This short video introduces viewers to a powerful 15 step method for undertaking and publishing literature reviews including by those new to the discipline. It is the first in a series of four videos on the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review providing an overview of the method in outlined in: Pickering, C.M. and Byrne, J. (2014).
PDF Systematic quantitative literature reviews
Step 15: Revise the paper till ready for submission. More practice = fewer drafts - but few people get it right first go as different drafts have different functions. • Early-drafts are about getting the information on paper. • Mid-drafts are about working out a better way to convey the information.
Systematic Quantitative Literature Review
Systematic quantitative literature review is a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others exploring new disciplines. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.
PDF Systematic quantitative literature reviews
So what about using a systematic quantitative literature review? 1. Systematic = methods to survey literature and select papers to include are explicit and reproducible 2. Quantitative = measure of the amount (number of papers) of research within different sections of topic 3.
The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews
The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. View/ Open. 82649_1.pdf (403.6Kb) Author(s) Pickering, Catherine. Byrne, Jason. Griffith University Author(s) Pickering, Catherine M. Year published. 2014. Metadata
Sport tourism collaboration: a systematic quantitative literature review
This study conducted a systemic quantitative review of sport tourism collaboration. In total, 40 peer-reviewed academic manuscripts published in English-language journals between 1996 and February 2020 were considered, based on predefined criteria, and reviewed in order to address several research objectives.
Systematic Quantitative Literature Review
Systematic quantitative literature review is a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others exploring new disciplines.It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.Narrative methods that are common in research theses, rely on the expertise and ...
Library Guides: Literature Reviews: Literature Review
Systematic quantitative literature review - This method developed by Griffith University's School of Environment bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analyses to enable student's to produce results that are reliable, quantifiable and reproducible.
Catherine Pickering Profile
This includes the 2021 Griffith University Research Excellence Award for Research Supervision, in part in recognition of the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review method used by researchers in more than 1,300 publications. She is also the chair of the Griffith Biodiversity working group and landscape advisor for Griffith University ...
Using Systematic Quantitative Literature Reviews for Urban ...
The systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) is a method for undertaking literature reviews, based on the key principles of rigour, comprehensiveness, and repeatability. The method has 15 steps that begin with ideation and conceptualisation, proceeding to searching databases, coding papers, analysing patterns and trends, and then ...
Systematic Quantitative Literature Review and Advancing SQLR
Systematic quantitative literature reviews are a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others new to an area. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.
Publishing not perishing: how research students transition from novice
Case studies are used to highlight how a new systematic quantitative literature review method, developed for the social and natural sciences, is beneficial as students can more readily create knowledge, produce text, and so transition from novice to knowledgeable and publish rather than perish.
Host-children of tourism destinations: systematic quantitative
Elaine has been identified as an Emerging Tourism Scholar by e-Review of Tourism Research. She is a proud volunteer administrator of Women Academics in Tourism (WAiT). Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Management, Griffith University. Catheryn's current research interest is in tourist ...
Events Calendar
Systematic quantitative literature reviews are a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others new to an area. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis. ... This session is for current Griffith University staff and students only. Event ...
COMMENTS
This short video introduces viewers to a powerful 15 step method for undertaking and publishing literature reviews including by those new to the discipline. It is the first in a series of four videos on the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review providing an overview of the method in outlined in: Pickering, C.M. and Byrne, J. (2014).
Step 15: Revise the paper till ready for submission. More practice = fewer drafts - but few people get it right first go as different drafts have different functions. • Early-drafts are about getting the information on paper. • Mid-drafts are about working out a better way to convey the information.
Systematic quantitative literature review is a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others exploring new disciplines. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.
So what about using a systematic quantitative literature review? 1. Systematic = methods to survey literature and select papers to include are explicit and reproducible 2. Quantitative = measure of the amount (number of papers) of research within different sections of topic 3.
The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers. View/ Open. 82649_1.pdf (403.6Kb) Author(s) Pickering, Catherine. Byrne, Jason. Griffith University Author(s) Pickering, Catherine M. Year published. 2014. Metadata
This study conducted a systemic quantitative review of sport tourism collaboration. In total, 40 peer-reviewed academic manuscripts published in English-language journals between 1996 and February 2020 were considered, based on predefined criteria, and reviewed in order to address several research objectives.
Systematic quantitative literature review is a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others exploring new disciplines.It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.Narrative methods that are common in research theses, rely on the expertise and ...
Systematic quantitative literature review - This method developed by Griffith University's School of Environment bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analyses to enable student's to produce results that are reliable, quantifiable and reproducible.
This includes the 2021 Griffith University Research Excellence Award for Research Supervision, in part in recognition of the Systematic Quantitative Literature Review method used by researchers in more than 1,300 publications. She is also the chair of the Griffith Biodiversity working group and landscape advisor for Griffith University ...
The systematic quantitative literature review (SQLR) is a method for undertaking literature reviews, based on the key principles of rigour, comprehensiveness, and repeatability. The method has 15 steps that begin with ideation and conceptualisation, proceeding to searching databases, coding papers, analysing patterns and trends, and then ...
Systematic quantitative literature reviews are a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others new to an area. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis.
Case studies are used to highlight how a new systematic quantitative literature review method, developed for the social and natural sciences, is beneficial as students can more readily create knowledge, produce text, and so transition from novice to knowledgeable and publish rather than perish.
Elaine has been identified as an Emerging Tourism Scholar by e-Review of Tourism Research. She is a proud volunteer administrator of Women Academics in Tourism (WAiT). Catheryn Khoo-Lattimore is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Tourism, Sport and Hotel Management, Griffith University. Catheryn's current research interest is in tourist ...
Systematic quantitative literature reviews are a smart and effective method for undertaking literature reviews, particularly for research students and others new to an area. It bridges the gap between traditional narrative review methods and meta-analysis. ... This session is for current Griffith University staff and students only. Event ...