• CASP Subquestions
Note . The CASP questions are adapted from “10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research,” by Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, 2013, retrieved from http://media.wix.com/ugd/dded87_29c5b002d99342f788c6ac670e49f274.pdf . Its license can be found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Once articles were assessed by the two authors independently, all three authors discussed and reconciled our assessment. No articles were excluded based on CASP results; rather, results were used to depict the general adequacy (or rigor) of all 55 articles meeting inclusion criteria for our systematic review. In addition, the CASP was included to enhance our examination of the relationship between the methods and the usefulness of the findings documented in each of the QD articles included in this review.
To further assess each of the 55 articles, data were extracted on: (a) research objectives, (b) design justification, (c) theoretical or philosophical framework, (d) sampling and sample size, (e) data collection and data sources, (f) data analysis, and (g) presentation of findings (see Table 2 ). We discussed extracted data and identified common and unique features in the articles included in our systematic review. Findings are described in detail below and in Table 3 .
Elements for Data Extraction
Elements | Data Extraction |
---|---|
Research objectives | • Verbs used in objectives or aims |
• Focuses of study | |
Design justification | • If the article cited references for qualitative description |
• If the article offered rationale to choose qualitative description | |
• References cited | |
• Rationale reported | |
Theoretical or philosophical frameworks | • If the article has theoretical or philosophical frameworks for study |
• Theoretical or philosophical frameworks reported | |
• How the frameworks were used in data collection and analysis | |
Sampling and sample sizes | • Sampling strategies (e.g., purposeful sampling, maximum variation) |
• Sample size | |
Data collection and sources | • Data collection techniques (e.g., individual or focus-group interviews, interview guide, surveys, field notes) |
Data analysis | • Data analysis techniques (e.g., qualitative content analysis, thematic analysis, constant comparison) |
• If data saturation was achieved | |
Presentation of findings | • Statement of findings |
• Consistency with research objectives |
Data Extraction and Analysis Results
Authors Country | Research Objectives | Design justification | Theoretical/ philosophical frameworks | Sampling/ sample size | Data collection and data sources | Data analysis | Findings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
• USA | • Explore • Responses to communication strategies | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | Not reported (NR) | • Purposive sampling/ maximum variation • 32 family members | • Interviews • Observations • Review of daily flow sheet • Demographics | • Inductive and deductive qualitative content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Five themes about family members’ perceptions of nursing communication approaches |
• Sweden | • Describe • Experiences of using guidelines in daily practice | • (-) Reference • (+) Rationale • Part of a research program | NR | • Unspecified • 8 care providers | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Interview guide | • Qualitative content analysis • (-) Data saturation | One theme and seven subthemes about care providers’ experiences of using guidelines in daily practice |
• USA | • Examine • Culturally specific views of processes and causes of midlife weight gain | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | Health belief model and Kleiman’s explanatory model | • Unspecified • 19 adults | • Semistructured, individual interview | • Conventional content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Three main categories (from the model) and eight subthemes about causes of weight gain in midlife |
• Iran | • Explore • Factors initiating responsibility among medical trainees | • (-) Reference • (+) Rationale | NR | • Convenience, snowball, and maximum variation sampling • 15 trainees and other professionals | • Semistructured, individual interview • Interview guide | • Conventional content analysis • Constant comparison • (+) Data saturation | Two themes and individual and non- individual-based factors per theme |
• Iran | • Explore • Factors related to job satisfaction and dissatisfaction | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Convenience sampling • 85 nurses | • Semistructured focus group interviews • Interview guide | • Thematic analysis • (+) Data saturation | Three main themes and associated factors regarding job satisfaction and dissatisfaction |
• Norway | • Describe • Perceptions on simulation-based team training | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Strategic sampling • 18 registered nurses | • Semistructured individual interviews | • Inductive content analysis • (-) Data saturation | One main category, three categories, and six sub- categories regarding nurses’ perceptions on simulation-based team training |
• USA | • Determine • Barriers and supports for attending college and nursing school | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Unspecified • 45 students | • Focus-group interviews • Using Photovoice and SHOWeD | • Constant comparison • (-) Data saturation | Five themes about facilitators and barriers |
• USA | • Explore • Reasons for choosing home birth and birth experiences | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 20 women | • Semistructured focus-group interviews • Interview guide • Field notes | • Qualitative content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Five common themes and concepts about reasons for choosing home birth based on their birth experiences |
• New Zealand | • Explore • Normal fetal activity related to hunger and satiation | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • Denzin & Lincoln (2011) | NR | • Purposive sampling • 19 pregnant women | • Semistructured individual interviews • Open-ended questions | • Inductive qualitative content analysis • Descriptive statistical analysis • (+) Data saturation | Four patterns regarding fetal activities in relation to meal anticipation, maternal hunger, maternal meal consummation, and maternal satiety |
• Italy | • Explore, describe, and compare • perceptions of nursing caring | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | NR | • Purposive sampling • 20 nurses and 20 patients | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide • Field notes during interviews | • Unspecified various analytic strategies including constant comparison • (-) Data saturation | Nursing caring from both patients’ and nurses’ perspectives – a summary of data in visible caring and invisible caring |
• Hong Kong | • Address • How to reduce coronary heart disease risks | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • Secondary analysis • • | NR | • Convenience and snowball sampling • 105 patients | • Focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Four categories about patients’ abilities to reduce coronary heart disease |
• Taiwan | • Explore • Reasons for young–old people not killing themselves | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Convenience sampling • 31 older adults | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide • Observation with memos/reflective journal | • Content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Six themes regarding reasons for not committing to suicide |
• USA | • Explore • Neonatal intensive care unit experiences | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Purposive sampling and convenience sample • 15 mothers | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide | • Qualitative content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Four themes about participants’ experiences of neonatal intensive care unit |
• Colombia | • Investigate • Barriers/facilitators to implementing evidence-based nursing | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | Ottawa model for research use: knowledge translation framework | • Convenience sampling • 13 nursing professionals | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide | • Inductive qualitative content analysis • Constant comparison • (-) Data saturation | Four main barriers and potential facilitators to evidence-based nursing |
• Australia | • Explore • Perceptions and utilization of diaries | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | NR | • Unspecified • 19 patients and families | • Responses to open-ended questions on survey | • Unspecified analysis strategy • (-) Data saturation | Five themes regarding perceptions on use of diaries and descriptive statistics using frequencies of utilization |
• USA | • Explore • Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about sexual consent | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • Part of a larger mixed-method study | Theory of planned behavior | • Purposive sampling • snowball sampling • 26 women | • Semistructured focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Three main categories and subthemes regarding sexual consent |
• Sweden | • Describe • Experiences of knowledge development in wound management | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale: weak • | NR | • Purposive sampling • 16 district nurses | • Individual interviews • Interview guide | • Qualitative content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Three categories and eleven sub-categories about knowledge development experiences in wound management |
• USA | • Describe • Parental-pain journey, beliefs about pain, and attitudes/behaviors related to children’s responses | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • • Part of a larger mixed methods study | NR | • Purposive sampling • 9 parents | • Individual interviews • One open- ended question | • Qualitative content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Two main themes, categories, and subcategories about parents’ experiences of observing children’s pain |
• USA | • Describe • Challenges and barriers in providing culturally competent care | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • Secondary analysis | NR | • Stratified sampling • 253 nurses | • Written responses to 2 open-ended questions on survey | • Thematic analysis • (-) Data saturation | Three themes regarding challenges/barriers |
• Denmark | • Describe • Experiences of childbirth | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • A substudy | NR | • Purposive sampling with maximum variation • Partners of 10 women | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Interview guide | • Thematic analysis • (+) Data saturation | Three themes and four subthemes about partners’ experiences of women’s childbirth |
• Australia | • Explore • Perceptions about medical nutrition and hydration at the end of life | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 10 nurses | • Focus-group interviews | • “analyzed thematically” • (-) Data saturation | One main theme and four subthemes regarding nurses’ perceptions on EOL- related medical nutrition and hydration |
• USA | • Describe • Reasons for leaving a home visiting program early | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Convenience sample • 32 mothers, nurses, and nurse supervisors | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Inductive content analysis • Constant comparison approach • (+) Data saturation | Three sets of reasons for leaving a home visiting program |
• Sweden | • Explore and describe • Beliefs and attitudes around the decision for a caesarean section | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • | NR | • Unspecified • 21 males | • Individual telephone interviews | • Thematic analysis • Constant comparison approach • (-) Data saturation | Two themes and subthemes in relation to the research objective |
• Taiwan | • Explore • Illness experiences of early onset of knee osteoarthritis | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • • Part of a large research series | NR | • Purposive sampling • 17 adults | • Semistructured, Individual interviews • Interview guide • Memo/field notes (observations) | • Inductive content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Three major themes and nine subthemes regarding experiences of early onset-knee osteoarthritis |
• Australia | • Explore • Perceptions about bedside handover (new model) by nurses | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • | NR | • Purposive sampling • 30 patients | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Interview guide | • Thematic content analysis • (-) Data analysis | Two dominant themes and related subthemes regarding patients’ thoughts about nurses’ bedside handover |
• Sweden | • Identify • Patterns in learning when living with diabetes | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposive sampling with variations in age and sex • 13 participants | • Semistructured, individual interviews (3 times over 3 years) | • analysis process • Inductive qualitative content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Five main patterns of learning when living with diabetes for three years following diagnosis |
• Canada | • Evaluate • Book chat intervention based on a novel | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • Part of a larger research project | NR | • Unspecified • 11 long-term- care staff | • Questionnaire with two open- ended questions | • Thematic content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Five themes (positive comments) about the book chat with brief description |
• Taiwan | • Explore • Facilitators and barriers to implementing smoking- cessation counseling services | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Unspecified • 16 nurse- counselors | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide | • Inductive content analysis • Constant comparison • (-) Data saturation | Two themes and eight subthemes about facilitators and barriers described using 2-4 quotations per subtheme |
• USA | • Identify • Educational strategies to manage disruptive behavior | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • Part of a larger study | NR | • Unspecified • 9 nurses | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Interview guide | • Content analysis procedures • (-) Data saturation | Two main themes regarding education strategies for nurse educators |
• USA | • Explore • Experiences of difficulty resolving patient- related concerns | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • Secondary analysis | NR | • Unspecified • 1932 physician, nursing, and midwifery professionals | • E-mail survey with multiple- choice and free- text responses | • Inductive thematic analysis • Descriptive statistics • (-) Data saturation | One overarching theme and four subthemes about professionals’ experiences of difficulty resolving patient-related concerns |
• Singapore | • Explicate • Experience of quality of life for older adults | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | Parse’s human becoming paradigm | • Unspecified • 10 elderly residents | • Individual interviews • Interview questions presented (Parse) | • Unspecified analysis techniques • (-) Data saturation | Three themes presented using both participants’ language and the researcher’s language |
• China | • Explore • Perspectives on learning about caring | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 20 nursing students | • Focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Conventional content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Four categories and associated subcategories about facilitators and challenges to learning about caring |
• Poland | • Describe and assess • Components of the patient–nurse relationship and pediatric-ward amenities | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful, maximum variation sampling • 26 parents or caregivers and 22 children | • Individual interviews | • Qualitative content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Five main topics described from the perspectives of children and parents |
• Canada | • Evaluate • Acceptability and feasibility of hand-massage therapy | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale • Secondary to a RCT | Focused on feasibility and acceptability | • Unspecified • 40 patients | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Field notes • Video recording | • Thematic analysis for acceptability • Quantitative ratings of video items for feasibility • (-) Data analysis | Summary of data focusing on predetermined indicators of acceptability and descriptive statistics to present feasibility |
• USA | • Understand • Challenges occurring during transitions of care | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • Part of a larger study | NR | • Convenience sample • 22 nurses | • Focus groups • Interview guide | • Qualitative content analysis methods • (+) Data analysis | Three themes about challenges regarding transitions of care: |
• Canada | • Understand • Factors that influence nurses’ retention in their current job | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 41 nurses | • Focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Directed content analysis • (+) Data saturation | Nurses’ reasons to stay and leave their current job |
• Australia | • Extend • Understanding of caregivers’ views on advance care planning | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • Grounded theory overtone | NR | • Theoretical sampling • 18 caregivers | • Semistructured focus group and individual interviews • Interview guide • Vignette technique | • Inductive, cyclic, and constant comparative analysis • (-) Data analysis | Three themes regarding caregivers’ perceptions on advance care planning |
• USA | • Describe • Outcomes older adults with epilepsy hope to achieve in management | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Unspecified • 20 patients | • Individual interview | • Conventional content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Six main themes and associated subthemes regarding what older adults hoped to achieve in management of their epilepsy |
• The Netherlands | • Gain • Experience of personal dignity and factors influencing it | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | Model of dignity in illness | • Maximum variation sampling • 30 nursing home residents | • Individual interviews • Interview guide | • Thematic analysis • Constant comparison • (+) Data saturation | The threatening effect of illness and three domains being threatened by illness in relation to participants’ experiences of personal dignity |
• USA | • Identify and describe • Needs in mental health services and “ideal” program | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • There is a primary study | NR | • Unspecified • 52 family members | • Semistructured, individual and focus-group interviews | • “Standard content analytic procedures” with case-ordered meta-matrix • (-) Data saturation | Two main topics – (a) intervention modalities that would fit family members’ needs in mental health services and (b) topics that programs should address |
• USA | • “What are the perceptions of staff nurses regarding palliative care…?” | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposive, convenience sampling • 18 nurses | • Semistructured and focus-group interviews • Interview guide | • Ritchie and Spencer’s framework for data analysis • (-) Data saturation | Five thematic categories and associated subcategories about nurses’ perceptions of palliative care |
• Canada | • Describe • Experience of caring for a relative with dementia | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • Sandelowski ( ; ) • Secondary analysis • Phenomenological overtone | NR | • Purposive sampling • 11 bereaved family members | • Individual interviews • 27 transcripts from the primary study | • Unspecified • (-) Data saturation | Five major themes regarding the journey with dementia from the time prior to diagnosis and into bereavement |
• Canada | • Describe Experience of fetal fibronectin testing | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • | NR | • Unspecified • 17 women | • Semistructured individual interviews • Interview guide | • Conventional content analysis • (+) Data saturation | One overarching theme, three themes, and six subthemes about women’s experiences of fetal fibronectin testing |
• New Zealand | • Explore • Role of nurses in providing palliative and end-of-life care | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • • Part of a larger study | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 21 nurses | • Semistructured individual interviews | • Thematic analysis • (-) Data saturation | Three themes about practice nurses’ experiences in providing palliative and end-of-life care |
• Brazil | • Understand • Experience with postnatal depression | • (+) Reference • (-) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful, criterion sampling • 15 women with postnatal depression | • Minimally structured, individual interviews | • Thematic analysis • (+) Data saturation | Two themes – women’s “bad thoughts” and their four types of responses to fear of harm (with frequencies) |
• Australia | • Understand • Experience of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 10 patients | • Semistructured, individual interviews • Interview guide | • Thematic analysis • (+) Data saturation | Four themes regarding patients’ experiences of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion |
• USA | • Discover • Context, values, and background meaning of cultural competency | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | Focused on cultural competence | • Purposive, maximum variation, and network • 20 experts | • Semistructured, individual interviews | • Within-case and across-case analysis • (-) Data saturation | Three themes regarding cultural competency |
• USA | • Explore and describe • Cancer experience | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Unspecified • 15 patients | • Longitudinal individual interviews (4 time points) • 40 interviews | • Inductive content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Processes and themes about adolescent identify work and cancer identify work across the illness trajectory |
• Sweden | • Explore • Experiences of giving support to patients during the transition | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | Focused on support and transition | • Unspecified (but likely purposeful sampling) • 8 nurses | • Semistructured Individual interviews • Interview guide | • Content analysis • (-) Data saturation | One theme, three main categories, and eight associated categories |
• Taiwan | • Describe • Process of women’s recovery from stillbirth | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 21 women | • Individual interview techniques | • Inductive analytic approaches ( ) • (+) Data saturation | Three stages (themes) regarding the recovery process of Taiwanese women with stillbirth |
• Iran | • Describe • Perspectives of causes of medication errors | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 24 nursing students | • Focus-group interviews • Observations with notes | • Content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Two main themes about nursing students’ perceptions on causes of medication errors |
• Iran | • Explore • Image of nursing | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Purposeful sampling • 18 male nurses | • Semistructured individual, interviews • Field notes | • Content analysis • (-) Data saturation | Two main views (themes) on nursing presented with subthemes per view |
• Spain | • Ascertain • Barriers to sexual expression | • (-) Reference • (-) Rationale | NR | • Maximum variation • 100 staff and residents | • Semistructured, individual interview | • Content analysis • (-) Data saturation | 40% of participants without identification of barriers and 60% with seven most cited barriers to sexual expression in the long-term care setting |
• Canada | • Explore • Perceptions of empowerment in academic nursing environments | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • Sandelowski ( , ) | Theories of structural power in organizations and psychological empowerment | • Unspecified • 8 clinical instructors | • Semistructured, individual • interview guide | • Unspecified (but used pre-determined concepts) • (+) Data saturation | Structural empowerment and psychological empowerment described using predetermined concepts |
• China | • Investigate • Meaning of life and health experience with chronic illness | • (+) Reference • (+) Rationale • Sandelowski ( , ) | Positive health philosophy | • Purposive, convenience sampling • 11 patients | • Individual interviews • Observations of daily behavior with field notes | • Thematic analysis • (-) Data saturation | Four themes regarding the meaning of life and health when living with chronic illnesses |
Note . NR = not reported
Justification for use of a QD design was evident in close to half (47.3%) of the 55 publications. While most researchers clearly described recruitment strategies (80%) and data collection methods (100%), justification for how the study setting was selected was only identified in 38.2% of the articles and almost 75% of the articles did not include any reason for the choice of data collection methods (e.g., focus-group interviews). In the vast majority (90.9%) of the articles, researchers did not explain their involvement and positionality during the process of recruitment and data collection or during data analysis (63.6%). Ethical standards were reported in greater than 89% of all articles and most articles included an in-depth description of data analysis (83.6%) and development of categories or themes (92.7%). Finally, all researchers clearly stated their findings in relation to research questions/objectives. Researchers of 83.3% of the articles discussed the credibility of their findings (see Table 1 ).
In statements of study objectives and/or questions, the most frequently used verbs were “explore” ( n = 22) and “describe” ( n = 17). Researchers also used “identify” ( n = 3), “understand” ( n = 4), or “investigate” ( n = 2). Most articles focused on participants’ experiences related to certain phenomena ( n = 18), facilitators/challenges/factors/reasons ( n = 14), perceptions about specific care/nursing practice/interventions ( n = 11), and knowledge/attitudes/beliefs ( n = 3).
A total of 30 articles included references for QD. The most frequently cited references ( n = 23) were “Whatever happened to qualitative description?” ( Sandelowski, 2000 ) and “What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited” ( Sandelowski, 2010 ). Other references cited included “Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research?” ( Neergaard et al., 2009 ), “Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research” ( Pope & Mays, 1995 ), and general research textbooks ( Polit & Beck, 2004 , 2012 ).
In 26 articles (and not necessarily the same as those citing specific references to QD), researchers provided a rationale for selecting QD. Most researchers chose QD because this approach aims to produce a straight description and comprehensive summary of the phenomenon of interest using participants’ language and staying close to the data (or using low inference).
Authors of two articles distinctly stated a QD design, yet also acknowledged grounded-theory or phenomenological overtones by adopting some techniques from these qualitative traditions ( Michael, O'Callaghan, Baird, Hiscock, & Clayton, 2014 ; Peacock, Hammond-Collins, & Forbes, 2014 ). For example, Michael et al. (2014 , p. 1066) reported:
The research used a qualitative descriptive design with grounded theory overtones ( Sandelowski, 2000 ). We sought to provide a comprehensive summary of participants’ views through theoretical sampling; multiple data sources (focus groups [FGs] and interviews); inductive, cyclic, and constant comparative analysis; and condensation of data into thematic representations ( Corbin & Strauss, 1990 , 2008 ).
Authors of four additional articles included language suggestive of a grounded-theory or phenomenological tradition, e.g., by employing a constant comparison technique or translating themes stated in participants’ language into the primary language of the researchers during data analysis ( Asemani et al., 2014 ; Li, Lee, Chen, Jeng, & Chen, 2014 ; Ma, 2014 ; Soule, 2014 ). Additionally, Li et al. (2014) specifically reported use of a grounded-theory approach.
In most (n = 48) articles, researchers did not specify any theoretical or philosophical framework. Of those articles in which a framework or philosophical stance was included, the authors of five articles described the framework as guiding the development of an interview guide ( Al-Zadjali, Keller, Larkey, & Evans, 2014 ; DeBruyn, Ochoa-Marin, & Semenic, 2014 ; Fantasia, Sutherland, Fontenot, & Ierardi, 2014 ; Ma, 2014 ; Wiens, Babenko-Mould, & Iwasiw, 2014 ). In two articles, data analysis was described as including key concepts of a framework being used as pre-determined codes or categories ( Al-Zadjali et al., 2014 ; Wiens et al., 2014 ). Oosterveld-Vlug et al. (2014) and Zhang, Shan, and Jiang (2014) discussed a conceptual model and underlying philosophy in detail in the background or discussion section, although the model and philosophy were not described as being used in developing interview questions or analyzing data.
In 38 of the 55 articles, researchers reported ‘purposeful sampling’ or some derivation of purposeful sampling such as convenience ( n = 10), maximum variation ( n = 8), snowball ( n = 3), and theoretical sampling ( n = 1). In three instances ( Asemani et al., 2014 ; Chan & Lopez, 2014 ; Soule, 2014 ), multiple sampling strategies were described, for example, a combination of snowball, convenience, and maximum variation sampling. In articles where maximum variation sampling was employed, “variation” referred to seeking diversity in participants’ demographics ( n = 7; e.g., age, gender, and education level), while one article did not include details regarding how their maximum variation sampling strategy was operationalized ( Marcinowicz, Abramowicz, Zarzycka, Abramowicz, & Konstantynowicz, 2014 ). Authors of 17 articles did not specify their sampling techniques.
Sample sizes ranged from 8 to 1,932 with nine studies in the 8–10 participant range and 24 studies in the 11–20 participant range. The participant range of 21–30 and 31–50 was reported in eight articles each. Six studies included more than 50 participants. Two of these articles depicted quite large sample sizes (N=253, Hart & Mareno, 2014 ; N=1,932, Lyndon et al., 2014 ) and the authors of these articles described the use of survey instruments and analysis of responses to open-ended questions. This was in contrast to studies with smaller sample sizes where individual interviews and focus groups were more commonly employed.
In a majority of studies, researchers collected data through individual ( n = 39) and/or focus-group ( n = 14) interviews that were semistructured. Most researchers reported that interviews were audiotaped ( n = 51) and interview guides were described as the primary data collection tool in 29 of the 51 studies. In some cases, researchers also described additional data sources, for example, taking memos or field notes during participant observation sessions or as a way to reflect their thoughts about interviews ( n = 10). Written responses to open-ended questions in survey questionnaires were another type of data source in a small number of studies ( n = 4).
The analysis strategy most commonly used in the QD studies included in this review was qualitative content analysis ( n = 30). Among the studies where this technique was used, most researchers described an inductive approach; researchers of two studies analyzed data both inductively and deductively. Thematic analysis was adopted in 14 studies and the constant comparison technique in 10 studies. In nine studies, researchers employed multiple techniques to analyze data including qualitative content analysis with constant comparison ( Asemani et al., 2014 ; DeBruyn et al., 2014 ; Holland, Christensen, Shone, Kearney, & Kitzman, 2014 ; Li et al., 2014 ) and thematic analysis with constant comparison ( Johansson, Hildingsson, & Fenwick, 2014 ; Oosterveld-Vlug et al., 2014 ). In addition, five teams conducted descriptive statistical analysis using both quantitative and qualitative data and counting the frequencies of codes/themes ( Ewens, Chapman, Tulloch, & Hendricks, 2014 ; Miller, 2014 ; Santos, Sandelowski, & Gualda, 2014 ; Villar, Celdran, Faba, & Serrat, 2014 ) or targeted events through video monitoring ( Martorella, Boitor, Michaud, & Gelinas, 2014 ). Tseng, Chen, and Wang (2014) cited Thorne, Reimer Kirkham, and O’Flynn-Magee (2004)’s interpretive description as the inductive analytic approach. In five out of 55 articles, researchers did not specifically name their analysis strategies, despite including descriptions about procedural aspects of data analysis. Researchers of 20 studies reported that data saturation for their themes was achieved.
Researchers described participants’ experiences of health care, interventions, or illnesses in 18 articles and presented straightforward, focused, detailed descriptions of facilitators, challenges, factors, reasons, and causes in 15 articles. Participants’ perceptions of specific care, interventions, or programs were described in detail in 11 articles. All researchers presented their findings with extensive descriptions including themes or categories. In 25 of 55 articles, figures or tables were also presented to illustrate or summarize the findings. In addition, the authors of three articles summarized, organized, and described their data using key concepts of conceptual models ( Al-Zadjali et al., 2014 ; Oosterveld-Vlug et al., 2014 ; Wiens et al., 2014 ). Martorella et al. (2014) assessed acceptability and feasibility of hand massage therapy and arranged their findings in relation to pre-determined indicators of acceptability and feasibility. In one longitudinal QD study ( Kneck, Fagerberg, Eriksson, & Lundman, 2014 ), the researchers presented the findings as several key patterns of learning for persons living with diabetes; in another longitudinal QD study ( Stegenga & Macpherson, 2014 ), findings were presented as processes and themes regarding patients’ identity work across the cancer trajectory. In another two studies, the researchers described and compared themes or categories from two different perspectives, such as patients and nurses ( Canzan, Heilemann, Saiani, Mortari, & Ambrosi, 2014 ) or parents and children ( Marcinowicz et al., 2014 ). Additionally, Ma (2014) reported themes using both participants’ language and the researcher’s language.
In this systematic review, we examined and reported specific characteristics of methods and findings reported in journal articles self-identified as QD and published during one calendar year. To accomplish this we identified 55 articles that met inclusion criteria, performed a quality appraisal following CASP guidelines, and extracted and analyzed data focusing on QD features. In general, three primary findings emerged. First, despite inconsistencies, most QD publications had the characteristics that were originally observed by Sandelowski (2000) and summarized by other limited available QD literature. Next, there are no clear boundaries in methods used in the QD studies included in this review; in a number of studies, researchers adopted and combined techniques originating from other qualitative traditions to obtain rich data and increase their understanding of the phenomenon under investigation. Finally, justification for how QD was chosen and why it would be an appropriate fit for a particular study is an area in need of increased attention.
In general, the overall characteristics were consistent with design features of QD studies described in the literature ( Neergaard et al., 2009 ; Sandelowski, 2000 , 2010 ; Vaismoradi et al., 2013 ). For example, many authors reported that study objectives were to describe or explore participants’ experiences and factors related to certain phenomena, events, or interventions. In most cases, these authors cited Sandelowski (2000) as a reference for this particular characteristic. It was rare that theoretical or philosophical frameworks were identified, which also is consistent with descriptions of QD. In most studies, researchers used purposeful sampling and its derivative sampling techniques, collected data through interviews, and analyzed data using qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis. Moreover, all researchers presented focused or comprehensive, descriptive summaries of data including themes or categories answering their research questions. These characteristics do not indicate that there are correct ways to do QD studies; rather, they demonstrate how others designed and produced QD studies.
In several studies, researchers combined techniques that originated from other qualitative traditions for sampling, data collection, and analysis. This flexibility or variability, a key feature of recently published QD studies, may indicate that there are no clear boundaries in designing QD studies. Sandelowski (2010) articulated: “in the actual world of research practice, methods bleed into each other; they are so much messier than textbook depictions” (p. 81). Hammersley (2007) also observed:
“We are not so much faced with a set of clearly differentiated qualitative approaches as with a complex landscape of variable practice in which the inhabitants use a range of labels (‘ethnography’, ‘discourse analysis’, ‘life history work’, narrative study’, ……, and so on) in diverse and open-ended ways in order to characterize their orientation, and probably do this somewhat differently across audiences and occasions” (p. 293).
This concept of having no clear boundaries in methods when designing a QD study should enable researchers to obtain rich data and produce a comprehensive summary of data through various data collection and analysis approaches to answer their research questions. For example, using an ethnographical approach (e.g., participant observation) in data collection for a QD study may facilitate an in-depth description of participants’ nonverbal expressions and interactions with others and their environment as well as situations or events in which researchers are interested ( Kawulich, 2005 ). One example found in our review is that Adams et al. (2014) explored family members’ responses to nursing communication strategies for patients in intensive care units (ICUs). In this study, researchers conducted interviews with family members, observed interactions between healthcare providers, patients, and family members in ICUs, attended ICU rounds and family meetings, and took field notes about their observations and reflections. Accordingly, the variability in methods provided Adams and colleagues (2014) with many different aspects of data that were then used to complement participants’ interviews (i.e., data triangulation). Moreover, by using a constant comparison technique in addition to qualitative content analysis or thematic analysis in QD studies, researchers compare each case with others looking for similarities and differences as well as reasoning why differences exist, to generate more general understanding of phenomena of interest ( Thorne, 2000 ). In fact, this constant comparison analysis is compatible with qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis and we found several examples of using this approach in studies we reviewed ( Asemani et al., 2014 ; DeBruyn et al., 2014 ; Holland et al., 2014 ; Johansson et al., 2014 ; Li et al., 2014 ; Oosterveld-Vlug et al., 2014 ).
However, this flexibility or variability in methods of QD studies may cause readers’ as well as researchers’ confusion in designing and often labeling qualitative studies ( Neergaard et al., 2009 ). Especially, it could be difficult for scholars unfamiliar with qualitative studies to differentiate QD studies with “hues, tones, and textures” of qualitative traditions ( Sandelowski, 2000 , p. 337) from grounded theory, phenomenological, and ethnographical research. In fact, the major difference is in the presentation of the findings (or outcomes of qualitative research) ( Neergaard et al., 2009 ; Sandelowski, 2000 ). The final products of grounded theory, phenomenological, and ethnographical research are a generation of a theory, a description of the meaning or essence of people’s lived experience, and an in-depth, narrative description about certain culture, respectively, through researchers’ intensive/deep interpretations, reflections, and/or transformation of data ( Streubert & Carpenter, 2011 ). In contrast, QD studies result in “a rich, straight description” of experiences, perceptions, or events using language from the collected data ( Neergaard et al., 2009 ) through low-inference (or data-near) interpretations during data analysis ( Sandelowski, 2000 , 2010 ). This feature is consistent with our finding regarding presentation of findings: in all QD articles included in this systematic review, the researchers presented focused or comprehensive, descriptive summaries to their research questions.
Finally, an explanation or justification of why a QD approach was chosen or appropriate for the study aims was not found in more than half of studies in the sample. While other qualitative approaches, including grounded theory, phenomenology, ethnography, and narrative analysis, are used to better understand people’s thoughts, behaviors, and situations regarding certain phenomena ( Sullivan-Bolyai et al., 2005 ), as noted above, the results will likely read differently than those for a QD study ( Carter & Little, 2007 ). Therefore, it is important that researchers accurately label and justify their choices of approach, particularly for studies focused on participants’ experiences, which could be addressed with other qualitative traditions. Justifying one’s research epistemology, methodology, and methods allows readers to evaluate these choices for internal consistency, provides context to assist in understanding the findings, and contributes to the transparency of choices, all of which enhance the rigor of the study ( Carter & Little, 2007 ; Wu, Thompson, Aroian, McQuaid, & Deatrick, 2016 ).
Use of the CASP tool drew our attention to the credibility and usefulness of the findings of the QD studies included in this review. Although justification for study design and methods was lacking in many articles, most authors reported techniques of recruitment, data collection, and analysis that appeared. Internal consistencies among study objectives, methods, and findings were achieved in most studies, increasing readers’ confidence that the findings of these studies are credible and useful in understanding under-explored phenomenon of interest.
In summary, our findings support the notion that many scholars employ QD and include a variety of commonly observed characteristics in their study design and subsequent publications. Based on our review, we found that QD as a scholarly approach allows flexibility as research questions and study findings emerge. We encourage authors to provide as many details as possible regarding how QD was chosen for a particular study as well as details regarding methods to facilitate readers’ understanding and evaluation of the study design and rigor. We acknowledge the challenge of strict word limitation with submissions to print journals; potential solutions include collaboration with journal editors and staff to consider creative use of charts or tables, or using more citations and less text in background sections so that methods sections are robust.
Several limitations of this review deserve mention. First, only articles where researchers explicitly stated in the main body of the article that a QD design was employed were included. In contrast, articles labeled as QD in only the title or abstract, or without their research design named were not examined due to the lack of certainty that the researchers actually carried out a QD study. As a result, we may have excluded some studies where a QD design was followed. Second, only one database was searched and therefore we did not identify or describe potential studies following a QD approach that were published in non-PubMed databases. Third, our review is limited by reliance on what was included in the published version of a study. In some cases, this may have been a result of word limits or specific styles imposed by journals, or inconsistent reporting preferences of authors and may have limited our ability to appraise the general adequacy with the CASP tool and examine specific characteristics of these studies.
A systematic review was conducted by examining QD research articles focused on nursing-related phenomena and published in one calendar year. Current patterns include some characteristics of QD studies consistent with the previous observations described in the literature, a focus on the flexibility or variability of methods in QD studies, and a need for increased explanations of why QD was an appropriate label for a particular study. Based on these findings, recommendations include encouragement to authors to provide as many details as possible regarding the methods of their QD study. In this way, readers can thoroughly consider and examine if the methods used were effective and reasonable in producing credible and useful findings.
This work was supported in part by the John A. Hartford Foundation’s National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence Award Program.
Hyejin Kim is a Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Predoctoral Fellow (F31NR015702) and 2013–2015 National Hartford Centers of Gerontological Nursing Excellence Patricia G. Archbold Scholar. Justine Sefcik is a Ruth L. Kirschstein Predoctoral Fellow (F31NR015693) through the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Nursing Research.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Hyejin Kim, MSN, CRNP, Doctoral Candidate, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
Justine S. Sefcik, MS, RN, Doctoral Candidate, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
Christine Bradway, PhD, CRNP, FAAN, Associate Professor of Gerontological Nursing, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Email citation, add to collections.
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
Affiliation.
PubMed Disclaimer
Full text sources.
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Home » Descriptive Research Design – Types, Methods and Examples
Table of Contents
Definition:
Descriptive research design is a type of research methodology that aims to describe or document the characteristics, behaviors, attitudes, opinions, or perceptions of a group or population being studied.
Descriptive research design does not attempt to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables or make predictions about future outcomes. Instead, it focuses on providing a detailed and accurate representation of the data collected, which can be useful for generating hypotheses, exploring trends, and identifying patterns in the data.
Types of Descriptive Research Design are as follows:
This involves collecting data at a single point in time from a sample or population to describe their characteristics or behaviors. For example, a researcher may conduct a cross-sectional study to investigate the prevalence of certain health conditions among a population, or to describe the attitudes and beliefs of a particular group.
This involves collecting data over an extended period of time, often through repeated observations or surveys of the same group or population. Longitudinal studies can be used to track changes in attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes over time, or to investigate the effects of interventions or treatments.
This involves an in-depth examination of a single individual, group, or situation to gain a detailed understanding of its characteristics or dynamics. Case studies are often used in psychology, sociology, and business to explore complex phenomena or to generate hypotheses for further research.
This involves collecting data from a sample or population through standardized questionnaires or interviews. Surveys can be used to describe attitudes, opinions, behaviors, or demographic characteristics of a group, and can be conducted in person, by phone, or online.
This involves observing and documenting the behavior or interactions of individuals or groups in a natural or controlled setting. Observational studies can be used to describe social, cultural, or environmental phenomena, or to investigate the effects of interventions or treatments.
This involves examining the relationships between two or more variables to describe their patterns or associations. Correlational studies can be used to identify potential causal relationships or to explore the strength and direction of relationships between variables.
Descriptive research design data analysis methods depend on the type of data collected and the research question being addressed. Here are some common methods of data analysis for descriptive research:
This method involves analyzing data to summarize and describe the key features of a sample or population. Descriptive statistics can include measures of central tendency (e.g., mean, median, mode) and measures of variability (e.g., range, standard deviation).
This method involves analyzing data by creating a table that shows the frequency of two or more variables together. Cross-tabulation can help identify patterns or relationships between variables.
This method involves analyzing qualitative data (e.g., text, images, audio) to identify themes, patterns, or trends. Content analysis can be used to describe the characteristics of a sample or population, or to identify factors that influence attitudes or behaviors.
This method involves analyzing qualitative data by assigning codes to segments of data based on their meaning or content. Qualitative coding can be used to identify common themes, patterns, or categories within the data.
This method involves creating graphs or charts to represent data visually. Visualization can help identify patterns or relationships between variables and make it easier to communicate findings to others.
This method involves comparing data across different groups or time periods to identify similarities and differences. Comparative analysis can help describe changes in attitudes or behaviors over time or differences between subgroups within a population.
Descriptive research design has numerous applications in various fields. Some of the common applications of descriptive research design are:
Here are some real-time examples of descriptive research designs:
To conduct a descriptive research design, you can follow these general steps:
Descriptive research design is used in situations where the researcher wants to describe a population or phenomenon in detail. It is used to gather information about the current status or condition of a group or phenomenon without making any causal inferences. Descriptive research design is useful in the following situations:
The main purpose of descriptive research design is to describe and measure the characteristics of a population or phenomenon in a systematic and objective manner. It involves collecting data that describe the current status or condition of the population or phenomenon of interest, without manipulating or altering any variables.
The purpose of descriptive research design can be summarized as follows:
Descriptive research design has several key characteristics that distinguish it from other research designs. Some of the main characteristics of descriptive research design are:
Descriptive research design has several advantages that make it a popular choice for researchers. Some of the main advantages of descriptive research design are:
Descriptive research design also has some limitations that researchers should consider before using this design. Some of the main limitations of descriptive research design are:
Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer
The observational method: monitor people while they engage with a subject, the case study method: gain an in-depth understanding of a subject, survey descriptive research: easy and cost-effective, types of descriptive research design, what is the descriptive survey research design definition by authors, 1. quantitativeness and qualitatively, 2. uncontrolled variables, 3. natural environment, 4. provides a solid basis for further research, describe a group and define its characteristics, measure data trends by conducting descriptive marketing research, understand how customers perceive a brand, descriptive survey research design: how to make the best descriptive questionnaire, create descriptive surveys with surveyplanet.
Survey descriptive research is a quantitative method that focuses on describing the characteristics of a phenomenon rather than asking why it occurs. Doing this provides a better understanding of the nature of the subject at hand and creates a good foundation for further research.
Descriptive market research is one of the most commonly used ways of examining trends and changes in the market. It is easy, low-cost, and provides valuable in-depth information on a chosen subject.
This article will examine the basic principles of the descriptive survey study and show how to make the best descriptive survey questionnaire and how to conduct effective research.
It is often said to be quantitative research that focuses more on the what, how, when, and where instead of the why. But what does that actually mean?
The answer is simple. By conducting descriptive survey research, the nature of a phenomenon is focused upon without asking about what causes it.
The main goal of survey descriptive research is to shed light on the heart of the research problem and better understand it. The technique provides in-depth knowledge of what the research problem is before investigating why it exists.
Descriptive research methods can differ based on data collection. We distinguish three main data collection methods: case study, observational method, and descriptive survey method.
Of these, the descriptive survey research method is most commonly used in fields such as market research, social research, psychology, politics, etc.
Sometimes also called the observational descriptive method, this is simply monitoring people while they engage with a particular subject. The aim is to examine people’s real-life behavior by maintaining a natural environment that does not change the respondents’ behavior—because they do not know they are being observed.
It is often used in fields such as market research, psychology, or social research. For example, customers can be monitored while dining at a restaurant or browsing through the products in a shop.
When doing case studies, researchers conduct thorough examinations of individuals or groups. The case study method is not used to collect general information on a particular subject. Instead, it provides an in-depth understanding of a particular subject and can give rise to interesting conclusions and new hypotheses.
The term case study can also refer to a sample group, which is a specific group of people that are examined and, afterward, findings are generalized to a larger group of people. However, this kind of generalization is rather risky because it is not always accurate.
Additionally, case studies cannot be used to determine cause and effect because of potential bias on the researcher’s part.
The survey descriptive research method consists of creating questionnaires or polls and distributing them to respondents, who then answer the questions (usually a mix of open-ended and closed-ended).
Surveys are the easiest and most cost-efficient way to gain feedback on a particular topic. They can be conducted online or offline, the size of the sample is highly flexible, and they can be distributed through many different channels.
When doing market research , use such surveys to understand the demographic of a certain market or population, better determine the target audience, keep track of the changes in the market, and learn about customer experience and satisfaction with products and services.
Several types of survey descriptive research are classified based on the approach used:
A descriptive survey research design is a methodology used in social science and other fields to gather information and describe the characteristics, behaviors, or attitudes of a particular population or group of interest. While there may not be a single definition provided by specific authors, the concept is widely understood and defined similarly across the literature.
Here’s a general definition that captures the essence of a descriptive survey research design definition by authors:
A descriptive survey research design is a systematic and structured approach to collecting data from a sample of individuals or entities within a larger population, with the primary aim of providing a detailed and accurate description of the characteristics, behaviors, opinions, or attitudes that exist within the target group. This method involves the use of surveys, questionnaires, interviews, or observations to collect data, which is then analyzed and summarized to draw conclusions about the population of interest.
It’s important to note that descriptive survey research is often used when researchers want to gain insights into a population or phenomenon, but without manipulating variables or testing hypotheses, as is common in experimental research. Instead, it focuses on providing a comprehensive overview of the subject under investigation. Researchers often use various statistical and analytical techniques to summarize and interpret the collected data in descriptive survey research.
There are numerous advantages to using a descriptive survey design. First of all, it is cheap and easy to conduct. A large sample can be surveyed and extensive data gathered quickly and inexpensively.
The data collected provides both quantitative and qualitative information , which provides a holistic understanding of the topic. Moreover, it can be used in further research on this or related topics.
Here are some of the most important advantages of conducting a survey descriptive research:
The descriptive survey research design uses both quantitative and qualitative research methods. It is used primarily to conduct quantitative research and gather data that is statistically easy to analyze. However, it can also provide qualitative data that helps describe and understand the research subject.
Descriptive research explores more than one variable. However, unlike experimental research, descriptive survey research design doesn’t allow control of variables. Instead, observational methods are used during research. Even though these variables can change and have an unexpected impact on an inquiry, they will give access to honest responses.
The descriptive research is conducted in a natural environment. This way, answers gathered from responses are more honest because the nature of the research does not influence them.
The data collected through descriptive research can be used to further explore the same or related subjects. Additionally, it can help develop the next line of research and the best method to use moving forward.
Descriptive research design can be used for many purposes. It is mainly utilized to test a hypothesis, define the characteristics of a certain phenomenon, and examine the correlations between them.
Market research is one of the main fields in which descriptive methods are used to conduct studies. Here’s what can be done using this method:
Understanding the needs of customers and their desires is the key to a business’s success. By truly understanding these, it will be possible to offer exactly what customers need and prevent them from turning to competitors.
By using a descriptive survey, different customer characteristics—such as traits, opinions, or behavior patterns—can be determined. With this data, different customer types can be defined and profiles developed that focus on their interests and the behavior they exhibit. This information can be used to develop new products and services that will be successful.
Measuring data trends is extremely important. Explore the market and get valuable insights into how consumers’ interests change over time—as well as how the competition is performing in the marketplace.
Over time, the data gathered from a descriptive questionnaire can be subjected to statistical analysis. This will deliver valuable insights.
Another important aspect to consider is brand awareness. People need to know about your brand, and they need to have a positive opinion of it. The best way to discover their perception is to conduct a brand survey , which gives deeper insight into brand awareness, perception, identity, and customer loyalty .
When conducting survey descriptive research, there are a few basic steps that are needed for a survey to be successful:
First of all, define the research goals. By setting up clear objectives, every other step can be worked through. This will result in the perfect descriptive questionnaire example and collect only valuable data.
Next, decide on the research method to use—in this case, the descriptive survey method. Then, define the sample population for (that is, the target audience). After that, think about the design itself and the questions that will be asked in the survey .
If you’re not sure where to start, we’ve got you covered. As free survey software, SurveyPlanet offers pre-made themes that are clean and eye-catching, as well as pre-made questions that will save you the trouble of making new ones.
Simply scroll through our library and choose a descriptive survey questionnaire sample that best suits your needs, though our user-friendly interface can help you create bespoke questions in a process that is easy and efficient.
With a survey in hand, it will then need to be delivered to the target audience. This is easy with our survey embedding feature, which allows for the linking of surveys on a website, via emails, or by sharing on social media.
When all the responses are gathered, it’s time to analyze them. Use SurveyPlanet to easily filter data and do cross-sectional analysis. Finally, just export the results and make a survey report.
Conducting descriptive survey research is the best way to gain a deeper knowledge of a topic of interest and develop a sound basis for further research. Sign up for a free SurveyPlanet account to start improving your business today!
Photo by Scott Graham on Unsplash
Cite this chapter.
1006 Accesses
19 Citations
Descriptive research is a study of status and is widely used in education, nutrition, epidemiology, and the behavioral sciences. Its value is based on the premise that problems can be solved and practices improved through observation, analysis, and description. The most common descriptive research method is the survey, which includes questionnaires, personal interviews, phone surveys, and normative surveys. Developmental research is also descriptive. Through cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, researchers investigate the interaction of diet (e.g., fat and its sources, fiber and its sources, etc.) and life styles (e.g., smoking, alcohol drinking, etc.) and of disease (e.g., cancer, coronary heart disease) development. Observational research and correlational studies constitute other forms of descriptive research. Correlational studies determine and analyze relationships between variables as well as generate predictions. Descriptive research generates data, both qualitative and quantitative, that define the state of nature at a point in time. This chapter discusses some characteristics and basic procedures of the various types of descriptive research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Institutional subscriptions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Achterberg C. Qualitative methods in nutritional education evaluation research. J Nutr Educ 1988; 20: 244
Article Google Scholar
Agar, M.H. The Professional Stranger: an Informal Introduction to Ethnography. Academic Press, New York: Academic Press 1980.
Google Scholar
Amstrong B., Doll R. Environmental factors and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practices. Int J Cancer, 1975; 15:617–631
Bang H.O., Dyerberg J., Hjorne, N. The composition of food consumed by Greenland Eskimos. Acta Med Scand 1976; 200: 69–75
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bailey, K.D. Methods of Social Research. New York: Free Press, Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc, 1978.
Beal V.A. The nutritional history in longitudinal research. J Am Dietet A 1967; 51: 526–531
Berdie D.R. Questionnaire length and response rate. J Appl Psychol 1973; 58:278–280
Berdie, D.R., Anderson J.F., Niebuhr, M.A. Questionnaires: Design and Use. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarescrow Press, 1986.
Buell P. Changing incidence of breast cancer in Japanese-American women. JNCI 1973; 51:1479–1483
CAS Google Scholar
Dyberg J., Bang H.O., Hjorne N. Fatty acid composition of the plasma lipids in Greenland Eskimos. Am J Clin Nutr 1975; 28: 958–961
Frank G. Life history model of adaptation to disability: the case of a congenital amputee. Soc Sci Med 1984; 19: 639–645
Fetterman, D.L. “A Walk Through the Wilderness: Learning to Find Your Way.” In Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research. Shaffir, W., Stebbins, R. eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991.
Fieldhouse, P. Food & Nutrition: Customs & Culture. New York: Croom Helm, 1986
Fielding, N.G., Fielding, J.L. Linking Data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.
Firestone W.A. Meaning in method: The rhetoric of quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Researcher 1987; 16:16–21
Geertz, C. The interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.
Glaser B.G., Strauss, A.L. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Co, 1967.
Goldberger, J.E. Goldberger on Pellagra. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1964.
Greer J.G. What do open-ended questions measure? Public Opinion Quart 1988; 52:365–371
Gordis, L. Epidemiology. Philadelphia PA: Saunders, 1996.
Hammersley, M., Atkinson, P. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock, 1983.
Headland, T.N., Pike, K.L., Harris, M. Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
Hodge, R., Kress, G. Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.
Holbrook J.T., Patterson K.Y., Bodner J.E., Douglas L.W., Veillon C., Kelsey J.L. Mertz W, Smith J.C. Sodium and potassium intake and balance in adults consuming self selected diets. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 40: 786–793
Human Nutrition Information Service, US Department of Agriculture, Food Consumption: Households in the United States, Spring 1977, Washington, D.E.: Government Printing Office, Publication H-1, 1982.
ICNND (International Committee on Nutrition for National Defense) Manual for Nutrition Surveys. Second edition. Superintendent of Documents. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963
Jacob E. Qualitative research traditions: A review. Rev Educ Res 1987; 57: 1–4
Jelliffe, D.B. The Assessment of the Nutritional Status of the Community. WHO Monograph 53. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1966.
Keys, A. Seven Countries: A Multivariate Analysis of Death and Corornary Heart Disease. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Kittler, P.G., Sucher, K. Food and Culture in America. New York: Reinhold, 1989.
Kirk, J., Miller, M.L. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.
Koh E.T., Caples V. Nutrient intake of low-income, black families in Southwest Mississippi. J Am Dietet A 1979; 75:665–670
Kolonel, L.N., Hinds, M.W., Hankin, J.H. “Cancer Patterns Among Migrant and Native-Born Japanese in Hawaii in Relation to Smoking, Drinking, and Dietary Habits.” In Genetic and Environmental Factors in Experimental and Human Cancer. Gelboin, H.V. et al. eds. Tokyo, Japan: Science Press, 1980.
Kromann N., Green A. Epidemiological studies in the Upernavik district, Greenland: Incidence of some chronic disease 1950–1974. Acta Med Scand 1980; 401–405
Krueger, R. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Rese arch. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
Langness, L.L. Frank, G. Lives: An Anthropological Approach to Biography. Novato, CA: Chandler & Sharp, 1981.
Lind, J. (1753) A Treatise on the Scurvy. Reprinted Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1953.
Lock, L.F. “The Question of Quality in Qualitative Research.” In Proceedings of the 5th Measurement and Evaluation Symposium. Nelson, J.K. ed. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, 1987.
Lofland, J., Lofland, L. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1984.
Marshall, C; Rossman, G.B. Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
Mauser, J.S., Kramer, S. Epidemiology — An Introductory Text. Philadelphia PA: Saunders, 1985.
McClendon M.J., O’Brien D.J. Question-order effects on the determinants of subjective well-being. Public Opinion Quart 1988; 52:351–364
McCraken, G. The Long Interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.
McMichael A.J., McCall M.G., Hartshorne J.M., Woodings T.L. Patterns of gastro-intestinal cancer in European migrants to Australia: The role of dietary changes. In J Cancer 1980; 25:431–437
Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
Montgomery A.C., Crittenden K.S. Improving coding reliability for open-ended questions. Public Opinion Quart 1977; 41: 235–243
National Center for Health Statistics: Plan and Operation of the HANES. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 1, Nos 10a and 10b, DHEW Pub No (HSM) 73–130. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
O’Brien T., Dugdale V. Questionnaire administration by computer. J Market Res Soc, 1978; 20:228–237
Okolo, E.N. Health Research Design and Methodology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 1990.
Parkin, D.M., Muir, C.S., Whelan, S.L., Gao, Y.T., Ferlay, J., Powell, J. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents VI IARC Sci Publ 120, Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1992.
Peterkin B.B., Rizek R.L., Tippett K.S. Nationwide food consumption survey, 1987. Nutr Today 1988; 23:18–24
Poe G.S., Seeman I., McLaughlin J., Mehl E., Dietz M. Don’t know boxes in factual questions in a mail questionnaire: Effects on level and quality of response. Public Opinion Quart 1988; 52: 212–222
Poikolainen K., Karkkainen P. Nature of questionnaire options affects estimates of alcohol intake. J Stud Alcohol 1985; 46: 219–222
Potter, J.D. Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, D.C.: American Institute for Cancer Research, 1997.
Rose, G.A., Blackburn, H. Cardiovascular Survey Methods. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization 1968.
Runcie, J.F. Experiencing Social Sresearch. Homewood, IL.: Dorsey Press, 1976.
Sandelowski, M. The Problem of Rigor in Qualitative Research. Adv Nurs Sci April 27–37, 1986.
Schutz R.W. Qualitative research: comments and controversies. Research Quarterly Exercise Sport, 1989; 60:30–35
Sheatsley, P.B. “Questionnaire Construction and Item Writing.” In Handbook of Survey Research. Rossi, P.H., Wright, J.D., Anderson, A.B. eds. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1983.
Sherry, B. “Epidemiologic Analytical Research.” In Research. Monsen, E.R. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association, 1992
Spradley, J. The Ethnographic Interview. Chicago, IL: Holtz, Rinehart & Winston, 1979.
Spradley, J.P. Participant Observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1980.
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N.M. Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. (2nd ed.) Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1983.
Taylor, S.J., Bogdan, R. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods. (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley, 1984.
Thomas, J.R. Nelson, J.K. Research Methods in Physical Activity. (3rd ed.), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1996.
Van Maanen, J. ed. Qualitative Methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1983.
Willett, W. Nutritional Epidemiology. (2nd ed.) New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Book Google Scholar
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA
Eunsook T. Koh & Willis L. Owen
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Reprints and permissions
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
Koh, E.T., Owen, W.L. (2000). Descriptive Research and Qualitative Research. In: Introduction to Nutrition and Health Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1401-5_12
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1401-5_12
Publisher Name : Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN : 978-1-4613-5535-9
Online ISBN : 978-1-4615-1401-5
eBook Packages : Springer Book Archive
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Policies and ethics
Home Market Research
Suppose an apparel brand wants to understand the fashion purchasing trends among New York’s buyers, then it must conduct a demographic survey of the specific region, gather population data, and then conduct descriptive research on this demographic segment.
The study will then uncover details on “what is the purchasing pattern of New York buyers,” but will not cover any investigative information about “ why ” the patterns exist. Because for the apparel brand trying to break into this market, understanding the nature of their market is the study’s main goal. Let’s talk about it.
Descriptive research is a research method describing the characteristics of the population or phenomenon studied. This descriptive methodology focuses more on the “what” of the research subject than the “why” of the research subject.
The method primarily focuses on describing the nature of a demographic segment without focusing on “why” a particular phenomenon occurs. In other words, it “describes” the research subject without covering “why” it happens.
The term descriptive research then refers to research questions, the design of the study, and data analysis conducted on that topic. We call it an observational research method because none of the research study variables are influenced in any capacity.
Some distinctive characteristics of descriptive research are:
A descriptive research method can be used in multiple ways and for various reasons. Before getting into any survey , though, the survey goals and survey design are crucial. Despite following these steps, there is no way to know if one will meet the research outcome. How to use descriptive research? To understand the end objective of research goals, below are some ways organizations currently use descriptive research today:
Some of the significant advantages of descriptive research are:
There are three distinctive methods to conduct descriptive research. They are:
The observational method is the most effective method to conduct this research, and researchers make use of both quantitative and qualitative observations.
A quantitative observation is the objective collection of data primarily focused on numbers and values. It suggests “associated with, of or depicted in terms of a quantity.” Results of quantitative observation are derived using statistical and numerical analysis methods. It implies observation of any entity associated with a numeric value such as age, shape, weight, volume, scale, etc. For example, the researcher can track if current customers will refer the brand using a simple Net Promoter Score question .
Qualitative observation doesn’t involve measurements or numbers but instead just monitoring characteristics. In this case, the researcher observes the respondents from a distance. Since the respondents are in a comfortable environment, the characteristics observed are natural and effective. In a descriptive research design, the researcher can choose to be either a complete observer, an observer as a participant, a participant as an observer, or a full participant. For example, in a supermarket, a researcher can from afar monitor and track the customers’ selection and purchasing trends. This offers a more in-depth insight into the purchasing experience of the customer.
Case studies involve in-depth research and study of individuals or groups. Case studies lead to a hypothesis and widen a further scope of studying a phenomenon. However, case studies should not be used to determine cause and effect as they can’t make accurate predictions because there could be a bias on the researcher’s part. The other reason why case studies are not a reliable way of conducting descriptive research is that there could be an atypical respondent in the survey. Describing them leads to weak generalizations and moving away from external validity.
In survey research, respondents answer through surveys or questionnaires or polls . They are a popular market research tool to collect feedback from respondents. A study to gather useful data should have the right survey questions. It should be a balanced mix of open-ended questions and close ended-questions . The survey method can be conducted online or offline, making it the go-to option for descriptive research where the sample size is enormous.
Some examples of descriptive research are:
Some other research problems and research questions that can lead to descriptive research are:
LEARN MORE FREE TRIAL
Aug 13, 2024
Aug 9, 2024
Aug 8, 2024
Last updated
5 February 2023
Reviewed by
Cathy Heath
Short on time? Get an AI generated summary of this article instead
Descriptive research is a common investigatory model used by researchers in various fields, including social sciences, linguistics, and academia.
Read on to understand the characteristics of descriptive research and explore its underlying techniques, processes, and procedures.
Dovetail streamlines analysis to help you uncover and share actionable insights
Descriptive research is an exploratory research method. It enables researchers to precisely and methodically describe a population, circumstance, or phenomenon.
As the name suggests, descriptive research describes the characteristics of the group, situation, or phenomenon being studied without manipulating variables or testing hypotheses . This can be reported using surveys , observational studies, and case studies. You can use both quantitative and qualitative methods to compile the data.
Besides making observations and then comparing and analyzing them, descriptive studies often develop knowledge concepts and provide solutions to critical issues. It always aims to answer how the event occurred, when it occurred, where it occurred, and what the problem or phenomenon is.
The following are some of the characteristics of descriptive research:
Descriptive research can be quantitative as it gathers quantifiable data to statistically analyze a population sample. These numbers can show patterns, connections, and trends over time and can be discovered using surveys, polls, and experiments.
Descriptive research can also be qualitative. It gives meaning and context to the numbers supplied by quantitative descriptive research .
Researchers can use tools like interviews, focus groups, and ethnographic studies to illustrate why things are what they are and help characterize the research problem. This is because it’s more explanatory than exploratory or experimental research.
Descriptive research differs from experimental research in that researchers cannot manipulate the variables. They are recognized, scrutinized, and quantified instead. This is one of its most prominent features.
Descriptive research is a cross-sectional study because it examines several areas of the same group. It involves obtaining data on multiple variables at the personal level during a certain period. It’s helpful when trying to understand a larger community’s habits or preferences.
Descriptive studies are usually carried out in the participants’ everyday environment, which allows researchers to avoid influencing responders by collecting data in a natural setting. You can use online surveys or survey questions to collect data or observe.
You can further dissect descriptive research’s outcomes and use them for different types of investigation. The outcomes also serve as a foundation for subsequent investigations and can guide future studies. For example, you can use the data obtained in descriptive research to help determine future research designs.
There are three basic approaches for gathering data in descriptive research: observational, case study, and survey.
You can use surveys to gather data in descriptive research. This involves gathering information from many people using a questionnaire and interview .
Surveys remain the dominant research tool for descriptive research design. Researchers can conduct various investigations and collect multiple types of data (quantitative and qualitative) using surveys with diverse designs.
You can conduct surveys over the phone, online, or in person. Your survey might be a brief interview or conversation with a set of prepared questions intended to obtain quick information from the primary source.
This descriptive research method involves observing and gathering data on a population or phenomena without manipulating variables. It is employed in psychology, market research , and other social science studies to track and understand human behavior.
Observation is an essential component of descriptive research. It entails gathering data and analyzing it to see whether there is a relationship between the two variables in the study. This strategy usually allows for both qualitative and quantitative data analysis.
A case study can outline a specific topic’s traits. The topic might be a person, group, event, or organization.
It involves using a subset of a larger group as a sample to characterize the features of that larger group.
You can generalize knowledge gained from studying a case study to benefit a broader audience.
This approach entails carefully examining a particular group, person, or event over time. You can learn something new about the study topic by using a small group to better understand the dynamics of the entire group.
There are several types of descriptive study. The most well-known include cross-sectional studies, census surveys, sample surveys, case reports, and comparison studies.
In the healthcare and medical fields, a case report is used to explain a patient’s circumstances when suffering from an uncommon illness or displaying certain symptoms. Case reports and case series are both collections of related cases. They have aided the advancement of medical knowledge on countless occasions.
The normative component is an addition to the descriptive survey. In the descriptive–normative survey, you compare the study’s results to the norm.
This descriptive type of research employs surveys to collect information on various topics. This data aims to determine the degree to which certain conditions may be attained.
You can extrapolate or generalize the information you obtain from sample surveys to the larger group being researched.
Correlative surveys help establish if there is a positive, negative, or neutral connection between two variables.
Performing census surveys involves gathering relevant data on several aspects of a given population. These units include individuals, families, organizations, objects, characteristics, and properties.
During descriptive research, you gather different degrees of interest over time from a specific population. Cross-sectional studies provide a glimpse of a phenomenon’s prevalence and features in a population. There are no ethical challenges with them and they are quite simple and inexpensive to carry out.
These surveys compare the two subjects’ conditions or characteristics. The subjects may include research variables, organizations, plans, and people.
Comparison points, assumption of similarities, and criteria of comparison are three important variables that affect how well and accurately comparative studies are conducted.
For instance, descriptive research can help determine how many CEOs hold a bachelor’s degree and what proportion of low-income households receive government help.
The primary advantage of descriptive research designs is that researchers can create a reliable and beneficial database for additional study. To conduct any inquiry, you need access to reliable information sources that can give you a firm understanding of a situation.
Quantitative studies are time- and resource-intensive, so knowing the hypotheses viable for testing is crucial. The basic overview of descriptive research provides helpful hints as to which variables are worth quantitatively examining. This is why it’s employed as a precursor to quantitative research designs.
Some experts view this research as untrustworthy and unscientific. However, there is no way to assess the findings because you don’t manipulate any variables statistically.
Cause-and-effect correlations also can’t be established through descriptive investigations. Additionally, observational study findings cannot be replicated, which prevents a review of the findings and their replication.
The absence of statistical and in-depth analysis and the rather superficial character of the investigative procedure are drawbacks of this research approach.
Several descriptive research examples are emphasized based on their types, purposes, and applications. Research questions often begin with “What is …” These studies help find solutions to practical issues in social science, physical science, and education.
Here are some examples and applications of descriptive research:
Organizations use descriptive research designs to determine how various demographic groups react to a certain product or service.
For example, a business looking to sell to its target market should research the market’s behavior first. When researching human behavior in response to a cause or event, the researcher pays attention to the traits, actions, and responses before drawing a conclusion.
Scientific descriptive research enables the classification of organisms and their traits and constituents.
A descriptive study design’s statistical capabilities allow researchers to track data trends over time. It’s frequently used to determine the study target’s current circumstances and underlying patterns.
Organizations can use a descriptive research approach to learn how various demographics react to a certain product or service. For example, you can study how the target market responds to a competitor’s product and use that information to infer their behavior.
A descriptive research design is suitable for exploring certain topics and serving as a prelude to larger quantitative investigations. It provides a comprehensive understanding of the “what” of the group or thing you’re investigating.
This research type acts as the cornerstone of other research methodologies . It is distinctive because it can use quantitative and qualitative research approaches at the same time.
Descriptive research design aims to systematically obtain information to describe a phenomenon, situation, or population. More specifically, it helps answer the what, when, where, and how questions regarding the research problem rather than the why.
Despite certain parallels, descriptive research concentrates on describing phenomena, while qualitative research aims to understand people better.
Data analysis involves using various methodologies, enabling the researcher to evaluate and provide results regarding validity and reliability.
Do you want to discover previous research faster?
Do you share your research findings with others?
Do you analyze research data?
Start for free today, add your research, and get to key insights faster
Last updated: 18 April 2023
Last updated: 27 February 2023
Last updated: 6 February 2023
Last updated: 5 February 2023
Last updated: 16 April 2023
Last updated: 9 March 2023
Last updated: 30 April 2024
Last updated: 12 December 2023
Last updated: 11 March 2024
Last updated: 4 July 2024
Last updated: 6 March 2024
Last updated: 5 March 2024
Last updated: 13 May 2024
Related topics, .css-je19u9{-webkit-align-items:flex-end;-webkit-box-align:flex-end;-ms-flex-align:flex-end;align-items:flex-end;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-flex-wrap:wrap;-ms-flex-wrap:wrap;flex-wrap:wrap;-webkit-box-pack:center;-ms-flex-pack:center;-webkit-justify-content:center;justify-content:center;row-gap:0;text-align:center;max-width:671px;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}}@media (max-width: 799px){.css-je19u9{max-width:400px;}.css-je19u9>span{white-space:pre;}} decide what to .css-1kiodld{max-height:56px;display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-align-items:center;-webkit-box-align:center;-ms-flex-align:center;align-items:center;}@media (max-width: 1079px){.css-1kiodld{display:none;}} build next, decide what to build next, log in or sign up.
Get started for free
Copyright © SurveySparrow Inc. 2024 Privacy Policy Terms of Service SurveySparrow Inc.
Last Updated: 16 July 2024
10 min read
Table Of Contents
Imagine you are a detective called to a crime scene. Your job is to study the scene and report whatever you find: whether that’s the half-smoked cigarette on the table or the large “RACHE” written in blood on the wall. That, in a nutshell, is descriptive research .
Researchers often need to do descriptive research on a problem before they attempt to solve it. So in this guide, we’ll take you through:
Click to jump to the section that interests you.
Let’s begin by going through what descriptive studies can and cannot do.
Definition: As its name says, descriptive research describes the characteristics of the problem, phenomenon, situation, or group under study.
So the goal of all descriptive studies is to explore the background, details, and existing patterns in the problem to fully understand it. In other words, preliminary research.
However, descriptive research can be both preliminary and conclusive . You can use the data from a descriptive study to make reports and get insights for further planning.
What descriptive research isn’t: Descriptive research finds the what/when/where of a problem, not the why/how .
Because of this, we can’t use the descriptive method to explore cause-and-effect relationships where one variable (like a person’s job role) affects another variable (like their monthly income).
In short, survey research is a brief interview or conversation with a set of prepared questions about a topic. So you create a questionnaire, share it, and analyze the data you collect for further action.
Read more : The difference between surveys vs questionnaires
FYI: If you’re looking for the perfect tool to conduct descriptive research, SurveySparrow’s got you covered. Our AI-powered text and sentiment analysis help you instantly capture detailed insights for your studies.
With 1,000+ customizable (and free) survey templates , 20+ question types, and 1500+ integrations , SurveySparrow makes research super-easy.
Want to try out our platform? Click on the template below to start using it.👇
Product Market Research Survey Template
Preview Template
The observational method is a type of descriptive research in which you, the researcher, observe ongoing behavior.
Now, there are several (non-creepy) ways you can observe someone. In fact, observational research has three main approaches:
In the case study method, you do a detailed study of a specific group, person, or event over a period.
This brings us to a frequently asked question: “What’s the difference between case studies and longitudinal studies?”
A case study will go very in-depth into the subject with one-on-one interviews, observations, and archival research. They are also qualitative, though sometimes they will use numbers and stats.
An example of longitudinal research would be a study of the health of night shift employees vs. general shift employees over a decade. An example of a case study would involve in-depth interviews with Casey, an assistant director of nursing who’s handled the night shift at the hospital for ten years now.
Cross-sectional research | Studies a particular group of people or their sections at a given point in time. Example: current social attitudes of Gen Z in the US |
Longitudinal research | Studies a group of people over a long period of time. Example: tracking changes in social attitudes among Gen-Zers from 2022 – 2032. |
Normative research | Compares the results of a study against the existing norms. Example: comparing a verdict in a legal case against similar cases. |
Correlational/relational research | Investigates the type of relationship and patterns between 2 variables. Example: music genres and mental states. |
Comparative research | Compares 2 or more similar people, groups or conditions based on specific traits. Example: job roles of employees in similar positions from two different companies. |
Classification research | Arranges the data into classes according to certain criteria for better analysis. Example: the classification of newly discovered insects into species. |
Archival research | Searching for and extracting information from past records. Example: Tracking US Census data over the decades. |
1. case study: airbnb’s growth strategy.
In an excellent case study, Tam Al Saad, Principal Consultant, Strategy + Growth at Webprofits, deep dives into how Airbnb attracted and retained 150 million users .
“What Airbnb offers isn’t a cheap place to sleep when you’re on holiday; it’s the opportunity to experience your destination as a local would. It’s the chance to meet the locals, experience the markets, and find non-touristy places.
Sure, you can visit the Louvre, see Buckingham Palace, and climb the Empire State Building, but you can do it as if it were your hometown while staying in a place that has character and feels like a home.” – Tam al Saad, Principal Consultant, Strategy + Growth at Webprofits
We often think that our elders are so hopeless with technology. But we’re not getting any younger either, and tech is changing at a hair trigger! This article by Annemieke Hendricks shares a wonderful example where researchers compare the levels of technological familiarity between age groups and how that influences usage.
“It is generally assumed that older adults have difficulty using modern electronic devices, such as mobile telephones or computers. Because this age group is growing in most countries, changing products and processes to adapt to their needs is increasingly more important. “ – Annemieke Hendricks, Marketing Communication Specialist, Noldus
SRI International (formerly Stanford Research Institute) – an independent, non-profit research center – wanted to investigate the impact of stress on an adolescent’s sleep. To get those insights, two actions were essential: tracking sleep patterns through wearable devices and sending surveys at a pre-set time – the pre-sleep period.
“With SurveySparrow’s recurring surveys feature, SRI was able to share engaging surveys with their participants exactly at the time they wanted and at the frequency they preferred.”
Read more about this project : How SRI International decoded sleep patterns with SurveySparrow
1: Answer the six Ws –
#2: Introduce and explain your methodological approach
#3: Describe your methods of data collection and/or selection.
#4: Describe your methods of analysis.
#5: Explain the reasoning behind your choices.
#6: Collect data.
#7: Analyze the data. Use software to speed up the process and reduce overthinking and human error.
#8: Report your conclusions and how you drew the results.
Whether it’s social media habits, consumer preferences, or mental health trends, descriptive research provides a clear snapshot into what people actually think.
If you want to know more about feedback methodology, or research, check out some of our other articles below.
👉 Desk Research 101: Definition, Methods, and Examples
👉 Exploratory Research: Your Guide to Unraveling Insights
👉 Design Research: Types, Methods, and Importance
Content marketer at SurveySparrow.
Parvathi is a sociologist turned marketer. After 6 years as a copywriter, she pivoted to B2B, diving into growth marketing for SaaS. Now she uses content and conversion optimization to fuel growth - focusing on CX, reputation management and feedback methodology for businesses.
Turn every feedback into a growth opportunity.
14-day free trial • Cancel Anytime • No Credit Card Required • Need a Demo?
Descriptive research design is a powerful tool used by scientists and researchers to gather information about a particular group or phenomenon. This type of research provides a detailed and accurate picture of the characteristics and behaviors of a particular population or subject. By observing and collecting data on a given topic, descriptive research helps researchers gain a deeper understanding of a specific issue and provides valuable insights that can inform future studies.
In this blog, we will explore the definition, characteristics, and common flaws in descriptive research design, and provide tips on how to avoid these pitfalls to produce high-quality results. Whether you are a seasoned researcher or a student just starting, understanding the fundamentals of descriptive research design is essential to conducting successful scientific studies.
Table of Contents
The descriptive research design involves observing and collecting data on a given topic without attempting to infer cause-and-effect relationships. The goal of descriptive research is to provide a comprehensive and accurate picture of the population or phenomenon being studied and to describe the relationships, patterns, and trends that exist within the data.
Descriptive research methods can include surveys, observational studies , and case studies, and the data collected can be qualitative or quantitative . The findings from descriptive research provide valuable insights and inform future research, but do not establish cause-and-effect relationships.
1. understanding of a population or phenomenon.
Descriptive research provides a comprehensive picture of the characteristics and behaviors of a particular population or phenomenon, allowing researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the topic.
The information gathered through descriptive research can serve as a baseline for future research and provide a foundation for further studies.
Descriptive research can provide valuable information and insights into a particular topic, which can inform future research, policy decisions, and programs.
Descriptive research can be used to validate sampling methods and to help researchers determine the best approach for their study.
Descriptive research is often less expensive and less time-consuming than other research methods , making it a cost-effective way to gather information about a particular population or phenomenon.
Descriptive research is straightforward to replicate, making it a reliable way to gather and compare information from multiple sources.
The primary purpose of descriptive research is to describe the characteristics, behaviors, and attributes of a particular population or phenomenon.
Descriptive research studies a particular population or sample that is representative of the larger population being studied. Furthermore, sampling methods can include convenience, stratified, or random sampling.
Descriptive research typically involves the collection of both qualitative and quantitative data through methods such as surveys, observational studies, case studies, or focus groups.
Descriptive research data is analyzed to identify patterns, relationships, and trends within the data. Statistical techniques , such as frequency distributions and descriptive statistics, are commonly used to summarize and describe the data.
Descriptive research is focused on describing and summarizing the characteristics of a particular population or phenomenon. It does not make causal inferences.
Descriptive research is non-experimental, meaning that the researcher does not manipulate variables or control conditions. The researcher simply observes and collects data on the population or phenomenon being studied.
A researcher can conduct descriptive research in the following situations:
1. survey research.
Surveys are a type of descriptive research that involves collecting data through self-administered or interviewer-administered questionnaires. Additionally, they can be administered in-person, by mail, or online, and can collect both qualitative and quantitative data.
Observational research involves observing and collecting data on a particular population or phenomenon without manipulating variables or controlling conditions. It can be conducted in naturalistic settings or controlled laboratory settings.
Case study research is a type of descriptive research that focuses on a single individual, group, or event. It involves collecting detailed information on the subject through a variety of methods, including interviews, observations, and examination of documents.
Focus group research involves bringing together a small group of people to discuss a particular topic or product. Furthermore, the group is usually moderated by a researcher and the discussion is recorded for later analysis.
Ethnographic research involves conducting detailed observations of a particular culture or community. It is often used to gain a deep understanding of the beliefs, behaviors, and practices of a particular group.
1. provides a comprehensive understanding.
Descriptive research provides a comprehensive picture of the characteristics, behaviors, and attributes of a particular population or phenomenon, which can be useful in informing future research and policy decisions.
Descriptive research is non-invasive and does not manipulate variables or control conditions, making it a suitable method for sensitive or ethical concerns.
Descriptive research allows for a wide range of data collection methods , including surveys, observational studies, case studies, and focus groups, making it a flexible and versatile research method.
Descriptive research is often less expensive and less time-consuming than other research methods. Moreover, it gives a cost-effective option to many researchers.
Descriptive research is easy to replicate, making it a reliable way to gather and compare information from multiple sources.
The insights gained from a descriptive research can inform future research and inform policy decisions and programs.
1. limited scope.
Descriptive research only provides a snapshot of the current situation and cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships.
Descriptive research relies on existing data, which may not always be comprehensive or accurate.
Researchers have no control over the variables in descriptive research, which can limit the conclusions that can be drawn.
The researcher’s own biases and preconceptions can influence the interpretation of the data.
Descriptive research findings may not be applicable to other populations or situations.
Descriptive research provides a surface-level understanding of a phenomenon, rather than a deep understanding.
Descriptive research often requires a large amount of data collection and analysis, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive.
A clearly defined research question is the foundation of any research study, and it is important to ensure that the question is both specific and relevant to the topic being studied.
Choosing the appropriate research design for a study is crucial to the success of the study. Moreover, researchers should choose a design that best fits the research question and the type of data needed to answer it.
Selecting a representative sample is important to ensure that the findings of the study are generalizable to the population being studied. Researchers should use a sampling method that provides a random and representative sample of the population.
Using valid and reliable data collection methods is important to ensure that the data collected is accurate and can be used to answer the research question. Researchers should choose methods that are appropriate for the study and that can be administered consistently and systematically.
Bias can significantly impact the validity and reliability of research findings. Furthermore, it is important to minimize bias in all aspects of the study, from the selection of participants to the analysis of data.
An adequate sample size is important to ensure that the results of the study are statistically significant and can be generalized to the population being studied.
The appropriate data analysis technique depends on the type of data collected and the research question being asked. Researchers should choose techniques that are appropriate for the data and the question being asked.
Have you worked on descriptive research designs? How was your experience creating a descriptive design? What challenges did you face? Do write to us or leave a comment below and share your insights on descriptive research designs!
extremely very educative
Indeed very educative and useful. Well explained. Thank you
Simple,easy to understand
Excellent and easy to understand queries and questions get answered easily. Its rather clear than any confusion. Thanks a million Shritika Sirisilla.
Easy to understand. Well written , educative and informative
Rate this article Cancel Reply
Your email address will not be published.
Google has released its 2024 Scholar Metrics, assessing scholarly articles from 2019 to 2023. This…
Academic integrity is the foundation upon which the credibility and value of scientific findings are…
How to Optimize Your Research Process: A step-by-step guide
For researchers across disciplines, the path to uncovering novel findings and insights is often filled…
Sony Group Corporation and the prestigious scientific journal Nature have collaborated to launch the inaugural…
Academia is built on the foundation of trustworthy and high-quality research, supported by the pillars…
Choosing the Right Analytical Approach: Thematic analysis vs. content analysis for…
Comparing Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies: 5 steps for choosing the right…
Research Recommendations – Guiding policy-makers for evidence-based decision making
Sign-up to read more
Subscribe for free to get unrestricted access to all our resources on research writing and academic publishing including:
We hate spam too. We promise to protect your privacy and never spam you.
I am looking for Editing/ Proofreading services for my manuscript Tentative date of next journal submission:
In your opinion, what is the most effective way to improve integrity in the peer review process?
Descriptive research can be explained as a statement of affairs as they are at present with the researcher having no control over variable. Moreover, “descriptive studies may be characterised as simply the attempt to determine, describe or identify what is, while analytical research attempts to establish why it is that way or how it came to be” [1] . Three main purposes of descriptive studies can be explained as describing, explaining and validating research findings. This type of research is popular with non-quantified topic.
Descriptive research is “aimed at casting light on current issues or problems through a process of data collection that enables them to describe the situation more completely than was possible without employing this method.” [2] To put it simply, descriptive studies are used to describe various aspects of the phenomenon. In its popular format, descriptive research is used to describe characteristics and/or behaviour of sample population. It is an effective method to get information that can be used to develop hypotheses and propose associations.
Importantly, these types of studies do not focus on reasons for the occurrence of the phenomenon. In other words, descriptive research focuses on the question “What?”, but it is not concerned with the question “Why?”
Descriptive studies have the following characteristics:
1. While descriptive research can employ a number of variables, only one variable is required to conduct a descriptive study.
2. Descriptive studies are closely associated with observational studies, but they are not limited with observation data collection method. Case studies and surveys can also be specified as popular data collection methods used with descriptive studies.
3. Findings of descriptive researches create a scope for further research. When a descriptive study answers to the question “What?”, a further research can be conducted to find an answer to “Why?” question.
Research questions in descriptive studies typically start with ‘What is…”. Examples of research questions in descriptive studies may include the following:
My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance contains discussions of theory and application of research designs. The e-book also explains all stages of the research process starting from the selection of the research area to writing personal reflection. Important elements of dissertations such as research philosophy , research approach , methods of data collection , data analysis and sampling are explained in this e-book in simple words.
John Dudovskiy
[1] Ethridge, D.E. (2004) “Research Methodology in Applied Economics” John Wiley & Sons, p.24
[2] Fox, W. & Bayat, M.S. (2007) “A Guide to Managing Research” Juta Publications, p.45
IMAGES
COMMENTS
Descriptive research aims to accurately and systematically describe a population, situation or phenomenon. It can answer what, where, when and how questions, but not why questions. A descriptive research design can use a wide variety of research methods to investigate one or more variables. Unlike in experimental research, the researcher does ...
A descriptive correlation study was a research method that observes and characterizes the behavior of participants from a scientific standpoint in relation to factors in a setting. It seeks to ...
According to Siedlecki (2020), the descriptive research design is a deliberate study that carefully and methodically explains, observes, or confirms group elements obtained through quantifiable ...
INTRODUCTION. In our previous article in this series, [ 1] we introduced the concept of "study designs"- as "the set of methods and procedures used to collect and analyze data on variables specified in a particular research question.". Study designs are primarily of two types - observational and interventional, with the former being ...
Descriptive research is a methodological approach that seeks to depict the characteristics of a phenomenon or subject under investigation. In scientific inquiry, it serves as a foundational tool for researchers aiming to observe, record, and analyze the intricate details of a particular topic. This method provides a rich and detailed account ...
Qualitative description (QD) is a term that is widely used to describe qualitative studies of health care and nursing-related phenomena. However, limited discussions regarding QD are found in the existing literature. In this systematic review, we identified characteristics of methods and findings reported in research articles published in 2014 ...
Understanding Descriptive Research Designs and Methods. ... :8-12. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493. Author Sandra L Siedlecki 1 Affiliation 1 Author Affiliation: Senior Nurse Scientist and Clinical Nurse Specialist, Office of Nursing Research & Innovation, Nursing Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio. PMID ...
Definition: Descriptive research design is a type of research methodology that aims to describe or document the characteristics, behaviors, attitudes, opinions, or perceptions of a group or population being studied. Descriptive research design does not attempt to establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables or make predictions ...
Descriptive research aims to accurately and systematically describe a population, situation or phenomenon. It can answer what, where, when, and how questions, but not why questions. A descriptive research design can use a wide variety of research methods to investigate one or more variables. Unlike in experimental research, the researcher does ...
Here's a general definition that captures the essence of a descriptive survey research design definition by authors: A descriptive survey research design is a systematic and structured approach to collecting data from a sample of individuals or entities within a larger population, with the primary aim of providing a detailed and accurate ...
Descriptive research is a study of status and is widely used in education, nutrition, epidemiology, and the behavioral sciences. Its value is based on the premise that problems can be solved and practices improved through observation, analysis, and description. The most common descriptive research method is the survey, which includes ...
Descriptive research is a research method describing the characteristics of the population or phenomenon studied. This descriptive methodologyfocuses more on the "what" of the research subject than the "why" of the research subject. The method primarily focuses on describing the nature of a demographic segment without focusing on "why ...
Descriptive research is an exploratory research method.It enables researchers to precisely and methodically describe a population, circumstance, or phenomenon.. As the name suggests, descriptive research describes the characteristics of the group, situation, or phenomenon being studied without manipulating variables or testing hypotheses.This can be reported using surveys, observational ...
Definition: As its name says, descriptive research describes the characteristics of the problem, phenomenon, situation, or group under study. So the goal of all descriptive studies is to explore the background, details, and existing patterns in the problem to fully understand it. In other words, preliminary research.
1. Purpose. The primary purpose of descriptive research is to describe the characteristics, behaviors, and attributes of a particular population or phenomenon. 2. Participants and Sampling. Descriptive research studies a particular population or sample that is representative of the larger population being studied.
Descriptive studies have the following characteristics: 1. While descriptive research can employ a number of variables, only one variable is required to conduct a descriptive study. 2. Descriptive studies are closely associated with observational studies, but they are not limited with observation data collection method.
Inconsistency in decision making within the research process coupled with a lack of transparency has created issues of credibility for this type of approach. It can be difficult to clearly differentiate what constitutes a descriptive research design from the range of other methodologies at the disposal of qualitative researchers.
2.1 Research Design This study made use of the descriptive research method because it dealt with the analysis of indirectness markers in the written discourse of the subjects under study. Calderon (2006), defined descriptive research as a purposive process of gathering, analyzing, classifying, and tabulating data about prevailing conditions,
The term descriptive research refers to the type of research question, design, and data analysis that will be applied to a given topic. Descriptive statistics tell what is, while inferential statistics try to determine cause and effect. The type of question asked by the researcher will ultimately determine the type of approach necessary to ...
A research design is the specific method a researcher uses to collect, analyze, and interpret data. Psychologists use three major types of research designs in their research, and each provides an essential avenue for scientific investigation. Descriptive research is research designed to provide a snapshot of the current state of affairs.
In other words, the research design sets the procedure on the required data, the methods to be applied to collect and analyze this data, and how all of this is going to answer the research ...
3 Methods. Descriptive research is a methodology that is not exclusive to market researchers but one that can apply to a variety of research methods used in healthcare, psychology, and education. At its core, descriptive research seeks to describe the characteristics or behavior of an audience. While it's not grounded in statistics, and ...
Specifically, it employed a descriptive-correlational research design to evaluate secondary teachers' writing motivation, research skills, and competence, and perspectives on the parts, scope, and ...