critical thinking for nurses examples

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (With Examples, Importance, & How to Improve)

Successful nursing requires learning several skills used to communicate with patients, families, and healthcare teams. One of the most essential skills nurses must develop is the ability to demonstrate critical thinking. If you are a nurse, perhaps you have asked if there is a way to know how to improve critical thinking in nursing? As you read this article, you will learn what critical thinking in nursing is and why it is important. You will also find 18 simple tips to improve critical thinking in nursing and sample scenarios about how to apply critical thinking in your nursing career.

What Is Critical Thinking In Nursing?

4 reasons why critical thinking is so important in nursing, 1. critical thinking skills will help you anticipate and understand changes in your patient’s condition., 2. with strong critical thinking skills, you can make decisions about patient care that is most favorable for the patient and intended outcomes., 3. strong critical thinking skills in nursing can contribute to innovative improvements and professional development., 4. critical thinking skills in nursing contribute to rational decision-making, which improves patient outcomes., what are the 8 important attributes of excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. the ability to interpret information:, 2. independent thought:, 3. impartiality:, 4. intuition:, 5. problem solving:, 6. flexibility:, 7. perseverance:, 8. integrity:, examples of poor critical thinking vs excellent critical thinking in nursing, 1. scenario: patient/caregiver interactions, poor critical thinking:, excellent critical thinking:, 2. scenario: improving patient care quality, 3. scenario: interdisciplinary collaboration, 4. scenario: precepting nursing students and other nurses, how to improve critical thinking in nursing, 1. demonstrate open-mindedness., 2. practice self-awareness., 3. avoid judgment., 4. eliminate personal biases., 5. do not be afraid to ask questions., 6. find an experienced mentor., 7. join professional nursing organizations., 8. establish a routine of self-reflection., 9. utilize the chain of command., 10. determine the significance of data and decide if it is sufficient for decision-making., 11. volunteer for leadership positions or opportunities., 12. use previous facts and experiences to help develop stronger critical thinking skills in nursing., 13. establish priorities., 14. trust your knowledge and be confident in your abilities., 15. be curious about everything., 16. practice fair-mindedness., 17. learn the value of intellectual humility., 18. never stop learning., 4 consequences of poor critical thinking in nursing, 1. the most significant risk associated with poor critical thinking in nursing is inadequate patient care., 2. failure to recognize changes in patient status:, 3. lack of effective critical thinking in nursing can impact the cost of healthcare., 4. lack of critical thinking skills in nursing can cause a breakdown in communication within the interdisciplinary team., useful resources to improve critical thinking in nursing, youtube videos, my final thoughts, frequently asked questions answered by our expert, 1. will lack of critical thinking impact my nursing career, 2. usually, how long does it take for a nurse to improve their critical thinking skills, 3. do all types of nurses require excellent critical thinking skills, 4. how can i assess my critical thinking skills in nursing.

• Ask relevant questions • Justify opinions • Address and evaluate multiple points of view • Explain assumptions and reasons related to your choice of patient care options

5. Can I Be a Nurse If I Cannot Think Critically?

Fastest Nurse Insight Engine

• MEDICAL ASSISSTANT
• Abdominal Key
• Anesthesia Key
• Basicmedical Key
• Otolaryngology & Ophthalmology
• Musculoskeletal Key
• Obstetric, Gynecology and Pediatric
• Oncology & Hematology
• Plastic Surgery & Dermatology
• Clinical Dentistry
• Radiology Key
• Thoracic Key
• Veterinary Medicine
• Gold Membership

Critical Thinking in Nursing Practice

Chapter 15 Critical Thinking in Nursing Practice Objectives •  Describe characteristics of a critical thinker. •  Discuss the nurse’s responsibility in making clinical decisions. •  Discuss how reflection improves clinical decision making. •  Describe the components of a critical thinking model for clinical decision making. •  Discuss critical thinking skills used in nursing practice. •  Explain the relationship between clinical experience and critical thinking. •  Discuss the critical thinking attitudes used in clinical decision making. •  Explain how professional standards influence a nurse’s clinical decisions. •  Discuss the relationship of the nursing process to critical thinking. Key Terms Clinical decision making, p. 196 Concept map, p. 202 Critical thinking, p. 193 Decision making, p. 195 Diagnostic reasoning, p. 196 Evidence-based knowledge, p. 193 Inference, p. 196 Nursing process, p. 197 Problem solving, p. 195 Reflection, p. 202 Scientific method, p. 195 http://evolve.elsevier.com/Potter/fundamentals/ •  Review Questions •  Case Study with Questions •  Audio Glossary •  Interactive Learning Activities •  Key Term Flashcards •  Content Updates Every day you think critically without realizing it. If it’s hot outside, you take off a sweater. If your DVD doesn’t start, you reposition the disc. If you decide to walk the dogs, you change to a pair of walking shoes. These examples involve critical thinking as you face each day and prepare for all possibilities. As a nurse, you will face many clinical situations involving patients, family members, health care staff, and peers. In each situation it is important to try to see the big picture and think smart. To think smart you have to develop critical thinking skills to face each new experience and problem involving a patient’s care with open-mindedness, creativity, confidence, and continual inquiry. When a patient develops a new set of symptoms, asks you to offer comfort, or requires a procedure, it is important to think critically and make sensible judgments so the patient receives the best nursing care possible. Critical thinking is not a simple step-by-step, linear process that you learn overnight. It is a process acquired only through experience, commitment, and an active curiosity toward learning. Clinical Decisions in Nursing Practice Nurses are responsible for making accurate and appropriate clinical decisions. Clinical decision making separates professional nurses from technical personnel. For example, a professional nurse observes for changes in patients, recognizes potential problems, identifies new problems as they arise, and takes immediate action when a patient’s clinical condition worsens. Technical personnel simply follow direction in completing aspects of care that the professional nurse has identified as necessary. A professional nurse relies on knowledge and experience when deciding if a patient is having complications that call for notification of a health care provider or decides if a teaching plan for a patient is ineffective and needs revision. Benner (1984) describes clinical decision making as judgment that includes critical and reflective thinking and action and application of scientific and practical logic. Most patients have health care problems for which there are no clear textbook solutions. Each patient’s problems are unique, a product of the patient’s physical health, lifestyle, culture, relationship with family and friends, living environment, and experiences. Thus as a nurse you do not always have a clear picture of a patient’s needs and the appropriate actions to take when first meeting a patient. Instead you must learn to question, wonder, and explore different perspectives and interpretations to find a solution that benefits the patient. Because no two patients’ health problems are the same, you always apply critical thinking differently. Observe patients closely, gather information about them, examine ideas and inferences about patient problems, recognize the problems, consider scientific principles relating to the problems, and develop an approach to nursing care. With experience you learn to creatively seek new knowledge, act quickly when events change, and make quality decisions for patients’ well-being. You will find nursing to be rewarding and fulfilling through the clinical decisions you make. Critical Thinking Defined Mr. Jacobs is a 58-year-old patient who had a radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer yesterday. His nurse, Tonya, finds the patient lying supine in bed with arms extended along his sides but tensed. When Tonya checks the patient’s surgical wound and drainage device, she notes that the patient winces when she gently places her hands to palpate around the surgical incision. She asks Mr. Jacobs when he last turned onto his side, and he responds, “Not since last night some time.” Tonya asks Mr. Jacobs if he is having incisional pain, and he nods yes, saying, “It hurts too much to move.” Tonya considers the information she has observed and learned from the patient to determine that he is in pain and has reduced mobility because of it. She decides that she needs to take action to relieve Mr. Jacobs’ pain so she can turn him more frequently and begin to get him out of bed for his recovery. In the case example the nurse observes the clinical situation, asks questions, considers what she knows about postoperative pain and risk for immobility, and takes action. The nurse applies critical thinking, a continuous process characterized by open-mindedness, continual inquiry, and perseverance, combined with a willingness to look at each unique patient situation and determine which identified assumptions are true and relevant ( Heffner and Rudy, 2008 ). Critical thinking involves recognizing that an issue (e.g., patient problem) exists, analyzing information about the issue (e.g., clinical data about a patient), evaluating information (reviewing assumptions and evidence) and making conclusions ( Settersten and Lauver, 2004 ). A critical thinker considers what is important in each clinical situation, imagines and explores alternatives, considers ethical principles, and makes informed decisions about the care of patients. Critical thinking is a way of thinking about a situation that always asks “Why?”, “What am I missing?”, “What do I really know about this patient’s situation?”, and “What are my options?” ( Heffner and Rudy, 2008 ; Paul and Heaslip, 1995 ). Tonya knew that pain was likely going to be a problem because the patient had extensive surgery. Her review of her observations and the patient’s report of pain confirmed her knowledge that pain was a problem. Her options include giving Mr. Jacobs an analgesic and waiting until it takes effect so she is able to reposition and make him more comfortable. Once he has less acute pain, Tonya offers to teach Mr. Jacobs some relaxation exercises. You begin to learn critical thinking early in your practice. For example, as you learn about administering baths and other hygiene measures, take time to read your textbook and the nursing literature about the concept of comfort. What are the criteria for comfort? How do patients from other cultures perceive comfort? What are the many factors that promote comfort? The use of evidence-based knowledge, or knowledge based on research or clinical expertise, makes you an informed critical thinker. Thinking critically and learning about the concept of comfort prepares you to better anticipate your patients’ needs, identify comfort problems more quickly, and offer appropriate care. Critical thinking requires cognitive skills and the habit of asking questions, remaining well informed, being honest in facing personal biases, and always being willing to reconsider and think clearly about issues ( Facione, 1990 ). When core critical thinking skills are applied to nursing, they show the complex nature of clinical decision making ( Table 15-1 ). Being able to apply all of these skills takes practice. You also need to have a sound knowledge base and thoughtfully consider what you learn when caring for patients. TABLE 15-1 Critical Thinking Skills SKILL NURSING PRACTICE APPLICATIONS Interpretation Be orderly in data collection. Look for patterns to categorize data (e.g., nursing diagnoses [see Chapter 17 ]). Clarify any data you are uncertain about. Analysis Be open-minded as you look at information about a patient. Do not make careless assumptions. Do the data reveal what you believe is true, or are there other options? Inference Look at the meaning and significance of findings. Are there relationships between findings? Do the data about the patient help you see that a problem exists? Evaluation Look at all situations objectively. Use criteria (e.g., expected outcomes, pain characteristics, learning objectives) to determine results of nursing actions. Reflect on your own behavior. Explanation Support your findings and conclusions. Use knowledge and experience to choose strategies to use in the care of patients. Self-regulation Reflect on your experiences. Identify the ways you can improve your own performance. What will make you believe that you have been successful? Modified from Facione P: Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. The Delphi report: research findings and recommendations prepared for the American Philosophical Association, ERIC Doc No. ED 315, Washington, DC, 1990, ERIC. Nurses who apply critical thinking in their work are able to see the big picture from all possible perspectives. They focus clearly on options for solving problems and making decisions rather than quickly and carelessly forming quick solutions ( Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor, 1994 ). Nurses who work in crisis situations such as the emergency department often act quickly when patient problems develop. However, even these nurses exercise discipline in decision making to avoid premature and inappropriate decisions. Learning to think critically helps you care for patients as their advocate, or supporter, and make better-informed choices about their care. Facione and Facione (1996) identified concepts for thinking critically ( Table 15-2 ). Critical thinking is more than just problem solving. It is a continuous attempt to improve how to apply yourself when faced with problems in patient care. TABLE 15-2 Concepts for a Critical Thinker CONCEPT CRITICAL THINKING BEHAVIOR Truth seeking Seek the true meaning of a situation. Be courageous, honest, and objective about asking questions. Open-mindedness Be tolerant of different views; be sensitive to the possibility of your own prejudices; respect the right of others to have different opinions. Analyticity Analyze potentially problematic situations; anticipate possible results or consequences; value reason; use evidence-based knowledge. Systematicity Be organized, focused; work hard in any inquiry. Self-confidence Trust in your own reasoning processes. Inquisitiveness Be eager to acquire knowledge and learn explanations even when applications of the knowledge are not immediately clear. Value learning for learning’s sake. Maturity Multiple solutions are acceptable. Reflect on your own judgments; have cognitive maturity. Modified from Facione N, Facione P: Externalizing the critical thinking in knowledge development and clinical judgment, Nurs Outlook 44(3):129, 1996. Thinking and Learning Learning is a lifelong process. Your intellectual and emotional growth involves learning new knowledge and refining your ability to think, problem solve, and make judgments. To learn, you have to be flexible and always open to new information. The science of nursing is growing rapidly, and there will always be new information for you to apply in practice. As you have more clinical experiences and apply the knowledge you learn, you will become better at forming assumptions, presenting ideas, and making valid conclusions. When you care for a patient, always think ahead and ask these questions: What is the patient’s status now? How might it change and why? Which physiological and emotional responses do I anticipate? What do I know to improve the patient’s condition? In which way will specific therapies affect the patient? What should be my first action? Do not let your thinking become routine or standardized. Instead, learn to look beyond the obvious in any clinical situation, explore the patient’s unique responses to health alterations, and recognize which actions are needed to benefit the patient. With experience you are able to recognize patterns of behavior, see commonalities in signs and symptoms, and anticipate reactions to therapies. Thinking about these experiences allows you to better anticipate each new patient’s needs and recognize problems when they develop. Levels of Critical Thinking in Nursing Your ability to think critically grows as you gain new knowledge in nursing practice. Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor (1994) developed a critical thinking model ( Fig. 15-1 ) that includes three levels: basic, complex, and commitment. An expert nurse thinks critically almost automatically. As a beginning student you make a more conscious effort to apply critical thinking because initially you are more task oriented and trying to learn how to organize nursing care activities. At first you apply the critical thinking model at the basic level. As you advance in practice, you adopt complex critical thinking and commitment. FIG. 15-1 Critical thinking model for nursing judgment. (Redrawn from Kataoka-Yahiro M, Saylor C: A critical thinking model for nursing judgment, J Nurs Educ 33(8):351, 1994. Modified from Glaser E: An experiment in the development of critical thinking, New York, 1941, Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University; Miller M, Malcolm N: Critical thinking in the nursing curriculum, Nurs Health Care 11:67, 1990; Paul RW: The art of redesigning instruction. In Willsen J, Blinker AJA, editors: Critical thinking: how to prepare students for a rapidly changing world, Santa Rosa, Calif, 1993, Foundation for Critical Thinking; and Perry W: Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: a scheme , New York, 1979, Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.) Basic Critical Thinking At the basic level of critical thinking a learner trusts that experts have the right answers for every problem. Thinking is concrete and based on a set of rules or principles. For example, as a nursing student you use a hospital procedure manual to confirm how to insert a Foley catheter. You likely follow the procedure step by step without adjusting it to meet a patient’s unique needs (e.g., positioning to minimize the patient’s pain or mobility restrictions). You do not have enough experience to anticipate how to individualize the procedure. At this level answers to complex problems are either right or wrong (e.g., when no urine drains from the catheter, the catheter tip must not be in the bladder), and one right answer usually exists for each problem. Basic critical thinking is an early step in developing reasoning ( Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor, 1994 ). A basic critical thinker learns to accept the diverse opinions and values of experts (e.g., instructors and staff nurse role models). However, inexperience, weak competencies, and inflexible attitudes can restrict a person’s ability to move to the next level of critical thinking. Complex Critical Thinking Complex critical thinkers begin to separate themselves from experts. They analyze and examine choices more independently. The person’s thinking abilities and initiative to look beyond expert opinion begin to change. A nurse learns that alternative and perhaps conflicting solutions exist. Consider the case of Mr. Rosen, a 36-year-old man who had hip surgery. The patient is having pain but is refusing his ordered analgesic. His health care provider is concerned that the patient will not progress as planned, delaying rehabilitation. While discussing the importance of rehabilitation with Mr. Rosen, the nurse, Edwin, realizes the patient’s reason for not taking pain medication. Edwin learns that the patient practices meditation at home. As a complex critical thinker, Edwin recognizes that Mr. Rosen has options for pain relief. Edwin decides to discuss meditation and other nonpharmacological interventions with the patient as pain control options and how, when combined with analgesics, these interventions can potentially enhance pain relief. In complex critical thinking each solution has benefits and risks that you weigh before making a final decision. There are options. Thinking becomes more creative and innovative. The complex critical thinker is willing to consider different options from routine procedures when complex situations develop. You learn a variety of different approaches for the same therapy. Commitment The third level of critical thinking is commitment ( Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor, 1994 ). At this level a person anticipates when to make choices without assistance from others and accepts accountability for decisions made. As a nurse you do more than just consider the complex alternatives that a problem poses. At the commitment level you choose an action or belief based on the available alternatives and support it. Sometimes an action is to not act or to delay an action until a later time. You choose to delay as a result of your experience and knowledge. Because you take accountability for the decision, you consider the results of the decision and determine whether it was appropriate. Critical Thinking Competencies Kataoka-Yahiro and Saylor (1994) describe critical thinking competencies as the cognitive processes a nurse uses to make judgments about the clinical care of patients. These include general critical thinking, specific critical thinking in clinical situations, and specific critical thinking in nursing. General critical thinking processes are not unique to nursing. They include the scientific method, problem solving, and decision making. Specific critical thinking competencies in clinical health care situations include diagnostic reasoning, clinical inference, and clinical decision making. The specific critical thinking competency in nursing involves use of the nursing process. Each of the competencies is discussed in the following paragraphs. General Critical Thinking Scientific Method The scientific method is a way to solve problems using reasoning. It is a systematic, ordered approach to gathering data and solving problems used by nurses, physicians, and a variety of other health care professionals. This approach looks for the truth or verifies that a set of facts agrees with reality. Nurse researchers use the scientific method when testing research questions in nursing practice situations (see Chapter 5 ). The scientific method has five steps: 1  Identifying the problem 2  Collecting data 3  Formulating a question or hypothesis 4  Testing the question or hypothesis 5  Evaluating results of the test or study Consider the following example of the scientific method in nursing practice. A nurse caring for patients who receive large doses of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer sees a pattern of patients developing severe inflammation in the mouth (mucositis) (identifies problem). The nurse reads research articles (collects data) about mucositis and learns that there is evidence to show that having patients keep ice in their mouths (cryotherapy) during the chemotherapy infusion reduces severity of mucositis after treatment. He or she asks (forms question), “Do patients with ovarian cancer who receive chemotherapy have less severe mucositis when given cryotherapy versus standard mouth rinse in the oral cavity?” The nurse then collaborates with colleagues to develop a nursing protocol for using ice with certain chemotherapy infusions. The nurses on the oncology unit collect information that allows them to compare the incidence and severity of mucositis for a group of patients who use cryotherapy versus those who use standard-practice mouth rinse (tests the question). They analyze the results of their project and find that the use of cryotherapy reduced the frequency and severity of mucositis in their patients (evaluating the results). They decide to continue the protocol for all patients with ovarian cancer. Problem Solving You face problems every day such as a computer program that doesn’t function properly or a close friend who has lost a favorite pet. When a problem arises, you obtain information and use it, plus what you already know, to find a solution. Patients routinely present problems in practice. For example, a home care nurse learns that a patient has difficulty taking her medications regularly. The patient is unable to describe what medications she has taken for the last 3 days. The medication bottles are labeled and filled. The nurse has to solve the problem of why the patient is not adhering to or following her medication schedule. The nurse knows that the patient was discharged from the hospital and had five medications ordered. The patient tells the nurse that she also takes two over-the-counter medications regularly. When the nurse asks her to show the medications that she takes in the morning, the nurse notices that she has difficulty reading the medication labels. The patient is able to describe the medications that she is to take but is uncertain about the times of administration. The nurse recommends having the patient’s pharmacy relabel the medications in larger lettering. In addition, the nurse shows the patient examples of pill organizers that will help her sort her medications by time of day for a period of 7 days. Effective problem solving also involves evaluating the solution over time to make sure that it is effective. It becomes necessary to try different options if a problem recurs. From the previous example, during a follow-up visit the nurse finds that the patient has organized her medications correctly and is able to read the labels without difficulty. The nurse obtained information that correctly clarified the cause of the patient’s problem and tested a solution that proved successful. Having solved a problem in one situation adds to a nurse’s experience in practice, and this allows the nurse to apply that knowledge in future patient situations. Decision Making When you face a problem or situation and need to choose a course of action from several options, you are making a decision. Decision making is a product of critical thinking that focuses on problem resolution. Following a set of criteria helps to make a thorough and thoughtful decision. The criteria may be personal; based on an organizational policy; or, frequently in the case of nursing, a professional standard. For example, decision making occurs when a person decides on the choice of a health care provider. To make a decision, an individual has to recognize and define the problem or situation (need for a certain type of health care provider to provide medical care) and assess all options (consider recommended health care providers or choose one whose office is close to home). The person has to weigh each option against a set of personal criteria (experience, friendliness, and reputation), test possible options (talk directly with the different health care providers), consider the consequences of the decision (examine pros and cons of selecting one health care provider over another), and make a final decision. Although the set of criteria follows a sequence of steps, decision making involves moving back and forth when considering all criteria. It leads to informed conclusions that are supported by evidence and reason. Examples of decision making in the clinical area include determining which patient care priority requires the first response, choosing a type of dressing for a patient with a surgical wound, or selecting the best teaching approach for a family caregiver who will assist a patient who is returning home after a stroke. Specific Critical Thinking Diagnostic Reasoning and Inference Once you receive information about a patient in a clinical situation, diagnostic reasoning begins. It is the analytical process for determining a patient’s health problems ( Harjai and Tiwari, 2009 ). Accurate recognition of a patient’s problems is necessary before you decide on solutions and implement action. It requires you to assign meaning to the behaviors and physical signs and symptoms presented by a patient. Diagnostic reasoning begins when you interact with a patient or make physical or behavioral observations. An expert nurse sees the context of a patient situation (e.g., a patient who is feeling light-headed with blurred vision and who has a history of diabetes is possibly experiencing a problem with blood glucose levels), observes patterns and themes (e.g., symptoms that include weakness, hunger, and visual disturbances suggest hypoglycemia), and makes decisions quickly (e.g., offers a food source containing glucose). The information a nurse collects and analyzes leads to a diagnosis of a patient’s condition. Nurses do not make medical diagnoses, but they do assess and monitor patients closely and compare the patients’ signs and symptoms with those that are common to a medical diagnosis. This type of diagnostic reasoning helps health care providers pinpoint the nature of a problem more quickly and select proper therapies. Part of diagnostic reasoning is clinical inference, the process of drawing conclusions from related pieces of evidence and previous experience with the evidence. An inference involves forming patterns of information from data before making a diagnosis. Seeing that a patient has lost appetite and experienced weight loss over the last month, the nurse infers that there is a nutritional problem. An example of diagnostic reasoning is forming a nursing diagnosis such as imbalanced nutrition: less than body requirements (see Chapter 17 ). In diagnostic reasoning use patient data that you gather or collect to logically recognize the problem. For example, after turning a patient you see an area of redness on the right hip. You palpate the area and note that it is warm to the touch and the patient complains of tenderness. You press over the area with your finger; after you release pressure, the area does not blanch or turn white. After thinking about what you know about normal skin integrity and the effects of pressure, you form the diagnostic conclusion that the patient has a pressure ulcer. As a student, confirm your judgments with experienced nurses. At times you possibly will be wrong, but consulting with nurse experts gives you feedback to build on future clinical situations. Often you cannot make a precise diagnosis during your first meeting with a patient. Sometimes you sense that a problem exists but do not have enough data to make a specific diagnosis. Some patients’ physical conditions limit their ability to tell you about symptoms. Some choose to not share sensitive and important information during your initial assessment. Some patients’ behaviors and physical responses become observable only under conditions not present during your initial assessment. When uncertain of a diagnosis, continue data collection. You have to critically analyze changing clinical situations until you are able to determine the patient’s unique situation. Diagnostic reasoning is a continuous behavior in nursing practice. Any diagnostic conclusions that you make will help the health care provider identify the nature of a problem more quickly and select appropriate medical therapies. Clinical Decision Making As in the case of general decision making, clinical decision making is a problem-solving activity that focuses on defining a problem and selecting an appropriate action. In clinical decision making a nurse identifies a patient’s problem and selects a nursing intervention. When you approach a clinical problem such as a patient who is less mobile and develops an area of redness over the hip, you make a decision that identifies the problem (impaired skin integrity in the form of a pressure ulcer) and choose the best nursing interventions (skin care and a turning schedule). Nurses make clinical decisions all the time to improve a patient’s health or maintain wellness. This means reducing the severity of the problem or resolving the problem completely. Clinical decision making requires careful reasoning (i.e., choosing the options for the best patient outcomes on the basis of the patient’s condition and the priority of the problem). Improve your clinical decision making by knowing your patients. Nurse researchers found that expert nurses develop a level of knowing that leads to pattern recognition of patient symptoms and responses ( White, 2003 ). For example, an expert nurse who has worked on a general surgery unit for many years is more likely able to detect signs of internal hemorrhage (e.g., fall in blood pressure, rapid pulse, change in consciousness) than a new nurse. Over time a combination of experience, time spent in a specific clinical area, and the quality of relationships formed with patients allow expert nurses to know clinical situations and quickly anticipate and select the right course of action. Spending more time during initial patient assessments to observe patient behavior and measure physical findings is a way to improve knowledge of your patients. In addition, consistently assessing and monitoring patients as problems occur help you to see how clinical changes develop over time. The selection of nursing therapies is built on both clinical knowledge and specific patient data, including: •  The identified status and situation you assessed about the patient, including data collected by actively listening to the patient regarding his or her health care needs. •  Knowledge about the clinical variables (e.g., age, seriousness of the problem, pathology of the problem, patient’s preexisting disease conditions) involved in the situation, and how the variables are linked together. •  A judgment about the likely course of events and outcome of the diagnosed problem, considering any health risks the patient has; includes knowledge about usual patterns of any diagnosed problem or prognosis. •  Any additional relevant data about requirements in the patient’s daily living, functional capacity, and social resources. •  Knowledge about the nursing therapy options available and the way in which specific interventions will predictably affect the patient’s situation.

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related posts:

• Legal Implications in Nursing Practice
• Documentation and Informatics
• Care of Surgical Patients
• Stress and Coping

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Comments are closed for this page.

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Two Examples of How I Used Critical Thinking to Care for my Patient (Real Life Nursing Stories) | NURSING.com

What are you struggling with in nursing school?

NURSING.com is the BEST place to learn nursing. With over 2,000+ clear, concise, and visual lessons, there is something for you!

Critical Thinking on the Nursing Floor

Critical thinking can seem like such an abstract term that you don’t practically use. However, this could not be farther from the truth. Critical thinking is frequently used in nursing. Let me give you a few examples from my career in which critical thinking helped me take better care of my patient.

The truth is, that as nurses we can’t escape critical thinking . . . I know you hate the word . . . but let me show you how it actually works!

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Example 1

I had a patient that was scheduled to go to get a pacemaker placed at 0900. The physician wanted the patient to get 2 units of blood before going downstairs for the procedure. I administered it per protocol. About 30 minutes after that second unit got started, I noticed his oxygen went from 95% down to 92% down to 90%. I put 2L of O2 on him and it came up to 91%. But it just sort of hung around the low 90s on oxygen.

I stopped. And thought. What the heck is going on?

I looked at his history. Congestive heart failure.

I looked at his intake and output. He was positive 1.5 liters.

I thought about how he’s got extra fluid in general, and because of his CHF, he can’t really pump out the fluid he already has, let alone this additional fluid. Maybe I should listen to his lungs..

His lungs were clear earlier. I heard crackles throughout both lungs.

OK, so he’s got extra fluid that he can’t get out of his body. What do I know that will get rid of extra fluid and make him pee? Maybe some Lasix?

I ran over my thought process with a coworker before calling the doc. They agreed. I called the doc and before I could suggest anything, he said “Give him 20 mg IV Lasix one time, and I’ll put the order in.” CLICK.

I gave the Lasix. He peed like a racehorse (and was NOT happy with me for making that happen!). And he was off of oxygen before he went down to get his pacemaker.

Badda Bing Bada Boom!

Critical Thinking in Nursing: Example 2

My patient just had her right leg amputated above her knee. She was on a Dilaudid PCA and still complaining of awful pain. She maxed it out every time, still saying she was in horrible pain. She told the doctor when he rounded that morning that the meds weren’t doing anything. He added some oral opioids as well and wrote an order that it was okay for me to give both the oral and PCA dosings, with the goal of weaning off PCA.

“How am I going to do that?” I thought. She kept requiring more and more meds and I’m supposed to someone wean her off?

I asked her to describe her pain. She said it felt like nerve pain. Deep burning and tingling. She said the pain meds would just knock her out and she’d sleep for a little while but wake up in even worse pain. She was at the end of her rope.

I thought about nerve pain. I thought about other patients that report similar pain. Diabetics with neuropathy would talk about similar pain… “What did they do for it? ” I thought. Then I remembered that many of my patients with diabetic neuropathy were taking gabapentin daily for pain.

“So if this works for their nerve pain, could it work for a patient who has had an amputation?” I thought.

I called the PA for the surgeon and asked them what they thought about trying something like gabapentin for her pain after I described my patient’s type of pain and thought process.

“That’s a really good idea, Kati. I’ll write for it and we’ll see if we can get her off the opioids sooner. ”

She wrote for it. I gave it. It takes a few days to really kick in and once it did, the patient’s pain and discomfort were significantly reduced. She said to get rid of those other pain meds because they “didn’t do a damn thing,” and to “just give her that nerve pain pill because it’s the only thing that works”.

And that we did!

She was able to work with therapy more because her pain was tolerable and was finally able to get rest.

What the HELL is Critical Thinking . . . and Why Should I Care?

What your nursing professor won’t tell you about critical thinking .

by Ashely Adkins RN BSN

When I started nursing school, I remember thinking,   “how in the world am I going to remember all of this information, let alone be able to apply it and critically think?”   You are not alone if you feel like your critical thinking skills need a little bit of polishing.

Let’s step back for a moment, and take a walk down memory lane. It was my first semester of nursing school and I was sitting in my Fundamentals of Nursing course. We were learning about vital signs, assessments, labs, etc. Feeling overwhelmed with all of this new information (when are you   not   overwhelmed in nursing school?), I let my mind wonder to a low place…

Am I really cut out for this? Can I really do this? How can I possibly retain all of this information?  Do they really expect me to remember everything AND critically think at the same time?

One of my first-semester nursing professors said something to me that has stuck with me throughout my nursing years. It went a little something like this:

“Critical thinking does not develop overnight . It takes time. You don’t learn to talk overnight or walk overnight. You don’t   learn to critically think overnight .”

My professor was absolutely right.

As my journey throughout nursing school, and eventually on to being a “real nurse” continued, my critical thinking skills began to BLOSSOM. With every class, lecture, clinical shift, lab, and simulation, my critical thinking skills grew.

You may ask…how?

Well, let me tell you…

• Questioning

These are the key ingredients to growing your critical thinking skills.

Time.   Critical thinking takes time. As I mentioned before, you do not learn how to critically think overnight. It is important to set   realistic   expectations for yourself both in nursing school and in other aspects of your life.

Exposure.   It is next to impossible to critically think if you have never been exposed to something. How would you ever learn to talk if no one ever talked to you? The same thing applies to nursing and critical thinking.

Over time, your exposure to new materials and situations will cause you to think and ask yourself, “why?”

This leads me to my next point.   Questioning.   Do not be afraid to ask yourself…

“Why is this happening?”

“Why do I take a blood pressure and heart rate before I give a beta-blocker?”

“Why is it important to listen to a patient’s lung sounds before and after they receive a blood transfusion?”

It is important to constantly question yourself. Let your mind process your questions, and discover answers.

Confidence.   We always hear the phrase, “confidence is key!” And as cheesy as that phrase may be, it really holds true. So many times, we often times sell ourselves short.

YOU KNOW MORE THAN YOU THINK YOU KNOW.

In case you did not catch it the first time…

Be confident in your knowledge, because trust me, it is there. It may be hiding in one single neuron in the back of your brain, but it is there.

It is impossible to know everything. Even experienced nurses do not know everything.

And if they tell you that they do…they are wrong!

The   key   to critical thinking is   not about knowing everything ; It is about   how you respond when you do not know something .

How do you reason through a problem you do not know the answer to? Do you give up? Or do you persevere until you discover the answer?

If you are a nursing student preparing for the NCLEX, you know that the NCLEX   loves   critical thinking questions. NRSNG has some great tips and advice on   critical thinking when it comes to taking the NCLEX .

There are so many pieces to the puzzle when it comes to nursing, and it is normal to feel overwhelmed. The beauty of nursing is when all of those puzzle pieces come together to form a beautiful picture.

That is critical thinking.

Critical thinking is something you’ll do every day as a nurse and honestly, you probably do it in your regular non-nurse life as well. It’s basically stopping, looking at a situation, identifying a solution, and trying it out. Critical thinking in nursing is just that but in a clinical setting.

We’ve written a MASSIVE lesson on Care Plans and Critical Thinking :

Mastering The COPD Nursing Care Plan in Just 10 Minutes!

Renal Failure Pt Care

4 "real world" examples of using clinical judgement to figure out what to do first as a nurse | nursing.com, 12 study tips for how to study for pharmacology in nursing school | nursing.com, similar blog posts.

Critical Thinking and Nursing Care Plans Go Together Like Chicken and Waffles | NURSING.com

Patients We Will Never Forget | NURSING.com

The Ultimate Guide to Creating an ICU Report Sheet (for new Critical Care Nurses and RN Students) | NURSING.com

NurseJournal.org

Nursing Programs, Scholarships, and Careers – NurseJournal.org

The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing

Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.

Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”

“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.

How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?

Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.

Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:

“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”

The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.

“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.

Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills

We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.

Case-Based Approach

Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.

In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”

Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.

Practice Self-Reflection

Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.

This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.

It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.

During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?

Develop a Questioning Mind

McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”

To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .

However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.

It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.

Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment

Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .

Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.

By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.

Use a Process

As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:

• Ask questions.
• Gather information.
• Implement a strategy.
• Evaluate the results.
• Consider another point of view.

These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.

Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing

Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.

“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.

New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.

“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”

Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:

• Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
• Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
• Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
• Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
• Solve problems with their colleagues
• Are self-confident
• Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care

An Essential Skill for All Nurses

Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.

By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing

How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.

Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.

How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?

Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.

Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?

Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.

Meet Our Contributors

Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.

Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.

Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.

• school Campus Bookshelves
• menu_book Bookshelves
• perm_media Learning Objects
• login Login
• how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
• hub Instructor Commons
• Download Page (PDF)
• Download Full Book (PDF)
• Periodic Table
• Physics Constants
• Scientific Calculator
• Reference & Cite
• Tools expand_more
• Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

2.4: Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning

• Last updated
• Save as PDF
• Page ID 63140

• Ernstmeyer & Christman (Eds.)
• Chippewa Valley Technical College via OpenRN

Prioritization of patient care should be grounded in critical thinking rather than just a checklist of items to be done. Critical thinking is a broad term used in nursing that includes “reasoning about clinical issues such as teamwork, collaboration, and streamlining workflow.” [1] Certainly, there are many actions that nurses must complete during their shift, but nursing requires adaptation and flexibility to meet emerging patient needs. It can be challenging for a novice nurse to change their mindset regarding their established “plan” for the day, but the sooner a nurse recognizes prioritization is dictated by their patients’ needs, the less frustration the nurse might experience. Prioritization strategies include collection of information and utilization of clinical reasoning to determine the best course of action. Clinical reasoning is defined as, “A complex cognitive process that uses formal and informal thinking strategies to gather and analyze patient information, evaluate the significance of this information, and weigh alternative actions.” [2]

When nurses use critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills, they set forth on a purposeful course of intervention to best meet patient-care needs. Rather than focusing on one’s own priorities, nurses utilizing critical thinking and reasoning skills recognize their actions must be responsive to their patients. For example, a nurse using critical thinking skills understands that scheduled morning medications for their patients may be late if one of the patients on their care team suddenly develops chest pain. Many actions may be added or removed from planned activities throughout the shift based on what is occurring holistically on the patient-care team.

Additionally, in today’s complex health care environment, it is important for the novice nurse to recognize the realities of the current health care environment. Patients have become increasingly complex in their health care needs, and organizations are often challenged to meet these care needs with limited staffing resources. It can become easy to slip into the mindset of disenchantment with the nursing profession when first assuming the reality of patient-care assignments as a novice nurse. The workload of a nurse in practice often looks and feels quite different than that experienced as a nursing student. As a nursing student, there may have been time for lengthy conversations with patients and their family members, ample time to chart, and opportunities to offer personal cares, such as a massage or hair wash. Unfortunately, in the time-constrained realities of today’s health care environment, novice nurses should recognize that even though these “extra” tasks are not always possible, they can still provide quality, safe patient care using the “CURE” prioritization framework. Rather than feeling frustrated about “extras” that cannot be accomplished in time-constrained environments, it is vital to use prioritization strategies to ensure appropriate actions are taken to complete what must be done. With increased clinical experience, a novice nurse typically becomes more comfortable with prioritizing and reprioritizing care.

• Klenke-Borgmann, L., Cantrell, M. A., & Mariani, B. (2020). Nurse educator’s guide to clinical judgment: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and development. Nursing Education Perspectives, 41 (4), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nep.0000000000000669 ↵

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Week 6: Clinical Judgment Part A

Unit Learning Outcomes

At the end of this chapter, the learner will:

1. Compare and contrast three approaches to problem solving.

2. Describe models of clinical judgment for critical thinking and decision-making judgments.

3. Discuss clinical judgment and decision-making necessary to provide quality care.

Overview of this Chapter

This chapter will introduce the concept of clinical judgement, a vital  process where nurses make decisions using their knowledge, clinical  reasoning and critical thinking.  It is important to understand concepts related to clinical judgement(CJ) in nursing practice. This chapter is the part A of this concept and will include concepts related to clinical judgement, models of CJ and how important it is to provide safe nursing care to patients.

Nurses make decisions while providing patient care by using critical thinking  and clinical reasoning . Let’s review what is critical thinking, clinical reasoning and clinical judgement.

Critical thinking is a broad term used in nursing that includes “reasoning about clinical issues such as teamwork, collaboration, and streamlining workflow.”[1] Using critical thinking means that nurses take extra steps to maintain patient safety and don’t just “follow orders.” It also means the accuracy of patient information is validated and plans for caring for patients are based on their needs, current clinical practice, and research. “Critical thinkers” possess certain attitudes that foster rational thinking. These attitudes are as follows:

• Independence of thought:  Thinking on your own
• Fair-mindedness:  Treating every viewpoint in an unbiased, unprejudiced way
• Insight into egocentricity and sociocentricity:  Thinking of the greater good and not just thinking of yourself. Knowing when you are thinking of yourself (egocentricity) and when you are thinking or acting for the greater good (sociocentricity)
• Intellectual humility:  Recognizing your intellectual limitations and abilities
• Nonjudgmental:  Using professional ethical standards and not basing your judgments on your own personal or moral standards
• Integrity:  Being honest and demonstrating strong moral principles
• Perseverance:  Persisting in doing something despite it being difficult
• Confidence:  Believing in yourself to complete a task or activity
• Interest in exploring thoughts and feelings:  Wanting to explore different ways of knowing
• Curiosity:  Asking “why” and wanting to know more

Clinical judgment is the result of critical thinking and clinical reasoning using inductive and deductive reasoning. Clinical judgment is defined by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) as, “The observed outcome of critical thinking and decision-making. It uses nursing knowledge to observe and assess presenting situations, identify a prioritized patient concern, and generate the best possible evidence-based solutions in order to deliver safe patient care.”  The NCSBN administers the national licensure exam (NCLEX) that measures nursing clinical judgment and decision-making ability of prospective entry-level nurses to assure safe and competent nursing care by licensed nurses.

Exercises: Pre-class:

Watch the video prior to class and be ready to discuss in the class. See the task below the video .

In-class discussion:

 Give an example of how you have used critical thinking, decision making & clinical reasoning in everyday life.  

I. Clinical Judgment and Nursing

When collecting subjective and objective data, you need to consider clinical judgment. In nursing, the purpose of health assessment is to facilitate  clinical judgment , which is defined as:

• A determination about a client’s health and illness status.
• Their health concerns and needs.
• The capacity to engage in their own care. AND
• The decision to intervene/act or not – and if action is required, what action (Tanner, 2006).

The nursing process is the foundation of clinical judgment. However, clinical judgment is more comprehensive, action-oriented, and guided by the philosophy of client safety. Thus, it is important to learn when to act to prevent  clinical   deterioration , a worsening clinical state related to physiological decompensation (Padilla & Mayo, 2017).

To facilitate clinical judgment, you must determine if the collected data represent normal findings or abnormal finding. When findings are abnormal, you must act on these cues as they signal a potential concern and require action. Failing to recognize abnormal findings and act on these cues can lead to negative consequences including sub-optimal health and wellness – and more importantly,  clinical   deterioration . Some abnormal findings are considered critical finding that place the client at further risk if the nurse does not act immediately.

The process leading to clinical judgment is described as  clinical   reasoning . This process involves:

• Thoughtfully considering all client data as a whole, whether each piece of information is relevant or irrelevant, and how each piece of information is related or not related.
• Recognizing and analyzing  cues. Is the information collected a normal, abnormal, or critical finding? Can the information be clustered to inform your clinical judgment?
• Interpreting problems. What is the priority problem and what are the factors causing it? What else do you need to assess to validate or invalidate your interpretation? What other information do you need to collect to make an accurate clinical judgment?

The clinical reasoning process is encompassed by  critical thinking . This means that when engaging in the process of clinical reasoning, you should systematically analyze your own thinking so that the outcomes are clear, rational, creative, and objective with limited risk of judgment and error.

Clinical Judgement 

A client tells you “I have a headache.” As the nurse, you immediately recognize the cue: headache. However, you do not have sufficient information to analyze this cue and identify the significance. Thus, you may ask a series of subjective questions such as “When did the headache start? What were you doing when it started? Have you ever had this type of headache before?” The client’s response will provide you detailed information to facilitate your critical thinking and the process of hypothesizing what is going on, and thereby helping you determine what actions to take.

Clinical judgement is facilitated by cognitive steps that help you determine when and how to act to prevent clinical deterioration; see  Table 6.1 . Like the nursing process, these steps should be performed in an iterative manner as per the client situation and your clinical reasoning process.

Table 6.1 : Clinical judgment steps (developed based on NCSBN, 2020)

Exercises:  Check Your Understanding

Discussion: Watch the video below and Discuss

 Video: NCSBN (National Council of State Boards of Nursing) : Clinical Judgment -The Next Generation NCLEX (NGN) – Right Decisions Come from Right Questions.

Discuss relevance of Clinical Judgment in nursing practice.

II. Priorities of Care

Why is clinical judgment important? How does it guide the provision of care?

Clinical judgment is important to ensure the nurse’s actions are based on the client’s most important needs. Clients often have several needs, and some are more important than others. As such, nurses need to assess and evaluate the  priorities   of care:  what actions are most important to take first, and then what actions can follow. Typically, priority actions are those that prevent clinical deterioration and death.

Exercises: CURE Hierarchy

• The CURE hierarchy has been introduced to help novice nurses better understand how to manage competing patient needs. The CURE hierarchy uses the acronym “CURE” to help guide prioritization based on identifying the differences among C ritical needs,  U rgent needs,  R outine needs, and  E xtras.

You are the nurse caring for the patients in the following table.  For each patient, indicate if this is a “critical,” “urgent,” “routine,” or “extra” need.

III. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Priorities of care can be determined using several frameworks such as  Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.  For example, at the most basic level, life requires an open airway to breathe, the physiological process of breathing, and the circulation of blood and oxygen throughout the body. Airway, breathing, and circulation are the ABCs, which you might have learned if you have taken a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) course.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs was developed to consider  basic human needs  and motivations of healthy individuals (Bouzenita & Wood Boulanouar, 2016; Francis & Kritsonsis, 2006; Gambrel & Cianci, 2003). Although not well known, Maslow’s work was closely influenced by the Blackfoot tribe in Canada (James & Lunday, 2014). One version includes  five  levels of needs: those related to  physiological, safety, love, esteem,  and  self-actualization  (Maslow, 1943), which can help prioritize care in nursing.  Figure 6 .2  presents one adapted version of Maslow’s Hierarchy.

Figure 6.2 : Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs (see attribution statement at bottom of page)

Drawing upon this framework, a nurse can use health assessments to explore five levels of needs:

• Are these basic physiological needs being met? Is the client’s breathing and circulation supported?
•  Does the client feel safe and secure in general in life? Does the client feel safe and secure in the healthcare environment? Is the bed lowered to the lowest position when you finish your assessment? Is the call bell in reach?
• Does the client feel love and belongingness in general in their relationships? More specifically, does the client feel cared for by nurses and other healthcare providers?
• Does the client feel respected and valued in general by others? Does the client feel respected and valued within the healthcare environment?
• What is important to the client in terms of what they want to achieve in life in general? What are the client’s goals that they may have for themselves in their own health and healing journey? Does the client feel satisfied, confident, and accomplished?

You can use Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs as a guide, but it is important to be aware of the  critiques  and possible limitations in its application. See  Video 6.1  of a conversation between Dr. Lisa Seto Nielsen and Mahidhar Pemasani.

Video 6.1 : A discussion about Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

Criticisms of Maslow’s hierarchy  are related to it being ethnocentric, based on individualistic societies, and not necessarily taking into account diversity in culture, gender, and age (Bouzenita & Wood Boulanouar, 2016; Francis & Kritsonsis, 2006; Gambrel & Cianci, 2003). It should not be arbitrarily applied to all healthcare encounters. Although you may initially focus on physiological needs to ensure the client is stable, the client may have different priorities that are more important to them. By drawing upon Indigenous knowledge, it is vital to recognize the role of community and advocacy in reaching self actualization at every level (Bennett & Shangreaux, 2005). This is particularly important in the context of systemic racism and oppression and the existing disparities among racialized populations including Black communities and Indigenous People.

IV. Levels of Priority of Care

Because of the importance of recognizing clinical deterioration in a client, a nurse must always be attuned to the set of physiological needs that are important to maintain life and prevent death. These priorities of care are related to the ABCs – airway, breathing, and circulation – introduced above. These priorities of care are often categorized as first, second, or third level, with the first level taking a priority (see  Table 6.2 ).

Table 6.2 : Priorities of care

With regard to levels of care, it is essential to consider what is  most important to the client . You should treat the client as the expert in their own life – and also as the expert in decisions about their own healthcare, if they choose. Although a client may have plummeting blood pressure, you need to consider tailoring the intervening action to their wishes. Some clients may not wish for intervention in a life-threatening circumstance. Therefore, you always need to be open to the client’s wishes, but also consider whether they are able to weigh the consequences of their decision (i.e., are they competent to consent?).

Urgent Priorities of Care: Mental Health 

In practice, mental health is typically not categorized as a first- or second-level priority of care unless the client is showing signs of clinical deterioration based on the examples noted in  Table 6.3 . In some situations, mental health may be positioned as a third-level priority of care, for example when a client is experiencing anxiety, depression, grief, but shows no signs of suicidal ideation. These symptoms should be addressed, but according to this framework, they are considered less urgent compared to first- and second-level priorities of care. However, sometimes, you should think differently about how  mental health   is a priority of care .

In some situations,  mental health may take precedence.  For example, a client who has attempted suicide or has just overdosed will probably have other physical symptoms as a result and therefore require urgent intervention and constant observation as per  Table 6.3 . However, the descriptions of the priorities of care presented in the table do not account for a client who has voiced a specific plan for suicide and has identified when and how. This client is at very high risk and requires urgent intervention regardless of what may be viewed as their physical health state or history. The description of priorities of care listed above does not account for this except as a third-level priority – but a client with suicide ideation or has voiced wanting to hurt others requires urgent action to protect their own wellbeing and others and the possibility of clinical deterioration as a result of their actions.

V. Intervention Types

As illustrated by the text box above, you will need to use your own judgement to determine how to act when a cue presents itself and how to categorize these interventions. This could involve four general  types of interventions  that you need to be aware of (see  Table 6.3 ) including  effective, ineffective, unrelated,  and  contraindicated.  These types of interventions will become more clear as you begin to learn about normal, abnormal, and critical findings for various body systems, and how interventions and actions will affect these findings and the client.

Table 6.3:  Types of interventions

Exercises: In-Class

2. SPOTLIGHT APPLICATION: https://wtcs.pressbooks.pub/nursingmpc/chapter/2-6-spotlight-application/

Sam is a novice nurse who is reporting to work for his 0600 shift on the medical telemetry/progressive care floor. He is waiting to receive handoff report from the night shift nurse for his assigned patients. The information that he has received thus far regarding his patient assignment includes the following:

• Room 501:  64-year-old patient admitted last night with heart failure exacerbation. Patient received furosemide 80mg IV push at 2000 with 1600 mL urine output. He is receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 2L/minute. According to the night shift aide, he has been resting comfortably overnight.
• Room 507:  74-year-old patient admitted yesterday for possible cardioversion due to new onset of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Is scheduled for transesophageal echocardiogram and possible cardioversion at 1000.
• Room 512:  82-year-old patient who is scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery today at 0700 and is receiving an insulin infusion.
• Room 536:  72-year-old patient who had a negative heart catheterization yesterday but experienced a groin bleed; plans for discharge this morning.

Based on the limited information Sam has thus far, he begins to prioritize his activities for the morning. With what is known thus far regarding his patient assignment, whom might Sam plan to see first and why? What principles of prioritization might be applied?

  Clinical Judgment Review:  Think, Pair, Share

Read the case scenario and complete the activity below.

Case Scenario

Client admitted to orthopedic unit following an open reduction internal fixation of right lower tibia and fibula. Client was brought to the emergency department by family after falling on the stairs at home. Client reports pain currently 4 out of 10 and tolerable. Right lower leg in cast, elevated on pillows. Toes warm, capillary refill < 3 seconds, client denies numbness or tingling. Client reminded of non-weight bearing status on the right leg. Reviewed prescriptions and expectations for hospital stay. Client asks, “Why do I need insulin? I don’t have diabetes. The last time I saw my doctor, I was just told to eat less sweets and try to walk more often.”

  Instructions:

Pair with another student and complete the following activity on a 3×5 card.

Share your answers with the class.

Lab values are numbers (example: 2.5, 80, etc.)

• List three lab values that indicates your patient’s condition is improving
• List three lab values that indicates your patient’s condition is worsening
• List a priority nursing intervention based on one of these lab values

VI. Reflections

Prepare for the librarian visit.

• Have few EBP articles ready to discuss with the librarian
• Choose an EBP article for the EBP assignment

Key Takeaways

Type your key takeaways here.

Assignment: Review Blackboard for details

• MC Library Tutorial APA Format and Quiz (90%) 2.5 points.
• Library Tutorial- Academic Integrity & Avoiding Plagiarism Quiz (90%) 2.5 points.

VII. Recommended Resources

CLINICAL JUDGMENT MEASUREMENT MODEL: https://www.nclex.com/clinical-judgment-measurement-model.page

Getting Ready for the Next-Generation NCLEX ® (NGN): How to Shift from the Nursing Process to Clinical Judgment in Nursing: https://evolve.elsevier.com/education/expertise/next-generation-nclex/ngn-transitioning-from-the-nursing-process-to-clinical-judgment/

References and Attributes

• Klenke-Borgmann, L., Cantrell, M. A., & Mariani, B. (2020). Nurse educator’s guide to clinical judgment: A review of conceptualization, measurement, and development. Nursing Education Perspectives, 41(4), 215-221.
• Dickison, P., Haerling, K., & Lasater, K. (2019). Integrating the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Model into nursing educational frameworks.  Journal of Nursing Education ,  58 (2), 72-78.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190122-03
• NCSBN (2020, Spring). Next Generation NCLEX news .  https://www.ncsbn.org/NGN_Spring20_Eng_02.pdf
• Padilla, R., & Mayo, A. (2017). Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing ,  27 , 1360-1368.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14238
• Tanner, C. (2006). Thinking like a nurse: A research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education ,  45 (6), 204-211.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20060601-04
• Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review ,  50 (4), 370-396.  https://doi .org/ 10.1037/h0054346
• Bennett, M., & Shangreaux, C. (2005). Applying Maslow’s Hierarchy Theory. First Peoples Child & Family Review: a Journal of Innovation and Best Practices in Aboriginal Child Welfare Administration, Research, Policy & Practice ,  2 (1)89-116. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069540ar
• Bouzenita, A. I. & Wood Boulanouar, A. (2016). Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: An Islamic critique. Intellectual Discourse ,  24 (1), 59-81.
• Francis, N.H. & Kritsonis, W.A. (2006). A brief analysis of Abraham Maslow’s original writing of self-actualizing people: A study of psychological health. Doctoral Forum: National Journal of Publishing and Mentoring Doctoral Student Research , 3(1), 1-7. 
• Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning: https://med.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Nursing/Nursing_Management_and_Professional_Concepts_(OpenRN)/02%3A_Prioritization/2.04%3A_Critical_Thinking_and_Clinical_Reasoning
• Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN) Nursing Management and Professional Concepts   by Chippewa Valley Technical College 

The Novice Nurse's Guide to Professional Nursing Practice Copyright © by Kunjamma George and rbertiz is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Critical thinking in nursing clinical practice, education and research: From attitudes to virtue

Affiliations.

• 1 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group Quantitative Psychology (2017-SGR-269), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 2 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, Consolidated Research Group on Gender, Identity and Diversity (2017-SGR-1091), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 3 Department of Fundamental Care and Medical Surgital Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
• 4 Multidisciplinary Nursing Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
• PMID: 33029860
• DOI: 10.1111/nup.12332

Critical thinking is a complex, dynamic process formed by attitudes and strategic skills, with the aim of achieving a specific goal or objective. The attitudes, including the critical thinking attitudes, constitute an important part of the idea of good care, of the good professional. It could be said that they become a virtue of the nursing profession. In this context, the ethics of virtue is a theoretical framework that becomes essential for analyse the critical thinking concept in nursing care and nursing science. Because the ethics of virtue consider how cultivating virtues are necessary to understand and justify the decisions and guide the actions. Based on selective analysis of the descriptive and empirical literature that addresses conceptual review of critical thinking, we conducted an analysis of this topic in the settings of clinical practice, training and research from the virtue ethical framework. Following JBI critical appraisal checklist for text and opinion papers, we argue the need for critical thinking as an essential element for true excellence in care and that it should be encouraged among professionals. The importance of developing critical thinking skills in education is well substantiated; however, greater efforts are required to implement educational strategies directed at developing critical thinking in students and professionals undergoing training, along with measures that demonstrate their success. Lastly, we show that critical thinking constitutes a fundamental component in the research process, and can improve research competencies in nursing. We conclude that future research and actions must go further in the search for new evidence and open new horizons, to ensure a positive effect on clinical practice, patient health, student education and the growth of nursing science.

Keywords: critical thinking; critical thinking attitudes; nurse education; nursing care; nursing research.

© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

• Attitude of Health Personnel*
• Education, Nursing / methods
• Nursing Process
• Nursing Research / methods

Grants and funding

• PREI-19-007-B/School of Nursing. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University of Barcelona

Clinical Reasoning In Nursing (Explained W/ Example)

Last updated on August 19th, 2023

In this article, we will cover:

What is Clinical Reasoning?

Definition of clinical reasoning in nursing.

• What is the concept of clinical reasoning?

Why is Clinical Reasoning Important in Nursing?

What are the types of clinical reasoning, what are the three elements of clinical reasoning, what are the steps of clinical reasoning, what is the importance of clinical reasoning and judgement in nursing, what is the difference between critical thinking and clinical reasoning, clinical reasoning in nursing example.

Clinical reasoning refers to the cognitive process that healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and other clinicians, use to analyze and make decisions about a patient’s condition and appropriate treatment.

It’s a complex and dynamic process that involves gathering and interpreting information from various sources, including patient history, physical examinations, laboratory tests, imaging studies, and the clinician’s own experience and knowledge.

Medicine, physical therapy, and occupational therapy were the first to introduce clinical reasoning to the healthcare disciplines. Since then, the nursing profession has used these strategies to improve patient care.

What is Clinical Reasoning in Nursing?

Clinical reasoning in nursing is dynamic and adaptive, as nurses continuously gather new information and adjust care plans based on patient responses.

It’s a crucial skill that guides nurses in providing safe, effective, and patient-centered care. Clinical reasoning involves the integration of clinical knowledge, critical thinking , and experience to address the complex and dynamic nature of patient situations.

It involves balancing medical knowledge with critical thinking , empathy, and ethical considerations to provide comprehensive and compassionate patient care.

Clinical reasoning in nursing refers to the cognitive process that nurses use to collect and assess patient information, analyze data, make informed judgments, and develop appropriate care plans.

What is the Concept of Clinical Reasoning?

Clinical reasoning is the cognitive process used by healthcare professionals to make informed decisions regarding patient care.

It encompasses tasks such as collecting information, analyzing data, identifying patterns, generating hypotheses, and making judgments for diagnosis and treatment.

Clinical reasoning blends science and intuition in medical practice. It combines evidence-based knowledge with experience-derived judgment to attain accurate diagnoses and treatments while addressing uncertainties.

As an essential component of clinical practice, clinical reasoning guides healthcare providers in delivering safe and effective patient care.

Clinical reasoning is important in nursing for several reasons. Some reasons are listed below.

Patient-Centered Care:

Clinical reasoning helps nurses tailor care plans to individual patients, considering their unique needs, preferences, and circumstances, leading to more personalized and effective care.

Safe and Effective Care:

It ensures that nurses make well-informed decisions based on thorough assessments, reducing the risk of errors and promoting patient safety.

Optimal Outcomes:

Through clinical reasoning, nurses can identify early signs of complications, make timely interventions, and contribute to better patient outcomes.

Nurtured Critical Thinking:

Clinical reasoning cultivates nurses’ critical thinking abilities, empowering them to dissect complex situations, appraise evidence, and make rational choices.

Efficient Resource Utilization:

It helps nurses prioritize care tasks, allocate resources effectively, and manage time efficiently, enhancing workflow and patient care delivery.

Evidence-Based Practice:

Nursing practice is constantly evolving with new research and evidence. Clinical reasoning involves integrating the latest evidence-based knowledge into decision-making, ensuring that care plans are aligned with the best available practices.

Complex Cases:

Nurses often encounter intricate patient cases; clinical reasoning equips them to navigate complexity, address multiple issues, and make comprehensive care plans.

Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Effective clinical reasoning supports collaboration with other healthcare professionals, promoting well-rounded patient care.

Adaptation to Change:

In rapidly changing healthcare environments, clinical reasoning enables nurses to adapt to new information, technologies, and practices.

Critical Decision-Making:

Nurses face complex situations where quick and accurate decisions are critical. Clinical reasoning equips them with the ability to analyze data, identify patterns, and generate hypotheses. This enables nurses to make informed decisions about interventions, medications, and treatments, leading to effective care.

Early Detection and Prevention:

Through clinical reasoning, nurses can detect subtle changes in a patient’s condition that might signal complications or deterioration. This allows for early interventions, preventing potential health crises and improving patient prognosis.

Error Reduction:

Clinical reasoning encourages systematic thinking, reducing the likelihood of errors in administering medications, performing procedures, and assessing patients. This promotes patient safety and prevents adverse events.

Holistic Care:

Patient’s health is influenced by various factors beyond just medical conditions. Clinical reasoning enables nurses to consider the social, emotional, and psychological aspects of patients, promoting holistic care and overall well-being.

Ethical Dilemmas:

Nursing often involves ethical challenges. Clinical reasoning guides nurses in making ethically sound decisions by considering patients’ autonomy, values, and cultural beliefs.

Communication and Collaboration:

Clinical reasoning enhances nurses’ ability to communicate effectively with patients, families, and other healthcare professionals. It fosters collaboration by enabling nurses to articulate their assessments, interventions, and rationales clearly.

Professional Growth:

Developing strong clinical reasoning skills enhances nurses’ professional growth. It increases their confidence, competence, and ability to take on more complex patient cases and leadership roles.

In summary , clinical reasoning is an important component of nursing practice, allowing nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

It enables nurses to make informed decisions, improve patient outcomes, and navigate the dynamic and complex healthcare setting.

Clinical reasoning involves three key elements that healthcare professionals integrate to make informed decisions about patient care:

1. Patient Information:

This element encompasses all the relevant data about the patient’s medical history, current condition, symptoms, physical examination findings, diagnostic test results, and social and contextual factors.

Gathering comprehensive and accurate patient information is essential for forming an accurate understanding of the patient’s health status and needs.

2. Clinical Knowledge and Expertise:

Healthcare professionals draw upon their extensive medical knowledge, clinical experience, and expertise to interpret patient information.

This knowledge includes an understanding of anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology, pharmacology, and medical guidelines.

Clinical expertise is built over years of practice, exposure to a variety of cases, and ongoing learning.

3. Critical Thinking and Decision-Making Skills:

Critical thinking involves the analytical and logical thought processes that healthcare professionals use to evaluate patient information in the context of their clinical knowledge.

It includes the ability to identify patterns, assess potential diagnoses, consider alternative explanations, and weigh the pros and cons of different treatment options.

Effective decision-making is the outcome of critical thinking , as healthcare professionals choose the most appropriate course of action based on the available information.

These three elements are interdependent and work together to form the foundation of clinical reasoning.

Healthcare professionals integrate patient information with their clinical knowledge and expertise while applying critical thinking skills to reach accurate diagnoses, develop effective treatment plans, and provide high-quality patient care.

The balance between these elements varies based on the complexity of the clinical situation and the healthcare provider’s level of experience and expertise.

8 Stages of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle

Clinical reasoning involves several key steps:

1. Data Collection: Gathering relevant information about the patient’s medical history, symptoms, physical examination findings, and any diagnostic tests that have been conducted.

2. Pattern Recognition: Recognizing patterns and relationships in the collected data to identify potential diagnoses or issues. This involves comparing the patient’s presentation to previous cases and medical knowledge.

3. Hypothesis Generation: Formulating hypotheses or possible explanations for the patient’s condition based on the patterns and information observed. This step often involves generating a list of potential diagnoses that fit the available evidence.

4. Differential Diagnosis: Narrowing down the list of potential diagnoses by considering the likelihood of each condition and ruling out less likely options. This is where critical thinking and medical knowledge come into play.

5. Testing and Validation: Ordering further diagnostic tests or investigations to confirm or rule out specific diagnoses. This could include blood tests, imaging studies, biopsies, or other procedures.

6. Synthesis: Integrating the results of diagnostic tests and additional information to refine the diagnosis and treatment plan. This may involve adjusting the initial hypotheses based on new data.

7. Treatment Planning: Developing a comprehensive treatment plan that addresses the diagnosed condition, the patient’s unique circumstances, preferences, and any potential risks or benefits of various treatment options.

8. Monitoring and Adaptation: Continuously monitoring the patient’s progress and adjusting the treatment plan as needed based on how the patient responds and any new information that emerges.

Clinical reasoning requires a deep understanding of medical science, anatomy, physiology, and pathology, as well as the ability to apply this knowledge to real-world clinical scenarios.

It also involves critical thinking skills , logical reasoning, and the ability to handle uncertainty, as medical situations can be complex and patients may present with atypical symptoms.

Overall, clinical reasoning is a crucial skill for healthcare professionals, as it forms the foundation for making accurate diagnoses and providing effective patient care.

Clinical reasoning and judgment are of paramount importance in nursing for several reasons:

• Accurate Diagnosis and Treatment: Effective clinical reasoning enables nurses to accurately assess patients’ conditions, identify potential problems, and make informed decisions about appropriate interventions and treatments. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are crucial for improving patient outcomes and preventing complications.
• Patient Safety: Sound clinical judgment helps nurses recognize potential risks and make timely interventions to ensure patient safety. By identifying early signs of deterioration or complications, nurses can take appropriate actions to prevent adverse events.
• Individualized Care: Clinical reasoning allows nurses to tailor care plans to each patient’s unique needs, preferences, and circumstances. This patient-centered approach improves patient satisfaction and contributes to better treatment outcomes.
• Early Detection of Changes: Nurses often spend the most time with patients, which puts them in a prime position to notice subtle changes in a patient’s condition. Strong clinical reasoning skills enable nurses to detect these changes early and respond appropriately.
• Effective Communication: Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can communicate more effectively with patients, families, and interdisciplinary healthcare teams. They can convey complex medical information, treatment plans, and concerns in a clear and organized manner.
• Ethical Decision-Making: Clinical reasoning includes ethical considerations in decision-making. Nurses must weigh the ethical implications of their actions and decisions, especially when faced with complex situations that involve moral dilemmas.
• Resource Utilization: Effective clinical reasoning helps nurses allocate resources efficiently. By accurately assessing patient needs and prioritizing care, nurses can optimize the use of time, personnel, and equipment.
• Adaptation to Change: Healthcare is dynamic, and patients’ conditions can change rapidly. Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can adapt quickly to changing situations, making necessary adjustments to care plans and interventions.
• Continuity of Care: Nurses often play a critical role in ensuring continuity of care as patients transition between different healthcare settings. Effective clinical reasoning facilitates clear communication of patient information and ensures a smooth transition of care.
• Professional Growth: Developing clinical reasoning and judgment skills enhances a nurse’s professional growth. These skills are transferrable and applicable across various healthcare settings, allowing nurses to provide high-quality care regardless of the environment.
• Confidence and Job Satisfaction: Nurses who feel confident in their clinical reasoning abilities experience greater job satisfaction. Confidence comes from knowing that decisions are based on a solid foundation of knowledge, experience, and critical thinking.
• Advocacy: Nurses with strong clinical reasoning skills can effectively advocate for their patients, ensuring that their needs are met, their voices are heard, and their rights are respected within the healthcare system.
• Quality Improvement: Clinical reasoning plays a role in quality improvement efforts by identifying areas for improvement in patient care processes and outcomes.

In summary, clinical reasoning and judgment are essential for nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered care.

These skills underpin the entire nursing process, enabling nurses to make informed decisions, communicate effectively, and positively impact patient outcomes and experiences.

Critical Thinking :

Critical thinking is a cognitive process that involves analyzing, evaluating, and synthesizing information, ideas, and arguments to make reasoned judgments and decisions.

It is a broader skill applicable to various aspects of life and professions, encouraging logical, evidence-based thinking and minimizing biases.

Critical thinking aims to enhance problem-solving, decision-making, and analytical abilities in a wide range of contexts beyond healthcare.

Clinical Reasoning:

Clinical reasoning, on the other hand, is a specialized form of critical thinking that is primarily focused on healthcare and clinical situations.

It specifically pertains to the cognitive process healthcare professionals, especially nurses and doctors, use to collect, assess, analyze, and apply information to make informed clinical judgments and decisions.

Clinical reasoning is crucial for providing safe and effective patient care, as it integrates medical knowledge, patient assessments, ethical considerations, and treatment planning.

Critical Thinking vs. Clinical Reasoning

Clinical reasoning can be categorized into different types or approaches. Each of which represents a particular way of thinking and making decisions in clinical practice.

Some of the commonly recognized types of clinical reasoning include:

• Deductive Reasoning: This type of reasoning starts with a general principle or theory and applies it to a specific case. Healthcare professionals use deductive reasoning to make predictions or decisions based on established medical knowledge. For example, if a patient presents with a set of symptoms consistent with a well-known disease, the clinician may deduce that the patient likely has that disease.
• Inductive Reasoning: In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning involves making generalizations or conclusions based on specific observations or cases. Clinicians use inductive reasoning to form hypotheses or theories from individual patient experiences. For instance, a nurse may notice a pattern of symptoms in several patients and develop a hypothesis about a potential new condition.
• Abductive Reasoning: Abductive reasoning combines elements of both deductive and inductive reasoning. It involves making educated guesses or hypotheses to explain observations or data that don’t fit neatly into established patterns. Clinicians use abductive reasoning when they encounter cases that don’t seem to fit existing diagnoses or models, and they generate plausible explanations to guide further investigation.
• Analytical Reasoning: This type of reasoning involves systematically breaking down a complex situation or problem into smaller parts to understand its components and relationships. Healthcare professionals use analytical reasoning to dissect complex patient cases, focusing on details and relationships to arrive at a diagnosis or treatment plan.
• Intuitive Reasoning: Intuitive reasoning relies on a healthcare professional’s experience, intuition, and gut feeling. It involves drawing on one’s own clinical experience and recognizing patterns that may not be immediately apparent. Intuitive reasoning is often employed in situations where rapid decision-making is necessary.
• Procedural Reasoning: Procedural reasoning focuses on the steps or processes needed to manage a clinical situation. It involves thinking about the sequence of actions required to address a patient’s needs. For example, a nurse may use procedural reasoning when administering medications, performing wound care, or carrying out other routine clinical procedures.
• Narrative Reasoning: Narrative reasoning involves considering the patient’s story, values, and context as essential components of clinical decision-making. It emphasizes understanding the patient’s perspective and tailoring care plans to the individual’s unique circumstances.
• Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: This approach involves generating and testing hypotheses systematically to arrive at a diagnosis. Healthcare professionals consider various possible diagnoses, then order specific tests to confirm or rule out each hypothesis.
• Pattern Recognition Reasoning: This type of reasoning relies on recognizing familiar patterns based on clinical experience and knowledge. Healthcare providers quickly identify common clinical presentations and apply established treatment protocols.

Emily Davis, a 68-year-old woman, is admitted to the medical unit with a diagnosis of Acute Exacerbation of COPD. She has a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and has been experiencing increased shortness of breath, cough, and decreased oxygen saturation levels.

How does your understanding of nursing fundamentals influence your clinical reasoning?

Nursing Action:

• Reflect on the nursing care provided to patients with COPD and respiratory distress.

• Review the pharmacologic treatments that will improve the patient’s COPD.

• Reflect the non-pharmacologic measures that will help to improve the patient’s respiratory distress.

• Determine the most appropriate assessments and interventions for managing respiratory distress in patients with COPD.

Implementation of Interventions:

• Assess Emily’s respiratory rate, depth, and effort, as well as oxygen saturation levels.

• Administer prescribed bronchodilators, and nebulization to improve airway patency.

• Elevate the head of the bed to promote better lung expansion.

• Encourage deep breathing exercises and effective coughing techniques.

• Consult with the physician to determine pharmacologic therapy

• Monitor Emily’s response to interventions and adjust care as needed. How does your understanding of pathophysiology guide your clinical reasoning?

• Knowledge of COPD’s pathophysiology helps anticipate complications and tailor interventions.

In this scenario, the nurse’s grasp of nursing fundamentals enables them to provide appropriate care for a patient with COPD.

By considering the patient’s history and symptoms, the nurse takes action to manage respiratory distress.

Implementing interventions such as bronchodilators and elevation of the head of the bed aligns with nursing knowledge.

Additionally, understanding the pathophysiology of COPD aids in predicting potential complications and choosing interventions to support the patient’s respiratory function.

• What is Critical Thinking in Nursing? (Explained W/ Examples)
• How To Improve Critical Thinking Skills In Nursing? 24 Strategies With Examples
• What Are Socratic Questions?
• What is the “5 Whys” Technique?
• 15 Attitudes of Critical Thinking in Nursing (Explained W/ Examples)

Clinical reasoning in nursing involves the skillful integration of medical knowledge, critical thinking , and patient assessment to make informed decisions about patient care.

It enables nurses to provide safe, effective, and patient-centered interventions while considering individual needs and complex healthcare situations.

Comments are closed.

Medical & Legal Disclaimer

All the contents on this site are for entertainment, informational, educational, and example purposes ONLY. These contents are not intended to be used as a substitute for professional medical advice or practice guidelines. However, we aim to publish precise and current information. By using any content on this website, you agree never to hold us legally liable for damages, harm, loss, or misinformation. Read the  privacy policy  and  terms and conditions.

Privacy Policy

Terms & Conditions

© 2024 nurseship.com. All rights reserved.

Find Study Materials for

• Business Studies
• Combined Science
• Computer Science
• Engineering
• English Literature
• Environmental Science
• Human Geography
• Macroeconomics
• Microeconomics
• Social Studies
• Browse all subjects
• Read our Magazine

Create Study Materials

Explore the essentials of Critical Thinking in Nursing with this comprehensive guide. In a field where informed, calculated decisions frequently tip the scale between life and death, mastering these skills is imperative. Delve into its definition, uncover key principles, and navigate your way towards effective application in your clinical placements. From formulating constructive questions to evaluating real-life examples, this guide will aid you in recognising the importance that critical thinking holds in the realm of nursing. Grasp its implications within practice and appreciate its indispensable role in nursing education .

Explore our app and discover over 50 million learning materials for free.

• Critical Thinking in Nursing
• Explanations
• StudySmarter AI
• Textbook Solutions
• AACN Essentials
• Active Listening in Nursing
• Advanced Procedures
• Barriers in Communication in Nursing
• Basic Procedures
• Bedside Manners
• Blood Pressure Measurement
• Brazil Healthcare system
• Building Rapport
• CPR Training
• Canadian Medicare
• Catheterisation
• Clinical Assessment
• Clinical Competence
• Clinical Decision-Making
• Clinical Experience
• Clinical Exposure
• Clinical Judgment
• Clinical Learning Activities
• Clinical Learning Environment
• Clinical Learning Outcomes
• Clinical Outcomes
• Clinical Practice Guidelines
• Clinical Reasoning in Nursing
• Clinical Rotation
• Clinical Scenarios
• Clinical Simulation Scenarios
• Clinical Skill Demonstration
• Clinical Skills
• Clinical Skills Assessment
• Clinical Supervision
• Clinical Training
• Clustering Data
• Collaborative Interventions
• Collaborative Practice
• Comfort Care
• Communication Strategies in Healthcare
• Conflict Resolution
• Coordination of Care
• Critical Reflection
• Cultural Responsiveness
• Direct Patient Care
• Disease Prevention
• E-learning modules
• Empathy in Nursing
• Error Reporting
• Ethical Principles in Nursing
• Ethical Standards
• France Healthcare System
• Germany Healthcare System
• Hands on Learning
• Health Assessment
• Health Care Delivery
• Health Care Policy
• Health Care Service
• Health Care System Structure
• Health Care Teamwork
• Health Promotion
• Health Teaching
• Healthcare Service Delivery
• Healthcare Systems
• Healthcare Team
• Hospital Protocol
• Human Error
• Hybrid Healthcare Systems
• IV Insertion
• Implicit Bias
• India Healthcare System
• Infection Control
• Interdisciplinary Collaboration
• Interpersonal Communications
• Japan Healthcare System
• Learning Opportunities
• Licensing Requirements
• Malpractice
• Medicare Australia
• Medication Administration
• Miscommunication in Nursing
• Morals in Nursing
• NHS Nursing
• Negligence in Nursing
• Non-therapeutic Communication
• Nurse Licensure Compact
• Nursing Care Assessment
• Nursing Care Delivery
• Nursing Care Plan Evaluation
• Nursing Care Plans
• Nursing Case Study
• Nursing Cues
• Nursing Diagnoses
• Nursing Documentation
• Nursing Education
• Nursing Inferences
• Nursing Interventions
• Nursing Judgment
• Nursing Outcomes Classification
• Nursing Procedures
• Nursing Process
• Patient Assessment
• Patient Care
• Patient Care Scenarios
• Patient Care Skills
• Patient Communication
• Patient Confidentiality
• Patient Education
• Patient Feedback
• Patient History Collection
• Patient Hygiene
• Patient Interaction
• Patient Interaction Skills
• Patient Management
• Patient Needs
• Patient Outcomes
• Patient Privacy
• Patient Safety
• Patient Safety Measures
• Patient-Centered Care
• Patient-Centered Interventions
• Private Healthcare
• Professional Accountability
• Professional Behavior
• Professional Ethics
• Professional Growth
• Professional Standards
• Public HealthCare
• Pulse and Respiratory Rate
• Recklessness
• SMART Goals
• Scope of Practice
• Simulation in Nursing Education
• Student Learning Objectives
• Swedish Healthcare System
• Teaching and Learning Methods in Nursing
• Team Communication
• Temperature Assessment
• Therapeutic Communication
• Therapeutic Interactions
• UK Healthcare System
• US Healthcare System
• US Medical Insurance
• Verbal Communication
• Virtual Reality Training
• Vital Signs
• Wellness Education
• Human Anatomy
• Intensive Care Nursing
• Mental Health Nursing
• Nursing Management
• Nursing Theories
• Types of Nursing

Lerne mit deinen Freunden und bleibe auf dem richtigen Kurs mit deinen persönlichen Lernstatistiken

Nie wieder prokastinieren mit unseren Lernerinnerungen.

Understanding Critical Thinking in Nursing

Critical thinking in nursing is a quintessential skill that the aspiring nurses need to learn and incorporate into their practice. It entails a systematic, logical, and reflective approach towards nursing care and decision-making, thus facilitating optimum patient outcomes . Mastery of this vital skill will significantly improve not just the quality of care you provide to your patients, but also your efficiency and effectiveness as a healthcare professional.

Definition of Critical Thinking in Nursing

Critical thinking in nursing refers to the deliberate cognitive process that nurses use to gather, interpret and evaluate information about their patients' health. It informs decision-making, problem-solving, and planning in delivering patient-centered care .

As a nursing professional, you'll encounter complex and unique patient scenarios that require rational, informed, and swift decisions. By applying critical thinking, you can ascertain the most appropriate interventions based on individual patient needs , clinical evidence, and best practice guidelines .

Here is a practical example: if you are presented with a patient who has a high fever, cough, and difficulty breathing , critical thinking plays a key role in your approach. You don’t just see these symptoms as a common cold. Instead, you consider more severe conditions, such as pneumonia or COVID-19, based on the patient's medical history and recent environmental exposure. Determining the right diagnosis relies on your ability to critically think and analyze all the patient information available.

Key Principles of Critical Thinking in Nursing

The principles of critical thinking in nursing guide you as you assess, interpret, and make decisions in your nursing practice.

• Integrity involves approaching situations with an open mind and a willingness to question your own assumptions.
• Accountability stresses the importance of taking responsibility for your decisions and actions.
• Clinical reasoning, which refers to applying reasoning and analytical skills in a clinical situation.
• Evidence-based practice means basing your interventions on the best current evidence from professional literature and guidelines.

The importance of critical thinking extends beyond clinical care delivery. It significantly impacts ethical issues, team communication , and risk management. As you make decisions, you must consider ethical principles like the rights of patients, their dignity, and justice. Effective team communication also hinges on critical thinking, as it enables you to articulate your ideas clearly, listen to others, and resolve conflicts.

In conclusion, understanding and employing critical thinking in nursing can be the difference between ordinary and exceptional nursing care. By honing these skills, you can better anticipate patient needs , make better decisions, and provide superior patient care .

Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Nursing

Developing strong critical thinking skills is crucial to the practice of nursing. This skill enhancement involves a variety of strategies, practice, and awareness of your thought processes. The key is to question and reflect on your working practices, engage in continuing professional development, and use evidence-based guidelines.

Strategies to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills

Enhancing critical thinking requires a diligent and thoughtful approach to your nursing practice. This progression is made feasible by implementing several strategies:

Reflective Journaling: This activity encourages you to reflect systematically on your actions, thoughts, and experiences. It aims to improve your understanding and thereby enhance your practice.

Reflective journaling can be achieved by writing about your daily experiences, patient interactions, clinical decisions, successes and challenges. The goal is to foster self-awareness and enhance your critical thinking through contemplative and thoughtful examination of your nursing practice.

For instance, if a patient in your care experienced an unexpected health decline, you could write about the signs that led to the event, your response, and what you could do differently in the future. Analyzing such situations helps you develop better judgement and decision-making skills.

Peer Reviews: Participating in peer reviews allows for constructive feedback and diversifying perspectives. It provides an opportunity to evaluate and learn from other professionals' approaches to patient care .

You may also employ critical thinking exercises, case study analysis, and group discussions to improve these skills.

It is important to remember that developing critical thinking skills isn't a one-time event but a continual learning process that needs to be integrated into your everyday nursing practice. It will require patience, time, and consistent effort.

Applying Critical Thinking Skills in Clinical Placement

Clinical placement provides a fantastic opportunity for you to apply your critical thinking skills in a realistic and supportive environment. It's where theoretical knowledge meets practical learning.

Clinical Reasoning Cycle: Clinical reasoning cycle is a step-by-step process used by nurses to gather information, process the information, come up with interventions, and assess the outcomes. Critical thinking is intrinsic to this process.

Identifying significant cues and collecting pertinent patient information, interpreting and analysing gathered data, evaluating outcomes, and reflecting on your performance - all of these stages require in-depth thinking and evaluation.

Imagine you're on your clinical placement in an emergency ward. A patient arrives with distressing symptoms such as chest pain, palpitations, and dizziness. By exercising critical thinking skills, you quickly connect these symptoms to possibily indicate a cardiac event. You promptly inform the physician, ensuring timely management and potentially saving the patient's life.

To apply critical thinking in clinical placements, always stay curious, ask questions, seek evidence, and don’t shy away from complex situations. Remember, guided experiences are a nurse's most valuable tool for skill development.

Practical Critical Thinking Questions in Nursing

Practical critical thinking questions are instrumental tools that can be used by nurses to enhance their reasoning abilities. These questions can stimulate the thought process, encouraging you to organise your thoughts, focus on the details, and make responsible and evidence-based decisions.

Examples of Critical Thinking Questions

To gain a better understanding of how practical questions can aid in facilitating critical thinking, consider the following examples:

• What are the patient's primary complaints and symptoms?
• How do these symptoms correlate with the patient's medical history?
• What could be the potential cause(s) of these symptoms?
• What additional information can be useful in making evidence-based decisions?
• What interventions are most suitable, and why?

These questions guide you in collecting relevant information, identifying potential issues, and making informed decisions regarding the plan of care. By regularly asking yourself these questions, you can develop a structured and consistent approach to patient care.

Implementing Critical Thinking Questions in Nursing Practice

Implementing critical thinking questions in your nursing practice can seem challenging at first, but with regular use, it can become second nature. It involves asking relevant questions concerning the patient's condition and reflecting on the responses to make a judgement.

To help with this, you can follow these steps:

• Collect all the relevant information from the patient, including their symptoms, medical history, and current medications.
• Analyse this information carefully and consider how it all connects. For instance, does the medical history explain the present symptoms?
• Consider different possibilities. What could be the potential disease or condition?
• Discuss your thoughts with your team or mentor. They may provide you with a different perspective or additional information that you might not have considered.
• Reflect on all available information and use your judgement to arrive at a decision. Remember to base your decision on the best available evidence and guidelines.

For example, imagine you're taking care of a patient who displays signs of confusion, abnormal behaviour and unsteady gait. Instead of considering this as a psychiatric issue, you delve deeper, keeping a broad differential diagnosis in mind. You understand these symptoms could be due to a multitude of reasons, including neurological disorders, metabolic abnormalities, or even intoxication. You then proceed to gather all the relevant information including a thorough medical history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory and imaging studies. By conducting a thorough evaluation and using critical thinking, you can reach a more accurate diagnosis.

Keep in mind, critical thinking is not about reaching a conclusion hastily; it's about taking the time to analyse all the information, consider all possible outcomes, and then make a reasoned judgement. Critical thinking questions are your ally in this process. They prompt you to go beyond surface-level observations and dig deeper, enabling you to provide the highest quality of patient care.

Evaluating Examples of Critical Thinking in Nursing

In nursing, critical thinking plays an immense role when it comes to patient care. Analysing clinical examples and case studies can prove to be an efficient way to understand and exercise this concept. These methods expose you to real-world situations where critical thinking is essential.

Clinical Examples of Effective Critical Thinking

There are countless clinical examples where effective critical thinking can define the difference between successful and unsuccessful patient outcomes .

Consider a patient who is experiencing severe abdominal pain on hospital admission. Their vitals are stable, but they're expressing an inability to urinate. They have no significant medical history, and initial investigations do not indicate any definitive diagnosis. It could be easy at this point to treat the situation as a case of urinary retention alone.

Nevertheless, by applying critical thinking, you point out that there is more to this situation than meets the eye. You are quick to understand that this could be an onset of an insidious condition such as abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). You take into account the patient’s age, the severity of the pain, its location, and the urinary symptoms. You call for immediate further investigations which confirm an emergent AAA that requires immediate surgical intervention.

Another common example is of a patient presenting with acute breathlessness and chest pain. Vital signs include tachycardia and decreased oxygen saturation levels. A routine approach might be to administer oxygen and provide symptomatic relief. However, you decide to critically analyse the entire situation with a broader perspective. You keep in mind the patient’s history of deep vein thrombosis and oral contraceptive use, eventually suspecting a pulmonary embolism . This leads to immediate administration of anticoagulation therapy, thus averting a potentially fatal outcome.

Case Studies Highlighting Critical Thinking

Case studies are a powerful tool that helps in understanding the application of critical thinking in nursing. They provide essential insights into real-life scenarios, demanding problem-solving and decision-making skills.

A case study may involve a patient with a long history of diabetes who presents with a non-healing wound on their foot. Routine wound care might help relieve the patient's discomfort temporarily, but it may not treat the underlying condition successfully. By engaging in critical thinking, you might suspect an undiagnosed case of diabetic foot and call for a comprehensive evaluation of peripheral blood circulation , foot sensation tests, and blood glucose control measures. This thought process not only initiates targeted treatment but also aids in preventing wound aggravation, possible infection, and serious consequences such as amputation .

Another case study could be a of a patient who is post-operative day 1 after abdominal surgery, presenting with confusion, restlessness and pallor. Unlike others who might suspect a reaction to anesthesia, considering the patient’s age and post-operative status, you think about acute blood loss and shock. You immediately assemble the surgical team and request re-evaluation. Your rapid decision-making, guided by critical thinking, results in detection of internal bleeding and the patient is swiftly taken for corrective surgery, averting a potential crisis.

Through these case studies and examples, it becomes clear that critical thinking can often mean the difference between life and death situations. It helps you to look beyond the obvious, encourages comprehensive patient assessment , facilitates recognition of potential complications, and promotes prompt intervention, thereby improving patient outcomes.

The Importance of Critical Thinking in Nursing

The realm of nursing inherently encompasses complexity and ambiguity. This is where the importance of critical thinking in nursing comes into play. This essential skill set empowers nurses to consider various factors that contribute to a patient's current health status, predict potential complications, decipher symptoms, and implement effective plans of care.

Implications of Critical Thinking in Nursing Practice

In nursing practice, critical thinking has widespread implications. From making accurate diagnoses to formulating efficient treatment plans, it plays an instrumental role.

Accurate Decision Making: Critical thinking aids in making accurate and informed decisions. These decisions impact patient care significantly and can enhance the quality of treatment provided.

Making accurate decisions requires one to analyse a range of information, consider potential consequences, and select an appropriate course of action. Such a practice can help prevent complications, minimise health risks, and promote recovery.

For instance, consider a patient admitted with fainting spells and bouts of dizziness. If you are quick to merely attribute these symptoms to dehydration without exploring other possibilities, you might miss an underlying cardiac problem. By thinking critically, you will consider all possible diagnoses, supporting investigations, and then decide the best approach.

Patient Safety : Critical thinking is instrumental in promoting patient safety . It enables nurses not only to detect impending health threats but also to act swiftly in the face of medical emergencies.

By using critical thinking, you can identify errors in medication administration , potential patient harm from treatment interventions, infection risks, and safety violations within the healthcare setting.

For example, a patient with a known allergy to penicillin has been mistakenly prescribed a medication containing a penicillin derivative. By critically examining the prescribed medications, you notice this error and prevent a possible allergic reaction, thereby ensuring patient safety .

Critical Thinking in Nursing Education: A Necessity

The integration of critical thinking in nursing education is now more crucial than ever. It is this skill that helps bring theoretical learning to practical fruition.

Theory-Practice Gap: Critical thinking aids in bridging the theory-practice gap in nursing education. It enables the application of theoretical knowledge into practical situations, enhancing learning and performance.

By employing critical thinking in education, students learn to analyse complex scenarios, solve clinical problems, and make informed decisions.

A nursing student in a pediatric rotation, for instance, comes across a child presenting with a high fever, irritability, and a rash. By critically thinking, the student can associate these symptoms to those learnt in theory, suspecting diseases like measles or roseola. Therefore, critical thinking helps to 'translate' classroom learning into a hands-on approach.

Preparing Future Nurses: Critical thinking education helps prepare future nurses to face the challenge of the ever-evolving healthcare environment. It enables them to grasp new concepts rapidly, adapt to change, develop innovative solutions, and engage in evidence-based practice.

To successfully navigate the complexities of the healthcare environment, nurses must master the ability to think critically, problem-solve, and make decisions based on solid evidence and sound reasoning.

Irrespective of the role or setting, critical thinking is a premier skill that every nurse must possess. It is the bedrock of nursing practice and education, forming the basis for maintaining standards, safety, and quality in patient care. Hence, cultivating these abilities must remain a prime focus in the journey of a nurse.

Critical Thinking in Nursing - Key takeaways

• Critical Thinking in Nursing refers to the ability to apply reasoning and analytical skills in various healthcare situations.
• Evidence-based practices are influential in enhancing critical thinking. These practices involve basing interventions on the current best evidence from professional literature and guidelines.
• Developing critical thinking skills involves strategies like questioning and reflecting on your practices, engaging in continuing professional development, and utilizing evidence-based guidelines.
• Practical critical thinking questions stimulate thought processes, enabling organization of thoughts, focusing on details, and making responsible decisions.
• The importance of critical thinking in nursing ranges from ethical issues and team communication to risk management, thereby playing a huge role in improving patient care.

Frequently Asked Questions about Critical Thinking in Nursing

--> what is the importance of critical thinking in nursing practice, --> how can nurses improve their critical thinking skills, --> what are the key steps used in critical thinking in nursing, --> can critical thinking in nursing influence patient outcomes, --> how does critical thinking in nursing contribute to clinical decision making, test your knowledge with multiple choice flashcards.

What is Critical Thinking in Nursing?

What are the elements of Critical Thinking in Nursing?

How does Critical Thinking in Nursing benefit Patient Care?

Your score:

Join the StudySmarter App and learn efficiently with millions of flashcards and more!

Learn with 30 critical thinking in nursing flashcards in the free studysmarter app.

Already have an account? Log in

Critical Thinking in Nursing is a cognitive process that involves systematic collection, interpretation, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of accurate data related to patient care to make informed decisions for optimal health outcomes.

The elements include interpretation (understanding and explaining the meaning of information), analysis (identifying the intended and actual inferential relationships), and evaluation (assessing the credibility of statements and the logical strength of the inferential relationships).

Critical Thinking in Nursing leads to enhanced patient care as it helps in interpreting and analysing patient data, evaluating potential risks, and making informed decisions, thus contributing to optimal health outcomes.

What is the role of critical thinking in nursing?

Critical thinking allows nurses to analyse complex situations, make sound judgments, and provide the best possible care. It is the backbone of clinical judgement and professional autonomy, enhancing patient safety, clinical outcomes, and the delivery of high-quality care.

How do critical thinking skills enhance the quality of nursing care?

Critical thinking skills enable nurses to accurately assess a slew of patient data, make informed clinical decisions considering various treatment options, and problem solve in complex health care environments, enhancing the quality of care provided.

What is the impact of critical thinking on patient outcomes?

Critical thinking aids in revising care plans when treatments fail, helps manage patients with complex conditions, and allows for quick and sound decision-making in emergencies. It also promotes team collaboration, resource utilisation, and evidence-based practice.

• Clinical Placement

of the users don't pass the Critical Thinking in Nursing quiz! Will you pass the quiz?

How would you like to learn this content?

Free nursing cheat sheet!

Everything you need to know on . A perfect summary so you can easily remember everything.

Join over 22 million students in learning with our StudySmarter App

The first learning app that truly has everything you need to ace your exams in one place

• Flashcards & Quizzes
• AI Study Assistant
• Study Planner
• Smart Note-Taking

Sign up to highlight and take notes. It’s 100% free.

This is still free to read, it's not a paywall.

You need to register to keep reading, create a free account to save this explanation..

Save explanations to your personalised space and access them anytime, anywhere!

By signing up, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and the Privacy Policy of StudySmarter.

Entdecke Lernmaterial in der StudySmarter-App

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• v.8(4); 2021 Jul

Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: A cross‐sectional study

Tuan van nguyen.

1 Faculty of Nursing and Medical Technology, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho Vietnam

2 School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan Taiwan

Hsueh‐Erh Liu

3 Department of Rheumatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Taiwan

4 Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Associated Data

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

To measure the level of critical thinking among Vietnamese professional nurses and to identify the related factors.

A cross‐sectional design was used.

The total sample included 420 professional nurses. Data were collected from July to September 2019 in three public hospitals located in Southwestern Vietnam. The level of critical thinking was measured using the Vietnamese version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire. The data were analysed using the independent Student's t tests, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation and regression analysis.

Most of the participants had a low (48.3%) or moderate (45.5%) level of critical thinking. Age, gender, ethnicity, education level, health condition, duration of working as a nurse, duration of working in the current hospital, having heard the term “critical thinking” and work position had an impact on the critical thinking ability. Work position and gender explained 11% of the total variance in critical thinking ability.

1. INTRODUCTION

Critical thinking is defined as the cognitive process of reasoning that involves trying to minimize errors and to maximize positive outcomes while attempting to make a decision during patient care (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al.,  2015 ). The importance of critical thinking in nursing practice has been identified in the literature (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Ludin,  2018 ; Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ; Yurdanur,  2016 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al.,  2015 ). The current nursing environment has become more complex and demanding, especially regarding the acuity and safety of patients and the rapid turnover rate of hospitalization. If professional nurses want to provide high‐quality care, critical thinking is required (Berkow et al.,  2011 ; Brunt,  2005 ; Fero et al.,  2009 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al.,  2015 ). Nurses are often the first‐line professionals to observe and provide direct care for patients. Therefore, critical thinking is a necessary skill for them to be able to analyse clinical situations in order to make fast and correct decisions (Lee et al.,  2017 ). More importantly, critical thinking can also improve patient outcomes by preventing habitual thinking that may lead to incorrect medication or procedures (Fesler‐Birch,  2005 ). The critical thinking ability of nurses can have an impact on the patient's safety, and it is a priority in educational programs for healthcare providers (Berkow et al.,  2011 ; Buerhaus et al.,  2006 ). We can identify those with poor critical thinking and provide in‐service education. Although critical thinking has been shown that is influenced by the experience and knowledge acquired during clinical practice (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al.,  2015 ), other personal information needs to be considered to clarifying. Therefore, it is essential to measure the levels of critical thinking and to identify the work‐related and personal‐related factors that influence the critical thinking of nurses.

2. BACKGROUND

The literature has identified that there is a relationship between leadership and positive patient outcomes, such as fewer medication errors and nosocomial infections, lower patient mortality and higher patient satisfaction (Van Dyk et al.,  2016 ; Wong,  2015 ). Alongside leadership, critical thinking is an important factor that supports the management. They can apply critical thinking skills in decision‐making and problem‐solving, and they can develop strategies that help staff nurses to improve their critical thinking ability (Van Dyk et al.,  2016 ; Wong,  2015 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). Thus, the ability to think critically is necessary for nurses because it will help them to effectively make decisions and to solve problems in practice.

Although the importance of critical thinking in nursing practice has been identified, a limited number of studies have been conducted in this population. Particularly, few hospitals have evaluated the critical thinking skills of nurses before employment or during the clinical competency evaluation (Lang et al.,  2013 ). By reviewing 90 articles to assess the current state of the scientific knowledge regarding critical thinking in nursing, Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., ( 2015 ) found that only 16 studies used working nurses as participants. Furthermore, Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., ( 2018 ) reported that few studies have explored the critical thinking ability of nurse managers (NMs). Moreover, several studies have identified that working nurses have a low (Lang et al.,  2013 ; Yurdanur,  2016 ) or moderate level of critical thinking (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Lang et al.,  2013 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). To the researchers’ knowledge, no studies have investigated this issue in Vietnam.

In order to improve the quality and safety of patient care, various types of professional nurses have been established, such as Registered Nurses (RNs), NMs and administrative assistants (AAs). RNs provide direct care to the patients, NMs are responsible for forwarding management and delivering expert clinical care for patients, and AAs are an integral part of maintaining the quality of patient care. The AAs perform administrative tasks (e.g. filing, taking meeting minutes and distributing them and undertaking regular reports) that help NMs to spend more time assisting staff nurses and taking care of patients (Locke et al.,  2011 ). Therefore, RNs, NMs and AAs need to cooperate to help patients to regain their health.

In Vietnam, professional nurses work in three different positions, which are NMs, general nurses (GNs) and AAs (Ministry of Health,  1997 ). Specifically, NMs are recognized as head nurses in Western countries, and their responsibilities are in charge of organizing and implementing comprehensive patient care and conduct a variety of administrative work (e.g. planning and assigning work to nurses, planning the acquisition of tools and consumables, checking care sheets, recording daily labour). GNs are similar to RNs in Western countries, and they provide direct and comprehensive care to patients. AAs perform administrative tasks (e.g. keeping records about the hospitalized and discharged patients, preserving medical records, managing daily medications). They also participate in patients care if necessary (Ministry of Health,  1997 , 2011 ). Although the roles of these three types of professional nurses are different, their final goal is the same to provide holistic care for patients. With the cooperation and effort of these three types of professional nurses, patients can recover. Therefore, more surveys are needed that examine these participants’ level of critical thinking and the associated work‐related factors.

Previous studies have also found that several personal‐related factors are associated with the nurses' critical thinking ability, which are age, gender, ethnicity, education qualification, working experience and shift work (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Feng et al.,  2010 ; Howenstein et al.,  1996 ; Lang et al.,  2013 ; Ludin,  2018 ; Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ; Ryan & Tatum,  2012 ; Wangensteen et al.,  2010 ; Yildirim et al.,  2012 ; Yurdanur,  2016 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). However, the relationships between the critical thinking ability and these variables are inconsistent. For example, age and critical thinking have been found to be positively correlated (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Ludin,  2018 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ), negatively correlated (Howenstein et al.,  1996 ) and not related (Lang et al.,  2013 ; Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ; Yurdanur,  2016 ). Gender and critical thinking have been reported with a statistically significant relationship (Liu et al.,  2019 ; Ludin,  2018 ) and no relationship (Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ; Wangensteen et al.,  2010 ). Level of education and critical thinking have been found in a positive association (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Ludin,  2018 ) and not association (Lang et al.,  2013 ; Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ). Year of experiences and critical thinking have been shown to be positively correlated (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Ludin,  2018 ), negatively correlated (Howenstein et al.,  1996 ) and not related (Lang et al.,  2013 ; Mahmoud & Mohamed,  2017 ). Those inconsistent findings indicated the relationships between the personal‐characteristics and the critical thinking ability of professional nurses need further exploration. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the level of critical thinking of professional nurses and to explore the work‐related and personal‐related factors. This is the first study to investigate this issue in Vietnam. The results of the current study will make a significant contribution to the literature because it will provide thorough descriptions of the critical thinking of professional nurses and its associated factors. Furthermore, the findings may be used as a baseline for nurse managers and nurse educators to propose further strategies to improve this ability in professional nurses.

3.1. Research design

A cross‐sectional design was used. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were applied in this report (Von Elm et al.,  2014 ).

3.2. Setting and sampling

Data collection was carried out from July to September 2019 in three representative and major public hospitals located in the Southwestern region of Vietnam. These hospitals have the same organizational structure, role of treating, operation of professional nursing and provide similar quality of health care to people around that area. The total numbers of professional in these three hospitals nurses were around 1,200. Besides, our study has two steps. The first step was to translate the English version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire (N‐CT‐4 Practice) into the Vietnamese version. In that step, we used data as a pilot study to estimate the sample size in the second step, which was reported here. Sample size calculation was done by the formula: n  = 1.96 2  × p × (1‐p)/0.05 2 , where p  = .46 came from the poor level of critical thinking among nurses in the first step and 0.05 indicated the acceptable margin of error (5.0%); 382 participants were required by this formula. An additional 10% of participants were done to adjust for potential failures such as withdrawals or missing data (Suresh & Chandrashekara,  2012 ). Therefore, in total, 420 participants were required for this study. Convenience sampling was conducted to recruit the sample. The inclusion criteria were the nurses' employed full‐time employment in the study hospitals. Participants who participated in step 1 or being absent during the data collection such as sick leave or delivering a baby were excluded. Participants were grouped in each hospital and received an envelope with all questionnaires. Then, researchers explained the research's purpose, benefits and risks to the potential participants and the procedure for ensuring confidentiality, and the voluntary nature of the participation. The informed consent form was signed immediately after they agreed to participate in this study. Then, the participants were required to complete the questionnaires in 20 to 30 min and to return them to the data collector.

3.3. Data assessment

3.3.1. sample characteristics.

This instrument collected data about the personal information and occupational variables. The personal information included age, gender, marital status, ethnicity, religion, education level and self‐rated health conditions. The occupational variables were the duration of working as a nurse, the duration of working in the current hospital, the duration of working in the specific position, having heard the term “critical thinking” or not, previous exposure to critical thinking training or education or not, and type of work position.

3.3.2. Vietnamese version of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire ((N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v))

The N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) was used to measure the critical thinking ability of the professional nurses. The original instrument (N‐CT‐4 Practice) was established and classified based on the four dimensions of the 4‐circle critical thinking model of Alfaro‐LeFevre (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2017 ). These four dimensions were personal; intellectual and cognitive; interpersonal and self‐management; and technical dimensions. The personal dimension has 39 items to assess the individual pattern of intellectual behaviours; the intellectual and cognitive dimension has 44 items to assesses the knowledge of activity comprehension connected to the nursing process and decision‐making. For the interpersonal and self‐management dimension, it has 20 items to analyse interpersonal abilities that allow for therapeutic communication with patients and health teams and to gain information that is associated with the patient in the clinical environment. The final one, the technical dimension, has 6 items to is concerned with knowledge and expertise in the procedures that are part of the discipline of nursing. This scale has 109 items that are rated using a four‐point Likert response format (1 = never or almost never, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, and 4 = always or almost always), for example: “I recognize my own emotions.” (item 1); “I have the scientific knowledge required to carry out my professional practice.” (item 40); “I adapt information to the needs and capacities of the patient.” (item 84); “I possess skills in the use of information and communication technologies needed to produce optimal professional results.” (item 105). The total score is obtained from the sum of the 109 items. The scores range from 109–436, and they are categorized into a low level (score <329), moderate level (score between 329–395) and high level (score >395). The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.96, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.77 (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2017).

The N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) was translated, and its psychometric properties were tested with 545 Vietnamese nurses. The results showed that the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) has acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and validity (content and construct validity). Particularly, the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.98, with that of the four dimensions ranging from 0.86–0.97. The ICC was 0.81 over two weeks. The item content validity index was 1.0. Moreover, the goodness‐of‐fit indexes in a confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable values, which were χ 2 / df  = 2.87, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.059, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.063, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.73 and Tucker Lewis index (TLI) = 0.72 (T. V. Nguyen & Liu,  2021 ). Therefore, the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) can be used to measure the critical thinking ability of Vietnamese professional nurses.

3.4. Ethical considerations

This study conformed with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (Helsinki Declaration,  2013 ), and it was granted research ethics committee approval by the ethical review board of the first author's institution.

3.5. Data analysis

The data were analysed using SPSS for Windows version 23.0 (IBM Corp.), and both descriptive and inferential statistics were calculated. The level of significance for all analyses was set at < 0.05. First, descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the collected data. The continuous variables were described using the mean and standard deviation ( SD ), and the frequency and percentage (%) were used for the categorical variables. Next, independent Student's t tests, analysis of variance (with Scheffe's post hoc comparison) and Pearson's correlation analysis were conducted to explore the association between the critical thinking ability and the personal and occupational factors. Then, a multiple regression analysis using the stepwise method was performed to identify the predictors of critical thinking ability (Pallant,  2010 ).

4.1. Characteristics of the participants

A total of 420 participants completed the questionnaires; the characteristics of overall participants and subjects in each group are listed in Table  1 . Three groups of subjects were included, which were NMs (24.8%), GNs (49.8%) and AAs (25.4%), respectively. Regarding the personal variables, almost all participants were Vietnamese (96.7%), no religion (73.1%) and had good health condition (60%). Meanwhile, the comparison among each group showed that age ( F  = 9.89, p  < .001), gender (χ 2  = 6.48, p  < .05), marital status (χ 2  = 6.77, p  < .05) and education level (χ 2  = 147.38, p  < .001) had reached the statistical significance. Further analysis showed that the age of NMs was significantly older than subjects in both the GN and AA group, AA group had a higher ratio of that in the GN group, and the AA group had a higher ratio of married one than the GN group. For educational levels, subjects in the NM group had a higher ratio of bachelor and master degree, whereas the other two groups had a high ratio of diploma and associate degree.

Characteristics of the participants ( n  = 420)

Abbreviations: AA, Administrator assistant; CT , Critical thinking; GN, General nurse; NM, Nurses manager ; SD , standard deviation.

Chi‐square and one‐way ANOVA test; significant at * p  < .05; ** p  < .01; *** p  < .001.

Regarding work‐related factors, the characters of all participants and subjects in each group are also listed in Table  1 . The comparison of professional experience, such as duration of working as a nurse, duration of working in the current hospital, duration of working in this specific position and heard the terminology of "critical thinking" showed a significant statistical difference among the three groups ( p  < .001). They showed that NMs had a longer duration of working as a nurse (mean = 12.30, SD  = 7.12) and duration of working in the current hospital (mean = 11.6, SD  = 7.02) than the other two groups; GNs had the longest duration of working in the specific position (mean = 7.41, SD  = 6.21). More subjects in the NM group heard the terminology of "critical thinking" than subjects in the other two groups. However, none of the subjects had been exposed to critical thinking training or education. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation among age, the duration of working as a nurse, the duration of working in the current hospital and duration of working in a specific position ( r  = .78–.975, p  < .01).

4.2. Level of the critical thinking of the professional nurses

The mean of the total scores of the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) for all participants was 333.86 ± 40.22 (with the average score/item = 3.06 ± 0.37), the median score was 331 (interquartile range [IQR] = 311–359), and it ranged from 204–436, which indicates that they generally had a moderate level of critical thinking. Meanwhile, most of the participants reported a low (48.3%) or moderate (45.5%) level of critical thinking. Only 6.2% of the participants had a high level of critical thinking. Regarding the four dimensions of the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v), the average sum score was 119.52 ± 14.19 (with the average score/item = 3.06 ± 0.36) in the personal dimension, 136.38 ± 17.62 (with the average score/item = 3.10 ± 0.40) in the intellectual and cognitive dimension, 68.71 ± 12.65 (with the average score/item = 3.44 ± 0.63) in the interpersonal and self‐management dimension and 18.09 ± 3.01 (with the average score/item = 3.01 ± 0.50) in the technical dimension.

4.3. Work‐related and personal‐related factors associated with critical thinking ability

There were statistically significant associations between the critical thinking ability and some work‐related factors, such as work position ( F  = 23.30, p  < .001), duration of working as a nurse ( r  = 0.15, p  < .01), duration of working in the current hospital ( r  = 0.13, p  < .05) and having heard the term "critical thinking" ( t  = −2.48, p  < .05; Table  2 ). The findings indicated that NMs had higher scores than GNs and AAs. Moreover, nurses who had worked for a longer duration as a nurse or worked longer in the current hospital had a higher critical thinking ability. Meanwhile, those who had not heard the term "critical thinking" had lower scores than participants who had heard this term.

Association between the participants’ characteristics and the critical thinking ability ( n  = 420)

The bolded values indicate the level of statistical significance (with p < .05; p < .01; or p < .001) between the independent and dependent variables.

Abbreviations: SD , standard deviation.

There were statistically significant associations between the critical thinking ability and some personal‐related factors, such as age ( r  = 0.12, p  < .05), gender ( t  = 2.32, p  < .05), ethnicity ( t  = 1.97, p  < .05), education level ( F  = 7.45, p  < .01) and health condition ( F  = 3.14, p  < .05; Table  2 ). The findings indicated that the older nurses reported a higher critical thinking ability, and male nurses had a higher score than female ones. Vietnamese participants had higher scores than participants with other ethnicities. Participants with a bachelor's/graduate degree level of education had higher scores than participants with a diploma and associate degree level of education. Those with very good health had a higher score than participants who rated their health as fair/bad/very bad.

All of the statistically significant variables identified in the univariate analysis were selected as independent variables to determine the predictors of critical thinking ability. For the regression analysis, the categorical variables were first coded as dummy variables. The factors of having never heard of “critical thinking,” being an NM being male, being Vietnamese, having a diploma degree and being in very good health were selected as the standard factors. The results of the stepwise multiple regression method showed that there were only two predictors, namely the variables of work position and gender. Working as an AA or GN or being female can predict the critical thinking ability, and they accounted for 11% of the total variance ( F  = 17.12, p  < .001). This indicates that the AAs and GNs had a lower level of critical thinking than the NMs. Besides, when compared with male nurses, the female nurses exhibited a lower level of critical thinking (Table  3 ).

Predictors of the critical thinking ability ( n  = 420)

5. DISCUSSION

This study showed that the critical thinking ability of most professional nurses was at a low or moderate level. This finding is consistent with previous studies (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Lang et al.,  2013 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). Using the same tool, Zuriguel‐Pérez et al. ( 2018 ) found that the median score of the N‐CT‐4 Practice was 363 (IQR = 340–386) for clinical nurses in Spain. Our study found a slightly lower median score (331; IQR = 311–359) but it was still in a moderate level (range of score: 329–395). Although critical thinking is a relatively new issue in Vietnamese professional nurses, it is not a brand new concept. Certain elements have been included in the nursing curriculum and clinical practice (e.g. the nursing process, problem‐based learning, evidence‐based practice). Therefore, up to 66.7% of participants had never heard the term "critical thinking," but 45.5% still reported a moderate level when measured using the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v).

In Vietnam, clinical professional nurses are categorized into NMs, GNs and AAs with different job descriptions. Critical thinking ability has been identified as an important component for the high quality of care around the world, except in Vietnam. In order to identify this ability, we collected data from 3 hospitals in one region and grouped these data for analysis. Based on the comparison among NMs, GNs and AAs, it was found that NMs had a higher level of critical thinking than GNs and AAs. This can be explained by the fact that NMs have a higher age, work experience and high educational qualification than the other two groups. This result partially supports the finding that NMs report a slightly higher level of critical thinking than RNs (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). Critical thinking is a necessary skill for effective and efficient management. Evidently, at present, NMs with a high level of critical thinking create positive practice environments that can help the staff nurses to deliver high quality and safe patient care (Zori et al.,  2010 ). Therefore, all healthcare personnel needs to learn and apply critical thinking in order to conduct their work effectively and efficiently.

For clinical nurses, continuous in‐service education is very important to update their knowledge and skill of care. Literature found various factors associated with curriculum design and learning of critical thinking ability. Therefore, grouping subjects in the present study together in order to identify the related factors could help the development of further in‐service education of critical thinking ability effectively and efficiently. In this study, a statistically significant positive correlation was found between the critical thinking ability and age, the duration of working as a nurse and the duration of working in the current hospital. These findings are consistent with previous studies. For example, older nurses have a higher level of critical thinking than younger ones (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Chen et al.,  2019 ; Feng et al.,  2010 ; Ludin,  2018 ; Wangensteen et al.,  2010 ; Yurdanur,  2016 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ), and nurses with more experience report a better critical thinking ability than those with less experience (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Chen et al.,  2019 ; Feng et al.,  2010 ; Ludin,  2018 ). Older and experienced nurses are more mature in their way of thinking (Chen et al.,  2019 ; Ludin,  2018 ). Because there were statistically significant positive correlations among age, the duration of working as a nurse and the duration of working in the current hospital. This indicates that older nurses have a longer duration of working as a nurse or working in the current hospital so they have better critical thinking. However, the correlation between these factors and critical thinking in the current study is small; further explorations are suggested.

This study showed that there is a significant association between critical thinking ability and gender and ethnicity, which is also supported by the literature. Ludin ( 2018 ) found that female nurses reported a lower critical thinking ability than male nurses. Traditionally, females have generally had fewer opportunities to receive education and more difficulty asserting their rights during decision‐making than males in Vietnam (L. T. Nguyen et al.,  2017 ). Even today, the phenomenon of gender inequality still exists in certain areas in Vietnam. This traditional burden and the limited opportunities to practice in a clinical care setting might lower the levels of the female participants’ critical thinking. Ethnicity has a similar impact, as found in the present study. For example, it has been reported that Caucasian and Hispanic/Latino participants have a significantly higher critical thinking ability than African American participants (Lang et al.,  2013 ) and that Malaysian and Indian participants report different levels of critical thinking; nevertheless, only 0.9% of the participants were Indian (Ludin,  2018 ). However, in the present study, as almost all of the participants were Vietnamese (96.7%), the skewed distribution of the ethnicity might limit the generalizability of the results. In future studies, an equal distribution of ethnicity is strongly recommended.

This study also confirmed that those who had a bachelor's/graduate degree had a higher level of critical thinking than those who had a diploma or associate degree, even though the former had never heard the term "critical thinking." A vast amount of studies has found that education has a positive impact on the level of critical thinking (Chang et al.,  2011 ; Gloudemans et al.,  2013 ; Ludin,  2018 ; Yildirim et al.,  2012 ; Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2018 ). Meanwhile, this study found that participants who had heard the term "critical thinking" displayed a higher level of critical thinking than those who had not heard this term. Education might be the major reason for this variation. In the present study, only 40.7% of participants had a bachelor's/graduate degree. In order to promote their levels of critical thinking, it is necessary to arrange for them, to encourage them, to attend advanced education or to provide further content in the in‐service education.

In this study, participants with very good health had a higher level of critical thinking than participants who self‐rated their health as fair/bad/very bad. Health status does have an impact on work productivity, job performance, quality of care and extra learning (Letvak et al.,  2011 ). Thus, poor health limits their learning and critical thinking ability. This ability is an important predictor of real‐life outcomes (e.g. interpersonal, work, financial, health and education) (Butler et al.,  2017 ). Therefore, the causal effects between health and critical thinking ability need further exploration.

In the current study, only the female gender and the type of work position as an AA or GN were identified as predictors, and they explained only 11% of the total variance of critical thinking ability in the regression model. The uneven distribution of gender and work position might be the reason for the low variance. Even though the male was significantly less than the female, NM was fewer than GN and AA. More factors need to be included in further studies.

The limitations of this study include that it used a convenience sample from only three public hospitals located in the Southwestern part of Vietnam. This sample does not represent all professional nurses in Vietnam. The N‐CT‐4 Practice is the instrument with good psychometric properties specific for clinical practice and translated into English (Zuriguel‐Pérez et al., 2017), Persian (FallahNezhad & Ziaeirad,  2018 ) and Turkish (Urhan & Seren, 2019 ). Different points of the Likert response format were selected by tools to measure critical thinking ability. For example, the N‐CT‐4 Practice selected a four‐point Likert response and it was rated in frequency, such as 1 = never or almost never and 4 = always or almost always. However, a seven‐point Likert scale for the Critical Thinking Disposition Assessment (CTDA) was selected and rated in levels of agreement, such as 1 for very strongly disagree and 7 for very strongly agree (Cui et al.,  2021 ). Which response format can be more reprinting the characters of critical thinking ability? Further investigation is strongly suggested. Besides, the N‐CT‐4 Practice (V‐v) questionnaire has too many items that may lead to the boredom of the participants to answer and thus affect the accuracy of the results. Moreover, the collapsing of three distinctly separate groups of nurses into one group for most of the analyses lead to not showing differences in critical thinking and influencing factors among the three groups. These factors all limit the generalization of the present results. Based on these limitations, it is suggested that the use of nationwide systematic sampling and an international comparison are strongly suggested in further studies. Regarding the critical thinking questionnaire, it would be better to use the revised versions with fewer questions. Therefore, developmental and psychometric properties are suggested to shorten this questionnaire.

6. CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that most of the professional nurses had a low or moderate critical thinking ability. Certain personal and occupational variables were significantly associated with the level of critical thinking. Being male or working as an NM were statistically significant predictors of critical thinking ability, and they explained only 11% of the total variance.

The findings of this study indicate that it is necessary to develop strategies to improve the critical thinking ability of professional nurses. The critical thinking ability has been confirmed to be an essential factor for high‐quality health care that focuses on the quality of patient care and patient safety. Besides, providing more opportunities to pursue advanced degrees or enhancing the provision of in‐service education in hospitals that involves classroom teaching or web‐based learning is strongly recommended for this specific group of nurses. Consequently, the quality of patient care could be improved.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the expert panel, translators, research assistants, the hospitals and all of the clinical nurses who participated in this study. We are indebted to the study participants and would like to dedicate the research findings to improving the critical thinking ability of Vietnamese professional nurses in the future. No specific grant was received from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not‐for‐profit sectors.

Van Nguyen T, Liu H‐E. Factors associated with the critical thinking ability of professional nurses: A cross‐sectional study . Nurs Open . 2021; 8 :1970–1980. 10.1002/nop2.875 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

• Berkow, S. , Virkstis, K. , Stewart, J. , Aronson, S. , & Donohue, M. (2011). Assessing individual frontline nurse critical thinking . Journal of Nursing Administration , 41 ( 4 ), 168–171. 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182118528 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Brunt, B. A. (2005). Critical thinking in nursing: An integrated review . The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing , 36 ( 2 ), 60–67. 10.3928/0022-0124-20050301-05 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Buerhaus, P. I. , Donelan, K. , Ulrich, B. T. , Norman, L. , & Dittus, R. (2006). State of the registered nurse workforce in the United States . Nursing Economics , 24 ( 1 ), 6. [ PubMed ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Butler, H. A. , Pentoney, C. , & Bong, M. P. (2017). Predicting real‐world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence . Thinking Skills and Creativity , 25 , 38–46. 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.005 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chang, M. J. , Chang, Y. J. , Kuo, S. H. , Yang, Y. H. , & Chou, F. H. (2011). Relationships between critical thinking ability and nursing competence in clinical nurses . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 20 ( 21–22 ), 3224–3232. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03593.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Chen, F.‐F. , Chen, S.‐Y. , & Pai, H.‐C. (2019). Self‐reflection and critical thinking: The influence of professional qualifications on registered nurses . Contemporary Nurse , 55 ( 1 ), 59–70. 10.1080/10376178.2019.1590154 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Cui, L. , Zhu, Y. , Qu, J. , Tie, L. , Wang, Z. , & Qu, B. (2021). Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: A cross‐sectional study . BMC Medical Education , 21 ( 1 ), 1–8. 10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Helsinki Declaration (2013). Ethical principels for medical research involving human subject . Helsinki Declaration. [ Google Scholar ]
• FallahNezhad, Z. , & Ziaeirad, M. (2018). The relationship between the quality of working life and critical thinking of nurses in Milad Hospital of Isfahan, Iran . Preventive Care in Nursing and Midwifery Journal , 8 ( 3 ), 62–68. 10.29252/pcnm.8.3.62 [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Feng, R. C. , Chen, M. J. , Chen, M. C. , & Pai, Y. C. (2010). Critical thinking competence and disposition of clinical nurses in a medical center . Journal of Nursing Research , 18 ( 2 ), 77–87. 10.1097/JNR.0b013e3181dda6f6 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fero, L. J. , Witsberger, C. M. , Wesmiller, S. W. , Zullo, T. G. , & Hoffman, L. A. (2009). Critical thinking ability of new graduate and experienced nurses . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 65 ( 1 ), 139–148. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04834.x [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Fesler‐Birch, D. M. (2005). Critical thinking and patient outcomes: A review . Nursing Outlook , 53 ( 2 ), 59–65. 10.1016/j.outlook.2004.11.005 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Gloudemans, H. A. , Schalk, R. M. , & Reynaert, W. (2013). The relationship between critical thinking skills and self‐efficacy beliefs in mental health nurses . Nurse Education Today , 33 ( 3 ), 275–280. 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.05.006 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Howenstein, M. A. , Bilodeau, K. , Brogna, M. J. , & Good, G. (1996). Factors associated with critical thinking among nurses . The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing , 27 ( 3 ), 100–103. 10.3928/0022-0124-19960501-04 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lang, G. M. , Beach, N. L. , Patrician, P. A. , & Martin, C. (2013). A cross‐sectional study examining factors related to critical thinking in nursing . Journal for Nurses in Professional Development , 29 ( 1 ), 8–15. 10.1097/NND.0b013e31827d08c8 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Lee, D. S. , Abdullah, K. L. , Subramanian, P. , Bachmann, R. T. , & Ong, S. L. (2017). An integrated review of the correlation between critical thinking ability and clinical decision‐making in nursing . Journal of Clinical Nursing , 26 ( 23–24 ), 4065–4079. 10.1111/jocn.13901 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Letvak, S. , Ruhm, C. , & Lane, S. (2011). The impact of nurses' health on productivity and quality of care . JONA. The Journal of Nursing Administration , 41 ( 4 ), 162–167. 10.1097/NNA.0b013e3182118516 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu, N.‐Y. , Hsu, W.‐Y. , Hung, C.‐A. , Wu, P.‐L. , & Pai, H.‐C. (2019). The effect of gender role orientation on student nurses’ caring behaviour and critical thinking . International Journal of Nursing Studies , 89 , 18–23. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.005 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Locke, R. , Leach, C. , Kitsell, F. , & Griffith, J. (2011). The impact on the workload of the ward manager with the introduction of administrative assistants . Journal of Nursing Management , 19 ( 2 ), 177–185. 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2011.01229.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ludin, S. M. (2018). Does good critical thinking equal effective decision‐making among critical care nurses? A cross‐sectional survey . Intensive & Critical Care Nursing , 44 , 1–10. 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.06.002 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Mahmoud, A. S. , & Mohamed, H. A. (2017). Critical thinking disposition among nurses working in puplic hospitals at port‐said governorate . International Journal of Nursing Sciences , 4 ( 2 ), 128–134. 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.02.006 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Ministry of Health (1997). Decision No. 1895/1997/QĐ‐BYT of the ministry of health on the promulgation of Hospital Regulations . Retrieved from http://vbpl.yte.gov.vn/van‐ban‐phap‐luat/quyet‐dinh‐18951997qd‐byt‐.1.2286.html
• Ministry of Health (2011). Circular No. 07/2011/TT‐BYT dated 26/01/2011 of the Ministry of Health on guiding on patient care in hospitals . Retrieved from https://kcb.vn/wp‐content/uploads/2015/07/TT‐07.2011.TT‐BYT‐ngay‐26.01.2011.pdf .
• Nguyen, L. T. , Annoussamy, L. C. , & LeBaron, V. T. (2017). Challenges Encountered by Vietnamese Nurses When Caring for Patients With Cancer . Paper presented at the Oncology nursing forum. [ PubMed ]
• Nguyen, T. V. , & Liu, H. E. (2021). The Vietnamese version of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire: Translation and psychometric evaluation . Nursing Open , 1–8. 10.1002/nop2.834 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS . Maidenhead. Open University Press/McGraw‐Hill. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryan, C. , & Tatum, K. (2012). Objective measurement of critical‐thinking ability in registered nurse applicants . Journal of Nursing Administration , 42 ( 2 ), 89–94. 10.1097/NNA.0b013e318243360b [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Suresh, K. , & Chandrashekara, S. (2012). Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies . Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences , 5 ( 1 ), 7. 10.4103/0974-1208.97779 [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ] Retracted
• Urhan, E. , & Seren, A. K. H. (2019). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire . University of Health Sciences Journal of Nursing , 1 ( 3 ), 147–156. [ Google Scholar ]
• Van Dyk, J. , Siedlecki, S. L. , & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2016). Frontline nurse managers' confidence and self‐efficacy . Journal of Nursing Management , 24 ( 4 ), 533–539. 10.1111/jonm.12355 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Von Elm, E. , Altman, D. G. , Egger, M. , Pocock, S. J. , Gøtzsche, P. C. , Vandenbroucke, J. P. , & Initiative, S. (2014). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies . International Journal of Surgery , 12 ( 12 ), 1495–1499. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wangensteen, S. , Johansson, I. S. , Bjorkstrom, M. E. , & Nordstrom, G. (2010). Critical thinking dispositions among newly graduated nurses . Journal of Advanced Nursing , 66 ( 10 ), 2170–2181. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05282.x [ PMC free article ] [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Wong, C. A. (2015). Connecting nursing leadership and patient outcomes: State of the science . Journal of Nursing Management , 23 ( 3 ), 275–278. 10.1111/jonm.12307 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Yildirim, B. , Özkahraman, Ş. , & Ersoy, S. (2012). Investigation of critical thinking disposition in nurses working in public hospitals . International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology , 2 , 61–67. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yurdanur, D. (2016). Critical Thinking Competence and Dispositions among Critical Care Nurses: A Descriptive Study . International Journal , 9 ( 2 ), 489. [ Google Scholar ]
• Zori, S. , Nosek, L. J. , & Musil, C. M. (2010). Critical thinking of nurse managers related to staff RNs’ perceptions of the practice environment . Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 42 ( 3 ), 305–313. 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01354.x [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zuriguel‐Pérez, E. , Falcó‐Pegueroles, A. , Roldán‐Merino, J. , Agustino‐Rodriguez, S. , Gómez‐Martín, M. C. , & Lluch‐Canut, M. T. (2017). Development and psychometric properties of the nursing critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire . Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing , 14 ( 4 ), 257–264. 10.1111/wvn.12220 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zuriguel‐Pérez, E. , Lluch Canut, M. T. , Falcó Pegueroles, A. , Puig Llobet, M. , Moreno Arroyo, C. , & Roldán Merino, J. (2015). Critical thinking in nursing: Scoping review of the literature . International Journal of Nursing Practice , 21 ( 6 ), 820–830. 10.1111/ijn.12347 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]
• Zuriguel‐Pérez, E. , Lluch‐Canut, M. T. , Agustino‐Rodríguez, S. , Gómez‐Martín, M. D. C. , Roldán‐Merino, J. , & Falcó‐Pegueroles, A. (2018). Critical thinking: A comparative analysis between nurse managers and registered nurses . Journal of Nursing Management , 26 ( 8 ), 1083–1090. 10.1111/jonm.12640 [ PubMed ] [ CrossRef ] [ Google Scholar ]

Critical thinking definition

Critical thinking, as described by Oxford Languages, is the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgement.

Active and skillful approach, evaluation, assessment, synthesis, and/or evaluation of information obtained from, or made by, observation, knowledge, reflection, acumen or conversation, as a guide to belief and action, requires the critical thinking process, which is why it's often used in education and academics.

Some even may view it as a backbone of modern thought.

However, it's a skill, and skills must be trained and encouraged to be used at its full potential.

People turn up to various approaches in improving their critical thinking, like:

• Developing technical and problem-solving skills
• Engaging in more active listening
• Actively questioning their assumptions and beliefs
• Seeking out more diversity of thought
• Opening up their curiosity in an intellectual way etc.

Is critical thinking useful in writing?

Critical thinking can help in planning your paper and making it more concise, but it's not obvious at first. We carefully pinpointed some the questions you should ask yourself when boosting critical thinking in writing:

• What information should be included?
• Which information resources should the author look to?
• What degree of technical knowledge should the report assume its audience has?
• What is the most effective way to show information?
• How should the report be organized?
• How should it be designed?
• What tone and level of language difficulty should the document have?

Usage of critical thinking comes down not only to the outline of your paper, it also begs the question: How can we use critical thinking solving problems in our writing's topic?

Let's say, you have a Powerpoint on how critical thinking can reduce poverty in the United States. You'll primarily have to define critical thinking for the viewers, as well as use a lot of critical thinking questions and synonyms to get them to be familiar with your methods and start the thinking process behind it.

Are there any services that can help me use more critical thinking?

We understand that it's difficult to learn how to use critical thinking more effectively in just one article, but our service is here to help.

We are a team specializing in writing essays and other assignments for college students and all other types of customers who need a helping hand in its making. We cover a great range of topics, offer perfect quality work, always deliver on time and aim to leave our customers completely satisfied with what they ordered.

The ordering process is fully online, and it goes as follows:

• Select the topic and the deadline of your essay.
• Provide us with any details, requirements, statements that should be emphasized or particular parts of the essay writing process you struggle with.
• Leave the email address, where your completed order will be sent to.
• Select your prefered payment type, sit back and relax!

With lots of experience on the market, professionally degreed essay writers , online 24/7 customer support and incredibly low prices, you won't find a service offering a better deal than ours.

Dialysis Technician Education and Training

Critical Thinking

Critical thinking means making good choices by using information from multiple sources. These sources might include your training, a policy manual, a talk with a doctor, or what your patient prefers. When you use critical thinking, you see that not all decisions are “black and white” or “right and wrong.” In dialysis care, there are times when you need to factor in multiple issues.

Critical thinking means that you are always aware of the status of your patients. And, you look to identify potential problems before they happen. For example, you have a patient who tends to drop his blood pressure halfway into his treatment. How might you prevent this? Remember that each minute of dialysis is vital to a patient. (Standard in-center dialysis treatments just barely prevent uremic symptoms.) A machine in bypass mode means a patient who is losing valuable treatment time.