assignment of future intellectual property rights

IP Assignment and Licensing

IP rights have essentially transformed intangibles (knowledge, creativity) into valuable assets that you can put to strategic use in your business. You can do this by directly integrating the IP in the production or marketing of your products and services, thereby strengthening their competitiveness. With IP assignement and IP licensing, IP owners can also use your IP rights to create additional revenue streams by selling them out, giving others a permission to use them, and establishing joint ventures or other collaboration agreements with others who have complementary assets.

  Expert tip: Assignment, license and franchising agreements are flexible documents that can be adapted to the needs of the parties. Nevertheless, most countries establish specific requirements for these agreements, e.g. written form, registration with a national IP office or other authority, etc. For more information, consult your IP office .

IP rights assignment

You can sell your IP asset to another person or legal entity.

When all the exclusive rights to a patented invention, registered trademark, design or copyrighted work are transferred by the owner to another person or legal entity, it is said that an assignment of such rights has taken place.

Assignment is the sale of an IP asset. It means that you transfer ownership of an IP asset to another person or legal entity.

IP for Business Guides

Learn more about the commercialization of patents, trademarks, industrial designs, copyright.

Read IP for Business Guides

IP licensing

You can authorize someone else to use your IP, while maintaining your ownership, by granting a license in exchange for something of value, such as a monetary lump sum, recurrent payments (royalties), or a combination of these.

Licensing provides you with the valuable opportunity to expand into new markets, add revenue streams through royalties, develop partnerships etc.

If you own a patent, know-how, or other IP assets, but cannot or do not want to be involved in all the commercialization activities (e.g. technology development, manufacturing, market expansion, etc.) you can benefit from the licensing of your IP assets by relying on the capacity, know-how, and management expertise of your partner.

  Expert tip: Licensing can generally be sole, exclusive or non-exclusive, depending on whether the IP owner retains some rights, or on whether the IP rights can be licensed to one or multiple parties.

Technology licensing agreements

Trademark licensing agreements, copyright licensing agreements, franchising agreements, merchande licensing, joint venture agreements, find out more.

• Learn more about Technology Transfer .

• Legal GPS for Business
• All Contracts
• Member-Managed Operating Agreement
• Manager-Managed Operating Agreement
• S Corp LLC Operating Agreement
• Multi-Member LLC Operating Agreement
• Multi-Member LLC Operating Agreement (S Corp)

Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement: A Comprehensive Guide for Your Business

LegalGPS : August 2, 2023 at 8:43 AM

Hello there, entrepreneur friend! Today let’s have that coffee chat about Intellectual Property Assignment Agreements. If you're thinking "what's that?" or "why do I need it?" then this is the perfect starting point for you. In today's competitive business world, protecting your intellectual property (IP) is more crucial than ever.

What is An Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement?

An Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement is a legal document that ensures the transfer of an inventor or creator's rights to another person or company. Essentially, it’s a legal way of saying "what’s mine is now yours". These agreements are often used in situations involving startups, company buyouts, or employees creating new works or inventions during their jobs - situations a lot of entrepreneurs find themselves in.

Let's break that down a touch more:

Defining the Purpose

The IP assignment agreement's primary purpose is to help your business prevent future disputes regarding IP ownership. When all parties are clear on who owns the intellectual property, it prevents a whole host of potential issues.

Believe me, the last thing you need or want as an entrepreneur is a legal dispute over who owns an idea, an invention, or any creative output.

And that's where this agreement steps in: it provides legal proof that the ownership has been transferred. So, if ever challenged, you can show the agreement and say "See, it’s mine!" .

Key Elements to Consider for a Properly Drafted Agreement

When it comes to IP assignment agreements, not just any generic contract will do. It's crucial to understand and include some key elements to ensure you're fully protected.

1. Clarity of Transfer

The agreement must clearly define the scope and extent of the transferred rights. To do this, use precise language that leaves no room for confusion. For example, specify whether the IP rights being transferred are exclusive or non-exclusive and if there are any limitations on how the Assignee can use or sublicense the IP. Here's a suggested format:

"The Assignor hereby assigns to the Assignee, its successors and assigns, [exclusive/non-exclusive] rights, title, and interest in and to the Intellectual Property, subject to the following limitations [if any]:"

2. Definition of Transferred Intellectual Property

This section is where you identify the specific Intellectual Property being assigned. Start by describing the IP type (e.g., copyright, patent, trademark), then provide the necessary details:

For a copyright, include the work title and a brief description.

For a patent, mention the patent number and summarize the invention.

For a trademark, provide the trademark name, registration number, and design details.

Remember, the key is to be as detailed and transparent as possible.

3. Compensation and Payment Terms

Just as with any deal, it's important to be crystal clear about the compensation for transferring IP rights. Make sure you consider the following in your agreement:

The total amount payable

The currency

The payment method (e.g., check, wire transfer)

The payment schedule (e.g., lump-sum, installments)

For example: "In consideration for the assignment of rights, the Assignee shall pay the Assignor a total sum of [Amount] in [Currency], through [Payment Method], payable as follows:"

4. Warranties and Representations

Including warranties and representations in the agreement helps provide confidence to both parties. The Assignor should explicitly declare that they:

Are the sole and true owner of the IP

Have the complete right to assign the IP to the Assignee

The IP does not infringe on any third-party rights

A sample clause might look like this:

"The Assignor warrants and represents that they are the true and lawful owner of the Intellectual Property, have full right and authority to enter into this Agreement, and that the Intellectual Property does not infringe upon any third-party rights."

5. Confidentiality Agreements

A crucial aspect of a well-drafted IP Assignment Agreement is protecting sensitive information about the business and the IP itself. Incorporate confidentiality clauses to maintain a secure environment.

Try a clause similar to this one: "The parties agree to treat all confidential information related to this Agreement as strictly confidential, and to take all necessary precautions to prevent unauthorized disclosure or use of such information."

6. Governing Law and Dispute Resolution

Last but not least, outline which jurisdiction's laws will govern the agreement. Furthermore, state how any disputes will be resolved, such as through arbitration, mediation, or litigation.

A model clause could be: "This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of [State]. Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be resolved by [method of dispute resolution]."

Drafting Your IP Assignment Agreement

Let's move on to the most crucial part of our discussion: Creating your Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement. This section intends to make it much clearer and more action-oriented. Your aim? To walk away with enough information to begin drafting your agreement. Let's dive in.

Step 1 - Identify the Parties Involved

Start by clearly naming the parties involved in the agreement.

Who is the 'Assignor' (the party transferring the rights)?

Who is the 'Assignee' (the individual or business entity receiving the rights)? Clearly outline their legal names and any other relevant identifying information, like addresses or official business names. It would typically look like this: "[Full Legal Name], referred to as the "Assignor," and [Full Legal Name], referred to as the "Assignee."

Step 2 - Specify the Assigned Intellectual Property

Here, you need to provide a full and exhaustive description of the intellectual property being transferred. Please don't leave room for vagueness or ambiguity - the more specific, the better. For instance, if it's a patent, include the patent number and a detailed summary of what the patent covers. If it's a copyrighted work, offer the title, the form of the work (e.g., a book, software, music), and a short description of it.

Your entry here might read: "The "Intellectual Property" includes, but is not limited to, [detailed description]."

Step 3 - Describe the Transfer of Rights

This section is all about clearly laying out what you're giving up and what you're gaining. Highlight all rights, titles, and interests being assigned from the Assignor to the Assignee. You could list them out just to ensure nothing falls between the cracks.

It’s vital to be as clear and detailed as possible here. You're specifying the extent of the rights transferred. It could be exclusive, non-exclusive, permanent, temporary, how it can be used, if it can be sold, and more.

Here's an example:

"The Assignor hereby assigns to the Assignee, its successors and assigns, all rights, title, and interest in and to the Intellectual Property, including, without limitation, the right to sue and recover for past, present, and future violations."

Step 4 - Detail Compensation and Payment Terms

Now, let's talk about money. In this step, you need to fully detail the financial exchanges. Include the amount of payment, payment format, and schedule (upfront, lump sum, installments). It wouldn't hurt to clearly lay out what conditions, if any, would lead to a return of the compensation.

This clause might look something like:

"For the assignment of rights under this Agreement, the Assignee shall provide compensation to the Assignor in the amount of [Amount], payable [insert payment method and schedule]".

Step 5 - Include Confidentiality Clauses

Especially with IP, you'll want to build in some safety nets. You can include a confidentiality clause that prevents the involved parties from disclosing sensitive information about the IP.

A basic confidentiality clause may read: "The Assignor agrees to keep confidential all non-public information that the Assignee designates as being confidential, not to disclose it to any other people, and not to use it for any purpose other than the discharge of the Assignor's obligations under this Agreement."

Step 6 - Determine Governing Law and Dispute Resolution Process

Finally, specify which state or country's laws will govern the agreement. This is crucial in the case of any future legal disputes. Additionally, include how disputes over the agreement will be resolved - arbitration, mediation, litigation, etc.

Here is an example:

"This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of [State]. Any disputes under this Agreement shall be resolved by [method of dispute resolution]."

Tips for Avoiding Common Mistakes and Pitfalls

You're now equipped with all you need to draft an agreement. But before you get started, here are some quick tips to avoid any missteps:

Ensure the agreement is detailed and described correctly

Work with a knowledgeable attorney

Review the final agreement carefully before signing

With these, you're set to protect your business's most valuable assets!

In today's competitive business environment, it's imperative to protect your inventions, your creations - your Intellectual Property. If you're still unsure where to start, check out our professional template for Intellectual Property Assignments!

With an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement in hand, you're ensuring that ownership of these is well established to prevent future disputes. So here's to smoother operations and peace of mind!

Always remember, we're in this together - as you navigate the business world, consider us your legal co-pilot, happy to guide you on your journey.

Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement

Jump to section, what is an assignment of intellectual property agreement.

An assignment of intellectual property agreement is a contract that transfers the intellectual property rights (For example, patents, trademarks, industrial designs, or copyrights.) from the creator to another entity. The intellectual property rights holder may transfer all or part of their rights. The transfer of intellectual property rights is made upon a payment of a lump sum or royalties.

Employees hired for research and development roles or other technical areas sign intellectual property assignment agreements to assign to the company any ideas, work products, or inventions related to the company business that they may create during their employment.

Common Sections in Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.2 5 gabriel_ex1002.htm ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY , Viewed October 21, 2021, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on assignment of intellectual property agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with an assignment of intellectual property agreement?

Post a project  in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate assignment of intellectual property agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Need help with an Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement?

Meet some of our assignment of intellectual property agreement lawyers.

Ms. Ayub is an attorney licensed to practice in Texas. Before moving to the US, she has a number of years of experience in contract review, analysis and drafting. Ms. Ayub is available to help you with your legal problems, as well as filling LLC and other business entity formation documents. To know more about her practice, please visit https://ayublawfirmpllc.com/.

Anand is an entrepreneur and attorney with a wide-ranging background. In his legal capacity, Anand has represented parties in (i) commercial finance, (ii) corporate, and (iii) real estate matters throughout the country, including New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Arizona, and Georgia. He is well-versed in business formation and management, reviewing and negotiating contracts, advising clients on financing strategy, and various other arenas in which individuals and businesses commonly find themselves. As an entrepreneur, Anand is involved in the hospitality industry and commercial real estate. His approach to the legal practice is to treat clients fairly and provide the highest quality representation possible. Anand received his law degree from Rutgers University School of Law in 2013 and his Bachelor of Business Administration from Pace University, Lubin School of Business in 2007.

Terry Brennan is an experienced corporate, intellectual property and emerging company transactions attorney who has been a partner at two national Wall Street law firms and a trusted corporate counsel. He focuses on providing practical, cost-efficient and creative legal advice to entrepreneurs, established enterprises and investors for business, corporate finance, intellectual property and technology transactions. As a partner at prominent law firms, Terry's work centered around financing, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, securities transactions, outsourcing and structuring of business entities to protect, license, finance and commercialize technology, manufacturing, digital media, intellectual property, entertainment and financial assets. As the General Counsel of IBAX Healthcare Systems, Terry was responsible for all legal and related business matters including health information systems licensing agreements, merger and acquisitions, product development and regulatory issues, contract administration, and litigation. Terry is a graduate of the Georgetown University Law Center, where he was an Editor of the law review. He is active in a number of economic development, entrepreneurial accelerators, veterans and civic organizations in Florida and New York.

I am a New Jersey licensed attorney and I have been in practice for over nineteen years. My practice mainly consists of representing public entities (municipalities, school boards, etc) and businesses, both small and large. In that capacity, much of work consists of drafting, reviewing and revising contracts.

I am a corporate lawyer with expertise working with small businesses, venture capital and healthcare. Previously, I worked at large law firms, as well as head attorney for companies. I graduated from Harvard College and University of Pennsylvania Law School. I speak 5 languages (Spanish, French, Italian and Russian, plus English), visited over 60 countries, and used to compete in salsa dancing!

Legal services cost too much, and are often of low quality. I have devoted my law practice to providing the best work at the most affordable price—in everything from defending small businesses against patent trolls to advising multinational corporations on regulatory compliance to steering couples through a divorce.

Jonathan D.

Miami-based duly licensed attorney and customs broker with significant experience in various types of supply chain business agreements, as well as experience in entertainment law.

Find the best lawyer for your project

Intellectual property lawyers by top cities.

• Austin Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Boston Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Chicago Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Dallas Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Denver Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Houston Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Los Angeles Intellectual Property Lawyers
• New York Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Phoenix Intellectual Property Lawyers
• San Diego Intellectual Property Lawyers
• Tampa Intellectual Property Lawyers

Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement lawyers by city

• Austin Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Boston Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Chicago Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Dallas Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Denver Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Houston Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Los Angeles Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• New York Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Phoenix Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• San Diego Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers
• Tampa Assignment Of Intellectual Property Agreement Lawyers

ContractsCounsel User

Review IP Assignment Contract to Sell 3D Solar & Manufacturing IP for $35,000,000

Location: california, turnaround: less than a week, service: contract review, doc type: ip assignment agreement, page count: 8, number of bids: 3, bid range: $490 - $850, employment contract review, location: colorado, bid range: $385 - $475, user feedback:, related contracts.

• 93a Demand Letter
• Accounting Services Agreement
• Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
• Ad Agency Contract
• Adhesion Contract
• Advertising Services Agreement
• Agency Agreement
• Agency Contract

other helpful articles

• How much does it cost to draft a contract?
• Do Contract Lawyers Use Templates?
• How do Contract Lawyers charge?
• Business Contract Lawyers: How Can They Help?
• What to look for when hiring a lawyer

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

• What’s New on the Watch?
• COVID-19 Updates
• Private Equity Webinar Series
• Private Equity Finance
• Global PE Update
• Glenn West Musings
• Quarterly Private Funds Update
• Ancillary Agreements
• Co-investments
• Cybersecurity
• Going Privates
• Legal Developments
• Minority Investments
• Portfolio Company Matters
• Purchase Agreements
• R&W Insurance
• Secondaries
• Securities Laws
• Shareholder Agreements
• Specialist Areas
• Contributors
• Global Team
• Privacy Policy

Private Equity

Watch your inbox.

Get the latest views and developments in the private equity world from the Global Private Equity Watch team at Weil.

Assignment of IP

Fact sheet: commercialising intellectual property - assignment agreements.

This fact sheet deals with the assignment of Intellectual Property (IP) rights. An assignment can be beneficial in many business circumstances. Examples may include your company not having the means to undertake commercialisation or preferring to receive a once-off lump sum payment for the innovative technology. This implies having no further concerns regarding the maintenance and enforcement of the IP rights.

Download Fact sheet

Infographic: Commercialising IP - Assignment Agreements

An IP assignment is a transfer of ownership of an intellectual property right, such as a patent, trade mark or copyright, from one party (the assignor) to another party (the assignee). This infographic adds together the benefits, risks and the key elements of assignment agreements.

Download Infographic

IP Guide: Your Guide to IP and Contracts

IP can be transferred or licensed, offered to enter into cooperation agreements or contributed as capital in a joint venture. Protecting and managing IP through well-drafted agreements is key for business success. Therefore, the purpose of this guide on IP and contracts is to be a useful tool regarding IP exploitation and management. It aims to help businesses better understand contracts in the IP field and to get an idea on different key points and how these should be drafted.

Download IP Guide

Share this page

Champion Law

Intuitive legal solutions for dynamic business

Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights

This article is intended to facilitate a basic understanding of intellectual property (which will be referred to as IP throughout this article) and some of the most pertinent aspects to look out for when drafting or reviewing an assignment agreement.

Intellectual property is created all the time, whether in business or your personal life, and can stem from Copyright, for example, which is the most frequent, and typically exists in original artistic work, from drawings and songs, to articles, like this one. Copyright exists automatically upon creation, and lasts for the lifetime of the author, plus 70 years from the end of the year of their death.

Trademarks are another form of IP, and are typically used to distinguish the names and logos of one business from another, but can extend to associated sounds, like jingles and tunes, and even a smell. Trademarks exist automatically, but need to be registered in the UK, and then internationally to offer the monopolistic protection needed worldwide.

Patents are something that protect the functionality of an invention, like a mechanism in a machine, but has strict registration requirements. For example, it must be new, inventive, and capable of industrial application. It must also not be excluded from protection, like a scientific theory, artistic work, a process of doing something, or a presentation of information.

Design Rights

Design Rights are something similar to Patents, but their registration requirements are far less stringent. In fact, like a lot of IP, they can exist automatically, and are more applicable to shape and configuration. Essentially, Design Rights are used when a Patent cannot be. Interestingly, it’s important to note that domain name registrations are not normally classed as IP, but are typically dealt with under assignment agreements.

Most common types of assignment

Now that we’ve covered the absolute basics of the different types of IP, let’s look at one of the most common scenarios of a transfer of IP for small businesses. This can exist when the assignee (the body receiving the IP) has instructed the assignor (the body who creates the IP) to create something capable of attracting IP rights, such as a graphic designer working on a logo, for a fee. As this is an artistic design, it would be classed as Copyright. Most transfers of IP should be embodied in a carefully worded contract, or a deed (we’ll get on to this later) and should expressly refer to the type of IP to be assigned on the face of it. Moreover, it should also be used to assign any IP associated with any asset purchased from another business, like a unique machine, which may carry a Patent, or a Design Right. The agreement must then expressly refer to that asset purchase agreement. 

What exactly are you assigning?

Be clear about exactly what different types of IP are being assigned, and make reference to the schedules that will set them out in full. These schedules will feature at the end of the agreement, so we’ll go over these in more detail later on. 

Who are the parties?

Ensure the agreement also clearly identifies all parties to the agreement who currently hold rights, and all those to which the rights will be transferred, so consider joint ownership in both instances. Also, the section under the heading ‘background’, whilst important for clarity, is only a prelude and not legally binding, so any fundamental aspects must be clearly set out in relevant clauses and subsections. 

What about Brexit?

Also, in lieu of Brexit, although the outcomes are generally uncertain, when it comes to IP, it is likely that statutory instruments will ensure that protection and enforcement between registered right holders in the UK and EU, and vice versa, remains unchanged. However, to avoid uncertainty, anything relating to the interpretation of definitions, and particularly statute, should be ‘as at the date’, instead of ‘from time to time’, to avoid unanticipated rights and obligations in the future. 

And the rest of the world..?

Whilst on the topic of Brexit, although many assignment agreements should cover IP rights worldwide, it’s important to look into the requirements of the jurisdiction of a particular country, should you or the other party intend using the IP outside of the UK, and particularly outside of the EU. 

Know what you’re dealing with

Beware of any trusts or other covenants attached to the IP rights on assignments. ‘Full title guarantee’ will ensure the IP rights are free of adverse encumbrances (to the assignor’s reasonable knowledge). On the other hand, ‘limited title guarantee’ will mean that, although the assignee is free to sell, the assignor can only guarantee that no encumbrances have been made within their period of ownership, but not before, even if they are aware of prior encumbrances. 

You got a licence for that..?

Following on, although this article primarily concerns assignments of IP, it’s also important to acknowledge licences, and how they relate to assignments, as it may be the case that the assignee or assignor to be, actually holds the IP rights under a licence, which excludes assignments. It is therefore important that when granting assignments or licences, close consideration is given to the extended rights to third parties that the ability to licence IP can create. 

What about tech?

Coming back to an assignment of Copyright, which, if not the sole purpose of the agreement, will likely form a large part of it, it is important to note that in this growing age of technology, Copyright is the primary category of computer software and databases. Also, if databases include personal data, it is also important to include warranties that best practice for data protection is observed. 

All together now

Moving on to Design Rights, it’s important to note that these, whether registered, unregistered, or partial, if they relate to the same material, they cannot be assigned separately. 

Registered or unregistered?

When it comes to Trademarks, do not underestimate the distinction between registered and unregistered Trademarks, as one of the main purposes of registration is to deter passing-off (the act of a third party using the Trademark, typically to benefit from the associated goodwill without the authority of the rights holder) and to make the process of achieving a remedy against the third party simple and inexpensive, as the opposite can be said for remedies under unregistered Design Rights, as goodwill is more intangible and abstract. It is therefore important to note that all IP capable of subsisting unregistered, should ideally be registered prior to assignment, or that the assignment at least includes the goodwill, as this is the only value in an unregistered Trademark. Whilst this article does not cover registration processes, these can be found on the relevant government website pages – links to which can be found below:

Patenting Your Invention (UK Government Website)

Registering Design Rights (UK Government Website)

Apply to Register a Trademark (UK Government Website)

Automatic right to sue..?

Once the assignee is the rights holder, they of course have the right to sue for infringement. However, the right to sue for infringements prior to their assignment must be expressly provided for in the agreement. 

Contract or deed?

In establishing whether the assignment document should be a contract or a deed, whilst a simple contract will suffice in any instance where the assignment is for consideration (i.e. a fee is paid), if no consideration is given, or there is a power of attorney granted by the assignor for the assignee to deal with an element of the IP rights on the assignor’s behalf (such as executing registration documents to give full effect to the agreement), then the agreement must be a deed, meaning that it must clearly be stated as such, and be signed in the presence of witnesses, who attest the signatures. 

Consideration

If the agreement is to be a contract, and the assignment attracts a fee, then firstly, any VAT must be clearly set out as being separate from the amount payable for the IP rights. Secondly, even if there is an element of consideration, to avoid any future disputes over proportionality, a deed would be highly advisable – not least for this purpose, but also because adding a power of attorney would prevent the need for enforcement action against the assignor for any further assistance required from them. If, however, further assistance is nevertheless needed, or document execution is anticipated to be an expense the assignee cannot justify, then a clause must be added to bind the assignor to provide future assistance at their expense.

Unlike many contractual arrangements, the furthest extent liability can be excluded for the assignor includes death and personal injury, which can be applied generally to IP, but is especially applicable for patents for machinery, for example. 

The importance of schedules

Returning to the need for schedules at the end of the agreement, Patents, Trademarks, and Design Rights, would each be listed in separate schedules. Assignment of particular materials, like specific documents and physical items, would be classed as Copyright and unregistered Design Rights, and require their own schedule. There may also be other unregistered rights, like domain names, which, as touched on earlier, are not classed as IP, but can be just as important to expressly assign, and can include confidential information, like trade secrets and financials, or rights in get-up (the whole appearance), goodwill (reputation), and know-how (which is especially important to be transferred under a written document, as both equitable and statutory requirements necessitate this) and should be listed in a separate schedule. 

You’re almost there…

Once the agreement has been executed, it is imperative that the assignee registers as the new rights holder. 

If you’re in need of some additional guidance with drafting or reviewing an assignment agreement, or you need some IP advice generally, then we’d be happy to help, so feel free to contact us for a free 30 minute consultation . Alternatively, you can submit your queries to us by commenting on our Topic of the Week post on LinkedIn.

If you found this article useful, you’ll be pleased to know that we’ll be posting loads more like this. Be one of the first to find out about new additions by signing up to our monthly newsletter (on the right hand side of this page) which has some great offers in as well!

Published by Fergus Thompson

View all posts by Fergus Thompson

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Trending News

Related Practices & Jurisdictions

• Intellectual Property
• Litigation / Trial Practice
• All Federal

In yet another decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to impact intellectual property rights, the Court now maintains a centuries-old law that the rights to an invention belong to the inventor. In a decision issued on June 6, 2011, in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., the Supreme Court held the rights to inventions supported by federally funded research are not vested with the institutional recipient of those federal funds.

In 1980, Congress enacted The Bayh-Dole Act to allocate the rights to federally funded inventions between the Federal Government and the recipient of the federal funds. In Stanford v. Roche, Stanford argues that one consequence of the Bayh-Dole Act is that institutional recipients of federal funds for research are automatically vested with the ownership rights to inventions made by their employees from those funds.

The issue in Standford v. Roche begins in 1988 with a research fellow at Stanford University, Dr. Holodniy, developing an assay for quantifying HIV levels in patients using PCR. Because he was unfamiliar with the technique, Holodniy went to the company that developed PCR, Cetus. Holodniy worked at Cetus developing the assay, and then returned to Stanford where he pursued the research further. Stanford eventually obtained the assignment rights for the invention from Holodniy and acquired three patents as a result. In 1991, Roche acquired Cetus, and Roche commercialized the assay developed by Holodniy while he was at Cetus.

Importantly, Holodniy signed an agreement upon joining Stanford that stated he “agree[d] to assign [his] right, title and interest in” inventions resulting from his employment to Stanford. However, in order to initially gain access to Cetus, Holodniy signed a confidentiality agreement that stated he “will assign and do[es] hereby assign [his] right, title and interest in each of the ideas, inventions and improvements [made] as a consequence of [his] access” to Cetus. Thus, it was at issue to whom Holodniy had actually assigned his rights.

In 2005, Stanford brought suit against Roche asserting that Roche’s commercial assay infringed on the patents held by Stanford. Roche argued that they were co-owners in the patents because Holodniy had assigned his rights to Cetus when he signed the confidentiality agreement. Thus, Stanford could not sue Roche for infringement of patents they co-owned. Stanford countered that they had already acquired Holodniy’s rights under the Bayh-Dole Act because the research was federally funded. Therefore, Holodniy had no rights to assign. The District Court agreed that Holodniy had assigned his rights to Roche. However, the court agreed with Stanford that Holodniy had no valid rights to assign because of the Bayh-Dole Act. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded that Holodniy’s agreement with Stanford to “agree to assign” his rights was a promise to assign his rights at some point in the future. Whereas, in his agreement with Cetus to “hereby assign” his rights,he actively assigned them away right then and there. Furthermore, the Federal Circuit found Agree to Assign vs. Hereby Assign: I that under the Bayh-Dole Act, an inventor’s rights are not automatically relinquished to his employer when the invention is federally funded. Therefore, Roche was part owner of the patents in question, and Stanford lacked standing to file suit.

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court agreed with the Federal Circuit that the Bayh-Dole Act did not supersede centuries of patent law and automatically assign an inventor’s ownership rights to his employer as a consequence of using federal funds. The Court found that the Bayh-Dole Act only confers to recipients of federal funding the right to retain that which they already have the rights to hold, and that the Act’s main purpose is to prevent a “Government-imposed impediment to retaining title” to federally funded inventions. Consequently, because Stanford never received Holodniy’s rights due to the wording of his employment agreement, they could not retain that which they never had the right to hold. Put another way, under Bayh-Dole, Stanford could not re-obtain that which Holodniy had already given away. The dissent stated that under the majority’s opinion, inventors working from federal funds could assign their rights to a third-party who never was a recipient of the federal money. Thus, circumventing the purpose of the Bayh-Dole Act. Furthermore, the dissent contended that since the parties had not fully argued the assignment question, the case should be remanded back to the Federal Circuit.

The decision in Stanford v. Roche will certainly have an impact in the area of technology transfer. Employers generally have policies to insure that the inventions of their employees will be assigned to the employer. However, if employers want to better protect themselves as eventual owners of the inventions of their employees, it will be necessary to draft better employment agreements that assign patent ownership rights in an active manner at the start of employment. The use of the phrase “agree to assign” will likely not protect an employer against an employee’s inadvertent assignment of their invention rights to another party.

Current Legal Analysis

More from sterne, kessler, goldstein & fox p.l.l.c., upcoming legal education events.

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins

What is an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement?

By June Ahern Legal Project Manager

Updated on August 4, 2020 Reading time: 5 minutes

This article meets our strict editorial principles. Our lawyers, experienced writers and legally trained editorial team put every effort into ensuring the information published on our website is accurate. We encourage you to seek independent legal advice. Learn more .

Key Clauses in an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement

Key takeaways.

As an individual or business owner, there may be times when you want to assign your intellectual property (IP) rights to another individual or business. Alternatively, you may want another entity to assign their IP rights to you. IP is a term which is applied broadly to something which is created, invented or designed. IP is sometimes referred to as ‘property of the mind’. Assigning your IP rights to another party is most often seen in the context of an employment contract, whereby any IP produced in the course of employment is automatically assigned to the employer. You may need another individual or entity to assign their IP rights to you if you engage a service provider to carry out work for you, such as:

• designing your logo; or 
• writing the code for your app. 

This article explains: 

• what an IP assignment agreement is; and 
• why an IP assignment is important in defining and protecting your rights.

An IP assignment agreement is a contractual agreement which facilitates the transfer of IP from one party to another. The party transferring the IP interest is the assignor . The party receiving the IP interest is the assignee . There are several important clauses which you should include in an IP assignment agreement.

The Assignment Clause

Assignment of IP rights may t ake place in return for a sum of money. However, this is not always so, as in the case of employees automatically assigning their IP rights to their employer. The clause should make it clear that all current or future rights, titles or interest in the IP are conveyed to the assignee.

Timing of the Assignment

It is important to state that all rights, titles or interest in the IP are conveyed to the assignee immediately upon creation of the IP. The assignor must agree to do ‘all things necessary’, including signing required documents, to facilitate a successful transfer of IP.

Assignment of Moral Rights

The assignor must also consent to the assignment of their moral rights in the IP. Moral rights are the rights of a creator to control, protect and enforce the artistic integrity that subsists in the IP. This includes the right:

• of the assignor to attribute their name to the work;
• against false attribution from other parties; and
• against derogatory treatment.

Third-Party Confidentiality

To the extent that any rights held by the assignor under third-party confidentiality agreements cannot be assigned, the assignor must agree to hold such rights on trust for the benefit of the assignee.

The assignor must represent and warrant that it:

• is the sole and absolute owner of the IP;
• has the authority and capacity to assign the IP in full;
• has not licenced or encumbered any right, title or interest in the IP to any third party;
• does not infringe any third-party’s IP rights or moral rights; and
• has no other obligations to any third-party which are inconsistent with the rights and obligations as set out in the intellectual property assignment agreement.

A warranty clause is important, as it protects the assignee from liability in the event that the assignor attempts to transfer IP which belongs to another party, whether intentionally or not.

A comprehensive intellectual property assignment agreement is important to d efine and protect your position in either assigning or receiving IP. A well-drafted intellectual property assignment agreement will protect you against any claims of IP infringement from third-parties and ensure that you have full ownership rights of the IP. If you have any questions on intellectual property assignment agreements, please contact LegalVision’s intellectual property lawyers on 1300 544 755 or fill out the form on this page.

We appreciate your feedback – your submission has been successfully received.

Register for our free webinars

Effective strategies for managing non-compliant franchisees, ai in business: mastering compliance and mitigating risks, preventing sexual and gender-based harassment: your whs legal duties, protecting your retail business: understanding your legal obligations, contact us now.

Fill out the form and we will contact you within one business day

Related articles

What is the Difference Between an IP Licence and an Assignment?

What Do I Include in Employment Contracts to Protect My IP?

Drafting Sales Terms and Conditions: How Do You Write an Intellectual Property Clause?

Can I Assign or License Copyright?

We’re an award-winning law firm

2023 Fast Firms - Australasian Lawyer

2022 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2021 Law Firm of the Year - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Excellence in Technology & Innovation Finalist - Australasian Law Awards

2020 Employer of Choice Winner - Australasian Lawyer

• Practical Law

Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights: Overview (International)

Practical law uk practice note overview w-020-0516  (approx. 12 pages).

• International

• [email protected]

Drafting Intellectual Property Rights Transfer Agreements - Part II

Home | Knowledge Center | Thought Papers Drafting Intellectual Property Rights Transfer Agreements - Part II

06th Aug, 2020

• Corporate and M&A

In the first part of this series on intellectual property (“ IP ”) transfers available here , we discussed the legal provisions governing assignment and license of IP. In this second part, we will discuss the various transfer related clauses in IP assignment and license agreements and the manner in which these clauses must be drafted.

As discussed in the first paper of this series, IP can either be assigned or licensed by the owner, allowing the commercial use of the asset in various forms. Apart from this, various other commercial arrangements also lead to the creation of IP. For instance, IP can be created under an employment agreement, a collaboration among multiple persons, a commissioning agreement or a consulting agreement. These are just a few examples. In all the above circumstances, it is important to have an effective contract that clearly establishes the rights held by the parties concerned. In this paper we cover two issues. First, we will look at certain crucial clauses that are an integral part of IP transfer agreements, and broadly discuss the structure and framing of these clauses. Second, we will look at some specific types of agreements dealing with IP creation and transfer, and also cover some of the key commercial and legal aspects of these agreements.

Generally, in agreements concerning the use and/or transfer of IP, the following clauses are important:

1. Assignment:

In any IP assignment, there is a clause specifically assigning/transferring the title in the IP from the assignor to the assignee. This clause must clearly state the extent of the rights that are being granted to the assignee. Assignments must contain express language such as “hereby assigns”, which indicates that the assignor is assigning rights in an existing or a future work in the present. [1]

Example: “Rights granted– X hereby grants, conveys and assigns to Y all the rights in the [Work], including without limitation the following exclusive rights throughout the Territory (as defined in clause [•]) for the Term (as defined in clause [•]) –

- insert a list of all rights in relation to the [Work] that are being assigned -"

Points to remember:

1.1. Work/invention/mark/property: It is advisable for the agreement to have a specific definition for the work or the invention or other IP that is being assigned. In this way, the assignment clause can be short and precise without having to define the work/invention that is being assigned.

1.2. Indicative list of rights: The assignment clause must contain an indicative list of rights, i.e., a list of ways in which the assignee may use the work/invention. These words are normally borrowed from the statute but drafted in a manner that is consistent with the intent of the parties. For instance, in the case of a cinematograph film, one of the rights assigned would be the right to make, sell, distribute copies of the film and communicate the film to the public.

2. License:

In an agreement where IP is licensed, there is no transfer of title. Therefore, the agreement must contain a clause demarcating the specific rights of use granted to the licensee. It is advisable to use clear terms such as “hereby grants a license”.

Example: “Grant of License– The Licensor hereby grants to the Licensee a non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sub-licensable, non-delegable and conditional license to use in the manner agreed hereinbelow, the Trademark, solely in relation to the business operations of the Licensee, within the Territory and for the Term:

- insert a list of all rights in relation to the trademark that are being licensed -"

2.1. Intellectual Property: The IP, whether it is a work/invention or trademark, that is being licensed must be specifically defined in a separate clause. As stated in 1.1 above, it makes for easier and cleaner drafting of the license clause.

2.2. Exclusive/non-exclusive: This is the most important part of the license grant which must clearly indicate whether the license is exclusive or non-exclusive.

2.3. Sublicense/further transfers: If the intention of the parties is that the license remains with the licensee alone, the clause must specify that the licensee does not have the authority to sub-license or further transfer the rights granted under the license.

2.4. Indicative list of rights: Given that a license can be far more limited than an assignment in its scope, it is advisable to include a list of specific uses that are permissible under the license. Further, the licensor may also clarify that the licensee is not permitted to do anything other than what is stated in the license.

2.5. The ownership of any IP must be mentioned, and the licensor must have the right to immediately know when there is a possibility that the IP may have been infringed by a third-party.

3. Term and termination:

The assignment or license agreement must contain separate clauses defining the term and instances when the agreement can be terminated.

a. “The rights assigned herein shall be irrevocable and shall be vested in the assignee for perpetuity including without limitation, for the full term of copyright protection everywhere in the world and any and all renewals, extensions and revivals thereof.”

b. “This License shall come into effect on the Effective Date and shall remain valid and binding on the Parties until such time that it is terminated in accordance with clause [•] of this Agreement.”

c. “This License shall come into effect on the Effective Date and shall remain valid for a period of 5 (five) years from the effective date unless it is terminated in accordance with clause [•] of this Agreement.”

Termination:

“This Agreement may be terminated: a) by mutual agreement of the Parties; or b) on a material breach of any provision of this Agreement by the other Party, provided however that in case of a breach capable of remedy, only if the breach is not remedied by the other Party within the Notice Period. Upon termination: a) either Party shall forthwith hand over to the other Party all documents, material and any other property belonging to the other Party that may be in the possession of the Party or any of its employees or agents; b) each Party shall immediately pay all pending fees or other amounts due to the other Party under this Agreement.”

3.1. Term: The term of the assignment or license can be anything that the parties choose. However, the outer limit of the grant is determined by the term specified in the statute for the IP. For instance, the term of a patent is 25 (twenty- five) years from the date of the application beyond which period the invention enters the public domain.

3.2. Termination: This clause must be drafted with care and caution bearing in mind the agreement between the parties. Further, if the agreement involves promises that can only be performed by a specific individual, termination by such party must not be permitted. In any event, if the assignment is irrevocable in nature, termination must not be permitted unless there is a material breach and terminating party must be required to serve adequate notice. Once the agreement is terminated, the IP will revert to the assignor or the licensor, as the case may be. Any IP that still remains with the transferee must be returned to the transferor or destroyed (when appropriate) upon termination.

4. Territory:

The territory for which the IP is assigned is crucial to be specified in the agreement. The same IP can be assigned or licensed to two or more separate entities for use and exploitation in different territories. If this is not clearly specified in the agreement, the territory might be deemed to be India as a whole. This would render any subsequent assignment or license impossible to carry out.

Example: “The assignment/license granted herein shall be exercisable within the territory of India (“Territory”).”

5. Consideration:

The agreement must contain a clause on consideration or fees/payment to be made for transfer of the IP. This clause must define the manner in which payments will be made by the assignee or licensee. There are several ways in which payment terms can be structured; some of the most common modes are discussed below:

5.1.  Lumpsum payments: IP rights can be granted in exchange for a lumpsum payment where the grantee can pay a specific sum of money in the manner prescribed under the agreement. This amount can be paid either as a single payment or in instalments.

a. “In consideration of Licensor granting a license to use the Intellectual Property in terms of this Agreement, the Licensee shall pay a monthly fee of Rs. [•] ([•]) to the Licensor (“License Fee”).

The Licensee shall pay the License Fee to the Licensor by way of wire transfer, no later than [7 (seven) days] prior to the commencement of each month.”

b. “As consideration for all the rights granted and assigned in the Intellectual Property by the Assignor, the Assignee agrees to pay a sum of Rs. [•] ([•]) to the Assignor in the following manner:

i. Rs. [•] ([•]) via -insert mode of payment-  on the Execution Date;

ii. The remaining sum of Rs. [•] ([•]) via -insert mode of payment-  no later than -insert date- ”

5.1.1. In the event the parties agree on payment in instalments, the agreement must clearly specify the schedule.

5.1.2. The mode of payments which are acceptable to both parties must be specified.

5.1.3. The agreement must also provide for consequences of delay in payment, if any.

5.1.4. The payments clause must specify the taxes, if any, that are deductible.

5.2. Royalty: In consideration for the rights granted, the assignor or licensor may also require that royalty be paid. Typically, royalty payments will be a portion of the sales revenue earned by the use/exploitation of the IP rights granted.

a. “In consideration of the rights granted in clause [•], the Licensee shall pay to Licensor a royalty (the “Royalty”) equal to [•]% of Net Sales occurring during the Royalty Term. The royalty under this clause shall be payable no later than 5 (five) business days after the last day of every quarter.”

b. “Royalty will accrue upon distribution of any copy of [software] delivered or sold in the manner specified in clause [•]. Rs. [•]/[•]% of the sale price of any copy of [software] shall be payable as royalty on each copy sold. All accrued Royalty shall be paid to the Licensor within [•] days after the end of each fiscal quarter, which ends on the last day of each of March, June, September and December. Payments shall be accompanied by a report stating the number of units of [software] sold/distributed in the relevant quarter, and the calculation of the royalty payment.

5.2.1. While royalty is typically represented as a percentage portion of the net sales revenue, it can be structured in any manner as the parties deem fit.

5.2.2. Royalty must be payable for the royalty term, which can either be for the whole term of the agreement or only a part of the term.

5.2.3. The schedule for payment must be specific and must always be accompanied by proper accounts for the relevant period showing the manner in which royalty payments have been calculated.

5.2.4. The agreement must also provide for consequences of delay in payment, if any.

5.2.5. The payments clause must specify the taxes, if any, that are deductible.

5.2.6. The method and frequency of invoicing must also be included.

6. Representations, warranties and covenants:

Apart from the representations and warranties that are usually included in agreements, including in relation to capacity and execution, there are certain specific warranties that should be included in IP related agreements.

6.1. The person granting the rights must represent that he has the sole and absolute ownership of the IP and is therefore entitled to grant rights either by way of assignment or license.

6.2. The person granting the rights must also represent that the IP in which the rights are being granted does not infringe any third party’s IP rights.

7. Indemnity

The person granting the rights must ordinarily indemnify the other party from any legal proceedings or costs arising as a result of defective title in the IP or any third-party claims of infringement. The person granting the rights, especially in a license, must be indemnified against all illegal and improper uses of the IP including indemnification against any legal proceedings that may arise as a result of such actions of the grantee.

8. Further assignments:

Depending on the rights being granted and the discussions between parties, the rights that are being transferred may be further assigned by the parties. Note however, there must be a clear bar on further assignment of rights and obligations especially when the promises made by the parties concerned are personal in nature.

9. Standard form clauses:

Other than the specific terms detailed above, all the standard form clauses that find their place in other agreements must also be included in IP assignments and licenses.

In this part we will discuss certain specific types of agreements and clauses in relation to copyrights, patents and trademarks.

1. Copyright:

1.1.  Film-related agreements: The producer of a film is the author of a film. [2] The producer enters into several agreements including with writers, composers of music, etc. in order to create various works which will be included in the film. An effective contract between the producer and other authors such as the music composer, writer, etc. would help avoid any disputes as to the ownership of the film and the use of other content in the making of the film. The producer also enters into agreements with financiers to finance the making of the film, and with distributors and digital partners. Some aspects of these agreements have been discussed below:

1.1.1. Agreement with composer of music: It is industry practice for the producer of a film to engage the music composer to compose the music and the background score for the film. Under the Copyright Act, 1957 (“ Copyright Act ”), the composer is the author of the musical work. It is often the case that until the release of the film the producer retains the copyrights in all the musical works by entering into a contract of service with the music composer. [3]

The producer, as the owner of the copyright in the musical works under a contract of service, can either retain all the copyrights or assign the rights to a music label. Usually, when the producer assigns the rights in the musical works to a music label, the producer, who is the owner of the film, retains the right to use the sound recording as a part of the film, and the music label would then hold the rights in the sound recordings and the underlying musical works, and can commercialize such music through sales or further licenses. The basic goal here is for the producer to leverage the rights in the music in a profitable manner.

While this is generally the industry practice, it is legally possible for a composer to retain the rights in his works. Such an agreement would encompass a limited license from the composer allowing the use of the musical works in the film by the producer.

1.1.2. Agreement with lyricist: Similar to the composer, the lyricist is also engaged by the producer to write the lyrics for various songs that are usually part of Indian films. Copyrights in lyrics, which are literary works as per the Copyright Act, will be retained by the producer or transferred by him to the music label. The lyricist is also eligible to receive unassignable royalty from the use of the lyrics.

i. To protect the interests of the producer, the agreement with the composer and lyricist must contain a clause that clearly states that all the IP in the musical and literary works will belong to the producer.

ii. In appropriate circumstances, it is also prudent to include a clause giving creative control over the final product to the producer.

iii. As discussed in Section 1.2.2 of the first paper in this series, composers and lyricists continue to retain unassignable royalty rights in the musical works.

iv. These agreements must contain a clause with specific timelines within which the composer must deliver the musical works.

1.1.3. Agreement with writers: The producer of a film usually engages more than one writer to write the story, script, screenplay, dialogues, etc. These works amount to literary works under the Copyright Act. It has been held by the Madras High Court in Thiagarajan Kumararaja v. Capital Film Works, [4] that the producer of a film has the rights to dub the film into any number of languages and this right is part of her copyright under Section 14(d) of the Copyright Act. On the other hand, it has also been held that the producer can remake the film in any number of languages only if she owns the script because remaking a film would require changes being made to the underlying script. Therefore, where a producer proposes to remake the film in various languages, apart from permission to use the script for the making of the film itself, the producer needs to entirely retain the copyrights in the script in order to be able to remake the film. [5]

i. If it is the intention of the producer to make remakes or sequels of the film, it is advisable for her to ensure that she owns the script. Whether the agreement is a contract of service or otherwise, it is prudent to have an IP clause specifically stating that the producer seeks to own the script.

ii. On the other hand, if the writer owns the script, any remake can only be made with a license from the writer.

iii. The contract must specify the degree of creative control each party has over the script or story.

iv. If the producer seeks to own the script in its entirety, she must also ensure this includes the characters and other distinctive elements of the script. [6]

v. This agreement must contain a clause with specific timelines within which the writers must deliver the scripts.

1.1.4. Agreements engaging principal director, actors and other individuals: Under Indian law, a director of a film does not have any copyrights in any aspect of the film. Therefore, producers in India can enter into a regular contract of service with the director. There will be certain circumstances where the director is also the scriptwriter, in which cases there can be a common agreement which includes the terms in 1.1.3 above and the contain clauses covering her directorial responsibilities. The director will be remunerated for her services.

Additionally, there are agreements that the producer enters with actors and other artists. These agreements will define the roles and responsibilities of the actor and her remuneration. The actor or other artists typically do not own any of the copyrights in the content or the character.

1.1.5. Credits clauses under 1.1.1 to 1.1.4: The parties to these agreements must also approve the manner in which each of these persons is credited in the film.

Example: “The Parties agree that the Composer shall be credited in the film as “Music by ______” by the Producer. The Composer shall have no copyrights in the sound recordings or the Musical Works in the film by way of such credits.”

1.1.6. Financing agreement/film investment agreement: The producer can enter into agreements with various persons for raising funds to make a film. These agreements can be structured in many ways and might in certain cases result in transfer of ownership of IP. Some types of investment agreements are discussed below:

i. Film investment agreement: The producer and the third-party investor can agree to co-produce the film. In these cases, the parties must arrive at a revenue sharing arrangement. The co-producer will also have a share in the IP that is consequential to the extent of investment.

ii. Rights agreement: The producer can, in exchange for money, grant the financier some right in the IP. For instance, if the producer seeks an investment of Rupees Fifty Lakhs, he can grant the dubbing rights, or overseas distribution rights in exchange for the same. Such agreements work just like assignments or exclusive licenses but are a useful way in which producers can raise funds.

1.1.7. Theatrical distribution agreement: Producers must also enter into various distribution agreements with several distributors for distributing the film in theatres in various territories. Essentially, what the distributor receives under these agreements is a limited license or assignment to communicate the film to the public through theatrical distribution. The term of these agreements is limited to the period during which the film would be distributed in theatres.

Example: “In consideration of the mutual promises, payments and other terms contained herein, Producer hereby exclusively [assigns/licenses] to the Distributor the right to communicate the Film to the public only via theatrical distribution in the Territory for the Term.”

1.1.8.  Production of television/web-series/other shows/online content: For the production of any other content, all the agreements described in 1.1.1 to 1.1.8 will be used. However, the manner in which the IP is shared and owned may differ depending upon the facts and circumstances of each case. For example, let us say XYZ Pvt. Ltd. is producing a stand-up comedy special with a prominent comedian Mr. P. The parties can agree that the content will be written, performed and, therefore, owned by Mr. P, and where XYZ Pvt. Ltd. only takes a commission and a share of the revenue.

1.2. Album production:

1.2.1. Agreements with music composers and lyricists: These agreements are similar to the agreements described in 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 above. The producer of the sound recording may engage composers and lyricists and seek to retain the copyrights in the underlying works along with the sound recording he produces and owns.

1.2.2. Agreement with the singers/other artists: The singers and other artists are usually engaged under a contract of service to sing in a studio, which performance is recorded, edited and produced into a sound recording at the instance of the producer. The singer does not own the copyright in the musical work, literary work or the sound recording itself.

1.3.  Digital distribution of copyrighted works: Songs, films or any other copyrighted content can be distributed and communicated to the public through a variety of digital platforms. Today, most popular among these are OTT platforms such as Netflix, Prime Video, etc. Typically, these entities enter into either an exclusive license with the owner of the content for a particular term and for a specific territory. Since these entities are able to geo-block the content, they avail territory specific licenses for various titles. Therefore, a TV series that is available in the United States of America on X OTT service, may instead be available on Y OTT service in India. These entities do not seek a complete transfer of title typically but restrict themselves to a license for a specified term.

i. The agreements must contain a schedule detaining the timeline for delivery of prints and materials to the platform along with the technical specifications for such materials.

ii. Clauses must specify the manner of use of any trademarks and other artwork belonging to either party.

iii. The consideration or license fee can pe paid in a single lumpsum payment or be divided into instalments.

1.4. Book publishing agreements: These agreements are entered between the authors of books and publishers. Under the Copyright Act, the author of a literary work has the right to make copies of her work and sell them. However, such rights are normally transferred to publishing houses that have the means to mass produce the book and aid in the distribution of the work. This may also include various formats in physical or digital form. The rights granted could also include the right to translate the books into various languages. Typically, the author retains the right to make film/television adaptations of the book.

Example: “The Author grants the Publisher the exclusive right during the Term to reproduce, print, publish, distribute, translate, display and transmit the Work, in whole and in part, in the Territory, in such languages and formats as agreed to between the Parties. It is clarified that no film, motion picture, television, radio, dramatic or other adaptation rights are granted to the Publisher and the Author can exploit such rights.”

i. Publishing agreements must contain detailed clauses on when the author will deliver the work to the publisher.

ii. The acceptance of the work for publication is usually left to the discretion of the publisher.

iii. The author gives the publisher the sole and exclusive right to publish and distribute the work. The author, however, may retain other rights such as the right to translate the work, the right to make adaptations, the right to make films, etc.

iv. The author is usually paid a certain advance amount on the date of signing of the agreement. Additionally, royalties may be paid to the author for the sale of each copy of the work payable as a percentage portion of the net sales revenue earned by the publisher.

v. The onus of receiving any prior approvals for copyrighted works to be included in the book usually lies with the author.

1.4.1. Option Purchase agreements: Such agreements are typically entered into between the author of the book and a producer. The agreement grants an option to a purchaser to avail an assignment or a license at a future date to make film/television/digital adaptations of the book. For example, A, the author of a book, can enter into an option-purchase agreement with B who wants to make a film-adaptation of the book. The option purchase agreement will give B a specific timeframe for some groundwork such as testing the viability of the project, raising funds, etc. At the end of the option period, B can exercise the option and have the adaption rights assigned or licensed to her. The author is usually offered an option-fee for the period during which the grantee-purchaser holds on to the option. Once the option is exercised, the parties can enter into an assignment or a license agreement as the case may be.

1.4.2. Adaptation agreement: If the film is based on a story or book written by a third-party upon which the producer seeks to rely, then the producer may avail an adaptation license from the author of the literary work.

1.5.  Software license: In India, software is a subject matter of copyright law. The person writing and creating the program holds a copyright over it. The software can therefore be licensed by the owner for use by another entity. Software licenses are normally granted by companies to their users usually based on a subscription fee model.

Example: “Entity hereby grants the customer a non-exclusive, non-sublicensable, non-assignable, world-wide license to use the Service solely for the internal business operations of the customer in accordance with the terms of use specified herein.”

1.5.1. Platform licenses for user-generated content: If the software is such that it allows the creation, storage and dissemination of user-generated content, the entity licensing the software must also take a license from each user to store and disseminate the user-generated content. For instance, with applications such as YouTube or TikTok, such a license would be required from the user. The clause must clarify that the user agrees to a non-exclusive, non-sublicensable, non-assignable, royalty-free license to be granted to the entity for the use of the content while the user continues to retain all the copyrights in the content.

1.5.2. Software as a service: Typically, in these agreements, there is an entity that has developed a software and provides services that aid in the productive use of such software. The entity enters into an agreement with the customer granting a customer a license to use the software for its business operations while the entity retains the IP in the software.

Example: “The Company agrees to license and grant access and right to use the Application to the Subscriber and provide to the Subscriber all other services necessary for the productive use of the Application, including, initial setup and installation, user identification, user account and password change management, data import/export, remote technical support, maintenance, training, backup and recovery, and change management ("Services") as further set forth in Schedule [•] of this Agreement.”

i. These agreements must contain a clause preventing any reverse engineering of the software and controlling security breaches. This would also include clauses pertaining to data security and data protection.

ii. The data that belongs to the customer will continue to belong to her while the licensor/service provider will continue to own the software.

1.5.3.  Software development agreement: In certain cases, one may choose to engage the services of a third-party software developer to develop a software or product under a contract of service. For instance, A may have a concept or idea but may not have the expertise to engineer the product. A can engage the services of B, third-party developer, to develop the product. B will be remunerated for his services. But A, whose resources (typically monetary resources as A would bear the operational costs) were expended on developing the product, will be the owner of the IP in the product.

Example: “The Service Provider agrees that all original works that are made by the Service Provider (solely or jointly with others) using the Company’s resources, or any other assistance that may be provided by the Company, pursuant to this Agreement, are protectable by copyright as “works made under a contract of service” under the Copyright Act, 1957.

The Service Provider hereby agrees to transfer and assign all intellectual property rights that may be developed or created by it pursuant to this Agreement without any claim over any such work, and waives any other right that the Service Provider may have in law.”

1.5.4.  Application programming interface (“API”) integration agreement: APIs are tools that permit interaction between various software intermediaries. In API integration agreements, (i) a party licenses its API (either on an exclusive basis or on a non-exclusive basis) to another party for integration of its API into the software (in the form of an app or website), or (ii) two parties propose to integrate their software to create a new product.

i. In these agreements, there must be a two-way obligation to keep the licensee’s tool/programme and the licensor’s API fully functional and usable at all times.

ii. These agreements would also contain clauses on data security, data protection and covenants on the basis that security breaches will be controlled and monitored.

iii. It must be specified that the integration agreement will not result in any transfer of IP and each party will continue to hold their IP rights. However, a limited right to use the tool and the API will be licensed to the other party for the duration of the agreement. In case a new product is created both parties hold rights in the IP jointly.

2. Trademark:

Trademarks can be assigned or licensed irrespective of whether they are registered or unregistered trademarks. Generally, all assignments and licenses of trademarks must be in conformity with the principles and rules under the Trademarks Act, 1999.

Apart from what is covered in Part I of this article, the following must be noted while drafting clauses on assignments and licenses of trademarks.

Assignment:

i. The grant clause in an assignment agreement must clearly specify whether the mark is being assigned together with the goodwill of the business or not.

ii. Assignment agreements must contain a clause/schedule describing all the trademarks that are being assigned, and details pertaining to their registration.

iii. The assignor must agree to execute all necessary documents in order to record the assignment with the Registrar of trademarks under Section 45 of the Trademarks Act.

i. Prevention of naked licensing: While licensing a trademark, the terms of use need to be specific and clear. If a license permits the unbridled use of a trademark without any quality assurance measures in place, such a license amounts to ‘naked licensing’. The clause must also state that the mark can only be used in relation to the goods and services specified in the agreement. Quality control is essential to protect the interests of both the licensor and the end-user of the product.

ii. There must be a separate clause defining the uses of the mark by the licensee that are permitted and uses that are strictly disallowed and not within the ambit of the license.

iii. The agreement must also include a clause stating that no rights in and to the trademarks are being transferred or assigned by virtue of the license.

iv. The more control the licensor would like to exercise over the use of the mark, the stronger must be the quality, use and termination clauses of the agreement.

v. It must be specified that the licensee shall not have the right to further assign or license the mark to any third-party.

Apart from these issues, transfer of trademarks through assignment and license might involve larger commercial arrangements that impact the creation, use and transfer of trademarks. Some of these are discussed below:

2.1.  Transfer of trademark under a franchise agreement: Franchisors typically have proprietary methods of doing business and own trademarks which consumers come to solely associate with the business of the franchisor. Internationally renowned brands such as McDonalds or Krispy Kreme follow this business model where their businesses have proprietary elements which they license to local businesses all over the world. The businesses which acquire a license of this kind under a franchise agreement will have the right to set up a local unit of the franchisors business and run it as per the terms of the franchise agreement.

2.1.1. Use of the franchisor’s trademark: The main condition as to the use of the franchisor’s trademark is that the franchisee will be permitted to use the franchisor’s trademark in accordance with the terms specified in the franchise agreement. Please note that the agreement must clarify that this is a limited use license granted to the licensee and does not result in transfer of ownership. Further, in relation to the franchisor’s business, the franchisee shall not have the right to any mark other than the ones that it is authorized to use under the franchise agreement.

Example: “The Franchisee agrees that the Franchisor is the sole and exclusive owner of the TRADEMARKS and has the absolute right to control the Franchisee’s use of the TRADEMARKS. For removal of doubts, the Franchisee agrees and affirms that it has not acquired any right, title or interest in the TRADEMARKS and that its limited right to use the TRADEMARKS is governed by the terms of this agreement. Further, the Franchisee agrees that it shall not register, in its name or in the name of any associated entity or person, any trademark, logo or domain name that is identical or similar to the TRADEMARKS.”

i. The franchisee must not be permitted to take any action against any infringer without the prior consent of the franchisor. It is best for the franchisor to initiate any legal action as the sole and absolute owner of the mark.

ii. If the agreement is terminated, any action taken by the franchisee in respect of the trademarks must revert to the benefit of the franchisor and the franchisee must stop associating itself with the trademarks of the franchisor.

iii. There must be a clause allowing the franchisor to terminate the agreement if the trademark is used in a manner that would bring disrepute to the business of the franchisor.

iv. There must be clauses controlling the use of the trademark by the franchisee in advertising and marketing literature.

1.2.  Marketing Agreement: A marketing agreement allows a third-party a limited right to display the trademarks of the licensor while marketing, advertising and selling products that belong to the licensor.

i. This agreement has to specify that the licensor continues to own the trademark and this agreement does not result in any transfer of ownership.

ii. Such a license must specify the manner in which the trademark is permitted to be used. Any contravention of such use restriction would amount to a material breach of the agreement.

Patents can be assigned or licensed for specific purposes meaning that patent rights can be granted to make, sell or import the subject matter of a patent.

Some specific agreements pertaining to patentable subject matter are discussed below:

3.1.  Technology transfer agreement: Technology transfer agreements (“ TTA ”) involve the licensor transferring its IP and know-how to the transferee for a specific period of time and for a specific purpose. A large part of arrangements of this nature would depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. Not everything that is transferable under a TTA will be IP. One part of the transfer may relate to the licensing of IP such as patents or software for specific purposes, while the other would include information and know-how. Clauses in relation to the sharing of information and other know-how are strictly contractual and are secured by having strong confidentiality clauses in the agreement.

i. The agreement must define the IP or the technical know-how to be transferred clearly. The definition must be tightly worded so as to cover only what is necessary, failing which, the licensee will secure access to more than what was intended by the parties.

ii. The territory within which these rights can be exercised must be specific, and the term must also be specified. The term must be agreed upon based on prevailing norms of the Reserve Bank of India and other regulations in this regard. The termination clause must specify the consequences of early termination, reversion of the IP to the licensor, and, to the extent possible, destruction of any confidential material or information within the possession of the licensor.

iii. Consideration including royalty payments must be structured properly.

iv. As far as the know-how is concerned, the confidentiality clause matters the most. The confidential information must be clearly identified as such. If the information is highly technical, this clause must be drafted in an industry specific manner. The consequences for any breach must be clearly identified.

v. The tax liability under TTAs varies based on whether the parties are Indian or would include foreign collaborators. The tax liability clause must identify the manner in which all taxes must be paid.

vi. TTAs involve heavy obligations on both parties. The licensor must ensure that the technology is used properly and for that ensure that the licensee, at all times, has the technical capabilities that are required to achieve it. This may include training, testing, quality control and other measures. The licensee will have the responsibility to use the technology to the fullest, make all payments on time and to maintain confidentiality throughout the duration of the agreement.

vii. Use of other IP, i.e., brand names or other literature, must be carved out through separate clauses defining all permissible uses.

4. Employment agreement:

Employment agreements must typically contain a blanket clause allowing the use and transfer of all IP created by the employee, during the course of employment, by and to the employer, especially where the employee is a senior member of the team. The clause also grants exclusive rights in all such IP to the employer.

Example: “The Employee agrees that all and any work executed and performed in the course of employment, whether or not conducted on the premises of the Company but related to the business of the Company, is being done on behalf of the Company. In this regard any discoveries, inventions, work created, data produced, concepts, ideas, creations and discoveries belong to the Company. The Employee hereby agrees to transfer and assign all intellectual property rights that may be developed or created by her without any claim over any such work, and waives any other right that she may have in law.

The Employee further agrees to execute, upon the request of the Company all necessary papers and otherwise provide proper assistance to enable the Company to obtain for itself (and to vest legal title in the Company), patents, copyrights, or other legal protection for such inventions, discoveries, innovations, improvements, original works of authorship, trade secrets and technical or business information in any and all countries.”

In this article, which is the second of the two-part series on transfer of IP, we have discussed the manner in which various clauses in an IP transfer agreement must be drafted. There are several ways in which these agreements can be structured, but it is important to keep in mind the intention of the parties and the extent of rights that are to be granted. Similarly, rights must be granted in such a manner that would allow the full and proper use of the IP. Note that the example clauses given in this article are only indicative, and in any agreement, these clauses must be drafted to suit the relevant purpose and context.

This paper has been written by Suchita Ambadipudi (Partner) and Sheetal Srikanth (Associate).

[1] In Waterman v. MacKenzie et.al , 138 US 252, the Supreme Court of the United States held that to determine whether an agreement is an assignment or a license, the legal effect of the clauses and the grant must be considered and not the mere nomenclature of the agreement or the headings for various clauses.

[2] Section 2(d) and 2(uu), Copyright Act, 1957.

[3] Section 17, Copyright Act, 1957.

[4] 2018 (73) PTC 365 (Mad).

[5] For similar issues arising out of making a sequel of a film, see, Ian Eagles “Copyright and the Sequel: What Happens Next?” in F MacMillan (ed), New Directions in Copyright Law, Vol 6, (Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, 2007) pp. 35-65. See also, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited v. Ameya Vinod Khopkar Entertainment and Ors. , MANU/MH/0512/2020.

[6] For an overview of issues arising out of character- related rights, see, Arbaaz Khan Production Private Limited v. Northstar Entertainment Private Limited and Ors. , 2016 (67) PTC 525 (Bom).

Our Offices

11, 1st Floor, Free Press House 215, Nariman Point Mumbai – 400021

+91 22 67362222

7A, 7th Floor, Tower C, Max House, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase 3, New Delhi – 110020

+91 11 6904 4200

68 Nandidurga Road Jayamahal Extension Bengaluru – 560046

+91 80 46462300

Binoy Bhavan 3rd Floor, 27B Camac Street Kolkata – 700016

+91 33 40650155/56

The rules of the Bar Council of India do not permit advocates to solicit work or advertise in any manner. This website has been created only for informational purposes and is not intended to constitute solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work in any manner. By clicking on 'Agree' below, you acknowledge and confirm the following:

a) there has been no solicitation, invitation, advertisement or inducement of any sort whatsoever from us or any of our members to solicit any work through this website;

b) you are desirous of obtaining further information about us on your own accord and for your use;

c) no information or material provided on this website is to be construed as a legal opinion and use of this website will not create any lawyer-client relationship;

d) while reasonable care has been taken in ensuring the accuracy of the contents of the website, Argus Partners shall not be responsible for the results of any actions taken on the basis of information provided in this website or for any error or omission in the website; and

e) in cases where the user has any legal issues, the user must seek independent legal advice.

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog

Assignment of Copyrights & Legal Implications

Copyright gives authors a bundle of personal property or economic rights in an original work of authorship. These rights include the rights to reproduce, create derivative works, distribute work to the public, publicly perform a work, publicly display visual works, and digitally transmit sound records. They belong exclusively to a copyright holder.

Usually, the copyright holder is the person who created the work. However, any of these economic rights, or any part of these economic rights, can be transferred. Under the Visual Artists Rights Act (VARA), an artist’s moral rights in a work of fine art can be waived but not assigned.

An original owner who assigns their copyright to someone else will not retain any right to control how the work is used.

The transfer of economic rights may be on an exclusive basis, which requires a written agreement, or a non-exclusive basis, which does not require a written agreement. Most commonly, this transfer is accomplished by assignment or license. Unlike a license in which the copyright owner maintains their ownership, an assignment is similar to a sale. The original copyright owner sells the rights to a third party and cannot control how the rights are used, just as they would not be able to control how personal property that they sold was used once it was transferred.

Generally, a license is preferable if a copyright holder expects to continue exercising interests and control over the work. For example, if you assign your copyright in a song to a music producer, the decision about whether to allow a film studio to use your song in a film will belong to the producer, not to you. If you license your copyright in a song in a limited capacity to a music producer, however, you will continue to be able to license your copyright in the song to a film producer.

Assignments can be used for many different purposes, such as security for debt, as an asset passed to heirs, or as part of the distribution of assets after a bankruptcy proceeding. Once you assign your rights to somebody else, however, you are permanently giving away your right to control the work. That means if you try to exercise any of the rights you have assigned, you are committing copyright infringement even though you created the work. If you assign your copyright to somebody else and regret the loss, you may be able to buy your copyright back from that person, but whether or not to sell it back to you is up to the assignee.

How Is Copyright Assigned?

Under Section 204 , a transfer of ownership is only valid if the instrument, note, or memorandum of transfer is in writing, signed by the copyright owner or their duly authorized agent. Generally, a certificate of acknowledgment is not required for the transfer to be valid, but it can be used as prima facie evidence that a transfer was executed if it is issued by someone authorized to administer oaths in the United States or, if the transfer is executed abroad, if the certificate is issued by a United States diplomatic or consular official, or a person authorized to administer oaths who also provides a certificate.

Formally recording an assignment with the Copyright Office is not required but can be advantageous.

You do not have to record an assignment in order to assign the interest. However, there are advantages to recording the assignment, such as creating a public record of the transfer details, giving constructive notice to members of the public, establishing priority of rights when there are conflicting transfers of ownership, validating the transfer of the copyright against a third party, or in some cases perfecting a security interest.

Last reviewed October 2023

Intellectual Property Law Center Contents   

• Intellectual Property Law Center
• Copyright Infringement & Related Lawsuits
• Copyright Ownership Under the Law
• Assignment of Copyrights & Legal Implications
• Copyright Licensing Under the Law
• Copyright Registration Under the Law
• Safe Harbors for Online Service Providers Under Copyright Law
• Criminal Copyright Infringement Laws
• Enforcement of Copyrights Through Lawsuits & Criminal Charges
• Fair Use Defense to Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
• Software Development Agreements & Related Legal Concerns
• End-User License Agreements Imposing Legal Restrictions on Software
• Lists, Directories, and Databases Under Copyright Law
• Photos of Buildings and Architecture Under Copyright Law
• Photos of Copyrighted or Trademarked Works & the Fair Use Defense to Infringement Lawsuits
• Works in the Public Domain After Copyrights Legally Expire
• Copyrights and Credits for Songwriters Under the Law
• Music Samples and Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
• Playing Music in Stores or Restaurants — How to Avoid Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
• Consignment Sales by Artists to Stores & Legal Protections
• Destruction of Copyrighted Works & Limited Legal Protections
• Copyright Legal Forms
• Trademark Law
• Trade Secret Law
• Choosing Among Patent, Copyright, and Trademark for Legal Protection
• Intellectual Property Law FAQs
• Find an Intellectual Property Lawyer

Related Areas   

• Small Business Legal Center
• Entertainment Law Center
• Communications and Internet Law Center
• Sports Law Center
• Related Areas
• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials

When a Promise Isn’t Enough – Crafting Proper Employee Patent Assignments

Christopher M. King

Related insights, foley automotive update, significant recent decisions relevant to private company m&a, rng project fundamentals.

You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience.

• 01 Family-owned Businesses
• 02 High Net Worth Individuals
• 03 Private Client
• 01 Construction and Engineering
• 03 Financial Institutions
• 04 Insurance
• 05 International Trade, Transport & Maritime
• 06 Leisure & Hospitality
• 07 Life Sciences & Healthcare
• 08 Real Estate
• 09 Retail & Consumer Goods
• 10 Technology, Media & Telecommunications (TMT)
• 01 Arbitration
• 02 Banking & Finance
• 03 Commercial
• 04 Corporate & M&A
• 05 Cyber security & data protection
• 06 Employment
• 07 Environment, social and governance
• 08 Intellectual Property
• 09 Litigation
• 10 Regulatory & Compliance

Knowledge Hub

• 02 Regulatory & Legal Updates

Home / Knowledge Hub / News

Intellectual Property Right Assignments

Intellectual Property Right Assignments Q&A: United Arab Emirates

Registration and recordal aspects of intellectual property right assignments, warranties and indemnities in intellectual property right assignments, express warranties from assignor, assigning specific types of intellectual property rights, confirmatory assignments of intellectual property rights, contributor details, related insights, bsa law hosts art dialogue with the french ambassador to the uae.

BSA Law, a leading regional law firm headquartered in the...

Generative AI has an intellectual property problem, here's why

Munir Suboh and Felicity Hammond of the BSA Intellectual Property...

Global Legal Post: UAE Anti-Counterfeiting Guide

This chapter forms part of the Anti-counterfeiting Law Over Borders...

2021 in Review: The Legal and Regulatory changes impacting the UAE

2021 was an exciting year for the UAE: the market...

The impact of the new UAE Laws on the creative sector

The press release says the raft of new laws and...

ICLG: UAE Franchise Laws and Regulations 2022

The following UAE Franchise Laws and Regulations 2022 Guidecovers common...

Dubai DIFC's new IP regulations provide welcome clarity

The following article was originally published for BSA on Zawya....

Recent Updates and Developments in UAE Intellectual Property Practice and Procedures

In the following article, the BSA Intellectual Property practice provides...

The Intellectual Property Law Blog at Loyola University Chicago

Transforming challenges into opportunities: my journey into intellectual property law.

Author : Katelyn Sears Assistant Blogger Loyola University Chicago School of Law, J.D. 2026

Epilepsy: a life-altering word. Time stood still as the doctor gave me her diagnosis. My knuckles whitened as my grip tightened on the armchair. After years of not knowing the root cause of my health issues, I now had an answer. My diagnosis changed the trajectory of my life as I knew it. This pivotal moment separated my life into a “before” and an “after.” The love for math and science from my “before” life melded into a passion for navigating the landscape of innovation and technology. This passion defined my “after” life, and eventually propelled me into intellectual property law . But, let me start at the beginning with the “before.”

I’ve always had a love for math and science. This love sent me down the path of obtaining my bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering at Florida State University. I dove headlong into my courses and as much research as I could get my hands on. I explored a range of opportunities through a National Science Foundation internship , an undergraduate honors thesis , and a job working as a technical writer for a government defense contractor. Before my diagnosis, I was content with synthesizing data. I enjoyed solving problems with formulas. Looking back, it was easy to be detached from the real-world implications of innovations created in labs like the ones I worked in. It was easy to crunch the numbers, perform the lab duties, and forget about the impact of what I was doing.

Being diagnosed with epilepsy allowed me to remember how inventions can truly change people’s lives. Using epilepsy treatments that addressed my symptoms transformed my life in a profound way. My experience with how inventions can positively impact lives made me want to help others have this positive experience as well.

After my diagnosis, I reevaluated my passions. I recognized that my love for the STEM field was no longer located entirely in the lab. I realized that I wanted to align myself more with the “human” side of STEM. What may have seemed like routine lab performances were now smaller parts of a greater whole. When I would be doing daily quality control tests on cell cultures, I now was able to more clearly see the bigger picture of how this impacts real people. I became passionate about advocating for the inventions that were now a bigger part of my own reality. For groundbreaking technology and treatment to reach others like it supported me, the promotion of innovation is essential. Promoting innovation can lead to new inventions, and ultimately improve quality of life. With my experience in STEM and research, the best way to accomplish this seemed to be by pursuing a career in supporting creation.

My lab and STEM experience showed me how much time and resources go into research and development. My diagnosis gave me an appreciation for the importance of rewarding that hard work to incentivize further innovation. Without incentives, who would want to spend all the time and money on developing inventions? These two perspectives have shown me that the key to promoting innovation lies in supporting the inventors behind it.

With this new realization, I was eager to explore a new path that would allow me to support inventors in developing important innovations. I believed that innovations of all types have the potential to positively impact everyone’s lives. This belief sparked a new passion in me for protecting these innovations in order to ensure their continuous growth and lasting impact. Although my diagnosis may have given me a new perspective, it hasn’t weakened my interest in STEM. Despite realizing that my desired role extended beyond the laboratory, I still wanted to pursue a path that merged my newfound passion with my love for STEM.

Discovering IP

With a new desire to carve out a different path, I turned to Google for some guidance on where to start. It wasn’t long into my search that I came across the field of intellectual property (IP) law. Intrigued, I reached out to an attorney I knew so I could learn more. She connected me with her former law school friend who practices IP litigation . Through this connection, I learned about how IP attorneys help protect intellectual property by advocating for IP owners in lawsuits. Our conversation also highlighted the need for attorneys with scientific backgrounds who understood both science and the law. That was the moment when I realized that becoming an IP attorney seemed like a great way to combine my previous love for STEM with my newfound passion for protecting innovation.

From my Google search and meeting with an IP litigation attorney, I learned that intellectual property includes various types of protections, such as patents . With a patent, inventors have the right to exclude others from making their invention for a specified period of time. It is these exclusive rights that can promote innovation by incentivizing investment in research and development. Armed with these exclusive rights, patent holders have the opportunity to recover development expenses. They can generate revenue through licensing agreements, which grant others the right to manufacture their invention for a fee. Alternatively, they can make a profit as the sole seller of the patented invention in the market for the duration of the patent’s validity.

The treatments that have greatly impacted my life, and that of many others, are precisely the kinds of innovations incentivized by the exclusive rights granted by patents. However, one of the remarkable aspects of innovation is its continuous advancement. Why stop at something that performs well when there’s the potential to develop something better? A cool example of this is a potential new epilepsy drug XEN1101 by Xenon. Although it is still pending market approval from the Food and Drug Administration , this drug received a patent in October of 2021. By securing this patent, Xenon will be able to use its exclusive rights to recover the significant financial investment required to develop such a drug. Given that epilepsy drugs are already available on the market, one might question why a company would bother to develop a new seizure treatment. Without patent protection, such endeavors might indeed appear unworthy of the expense. Luckily, this isn’t the case.

XEN1101 helps those with focal seizures. Currently, 50% of patients with focal seizures are considered inadequately managed. Early clinical data shows that XEN1101 has the potential to reduce their seizures by ≥ 50%, which would greatly improve their quality of life. Even with current epilepsy treatments on the market, there is not a one size fits all. There is always potential to develop something better. With the possibility of patent protection, innovators like Xenon can have the necessary motivation to continue striving for improvement that can benefit us all.

This, in a nutshell, is why I want to be an IP lawyer. As an IP lawyer, I can work alongside inventors to help them obtain patents and assert their exclusive rights over the inventions they worked hard to develop. I am optimistic and excited by the possibilities that exist in this field and my potential role in protecting the revolutionary innovations that are emerging. After recognizing that I wanted to pursue IP law, I knew I just needed to find the right place to do it.

IP at Loyola

When applying to law school, I knew I wanted to be at a school that would set me up for a successful career in IP. I wanted a supportive environment with ample opportunities to do so. Prior to committing to law school at Loyola, I met Professor Cynthia Ho at the annual IP alumni event. Here, she introduced me to current Loyola IP students and alumni. Everyone I spoke to was eager to tell me about their path into IP and give me advice for how to navigate the transition from a STEM background to law school. I knew that if these individuals were willing to be this generous with their time and advice to me as a prospective student, it would only be amplified once I chose to commit to Loyola.

As a first-year law student (“1L”) at Loyola, my understanding of IP has expanded significantly. This understanding is attributed to the unique opportunity to take IP classes as a 1L, such as IP legal writing and an IP elective. In IP legal writing, I have learned about IP through hypothetical cases involving issues with patents, copyrights , issues, and trademarks . I particularly enjoyed our first assignment, which involved completing a research memo on the potential violation of a patent for peanut butter pancakes . I am also enrolled in the IP elective, Global Access to Medicine: A Patent Perspective . This elective has shown me different perspectives on how patents can both promote innovation and hinder access to affordable medicine. Each of these courses have exposed to me how IP works in the real world and confirmed my interest in IP. The more I learn about IP, the more I desire to learn even more.

Additionally, I am currently a 1L Representative for Loyola’s IP Law Society (“IPLS”) . As a 1L Representative, I work as a liaison between the executive board and my section to notify them of all the IP opportunities throughout the year. I have enjoyed sharing my excitement about IP with my fellow students. Being involved in IPLS has also given me the opportunity to attend various IP networking events. At these events, I engaged with attorneys from diverse professional backgrounds and learned about the vast range of opportunities available in the field. I am incredibly excited to explore and apply this interest even further this summer, as a 1L Summer Associate at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun (an IP firm).

My “before” and “after” are defined by one event but one is not more important than the other. My experiences and knowledge gained “before” continues to influence my “after” everyday through my decision to attend Loyola and pursue IP. I am excited to see how my story guides me through the long career I have ahead of me!

Katelyn Sears Assistant Blogger Loyola University Chicago School of Law, J.D 2026