null hypothesis correlation example

school Campus Bookshelves
menu_book Bookshelves
perm_media Learning Objects
login Login
how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
hub Instructor Commons

Margin Size

Download Page (PDF)
Download Full Book (PDF)
Periodic Table
Physics Constants
Scientific Calculator
Reference & Cite
Tools expand_more
Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

11.2: Correlation Hypothesis Test

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 25691

$ \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } $

$ \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash {#1}}} $

$ \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$ $ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) $ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$ $ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$ $ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$ \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}$

$ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$

$ \newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}$

$ \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}$

$ \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}$

$ \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}$

$ \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}$

$ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}$

$ \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}$ $ \newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}$

$ \newcommand{\vectorA}[1]{\vec{#1}} % arrow$

$ \newcommand{\vectorAt}[1]{\vec{\text{#1}}} % arrow$

$ \newcommand{\vectorB}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}} } $

$ \newcommand{\vectorC}[1]{\textbf{#1}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectorD}[1]{\overrightarrow{#1}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectorDt}[1]{\overrightarrow{\text{#1}}} $

$ \newcommand{\vectE}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{\mathbf {#1}}}} $

The correlation coefficient, $r$, tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between $x$ and $y$. However, the reliability of the linear model also depends on how many observed data points are in the sample. We need to look at both the value of the correlation coefficient $r$ and the sample size $n$, together. We perform a hypothesis test of the "significance of the correlation coefficient" to decide whether the linear relationship in the sample data is strong enough to use to model the relationship in the population.

The sample data are used to compute $r$, the correlation coefficient for the sample. If we had data for the entire population, we could find the population correlation coefficient. But because we have only sample data, we cannot calculate the population correlation coefficient. The sample correlation coefficient, $r$, is our estimate of the unknown population correlation coefficient.

The symbol for the population correlation coefficient is $\rho$, the Greek letter "rho."
$\rho =$ population correlation coefficient (unknown)
$r =$ sample correlation coefficient (known; calculated from sample data)

The hypothesis test lets us decide whether the value of the population correlation coefficient $\rho$ is "close to zero" or "significantly different from zero". We decide this based on the sample correlation coefficient $r$ and the sample size $n$.

If the test concludes that the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero, we say that the correlation coefficient is "significant."

Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.
What the conclusion means: There is a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$. We can use the regression line to model the linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ in the population.

If the test concludes that the correlation coefficient is not significantly different from zero (it is close to zero), we say that correlation coefficient is "not significant".

Conclusion: "There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ because the correlation coefficient is not significantly different from zero."
What the conclusion means: There is not a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$. Therefore, we CANNOT use the regression line to model a linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ in the population.
If $r$ is significant and the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the line can be used to predict the value of $y$ for values of $x$ that are within the domain of observed $x$ values.
If $r$ is not significant OR if the scatter plot does not show a linear trend, the line should not be used for prediction.
If $r$ is significant and if the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the line may NOT be appropriate or reliable for prediction OUTSIDE the domain of observed $x$ values in the data.

PERFORMING THE HYPOTHESIS TEST

Null Hypothesis: $H_{0}: \rho = 0$
Alternate Hypothesis: $H_{a}: \rho \neq 0$

WHAT THE HYPOTHESES MEAN IN WORDS:

Null Hypothesis $H_{0}$ : The population correlation coefficient IS NOT significantly different from zero. There IS NOT a significant linear relationship(correlation) between $x$ and $y$ in the population.
Alternate Hypothesis $H_{a}$ : The population correlation coefficient IS significantly DIFFERENT FROM zero. There IS A SIGNIFICANT LINEAR RELATIONSHIP (correlation) between $x$ and $y$ in the population.

DRAWING A CONCLUSION:There are two methods of making the decision. The two methods are equivalent and give the same result.

Method 1: Using the $p\text{-value}$
Method 2: Using a table of critical values

In this chapter of this textbook, we will always use a significance level of 5%, $\alpha = 0.05$

Using the $p\text{-value}$ method, you could choose any appropriate significance level you want; you are not limited to using $\alpha = 0.05$. But the table of critical values provided in this textbook assumes that we are using a significance level of 5%, $\alpha = 0.05$. (If we wanted to use a different significance level than 5% with the critical value method, we would need different tables of critical values that are not provided in this textbook.)

METHOD 1: Using a $p\text{-value}$ to make a decision

Using the ti83, 83+, 84, 84+ calculator.

To calculate the $p\text{-value}$ using LinRegTTEST:

On the LinRegTTEST input screen, on the line prompt for $\beta$ or $\rho$, highlight "$\neq 0$"

The output screen shows the $p\text{-value}$ on the line that reads "$p =$".

(Most computer statistical software can calculate the $p\text{-value}$.)

If the $p\text{-value}$ is less than the significance level ( $\alpha = 0.05$ ):

Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: "There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero."

If the $p\text{-value}$ is NOT less than the significance level ( $\alpha = 0.05$ )

Decision: DO NOT REJECT the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: "There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ because the correlation coefficient is NOT significantly different from zero."

Calculation Notes:

You will use technology to calculate the $p\text{-value}$. The following describes the calculations to compute the test statistics and the $p\text{-value}$:
The $p\text{-value}$ is calculated using a $t$-distribution with $n - 2$ degrees of freedom.
The formula for the test statistic is $t = \frac{r\sqrt{n-2}}{\sqrt{1-r^{2}}}$. The value of the test statistic, $t$, is shown in the computer or calculator output along with the $p\text{-value}$. The test statistic $t$ has the same sign as the correlation coefficient $r$.
The $p\text{-value}$ is the combined area in both tails.

An alternative way to calculate the $p\text{-value}$ ( $p$ ) given by LinRegTTest is the command 2*tcdf(abs(t),10^99, n-2) in 2nd DISTR.

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAMPLE: $p\text{-value}$ method

Consider the third exam/final exam example.
The line of best fit is: $\hat{y} = -173.51 + 4.83x$ with $r = 0.6631$ and there are $n = 11$ data points.
Can the regression line be used for prediction? Given a third exam score ( $x$ value), can we use the line to predict the final exam score (predicted $y$ value)?
$H_{0}: \rho = 0$
$H_{a}: \rho \neq 0$
$\alpha = 0.05$
The $p\text{-value}$ is 0.026 (from LinRegTTest on your calculator or from computer software).
The $p\text{-value}$, 0.026, is less than the significance level of $\alpha = 0.05$.
Decision: Reject the Null Hypothesis $H_{0}$
Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between the third exam score ($x$) and the final exam score ($y$) because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.

Because $r$ is significant and the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the regression line can be used to predict final exam scores.

METHOD 2: Using a table of Critical Values to make a decision

The 95% Critical Values of the Sample Correlation Coefficient Table can be used to give you a good idea of whether the computed value of $r$ is significant or not . Compare $r$ to the appropriate critical value in the table. If $r$ is not between the positive and negative critical values, then the correlation coefficient is significant. If $r$ is significant, then you may want to use the line for prediction.

Example $\PageIndex{1}$

Suppose you computed $r = 0.801$ using $n = 10$ data points. $df = n - 2 = 10 - 2 = 8$. The critical values associated with $df = 8$ are $-0.632$ and $+0.632$. If $r <$ negative critical value or $r >$ positive critical value, then $r$ is significant. Since $r = 0.801$ and $0.801 > 0.632$, $r$ is significant and the line may be used for prediction. If you view this example on a number line, it will help you.

Horizontal number line with values of -1, -0.632, 0, 0.632, 0.801, and 1. A dashed line above values -0.632, 0, and 0.632 indicates not significant values.

Exercise $\PageIndex{1}$

For a given line of best fit, you computed that $r = 0.6501$ using $n = 12$ data points and the critical value is 0.576. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

If the scatter plot looks linear then, yes, the line can be used for prediction, because $r >$ the positive critical value.

Example $\PageIndex{2}$

Suppose you computed $r = –0.624$ with 14 data points. $df = 14 – 2 = 12$. The critical values are $-0.532$ and $0.532$. Since $-0.624 < -0.532$, $r$ is significant and the line can be used for prediction

Horizontal number line with values of -0.624, -0.532, and 0.532.

Exercise $\PageIndex{2}$

For a given line of best fit, you compute that $r = 0.5204$ using $n = 9$ data points, and the critical value is $0.666$. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

No, the line cannot be used for prediction, because $r <$ the positive critical value.

Example $\PageIndex{3}$

Suppose you computed $r = 0.776$ and $n = 6$. $df = 6 - 2 = 4$. The critical values are $-0.811$ and $0.811$. Since $-0.811 < 0.776 < 0.811$, $r$ is not significant, and the line should not be used for prediction.

Horizontal number line with values -0.924, -0.532, and 0.532.

Exercise $\PageIndex{3}$

For a given line of best fit, you compute that $r = -0.7204$ using $n = 8$ data points, and the critical value is $= 0.707$. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

Yes, the line can be used for prediction, because $r <$ the negative critical value.

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAMPLE: critical value method

Consider the third exam/final exam example. The line of best fit is: $\hat{y} = -173.51 + 4.83x$ with $r = 0.6631$ and there are $n = 11$ data points. Can the regression line be used for prediction? Given a third-exam score ( $x$ value), can we use the line to predict the final exam score (predicted $y$ value)?

Use the "95% Critical Value" table for $r$ with $df = n - 2 = 11 - 2 = 9$.
The critical values are $-0.602$ and $+0.602$
Since $0.6631 > 0.602$, $r$ is significant.
Conclusion:There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between the third exam score ($x$) and the final exam score ($y$) because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.

Example $\PageIndex{4}$

Suppose you computed the following correlation coefficients. Using the table at the end of the chapter, determine if $r$ is significant and the line of best fit associated with each r can be used to predict a $y$ value. If it helps, draw a number line.

$r = –0.567$ and the sample size, $n$, is $19$. The $df = n - 2 = 17$. The critical value is $-0.456$. $-0.567 < -0.456$ so $r$ is significant.
$r = 0.708$ and the sample size, $n$, is $9$. The $df = n - 2 = 7$. The critical value is $0.666$. $0.708 > 0.666$ so $r$ is significant.
$r = 0.134$ and the sample size, $n$, is $14$. The $df = 14 - 2 = 12$. The critical value is $0.532$. $0.134$ is between $-0.532$ and $0.532$ so $r$ is not significant.
$r = 0$ and the sample size, $n$, is five. No matter what the $dfs$ are, $r = 0$ is between the two critical values so $r$ is not significant.

Exercise $\PageIndex{4}$

For a given line of best fit, you compute that $r = 0$ using $n = 100$ data points. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

No, the line cannot be used for prediction no matter what the sample size is.

Assumptions in Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient

Testing the significance of the correlation coefficient requires that certain assumptions about the data are satisfied. The premise of this test is that the data are a sample of observed points taken from a larger population. We have not examined the entire population because it is not possible or feasible to do so. We are examining the sample to draw a conclusion about whether the linear relationship that we see between $x$ and $y$ in the sample data provides strong enough evidence so that we can conclude that there is a linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ in the population.

The regression line equation that we calculate from the sample data gives the best-fit line for our particular sample. We want to use this best-fit line for the sample as an estimate of the best-fit line for the population. Examining the scatter plot and testing the significance of the correlation coefficient helps us determine if it is appropriate to do this.

The assumptions underlying the test of significance are:

There is a linear relationship in the population that models the average value of $y$ for varying values of $x$. In other words, the expected value of $y$ for each particular value lies on a straight line in the population. (We do not know the equation for the line for the population. Our regression line from the sample is our best estimate of this line in the population.)
The $y$ values for any particular $x$ value are normally distributed about the line. This implies that there are more $y$ values scattered closer to the line than are scattered farther away. Assumption (1) implies that these normal distributions are centered on the line: the means of these normal distributions of $y$ values lie on the line.
The standard deviations of the population $y$ values about the line are equal for each value of $x$. In other words, each of these normal distributions of $y$ values has the same shape and spread about the line.
The residual errors are mutually independent (no pattern).
The data are produced from a well-designed, random sample or randomized experiment.

The left graph shows three sets of points. Each set falls in a vertical line. The points in each set are normally distributed along the line — they are densely packed in the middle and more spread out at the top and bottom. A downward sloping regression line passes through the mean of each set. The right graph shows the same regression line plotted. A vertical normal curve is shown for each line.

Linear regression is a procedure for fitting a straight line of the form $\hat{y} = a + bx$ to data. The conditions for regression are:

Linear In the population, there is a linear relationship that models the average value of $y$ for different values of $x$.
Independent The residuals are assumed to be independent.
Normal The $y$ values are distributed normally for any value of $x$.
Equal variance The standard deviation of the $y$ values is equal for each $x$ value.
Random The data are produced from a well-designed random sample or randomized experiment.

The slope $b$ and intercept $a$ of the least-squares line estimate the slope $\beta$ and intercept $\alpha$ of the population (true) regression line. To estimate the population standard deviation of $y$, $\sigma$, use the standard deviation of the residuals, $s$. $s = \sqrt{\frac{SEE}{n-2}}$. The variable $\rho$ (rho) is the population correlation coefficient. To test the null hypothesis $H_{0}: \rho =$ hypothesized value , use a linear regression t-test. The most common null hypothesis is $H_{0}: \rho = 0$ which indicates there is no linear relationship between $x$ and $y$ in the population. The TI-83, 83+, 84, 84+ calculator function LinRegTTest can perform this test (STATS TESTS LinRegTTest).

Formula Review

Least Squares Line or Line of Best Fit:

\[\hat{y} = a + bx\]

\[a = y\text{-intercept}\]

\[b = \text{slope}\]

Standard deviation of the residuals:

\[s = \sqrt{\frac{SSE}{n-2}}\]

\[SSE = \text{sum of squared errors}\]

\[n = \text{the number of data points}\]

9.1 Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual test begins by considering two hypotheses . They are called the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis . These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.

H 0 , the — null hypothesis: a statement of no difference between sample means or proportions or no difference between a sample mean or proportion and a population mean or proportion. In other words, the difference equals 0.

H a —, the alternative hypothesis: a claim about the population that is contradictory to H 0 and what we conclude when we reject H 0 .

Since the null and alternative hypotheses are contradictory, you must examine evidence to decide if you have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis or not. The evidence is in the form of sample data.

After you have determined which hypothesis the sample supports, you make a decision. There are two options for a decision. They are reject H 0 if the sample information favors the alternative hypothesis or do not reject H 0 or decline to reject H 0 if the sample information is insufficient to reject the null hypothesis.

Mathematical Symbols Used in H 0 and H a :

H 0 always has a symbol with an equal in it. H a never has a symbol with an equal in it. The choice of symbol depends on the wording of the hypothesis test. However, be aware that many researchers use = in the null hypothesis, even with > or < as the symbol in the alternative hypothesis. This practice is acceptable because we only make the decision to reject or not reject the null hypothesis.

Example 9.1

H 0 : No more than 30 percent of the registered voters in Santa Clara County voted in the primary election. p ≤ 30 H a : More than 30 percent of the registered voters in Santa Clara County voted in the primary election. p > 30

A medical trial is conducted to test whether or not a new medicine reduces cholesterol by 25 percent. State the null and alternative hypotheses.

Example 9.2

We want to test whether the mean GPA of students in American colleges is different from 2.0 (out of 4.0). The null and alternative hypotheses are the following: H 0 : μ = 2.0 H a : μ ≠ 2.0

We want to test whether the mean height of eighth graders is 66 inches. State the null and alternative hypotheses. Fill in the correct symbol (=, ≠, ≥, <, ≤, >) for the null and alternative hypotheses.

H 0 : μ __ 66
H a : μ __ 66

Example 9.3

We want to test if college students take fewer than five years to graduate from college, on the average. The null and alternative hypotheses are the following: H 0 : μ ≥ 5 H a : μ < 5

We want to test if it takes fewer than 45 minutes to teach a lesson plan. State the null and alternative hypotheses. Fill in the correct symbol ( =, ≠, ≥, <, ≤, >) for the null and alternative hypotheses.

H 0 : μ __ 45
H a : μ __ 45

Example 9.4

An article on school standards stated that about half of all students in France, Germany, and Israel take advanced placement exams and a third of the students pass. The same article stated that 6.6 percent of U.S. students take advanced placement exams and 4.4 percent pass. Test if the percentage of U.S. students who take advanced placement exams is more than 6.6 percent. State the null and alternative hypotheses. H 0 : p ≤ 0.066 H a : p > 0.066

On a state driver’s test, about 40 percent pass the test on the first try. We want to test if more than 40 percent pass on the first try. Fill in the correct symbol (=, ≠, ≥, <, ≤, >) for the null and alternative hypotheses.

H 0 : p __ 0.40
H a : p __ 0.40

Collaborative Exercise

Bring to class a newspaper, some news magazines, and some internet articles. In groups, find articles from which your group can write null and alternative hypotheses. Discuss your hypotheses with the rest of the class.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This book may not be used in the training of large language models or otherwise be ingested into large language models or generative AI offerings without OpenStax's permission.

Want to cite, share, or modify this book? This book uses the Creative Commons Attribution License and you must attribute Texas Education Agency (TEA). The original material is available at: https://www.texasgateway.org/book/tea-statistics . Changes were made to the original material, including updates to art, structure, and other content updates.

Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/statistics/pages/1-introduction

Authors: Barbara Illowsky, Susan Dean
Publisher/website: OpenStax
Book title: Statistics
Publication date: Mar 27, 2020
Location: Houston, Texas
Book URL: https://openstax.org/books/statistics/pages/1-introduction
Section URL: https://openstax.org/books/statistics/pages/9-1-null-and-alternative-hypotheses

© Jan 23, 2024 Texas Education Agency (TEA). The OpenStax name, OpenStax logo, OpenStax book covers, OpenStax CNX name, and OpenStax CNX logo are not subject to the Creative Commons license and may not be reproduced without the prior and express written consent of Rice University.

Have a thesis expert improve your writing

Check your thesis for plagiarism in 10 minutes, generate your apa citations for free.

Knowledge Base
Null and Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions & Examples

Null and Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions & Examples

Published on 5 October 2022 by Shaun Turney . Revised on 6 December 2022.

The null and alternative hypotheses are two competing claims that researchers weigh evidence for and against using a statistical test :

Null hypothesis (H 0 ): There’s no effect in the population .
Alternative hypothesis (H A ): There’s an effect in the population.

The effect is usually the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable .

Answering your research question with hypotheses, what is a null hypothesis, what is an alternative hypothesis, differences between null and alternative hypotheses, how to write null and alternative hypotheses, frequently asked questions about null and alternative hypotheses.

The null and alternative hypotheses offer competing answers to your research question . When the research question asks “Does the independent variable affect the dependent variable?”, the null hypothesis (H 0 ) answers “No, there’s no effect in the population.” On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis (H A ) answers “Yes, there is an effect in the population.”

The null and alternative are always claims about the population. That’s because the goal of hypothesis testing is to make inferences about a population based on a sample . Often, we infer whether there’s an effect in the population by looking at differences between groups or relationships between variables in the sample.

You can use a statistical test to decide whether the evidence favors the null or alternative hypothesis. Each type of statistical test comes with a specific way of phrasing the null and alternative hypothesis. However, the hypotheses can also be phrased in a general way that applies to any test.

The null hypothesis is the claim that there’s no effect in the population.

If the sample provides enough evidence against the claim that there’s no effect in the population ( p ≤ α), then we can reject the null hypothesis . Otherwise, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Although “fail to reject” may sound awkward, it’s the only wording that statisticians accept. Be careful not to say you “prove” or “accept” the null hypothesis.

Null hypotheses often include phrases such as “no effect”, “no difference”, or “no relationship”. When written in mathematical terms, they always include an equality (usually =, but sometimes ≥ or ≤).

Examples of null hypotheses

The table below gives examples of research questions and null hypotheses. There’s always more than one way to answer a research question, but these null hypotheses can help you get started.

*Note that some researchers prefer to always write the null hypothesis in terms of “no effect” and “=”. It would be fine to say that daily meditation has no effect on the incidence of depression and p 1 = p 2 .

The alternative hypothesis (H A ) is the other answer to your research question . It claims that there’s an effect in the population.

Often, your alternative hypothesis is the same as your research hypothesis. In other words, it’s the claim that you expect or hope will be true.

The alternative hypothesis is the complement to the null hypothesis. Null and alternative hypotheses are exhaustive, meaning that together they cover every possible outcome. They are also mutually exclusive, meaning that only one can be true at a time.

Alternative hypotheses often include phrases such as “an effect”, “a difference”, or “a relationship”. When alternative hypotheses are written in mathematical terms, they always include an inequality (usually ≠, but sometimes > or <). As with null hypotheses, there are many acceptable ways to phrase an alternative hypothesis.

Examples of alternative hypotheses

The table below gives examples of research questions and alternative hypotheses to help you get started with formulating your own.

Null and alternative hypotheses are similar in some ways:

They’re both answers to the research question
They both make claims about the population
They’re both evaluated by statistical tests.

However, there are important differences between the two types of hypotheses, summarized in the following table.

To help you write your hypotheses, you can use the template sentences below. If you know which statistical test you’re going to use, you can use the test-specific template sentences. Otherwise, you can use the general template sentences.

The only thing you need to know to use these general template sentences are your dependent and independent variables. To write your research question, null hypothesis, and alternative hypothesis, fill in the following sentences with your variables:

Does independent variable affect dependent variable ?

Null hypothesis (H 0 ): Independent variable does not affect dependent variable .
Alternative hypothesis (H A ): Independent variable affects dependent variable .

Test-specific

Once you know the statistical test you’ll be using, you can write your hypotheses in a more precise and mathematical way specific to the test you chose. The table below provides template sentences for common statistical tests.

Note: The template sentences above assume that you’re performing one-tailed tests . One-tailed tests are appropriate for most studies.

The null hypothesis is often abbreviated as H 0 . When the null hypothesis is written using mathematical symbols, it always includes an equality symbol (usually =, but sometimes ≥ or ≤).

The alternative hypothesis is often abbreviated as H a or H 1 . When the alternative hypothesis is written using mathematical symbols, it always includes an inequality symbol (usually ≠, but sometimes < or >).

A research hypothesis is your proposed answer to your research question. The research hypothesis usually includes an explanation (‘ x affects y because …’).

A statistical hypothesis, on the other hand, is a mathematical statement about a population parameter. Statistical hypotheses always come in pairs: the null and alternative hypotheses. In a well-designed study , the statistical hypotheses correspond logically to the research hypothesis.

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the ‘Cite this Scribbr article’ button to automatically add the citation to our free Reference Generator.

Turney, S. (2022, December 06). Null and Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved 14 May 2024, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/stats/null-and-alternative-hypothesis/

Is this article helpful?

Shaun Turney

Other students also liked, levels of measurement: nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio, the standard normal distribution | calculator, examples & uses, types of variables in research | definitions & examples.

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

Chapter 13: Inferential Statistics

Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing

Learning Objectives

Explain the purpose of null hypothesis testing, including the role of sampling error.
Describe the basic logic of null hypothesis testing.
Describe the role of relationship strength and sample size in determining statistical significance and make reasonable judgments about statistical significance based on these two factors.

The Purpose of Null Hypothesis Testing

As we have seen, psychological research typically involves measuring one or more variables for a sample and computing descriptive statistics for that sample. In general, however, the researcher’s goal is not to draw conclusions about that sample but to draw conclusions about the population that the sample was selected from. Thus researchers must use sample statistics to draw conclusions about the corresponding values in the population. These corresponding values in the population are called parameters . Imagine, for example, that a researcher measures the number of depressive symptoms exhibited by each of 50 clinically depressed adults and computes the mean number of symptoms. The researcher probably wants to use this sample statistic (the mean number of symptoms for the sample) to draw conclusions about the corresponding population parameter (the mean number of symptoms for clinically depressed adults).

Unfortunately, sample statistics are not perfect estimates of their corresponding population parameters. This is because there is a certain amount of random variability in any statistic from sample to sample. The mean number of depressive symptoms might be 8.73 in one sample of clinically depressed adults, 6.45 in a second sample, and 9.44 in a third—even though these samples are selected randomly from the same population. Similarly, the correlation (Pearson’s r ) between two variables might be +.24 in one sample, −.04 in a second sample, and +.15 in a third—again, even though these samples are selected randomly from the same population. This random variability in a statistic from sample to sample is called sampling error . (Note that the term error here refers to random variability and does not imply that anyone has made a mistake. No one “commits a sampling error.”)

One implication of this is that when there is a statistical relationship in a sample, it is not always clear that there is a statistical relationship in the population. A small difference between two group means in a sample might indicate that there is a small difference between the two group means in the population. But it could also be that there is no difference between the means in the population and that the difference in the sample is just a matter of sampling error. Similarly, a Pearson’s r value of −.29 in a sample might mean that there is a negative relationship in the population. But it could also be that there is no relationship in the population and that the relationship in the sample is just a matter of sampling error.

In fact, any statistical relationship in a sample can be interpreted in two ways:

There is a relationship in the population, and the relationship in the sample reflects this.
There is no relationship in the population, and the relationship in the sample reflects only sampling error.

The purpose of null hypothesis testing is simply to help researchers decide between these two interpretations.

The Logic of Null Hypothesis Testing

Null hypothesis testing is a formal approach to deciding between two interpretations of a statistical relationship in a sample. One interpretation is called the null hypothesis (often symbolized H 0 and read as “H-naught”). This is the idea that there is no relationship in the population and that the relationship in the sample reflects only sampling error. Informally, the null hypothesis is that the sample relationship “occurred by chance.” The other interpretation is called the alternative hypothesis (often symbolized as H 1 ). This is the idea that there is a relationship in the population and that the relationship in the sample reflects this relationship in the population.

Again, every statistical relationship in a sample can be interpreted in either of these two ways: It might have occurred by chance, or it might reflect a relationship in the population. So researchers need a way to decide between them. Although there are many specific null hypothesis testing techniques, they are all based on the same general logic. The steps are as follows:

Assume for the moment that the null hypothesis is true. There is no relationship between the variables in the population.
Determine how likely the sample relationship would be if the null hypothesis were true.
If the sample relationship would be extremely unlikely, then reject the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis. If it would not be extremely unlikely, then retain the null hypothesis .

Following this logic, we can begin to understand why Mehl and his colleagues concluded that there is no difference in talkativeness between women and men in the population. In essence, they asked the following question: “If there were no difference in the population, how likely is it that we would find a small difference of d = 0.06 in our sample?” Their answer to this question was that this sample relationship would be fairly likely if the null hypothesis were true. Therefore, they retained the null hypothesis—concluding that there is no evidence of a sex difference in the population. We can also see why Kanner and his colleagues concluded that there is a correlation between hassles and symptoms in the population. They asked, “If the null hypothesis were true, how likely is it that we would find a strong correlation of +.60 in our sample?” Their answer to this question was that this sample relationship would be fairly unlikely if the null hypothesis were true. Therefore, they rejected the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis—concluding that there is a positive correlation between these variables in the population.

A crucial step in null hypothesis testing is finding the likelihood of the sample result if the null hypothesis were true. This probability is called the p value . A low p value means that the sample result would be unlikely if the null hypothesis were true and leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis. A high p value means that the sample result would be likely if the null hypothesis were true and leads to the retention of the null hypothesis. But how low must the p value be before the sample result is considered unlikely enough to reject the null hypothesis? In null hypothesis testing, this criterion is called α (alpha) and is almost always set to .05. If there is less than a 5% chance of a result as extreme as the sample result if the null hypothesis were true, then the null hypothesis is rejected. When this happens, the result is said to be statistically significant . If there is greater than a 5% chance of a result as extreme as the sample result when the null hypothesis is true, then the null hypothesis is retained. This does not necessarily mean that the researcher accepts the null hypothesis as true—only that there is not currently enough evidence to conclude that it is true. Researchers often use the expression “fail to reject the null hypothesis” rather than “retain the null hypothesis,” but they never use the expression “accept the null hypothesis.”

The Misunderstood p Value

The p value is one of the most misunderstood quantities in psychological research (Cohen, 1994) [1] . Even professional researchers misinterpret it, and it is not unusual for such misinterpretations to appear in statistics textbooks!

The most common misinterpretation is that the p value is the probability that the null hypothesis is true—that the sample result occurred by chance. For example, a misguided researcher might say that because the p value is .02, there is only a 2% chance that the result is due to chance and a 98% chance that it reflects a real relationship in the population. But this is incorrect . The p value is really the probability of a result at least as extreme as the sample result if the null hypothesis were true. So a p value of .02 means that if the null hypothesis were true, a sample result this extreme would occur only 2% of the time.

You can avoid this misunderstanding by remembering that the p value is not the probability that any particular hypothesis is true or false. Instead, it is the probability of obtaining the sample result if the null hypothesis were true.

Role of Sample Size and Relationship Strength

Recall that null hypothesis testing involves answering the question, “If the null hypothesis were true, what is the probability of a sample result as extreme as this one?” In other words, “What is the p value?” It can be helpful to see that the answer to this question depends on just two considerations: the strength of the relationship and the size of the sample. Specifically, the stronger the sample relationship and the larger the sample, the less likely the result would be if the null hypothesis were true. That is, the lower the p value. This should make sense. Imagine a study in which a sample of 500 women is compared with a sample of 500 men in terms of some psychological characteristic, and Cohen’s d is a strong 0.50. If there were really no sex difference in the population, then a result this strong based on such a large sample should seem highly unlikely. Now imagine a similar study in which a sample of three women is compared with a sample of three men, and Cohen’s d is a weak 0.10. If there were no sex difference in the population, then a relationship this weak based on such a small sample should seem likely. And this is precisely why the null hypothesis would be rejected in the first example and retained in the second.

Of course, sometimes the result can be weak and the sample large, or the result can be strong and the sample small. In these cases, the two considerations trade off against each other so that a weak result can be statistically significant if the sample is large enough and a strong relationship can be statistically significant even if the sample is small. Table 13.1 shows roughly how relationship strength and sample size combine to determine whether a sample result is statistically significant. The columns of the table represent the three levels of relationship strength: weak, medium, and strong. The rows represent four sample sizes that can be considered small, medium, large, and extra large in the context of psychological research. Thus each cell in the table represents a combination of relationship strength and sample size. If a cell contains the word Yes , then this combination would be statistically significant for both Cohen’s d and Pearson’s r . If it contains the word No , then it would not be statistically significant for either. There is one cell where the decision for d and r would be different and another where it might be different depending on some additional considerations, which are discussed in Section 13.2 “Some Basic Null Hypothesis Tests”

Although Table 13.1 provides only a rough guideline, it shows very clearly that weak relationships based on medium or small samples are never statistically significant and that strong relationships based on medium or larger samples are always statistically significant. If you keep this lesson in mind, you will often know whether a result is statistically significant based on the descriptive statistics alone. It is extremely useful to be able to develop this kind of intuitive judgment. One reason is that it allows you to develop expectations about how your formal null hypothesis tests are going to come out, which in turn allows you to detect problems in your analyses. For example, if your sample relationship is strong and your sample is medium, then you would expect to reject the null hypothesis. If for some reason your formal null hypothesis test indicates otherwise, then you need to double-check your computations and interpretations. A second reason is that the ability to make this kind of intuitive judgment is an indication that you understand the basic logic of this approach in addition to being able to do the computations.

Statistical Significance Versus Practical Significance

Table 13.1 illustrates another extremely important point. A statistically significant result is not necessarily a strong one. Even a very weak result can be statistically significant if it is based on a large enough sample. This is closely related to Janet Shibley Hyde’s argument about sex differences (Hyde, 2007) [2] . The differences between women and men in mathematical problem solving and leadership ability are statistically significant. But the word significant can cause people to interpret these differences as strong and important—perhaps even important enough to influence the college courses they take or even who they vote for. As we have seen, however, these statistically significant differences are actually quite weak—perhaps even “trivial.”

This is why it is important to distinguish between the statistical significance of a result and the practical significance of that result. Practical significance refers to the importance or usefulness of the result in some real-world context. Many sex differences are statistically significant—and may even be interesting for purely scientific reasons—but they are not practically significant. In clinical practice, this same concept is often referred to as “clinical significance.” For example, a study on a new treatment for social phobia might show that it produces a statistically significant positive effect. Yet this effect still might not be strong enough to justify the time, effort, and other costs of putting it into practice—especially if easier and cheaper treatments that work almost as well already exist. Although statistically significant, this result would be said to lack practical or clinical significance.

Key Takeaways

Null hypothesis testing is a formal approach to deciding whether a statistical relationship in a sample reflects a real relationship in the population or is just due to chance.
The logic of null hypothesis testing involves assuming that the null hypothesis is true, finding how likely the sample result would be if this assumption were correct, and then making a decision. If the sample result would be unlikely if the null hypothesis were true, then it is rejected in favour of the alternative hypothesis. If it would not be unlikely, then the null hypothesis is retained.
The probability of obtaining the sample result if the null hypothesis were true (the p value) is based on two considerations: relationship strength and sample size. Reasonable judgments about whether a sample relationship is statistically significant can often be made by quickly considering these two factors.
Statistical significance is not the same as relationship strength or importance. Even weak relationships can be statistically significant if the sample size is large enough. It is important to consider relationship strength and the practical significance of a result in addition to its statistical significance.
Discussion: Imagine a study showing that people who eat more broccoli tend to be happier. Explain for someone who knows nothing about statistics why the researchers would conduct a null hypothesis test.
The correlation between two variables is r = −.78 based on a sample size of 137.
The mean score on a psychological characteristic for women is 25 ( SD = 5) and the mean score for men is 24 ( SD = 5). There were 12 women and 10 men in this study.
In a memory experiment, the mean number of items recalled by the 40 participants in Condition A was 0.50 standard deviations greater than the mean number recalled by the 40 participants in Condition B.
In another memory experiment, the mean scores for participants in Condition A and Condition B came out exactly the same!
A student finds a correlation of r = .04 between the number of units the students in his research methods class are taking and the students’ level of stress.

Long Descriptions

“Null Hypothesis” long description: A comic depicting a man and a woman talking in the foreground. In the background is a child working at a desk. The man says to the woman, “I can’t believe schools are still teaching kids about the null hypothesis. I remember reading a big study that conclusively disproved it years ago.” [Return to “Null Hypothesis”]

“Conditional Risk” long description: A comic depicting two hikers beside a tree during a thunderstorm. A bolt of lightning goes “crack” in the dark sky as thunder booms. One of the hikers says, “Whoa! We should get inside!” The other hiker says, “It’s okay! Lightning only kills about 45 Americans a year, so the chances of dying are only one in 7,000,000. Let’s go on!” The comic’s caption says, “The annual death rate among people who know that statistic is one in six.” [Return to “Conditional Risk”]

Media Attributions

Null Hypothesis by XKCD CC BY-NC (Attribution NonCommercial)
Conditional Risk by XKCD CC BY-NC (Attribution NonCommercial)
Cohen, J. (1994). The world is round: p < .05. American Psychologist, 49 , 997–1003. ↵
Hyde, J. S. (2007). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 , 259–263. ↵

Values in a population that correspond to variables measured in a study.

The random variability in a statistic from sample to sample.

A formal approach to deciding between two interpretations of a statistical relationship in a sample.

The idea that there is no relationship in the population and that the relationship in the sample reflects only sampling error.

The idea that there is a relationship in the population and that the relationship in the sample reflects this relationship in the population.

When the relationship found in the sample would be extremely unlikely, the idea that the relationship occurred “by chance” is rejected.

When the relationship found in the sample is likely to have occurred by chance, the null hypothesis is not rejected.

The probability that, if the null hypothesis were true, the result found in the sample would occur.

How low the p value must be before the sample result is considered unlikely in null hypothesis testing.

When there is less than a 5% chance of a result as extreme as the sample result occurring and the null hypothesis is rejected.

Research Methods in Psychology - 2nd Canadian Edition Copyright © 2015 by Paul C. Price, Rajiv Jhangiani, & I-Chant A. Chiang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Module 12: Linear Regression and Correlation

Hypothesis test for correlation, learning outcomes.

Conduct a linear regression t-test using p-values and critical values and interpret the conclusion in context

The correlation coefficient, r , tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between x and y . However, the reliability of the linear model also depends on how many observed data points are in the sample. We need to look at both the value of the correlation coefficient r and the sample size n , together.

We perform a hypothesis test of the “ significance of the correlation coefficient ” to decide whether the linear relationship in the sample data is strong enough to use to model the relationship in the population.

The sample data are used to compute r , the correlation coefficient for the sample. If we had data for the entire population, we could find the population correlation coefficient. But because we only have sample data, we cannot calculate the population correlation coefficient. The sample correlation coefficient, r , is our estimate of the unknown population correlation coefficient.

The symbol for the population correlation coefficient is ρ , the Greek letter “rho.”
ρ = population correlation coefficient (unknown)
r = sample correlation coefficient (known; calculated from sample data)

The hypothesis test lets us decide whether the value of the population correlation coefficient ρ is “close to zero” or “significantly different from zero.” We decide this based on the sample correlation coefficient r and the sample size n .

If the test concludes that the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero, we say that the correlation coefficient is “significant.”

Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between x and y because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.
What the conclusion means: There is a significant linear relationship between x and y . We can use the regression line to model the linear relationship between x and y in the population.

If the test concludes that the correlation coefficient is not significantly different from zero (it is close to zero), we say that the correlation coefficient is “not significant.”

Conclusion: “There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between x and y because the correlation coefficient is not significantly different from zero.”
What the conclusion means: There is not a significant linear relationship between x and y . Therefore, we CANNOT use the regression line to model a linear relationship between x and y in the population.
If r is significant and the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the line can be used to predict the value of y for values of x that are within the domain of observed x values.
If r is not significant OR if the scatter plot does not show a linear trend, the line should not be used for prediction.
If r is significant and if the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the line may NOT be appropriate or reliable for prediction OUTSIDE the domain of observed x values in the data.

Performing the Hypothesis Test

Null Hypothesis: H 0 : ρ = 0
Alternate Hypothesis: H a : ρ ≠ 0

What the Hypotheses Mean in Words

Null Hypothesis H 0 : The population correlation coefficient IS NOT significantly different from zero. There IS NOT a significant linear relationship (correlation) between x and y in the population.
Alternate Hypothesis H a : The population correlation coefficient IS significantly DIFFERENT FROM zero. There IS A SIGNIFICANT LINEAR RELATIONSHIP (correlation) between x and y in the population.

Drawing a Conclusion

There are two methods of making the decision. The two methods are equivalent and give the same result.

Method 1: Using the p -value
Method 2: Using a table of critical values

In this chapter of this textbook, we will always use a significance level of 5%, α = 0.05

Using the p -value method, you could choose any appropriate significance level you want; you are not limited to using α = 0.05. But the table of critical values provided in this textbook assumes that we are using a significance level of 5%, α = 0.05. (If we wanted to use a different significance level than 5% with the critical value method, we would need different tables of critical values that are not provided in this textbook).

Method 1: Using a p -value to make a decision

Using the ti-83, 83+, 84, 84+ calculator.

To calculate the p -value using LinRegTTEST:

On the LinRegTTEST input screen, on the line prompt for β or ρ , highlight “≠ 0”
The output screen shows the p-value on the line that reads “p =”.
(Most computer statistical software can calculate the p -value).

If the p -value is less than the significance level ( α = 0.05)

Decision: Reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: “There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between x and y because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.”

If the p -value is NOT less than the significance level ( α = 0.05)

Decision: DO NOT REJECT the null hypothesis.
Conclusion: “There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between x and y because the correlation coefficient is NOT significantly different from zero.”

Calculation Notes:

You will use technology to calculate the p -value. The following describes the calculations to compute the test statistics and the p -value:
The p -value is calculated using a t -distribution with n – 2 degrees of freedom.
The formula for the test statistic is [latex]\displaystyle{t}=\dfrac{{{r}\sqrt{{{n}-{2}}}}}{\sqrt{{{1}-{r}^{{2}}}}}[/latex]. The value of the test statistic, t , is shown in the computer or calculator output along with the p -value. The test statistic t has the same sign as the correlation coefficient r .
The p -value is the combined area in both tails.

Recall: ORDER OF OPERATIONS

1st find the numerator:

Step 1: Find [latex]n-2[/latex], and then take the square root.

Step 2: Multiply the value in Step 1 by [latex]r[/latex].

2nd find the denominator:

Step 3: Find the square of [latex]r[/latex], which is [latex]r[/latex] multiplied by [latex]r[/latex].

Step 4: Subtract this value from 1, [latex]1 -r^2[/latex].

Step 5: Find the square root of Step 4.

3rd take the numerator and divide by the denominator.

An alternative way to calculate the p -value (p) given by LinRegTTest is the command 2*tcdf(abs(t),10^99, n-2) in 2nd DISTR.

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAM: p- value method

Consider the third exam/final exam example (example 2).
The line of best fit is: [latex]\hat{y}[/latex] = -173.51 + 4.83 x with r = 0.6631 and there are n = 11 data points.
Can the regression line be used for prediction? Given a third exam score ( x value), can we use the line to predict the final exam score (predicted y value)?
H 0 : ρ = 0
H a : ρ ≠ 0
The p -value is 0.026 (from LinRegTTest on your calculator or from computer software).
The p -value, 0.026, is less than the significance level of α = 0.05.
Decision: Reject the Null Hypothesis H 0
Conclusion: There is sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant linear relationship between the third exam score ( x ) and the final exam score ( y ) because the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero.

Because r is significant and the scatter plot shows a linear trend, the regression line can be used to predict final exam scores.

Method 2: Using a table of Critical Values to make a decision

The 95% Critical Values of the Sample Correlation Coefficient Table can be used to give you a good idea of whether the computed value of r is significant or not . Compare r to the appropriate critical value in the table. If r is not between the positive and negative critical values, then the correlation coefficient is significant. If r is significant, then you may want to use the line for prediction.

Suppose you computed r = 0.801 using n = 10 data points. df = n – 2 = 10 – 2 = 8. The critical values associated with df = 8 are -0.632 and + 0.632. If r < negative critical value or r > positive critical value, then r is significant. Since r = 0.801 and 0.801 > 0.632, r is significant and the line may be used for prediction. If you view this example on a number line, it will help you.

r is not significant between -0.632 and +0.632. r = 0.801 > +0.632. Therefore, r is significant.

For a given line of best fit, you computed that r = 0.6501 using n = 12 data points and the critical value is 0.576. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

If the scatter plot looks linear then, yes, the line can be used for prediction, because r > the positive critical value.

Suppose you computed r = –0.624 with 14 data points. df = 14 – 2 = 12. The critical values are –0.532 and 0.532. Since –0.624 < –0.532, r is significant and the line can be used for prediction

r = –0.624-0.532. Therefore, r is significant.

For a given line of best fit, you compute that r = 0.5204 using n = 9 data points, and the critical value is 0.666. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

No, the line cannot be used for prediction, because r < the positive critical value.

Suppose you computed r = 0.776 and n = 6. df = 6 – 2 = 4. The critical values are –0.811 and 0.811. Since –0.811 < 0.776 < 0.811, r is not significant, and the line should not be used for prediction.

–0.811 < r = 0.776 < 0.811. Therefore, r is not significant.

For a given line of best fit, you compute that r = –0.7204 using n = 8 data points, and the critical value is = 0.707. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

Yes, the line can be used for prediction, because r < the negative critical value.

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAMPLE: critical value method

Consider the third exam/final exam example again. The line of best fit is: [latex]\hat{y}[/latex] = –173.51+4.83 x with r = 0.6631 and there are n = 11 data points. Can the regression line be used for prediction? Given a third-exam score ( x value), can we use the line to predict the final exam score (predicted y value)?

Use the “95% Critical Value” table for r with df = n – 2 = 11 – 2 = 9.
The critical values are –0.602 and +0.602
Since 0.6631 > 0.602, r is significant.

Suppose you computed the following correlation coefficients. Using the table at the end of the chapter, determine if r is significant and the line of best fit associated with each r can be used to predict a y value. If it helps, draw a number line.

r = –0.567 and the sample size, n , is 19. The df = n – 2 = 17. The critical value is –0.456. –0.567 < –0.456 so r is significant.
r = 0.708 and the sample size, n , is nine. The df = n – 2 = 7. The critical value is 0.666. 0.708 > 0.666 so r is significant.
r = 0.134 and the sample size, n , is 14. The df = 14 – 2 = 12. The critical value is 0.532. 0.134 is between –0.532 and 0.532 so r is not significant.
r = 0 and the sample size, n , is five. No matter what the dfs are, r = 0 is between the two critical values so r is not significant.

For a given line of best fit, you compute that r = 0 using n = 100 data points. Can the line be used for prediction? Why or why not?

No, the line cannot be used for prediction no matter what the sample size is.

Assumptions in Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient

Testing the significance of the correlation coefficient requires that certain assumptions about the data are satisfied. The premise of this test is that the data are a sample of observed points taken from a larger population. We have not examined the entire population because it is not possible or feasible to do so. We are examining the sample to draw a conclusion about whether the linear relationship that we see between x and y in the sample data provides strong enough evidence so that we can conclude that there is a linear relationship between x and y in the population.

The regression line equation that we calculate from the sample data gives the best-fit line for our particular sample. We want to use this best-fit line for the sample as an estimate of the best-fit line for the population. Examining the scatterplot and testing the significance of the correlation coefficient helps us determine if it is appropriate to do this.

The assumptions underlying the test of significance are:

There is a linear relationship in the population that models the average value of y for varying values of x . In other words, the expected value of y for each particular value lies on a straight line in the population. (We do not know the equation for the line for the population. Our regression line from the sample is our best estimate of this line in the population).
The y values for any particular x value are normally distributed about the line. This implies that there are more y values scattered closer to the line than are scattered farther away. Assumption (1) implies that these normal distributions are centered on the line: the means of these normal distributions of y values lie on the line.
The standard deviations of the population y values about the line are equal for each value of x . In other words, each of these normal distributions of y values has the same shape and spread about the line.
The residual errors are mutually independent (no pattern).
The data are produced from a well-designed, random sample or randomized experiment.

The y values for each x value are normally distributed about the line with the same standard deviation. For each x value, the mean of the y values lies on the regression line. More y values lie near the line than are scattered further away from the line.

Provided by : Lumen Learning. License : CC BY: Attribution
Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient. Provided by : OpenStax. Located at : https://openstax.org/books/introductory-statistics/pages/12-4-testing-the-significance-of-the-correlation-coefficient . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introductory-statistics/pages/1-introduction
Introductory Statistics. Authored by : Barbara Illowsky, Susan Dean. Provided by : OpenStax. Located at : https://openstax.org/books/introductory-statistics/pages/1-introduction . License : CC BY: Attribution . License Terms : Access for free at https://openstax.org/books/introductory-statistics/pages/1-introduction

Statistics Made Easy

How to Write a Null Hypothesis (5 Examples)

A hypothesis test uses sample data to determine whether or not some claim about a population parameter is true.

Whenever we perform a hypothesis test, we always write a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis, which take the following forms:

H 0 (Null Hypothesis): Population parameter =, ≤, ≥ some value

H A (Alternative Hypothesis): Population parameter <, >, ≠ some value

Note that the null hypothesis always contains the equal sign .

We interpret the hypotheses as follows:

Null hypothesis: The sample data provides no evidence to support some claim being made by an individual.

Alternative hypothesis: The sample data does provide sufficient evidence to support the claim being made by an individual.

For example, suppose it’s assumed that the average height of a certain species of plant is 20 inches tall. However, one botanist claims the true average height is greater than 20 inches.

To test this claim, she may go out and collect a random sample of plants. She can then use this sample data to perform a hypothesis test using the following two hypotheses:

H 0 : μ ≤ 20 (the true mean height of plants is equal to or even less than 20 inches)

H A : μ > 20 (the true mean height of plants is greater than 20 inches)

If the sample data gathered by the botanist shows that the mean height of this species of plants is significantly greater than 20 inches, she can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the mean height is greater than 20 inches.

Read through the following examples to gain a better understanding of how to write a null hypothesis in different situations.

Example 1: Weight of Turtles

A biologist wants to test whether or not the true mean weight of a certain species of turtles is 300 pounds. To test this, he goes out and measures the weight of a random sample of 40 turtles.

Here is how to write the null and alternative hypotheses for this scenario:

H 0 : μ = 300 (the true mean weight is equal to 300 pounds)

H A : μ ≠ 300 (the true mean weight is not equal to 300 pounds)

Example 2: Height of Males

It’s assumed that the mean height of males in a certain city is 68 inches. However, an independent researcher believes the true mean height is greater than 68 inches. To test this, he goes out and collects the height of 50 males in the city.

H 0 : μ ≤ 68 (the true mean height is equal to or even less than 68 inches)

H A : μ > 68 (the true mean height is greater than 68 inches)

Example 3: Graduation Rates

A university states that 80% of all students graduate on time. However, an independent researcher believes that less than 80% of all students graduate on time. To test this, she collects data on the proportion of students who graduated on time last year at the university.

H 0 : p ≥ 0.80 (the true proportion of students who graduate on time is 80% or higher)

H A : μ < 0.80 (the true proportion of students who graduate on time is less than 80%)

Example 4: Burger Weights

A food researcher wants to test whether or not the true mean weight of a burger at a certain restaurant is 7 ounces. To test this, he goes out and measures the weight of a random sample of 20 burgers from this restaurant.

H 0 : μ = 7 (the true mean weight is equal to 7 ounces)

H A : μ ≠ 7 (the true mean weight is not equal to 7 ounces)

Example 5: Citizen Support

A politician claims that less than 30% of citizens in a certain town support a certain law. To test this, he goes out and surveys 200 citizens on whether or not they support the law.

H 0 : p ≥ .30 (the true proportion of citizens who support the law is greater than or equal to 30%)

H A : μ < 0.30 (the true proportion of citizens who support the law is less than 30%)

Additional Resources

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing Introduction to Confidence Intervals An Explanation of P-Values and Statistical Significance

Featured Posts

5 Regularization Techniques You Should Know

Hey there. My name is Zach Bobbitt. I have a Masters of Science degree in Applied Statistics and I’ve worked on machine learning algorithms for professional businesses in both healthcare and retail. I’m passionate about statistics, machine learning, and data visualization and I created Statology to be a resource for both students and teachers alike. My goal with this site is to help you learn statistics through using simple terms, plenty of real-world examples, and helpful illustrations.

2 Replies to “How to Write a Null Hypothesis (5 Examples)”

you are amazing, thank you so much

Say I am a botanist hypothesizing the average height of daisies is 20 inches, or not? Does T = (ave – 20 inches) / √ variance / (80 / 4)? … This assumes 40 real measures + 40 fake = 80 n, but that seems questionable. Please advise.

Join the Statology Community

Sign up to receive Statology's exclusive study resource: 100 practice problems with step-by-step solutions. Plus, get our latest insights, tutorials, and data analysis tips straight to your inbox!

By subscribing you accept Statology's Privacy Policy.

13.1 Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing

Learning objectives.

Explain the purpose of null hypothesis testing, including the role of sampling error.
Describe the basic logic of null hypothesis testing.
Describe the role of relationship strength and sample size in determining statistical significance and make reasonable judgments about statistical significance based on these two factors.

The Purpose of Null Hypothesis Testing

As we have seen, psychological research typically involves measuring one or more variables in a sample and computing descriptive statistics for that sample. In general, however, the researcher’s goal is not to draw conclusions about that sample but to draw conclusions about the population that the sample was selected from. Thus researchers must use sample statistics to draw conclusions about the corresponding values in the population. These corresponding values in the population are called parameters . Imagine, for example, that a researcher measures the number of depressive symptoms exhibited by each of 50 adults with clinical depression and computes the mean number of symptoms. The researcher probably wants to use this sample statistic (the mean number of symptoms for the sample) to draw conclusions about the corresponding population parameter (the mean number of symptoms for adults with clinical depression).

Unfortunately, sample statistics are not perfect estimates of their corresponding population parameters. This is because there is a certain amount of random variability in any statistic from sample to sample. The mean number of depressive symptoms might be 8.73 in one sample of adults with clinical depression, 6.45 in a second sample, and 9.44 in a third—even though these samples are selected randomly from the same population. Similarly, the correlation (Pearson’s r ) between two variables might be +.24 in one sample, −.04 in a second sample, and +.15 in a third—again, even though these samples are selected randomly from the same population. This random variability in a statistic from sample to sample is called sampling error . (Note that the term error here refers to random variability and does not imply that anyone has made a mistake. No one “commits a sampling error.”)

In fact, any statistical relationship in a sample can be interpreted in two ways:

There is a relationship in the population, and the relationship in the sample reflects this.
There is no relationship in the population, and the relationship in the sample reflects only sampling error.

The purpose of null hypothesis testing is simply to help researchers decide between these two interpretations.

The Logic of Null Hypothesis Testing

Assume for the moment that the null hypothesis is true. There is no relationship between the variables in the population.
Determine how likely the sample relationship would be if the null hypothesis were true.
If the sample relationship would be extremely unlikely, then reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If it would not be extremely unlikely, then retain the null hypothesis .

Following this logic, we can begin to understand why Mehl and his colleagues concluded that there is no difference in talkativeness between women and men in the population. In essence, they asked the following question: “If there were no difference in the population, how likely is it that we would find a small difference of d = 0.06 in our sample?” Their answer to this question was that this sample relationship would be fairly likely if the null hypothesis were true. Therefore, they retained the null hypothesis—concluding that there is no evidence of a sex difference in the population. We can also see why Kanner and his colleagues concluded that there is a correlation between hassles and symptoms in the population. They asked, “If the null hypothesis were true, how likely is it that we would find a strong correlation of +.60 in our sample?” Their answer to this question was that this sample relationship would be fairly unlikely if the null hypothesis were true. Therefore, they rejected the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis—concluding that there is a positive correlation between these variables in the population.

A crucial step in null hypothesis testing is finding the likelihood of the sample result if the null hypothesis were true. This probability is called the p value . A low p value means that the sample result would be unlikely if the null hypothesis were true and leads to the rejection of the null hypothesis. A p value that is not low means that the sample result would be likely if the null hypothesis were true and leads to the retention of the null hypothesis. But how low must the p value be before the sample result is considered unlikely enough to reject the null hypothesis? In null hypothesis testing, this criterion is called α (alpha) and is almost always set to .05. If there is a 5% chance or less of a result as extreme as the sample result if the null hypothesis were true, then the null hypothesis is rejected. When this happens, the result is said to be statistically significant . If there is greater than a 5% chance of a result as extreme as the sample result when the null hypothesis is true, then the null hypothesis is retained. This does not necessarily mean that the researcher accepts the null hypothesis as true—only that there is not currently enough evidence to reject it. Researchers often use the expression “fail to reject the null hypothesis” rather than “retain the null hypothesis,” but they never use the expression “accept the null hypothesis.”

The Misunderstood p Value

“Null Hypothesis” retrieved from http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/null_hypothesis.png (CC-BY-NC 2.5)

Role of Sample Size and Relationship Strength

Statistical Significance Versus Practical Significance

“Conditional Risk” retrieved from http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/conditional_risk.png (CC-BY-NC 2.5)

Key Takeaways

Null hypothesis testing is a formal approach to deciding whether a statistical relationship in a sample reflects a real relationship in the population or is just due to chance.
The logic of null hypothesis testing involves assuming that the null hypothesis is true, finding how likely the sample result would be if this assumption were correct, and then making a decision. If the sample result would be unlikely if the null hypothesis were true, then it is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. If it would not be unlikely, then the null hypothesis is retained.
The probability of obtaining the sample result if the null hypothesis were true (the p value) is based on two considerations: relationship strength and sample size. Reasonable judgments about whether a sample relationship is statistically significant can often be made by quickly considering these two factors.
Statistical significance is not the same as relationship strength or importance. Even weak relationships can be statistically significant if the sample size is large enough. It is important to consider relationship strength and the practical significance of a result in addition to its statistical significance.
Discussion: Imagine a study showing that people who eat more broccoli tend to be happier. Explain for someone who knows nothing about statistics why the researchers would conduct a null hypothesis test.
The correlation between two variables is r = −.78 based on a sample size of 137.
The mean score on a psychological characteristic for women is 25 ( SD = 5) and the mean score for men is 24 ( SD = 5). There were 12 women and 10 men in this study.
In a memory experiment, the mean number of items recalled by the 40 participants in Condition A was 0.50 standard deviations greater than the mean number recalled by the 40 participants in Condition B.
In another memory experiment, the mean scores for participants in Condition A and Condition B came out exactly the same!
A student finds a correlation of r = .04 between the number of units the students in his research methods class are taking and the students’ level of stress.
Cohen, J. (1994). The world is round: p < .05. American Psychologist, 49 , 997–1003. ↵
Hyde, J. S. (2007). New directions in the study of gender similarities and differences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 , 259–263. ↵

Share This Book

Increase Font Size

Sciencing_Icons_Science SCIENCE

Sciencing_icons_biology biology, sciencing_icons_cells cells, sciencing_icons_molecular molecular, sciencing_icons_microorganisms microorganisms, sciencing_icons_genetics genetics, sciencing_icons_human body human body, sciencing_icons_ecology ecology, sciencing_icons_chemistry chemistry, sciencing_icons_atomic & molecular structure atomic & molecular structure, sciencing_icons_bonds bonds, sciencing_icons_reactions reactions, sciencing_icons_stoichiometry stoichiometry, sciencing_icons_solutions solutions, sciencing_icons_acids & bases acids & bases, sciencing_icons_thermodynamics thermodynamics, sciencing_icons_organic chemistry organic chemistry, sciencing_icons_physics physics, sciencing_icons_fundamentals-physics fundamentals, sciencing_icons_electronics electronics, sciencing_icons_waves waves, sciencing_icons_energy energy, sciencing_icons_fluid fluid, sciencing_icons_astronomy astronomy, sciencing_icons_geology geology, sciencing_icons_fundamentals-geology fundamentals, sciencing_icons_minerals & rocks minerals & rocks, sciencing_icons_earth scructure earth structure, sciencing_icons_fossils fossils, sciencing_icons_natural disasters natural disasters, sciencing_icons_nature nature, sciencing_icons_ecosystems ecosystems, sciencing_icons_environment environment, sciencing_icons_insects insects, sciencing_icons_plants & mushrooms plants & mushrooms, sciencing_icons_animals animals, sciencing_icons_math math, sciencing_icons_arithmetic arithmetic, sciencing_icons_addition & subtraction addition & subtraction, sciencing_icons_multiplication & division multiplication & division, sciencing_icons_decimals decimals, sciencing_icons_fractions fractions, sciencing_icons_conversions conversions, sciencing_icons_algebra algebra, sciencing_icons_working with units working with units, sciencing_icons_equations & expressions equations & expressions, sciencing_icons_ratios & proportions ratios & proportions, sciencing_icons_inequalities inequalities, sciencing_icons_exponents & logarithms exponents & logarithms, sciencing_icons_factorization factorization, sciencing_icons_functions functions, sciencing_icons_linear equations linear equations, sciencing_icons_graphs graphs, sciencing_icons_quadratics quadratics, sciencing_icons_polynomials polynomials, sciencing_icons_geometry geometry, sciencing_icons_fundamentals-geometry fundamentals, sciencing_icons_cartesian cartesian, sciencing_icons_circles circles, sciencing_icons_solids solids, sciencing_icons_trigonometry trigonometry, sciencing_icons_probability-statistics probability & statistics, sciencing_icons_mean-median-mode mean/median/mode, sciencing_icons_independent-dependent variables independent/dependent variables, sciencing_icons_deviation deviation, sciencing_icons_correlation correlation, sciencing_icons_sampling sampling, sciencing_icons_distributions distributions, sciencing_icons_probability probability, sciencing_icons_calculus calculus, sciencing_icons_differentiation-integration differentiation/integration, sciencing_icons_application application, sciencing_icons_projects projects, sciencing_icons_news news.

Share Tweet Email Print
Home ⋅
Math ⋅
Probability & Statistics ⋅
Distributions

How to Write a Hypothesis for Correlation

A hypothesis for correlation predicts a statistically significant relationship.

How to Calculate a P-Value

A hypothesis is a testable statement about how something works in the natural world. While some hypotheses predict a causal relationship between two variables, other hypotheses predict a correlation between them. According to the Research Methods Knowledge Base, a correlation is a single number that describes the relationship between two variables. If you do not predict a causal relationship or cannot measure one objectively, state clearly in your hypothesis that you are merely predicting a correlation.

Research the topic in depth before forming a hypothesis. Without adequate knowledge about the subject matter, you will not be able to decide whether to write a hypothesis for correlation or causation. Read the findings of similar experiments before writing your own hypothesis.

Identify the independent variable and dependent variable. Your hypothesis will be concerned with what happens to the dependent variable when a change is made in the independent variable. In a correlation, the two variables undergo changes at the same time in a significant number of cases. However, this does not mean that the change in the independent variable causes the change in the dependent variable.

Construct an experiment to test your hypothesis. In a correlative experiment, you must be able to measure the exact relationship between two variables. This means you will need to find out how often a change occurs in both variables in terms of a specific percentage.

Establish the requirements of the experiment with regard to statistical significance. Instruct readers exactly how often the variables must correlate to reach a high enough level of statistical significance. This number will vary considerably depending on the field. In a highly technical scientific study, for instance, the variables may need to correlate 98 percent of the time; but in a sociological study, 90 percent correlation may suffice. Look at other studies in your particular field to determine the requirements for statistical significance.

State the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis gives an exact value that implies there is no correlation between the two variables. If the results show a percentage equal to or lower than the value of the null hypothesis, then the variables are not proven to correlate.

Record and summarize the results of your experiment. State whether or not the experiment met the minimum requirements of your hypothesis in terms of both percentage and significance.

How to determine the sample size in a quantitative..., how to calculate a two-tailed test, how to interpret a student's t-test results, how to know if something is significant using spss, quantitative vs. qualitative data and laboratory testing, similarities of univariate & multivariate statistical..., what is the meaning of sample size, distinguishing between descriptive & causal studies, how to calculate cv values, how to determine your practice clep score, what are the different types of correlations, how to calculate p-hat, how to calculate percentage error, how to calculate percent relative range, how to calculate a sample size population, how to calculate bias, how to calculate the percentage of another number, how to find y value for the slope of a line, advantages & disadvantages of finding variance.

University of New England; Steps in Hypothesis Testing for Correlation; 2000
Research Methods Knowledge Base; Correlation; William M.K. Trochim; 2006
Science Buddies; Hypothesis

About the Author

Brian Gabriel has been a writer and blogger since 2009, contributing to various online publications. He earned his Bachelor of Arts in history from Whitworth University.

Photo Credits

Thinkstock/Comstock/Getty Images

Find Your Next Great Science Fair Project! GO

User Preferences

Content preview.

Arcu felis bibendum ut tristique et egestas quis:

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident

Keyboard Shortcuts

6.3 - testing for partial correlation.

When discussing ordinary correlations we looked at tests for the null hypothesis that the ordinary correlation is equal to zero, against the alternative that it is not equal to zero. If that null hypothesis is rejected, then we look at confidence intervals for the ordinary correlation. Similar objectives can be considered for the partial correlation.

First, consider testing the null hypothesis that a partial correlation is equal to zero against the alternative that it is not equal to zero. This is expressed below:

$H_0\colon \rho_{jk\textbf{.x}}=0$ against $H_a\colon \rho_{jk\textbf{.x}}\ne 0$

Here we will use a test statistic that is similar to the one we used for an ordinary correlation. This test statistic is shown below:

$t = r_{jk\textbf{.x}}\sqrt{\frac{n-2-c}{1-r^2_{jk\textbf{.x}}}}$ $\dot{\sim}$ $t_{n-2-c}$

The only difference between this and the previous one is what appears in the numerator of the radical. Before we just took n - 2. Here we take n - 2 - c , where c is the number of variables upon which we are conditioning. In our Adult Intelligence data, we conditioned on two variables so c would be equal to 2 in this case.

Under the null hypothesis, this test statistic will be approximately t -distributed, also with n - 2 - c degrees of freedom.

We would reject $H_{o}\colon$ if the absolute value of the test statistic exceeded the critical value from the t -table evaluated at $\alpha$ over 2:

$|t| > t_{n-2-c, \alpha/2}$

Example 6-3: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data Section

For the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data, we found a partial correlation of 0.711879, which we enter into the expression for the test statistic as shown below:

$t = 0.711879 \sqrt{\dfrac{37-2-2}{1-0.711879^2}}=5.82$

The sample size is 37, along with the 2 variables upon which we are conditioning is also substituted in. Carry out the math and we get a test statistic of 5.82 as shown above.

Here we want to compare this value to a t -distribution with 33 degrees of freedom for an $\alpha$ = 0.01 level test. Therefore, we are going to look at the critical value for 0.005 in the table (because 33 does not appear to use the closest df that does not exceed 33 which is 30). In this case it is 2.75, meaning that $t _ { ( d f , 1 - \alpha / 2 ) } = t _ { ( 33,0.995 ) } $ is 2.75.

Because $5.82 > 2.75 = t _ { ( 33,0.995 ) }$, we can reject the null hypothesis, $H_{o}$ at the $\alpha = 0.01$ level and conclude that there is a significant partial correlation between these two variables. In particular, we would include that this partial correlation is positive indicating that even after taking into account Arithmetic and Picture Completion, there is a positive association between Information and Similarities.

Confidence Interval for the partial correlation, $\rho_{jk\textbf{.x}}$ Section

The procedure here is very similar to the procedure we used for ordinary correlation.

Compute Fisher's transformation of the partial correlation using the same formula as before.

$z_{jk} = \dfrac{1}{2}\log \left( \dfrac{1+r_{jk\textbf{.X}}}{1-r_{jk\textbf{.X}}}\right) $

In this case, for a large n , this Fisher transform variable will be possibly normally distributed. The mean is equal to the Fisher transform for the population value for this partial correlation, and the variance is equal to 1 over n-3-c .

$z_{jk}$ $\dot{\sim}$ $N \left( \dfrac{1}{2}\log \dfrac{1+\rho_{jk\textbf{.X}}}{1-\rho_{jk\textbf{.X}}}, \dfrac{1}{n-3-c}\right)$

Compute a $(1 - \alpha) × 100\%$ confidence interval for the Fisher transform correlation. This expression is shown below:

$ \dfrac{1}{2}\log \dfrac{1+\rho_{jk\textbf{.X}}}{1-\rho_{jk\textbf{.X}}}$

This yields the bounds $Z_{l}$ and $Z_{u}$ as before.

$\left(\underset{Z_l}{\underbrace{Z_{jk}-\dfrac{Z_{\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-3-c}}}}, \underset{Z_U}{\underbrace{Z_{jk}+\dfrac{Z_{\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-3-c}}}}\right)$

Back transform to obtain the desired confidence interval for the partial correlation - $\rho_{jk\textbf{.X}}$

$\left(\dfrac{e^{2Z_l}-1}{e^{2Z_l}+1}, \dfrac{e^{2Z_U}-1}{e^{2Z_U}+1}\right)$

Example 6-3: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data (Steps Shown) Section

The confidence interval is calculated by substituting the results from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data into the appropriate steps below:

Step 1 : Compute the Fisher transform:

\begin{align} Z_{12} &= \dfrac{1}{2}\log \frac{1+r_{12.34}}{1-r_{12.34}}\\[5pt] &= \dfrac{1}{2} \log \frac{1+0.711879}{1-0.711879}\\[5pt] &= 0.89098 \end{align}

Step 2 : Compute the 95% confidence interval for $ \frac{1}{2}\log \frac{1+\rho_{12.34}}{1-\rho_{12.34}}$ :

\begin{align} Z_l &= Z_{12}-Z_{0.025}/\sqrt{n-3-c}\\[5pt] & = 0.89098 - \dfrac{1.96}{\sqrt{37-3-2}}\\[5pt] &= 0.5445 \end{align}

\begin{align} Z_U &= Z_{12}+Z_{0.025}/\sqrt{n-3-c}\\[5pt] &= 0.89098 + \dfrac{1.96}{\sqrt{37-3-2}} \\[5pt] &= 1.2375 \end{align}

Step 3 : Back-transform to obtain the 95% confidence interval for $\rho_{12.34}$ :

$\left(\dfrac{\exp\{2Z_l\}-1}{\exp\{2Z_l\}+1}, \dfrac{\exp\{2Z_U\}-1}{\exp\{2Z_U\}+1}\right)$

$\left(\dfrac{\exp\{2\times 0.5445\}-1}{\exp\{2\times 0.5445\}+1}, \dfrac{\exp\{2\times 1.2375\}-1}{\exp\{2\times 1.2375\}+1}\right)$

$(0.4964, 0.8447)$

Based on this result, we can conclude that we are 95% confident that the interval (0.4964, 0.8447) contains the partial correlation between Information and Similarities scores given scores on Arithmetic and Picture Completion.

IMAGES

Null Hypothesis
How To Find Null Hypothesis In R
Null Hypothesis
Null hypothesis for pearson correlation
PPT
Understanding the Null Hypothesis for Linear Regression

VIDEO

Correlation hypothesis testing part 1
Hypothesis Testing based on Correlation
Correlation Hypothesis Test Theory
Hypothsis Testing in Statistics Part 2 Steps to Solving a Problem
Testing the Significance of Correlation Coefficient
Summarizing Bivariate Data

COMMENTS

11.2: Correlation Hypothesis Test
The sample correlation coefficient, $r$, is our estimate of the unknown population correlation coefficient. The symbol for the population correlation coefficient is $\rho$, the Greek letter "rho." ... Null Hypothesis $H_{0}$: The population correlation coefficient IS NOT significantly different from zero. There IS NOT a significant linear ...
1.9
Let's perform the hypothesis test on the husband's age and wife's age data in which the sample correlation based on n = 170 couples is r = 0.939. To test H 0: ρ = 0 against the alternative H A: ρ ≠ 0, we obtain the following test statistic: t ∗ = r n − 2 1 − R 2 = 0.939 170 − 2 1 − 0.939 2 = 35.39. To obtain the P -value, we need ...
Null & Alternative Hypotheses
A null hypothesis claims that there is no effect in the population, while an alternative hypothesis claims that there is an effect. ... Be careful not to say you "prove" or "accept" the null hypothesis. Example: ... There is a correlation between independent variable and dependent variable in the population; ρ ≠ 0.
Pearson Correlation Coefficient (r)
Example: Deciding whether to reject the null hypothesis For the correlation between weight and height in a sample of 10 newborns, the t value is less than the critical value of t. Therefore, we don't reject the null hypothesis that the Pearson correlation coefficient of the population ( ρ ) is 0.
9.4.1
Under the null hypothesis and with above assumptions, the test statistic, $t^*$, found by: ... The output from Minitab previously used to find the sample correlation also provides a p-value. This p-value is for the two-sided test. If the alternative is one-sided, the p-value from the output needs to be adjusted. Example 9-7: Student height ...
5.3
5.3 - Inferences for Correlations. Let us consider testing the null hypothesis that there is zero correlation between two variables X j and X k. Mathematically we write this as shown below: H 0: ρ j k = 0 against H a: ρ j k ≠ 0. Recall that the correlation is estimated by sample correlation r j k given in the expression below: r j k = s j k ...
12.4 Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient
The correlation coefficient, r, tells us about the strength and direction of the linear relationship between x and y.However, the reliability of the linear model also depends on how many observed data points are in the sample. We need to look at both the value of the correlation coefficient r and the sample size n, together.. We perform a hypothesis test of the "significance of the correlation ...
Null Hypothesis: Definition, Rejecting & Examples
When your sample contains sufficient evidence, you can reject the null and conclude that the effect is statistically significant. Statisticians often denote the null hypothesis as H 0 or H A.. Null Hypothesis H 0: No effect exists in the population.; Alternative Hypothesis H A: The effect exists in the population.; In every study or experiment, researchers assess an effect or relationship.
13.2 Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient
The sample correlation coefficient, r, is our estimate of the unknown population correlation coefficient. ... Null Hypothesis H 0: The population correlation coefficient IS NOT significantly different from zero. There IS NOT a significant linear relationship (correlation) ...
9.1 Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The actual test begins by considering two hypotheses.They are called the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints. H 0, the —null hypothesis: a statement of no difference between sample means or proportions or no difference between a sample mean or proportion and a population mean or proportion. In other words, the difference equals 0.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null and alternative hypotheses are two competing claims that researchers weigh evidence for and against using a statistical test: Null hypothesis (H0): There's no effect in the population. Alternative hypothesis (HA): There's an effect in the population. The effect is usually the effect of the independent variable on the dependent ...
Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing
Therefore, they rejected the null hypothesis in favour of the alternative hypothesis—concluding that there is a positive correlation between these variables in the population. A crucial step in null hypothesis testing is finding the likelihood of the sample result if the null hypothesis were true. This probability is called the p value.
10.1
Here are some examples. Example 10.2: Hypotheses with One Sample of One Categorical Variable Section . About 10% of the human population is left-handed. ... Null Hypothesis: The correlation between the daily stock price change (\$) and the daily stock purchases by non-management employees (\$) = 0.
Hypothesis Test for Correlation
The hypothesis test lets us decide whether the value of the population correlation coefficient ρ is "close to zero" or "significantly different from zero.". We decide this based on the sample correlation coefficient r and the sample size n. If the test concludes that the correlation coefficient is significantly different from zero, we ...
How to Write a Null Hypothesis (5 Examples)
Whenever we perform a hypothesis test, we always write a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis, which take the following forms: H0 (Null Hypothesis): Population parameter =, ≤, ≥ some value. HA (Alternative Hypothesis): Population parameter <, >, ≠ some value. Note that the null hypothesis always contains the equal sign.
13.1 Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing
Therefore, they rejected the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis—concluding that there is a positive correlation between these variables in the population. A crucial step in null hypothesis testing is finding the likelihood of the sample result if the null hypothesis were true. This probability is called the p value.
5.2
5.2 - Writing Hypotheses. The first step in conducting a hypothesis test is to write the hypothesis statements that are going to be tested. For each test you will have a null hypothesis ( H 0) and an alternative hypothesis ( H a ). When writing hypotheses there are three things that we need to know: (1) the parameter that we are testing (2) the ...
How to Write a Hypothesis for Correlation
State the null hypothesis. The null hypothesis gives an exact value that implies there is no correlation between the two variables. If the results show a percentage equal to or lower than the value of the null hypothesis, then the variables are not proven to correlate. Record and summarize the results of your experiment.
Conducting a Hypothesis Test for the Population Correlation Coefficient
We follow standard hypothesis test procedures in conducting a hypothesis test for the population correlation coefficient ρ. First, we specify the null and alternative hypotheses: Null hypothesis H0: ρ = 0. Alternative hypothesis HA: ρ ≠ 0 or HA: ρ < 0 or HA: ρ > 0. Second, we calculate the value of the test statistic using the following ...
(PDF) Open Peer Review on Qeios Intersections of Statistical
It is shown that p-values are strongly related to correlation coefficients under a true null hypothesis; hence, can reveal the "importance of an association or effect."
6.3
First, consider testing the null hypothesis that a partial correlation is equal to zero against the alternative that it is not equal to zero. This is expressed below: H 0: ρ j k .x = 0 against H a: ρ j k .x ≠ 0. Here we will use a test statistic that is similar to the one we used for an ordinary correlation. This test statistic is shown below:

Margin Size

11.2: Correlation Hypothesis Test

PERFORMING THE HYPOTHESIS TEST

METHOD 1: Using a \(p\text{-value}\) to make a decision

METHOD 2: Using a table of Critical Values to make a decision

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{1}\)

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\)

Example \(\PageIndex{3}\)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{3}\)

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAMPLE: critical value method

Example \(\PageIndex{4}\)

Exercise \(\PageIndex{4}\)

Assumptions in Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient

Formula Review

9.1 Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Example 9.1

Example 9.2

Example 9.3

Example 9.4

Collaborative Exercise

Have a thesis expert improve your writing

Null and Alternative Hypotheses | Definitions & Examples

Table of contents

Examples of null hypotheses

Examples of alternative hypotheses

Test-specific

Cite this Scribbr article

Is this article helpful?

Shaun Turney

Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing

The Purpose of Null Hypothesis Testing

The Logic of Null Hypothesis Testing

Role of Sample Size and Relationship Strength

Statistical Significance Versus Practical Significance

Long Descriptions

Media Attributions

Share This Book

Module 12: Linear Regression and Correlation

Performing the Hypothesis Test

What the Hypotheses Mean in Words

Drawing a Conclusion

Method 1: Using a p -value to make a decision

Recall: ORDER OF OPERATIONS

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAM: p- value method

Method 2: Using a table of Critical Values to make a decision

THIRD-EXAM vs FINAL-EXAM EXAMPLE: critical value method

Assumptions in Testing the Significance of the Correlation Coefficient

How to Write a Null Hypothesis (5 Examples)

Example 1: Weight of Turtles

Example 2: Height of Males

Example 3: Graduation Rates

Example 4: Burger Weights

Example 5: Citizen Support

Additional Resources

Featured Posts

2 Replies to “How to Write a Null Hypothesis (5 Examples)”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Join the Statology Community

13.1 Understanding Null Hypothesis Testing

The Purpose of Null Hypothesis Testing

The Logic of Null Hypothesis Testing

The Misunderstood p Value

Role of Sample Size and Relationship Strength

Statistical Significance Versus Practical Significance

Key Takeaways

Share This Book

Sciencing_Icons_Science SCIENCE

How to Write a Hypothesis for Correlation

How to Calculate a P-Value

Related Articles

Find Your Next Great Science Fair Project! GO

User Preferences

Keyboard Shortcuts

Example 6-3: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data Section

Confidence Interval for the partial correlation, \(\rho_{jk\textbf{.x}}\) Section

Example 6-3: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Data (Steps Shown) Section

IMAGES

VIDEO