example of collaborative problem solving

• Virtual Experiences
• In-Person Experiences
• Hybrid Experiences
• Attend a Demo
• Experience FAQ
• Features & Benefits
• How Pricing Works
• Client Testimonials
• Happiness Guarantee
• Schedule Call
• View Experiences

9 Examples Of Collaboration Skills

By: Grace He | Updated: February 12, 2024

You found our list of examples of collaboration skills .

Collaboration skills are competencies required when working with other team members on a joint objective. Examples include communication, open-mindedness, and conflict resolution. These skills are essential to work successfully with others, get more work done, move up the corporate ladder, and achieve better outcomes.

This article is similar to this guide to collaboration . This guide aims to help improve team cooperation in the workplace. These abilities are similar to team building skills , team management skills , leadership skills , and HR skills .

This article contains:

• what are collaboration skills
• real-life examples of collaboration in business
• teamwork and collaboration skills examples
• ways to build collaborative skills

Let’s get started!

What are collaboration skills?

Collaboration skills are the ability to effectively work with others to achieve common goals through communication, teamwork, and problem-solving. Teams working together on tasks and projects need these capabilities. These skills act like tools that facilitate effective communication, idea-sharing, and the achievement of common objectives. When individuals have strong collaboration skills, they can express their thoughts clearly, actively listen to others, and collectively discover solutions.

A significant collaboration skill is good communication. This ability involves clearly expressing thoughts and understanding others’ viewpoints. Proficient communication ensures mutual understanding and minimizes the chances of misunderstandings. Another essential skill is teamwork, which is productive cooperation and a willingness to embrace diverse opinions. When colleagues function as a team, their combined efforts contribute to the larger picture. Last, effective problem-solving stands as a key collaboration skill. This technique requires innovative thinking to address challenges that arise during projects. By collaborating and leveraging each colleague’s strengths, teams can resolve obstacles more efficiently.

Whether in a professional setting or various aspects of life, collaboration skills hold immense significance for adult workers. These capabilities empower groups to surpass their individual capabilities. Whether tackling work projects, engaging in business endeavors, or participating in group activities, collaboration skills are pivotal in enhancing overall success.

Collaborative skills examples

Collaboration in the workplace may take numerous forms, depending on the employees involved and the media used. For instance, collaborating with a colleague on a short email campaign calls for a different set of skills than working on a project with external customers for a month. The following are some of the most crucial teamwork and collaboration skills examples.

1. Time Management

Time management involves effectively organizing and prioritizing tasks to make the most of available time. This skill relies on setting clear goals, planning how to achieve them, and allocating the right amount of time to each task. Individuals with strong time management skills can balance their responsibilities, meet deadlines, and ensure that projects progress smoothly. This skill is essential for collaboration, as it helps team members stay on track, avoid last-minute rushes, and contribute their best efforts to collective projects.

2. Cultural Sensitivity

Cultural sensitivity is the ability to respect and appreciate the diverse perspectives, values, and practices of colleagues from different cultures. This skill involves being aware of potential cultural differences and ensuring that interactions are inclusive and respectful. In collaborative settings, cultural sensitivity fosters an environment where team members feel valued and understood, leading to better communication and cooperation. By recognizing and celebrating cultural diversity, individuals can work harmoniously and use their varied backgrounds to achieve shared goals.

Get our free team building toolbox

• icebreaker games
• bingo cards

3. Adaptive Learning

Adaptive learning refers to the willingness and ability to learn and adjust in response to new information, situations, or challenges. This process is about staying open-minded, embracing change, and continuously expanding knowledge and skills. In collaborative environments, adaptive learners can bring fresh ideas and insights, helping the team evolve and innovate. These workers can also bridge gaps in knowledge and contribute diverse perspectives, enhancing problem-solving and overall team effectiveness.

4. Resilience

Resilience is the capacity to bounce back from setbacks, challenges, or difficult situations. This technique involves maintaining a positive attitude, persevering through adversity, and learning from failures. In collaborative contexts, resilience is crucial because teams often encounter obstacles that can slow progress or lead to disappointment. Resilient individuals can inspire others to stay motivated, find alternative solutions when things do not go as planned, and create a supportive atmosphere that encourages team members to keep moving forward together.

5. Communication

It is crucial to express yourself clearly if you want other coworkers to benefit from your knowledge and experience.

The three primary modes of communication include:

• Written communication is difficult since so many nonverbal cues get lost in translation. It is preferable to watch one’s tone and vocabulary. Your writing should be easy to understand and free of mistakes. If the information has a timing crunch, ensure the recipient knows about it.
• Verbal communication includes what and how you talk to your coworkers. As much as possible, you should state your case concisely and clearly. You should also treat those with whom you disagree with dignity and keep in mind that there are likely varying viewpoints.
• Nonverbal communication might reveal more about their emotions and thoughts than words ever could. When communicating with someone, pay attention to your tone, body language, and facial expressions. These factors might alter the meaning of the words you say.

Here is a list of books about communication .

6. Empathy and Emotional Intelligence

With empathy and emotional intelligence, you can discern when a coworker is distressed and know how to react. Your coworker may need you to listen to an issue they are experiencing outside of work or troubles with a particular assignment. You would know when the employee needs time away from work to rejuvenate after experiencing work burnout.

Similarly, if you feel down on the job, a colleague with high emotional intelligence may understand your situation and support you. The ability to assist and collaborate improves significantly in a workplace where employees are emotionally intelligent and empathic. Also, emotionally intelligent workers are less likely to find criticism or feedback offensive.

Check out this list of ways to show empathy at work .

7. Conflict Resolution

Disputes are tricky in any setting but are particularly trying in the workplace. A disagreement between coworkers may put a stop to any ongoing work. Employees who operate in a collaborative environment have the tools and dispositions necessary to promptly and amicably resolve any conflict.

Conflict resolution demands that you:

• Take the time to talk and hear each other out
• Maintain personal responsibility and accountability
• Try to understand the problem without apportioning the blame
• Treat each other with dignity and respect
• Try to work out your differences amicably

Conflict resolution typically requires making whatever concessions are necessary for the group to reach a consensus and move on.

Here is a list of books about conflict resolution .

8. Open-Mindedness

When employees doubt how others will receive their input, they may hesitate to voice their opinions publicly. Individuals receptive to new ideas can flourish in a collaborative setting, whereas a worker more resistant to change may struggle and slow the process down. The leadership of an organization should foster an atmosphere that encourages brainstorming and sharing perspectives.

Collaboration means accepting information from others and engaging in thought-provoking discussion and debate. Many workers cannot get out of their department’s silo, which stunts teamwork and development opportunities. A collaborative workplace fosters knowledge exchange and constructive discussion because they contribute to a climate that fosters creativity and productivity. Every team member is aware of one another’s strengths and the contributions each person makes to the whole.

Debates between coworkers result in helpful feedback that enhances the project and, in turn, boosts earnings. Managers should ensure everyone can keep their emotions in check and keep the conversation focused on the work at hand.

9. Organizational and Delegation Skills

The most effective forms of teamwork occur when tasks and responsibilities are clearly defined and integrated into daily operations. If you repeatedly coordinate and reassign tasks and responsibilities, you might end up frustrating and undermining your workers’ sense of duty and accountability.

Delegating work to team members according to their areas of knowledge, experience, and competence is a valuable collaborative ability for project or task leaders. In addition, distributing duties between a large group of employees ensures that nobody gets overwhelmed by the workload.

Ways to build collaborative skills

To avoid problems with unfinished projects and disgruntled workers, businesses should devote time and energy to teaching staff how to collaborate. The following are easy ways to improve workplace teamwork and collaboration skills.

1. Encourage Diverse Teams

Encouraging diverse teams involves intentionally bringing together individuals with varying backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives. When teams are diverse, they can tap into a broader range of ideas and solutions. Different viewpoints lead to richer discussions, more creative problem-solving, and innovative approaches. Diverse teams also promote a deeper understanding of different markets, customer needs, and global trends. These groups enhance the organization’s ability to adapt and succeed in a rapidly changing world.

2. Rotate Responsibilities

Rotating responsibilities within a team involves periodically switching team members’ roles and tasks. This practice has multiple benefits. For instance, this process helps team members gain a better understanding of each other’s responsibilities and challenges. This understanding fosters empathy and a sense of shared ownership. Rotations also prevent stagnation by keeping individuals engaged and continuously learning. Moreover, by experiencing different roles, team members can identify opportunities for process improvements and innovation, leading to more efficient workflows and collaboration.

3. Implement Cross-Training

Cross-training involves providing team members with opportunities to learn skills and tasks outside of their usual roles. This technique bolsters individuals’ expertise and facilitates collaboration. When team members understand each other’s skill sets, they can collaborate more effectively, fill in for each other when needed, and brainstorm creative solutions. Cross-training also boosts team flexibility, as members are better prepared to adapt to changing demands and cover for absences.

4. Promote Self-Care

Promoting self-care involves valuing the well-being of team members as an integral part of the collaborative environment. Encouraging employees to prioritize their physical and mental health demonstrates that their holistic well-being matters. When team members are well-rested, emotionally balanced, and healthy, they can contribute more effectively to collaborative efforts. Promoting self-care also includes offering resources for stress management, flexible work arrangements, and avenues for seeking support. All of these facets contribute to a positive, resilient, and collaborative workplace culture.

5. Clarify Your Company’s Purpose and Vision

The lack of clear objectives is a major barrier to effective collaboration among teams and corporations. You can establish a routine of defining your yearly or project-specific goals. You should ensure your objectives are SMART so you can keep track of the progress you have made and the indicators of success that are most important to you.

Knowing your employees’ professional aspirations is also helpful. When you understand your workers’ motivations in the workplace, you can better connect their ambitions with the firm’s goals, resulting in a win-win for everyone.

Here is a list of goal setting activities .

6. Acknowledge Strengths and Weaknesses

As a manager, you quickly learn that no two employees are similar. Instead, you should recognize each worker’s unique skills and perspectives and use them to your advantage. One benefit of managing a distributed team with members from different parts of the globe is that they have different life experiences and skill sets, which all contribute to the team’s success.

When you assign individuals tasks and projects based on their particular skill sets, they will be more motivated to use their expertise to further the group’s objectives. When implementing new projects, the first step is to have one-on-one conversations with workers to learn where they think they can make the biggest impact.

7. Hold Team Building Activities

A team’s collaborative ability can always use some honing, but sometimes outside assistance makes the difference. Having team-building retreats is one of the best approaches to discovering real-life examples of collaboration in business. Team building is beneficial when integrating new employees into an existing team, but even well-established groups may benefit from regular team-building activities. Team members may learn more about one another and improve their problem-solving and leadership styles through the various structured activities of a team-building retreat.

Check out team building best practices .

8. Promote a Communication Culture

Efficient team communication is crucial for successful cooperation. Therefore, your top responsibility as a manager should be to facilitate open lines of communication, whether via digital platforms like Slack or more traditional methods like face-to-face meetings and routine office interactions.

To foster an environment where every member feels comfortable speaking out, it is advisable to implement measures like a “no dumb questions” policy and mandatory participation in brainstorming sessions. Unfortunately, although many supervisors know this straightforward method for fostering collaboration, they only sometimes implement the measure.

For example, here is a guide to open-door policies .

9. Promote Openness

Trust is essential in the workplace if you want to build collaboration skills. One of the quickest and easiest ways to foster trust is via openness. First, be honest about the current state of your team or organization. As important as sharing your vision is for the future with your team, it is essential to be transparent about any obstacles you have encountered.

It is okay to admit that if you do not have all the answers. However, you can refrain from trying to dodge issues at work or pretending to be knowledgeable when you are not. The trust between you and your team will suffer if your staff interprets your actions as secrecy or mistrust.

10. Celebrate Achievements and Successes

You can boost morale by commemorating both major and minor accomplishments. Leaders have nothing to lose and everything to gain by publicly recognizing employees’ contributions.

You may begin this practice by praising the efforts of individuals and teams that have achieved set goals. Then, you can send out an announcement to team members. It is also a good idea to spend some time at the beginning of each meeting highlighting recent successes your business has had.

Here is a list of employee recognition program ideas .

11. Treat Mistakes as Opportunities for Improvement

Beyond the mistakes, how you handle errors may become a significant stumbling block on the path to a collaborative work environment. When employees make errors or fall short of expectations, they seldom react well to harsh criticism. A better strategy is to see setbacks as opportunities for learning.

When projects fall short or objectives are incomplete, make it a point to convene your team and get to the bottom of the issue. It would help if you established that discussing setbacks is to discover lessons for the group.

12. Provide Your Staff with Educational Opportunities

You should provide your staff with many opportunities for professional development. If you want workers to continue developing as individuals and team members, then give them the opportunity. To maximize organic reach, for instance, a firm may send its content marketing staff to training classes or employ an outside consultant to teach them the basics of search engine optimization. Paying for your staff’s training and development is an excellent investment.

Here is a list of professional development ideas .

Developing collaboration skills effectively in the business is not a one-and-done deal. You and your group can improve at this practice, and one approach is to take advantage of available resources. Getting every employee on board with new plans and objectives is best. This step will help you foster a culture where workers are more invested in their work, more open to new ideas, and more capable of collaboration to expand your company.

Next, check out this list of online collaboration tools and this list of books about teamwork , and get inspired by these teamwork games . You can also read about team building activities for students .

Book wildly fun team building events with expert hosts

FAQ: Collaboration skills

Here are frequently asked questions about examples of collaboration skills.

What are some examples of collaboration skills?

Examples of collaboration skills include communication, conflict resolution, and open-mindedness. Another critical skill is organizing and delegating tasks. These collaboration skills are vital for a company’s growth and development.

What skills are important for collaboration?

Collaboration requires skills like agility and adaptability. Empathy and emotional intelligence also help you relate better with your teammates. Employees must collaborate at work to increase their productivity and meet the company’s goals.

How do you develop collaborative skills?

You can develop collaborative skills by setting clear expectations in the workplace and ensuring every teammate understands their roles. You can also schedule regular team-building retreats. Another great option is to invest in employee training programs so your team members can learn how to collaborate more effectively.

Author: Grace He

People & Culture Director at teambuilding.com. Grace is the Director of People & Culture at teambuilding.com. She studied Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell University, Information Science at East China Normal University and earned an MBA at Washington State University.

Leave a Reply Cancel

Your email address will not be published.

People & Culture Director at teambuilding.com.

Grace is the Director of People & Culture at teambuilding.com. She studied Industrial and Labor Relations at Cornell University, Information Science at East China Normal University and earned an MBA at Washington State University.

• 45,000+ clients including Apple, Amazon, Google and NASA
• 50,225+ five star reviews on Google
• #15 on Inc 5000's List of Fastest Growing Private Companies in America for 2022
• 80+ happy remote employees

We lead wildly fun experiences for teams with 1,000,000+ players to date.

4.96 / 5.0 rating on

50,225 Google Reviews

Get our free team building tool box

$49 value at no cost..

• May as well check it out?
• 100+ tested icebreaker questions
• 24+ themed Bingo generators
• 5+ PDFs (including the 8% Rule)
• 2024 team building calendar and more...

Enter your email for instant access

Collaborative Problem Solving: What It Is and How to Do It

What is collaborative problem solving, how to solve problems as a team, celebrating success as a team.

Problems arise. That's a well-known fact of life and business. When they do, it may seem more straightforward to take individual ownership of the problem and immediately run with trying to solve it. However, the most effective problem-solving solutions often come through collaborative problem solving.

As defined by Webster's Dictionary , the word collaborate is to work jointly with others or together, especially in an intellectual endeavor. Therefore, collaborative problem solving (CPS) is essentially solving problems by working together as a team. While problems can and are solved individually, CPS often brings about the best resolution to a problem while also developing a team atmosphere and encouraging creative thinking.

Because collaborative problem solving involves multiple people and ideas, there are some techniques that can help you stay on track, engage efficiently, and communicate effectively during collaboration.

• Set Expectations. From the very beginning, expectations for openness and respect must be established for CPS to be effective. Everyone participating should feel that their ideas will be heard and valued.
• Provide Variety. Another way of providing variety can be by eliciting individuals outside the organization but affected by the problem. This may mean involving various levels of leadership from the ground floor to the top of the organization. It may be that you involve someone from bookkeeping in a marketing problem-solving session. A perspective from someone not involved in the day-to-day of the problem can often provide valuable insight.
• Communicate Clearly.  If the problem is not well-defined, the solution can't be. By clearly defining the problem, the framework for collaborative problem solving is narrowed and more effective.
• Expand the Possibilities.  Think beyond what is offered. Take a discarded idea and expand upon it. Turn it upside down and inside out. What is good about it? What needs improvement? Sometimes the best ideas are those that have been discarded rather than reworked.
• Encourage Creativity.  Out-of-the-box thinking is one of the great benefits of collaborative problem-solving. This may mean that solutions are proposed that have no way of working, but a small nugget makes its way from that creative thought to evolution into the perfect solution.
• Provide Positive Feedback. There are many reasons participants may hold back in a collaborative problem-solving meeting. Fear of performance evaluation, lack of confidence, lack of clarity, and hierarchy concerns are just a few of the reasons people may not initially participate in a meeting. Positive public feedback early on in the meeting will eliminate some of these concerns and create more participation and more possible solutions.
• Consider Solutions. Once several possible ideas have been identified, discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each one until a consensus is made.
• Assign Tasks.  A problem identified and a solution selected is not a problem solved. Once a solution is determined, assign tasks to work towards a resolution. A team that has been invested in the creation of the solution will be invested in its resolution. The best time to act is now.
• Evaluate the Solution. Reconnect as a team once the solution is implemented and the problem is solved. What went well? What didn't? Why? Collaboration doesn't necessarily end when the problem is solved. The solution to the problem is often the next step towards a new collaboration.

The burden that is lifted when a problem is solved is enough victory for some. However, a team that plays together should celebrate together. It's not only collaboration that brings unity to a team. It's also the combined celebration of a unified victory—the moment you look around and realize the collectiveness of your success.

We can help

Check out MindManager to learn more about how you can ignite teamwork and innovation by providing a clearer perspective on the big picture with a suite of sharing options and collaborative tools.

Need to Download MindManager?

Try the full version of mindmanager free for 30 days.

10 Collaboration Skills Examples—and How to Improve Yours

Collaboration skills are more than just being a buzzy phrase—they're essential for any successful team. Whether you're brainstorming with coworkers or tackling a complex project, the ability to work well with others can make all the difference. But what are collaboration skills, exactly, and why do they matter so much in today’s workplace?

In this article, we'll explore everything you need to know about collaboration skills: definition, examples, and practical tips to help you boost your abilities. Whether you're wondering, “Is collaboration a skill I can develop?” or looking to define collaboration skills more clearly, we’ve got you covered.

Looking for a collaborative work environment? Check these amazing open jobs on The Muse and find the next perfect role for you »

What are collaborative skills?

At its core, collaboration skills are about bringing together diverse perspectives and working cohesively towards a common goal.

“They're the ‘glue’ that holds a team together, enabling it to transcend sum-of-its-parts limitations,” says Philip Alves, founder and CEO of DevSquad , who has extensive experience fostering collaboration through diverse tech teams and firmly believes in its power. “In today's interconnected world, these skills are not just nice to have; they’re crucial for driving innovation and navigating complex projects across geographies and cultures.”

Why are collaboration skills important?

Whether you're part of a small team or a large organization, the ability to work effectively with others is crucial for achieving shared goals. “Collaboration skills enable different teams to combine their strengths, pool their knowledge and come up with creative solutions,” says Tanya Lamont, CEO of Conversational , who has personally experienced how essential collaboration skills are to the success of any team, especially in a remote work environment. “This enhances decision making, increases productivity and creates a positive working atmosphere.”

Sofia Perez, Owner and Content Manager at Character Counter , also highlights the importance of collaboration skills from her own experience. “One of my favorite examples in action is when my marketing department convenes to organize and administer marketing campaigns, especially through our social media channels,” Perez says. “Because diverse platforms appeal to different customers—graphics vs. written copy vs. short videos—my staff collaborates in these meetings to offer distinct ideas that perhaps someone else had not considered.”

When team members communicate clearly and work well together, tasks get done more efficiently, with fewer errors and misunderstandings. Plus, strong collaboration skills help create a positive work environment, build trust and camaraderie among colleagues, and usually lead to higher job satisfaction and better retention rates.

Collaboration skills: are they soft skills, hard skills—or both?

In the realm of professional development, collaboration skills are often seen as soft skills —those interpersonal abilities that enable effective teamwork and communication. While hard skills , such as technical expertise or specific job-related knowledge, are important for completing tasks, soft skills like empathy, active listening, and adaptability are essential for fostering team collaboration skills.

In reality, it's a mix of both that makes for great collaboration; hard skills let you tackle tasks effectively, and soft skills help you connect and work smoothly with your team. Together, they lay the groundwork for successful teamwork and career growth.

Collaboration skills: examples

When it comes to collaboration, Alves says, “in my experience, adaptability, emotional intelligence, and resilience stand out as the most valued soft skills. These qualities allow professionals to thrive in fluctuating work environments and maintain team morale, proving essential for long-term success.”

Lamont calls out problem-solving skills, too. “They drive innovation and play a critical role within any organization that seeks continuous improvement in its operations,” she says.

Below, we’ll break down these and other collaboration skills and show you how they can help you succeed at work.

1. Adaptability

Being open to new ideas and ready to pivot when necessary is crucial in a collaborative environment. Adaptability allows you to navigate changes and challenges without losing momentum, helping the team remain agile and responsive in dynamic work situations.

2. Emotional intelligence

Emotional intelligence involves recognizing, understanding, and managing your own emotions, as well as being aware of others’ emotions. This skill is vital for building strong relationships within a team, enabling you to navigate social complexities, resolve conflicts, and foster a positive work environment.

3. Resilience

Resilience is the ability to bounce back from setbacks and maintain a positive attitude during challenging times. In a collaborative setting, resilience ensures that you can keep the team motivated and focused, even when facing obstacles or difficult circumstances.

4. Problem-solving

Problem-solving skills are essential in any collaborative environment. Being able to analyze situations, identify potential challenges, and devise effective solutions is crucial for driving innovation and ensuring the team can overcome obstacles to reach its goals.

5. Active listening

This skill is about truly hearing what others are saying, asking clarifying questions, and making sure you understand their point of view before responding. Active listening fosters mutual respect and ensures that everyone’s ideas are considered, which is key to effective collaboration.

6. Communication

Whether you’re sharing ideas in a meeting or sending an email, being able to articulate your thoughts clearly is critical. Effective communication helps prevent misunderstandings, ensures that everyone stays on the same page, and facilitates a smoother collaboration process.

7. Conflict resolution

When disagreements arise, it’s important to address them constructively. Conflict resolution involves finding solutions that satisfy all parties, allowing the team to move forward without lingering tensions. This skill is essential for maintaining harmony and productivity within the team.

Understanding and sharing the feelings of others can help you better relate to your teammates, fostering stronger connections and more effective collaboration. Empathy allows you to build trust and create a supportive environment where everyone feels valued.

9. Giving and receiving feedback

Constructive feedback is crucial for continuous improvement in a collaborative environment. Being able to give feedback in a helpful and respectful manner, as well as being open to receiving it , helps the team refine processes and enhance performance. This skill encourages growth and helps individuals and teams reach their full potential.

10. Trust-building

Trust-building is the foundation of any successful collaboration. Developing trust within a team involves being reliable, maintaining transparency, and consistently delivering on commitments. When team members trust each other, collaboration flows more smoothly, and the team can tackle challenges with greater confidence.

How to improve your collaboration skills

Collaboration skills don’t just appear overnight—they take ongoing effort and refinement. Whether you're already a strong collaborative person or looking to improve, there are plenty of strategies you can use to boost your skills.

Engage in self-reflection

Think about past team experiences to identify what went well and where you could have contributed more effectively. Tracking your progress through notes or a journal can help you pinpoint the collaboration skills that matter most for your role and identify areas where you can improve.

Seek feedback from colleagues

Coworkers can provide valuable insights into how you contribute to team collaboration skills and where you might need to improve. Approach this with an open mind, viewing feedback as an opportunity for growth rather than criticism.

Invest in communication skills

Consider taking courses or participating in workshops that focus on enhancing communication skills. This could include public speaking, active listening, or conflict resolution techniques. The better you communicate, the more seamlessly you can contribute to your team collaboration skills.

Practice empathy and understanding

Empathy helps you connect with your teammates on a deeper level. Make a conscious effort to understand their perspectives and emotions. This not only strengthens your relationships but also makes you a more adaptable and effective collaborative person.

Be proactive in team settings

Being proactive demonstrates your commitment to the team's success and your willingness to go above and beyond your responsibilities. So, take the initiative and offer help where needed. Whether it’s volunteering for a new project or simply offering support to a colleague, proactive behavior can significantly enhance your team collaboration skills.

Look for company tools to boost your collaboration skills

Many companies already incorporate exercises or activities designed to boost team collaboration.

“One innovative approach we've implemented at DevSquad is the Collab Hackathons, where teams are mixed across projects to solve an unrelated problem in a limited time frame,” Alves says. “This not only breaks routine but also sparks creativity, as team members bring different skills and perspectives to the table.”

Lamont favors team-building activities such as brainstorming sessions, role-playing, or feedback exercises. “For instance, regular check-in meetings where members discuss challenges faced and successes achieved can build trust and open up communication channels within the group,” she says.

Bonus tips: Using professional guidance to boost your collaboration skills

While practice and experience are essential, seeking professional guidance can take your collaboration skills to the next level.

In this bonus section, we'll explore how expert advice and tailored strategies can help you boost your collaboration skills, making you an even more valuable team member.

Work with a professional coach or mentor

A coach or mentor specializing in leadership and communication can help you become a more effective collaborative person. “They provide a neutral perspective, helping to realign team objectives, mediate conflicts, and introduce frameworks that enhance mutual understanding and respect,” Alves says.

(You can find career coaching services right here on The Muse, hi!)

Consult an organizational development expert

These professionals can assess your team’s dynamics and offer customized training to improve your collaboration skills. They can design workshops that foster better teamwork and communication, helping your team work more cohesively.

Leverage HR resources

HR specialists can recommend team-building exercises , communication workshops, and other resources to boost team collaboration skills. They can also introduce tools and programs that promote effective collaboration within your organization.

Engage a conflict resolution expert

If conflicts are hindering collaboration, a mediator can teach your team strategies for managing disagreements constructively. “Mediators help navigate difficult conversations between two parties involved ensuring each person’s point of view is taken into account towards reaching an amicable settlement,” Lamont says.

This might also help: Conflict Resolution Skills: Definition, Examples, and How to Improve Them

Enroll in educational courses

Many universities and online platforms offer courses in organizational behavior and team dynamics. These courses can equip you with both the theoretical and practical knowledge needed to improve your collaboration skills.

By following these steps, you can steadily improve your collaboration skills and become a more effective, valued team member. Remember, the key to successful collaboration is continuous learning and adapting—skills that will serve you well in any professional setting.

How to ace collaborative problem solving

April 30, 2023 They say two heads are better than one, but is that true when it comes to solving problems in the workplace? To solve any problem—whether personal (eg, deciding where to live), business-related (eg, raising product prices), or societal (eg, reversing the obesity epidemic)—it’s crucial to first define the problem. In a team setting, that translates to establishing a collective understanding of the problem, awareness of context, and alignment of stakeholders. “Both good strategy and good problem solving involve getting clarity about the problem at hand, being able to disaggregate it in some way, and setting priorities,” Rob McLean, McKinsey director emeritus, told McKinsey senior partner Chris Bradley  in an Inside the Strategy Room podcast episode . Check out these insights to uncover how your team can come up with the best solutions for the most complex challenges by adopting a methodical and collaborative approach. 

Want better strategies? Become a bulletproof problem solver

How to master the seven-step problem-solving process

Countering otherness: Fostering integration within teams

Psychological safety and the critical role of leadership development

If we’re all so busy, why isn’t anything getting done?

To weather a crisis, build a network of teams

Unleash your team’s full potential

Modern marketing: Six capabilities for multidisciplinary teams

Beyond collaboration overload

MORE FROM MCKINSEY

Take a step Forward

• SUGGESTED TOPICS
• The Magazine
• Newsletters
• Managing Yourself
• Managing Teams
• Work-life Balance
• The Big Idea
• Data & Visuals
• Case Selections
• HBR Learning
• Topic Feeds
• Account Settings
• Email Preferences

How to Solve Problems

• Laura Amico

To bring the best ideas forward, teams must build psychological safety.

Teams today aren’t just asked to execute tasks: They’re called upon to solve problems. You’d think that many brains working together would mean better solutions, but the reality is that too often problem-solving teams fall victim to inefficiency, conflict, and cautious conclusions. The two charts below will help your team think about how to collaborate better and come up with the best solutions for the thorniest challenges.

• Laura Amico is a former senior editor at Harvard Business Review.

Partner Center

Collaborative problem solvers are made not born – here’s what you need to know

Professor of Cognitive Sciences, University of Central Florida

Disclosure statement

Stephen M. Fiore has received funding from federal agencies such as NASA, ONR, DARPA, and the NSF to study collaborative problem solving and teamwork. He is past president of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research, currently a board member of the International Network for the Science of Team Science, and a member of DARPA's Information Science and Technology working group.

View all partners

Challenges are a fact of life. Whether it’s a high-tech company figuring out how to shrink its carbon footprint, or a local community trying to identify new revenue sources, people are continually dealing with problems that require input from others. In the modern world, we face problems that are broad in scope and great in scale of impact – think of trying to understand and identify potential solutions related to climate change, cybersecurity or authoritarian leaders.

But people usually aren’t born competent in collaborative problem-solving. In fact, a famous turn of phrase about teams is that a team of experts does not make an expert team . Just as troubling, the evidence suggests that, for the most part, people aren’t being taught this skill either. A 2012 survey by the American Management Association found that higher level managers believed recent college graduates lack collaboration abilities .

Maybe even worse, college grads seem to overestimate their own competence. One 2015 survey found nearly two-thirds of recent graduates believed they can effectively work in a team, but only one-third of managers agreed . The tragic irony is that the less competent you are, the less accurate is your self-assessment of your own competence. It seems that this infamous Dunning-Kruger effect can also occur for teamwork.

Perhaps it’s no surprise that in a 2015 international assessment of hundreds of thousands of students, less than 10% performed at the highest level of collaboration . For example, the vast majority of students could not overcome teamwork obstacles or resolve conflict. They were not able to monitor group dynamics or to engage in the kind of actions needed to make sure the team interacted according to their roles. Given that all these students have had group learning opportunities in and out of school over many years, this points to a global deficit in the acquisition of collaboration skills.

How can this deficiency be addressed? What makes one team effective while another fails? How can educators improve training and testing of collaborative problem-solving? Drawing from disciplines that study cognition, collaboration and learning, my colleagues and I have been studying teamwork processes. Based on this research, we have three key recommendations.

How it should work

At the most general level, collaborative problem-solving requires team members to establish and maintain a shared understanding of the situation they’re facing and any relevant problem elements they’ve identified. At the start, there’s typically an uneven distribution of knowledge on a team. Members must maintain communication to help each other know who knows what, as well as help each other interpret elements of the problem and which expertise should be applied.

Then the team can get to work, laying out subtasks based upon member roles, or creating mechanisms to coordinate member actions. They’ll critique possible solutions to identify the most appropriate path forward.

Finally, at a higher level, collaborative problem-solving requires keeping the team organized – for example, by monitoring interactions and providing feedback to each other. Team members need, at least, basic interpersonal competencies that help them manage relationships within the team (like encouraging participation) and communication (like listening to learn). Even better is the more sophisticated ability to take others’ perspectives, in order to consider alternative views of problem elements.

Whether it is a team of professionals in an organization or a team of scientists solving complex scientific problems , communicating clearly, managing conflict, understanding roles on a team, and knowing who knows what – all are collaboration skills related to effective teamwork.

What’s going wrong in the classroom?

When so many students are continually engaged in group projects, or collaborative learning, why are they not learning about teamwork? There are interrelated factors that may be creating graduates who collaborate poorly but who think they are quite good at teamwork.

I suggest students vastly overestimate their collaboration skills due to the dangerous combination of a lack of systematic instruction coupled with inadequate feedback. On the one hand, students engage in a great deal of group work in high school and college. On the other hand, students rarely receive meaningful instruction, modeling and feedback on collaboration . Decades of research on learning show that explicit instruction and feedback are crucial for mastery .

Although classes that implement collaborative problem-solving do provide some instruction and feedback, it’s not necessarily about their teamwork. Students are learning about concepts in classes; they are acquiring knowledge about a domain. What is missing is something that forces them to explicitly reflect on their ability to work with others.

When students process feedback on how well they learned something, or whether they solved a problem, they mistakenly think this is also indicative of effective teamwork. I hypothesize that students come to conflate learning course content material in any group context with collaboration competency.

A prescription for better collaborators

Now that we’ve defined the problem, what can be done? A century of research on team training , combined with decades of research on group learning in the classroom , points the way forward. My colleagues and I have distilled some core elements from this literature to suggest improvements for collaborative learning .

First, most pressing is to get training on teamwork into the world’s classrooms. At a minimum, this needs to happen during college undergraduate education, but even better would be starting in high school or earlier. Research has demonstrated it’s possible to teach collaboration competencies such as dealing with conflict and communicating to learn. Researchers and educators need, themselves, to collaborate to adapt these methods for the classroom.

Secondly, students need opportunities for practice. Although most already have experience working in groups, this needs to move beyond science and engineering classes. Students need to learn to work across disciplines so after graduation they can work across professions on solving complex societal problems.

Third, any systematic instruction and practice setting needs to include feedback. This is not simply feedback on whether they solved the problem or did well on learning course content. Rather, it needs to be feedback on interpersonal competencies that drive successful collaboration. Instructors should assess students on teamwork processes like relationship management, where they encourage participation from each other, as well as skills in communication where they actively listen to their teammates.

Even better would be feedback telling students how well they were able to take on the perspective of a teammate from another discipline. For example, was the engineering student able to take the view of a student in law and understand the legal ramifications of a new technology’s implementation?

My colleagues and I believe that explicit instruction on how to collaborate, opportunities for practice, and feedback about collaboration processes will better prepare today’s students to work together to solve tomorrow’s problems.

• Decision making
• Cooperation
• Problem solving
• Collaboration
• Dunning-Kruger effect
• Wicked problems
• student collaboration
• College graduates
• 21st century skills
• Group decision making
• Collaborative problem solving

Research Fellow, Water Resources & Climate Change

Integrated Management of Invasive Pampas Grass for Enhanced Land Rehabilitation

Economics Editor

Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Indigenous Strategy and Services)

Business Collaboration collaborative culture company culture

5 Expert Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies

Lorin mccann.

• December 9th, 2015

You don’t need to be an executive to initiate powerful change within your organization. According to collaboration expert Jane Ripley, collaboration begins with you.

Expecting superiors, employees, coworkers, or other departments to take responsibility will get you nowhere, fast. Instead, adopt collaboration as a personal responsibility and be unafraid to take initiative — it doesn’t matter if you’re an entry-level employee or a seasoned executive.

Jane Ripley is a collaboration expert and co-author of the book Collaboration Begins With You: Be a Silo Buster along with Ken Blanchard and Eunice Parisi-Carew (you can follow Jane on Twitter: @WiredLeadership ). Jane draws on her research working with companies ranging from small businesses and entrepreneurs to large, multi-national enterprises to talk about collaborative problem-solving strategies professionals can use no matter what organizational level they’re at.

Initiating collaborative problem-solving within an organization is a complex task, with many moving parts. Jane describes it well: “Imagine you’re in the aircraft and there’s this dashboard. You’ve got to try and get all the buttons and levers in the right places.” Collaboration within an organization is also a complex process.

The approach Jane and her co-authors adopt in their books aims to simplify a complex subject with actionable models, including the UNITE model for collaborative problem-solving:

U = Utilize difference N = Nurture safety and trust I = Involve others in creating a clear purpose, values, and goals T = Talk openly E = Empower yourself and others

Executives can use these strategies to transform the culture and impact of their organizations from the company culture from the top down. Alternatively,entry-level employees can adopt the same strategies to accelerate professional growth while offering enormous value to their organizations from the bottom up.

In this post, we’ll look at each of the elements of the UNITE model — and what you need to know to put them into action.  

1. Utilize differences in collaborative problem-solving

Collaborative problem-solving relies on the presence of multiple perspectives.

Jane advises to remember that different perspectives are not personal. In fact, conflict is important.

Fear of contrasting opinions often indicates a competitive mindset, not a collaborative one. This only creates more problems rather than solving them.

“The power,” Jane says, “is in the combination of perspectives.”  

2. Nurture safety and trust within your organization

Effective collaboration is impossible when trust isn’t a part of the culture.

Jane elaborates: “My co-author, Eunice Parisi-Carew, always says, ‘Fear is the number one inhibitor to collaboration, because if you’re inhibited, you won’t contribute, and if you don’t contribute nobody will know that you have a different perspective.’”

In fact, trust is one of the most crucial elements in being a silo-buster; it plays enormous role in preventing bottlenecks and accelerating growth.

“Some people come to the workplace trusting everybody, and they get let down. Other people come to the workplace believing nobody will do the work as well as they can. Those people try to do it all and become a bottleneck,” Jane explains.

Low trust within an organization rarely goes unnoticed. Even if executives are unaware of the problem, employees always are — it negatively impacts their ability to be effective.

A tell-tale sign of a low-trust culture for leaders is when people don’t contribute ideas. Jane shares a classic example: “When the leader sits at the meeting and says, ‘I’ve got this new thing that’s been handed to us from headquarters, now we’ve got to implement XYZ initiative. Any ideas?’ And…there’s no response.”

Silence follows because, as Jane explains, “not usually because [the employees] don’t have any ideas, it’s just that they just don’t want to voice them” — for fear of criticism, negative feedback, no feedback, or backlash.  

3. Involve others for effective collaborative problem-solving

According to Jane, “Not all the best ideas come from the top, and not all the best ideas come from a specific group. Marketing can have a very valuable perspective on the use of collaborative software, and so can IT.”

It may be uncomfortable to involve people and departments with whom you don’t currently have a relationship, but it’s essential for effective collaborative problem-solving. Even as an entry-level employee, you can take the initiative to open the lines of communication to other people within your organization.

Invite someone to lunch — or suggest involving someone from another department in a final review on a project that could use their feedback. It’s a simple way to begin, but it’s powerful.  

4. Don’t be afraid to talk openly

How important is speed to your organization? On a scale of one to ten it’s probably an eight, nine, or ten.

According to Jane, speed is the number-one benefit of talking openly, or transparency: “If you’ve all got the same information, you can all make decisions and bring those pieces of information together to solve the problem more quickly.” Alternatively, a lack of transparency creates confusion, more meetings, and more discussion.

“So now you’ve got a [unproductive] discussion instead of having everybody on the same level playing field all coming at it from the same approach, able to look at the data or the information and critically evaluate that,” she adds.

And speed isn’t the only benefit of talking openly. As counterintuitive as it may seem, so is security.

Jane often talks about information theft when discussing transparency. “When information is kept in silos you open up an opportunity for other people to prosper from it,” she says. “So an unscrupulous individual can take that information and do what they like with it, whereas if it’s common knowledge, it’s in the public domain, [and] they have no more power.”  

5. Don’t wait to empower yourself and others

As a leader, empowering your organization starts with you. As an employee, it’s no different! You can’t wait for someone at the top to make the shift before you allow yourself to as well.

Jane shares insights into how both leaders and employees can take take steps to empower themselves, and in doing so empower others:

Firstly, leaders must discard a competitive mindset in favor of a collaborative one.

“Empowering yourself and others is the big part for the leader. [Leaders] are coaching for competence, creating clarity around goals, and setting boundaries. They’re removing roadblocks, sharing their networks, and giving opportunities to build knowledge… it’s how they help an individual become collaborative and make a greater contribution [to the organization].”

Instead of keeping your knowledge, network, and expertise close to the vest as a leader, share it openly with your employees. Not only will your experiences add enormous value to their professional growth, it will also empower them to be more effective in their jobs. They’ll also trust and appreciate you more.

Employees can also take initiative within their organization, regardless of the current company culture. They can start by offering their ideas, insights — even their networks.

Jane says, “It always amazes me how, particularly with the millennial generation, that they’re networked electronically they have some phenomenal people in their networks and can bring those equally to leaders who are sitting in a position maybe four, five, six, seven years older than them, it’s tremendous.”  

People are innately collaborative

Jane ties together the concepts and action steps surrounding collaborative problem with a familiar example:

“People are innately collaborative. We do it innately and we do it socially. If somebody wants to throw a party everybody says,‘What should I bring?’‘What shall I do?’ ‘I’ll do the decorating!’

And yet, when they come to work, ‘Oh, wait a minute, the decorating belongs to that department, refreshments belongs to that department, so now we need a meeting.’”

“We’re wired,” Jane explains, “for collaboration, and it’s our workplace habits, systems, and beliefs that get in the way. For better collaborative problem-solving where you work, you don’t need more meetings.”

Instead, work on building a culture of collaboration by utilizing difference, nurturing safety and trust, involving others in creating a clear purpose, values, and goals, talking openly, and empowering yourself and others. And that’s something we all can do.

Lorin is an inbound marketer and demand generation specialist at Lotus Growth , a B2B marketing consultancy. She also helps entrepreneurs kick off new digital marketing strategies at Vrtical . Read more by Lorin McCann »

More From Forbes

How to adopt a collaborative problem-solving approach through 'yes, and' thinking.

• Share to Facebook
• Share to Twitter
• Share to Linkedin

After more than 24 years of coaching, I've noticed that teams and organizations still use traditional problem-solving techniques despite these being either obsolete or ineffective. For example, individuals still attempt to focus and dissect problems on their own with the hope of coming up with a solution by themselves.

I also notice a pattern of clients operating in silos. They have a tendency to equate the ability to solve problems by themselves as a form of independence and initiative. This works only to a certain degree. As the problem becomes more complex, this solo-solving technique becomes ineffective. Instead, teams should tap into the increasingly diverse and multidisciplinary pool that makes up the workforce. Not only is this useful for performance and productivity but also for problem solving.

I have found the collaborative problem-solving approach, by Alexander Hancock , to be an effective approach to achieving clients’ objectives. Collaborative problem solving occurs as you collaborate with other people to exchange information, ideas or perspectives. The essence of this type of collaboration is based on “yes, and” thinking – building on and valuing each other’s ideas.

Any individual, team or company can take advantage of this approach. I have found this approach to be most effective for companies facing problems that involve team members from different departments, backgrounds and personalities. This is also an approach that is usually unique to the coaching profession.

In any situation, when someone comes to you as a leader with a problem to discuss, your role is to help him or her look for the causes and discover solutions. Your role is not to resolve the problem alone but to guide them through collaborative problem-solving approach.

Attitudes For Collaborative Problem Solving

Hancock provides the list below of attitudes that are best paired with the approach:

• Win-win abundance thinking:  Collaboration allows you to work with others to develop solutions that will benefit you both. The key concept is to believe that it is possible to create a synergistic solution before you create them. It is not "you vs. me" — we can both succeed. Develop an "abundance mentality" — there is enough for everyone. “If you win, we all win.”

• Patience:  Collaboration takes time. You need to recognize that you are both helping one another to reach a resolution, and it may take more than one meeting to discuss. You will often need to work together over time to reach a satisfying solution that you will both agree on.

• “Yes, and” thinking:  Move away from polarized (either/or) thinking, and develop a “yes, and” way of thinking. This thinking is supporting a suggested idea and building on the idea to make it better.

Benefits Of Collaborative Problem Solving

Collaborative problem solving opens communication and builds trust in the relationship as you and your co-collaborator discover that you are both working together toward a shared outcome. This increases a joint commitment to the relationship and to the organization. It also indicates a commitment to helping others reach their goals and objectives, and to improve everyone’s performance for the company or the organization. Collaborative communication also encourages finding creative solutions. This increases the likelihood that others will take ownership of an issue and its solution.

Collaborative Problem-Solving Techniques

There are techniques that can help you engage in collaborative communication. Here are a few examples:

• Build on and connect ideas, rather than discarding one idea and looking for another one.

• Explore the strengths and drawbacks of each idea, compare and balance the pluses and drawbacks of each idea.

• Convert drawbacks to new possibilities. Try to find ways to integrate and combine new possibilities into an existing idea.

• When sharing your own opinion, make sure you offer it as a suggestion and not as a directive. The intention of collaborative problem solving is to provide a catalyst for exploration and consideration, instead of having the other person accept your advice or direction.

The collaborative problem-solving approach paves ways to open communication, trust, better planning and smooth implementation of a plan or strategy.

• Editorial Standards
• Forbes Accolades

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Review Article
• Open access
• Published: 11 January 2023

The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature

• Enwei Xu   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-8169 1 ,
• Wei Wang 1 &
• Qingxia Wang 1  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  10 , Article number:  16 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

22k Accesses

26 Citations

3 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Science, technology and society

Collaborative problem-solving has been widely embraced in the classroom instruction of critical thinking, which is regarded as the core of curriculum reform based on key competencies in the field of education as well as a key competence for learners in the 21st century. However, the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking remains uncertain. This current research presents the major findings of a meta-analysis of 36 pieces of the literature revealed in worldwide educational periodicals during the 21st century to identify the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking and to determine, based on evidence, whether and to what extent collaborative problem solving can result in a rise or decrease in critical thinking. The findings show that (1) collaborative problem solving is an effective teaching approach to foster students’ critical thinking, with a significant overall effect size (ES = 0.82, z  = 12.78, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.69, 0.95]); (2) in respect to the dimensions of critical thinking, collaborative problem solving can significantly and successfully enhance students’ attitudinal tendencies (ES = 1.17, z  = 7.62, P  < 0.01, 95% CI[0.87, 1.47]); nevertheless, it falls short in terms of improving students’ cognitive skills, having only an upper-middle impact (ES = 0.70, z  = 11.55, P  < 0.01, 95% CI[0.58, 0.82]); and (3) the teaching type (chi 2  = 7.20, P  < 0.05), intervention duration (chi 2  = 12.18, P  < 0.01), subject area (chi 2  = 13.36, P  < 0.05), group size (chi 2  = 8.77, P  < 0.05), and learning scaffold (chi 2  = 9.03, P  < 0.01) all have an impact on critical thinking, and they can be viewed as important moderating factors that affect how critical thinking develops. On the basis of these results, recommendations are made for further study and instruction to better support students’ critical thinking in the context of collaborative problem-solving.

Similar content being viewed by others

A meta-analysis of the effects of design thinking on student learning

Fostering twenty-first century skills among primary school students through math project-based learning

A meta-analysis to gauge the impact of pedagogies employed in mixed-ability high school biology classrooms

Introduction.

Although critical thinking has a long history in research, the concept of critical thinking, which is regarded as an essential competence for learners in the 21st century, has recently attracted more attention from researchers and teaching practitioners (National Research Council, 2012 ). Critical thinking should be the core of curriculum reform based on key competencies in the field of education (Peng and Deng, 2017 ) because students with critical thinking can not only understand the meaning of knowledge but also effectively solve practical problems in real life even after knowledge is forgotten (Kek and Huijser, 2011 ). The definition of critical thinking is not universal (Ennis, 1989 ; Castle, 2009 ; Niu et al., 2013 ). In general, the definition of critical thinking is a self-aware and self-regulated thought process (Facione, 1990 ; Niu et al., 2013 ). It refers to the cognitive skills needed to interpret, analyze, synthesize, reason, and evaluate information as well as the attitudinal tendency to apply these abilities (Halpern, 2001 ). The view that critical thinking can be taught and learned through curriculum teaching has been widely supported by many researchers (e.g., Kuncel, 2011 ; Leng and Lu, 2020 ), leading to educators’ efforts to foster it among students. In the field of teaching practice, there are three types of courses for teaching critical thinking (Ennis, 1989 ). The first is an independent curriculum in which critical thinking is taught and cultivated without involving the knowledge of specific disciplines; the second is an integrated curriculum in which critical thinking is integrated into the teaching of other disciplines as a clear teaching goal; and the third is a mixed curriculum in which critical thinking is taught in parallel to the teaching of other disciplines for mixed teaching training. Furthermore, numerous measuring tools have been developed by researchers and educators to measure critical thinking in the context of teaching practice. These include standardized measurement tools, such as WGCTA, CCTST, CCTT, and CCTDI, which have been verified by repeated experiments and are considered effective and reliable by international scholars (Facione and Facione, 1992 ). In short, descriptions of critical thinking, including its two dimensions of attitudinal tendency and cognitive skills, different types of teaching courses, and standardized measurement tools provide a complex normative framework for understanding, teaching, and evaluating critical thinking.

Cultivating critical thinking in curriculum teaching can start with a problem, and one of the most popular critical thinking instructional approaches is problem-based learning (Liu et al., 2020 ). Duch et al. ( 2001 ) noted that problem-based learning in group collaboration is progressive active learning, which can improve students’ critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Collaborative problem-solving is the organic integration of collaborative learning and problem-based learning, which takes learners as the center of the learning process and uses problems with poor structure in real-world situations as the starting point for the learning process (Liang et al., 2017 ). Students learn the knowledge needed to solve problems in a collaborative group, reach a consensus on problems in the field, and form solutions through social cooperation methods, such as dialogue, interpretation, questioning, debate, negotiation, and reflection, thus promoting the development of learners’ domain knowledge and critical thinking (Cindy, 2004 ; Liang et al., 2017 ).

Collaborative problem-solving has been widely used in the teaching practice of critical thinking, and several studies have attempted to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature on critical thinking from various perspectives. However, little attention has been paid to the impact of collaborative problem-solving on critical thinking. Therefore, the best approach for developing and enhancing critical thinking throughout collaborative problem-solving is to examine how to implement critical thinking instruction; however, this issue is still unexplored, which means that many teachers are incapable of better instructing critical thinking (Leng and Lu, 2020 ; Niu et al., 2013 ). For example, Huber ( 2016 ) provided the meta-analysis findings of 71 publications on gaining critical thinking over various time frames in college with the aim of determining whether critical thinking was truly teachable. These authors found that learners significantly improve their critical thinking while in college and that critical thinking differs with factors such as teaching strategies, intervention duration, subject area, and teaching type. The usefulness of collaborative problem-solving in fostering students’ critical thinking, however, was not determined by this study, nor did it reveal whether there existed significant variations among the different elements. A meta-analysis of 31 pieces of educational literature was conducted by Liu et al. ( 2020 ) to assess the impact of problem-solving on college students’ critical thinking. These authors found that problem-solving could promote the development of critical thinking among college students and proposed establishing a reasonable group structure for problem-solving in a follow-up study to improve students’ critical thinking. Additionally, previous empirical studies have reached inconclusive and even contradictory conclusions about whether and to what extent collaborative problem-solving increases or decreases critical thinking levels. As an illustration, Yang et al. ( 2008 ) carried out an experiment on the integrated curriculum teaching of college students based on a web bulletin board with the goal of fostering participants’ critical thinking in the context of collaborative problem-solving. These authors’ research revealed that through sharing, debating, examining, and reflecting on various experiences and ideas, collaborative problem-solving can considerably enhance students’ critical thinking in real-life problem situations. In contrast, collaborative problem-solving had a positive impact on learners’ interaction and could improve learning interest and motivation but could not significantly improve students’ critical thinking when compared to traditional classroom teaching, according to research by Naber and Wyatt ( 2014 ) and Sendag and Odabasi ( 2009 ) on undergraduate and high school students, respectively.

The above studies show that there is inconsistency regarding the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking. Therefore, it is essential to conduct a thorough and trustworthy review to detect and decide whether and to what degree collaborative problem-solving can result in a rise or decrease in critical thinking. Meta-analysis is a quantitative analysis approach that is utilized to examine quantitative data from various separate studies that are all focused on the same research topic. This approach characterizes the effectiveness of its impact by averaging the effect sizes of numerous qualitative studies in an effort to reduce the uncertainty brought on by independent research and produce more conclusive findings (Lipsey and Wilson, 2001 ).

This paper used a meta-analytic approach and carried out a meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking in order to make a contribution to both research and practice. The following research questions were addressed by this meta-analysis:

What is the overall effect size of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking and its impact on the two dimensions of critical thinking (i.e., attitudinal tendency and cognitive skills)?

How are the disparities between the study conclusions impacted by various moderating variables if the impacts of various experimental designs in the included studies are heterogeneous?

This research followed the strict procedures (e.g., database searching, identification, screening, eligibility, merging, duplicate removal, and analysis of included studies) of Cooper’s ( 2010 ) proposed meta-analysis approach for examining quantitative data from various separate studies that are all focused on the same research topic. The relevant empirical research that appeared in worldwide educational periodicals within the 21st century was subjected to this meta-analysis using Rev-Man 5.4. The consistency of the data extracted separately by two researchers was tested using Cohen’s kappa coefficient, and a publication bias test and a heterogeneity test were run on the sample data to ascertain the quality of this meta-analysis.

Data sources and search strategies

There were three stages to the data collection process for this meta-analysis, as shown in Fig. 1 , which shows the number of articles included and eliminated during the selection process based on the statement and study eligibility criteria.

This flowchart shows the number of records identified, included and excluded in the article.

First, the databases used to systematically search for relevant articles were the journal papers of the Web of Science Core Collection and the Chinese Core source journal, as well as the Chinese Social Science Citation Index (CSSCI) source journal papers included in CNKI. These databases were selected because they are credible platforms that are sources of scholarly and peer-reviewed information with advanced search tools and contain literature relevant to the subject of our topic from reliable researchers and experts. The search string with the Boolean operator used in the Web of Science was “TS = (((“critical thinking” or “ct” and “pretest” or “posttest”) or (“critical thinking” or “ct” and “control group” or “quasi experiment” or “experiment”)) and (“collaboration” or “collaborative learning” or “CSCL”) and (“problem solving” or “problem-based learning” or “PBL”))”. The research area was “Education Educational Research”, and the search period was “January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2021”. A total of 412 papers were obtained. The search string with the Boolean operator used in the CNKI was “SU = (‘critical thinking’*‘collaboration’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘collaborative learning’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘CSCL’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘problem solving’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘problem-based learning’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘PBL’ + ‘critical thinking’*‘problem oriented’) AND FT = (‘experiment’ + ‘quasi experiment’ + ‘pretest’ + ‘posttest’ + ‘empirical study’)” (translated into Chinese when searching). A total of 56 studies were found throughout the search period of “January 2000 to December 2021”. From the databases, all duplicates and retractions were eliminated before exporting the references into Endnote, a program for managing bibliographic references. In all, 466 studies were found.

Second, the studies that matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the meta-analysis were chosen by two researchers after they had reviewed the abstracts and titles of the gathered articles, yielding a total of 126 studies.

Third, two researchers thoroughly reviewed each included article’s whole text in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, a snowball search was performed using the references and citations of the included articles to ensure complete coverage of the articles. Ultimately, 36 articles were kept.

Two researchers worked together to carry out this entire process, and a consensus rate of almost 94.7% was reached after discussion and negotiation to clarify any emerging differences.

Eligibility criteria

Since not all the retrieved studies matched the criteria for this meta-analysis, eligibility criteria for both inclusion and exclusion were developed as follows:

The publication language of the included studies was limited to English and Chinese, and the full text could be obtained. Articles that did not meet the publication language and articles not published between 2000 and 2021 were excluded.

The research design of the included studies must be empirical and quantitative studies that can assess the effect of collaborative problem-solving on the development of critical thinking. Articles that could not identify the causal mechanisms by which collaborative problem-solving affects critical thinking, such as review articles and theoretical articles, were excluded.

The research method of the included studies must feature a randomized control experiment or a quasi-experiment, or a natural experiment, which have a higher degree of internal validity with strong experimental designs and can all plausibly provide evidence that critical thinking and collaborative problem-solving are causally related. Articles with non-experimental research methods, such as purely correlational or observational studies, were excluded.

The participants of the included studies were only students in school, including K-12 students and college students. Articles in which the participants were non-school students, such as social workers or adult learners, were excluded.

The research results of the included studies must mention definite signs that may be utilized to gauge critical thinking’s impact (e.g., sample size, mean value, or standard deviation). Articles that lacked specific measurement indicators for critical thinking and could not calculate the effect size were excluded.

Data coding design

In order to perform a meta-analysis, it is necessary to collect the most important information from the articles, codify that information’s properties, and convert descriptive data into quantitative data. Therefore, this study designed a data coding template (see Table 1 ). Ultimately, 16 coding fields were retained.

The designed data-coding template consisted of three pieces of information. Basic information about the papers was included in the descriptive information: the publishing year, author, serial number, and title of the paper.

The variable information for the experimental design had three variables: the independent variable (instruction method), the dependent variable (critical thinking), and the moderating variable (learning stage, teaching type, intervention duration, learning scaffold, group size, measuring tool, and subject area). Depending on the topic of this study, the intervention strategy, as the independent variable, was coded into collaborative and non-collaborative problem-solving. The dependent variable, critical thinking, was coded as a cognitive skill and an attitudinal tendency. And seven moderating variables were created by grouping and combining the experimental design variables discovered within the 36 studies (see Table 1 ), where learning stages were encoded as higher education, high school, middle school, and primary school or lower; teaching types were encoded as mixed courses, integrated courses, and independent courses; intervention durations were encoded as 0–1 weeks, 1–4 weeks, 4–12 weeks, and more than 12 weeks; group sizes were encoded as 2–3 persons, 4–6 persons, 7–10 persons, and more than 10 persons; learning scaffolds were encoded as teacher-supported learning scaffold, technique-supported learning scaffold, and resource-supported learning scaffold; measuring tools were encoded as standardized measurement tools (e.g., WGCTA, CCTT, CCTST, and CCTDI) and self-adapting measurement tools (e.g., modified or made by researchers); and subject areas were encoded according to the specific subjects used in the 36 included studies.

The data information contained three metrics for measuring critical thinking: sample size, average value, and standard deviation. It is vital to remember that studies with various experimental designs frequently adopt various formulas to determine the effect size. And this paper used Morris’ proposed standardized mean difference (SMD) calculation formula ( 2008 , p. 369; see Supplementary Table S3 ).

Procedure for extracting and coding data

According to the data coding template (see Table 1 ), the 36 papers’ information was retrieved by two researchers, who then entered them into Excel (see Supplementary Table S1 ). The results of each study were extracted separately in the data extraction procedure if an article contained numerous studies on critical thinking, or if a study assessed different critical thinking dimensions. For instance, Tiwari et al. ( 2010 ) used four time points, which were viewed as numerous different studies, to examine the outcomes of critical thinking, and Chen ( 2013 ) included the two outcome variables of attitudinal tendency and cognitive skills, which were regarded as two studies. After discussion and negotiation during data extraction, the two researchers’ consistency test coefficients were roughly 93.27%. Supplementary Table S2 details the key characteristics of the 36 included articles with 79 effect quantities, including descriptive information (e.g., the publishing year, author, serial number, and title of the paper), variable information (e.g., independent variables, dependent variables, and moderating variables), and data information (e.g., mean values, standard deviations, and sample size). Following that, testing for publication bias and heterogeneity was done on the sample data using the Rev-Man 5.4 software, and then the test results were used to conduct a meta-analysis.

Publication bias test

When the sample of studies included in a meta-analysis does not accurately reflect the general status of research on the relevant subject, publication bias is said to be exhibited in this research. The reliability and accuracy of the meta-analysis may be impacted by publication bias. Due to this, the meta-analysis needs to check the sample data for publication bias (Stewart et al., 2006 ). A popular method to check for publication bias is the funnel plot; and it is unlikely that there will be publishing bias when the data are equally dispersed on either side of the average effect size and targeted within the higher region. The data are equally dispersed within the higher portion of the efficient zone, consistent with the funnel plot connected with this analysis (see Fig. 2 ), indicating that publication bias is unlikely in this situation.

This funnel plot shows the result of publication bias of 79 effect quantities across 36 studies.

Heterogeneity test

To select the appropriate effect models for the meta-analysis, one might use the results of a heterogeneity test on the data effect sizes. In a meta-analysis, it is common practice to gauge the degree of data heterogeneity using the I 2 value, and I 2  ≥ 50% is typically understood to denote medium-high heterogeneity, which calls for the adoption of a random effect model; if not, a fixed effect model ought to be applied (Lipsey and Wilson, 2001 ). The findings of the heterogeneity test in this paper (see Table 2 ) revealed that I 2 was 86% and displayed significant heterogeneity ( P  < 0.01). To ensure accuracy and reliability, the overall effect size ought to be calculated utilizing the random effect model.

The analysis of the overall effect size

This meta-analysis utilized a random effect model to examine 79 effect quantities from 36 studies after eliminating heterogeneity. In accordance with Cohen’s criterion (Cohen, 1992 ), it is abundantly clear from the analysis results, which are shown in the forest plot of the overall effect (see Fig. 3 ), that the cumulative impact size of cooperative problem-solving is 0.82, which is statistically significant ( z  = 12.78, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.69, 0.95]), and can encourage learners to practice critical thinking.

This forest plot shows the analysis result of the overall effect size across 36 studies.

In addition, this study examined two distinct dimensions of critical thinking to better understand the precise contributions that collaborative problem-solving makes to the growth of critical thinking. The findings (see Table 3 ) indicate that collaborative problem-solving improves cognitive skills (ES = 0.70) and attitudinal tendency (ES = 1.17), with significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 7.95, P  < 0.01). Although collaborative problem-solving improves both dimensions of critical thinking, it is essential to point out that the improvements in students’ attitudinal tendency are much more pronounced and have a significant comprehensive effect (ES = 1.17, z  = 7.62, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.87, 1.47]), whereas gains in learners’ cognitive skill are slightly improved and are just above average. (ES = 0.70, z  = 11.55, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.58, 0.82]).

The analysis of moderator effect size

The whole forest plot’s 79 effect quantities underwent a two-tailed test, which revealed significant heterogeneity ( I 2  = 86%, z  = 12.78, P  < 0.01), indicating differences between various effect sizes that may have been influenced by moderating factors other than sampling error. Therefore, exploring possible moderating factors that might produce considerable heterogeneity was done using subgroup analysis, such as the learning stage, learning scaffold, teaching type, group size, duration of the intervention, measuring tool, and the subject area included in the 36 experimental designs, in order to further explore the key factors that influence critical thinking. The findings (see Table 4 ) indicate that various moderating factors have advantageous effects on critical thinking. In this situation, the subject area (chi 2  = 13.36, P  < 0.05), group size (chi 2  = 8.77, P  < 0.05), intervention duration (chi 2  = 12.18, P  < 0.01), learning scaffold (chi 2  = 9.03, P  < 0.01), and teaching type (chi 2  = 7.20, P  < 0.05) are all significant moderators that can be applied to support the cultivation of critical thinking. However, since the learning stage and the measuring tools did not significantly differ among intergroup (chi 2  = 3.15, P  = 0.21 > 0.05, and chi 2  = 0.08, P  = 0.78 > 0.05), we are unable to explain why these two factors are crucial in supporting the cultivation of critical thinking in the context of collaborative problem-solving. These are the precise outcomes, as follows:

Various learning stages influenced critical thinking positively, without significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 3.15, P  = 0.21 > 0.05). High school was first on the list of effect sizes (ES = 1.36, P  < 0.01), then higher education (ES = 0.78, P  < 0.01), and middle school (ES = 0.73, P  < 0.01). These results show that, despite the learning stage’s beneficial influence on cultivating learners’ critical thinking, we are unable to explain why it is essential for cultivating critical thinking in the context of collaborative problem-solving.

Different teaching types had varying degrees of positive impact on critical thinking, with significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 7.20, P  < 0.05). The effect size was ranked as follows: mixed courses (ES = 1.34, P  < 0.01), integrated courses (ES = 0.81, P  < 0.01), and independent courses (ES = 0.27, P  < 0.01). These results indicate that the most effective approach to cultivate critical thinking utilizing collaborative problem solving is through the teaching type of mixed courses.

Various intervention durations significantly improved critical thinking, and there were significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 12.18, P  < 0.01). The effect sizes related to this variable showed a tendency to increase with longer intervention durations. The improvement in critical thinking reached a significant level (ES = 0.85, P  < 0.01) after more than 12 weeks of training. These findings indicate that the intervention duration and critical thinking’s impact are positively correlated, with a longer intervention duration having a greater effect.

Different learning scaffolds influenced critical thinking positively, with significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 9.03, P  < 0.01). The resource-supported learning scaffold (ES = 0.69, P  < 0.01) acquired a medium-to-higher level of impact, the technique-supported learning scaffold (ES = 0.63, P  < 0.01) also attained a medium-to-higher level of impact, and the teacher-supported learning scaffold (ES = 0.92, P  < 0.01) displayed a high level of significant impact. These results show that the learning scaffold with teacher support has the greatest impact on cultivating critical thinking.

Various group sizes influenced critical thinking positively, and the intergroup differences were statistically significant (chi 2  = 8.77, P  < 0.05). Critical thinking showed a general declining trend with increasing group size. The overall effect size of 2–3 people in this situation was the biggest (ES = 0.99, P  < 0.01), and when the group size was greater than 7 people, the improvement in critical thinking was at the lower-middle level (ES < 0.5, P  < 0.01). These results show that the impact on critical thinking is positively connected with group size, and as group size grows, so does the overall impact.

Various measuring tools influenced critical thinking positively, with significant intergroup differences (chi 2  = 0.08, P  = 0.78 > 0.05). In this situation, the self-adapting measurement tools obtained an upper-medium level of effect (ES = 0.78), whereas the complete effect size of the standardized measurement tools was the largest, achieving a significant level of effect (ES = 0.84, P  < 0.01). These results show that, despite the beneficial influence of the measuring tool on cultivating critical thinking, we are unable to explain why it is crucial in fostering the growth of critical thinking by utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

Different subject areas had a greater impact on critical thinking, and the intergroup differences were statistically significant (chi 2  = 13.36, P  < 0.05). Mathematics had the greatest overall impact, achieving a significant level of effect (ES = 1.68, P  < 0.01), followed by science (ES = 1.25, P  < 0.01) and medical science (ES = 0.87, P  < 0.01), both of which also achieved a significant level of effect. Programming technology was the least effective (ES = 0.39, P  < 0.01), only having a medium-low degree of effect compared to education (ES = 0.72, P  < 0.01) and other fields (such as language, art, and social sciences) (ES = 0.58, P  < 0.01). These results suggest that scientific fields (e.g., mathematics, science) may be the most effective subject areas for cultivating critical thinking utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving with regard to teaching critical thinking

According to this meta-analysis, using collaborative problem-solving as an intervention strategy in critical thinking teaching has a considerable amount of impact on cultivating learners’ critical thinking as a whole and has a favorable promotional effect on the two dimensions of critical thinking. According to certain studies, collaborative problem solving, the most frequently used critical thinking teaching strategy in curriculum instruction can considerably enhance students’ critical thinking (e.g., Liang et al., 2017 ; Liu et al., 2020 ; Cindy, 2004 ). This meta-analysis provides convergent data support for the above research views. Thus, the findings of this meta-analysis not only effectively address the first research query regarding the overall effect of cultivating critical thinking and its impact on the two dimensions of critical thinking (i.e., attitudinal tendency and cognitive skills) utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving, but also enhance our confidence in cultivating critical thinking by using collaborative problem-solving intervention approach in the context of classroom teaching.

Furthermore, the associated improvements in attitudinal tendency are much stronger, but the corresponding improvements in cognitive skill are only marginally better. According to certain studies, cognitive skill differs from the attitudinal tendency in classroom instruction; the cultivation and development of the former as a key ability is a process of gradual accumulation, while the latter as an attitude is affected by the context of the teaching situation (e.g., a novel and exciting teaching approach, challenging and rewarding tasks) (Halpern, 2001 ; Wei and Hong, 2022 ). Collaborative problem-solving as a teaching approach is exciting and interesting, as well as rewarding and challenging; because it takes the learners as the focus and examines problems with poor structure in real situations, and it can inspire students to fully realize their potential for problem-solving, which will significantly improve their attitudinal tendency toward solving problems (Liu et al., 2020 ). Similar to how collaborative problem-solving influences attitudinal tendency, attitudinal tendency impacts cognitive skill when attempting to solve a problem (Liu et al., 2020 ; Zhang et al., 2022 ), and stronger attitudinal tendencies are associated with improved learning achievement and cognitive ability in students (Sison, 2008 ; Zhang et al., 2022 ). It can be seen that the two specific dimensions of critical thinking as well as critical thinking as a whole are affected by collaborative problem-solving, and this study illuminates the nuanced links between cognitive skills and attitudinal tendencies with regard to these two dimensions of critical thinking. To fully develop students’ capacity for critical thinking, future empirical research should pay closer attention to cognitive skills.

The moderating effects of collaborative problem solving with regard to teaching critical thinking

In order to further explore the key factors that influence critical thinking, exploring possible moderating effects that might produce considerable heterogeneity was done using subgroup analysis. The findings show that the moderating factors, such as the teaching type, learning stage, group size, learning scaffold, duration of the intervention, measuring tool, and the subject area included in the 36 experimental designs, could all support the cultivation of collaborative problem-solving in critical thinking. Among them, the effect size differences between the learning stage and measuring tool are not significant, which does not explain why these two factors are crucial in supporting the cultivation of critical thinking utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

In terms of the learning stage, various learning stages influenced critical thinking positively without significant intergroup differences, indicating that we are unable to explain why it is crucial in fostering the growth of critical thinking.

Although high education accounts for 70.89% of all empirical studies performed by researchers, high school may be the appropriate learning stage to foster students’ critical thinking by utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving since it has the largest overall effect size. This phenomenon may be related to student’s cognitive development, which needs to be further studied in follow-up research.

With regard to teaching type, mixed course teaching may be the best teaching method to cultivate students’ critical thinking. Relevant studies have shown that in the actual teaching process if students are trained in thinking methods alone, the methods they learn are isolated and divorced from subject knowledge, which is not conducive to their transfer of thinking methods; therefore, if students’ thinking is trained only in subject teaching without systematic method training, it is challenging to apply to real-world circumstances (Ruggiero, 2012 ; Hu and Liu, 2015 ). Teaching critical thinking as mixed course teaching in parallel to other subject teachings can achieve the best effect on learners’ critical thinking, and explicit critical thinking instruction is more effective than less explicit critical thinking instruction (Bensley and Spero, 2014 ).

In terms of the intervention duration, with longer intervention times, the overall effect size shows an upward tendency. Thus, the intervention duration and critical thinking’s impact are positively correlated. Critical thinking, as a key competency for students in the 21st century, is difficult to get a meaningful improvement in a brief intervention duration. Instead, it could be developed over a lengthy period of time through consistent teaching and the progressive accumulation of knowledge (Halpern, 2001 ; Hu and Liu, 2015 ). Therefore, future empirical studies ought to take these restrictions into account throughout a longer period of critical thinking instruction.

With regard to group size, a group size of 2–3 persons has the highest effect size, and the comprehensive effect size decreases with increasing group size in general. This outcome is in line with some research findings; as an example, a group composed of two to four members is most appropriate for collaborative learning (Schellens and Valcke, 2006 ). However, the meta-analysis results also indicate that once the group size exceeds 7 people, small groups cannot produce better interaction and performance than large groups. This may be because the learning scaffolds of technique support, resource support, and teacher support improve the frequency and effectiveness of interaction among group members, and a collaborative group with more members may increase the diversity of views, which is helpful to cultivate critical thinking utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

With regard to the learning scaffold, the three different kinds of learning scaffolds can all enhance critical thinking. Among them, the teacher-supported learning scaffold has the largest overall effect size, demonstrating the interdependence of effective learning scaffolds and collaborative problem-solving. This outcome is in line with some research findings; as an example, a successful strategy is to encourage learners to collaborate, come up with solutions, and develop critical thinking skills by using learning scaffolds (Reiser, 2004 ; Xu et al., 2022 ); learning scaffolds can lower task complexity and unpleasant feelings while also enticing students to engage in learning activities (Wood et al., 2006 ); learning scaffolds are designed to assist students in using learning approaches more successfully to adapt the collaborative problem-solving process, and the teacher-supported learning scaffolds have the greatest influence on critical thinking in this process because they are more targeted, informative, and timely (Xu et al., 2022 ).

With respect to the measuring tool, despite the fact that standardized measurement tools (such as the WGCTA, CCTT, and CCTST) have been acknowledged as trustworthy and effective by worldwide experts, only 54.43% of the research included in this meta-analysis adopted them for assessment, and the results indicated no intergroup differences. These results suggest that not all teaching circumstances are appropriate for measuring critical thinking using standardized measurement tools. “The measuring tools for measuring thinking ability have limits in assessing learners in educational situations and should be adapted appropriately to accurately assess the changes in learners’ critical thinking.”, according to Simpson and Courtney ( 2002 , p. 91). As a result, in order to more fully and precisely gauge how learners’ critical thinking has evolved, we must properly modify standardized measuring tools based on collaborative problem-solving learning contexts.

With regard to the subject area, the comprehensive effect size of science departments (e.g., mathematics, science, medical science) is larger than that of language arts and social sciences. Some recent international education reforms have noted that critical thinking is a basic part of scientific literacy. Students with scientific literacy can prove the rationality of their judgment according to accurate evidence and reasonable standards when they face challenges or poorly structured problems (Kyndt et al., 2013 ), which makes critical thinking crucial for developing scientific understanding and applying this understanding to practical problem solving for problems related to science, technology, and society (Yore et al., 2007 ).

Suggestions for critical thinking teaching

Other than those stated in the discussion above, the following suggestions are offered for critical thinking instruction utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

First, teachers should put a special emphasis on the two core elements, which are collaboration and problem-solving, to design real problems based on collaborative situations. This meta-analysis provides evidence to support the view that collaborative problem-solving has a strong synergistic effect on promoting students’ critical thinking. Asking questions about real situations and allowing learners to take part in critical discussions on real problems during class instruction are key ways to teach critical thinking rather than simply reading speculative articles without practice (Mulnix, 2012 ). Furthermore, the improvement of students’ critical thinking is realized through cognitive conflict with other learners in the problem situation (Yang et al., 2008 ). Consequently, it is essential for teachers to put a special emphasis on the two core elements, which are collaboration and problem-solving, and design real problems and encourage students to discuss, negotiate, and argue based on collaborative problem-solving situations.

Second, teachers should design and implement mixed courses to cultivate learners’ critical thinking, utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving. Critical thinking can be taught through curriculum instruction (Kuncel, 2011 ; Leng and Lu, 2020 ), with the goal of cultivating learners’ critical thinking for flexible transfer and application in real problem-solving situations. This meta-analysis shows that mixed course teaching has a highly substantial impact on the cultivation and promotion of learners’ critical thinking. Therefore, teachers should design and implement mixed course teaching with real collaborative problem-solving situations in combination with the knowledge content of specific disciplines in conventional teaching, teach methods and strategies of critical thinking based on poorly structured problems to help students master critical thinking, and provide practical activities in which students can interact with each other to develop knowledge construction and critical thinking utilizing the approach of collaborative problem-solving.

Third, teachers should be more trained in critical thinking, particularly preservice teachers, and they also should be conscious of the ways in which teachers’ support for learning scaffolds can promote critical thinking. The learning scaffold supported by teachers had the greatest impact on learners’ critical thinking, in addition to being more directive, targeted, and timely (Wood et al., 2006 ). Critical thinking can only be effectively taught when teachers recognize the significance of critical thinking for students’ growth and use the proper approaches while designing instructional activities (Forawi, 2016 ). Therefore, with the intention of enabling teachers to create learning scaffolds to cultivate learners’ critical thinking utilizing the approach of collaborative problem solving, it is essential to concentrate on the teacher-supported learning scaffolds and enhance the instruction for teaching critical thinking to teachers, especially preservice teachers.

Implications and limitations

There are certain limitations in this meta-analysis, but future research can correct them. First, the search languages were restricted to English and Chinese, so it is possible that pertinent studies that were written in other languages were overlooked, resulting in an inadequate number of articles for review. Second, these data provided by the included studies are partially missing, such as whether teachers were trained in the theory and practice of critical thinking, the average age and gender of learners, and the differences in critical thinking among learners of various ages and genders. Third, as is typical for review articles, more studies were released while this meta-analysis was being done; therefore, it had a time limit. With the development of relevant research, future studies focusing on these issues are highly relevant and needed.

Conclusions

The subject of the magnitude of collaborative problem-solving’s impact on fostering students’ critical thinking, which received scant attention from other studies, was successfully addressed by this study. The question of the effectiveness of collaborative problem-solving in promoting students’ critical thinking was addressed in this study, which addressed a topic that had gotten little attention in earlier research. The following conclusions can be made:

Regarding the results obtained, collaborative problem solving is an effective teaching approach to foster learners’ critical thinking, with a significant overall effect size (ES = 0.82, z  = 12.78, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.69, 0.95]). With respect to the dimensions of critical thinking, collaborative problem-solving can significantly and effectively improve students’ attitudinal tendency, and the comprehensive effect is significant (ES = 1.17, z  = 7.62, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.87, 1.47]); nevertheless, it falls short in terms of improving students’ cognitive skills, having only an upper-middle impact (ES = 0.70, z  = 11.55, P  < 0.01, 95% CI [0.58, 0.82]).

As demonstrated by both the results and the discussion, there are varying degrees of beneficial effects on students’ critical thinking from all seven moderating factors, which were found across 36 studies. In this context, the teaching type (chi 2  = 7.20, P  < 0.05), intervention duration (chi 2  = 12.18, P  < 0.01), subject area (chi 2  = 13.36, P  < 0.05), group size (chi 2  = 8.77, P  < 0.05), and learning scaffold (chi 2  = 9.03, P  < 0.01) all have a positive impact on critical thinking, and they can be viewed as important moderating factors that affect how critical thinking develops. Since the learning stage (chi 2  = 3.15, P  = 0.21 > 0.05) and measuring tools (chi 2  = 0.08, P  = 0.78 > 0.05) did not demonstrate any significant intergroup differences, we are unable to explain why these two factors are crucial in supporting the cultivation of critical thinking in the context of collaborative problem-solving.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article and its supplementary information files, and the supplementary information files are available in the Dataverse repository: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IPFJO6 .

Bensley DA, Spero RA (2014) Improving critical thinking skills and meta-cognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Think Skills Creat 12:55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.001

Article   Google Scholar  

Castle A (2009) Defining and assessing critical thinking skills for student radiographers. Radiography 15(1):70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2007.10.007

Chen XD (2013) An empirical study on the influence of PBL teaching model on critical thinking ability of non-English majors. J PLA Foreign Lang College 36 (04):68–72

Google Scholar  

Cohen A (1992) Antecedents of organizational commitment across occupational groups: a meta-analysis. J Organ Behav. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130602

Cooper H (2010) Research synthesis and meta-analysis: a step-by-step approach, 4th edn. Sage, London, England

Cindy HS (2004) Problem-based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 51(1):31–39

Duch BJ, Gron SD, Allen DE (2001) The power of problem-based learning: a practical “how to” for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline. Stylus Educ Sci 2:190–198

Ennis RH (1989) Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research. Educ Res 18(3):4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x018003004

Facione PA (1990) Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Research findings and recommendations. Eric document reproduction service. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed315423

Facione PA, Facione NC (1992) The California Critical Thinking Dispositions Inventory (CCTDI) and the CCTDI test manual. California Academic Press, Millbrae, CA

Forawi SA (2016) Standard-based science education and critical thinking. Think Skills Creat 20:52–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.02.005

Halpern DF (2001) Assessing the effectiveness of critical thinking instruction. J Gen Educ 50(4):270–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/27797889

Hu WP, Liu J (2015) Cultivation of pupils’ thinking ability: a five-year follow-up study. Psychol Behav Res 13(05):648–654. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-0628.2015.05.010

Huber K (2016) Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 86(2):431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917

Kek MYCA, Huijser H (2011) The power of problem-based learning in developing critical thinking skills: preparing students for tomorrow’s digital futures in today’s classrooms. High Educ Res Dev 30(3):329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.501074

Kuncel NR (2011) Measurement and meaning of critical thinking (Research report for the NRC 21st Century Skills Workshop). National Research Council, Washington, DC

Kyndt E, Raes E, Lismont B, Timmers F, Cascallar E, Dochy F (2013) A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? Educ Res Rev 10(2):133–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002

Leng J, Lu XX (2020) Is critical thinking really teachable?—A meta-analysis based on 79 experimental or quasi experimental studies. Open Educ Res 26(06):110–118. https://doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2020.06.011

Liang YZ, Zhu K, Zhao CL (2017) An empirical study on the depth of interaction promoted by collaborative problem solving learning activities. J E-educ Res 38(10):87–92. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2017.10.014

Lipsey M, Wilson D (2001) Practical meta-analysis. International Educational and Professional, London, pp. 92–160

Liu Z, Wu W, Jiang Q (2020) A study on the influence of problem based learning on college students’ critical thinking-based on a meta-analysis of 31 studies. Explor High Educ 03:43–49

Morris SB (2008) Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organ Res Methods 11(2):364–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Mulnix JW (2012) Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educ Philos Theory 44(5):464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x

Naber J, Wyatt TH (2014) The effect of reflective writing interventions on the critical thinking skills and dispositions of baccalaureate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 34(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.04.002

National Research Council (2012) Education for life and work: developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

Niu L, Behar HLS, Garvan CW (2013) Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev 9(12):114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002

Peng ZM, Deng L (2017) Towards the core of education reform: cultivating critical thinking skills as the core of skills in the 21st century. Res Educ Dev 24:57–63. https://doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2017.24.011

Reiser BJ (2004) Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci 13(3):273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2

Ruggiero VR (2012) The art of thinking: a guide to critical and creative thought, 4th edn. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York

Schellens T, Valcke M (2006) Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Comput Educ 46(4):349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010

Sendag S, Odabasi HF (2009) Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Comput Educ 53(1):132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.008

Sison R (2008) Investigating Pair Programming in a Software Engineering Course in an Asian Setting. 2008 15th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp. 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2008.61

Simpson E, Courtney M (2002) Critical thinking in nursing education: literature review. Mary Courtney 8(2):89–98

Stewart L, Tierney J, Burdett S (2006) Do systematic reviews based on individual patient data offer a means of circumventing biases associated with trial publications? Publication bias in meta-analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, pp. 261–286

Tiwari A, Lai P, So M, Yuen K (2010) A comparison of the effects of problem-based learning and lecturing on the development of students’ critical thinking. Med Educ 40(6):547–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02481.x

Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G (2006) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 17(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Wei T, Hong S (2022) The meaning and realization of teachable critical thinking. Educ Theory Practice 10:51–57

Xu EW, Wang W, Wang QX (2022) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of programming teaching in promoting K-12 students’ computational thinking. Educ Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11445-2

Yang YC, Newby T, Bill R (2008) Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: a quasi-experimental study on promoting learners’ critical thinking skills. Comput Educ 50(4):1572–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.006

Yore LD, Pimm D, Tuan HL (2007) The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. Int J Sci Math Educ 5(4):559–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9089-4

Zhang T, Zhang S, Gao QQ, Wang JH (2022) Research on the development of learners’ critical thinking in online peer review. Audio Visual Educ Res 6:53–60. https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2022.06.08

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the graduate scientific research and innovation project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region named “Research on in-depth learning of high school information technology courses for the cultivation of computing thinking” (No. XJ2022G190) and the independent innovation fund project for doctoral students of the College of Educational Science of Xinjiang Normal University named “Research on project-based teaching of high school information technology courses from the perspective of discipline core literacy” (No. XJNUJKYA2003).

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

College of Educational Science, Xinjiang Normal University, 830017, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China

Enwei Xu, Wei Wang & Qingxia Wang

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Enwei Xu or Wei Wang .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Additional information.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary tables, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Xu, E., Wang, W. & Wang, Q. The effectiveness of collaborative problem solving in promoting students’ critical thinking: A meta-analysis based on empirical literature. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10 , 16 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1

Download citation

Received : 07 August 2022

Accepted : 04 January 2023

Published : 11 January 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01508-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Impacts of online collaborative learning on students’ intercultural communication apprehension and intercultural communicative competence.

• Hoa Thi Hoang Chau
• Hung Phu Bui
• Quynh Thi Huong Dinh

Education and Information Technologies (2024)

Exploring the effects of digital technology on deep learning: a meta-analysis

The influence of scaffolding for computational thinking on cognitive load and problem-solving skills in collaborative programming.

• Yoonhee Shin
• Jaewon Jung
• Bokmoon Jung

The impacts of computer-supported collaborative learning on students’ critical thinking: a meta-analysis

• Yoseph Gebrehiwot Tedla
• Hsiu-Ling Chen

Sustainable electricity generation and farm-grid utilization from photovoltaic aquaculture: a bibliometric analysis

• A. A. Amusa
• M. Alhassan

International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (2024)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

40 problem-solving techniques and processes

All teams and organizations encounter challenges. Approaching those challenges without a structured problem solving process can end up making things worse.

Proven problem solving techniques such as those outlined below can guide your group through a process of identifying problems and challenges , ideating on possible solutions , and then evaluating and implementing the most suitable .

In this post, you'll find problem-solving tools you can use to develop effective solutions. You'll also find some tips for facilitating the problem solving process and solving complex problems.

Design your next session with SessionLab

Join the 150,000+ facilitators 
using SessionLab.

Recommended Articles

A step-by-step guide to planning a workshop, 54 great online tools for workshops and meetings, how to create an unforgettable training session in 8 simple steps.

• 18 Free Facilitation Resources We Think You’ll Love

What is problem solving?

Problem solving is a process of finding and implementing a solution to a challenge or obstacle. In most contexts, this means going through a problem solving process that begins with identifying the issue, exploring its root causes, ideating and refining possible solutions before implementing and measuring the impact of that solution.

For simple or small problems, it can be tempting to skip straight to implementing what you believe is the right solution. The danger with this approach is that without exploring the true causes of the issue, it might just occur again or your chosen solution may cause other issues.

Particularly in the world of work, good problem solving means using data to back up each step of the process, bringing in new perspectives and effectively measuring the impact of your solution.

Effective problem solving can help ensure that your team or organization is well positioned to overcome challenges, be resilient to change and create innovation. In my experience, problem solving is a combination of skillset, mindset and process, and it’s especially vital for leaders to cultivate this skill.

What is the seven step problem solving process?

A problem solving process is a step-by-step framework from going from discovering a problem all the way through to implementing a solution.

With practice, this framework can become intuitive, and innovative companies tend to have a consistent and ongoing ability to discover and tackle challenges when they come up.

You might see everything from a four step problem solving process through to seven steps. While all these processes cover roughly the same ground, I’ve found a seven step problem solving process is helpful for making all key steps legible.

We’ll outline that process here and then follow with techniques you can use to explore and work on that step of the problem solving process with a group.

The seven-step problem solving process is:

1. Problem identification 

The first stage of any problem solving process is to identify the problem(s) you need to solve. This often looks like using group discussions and activities to help a group surface and effectively articulate the challenges they’re facing and wish to resolve.

Be sure to align with your team on the exact definition and nature of the problem you’re solving. An effective process is one where everyone is pulling in the same direction – ensure clarity and alignment now to help avoid misunderstandings later.

2. Problem analysis and refinement

The process of problem analysis means ensuring that the problem you are seeking to solve is  the   right problem . Choosing the right problem to solve means you are on the right path to creating the right solution.

At this stage, you may look deeper at the problem you identified to try and discover the root cause at the level of people or process. You may also spend some time sourcing data, consulting relevant parties and creating and refining a problem statement.

Problem refinement means adjusting scope or focus of the problem you will be aiming to solve based on what comes up during your analysis. As you analyze data sources, you might discover that the root cause means you need to adjust your problem statement. Alternatively, you might find that your original problem statement is too big to be meaningful approached within your current project.

Remember that the goal of any problem refinement is to help set the stage for effective solution development and deployment. Set the right focus and get buy-in from your team here and you’ll be well positioned to move forward with confidence.

3. Solution generation

Once your group has nailed down the particulars of the problem you wish to solve, you want to encourage a free flow of ideas connecting to solving that problem. This can take the form of problem solving games that encourage creative thinking or techniquess designed to produce working prototypes of possible solutions.

The key to ensuring the success of this stage of the problem solving process is to encourage quick, creative thinking and create an open space where all ideas are considered. The best solutions can often come from unlikely places and by using problem solving techniques that celebrate invention, you might come up with solution gold.

4. Solution development

No solution is perfect right out of the gate. It’s important to discuss and develop the solutions your group has come up with over the course of following the previous problem solving steps in order to arrive at the best possible solution. Problem solving games used in this stage involve lots of critical thinking, measuring potential effort and impact, and looking at possible solutions analytically.

During this stage, you will often ask your team to iterate and improve upon your front-running solutions and develop them further. Remember that problem solving strategies always benefit from a multitude of voices and opinions, and not to let ego get involved when it comes to choosing which solutions to develop and take further.

Finding the best solution is the goal of all problem solving workshops and here is the place to ensure that your solution is well thought out, sufficiently robust and fit for purpose. 

5. Decision making and planning

Nearly there! Once you’ve got a set of possible, you’ll need to make a decision on which to implement. This can be a consensus-based group decision or it might be for a leader or major stakeholder to decide. You’ll find a set of effective decision making methods below.

Once your group has reached consensus and selected a solution, there are some additional actions that also need to be decided upon. You’ll want to work on allocating ownership of the project, figure out who will do what, how the success of the solution will be measured and decide the next course of action.

Set clear accountabilities, actions, timeframes, and follow-ups for your chosen solution. Make these decisions and set clear next-steps in the problem solving workshop so that everyone is aligned and you can move forward effectively as a group.

Ensuring that you plan for the roll-out of a solution is one of the most important problem solving steps. Without adequate planning or oversight, it can prove impossible to measure success or iterate further if the problem was not solved. 

6. Solution implementation 

This is what we were waiting for! All problem solving processes have the end goal of implementing an effective and impactful solution that your group has confidence in.

Project management and communication skills are key here – your solution may need to adjust when out in the wild or you might discover new challenges along the way. For some solutions, you might also implement a test with a small group and monitor results before rolling it out to an entire company.

You should have a clear owner for your solution who will oversee the plans you made together and help ensure they’re put into place. This person will often coordinate the implementation team and set-up processes to measure the efficacy of your solution too.

7. Solution evaluation 

So you and your team developed a great solution to a problem and have a gut feeling it’s been solved. Work done, right? Wrong. All problem solving strategies benefit from evaluation, consideration, and feedback.

You might find that the solution does not work for everyone, might create new problems, or is potentially so successful that you will want to roll it out to larger teams or as part of other initiatives.

None of that is possible without taking the time to evaluate the success of the solution you developed in your problem solving model and adjust if necessary.

Remember that the problem solving process is often iterative and it can be common to not solve complex issues on the first try. Even when this is the case, you and your team will have generated learning that will be important for future problem solving workshops or in other parts of the organization. 

It’s also worth underlining how important record keeping is throughout the problem solving process. If a solution didn’t work, you need to have the data and records to see why that was the case. If you go back to the drawing board, notes from the previous workshop can help save time.

What does an effective problem solving process look like?

Every effective problem solving process begins with an agenda . In our experience, a well-structured problem solving workshop is one of the best methods for successfully guiding a group from exploring a problem to implementing a solution.

The format of a workshop ensures that you can get buy-in from your group, encourage free-thinking and solution exploration before making a decision on what to implement following the session.

This Design Sprint 2.0 template is an effective problem solving process from top agency AJ&Smart. It’s a great format for the entire problem solving process, with four-days of workshops designed to surface issues, explore solutions and even test a solution.

Check it for an example of how you might structure and run a problem solving process and feel free to copy and adjust it your needs!

For a shorter process you can run in a single afternoon, this remote problem solving agenda will guide you effectively in just a couple of hours.

Whatever the length of your workshop, by using SessionLab, it’s easy to go from an idea to a complete agenda . Start by dragging and dropping your core problem solving activities into place . Add timings, breaks and necessary materials before sharing your agenda with your colleagues.

The resulting agenda will be your guide to an effective and productive problem solving session that will also help you stay organized on the day!

Complete problem-solving methods

In this section, we’ll look at in-depth problem-solving methods that provide a complete end-to-end process for developing effective solutions. These will help guide your team from the discovery and definition of a problem through to delivering the right solution.

If you’re looking for an all-encompassing method or problem-solving model, these processes are a great place to start. They’ll ask your team to challenge preconceived ideas and adopt a mindset for solving problems more effectively.

Six Thinking Hats

Individual approaches to solving a problem can be very different based on what team or role an individual holds. It can be easy for existing biases or perspectives to find their way into the mix, or for internal politics to direct a conversation.

Six Thinking Hats is a classic method for identifying the problems that need to be solved and enables your team to consider them from different angles, whether that is by focusing on facts and data, creative solutions, or by considering why a particular solution might not work.

Like all problem-solving frameworks, Six Thinking Hats is effective at helping teams remove roadblocks from a conversation or discussion and come to terms with all the aspects necessary to solve complex problems.

The Six Thinking Hats   #creative thinking   #meeting facilitation   #problem solving   #issue resolution   #idea generation   #conflict resolution   The Six Thinking Hats are used by individuals and groups to separate out conflicting styles of thinking. They enable and encourage a group of people to think constructively together in exploring and implementing change, rather than using argument to fight over who is right and who is wrong.

Lightning Decision Jam

Featured courtesy of Jonathan Courtney of AJ&Smart Berlin, Lightning Decision Jam is one of those strategies that should be in every facilitation toolbox. Exploring problems and finding solutions is often creative in nature, though as with any creative process, there is the potential to lose focus and get lost.

Unstructured discussions might get you there in the end, but it’s much more effective to use a method that creates a clear process and team focus.

In Lightning Decision Jam, participants are invited to begin by writing challenges, concerns, or mistakes on post-its without discussing them before then being invited by the moderator to present them to the group.

From there, the team vote on which problems to solve and are guided through steps that will allow them to reframe those problems, create solutions and then decide what to execute on. 

By deciding the problems that need to be solved as a team before moving on, this group process is great for ensuring the whole team is aligned and can take ownership over the next stages. 

Lightning Decision Jam (LDJ)   #action   #decision making   #problem solving   #issue analysis   #innovation   #design   #remote-friendly   It doesn’t matter where you work and what your job role is, if you work with other people together as a team, you will always encounter the same challenges: Unclear goals and miscommunication that cause busy work and overtime Unstructured meetings that leave attendants tired, confused and without clear outcomes. Frustration builds up because internal challenges to productivity are not addressed Sudden changes in priorities lead to a loss of focus and momentum Muddled compromise takes the place of clear decision- making, leaving everybody to come up with their own interpretation. In short, a lack of structure leads to a waste of time and effort, projects that drag on for too long and frustrated, burnt out teams. AJ&Smart has worked with some of the most innovative, productive companies in the world. What sets their teams apart from others is not better tools, bigger talent or more beautiful offices. The secret sauce to becoming a more productive, more creative and happier team is simple: Replace all open discussion or brainstorming with a structured process that leads to more ideas, clearer decisions and better outcomes. When a good process provides guardrails and a clear path to follow, it becomes easier to come up with ideas, make decisions and solve problems. This is why AJ&Smart created Lightning Decision Jam (LDJ). It’s a simple and short, but powerful group exercise that can be run either in-person, in the same room, or remotely with distributed teams.

Problem Definition Process

While problems can be complex, the problem-solving methods you use to identify and solve those problems can often be simple in design. 

By taking the time to truly identify and define a problem before asking the group to reframe the challenge as an opportunity, this method is a great way to enable change.

Begin by identifying a focus question and exploring the ways in which it manifests before splitting into five teams who will each consider the problem using a different method: escape, reversal, exaggeration, distortion or wishful. Teams develop a problem objective and create ideas in line with their method before then feeding them back to the group.

This method is great for enabling in-depth discussions while also creating space for finding creative solutions too!

Problem Definition   #problem solving   #idea generation   #creativity   #online   #remote-friendly   A problem solving technique to define a problem, challenge or opportunity and to generate ideas.

The 5 Whys 

Sometimes, a group needs to go further with their strategies and analyze the root cause at the heart of organizational issues. An RCA or root cause analysis is the process of identifying what is at the heart of business problems or recurring challenges. 

The 5 Whys is a simple and effective method of helping a group go find the root cause of any problem or challenge and conduct analysis that will deliver results. 

By beginning with the creation of a problem statement and going through five stages to refine it, The 5 Whys provides everything you need to truly discover the cause of an issue.

The 5 Whys   #hyperisland   #innovation   This simple and powerful method is useful for getting to the core of a problem or challenge. As the title suggests, the group defines a problems, then asks the question “why” five times, often using the resulting explanation as a starting point for creative problem solving.

World Cafe is a simple but powerful facilitation technique to help bigger groups to focus their energy and attention on solving complex problems.

World Cafe enables this approach by creating a relaxed atmosphere where participants are able to self-organize and explore topics relevant and important to them which are themed around a central problem-solving purpose. Create the right atmosphere by modeling your space after a cafe and after guiding the group through the method, let them take the lead!

Making problem-solving a part of your organization’s culture in the long term can be a difficult undertaking. More approachable formats like World Cafe can be especially effective in bringing people unfamiliar with workshops into the fold. 

World Cafe   #hyperisland   #innovation   #issue analysis   World Café is a simple yet powerful method, originated by Juanita Brown, for enabling meaningful conversations driven completely by participants and the topics that are relevant and important to them. Facilitators create a cafe-style space and provide simple guidelines. Participants then self-organize and explore a set of relevant topics or questions for conversation.

Discovery & Action Dialogue (DAD)

One of the best approaches is to create a safe space for a group to share and discover practices and behaviors that can help them find their own solutions.

With DAD, you can help a group choose which problems they wish to solve and which approaches they will take to do so. It’s great at helping remove resistance to change and can help get buy-in at every level too!

This process of enabling frontline ownership is great in ensuring follow-through and is one of the methods you will want in your toolbox as a facilitator.

Discovery & Action Dialogue (DAD)   #idea generation   #liberating structures   #action   #issue analysis   #remote-friendly   DADs make it easy for a group or community to discover practices and behaviors that enable some individuals (without access to special resources and facing the same constraints) to find better solutions than their peers to common problems. These are called positive deviant (PD) behaviors and practices. DADs make it possible for people in the group, unit, or community to discover by themselves these PD practices. DADs also create favorable conditions for stimulating participants’ creativity in spaces where they can feel safe to invent new and more effective practices. Resistance to change evaporates as participants are unleashed to choose freely which practices they will adopt or try and which problems they will tackle. DADs make it possible to achieve frontline ownership of solutions.

Design Sprint 2.0

Want to see how a team can solve big problems and move forward with prototyping and testing solutions in a few days? The Design Sprint 2.0 template from Jake Knapp, author of Sprint, is a complete agenda for a with proven results.

Developing the right agenda can involve difficult but necessary planning. Ensuring all the correct steps are followed can also be stressful or time-consuming depending on your level of experience.

Use this complete 4-day workshop template if you are finding there is no obvious solution to your challenge and want to focus your team around a specific problem that might require a shortcut to launching a minimum viable product or waiting for the organization-wide implementation of a solution.

Open space technology

Open space technology- developed by Harrison Owen – creates a space where large groups are invited to take ownership of their problem solving and lead individual sessions. Open space technology is a great format when you have a great deal of expertise and insight in the room and want to allow for different takes and approaches on a particular theme or problem you need to be solved.

Start by bringing your participants together to align around a central theme and focus their efforts. Explain the ground rules to help guide the problem-solving process and then invite members to identify any issue connecting to the central theme that they are interested in and are prepared to take responsibility for.

Once participants have decided on their approach to the core theme, they write their issue on a piece of paper, announce it to the group, pick a session time and place, and post the paper on the wall. As the wall fills up with sessions, the group is then invited to join the sessions that interest them the most and which they can contribute to, then you’re ready to begin!

Everyone joins the problem-solving group they’ve signed up to, record the discussion and if appropriate, findings can then be shared with the rest of the group afterward.

Open Space Technology   #action plan   #idea generation   #problem solving   #issue analysis   #large group   #online   #remote-friendly   Open Space is a methodology for large groups to create their agenda discerning important topics for discussion, suitable for conferences, community gatherings and whole system facilitation

Techniques to identify and analyze problems

Using a problem-solving method to help a team identify and analyze a problem can be a quick and effective addition to any workshop or meeting.

While further actions are always necessary, you can generate momentum and alignment easily, and these activities are a great place to get started.

We’ve put together this list of techniques to help you and your team with problem identification, analysis, and discussion that sets the foundation for developing effective solutions.

Let’s take a look!

Fishbone Analysis

Organizational or team challenges are rarely simple, and it’s important to remember that one problem can be an indication of something that goes deeper and may require further consideration to be solved.

Fishbone Analysis helps groups to dig deeper and understand the origins of a problem. It’s a great example of a root cause analysis method that is simple for everyone on a team to get their head around. 

Participants in this activity are asked to annotate a diagram of a fish, first adding the problem or issue to be worked on at the head of a fish before then brainstorming the root causes of the problem and adding them as bones on the fish. 

Using abstractions such as a diagram of a fish can really help a team break out of their regular thinking and develop a creative approach.

Fishbone Analysis   #problem solving   ##root cause analysis   #decision making   #online facilitation   A process to help identify and understand the origins of problems, issues or observations.

Problem Tree 

Encouraging visual thinking can be an essential part of many strategies. By simply reframing and clarifying problems, a group can move towards developing a problem solving model that works for them. 

In Problem Tree, groups are asked to first brainstorm a list of problems – these can be design problems, team problems or larger business problems – and then organize them into a hierarchy. The hierarchy could be from most important to least important or abstract to practical, though the key thing with problem solving games that involve this aspect is that your group has some way of managing and sorting all the issues that are raised.

Once you have a list of problems that need to be solved and have organized them accordingly, you’re then well-positioned for the next problem solving steps.

Problem tree   #define intentions   #create   #design   #issue analysis   A problem tree is a tool to clarify the hierarchy of problems addressed by the team within a design project; it represents high level problems or related sublevel problems.

SWOT Analysis

Chances are you’ve heard of the SWOT Analysis before. This problem-solving method focuses on identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is a tried and tested method for both individuals and teams.

Start by creating a desired end state or outcome and bare this in mind – any process solving model is made more effective by knowing what you are moving towards. Create a quadrant made up of the four categories of a SWOT analysis and ask participants to generate ideas based on each of those quadrants.

Once you have those ideas assembled in their quadrants, cluster them together based on their affinity with other ideas. These clusters are then used to facilitate group conversations and move things forward. 

SWOT analysis   #gamestorming   #problem solving   #action   #meeting facilitation   The SWOT Analysis is a long-standing technique of looking at what we have, with respect to the desired end state, as well as what we could improve on. It gives us an opportunity to gauge approaching opportunities and dangers, and assess the seriousness of the conditions that affect our future. When we understand those conditions, we can influence what comes next.

Agreement-Certainty Matrix

Not every problem-solving approach is right for every challenge, and deciding on the right method for the challenge at hand is a key part of being an effective team.

The Agreement Certainty matrix helps teams align on the nature of the challenges facing them. By sorting problems from simple to chaotic, your team can understand what methods are suitable for each problem and what they can do to ensure effective results. 

If you are already using Liberating Structures techniques as part of your problem-solving strategy, the Agreement-Certainty Matrix can be an invaluable addition to your process. We’ve found it particularly if you are having issues with recurring problems in your organization and want to go deeper in understanding the root cause. 

Agreement-Certainty Matrix   #issue analysis   #liberating structures   #problem solving   You can help individuals or groups avoid the frequent mistake of trying to solve a problem with methods that are not adapted to the nature of their challenge. The combination of two questions makes it possible to easily sort challenges into four categories: simple, complicated, complex , and chaotic .  A problem is simple when it can be solved reliably with practices that are easy to duplicate.  It is complicated when experts are required to devise a sophisticated solution that will yield the desired results predictably.  A problem is complex when there are several valid ways to proceed but outcomes are not predictable in detail.  Chaotic is when the context is too turbulent to identify a path forward.  A loose analogy may be used to describe these differences: simple is like following a recipe, complicated like sending a rocket to the moon, complex like raising a child, and chaotic is like the game “Pin the Tail on the Donkey.”  The Liberating Structures Matching Matrix in Chapter 5 can be used as the first step to clarify the nature of a challenge and avoid the mismatches between problems and solutions that are frequently at the root of chronic, recurring problems.

Organizing and charting a team’s progress can be important in ensuring its success. SQUID (Sequential Question and Insight Diagram) is a great model that allows a team to effectively switch between giving questions and answers and develop the skills they need to stay on track throughout the process. 

Begin with two different colored sticky notes – one for questions and one for answers – and with your central topic (the head of the squid) on the board. Ask the group to first come up with a series of questions connected to their best guess of how to approach the topic. Ask the group to come up with answers to those questions, fix them to the board and connect them with a line. After some discussion, go back to question mode by responding to the generated answers or other points on the board.

It’s rewarding to see a diagram grow throughout the exercise, and a completed SQUID can provide a visual resource for future effort and as an example for other teams.

SQUID   #gamestorming   #project planning   #issue analysis   #problem solving   When exploring an information space, it’s important for a group to know where they are at any given time. By using SQUID, a group charts out the territory as they go and can navigate accordingly. SQUID stands for Sequential Question and Insight Diagram.

To continue with our nautical theme, Speed Boat is a short and sweet activity that can help a team quickly identify what employees, clients or service users might have a problem with and analyze what might be standing in the way of achieving a solution.

Methods that allow for a group to make observations, have insights and obtain those eureka moments quickly are invaluable when trying to solve complex problems.

In Speed Boat, the approach is to first consider what anchors and challenges might be holding an organization (or boat) back. Bonus points if you are able to identify any sharks in the water and develop ideas that can also deal with competitors!   

Speed Boat   #gamestorming   #problem solving   #action   Speedboat is a short and sweet way to identify what your employees or clients don’t like about your product/service or what’s standing in the way of a desired goal.

The Journalistic Six

Some of the most effective ways of solving problems is by encouraging teams to be more inclusive and diverse in their thinking.

Based on the six key questions journalism students are taught to answer in articles and news stories, The Journalistic Six helps create teams to see the whole picture. By using who, what, when, where, why, and how to facilitate the conversation and encourage creative thinking, your team can make sure that the problem identification and problem analysis stages of the are covered exhaustively and thoughtfully. Reporter’s notebook and dictaphone optional.

The Journalistic Six – Who What When Where Why How   #idea generation   #issue analysis   #problem solving   #online   #creative thinking   #remote-friendly   A questioning method for generating, explaining, investigating ideas.

Individual and group perspectives are incredibly important, but what happens if people are set in their minds and need a change of perspective in order to approach a problem more effectively?

Flip It is a method we love because it is both simple to understand and run, and allows groups to understand how their perspectives and biases are formed. 

Participants in Flip It are first invited to consider concerns, issues, or problems from a perspective of fear and write them on a flip chart. Then, the group is asked to consider those same issues from a perspective of hope and flip their understanding.  

No problem and solution is free from existing bias and by changing perspectives with Flip It, you can then develop a problem solving model quickly and effectively.

Flip It!   #gamestorming   #problem solving   #action   Often, a change in a problem or situation comes simply from a change in our perspectives. Flip It! is a quick game designed to show players that perspectives are made, not born.

LEGO Challenge

Now for an activity that is a little out of the (toy) box. LEGO Serious Play is a facilitation methodology that can be used to improve creative thinking and problem-solving skills.

The LEGO Challenge includes giving each member of the team an assignment that is hidden from the rest of the group while they create a structure without speaking.

What the LEGO challenge brings to the table is a fun working example of working with stakeholders who might not be on the same page to solve problems. Also, it’s LEGO! Who doesn’t love LEGO! 

LEGO Challenge   #hyperisland   #team   A team-building activity in which groups must work together to build a structure out of LEGO, but each individual has a secret “assignment” which makes the collaborative process more challenging. It emphasizes group communication, leadership dynamics, conflict, cooperation, patience and problem solving strategy.

What, So What, Now What?

If not carefully managed, the problem identification and problem analysis stages of the problem-solving process can actually create more problems and misunderstandings.

The What, So What, Now What? problem-solving activity is designed to help collect insights and move forward while also eliminating the possibility of disagreement when it comes to identifying, clarifying, and analyzing organizational or work problems. 

Facilitation is all about bringing groups together so that might work on a shared goal and the best problem-solving strategies ensure that teams are aligned in purpose, if not initially in opinion or insight.

Throughout the three steps of this game, you give everyone on a team to reflect on a problem by asking what happened, why it is important, and what actions should then be taken. 

This can be a great activity for bringing our individual perceptions about a problem or challenge and contextualizing it in a larger group setting. This is one of the most important problem-solving skills you can bring to your organization.

W³ – What, So What, Now What?   #issue analysis   #innovation   #liberating structures   You can help groups reflect on a shared experience in a way that builds understanding and spurs coordinated action while avoiding unproductive conflict. It is possible for every voice to be heard while simultaneously sifting for insights and shaping new direction. Progressing in stages makes this practical—from collecting facts about What Happened to making sense of these facts with So What and finally to what actions logically follow with Now What . The shared progression eliminates most of the misunderstandings that otherwise fuel disagreements about what to do. Voila!

Journalists  

Problem analysis can be one of the most important and decisive stages of all problem-solving tools. Sometimes, a team can become bogged down in the details and are unable to move forward.

Journalists is an activity that can avoid a group from getting stuck in the problem identification or problem analysis stages of the process.

In Journalists, the group is invited to draft the front page of a fictional newspaper and figure out what stories deserve to be on the cover and what headlines those stories will have. By reframing how your problems and challenges are approached, you can help a team move productively through the process and be better prepared for the steps to follow.

Journalists   #vision   #big picture   #issue analysis   #remote-friendly   This is an exercise to use when the group gets stuck in details and struggles to see the big picture. Also good for defining a vision.

Problem-solving techniques for brainstorming solutions

Now you have the context and background of the problem you are trying to solving, now comes the time to start ideating and thinking about how you’ll solve the issue.

Here, you’ll want to encourage creative, free thinking and speed. Get as many ideas out as possible and explore different perspectives so you have the raw material for the next step.

Looking at a problem from a new angle can be one of the most effective ways of creating an effective solution. TRIZ is a problem-solving tool that asks the group to consider what they must not do in order to solve a challenge.

By reversing the discussion, new topics and taboo subjects often emerge, allowing the group to think more deeply and create ideas that confront the status quo in a safe and meaningful way. If you’re working on a problem that you’ve tried to solve before, TRIZ is a great problem-solving method to help your team get unblocked.

Making Space with TRIZ   #issue analysis   #liberating structures   #issue resolution   You can clear space for innovation by helping a group let go of what it knows (but rarely admits) limits its success and by inviting creative destruction. TRIZ makes it possible to challenge sacred cows safely and encourages heretical thinking. The question “What must we stop doing to make progress on our deepest purpose?” induces seriously fun yet very courageous conversations. Since laughter often erupts, issues that are otherwise taboo get a chance to be aired and confronted. With creative destruction come opportunities for renewal as local action and innovation rush in to fill the vacuum. Whoosh!

Mindspin  

Brainstorming is part of the bread and butter of the problem-solving process and all problem-solving strategies benefit from getting ideas out and challenging a team to generate solutions quickly. 

With Mindspin, participants are encouraged not only to generate ideas but to do so under time constraints and by slamming down cards and passing them on. By doing multiple rounds, your team can begin with a free generation of possible solutions before moving on to developing those solutions and encouraging further ideation. 

This is one of our favorite problem-solving activities and can be great for keeping the energy up throughout the workshop. Remember the importance of helping people become engaged in the process – energizing problem-solving techniques like Mindspin can help ensure your team stays engaged and happy, even when the problems they’re coming together to solve are complex.

MindSpin   #teampedia   #idea generation   #problem solving   #action   A fast and loud method to enhance brainstorming within a team. Since this activity has more than round ideas that are repetitive can be ruled out leaving more creative and innovative answers to the challenge.

The Creativity Dice

One of the most useful problem solving skills you can teach your team is of approaching challenges with creativity, flexibility, and openness. Games like The Creativity Dice allow teams to overcome the potential hurdle of too much linear thinking and approach the process with a sense of fun and speed. 

In The Creativity Dice, participants are organized around a topic and roll a dice to determine what they will work on for a period of 3 minutes at a time. They might roll a 3 and work on investigating factual information on the chosen topic. They might roll a 1 and work on identifying the specific goals, standards, or criteria for the session.

Encouraging rapid work and iteration while asking participants to be flexible are great skills to cultivate. Having a stage for idea incubation in this game is also important. Moments of pause can help ensure the ideas that are put forward are the most suitable. 

The Creativity Dice   #creativity   #problem solving   #thiagi   #issue analysis   Too much linear thinking is hazardous to creative problem solving. To be creative, you should approach the problem (or the opportunity) from different points of view. You should leave a thought hanging in mid-air and move to another. This skipping around prevents premature closure and lets your brain incubate one line of thought while you consciously pursue another.

Idea and Concept Development

Brainstorming without structure can quickly become chaotic or frustrating. In a problem-solving context, having an ideation framework to follow can help ensure your team is both creative and disciplined.

In this method, you’ll find an idea generation process that encourages your group to brainstorm effectively before developing their ideas and begin clustering them together. By using concepts such as Yes and…, more is more and postponing judgement, you can create the ideal conditions for brainstorming with ease.

Idea & Concept Development   #hyperisland   #innovation   #idea generation   Ideation and Concept Development is a process for groups to work creatively and collaboratively to generate creative ideas. It’s a general approach that can be adapted and customized to suit many different scenarios. It includes basic principles for idea generation and several steps for groups to work with. It also includes steps for idea selection and development.

Problem-solving techniques for developing and refining solutions 

The success of any problem-solving process can be measured by the solutions it produces. After you’ve defined the issue, explored existing ideas, and ideated, it’s time to develop and refine your ideas in order to bring them closer to a solution that actually solves the problem.

Use these problem-solving techniques when you want to help your team think through their ideas and refine them as part of your problem solving process.

Improved Solutions

After a team has successfully identified a problem and come up with a few solutions, it can be tempting to call the work of the problem-solving process complete. That said, the first solution is not necessarily the best, and by including a further review and reflection activity into your problem-solving model, you can ensure your group reaches the best possible result. 

One of a number of problem-solving games from Thiagi Group, Improved Solutions helps you go the extra mile and develop suggested solutions with close consideration and peer review. By supporting the discussion of several problems at once and by shifting team roles throughout, this problem-solving technique is a dynamic way of finding the best solution. 

Improved Solutions   #creativity   #thiagi   #problem solving   #action   #team   You can improve any solution by objectively reviewing its strengths and weaknesses and making suitable adjustments. In this creativity framegame, you improve the solutions to several problems. To maintain objective detachment, you deal with a different problem during each of six rounds and assume different roles (problem owner, consultant, basher, booster, enhancer, and evaluator) during each round. At the conclusion of the activity, each player ends up with two solutions to her problem.

Four Step Sketch

Creative thinking and visual ideation does not need to be confined to the opening stages of your problem-solving strategies. Exercises that include sketching and prototyping on paper can be effective at the solution finding and development stage of the process, and can be great for keeping a team engaged. 

By going from simple notes to a crazy 8s round that involves rapidly sketching 8 variations on their ideas before then producing a final solution sketch, the group is able to iterate quickly and visually. Problem-solving techniques like Four-Step Sketch are great if you have a group of different thinkers and want to change things up from a more textual or discussion-based approach.

Four-Step Sketch   #design sprint   #innovation   #idea generation   #remote-friendly   The four-step sketch is an exercise that helps people to create well-formed concepts through a structured process that includes: Review key information Start design work on paper,  Consider multiple variations , Create a detailed solution . This exercise is preceded by a set of other activities allowing the group to clarify the challenge they want to solve. See how the Four Step Sketch exercise fits into a Design Sprint

Ensuring that everyone in a group is able to contribute to a discussion is vital during any problem solving process. Not only does this ensure all bases are covered, but its then easier to get buy-in and accountability when people have been able to contribute to the process.

1-2-4-All is a tried and tested facilitation technique where participants are asked to first brainstorm on a topic on their own. Next, they discuss and share ideas in a pair before moving into a small group. Those groups are then asked to present the best idea from their discussion to the rest of the team.

This method can be used in many different contexts effectively, though I find it particularly shines in the idea development stage of the process. Giving each participant time to concretize their ideas and develop them in progressively larger groups can create a great space for both innovation and psychological safety.

1-2-4-All   #idea generation   #liberating structures   #issue analysis   With this facilitation technique you can immediately include everyone regardless of how large the group is. You can generate better ideas and more of them faster than ever before. You can tap the know-how and imagination that is distributed widely in places not known in advance. Open, generative conversation unfolds. Ideas and solutions are sifted in rapid fashion. Most importantly, participants own the ideas, so follow-up and implementation is simplified. No buy-in strategies needed! Simple and elegant!

15% Solutions

Some problems are simpler than others and with the right problem-solving activities, you can empower people to take immediate actions that can help create organizational change. 

Part of the liberating structures toolkit, 15% solutions is a problem-solving technique that focuses on finding and implementing solutions quickly. A process of iterating and making small changes quickly can help generate momentum and an appetite for solving complex problems.

Problem-solving strategies can live and die on whether people are onboard. Getting some quick wins is a great way of getting people behind the process.   

It can be extremely empowering for a team to realize that problem-solving techniques can be deployed quickly and easily and delineate between things they can positively impact and those things they cannot change. 

15% Solutions   #action   #liberating structures   #remote-friendly   You can reveal the actions, however small, that everyone can do immediately. At a minimum, these will create momentum, and that may make a BIG difference.  15% Solutions show that there is no reason to wait around, feel powerless, or fearful. They help people pick it up a level. They get individuals and the group to focus on what is within their discretion instead of what they cannot change.  With a very simple question, you can flip the conversation to what can be done and find solutions to big problems that are often distributed widely in places not known in advance. Shifting a few grains of sand may trigger a landslide and change the whole landscape.

Problem-solving techniques for making decisions and planning

After your group is happy with the possible solutions you’ve developed, now comes the time to choose which to implement. There’s more than one way to make a decision and the best option is often dependant on the needs and set-up of your group.

Sometimes, it’s the case that you’ll want to vote as a group on what is likely to be the most impactful solution. Other times, it might be down to a decision maker or major stakeholder to make the final decision. Whatever your process, here’s some techniques you can use to help you make a decision during your problem solving process.

How-Now-Wow Matrix

The problem-solving process is often creative, as complex problems usually require a change of thinking and creative response in order to find the best solutions. While it’s common for the first stages to encourage creative thinking, groups can often gravitate to familiar solutions when it comes to the end of the process. 

When selecting solutions, you don’t want to lose your creative energy! The How-Now-Wow Matrix from Gamestorming is a great problem-solving activity that enables a group to stay creative and think out of the box when it comes to selecting the right solution for a given problem.

Problem-solving techniques that encourage creative thinking and the ideation and selection of new solutions can be the most effective in organisational change. Give the How-Now-Wow Matrix a go, and not just for how pleasant it is to say out loud. 

How-Now-Wow Matrix   #gamestorming   #idea generation   #remote-friendly   When people want to develop new ideas, they most often think out of the box in the brainstorming or divergent phase. However, when it comes to convergence, people often end up picking ideas that are most familiar to them. This is called a ‘creative paradox’ or a ‘creadox’. The How-Now-Wow matrix is an idea selection tool that breaks the creadox by forcing people to weigh each idea on 2 parameters.

Impact and Effort Matrix

All problem-solving techniques hope to not only find solutions to a given problem or challenge but to find the best solution. When it comes to finding a solution, groups are invited to put on their decision-making hats and really think about how a proposed idea would work in practice. 

The Impact and Effort Matrix is one of the problem-solving techniques that fall into this camp, empowering participants to first generate ideas and then categorize them into a 2×2 matrix based on impact and effort.

Activities that invite critical thinking while remaining simple are invaluable. Use the Impact and Effort Matrix to move from ideation and towards evaluating potential solutions before then committing to them. 

Impact and Effort Matrix   #gamestorming   #decision making   #action   #remote-friendly   In this decision-making exercise, possible actions are mapped based on two factors: effort required to implement and potential impact. Categorizing ideas along these lines is a useful technique in decision making, as it obliges contributors to balance and evaluate suggested actions before committing to them.

If you’ve followed each of the problem-solving steps with your group successfully, you should move towards the end of your process with heaps of possible solutions developed with a specific problem in mind. But how do you help a group go from ideation to putting a solution into action? 

Dotmocracy – or Dot Voting -is a tried and tested method of helping a team in the problem-solving process make decisions and put actions in place with a degree of oversight and consensus. 

One of the problem-solving techniques that should be in every facilitator’s toolbox, Dot Voting is fast and effective and can help identify the most popular and best solutions and help bring a group to a decision effectively. 

Dotmocracy   #action   #decision making   #group prioritization   #hyperisland   #remote-friendly   Dotmocracy is a simple method for group prioritization or decision-making. It is not an activity on its own, but a method to use in processes where prioritization or decision-making is the aim. The method supports a group to quickly see which options are most popular or relevant. The options or ideas are written on post-its and stuck up on a wall for the whole group to see. Each person votes for the options they think are the strongest, and that information is used to inform a decision.

Straddling the gap between decision making and planning, MoSCoW is a simple and effective method that allows a group team to easily prioritize a set of possible options.

Use this method in a problem solving process by collecting and summarizing all your possible solutions and then categorize them into 4 sections: “Must have”, “Should have”, “Could have”, or “Would like but won‘t get”.

This method is particularly useful when its less about choosing one possible solution and more about prioritorizing which to do first and which may not fit in the scope of your project. In my experience, complex challenges often require multiple small fixes, and this method can be a great way to move from a pile of things you’d all like to do to a structured plan.

MoSCoW   #define intentions   #create   #design   #action   #remote-friendly   MoSCoW is a method that allows the team to prioritize the different features that they will work on. Features are then categorized into “Must have”, “Should have”, “Could have”, or “Would like but won‘t get”. To be used at the beginning of a timeslot (for example during Sprint planning) and when planning is needed.

When it comes to managing the rollout of a solution, clarity and accountability are key factors in ensuring the success of the project. The RAACI chart is a simple but effective model for setting roles and responsibilities as part of a planning session.

Start by listing each person involved in the project and put them into the following groups in order to make it clear who is responsible for what during the rollout of your solution.

• Responsibility  (Which person and/or team will be taking action?)
• Authority  (At what “point” must the responsible person check in before going further?)
• Accountability  (Who must the responsible person check in with?)
• Consultation  (Who must be consulted by the responsible person before decisions are made?)
• Information  (Who must be informed of decisions, once made?)

Ensure this information is easily accessible and use it to inform who does what and who is looped into discussions and kept up to date.

RAACI   #roles and responsibility   #teamwork   #project management   Clarifying roles and responsibilities, levels of autonomy/latitude in decision making, and levels of engagement among diverse stakeholders.

Problem-solving warm-up activities

All facilitators know that warm-ups and icebreakers are useful for any workshop or group process. Problem-solving workshops are no different.

Use these problem-solving techniques to warm up a group and prepare them for the rest of the process. Activating your group by tapping into some of the top problem-solving skills can be one of the best ways to see great outcomes from your session.

Check-in / Check-out

Solid processes are planned from beginning to end, and the best facilitators know that setting the tone and establishing a safe, open environment can be integral to a successful problem-solving process. Check-in / Check-out is a great way to begin and/or bookend a problem-solving workshop. Checking in to a session emphasizes that everyone will be seen, heard, and expected to contribute.

If you are running a series of meetings, setting a consistent pattern of checking in and checking out can really help your team get into a groove. We recommend this opening-closing activity for small to medium-sized groups though it can work with large groups if they’re disciplined!

Check-in / Check-out   #team   #opening   #closing   #hyperisland   #remote-friendly   Either checking-in or checking-out is a simple way for a team to open or close a process, symbolically and in a collaborative way. Checking-in/out invites each member in a group to be present, seen and heard, and to express a reflection or a feeling. Checking-in emphasizes presence, focus and group commitment; checking-out emphasizes reflection and symbolic closure.

Doodling Together  

Thinking creatively and not being afraid to make suggestions are important problem-solving skills for any group or team, and warming up by encouraging these behaviors is a great way to start.

Doodling Together is one of our favorite creative ice breaker games – it’s quick, effective, and fun and can make all following problem-solving steps easier by encouraging a group to collaborate visually. By passing cards and adding additional items as they go, the workshop group gets into a groove of co-creation and idea development that is crucial to finding solutions to problems.

Doodling Together   #collaboration   #creativity   #teamwork   #fun   #team   #visual methods   #energiser   #icebreaker   #remote-friendly   Create wild, weird and often funny postcards together & establish a group’s creative confidence.

Show and Tell

You might remember some version of Show and Tell from being a kid in school and it’s a great problem-solving activity to kick off a session.

Asking participants to prepare a little something before a workshop by bringing an object for show and tell can help them warm up before the session has even begun! Games that include a physical object can also help encourage early engagement before moving onto more big-picture thinking.

By asking your participants to tell stories about why they chose to bring a particular item to the group, you can help teams see things from new perspectives and see both differences and similarities in the way they approach a topic. Great groundwork for approaching a problem-solving process as a team! 

Show and Tell   #gamestorming   #action   #opening   #meeting facilitation   Show and Tell taps into the power of metaphors to reveal players’ underlying assumptions and associations around a topic The aim of the game is to get a deeper understanding of stakeholders’ perspectives on anything—a new project, an organizational restructuring, a shift in the company’s vision or team dynamic.

Constellations

Who doesn’t love stars? Constellations is a great warm-up activity for any workshop as it gets people up off their feet, energized, and ready to engage in new ways with established topics. It’s also great for showing existing beliefs, biases, and patterns that can come into play as part of your session.

Using warm-up games that help build trust and connection while also allowing for non-verbal responses can be great for easing people into the problem-solving process and encouraging engagement from everyone in the group. Constellations is great in large spaces that allow for movement and is definitely a practical exercise to allow the group to see patterns that are otherwise invisible. 

Constellations   #trust   #connection   #opening   #coaching   #patterns   #system   Individuals express their response to a statement or idea by standing closer or further from a central object. Used with teams to reveal system, hidden patterns, perspectives.

Draw a Tree

Problem-solving games that help raise group awareness through a central, unifying metaphor can be effective ways to warm-up a group in any problem-solving model.

Draw a Tree is a simple warm-up activity you can use in any group and which can provide a quick jolt of energy. Start by asking your participants to draw a tree in just 45 seconds – they can choose whether it will be abstract or realistic. 

Once the timer is up, ask the group how many people included the roots of the tree and use this as a means to discuss how we can ignore important parts of any system simply because they are not visible.

All problem-solving strategies are made more effective by thinking of problems critically and by exposing things that may not normally come to light. Warm-up games like Draw a Tree are great in that they quickly demonstrate some key problem-solving skills in an accessible and effective way.

Draw a Tree   #thiagi   #opening   #perspectives   #remote-friendly   With this game you can raise awarness about being more mindful, and aware of the environment we live in.

Closing activities for a problem-solving process

Each step of the problem-solving workshop benefits from an intelligent deployment of activities, games, and techniques. Bringing your session to an effective close helps ensure that solutions are followed through on and that you also celebrate what has been achieved.

Here are some problem-solving activities you can use to effectively close a workshop or meeting and ensure the great work you’ve done can continue afterward.

One Breath Feedback

Maintaining attention and focus during the closing stages of a problem-solving workshop can be tricky and so being concise when giving feedback can be important. It’s easy to incur “death by feedback” should some team members go on for too long sharing their perspectives in a quick feedback round. 

One Breath Feedback is a great closing activity for workshops. You give everyone an opportunity to provide feedback on what they’ve done but only in the space of a single breath. This keeps feedback short and to the point and means that everyone is encouraged to provide the most important piece of feedback to them. 

One breath feedback   #closing   #feedback   #action   This is a feedback round in just one breath that excels in maintaining attention: each participants is able to speak during just one breath … for most people that’s around 20 to 25 seconds … unless of course you’ve been a deep sea diver in which case you’ll be able to do it for longer.

Who What When Matrix 

Matrices feature as part of many effective problem-solving strategies and with good reason. They are easily recognizable, simple to use, and generate results.

The Who What When Matrix is a great tool to use when closing your problem-solving session by attributing a who, what and when to the actions and solutions you have decided upon. The resulting matrix is a simple, easy-to-follow way of ensuring your team can move forward. 

Great solutions can’t be enacted without action and ownership. Your problem-solving process should include a stage for allocating tasks to individuals or teams and creating a realistic timeframe for those solutions to be implemented or checked out. Use this method to keep the solution implementation process clear and simple for all involved. 

Who/What/When Matrix   #gamestorming   #action   #project planning   With Who/What/When matrix, you can connect people with clear actions they have defined and have committed to.

Response cards

Group discussion can comprise the bulk of most problem-solving activities and by the end of the process, you might find that your team is talked out! 

Providing a means for your team to give feedback with short written notes can ensure everyone is head and can contribute without the need to stand up and talk. Depending on the needs of the group, giving an alternative can help ensure everyone can contribute to your problem-solving model in the way that makes the most sense for them.

Response Cards is a great way to close a workshop if you are looking for a gentle warm-down and want to get some swift discussion around some of the feedback that is raised. 

Response Cards   #debriefing   #closing   #structured sharing   #questions and answers   #thiagi   #action   It can be hard to involve everyone during a closing of a session. Some might stay in the background or get unheard because of louder participants. However, with the use of Response Cards, everyone will be involved in providing feedback or clarify questions at the end of a session.

Tips for effective problem solving

Problem-solving activities are only one part of the puzzle. While a great method can help unlock your team’s ability to solve problems, without a thoughtful approach and strong facilitation the solutions may not be fit for purpose.

Let’s take a look at some problem-solving tips you can apply to any process to help it be a success!

Clearly define the problem

Jumping straight to solutions can be tempting, though without first clearly articulating a problem, the solution might not be the right one. Many of the problem-solving activities below include sections where the problem is explored and clearly defined before moving on.

This is a vital part of the problem-solving process and taking the time to fully define an issue can save time and effort later. A clear definition helps identify irrelevant information and it also ensures that your team sets off on the right track.

Don’t jump to conclusions

It’s easy for groups to exhibit cognitive bias or have preconceived ideas about both problems and potential solutions. Be sure to back up any problem statements or potential solutions with facts, research, and adequate forethought.

The best techniques ask participants to be methodical and challenge preconceived notions. Make sure you give the group enough time and space to collect relevant information and consider the problem in a new way. By approaching the process with a clear, rational mindset, you’ll often find that better solutions are more forthcoming.  

Try different approaches  

Problems come in all shapes and sizes and so too should the methods you use to solve them. If you find that one approach isn’t yielding results and your team isn’t finding different solutions, try mixing it up. You’ll be surprised at how using a new creative activity can unblock your team and generate great solutions.

Don’t take it personally 

Depending on the nature of your team or organizational problems, it’s easy for conversations to get heated. While it’s good for participants to be engaged in the discussions, ensure that emotions don’t run too high and that blame isn’t thrown around while finding solutions.

You’re all in it together, and even if your team or area is seeing problems, that isn’t necessarily a disparagement of you personally. Using facilitation skills to manage group dynamics is one effective method of helping conversations be more constructive.

Get the right people in the room

Your problem-solving method is often only as effective as the group using it. Getting the right people on the job and managing the number of people present is important too!

If the group is too small, you may not get enough different perspectives to effectively solve a problem. If the group is too large, you can go round and round during the ideation stages.

Creating the right group makeup is also important in ensuring you have the necessary expertise and skillset to both identify and follow up on potential solutions. Carefully consider who to include at each stage to help ensure your problem-solving method is followed and positioned for success.

Create psychologically safe spaces for discussion

Identifying a problem accurately also requires that all members of a group are able to contribute their views in an open and safe manner.

It can be tough for people to stand up and contribute if the problems or challenges are emotive or personal in nature. Try and create a psychologically safe space for these kinds of discussions and where possible, create regular opportunities for challenges to be brought up organically.

Document everything

The best solutions can take refinement, iteration, and reflection to come out. Get into a habit of documenting your process in order to keep all the learnings from the session and to allow ideas to mature and develop. Many of the methods below involve the creation of documents or shared resources. Be sure to keep and share these so everyone can benefit from the work done!

Bring a facilitator 

Facilitation is all about making group processes easier. With a subject as potentially emotive and important as problem-solving, having an impartial third party in the form of a facilitator can make all the difference in finding great solutions and keeping the process moving. Consider bringing a facilitator to your problem-solving session to get better results and generate meaningful solutions!

Develop your problem-solving skills

It takes time and practice to be an effective problem solver. While some roles or participants might more naturally gravitate towards problem-solving, it can take development and planning to help everyone create better solutions.

You might develop a training program, run a problem-solving workshop or simply ask your team to practice using the techniques below. Check out our post on problem-solving skills to see how you and your group can develop the right mental process and be more resilient to issues too!

Design a great agenda

Workshops are a great format for solving problems. With the right approach, you can focus a group and help them find the solutions to their own problems. But designing a process can be time-consuming and finding the right activities can be difficult.

Check out our workshop planning guide to level-up your agenda design and start running more effective workshops. Need inspiration? Check out templates designed by expert facilitators to help you kickstart your process!

Save time and effort creating an effective problem solving process

A structured problem solving process is a surefire way of solving tough problems, discovering creative solutions and driving organizational change. But how can you design for successful outcomes?

With SessionLab, it’s easy to design engaging workshops that deliver results. Drag, drop and reorder blocks  to build your agenda. When you make changes or update your agenda, your session  timing   adjusts automatically , saving you time on manual adjustments.

Collaborating with stakeholders or clients? Share your agenda with a single click and collaborate in real-time. No more sending documents back and forth over email.

Explore  how to use SessionLab  to design effective problem solving workshops or  watch this five minute video  to see the planner in action!

Over to you

The problem-solving process can often be as complicated and multifaceted as the problems they are set-up to solve. With the right problem-solving techniques and a mix of exercises designed to guide discussion and generate purposeful ideas, we hope we’ve given you the tools to find the best solutions as simply and easily as possible.

Is there a problem-solving technique that you are missing here? Do you have a favorite activity or method you use when facilitating? Let us know in the comments below, we’d love to hear from you! 

James Smart is Head of Content at SessionLab. He’s also a creative facilitator who has run workshops and designed courses for establishments like the National Centre for Writing, UK. He especially enjoys working with young people and empowering others in their creative practice.

thank you very much for these excellent techniques

Certainly wonderful article, very detailed. Shared!

Your list of techniques for problem solving can be helpfully extended by adding TRIZ to the list of techniques. TRIZ has 40 problem solving techniques derived from methods inventros and patent holders used to get new patents. About 10-12 are general approaches. many organization sponsor classes in TRIZ that are used to solve business problems or general organiztational problems. You can take a look at TRIZ and dwonload a free internet booklet to see if you feel it shound be included per your selection process.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Going from a mere idea to a workshop that delivers results for your clients can feel like a daunting task. In this piece, we will shine a light on all the work behind the scenes and help you learn how to plan a workshop from start to finish. On a good day, facilitation can feel like effortless magic, but that is mostly the result of backstage work, foresight, and a lot of careful planning. Read on to learn a step-by-step approach to breaking the process of planning a workshop into small, manageable chunks.  The flow starts with the first meeting with a client to define the purposes of a workshop.…

Effective online tools are a necessity for smooth and engaging virtual workshops and meetings. But how do you choose the right ones? Do you sometimes feel that the good old pen and paper or MS Office toolkit and email leaves you struggling to stay on top of managing and delivering your workshop? Fortunately, there are plenty of great workshop tools to make your life easier when you need to facilitate a meeting and lead workshops. In this post, we’ll share our favorite online tools you can use to make your life easier and run better workshops and meetings. In fact, there are plenty of free online workshop tools and meeting…

How does learning work? A clever 9-year-old once told me: “I know I am learning something new when I am surprised.” The science of adult learning tells us that, in order to learn new skills (which, unsurprisingly, is harder for adults to do than kids) grown-ups need to first get into a specific headspace.  In a business, this approach is often employed in a training session where employees learn new skills or work on professional development. But how do you ensure your training is effective? In this guide, we'll explore how to create an effective training session plan and run engaging training sessions. As team leader, project manager, or consultant,…

Design your next workshop with SessionLab

Join the 150,000 facilitators using SessionLab

Sign up for free

FIND A MEDIATOR QUICK LISTS

• Mediators Listed by State/City
• Mediators Listed by Practice Area
• Mediator Services
• Certification
• Mediate University
• Statewide Banner
• Online Meeting Room
• About Mediation
• Public Policy

Collaborative Problem Solving: An Effective Approach For Managing Conflict In The Workplace

The workplace is a complex interpersonal environment where conflict inevitably occurs. When handled poorly, conflict undermines relationships, team performance, and morale. It keeps managers and staff alike up at night, dreading the start of a new day at work. When handled well, working though conflict can build trust and create a positive work environment where people work effectively together.

Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) was originated by Dr. Ross Greene and subsequently developed by Dr. Greene and Dr. Stuart Ablon, and their associates at Massachusetts General Hospital and the Harvard Medical School. It is a method of conflict resolution that was originally developed for working with very difficult children. As more people have learned CPS, it has been applied in an increasingly wide range of settings with diverse populations and provocative results. Its effectiveness has been demonstrated everywhere from homes and schools to residential treatment facilities, hospitals and even corrections facilities. We have found this approach to be coherent, accessible, and applicable to the workplace setting.

The CPS Philosophy

It is essential for the managers to establish an expectation among themselves and with their staff that conflict will be handled in a consistent manner. Managers also need to have and to communicate a clear philosophy of conflict management. The original philosophy of CPS is that “kids do well if they can. If they can’t, we adults need to figure out why, so we can help. ” Translated into the workplace, this reads, “staff do well at their jobs if they can. If they can’t, managers need to help them figure out why, so they can.”

The CPS philosophy informs us that the manager’s explanation of a staff’s behavior, attitude, etc. will guide his or her intervention with that staff member. Conventional wisdom tells the manager that staff’s challenging behavior is usually designed to get things or avoid things, such as getting attention or avoiding work. Flowing from a conventional explanation like this, a conventional response to such behavior would be to ignore it or try to motivate more compliant behavior. This approach might work in some situations, but not as effectively as a transparent, systematic, and collaborative method of conflict resolution.

The CPS Approach To Managing Conflict

When presented with conflict or an expectation that a staff member is not meeting, managers generally have three choices: Plan A: impose their will; Plan B: collaborative problem solving; Plan C: drop the issue, at least for now.

Which option managers chose depends on the long term and short term goals managers have with individual staff; how far along they and their staff are in realizing those goals; and the situation/problem at hand. As managers come to know more about each of these Plans and as they improve their understanding of how each of their staff respond to them in different situations, they will gain more confident in which Plan to chose at any given point in time.

In executing Plan A, managers are exercising their prerogative as the person in authority. This is what French and Raven (1959) refer to as “legitimate power.” There is nothing inherently wrong with this approach. Sometimes it represents the shortest distance between two points. Sometimes staff really want their manager to make an executive decision and get on with it rather than take the time needed to arrive at a consensus.

More often, Plan A is experienced by staff in the same way they experienced a parent saying, “because I said so.” Staff may comply because there was no real choice, but they remain angry and consequently find passive ways to resist. Managers, may be able to tell themselves, “my staff did what I told them to do”, but it is highly likely that the situations which required the boss to give these orders will keep popping up. Plan A can be effective; it can also be risky and unproductive. It rarely solves tough problems in durable ways. It certainly does not teach staff the skills that would be needed to resolve such issues in the future without the intervention of their managers. It definitely does not build the kind of collaborative relationships that are key to effective management in organizations that require group problem solving to succeed.

Plan C has obvious advantages. “Pick your battles” is sage and time-tested advice, but that there is a significant downside to this strategy. Managers are likely to feel that when they execute Plan C they will be viewed by staff as dodging the issue or capitulating. They might then be concerned that their staff, in observing their managers avoid a conflict, will be emboldened to continue with this behavior. To execute Plan C properly, the manager must recognize that Plan C is not giving in. It is a well thought out decision. What is giving in? A failed Plan A leading to Plan C! In other words, the manager tries to make staff do something, it does not occur, and then the manager drops the expectation. The key to using Plan C successfully is to only use it tactically. Managers use it when they have reasoned that a particular conflict is not worth the time it will take to effectively work it through; because the timing is not right for dealing with the issue; or simply because they or their organizations have bigger fish to fry for the moment.

Plan B is the middle way. Plan B is the heart and soul of CPS: it is collaborative problem solving. At the end of a successfully executed Plan B the manger can say to him or herself, “we worked it out. We solved the problem…..together.” Obviously CPS did not invent the idea that people at different levels of authority can jointly work out their problems. What CPS does exceptionally well is to describe a series of  research-based  and easily understandable  steps for accomplishing this goal.

Our description of Plan B below differs somewhat from how Plan B is described in working with challenging kids. The modifications to Plan B flow from our experience applying it in the workplace. Plan B consists of two phases. In the first phase, the manager and staff member form a collaborative relationship. They take turns working towards a mutual definition of their problem. This definition serves as the basis for entering into the second phase, which is negotiation and problem solving. The first phase generally takes a lot longer than the second. It’s a lot like painting a room in a house. To paint well, two-thirds of the time needs to be spent prepping. Only one-third of the time will actually be devoted to applying the paint. The same holds true for two people trying to solve a problem. It is the “prep work” that makes the difference between an effort that lasts and one that just buys a little time until the next conflict. Although the first phase of Plan B is broken into three steps, it is often necessary to go back and forth between steps to complete this prep work. Plan B should be thought of as a process, not a technique.

When Plan B is executed after careful thought has been given, it is called Proactive Plan B. However, sometimes situations quickly arise and it is not possible to take the time to thoughtfully develop a Plan B. The situation demands that the manager responds immediately. When managers apply the principles of CPS on the fly, without a clear plan, this is called Emergency Plan B. It is less likely to be effective than Proactive Plan B, but it is much more likely to be effective than trying to respond to a conflict in the moment without a set of guiding principles. Since chronic problems with staff not meeting expectations in the work place are quite common, managers who are skilled in using CPS will rarely need to use Emergency Plan B with staff they have come to know. Rather, they will have planned, proactive conversations with staff to develop an approach together that they can then use when the need arises in the future.

A Step By Step Illustration Of How To Execute Plan B

Follow the link to the full article which provides step by step instructions and multiple illustrations of how to execute Plan B. It also includes a “troubleshooting” section which provides guidance to managers about what to do when they feel stuck or find that a particular Plan B is not working as well as a broader discussion of the theoretical and empirical underpinnings of CPS.

Attachments to this Article

• CPSInTheWorkplace.pdf

Seth Bernstein

Seth Bernstein, Ph.D., is a psychologist who has worked as a clinician and managed care executive for over thirty years. Dr. Bernstein is currently the Executive Director of the Accountable Behavioral Health Alliance. Prior to his work at ABHA, Dr. Bernstein worked as a manager for The Travelers Insurance Company,… MORE >

Stuart Ablon

J. Stuart Ablon, Ph.D., is the Director of Think:Kids in the Department of Psychiatry at Massachusetts General Hospital. He is also Associate Clinical Professor of Psychology in the Department of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. Dr. Ablon co-founded the Center for Collaborative Problem Solving where he also served as Co-Director… MORE >

Featured Members

Read these next

So what does identity theft have to do with dispute resolution.

Dispute Settlement Counsel by Michael Zeytoonian. Early on in the movie, Field of Dreams, Ray Kinsella’s wife Annie asks him a key question as she tries to understand why her...

Affect in Methods of Dispute Resolution

ABSTRACT The paper addresses affect in its philosophical aspect, proposing a rational reflection on the individual perceptions of each party involved in a conflict, in order to analyze how this...

About Forgiving

“Forgiveness means giving up all hope of a better past.” Lily Tomlin Forgiving is complex. Among other things, forgiveness means being able to let go of the hurt and pain from...

• Log In
• Join CLN
• RSS Feed

Please log in below to comment and contribute to the Collaborative Leaders Network.

Not a Member? Join CLN .

Join the Collaborative Leaders Network

Members of the Collaborative Leaders Network (CLN) come from all walks of life. We are leaders of businesses and organizations, we are practitioners, and we are community members. What connects us is our belief that collaborative leadership and practices are necessary for solving the complex problems we face in Hawaii. There is no cost to joining CLN, nor any obligation to participate. Membership entitles you to contribute your own ideas and experiences to the site, receive updates, and engage with other collaborative leaders who are finding ways to shape Hawaii for the better.

Already a Member? Log in Now .

Forgot Your Password?

Simply enter your email address below, and a new password will be generated and emailed to you.

Collaborative Problem Solving

Strategy overview.

• 1 – Clarify Intentions
• 2 – Background Inquiry
• 3 – Process Design
• 4 – Group Launch
• 5 – Issue Analysis
• 6 – Generate Options
• 7 – Evaluate Options
• 8 – Produce Documents
• 9 – Executive Review
• Download PDF of Strategy
• Download PDF of Tools
• About Kem Lowry

It is increasingly difficult to craft plans, policies, and programs that are regarded as legitimate and sustainable without the direct engagement of representatives from multiple agencies, corporations, and non-governmental organizations.  Cross-sector collaborations of this type are designed to engage well-informed stakeholders in a process of sustained problem solving; the end product is often a policy document that can help to establish legislation, regulations, and standards.

This strategy requires that participants understand the logic of each stage of the process in order to build commitment toward a consensus perspective. Group members engage in clarifying the problem, analyzing potential strategies, crafting recommendations, evaluating draft documents, and delivering a report for which there is a high level of consensus and commitment.

An issue that is of sufficient importance and a convener who is of sufficient stature are among the critical success factors that will mobilize the necessary resources and participants for a  cross-sector collaboration of this type.

Cross-sector collaboration provides both the forum and the strategy for engaging the most knowledgeable stakeholders in sustained problem solving.

Stage 1: Clarify Intentions Identify the expectations of conveners to help them envision how the process might be organized, who might be participating, what time and resources will likely be required, and what the outcomes might be.

Stage 2: Background Inquiry Gather first- and second-hand background information to determine which issues should figure into the tailored design of a collaborative process.

Stage 3: Process Design Develop a provisional process design explaining the logic and outputs of each phase in order to garner participants’ early commitment to the process and the products.

Stage 4: Group Launch Introduce the participants and process, and start building trust and confidence by collaborating on a group charter and amending the process plan to reflect group concerns.

Stage 5: Issue Analysis Develop a shared understanding of the issue and identify those aspects that are most amenable to intervention.

Stage 6: Generate Options Identify and analyze a range of alternative strategies for addressing a problem or taking advantage of an opportunity.

Stage 7: Evaluate Options Evaluate strategies and choose between them using criteria the group selects.

Stage 8: Produce Documents Develop a plan, set of recommendations, or policy document that describes the strategy the group has developed, the rationale for the strategy, and the process by which it was developed.

Stage 9: Executive Review Present and explain the report to the executive or convener in a way that it is understood, accepted, and supported.

Related Examples

Designing the future of kakaako makai, related tools/resources.

• Critical success factors for Collaborative Problem Solving

Exploring the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development

• Published: 22 October 2024

Cite this article

• Lianyu Cai 1 ,
• Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2223-090X 1 &
• Daniel Kangwa 1  

This systematic literature review explored the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) by Lev Vygotsky. It examined how AI tools assist the students in identifying and operating within their ZPD, how to create and facilitate a collaborative learning environment, and how to provide the necessary scaffolding for effective learning. The sample included 158 empirical studies which were retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and ERIC, published between 2021 and 2024. Findings indicated that AI tools assist learners in personalising their self-assessment through social and technological interactions, and effective communication; they improve motivation, learning engagement, and learning support, which leads to better academic performance, student maturation, and development. Additionally, AI tools were found suitable for creating collaborative learning environments, empowering learners, and facilitating meaningful interactions. Furthermore, results emphasise the need for educator’s professional development, ethical AI deployment, and the integration of AI into designing meaningful learning experiences. These results indicate that there should be equitable access to training and effective resolutions for ethical challenges that may undermine the integrity of the learning process. The study highlights strategic AI integration to significantly enhance learning outcomes and student engagement, focusing on academic integrity and complementing traditional educational methods. Recommendations are that there is a need for longitudinal studies to assess the long-term impact of AI on learning outcomes, student engagement, and the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Explore related subjects

• Artificial Intelligence
• Digital Education and Educational Technology

Data availability

Not applicable. The data for this study originated from secondary desk research.

Abulibdeh, A., Zaidan, E., & Abulibdeh, R. (2024). Navigating the confluence of artificial intelligence and education for sustainable development in the era of industry 4.0: Challenges, opportunities, and ethical dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 437 , 140527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140527

Article   Google Scholar  

Adipat, S. (2023). An artificial intelligence-enhanced phenomenon-based learning approach for interdisciplinary understanding and speaking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 16 (3), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16329a

Ahmad, D., Latif, I., Arafah, B., & Suryadi, R. (2024). Defining the role of artificial intelligence in improving English writing skills among Indonesian students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15 (2), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.25

Ahmad, M., Alhalaiqa, F., & Subih, M. (2023). Constructing and testing the psychometrics of an instrument to measure the attitudes, benefits, and threats associated with the use of Artificial Intelligence tools in higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.36

Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023). Modeling students’ perceptions of chatbots in learning: Integrating technology acceptance with the value-based adoption model. Education Sciences, 13 (11), 1151. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111151

Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Al-Dokhny, A. A., & Drwish, A. M. (2023). Implementing the Bashayer chatbot in Saudi higher education: measuring the influence on students’ motivation and learning strategies. Frontiers in Psychology , 14 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1129070

Alamäki, A., Nyberg, C., Kimberley, A., & Salonen, A. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy in sustainable development: A learning experiment in higher education. Frontiers in Education , 9 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1343406

Alammari, A. (2024). Evaluating generative AI integration in Saudi Arabian education: A mixed-methods study. PeerJ Computer Science, 10 , e1879. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1879

Alnaqbi, A. M. A., & Yassin, A. M. (2021). Evaluation of success factors in adopting artificial intelligence in e-learning environment. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 12 (3), 362–369. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2021.12.03.035

Alshammari, S. H., & Alshammari, M. H. (2024). Factors affecting the adoption and use of ChatGPT in higher education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 20 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.339557

Álvarez-Álvarez, C., & Falcon, S. (2023). Students’ preferences with university teaching practices: Analysis of testimonials with artificial intelligence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71 (4), 1709–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10239-8

Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: a comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education , 9 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421

Antony, S., & Ramnath, R. (2023). A phenomenological exploration of students’ perceptions of AI chatbots in higher education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11 (2), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.2.01

Atchley, P., Pannell, H., Wofford, K., Hopkins, M., & Atchley, R. A. (2024). Human and AI collaboration in the higher education environment: Opportunities and concerns. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9 (1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00547-9

Baba, K., El Faddouli, N.-E., & Cheimanoff, N. (2024). Mobile-optimized AI-driven personalized learning: A case study at Mohammed VI Polytechnic University. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18 (4), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i04.46547

Banihashem, S. K., Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Moon, J., & Drachsler, H. (2024). Feedback sources in essay writing: peer-generated or AI-generated feedback? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 21 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00455-4

Barnett-Itzhaki, Z., Beimel, D., & Tsoury, A. (2023). Using a variety of interactive learning methods to improve learning effectiveness: Insights from AI models based on teaching surveys. Online Learning Journal, 27 (3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3575

Bobrytska, V. I., Krasylnykova, H. V., Beseda, N. A., Krasylnykov, S. R., & Skyrda, T. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian higher education: A comprehensive study of stakeholder attitudes, expectations and concerns. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23 (1), 400–426. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20

Bosch, J., Olsson, H. H., Brinne, B., & Crnkovic, I. (2022). AI engineering: Realizing the potential of AI. IEEE Software, 39 (6), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2022.3199621

Bosman, L., Kotla, B., Madamanchi, A., Bartholomew, S., & Byrd, V. (2023). Preparing the future entrepreneurial engineering workforce using web-based AI-enabled tools. European Journal of Engineering Education, 48 (5), 972–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2119122

Boubker, O. (2024). From chatting to self-educating: Can AI tools boost student learning outcomes? Expert Systems with Applications , 238 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121820

Bouteraa, M., Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K. A., Benlahcene, A., Sadallah, M., Zaki, H. O., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Fook, L. M., & Chekima, B. (2024). Understanding the diffusion of AI-generative (ChatGPT) in higher education: Does students’ integrity matter? Computers in Human Behavior Reports , 14 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402

Calonge, D. S., Smail, L., & Kamalov, F. (2023). Enough of the chit-chat: A comparative analysis of four AI chatbots for calculus and statistics. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (2), 346–357. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.22

Celik, I. (2023). Exploring the determinants of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy: Digital divide, computational thinking, cognitive absorption. Telematics and Informatics , 83 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102026

Chai, F., Ma, J., Wang, Y., Zhu, J., & Han, T. (2024). Grading by AI makes me feel fairer? How different evaluators affect college students’ perception of fairness. Frontiers in Psychology , 15 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1221177

Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A systematic review–handwritten examinations are becoming outdated, is it time to change to typed examinations in our assessment policy? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 48 (8), 1385–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2219422

Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments , 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3

Chan, C. K. Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). An expectancy value theory (EVT) based instrument for measuring student perceptions of generative AI. Smart Learning Environments , 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00284-4

Chang, D. H., Lin, M.P.-C., Hajian, S., & Wang, Q. Q. (2023). Educational design principles of using AI Chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15 (17), 12921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712921

Chang, H.-T., Lin, C.-Y., Jheng, W.-B., Chen, S.-H., Wu, H.-H., Tseng, F.-C., & Wang, L.-C. (2023). AI, please help me choose a course: Building a personalized hybrid course recommendation system to assist students in choosing courses adaptively. Educational Technology and Society, 26 (1), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202301_26(1).0015

Chen, J., Lai, P., Chan, A., Man, V., & Chan, C.-H. (2023). AI-assisted enhancement of student presentation skills: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15 (1), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010196

Chen, J., Yuan, D., Dong, R., Cai, J., Ai, Z., & Zhou, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence significantly facilitates development in the mental health of college students: a bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology , 15 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1375294

Chen, Y., Jensen, S., Albert, L. J., Gupta, S., & Lee, T. (2023b). Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers, 25 (1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10291-4

Chergarova, V., Tomeo, M., Provost, L., De la Peña, G., Ulloa, A., & Miranda, D. (2023). Case study: Exploring the role of current and potential usage of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Issues in Information Systems, 24 (2), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2023_125

Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-H., Tu, Y.-F., & Yang, K.-H. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38 (3), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7526

Cooper, H. (2017). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878644

Book   Google Scholar  

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61 (2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Cowling, M., Crawford, J., Allen, K.-A., & Wehmeyer, M. (2023). Using leadership to leverage ChatGPT and artificial intelligence for undergraduate and postgraduate research supervision. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (4), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8598

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8

Crudele, F., & Raffaghelli, J. E. (2023). Promoting critical thinking through argument mapping: A lab for undergraduate students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 22 , 497–525. https://doi.org/10.28945/5220

Cudzik, J., Nyka, L., & Szczepański, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in architectural education - green campus development research. Global Journal of Engineering Education , 26 (1), 20–25. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187284166&partnerID=40&md5=43ed2ac9b4f0a3436270f5d4909fedca . Accessed 30 May 2024.

Currie, G., & Barry, K. (2023). ChatGPT in nuclear medicine education. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 51 (3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.123.265844

Dai, Y. (2024). Dual-contrast pedagogy for AI literacy in upper elementary schools. Learning and Instruction , 91 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101899

Delcker, J., Heil, J., Ifenthaler, D., Seufert, S., & Spirgi, L. (2024). First-year students AI-competence as a predictor for intended and de facto use of AI-tools for supporting learning processes in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 21 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00452-7

Deo, R. C., Yaseen, Z. M., Al-Ansari, N., Nguyen-Huy, T., Langlands, T. A. M., & Galligan, L. (2020). Modern artificial intelligence model development for undergraduate student performance prediction: An investigation on engineering mathematics courses. IEEE Access, 8 , 136697–136724. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010938

Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Saad, H. B. (2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40 (2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/BIOLSPORT.2023.125623

Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. International Journal of Management Education , 21 (3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883

El Naggar, A., Gaad, E., & Inocencio, S. A. M. (2024). Enhancing inclusive education in the UAE: Integrating AI for diverse learning needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities , 147 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104685

Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3 (2), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2023006

Entenberg, G. A., Mizrahi, S., Walker, H., Aghakhani, S., Mostovoy, K., Carre, N., Marshall, Z., Dosovitsky, G., Benfica, D., Rousseau, A., Lin, G., & Bunge, E. L. (2023). AI-based chatbot micro-intervention for parents: Meaningful engagement, learning, and efficacy. Frontiers in Psychiatry , 14 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1080770

Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Tachie-Menson, A., Johnson, E. E., & Baah, P. K. (2022). The impact of a virtual teaching assistant (chatbot) on students’ learning in Ghanaian higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 19 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00362-6

Ezzaim, A., Dahbi, A., Haidine, A., & Aqqal, A. (2023). Enhancing academic outcomes through an adaptive learning framework utilizing a novel machine learning-based performance prediction method. Data and Metadata, 2 , 164. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023164

Fan, X., & Li, J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Interactive Learning Methods for Enhancing Art and Design Education in Higher Institutions. Applied Artificial Intelligence , 37 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2225907

Ferguson, C., van den Broek, E. L., & van Oostendorp, H. (2022). AI-Induced guidance: Preserving the optimal Zone of Proximal Development. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 3 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100089

Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022). Supporting the instructional videos with chatbot and peer feedback mechanisms in online learning: The effects on learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60 (7), 1716–1741. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221077901

Firat, M. (2023). What ChatGPT means for universities: Perceptions of scholars and students. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.22

Fu, X., Lokesh Krishna, K., & Sabitha, R. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications with e-learning system for China’s higher education platform. Journal of Interconnection Networks , 22 . https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219265921430167

Gao, Z., Cheah, J.-H., Lim, X.-J., & Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. International Journal of Management Education, 22 (2), 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958

Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., & Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing Assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 3 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055

George, B., & Wooden, O. (2023). Managing the strategic transformation of higher education through artificial intelligence. Administrative Sciences, 13 (9), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci13090196

Grassini, S. (2023). Shaping the future of education: Exploring the potential and consequences of AI and ChatGPT in educational settings. Education Sciences, 13 (7), 692. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070692

Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100 (12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505

Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting Inclusive Learning Using Chatbots? A Chatbot-Led Interview Study. Journal of Information Systems Education , 33 (1), 98–108. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125075350&partnerID=40&md5=c5f65d662cdd1a78ab03f1e536b0fd96 . Accessed 30 May 2024.

Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34 (1), 100072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3 , 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Hasanein, A. M., & Sobaih, A. E. E. (2023). Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT Use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13 (11), 2599–2614. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110181

Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W. (2024). Higher education students’ task motivation in the generative artificial intelligence context: The case of ChatGPT. Information (Switzerland), 15 (1), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15010033

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning . Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hooda, M., Rana, C., Dahiya, O., Rizwan, A., & Hossain, M. S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for assessment and feedback to enhance student success in higher education. Mathematical Problems in Engineering , 2022 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5215722

Hu, W. (2023). A new artificial intelligence based internet online English teaching model with curriculum of ideological and political concern. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11 (6s), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i6s.6820

Huallpa, J. J., Flores Arocutipa, J. P., Panduro, W. D., Huete, L. C., Flores Limo, F. A., Herrera, E. E., Alba Callacna, R. A., Ariza Flores, V. A., Medina Romero, M. Á., Quispe, I. M., & Hernández Hernández, F. A. (2023). Exploring the ethical considerations of using Chat GPT in university education. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 11 (4), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v11i4.3770

Huang, C., Samek, T., & Shiri, A. (2021). AI and ethics: Ethical and educational perspectives for LIS. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 62 (4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.3138/jelis-62-4-2020-0106

Huang, L. (2024). Improve English learning through artificial intelligence for online and offline mixed teaching path. Scalable Computing, 25 (1), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.12694/scpe.v25i1.2399

Hwang, G.-J., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9 (6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584

Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Dimitrov, A., Bratkov, M., & Angelov, D. (2023). Effects of generative chatbots in higher education. Information (Switzerland), 14 (9), 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14090492

Ivanov, S., Soliman, M., Tuomi, A., Alkathiri, N. A., & Al-Alawi, A. N. (2024). Drivers of generative AI adoption in higher education through the lens of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Technology in Society , 77 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102521

James, A. B., & Filgo, E. H. (2023). Where does ChatGPT fit into the framework for information literacy? The possibilities and problems of AI in library instruction. College and Research Libraries News, 84 (9), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.9.334

Jia, X.-H., & Tu, J.-C. (2024). Towards a New Conceptual Model of AI-Enhanced Learning for College Students: The Roles of Artificial Intelligence Capabilities, General Self-Efficacy, Learning Motivation, and Critical Thinking Awareness. Systems , 12 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12030074

Jiang, L. (2024). Research on the Integration Path and Practice of AI Intelligent Technology and English Distance Education. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences , 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.2.01427

Jiang, Y., Yang, X., & Zheng, T. (2023). Make chatbots more adaptive: Dual pathways linking human-like cues and tailored response to trust in interactions with chatbots. Computers in Human Behavior , 138 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107485

José-García, A., Sneyd, A., Melro, A., Ollagnier, A., Tarling, G., Zhang, H., Stevenson, M., Everson, R., & Arthur, R. (2023). C3-IoC: A career guidance system for assessing student skills using machine learning and network visualisation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 33 (4), 1092–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00317-y

Kangwa, D., Msafiri, M. M., Wan, X., & Fute, A. (2024). Self-doubt and self-regulation: A systematic literature review of the factors affecting academic cheating in online learning environments. Social Psychology of Education . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09939-7

Kavadella, A., Da Silva, M. A. D., Kaklamanos, E. G., Stamatopoulos, V., & Giannakopoulos, K. (2024). Evaluation of ChatGPT’s real-life implementation in undergraduate dental education: Mixed methods study. JMIR Medical Education, 10 (1), e51344. https://doi.org/10.2196/51344

Kemelbekova, Z., Degtyareva, X., Yessenaman, S., Ismailova, D., & Seidaliyeva, G. (2024). AI in teaching English as a foreign language: Effectiveness and prospects in Kazakh higher education. XLinguae, 17 (1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.05

Khotimah, K., & Mariono, A. (2024). Enhancing metacognitive and creativity skills through AI-driven meta-learning strategies. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18 (5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i05.47705

Khrapatyi, S., Tokarieva, K., Hlushchenko, O., Paramonova, O., & Lvova, I. (2024). Research on performance evaluation of higher vocational education, informatization based on data envelopment analysis. STEM Education, 4 (1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024004

Kim, S. J. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in collaborative ideation: Educational insight from fashion students. IEEE Access, 12 , 49261–49274. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3382194

Kingchang, T., Chatwattana, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence chatbot platform: AI Chatbot platform for educational recommendations in higher education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 14 (1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2024.14.1.2021

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 5 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156

Kolade, O., Owoseni, A., & Egbetokun, A. (2024). Is AI changing learning and assessment as we know it? Evidence from a ChatGPT experiment and a conceptual framework. Heliyon , 10 (4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25953

Kozov, V., Ivanova, G., & Atanasova, D. (2024). Practical application of AI and large language models in software engineering education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15 (1), 690–696. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150168

Krigstin, S., Cardoso, J., Kayadapuram, M., & Wang, M. L. (2023). Benefits of adopting wild pedagogies in university education. Forests , 14 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071375

Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M. D., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 13 (18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424

Kwak, Y., Ahn, J.-W., & Seo, Y. H. (2022). Influence of AI ethics awareness, attitude, anxiety, and self-efficacy on nursing students’ behavioral intentions. BMC Nursing , 21 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-01048-0

Latif, G., Alghazo, R., Pilotti, M. A. E., & Ben Brahim, G. (2022). Identifying “At-Risk” students: An AI-based prediction approach. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 11 (1), 1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/110184

Li, Q., & Qin, Y. (2023). AI in medical education: medical student perception, curriculum recommendations and design suggestions. BMC Medical Education , 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04700-8

Li, T., Ji, Y., & Zhan, Z. (2024). Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44 (1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305163

Liao, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based English vocabulary test research using log analysis with virtual reality assistance. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 20 (S9), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2023.S9.23-39

Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., Klayklung, P., & Chocksathaporn, P. (2023). The use of ChatGPT in the digital era: Perspectives on chatbot implementation. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.32

Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., Jangjarat, K., & Shaengchart, Y. (2023). Applying ChatGPT as a new business strategy: A great power comes with great responsibility. Corporate and Business Strategy Review, 4 (4 Special Issue), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv4i4siart2

Lin, X.-F., Wang, Z., Zhou, W., Luo, G., Hwang, G.-J., Zhou, Y., Wang, J., Hu, Q., Li, W., & Liang, Z.-M. (2023). Technological support to foster students’ artificial intelligence ethics: An augmented reality-based contextualized dilemma discussion approach. Computers and Education , 201 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104813

Lin, X.-F., Zhou, Y., Shen, W., Luo, G., Xian, X., & Pang, B. (2024). Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (5), 6189–6215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12029-4

Liu, Z., Vobolevich, A., & Oparin, A. (2023). The influence of AI ChatGPT on improving teachers’ creative thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22 (12), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.12.7

Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50 (6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861

Lukić, A., Kudelić, N., Antičević, V., Lazić-Mosler, E., Glunčić, V., Hren, D., & Lukić, I. K. (2023). First-year nursing students’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence: Cross-sectional multi-center study. Nurse Education in Practice , 71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103735

Luo, Y., Weng, H., Yang, L., Ding, Z., & Wang, Q. (2023). College students’ employability, cognition, and demands for ChatGPT in the AI era among chinese nursing students: Web-based survey. JMIR Formative Research, 7 (1), e50413. https://doi.org/10.2196/50413

Luo, Z., Shao, X., & Ma, X. (2024). Enhancing learners’ performance in contest through knowledge mapping algorithm: The roles of artificial intelligence and blockchain in scoring and data integrity. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 36 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.336277

Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open , 5 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

Martín Núñez, J. L., & Lantada, A. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence aided engineering education: State of the art, potentials and challenges. International Journal of Engineering Education , 36 (6), 1740–1751. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85096036820&partnerID=40&md5=7473acd01df33ca82b0ed0da57d11002 . Accessed 30 May 2024.

Martín-Núñez, J. L., Ar, A. Y., Fernández, R. P., Abbas, A., & Radovanović, D. (2023). Does intrinsic motivation mediate perceived artificial intelligence (AI) learning and computational thinking of students during the COVID-19 pandemic? Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 4 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100128

McIntire, A., Calvert, I., & Ashcraft, J. (2024). Pressure to plagiarize and the choice to cheat: Toward a pragmatic reframing of the ethics of academic integrity. Education Sciences, 14 (3), 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030244

Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13 (9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856

Mills, A., Bali, M., & Eaton, L. (2023). How do we respond to generative AI in education? Open educational practices give us a framework for an ongoing process. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.34

Mohd Ayub, A. F., Tarmizi, R. A., Abu Bakar, K., & Luan, W. S. (2014). Adoption of WxMaxima software in the classroom: Effect on students’ motivation and learning of mathematics. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 8 (2), 311–323.

Google Scholar  

Mohd Rahim, N. I., A. Iahad, N., Yusof, A. F., & A. Al-Sharafi, M. (2022). AI-based Chatbots adoption model for higher-education institutions: A hybrid PLS-SEM-neural network modelling approach. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 14 (19). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912726

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4 (1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Moussa, N., Bentoumi, R., & Saali, T. (2024). Promoting student success with neutrosophic sets: Artificial intelligence and student engagement in higher education context. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 23 (1), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.230121

Musyaffi, A. M., Baxtishodovich, B. S., Afriadi, B., Hafeez, M., Adha, M. A., & Wibowo, S. N. (2024). New challenges of learning accounting with artificial intelligence: The role of innovation and trust in technology. European Journal of Educational Research, 13 (1), 183–195. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.183

Mutawa, A. M., Al Mudhahkah, H. M., Al-Huwais, A., Al-Khaldi, N., Al-Otaibi, R., & Al-Ansari, A. (2023). Augmenting mobile app with NAO robot for autism education. Machines, 11 (8), 833. https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11080833

Nam, B. H., & Bai, Q. (2023). ChatGPT and its ethical implications for STEM research and higher education: a media discourse analysis. International Journal of STEM Education , 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00452-5

Neo, M. (2022). The Merlin project: Malaysian students’ acceptance of an AI chatbot in their learning process. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education , 23 (3), 31–48. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133766815&partnerID=40&md5=1e9e74e13a441c660d8c3318522e9029 . Accessed 30 May 2024.

Nikonova, E., Yakhyaeva, K., Pivkina, N., & Schetinina, A. (2023). Using artificial intelligence tools in teaching a foreign language in higher technical institutions. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 12 (2), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2023.2.578

Niloy, A. C., Bari, M. A., Sultana, J., Chowdhury, R., Raisa, F. M., Islam, A., Mahmud, S., Jahan, I., Sarkar, M., Akter, S., Nishat, N., Afroz, M., Sen, A., Islam, T., Tareq, M. H., & Hossen, M. A. (2024). Why do students use ChatGPT? Answering through a triangulation approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 6 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100208

Oluwadiya, K. S., Adeoti, A. O., Agodirin, S. O., Nottidge, T. E., Usman, M. I., Gali, M. B., Onyemaechi, N. O., Ramat, A. M., Adedire, A., & Zakari, L. Y. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in the Nigerian medical educational space: An online cross-sectional study of perceptions, risks and benefits among students and lecturers from ten universities. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal, 30 (4), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.4103/npmj.npmj_186_23

Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Adekomaya, V. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence for advancing sustainable development goals in South Africa’s higher education system: A qualitative study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23 (3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.4

Oravec, J. A. (2022). AI, Biometric Analysis, and Emerging Cheating Detection Systems: The Engineering of Academic Integrity? Education Policy Analysis Archives , 30 . https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.30.5765

Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zhang, L., Xu, W., Zheng, L., & Cukurova, M. (2023). Making strides towards AI-supported regulation of learning in collaborative knowledge construction. Computers in Human Behavior , 142 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107650

Ouyang, F., Wu, M., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., & Jiao, P. (2023). Integration of artificial intelligence performance prediction and learning analytics to improve student learning in online engineering course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 20 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00372-4

Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27 (6), 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9

Pacheco-Mendoza, S., Guevara, C., Mayorga-Albán, A., & Fernández-Escobar, J. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A predictive model for academic performance. Education Sciences, 13 (10), 990. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100990

Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. International Journal of Surgery , 88 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906

Pan, Y., & Yang, P. (2021). The role of AI assisted socio-cultural frameworks in academic change and higher education growth. International Journal of Technology Management, 86 (2–4), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2021.118316

Pesovski, I., Santos, R., Henriques, R., & Trajkovik, V. (2024). Generative AI for customizable learning experiences. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16 (7), 3034. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073034

Pham, T., Nguyen, B., Ha, S., & Ngoc, T. N. (2023). Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 39 (5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8825

Pisica, A. I., Edu, T., Zaharia, R. M., & Zaharia, R. (2023). Implementing artificial intelligence in higher education: Pros and cons from the perspectives of academics. Societies, 13 (5), 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13050118

Polyportis, A. (2023). A longitudinal study on artificial intelligence adoption: understanding the drivers of ChatGPT usage behavior change in higher education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , 6 . https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1324398

Popescu, R.-I., Sabie, O. M., & Trușcă, M. I. (2023). The contribution of artificial intelligence to stimulating the innovation of educational services and university programs in public administration. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2023 (70), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.70E.5

Qian, C. (2023). Research on human-centered design in college music education to improve student experience of artificial intelligence-based information systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 8 (3), 23761. https://doi.org/10.55267/iadt.07.13854

Rahiman, H. U., & Kodikal, R. (2024). Revolutionizing education: Artificial intelligence empowered learning in higher education. Cogent Education , 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2293431

Rahman, M. R., Koka, R. S., Shah, S. K., Solorio, T., & Subhlok, J. (2024). Enhancing lecture video navigation with AI generated summaries. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (6), 7361–7384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11866-7

Raji, N. R., Kumar, R. M. S., & Biji, C. L. (2024). Explainable machine learning prediction for the academic performance of deaf scholars. IEEE Access, 12 , 23595–23612. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3363634

Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., Santini, F. O., Ladeira, W. J., Sun, M., Day, I., Rather, R. A., & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29

Razia, B., Awwad, B., & Taqi, N. (2023). The relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) and its aspects in higher education. Development and Learning in Organizations, 37 (3), 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2022-0074

Remoto, J. P. (2024). ChatGPT and other AIs: Personal relief and limitations among mathematics-oriented learners. Environment and Social Psychology , 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.54517/esp.v9i1.1911

Roldan-Alvarez, D., & Mesa, F. J. (2024). Intelligent deep-learning tutoring system to assist instructors in programming courses. IEEE Transactions on Education, 67 (1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3331055

Roy, D., & Putatunda, T. (2023). From textbooks to chatbots: Integrating AI in English literature classrooms of India. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 19 (3), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135860

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9

Ruwe, T., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023). “Your argumentation is good”, says the AI vs humans – The role of feedback providers and personalised language for feedback effectiveness. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 5 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100189

Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., Alotaibi, A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024). Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism. Computers in Human Behavior , 154 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097

Saleem, N., Mufti, T., Sohail, S. S., & Madsen, D. Ø. (2024). ChatGPT as an innovative heutagogical tool in medical education. Cogent Education , 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2332850

Salifu, I., Arthur, F., Arkorful, V., Abam Nortey, S., & Solomon Osei-Yaw, R. (2024). Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education: a hybrid structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Cogent Social Sciences , 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2300177

Sallam, M., & Al-Salahat, K. (2023). Below average ChatGPT performance in medical microbiology exam compared to university students. Frontiers in Education , 8 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1333415

Saqr, R. R., Al-Somali, S. A., & Sarhan, M. Y. (2024). Exploring the Acceptance and User Satisfaction of AI-Driven e-Learning Platforms (Blackboard, Moodle, Edmodo, Coursera and edX): An Integrated Technology Model. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010204

Sayed Al Mnhrawi, D. N. T. A., & Alreshidi, H. A. (2023). A systemic approach for implementing AI methods in education during COVID-19 pandemic: Higher education in Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Engineering, 20 (5), 808–814. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-11-2021-0623

Sayed, W. S., Noeman, A. M., Abdellatif, A., Abdelrazek, M., Badawy, M. G., Hamed, A., & El-Tantawy, S. (2023). AI-based adaptive personalized content presentation and exercises navigation for an effective and engaging e-learning platform. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82 (3), 3303–3333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-13076-8

Shen, C., Shi, P., Guo, J., Xu, S., & Tian, J. (2023). From process to product: writing engagement and performance of EFL learners under computer-generated feedback instruction. Frontiers in Psychology , 14 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1258286

Shu, X., & Gu, X. (2023). An Empirical Study of A Smart Education Model Enabled by the Edu-Metaverse to Enhance Better Learning Outcomes for Students. Systems , 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11020075

Shu, X., & Xu, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence-Based English Self-Learning Effect Evaluation and Adaptive Influencing Factors Analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering , 2022 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2776823

Silva, C. A. G. D., Ramos, F. N., de Moraes, R. V., & Santos, E. L. D. (2024). ChatGPT: Challenges and benefits in software programming for higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16 (3), 1245. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031245

Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M.-H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023). Exploring computer science students’ perception of ChatGPT in higher education: A descriptive and correlation study. Education Sciences, 13 (9), 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090924

Smith, N., & Vickers, D. (2024). Living well with AI: Virtue, education, and artificial intelligence. Theory and Research in Education, 22 (1), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785241231561

Song, N. (2024). Higher education crisis: Academic misconduct with generative AI. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management , 32 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12532

Stone, A. (2023). Student perceptions of academic integrity: A qualitative study of understanding, consequences, and impact. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21 (3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09461-5

Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49 (2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1

Suleymenova, K., Dawood, M., & Psyllou, M. (2024). Essays in economics in ICU: Resuscitate or pull the plug? International Review of Economics Education , 45 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2024.100284

Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6 (1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

Sun, H., Hou, H., Song, W., Hu, H., Liu, N., & Shankar, A. (2024). Brain computer interface with EEG signals to improve feedback system in higher education based on augmentative and alternative communication. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 24 (2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2024.137203

Taskiran, N. (2023). Effect of artificial intelligence course in nursing on students’ medical artificial intelligence readiness: A comparative quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educator, 48 (5), E147–E152. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001446

Tian, W., Ge, J., Zhao, Y., & Zheng, X. (2024). AI Chatbots in Chinese higher education: adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—an integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology , 15 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549

Tominc, P., & Rožman, M. (2023). Artificial intelligence and business studies: Study cycle differences regarding the perceptions of the key future competences. Education Sciences , 13 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060580

Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students’ perception of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15 (1), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150143

van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13 (10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998

van der Veer, R. (2015). Vygotsky, Lev Semenovic (1896–1934). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 312–315). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.61134-0

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Vetter, M. A., Lucia, B., Jiang, J., & Othman, M. (2024). Towards a framework for local interrogation of AI ethics: A case study on text generators, academic integrity, and composing with ChatGPT. Computers and Composition , 71 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102831

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes . Harvard University Press.

Wang, J. (2024). Exploring New Directions in Higher Education Aided by Artificial Intelligence Technology. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences , 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0378

Wang, S., Sun, Z., & Chen, Y. (2023). Effects of higher education institutes’ artificial intelligence capability on students’ self-efficacy, creativity and learning performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28 (5), 4919–4939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11338-4

Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology , 14 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955

William, F. K. A., & Misheal, M. R. (2024). Exploring graduate students’ perception and adoption of AI chatbots in Zimbabwe: Balancing pedagogical innovation and development of higher-order cognitive skills. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching , 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.12

Williams, R. T. (2023). The ethical implications of using generative chatbots in higher education. Frontiers in Education , 8 . https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1331607

Wilson, S. E., & Nishimoto, M. (2024). Assessing Learning of Computer Programing Skills in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering , 146 (5). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064364

Wise, B., Emerson, L., Van Luyn, A., Dyson, B., Bjork, C., & Thomas, S. E. (2024). A scholarly dialogue: Writing scholarship, authorship, academic integrity and the challenges of AI. Higher Education Research and Development, 43 (3), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2280195

Wu, C.-H., Hung, C.-H., Shen, C.-C., & Yu, J.-H. (2024). Enhancing the willingness of adopting AI in education using back-propagation neural networks. Sensors and Materials, 36 (3), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4485

Wu, X., & Li, R. (2024). Unraveling effects of AI chatbots on EFL learners’ language skill development: A meta-analysis. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher . https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00853-2

Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C. S. (2023). The moderating effects of gender and need satisfaction on self-regulated learning through Artificial Intelligence (AI). Education and Information Technologies, 28 (7), 8691–8713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11547-x

Xu, X., Su, Y., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., & Xu, X. (2024). Understanding learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT: A thematic analysis of peer interviews among undergraduates and postgraduates in China. Heliyon, 10 (4), e26239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26239

Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence , 4 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147

Yu, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Research on the Integration Path and Practice of AI Intelligent Technology and English Teaching Reform in Higher Vocational Colleges and Universities. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences , 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-0442

Yusuf, A., Pervin, N., & Román-González, M. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 21 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? In International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (Vol. 16, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zawiah, M., Al-Ashwal, F. Y., Gharaibeh, L., Farha, R. A., Alzoubi, K. H., Hammour, K. A., Qasim, Q. A., & Abrah, F. (2023). ChatGPT and clinical training: Perception, concerns, and practice of Pharm-D students. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 16 , 4099–4110. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S439223

Zeb, A., Ullah, R., & Karim, R. (2024). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41 (1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0046

Zhang, X., Li, D., Wang, C., Jiang, Z., Ngao, A. I., Liu, D., Peters, M. A., & Tian, H. (2023). From ChatGPT to China’ Sci-Tech: Implications for Chinese higher education. Beijing International Review of Education, 5 (3), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1163/25902539-05030007

Zhang, Y., Qin, G., Cheng, L., Marimuthu, K., & Kumar, B. S. (2021). Interactive smart educational system using ai for students in the higher education platform. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing , 36 (1), 83–98. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108326750&partnerID=40&md5=f9fea28c90a874473a8c9270d5d5a746 . Accessed 30 May 2024.

Zhao, X., Cox, A., & Cai, L. (2024). ChatGPT and the digitisation of writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02904-x

Zheng, L., Fan, Y., Chen, B., Huang, Z., LeiGao, & Long, M. (2024). An AI-enabled feedback-feedforward approach to promoting online collaborative learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (9), 11385–11406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12292-5

Zhou, Q., Suraworachet, W., & Cukurova, M. (2024). Detecting non-verbal speech and gaze behaviours with multimodal data and computer vision to interpret effective collaborative learning interactions. Education and Information Technologies, 29 (1), 1071–1098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12315-1

Zhu, J., & Ren, C. (2022). Analysis of the effect of artificial intelligence on role cognition in the education system. Occupational Therapy International , 2022 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1781662

Download references

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute of International and Comparative Education, College of Teacher Education, Zhejiang Normal University, 688 Yingbin Avenue, Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province, 321004, PR China

Lianyu Cai, Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri & Daniel Kangwa

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L, M.M.M. and K.D; methodology, M.M.M; software, M.M.M. and K.D; format analysis, M.M.M. and K.D; investigation, M.M.M. and K.D; resources, M.M.M., C.L and K.D.; data curation, M.M.M., C.L and K.D; writing original draft preparation, M.M.M., C.L and K.D; review and editing, M.M.M., C.L and K.D; supervision, C.L; funding acquisition, no funding received. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cai, L., Msafiri, M.M. & Kangwa, D. Exploring the impact of integrating AI tools in higher education using the Zone of Proximal Development. Educ Inf Technol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0

Download citation

Received : 10 June 2024

Accepted : 11 October 2024

Published : 22 October 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13112-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Zone of Proximal Development
• Personalised learning
• Collaborative learning
• Learning support
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research