qualitative research methods drawings

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

DRAWING AS A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TOOL AN APPROACH TO FIELD WORK FROM A SOCIAL COMPLEXITY PERSPECTIVE

Drawing allows an in-depth and less linear insight into complex situations if compared to speech alone. As such, having interviewees draw models of their setting allows them and the researcher to develop a new, multiscale and more complex understanding and thus to harness the complexity of real-life situations differently. In this paper, we present the Subjective Modelling method, which allies the features of drawing and speech in qualitative interviews. This mapping out `mediate[s] the inner mental world and outer physical world ́ (Okada et al. 2008, p.vii) allowing the visualisation of inner world views necessary to the understanding of complexity in an interpretational approach. We propose a method of data collection that integrates the drawing process as a trigger for complexification by the interviewees, combined with a data processing and analysis method based on Guattari's metamodelling processes (Guattari 1989) in order to bring `fluid thinking ́ (Berardi 2008) into a planning situation and to develop a scientific metamodelling process (Paisiou 2010). While we discuss the practical features of subjective modelling in depth, we also aim at introducing the ontological premises and conceptual discussions that are needed in order to develop the method. We illustrate our argument with empirical examples from research into municipal old-age policy planning in Switzerland.

Related Papers

Tamaryn Jordaan

Drawing allows an in-depth and less linear insight into complex situations if compared to speech alone. As such, having interviewees draw models of their setting allows them and the researcher to develop a new, multiscale and more complex understanding and thus to harness the complexity of real-life situations differently. In this paper, we present the Subjective Modelling method, which allies the features of drawing and speech in qualitative interviews. This mapping out`mediate[s] the inner mental world and outer physical world´(Okada et al. 2008, p.vii) allowing the visualisation of inner world views necessary to the understanding of complexity in an interpretational approach. We propose a method of data collection that integrates the drawing process as a trigger for complexification by the interviewees, combined with a data processing and analysis method based on Guattari's metamodelling processes (Guattari 1989) in order to bring`fluid thinking´(Berardi 2008) into a planning situation and to develop a scientific metamodelling process (Paisiou 2010). While we discuss the practical features of subjective modelling in depth, we also aim at introducing the ontological premises and conceptual discussions that are needed in order to develop the method. We illustrate our argument with empirical examples from research into municipal old-age policy planning in Switzerland.

Ultima Thule: Journal of …

Isabelle Schoepfer

Natalya Sergeeva

WORKSPACE METHODOLOGIES–STUDYING …

Ursula Hyrkkänen

Anu Sivunen

This report consists of descriptions of methods, which are used for studying, evaluating and developing workplaces. Work environments are analyzed as layers or imbedded levels: as physical, virtual and mental/social spaces. In this analysis, Kurt Lewin's classical psychological concept'Life Space'is used as well as the concept'ba'provided by Nonaka, Toyama and Konno.'Ba'refers to socially shared space, where people create, share and use knowledge.

Eric Scheepbouwer

Executive summary The aim of this study is to understand and identify the barriers to labour productivity gains in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the New Zealand vertical construction sector. A recent Treasury report highlighted as a priority, the need to improve New Zealand’s comparatively low productivity and as construction accounts for approximately 10% of GNP it is critical to achieving the Treasury’s goal. SMEs are key drivers of economic growth, employment and performance. In the construction industry close to 99% of all companies are SME; they employ over 80% of all the workers in construction and contribute over 2/3rd of the industry turnover. Yet, international studies show that labour productivity reduces with the size of the firm. Considerable effort has been directed to understanding the productivity issue in construction in New Zealand and overseas, yet real sustainable improvements seem elusive. Much previous research has been aimed at large construction organ...

Luke Houghton

Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 49, no. 2 (forthcoming)

This article presents a methodological and technical reflection about an innovative and interactive qualitative Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tool and method created for gauging neighbourhood images and perceptions from the perspective of residents. Knowledge gained from the critical GIS debates has led to the development of qualitative GIS and Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) methods which aim to counteract the adverse effects of the GIS seen as predominantly top-down. Drawing from critical and qualitative GIS arguments, we attempted to create an accessible, bottom-up, GIS data collection method that consisted of conducting qualitative interviews while presenting digital maps on a tablet. This digital tool provided the ability to change scales by zooming in and out on the map and also offered a selection of base maps which afforded numerous views of the city. This method not only allowed residents to generate GIS data about their neighbourhood, but was also used as a visual support tool that acted as a catalyst for dialog during the interviews. With the aid of examples from a study in Geneva, Switzerland, this paper discusses the relevance, strengths, and limitations of the presented method in the field of neighbourhood research.

Bridget Malcolm

This master’s thesis sought to understand the current practice of a regulatory agency to address complex problems and whether this could be supported by methods from the field of systemic design. The research comprised a qualitative case study to understand current practice within an Australian Government regulator, with the findings compared against literature on the practices of systems thinking and complexity theory. Systemic design was then examined as an alternative practice to address complex problems. A systemic design intervention (combining systems thinking and design methods) was developed and trialled in a second qualitative case study within the regulatory agency. The thesis concludes that systemic design principles and methods have the potential to support regulatory agencies navigate compartmentalised governance systems by establishing a shared frame of reference to problems and the co-design of new responses. It proposes that the incorporation of systems thinking and complexity theories within design methods increases the likelihood of them being taken seriously in the government sector and that methods need to be tested and adapted further to enable integration within existing regulatory practice.

RELATED PAPERS

dissertations.jyu.fi

Marikka Heikkilä

AI & SOCIETY

Larry Stillman

Hannele Lampela

frido smulders

International Journal of Action Research

Sabine Pfeiffer , Petra Schütt

Andrew Rawdin , J. Chilcott

Gerald R Midgley

douglas kusi

mostafa jafari

Todd David Bowers, PhD

Peter Bednar

Original Citation

Frederik Lesage

Deborah Cleland , Carina Wyborn

Isto Huvila

Jan Aidemark

Critical reflections on information systems

Methodological Innovations

Petra Ahrens

Joshua Ayarkwa

Ecology and …

Anne Leitch

Noel Carroll

manea almanea

Mathew Hillier

Information and Organization

Michel Avital

Management Decision

gabriel cepeda

C-SAND working paper, …

Nathalie Mitev

Margareta Lützhöft , Sigrun Lurås

Satu Koivisto

Sirpa Wrede

Sigrun Lurås

Ingvild Digranes , Erik Bohemia

Tovi Fenster

Björn Cronquist

Rodrigo Magalhães

European Journal of Operational Research

Leonardo Antonio Monteiro Pessôa

Amaury Daele , Lysanne Lessard

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Have a language expert improve your writing

Run a free plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free.

• Knowledge Base

Methodology

• What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples

Published on June 19, 2020 by Pritha Bhandari . Revised on June 22, 2023.

Qualitative research involves collecting and analyzing non-numerical data (e.g., text, video, or audio) to understand concepts, opinions, or experiences. It can be used to gather in-depth insights into a problem or generate new ideas for research.

Qualitative research is the opposite of quantitative research , which involves collecting and analyzing numerical data for statistical analysis.

Qualitative research is commonly used in the humanities and social sciences, in subjects such as anthropology, sociology, education, health sciences, history, etc.

• How does social media shape body image in teenagers?
• How do children and adults interpret healthy eating in the UK?
• What factors influence employee retention in a large organization?
• How is anxiety experienced around the world?
• How can teachers integrate social issues into science curriculums?

Table of contents

Approaches to qualitative research, qualitative research methods, qualitative data analysis, advantages of qualitative research, disadvantages of qualitative research, other interesting articles, frequently asked questions about qualitative research.

Qualitative research is used to understand how people experience the world. While there are many approaches to qualitative research, they tend to be flexible and focus on retaining rich meaning when interpreting data.

Common approaches include grounded theory, ethnography , action research , phenomenological research, and narrative research. They share some similarities, but emphasize different aims and perspectives.

Note that qualitative research is at risk for certain research biases including the Hawthorne effect , observer bias , recall bias , and social desirability bias . While not always totally avoidable, awareness of potential biases as you collect and analyze your data can prevent them from impacting your work too much.

Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting

Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:

• Academic style
• Vague sentences
• Style consistency

See an example

Each of the research approaches involve using one or more data collection methods . These are some of the most common qualitative methods:

• Observations: recording what you have seen, heard, or encountered in detailed field notes.
• Interviews:  personally asking people questions in one-on-one conversations.
• Focus groups: asking questions and generating discussion among a group of people.
• Surveys : distributing questionnaires with open-ended questions.
• Secondary research: collecting existing data in the form of texts, images, audio or video recordings, etc.
• You take field notes with observations and reflect on your own experiences of the company culture.
• You distribute open-ended surveys to employees across all the company’s offices by email to find out if the culture varies across locations.
• You conduct in-depth interviews with employees in your office to learn about their experiences and perspectives in greater detail.

Qualitative researchers often consider themselves “instruments” in research because all observations, interpretations and analyses are filtered through their own personal lens.

For this reason, when writing up your methodology for qualitative research, it’s important to reflect on your approach and to thoroughly explain the choices you made in collecting and analyzing the data.

Qualitative data can take the form of texts, photos, videos and audio. For example, you might be working with interview transcripts, survey responses, fieldnotes, or recordings from natural settings.

Most types of qualitative data analysis share the same five steps:

• Prepare and organize your data. This may mean transcribing interviews or typing up fieldnotes.
• Review and explore your data. Examine the data for patterns or repeated ideas that emerge.
• Develop a data coding system. Based on your initial ideas, establish a set of codes that you can apply to categorize your data.
• Assign codes to the data. For example, in qualitative survey analysis, this may mean going through each participant’s responses and tagging them with codes in a spreadsheet. As you go through your data, you can create new codes to add to your system if necessary.
• Identify recurring themes. Link codes together into cohesive, overarching themes.

There are several specific approaches to analyzing qualitative data. Although these methods share similar processes, they emphasize different concepts.

Qualitative research often tries to preserve the voice and perspective of participants and can be adjusted as new research questions arise. Qualitative research is good for:

• Flexibility

The data collection and analysis process can be adapted as new ideas or patterns emerge. They are not rigidly decided beforehand.

• Natural settings

Data collection occurs in real-world contexts or in naturalistic ways.

• Meaningful insights

Detailed descriptions of people’s experiences, feelings and perceptions can be used in designing, testing or improving systems or products.

• Generation of new ideas

Open-ended responses mean that researchers can uncover novel problems or opportunities that they wouldn’t have thought of otherwise.

Here's why students love Scribbr's proofreading services

Discover proofreading & editing

Researchers must consider practical and theoretical limitations in analyzing and interpreting their data. Qualitative research suffers from:

• Unreliability

The real-world setting often makes qualitative research unreliable because of uncontrolled factors that affect the data.

• Subjectivity

Due to the researcher’s primary role in analyzing and interpreting data, qualitative research cannot be replicated . The researcher decides what is important and what is irrelevant in data analysis, so interpretations of the same data can vary greatly.

• Limited generalizability

Small samples are often used to gather detailed data about specific contexts. Despite rigorous analysis procedures, it is difficult to draw generalizable conclusions because the data may be biased and unrepresentative of the wider population .

• Labor-intensive

Although software can be used to manage and record large amounts of text, data analysis often has to be checked or performed manually.

If you want to know more about statistics , methodology , or research bias , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.

• Chi square goodness of fit test
• Degrees of freedom
• Null hypothesis
• Discourse analysis
• Control groups
• Mixed methods research
• Non-probability sampling
• Quantitative research
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Research bias

• Rosenthal effect
• Implicit bias
• Cognitive bias
• Selection bias
• Negativity bias
• Status quo bias

Quantitative research deals with numbers and statistics, while qualitative research deals with words and meanings.

Quantitative methods allow you to systematically measure variables and test hypotheses . Qualitative methods allow you to explore concepts and experiences in more detail.

There are five common approaches to qualitative research :

• Grounded theory involves collecting data in order to develop new theories.
• Ethnography involves immersing yourself in a group or organization to understand its culture.
• Narrative research involves interpreting stories to understand how people make sense of their experiences and perceptions.
• Phenomenological research involves investigating phenomena through people’s lived experiences.
• Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative changes.

Data collection is the systematic process by which observations or measurements are gathered in research. It is used in many different contexts by academics, governments, businesses, and other organizations.

There are various approaches to qualitative data analysis , but they all share five steps in common:

• Prepare and organize your data.
• Review and explore your data.
• Develop a data coding system.
• Assign codes to the data.
• Identify recurring themes.

The specifics of each step depend on the focus of the analysis. Some common approaches include textual analysis , thematic analysis , and discourse analysis .

Cite this Scribbr article

If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.

Bhandari, P. (2023, June 22). What Is Qualitative Research? | Methods & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved April 5, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/

Is this article helpful?

Pritha Bhandari

Other students also liked, qualitative vs. quantitative research | differences, examples & methods, how to do thematic analysis | step-by-step guide & examples, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".

I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”

• Privacy Policy

Buy Me a Coffee

Home » Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide

Qualitative Research – Methods, Analysis Types and Guide

Table of Contents

Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is a type of research methodology that focuses on exploring and understanding people’s beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and experiences through the collection and analysis of non-numerical data. It seeks to answer research questions through the examination of subjective data, such as interviews, focus groups, observations, and textual analysis.

Qualitative research aims to uncover the meaning and significance of social phenomena, and it typically involves a more flexible and iterative approach to data collection and analysis compared to quantitative research. Qualitative research is often used in fields such as sociology, anthropology, psychology, and education.

Qualitative Research Methods

Qualitative Research Methods are as follows:

One-to-One Interview

This method involves conducting an interview with a single participant to gain a detailed understanding of their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. One-to-one interviews can be conducted in-person, over the phone, or through video conferencing. The interviewer typically uses open-ended questions to encourage the participant to share their thoughts and feelings. One-to-one interviews are useful for gaining detailed insights into individual experiences.

Focus Groups

This method involves bringing together a group of people to discuss a specific topic in a structured setting. The focus group is led by a moderator who guides the discussion and encourages participants to share their thoughts and opinions. Focus groups are useful for generating ideas and insights, exploring social norms and attitudes, and understanding group dynamics.

Ethnographic Studies

This method involves immersing oneself in a culture or community to gain a deep understanding of its norms, beliefs, and practices. Ethnographic studies typically involve long-term fieldwork and observation, as well as interviews and document analysis. Ethnographic studies are useful for understanding the cultural context of social phenomena and for gaining a holistic understanding of complex social processes.

Text Analysis

This method involves analyzing written or spoken language to identify patterns and themes. Text analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative text analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Text analysis is useful for understanding media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.

This method involves an in-depth examination of a single person, group, or event to gain an understanding of complex phenomena. Case studies typically involve a combination of data collection methods, such as interviews, observations, and document analysis, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the case. Case studies are useful for exploring unique or rare cases, and for generating hypotheses for further research.

Process of Observation

This method involves systematically observing and recording behaviors and interactions in natural settings. The observer may take notes, use audio or video recordings, or use other methods to document what they see. Process of observation is useful for understanding social interactions, cultural practices, and the context in which behaviors occur.

Record Keeping

This method involves keeping detailed records of observations, interviews, and other data collected during the research process. Record keeping is essential for ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the data, and for providing a basis for analysis and interpretation.

This method involves collecting data from a large sample of participants through a structured questionnaire. Surveys can be conducted in person, over the phone, through mail, or online. Surveys are useful for collecting data on attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, and for identifying patterns and trends in a population.

Qualitative data analysis is a process of turning unstructured data into meaningful insights. It involves extracting and organizing information from sources like interviews, focus groups, and surveys. The goal is to understand people’s attitudes, behaviors, and motivations

Qualitative Research Analysis Methods

Qualitative Research analysis methods involve a systematic approach to interpreting and making sense of the data collected in qualitative research. Here are some common qualitative data analysis methods:

Thematic Analysis

This method involves identifying patterns or themes in the data that are relevant to the research question. The researcher reviews the data, identifies keywords or phrases, and groups them into categories or themes. Thematic analysis is useful for identifying patterns across multiple data sources and for generating new insights into the research topic.

Content Analysis

This method involves analyzing the content of written or spoken language to identify key themes or concepts. Content analysis can be quantitative or qualitative. Qualitative content analysis involves close reading and interpretation of texts to identify recurring themes, concepts, and patterns. Content analysis is useful for identifying patterns in media messages, public discourse, and cultural trends.

Discourse Analysis

This method involves analyzing language to understand how it constructs meaning and shapes social interactions. Discourse analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as conversation analysis, critical discourse analysis, and narrative analysis. Discourse analysis is useful for understanding how language shapes social interactions, cultural norms, and power relationships.

Grounded Theory Analysis

This method involves developing a theory or explanation based on the data collected. Grounded theory analysis starts with the data and uses an iterative process of coding and analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data. The theory or explanation that emerges is grounded in the data, rather than preconceived hypotheses. Grounded theory analysis is useful for understanding complex social phenomena and for generating new theoretical insights.

Narrative Analysis

This method involves analyzing the stories or narratives that participants share to gain insights into their experiences, attitudes, and beliefs. Narrative analysis can involve a variety of methods, such as structural analysis, thematic analysis, and discourse analysis. Narrative analysis is useful for understanding how individuals construct their identities, make sense of their experiences, and communicate their values and beliefs.

Phenomenological Analysis

This method involves analyzing how individuals make sense of their experiences and the meanings they attach to them. Phenomenological analysis typically involves in-depth interviews with participants to explore their experiences in detail. Phenomenological analysis is useful for understanding subjective experiences and for developing a rich understanding of human consciousness.

Comparative Analysis

This method involves comparing and contrasting data across different cases or groups to identify similarities and differences. Comparative analysis can be used to identify patterns or themes that are common across multiple cases, as well as to identify unique or distinctive features of individual cases. Comparative analysis is useful for understanding how social phenomena vary across different contexts and groups.

Applications of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research has many applications across different fields and industries. Here are some examples of how qualitative research is used:

• Market Research: Qualitative research is often used in market research to understand consumer attitudes, behaviors, and preferences. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with consumers to gather insights into their experiences and perceptions of products and services.
• Health Care: Qualitative research is used in health care to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
• Education: Qualitative research is used in education to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. Researchers conduct classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
• Social Work : Qualitative research is used in social work to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
• Anthropology : Qualitative research is used in anthropology to understand different cultures and societies. Researchers conduct ethnographic studies and observe and interview members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
• Psychology : Qualitative research is used in psychology to understand human behavior and mental processes. Researchers conduct in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
• Public Policy : Qualitative research is used in public policy to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. Researchers conduct focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.

How to Conduct Qualitative Research

Here are some general steps for conducting qualitative research:

• Identify your research question: Qualitative research starts with a research question or set of questions that you want to explore. This question should be focused and specific, but also broad enough to allow for exploration and discovery.
• Select your research design: There are different types of qualitative research designs, including ethnography, case study, grounded theory, and phenomenology. You should select a design that aligns with your research question and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
• Recruit participants: Once you have your research question and design, you need to recruit participants. The number of participants you need will depend on your research design and the scope of your research. You can recruit participants through advertisements, social media, or through personal networks.
• Collect data: There are different methods for collecting qualitative data, including interviews, focus groups, observation, and document analysis. You should select the method or methods that align with your research design and that will allow you to gather the data you need to answer your research question.
• Analyze data: Once you have collected your data, you need to analyze it. This involves reviewing your data, identifying patterns and themes, and developing codes to organize your data. You can use different software programs to help you analyze your data, or you can do it manually.
• Interpret data: Once you have analyzed your data, you need to interpret it. This involves making sense of the patterns and themes you have identified, and developing insights and conclusions that answer your research question. You should be guided by your research question and use your data to support your conclusions.
• Communicate results: Once you have interpreted your data, you need to communicate your results. This can be done through academic papers, presentations, or reports. You should be clear and concise in your communication, and use examples and quotes from your data to support your findings.

Examples of Qualitative Research

Here are some real-time examples of qualitative research:

• Customer Feedback: A company may conduct qualitative research to understand the feedback and experiences of its customers. This may involve conducting focus groups or one-on-one interviews with customers to gather insights into their attitudes, behaviors, and preferences.
• Healthcare : A healthcare provider may conduct qualitative research to explore patient experiences and perspectives on health and illness. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with patients and their families to gather information on their experiences with different health care providers and treatments.
• Education : An educational institution may conduct qualitative research to understand student experiences and to develop effective teaching strategies. This may involve conducting classroom observations and interviews with students and teachers to gather insights into classroom dynamics and instructional practices.
• Social Work: A social worker may conduct qualitative research to explore social problems and to develop interventions to address them. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals and families to understand their experiences with poverty, discrimination, and other social problems.
• Anthropology : An anthropologist may conduct qualitative research to understand different cultures and societies. This may involve conducting ethnographic studies and observing and interviewing members of different cultural groups to gain insights into their beliefs, practices, and social structures.
• Psychology : A psychologist may conduct qualitative research to understand human behavior and mental processes. This may involve conducting in-depth interviews with individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings, and experiences.
• Public Policy: A government agency or non-profit organization may conduct qualitative research to explore public attitudes and to inform policy decisions. This may involve conducting focus groups and one-on-one interviews with members of the public to gather insights into their perspectives on different policy issues.

Purpose of Qualitative Research

The purpose of qualitative research is to explore and understand the subjective experiences, behaviors, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Unlike quantitative research, which focuses on numerical data and statistical analysis, qualitative research aims to provide in-depth, descriptive information that can help researchers develop insights and theories about complex social phenomena.

Qualitative research can serve multiple purposes, including:

• Exploring new or emerging phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring new or emerging phenomena, such as new technologies or social trends. This type of research can help researchers develop a deeper understanding of these phenomena and identify potential areas for further study.
• Understanding complex social phenomena : Qualitative research can be useful for exploring complex social phenomena, such as cultural beliefs, social norms, or political processes. This type of research can help researchers develop a more nuanced understanding of these phenomena and identify factors that may influence them.
• Generating new theories or hypotheses: Qualitative research can be useful for generating new theories or hypotheses about social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data about individuals’ experiences and perspectives, researchers can develop insights that may challenge existing theories or lead to new lines of inquiry.
• Providing context for quantitative data: Qualitative research can be useful for providing context for quantitative data. By gathering qualitative data alongside quantitative data, researchers can develop a more complete understanding of complex social phenomena and identify potential explanations for quantitative findings.

When to use Qualitative Research

Here are some situations where qualitative research may be appropriate:

• Exploring a new area: If little is known about a particular topic, qualitative research can help to identify key issues, generate hypotheses, and develop new theories.
• Understanding complex phenomena: Qualitative research can be used to investigate complex social, cultural, or organizational phenomena that are difficult to measure quantitatively.
• Investigating subjective experiences: Qualitative research is particularly useful for investigating the subjective experiences of individuals or groups, such as their attitudes, beliefs, values, or emotions.
• Conducting formative research: Qualitative research can be used in the early stages of a research project to develop research questions, identify potential research participants, and refine research methods.
• Evaluating interventions or programs: Qualitative research can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or programs by collecting data on participants’ experiences, attitudes, and behaviors.

Characteristics of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is characterized by several key features, including:

• Focus on subjective experience: Qualitative research is concerned with understanding the subjective experiences, beliefs, and perspectives of individuals or groups in a particular context. Researchers aim to explore the meanings that people attach to their experiences and to understand the social and cultural factors that shape these meanings.
• Use of open-ended questions: Qualitative research relies on open-ended questions that allow participants to provide detailed, in-depth responses. Researchers seek to elicit rich, descriptive data that can provide insights into participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Sampling-based on purpose and diversity: Qualitative research often involves purposive sampling, in which participants are selected based on specific criteria related to the research question. Researchers may also seek to include participants with diverse experiences and perspectives to capture a range of viewpoints.
• Data collection through multiple methods: Qualitative research typically involves the use of multiple data collection methods, such as in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation. This allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data from multiple sources, which can provide a more complete picture of participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Inductive data analysis: Qualitative research relies on inductive data analysis, in which researchers develop theories and insights based on the data rather than testing pre-existing hypotheses. Researchers use coding and thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes in the data and to develop theories and explanations based on these patterns.
• Emphasis on researcher reflexivity: Qualitative research recognizes the importance of the researcher’s role in shaping the research process and outcomes. Researchers are encouraged to reflect on their own biases and assumptions and to be transparent about their role in the research process.

Advantages of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research offers several advantages over other research methods, including:

• Depth and detail: Qualitative research allows researchers to gather rich, detailed data that provides a deeper understanding of complex social phenomena. Through in-depth interviews, focus groups, and observation, researchers can gather detailed information about participants’ experiences and perspectives that may be missed by other research methods.
• Flexibility : Qualitative research is a flexible approach that allows researchers to adapt their methods to the research question and context. Researchers can adjust their research methods in real-time to gather more information or explore unexpected findings.
• Contextual understanding: Qualitative research is well-suited to exploring the social and cultural context in which individuals or groups are situated. Researchers can gather information about cultural norms, social structures, and historical events that may influence participants’ experiences and perspectives.
• Participant perspective : Qualitative research prioritizes the perspective of participants, allowing researchers to explore subjective experiences and understand the meanings that participants attach to their experiences.
• Theory development: Qualitative research can contribute to the development of new theories and insights about complex social phenomena. By gathering rich, detailed data and using inductive data analysis, researchers can develop new theories and explanations that may challenge existing understandings.
• Validity : Qualitative research can offer high validity by using multiple data collection methods, purposive and diverse sampling, and researcher reflexivity. This can help ensure that findings are credible and trustworthy.

Limitations of Qualitative Research

Qualitative research also has some limitations, including:

• Subjectivity : Qualitative research relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers, which can introduce bias into the research process. The researcher’s perspective, beliefs, and experiences can influence the way data is collected, analyzed, and interpreted.
• Limited generalizability: Qualitative research typically involves small, purposive samples that may not be representative of larger populations. This limits the generalizability of findings to other contexts or populations.
• Time-consuming: Qualitative research can be a time-consuming process, requiring significant resources for data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
• Resource-intensive: Qualitative research may require more resources than other research methods, including specialized training for researchers, specialized software for data analysis, and transcription services.
• Limited reliability: Qualitative research may be less reliable than quantitative research, as it relies on the subjective interpretation of researchers. This can make it difficult to replicate findings or compare results across different studies.
• Ethics and confidentiality: Qualitative research involves collecting sensitive information from participants, which raises ethical concerns about confidentiality and informed consent. Researchers must take care to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants and obtain informed consent.

Also see Research Methods

About the author

Muhammad Hassan

Researcher, Academic Writer, Web developer

You may also like

Questionnaire – Definition, Types, and Examples

Case Study – Methods, Examples and Guide

Observational Research – Methods and Guide

Quantitative Research – Methods, Types and...

Qualitative Research Methods

Explanatory Research – Types, Methods, Guide

We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!

Internet Archive Audio

• This Just In
• Grateful Dead
• Old Time Radio
• 78 RPMs and Cylinder Recordings
• Audio Books & Poetry
• Computers, Technology and Science
• Music, Arts & Culture
• News & Public Affairs
• Spirituality & Religion
• Radio News Archive

• Flickr Commons
• Occupy Wall Street Flickr
• NASA Images
• Solar System Collection
• Ames Research Center

• All Software
• Old School Emulation
• MS-DOS Games
• Historical Software
• Classic PC Games
• Software Library
• Kodi Archive and Support File
• Vintage Software
• CD-ROM Software
• CD-ROM Software Library
• Software Sites
• Tucows Software Library
• Shareware CD-ROMs
• Software Capsules Compilation
• CD-ROM Images
• ZX Spectrum
• DOOM Level CD

• Smithsonian Libraries
• FEDLINK (US)
• Lincoln Collection
• American Libraries
• Canadian Libraries
• Universal Library
• Project Gutenberg
• Children's Library
• Biodiversity Heritage Library
• Books by Language
• Additional Collections

• Prelinger Archives
• Democracy Now!
• Occupy Wall Street
• TV NSA Clip Library
• Animation & Cartoons
• Arts & Music
• Computers & Technology
• Cultural & Academic Films
• Ephemeral Films
• Sports Videos
• Videogame Videos
• Youth Media

Search the history of over 866 billion web pages on the Internet.

Mobile Apps

• Wayback Machine (iOS)
• Wayback Machine (Android)

Browser Extensions

Archive-it subscription.

• Explore the Collections
• Build Collections

Save Page Now

Capture a web page as it appears now for use as a trusted citation in the future.

Please enter a valid web address

• Donate Donate icon An illustration of a heart shape

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS

Bookreader item preview, share or embed this item, flag this item for.

• Graphic Violence
• Explicit Sexual Content
• Hate Speech
• Misinformation/Disinformation
• Marketing/Phishing/Advertising
• Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata

plus-circle Add Review comment Reviews

Download options, in collections.

Uploaded by FREE-EDUCATIONAL-BOOKS on March 27, 2024

SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

The Ethics of ‘Using’ Children’s Drawings in Research

Cite this chapter.

• Emese Hall  

Part of the book series: Studies in Childhood and Youth ((SCY))

335 Accesses

6 Citations

The use of visual research methods is becoming increasingly popular (Butler-Kisber, 2010) and over the last 20 years a particular interest has developed in eliciting children’s own perceptions on their lived experiences (Harcourt and Einarsdottir, 2011). Given these research directions, it is notable that within many cultures and contexts it is recognised that drawings can provide valuable insights into children’s experiences, ideas and feelings. Indeed, children’s drawings have long interested psychologists, artists and educators; much has been published on this topic and the literature continues to grow. However, researchers have their own agendas and these agendas may not always have children’s needs and interests at their heart. I argue that, although children should be recognised as expert informers and witnesses regarding their own experiences and perspectives (Wood, 2005), the ‘use’ of children drawings in research can, at times, be restrictive and tokenistic. Within this chapter I will describe and critique the various ways that children’s drawings can be collected and examined in research, with a particular emphasis on related ethical considerations. The overall theme of this part of the book is ‘beyond ethics’, so I move beyond conventional understandings of ethics, such as informed consent, anonymity, right to withdraw, and so on, instead focussing on deeper and more complex concerns.

• Early Childhood
• Meaning Making
• Fellow Traveller
• Early Childhood Research
• Early Childhood Literacy

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Unable to display preview.  Download preview PDF.

Adams, E. (2002) Power drawing. Journal of Art and Design Education , 21 (3), 220–233.

Article   Google Scholar  

Adams, E. (2005) Power Drawing: Lines of enquiry . London: The Campaign for Drawing.

Google Scholar  

Adams, E. (2006) Drawing Insights . London: The Campaign for Drawing.

Ahn, J. and Filipenko, M. (2007) Narrative, imaginary play, art, and self: Intersecting worlds. Early Childhood Education Journal , 34 (4), 279–289.

Alderson, P. (2000) Children as researchers: The effects of participation rights on research methodology. In P. Christensen and A. James (eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and practices , pp. 9–35. London: Falmer Press.

Anning, A. (1997) Drawing out ideas: graphicacy and young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education , 7, 219–239.

Anning, A. (1999) Learning to draw and drawing to learn. Journal of Art and Design Education , 18 (2), 163–172.

Anning, A. (2003) Pathways to the graphicacy club: The crossroad of home and pre-school. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy , 3 (1), 5–35.

Anning, A. and Ring, K. (2004) Making Sense of Children’s Drawings . Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Arnheim, R. (1974) Art and Visual Perception: A psychology of the creative eye (new version). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Atkinson, D. (1991) How children use drawing. In S. Hearne, S. Cox & R. Watts (2009) (Eds.), Readings in Primary Art Education (pp. 139–152 ). Bristol: Intellect Books.

Boyatzis, C. J. & Albertini, G. (2000) A naturalistic observation of children drawing: Peer collaboration processes and influences in children’s art. In C. J. Boyatzis & M.W. Watson (Eds.), Symbolic and social constraints on the development of children’s artistic style (pp. 31–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Boyatzis, C. J., & Eades, J. (1999) Gender differences in preschoolers’ and kindergarteners’ artistic production and preference. Sex Roles , 41 (7/8), 627–638.

Brittain, W.L. (1979) Creativity, Art and the Young Child . New York, NY: Macmillan.

Brooks, M. (2002) Drawing to learn. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Alberta. Retrieved 14 May 2008, from http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca /obj/s4/f2/dsk4/etd/NQ81169.PDF.

Brooks, M. (2004) Drawing: The social construction of knowledge. Australian Journal of Early Childhood , 29 (2), 41–49.

Brooks, M. (2005) Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood , 6 (1), 80–91.

Butler-Kisber, L. (2010) Qualitative Enquiry: Thematic, narrative and arts-informed perspectives . London: Sage.

Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M. & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006) Children’s drawings: A mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26 (1), 127–142.

Christensen, P. H. (2004) Children’s participation in ethnographic research: Issues of power and representation. Children and Society , 18 (2), 165–176.

Coady, M. M. (2006) Ethics in early childhood research. In G. MacNaughton, S. A. Rolfe and I. Siraj-Blatchford (eds), Doing Early Childhood Research: International perspectives on theory and practice , pp. 64–72. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Coates, E. and Coates, A. (2006) Young children talking and drawing. International Journal of Early Years Education , 14 (3), 221–241.

Costall, A. (2001) Introduction. In G. H. Luquet, Children’s drawings (‘Le dessin enfantin’) , trans. A. Costall, pp. vii–xxiv. London: Free Association Books.

Cox, S. (2005) Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. International Journal of Art and Design Education , 24 (2), 115–125.

Craft, A. with Douglas, J., Dyer, G, Jeffrey, B. and Lyns, T. (1997) Can You Teach Creativity ? Nottingham: Education Now.

Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1998) Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Strategies of Qualitative Enquiry , pp. 1–34. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Dockett, S. and Perry, B. (2005) Children’s drawings: Experiences and expectations of school. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood , 3 (2), 77–98.

Edmiston, B. (2008) Forming Ethical Identities in Early Childhood Play . Abingdon: Routledge.

Eng, H. (1931/1999) The psychology of children’s drawings: From the first stroke to the coloured drawing (H. Stafford Hatfield, Trans.). London: Routledge.

Finnegan, R. (2002) Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnection . London: Routledge.

Freeman, N. (1976) Children’s drawings: Cognitive aspects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry , 17, 345–350.

Gardner, H. (1980) Artful Scribbles: The significance of children’s drawings . London: Jill Norman.

Golomb, C. (1992) The Child’s Creation of a Pictorial World . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Goodnow, J. (1977) Children’s drawing . London: Fontana/Open Books.

Book   Google Scholar  

Graham-Dixon, A. (2008) Art: The Definitive Visual Guide . London: Dorling Kindersley.

Greig, A., Taylor, J. and Mackay, T. (2007) Doing Research with Children , 2nd edn. London: Sage.

Hall, E. (2009) Mixed messages: The role and value of drawing in early education. International Journal of Early Years Education , 17 (3), 179–190.

Hall, E. (2010a) The communicative potential of young children’s drawings. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Exeter.

Hall, E. (2010b) Identity in young children’s drawings: Power, agency, control, and transformation. In P. Broadhead, J. Howard and E. Wood (eds), Play and learning in the Early Years , pp. 95–112. London: Sage.

Hall, E. (2013) Unique ways of seeing: Five children’s approaches to observational drawing. Paper represented at the 5th International Art in Early Childhood Conference, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, June.

Harcourt, D. (2011) An encounter with children: Seeking meaning and understanding about childhood. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal , 19 (3), 331–343.

Harcourt, D. and Einarsdottir, J. (2011) Editorial: Introducing children’s perspectives and participation in research. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal , 19 (3), 301–307.

Hope. G. (2008) Thinking and Learning Through Drawing in Primary Classrooms . London: Sage.

Janzen, M.D. (2008) Where is the (postmodern) child in early childhood education research?. Early Years, 28 (3), 287–298.

Johnson, K. (2008) Teaching visual research methods. In P. Thomson (ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People , pp. 77–94. Abingdon: Routledge.

Jordan, B. (2004) Scaffolding learning and co-constructing understandings. In A. Anning, J. Cullen and M. Fleer (eds), Early Childhood Education: Society and culture , pp. 31–42. London: Sage.

Kress, G. (2000). Before writing: rethinking the paths to literacy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Kendrick, M., & McKay, R. (2004) Drawings as an alternative way of understanding young children’s constructions of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4 (1), 109–128.

Knight, L. (2009) Dreaming of Other Spaces: What do we think about when we draw? The Psychology of Education Review , 33 (1), 10–17.

Leeds, J. A. (1989) The history of attitudes towards children’s art. Studies in Art Education , 30 (2), 93–103.

Leitch, R. (2008) Creatively researching children’s narratives through images and drawings. In P. Thomson (ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People , pp. 37–58. Abingdon: Routledge.

Lenz-Taguchi, H. (2006) Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education: Challenging taken-for-granted ideas. In J. Einarsdottir and T. T. Wagner (eds), Nordic Childhoods and Education: Philosophy, research, policy, and practice in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden , pp. 257–287. Greenwood, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Lewis, A. and Lindsay, G. (2000) Emerging issues. In A. Lewis and G. Lindsay (eds), Researching Children’s Perspectives , pp. 189–197. Buckingham: Open University Press,

Lindstrom, M. (1970) Children’s Art . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

MacNaughton, G. (2004) Exploring critical constructivist perspectives on learning. In A. Anning, J. Cullen and M. Fleer (eds), Early Childhood Education: Society and culture , pp. 43–54. London: Sage.

Mak, M. (2011) The visual ethics of using children’s drawings in the documentary ‘Unwanted Images’. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith and J. Stuart (eds), Picturing Research: Drawing as visual methodology , pp. 77–88. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Malchiodi, C. (1998) Understanding Children’s Drawings . London: Jessica Kingsley.

Matthews, J. (1997a) How children learn to draw the human figure: Studies from Singapore. European Early Childhood Research Journal , 5 (1), 29–56.

Matthews, J. (1997b) The 4 dimensional language of infancy: The interpersonal basis of art praxis. Journal of Art and Design Education , 16 (3), 285–293.

Matthews, J. (1999) The Art of Childhood and Adolescence: The construction of meaning . London: Falmer Press.

Matthews, J. (2003) Drawing and painting: Children and visual representation . London: Paul Chapman.

Mayall, B. (2000) Conversations with children: Working with generational issues. In P. Christensen and A. James (eds), Research with children: Perspectives and Practices , 120–135. London: Falmer Press.

McNiff, B. (1982) Sex differences in children’s art. Journal of Education , 164 (3), 271–289.

Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A. and Campbell, Z. (2011) Drawings as research method. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith and J. Stuart (eds), Picturing Research: Drawing as visual methodology , pp. 19–36. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Mitchell, L. M. (2006) Child centred? Thinking critically about children’s draw- ings as a visual research method. Visual Anthropology Review , 22 (1), 60–73.

Moll, L.C., Amanti, C., Neff, D. and Gonzalez, N. (1992) Funds of knowledge: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice , 31 (2), 132–141.

Morati, L. and Harcourt, D. (2012) Living ethical dilemmas for researchers when researching with children. International Journal of Early Years Education , 20 (3), 234–243.

Morrow, V. (2006) Understanding gender differences in context: Implications for young children’s everyday lives. Children and Society , 20 (2), 92–104.

National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (2013) Conducting safe and ethical research with children. Retrieved 28 February 2014 from http://www.nspcc.org.uk /Inform/research/briefings/ethical-research-factsheet_wda97712.html.

Papandreou, M. (2014) Communicating and thinking through drawing activity in early childhood. Journal of Research in Childhood Education , 28, 85–100.

Paine, S. (1981) Introduction. In S. Paine (Ed.). Six children draw (pp. 1–8 ). London: Academic Press.

Paine, S. (1992) Conflicting paradigms of vision in drawing development research. In D. Thistlewood, D., S. Paine, & E. Court (Eds.), Drawing research and development . (pp. 1–13 ). Harlow: Longman.

Pariser, D. (1995) Not under the lamppost: Piagetian and neo-Piagetian research in the arts. A Review and critique. Journal of Aesthetic Education , 29 (3), 93–107.

Pollard, A. with Filer, A. (1996) The Social World of Children’s Learning: Case studies of pupils from four to seven . London: Cassell.

Read, H. (1943) Education Through Art . London: Faber and Faber.

Ring, K. (2003) Young children drawing at home, pre-school and school: The influence of the socio-cultural context . Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Leeds, UK.

Ring, K. (2005, July) Supporting young children drawing: Developing a role. Paper presented at the International Art in Early Childhood conference, Froebel College, Roehampton University, UK.

Ring, K. (2006) What mothers do: Everyday routines and rituals and their impact upon young children’s use of drawing for meaning making. International Journal of Early Years Education , 14 (1), 63–84.

Roberts, H. (2000) Listening to children: And hearing them. In P. Christensen and A. James (eds), Research with Children: Perspectives and practices , pp. 225–240. London: Falmer Press.

Thompson, C. M. (1999) Action, autobiography and aesthetics in young children’s self-initiated drawings. The International Journal of Art and Design Education , 18 (2), 155–161.

Thomson, P. and Hall, C. (2008) Analysing children’s self-portraits. In P. Thomson (ed.), Doing Visual Research with Children and Young People , pp. 146–163. Abingdon: Routledge.

Trautner, H. M. and Milbrath, C. (2008) Children’s knowledge about pictures, drawing and art. In H. M. Trautner and C. Milbrath (eds), Children’s Understandings and Production of Pictures Drawing and Art , pp. 3–18. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe.

Vygotsky, L. V. (1978) Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes . Ed. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner and E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Willats, J. (2005) Making Sense of Children’s Drawings . New York: Psychology Press.

Wilson, B. (1976) Guest editorial: Child art and art education. Studies in Art Education , 17 (2), 5–7.

Wilson, M. and Wilson, B. (1981) I draw–you draw: The graphic dialogue. School Arts , 81 (2), 50–55.

Wood, E. (2005) Young children’s voices and perspectives in research: Methodological and ethical considerations. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood , 3 (2), 64–76.

Wood, E. & Attfield, J. (2005) Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum ( 2nd ed. ). London: Paul Chapman.

Wood, E. and Hall, E. (2011) Drawings as spaces for intellectual play. International Journal of Early Years Education , 19 (3–4), 267–281.

Woodhead, M. and Faulkner, D. (2000) Subjects, objects or participants: Dilemmas of psychological research with children. In P. Christensen and A. James (eds), Research with Children: Perspectives and practices , pp. 9–35. London: Falmer Press.

Wright, S. (2007a) Graphic-narrative play: Young children’s authoring through drawing and telling. International Journal of Education and the Arts , 8 (8), 1–27.

Wright, S. (2007b) Young children’s meaning-making through drawing and ‘telling’: Analogies to filmic textual features. Australian Journal of Early Childhood , 32 (4), 33–48.

Download references

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Sheffield Hallam University, UK

Eve Stirling

University of Sheffield, UK

Dylan Yamada-Rice

Copyright information

© 2015 Emese Hall

About this chapter

Hall, E. (2015). The Ethics of ‘Using’ Children’s Drawings in Research. In: Stirling, E., Yamada-Rice, D. (eds) Visual Methods with Children and Young People. Studies in Childhood and Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402295_10

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137402295_10

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, London

Print ISBN : 978-1-137-40228-8

Online ISBN : 978-1-137-40229-5

eBook Packages : Palgrave Social Sciences Collection Social Sciences (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Skip to Content

Make an Impact

Together we can do more

Refine Search

Visiting Professor of the Practice in Qualitative Research Research Methods & Statistics (RMS) Program

Apply now Job no: 497212 Work type: Faculty Full-Time Location: Denver, CO Categories: Faculty Division: Morgridge College Of Education

The Morgridge College of Education (MCE) at the University of Denver (DU) invites applications for a 9-month qualitative research faculty position in the Research Methods and Statistics (RMS) Program at the rank of Visiting Professor of the Practice to begin September 1, 2024. The oldest and largest independent university in the Rocky Mountain Region, DU is in the city of Denver, which is an increasing ethnically diverse city according to the U.S. Census data. Situated in a vibrant metropolitan community, DU is committed to building and sustaining a culturally diverse faculty, staff, and student body, and advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion. DU has high research activity and enrolls approximately 12,000 students in its undergraduate, graduate, and professional preparation programs. The MCE, a 65,000 square foot complex built in 2010, is in Katherine A. Ruffatto Hall and provides a flexible, innovative, and multidisciplinary learning environment. The MCE and Research Methods and Statistics (RMS) program are strongly committed to Diversity Equity Inclusion Justice and Accessibility (DEIJA). The RMS faculty seek a colleague who can teach qualitative research and is passionate about developing strong leaders and practitioners across the fields of education, mental health, and research and information science. RMS is dedicated to preparing professionals who can use data as a tool for promoting social justice and the public good. RMS students learn advanced and holistic analytic skills for educational, social, behavior, and health research. A strong candidate will model educational and social equity through meaningful teaching, service, and scholarship activities commensurate with the visiting faculty line.

Position Summary

We seek a candidate with a proven record of excellence in teaching and mentoring/advising, and who values our mission of serving the public good. We are especially interested in qualified candidates who can contribute to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Justice, and Accessibility (DEIJA) through their teaching, service, and scholarship. The position requires an innovative and critical thinker capable of working within a dynamic environment. The faculty in this position will:

• Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of qualitative methodologies in educational research and legal, ethical, and professional standards of practice
• Teach and support students across MCE’s MA, EdD, and PhD programs—which provide comprehensive preparation in the areas of Research Methods & Statistics, Library and Information Science, Higher Education, Educational Leadership & Policy Studies, Curriculum & Instruction, Counseling Psychology, and School Psychology
• Demonstrate criticality, creativity, and excellence in conducting and disseminating qualitative research

Essential Functions

Teaching: Teach courses as assigned at a range of 38-40 quarter credit hours demonstrating experience and versatility through engaging and rigorous pedagogical approaches. Serve on doctoral dissertation committees. Service: Provide Program, Department, and College Service (e.g., support for program admissions and marketing, active participation in program/department/college meetings and retreats, updating program curriculum, serving on committees, and additional duties as needed).

Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities

• Excellent written and oral communication skills.
• Demonstrated knowledge and experience with a variety of teaching methods.
• Outstanding teaching skills.
• Initiative and ability to work both independently and in a collaborative, collegial environment.
• Demonstrated experience interacting with diverse communities or evidence of a commitment to incorporate inclusive teaching methods and/or pedagogies to effectively engage broadly diverse student populations.
• Demonstrated commitment to inclusive excellence, equity, and access in education.
• Exceptional abilities in scholarly and/or creative activities are needed as required by the department/center/school/college and position.

Required Qualifications

• Earned doctorate in research methods, education, or a related field by the start of the appointment.
• Demonstrated expertise in critical qualitative methodologies (e.g., critical inquiry, critical ethnography, critical narrative inquiry, testimonio, critical phenomenology, critical grounded theory).
• Prior teaching of diverse students in higher education.
• Demonstrated commitment to diversity, equity, inclusions, justice, and accessibility (DEIJA) in education

Preferred Qualifications

• At least 3 years of experience teaching qualitative research methods courses at the higher education level.
• Prior experience serving on doctoral dissertation committees.
• Prior supervision of graduate student-led research (e.g., providing feedback on students’ research designs, study implementation, or reporting).
• Prior experience using qualitative analysis software (e.g., Dedoose, NVivo).

Working Environment

1. Standard office environment. 2. Unexpected interruptions occur often and stress level is moderate to high. 3. Noise level is quiet to moderate.

Physical Activities

1. Ability to sit in front of a computer for an extended period of time. 2. Occasionally required to move about the office/campus with the capability of transporting objects up to 20 lbs.

Work Schedule While the University's administrative offices are open Monday – Friday, 8:00 am – 4:30 pm, faculty schedules vary from term to term and are based on courses taught, service commitments, and research agendas. The University's academic calendars are posted on the registrar's website (the law school is on a semester system and has a different academic calendar ).

Application Deadline For consideration, please submit your application materials by 4:00 p.m. (MST) April 26, 2024

Special Instructions Candidates must apply online through jobs.du.edu to be considered. Only applications submitted online will be accepted.

Salary Grade Number: The salary grade for the position is UC. Salary Range: The salary range for the position is $58,000-$68,000

The University of Denver has provided a compensation range that represents its good faith estimate of what the University may pay for the position at the time of posting. The University may ultimately pay more or less than the posted compensation range. The salary offered to the selected candidate will be determined based on factors such as the qualifications of the selected candidate, departmental budget availability, internal salary equity considerations, and available market information, but not based on a candidate’s sex or any other protected status.

Benefits: The University of Denver offers excellent benefits, including medical, dental, retirement, paid time off, tuition benefit and ECO pass. The University of Denver is a private institution that empowers students who want to make a difference. Learn more about the University of Denver .

Please include the following documents with your application: 1. Resume 2. Cover Letter

The University of Denver is an equal opportunity employer. The University of Denver prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, age, religion, creed, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, marital status, pregnancy, genetic information, military enlistment, or veteran status, and any other class of individuals protected from discrimination under federal, state, or local law, regulation, or ordinance in any of the University's educational programs and activities, and in the employment (including application for employment) and admissions (including application for admission) context, as required by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Americans with Disabilities Act; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; Equal Pay Act; Colorado Equal Pay for Equal Work Act; the Colorado Protecting Opportunities and Workers' Rights ("POWR") Act; and any other federal, state, and local laws, regulations, or ordinances that prohibit discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation. For more information, please see the University of Denver's Non‑Discrimination‑Statement .

All offers of employment are contingent upon satisfactory completion of a criminal history background check.

Advertised: April 03, 2024 Applications close: April 26, 2024

Back to search results Apply now Refer a friend

We will email you new jobs that match this search.

Ok, we will send you jobs like this.

The email address was invalid, please check for errors.

You must agree to the privacy statement

Search results

Current opportunities.

Powered by PageUp

We're Here to Help

Browse our knowledge base for help with frequently asked questions or submit a ticket

Submit a Ticket

The University of Denver Annual Security and Fire Safety Report is available. This report includes statistics from the previous three years concerning reported crime that occurred on campus, in certain off-campus buildings or property owned or controlled by the University of Denver campus and statistics for fires in University housing. The report also includes institutional policies concerning campus security and other safety information along with fire safety policies and procedures. You may obtain a hard copy of this report by contacting the Department of Campus Safety or by accessing the following website: https://www.du.edu/campussafety/clery-act

University of Denver is proud to be ranked among the top five Best Employers in Colorado

Human Resources & Inclusive Community

Connect with us.

• [email protected]
• 303-871-7420
• 303-871-2143
• https://www.du.edu/human-resources
• Mary Reed Building 2199 S University Blvd Denver, CO 80208
• M - F 8am - 4:30pm