Main navigation
- Graduate Students
- Faculty & Staff
- General requirements
- Preparation of a thesis
- Initial Thesis Submission
- Thesis examiners
- Evaluation of written thesis
- Thesis examination failures
- Doctoral oral defence
- Final Thesis Submission
- Thesis Writing and Support Resources
- Letters of Completion/PGWP
Evaluation of a Written Thesis
Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis in myThesis, according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. For an example of the criteria, please see the forms: see: Master's Examiner report form ; Doctoral Examiner report form (note these forms are now integrated in myThesis).
Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or ‘not passed’, in addition to a written report. For Master's students, this evaluation determines whether or not the thesis is ready for final submission, even if minor changes are recommended. For Doctoral candidates, this evaluation determines whether or not the candidate is ready to proceed to the oral defence.
If the thesis meets the general criteria for the degree sought, as well as those listed on the examiner's report form it should be evaluated as 'Passed', even if some changes are recommended.
If the overall judgement is 'Passed', examiners are asked to provide:
- A report that includes any recommendations for minor revisions to the thesis (i.e., stylistic or editorial changes that can be completed in three weeks or less).
- For doctoral theses, External Examiners who will not be at the oral defence must also provide a list of questions to be asked of the candidate at the oral defence.
An evaluation of 'Not Passed' should be given if:
- the need for a new study, experimentation, or significant additional research or reformulation.
- the need to address major problems with the presentation of the work. Stylistic or editorial changes are not normally considered to be major revisions, but if the quality of the presentation is so poor that extensive rewriting is required, the thesis should not be passed.
- At least one of the Criteria for the Evaluation of the Thesis (see Master's Examiner report form ; Doctoral Examiner report form ) is judged as unsatisfactory.
Examiners are asked to identify required changes clearly in their reports. The supervisor or another designated person will ensure that the student corrects the thesis and that it appropriately reflects the examiners' suggestions for revisions prior to re-submission of the thesis.
The candidate will normally revise and re-submit the thesis for re-assessment, usually by the same examiner. If/when review of the revised thesis is required, the Thesis Unit will contact the initial examiner to determine their availability. In rare cases, a revised thesis may be sent to a new examiner if the first examiner is not available to re-examine the thesis. For more, please see Thesis examination failures.
If the revised thesis is again ‘not passed’, the student will be withdrawn from the University unless the decision is reversed through an appeal to the Hearing Committee (Bias, Error, or Misrepresentation ).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License . Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, McGill University .
Department and University Information
Graduate and postdoctoral studies.
- Literature review example analysis
- Information and services
- Student support
- Study skills and learning advice
- Study skills and learning advice overview
- Assignment writing
- How to write a literature review
This example shows how a literature review from a PhD thesis can be analysed for its structure, purpose and content.
Three sections of the thesis are analysed to show the:
- relationship between the introduction and the literature review
- structure and purpose of dedicated literature review chapters
- inclusion of literature review in other chapters of the thesis.
Access the thesis
Co-witnesses and the effects of discussion on eyewitness memory by Helen M Paterson
Overview of thesis (introduction)
This introductory section is less than two pages long.
The first paragraph:
- states the overall objective of the thesis
- defines the introduced term
- provides broad motivation for interest in the area
- introduces the sections of the thesis that will address the overall objective.
The other paragraphs describe the content and purpose of each section of the thesis.
Literature review
The literature review is made of up of two chapters.
Chapter 1: Literature review of relevant research
The overall goals of this chapter are to firstly establish the significance of the general field of study, and then identify a place where a new contribution could be made.
The bulk of the chapter critically evaluates the methodologies used in this field to identify the appropriate approach for investigating the research questions.
Chapter 2: Theoretical explanations of memory conformity
Chapter 5, study 3: co-witness contamination.
This chapter has the following structure:
- Introduction
- Discussion.
The introduction introduces the particular study to be reported on, and includes a three-and-a-half page literature review.
The literature review in this chapter:
- links back to the relevant general findings of the earlier literature review chapters
- briefly reviews the broad motivation for this study
- identifies that two previously used methodologies in this field will be compared to resolve questions about the findings of previous studies which had only used a single methodology
- uses previous literature to generate specific hypotheses to test
- reviews additional literature to provide a justification for a second objective to be investigated in the study reported on in this chapter.
Learning Advisers
Our advisers can help undergraduate and postgraduate students in all programs clarify ideas from workshops, help you develop skills and give feedback on assignments.
How a Learning Adviser can help
45+ SAMPLE Thesis Evaluation in PDF | MS Word
Thesis evaluation | ms word, 45+ sample thesis evaluation, what is a thesis evaluation, different types of thesis evaluation, benefits of writing a thesis evaluation, basic elements of a thesis evaluation, how to write a thesis evaluation, what are some examples of thesis, what is the purpose of a thesis evaluation, what are the essential steps in writing a thesis evaluation, how to write a good thesis introduction.
Master Thesis Written Evaluation Form
Honors Critical Thesis Evaluation
Thesis and Dissertation Award Evaluation Report Form
Undergraduate Thesis Supervisor Evaluation Assessment Form
Outstanding Thesis Dissertation External Examiner Evaluation
Senior Honors Thesis Defense Evaluation Criteria Form
PhD Thesis Supervisor Evaluation
Undergraduate Thesis Evaluation Sheet
Thesis Proposal Evaluation For Students
Bachelor Thesis Evaluation Form
Thesis Evaluation Form
Graduate Recital Analysis and Thesis Evaluation
Thesis Defense Evaluation
Thesis Evaluation of Examiners
Thesis Evaluation Report
Thesis Evaluation and Student Worksheet
Thesis Evaluation Status Form
Thesis Prospectus Evaluation Form
Thesis Evaluation Matrix
Department of Mathematics and Statistics Thesis Evaluation Form
Thesis Evaluation Form For Master of Science in Biology
Senior Thesis Evaluation
Basic Thesis Evaluation
Thesis Committee Evaluation
Faculty Thesis Final Evaluation
Thesis Evaluation in PDF
Thesis Dissertation Project Defense Evaluation
Master Thesis Defense Evaluation
Honors College Thesis Evaluation
Thesis Evaluation Plan
Thesis Proposal Evaluation Form
Doctoral Thesis Evaluation Form
Thesis Project Evaluation Form
Thesis Application and Evaluation
Humanities Exit Assessment Thesis Evaluation
Thesis Committee Meeting Evaluation
Master Thesis Evaluation Sheet
Senior Honors Thesis Evaluation Form
Master Thesis Evaluation and Score Assignment
Thesis Evaluation Example
Programmes Thesis Evaluation
Supervisor Thesis Evaluation
Master Thesis Preliminary Evaluation
Thesis Review Evaluation Form
Graduate Thesis Evaluation
Exams Thesis Evaluation Form
1. bachelor thesis evaluation, 2. master thesis evaluation, 3. doctoral thesis evaluation, 1. maintains a clear analysis of thesis work, 2. facilitates organized decision making, 3. aims on a student’s overall performance, 4. provides summative comments , step 3: search for possible errors in a balanced way, what are some examples of thesis evaluation , share this post on your network, file formats, word templates, google docs templates, excel templates, powerpoint templates, google sheets templates, google slides templates, pdf templates, publisher templates, psd templates, indesign templates, illustrator templates, pages templates, keynote templates, numbers templates, outlook templates, you may also like these articles, 50+ sample internship evaluation in pdf | ms word.
Providing invaluable professional experience can be made through facilitating internships to potential individuals, allowing college and undergraduate students to test the concepts and theories that they learned throughout their…
39+ SAMPLE Probationary Evaluation in PDF | MS Word
It is hard to find a job these days. There is a 5.6% unemployment rate in the US this year. Though Trade Economics has predicted that it would go…
browse by categories
- Questionnaire
- Description
- Reconciliation
- Certificate
- Spreadsheet
Information
- privacy policy
- Terms & Conditions
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
the PhD thesis and determines often the success or failure of the whole PhD project. In the introductory part of this evaluation, I commended author´s choice of the topic. Unfortunately, I consider the definition of the goals and the scope of the thesis rather vague. I admit that the scope
thesis outcome for the student if someone reasonably eminent has marked their work). I also know that the student should have been asked who they did NOT want to examine their work and therefore I am not on their hit list. Some examples of theses marked: 1. Sorting out a nightmare in Gender Studies at University of Sydney - mediating between two
1. Evaluation of the Thesis: Complete the evaluation grid below and comment on the criteria in your written report. Criteria for Evaluation of Thesis Excellent Top 10% Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 1. Makes an original contribution to knowledge 2. Advances knowledge in the field 3.
Examiners are asked to evaluate the thesis in myThesis, according to the criteria in the respective thesis examiner report for a Master's or Doctoral thesis. For an example of the criteria, please see the forms: see: Master's Examiner report form; Doctoral Examiner report form (note these forms are now integrated in myThesis). Examiners provide an overall judgment of 'passed' or 'not passed ...
Prize-Winning Thesis and Dissertation Examples. Published on September 9, 2022 by Tegan George.Revised on July 18, 2023. It can be difficult to know where to start when writing your thesis or dissertation.One way to come up with some ideas or maybe even combat writer's block is to check out previous work done by other students on a similar thesis or dissertation topic to yours.
*This evaluation grid and mark allocation serves as a guideline to assist you in marking a thesis . TITLE OF RESEARCH: _____ _____ CRITERIA YES NO N/A The title is concise and descriptive of the research problem/focus area. The abstract is a true reflection of the content of the thesis. 5
A scanned copy of the DAC should appear before the title page of the PDF online submission of your dissertation; no page number should be assigned to the DAC. The title on the DAC must read exactly as it does on the title page of the dissertation. The DAC will be included in all copies of the dissertation.
Template for PhD evaluation reports To facilitate the composition of a synthetic evaluation report, PhD committee members are asked to follow the present template when preparing their individual reports. Specific comments (that would be more like suggestions for rewriting rather than elements of an evaluation) can be added separately. The final ...
This example shows how a literature review from a PhD thesis can be analysed for its structure, purpose and content. Three sections of the thesis are analysed to show the: relationship between the introduction and the literature review. structure and purpose of dedicated literature review chapters. inclusion of literature review in other ...
If you give a 6, the thesis must be excellent. Please provide a specific reason if you decide to give a grade below 4 or a 6. Based on above explanations, the Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences at the University of Bern defines the following six standards for Doctoral thesis evaluation reports: 1. Evaluate the thesis independently.
The examination of a PhD thesis marks an important stage in the PhD student journey. Here, the student's research, thinking and writing are assessed by experts in their field. ... the supervisor can use the tool in Table 1 as a prompt to focus the student's critical self-reflection and evaluation of their work. For example, ...
Step 5: Proofread, Revise, and Prepare the Final Thesis Evaluation Report. Check your entire thesis evaluation. Write all the crucial aspects in your thesis evaluation. If you notice that you overlook some sections that require sufficient points, we suggest that you proofread and revise the document.
Program Evaluation Dissertation Outline Chapter 1: Introduction Clear statement of the research problem Evidence that supports the existence of the problem Probable causes related to the problem Brief description of the need for an evaluation approach Descriptive information related to the organization where the program is
Considering its significance, a PhD degree is not awarded lightly and doctoral candidates undergo a rigorous examination process that involves the evaluation of a written thesis and the viva voce ...
Evaluation Report of PhD Thesis Name of Research Scholar : Registration Number : Department/Centre : ... The thesis is acceptable after minor revisions as specified to the satisfaction of the Oral Board during viva-voce examination.
3.Thesis submission. Within 30 days of submission of synopsis the students submits soft copy (pdf) of the thesis for evaluation. A student can be asked to submit the hard copy of the thesis if required by the examiner. The format for preparation of Ph.D. thesis is placed at Annexure-II.
6 Guide for Preparation and Evaluation of Higher Degree Research Thesis methodological knowledge. The thesis must, therefore, contain ample evidence of the student's familiarity with the research process. The scope of work in a Master degree by research is normally less than that undertaken in a Doctoral programme.
The dissertation contains an introduction, three chapters, conclusion, bibliography and 4 appendices. The distribution of text in the three chapters is disproportionate (100/28/22 pp). The methods used in the thesis are in general adequate and justified. Taking the thesis as a whole, the author demonstrates sufficiently the ability to choose
Your thesis evaluation will be made available to the Dean of Research and is used to decide whether the PhD candidate can be allowed to defend the thesis. Moreover, the Dean will use your evaluation to decide whether the PhD thesis should be c onsidered for a cum laude designation in which case two additional reviewers (external experts) will
This is a sample of an M. Sc. preliminary evaluation report. The report gives different comments that help student to upgrade his/her thesis before final delivery. Discover the world's research
The Materials and Methodssection describes in detail 366 patients with chronic viral hepatitis and cirrhosis, of which 193 men and 173 women, aged 18 to 75 years, who were enrolled in the study between 2016 and 2018. Of these, 241 patients had hepatitis C, 37 had hepatic C cirrhosis, and 88 had hepatitis B.
thesis is not examining precisely the background mechanisms, it/they are not necessary. Table 1 is excellent with clear output. Considering one focus of this thesis, the experimental pain perception, the review of literature of this field is comprehensive and clearly points out the conflicting results. Also the
1997, Tinkler & Jackson 2001, Kiley & Mullins 2002). However, a poorly written thesis generally had a negative effect on the examiner (Johnston 1997, Kiley & Mullins 2002). A panel of 67 scholars from the USA, UK, Australia and Canada identified writing quality as one of the most problematic issues about PhD study (Noble 1994).