
• Easy order tracking : We make it easy for you to track your order and receive updates on its progress.
• Money-back guarantee : We offer a money-back guarantee if you are not satisfied with the final product. We want to ensure that you are completely satisfied with our services and the work that we produce for you.

In conclusion, writing a criminal law research paper requires a thorough understanding of the topic, extensive research, and strong writing skills. It is essential to choose a topic that is relevant and interesting to you while also meeting the assignment requirements. Proper organization, formatting, and citation of sources are crucial in producing a high-quality paper. However, if you need assistance with your criminal law research paper, iResearchNet offers expert writing services with a team of experienced writers in the field of law. Our customized solutions, timely delivery, 24/7 support, and money-back guarantee ensure that you receive a top-quality paper that meets your specific needs and requirements. Contact us today to learn more about our services and how we can help you achieve academic success.

Order Your Custom Research Paper Today!

criminal law is a complex and evolving field that offers a diverse range of research paper topics. The categories outlined in this guide provide a starting point for students to explore the various aspects of criminal law and its application in different contexts. Choosing a topic that is both relevant and interesting can be a challenging task, but with the expert advice provided, students can confidently navigate this process.

Writing a successful criminal law research paper requires a thorough understanding of the topic, a clear and concise thesis statement, and the ability to effectively synthesize and present information from credible sources. With proper research and organization, students can develop a well-structured and compelling paper that effectively communicates their ideas and arguments.

iResearchNet offers expert writing services that provide students with custom-written criminal law research papers that are tailored to their specific needs and requirements. Our team of experienced writers has a wealth of knowledge and expertise in the field of criminal law, ensuring that every paper we produce is of the highest quality. Our flexible pricing options, timely delivery, and 24/7 customer support make it easy for students to receive the assistance they need to succeed academically.

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER

• Skip to main content
• Skip to primary sidebar

Criminal Justice

IResearchNet

Academic Writing Services

Criminal justice research topics.

This collection provides overviews of   nearly 100 key criminal justice research topics comprising traditional criminology and its more modern interdisciplinary outgrowths. These topics are divided into six thematic parts:

• Criminology
• Correlates of Crime
• Criminology Theories
• Crime Research
• Types of Crime
• Criminal Justice System

Criminology and Criminal Justice Research Topics

Research topics in criminology:.

• Criminology as Social Science .
• Criminology and Public Policy .
• History of Criminology .

Research Topics in Crime and Victimization:

• Age and Crime .
• Aggression and Crime .
• Citizenship and Crime .
• Education and Crime .
• Employment and Crime .
• Families and Crime .
• Gender and Crime .
• Guns and Crime .
• Immigration and Crime .
• Intelligence and Crime .
• Mental Illness and Crime .
• Neighborhoods and Crime .
• Peers and Crime .
• Race and Crime .
• Religion and Crime .
• Social Class and Crime .
• Victimization .
• Weather and Crime .

Research Topics in Criminology Theories:

• Biological Theori es.
• Classical Criminology .
• Convict Criminology .
• Criminal Justice Theories .
• Critical Criminology .
• Cultural Criminology .
• Cultural Transmission Theory .
• Deterrence and Rational Choice Theory .
• Feminist Criminology .
• Labeling and Symbolic Interaction Theories .
• Life Course Criminology .
• Psychological Theories of Crime .
• Routine Activities Theory .
• Self-Control Theory .
• Social Construction of Crime .
• Social Control Theory .
• Social Disorganization Theory .
• Social Learning Theory .
• Strain Theories .
• Theoretical Integration.

Research Topics in Criminology Research and Measurement:

• Citation and Content Analysis .
• Crime Classification Systems .
• Crime Mapping .
• Crime Reports and Statistics .
• Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) and Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) .
• Edge Ethnography .
• Experimental Criminology .
• Fieldwork in Criminology .
• Program Evaluation .
• Quantitative Criminology .

Research Topics in Types of Crime:

• Campus Crime .
• Child Abuse .
• Cybercrime .
• Domestic Violence .
• Elder Abuse .
• Environmental Crime .
• Hate Crime .
• Human Trafficking .
• Identity Theft .
• Juvenile Delinquency .
• Organizational Crime .
• Prostitution .
• Sex Offenses .
• Terrorism .
• Theft and Shoplifting .
• White-Collar Crime .
• Wildlife Crime .

Research Topics in Criminal Justice System:

• Capital Punishment .
• Community Corrections .
• Crime Prevention .
• Criminal Courts .
• Criminal Justice Ethics .
• Criminal Law .
• Criminal Specialization .
• Drug Courts .
• Drugs and the Criminal Justice System .
• Felon Disenfranchisement .
• Forensic Science .
• Juvenile Court .
• Juvenile Justice .
• Mass Media, Crime, and Justice .
• Offender Classification .
• Offender Reentry .
• Police–Community Relations .
• Prison System .
• Problem-Solving Courts .
• Public Health and Criminal Justice .
• Racial Profiling .
• Restorative Justice .
• Sentencing .
• The Police .
• Victim Services .
• Wrongful Convictions .
• Youth Gangs .

Because just listing suggestions for criminal justice research topics will be of limited value we have included short topical overviews and suggestions for narrowing those topics and divided them into 6 parts as in the list above. If you’re interested in some topic in the list follow the links below for more information.

Example   criminal justice research papers   on these topics have been designed to serve as sources of model papers for most criminological topics. These research papers were written by several well-known discipline figures and emerging younger scholars who provide authoritative overviews coupled with insightful discussion that will quickly familiarize researchers and students alike with fundamental and detailed information for each criminal justice topic.

This collection begins by defining the discipline of criminology and observing its historical development (Part I: Criminology ). The various social (e.g., poverty, neighborhood, and peer/family influences), personal (e.g., intelligence, mental illness), and demographic (e.g., age, race, gender, and immigration) realities that cause, confound, and mitigate crime and crime control are featured in   Part II: Correlates of Crime . The research papers in this section consider each correlate’s impact, both independently and in a broader social ecological context. The sociological origins of theoretical criminology are observed across several research papers that stress classical, environmental, and cultural influences on crime and highlight peer group, social support, and learning processes. Examination of these criminological theory research papers quickly confirms the aforementioned interdisciplinary nature of the field, with research papers presenting biological, psychological, and biosocial explanations and solutions for crime (Part III: Criminology Theories ).

Part IV: Criminology Research provides example research papers on various quantitative and qualitative designs and techniques employed in criminology research. Comparison of the purposes and application of these research methods across various criminal justice topics illustrates the role of criminologists as social scientists engaged in research enterprises wherein single studies fluctuate in focus along a pure–applied research continuum. This section also addresses the measurement of crimes with attention to major crime reporting and recording systems.

Having established a theoretical–methodological symmetry as the scientific foundation of criminology, and increasingly the field of criminal justice,   Part V: Types of Crime   considers a wide range of criminal offenses. Each research paper in this section thoroughly defines its focal offense and considers the related theories that frame practices and policies used to address various leading violent, property, and morality crimes. These research papers also present and critically evaluate the varying level of empirical evidence, that is, research confirmation, for competing theoretical explanations and criminal justice system response alternatives that are conventionally identified as best practices.

Ostensibly, an accurate and thorough social science knowledge base stands to render social betterment in terms of reduced crime and victimization through the development of research–based practices. This science–practitioner relationship is featured, advocated, and critiqued in the research papers of the final section,   Part VI: Criminal Justice System . Here, the central components of criminal justice research paper topics (law enforcement, courts, and corrections) are presented from a criminology–criminal justice outlook that increasingly purports to leverage theory and research (in particular, program evaluation results) toward realizing criminal justice and related social policy objectives. Beyond the main system, several research papers consider the role and effectiveness of several popular justice system and wrap-around component initiatives (e.g., specialty courts, restorative justice, and victim services).

See also: Domestic Violence Research Topics and School Violence Research Topics .

Criminal Law Research Group

The Criminal Law Research Group (CLRG) does criminal-justice related drafting and policy work for governments, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations.

The expertise of its Director, Paul H. Robinson, the Colin S. Diver Professor of Law, and the talent of the exceptional students who are selected to membership in the Group, allow the CLRG to produce authoritative and functional solutions to criminal justice related policy problems worldwide.

Joining the CLRG

Students interested in joining the CLRG should view our presentation [ html ] [ powerpoint ] and email Professor Robinson for more information.

Maldives Criminal Justice Project

Penal code drafted by Prof. Paul Robinson & students is enacted in the Maldives 

Pennsylvania Criminal Code Grading Study

CLRG prepares analysis for PA’s Senate Judiciary Committee & House Judiciary Committee

Stopping Foreign Fighters

Prof. Paul Robinson’s students are honored for their work on interdicting foreign terrorist fighters

Somali Criminal Codification Initiative

Somalia’s tragic past of warlord conflict has left the country teetering on lawlessness. Yet, there are reasons for long-term optimism.

Delaware Recodification Project

The Criminal Justice Improvement Committee (CJIC) asked Professor Robinson and the CLRG to undertake a comprehensive review of Delaware’s substantive criminal law. The following is the result of this process.

Featured Projects

Legal Interdiction of Foreign Terrorist Fighters

A joint project with the US Military’s Special Operations Command Pacific (SOCPAC) to use domestic criminal law statutes to interdict foreign terrorist fighters on their way to or from Islamic State forces.

Learn more about the project

A study of offense grading in Pennsylvania commissioned by the Pennsylvania Legislature’s Senate Judiciary Committee and Assembly Judiciary Committee.

American Criminal Code Project: General Defenses

A study of general defenses in all 52 American jurisdictions, with a statutory formulation of each defense that reflects the majority American view, resulting in a scholarly article published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Legal Analysis. 

Contact the Center

Paul H. Robinson

Colin S. Diver Professor of Law and Director, Criminal Law Research Group

Tel: 215.898.1017

Still Cruel and Unusual: Extreme Sentences for Youth and Emerging Adults

Despite a wave of reforms across America that reduce the use of juvenile life without parole sentences, thousands of youth and emerging adults have been left behind even though their sentences are essentially the same.

Latest Reports

Out of step: u.s. policy on voting rights in global perspective, media guide: 10 crime coverage dos and don’ts, incarceration and crime: a weak relationship, over 35 years of fighting for justice.

We advocate for effective and humane responses to crime that minimize imprisonment and criminalization of youth and adults by promoting racial, ethnic, economic, and gender justice.

Learn about our key areas of focus to end mass incarceration and promote racial justice.

Groundbreaking Research

Explore our trusted research on the U.S. criminal legal system. Get the data, compare state statistics, and search resources in our comprehensive digital library.

Fighting for Real Change

Join us in the fight to advance policies that are rooted in research and promote humane and effective approaches to justice for youth and adults.

Mission, Vision, and Priorities

See how we're advancing a more equitable criminal legal system that promotes the full inclusion of people with criminal records and puts an end to extreme punishments.

Second Look Network

Launched in 2023, the Second Look Network is a coalition of attorneys and mitigation specialists across the country providing direct legal representation to incarcerated individuals seeking relief from lengthy or unfair sentences. We provide a safe and confidential space for collaboration, training, support, and encouragement.

Amplifying Impacted Voices

Sentenced to life in prison as a teen, John Pace spent 31 years behind bars before a Supreme Court decision brought him home. Now, he works to assist others who are coming out of prison and adjusting to life on the outside.

Monica Szlekovics

Monica Szlekovics was forced to contribute to crimes by her abusive husband, which led to her being sentenced to life in prison at 20 years old. In prison, she committed herself to personal transformation and her sentence was commuted in 2019.

Tevin Louis

In 2012, Tevin Louis was charged with felony murder after a police officer killed his friend. In 2021, Illinois narrowed the scope of its felony murder rule, but unless it’s applied retroactively, Tevin will have to serve a 52-year sentence.

Melody Brown

When Melody Brown’s husband was murdered, she never thought she would be able to forgive the man who killed him. However, she was able to find mercy and forgiveness, and even supported the man’s release under Washington, DC’s second look reforms. Now, she’s working at a local nonprofit to support formerly incarcerated people in the District.

Help End Mass Incarceration and Racial Injustice

Support our groundbreaking research, advocacy, and public education programs and help fight to end mass incarceration and racial injustice. Change needs to happen now–and together, we can make a difference.

Stay involved & informed

Stay up-to-date on the latest reports and news from The Sentencing Project.

Thanks for subscribing!

By submitting your cell phone number, you are agreeing to receive text messages from The Sentencing Project. Messages may include fundraising. 4 msgs/month. Message and data rates may apply. Text HELP for more information. Text STOP to stop receiving messages. Terms & Conditions . Privacy Policy .

One more thing, !

Please click the link in the email we sent to . Otherwise, we won't be able to contact you.

In the meantime, get social with us! Join our community of over 100,000 followers on Twitter , Facebook , and Instagram .

Penn State University Libraries

Crim 480: research topics in crime, law and justice.

• Articles and Databases
• Statistics & Data
• Dissertations & Theses
• Working Papers & Public Policy
• Reference & Research Services

Social Science Librarian

General Interdisciplinary Resources

• Academic Search Complete (Ebsco) This link opens in a new window Academic Search Complete allows you to search over 40 subject indexes at one time. It can be a useful interdisciplinary tool for finding criminal justice articles in resources that focus on: race relations, peace research, LGBT, women studies, business and a host of other fields. more... less... Academic Search Complete is a comprehensive scholarly, multi-disciplinary full-text database, with more than 5,300 full-text periodicals, including 4,400 peer-reviewed journals. In addition to full text, this database offers indexing and abstracts for more than 9,300 journals and a total of 10,900 publications including monographs, reports, conference proceedings, etc. The database features PDF content going back as far as 1865, with the majority of full text titles in native (searchable) PDF format.
• ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection This link opens in a new window Search across a range of ProQuest’s specialist index and full-text social sciences databases, covering subject areas including Politics, Sociology, Education, Linguistics, and Criminal Justice.
• Web of Science This link opens in a new window Search for articles in highly cited journals in various disciplines. Also allows you to search for conference proceedings. more... less... Web of Science provides access to: the Science Citation Index Expanded 1900-present; the Social Sciences Citation Index 1956-present; and the Arts & Humanities Citation Index 1975-present. Web of Science indexes articles from thousands of journals and also indexes the citations used in those articles, thus allowing the user to see which papers have cited a core paper, and how many times a paper was cited in a given time period. Covers published content is almost every discipline.
• Google Scholar This link opens in a new window Google Scholar is an amazing inter-disciplinary resource for criminal justice research. You are encourage to explore the advanced research options, citation alerts and Google's Metrics. It can be a powerful tool for known item searching particularly combined with the "Cited by" features. more... less... Google Scholar enables you to search specifically for scholarly literature, including peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, preprints, abstracts and technical reports from all broad areas of research. Use Google Scholar to find articles from a wide variety of academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories and universities, as well as scholarly articles available across the web. Once you set your institutional preferences, links to full-text, if available at Penn State, should appear.
• LionSearch This link opens in a new window an integrated search of books, e-books, research articles, newspaper articles, and other publications

Subject Resources for Scholarly Research

• Criminal Justice Abstracts This link opens in a new window The journal articles described in this resource are from the premier journals in the field as well as from trade publications in the profession. more... less... Provides abstracts of articles from the major journals in criminology and related disciplines, as well as books and reports from government and nongovernmental agencies. For each document, an informative summary of the findings, methodology, and conclusions is provided. Topics include crime trends, prevention projects, corrections, juvenile delinquency, police, courts, offenders, victims, and sentencing.
• Criminology Collection (Proquest) databases covering criminology, criminal justice, and security includes Criminal Justice Database and NCJRS
• National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts This link opens in a new window This resource is published by the US Department of Justice. It functions as a clearinghouse of information from government agencies at all levels of government. It is particularly useful for finding reports and scholarly research funded through tax dollars. It is equally a wealth of information on current policy topics and events. more... less... The National Criminal Justice Reference Service Abstracts Database contains summaries of more than 150,000 publications on criminal justice, including Federal, state, and local government reports, books, research reports, journal articles, and unpublished research. Subject areas include corrections, courts, drugs and crime, law enforcement, juvenile justice, crime statistics, and victims of crime. Coverage: The time period covered is from the early 1970's to the present.
• Sociological Abstracts This link opens in a new window A premier resource for interdisciplinary research on subjects impacting society and the single most important database in the Social Sciences. This resource can be useful for any number of topics including: family violence, gangs, violence, drug issues, schools, and media. more... less... CSA Sociological Abstracts abstracts and indexes the international literature in sociology and related disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences. The database provides abstracts of journal articles and citations to book reviews drawn from over 1,700 serials publications, and also provides abstracts of books, book chapters, dissertations, and conference papers. Records added after 1974 contain in-depth and nonevaluative abstracts of journal articles.
• PsycINFO (via ProQuest) This link opens in a new window A great resource for scholarly articles that focus on victimization, behavior and crime, Primary database for international literature in psychology and related disciplines. It is published by the American Psychological Association and provides coverage from 1840 to the present. more... less... PsycINFO provides access to international literature in psychology and related disciplines. Unrivaled in its depth of psychological coverage and respected worldwide for its high quality, the database is enriched with literature from an array of disciplines related to psychology such as psychiatry, education, business, medicine, nursing, pharmacology, law, linguistics, and social work. Nearly all records contain nonevaluative summaries, and all records from 1967 to the present are indexed using the Thesaurus of Psychological Index Terms.
• ERIC (ProQuest) This link opens in a new window An education resource sponsored by the US Department of Education. It is useful for topics such as: juvenile delinquency, school violence, rehabilitation programs, counseling. more... less... ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center) is the major database for education literature, sponsored by the U.S. Department. of Education. The same database content is available on many platforms.

Law Reviews & Legal News

• Law: Research Effectively with Secondary Sources by Stephen (Social Sciences) Woods Last Updated Jul 9, 2024 131 views this year
• Next: Statistics & Data >>
• Last Updated: Aug 26, 2024 2:22 PM
• URL: https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/UPCRIM480

Criminal Law

More than at any other time in recent memory, lawmakers, the media, and the public are focused on the fairness and effectiveness of our criminal justice system. With more than two million people incarcerated in our prisons and jails, and millions more under community supervision, questions increasingly arise about policing practices, the discretion held by prosecutors and judges, and the length of sentences meted out for particular offenses. Understanding our criminal justice system is critical for any aspiring lawyer, and especially for those contemplating careers in prosecution, criminal defense, or criminal justice policy. Stanford Law School offers unparalleled opportunities to take classes with and to work alongside internationally recognized experts in policing, sentencing, corrections, prisoner reentry, jury decision making, plea bargaining, drug policy, and virtually every other area of controversy in criminal justice. Full-time clinics allow students to gain hands-on experience prosecuting and defending criminal cases. Policy labs involve students in cutting-edge research with the potential to redirect public debate and change practices on the ground. Pro bono opportunities — like Project ReMADE and Street Law — and our Three Strikes Project allow our students to work with renowned practitioners to make the criminal justice system more humane, one client at a time. No law school anywhere better equips its students to work within or to help reform criminal justice, in the United States and around the world.

• Professor of Law
• Justin M. Roach, Jr. Faculty Scholar
• Professor, by courtesy, History

Juliet Brodie

• Director of the Stanford Community Law Clinic
• Peter E. Haas Faculty Director of the Haas Center for Public Service

• George Fisher
• Judge John Crown Professor of Law
• Faculty Co-Director, Criminal Prosecution Clinic

Jeffrey L. Fisher

• Co-Director, Supreme Court Litigation Clinic

• David Mills
• Professor of the Practice of Law
• Senior Lecturer in Law

Lawrence C. Marshall

Michael Romano

• Director, Three Strikes Project
• Lecturer in Law

Shirin Sinnar

• William W. and Gertrude H. Saunders Professor of Law

• David Alan Sklansky
• Stanley Morrison Professor of Law
• Faculty Co-Director, Stanford Criminal Justice Center

Ronald Tyler

• Director, Criminal Defense Clinic

• Robert Weisberg
• Edwin E. Huddleson, Jr. Professor of Law

Organizations and Projects

Stanford criminal justice center, stanford justice advocacy project, student journal, organizations, and pro bono projects, stanford prisoner advocacy and resources coalition (sparc), project remade, criminal law society.

Criminal Defense Clinic

Criminal Prosecution Clinic

Community Law Clinic

Supreme Court Litigation Clinic

Practical Training

Publications, police agencies on facebook overreport on black suspects, proceedings of the national academy of sciences.

Author(s): Ben Grunwald , Julian Nyarko , John Rappaport

This article analyzes all Facebook posts from pages maintained by US law enforcement agencies to show that Facebook users are exposed to posts about serious crimes that significantly overrepresent Black suspects relative to local arrest rates. Results point to one mechanism by which the state itself may reinforce racial stereotypes…

Homicide Deaths Among Adult Cohabitants of Handgun Owners in California, 2004 to 2016

Annals of Internal Medicine

Author(s): David M. Studdert , Yifan Zhang , Erin E. Holsinger , Lea Prince , Alexander F. Holsinger , Jonathan A. Rodden , Garen J. Wintemute , Matthew Miller

California Treating Gun Violence as a Public Health Problem

Sacramento Bee

Author(s): David M. Studdert

Discussion (1L): The Trump Prosecutions: Law, Politics, and Polarization

Homicide law and gender based violence.

• David Alan Sklansky , 
• Rachel Snyder

Police and Prisons: German and American Approaches to Reform and Abolition

Policy practicum: regilla project: women convicted of intimate partner violence-related homicides.

• Debbie Mukamal , 

Public Law Workshop

• Gregory Ablavsky , 
• Evelyn Douek , 
• Bernadette Meyler

Political Violence and the Law

Discussion (1l): how does criminal law "know" the truth, policy practicum: moving forward from dobbs, law and disorder: advanced criminal law.

• Emily Galvin-Almanza , 

Comparative Evidence Law

Criminal justice and the crisis of american democracy, discussion (1l): asian americans justice struggles, policy practicum: selective de-policing: operationalizing concrete reforms, policy practicum: covid-19 and the effect of video technology on indigent defense services, policy practicum: creating a national census of women imprisoned for murdering their abusers, discussion (1l): why is the usa exceptional — in crime and punishment, discussion (1l): abolish or reform prisons, police, and the death penalty, american criminal justice and its discontents, policy practicum: california penal code revision committee project, policy practicum: tools for reentry: practices, apps, and services, policy practicum: assessing alternative approaches to hate crimes, discussion (1l): the central park five case, discussion (1l): prosecutors and defense attorneys as agents of change, discussion (1l): criminal legal histories, united states v. milken: a case study, policy practicum: expanding access to the legal bar for the formerly incarcerated, violence and the law, advanced criminal law, policy practicum: policing and technology, policy practicum: decarcerating prisons, race, identity, and national security, constitutional theory, criminal procedure: investigation, policy practicum: improving investigations of police shootings, policy practicum: veterans treatment courts, policy practicum: rethinking penal code enhancements in california, inside stanford lawyer magazine.

Criminal Justice Center Report Spurs Quick Action by California Parole Board

Sls report analyzes how women incarcerated for killing their abusers fare in the criminal legal system, van schaack appointment.

Michael Romano on NPR’s The Takeaway: Ride Home Program for Released Prisoners

New Stanford study analyzes recent research on causes of gun violence

Does Increased Gun Ownership Help Decrease Crime?

Faculty on Point: Lawrence Friedman on Impact and Crime without Punishment

Does Carrying a Gun Make You Safer? Professor John Donohue Weighs In

Weisberg on Obstruction of Justice

Decarcerating Prisons

People with Developmental Disabilities and the Criminal Justice System

SLS Alumni at the California Office of the Solicitor General

Exploring Criminal Investigations of Police Shootings

California Attorney General Kamala Harris Discusses Stanford Law Policy Seminar on Recidivism and Crime Prevention

The Chief: Ron George At The Helm of California’s Supreme Court

Reflecting on nuremberg’s legacy.

This is Not a Game: Law and Orders in Virtual Worlds

International Criminal Law: A Conversation with Professor Jenny S. Martinez

Criminal law at the law school, the legal aid society, law school news.

Criminal Justice Program

The Criminal Justice Program (CJP) serves as a central hub for UCLA Law’s criminal justice research, curriculum, and student programs.

Moving Justice Forward

Explore the impacts of the criminal legal system on individuals, communities, and American society.

Faculty at UCLA Law have published widely in the area of criminal law. The research interests of our faculty cover a wide range of issues, including qualified immunity, the criminalization of immigration, the collateral consequences of criminal convictions, comparative criminal law, fines and fees in the criminal system, Fourth Amendment law, policing, the impact of racial bias on charging and sentencing decisions, plea bargaining, juvenile justice, prison conditions, and much more. Through seminars and special research projects initiated by CJP, students regularly have the opportunity to engage in independent research projects, support faculty research, and engage in projects to disseminate research findings in ways that impact public policy.

Students at UCLA Law have the opportunity to enroll in a full menu of criminal law courses with leading faculty in the field. In addition to the required introductory criminal law class, students may enroll in core advanced courses such as  Evidence ,  Criminal Procedure: Investigations , Criminal Procedure: Adjudication , Criminal Procedure: Habeas Corpus , Capital Punishment in America , Federal White Collar Crime . UCLA Law also offers numerous courses in international and comparative criminal law, including  Global Perspectives on Criminal Procedure  and  International Criminal Law . There are also many specialty seminars to choose from, including:

• Current Topics in Criminal Law
• Prison Law and Policy
• Sentencing Law and Policy
• Suing the Police
• Topics in Post-Conviction Law and Policy
• Re-envisioning the Lawyer’s Role: Trauma Informed Lawyering and Restorative/Transformative Justice

UCLA Law also offers experiential courses for students interested in criminal practice. Classes such as  Criminal Trial Advocacy  and  Advanced Criminal Trial Advocacy  teach valuable courtroom advocacy skills. In addition, students may represent clients under the supervision of experienced faculty in the following experiential courses:

• Prisoners’ Rights Clinic
• Criminal Defense Clinic
• Supreme Court Clinic
• Community Lawyering in Education Clinic
• Pay or Stay Bail Practicum
• Veterans Justice Clinic: Poverty, Homelessness & Criminalization

Students also regularly enroll in part-time externships with local public defender and prosecutor offices, including at the Federal Public Defender and U.S. Attorney's Office for the Central District of California, the Los Angeles Public Defender, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, and the Los Angeles City Attorney. Students interested in full-time externships travel throughout the country to join cutting-edge criminal law practices.

Student Engagement

Students at UCLA Law have numerous extracurricular opportunities to develop their interests in criminal law by taking a leadership role in student groups, joining the editorial board of the Criminal Justice Law Review, participating in summer internships in the field of criminal law, or volunteering for community-based organizations.

Student Membership Organizations

• UCLA Law Students for Decarceration (LSFD) is a student-led group that fosters an inclusive forum for UCLA Law students to contribute to advancing justice within the criminal law system. LSFD seeks to promote criminal law dialogue, practice, reform, policy, and scholarship related to decarceration. LSFD promotes inclusive and diverse participation in a critical examination of the criminal legal system.
• Child and Youth Advocates (CYA) is a student-led group to provide UCLA Law students with opportunities to learn about the many sub-disciplines of child and youth law, including child welfare, family law, juvenile justice, education, and crimes against children. CYA enables students to connect with organizations providing legal services to children, learn from invited speakers and panelists, and participate in community service with local youth-serving organizations. They aim to inform members about legal issues affecting children and youth and support their endeavors in the field.
• Bruin Underground Scholars supports the academic experiences of students that identify as formerly incarcerated and/or system impacted. Bruin Underground Scholars understands that UCLA Law’s students come from a plethora of walks and honors the lived experiences of those that have dealt with the direct and indirect experiences of the carceral system.
• Alliance of Formerly Incarcerated & System-Involved Students (AFISIS) is an organization of formerly incarcerated/system-involved students and allies. AFISIS is dedicated to advocating on behalf of formerly incarcerated and system-involved students and aspiring law students and providing support. AFISIS’ first efforts involved creating a website to support prospective applicants to UCLA Law who identify as formerly incarcerated/system-involved.

Student Journal

UCLA School of Law hosts a student-run journal that focuses on current topics in criminal law and policy, the Criminal Justice Law Review (CJLR) . CJLR seeks to develop a discourse regarding criminal justice by publishing articles, editorials, and interviews of practitioners, academics, and policymakers. CJLR also aims to foster a community by hosting an annual symposium for students, academics, practitioners, policymakers, and judges to come together to discuss current criminal justice issues.

Volunteer Opportunities

El Centro’s Reentry Legal Clinic is a volunteer clinic that trains students to prepare expungement petitions in partnership with the Los Angeles-based nonprofit organization A New Way of Life.

Career Resources

Students interested in criminal law careers should consult the following job guides as well as take advantage of the career counseling available through the Office of Public Interest Programs and Office of Career Services.

• Careers in Criminal Law and Policy
• Careers in Prosecution
• Careers in California Public Defender Offices
• Careers in Public Defense

Community Resources

There are many opportunities for students to become involved in local organizations working on criminal law related issues in Los Angeles. Here is just a small selection:

• American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California ’s Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Reform Team—a project committed to helping re-envision a criminal justice approach that is fair and free of racial bias, keeps communities safe and respects the dignity and rights of all who come into contact with it.
• Anti-Recidivism Coalition —an organization that works to end mass incarceration in California by providing a support network, comprehensive reentry services, and opportunities to advocate for policy change.
• California System-Involved Bar Association —an organization whose mission is to diversity California’s legal profession by increasing access to legal education and State Bar of California licensure for people with prior criminal justice system involvement.
• DA Accountability Coalition —a coalition of local justice reform organizations, advocates, artists, organizers, and people who have been directly impacted by the criminal legal system promoting greater accountability within the Los Angeles DA’s office.
• Drug Policy Alliance —an organization committed to promoting alternatives to the war on drugs. They envision a just society in which the use and regulation of drugs are grounded in science, compassion, health, and human rights.
• Justice LA —a coalition that works to reduce the footprint of incarceration by stopping jail expansion and reclaiming, reimagining and reinvesting dollars away from incarceration and into community-based systems of care.
• Los Angeles Youth Uprising Coalition —a coalition that builds power through youth leadership, direct action organizing and policy advocacy to dismantle the racist juvenile justice system and divert its resources towards holistic models of youth development that ensure LA youth rise and thrive.
• Reimagine Child Safety Coalition —a Los Angeles County-based group of advocates, organizations and impacted families united against the child welfare/family regulation system
• Stop LAPD Spying —a community group building power toward abolition of the police state.

Empowering Communities with Information

Advancing policy change and transformation in the criminal legal system.

Supporting the transformation of the juvenile legal and child welfare/family policing systems.

Creating research and innovative solutions to issues surrounding pretrial incarceration.

The Criminal Justice Program's initiatives during the COVID-19 crisis.

Resources on fines and fees, and mental health.

A framework for sustainable change in jurisdictions that are investing in non-law enforcement responses.

Students learn how various communities are implementing the practices of restorative justice which views crime as a harm to individuals and society and focuses on repairing these harms through a cooperative process.

Sharon Dolovich

Ingrid eagly, alicia virani, leah zeidler-ordaz, shirin bakhshay, stuart banner, devon w. carbado, timothy casey, beth a. colgan, gerloni cotton, kimberlé w. crenshaw, fanna gamal, mark greenberg, máximo langer, aaron littman, kerry o'neill, sunita patel, joanna c. schwartz, sherod thaxton, eugene volokh, pavel wonsowicz, norman abrams, peter l. arenella, paul bergman, ucla affiliated programs and projects.

Prison Law and Policy Program

COVID Behind Bars Data Project

Transnational Program on Criminal Justice

Prison Education Program

Million Dollar Hoods

This year’s symposium is “Guns Everywhere: Individual Rights and Communal Harms after NYSRPA v. Bruen” and is co-sponsored by the Giffords Law Center

More information about the upcoming and past symposia.

The first Connecting Art and Law for Liberation (CALL) Festival took place on April 12-14, 2019 and brought together visionary artists, activists, attorneys, advocates and legal scholars to share innovative, cutting-edge collaborations at the intersection of art and law. We committed to hosting this festival every other year and 2021’s festival took place over zoom and was “A CALL to Imagine Abolitionist Futures.”

CJP Newsletter

Summer 2023

Summer 2022

Summer 2021

Summer 2020

Summer 2019

Aaron Littman earns Hellman fellowship for talented assistant professors

Aaron littman speaks with the arizona republic for a story about deaths in maricopa county jails, criminal justice program report illuminates collaboration between law enforcement and child protective services in la county.

Discussing the state of LGBTQ+ law and policy and what's at stake in the November election and beyond.

251+ Interesting Criminal Justice Research Topics For Students

Did you know that more than 65 million people have a criminal record in the US alone? Every 36 seconds, an American is put in jail. But are we creating fairness or just locking people up?

Understanding how serious these numbers are shows why it’s so important for students to study criminal justice topics. 

In today’s world, where issues about police, laws, and fairness are always changing, students need to learn about them. 

Research helps students learn to think carefully, understand tough issues, and improve things. 

In this blog, we’ll talk about many different criminal justice research topics that are good for students to study. From looking at the unfairness in the system to thinking about how laws affect people’s lives, we want to give you interesting things to think about and talk about. 

Join us as we explore these topics and try to understand how we can make the world fairer for everyone.

Can You Describe a Criminal Justice Research Topic?

Table of Contents

A research topic in criminal justice is a specific area of interest or inquiry within the field that students or researchers explore to gain a deeper understanding of various aspects of law enforcement, legal systems, and societal issues related to crime and justice. 

These topics can range from studying the effectiveness of policing strategies to analyzing the impact of criminal laws on different communities. 

Research topics in criminal justice aim to address pressing issues, identify trends, and contribute to the development of policies and practices that promote fairness, equity, and safety within the criminal justice system and society as a whole.

How to Choose the Right Research Topic for Criminal Justice?

Choosing the right research topic in criminal justice involves considering various factors to ensure relevance, feasibility, and interest. Here are some steps to help you select a suitable research topic:

1. Identify your interests

Reflect on what aspects of criminal justice intrigue you the most, such as law enforcement practices, legal procedures, or societal impacts of crime.

2. Consider relevance

Choose a topic that is timely and relevant to current issues or debates within the field of criminal justice.

3. Assess feasibility

Evaluate the availability of resources, data, and access to information necessary for researching your chosen topic.

4. Narrow down your focus

Refine your topic to a specific research question or area of inquiry that can be feasibly explored within the scope of your project.

5. Consult with experts

Seek guidance from professors, professionals, or peers in the field to gather insights and refine your research topic further.

6. Ensure significance

Ensure that your chosen topic addresses important gaps in knowledge or contributes to ongoing discussions within the field of criminal justice.

List of Good Criminal Justice Research Topics

Here’s a list of top criminal justice research topics for students:

Law Enforcement

• The impact of community policing on crime rates.
• Strategies for reducing police brutality and misconduct.
• The effectiveness of body-worn cameras in law enforcement.
• Racial disparities in police stops and arrests.
• The role of technology in modern policing.
• Mental health training for law enforcement officers.
• Police use of force policies and their implications.
• Investigating the rise of cybercrime and its challenges for law enforcement.
• The relationship between police militarization and public trust.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of crime prevention programs implemented by police departments.
• Addressing corruption within law enforcement agencies.
• The impact of drug legalization on policing strategies.
• Police response to domestic violence cases.
• The use of predictive policing algorithms and their ethical implications.
• Improving diversity and inclusion in law enforcement agencies.
• The role of police unions in shaping law enforcement policies.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of de-escalation training for police officers.
• The impact of social media on police-community relations.
• Exploring the challenges of policing in rural communities.
• The influence of media portrayals on public perceptions of law enforcement.

Criminal Law and Legal Systems

• The effectiveness of restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism.
• The impact of mandatory minimum sentencing laws on incarceration rates.
• Analyzing the role of defense attorneys in ensuring fair trials.
• Jury selection processes and racial bias in the criminal justice system.
• The use of plea bargaining and its implications for justice.
• Legal and ethical considerations in prosecuting white-collar crime.
• The impact of the war on drugs on criminal justice policies.
• Examining the role of forensic evidence in criminal trials.
• The effectiveness of diversion programs for juvenile offenders.
• The use of solitary confinement in prisons and its psychological effects.
• Investigating wrongful convictions and their causes.
• The influence of political ideologies on criminal justice policies.
• Reforming bail systems to address socioeconomic disparities.
• Legal challenges surrounding the use of new surveillance technologies.
• The intersection of immigration law and criminal justice.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of reentry programs for ex-offenders.
• Analyzing the role of prosecutors in the criminal justice system.
• Exploring the use of alternative dispute resolution methods in criminal cases.
• Legal and ethical issues in handling digital evidence.
• The impact of legalizing marijuana on criminal justice systems.

Corrections and Rehabilitation

• The effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in reducing recidivism.
• Mental health treatment in correctional facilities.
• Overcrowding in prisons and its consequences.
• Examining the role of private prisons in the criminal justice system.
• The use of alternative sentencing options, such as probation and parole.
• Addressing the healthcare needs of incarcerated individuals.
• The impact of solitary confinement on prisoner mental health.
• Gender-responsive approaches to correctional programming.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of drug treatment courts.
• Restorative justice practices in correctional settings.
• The role of education and vocational training in prisoner reintegration.
• Exploring the challenges of managing aging prison populations.
• The impact of reentry support services on post-release outcomes.
• Assessing the use of electronic monitoring as an alternative to incarceration.
• Gender disparities in the criminal justice system.
• The relationship between substance abuse and criminal behavior.
• Correctional officer training and professionalism.
• The effectiveness of faith-based initiatives in rehabilitation.
• Analyzing the impact of incarceration on families and communities.
• Strategies for reducing violence in prisons.

Juvenile Justice

• Exploring the causes of juvenile delinquency.
• The impact of parental involvement on juvenile rehabilitation.
• Assessing the use of restorative justice practices in juvenile courts.
• Examining the relationship between childhood trauma and delinquent behavior.
• Gender disparities in juvenile justice processing.
• The role of schools in preventing juvenile crime.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of mentoring programs for at-risk youth.
• Legal and ethical considerations in juvenile interrogation practices.
• Addressing racial disparities in juvenile justice outcomes.
• The impact of social media on juvenile offending.
• Alternatives to detention for juvenile offenders.
• Exploring the challenges of transferring juveniles to adult court.
• The role of technology in juvenile justice supervision.
• Assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs for juvenile offenders.
• The relationship between substance abuse and juvenile delinquency.
• Gender-responsive approaches to juvenile justice programming.
• Preventing gang involvement among youth.
• The impact of family dynamics on juvenile delinquency.
• The use of evidence-based practices in juvenile justice interventions.

Victimology

• Understanding the psychological effects of victimization.
• The role of victim services in the criminal justice system.
• Exploring the experiences of marginalized victims.
• Addressing the needs of human trafficking survivors.
• The impact of technology-facilitated crimes on victims.
• Restitution and compensation for crime victims.
• The role of the media in shaping perceptions of victims.
• Assessing the effectiveness of victim impact statements in court.
• Exploring cultural factors in victimization.
• The intersectionality of victimization experiences.
• Restorative justice approaches to addressing harm and victimization.
• Legal and ethical issues in victim advocacy.
• The impact of victimization on vulnerable populations.
• Preventing revictimization in the criminal justice system.
• Understanding the experiences of hate crime victims.
• The role of community support networks for victims.
• Assessing barriers to reporting crimes and seeking help.
• Victim-offender mediation and its benefits.
• Exploring the long-term effects of trauma on victims.
• Supporting survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault.

Criminology and Criminal Behavior

• Theories of crime causation: exploring biological, psychological, and sociological perspectives.
• The relationship between poverty and crime.
• The impact of media violence on aggressive behavior.
• Gender differences in criminal behavior.
• The influence of peer groups on delinquency.
• Analyzing the root causes of gang involvement.
• The role of substance abuse in criminal behavior.
• Understanding the dynamics of white-collar crime.
• Exploring the connection between mental illness and criminality.
• Environmental criminology: assessing the role of neighborhoods in crime.
• The impact of family structure on juvenile delinquency.
• Cybercrime trends and motivations.
• The relationship between education level and criminal behavior.
• Investigating the role of genetics in criminal propensity.
• The influence of social media on criminal behavior.
• Cultural factors in crime and deviance.
• Exploring the motivations behind hate crimes.
• The impact of immigration on crime rates.
• The role of routine activities theory in understanding crime patterns.
• Assessing the effectiveness of crime prevention strategies.

Forensic Science

• Advances in DNA analysis techniques.
• The use of forensic entomology in criminal investigations.
• Exploring the reliability of fingerprint evidence.
• Digital forensics: examining electronic evidence in criminal cases.
• The role of forensic anthropology in identifying human remains.
• Investigating the accuracy of eyewitness testimony in court.
• Firearms examination and ballistics analysis.
• Forensic psychology: understanding criminal behavior through psychological profiling.
• The use of forensic odontology in identifying individuals.
• The reliability of forensic evidence in court proceedings.
• Advancements in forensic toxicology.
• Exploring the potential of forensic botany in criminal investigations.
• The challenges of forensic evidence preservation and storage.
• Forensic linguistics: analyzing language patterns in criminal cases.
• The use of forensic imaging technology in crime scene reconstruction.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of forensic science in cold case investigations.
• Forensic accounting: uncovering financial fraud and embezzlement.
• The role of forensic nursing in collecting evidence from victims of crime.
• Exploring the ethical implications of forensic research and practice.
• The impact of forensic evidence on wrongful convictions.
• Digital forensics challenges in the age of encryption.
• The use of forensic anthropology in mass disaster victim identification.
• Investigating the reliability of bite mark analysis in forensic investigations.
• The future of forensic science: emerging technologies and methodologies.
• The role of forensic entomology in estimating time since death.
• Analyzing the accuracy of voice recognition technology in forensic analysis.
• Forensic archaeology: excavating and analyzing crime scenes.
• The challenges of forensic evidence admissibility in court.
• The use of forensic geology in criminal investigations.
• The impact of forensic science on criminal justice policy and practice.
• The evolution of cybercrime: from hacking to ransomware.
• Exploring the dark web and its role in cybercrime.
• The challenges of prosecuting cybercriminals across international borders.
• Cybersecurity vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure.
• The impact of social engineering techniques on cybersecurity.
• Digital currency and its implications for cybercrime investigations.
• The role of artificial intelligence in cyber threat detection.
• Cyberterrorism: assessing the risk to national security.
• The psychological profile of cybercriminals.
• The use of blockchain technology in combating cybercrime.
• Analyzing the effectiveness of cybercrime laws and regulations.
• Cyberbullying: understanding the psychological effects on victims.
• The role of social media in facilitating cybercrime.
• Investigating the link between organized crime groups and cyber attacks.
• The challenges of securing Internet of Things (IoT) devices.
• Cyber espionage and its impact on corporate and government entities.
• The role of government agencies in cybercrime prevention and response.
• Exploring emerging trends in cybercrime, such as deepfakes and AI-driven attacks.
• The economic impact of cybercrime on businesses and individuals.
• Ethical hacking: assessing the role of white hat hackers in cybersecurity.

Terrorism and Homeland Security

• The root causes of terrorism: ideological, political, and socioeconomic factors.
• The effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies in preventing attacks.
• The role of intelligence agencies in identifying and disrupting terrorist plots.
• Exploring the motivations behind lone wolf terrorist attacks.
• The impact of globalization on the spread of terrorist ideologies.
• Cyberterrorism threats and vulnerabilities.
• Assessing the risk of bioterrorism in the modern world.
• The role of border security in preventing terrorist infiltration.
• The use of drones in counterterrorism operations.
• The psychological effects of terrorism on society.
• Radicalization pathways: understanding the process of becoming a terrorist.
• The role of religious extremism in fueling terrorist violence.
• Exploring the nexus between organized crime and terrorism.
• The challenges of balancing civil liberties with national security measures.
• The impact of counterterrorism policies on immigrant communities.
• The role of social media in terrorist recruitment and propaganda.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of counter-radicalization programs.
• The use of financial intelligence in disrupting terrorist financing networks.
• The role of international cooperation in combating transnational terrorism.
• Homeland security preparedness and response to terrorist threats.

Social Justice and Human Rights

• The intersectionality of race, class, and gender in criminal justice outcomes.
• Addressing systemic racism in policing and the justice system.
• LGBTQ+ rights and discrimination in the criminal justice system.
• The impact of mass incarceration on communities of color.
• Indigenous rights and justice in colonial settler societies.
• Disability rights and access to justice for individuals with disabilities.
• The role of advocacy groups in promoting criminal justice reform.
• Environmental justice and its relationship to crime and punishment.
• The impact of socioeconomic inequality on access to legal representation.
• Human trafficking and modern-day slavery: prevention and intervention strategies.
• Refugee rights and access to asylum in the criminal justice system.
• Restorative justice approaches to addressing historical injustices.
• The rights of prisoners and the conditions of confinement.
• Disability justice: ensuring equitable treatment for individuals with disabilities in the justice system.
• The impact of colonial legacies on contemporary criminal justice systems.
• Gender equality and women’s rights in the justice system.
• The criminalization of poverty: exploring the cycle of poverty and incarceration.
• Intersectional feminism and its implications for criminal justice reform.
• The role of transitional justice mechanisms in post-conflict societies.
• The impact of globalization on human rights and justice.

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

• Contrasting approaches to policing: community-oriented vs. militarized.
• Legal systems around the world: common law vs. civil law traditions.
• The role of religion in shaping criminal justice systems.
• The influence of cultural values on punishment and rehabilitation.
• Comparing juvenile justice systems: rehabilitative vs. punitive approaches.
• The impact of colonialism on indigenous justice systems.
• Restorative justice practices in different cultural contexts.
• Gender disparities in legal rights and protections globally.
• The role of international law in addressing transnational crime.
• Exploring variations in prison systems and correctional philosophies.

Policy Analysis and Reform

• Assessing the impact of mandatory minimum sentencing laws on incarceration rates.
• The effectiveness of drug decriminalization policies in reducing substance abuse.
• Bail reform: alternatives to cash bail and pretrial detention.
• The role of prosecutorial discretion in shaping criminal justice outcomes.
• Gun control policies and their implications for public safety.
• Evaluating the effectiveness of diversion programs in reducing recidivism.
• The impact of privatization on correctional facilities and rehabilitation programs.
• Sentencing disparities: addressing racial and socioeconomic inequalities.
• Immigration policies and their impact on immigrant communities in the criminal justice system.
• The role of evidence-based practices in shaping criminal justice policy.

Emerging Issues in Criminal Justice

• The legalization of marijuana: impacts on crime rates and law enforcement.
• Artificial intelligence in criminal justice: opportunities and ethical challenges.
• The future of policing: predictive analytics and algorithmic surveillance.
• Environmental crime and its consequences for global security.
• The impact of COVID-19 on criminal justice systems and practices.
• The rise of domestic terrorism: responding to threats from within.
• Mental health crisis intervention: diverting individuals from the criminal justice system
• Cyberbullying legislation and prevention strategies in the digital age.
• The role of big data in criminal justice decision-making.
• Online extremism and radicalization: countering digital propaganda.
• The implications of artificial intelligence in criminal sentencing.
• Police-community relations in the era of Black Lives Matter.
• Restorative justice in schools: promoting accountability and reconciliation.
• The impact of mass surveillance on civil liberties and privacy rights.
• Hate crime legislation and enforcement in multicultural societies.
• Policing protests: balancing public safety and First Amendment rights.
• The role of social media influencers in shaping perceptions of crime and justice.
• Corporate crime and regulatory enforcement: holding businesses accountable.
• The challenges of combating human trafficking in the digital age.
• The future of rehabilitation: integrating technology and evidence-based practices.
• The role of trauma-informed care in criminal justice settings.
• Smart justice initiatives: leveraging technology for offender reintegration.
• The impact of climate change on patterns of criminal activity.
• Exploring the link between mental health and homelessness in the justice system.
• Criminal justice responses to environmental disasters and emergencies.
• Ethical considerations in criminal justice research and experimentation.
• Police use of surveillance drones: balancing security and privacy concerns.
• The role of public defenders in ensuring access to justice for marginalized communities.
• The impact of globalization on transnational organized crime networks.
• Innovative approaches to reducing recidivism and promoting reentry success.

These diverse research topics offer a broad spectrum of areas for exploration and analysis within the criminal justice field, catering to the interests and concerns of students and researchers alike.

Ethics and Challenges in Criminal Justice Research

Ethics and challenges in criminal justice research are significant considerations that researchers must navigate to ensure their studies’ integrity, validity, and ethicality. Here are some key points regarding ethics and challenges in criminal justice research:

• Informed Consent: Ensuring participants understand the purpose, risks, and benefits of the research.
• Confidentiality: Safeguarding sensitive information and protecting the identities of participants.
• Avoiding Harm: Minimizing potential physical, emotional, or psychological harm to participants.
• Conflict of Interest: Maintaining objectivity and integrity in research design and analysis.
• Bias and Stereotyping: Addressing researcher biases and avoiding stereotypes that may influence findings.
• Access to Data: Navigating legal and ethical considerations regarding access to sensitive data.
• Balancing Transparency and Confidentiality: Striking a balance between transparency in research methods and confidentiality of participants.
• Cultural Sensitivity: Acknowledging and respecting diverse cultural perspectives and practices in research.

Bottom Line

The exploration of criminal justice research topics is paramount in understanding, addressing, and reforming the complexities within the justice system. 

By delving into diverse subjects such as law enforcement practices, legal systems, and societal impacts of crime, researchers contribute to advancing knowledge and promoting fairness and equity. 

Through rigorous inquiry and analysis, solutions to pressing issues such as racial disparities, wrongful convictions, and rehabilitation strategies emerge.

 As scholars and practitioners continue to engage with these topics, they play a vital role in shaping policies, practices, and perceptions, ultimately striving towards a more just and equitable society.

1. How can I find reliable sources for my criminal justice research?

Utilize academic databases, peer-reviewed journals, and reputable online resources recommended by your instructors or university library.

2. What are some current trends in criminal justice research?

Current trends include restorative justice approaches, the impact of technology on crime prevention, and the intersection of mental health and criminal justice.

3. How can students contribute to criminal justice research?

Students can contribute to criminal justice research by conducting literature reviews, designing and implementing studies, analyzing data, and disseminating findings through publications or presentations. They can also engage in internships or fieldwork to gain practical experience and collaborate with faculty or professionals.

Related Posts

Tips on How to Design Professional Venn Diagrams in Python

Venn diagram is the most popular diagram in scientific research articles and can be utilized to describe the relationship between various data sets. From the…

How to Get Help With Programming in R With Online Resources

Writing a programming assignment is not an easy task for many students. In the modern education system, students need R programming assignments because of the…

Gender and International Criminal Law Project

You are here: american university washington college of law impact initiatives programs warcrimes our projects war crimes research office.

War Crimes Research Office

Back to top

Gender and International Criminal Law Project

The Gender and International Criminal Law Project is a collaborative project between the War Crimes Research Office (WCRO) and the Women and International Law Program (W&LP) at American University Washington College of Law. The project aims to raise awareness of and encourage research and debate about the jurisprudence emerging from international and hybrid tribunals regarding sexual and gender-based violence committed during times of conflict, mass violence, or repression and to facilitate the investigation and prosecution of these crimes under international law.

More information coming soon. 

International and Comparative Law Research Scholars

Each year we welcome 15 to 25 scholars from around the globe into our community as non-degree International and Comparative Law Research Scholars to conduct research and engage fully in the intellectual and social life of Michigan Law School. Visits vary in length from a few weeks to one year.

As you can imagine, we receive many more excellent applications than we could ever accept, so those chosen are senior scholars with impressive accomplishments, mid-career intellectuals who are beginning to make their mark, or early-career researchers who show special promise for the future. While they may come from many walks of life—junior or senior faculty members in law or related fields, doctoral or postdoctoral students, and public service practitioners—in all cases, they are exploring areas of law that intrigue our faculty members and for which we can provide meaningful academic support.

International and Comparative Law Research Scholars pay a fee of $2,500 for each semester or $5,000 for each full academic year in residence, prorated for stays of less than a semester.  Requests for fee reductions or waivers are considered on a case-by-case basis.

Research Scholar Program Privileges 

With the intention of ensuring that all our Research Scholars have productive, lively and satisfying experiences while they are with us, our program includes the following privileges:

• Assigned personal workspace (private office or individual workstation) within a large suite that is dedicated solely to Research Scholars and SJD  students.
• Attend JD classes with the permission of the professor.
• Access the Law School’s extensive library collections and first-rate research facilities, including Westlaw and Lexis/Nexis.
• Access the library resources of the larger University.
• Participate in a weekly colloquium of Michigan Research Scholars and SJD students to discuss works in progress.
• Assist in organizing the Michigan Law School Junior Scholars Conference.
• Attend workshops, lectures, and other events.
• Engage with the broader University campus, including other schools, departments and centers.

Program Participants

Most recently, our research scholar program has included faculty members from Kyoto University in Japan, the University of Osnabrueck in Germany, Peking and Renmin universities in Beijing, the University of the Philippines and of Aix-Marseille in France, as well as the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland; a counsel to the Slovenian Ministry of Justice, the former chairperson of the Irish Society for European Law; staff members of the Japanese and Korean Ministries of Justice; a consultant to the UNHCR office in Morocco and a policy adviser to the Danish Refugee Council; counsel to the Brazilian legislature; a deputy chief at the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation; and doctoral students from major universities all over the world. Their research interests have encompassed a broad array of legal and interdisciplinary subjects.

How to Apply

You will need a Google account to access, save, and submit applications.

Next, please complete the online Michigan Law Research Scholar application form. The application form asks for biographical data, educational and work history, proposed dates of stay, and the names of the University of Michigan Law faculty with whom you would like to confer during your stay.

Please note that you are not expected to contact Michigan Law professors in advance of your application. We will notify the appropriate faculty on your behalf as part of the admission process to gauge their level of interest.

You will also be asked to upload the following materials with your application:

• CV or resume
• Description of your intended research project and its purpose (e.g. doctoral thesis, journal publication), as well as a description of how a research scholar visit will be of value
• Two letters of reference from academics familiar with your work
• Level of English fluency, in particular speaking and listening comprehension, and a description of your training and experience in EnglishTOEFL or IELTS score and/or academic records may be requested on a case by case basis.

Apply Now

International and Comparative Law Research Fellowships 

Applicants to the Law School’s research scholar program may be eligible for very limited supplemental funding, which is granted on a competitive basis and considerate of need. 

After submission of the applicant’s International and Comparative Law Research Scholar application, those interested in being considered for these fellowships will be asked to submit a separate fellowship application. 

International and Comparative Law Research Fellowships are intended to assist with living expenses while researchers are in full-time residence. Most research scholars are supported by funds from other sources, such as Fulbright or sabbatical leave salary from their home university. Because of stiff competition for Michigan Law funding, applicants are encouraged to seek alternate sources of support. 

Due to funding limitations, we are not in a position to provide support for accompanying family members. 

Deadline: January 15 

The application deadline for the International and Comparative Law Research Scholar Program and for International and Comparative Law Research Fellowships is January 15 for visits proposed in the following summer, fall, or winter terms (June through May). 

Applicants are encouraged to apply to multiple institutions as the selection process is competitive. Although applications are welcome at any time during the year, those who apply after January 15 risk that space and funding may no longer be available.​​

Research Scholars

Bio:  Luís Armando Saboya is a Brazilian lawyer and professor. He holds a degree in Law from the University of Fortaleza, a postgraduate degree in Business Law and Management from the University of Fortaleza, and a master’s degree in Constitutional Law from the University of Fortaleza. Currently, he is a Ph.D. candidate in Commercial Law at the University of São Paulo.

Research Focus:  Luis’ research focuses on the rights of minority shareholders in cases of Judicial Recovery.

Languages: Portuguese (native), Spanish (fluent), French (beginner-level proficiency)

Bio:  Maxim Bönnemann is a research fellow at Humboldt University Berlin and the Kassel Institute for Sustainability. In 2022 he defended his PhD in the law and politics of Special Economic Zones at Humboldt University for which he was awarded the Law School Prize for Best Dissertation in Public Law. Since 2021, he has also been a permanent editor of the Verfassungsblog, covering comparative constitutional and environmental law. Maxim has been a visiting researcher at the National Law University, Delhi, and at the Centre for Policy Research ( CPR ). Before his legal studies, he worked for a human rights NGO in Moscow. Maxim has authored several papers and book chapters on comparative legal theory and has edited a book on “The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law” ( OUP , 2020).

Research Focus:  Maxim’s main research interests lie in comparative legal theory, political institutions and international economic law. During his stay at Michigan he will pursue a project on the role of non-majoritarian institutions in environmental and climate governance, in addition to a comparative project on the evolution of national Special Economic Zone laws.

Languages : German (native), Russian (proficient), French (elementary)

Bio:  Jonathan Bonnitcha is an Associate Professor, in Law at the University of New South Wales. He holds the degrees of DP hil, MP hil and BCL from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes scholar, and the degrees of LLB and BE c from the University of Sydney.

Jonathan’s research examines international and domestic legal regimes governing foreign investment. He is the author of two books on investment treaties, including (with Lauge Poulsen and Michael Waibel) The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime.

Much of Jonathan’s research is inter-disciplinary. His article (with Emma Aisbett) ‘A Pareto Improving Compensation Rule for Investment Treaties’ won the John Jackson prize for the best article published in the Journal of International Economic Law in 2021. A forthcoming article (with Zoe Phillips Williams) in Law & Policy empirically examines the impact of investment treaties on domestic governance in developing countries, through cross-country quantitative analysis and a detailed qualitative case-study on Myanmar.

Research:  Jonathan is currently working on two research projects. The first (with Taylor St John) is a comparative study of domestic investment laws. The project seeks to identify and explain shifts in the functions and content of national investment laws over time and space. The second (with Zhenyu Xiao) uses a series of case studies from across the Belt and Road Initiative to explore the legal and political dynamics in renegotiation of infrastructure contracts between Chinese foreign investors and host governments.

Languages:  Spanish (intermediate); Burmese (basic)

Bio:  Mireille is a doctoral student in legal history and civil law at Université Laval’s Faculty of Law in cotutelle with the Sciences Po Law School in Paris. She is a member of the Groupe de recherche sur les humanités juridiques. Mireille holds a bachelor’s degree in civil law and common law from the McGill Faculty of Law (2016) and a master’s degree in law and society from the University of Victoria (2018). Her master’s thesis focused on the intellectual contexts of the 1900 Comparative Law Congress in Paris. A member of the Quebec Bar since 2018, she worked as a law clerk at the Quebec Court of Appeal from 2018 to 2020. 

Research Focus:  Mireille’s research focuses on the contributions of civil society to the development of the civil law in the controversy over the nature and origins of legal personality in 19th-century France. In particular she looks at the way legal arguments published by lawyers and non-lawyers in the public press contribute to transforming the formal legal landscape in caslaw and doctrinal works. She is interested in developing a law and humanities research framework that can be applied in civil law countries, by mobilizing existing French-language theoretical resources and translating some English theoretical pieces to French.

Languages : French, Spanish

Bio : Jiwon Jheong has been a presiding judge of Geochang Branch of Changwon District Court of the Republic of Korea since 2020. She served as an associate judge of Seoul Central District Court from 2018 to 2020, and served as an associate judge of Ansan Branch of Suwon District Court from 2015 to 2018. She worked as a law clerk at Seoul High Court from 2014 to 2015. Before entering her profession, from 2012 to 2013, she was assigned to the two-year program at the Supreme Court of Korea’s Judicial Research and Training Institute. As a judge and a former law clerk, she has dealt with a wide range of labor cases as well as civil and criminal cases. She won 2020, 2021 Outstanding Judge of the Year by Gyeongsangnam-province Bar Association. 

Jiwon is also a member of the Labor Law Community of the Supreme Court of Korea. She is one of the co-authors of the revised edition of “The Commentary on the Trade Unions and Labor Relations Adjustment Act ( TULRAA )”, a notable legal commentary in Korea.

She obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree from Seoul National University College of Humanities in 2012 and a Master of Laws degree in administrative law from Seoul National University School of Law in 2018. 

Research Focus : Jiwon’s research first focuses on the criteria for deciding an appropriate bargaining unit in the U.S. legal system. Korea’s collective bargaining system is unique in that the TULRAA defines the bargaining unit as a business or workplace. However, the Labor Relations Commission ( LRC ) may divide the bargaining unit if there is any considerable disparity in working conditions, employment status, and bargaining practices. As there is a scarcity of precedents on the separation criteria of bargaining units, she hopes to deepen her understanding of the concrete criteria for determining an appropriate bargaining unit in the U.S. 

The second part of her research focuses on the legal principle of joint employment in the U.S. A segment of Korean legal society argues that the adoption of the U.S. approach will represent an expansion of the nature of employers as a party to collective bargaining compared to the currently dominant interpretation under TULRAA . Scrutinizing the legal principle of joint employment in the U.S. will provide an additional perspective on the concept of an employer in a collective bargaining setting and determining whether it is possible to expand the concept of a client company in an in-house subcontracting relationship. 

Languages : Korean (native), Chinese (intermediary), Japanese elementary)

Bio:  Dr. Muhammad Asif Khan is an Associate Professor at the Department of Law at the School of Social Sciences and Humanities in the National University of Science and Technology Islamabad, Pakistan. He is also the Head of the Department of Law. He holds an LL .B. from University of Peshawar (Pakistan), and an LL .M. from the University of Liverpool ( UK ) in Public International Law. He defended his PhD thesis “Adjusting Business Entities in a Globalized World: The Concept of an International Treaty Regulating Transnational Corporations against Violations of International Law” at the University of Salzburg (Austria) in May 2015. He has vast experience in teaching Public International Law and has served in different public sector universities in Pakistan. He has worked as a consultant with the International Committee of the Red Cross ( ICRC ) in Pakistan. He has also worked as a Business and Human Rights Specialist with the United Nations Development Program ( UNDP ) in the Decentralisation, Human Rights and Local Governance Project ( DHL ) in Pakistan. He has remained a member of the governance committee of teaching business and human rights forum for one year (2021-2022). He is an associate editor of the  Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice  and the  NUST Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities . His teaching activities include undergraduate and postgraduate courses on Public International Law, International Humanitarian Law, Business and Human Rights, Human Rights Law and Jurisprudence.

Research Focus:  Dr. Khan’s research activities focus on Business and Human Rights along with issues related with International Humanitarian Law including cyber warfare. Previously, his research has focussed on the regulation of transnational corporations and other business entities through an international treaty. At Michigan he will be focussing on human rights protection through international investment law. The major outcome will be to explore the possibility of including human rights protection clauses in bilateral investment treaties and international investment agreements from the perspectives of South Asian states. 

Languages:  Pashto (native), Urdu and English

Bio:  Kana Koyasu is a public prosecutor in Japan. She graduated from Waseda Law School with a Juris Doctor degree. After she passed the Japanese Bar Exam, she was appointed Public Prosecutor in December 2017 and has been working at the Sapporo District Public Prosecutors Office since 2023. She has been working in both the criminal and trial division of a number of District Public Prosecutors Offices for six years, gaining experience as a public prosecutor.

As a practicing lawyer, she has handled a number of difficult and complex criminal cases and has successfully prosecuted and argued a number of them. She was recommended by the Public Prosecutors Office in Japan and is currently beginning studies and research at the University of Michigan Law School as a research scholar.

Research Focus:  Kana’s research focuses on recent developments in the legislation and practice of the criminal justice system in the U.S. In general, the U.S. is much quicker than other countries in reflecting changes in socioeconomic conditions in its legal systems and practice. There are many lessons that Japan should learn in order to timely catch socioeconomic changes and expeditiously take legislative and other actions in line with such changes. A general study of such recent legislation and its practice will be indispensable for the future development of the criminal justice system in Japan.

Languages:  Japanese (native)

Bio:  Isola Clara Macchia is a Ph.D. Researcher at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Her Ph.D. project investigates how the European Union enforces sustainable development clauses in its Free Trade Agreements, and whether variations in enforcement can be detected. She holds a Law degree from the University of Bologna and an MS c in European and International Public Policy from the London School of Economics. Isola Clara is a member of the Jean Monnet Module “Reforming the Global Economic Governance: The EU for SDG s in International Economic Law” research team at the University of Bologna, funded by the European Union. Before her Ph.D., she worked at the European Commission in the Directorate-General for Employment as a trainee on Directives’ implementation and infringement proceedings. She also served as a researcher at the Attorney General’s Office in Bologna working on regional cooperation in law enforcement and as a research assistant in international law at the University of Bologna. 

Research Focus:  At Michigan Law School, Isola Clara’s research will focus on the comparison between the EU ’s and U.S.’ approaches to enforcing international law, specifically in the area of trade and sustainable development. The choice to compare these two legal systems stems from the recurrent juxtaposition of the EU ’s cooperation-based model with the U.S.’ sanction-based one. The doctoral project investigates the mutual supportiveness of these two different approaches and whether their combination can help in ensuring a more consistent enforcement.

Languages:  Italian (native), Spanish (intermediate), French (elementary)

Bio:  Csongor István Nagy is professor of law at the University of Szeged and research professor at the Center for Social Sciences of the Hungarian Research Network. He is a recurrent visiting professor at the Central European University (Budapest/New York/Vienna) and the Sapientia University of Transylvania (Romania), and an associate member at the Center for Private International Law at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. 

Csongor graduated at the Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences (dr. jur.), where he also earned a Ph.D. He received master ( LL .M.) and S.J.D. degrees from the Central European University and a D.Sc. degree from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. He pursued graduate studies in Rotterdam, Heidelberg and Ithaca (New York) and had visiting appointments in the Hague, Munich, Brno, Hamburg, Edinburgh, London, Riga, Bloomington (Indiana), Brisbane, Beijing, Taipei and Rome. 

He has more than 260 publications in English, French, German, Hungarian, Romanian and (in translation) in Croatian and Spanish. 

Research Focus:  The purpose of Csongor Nagy’s research in Ann Arbor is to put the current European rule-of-law debate in the context of comparative federalism and to provide a normative analysis through the lens of US constitutional ideas. Benchmarking Europe’s idiosyncratic “federalism” should be an important facet of the social discourse on the “European project”, and comparative federalism could contribute significantly to the resolution of the EU ’s current constitutional crisis. The path the EU is walking in the direction of an “ever closer Union” is far from unprecedented and, as far as multilevel constitutionalism is concerned, EU law may draw on the experiences of various regimes where centralized human rights protection and state constitutional identities coexist.

Languages : German (fluent), Hungarian (native), Romanian (fluent), French (working knowledge), Spanish (basic)

Bio : Since November 2021, Orlando has been a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for European Law, KU Leuven. He obtained his master’s degree in law from the University of Pisa and his LL .M. in European, Comparative and International Law from the European University Institute. He holds an Honors Degree and a PhD in Law from Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies in Pisa. He was a visiting graduate student at the University of Toronto. After his PhD, Orlando was an Emile Noël Global fellow at NYU School of Law and a postdoctoral researcher at LUISS Guido Carli in Rome. He is admitted to the Italian Bar and is author of  Radical Constitutional Pluralism in Europe  (Routledge, 2023).

Research   Focus:  At Michigan, Orlando will be working on the incorporation of federal rights and on the subsequent emergence of New Judicial Federalism in the United States. This study of the American system is part of a broader research project on the incorporation of rights and on the reaction at the level of the constituent units in federal and quasi-federal systems. Part of the broader ERC RESHUFFLE at the KU Leuven, the project aims at comparing the twofold dynamic of incorporation and subsequent contestation in the United States, Canada, and the European Union.

Languages : Italian (native), French (advanced).

Bio:  Johannes Thierer is a PhD student at the Chair of Constitutional Law (Professor Johannes Masing) at the University of Freiburg (Germany) where he also worked as a research assistant from 2020 till 2023. He studied law at the University of Freiburg and the School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg (Sweden) and graduated in 2020. In his position as research assistant, he taught first and second semester students in constitutional law and European law. 

He currently works on his thesis about the European and American single market. His doctoral research is funded the German National Academic Foundation.

Johannes’ interests include European law, constitutional law and comparative law.

Research Focus:  Johannes’ PhD-project explores constitutional constraints against economic regulation of single member states in federal systems. It compares the fundamental freedoms of the European Union with the dormant Commerce Clause of the American Constitution. Whereas the doctrines and tests of the European Court of Justice and the US Supreme Court seem strikingly similar at first glance, Johannes’ aim is to examine the different notions and concepts behind the norms. Building on this, the project intends to rethink the EU ’s fundamental freedoms.

Languages:  German (native), Swedish (intermediate), French (elementary)

Bio:  Holding a Master’s Degree in Law  magna cum laude , Justin started his career as a researcher at KUL euven (Belgium). After completing this first professional experience, he wanted to gain practical experience and help disadvantaged groups. Therefore, Justin worked as a legal counsel in an association helping young people. After this first practical experience, he undertook the bar traineeship. Justin was fully admitted to the bar after successfully passing the bar exam in 2016. While doing his bar traineeship, he also started working at UCL ouvain (Belgium) in 2012. Justin has been lecturing various courses as a teaching assistant and, since 2020, as a lecturer. In 2021, he defended his Ph.D. thesis dealing with distressed sovereign debts. Justin will conduct postdoctoral research at the University of Michigan Law School as a B.A.E.F.  Fellow.

Research Focus:  In his Ph.D. thesis, Justin analyzed the regulation of the so-called “vulture funds” and proposed a new judicial approach in order to better address their speculation on sovereign debts. He wishes to expand the scope of his research findings and undertake a deeper comparative analysis during a one-year postdoctoral research stay at the University of Michigan Law School. The goal of this research project is to outline a legislative proposal concerned with profiteering in sovereign debts. Such a proposal appears to be of paramount importance given the boom in borrowing following the pandemic crisis.

Languages : French (native) and Dutch (proficient)

Bio : Eva-Maria Wettstein is a PhD student at the University of Cologne in Germany. She completed her state exam in law in 2022, which included a specialization on private international law, civil litigation, and economic law. Wettstein currently works as a trainee lawyer at Osborne Clarke’s Dispute and Risk Team in Cologne, where she is involved in an investor state arbitration proceeding. Additionally, she is a research fellow with the International Investment Law Centre Cologne ( IILCC , University of Cologne). In this capacity, Wettstein contributes to research and teaching in international investment law, arbitration law and public international law. As speaker of the German doctoral researchers’ network for international investment law, Wettstein regularly organizes events and encourages interaction between practitioners and academics.

Research Focus : Wettstein’s research focuses on the enforcement of investor-state arbitration awards between European investors and European Union member states (“intra- EU arbitration awards”) in the USA . The heart of the research question – whether intra- EU arbitration awards are enforceable in the USA – lies in the relationship of public international law, EU law and US law. Against this background, the research project aims to explore the interaction between courts of both sovereign EU member states and the USA as well as the interaction between their laws from an international legal perspective.

Languages : German (native), French (intermediate), Portuguese (elementary)

Bio:  Ms.Xiaodan ZHU is a Chinese professor specialized in International Tax Law. In this capacity, Xiaodan works at the Law School, Dalian Ocean University, where she also is the director of both Bachelor and Master Degree programs in Law. Prof. Zhu obtained a Ph.D. in International Tax Law from Xiamen University of China in 2013. She has been a Grotius Research Scholar of the University of Michigan Law School during 2015 and 2016. Her teaching activities include courses on international economic law, China’s tax law, and international tax law. Her wiritings (including journal articles and monographs) have appeared in many Chinese and English academic publications. Moreover, Professor Zhu is also a brilliant practical expert in tax law. She has been seconded to the Department of Tax Policy, Ministry of Finance of China in 2020, and she has been a part-time tax lawyer for almost six years in China.

Research Focus:  Professor Zhu’s research is titled “ Interaction Between the OECD ’s Global Minimum Tax Proposal and Tax Competition Rules: From the Perspective of China”, and the project addresses the following key issues: (1) What is the impact of OECD ’s Global Minimum Tax 

Proposal (Pillar 2) on China’s tax competition rules and domestic tax law? (2)Is there any legal experience in US tax law relating to minimum income tax which is valuable for China? (3) How would China figure out the tax reforms conflict between international “Global Minimum Tax ” and domestic “Tax and Fee Reduction Policy”? 

Languages:  Mandarin Chinese (native)

Bio: Niklas Burkart is a research assistant at the Institute for Public Law, Department of Constitutional Law at University of Freiburg. He currently works on his thesis about the conflict between Freedom of Art und Copyright. Burkart studied Law at Freiburg and Speyer. He was a research assistant at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law. During his legal clerkship he worked at a law firm specialized in administrative law and at the German Federal Foreign Office, Department of Human Rights, in Berlin. Burkart coordinates the DFG (German Research Council) project “Handbook of Constitutional Law – German Constitutional Law from a Transnational Perspective”. In his position as research assistant, he teaches first and second semester students in constitutional law. 

Research Focus:  Burkart’s PhD-project explores the relationship between Freedom of Art and Copyright from a fundamental law perspective. The thesis is driven by the idea of strengthening Art without threatening Copyright. This requires to reveal the parts of Copyright that are not based on Freedom of Property but on Personality Rights. Given the fact that German Copyright Law is regulated by European Law, the thesis has to address not only German but also European Fundamental Rights. To contrast the results, the conflict between Freedom of Art and Copyright shall also be examined under US  Law. 

Languages:  German (native), French (elementary)

Bio:  Andrew Cecchinato is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Global Fellow at the University of Michigan Law School and the School of History at the University of St Andrews. He is PI of the Horizon 2020 project on  John Selden’s Harmonic Jurisprudence. A European Interpretation of English Legal History . Previously, he was a postdoc in St Andrews, working on the ERC project  Civil Law, Common Law, Customary Law: Consonance Divergence and Transformation in Western Europe from the late eleventh to the thirteenth centuries . 

Andrew is book review editor for the American Journal of Legal History. He has received scholarships from the Max-Planck-Institute für europäische Rechtsgeschichte and the Robert H. Smith International Center for Jefferson Studies. He has also been a visiting researcher at the Robbins Collection in Civil and Religious Law, the Georgetown University Law Center, and the Library of Congress. He studied law at the University of Trento, where his PhD on  The Legal Education of Thomas Jefferson  won the faculty prize. 

Research Focus:  Andrew’s main research aims to repurpose the idea of Europe by studying how the seventeenth-century jurist, historian, and Hebraist John Selden harmonized the history of English law and the authority of the European legal tradition. His project will center on Selden’s effort to preserve and harmonize the history of English law within the inclusive order of nations recognized by a distinct reading of medieval and modern European jurisprudence. The research will thus focus on the cogent yet overlooked reasoning by which Selden proved that no law, however discrete, can rightfully be understood if isolated from the continuum of legal experience. 

Languages:  English and Italian (native), French and German (elementary)

Bio:  Fabian is a PhD Candidate in public international law at Gonville & Caius College, University of Cambridge. His doctoral research is funded by a W.M. Tapp Studentship and the German National Academic Foundation. Previously, Fabian was a Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, and read law in Hamburg (Dipl. Jur.) and Oxford (M.Jur.).

At the University of Cambridge, Fabian has supervised undergraduates and conducted workshops for Cambridge LL .M. students in International Investment Law and International Law as a Legal System. He is currently an Associate Editor at International Law in Domestic Courts ( OUP ) and an Assistant Editor for Investment Arbitration at Kluwer Arbitration Blog.

In recent years, Fabian has worked as a research assistant for Professor Campbell McLachlan, Professor Eyal Benvenisti and Sir Christopher Greenwood. In 2022, his article on informal communications to the ICJ was awarded the Rosalyn Higgins Prize of The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals.  

Research Focus:  Fabian’s research interests lie in the areas of general international law, international dispute settlement, international investment law and German public law. His PhD project (“Self-Judgment in International Law”) investigates to what extent states can authoritatively auto-interpret international law. It traces the evolution of self-judgment throughout the history of international law, unearths links between self-judgment and the concept of obligation in international law, and assesses the approach of international courts and tribunals. Against this background, the project develops a theoretical and doctrinal framework to accommodate self-judgment in international law. 

Languages: German (native), French (proficient, C1 ), Spanish (advanced, B1 / B2 ), Hindi (Basic), Italian (Basic)

Bio : Hijratullah Ekhtyar is an International & Comparative Law Research Scholar of the University of Michigan Law School. He served as a lecturer at the Nangarhar University Faculty of Law and Political Science since 2012 to 2021, and also was provincial director for the Independent Administrative Reform and Civil Services Commission of Afghanistan in Nangarhar province since 2018 to 2021. Ekhtyar also worked as a local coordinator and journalist for the Institute for War and Peace Reporting ( IWPR ) in eastern provinces (Laghman, Nangarhar, Kunar, and Noristan) from 2011 to 2014. He served as a Lawyer and Provincial Commissioner for the Independent Electoral Compliant Commission ( IECC ) of Afghanistan in Nangarhar province from 2009 to 2011. Moreover, he served as an administrative clerk for the Economic Committee of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of Afghanistan from 2008 to 2009. He also worked for Mediothek Afghanistan, a German based NGO as an in-charge of Academic and Cultural Affairs from 2007 to 2008.

He obtained LL .M degree in Sustainable International Development ( SID ) program from the University of Washington Law School in 2017, and completed his undergraduate studies in the Nangarhar University Faculty of Law and Political Science in 2008.

Ekhtyar participated in the University of Washington School of Law visiting scholar program in 2015, and attended the International Visitor Leadership Program ( IVLP ) of the State Department of the United States in 2013.

Ekhtyar also run Ekhtyar Legal Services ( ELS ), a non-profit legal assistance provider organization in Nangarhar province from 2009 to 2015. He was a certified defense lawyer under the Afghanistan Independent Bar Association during 2009-2015.

After completion of his graduate studies in the University of Washington Law School, he served as a Legal Research Intern in the Library of Congress in 2017.

During his tenure with IWPR , Ekhtyar wrote about 30 articles for  www.iwpr.net . He also published an article about combating corruption in Afghanistan in  https://nsuworks.nova.edu/ilsajournal/vol24/iss1/4/  and  https://www.ijlsr.in/ijlsr_special_issue_june_2018 . Furthermore, he wrote/ translated more than 20 books and numerous articles that are published in national language, Pashto.

Ekhtyar received a Medal of Excellence from Zhwand Group of Companies and Green Motion for his writings in 2014. 

Research Focus : Ekhtyar’s research focus is on International Law of Armed Conflicts, Good Governance, Corruption, and Constitutional Law. He recently completed his research project on the Hiring Process of lecturers in Afghanistan universities. He is currently working on another research project focusing on Constitutionalism in Afghanistan. The main theme of his research is how to adopt a comprehensive constitution for Afghanistan to end up the long-lasting crises and war in that country.

Languages : Pashto and Dari (native), English (excellent), and Urdu (elementary).

Bio: Giulia Giusy Cusenza is a postdoctoral researcher at the Faculty of Law at the University of Udine in Italy, where she is also an adjunct professor of administrative law at the Engineering Faculty. She earned her Ph.D. in administrative law from the University of Trento in 2020, and in 2018 she obtained an Intensive International Master of Laws ( I.I.LL.M. ) held by the European Public Law Organization in Athens. In recent years she has been lecturing various courses as a teaching assistant and as a lecturer. Moreover, she became a lawyer in 2018, and she was awarded the title of lawyer specialized in administrative law in June 2022 by the Italian National Bar Council.

Research Focus: Giulia’s research investigates the implications of the digitalization process and the application of artificial intelligence on public administrations and judicial activities. She is conducting comparative research on assessment procedures for developing algorithmic systems within the public administration. Her current project aims at studying the benefits of prioritizing stakeholders’ welfare in algorithm design for public administrations by implementing democratic and participatory processes. Her research interests revolve around administrative law and comparative administrative law.

Languages: Italian (native)

Bio:  Maria Haag is a lecturer of European law at Tilburg University Law School (Netherlands). She holds an LL .B. from Durham University (United Kingdom), and an LL .M. from the European University Institute (Italy). She defended her PhD thesis “A Sense of Responsibility: The Shifting Roles of the Member States for the Union Citizen” at the European University Institute in October 2019. She has previously worked as a trainee at the Legal Service of the European Commission and a research assistant at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advance Studies (Italy). From August to December 2016, Maria visited Michigan Law School for the first time as a Grotius Research Scholar. She is an editor for the European Law Blog and an external editor for the European Journal of Legal Studies. Her teaching activities include undergraduate and postgraduate courses on EU constitutional law, internal market and free movement law, judicial protection, and migration law.

Research Focus:  Maria previously developed the concept of responsibility as a prism to re-evaluate the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and to differentiate between the roles that the home and the host Member States play for EU citizens. Building on this, she now wishes to examine further aspects of the concept of responsibility: the responsibilities of citizens in EU law, on the one hand, and the responsibility of the Union as whole for its citizens, on the other.

Languages : German (native), French, Dutch

Bio:  Lucas Hartmann is a Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Legal Theory at the University of Freiburg, Germany. Prior to that, he conducted research at the Institute for German and European Administrative Law at the University of Heidelberg. Lucas’ research interests focus on legal theory, on comparative law studies, and on European Union Law.

Lucas defended his PhD entitled “The Codification of EU Administrative Law” (“Die Kodifikation des Europäischen Verwaltungsrechts”) at the University of Heidelberg in 2019. He was also a visiting researcher at Université Paris 1, Panthéon-Sorbonne (France) in 2021 and was awarded a three-year full-time Senior Researcher Fellowship (“Eigene Stelle”) from the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft – DFG ) in 2020. 

Research Focus:  At Michigan, Lucas will focus on his comparative research project on judicial lawmaking. The aim of this research project is to compare German concepts of dynamic interpretation with similar understandings concerning the role of judicial lawmaking in the USA , France, and the EU that allow or forbid courts to develop the constitution, statutes, or “the law” in general. In particular, he intends to learn about the American practice and literature on constitutional and statutory construction, common law reasoning, and judicial activism/restraint.

Languages:  German, English and French

Bio:  Moshe Jaffe is a JSD candidate at Bar Ilan University, and an LLM Graduate from Columbia Law School. Jaffe is a constitutional law Adjunct Professor at the Academic Center of Law and Science in Israel, and an Adjunct Professor at Cardozo School of Law. As an Israeli lawyer, Jaffe represented dozens of cases before the Israeli Supreme Court with emphasis on Religion and State, Human Rights, and National Security. Simultaneously, Jaffe serves as a legal advisor for the Counter-Terrorism section in the IDF ’s Department of the Legal Advisor to Judea and Samaria. Jaffe also serves as an administrative judge on the Confiscation of Funds Committee of the Money Laundering Headquarters tribunal.

Research Focus:  Jaffe’s research comparatively addresses the constitutionality and the use of proportionality tests in judicial review of tax legislation. The research focuses on three different judicial systems — Israel, the U.S, and Jewish Law. Alongside the main issue, the research addresses the questions of tax definitions and equality in tax law. The research’s main argument is that the Israeli proportionality doctrine is the most effective and correct instrument for applying judicial review to tax legislation. This stands in contrast to the use of the scrutiny doctrine, which struggles to adapt itself to the flexibility and balances that tax laws require.

Languages : Hebrew – native, Spanish – proficient, France – elementary.

Bio:  Shajan Kreuter is a PhD student at the University of Freiburg in Germany. He studied law at the University of Frankfurt and spent his clerkship at the Higher Regional Court in Frankfurt. 

Shajan Kreuter is admitted to the bar and works at Sullivan Cromwell LLP in Frankfurt.

Research Focus:  In his PhD thesis Kreuter portrays the regulation of crypto assets in Germany, the EU and the US . The thesis examines the current regulation of crypto assets in Germany and the EU and analyses the digital finance package of the European Commission which contains three draft legislations constituting the first comprehensive regulation of crypto assets in the EU . Furthermore, the thesis describes the current regulatory landscape and developments in the US and compares the EU draft legislation with the US regulatory regime.

Languages:  German (native), French (proficient)

Bio:  Linda Meister is a PhD student at the Department for Private International Law, International Civil Litigation and Comparative Law at the Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen in Germany. After her state exam in 2020 which included a specialization on Private International Law, International Civil Litigation and Comparative Law, she started working as a Research, Teaching and Grading Assistant at the University of Tuebingen. In this capacity she has taught courses in Public Law, Private Law and Private International Law. During her undergraduate and doctoral studies, she also participated successfully in the certificate programs “Law, Ethics, Economics” and “Human Rights Law in Practice”.

Her interests include Principles of Private International Law, International Civil Litigation, Comparative Law and Human Rights Law.

Research Focus:  Linda’s research focuses on the principle of neutrality in Private International Law. This area of law determines which country’s law is applicable in a case with connections to multiple countries. The classical European approach aims to treat all legal systems equally and abstracts the question of applicable law from the content of the different laws. This abstraction is called the principle of neutrality. However, this principle is being challenged. Developments in Europe and especially teachings in the US focus on a just outcome rather than a neutral decision. Linda tries to substantiate the principle of neutrality and assess deviating developments.

Languages:  German (native), French (intermediate), Spanish (intermediate), Turkish (elementary)

Bio:  Zhiruo Ni is a PhD candidate in the College of Comparative Law, China University of Political Science and Law, in Beijing. Prior to her PhD studies, she received a Master of Laws at King’s College London and a Bachelor of Laws at the University of International Business and Economics in China. In 2017 she was a Visiting Student at Bar-Ilan University, Tel Aviv (Israel). From 2016 to 2018, she held legal internships in the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission ( CIETAC ) and JunHe LLP , China. Her research interests mainly include Antitrust Law and Comparative Law.

Research Focus:  Ni’s research focuses on antitrust regulation toward vertical integration. She has found that antitrust law is getting primary attention in China, but there is still a lack of Law & Economics studies and relevant cases, due to a long-term regulatory and judicial oversight before the information age. As vertical integration has been a dominant characteristic of some major 

industries in the U.S., she hopes to build a comparative antitrust study on the issue between both jurisdictions, where the digital platforms could be the most suitable legal subjects for antitrust analysis at present.

Languages:  Chinese (native)

Bio:  Saba Pipia holds a Ph.D. degree in Law from Tbilisi State University (Tbilisi, Georgia). He taught international law at several universities in Tbilisi, Georgia. Throughout his doctoral and post-doctoral studies, he was a visiting researcher at Michigan State University ( USA ), The Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Germany); The University of Groningen (The Netherlands); Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece); Max Planck Institute for Comparative and Private International Law (Germany), Peace Palace Library (The Netherlands) and Jerusalem Institute of Justice (Israel). He was an invited lecturer at the University of Porto (Portugal) and the University of Iasi (Romania). He is a recipient of multiple research scholarships including from the Georgian National Scientific Foundation, German Academic Exchange Service ( DAAD ), European Commission (Erasmus program), and the US State Department (Fulbright Visiting Scholars program). Areas of his research include international humanitarian law, international criminal law, global animal law, and international environmental law. He has published academic publications in Georgia and abroad.

Research Focus:  Saba’s research project is about missing persons. He intends to study the issue of missing persons from all possible international legal angles and provide an analysis, which will be useful for various target groups, including academics, students, governments, and armed forces. Saba thinks that there is a need to develop the concept of ‘international law of missing persons’ and examine this multi-dimensional issue through the lens of various international law instruments to determine the body of law, that regulates the issue of missing persons, and which can be 

applied whenever there is a need to deal with missing persons. The most important goal of this research visit is to promote legal scholarship in the emerging field of international law – missing persons law – and eventually to produce an academic publication on this topic.

Languages : Georgian (native), Russian (limited working proficiency), Hebrew (elementary proficiency)

Bio:  Dr. Elena Pribytkova is a Lecturer in Law at Southampton Law School. She received a Doctor of the Science of Law ( J.S.D. ) degree from Columbia Law School and is a Habilitation candidate at the Faculty of Law of the University of Basel. She held various research and teaching appointments at leading universities and research institutes all over the world, including Columbia Law School, New York University School of Law, University of Oxford, European University Institute, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg University, Swiss Institute of Comparative Law, University of Basel, Radboud University Nijmegen, and National University of Singapore. She has more than fifty publications, including publications in top U.S. law reviews and internationally recognized peer-reviewed law journals, such as the  Chicago Journal of International Law ,  University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law ,  Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie ,  RphZ – Rechtsphilosophie – Zeitschrift für Grundlagen des Rechts , and  N.Y.U. Journal of International Law & Politics .

Research Focus:  Elena has worked extensively on individual and collective multidisciplinary research projects on theories of justice, human dignity, law and morality, governance, and human rights, in particular, socio-economic rights and their role in reducing poverty and inequality as well as in promoting social, global, and environmental justice, and sustainable development. Her current project  Towards a World of Accountability: Extraterritorial Obligations in the Area of Socio-Economic Rights from Philosophical, Legal and Practical Perspectives  pays special attention to human rights obligations of non-state actors. Her Habilitation monograph  A Decent Social Minimum in the Language of Human Rights  focuses on mechanisms for ensuring the social minimum guarantees in international, regional, and national orders.

Languages:  Russian (native speaker); English & German (fluent); French (intermediate); Slavic languages & Swiss German (basic knowledge)

Bio:  Sabrina Ragone (PhD) teaches comparative law at the University of Bologna’s Department of Political and Social Sciences, where she holds the post of Head of International Relations. She is also a member of the scientific committee of the Buenos Aires Campus and the excellence college of the University. She is Senior Research Affiliate of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg), where she pursued her research between 2015 and 2017. Previously, she was a García Pelayo Fellow at the Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales – Madrid (2012-2015) and researcher at the Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (2011-2012). She has taught comparative law in Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Colombia, Chile, Mexico, and Argentina. 

She has collaborated with several competitive national research projects funded by the Italian and Spanish ministries of education as well as by research institutes in Latin America. Between 2018 and 2021 she was the PI of the Jean Monnet Module CRISES “Critical Risks for Integration and Solidarity in the European Space”, Erasmus+ Program. See:  https://www.unibo.it/sitoweb/sabrina.ragone2/cv-en  

Research Focus:  Sabrina Ragone’s research comparatively addresses constitutional adjudication, territorial organization, and the interaction between international and domestic laws. She deals with Latin American constitutionalism from a comparative perspective, taking into account its transnational dimension. Her book on constitutional adjudication on constitutional amendments was the first comprehensive assessment of the issue (“I controlli giurisdizionali sulle revisioni costituzionali” 2011 in Italian, 2012 in Spanish). She then focused on the core constitutional issues of European integration, publishing several pieces on the issue, among them, the edited book “Managing the Euro Crisis. National EU policy coordination in the debtor countries”, Routledge 2018, and the volume “Parlamentarismos y crisis económica: afectación de los encajes constitucionales en Italia y España”, Bosch, 2020.

Languages : Italian (native); Spanish (proficient); German (good); French (intermediate); Portuguese (working knowledge); Catalan (working knowledge) 

Bio : Lea Schneider is a PhD student at the Institute for International Law and Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. From 2020 to 2022, she served as Research and Teaching Assistant at the University of Zurich, where she taught courses and co-organized the 22nd Conference of Young Research Scholars in Public Law ( Junge Tagung Öffentliches Recht ) and co-edited the annual anthology for young legal researchers of the University of Zurich ( APARIUZ ). Prior to pursuing her PhD studies, she received an LL .M. in Transnational Law from King’s College London and a Master of Laws from the University of Zurich. Her interests include public international law, public law, international economic law, transnational law and human rights law.

Research Focus : Lea Schneider’s research centers on the regulatory landscape of transnational corporations ( TNC s) regarding human rights and environmental standards. In her PhD thesis she analyses what insights are gained from a transnational perspective on the regulatory landscape of TNC s. Schneider conceptualizes transnational law, along the lines of Peer Zumbansen, as a methodology. In her thesis, she claims, for example, that a transnational perspective allows us to gain an enhanced understanding of the role and functioning of international soft law-initiatives in this regulatory area.

Languages : German (native), French (proficient), Italian (elementary)

Bio:  Francesco Tumbiolo is a Ph.D. student in Legal Sciences at the University of Milan-Bicocca. He was awarded a doctoral scholarship for his research project about cryptocurrencies’ taxation. Francesco is also a teaching assistant at the University of Insubria (Como), where he graduated in law. He was admitted, ranking among the top five students, to the School of Specialization in Legal Professions of the University of Milan. After getting the specialization diploma, he passed the bar exam, and he is currently an attorney-at-law in Italy at a renowned tax law firm with branches in Rome and Milan.

Research Focus:  Francesco’s research focuses on cryptocurrencies’ taxation, especially from the Italian tax law point of view. However, he is now interested in giving his doctoral thesis a comparative perspective: his aim is to find what are the solutions adopted by different OECD members, like the US , to fix the same problems every country faces in taxing cryptocurrencies. Since they are in rapid development, he agrees that policymakers have to progress in considering cryptocurrencies’ tax implications in order to find a shared best practice.

Languages : Italian (native)

Bio : Wu Weiding is currently a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Law of Renmin University of China ( RUC ). His areas of interest include corporate and securities law and arbitration law. He received his Bachelor of Laws degree and Juris Master degree respectively from China University of Political Science and Law ( CUPL ) and Peking University ( PKU ). Wu has participated in several research programs, such as “Research on Major Problems of Bankruptcy of Listed Companies” and “Improvement of Governance Mechanism of Listed Companies”. He has worked as an intern in Beijing JunZeJun (Changsha) Law Firm, Beijing Tiantong Law Firm and the People’s Court of Changping District. Currently, he is an editor of  Renming University Law Review . Wu has also already published a number of academic papers in core journals of China.

Research Focus : Wu has been focusing on social enterprises in the form of companies in China. Social enterprises are the types of enterprises pursuing both profits and public welfare. In China, there are a large number of social enterprises taking the form of companies. The core problem is that in China, the company is an organizational form purely pursuing profit-making goals, and Company Law of the People’s Republic of China does not provide any strong institutional guarantee for social enterprises to achieve social goals. Questions to be addressed in Wu’s research are as follows: Why do an increasing number of social enterprises exist in the form of companies in China? How can these social enterprises achieve their social goals without “mission drift”?

Languages:  Chinese (native) and German (elementary)

Bio:  Ms.Xiaodan Zhu is a Chinese professor specialized in International Tax Law. In this capacity, Xiaodan works at the Law School, Dalian Ocean University, where she also is the director of both Bachelor and Master Degree programs in Law. Prof. Zhu obtained a Ph.D. in International Tax Law from Xiamen University of China in 2013. She has been a Grotius Research Scholar of the University of Michigan Law School during 2015 and 2016. Her teaching activities include courses on international economic law, China’s tax law, and international tax law. Her writings (including journal articles and monographs) have appeared in many Chinese and English academic publications. Moreover, Professor Zhu is also a brilliant practical expert in tax law. She has been seconded to the Department of Tax Policy, Ministry of Finance of China in 2020, and she has been a part-time tax lawyer for almost six years in China.

Bio:  Zhiyu Li is an Assistant Professor in Law and Policy at Durham Law School and a Fellow at the Durham Research Methods Centre. She holds undergraduate degrees in law and economics from the East China University of Political Science and Law and a J.S.D. from the University of California, Berkeley.

Zhiyu’s research investigates issues that lie at the intersection of law and policy, with a particular emphasis on the role of courts in democratic and authoritarian regimes. The findings of her research have been published in or accepted by U.S. and international journals, including the  Harvard International Law Journal , the  Columbia Journal of Asian Law , and the  Cornell International Law Journal , and presented at various fora, such as the Stanford International Junior Faculty Forum and the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Comparative Law.

Research Focus:  Zhiyu’s current research asks whether the rejection of the separation of powers principle in socialist jurisdictions makes it easier for courts to take on extrajudicial functions and exercise influence in ways that are salutary but forbidden to their liberal democratic cousins.

At Michigan, she will work on a joint project that aims to study cognitive biases of legal professionals and lay persons through survey experiments fielded on judges and university students. The project findings are expected to have normative implications for institutional choices in the civil and criminal justice system. She will also further her work on specialized judicial empowerment.

Languages:  Mandarin Chinese (native)

Bio:  Sarah Zimmermann is a PhD student at the Max-Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory in Frankfurt am Main (Germany) where she also works at the European and Comparative Legal History department.

Zimmermann studied Law and European Studies in Mainz (Germany), Maastricht (Netherlands) and Dijon (France). Prior to pursuing her PhD, she obtained the German State Exams and a Masters (Maîtrise en Droit) from the University of Dijon with a focus on European economic law. She also holds a joint LL .M in international private law and European Law from the universities of Mainz and Dijon. She has received various scholarships during her studies and for her PhD research. During her legal clerkship she worked at the Frankfurt office of WilmerHale obtaining professional experience in the field of regulatory affairs and European Law.

Her interests include European law, procedural law, comparative law and administrative law.

Research Focus:  Zimmermann’s PhD research focuses on the procedural law of the Courts of the European Union. It looks at the emergence of these rules in the 1950s from a historical and comparative legal perspective. She is evaluating to which extent the ECJ procedural rules during that time were comparable to the national procedural rules of the member states and to those of international courts. She is using sources from the archives of the European institutions and the relevant ministries of the founding states and seeks to give insight into one of the first decision making processes of the Community.

Languages : German (native), French (proficient), Dutch (elementary)

Bio:  Alain is a Senior Lecturer (Associate Professor) at the School of Law, University of Glasgow ( UK ). Alain holds graduate degrees in Philosophy ( MS c, London School of Economics), History ( MA , Graduate Institute) and Law ( LL .M., Toronto). He was awarded his doctoral degree at the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. His doctoral dissertation was published as a monograph with Routledge ( The ECHR and Human Rights Theory ). Alain subsequently obtained three post-doctoral fellowships funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the European University Institute in Florence (Max Weber Fellowship) and the University of Oslo (PluriCourts Centre of Excellence).

Research Focus:  Alain’s research aims to reconstruct and evaluate the practices of constitutional law, human rights law and international law from the perspective of normative theory. In particular, Alain has examined the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, UN treaty bodies and the International Criminal Court. His research has appeared in leading peer-reviewed journals such as  International Journal of Constitutional Law  (2019, 2022),  Global Constitutionalism  (2016, 2021, 2022),  Ratio Juris  (2019),  Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy  (2019, 2021),  Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence  (2016) and  Criminal Law and Philosophy  (2018), among others. Alain is also currently Senior Research Fellow at the University of Oslo (PluriCourts Center for Excellence) for a two-year project (2021-23) studying the nexus between theories of populism and the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. His monograph on the topic is under contract with Cambridge University Press.

Languages : English, French, German, Spanish

Andrew Cecchinato is a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Global Fellow at the University of Michigan Law School and the School of History at the University of St Andrews. He is PI of the Horizon 2020 project on John Selden’s Harmonic Jurisprudence. A European Interpretation of English Legal History . Previously, he was a postdoc in St Andrews, working on the ERC project Civil Law, Common Law, Customary Law: Consonance Divergence and Transformation in Western Europe from the late eleventh to the thirteenth centuries . 

Andrew is a book review editor for the American Journal of Legal History. He has received scholarships from the Max-Planck-Institute für europäische Rechtsgeschichte and the Robert H. Smith International Center for Jefferson Studies. He has also been a visiting researcher at the Robbins Collection in Civil and Religious Law, the Georgetown University Law Center, and the Library of Congress. He studied law at the University of Trento, where his Ph.D. on The Legal Education of Thomas Jefferson won the faculty prize. 

Research Focus

Andrew’s main research aims to repurpose the idea of Europe by studying how the seventeenth-century jurist, historian, and Hebraist John Selden harmonized the history of English law and the authority of the European legal tradition. His project will center on Selden’s effort to preserve and harmonize the history of English law within the inclusive order of nations recognized by a distinct reading of medieval and modern European jurisprudence. The research will thus focus on the cogent yet overlooked reasoning by which Selden proved that no law, however discrete, can rightfully be understood if isolated from the continuum of legal experience. 

English and Italian (native), French and German (elementary)

Apostolos Chronopoulos is Senior Lecturer in Intellectual Property Law at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London.

Apostolos has studied law at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. He continued his studies at Queen Mary University of London ( LLM Lond.) and the Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich ( LLM Eur. and Dr. Jur.). During his Ph.D. studies, he was supported by a scholarship from the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition, and Tax Law (now MPI for Innovation and Competition). At the postdoctoral level, he has received scholarships that allowed him to conduct research as a visiting scholar at Stanford Law School and as an invited overseas researcher at the Institute of Intellectual Property in Tokyo, Japan.

His research interests span the broader field of intellectual property and competition law. Currently, his focus is on US and EU trademark law, unfair competition law, patent law, economic analysis of intellectual property law, comparative intellectual property law, the relationship of intellectual property law and general private law, the interface between Intellectual property and antitrust law.

His latest publications include: Exceptions to Trade Mark Exhaustion: Inalienability Rules for the Protection of Reputational Economic Value [2021] 43(6) European Intellectual Property Review 352-365; Reconstructing the Complete Patent Bargain: The Doctrine of Equivalents , [2020] Intellectual Property Quarterly, Issue 2, 138-160; Strict Liability and Negligence in Copyright Law: Fair Use as Regulation of Activity Levels , 97 Nebraska Law Review 384-468 (2018).

English, German, Greek

Viviana Galletto Farro graduated from the Catholic University of Uruguay with a Juris Doctor degree. She has been a professional judge in Uruguay since 2014, and she is currently nominated by the Supreme Court of Justice of this country for an upcoming promotion. She has attended on a wide range of cases in both civil and criminal law matters, gaining experience as a judge.

She is a contract law specialist and holds an LL .M degree in Contract Law. In addition, she is pursuing an LL .M degree in Criminal Procedure Law, while she currently works on her Ph.D. thesis in Legal and Research Sciences from the Catholic University of Argentine.

She is a graduate teaching assistant in civil and procedural law at the Catholic University of Uruguay. Her writings have been published in numerous legal publications. She has received multiple scholarships and awards, including the Fulbright Scholar grant to study at the University of Michigan Law School as a research scholar.

The purpose of the research will be to identify the relevant legal standards for the admission, evaluation and sufficiency of the evidence presented by the parties in the intermediate stage of the criminal process, in order to discover the truth and achieve effective, fast and fair solutions.

The main focus will be to analyze the objective parameters that constitute the rules of evidence by which judges issue their rulings, so these criteria could be used as a framework in the Uruguayan Criminal Procedure System during the intermediate stage of trials.

Spanish (native), Italian (elementary). 

Jaka Kukavica is a Ph.D. Researcher at European University Institute in Florence, Italy. His Ph.D. project comparatively examines consensus analysis as an interpretative method in various multilevel polities. He is also working as a researcher on “The Court of Justice in the Archives” project at the Academy of European Law and the “Judicial Networks between Supreme Courts in Europe” project led by Prof. Mathias Siems. Before commencing his doctoral project, Kukavica studied law at Ljubljana and Cambridge. He is the Head of Section for European Law at the European Journal of Legal Studies and he served as an Editor of the Cambridge International Law Journal in the past. He has received multiple scholarships and awards, including the Mary Higgins Scholarship and the Lilian Knowles Prize awarded by Girton College, University of Cambridge.

Kukavica’s doctoral research examines the relationship between the structure of multilevel polities and the types of consensus analysis courts use when interpreting legal norms. Kukavica argues that different types of consensus analysis imply different understandings of the value of state autonomy. On these grounds, he examines whether courts use consensus analysis in a way that fits the structure of the multilevel system in which they operate. In particular, he focuses on the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court, the Court of Justice of the EU , the European Court of Human Rights, and the UN Human Rights Committee.

Slovenian (native), Serbo-Croatian, and Italian (proficient)

Caroline Maciel is a doctoral researcher in open data of the Quality of Law Research Clinic, which is a member of the International Association of Legislation. She works as Regulatory Affairs and Government Relations at Stone Co (financial and software solutions) and is interested in Big Techs entrance in financial markets and how regulation should approach this matter. She studied Law at UFMG (Brazil) and University of Leeds ( UK ) and won two of the university’s prizes (best in civil and procedure law). Her master degree Institutions and Public Policies (Arraes: 2019) won two awards. She was a Research Fellow at AI Labs in a project on artificial intelligence to understand Congress. Her teaching and academic activities include courses on law and technology, constitutional law, administrative law and legal theory. Her writings have been published in numerous peer-reviewed publications, some in english.

Caroline’s research addresses how technology, such as machine learning-based systems, can be used to improve regulatory and legislative risk management. She argues that Brazil has substantial unequal access to public data and political players. Given this, tools to automatically process, analyze and categorize data, identify trends and predict best courses of legal action could change how advocacy is done, reducing this asymmetry. She analyzes some of these situations in financial market, as Big Tech’s started to provide payment services in Brazil. She chose to collect improvements from the US private and public sector because it is one of the front-runners in AI and algorithmic transparency, which can be used in Regulatory Impact Assessment Brazilian models. She evaluates how to decipher the government’s decision-making process patterns (without losing the political aspect) and the possible benefits to the democratic and economic development. 

Portuguese (native), English (proficient) and Spanish (intermediate)

Veena Manikulam is a PhD student at the Institute for International Law and Comparative Constitutional Law at the University of Zurich in Switzerland. From 2019 to 2021, she served as Research and Teaching Assistant at the University of Zurich, where she taught several courses and co-authored three articles in the area of international economic law. Prior to pursuing her PhD studies, she received an LL .M. in Transnational Law from King’s College London and a Master of Laws from the University of Zurich. In 2016, she was an exchange student at the National Law School of India University. Her interests include international economic law, transnational law and human rights law.

Veena Manikulam’s research centres on the reform of international investment law. In her PhD thesis she addresses to what extent the concept of investor accountability has been incorporated in investment law. Based on the insufficient adoption of investor accountability in existing investment agreements, her research focuses on the question how mechanisms to enforce substantive standards (including human rights, labour and environmental standards) could be designed to adequately incorporate the notion of investor accountability in investment law. Manikulam argues that a transnational approach to this question presents the chance to propose innovative enforcement mechanisms.

German (native), Malayalam (native), French (proficient), Hindi (limited working proficiency), Arabic (limited working proficiency)

Marcin Menkes is an Associate Professor at Warsaw School of Economics, in the Department of Business Law, where he also heads the Post-Graduate Studies of Law and Economics of the Capital Market. He is a member of the International Law Association Committee on the Rule of Law in International Investment Law and the Investor-States Dispute Settlement Academic Forum. He has held visiting fellowships at top universities including Cornell University, Cambridge University, Università di Torino, Università degli Studi di Firenze, and Università di Bologna.

His research interests include international investment arbitration, international monetary and financial matters, sovereign debt restructuring, sovereign immunities, and economic sanctions. He has published four books, over 100 scientific articles, and more than 1,000 blog posts, newspaper articles, etc.

Besides his academic work, he is also Of Counsel in Queirtius, an international litigation and arbitration law firm.

Menkes’s recent piecemeal projects are part of a larger research agenda on the evolution of public international law. His overarching hypothesis is that current diagnoses of the Westaphalian international order crisis are superficial and address only symptoms, not the roots of change.

While at Michigan Law School, he will examine the extent to which blockchain carries the potential to go beyond what has been debated and analyzed so far: to undermine the legal personality of states, to recognize the personality of MNE s, to open up the catalog of sources of law, and, ultimately, to undermine the foundations of the entire system.

Polish (native), French (proficient), Italian (proficient), Spanish (Intermediary), Dutch (elementary)

Zarina Mussakhojayeva is a lawyer specializing in international trade law and compliance, focusing particularly on regulatory compliance, international sanctions, and anti-bribery regulations. Zarina has worked for multinational companies, advising on corporate compliance and governance issues in the areas of Antitrust, U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, U.K. Bribery Act, Antiboycott and economic sanctions. Zarina is an experienced lawyer qualified to practice law in Kazakhstan with professional experience covering matters related to mining operations, corporate finance, and mergers and acquisitions in the oil and gas industry.

Zarina received her B.A. in law from Kazakh Humanitarian Law University in 2006, where she received the University President’s Scholarship award. In 2008 she obtained her LL .M. degree at Duke University School of Law. Zarina was awarded a prestigious Kazakhstan Government-sponsored International Scholarship to pursue her studies at Duke. Zarina studied at American University in Washington, D.C. and Minnesota State University as an exchange student under the U.S. Department of State “Freedom Support Act” Fellowship Program.

Zarina’s research focuses on regulatory and legal aspects of implementing global compliance practices in Russia and Kazakhstan. The research is intended to identify regulatory compliance challenges faced by multinational corporations operating in the region. It is aimed at analyzing applicable regulatory environment in these post-Soviet countries, understanding available compliance function and established practices, and investigating recent FCPA enforcement actions. The research identifies the OFAC -imposed economic sanctions and Russian countersanctions and conflict between Russian antimonopoly legislation and U.S. anti-boycott regulations as key areas for further examination. In addition, some of the essential legal concepts are proposed to overcome the identified challenges.

Kazakh (native), Russian (native), and English (fluent)

Azusa Ogasawara has been a public prosecutor in Japan for six years. She graduated from Kyoto University Law School with a Juris Doctor degree. She has worked on a wide range of cases in both the investigation and trial departments, gaining experience as a practicing lawyer. She was recommended by the Public Prosecutors Office in Japan and is currently studying at the University of Michigan Law School as a research scholar.

Azusa’s research investigates legislative and operational issues related to laws against money laundering. In recent years, Japan has seen an increase in the amount of money laundering cases. However, the reaction of Japan to these crimes has not been fulfilling due to the lack of our experience in this field; thus, Japan must consider further strengthening its regulations while referring to the efforts of other countries. She chose these issues, because she believed that studying in the U.S., where research in this field is more advanced, would provide meaningful results for Japanese criminal justice.

Japanese (native)

Aparna Singh is a lawyer licensed to practice in India. She holds law degrees from the University of Cambridge ( U.K. ) and the University of Delhi (India).

After graduating from Cambridge with an LL .M. degree in International Law, she joined Fietta LLP (London). At Fietta LLP , she assisted in ongoing investor-state arbitrations and even worked on several maritime law issues including, but not limited to, extent of the territorial waters of archipelagic states.

Prior to pursuing the LL .M. program, Aparna practiced law in India for four years. As a Senior Associate at a premier law firm, she represented private parties and government authorities in cases covering diverse areas of law, ranging from government regulation to cross-border transactions. Aparna also had the opportunity to work on several international arbitrations and received favorable awards for the firm’s clients.

Before coming to the University of Michigan Law School, Aparna practiced as an Arbitration Consultant in India, advising clients on international and domestic arbitration issues. 

Aparna’s current research includes a comparative analysis of regulatory regimes adopted in developed and developing countries to promote cross-border transactions and foreign direct investment. She intends to expand the scope of this research by looking at regulatory practices adopted by the U.S. and how India’s recent reforms stand in comparison. In light of India’s recent termination of many of its Bilateral Investment Treaties ( BIT s), this research will also encompass India’s dispute resolution system, both within and without the new Model BIT , and how it can be improved to meet the challenges ahead.

Hindi (native), Spanish (basic/learning)

John Trajer is a doctoral researcher in law at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Over the course of his PhD, he has been a visiting fellow at the Amsterdam Centre for Migration and Refugee Law (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) and at the Dickson Poon School of Law (King’s College London). Prior to commencing his doctoral degree, he obtained a BA from the University of Oxford, a Joint MA from the universities of Göttingen and Groningen, and an LLM from the European University Institute. He has acquired professional experience in the field of migration and refugee law at a range of NGO s and international organizations, including the AIRE Centre (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe), the Hungarian Helsinki Committee, and the Council of Europe.

John’s doctoral research explores the scope of states’ protective duties towards trafficked

persons under international and regional European law. Specifically, it examines the conditions under which host states are obliged to ensure access to rehabilitative assistance for trafficked migrants, focusing on points of intersection between anti-trafficking, human rights, and refugee law. Beyond his PhD project, John is interested generally in the fields of migration, criminal, and international human rights law. At the European University Institute, he is one of the coordinators of the Migration Working Group (Migration Policy Centre) and an active participant of the Human and Fundamental Rights Working Group (Law Department). He is also a member of the Human Trafficking Research Network based at Queen’s University Belfast.

John is proficient in Hungarian and Italian, while he speaks Dutch and German at an upper-intermediate level.

I am Professor of International Law and Co-Director of  PluriCourts – Centre for the Study of the Legitimate Roles of the Judiciary in the Global Order , University of Oslo, Norway. I have been Director of the Norwegian Centre for Human Rights, University of Oslo. I was Co-chair of the International Law Association’s Study Group on the ‘Content and Evolution of the Rules of Interpretation’ and am Chair of the Scientific Advisory Board, Max Planck Institute for Procedural Law, Luxembourg. I have been a member of the Executive Board of the European Society of International Law.

I will give a special course as part of the 2022 Hague Academy Winter Course on ‘Deference by International Courts and Tribunals to National Organs’. I have committed to write a book on the basis of the lectures, to be published in the Academy’s  Collected Courses . I am looking forward to writing the book in the research environment provided by the University of Michigan.

English (some German and French)

Thomas Verellen is Assistant Professor in European Union and International Law at Utrecht University (Netherlands) and a Research Fellow at the Institute for European Law, KU Leuven (Belgium). Thomas is an expert in EU and comparative foreign relations law and has a particular interest in the impact of geopolitical change on the governance of EU trade and investment policy. 

Thomas defended his PhD entitled ‘ EU Foreign Relations Federalism. A Comparison with the United States, Canada and Belgium’ at KU Leuven in September 2019. From 2018 to 2020, Thomas practiced EU and international trade law at the Brussels office of Bird & Bird LLP . Thomas has held visiting positions at the University of Michigan Law School (2016-2017) and the Université de Montréal (2015) and was a trainee in the chambers of Professor Koen Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice of the EU  (2015).

At Michigan, Thomas will start a comparative research project on legal and political accountability mechanisms in EU and U.S. trade and investment policy, and he will work on the book version of his PhD, which will be published in 2022 as part of Oxford University Press’ Comparative Constitutionalism series. In addition, Thomas will teach European Union Law at Michigan during the 2022 Winter Term.

Dutch, French and English

Dr. Eddie Wei is an International and Comparative Law Research Scholar at the University of Michigan Law School under the mentorship of Professors Catharine MacKinnon and Kimberly Thomas. During his stay in Michigan, he is also a postdoctoral fellow in the China- US Scholar Program, which is administered by the International Institute of Education. Dr. Wei received his PhD in Gender Studies from the University of Cambridge and JSD from City University of Hong Kong. His research interests include judges’ gender and sentencing, sexual abuse and violence, and feminist judgments project. He received the Graduate Student Paper Award from the Division on Women and Crime, American Society of Criminology in 2019, as well as the Jiang-Land-Wang Outstanding Student Paper Award from the Association of Chinese Criminology and Criminal Justice in the same year. His publications can be found in peer-reviewed journals, such as Feminist Criminology, Feminist Legal Studies, British Journal of Criminology, Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, and International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology . He has been a member of the All China Lawyers Association since 2008.

Legal studies worldwide have documented the ways in which sentences of rape are influenced by victims’ relationships with offenders. The systematic failure to effectively sanction private sexual violence speaks to the influence of extra-legal factors on judges’ decision-making processes. Nevertheless, what typically has been found in the literature on the categorization of rape offenders is the dichotomy between strangers and non-strangers to victims. Such classification is problematic because of the distinct nature of the relationships captured in acquaintance rape. I will use a more refined categorization of victim-offender relationships to examine the predictive power of relationship type in sentencing outcomes.

Mandarin (native) and Cantonese (proficient)

Sonya Ziaja is an assistant professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, where she teaches Environmental Law; Climate Adaptation, Law and Equity; and Property. Ziaja holds a Ph.D. in Geography from the University of Arizona; M.Sc. in Water Science, Policy and Management from the University of Oxford; and J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law.

Ziaja’s research interests focus on the overlapping areas of environmental governance and law, technology and society: How can environmental law and institutions sustainably adjust to rapidly changing bio-geophysical conditions and societal demands associated with climate change? And with what consequences for equity and democratic participation? Her approach to these questions draws on her interdisciplinary background in geography, water policy and law, as well as her practical knowledge of energy regulation.

Prior to entering academia, Ziaja worked in energy regulation at the California Public Utilities Commission and was the research lead for the Water, Energy, Climate Nexus at the California Energy Commission. She was a lead author of California’s Fourth Climate Assessment. Her research has informed the climate adaptation strategy of the U.S. National Parks Service and the first climate adaptation regulation of investor-owned energy utilities in California.

Dr. Ziaja’s current research project examines an emerging paradox in climate adaptation and equity. Climate adaptation is necessarily dependent on algorithm assisted decision making. These algorithmic tools are new fora for deliberation and environmental lawmaking. But these necessary tools also embed value laden assumptions and biases that make them counter to democratic participation and equity. This project is based on multiple years of qualitative research and detailed analysis of two cases where decision support software has informed climate adaptation for water and energy sectors. Through these case studies, Ziaja’s research provides a novel framework for evaluating procedural and substantive equity in algorithmic tools. Early versions of this research benefitted from discussions at the University of Columbia’s Sabin Colloquium for Innovative Environmental Scholarship and the University of Michigan Law School’s Junior Scholars Conference. Ziaja’s article, How Algorithm Assisted Decision  Making is Influencing Environmental Law and Climate Adaptation , is forthcoming in volume 48 of Ecology Law Quarterly .

Lorenzo Giovanni Luisetto is a Ph.D. student in Comparative and European legal studies from the University of Trento in Italy. Prior to receiving his scholarship to pursue his Ph.D, studies, he received an M.A. in law at the University of Trento. Luisetto received the Giorgio Ghezzi Award - Mention of Merit in 2018 for the adoption of a comparative and multidisciplinary method in his master’s thesis, entitled  “Working Conditions at “Amazon”: a Comparison between the United States and Italy.”  In 2018 he was a Visiting Researcher at the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations ( AFL - CIO ), Washington D.C. ( USA ), and in 2020 he was a Visiting Scholar at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven ( BE ), where he worked at the Institute for Labour Law. His research interests include Comparative Labor and Employment Law, Antitrust Law and EU  Law.

Luisetto’s research focuses on the interaction between Antitrust Law and Labor and Employment Law. He is conducting a comparative study between the United States’ and the European Union’s models of anti-competition law and their application to labor issues. His research question is based on the ineffectiveness of both Labor and Employment Law in protecting workers and the possibility of antitrust principles providing better protections for workers in different kinds of labor markets. Luisetto argues that antitrust should not only focus on consumer welfare but also on other important interests, such as the welfare of workers. More generally, he believes the goals of anti-competition law should be reconsidered in order to expand protection for labor. 

Francesco Marotta is a doctoral student in commercial law at the University of Padua. He was awarded a doctoral scholarship in 2019 after submitting a research project aimed at investigating the main legal issues posed by the Italian insolvency law reform. After graduating in Law at the same university in 2017, he worked for a year and a half as a deputy Public Prosecutor’s assistant in the section of the Prosecutor’s office specialized in economic, financial and tax crimes. He currently holds lessons and seminars for students at the university during the course of Commercial Law and Business Crisis Law. Marotta published academic articles/papers on insolvency and commercial law in various Italian law reviews. He is also a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute (International member) and the International Association of Restructuring, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Professionals ( INSOL ). 

Marotta’s research interests lie primarily within international comparison of insolvency laws, with a particular emphasis on the different legislative policies aimed at preventing insolvency and promoting business rehabilitation. Marotta’s research project analyses, with a comparative approach, the differences between the Italian and American legal regimes governing the prevention of business crisis. His purpose is to verify if the U.S. system is the most suitable for preventing insolvency without jeopardizing companies themselves. In this way, it will be possible to draw several inspirations to improve the Italian insolvency law, especially considering the high percentage of businesses that will probably experience financial difficulties due to the outbreak of the COVID -19 pandemic.

An Guohui is a Ph.D. candidate majoring in law and economics at China University of Political Science and Law. He focuses on economic analysis of law, especially administrative law and tort law. He studied law in China-Euro School of Law and received a Juris Master. Before he started his Ph.D. program, he worked in the China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, Chinese official Export Credit Agency. He previously was in an internship at the International Finance Corporation (World Bank Group) as a temporary consultant.

The social disciplining on various wrong doings is a new and fast-growing means of regulation. The wrong doings consist of criminal offense, administrative offense, contempt of court, bad faith in civil cases, etc. These are supposed to reduce the social transaction cost by reinforcing the authority and enforcement of law. As a very new regulation with universal influences, the disciplining is lack of prudent demonstration. Especially, an economic analysis needs to be used to deliberate the cost and benefit of the regulation. Due process in the disciplining is also a key issue.

Janis Beckedorf is a fellow of the doctoral research group “Digital Law” at Heidelberg University, an interdisciplinary institution of the Faculty of Law and Computer Science carrying out fundamental research to prepare and accompany the development of legal expert systems. Janis studied law at Bucerius Law School in Hamburg, Germany and at the University of Michigan during the fall term of 2014. Currently, he works on his PhD thesis and conducts a research project on “Complex Societies and the Growth of the Law” with three other scholars. Janis’ research is funded by the Foundation of German Economy (Stiftung der deutschen Wirtschaft) and the State of Baden-Württemberg. He is co-founder of iusio, a company providing customized software to law firms and insolvency administrators. 

Tax law is regularly criticized for being too complex. What does complexity mean in respect of law, how can it be quantified and what insights can be gained about law? To answer these questions, the research uses insights from economics, systems theory and network science. The first objective is to elaborate a definition of legal complexity. The second objective is to develop new methods to measure legal complexity laying a focus on network science. As underlying data for these approaches, the research uses federal laws of the United States and Germany as well as court decisions.

Won Kyung Chang is an associate professor in the Scranton Honors Program at Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea. She received a joint doctoral degree (Ph.D. in Law and Social Science) from the Maurer School of Law and the School of Public and Environmental Affairs at Indiana University-Bloomington.

Her research addresses a broad range of issues related to society, law, and public administration, including legal consciousness and legal culture, alternative dispute resolution, collaborative public administration, biomedical law and ethics, legal interpreting, and school violence. She has published around 30 articles in journals of law and public administration, such as  Asian Journal of Law and Society ,  Canadian Journal of Law and Society , and  Public Administrative Review . She also serves as a member of the Conflict Management Committee in the Ministry of Justice, Republic of Korea, and as a member of the board of directors in the Korean Society for the Sociology of Law and the Asian Women Law Association.

Dr. Chang’s main research question has always been how to design a legal apparatus that gives a sense that the justice system is, in fact, just. In searching for answers, she studied different concepts of justice—procedural, distributive, restorative, and relational—in alternative disputes resolution, public participation in administrative procedure, and biomedical law and ethics. Currently, she is investigating the institutionalization and evolution of American class actions, a project she believes will provide a basis for analyzing the mobilization of collectivized disputes in South Korea, and, ultimately, contribute to elaborating the theory of interaction between social transition and legal systems.

Lukáš Hrdlička is a Ph.D. candidate at the Faculty of Law of Charles University in Prague and a former bills drafter working for the Ministry of Finance. Lukáš was asked to draft a bill implementing the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (“ ATAD ”), thus becoming the author of the first rules dealing with hybrid mismatches enacted in the Czech Republic. He was also a member of the team drafting the first exit tax and CFC rules in the Czech Republic.

Regarding his studies, Lukáš is the principal investigator of the “International Co-operation in Tax Matters” research project funded by the Grant Agency of the Charles University and a researcher of several other research projects. His article about loopholes in the ATAD ’s CFC rules won the faculty prize and led to an amendment of a proposed bill implementing the ATAD . Lukáš is a co-author of a commentary to the Income Tax Act and a recipient of the prestigious Hlávka Foundation scholarship.

Lukáš’ research encompasses both taxation and financial regulations, but his visit to the University of Michigan Law School shall be focused rather on tax policy, income taxation, and, particularly, international taxation from the US and EU perspective, e.g. hybrid mismatch rules, CFC rules. In his current research, Lukáš analyzes the impact of the OECD anti- BEPS project on the European tax system and how the proposed and/or enacted EU rules implementing this project should be amended to become more effective and bring a greater fairness to the European tax system.

Dr. Constantin Hruschka works as a Senior Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy in Munich since November 2017. He is part of the Research Initiative of the Max Planck Society in “Challenges of Migration, Integration and Exclusion” (for further information see:  https://www.eth.mpg.de/4397290/wimi ). 

Before fully returning to academia, he had inter alia worked as head of the protection department at the Swiss Refugee Council (2014-2017) and as a lawyer for UNHCR , the UN Refugee Agency (2004-2014) in Nuremberg and Geneva. Dr. Hruschka studied law, history and philosophy in Würzburg, Poitiers and Paris. He holds a PhD in history from the university of Würzburg and a maîtrise en histoire from Université Paris IV (Sorbonne). In addition, he is a fully qualified lawyer and has passed his bar exam in 2002. 

He is teaching European Law and European Asylum Law as well as Human Rights Law mainly at the Universities in Germany and Switzerland. 

His current research project is focused on responsibility sharing mechanisms in the asylum context from a regional and global perspective. He looks into the structural challenges of regional and global asylum governance as well as into the compatibility of existing schemes with the 1951 Convention and the human rights standards. This focus derives from his longstanding research on the Common European Asylum System and on the 1951 Convention.  In addition to his research on refugee law, he is currently working on a research project looking at the access of European Union citizens to welfare in other EU Member States in cooperation with the University of Lausanne.  He has authored many publications on international, European, Swiss and German asylum and migration law inter alia he co-authored (with Francesco Maiani) a commentary on the Dublin III Regulation, is co-editing a comprehensive commentary on the Swiss migration law (5th edition 2019) and is the editor of the first German language commentary on the 1951 Convention (forthcoming 2020).

Niamh Kinchin is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Law, University of Wollongong, NSW , Australia. Niamh teaches Administrative Law, Constitutional Law and Refugee Law. From 2008-14 she was as a sessional lecturer at the University of Wollongong and the University of New South Wales ( UNSW ), teaching a variety of subjects including Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Torts and Contracts Law. Prior to teaching, she worked at the Commonwealth Administrative Appeals Tribunal as a legal officer. Niamh was admitted as a legal practitioner to the Supreme Court of NSW in 2002. She holds a Bachelor of Social Science from University of Newcastle, a Bachelor of Laws (Hons Class 1) from Western Sydney University, a Masters of Administrative Law and Policy from University of Sydney and a PhD from UNSW . The title of Niamh’s PhD is ‘Accountability in the Global Space: Plurality, Complexity and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees’.

Niamh’s primary research interests are in global accountability and administrative justice, administrative decision-making within the refugee context and constitutional interpretation within the international and Australian settings. Her current research includes projects on the potential and risks of artificial intelligence in refugee status determination, the accountability of UNHCR in a time of Global Compacts, the interpretation of the constitutions of international organizations, NGO participation in the United Nations ( UN ) and the evolution of constitutional principles in Australia. In December 2018, Niamh published a monograph with Edward Elgar Publishing ( UK ) focusing upon Administrative Justice within the UN .

Andreas Th. Müller is Full Professor at the Department of European Law and Public International Law of the University of Innsbruck, Austria. He studied law and philosophy at the Universities of Innsbruck, Strasbourg and Yale Law School. He has been a regular Visiting Professor at the University of Alcalá, Spain, the Universidad Panamericana, Mexico, as well as Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. In 2009/2010, he clerked for Judges Abdul G. Koroma and Bruno Simma at the International Court of Justice. His habilitation thesis dealt with Effet direct. The Direct Effect of EU Law. He is the principal investigator of the research project “Permissive Rules in Public International Law”, funded by the FWF (Austrian Science Fund). His teaching activities include courses on public international law, EU law, constitutional law, asylum and migration law and legal philosophy. 

Müller’s research focuses on international human rights law, international humanitarian law, international criminal law, international and European migration and asylum law, EU constitutional law and questions of legal philosophy and legal theory. His current research project starts from the observation that lawyers are trained to focus on rules ordering or prohibiting a certain conduct. However, numerous examples for permissive rules can be found also in public international law. The research project seeks to identify and systematize them and examine whether a distinction between thin and thick permissive rules may help to better conceptualize the architecture of contemporary public international law.

Tatjana Papić ( LL .B. Belgrade, LL .M. Connecticut, PhD Union Belgrade) is a professor of international law at the Union University Belgrade Law School. She teaches courses in public international law, international human rights law, and the European Court of Human Rights. She was a Visiting Professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law (2013). She is a former Head of Legal Department of the Belgrade Centre for Human Rights. Tatjana received Ron Brown Fellowship and OSI ’s Civil Society Scholar Award. She has published on questions of law of international responsibility, human rights, European Court of Human Rights and domestic reception of international law. Her work has been cited by the UN International Law Commission and the High Court of England and Wales.

Tatjana’s research addresses interactions between international law and domestic politics in post-conflict societies. Specifically, she explores impact of the international dispute settlement mechanisms – both on a dispute as such and on parties in the dispute – by focusing on highly political cases involving the states of the former Yugoslavia. Tatjana is, in particular, interested to see if, how and to what extent these proceedings have affected bilateral relations of the states involved, as well as their internal political dynamics and discourse. This will provide a background against which broader conclusions can be reached on the potential of legal means of settling international disputes in a post-conflict setting.

Louise Southalan is a lawyer working in the area of prison and detention health systems and is currently undertaking a  Churchill Fellowship  examining ways in which national agencies can best support state-based prison and jail mental health services.  As part of this travelling fellowship, she is delighted to be spending September at the University of Michigan Law School as a Michigan Grotius Research Scholar.

Louise works in the  Western Australian Department of Justice  on prison health projects and as a researcher with the  Justice Health Unit in the University of Melbourne’s School of Population and Global Health .  Her current projects with the University of Melbourne include undertaking a review for the  Australian National Mental Health Commission  on justice and health policies and strategies at federal and state levels, to identify ways in which they could better meet the mental health needs of justice-involved people.  Her previous roles include:

Working for  Australian Red Cross  monitoring conditions of detention in immigration detention facilities, 

In the  Western Australian Mental Health Commission , commissioning prison mental health services and developing forensic policy, and

Practicing as a lawyer.

She is very interested in international collaborations involving prison and detention health and would welcome opportunities to collaborate with colleagues from the University of Michigan.  Louise is a steering committee member of  WEPHREN , the Worldwide Prison Health Research and Engagement Network , a non-executive director of  HepatitisWA , and a collaborator on several international justice health projects.  She has a law degree and masters degrees in International Development and in Mental Health Policy and Services and is a graduate of the  Australian Institute of Company Directors .

Piotr Tereszkiewicz is a tenured Associate Professor of Private Law at Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland, and a Senior Research Affiliate at the University of Leuven, Belgium. After obtaining his PhD at Jagiellonian University and a Magister Juris Degree at University of Oxford, Tereszkiewicz spent several years as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Heidelberg, working on comparative contract law, funded by German Research Council. At Jagiellonian University, Tereszkiewicz teaches core private law courses (including contracts, torts, succession) as well as international commercial contracts. His published works deal in particular with contract and commercial law, financial services regulation, mostly from a comparative, international and European perspective. Tereszkiewicz held visiting positions among others in Zurich, Ferrara and Bloomington (Mauer School of Law).

Tereszkiewicz’s research analyzes the practice and theory of commercial cooperation between manufacturers and their suppliers and dealers in the automobile industry in the United States and selected European countries. It explores what legal and non-legal (economic, social, cultural) factors determine the content of long-term cooperation between manufacturers and their suppliers and dealers. The central assumption of the study is that an in-depth examination of network governance within the automotive industry should build upon three major perspectives: the economic approach, the sociological approach and the contract law approach. In particular, a profound comparative study of contract law rules dealing with manufacturer-supplier and manufacturer-dealer relationships is undertaken.

Sina Van den Bogaert, Dr. jur. (2017), Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University (Frankfurt am Main), is a Legal Officer at the European Commission in Brussels, and a voluntary research affiliate at the KU Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies. She is a former Research Fellow of the Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law in Heidelberg. Her doctoral dissertation on Segregation of Roma Children in Education (Brill Nijhoff: 2018) was awarded magna cum laude. The dissertation examines how the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Council of Europe) and the Racial Equality Directive 2000/43/ EC (European Union) have contributed towards desegregation of Roma children in education in Europe. Sina has also published several articles on European Non-discrimination Law. 

Sina has been awarded a post-doc Fulbright and BAEF grant to study how US desegregation injunctions can be of inspiration for European judges when they seek to establish a proportionate, dissuasive and effective sanction mechanism in cases of school segregation. She argues that European judges should impose positive desegregation measures on infringers, if the effectiveness of the Racial Equality Directive is to be ensured. She identifies a recent shift in jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union towards ‘effective judicial protection’ for practicing rights derived from EU law, to the detriment of procedural autonomy of the EU Member States. She will focus on two intertwined developments: tackling domestic obstacles to effective enforcement and the possible creation of remedies otherwise unavailable in domestic law, based on the notion of ‘effectiveness’ and on Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Wang Qi is a Ph.D. candidate at the School of Law of Renmin University of China ( RUC ). He studies commercial law as his major and works as a research assistant in the Research Center of Civil and Commercial Jurisprudence of RUC , which is funded by the Ministry of Education of China. Wang Qi received his master’s degree from RUC and bachelor’s degree from Wuhan University both in law. He was awarded the “Outstanding Graduate” by the Beijing Municipal Education Commission in 2017. He has been awarded a scholarship under the China Scholarship Council ( CSC ) to pursue study at the University of Michigan Law School. Wang Qi has participated in several research projects, including “The Theory and Practice of Dual-Class Share Structure”, “The Institutional Structure of the Initial Compensation of Sponsors”, and “The Regulation of Securities Investor Protection”. He has published a number of academic papers in numerous Chinese journals.

Wang’s research focuses on the securities investor protection in China. He chose to study this issue, because minority investors constitute the main body of China’s capital markets; therefore, the protection of their interests is closely related to the effective operation of the stock markets. By comparing the investor protection systems between China and the US , he analyzes the institutional deficiencies of investor protection in China based upon China’s Securities Law Amendment and the reform of the registration-based IPO system at the Shanghai Stock Exchange. He is exploring the approaches to improve the investor protection system in China.

Dr. Tadesse Kassa Woldetsadik is an Associate Professor of International Law and Human Rights at Addis Ababa University (Ethiopia) and Principal Advisor to the Ethiopian Investment Commission on Investment Policy and Jobs Compact. He was a Visiting Scholar at the Xiangtan University (China), Martin Luther University of Halle Wittenberg (Germany) and Fulbright Visiting Scholar at the UC Berkeley. He has published a book titled International Watercourses Law in the Nile Basin, Three States at a Crossroads (Routledge, Oxfordshire 2013) and co-authored edited books including Ethiopian-African Perspectives on Human Rights and Good Governance ( NWV Pub., Graz, Austria 2014). He is deeply involved in the drafting of national investment, industrial park, CRRF and refugee related laws and policies in Ethiopia, and has extensively published articles, book chapters and policy briefs on refugee law, human rights, labor rights and legal aspects of Ethiopian foreign policy.

Tadesse’s research focuses on the fast-evolving refugee law and policy setting in Ethiopia. It addresses lingering issues relating to legal frameworks, institutional response mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in the implementation of the new refugee policy and the Comprehensive Refugee Response Framework in Ethiopia. Specifically, the research analyzes what the new normative and institutional responses on refugees imply in terms of the rights of refugees recognized under international instruments and whether such approaches represent sustainable solutions.

Andrew Woodhouse is a lecturer in law at the University of Liverpool and co-director of the EU Law @ Liverpool research unit. Andrew received his PhD in EU law from the University of Liverpool with no corrections. He has engaged with a number of European universities, co-organizing a transnational PhD colloquium with the Universities of Leiden and Oslo and spending time as a visiting researcher at the University of Antwerp. He has taught and lectured on courses in EU law, UK constitutional law and comparative constitutional law. As part of the EU Law @ Liverpool research unit, Andrew has helped to shape the debate on the UK ’s withdrawal from the European Union. This has included engaging with governmental actors, as well as contributing to the public debate through national ( LBC ) and international media ( Yahoo ). 

Andrew’s research interests lie in the area of constitutional law and theory. His PhD research focused on the role of national parliaments in the European Union assessing the limits of national representative democracy in a multi-level governance framework. His work on the potential for judicial review of national parliamentary action in the EU legislative process was published in the  Common Market Law Review . Andrew will continue to explore the role of national parliaments in the European Union as a Michigan Grotius Scholar, reflecting on the extent to which they are being instrumentalized in the EU . In particular, he will ask whether the symbolism of national parliaments is being used by a range of national and European actors in pursuit of political ends.

Junseok Yoon has been a judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Korea for seven years. He has obtained a Master of Laws degree from and has completed Ph.D. coursework in tax law at Seoul National University School of Law. He is also a member of the International Association of Tax Judges and the International Fiscal Association. He has published articles and given presentations on tax issues, such as “Tax Statutory Interpretation in Law and Economic View“, “A Study on Notification on Changes in Amount of Income”, “Requirements of Acquisition Tax Exemption on Real Estate for Religious Organizations”, “Commercial and Tax Accounting in Korea” and “Withholding Tax on Domestic Source Income”. Since he has been interested in and conducted research on other legal issues as well as tax issues, he participated in the WIPO IGC 35th Session and UNCITRAL Working Group 3 ( ISDS Reforms) 37th session as a member of a Korean Delegation.  He is also a member of the Task-Force Team for Judicial Support for the Disabled.    

Junseok’s main research topic is “Prevention of Treaty Abuse and Limitation on Benefits of U.S. Model Income Convention”. He argues that in light of the substantial interaction between Korea and the United States, they might agree to revise the current income tax treaty and align their agreement with contemporary international tax policy on the prevention of treaty abuse. Because there have been few studies on the Korean Supreme Court’s Decision on LOB provision or comprehensive LOB in Korea, his research on the LOB provision will serve as valuable guidance for both judges and researchers.  

Also of Interest

See why the U of I College of Law is an excellent choice for your academic and professional success. See our viewbook

• Admitted Students
• Application Status
• Tuition & Costs

Emphasis Areas

• Business Law
• Environmental Law
• LSAT Prep Courses
• Student Accounts

Academic Administration

Important dates, class schedules, registration, honor code, and other general information for students. More Information

• Academic Calendar
• Room Calendars

Get Involved

• Student Organizations
• Pro Bono Program
• Externships
• Student Handbook
• Academic Success
• Law IT Services

Faculty-Staff Handbook

The Faculty-Staff Handbook provides an online reference for University of Idaho policies. View the FSH

Common Tools

• Human Resources
• Recreation and Wellbeing
• Administrative Procedures Manual (APM)
• Dates & Deadlines

You Can Inspire The Future

Support our students and programs at the College of Law. Inspire the future

Stay Connected

• Meet our Alumni
• Alumni Awards
• Law Advisory Council
• U of I Alumni Assoc.
• Law Library Service
• Find a Vandal
• VandalStore
• Liberty Mutual Benefits

College of Law

Email: [email protected]

Web: College of Law

Physical Address: Menard 101 711 S. Rayburn Drive

Mailing Address: College of Law University of Idaho 875 Perimeter Drive MS 2321 Moscow, ID 83844-2321 Main Office: 208-885-2255 Admissions: 208-885-2300 Legal Clinic: 208-885-6541 Office of the Dean: 208-364-4620

Fax: 208-885-5709

Physical Address: 501 W Front St, Boise, ID 83702

Mailing Address: 501 W Front St, Boise, ID 83702

Phone: 208-885-2255

Fax: 208-334-2176

Moscow Location

Moscow, with its tree-lined sidewalks and quiet places to study, provides several unique learning experiences for the ambitious law student:

Academic Specialties

Located on the University of Idaho campus, our Moscow location offers opportunities for interdisciplinary study.

• Business Law and Entrepreneurship
• Intellectual Property and Technology Law Track
• Natural Resources and Environmental Law
• Native American Law

Concurrent Degrees

• J.D./M.ACCT. (Master of Accountancy)
• J.D./M.S. in Environmental Science
• J.D./M.S./Ph.D. in Water Resources (Law, Management and Policy)
• J.D./P.S.M. (Professional Science Masters) in Natural Resources & Environmental Science

Clinics offer valuable practical experience that gives students a head start in their legal career. The following are available at the Moscow location: Community Law Clinic  and  Immigration Litigation & Appellate Clinic .

Trial Advocacy Program

The Trial Advocacy Program provides an opportunity for third-year law students to learn practical skills in courtroom advocacy from experienced faculty and accomplished judges and practitioners.

Professional Opportunities

In Moscow, students will interact with judges on the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and Idaho Supreme Court, as well as university counsel, local attorneys, visiting speakers and more. The Native American Law conference also provides educational opportunities on the law by and between Tribal, Federal and State governments.

Moscow Community

College Town

Moscow, Idaho, has a population of approximately 24,000 and offers a safe, family-oriented environment. The University of Idaho campus lies among the scenic Palouse region, defined by its vista of blue skies and rolling hills. Many people who come to visit end up making Moscow their home.

Vibrant Community

Moscow’s vibrant downtown area is a short walk from campus and offers several dining options, and a local farmer’s market. Moscow supports a rich art and cultural scene, including the annual Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, a Renaissance Fair, local theater, art galleries, and many family-friendly events. Moscow, Idaho, is also a relatively short drive from other fun cities, including Boise; Portland, Ore.; Spokane, Wash.; Seattle, Wash.; and Missoula, Montana.

The Great Outdoors

The University of Idaho in Moscow offers much to the outdoor enthusiast. Mountains, lakes and rivers feature miles of trails for biking and hiking, skiing and snowboarding, rock climbing, white-water rafting, fishing and camping. In addition, the university has an award-winning Outdoor Recreation Program to help students enjoy these activities with convenient equipment rentals and organized group trips. Make friends and great memories.

Network Opportunities

While you attend the U of I College of Law, you will interact with judges, U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Idaho Supreme Court, university counsel, law firms, intellectual property (IP) and patent lawyers, and many others. Students have many opportunities to build a network right here in the Moscow community.

Find information about degrees, emphasis areas, academic plans, clinics, the pro bono program, externships and more.

Find all your academic information

Family Friendly Moscow

Named a Best Place to Raise a Family, the Moscow location enjoys a family study room, changing tables, assigned study carrels, a lactation room, and community resources that promote a healthy balance between law school and life.

Color Scheme

• Use system setting
• Light theme

This column reflects the opinion of the writer. Learn about the differences between a news story and an opinion column.

How the technology that solved the 4 Idaho killings could solve many more crimes

The breakthrough forensic science known as genetic genealogy is back in the news in the case of the “Idaho Four” home invasion slayings, highlighting yet again what a game-changer this latest crimefighting tool is.

Or, rather, could be.

The brutal stabbing of four University of Idaho students on Nov. 13 as they slept in their Moscow, Idaho, home terrorized a normally peaceful campus and community. Detectives found clues but nothing definitive. Traces of DNA on a knife sheath left at the scene matched no one in the FBI’s massive DNA database of past offenders. As the investigation dragged on, students and residents stopped going out at night, fearing the killer might strike again.

Then investigators turned to genetic genealogy, the ingenious forensic tool that relies on the home DNA tests used by millions of Americans to explore their roots. It leverages that data to identify violent criminals who can’t be found in police files or databases.

In short order, detectives had a suspect in handcuffs: Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old criminology graduate student at Washington State University in Pullman, just across the state line from Moscow. Four grieving families had answers and a community could breathe again, all because of this unique combination of cutting-edge science and old-school family tree research called genetic genealogy.

If that seems almost magical, you’re not wrong. Genetic genealogy entered the limelight nearly five years ago as the key to arresting California’s Golden State Killer. At the same time, a cold case detective in Snohomish County, Washington, used it to solve the 1987 murder of a young couple on a road trip from Canada to Seattle, leading to the world’s first genetic genealogy criminal trial (the subject of my new book, “The Forever Witness”).

Killers who had eluded justice for decades were landing in jail because of this new forensics tool that appeared out of the blue, ending enduring mysteries in a matter of weeks – or less. In the Snohomish County murders of 18-year-old Tanya Van Cuylenborg and her 20-year-old boyfriend, Jay Cook, it took a mere two hours to identify a killer who roamed free for 31 years. Seattle truck driver William Earl Talbott II is now serving two life sentences for the crimes.

These cases showed genetic genealogy as arguably the biggest crime-solving breakthrough since the fingerprint, yet even more powerful, because it goes beyond merely matching crime scene to criminal. It’s also a search tool, the Google of crime.

When these cases broke in 2018 and others followed, it seemed we were entering a new age of crime-solving miracles. This latest triumph in the Idaho Four case seems to confirm the revolution is well underway.

Except … it’s not. The Idaho Four case really proves the opposite, an example of rarity rather than revolution.

Instead of genetic genealogy becoming what it should be after five years – a staple of everyday police work – genetic genealogy remains a novelty deployed in only a handful of “high-profile” investigations. Meanwhile, thousands of “ordinary” murders, rapes and other unsolved violent crimes languish.

The consequences of this failure to launch are stark. Between 500 and 1,000 cases of violent crimes and unidentified human remains have been solved in the last five years through genetic genealogy – averaging at most 200 a year. But there were nearly 60,000 unsolved violent crimes just last year that, like the Idaho Four, came up empty in the FBI’s DNA database, and would have been suitable for genetic genealogy.

It’s hardly a revolution if only 200 out of 60,000 crime victims benefit. Instead, we have two-tier justice, with the latest and greatest going to a select few, while most victims and families continue to wait for answers. Meanwhile, criminals run free, the dead stay unidentified and the innocent remain under needless suspicion when genetic genealogy could rule them out in a heartbeat.

“We expected to be so much further along by now,” says pioneering genetic genealogist CeCe Moore, who solved the Snohomish County case and more than 200 others, making her the leader in the field. It’s a title she would happily relinquish if genetic genealogy truly took off. “We could be doing so much more.”

So why does the vast promise of genetic genealogy remain unfulfilled?

The short answer: money. The feds and the states have dropped the ball. They have provided none of the funding, legislation, transparency, oversight or training that have been a given to lift earlier forensic breakthroughs from obscurity to ubiquity. So most crime labs can’t do it. Most cops don’t understand it. Genetic genealogy is not part of their standard operating procedures.

This is shameful, but not hard to see why: It’s all about origins, turf and pride.

Genetic genealogy came not from forensic experts, crime labs and law enforcement, but from hobbyists researching family trees. More than 40 million Americans have bought inexpensive DNA tests online, spit in a tube and sent those kits to 23andMe, Ancestry or other consumer DNA companies. All the while, they were doing genetic genealogy without knowing it, crowdsourcing family trees by sharing DNA profiles in big databases.

Then pioneers such as Moore realized this could be a powerful tool for other things: to help adoptees find birth families, or amnesiacs learn their identities – or to find the distant relatives of killers, then build out their family trees until the culprit’s name was revealed.

The forensics community scoffed when Moore first suggested this “investigative genetic genealogy,” and even after Golden State and Snohomish County, these experts were slow to accept that citizen scientists with their $69 DNA tests bought on Amazon could do things the best crime labs in the world could not.

But it’s time they got over themselves, and it’s time Congress, the Justice Department and the states put up the dollars needed to turn a novelty into the daily business of police work. Funding is needed to ramp up two big moves: training local police nationwide and equipping the hundreds of public crime labs to process DNA for genetic genealogy. Right now, about a half-dozen private labs are handling this for the whole country, a very expansive bottleneck.

“There’s no question in my mind that this technology should be the law enforcement standard,” says Anne Marie Schubert, the former Sacramento County District Attorney who presided over the Golden State Killer case, now working at DNA forensics company Verogen. “This is the greatest tool since the fingerprint.”

Tens of thousands more murders, rapes and other violent crimes will continue to go unsolved each year if this “novelty” doesn’t become an everyday reality. Let’s honor the Idaho Four by making sure that every other case counts, too.

Edward Humes is the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and author of “The Forever Witness: How DNA and Genealogy Solved a Cold Case Double Murder.”

More from this author

• Visit the Loyola University New Orleans page

Take command of your career.

Bachelor of criminology & justice (online).

Making the world a better place with your online criminal justice degree.

These are complex goals and begin with addressing the roots of crime and working toward equality. Criminal justice professionals make these lofty ambitions their personal mission by developing effective crime prevention and intervention strategies, understanding the consequences of crime for victims and society, and working toward justice policies that rehabilitate offenders and improve our society as a whole.

Request Information

Start the conversation — learn more about your program of interest.

How to Apply

Review the admission requirements for Loyola's online bachelor of criminology & justice.

Online Criminal Justice Degree Curriculum

Loyola University New Orleans now offers a 100% online bachelor of criminology & justice degree that features a strong social science research component allowing students to take a deep dive into the field. Learn how to conduct original research and critique agency-generated research in order to see the bigger picture. Students in the online criminal justice program are encouraged to ask questions about our social structures as a whole, not only to understand the implications that these constructs have on crime, but also to learn how we can make the world a better place.

Degree Overview

Major courses.

• Loyola Core
• General Electives

120 credits

Bachelor of criminology and justice

Loyola's online criminology degree consists of 120 credit hours, which includes:

• 35 credits of major-specific courses
• 39 credits of Loyola core courses
• 46 credits of general elective courses

Check out the University Bulletin to view further curriculum information and download a degree worksheet.

Criminology and Justice Major Courses (35 credits):

• CRIM A105: Introduction to Criminal Justice Systems (3 credits)
• CRIM A110: Criminology: Fundamentals (3 credits)
• CRIM A260: Statistics in Criminal Justice (3 credits)
• CRIM A262: Statistics in Criminal Justice Lab (1 credit)
• CRIM A300: Research Methods– Criminology (3 credits)
• CRIM A302: Research Methods in Criminology Lab (1 credit)

For the remainder of major course credits, students choose courses from the following areas:

• Criminological Analysis (3 credits)
• Law (3 credits)
• Victimology/Victim Services (3 credits)
• Administration of Justice (3 credits)
• Corrections (3 credits)
• *Criminology Electives (6 credits)

*Electives can be either Criminology and Justice electives, Forensic Science electives, a capstone project, or an internship approved by your advisor.

Loyola Core Courses

Bachelor of Criminology and Justice

Loyola Core Courses (39 credits):

The goal of the Loyola Core is to foster students’ competency in five key areas:

• Critical Thinking
• Effective Communication
• Quantitative Reasoning
• Information Literacy
• Ethical Reasoning

To help students in the online criminal justice program develop these competencies, the Loyola Core embraces an interdisciplinary approach to learning with an emphasis on the spiritual and intellectual, the moral and ethical, the natural and social scientific, the humanistic, and the artistic.

Foundation Courses

Foundation courses should be taken in your first three online sessions at Loyola and include:

• First-Year Seminar
• English – Critical Reading & Writing
• Math Models or Finite Math
• Science Process – Investigating Nature

Knowledge & Values Courses

Students complete courses in the following 9 categories:

• Creative Arts & Cultures
• History Sequence (2 courses for 6 total credit hours)
• Natural Science in Context
• Philosophy I: Introduction to the Philosophy of Reasoning
• Philosophy II: Philosophy of Knowledge & Morality
• Religious Studies I: Christian Traditions
• Religious Studies II: World Religions
• Writing About Literature
• *Major Substitution

One of the courses in the Loyola Core will be satisfied in each undergraduate major. This is usually the introductory course for each major. The result is the total hours to complete the Loyola Core are reduced to between 39 and 41 credit hours (depending on lab requirements associated with Math and Science courses).

General Elective Courses

General Elective Courses (46 credits)

The online criminology bachelor’s degree requires 46 credits of general electives. There is a wide range of online elective courses to choose from in other departments.

What can you do with an online criminal justice degree?

open the door to new opportunities

Loyola’s 100% online criminal justice degree will prepare you for advanced studies (such as in the master of criminology & justice program) or to enter the workforce in a wide range of careers that contribute to a safer world, including:

• Corrections Officer
• Criminal Detective
• Customs Officer
• Forensic Specialist
• Fraud Investigator
• Private Investigator
• Police Officer
• Policy Analyst
• U.S. Marshal
• Victim Services

Accreditation and National Recognitions

Get in touch with one of our enrollment specialists – we are here to support you.

[email protected]

504-588-6025

Fact-checking the Democratic convention: What Kamala Harris, others got right (and wrong)

Vice President Kamala Harris and the dozens of speakers that preceded her at Thursday's Democratic National Convention attacked former President Donald Trump on an array of fronts, including abortion, diplomacy and his litany of criminal charges.

Not all of it was true.

The USA TODAY Fact Check team followed along to sort fact from fiction and add context where it was missing.

More from the Fact-Check Team:   How we pick and research claims  |  Email newsletter  |  Facebook page

Kamala Harris claim: Trump tariffs would cost households $4,000 per year 

Trump tariffs ‘"would raise prices on middle-class families by almost $4,000 a year ."

This overstates the impact economists project from Trump’s proposed 10% tariff on imported goods. 

While Trump has described it as a way to raise revenue , economists say it would mostly be passed along to consumers , effectively making it a tax.

A study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found the tariff, along with a 60% tariff on Chinese goods also proposed by Trump, would lower the average post-tax incomes of American households by about $1,800.  

That’s mostly in line with projections from the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a think tank that says the tariff would cost households roughly $1,700 each year , and the conservative American Action Forum, which projects additional household costs between $1,700 and $2,350.

– Joedy McCreary  

Catch up on our convention fact-checks

We've fact-checked key speakers throughout the Republican and Democratic conventions. Catch up here on what was false, what was true and what was in between from Donald Trump, JD Vance, Tim Walz and a host of others.

• DNC Day 3: Tim Walz | Fact check live blog
• DNC Day 1: Joe Biden | Fact check live blog
• RNC Day 4: Donald Trump | Fact check live blog
• RNC Day 3 : JD Vance | Fact check live blog

What's true and what's false? Sign up for USA TODAY's Checking the Facts newsletter.

Kamala Harris claim: Trump immune from criminal prosecution 

“Consider the power he will have, especially after the United States Supreme Court just ruled that he would be immune from criminal prosecution.”  

In July, the Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that presidents, including Trump, are at least partially immune from prosecution for crimes committed while in office. But the court’s decision isn’t as clear cut as Harris’ remarks make it seem. It declares that “official” acts by presidents are protected, but steps taken as a candidate are not. 

The ruling also leaves room for presidents to be prosecuted under a narrow set of circumstances, related to responsibilities “within the outer perimeter” of presidential duties, or to unofficial acts, as  USA TODAY previously reported .  

“The parties before us do not dispute that a former President can be subject to criminal prosecution for unofficial acts committed while in office,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the 6-3 majority that divided along ideological lines. “They also agree that some of the conduct described in the indictment includes actions taken by Trump in his unofficial capacity.” 

In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that the court gave Trump “all the immunity he asked for and more.” Trump is the first president – former or current – to be criminally charged. 

-Chris Mueller  

Ruben Gallego claim: VP Harris responsible for veteran benefits expansion, unemployment rate 

“Kamala Harris has delivered more benefits to more veterans than ever before and has achieved the lowest veterans unemployment rate in history.”  

The Department of Veterans Affairs said it has granted benefits to 1.1 million veterans and their survivors so far in fiscal year 2024, an all-time record. 

The VA said it’s been able to deliver more care and benefits than ever before largely because of the PACT Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law in August 2022. The White House has described the law as the “most significant expansion of VA Health Care in 30 years.” 

It helps deliver more timely health care benefits and services to over five million veterans who may have been exposed to toxic substances – such as through burn pits – while serving the country, the White House said. 

But the claim overreaches by giving direct credit to Harris for actions taken by an administration led by Biden. In public remarks in 2022, Harris credited Biden’s leadership for the passage of the PACT Act. 

The issue is close to Biden, who has drawn a connection between burn pits and his late son Beau’s fatal brain cancer. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs website says the PACT Act is “is perhaps the largest health care and benefit expansion in VA history.” The Veterans of Foreign Wars , a nonprofit veterans service organization, considered the bill the most significant piece of veterans legislation in history. 

On unemployment, the jobless rate among veterans fell to 2.1% in April 2023 – during the Biden-Harris administration – the lowest mark since 2000 when the Bureau of Labor Statistics began tracking monthly unemployment for the group, the Military Times reported . For all of 2023, the rate was 2.8%, the lowest rate since at least 2000 , the outlet reported. 

The veterans unemployment rate was 3% in July, up from 2.9% the previous month, according to the Department of Labor . 

But as with the veterans benefits, referring to this veterans unemployment rate as something Harris has “achieved” overstates her role in the process. USA TODAY found no record of Harris leading initiatives that would justify such a description. 

-Andre Byik  

Kamala Harris claim: Trump plans to create a ‘national anti-abortion coordinator,’ force reporting on miscarriages and abortions

“He plans to create a national anti-abortion coordinator and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions.”  

This claim does not appear to reference any plan or platform endorsed by Trump, but rather aspects of Project 2025 , a political playbook created by the Heritage Foundation and dozens of other conservative groups.  

The project calls for increasing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s surveillance of abortion information by forcing states that don’t currently provide this information to the CDC, such as California, Maryland and New Hampshire, to do so. 

Page 455 of the plan explains this would be done by allowing the Department of Health and Human Services to “use every available tool, including the cutting of funds, to ensure that every state reports exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method.” It also calls for information about miscarriages to be collected from the states.  

As Harris alludes to, the plan also calls for appointing someone who is “unapologetically pro-life” as the “Senior Coordinator” of the “Office of Women, Children, and Families.”  

While Democrats have insisted Project 2025 is Trump’s plan if elected president, he has attempted to distance himself from it. In a July 5 Truth Social post , Trump wrote that he disagrees with parts of the plan and has “no idea who is behind it.” Notably, Trump embraced many of the Heritage Foundation’s policy proposals during his first administration, and some of his allies were involved in Project 2025, as  USA TODAY  previously reported.    

- Brad Sylvester  

Kamala Harris claim: Trump tried to cut Social Security and Medicare 

"Donald Trump tried to cut Social Security and Medicare."  

This is a slightly softened version of a claim Harris’ campaign has made before , including a tweet from her campaign claiming Trump attempted to do this "every single year." It oversimplifies a series of budget maneuvers.

Trump didn’t attempt to cut general Social Security retirement benefits, but he attempted – and failed – to reduce spending for Social Security Disability Insurance and Supplemental Security Income, according to The Washington Pos t. About 8.5 million people receive such disability benefits, but that’s only a fraction of the number who receive retirement and survivor benefits.

Trump did propose cuts to Medicare in his budgets for the fiscal years 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, The Post noted. But an analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget found that 85% of his proposed Medicare savings would come from healthcare providers and would lower costs for seniors. 

Trump’s last budget, released in February 2020, had about $500 billion in net Medicare spending reductions over 10 years, but most would come from reduced payments to hospitals and other healthcare providers, Forbes reported, citing the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities .

- Chris Mueller  

Kamala Harris claim: Trump encouraged Russia to invade allies 

“Trump on the other hand threatened to abandon NATO. He encouraged Putin to invade our allies. Said Russia could, quote, ‘Do whatever the hell they want.’” 

This claim popped up earlier in the evening by Sen. Mark Kelly, and by President Joe Biden at his State of the Union . Here’s what we reported when Kelly said it: 

The quote Harris cited here is technically accurate but significantly oversimplified.  

Trump, speaking at a Feb. 10 campaign rally in Conway, South Carolina, suggested he might not come to the aid of NATO members attacked by Russia if they weren’t contributing enough money to the alliance, as  USA TODAY previously reported .  

“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’"  Trump said . “I said, ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said, ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you.”  

Then, Trump added, “In fact I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want.” 

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at the time that Trump's comments could  endanger lives and undermine the security  of NATO members, including the U.S.  

- Chris Mueller and Andre Byik

Kamala Harris claim: She secured $20 billion for those hurt by foreclosure crisis 

“(I) delivered $20 billion for middle-class families who faced foreclosure.”

This refers to the settlement Harris, as California’s attorney general, negotiated with several large mortgage companies in 2012 to provide relief for struggling homeowners in her state following the foreclosure crisis. 

The nation’s five largest mortgage servicers – Bank of America Corp., Wells Fargo & Co., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Ally Bank/GMAC Mortgage – were accused of using illicit tactics to wrongfully foreclose on homeowners, the Los Angeles Times reported in 2016 . Harris pulled California out of nationwide mortgage settlement talks in September 2011 when it appeared her state’s share would be roughly $4 billion. 

In announcing the deal in 2012, her office said it totaled $18 billion , of which more than $12 billion was to go toward reducing the principal on loans or offering short sales to roughly 250,000 homeowners who owed more than their homes were worth or were behind (or almost behind) on payments. There is a discrepancy in the specific dollar amount, however. While her office announced it as $18 billion, multiple media outlets through the years used the same $20 billion figure that Harris referenced during her address.

Ultimately, about $4.5 billion of that settlement went to lower debt on primary mortgages, the Wall Street Journal reported . The rest went to reduce debt on second mortgages and to short sales, in which banks agreed to allow homes to be sold for less than the mortgage value and wrote off the difference.

Mark Kelly claim: Trump said Russia could do ‘whatever the hell they want’ 

“(Trump) invited Russia to do – and these are his words, not mine – whatever the hell they want.”  

As P resident Joe Biden did in his State of the Union , Kelly here cites a quote that is technically accurate but significantly oversimplified. 

Trump, speaking at a Feb. 10 campaign rally in Conway, South Carolina, suggested he might not come to the aid of NATO members attacked by Russia if they weren’t contributing enough money to the alliance, as USA TODAY previously reported . 

“One of the presidents of a big country stood up and said, ‘Well sir, if we don’t pay and we’re attacked by Russia, will you protect us?’" Trump said . “I said, ‘You didn’t pay? You’re delinquent?’ He said, ‘Yes, let’s say that happened.’ No, I would not protect you.” 

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said at the time that Trump's comments could endanger lives and undermine the security of NATO members, including the U.S. 

Al Sharpton claim: Trump paid for newspaper ads urging death penalty for five teens

“(Trump) spent a small fortune on full-page ads calling for the execution of five innocent young teenagers.”  

Sharpton is referring to the Central Park Five , a group of Black and Latino teenagers wrongly convicted of assaulting a white female jogger in Central Park in 1989. 

Less than two weeks after the attack, Trump took out $85,000 worth of full-page ads in The New York Times, The Daily News, The New York Post and New York Newsday. The ads proclaimed in all caps, “Bring back the death penalty and bring back our police," going on to condemn a "dangerously permissive atmosphere which allows criminals of every age to beat and rape a helpless woman and then laugh at her family's anguish."

The ads did not, however, explicitly advocate for the Central Park Five to be executed . 

In 2002, the group was exonerated after a convicted murder Matias Reyes confessed to assaulting the jogger, which was confirmed by DNA evidence.

Trump did not apologize for the ads when he was asked in 2019 whether he would apologize to the men. 

Marcia Fudge claim: Trump was sued over housing for Black people 

“He started his career being sued for denying housing to Black families”  

This lawsuit is real, though the quick mention leaves out how the case was resolved.

This claim from the former secretary of housing and urban development refers to a lawsuit filed more than half a century ago. Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton made the same claim during a debate with Trump in 2016.

Trump was in his late 20s in 1973 when the Justice Department sued him , his father Fred and their management company over allegations of racial discrimination at their housing developments in New York. According to testers for New York City’s human rights division, a Black woman who attempted to rent an apartment at a Brooklyn complex managed by Trump’s firm was told nothing was available, but a white woman was offered a choice of two apartments shortly after. 

The case was settled in 1975 after Trump countersued the Justice Department for $100 million for making false statements. That allegation was dismissed.

As noted by NPR , Trump responded in the 2016 debate by emphasizing there was no admission of guilt in the case. Indeed, NPR reports, the Trumps took a settlement offer that included no admission of guilt but required the Trumps to place newspaper ads saying their properties welcomed Black applicants.

"Yes, when I was very young, I went into my father's company — had a real estate company in Brooklyn and Queens," Trump said. "And we, along with  many, many  other companies throughout the country — it was a federal lawsuit — were sued. We settled the suit with zero, with no admission of guilt."

How we pick and research fact checks

Ever wonder how fact-checkers do their work? We've got you covered.

Check out our process explainer to see how we pick claims, research them and edit them.

And if you've ever wondered who fact-checks the fact-checkers , you might want to read this op-ed explaining our emphasis on transparency. Becaus the answer is you! We use the format and approach precisely so that everyone has the ability to check our work.

-Eric Litke

DNC background: After brief post-shooting cooldown, rhetoric heats back up 

The days following an  assassination attempt  that left Republican nominee Donald Trump with an injured ear were marked by widespread calls for unity and toned-down rhetoric. 

Fewer than six weeks after the shooting, the temperature has gone right back up. 

When Vice President Kamala Harris formally accepts the Democratic presidential nomination Thursday night, she also will have the opportunity to respond to Trump's vow that he’s “ not going to be nice ” while peppering Harris with a series of attacks. 

It marks a return to the tone that appeared to shift – albeit only temporarily – in the wake of the July 13 shooting in Pennsylvania that  left one dead  and  two others seriously injured. Trump said he rewrote his closing remarks  at the Republican National Convention in July to “bring the whole country, even the whole world, together,” he told the Washington Examiner. 

The FBI identified the gunman as  20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania , and said  Secret Service agents killed him at the scene . But officials have been unable to determine his motive, one of the key unanswered questions sparking a significant amount of misinformation. 

USA TODAY has debunked an array of false claims stemming from the assassination attempt. 

• Fact check roundup:  False claims about rally attack spread online  
• Claim:  Image shows Trump's suit jacket was pierced with a bullet during Pennsylvania rally shooting  (False) 
• Claim:  Thomas Matthew Crooks is not the suspected Trump rally shooter  (False) 
• Claim:  Image shows Trump rally shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks  (False) 
• Claim:  Alejandro Mayorkas denied requests for additional security at Trump rally  (False) 
• Claim: Butler, Pennsylvania, police identified Trump shooter as Mark Violets, arrested him at scene (False)  
• Claim: Video shows Trump assassination attempt was 'staged,' there were 'no bullets flying’ (False)  

DNC background: Democrats link Trump to Jan. 6 Capitol riot 

The Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol, and former President Donald Trump’s alleged role in the attack, has become a focal point at this week’s Democratic National Convention . 

Aquilino Gonell, a former U.S. Capitol police officer, said in a convention speech that rioters beat him with a pole attached to an American flag, and he blamed Trump for summoning protesters to the Capitol. 

Trump is accused in a  federal indictment  of directing his supporters to march on the Capitol in an  effort to pressure former Vice President Mike Pence  to reject the certification of Joe Biden’s election victory. 

More than  1,200 defendants have been charged  in the attack on the Capitol. Trump’s case was overseen by Justice Department  special counsel Jack Smith . Trump has  pleaded not guilty . 

USA TODAY has debunked numerous claims about the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol: 

• Fact check roundup:   What's real and not three years after the Jan. 6 Capitol riot  
• Claim:   Video shows comedian, not liberal Jan. 6 rioter, posing as Trump supporter  
• Claim: No evidence January 6 committee destroyed records, contrary to online claims  
• Claim: Image shows man later convicted for role in Jan. 6 riot, not federal agent  
• Claim: Video shows a pro-Trump mob with floor plans inside Capitol building on Jan. 6  

– Andre Byik  

DNC background: Harris’ childhood, ethnicity spawn misinformation 

Not long after the Democrats picked Vice President Kamala Harris to replace President Joe Biden at the top of their ticket, several false or misleading claims about her resurfaced. 

Many of those originated four years earlier when Harris was picked as Biden’s running mate in 2020. Some question whether Harris – the daughter of an Indian mother and a Jamaican father – is eligible for the presidency . Others claim she was raised in Canada , is not African-American and as a prosecutor held Black inmates past their release dates.

USA TODAY has debunked several false claims that center on Harris’ background: 

• Fact check roundup: Biden exit, Harris entry spur flurry of false claims  
• Claim: Kamala Harris was raised in Canada, is not African-American and held Black prisoners past release dates (Partly false) 
• Claim: Kamala Harris is ineligible to succeed Biden because of her parents' citizenship (False) 

DNC background: Democrats, GOP spar over election security claims 

As the 2024 election draws closer, Democrats and Republicans continue to spar over concerns about the security and integrity of the voting process. 

A bill passed in July by House Republicans and some Democrats would require proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections – even though data shows the problem of non-citizens voting is virtually nonexistent . 

The measure advanced amid repeated, baseless claims from former President Donald Trump – the Republican presidential nominee – that the 2020 election was rigged against him . He  referenced the claim  in a video shown during his party’s convention in July. However, state-level recounts, reviews and audits of the 2022 midterm elections  found no indication of systemic problems  with voter fraud.  

Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee led by his daughter-in-law have said  they will mobilize 100,000 people in battleground states  to ensure “transparency and fairness” in a move that has drawn criticism from opponents saying it has the potential  to lead to voter intimidation . 

USA TODAY has debunked numerous false claims about the integrity of the elections: 

• Fact check roundup:  False claims about election fraud, candidates swirl amid 2022 midterms  
• Claim: Wisconsin offers a free ID card that 'lets illegals vote ’ (False) 
• Claim: Biden can’t withdraw from Nevada, Wisconsin ballots (False) 
• Claim: Minnesota ballot envelopes are marked with voters' political party (False) 
• Claim:   105% of Michigan’s population is registered to vote  (False) 
• Claim:   A software company's contract allows officials to override election results  (False) 
• Claim:   Malware, remote access caused printer problems; 200,000 'ejected' ballots in Arizona  (False) 
• Claim:   A chart shows election fraud in the Michigan AG’s race  (False) 
• Claim:   Blackout in live stream in Nevada points to election theft  (False) 
• Claim:   Fraud due to Texas voting machine adding voters as polls close  (False) 
• Claim:   Photo showing ballots from 2022 midterms in the trash is evidence of fraud  (False) 
• Claim:   Democrats used 47 million mail-in ballots to steal every election  (False) 
• Claim:   Joe Biden did not legally win the presidential election  (False) 

DNC background: Project 2025 and that giant book

Vice President Kamala Harris has warned voters about what she describes as the dangers of Project 2025 in the weeks since she became the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.  

The project is an  effort by the Heritage Foundation  and other conservative organizations that resulted in a 900-page playbook for the next Republican president. A full implementation of the guidance in the document would effectively  overhaul the federal government .  

A slew of Trump’s  allies are involved  in the project, though Trump has maintained that he is not. 

He’s described its proposals as “extreme” and “ absolutely ridiculous ,” though he has not specified what he disagrees with. 

Numerous Democratic leaders, including Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina and Rep. Malcolm Kenyatta of Pennsylvania , attacked Project 2025 and attempted to connect it to Trump in their convention speeches. Some speakers, such as comedian Kenan Thompson, used an oversized physical copy of the playbook in condemning it on stage.  

USA TODAY has debunked several claims about Project 2025: 

• Claim: Page 451 of Project 2025 says the “only valid family” includes a working father, stay-at-home mother (False)  
• Claim: Project 2025 is a plan from Trump (False) 
• Claim: Project 2025 calls for women to carry “period passports” (False) 

-BrieAnna Frank 

DNC background: Harris wasn’t ‘border czar,’ but debate continues over immigration policy 

In 2021, President Joe Biden announced Harris would lead the administration's diplomatic efforts with Mexico and the Central American countries of Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador to slow migration to the U.S. southern border. At the time, Harris said the administration “must address the root causes that cause people to make the trek, as the president described, to come here.” 

But Harris was never put in charge of the southern border or made "border czar," contrary to some posts on social media . Immigration has been a top issue for voters as encounters with migrants at the southern border have increased under Biden .  

Trump, meanwhile, has promised the largest deportation effort in U.S. history if he is elected again. He also said he would reinstate strict immigration policies from his first term, limit asylum access at the U.S. southern border and eliminate automatic citizenship for people born in the U.S. to immigrant parents. 

In February, Republican lawmakers blocked an immigration bill that would have revamped the country’s immigration and border policies. Biden blamed the bill's failure on opposition from Trump. Since then, Biden has issued executive orders to implement new restrictions on asylum access and speed up the process to get a green card for certain spouses and children of U.S. citizens. 

• Claim: Kamala Harris was 'put in charge of the border' (False) 
• Claim: 51 million 'illegals' entered US under Biden, Harris (False) 
• Claim: Biden executive order granted citizenship to 1 million immigrants in the U.S. illegally (False) 
• Claim: Nearly 11,000 “illegals” were processed in Eagle Pass, Texas, in one day in mid-March 2024 (False) 
• Claim: The Texas National Guard has deployed tanks to the border with Mexico (False) 

- Chris Mueller