rancangan one shot case study

Child Care and Early Education Research Connections

Pre-experimental designs.

Pre-experiments are the simplest form of research design. In a pre-experiment either a single group or multiple groups are observed subsequent to some agent or treatment presumed to cause change.

Types of Pre-Experimental Design

One-shot case study design, one-group pretest-posttest design, static-group comparison.

A single group is studied at a single point in time after some treatment that is presumed to have caused change. The carefully studied single instance is compared to general expectations of what the case would have looked like had the treatment not occurred and to other events casually observed. No control or comparison group is employed.

A single case is observed at two time points, one before the treatment and one after the treatment. Changes in the outcome of interest are presumed to be the result of the intervention or treatment. No control or comparison group is employed.

A group that has experienced some treatment is compared with one that has not. Observed differences between the two groups are assumed to be a result of the treatment.

Validity of Results

An important drawback of pre-experimental designs is that they are subject to numerous threats to their  validity . Consequently, it is often difficult or impossible to dismiss rival hypotheses or explanations. Therefore, researchers must exercise extreme caution in interpreting and generalizing the results from pre-experimental studies.

One reason that it is often difficult to assess the validity of studies that employ a pre-experimental design is that they often do not include any control or comparison group. Without something to compare it to, it is difficult to assess the significance of an observed change in the case. The change could be the result of historical changes unrelated to the treatment, the maturation of the subject, or an artifact of the testing.

Even when pre-experimental designs identify a comparison group, it is still difficult to dismiss rival hypotheses for the observed change. This is because there is no formal way to determine whether the two groups would have been the same if it had not been for the treatment. If the treatment group and the comparison group differ after the treatment, this might be a reflection of differences in the initial recruitment to the groups or differential mortality in the experiment.

Advantages and Disadvantages

As exploratory approaches, pre-experiments can be a cost-effective way to discern whether a potential explanation is worthy of further investigation.

Disadvantages

Pre-experiments offer few advantages since it is often difficult or impossible to rule out alternative explanations. The nearly insurmountable threats to their validity are clearly the most important disadvantage of pre-experimental research designs.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

2. The “One Shot” Case Study Revisited

Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.———.(2000). Fuzzy Set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Ragin, Charles C. and Howard Becker, eds.(1992). What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Savolainen, Jukka.(1994).“The Rationality of Drawing Big Conclusions Based on Small Samples: In Defense of Mill's Methods.” Social Forces 72 (2), 1217–1224. Stinchcombe, Arthur.(1968). Constructing Social Theories.

Related Papers

Papers Revista De Sociologia

Mihaela Vancea

Journal of Politics

Bear Braumoeller

Papers: revista de sociologia

Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics

Attilia Ruzzene

Mohammed Faruque Uddin

This article exemplifies Yager’s theory of fuzzy logic for interpersonal communication to the area of social research. Taking the dilemma between qualitative and quantitative approaches into the account, there is an anticipation to make a merge between these two. There is an enormous prospect to turn up scientists’ philanthropic innovations if they could use fuzzy logic in social science researches! However, by using fuzzy logic in sociological research there is a great deal of opportunity to study the social facts related to poverty, consumption, employment, intersubjectivity, social capital, environment, gender etc. How can we use Yager’s theory of Fuzzy Logic to analyze the relationship between social capital and labor market partcicpation? From the experiential connection in Bangladesh society, I try to seek this answer using a hypothetical quantification of attributes.

David Collier

Analysts who developed the set-theoretic comparative method (STCM) have formulated admirable goals for researchers who work in the qualitative and multi-method tradition. STCM includes above all Charles Ragin’s innovative approach of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). However, the analytic tools employed by STCM have in many ways become an obstacle to achieving these goals. For example, the system of fuzzy-set scoring appears to be problematic, poorly matched to a standard under-standing of conceptual structure, and perhaps unnecessary in its present form. Computer simulations suggest that findings suffer from serious problems of stability and validity; and while the choice of simulations that appropriately evaluate the method is a matter of some controversy, the cumulative weight of simulation results raises major concerns about STCM’s algorithms—i.e., its basic, formalized analytic procedures. Questions also arise about the cumbersome formulation of findings in what is often a remarkably large number of causal paths. Relatedly, some scholars question the STCM’s rejection of the parsimonious findings, in the form of “net effects,” routinely reported in other methodological traditions. Regarding applications, readily available software has encouraged publication of dozens of articles that appear to abandon key foundations of the method and rely far too heavily on these algorithms. Finally, STCM appears inattentive to the major, recent rethinking of standards and procedures for causal inference from observational data. These problems raise the concern that the set-theoretic comparative method, as applied and practiced, has become disconnected from the underlying analytic goals that motivated Charles Ragin to create it.

American Journal of Sociology

Edgar Ojeda

Sujay Rao Mandavilli

The Sociological Ninety ten rules that are proposed in this paper, are based on the fundamental premise that various branches of social sciences like sociology, anthropology and economics are human-centric and are therefore inexact, and vary fundamentally from the more precise and exact sciences like physics, chemistry and mathematics which are characterized by precision and exactitude. A high degree of precision and certainty may not therefore manifest themselves in various branches of the social sciences, even if they at times make use of mathematical models or statistical techniques. Therefore, for every postulated rule in most fields in the social sciences, there are likely to be many different exceptions. These may be described as cultural variations and cultural exceptions, and exceptions over time or space. The name 'Ninety ten' is only an easy-to-understand and easy-to-use nomenclature. Real world exceptions to any given observation could be twenty per cent, five per cent, or take on any other value, but the above nomenclature is chosen for convenience. Variations across or within cultures or within or in between socio-cultural groups, socioeconomic groups, occupational groups or any other parameter must be assessed based on the principles that we propose. This may be a basis for splitting up such groups if necessary for further study and evaluation, and the prerogative for this lies with the researcher. Thus, not only rule-based reasoning but also case-based reasoning must be used for various fields in the social sciences. Therefore, a fundamental premise of this paper is that exceptions must be sought actively, as these will lead to better research and hypothesis formulation. Thus, every researcher must think of rules and exceptions to those rules, and this must become a mindset. If exceptions are significant, they may warrant an altogether different line of research. This process will also greatly aid in inductive analysis, nomothetic rule-building and theorization, and play a major role in the 'Globalization of science', particularly social sciences.

Sociological Methods & Research

Charles Ragin , Paul Pennings

RELATED PAPERS

Hormones and Behavior

Geert de Vries

Demonstratio Mathematica

Tadeusz Poreda

Plant, Cell & Environment

Thomas Sharkey

Applied Surface Science

Rodica Cristescu

Omar Elgendy

Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances

Shubhashish Mukhopadhyay

Gianpiere Eduardo Mejia Landa

Annales Academiae Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica

Sławomir Czapnik

European Urology Supplements

Mario Gardi

Emilija Sakadolskis

Nature methods

Brian Lings

Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Sipil

Monika Natalia

Salah BOUCHEMAL

Mohamed Kamal

Journal of Laboratory Physicians

Sweta Shrestha

Gudrun Klinker

TALIM: JOURNAL OF EDUCATION IN MUSLIM SOCIETIES AND COMMUNITIES

Yusuf Alpaydın

Franciscana 25

Amalia Salvestrini

Chemistry Central Journal

Muhammad ikram

merisha hastarina

… Losses Penalty Factor …

Dodi Prastianto

Tomori Adeyinka

International Journal of Production Economics

Iranian Journal of Diabetes and Metabolism

Arash Rafie Nezhad

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Online Submissions
• Focus and Scope
• Editorial Board
• Peer Review Process
• Review Guidelines
• Author Guidelines
• Section Policies
• Publication Frequency
• Open Access Policy
• Publication Ethics
• Reference Management
• Plagiarism Screening
• Copyright Notice
• Privacy Statement
• Template (.doc)

Dikdaya Statistics

• Announcements

Pengaruh Stimulasi Tugas Terhadap Motivasi dan Pemahaman Membaca Mahasiswa Dengan Rancangan One Shot case study

Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A.,Humenick, N.M.,Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A.,& Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehension.The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232. Doi:10.3200/JOER.99.4.232-246

Gottfried, A. E. (1985). Academic intrinsic motivation in elementary and junior high school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 631-645.

Hidi,S., & Harackiewics,J.M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century.Review od educational Research,70, 151-179.

Isaac,J.D., Sansone,C., & Smith,J.L. (1999). Other people as a source of interest in an activity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,35, 239-265.

Nolen, S. B., & Nichols, J. G. (1994). A place to begin (again) in research on student motivation: Teachers beliefs. Teaching and teacher education,10, 57-69

Reynolds, P.L., & Symons, S. (2001). Motivational variables and children’s text search. Journal of educational Pstchology,93(1), 14-23.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and Learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading,3, 54-67.

Sweet, A. P., Guthrie, J. T, & Ng, M. (1998).Teacher perceptions and student reading motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 210-224

Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T (2004).Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students.Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162-186.

Wigfield A., & Guthrie, J. T (1997). Motivation for reading: Individual, home, textual, and classroom perspective. Educational Psychologist, 32, 57-135.

• There are currently no refbacks.

EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN MODEL BLENDED LEARNING DITINJAU DARI PROSES DAN CAPAIAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR-DASAR KONSTRUKSI BANGUNAN DAN TEKNIK PENGUKURAN TANAH DI SMKN 1 BALONGAN

Ra Nouma Zaristi, - (2021) EFEKTIVITAS PENERAPAN MODEL BLENDED LEARNING DITINJAU DARI PROSES DAN CAPAIAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MATA PELAJARAN DASAR-DASAR KONSTRUKSI BANGUNAN DAN TEKNIK PENGUKURAN TANAH DI SMKN 1 BALONGAN. S1 thesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Baca Full Text klik disini

Dunia digemparkan dengan menyebarluasnya jenis virus baru yaitu coronavirus. Salah satu cara untuk memutus mata rantai penyebaran Covid-19 adalah dengan melakukan pembatasan interaksi masyarakat yang diterapkan dengan istilah physical distancing (Mustakim, 2020). Keputusan pemerintah untuk meliburkan para peserta didik, memindahkan proses belajar mengajar di sekolah menjadi di rumah dengan menerapkan kebijakan Work From Home. Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu untuk mengetahui efektifitas model blended learning ditinjau dari proses dan capaian hasil belajar siswa selama pandemi COVID-19 pada mata pelajaran DDKB&TPT di SMK Negeri 1 Balongan. Penelitian ini termasuk kedalam pre-experimental design dengan rancangan one-shot case study. Rancangan one-shot case study menurut Arikunto (2013: 124) desain ini peneliti hanya mengadakan treatment satu kali yang diperkirakan sudah mempunyai pengaruh, kemudian diadakan post-test. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan bahwa penerapan blended learning pada mata pelajaran DDKB&TPT dilihat dari proses dan capaian hasil belajar siswa cukup efektif diterapkan. Upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dan keefektifan dalam proses kegiatan belajar mengajar, hendaknya guru perlu memberikan suasana baru dalam proses KBM berlangsung dengan penggunaan media pembelajaran yang lebih bervariasi seperti blended learning. Upaya meningkatkan kualitas dan citra sekolah dimata masyarakat tentunya kepala sekolah sebagai pengambil kebijakan dan wewenang dapat memenuhi fasilitas pembelajaran blended learning. Siswa lebih rajin belajar dan aktif dalam megikuti pelajaran serta mampu menyesuaikan dengan perkembangan teknologi. The world is shocked by the spread of a new type of virus, namely the coronavirus. One way to break the chain of the spread of Covid-19 is to limit public interaction which is applied by the term physical distancing (Mustakim, 2020). The government's decision to dismiss students, move the teaching and learning process at school to be at home by implementing the Work From Home policy. The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of the blended learning model in terms of the process and achievement of student learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in DDKB & TPT subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Balongan. This research is included in the pre-experimental design with a one-shot case study design. According to Arikunto (2013: 124), the one-shot case study design is a one-time treatment that is thought to have had an effect, then a post-test is held. Based on the results of research and discussion that the application of blended learning in DDKB&TPT subjects seen from the process and achievement of student learning outcomes, it is quite effectively applied. Efforts to improve student learning outcomes and effectiveness in the process of teaching and learning activities, teachers should need to provide a new atmosphere in the teaching and learning process that takes place by using more varied learning media such as blended learning. Efforts to improve the quality and image of the school in the eyes of the community of course the principal as a policy maker and authority can fulfill blended learning learning facilities. Students are more diligent in studying and active in following lessons and able to adapt to technological developments.

Actions (login required)