Medical Student Guide For Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is an essential cognitive skill for every individual but is a crucial component for healthcare professionals such as doctors, nurses and dentists. It is a skill that should be developed and trained, not just during your career as a doctor, but before that when you are still a medical student.
To be more effective in their studies, students must think their way through abstract problems, work in teams and separate high quality from low quality information. These are the same qualities that today's medical students are supposed to possess regardless of whether they graduate in the UK or study medicine in Europe .
In both well-defined and ill-defined medical emergencies, doctors are expected to make competent decisions. Critical thinking can help medical students and doctors achieve improved productivity, better clinical decision making, higher grades and much more.
This article will explain why critical thinking is a must for people in the medical field.
Definition of Critical Thinking
You can find a variety of definitions of Critical Thinking (CT). It is a term that goes back to the Ancient Greek philosopher Socrates and his teaching practice and vision. Critical thinking and its meaning have changed over the years, but at its core always will be the pursuit of proper judgment.
We can agree on one thing. Critical thinkers question every idea, assumption, and possibility rather than accepting them at once.
The most basic definition of CT is provided by Beyer (1995):
"Critical thinking means making reasoned judgements."
In other words, it is the ability to think logically about what to do and/or believe. It also includes the ability to think critically and independently. CT is the process of identifying, analysing, and then making decisions about a particular topic, advice, opinion or challenge that we are facing.
Steps to critical thinking
There is no universal standard for becoming a critical thinker. It is more like a unique journey for each individual. But as a medical student, you have already so much going on in your academic and personal life. This is why we created a list with 6 steps that will help you develop the necessary skills for critical thinking.
1. Determine the issue or question
The first step is to answer the following questions:
- What is the problem?
- Why is it important?
- Why do we need to find a solution?
- Who is involved?
By answering them, you will define the situation and acquire a deeper understanding of the problem and of any factors that may impact it.
Only after you have a clear picture of the issue and people involved can you start to dive deeper into the problem and search for a solution.
2. Research
Nowadays, we are flooded with information. We have an unlimited source of knowledge – the Internet.
Before choosing which medical schools to apply to, most applicants researched their desired schools online. Some of the areas you might have researched include:
- If the degree is recognised worldwide
- Tuition fees
- Living costs
- Entry requirements
- Competition for entry
- Number of exams
- Programme style
Having done the research, you were able to make an informed decision about your medical future based on the gathered information. Our list may be a little different to yours but that's okay. You know what factors are most important and relevant to you as a person.
The process you followed when choosing which medical school to apply to also applies to step 2 of critical thinking. As a medical student and doctor, you will face situations when you have to compare different arguments and opinions about an issue. Independent research is the key to the right clinical decisions. Medical and dentistry students have to be especially careful when learning from online sources. You shouldn't believe everything you read and take it as the absolute truth. So, here is what you need to do when facing a medical/study argument:
- Gather relevant information from all available reputable sources
- Pay attention to the salient points
- Evaluate the quality of the information and the level of evidence (is it just an opinion, or is it based upon a clinical trial?)
Once you have all the information needed, you can start the process of analysing it. It’s helpful to write down the strong and weak points of the various recommendations and identify the most evidence-based approach.
Here is an example of a comparison between two online course platforms , which shows their respective strengths and weaknesses.
When recommendations or conclusions are contradictory, you will need to make a judgement call on which point of view has the strongest level of evidence to back it up. You should leave aside your feelings and analyse the problem from every angle possible. In the end, you should aim to make your decision based on the available evidence, not assumptions or bias.
4. Be careful about confirmation bias
It is in our nature to want to confirm our existing ideas rather than challenge them. You should try your best to strive for objectivity while evaluating information.
Often, you may find yourself reading articles that support your ideas, but why not broaden your horizons by learning about the other viewpoint?
By doing so, you will have the opportunity to get closer to the truth and may even find unexpected support and evidence for your conclusion.
Curiosity will keep you on the right path. However, if you find yourself searching for information or confirmation that aligns only with your opinion, then it’s important to take a step back. Take a short break, acknowledge your bias, clear your mind and start researching all over.
5. Synthesis
As we have already mentioned a couple of times, medical students are preoccupied with their studies. Therefore, you have to learn how to synthesise information. This is where you take information from multiple sources and bring the information together. Learning how to do this effectively will save you time and help you make better decisions faster.
You will have already located and evaluated your sources in the previous steps. You now have to organise the data into a logical argument that backs up your position on the problem under consideration.
6. Make a decision
Once you have gathered and evaluated all the available evidence, your last step is to make a logical and well-reasoned conclusion.
By following this process you will ensure that whatever decision you make can be backed up if challenged
Why is critical thinking so important for medical students?
The first and most important reason for mastering critical thinking is that it will help you to avoid medical and clinical errors during your studies and future medical career.
Another good reason is that you will be able to identify better alternative options for diagnoses and treatments. You will be able to find the best solution for the patient as a whole which may be different to generic advice specific to the disease.
Furthermore, thinking critically as a medical student will boost your confidence and improve your knowledge and understanding of subjects.
In conclusion, critical thinking is a skill that can be learned and improved. It will encourage you to be the best version of yourself and teach you to take responsibility for your actions.
Critical thinking has become an essential for future health care professionals and you will find it an invaluable skill throughout your career.
We’ll keep you updated
- - Google Chrome
Intended for healthcare professionals
- My email alerts
- BMA member login
- Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution
Search form
- Advanced search
- Search responses
- Search blogs
- News & Views
- Critical thinking in...
Critical thinking in healthcare and education
- Related content
- Peer review
- Jonathan M Sharples , professor 1 ,
- Andrew D Oxman , research director 2 ,
- Kamal R Mahtani , clinical lecturer 3 ,
- Iain Chalmers , coordinator 4 ,
- Sandy Oliver , professor 1 ,
- Kevan Collins , chief executive 5 ,
- Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren , senior researcher 2 ,
- Tammy Hoffmann , professor 6
- 1 EPPI-Centre, UCL Department of Social Science, London, UK
- 2 Global Health Unit, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- 3 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
- 4 James Lind Initiative, Oxford, UK
- 5 Education Endowment Foundation, London, UK
- 6 Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
- Correspondence to: J M Sharples Jonathan.Sharples{at}eefoundation.org.uk
Critical thinking is just one skill crucial to evidence based practice in healthcare and education, write Jonathan Sharples and colleagues , who see exciting opportunities for cross sector collaboration
Imagine you are a primary care doctor. A patient comes into your office with acute, atypical chest pain. Immediately you consider the patient’s sex and age, and you begin to think about what questions to ask and what diagnoses and diagnostic tests to consider. You will also need to think about what treatments to consider and how to communicate with the patient and potentially with the patient’s family and other healthcare providers. Some of what you do will be done reflexively, with little explicit thought, but caring for most patients also requires you to think critically about what you are going to do.
Critical thinking, the ability to think clearly and rationally about what to do or what to believe, is essential for the practice of medicine. Few doctors are likely to argue with this. Yet, until recently, the UK regulator the General Medical Council and similar bodies in North America did not mention “critical thinking” anywhere in their standards for licensing and accreditation, 1 and critical thinking is not explicitly taught or assessed in most education programmes for health professionals. 2
Moreover, although more than 2800 articles indexed by PubMed have “critical thinking” in the title or abstract, most are about nursing. We argue that it is important for clinicians and patients to learn to think critically and that the teaching and learning of these skills should be considered explicitly. Given the shared interest in critical thinking with broader education, we also highlight why healthcare and education professionals and researchers need to work together to enable people to think critically about the health choices they make throughout life.
Essential skills for doctors and patients
Critical thinking …
Log in using your username and password
BMA Member Log In
If you have a subscription to The BMJ, log in:
- Need to activate
- Log in via institution
- Log in via OpenAthens
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *.
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for: £50 / $60/ €56 ( excludes VAT )
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.
Buy this article
The Value of Critical Thinking in Nursing
- How Nurses Use Critical Thinking
- How to Improve Critical Thinking
- Common Mistakes
Some experts describe a person’s ability to question belief systems, test previously held assumptions, and recognize ambiguity as evidence of critical thinking. Others identify specific skills that demonstrate critical thinking, such as the ability to identify problems and biases, infer and draw conclusions, and determine the relevance of information to a situation.
Nicholas McGowan, BSN, RN, CCRN, has been a critical care nurse for 10 years in neurological trauma nursing and cardiovascular and surgical intensive care. He defines critical thinking as “necessary for problem-solving and decision-making by healthcare providers. It is a process where people use a logical process to gather information and take purposeful action based on their evaluation.”
“This cognitive process is vital for excellent patient outcomes because it requires that nurses make clinical decisions utilizing a variety of different lenses, such as fairness, ethics, and evidence-based practice,” he says.
How Do Nurses Use Critical Thinking?
Successful nurses think beyond their assigned tasks to deliver excellent care for their patients. For example, a nurse might be tasked with changing a wound dressing, delivering medications, and monitoring vital signs during a shift. However, it requires critical thinking skills to understand how a difference in the wound may affect blood pressure and temperature and when those changes may require immediate medical intervention.
Nurses care for many patients during their shifts. Strong critical thinking skills are crucial when juggling various tasks so patient safety and care are not compromised.
Jenna Liphart Rhoads, Ph.D., RN, is a nurse educator with a clinical background in surgical-trauma adult critical care, where critical thinking and action were essential to the safety of her patients. She talks about examples of critical thinking in a healthcare environment, saying:
“Nurses must also critically think to determine which patient to see first, which medications to pass first, and the order in which to organize their day caring for patients. Patient conditions and environments are continually in flux, therefore nurses must constantly be evaluating and re-evaluating information they gather (assess) to keep their patients safe.”
The COVID-19 pandemic created hospital care situations where critical thinking was essential. It was expected of the nurses on the general floor and in intensive care units. Crystal Slaughter is an advanced practice nurse in the intensive care unit (ICU) and a nurse educator. She observed critical thinking throughout the pandemic as she watched intensive care nurses test the boundaries of previously held beliefs and master providing excellent care while preserving resources.
“Nurses are at the patient’s bedside and are often the first ones to detect issues. Then, the nurse needs to gather the appropriate subjective and objective data from the patient in order to frame a concise problem statement or question for the physician or advanced practice provider,” she explains.
Top 5 Ways Nurses Can Improve Critical Thinking Skills
We asked our experts for the top five strategies nurses can use to purposefully improve their critical thinking skills.
Case-Based Approach
Slaughter is a fan of the case-based approach to learning critical thinking skills.
In much the same way a detective would approach a mystery, she mentors her students to ask questions about the situation that help determine the information they have and the information they need. “What is going on? What information am I missing? Can I get that information? What does that information mean for the patient? How quickly do I need to act?”
Consider forming a group and working with a mentor who can guide you through case studies. This provides you with a learner-centered environment in which you can analyze data to reach conclusions and develop communication, analytical, and collaborative skills with your colleagues.
Practice Self-Reflection
Rhoads is an advocate for self-reflection. “Nurses should reflect upon what went well or did not go well in their workday and identify areas of improvement or situations in which they should have reached out for help.” Self-reflection is a form of personal analysis to observe and evaluate situations and how you responded.
This gives you the opportunity to discover mistakes you may have made and to establish new behavior patterns that may help you make better decisions. You likely already do this. For example, after a disagreement or contentious meeting, you may go over the conversation in your head and think about ways you could have responded.
It’s important to go through the decisions you made during your day and determine if you should have gotten more information before acting or if you could have asked better questions.
During self-reflection, you may try thinking about the problem in reverse. This may not give you an immediate answer, but can help you see the situation with fresh eyes and a new perspective. How would the outcome of the day be different if you planned the dressing change in reverse with the assumption you would find a wound infection? How does this information change your plan for the next dressing change?
Develop a Questioning Mind
McGowan has learned that “critical thinking is a self-driven process. It isn’t something that can simply be taught. Rather, it is something that you practice and cultivate with experience. To develop critical thinking skills, you have to be curious and inquisitive.”
To gain critical thinking skills, you must undergo a purposeful process of learning strategies and using them consistently so they become a habit. One of those strategies is developing a questioning mind. Meaningful questions lead to useful answers and are at the core of critical thinking .
However, learning to ask insightful questions is a skill you must develop. Faced with staff and nursing shortages , declining patient conditions, and a rising number of tasks to be completed, it may be difficult to do more than finish the task in front of you. Yet, questions drive active learning and train your brain to see the world differently and take nothing for granted.
It is easier to practice questioning in a non-stressful, quiet environment until it becomes a habit. Then, in the moment when your patient’s care depends on your ability to ask the right questions, you can be ready to rise to the occasion.
Practice Self-Awareness in the Moment
Critical thinking in nursing requires self-awareness and being present in the moment. During a hectic shift, it is easy to lose focus as you struggle to finish every task needed for your patients. Passing medication, changing dressings, and hanging intravenous lines all while trying to assess your patient’s mental and emotional status can affect your focus and how you manage stress as a nurse .
Staying present helps you to be proactive in your thinking and anticipate what might happen, such as bringing extra lubricant for a catheterization or extra gloves for a dressing change.
By staying present, you are also better able to practice active listening. This raises your assessment skills and gives you more information as a basis for your interventions and decisions.
Use a Process
As you are developing critical thinking skills, it can be helpful to use a process. For example:
- Ask questions.
- Gather information.
- Implement a strategy.
- Evaluate the results.
- Consider another point of view.
These are the fundamental steps of the nursing process (assess, diagnose, plan, implement, evaluate). The last step will help you overcome one of the common problems of critical thinking in nursing — personal bias.
Common Critical Thinking Pitfalls in Nursing
Your brain uses a set of processes to make inferences about what’s happening around you. In some cases, your unreliable biases can lead you down the wrong path. McGowan places personal biases at the top of his list of common pitfalls to critical thinking in nursing.
“We all form biases based on our own experiences. However, nurses have to learn to separate their own biases from each patient encounter to avoid making false assumptions that may interfere with their care,” he says. Successful critical thinkers accept they have personal biases and learn to look out for them. Awareness of your biases is the first step to understanding if your personal bias is contributing to the wrong decision.
New nurses may be overwhelmed by the transition from academics to clinical practice, leading to a task-oriented mindset and a common new nurse mistake ; this conflicts with critical thinking skills.
“Consider a patient whose blood pressure is low but who also needs to take a blood pressure medication at a scheduled time. A task-oriented nurse may provide the medication without regard for the patient’s blood pressure because medication administration is a task that must be completed,” Slaughter says. “A nurse employing critical thinking skills would address the low blood pressure, review the patient’s blood pressure history and trends, and potentially call the physician to discuss whether medication should be withheld.”
Fear and pride may also stand in the way of developing critical thinking skills. Your belief system and worldview provide comfort and guidance, but this can impede your judgment when you are faced with an individual whose belief system or cultural practices are not the same as yours. Fear or pride may prevent you from pursuing a line of questioning that would benefit the patient. Nurses with strong critical thinking skills exhibit:
- Learn from their mistakes and the mistakes of other nurses
- Look forward to integrating changes that improve patient care
- Treat each patient interaction as a part of a whole
- Evaluate new events based on past knowledge and adjust decision-making as needed
- Solve problems with their colleagues
- Are self-confident
- Acknowledge biases and seek to ensure these do not impact patient care
An Essential Skill for All Nurses
Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.
By using the strategies in this guide during your daily life and in your nursing role, you can intentionally improve your critical thinking abilities and be rewarded with better patient outcomes and potential career advancement.
Frequently Asked Questions About Critical Thinking in Nursing
How are critical thinking skills utilized in nursing practice.
Nursing practice utilizes critical thinking skills to provide the best care for patients. Often, the patient’s cause of pain or health issue is not immediately clear. Nursing professionals need to use their knowledge to determine what might be causing distress, collect vital information, and make quick decisions on how best to handle the situation.
How does nursing school develop critical thinking skills?
Nursing school gives students the knowledge professional nurses use to make important healthcare decisions for their patients. Students learn about diseases, anatomy, and physiology, and how to improve the patient’s overall well-being. Learners also participate in supervised clinical experiences, where they practice using their critical thinking skills to make decisions in professional settings.
Do only nurse managers use critical thinking?
Nurse managers certainly use critical thinking skills in their daily duties. But when working in a health setting, anyone giving care to patients uses their critical thinking skills. Everyone — including licensed practical nurses, registered nurses, and advanced nurse practitioners —needs to flex their critical thinking skills to make potentially life-saving decisions.
Meet Our Contributors
Crystal Slaughter is a core faculty member in Walden University’s RN-to-BSN program. She has worked as an advanced practice registered nurse with an intensivist/pulmonary service to provide care to hospitalized ICU patients and in inpatient palliative care. Slaughter’s clinical interests lie in nursing education and evidence-based practice initiatives to promote improving patient care.
Jenna Liphart Rhoads is a nurse educator and freelance author and editor. She earned a BSN from Saint Francis Medical Center College of Nursing and an MS in nursing education from Northern Illinois University. Rhoads earned a Ph.D. in education with a concentration in nursing education from Capella University where she researched the moderation effects of emotional intelligence on the relationship of stress and GPA in military veteran nursing students. Her clinical background includes surgical-trauma adult critical care, interventional radiology procedures, and conscious sedation in adult and pediatric populations.
Nicholas McGowan is a critical care nurse with 10 years of experience in cardiovascular, surgical intensive care, and neurological trauma nursing. McGowan also has a background in education, leadership, and public speaking. He is an online learner who builds on his foundation of critical care nursing, which he uses directly at the bedside where he still practices. In addition, McGowan hosts an online course at Critical Care Academy where he helps nurses achieve critical care (CCRN) certification.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Publications
- Account settings
- My Bibliography
- Collections
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Email citation, add to collections.
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
- Search in PubMed
- Search in NLM Catalog
- Add to Search
Critical thinking in clinical medicine: what is it?
Affiliation.
- 1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Montreal, Montreal, PQ, Canada. [email protected]
- PMID: 22994988
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01897.x
In this paper, we explore the recent emphasis, in various medical contexts, of the term 'critical' or the notion of 'being critical'. We identify various definitions of being critical and note that they differ strikingly. What are these different uses of the term trying to capture that is important in clinical medicine and medical education? We have analysed these qualities as responsibilist, epistemic virtues. We believe that a virtues approach is best able to make sense of the non-cognitive elements of 'being critical', such as the honesty and courage to question claims in the face of persuasion, authority or social pressure. Medical educators and professional bodies seem to agree that being critical is important and desirable. Yet, it is unclear how this quality can be optimally fostered and balanced with the constraints that act upon individual practitioners in the context of institutional medicine including professional standards and the demands of the doctor-patient relationship. Other constraints such as authoritarianism, intimidation and financial pressures may act against the expression of being critical or even the cultivation of critical thinking. The issue of the constraints on critical thinking and the potential hazards it entails will require further consideration by those who encourage being critical in medicine.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
PubMed Disclaimer
Similar articles
- [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization]. Santiago-Delefosse M, Cahen F, Coeffin-Driol C. Santiago-Delefosse M, et al. Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 14615699 French.
- [Fragmentation of the doctor-patient relationship as a result of standardisation and economisation]. Kienzle HF. Kienzle HF. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 May;98(3):193-9; discussion 206, 213-5. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004. PMID: 15250386 German.
- Robot decisions: on the importance of virtuous judgment in clinical decision making. Gelhaus P. Gelhaus P. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):883-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01720.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011. PMID: 21834842
- Towards evidence-based critical thinking medicine? Uses of best evidence in flawless argumentations. Jenicek M. Jenicek M. Med Sci Monit. 2006 Aug;12(8):RA149-53. Epub 2006 Jul 12. Med Sci Monit. 2006. PMID: 16865076 Review.
- Evidence-based medicine beyond the bedside: keeping an eye on context. Tilburt JC. Tilburt JC. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):721-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00948.x. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008. PMID: 19018902 Review.
- Can medical practitioners rely on prediction models for COVID-19? A systematic review. Shamsoddin E. Shamsoddin E. Evid Based Dent. 2020 Sep;21(3):84-86. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0115-5. Evid Based Dent. 2020. PMID: 32978532 Free PMC article.
- Development and validation of the critical thinking disposition inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M). Wang X, Sun X, Huang T, He R, Hao W, Zhang L. Wang X, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1593-z. BMC Med Educ. 2019. PMID: 31196183 Free PMC article.
- Epistemological beliefs and therapeutic health concepts of physiotherapy students and professionals. Bientzle M, Cress U, Kimmerle J. Bientzle M, et al. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Oct 1;14:208. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-208. BMC Med Educ. 2014. PMID: 25273844 Free PMC article.
- Search in MeSH
Related information
Linkout - more resources, full text sources.
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Critical Thinking
Chris nickson.
- Nov 3, 2020
From Jenicek et al, 2011:
- According to Sackett and colleagues, evidence based medicine (EBM) as ‘… the conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients’, and its integration with individual clinical expertise’
- Critical thinking is a core skill that helps link evidence to clinical expertises, the patient’s individual circumstances and environmental influences
- Critical thinking has been defined as ‘ purposeful self-regulatory judgment which results in interpretation, analysis, evaluation and inference, as well as explanation of the evidential, conceptual, methodological, criteriological, or contextual considerations upon which that judgement is based ’ (numerous definitions exist)
- Critical thinking is a learned process that can be developed through teaching and guided practice
SPECIFIC ABILITIES UNDERLYING CRITICAL THINKING IN MEDICINE
- Understanding the principles of argumentation
- Knowing and understanding dual System 1 and System 2 thinking processes and their interaction (see below)
- Awareness and understanding of evolutionary influences on decision making
- Recognizing distracting stimuli, propaganda, bias, irrelevance
- Identifying, analyzing, and challenging assumptions in arguments
- Awareness and understanding of cognitive fallacies and poor reasoning
- Awareness and understanding of the impact of major cognitive and affective biases on thinking
- Recognizing deception, deliberate or otherwise
- Capacity for assessing credibility of information
- Understanding the need for monitoring and control of one’s own thought processes
- Understanding of the importance of monitoring and control of one’s own affective state
- Awareness of the critical impact of fatigue and sleep deprivation on decision making
- Imagining and exploring alternatives
- Capacity for effectively working through problems
- Understanding of the importance of the context in which decisions are made
- Systematic and effective decision making
- Understanding the dynamics and properties of individual vs. group decision making
- Capacity for anticipating the consequences of decisions
LOGICAL FALLACIES
- See LogicalFallacies.info for an overview of logical fallacies and examples of the different types
References and Links
Journal articles
- Croskerry P. Diagnostic Failure: A Cognitive and Affective Approach. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Volume 2: Concepts and Methodology). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb. [ PMID 21249816 ]
- Croskerry P, Petrie DA, Reilly JB, Tait G. Deciding about fast and slow decisions. Acad Med. 2014;89:(2)197-200. [ PMID 24362398 ]
- Croskerry P, Singhal G, Mamede S. Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22 Suppl 2:ii65-ii72. [ PMC3786644 ]
- Jenicek M, Croskerry P, Hitchcock DL. Evidence and its uses in health care and research: the role of critical thinking. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17:(1)RA12-7. [ PMC3524675 ]
- Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Muir Gray JA, et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72. [ PMC2349778 ]
- Sutherland WJ, et al. Twenty tips for interpreting scientific claims. Nature 2013;503:335–337 [Free Full Text]
FOAM and web resources
- Skeptical medicine
- Clinical Reasoning Toolkit
- LogicalFallacies.info
- Skeptics Guide to the Universe – Logical Fallacies
Chris is an Intensivist and ECMO specialist at the Alfred ICU in Melbourne. He is also a Clinical Adjunct Associate Professor at Monash University . He is a co-founder of the Australia and New Zealand Clinician Educator Network (ANZCEN) and is the Lead for the ANZCEN Clinician Educator Incubator programme. He is on the Board of Directors for the Intensive Care Foundation and is a First Part Examiner for the College of Intensive Care Medicine . He is an internationally recognised Clinician Educator with a passion for helping clinicians learn and for improving the clinical performance of individuals and collectives.
After finishing his medical degree at the University of Auckland, he continued post-graduate training in New Zealand as well as Australia’s Northern Territory, Perth and Melbourne. He has completed fellowship training in both intensive care medicine and emergency medicine, as well as post-graduate training in biochemistry, clinical toxicology, clinical epidemiology, and health professional education.
He is actively involved in in using translational simulation to improve patient care and the design of processes and systems at Alfred Health. He coordinates the Alfred ICU’s education and simulation programmes and runs the unit’s education website, INTENSIVE . He created the ‘Critically Ill Airway’ course and teaches on numerous courses around the world. He is one of the founders of the FOAM movement (Free Open-Access Medical education) and is co-creator of litfl.com , the RAGE podcast , the Resuscitology course, and the SMACC conference.
His one great achievement is being the father of three amazing children.
On Twitter, he is @precordialthump .
| INTENSIVE | RAGE | Resuscitology | SMACC
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Critical thinking (CT) can be defined as the ability to identify and analyse problems as well as seek and evaluate relevant information in order to reach an appropriate conclusion. Medical academics and practitioners have raised concerns about the low levels of critical thinking and stress the need for fostering critical thinking amongmedical ...
This chapter helps you begin the journey to improving thinking in two steps: (1) First you learn why health care organizations and nursing schools stress the need for critical thinking. (2) Secondly, you examine exactly what critical thinking is and how it relates to clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.
Critical thinking can help medical students and doctors achieve improved productivity, better clinical decision making, higher grades and much more. This article will explain why critical thinking is a must for people in the medical field.
The National League for Nursing Accreditation Commission (NLNAC) defined critical thinking as: the deliberate nonlinear process of collecting, interpreting, analyzing, drawing conclusions about, presenting, and evaluating information that is both factually and belief based.
Three main conceptions of critical thinking were identified, each of which will be elaborated in greater detail below: biomedical critical thinking, humanist critical thinking, and social justice-oriented critical thinking.
Critical thinking, the ability to think clearly and rationally about what to do or what to believe, is essential for the practice of medicine. Few doctors are likely to argue with this.
Critical thinking in nursing protects patient health and contributes to professional development and career advancement. Administrative and clinical nursing leaders are required to have strong critical thinking skills to be successful in their positions.
In this paper, we explore the recent emphasis, in various medical contexts, of the term 'critical' or the notion of 'being critical'. We identify various definitions of being critical and note that they differ strikingly.
Clinicians today need strong critical thinking skills in order to properly diagnose and treat patients. That’s one reason why it is critical for educators to help medical students cultivate these skills early in their training.
Critical thinking is a core skill that helps link evidence to clinical expertises, the patient’s individual circumstances and environmental influences.