research proposal on fintech

• How it works

Useful Links

How much will your dissertation cost?

Have an expert academic write your dissertation paper!

Dissertation Services

Get unlimited topic ideas and a dissertation plan for just £45.00

Order topics and plan

Get 1 free topic in your area of study with aim and justification

Yes I want the free topic

Fintech Dissertation Topics – With Examples

Published by Owen Ingram at December 29th, 2022 , Revised On May 2, 2024

Introduction:

Fintech, short for financial technology, is a rapidly growing industry that focuses on using technology to improve the efficiency of traditional banking and financial services.

Fintech companies specialise in developing software and other tools that automate banking processes and make it easier for businesses and individuals to manage their finances.

The products created by these companies include mobile apps to track spending, online payment systems, digital wallets, and blockchain technology.

Researching fintech is a critically important exercise for students of finance and technology alike. The growing importance of fintech as an innovation sector has made it an ever-evolving field, requiring researchers to stay abreast of the trends to keep up with its rapid pace.

Fintech dissertation topics require an understanding of the underlying concepts and a clear grasp of the practical applications and emerging trends in the industry.

However, for students researching fintech dissertation topics, there are some inherent challenges associated with this task.

Due to its highly specialised nature, staying up-to-date on relevant topics can be difficult as a lot of new information appears each day that needs sifting through and digesting.

How to Choose the Best Fintech Dissertation Topic:

When selecting a fintech topic, the process of researching and choosing a dissertation topic can be both exciting and daunting. Therefore, students need to take their time researching potential topics before settling on one. The following are some tips that can help streamline this process:

• First, Have a general understanding of what areas the student would like to explore in fintech. This will give them a better sense of the topics most applicable to their project or paper.
• Next, Look into industry publications and journals, as these are great resources for finding relevant content and cutting-edge information about fintech advances.
• Students should look at current trends in the field that might be of interest. Next, they need to identify areas where there may be gaps in knowledge or new opportunities that have not yet been explored.

List of Fintech Dissertation Topics

• Understanding blockchain and fintech
• Embracing digital transformation with fintech
• The impact of fintech on financial innovations
• Smart investing with fintech tools
• The impact of fintech on businesses
• The future of fintech
• Digital finance and fintech: current research and future research directions
• Fintech: ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges
• How do banks interact with fintech startups?
• The Impact of fintech startups on financial institutions’ performance and default risk
• Fintech growth during COVID-19 in MENA region: current challenges and future prospects
• How digital finance and fintech can improve financial inclusion
• Data security and consumer trust in fintech innovation
• Artificial intelligence in fintech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers
• VaR and market value of fintech companies: An analysis and evidence from global data
• Is the sustainability profile of fintech companies a key driver of their value?
• Competition and cooperation between fintech companies and traditional financial institutions
• Bitcoin, blockchain and fintech: a systematic review and case studies in the supply chain
• How Blockchain can impact financial services–The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewee
• How Can FinTech Impact Russia’s Development?
• A review of literature directions regarding the impact of fintech firms on the banking industry
• FinTech in India: An analysis of the impact of telecommunication on financial inclusion
• The impact of fintech innovation on green growth in China: Mediating effect of green finance
• How green FinTech can alleviate the impact of climate change—the case of Switzerland
• An empirical study of the impacts of perceived security and knowledge on continuous intention to use mobile fintech payment services
• The impact of fintech on the sustainability of Islamic accounting and finance education in Malaysia
• Research on Fintech development issues based on embedded cloud computing and big data analysis
• Fintech, digitalisation, and the law applicable to proprietary effects of transactions in securities (tokens): a European perspective
• The Problems of Consumer Protection in Fintech Peer To Peer Lending Business Activities in Indonesia
• Factors affecting continuance intention of FinTech payment among Millennials in Jakarta
• Banks and FinTechs: Friends or foes? What it takes for banks and FinTechs to successfully cooperate
• Effects of fintech on stock return: Evidence from retail banks listed in Indonesia stock exchange
• Fintech and Islamic finance: literature review and research agenda
• The Effect of FinTech on the Financial Institution in Six ASEAN Countries: Fama-French Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model Approach
• Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany
• Factors Affecting consumer acceptance of fintech products and Services in Malaysia
• What makes consumers trust and adopt fintech? An empirical investigation in China
• Toward Fintech Adoption Framework for Developing Countries-A Literature Review Based on the Stakeholder Perspective
• A detailed analysis of cryptography for financial markets
• An analysis of how different regulatory frameworks affect the growth and development of entrepreneurial fintech models in various regions.
• A Comparison of fintech models: peer-to-peer lending, robo-advisors, and blockchain-based solutions in terms of their sustainability, scalability, and impact on financial inclusion.
• The role of user experience (UX) design in shaping the adoption and usage of novel digital payment platforms. 
• The potential of blockchain technology to revolutionise digital payments through decentralised platforms
• The impact of novel digital payment platforms on cross-border transactions and financial inclusion, particularly in underserved regions and developing economies.
• Explore how the adoption and diffusion of complex financial technologies influence socio-economic networks. 

Other Subject Topics

• Medical Law Dissertation Topics
• Mental Health Dissertation Topics
• Healthcare Dissertation Topics
• Child Health Nursing Dissertation Topics
• Contract Law Dissertation Topics
• Commercial Law Dissertation Topics
• EU Law Dissertation Ideas
• Sports Law Dissertation Topics
• Maritime Law Dissertation Topics

What is the Importance of Choosing the Correct Fintech Research Topic

When considering the research within the field of fintech, it is important to consider and select a relevant topic carefully. The chosen topic should be engaging and topical, enabling research to be conducted effectively. It is essential that the right decision is made in order to ensure that meaningful results are achieved.

Firstly, when researching within fintech, it is vital to ensure that the selected topic is related to current trends within the sector. When exploring a current trend or development, an understanding can be gained as to how this will impact existing businesses and services, thus beneficial for those researching this field.

Secondly, personal interest must also be taken into account when choosing a research topic; this increases motivation and ensures that data collection remains efficient throughout the project.

By selecting a fintech topic that aligns with current trends and their own interests, students can ensure that they’re getting the most out of their research . The key is to select a project that allows students to explore current topics and those that may become more relevant in the future. Students should also consider what resources they already have access to so they can use them to support their projects.

Hire an Expert Writer

Orders completed by our expert writers are

• Formally drafted in an academic style
• Free Amendments and 100% Plagiarism Free – or your money back!
• 100% Confidential and Timely Delivery!
• Free anti-plagiarism report
• Appreciated by thousands of clients. Check client reviews

FAQs About Fintech Dissertation Ideas

When to choose the fintech dissertation topic.

You can choose a topic when you know you have an interest in it, there is enough information on the internet about it, and it can help others.

How do I choose the most appropriate fintech dissertation topic?

Firstly, ensuring that your topic is relevant to the current trends in financial technology is important. Do some research on what areas of fintech are currently being discussed or explored, and focus your attention on those topics.

Additionally, make sure that your chosen subject has enough information available online or through other sources so you can gather enough data for your paper. It’s also important to choose a title that you find engaging and inspiring – after all, this will be an extensive project you’ll be working on!

Can I use these topics for my dissertation?

Yes, you can use these topics for your dissertation. Depending on the type of research projects you are doing, there is a variety of topics that you can use.

Have other students used these topics already?

Yes, other students might have used these dissertation topics already. If you need unique dissertation topics which haven’t been used before, you can order the dissertation topics service on our website .

Can ResearchProspect provide unique and customised fintech dissertation topics?

Yes, ResearchProspect provides unique and customised fintech dissertation topics.

Can you do a research proposal on my selected topic?

Yes, we can do a research proposal on your selected topic. You can order the research proposal topics service on our website, or you can read about our proposal writing services .

You May Also Like

Need interesting and manageable history dissertation topics or thesis? Here are the trending history dissertation titles so you can choose the most suitable one.

Check out the list of most interesting 100+ chemistry dissertation topic ideas trending lately to help you write an exceptional research paper.

Authorizing your dissertation is a very challenging task. As determined by the supervisors and advisors, the subjects should be innovative and creative, cover both theoretical and practical aspects, and add something new to the field.

USEFUL LINKS

LEARNING RESOURCES

COMPANY DETAILS

• How It Works

Fintech and the Future of Finance

Stay connected.

This report explores the implications of fintech and the digital transformation of financial services for market outcomes on one side, and regulation and supervision, on the other, and how these interact.

• Full Report
• Policy Summary
• Executive Summaries of All Technical Notes
• Overview Paper

Technical Notes

📖  Read the 2-page policy summary

Fintech, the application of digital technology to financial services, is reshaping the future of finance– a process that the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated. The ongoing digitization of financial services and money creates opportunities to build more inclusive and efficient financial services and promote economic development. Fintech is transforming the financial sector landscape rapidly and is blurring the boundaries of both financial firms and the financial sector. This  presents a paradigm shift that has various policy implications, including:

• Foster beneficial innovation and competition, while managing the risks.
• Broaden monitoring horizons and re-assess regulatory perimeters as embedding of financial services blurs the boundaries of the financial sector.
• Be mindful of evolving policy tradeoffs as fintech adoption deepens.
• Review regulatory, supervisory, and oversight frameworks to ensure they remain fit for purpose and enable the authorities to foster a safe, efficient, and inclusive financial system.
• Anticipate market structure tendencies and proactively shape them to foster competition and contestability in the financial sector.
• Modernize and open up financial infrastructures to enable competition and contestability.
• Ensure public money remains fit for the digital world amid rapid advances in private money solutions.
• Pursue strong cross-border coordination and sharing of information and best practices, given the supra-national nature of fintech.

📖  Read the Full Overview Paper

Translations: Executive Summary

Arabic | Chinese | French | Portuguese (Brazil) |  Portuguese | Russian | Spanish

Fintech and the Future of Finance: Market and Policy Implications

Blog series.

• Jul 13, 2023 Digital financial services bridging the SME financing gap
• Apr 19, 2023 Central banks and innovation
• Apr 17, 2023 Innovation in payments: Opportunities and challenges for EMDEs
• Mar 07, 2023 Embracing the promise of Fintech responsibly through regulation and supervision
• Feb 24, 2023 Fintech and financial services: Delivering for development

Global Patterns of Fintech Activity and Enabling Factors

The Fintech Activity note takes stock of available fintech-related data, to document patterns of fintech activity across the world, and to help identify enabling factors.

• 🠞 Executive Summary
• 🠞 Full Technical Note

Global Market Survey: Digital Technology and the Future of Finance Survey

The Fintech Market Participants Survey discusses findings from the survey whose responses span 330 market participants from 109 countries.

Fintech and the Digital Transformation of Financial Services

The Market Structure note draws on the underlying economics of financial services and their industrial organization to examine the implications of digital innovation for market structure and attendant policies.

Regulation and Supervision of Fintech

The Regulation note aims to provide regulators and supervisors in emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) with high-level guidance on how to approach the regulating and supervising of fintech.

Consumer Protection Implications of Fintech

The Consumer Protection note provides an overview of new manifestations of consumer risks that are significant and cross-cutting across four key fintech products: digital microcredit, P2PL, investment-based crowdfunding, ...

Innovation in Payments

The Payments note discusses the most significant innovations in payments and their key impacts and implications on users, banks and other payment service providers, regulators, and the overall structure of the payments ...

Fintech and SME Finance: Expanding Responsible Access

The SME note discusses policy and regulatory approaches that can facilitate access to finance for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) through digital financial services.

What Does Digital Money Mean for EMDEs?

The Digital Money note categorizes new digital money proposals including crypto-assets, stablecoins, and central bank digital currencies; assesses the supply and demand factors for their adoption; and lays out particular ...

This site uses cookies to optimize functionality and give you the best possible experience. If you continue to navigate this website beyond this page, cookies will be placed on your browser. To learn more about cookies, click here .

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Challenges and trends of financial technology (fintech): a systematic literature review.

1. Introduction

2. methodology, 2.1. research question.

• RQ1. “What are the challenges and trends of fintech research?”

2.2. Search Process

2.3. implementation, 3.1. background and terminology, 3.2. thematic analysis of the articles selected, 3.2.1. publication per year, 3.2.2. classification of articles by fintech business model, 3.2.3. classification of articles by (main) methodology, 3.2.4. classification of articles by publications, 3.2.5. classification of articles by locations, 3.3. meta-analysis of the articles selected, 4. discussions and recommendations, 4.1. discussions, 4.1.1. research on fintech (in general), 4.1.2. research on payment, clearing, and settlement, 4.1.3. research on risk management and investment, 4.1.4. research on market aggregators, 4.1.5. research on financing (crowdfunding and p2p lending), 4.1.6. research on cryptocurrency and blockchain, 4.2. recommendations, 5. conclusions, author contributions, conflicts of interest.

• Schueffel, P. Taming the beast: A scientific definition of fintech. J. Innov. Manag. 2017 , 4 , 32–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leong, K. FinTech (Financial Technology): What is it and how to use technologies to create business value in fintech way? Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol. 2018 , 9 , 74–78. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, I.; Shin, Y.J. Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Bus. Horiz. 2018 , 61 , 35–46. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Davis, K.; Maddock, R.; Foo, M. Catching up with Indonesia’s fintech industry. Law Financ. Mark. Rev. 2017 , 11 , 33–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gimpel, H.; Rau, D.; Röglinger, M. Understanding FinTech start-ups—A taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings. Electron. Mark. 2018 , 28 , 245–264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Stern, C.; Makinen, M.; Qian, Z. FinTechs in China—With a special focus on peer to peer lending. J. Chin. Econ. Foreign Trade Stud. 2017 , 10 , 215–228. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Zavolokina, L.; Dolata, M.; Schwabe, G. FinTech—What’s in a name? In Proceedings of the Thirty Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland, 11–14 December 2016; pp. 469–490. [ Google Scholar ]
• Suryono, R.R.; Purwandari, B.; Budi, I. Peer to peer (P2P) lending problems and potential solutions: A systematic literature review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019 , 161 , 204–214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ashta, A.; Biot-Paquerot, G. FinTech evolution: Strategic value management issues in a fast changing industry. Strateg. Chang. 2018 , 27 , 301–311. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kitchenham, B.; Brereton, P. A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 2013 , 55 , 2049–2075. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Panurach, P. Money in electronic commerce: Digital cash, electronic fund transfer, and eCash. Commun. ACM 1996 , 39 , 45–50. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nicoletti, B. Financial Services and Fintech. In The Future of FinTech ; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2017. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chang, T.-C.; Chen, Y.-L. Fintech puzzle: The case of bitcoin. In Proceedings of the PICMET 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Managing Technological Entrepreneurship: The Engine for Economic Growth, Taichung, Taiwan, 19–23 August 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Eyal, I. Blockchain technology: Transforming libertarian cryptocurrency dreams to finance and banking realities. Computer 2017 , 50 , 38–49. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gomber, P.; Koch, J.A.; Siering, M. Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. J. Bus. Econ. 2017 , 87 , 537–580. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gomber, P.; Kauffman, R.J.; Parker, C.; Weber, B.W. On the Fintech revolution: Interpreting the forces of innovation, disruption, and transformation in financial services. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2018 , 35 , 220–265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gai, K.; Qiu, M.; Sun, X. A survey on FinTech. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2018 , 103 , 262–273. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Puschmann, T. Fintech. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017 , 59 , 69–76. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mathur, N.; Karre, S.A.; Mohan, S.L.; Reddy, Y.R. Analysis of fintech mobile app usability for geriatric users in India. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 23–29 March 2018; pp. 1–11. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fernando, E.; Surjandy; Meyliana; Touriano, D. Development and validation of instruments adoption fintech services in Indonesia (perspective of trust and risk). In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, Malang, Indonesia, 10–12 November 2018; pp. 283–287. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nomakuchi, T. A case study on fintech in Japan based on keystone strategy. In Proceedings of the PICMET 2018 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Managing Technological Entrepreneurship: The Engine for Economic Growth, Honolulu, HI, USA, 19–23 August 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ryu, H.S. What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech? The moderating effect of user type. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2018 , 118 , 541–569. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Iman, N. Assessing the dynamics of fintech in Indonesia. Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov. 2018 , 15 , 296–303. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Stewart, H.; Jürjens, J. Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Inf. Comput. Secur. 2018 , 26 , 109–128. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Huei, C.T.; Cheng, L.S.; Seong, L.C.; Khin, A.A.; Leh Bin, R.L. Preliminary study on consumer attitude towards fintech products and services in Malaysia. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018 , 7 , 166–169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hu, Z.; Ding, S.; Li, S.; Chen, L.; Yang, S. Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry 2019 , 11 , 340. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Wang, Q.; Gu, L.; Xue, M.; Xu, L.; Niu, W.; Dou, L.; He, L.; Xie, T. FACTS: Automated black-box testing of fintech systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 4–9 November 2018; pp. 839–844. [ Google Scholar ]
• Hatammimi, J.; Krisnawati, A. Financial literacy for entrepreneur in the industry 4.0 era: A conceptual framework in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, Salford, UK, 22–24 September 2018; pp. 183–187. [ Google Scholar ]
• Jin, T.; Wang, Q. FinExpert: Domain-specific test generation for fintech systems. In Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Tallinn, Estonia, 26–30 August 2019; pp. 853–862. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pantielieieva, N.; Krynytsia, S.; Khutorna, M.; Potapenko, L. FinTech, transformation of financial intermediation and financial stability. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Scientific-Practical Conference on Problems of Infocommunications Science and Technology, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 9–12 October 2018; pp. 553–559. [ Google Scholar ]
• Mehrotra, A. Financial inclusion through fintech—A case of lost focus. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Automation, Computational and Technology Management (ICACTM), London, UK, 24–26 April 2019; pp. 103–107. [ Google Scholar ]
• Shim, Y.; Shin, D.H. Analyzing China’s fintech industry from the perspective of actor-network theory. Telecommun. Policy 2016 , 40 , 168–181. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Eickhoff, M.; Muntermann, J.; Weinrich, T. What Do Fintechs Actually Do? A Taxonomy of Fintech Business Models. In Proceedings of the ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation, Seoul, Korea, 10–12 December 2017; Volume 22. [ Google Scholar ]
• Basole, R.C.; Patel, S.S. Transformation through unbundling: Visualizing the global FinTech ecosystem. Serv. Sci. 2018 , 10 , 379–396. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Riyanto, A.; Primiana, I.; Yunizar; Azis, Y. Disruptive technology: The phenomenon of FinTech towards conventional banking in Indonesia. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018 , 407 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haddad, C.; Hornuf, L. The emergence of the global fintech market: Economic and technological determinants. Small Bus. Econ. 2019 , 53 , 81–105. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Anagnostopoulos, I. Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. J. Econ. Bus. 2018 , 100 , 7–25. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hung, J.L.; Luo, B. FinTech in Taiwan: A case study of a Bank’s strategic planning for an investment in a FinTech company. Financ. Innov. 2016 , 2 . [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Kim, K.; Hong, S. The data processing approach for preserving personal data in fintech-driven paradigm. Int. J. Secur. Appl. 2016 , 10 , 341–350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Okamura, T.; Teranishi, I. Enhancing FinTech security with secure multi-party computation technology. NEC Tech. J. 2017 , 11 , 46–50. [ Google Scholar ]
• Dimbean-Creta, O. Fintech—Already new fashion in finance, but what about the future? Qual. Access Success 2017 , 18 , 25–29. [ Google Scholar ]
• Muthukannan, P.; Tan, F.T.C.; Tan, B.; Leong, C. The Concentric Development of the Financial Technology (Fintech) Ecosystem in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital, Seoul, Korea, 10–12 December 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Sybirianska, Y.; Dyba, M.; Britchenko, I.; Ivashchenko, A.; Vasylyshen, Y.; Polishchuk, Y. Fintech platforms in sme’s financing: Eu experience and ways of their application in Ukraine. Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov. 2018 , 15 , 83–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Abubakar, L.; Handayani, T. Financial technology: Legal challenges for Indonesia financial sector. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Makassar, Indonesia, 25–26 October 2018; Volume 175. [ Google Scholar ]
• Xiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Worthington, A.C. Determinants of the use of fintech finance among Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. In Proceedings of the TEMS-ISIE 2018 1st Annual International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship of the IEEE Technology and Engineering Management Society, Beijing, China, 30 March–1 April 2018; pp. 1–10. [ Google Scholar ]
• Milian, E.Z.; Spinola, M.D.M.; Carvalho, M.M. Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2019 , 34 , 100833. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Coeckelbergh, M. The invisible robots of global finance: Making visible machines, people and places. SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 2015 , 45 , 287–289. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Soloviev, V. Fintech ecosystem in Russia. In Proceedings of the 2018 11th International Conference on Management of Large-Scale System Development, Moscow, Russia, 1–3 October 2018; pp. 1–5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Drasch, B.J.; Schweizer, A.; Urbach, N. Integrating the ‘Troublemakers’: A taxonomy for cooperation between banks and fintechs. J. Econ. Bus. 2018 , 100 , 26–42. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Tsai, C.H.; Peng, K.J. The FinTech revolution and financial regulation: The case of online supply-chain financing. Asian J. Law Soc. 2017 , 4 , 109–132. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wonglimpiyarat, J. FinTech banking industry: A systemic approach. Foresight 2017 , 19 , 590–603. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Azarenkova, G.; Shkodina, I.; Samorodov, B.; Babenko, M.; Onishchenko, I. The influence of financial technologies on the global financial system stability. Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov. 2018 , 15 , 229–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chang, Y.; Wong, S.F.; Lee, H.; Jeong, S.P. What motivates Chinese consumers to adopt FinTech services: A regulatory focus theory. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce: E-Commerce in Smart Connected World, Suwon, Korea, 17–19 August 2016; pp. 1–3. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bello, G.; Perez, A.J. Adapting financial technology standards to blockchain platforms. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Southeast Conference, Columbus State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA, 18–20 April 2019; pp. 109–116. [ Google Scholar ]
• Nabila, M.; Purwandari, B.; Nazief, B.A.A.; Chalid, D.A.; Wibowo, S.S.; Solichah, I. Financial technology acceptance factors of electronic wallet and digital cash in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation, Padang, Indonesia, 22–26 October 2018; pp. 284–289. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chandra, Y.U.; Kristin, D.M.; Suhartono, J.; Sutarto, F.S.; Sung, M. Analysis of determinant factors of user acceptance of mobile payment system in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, Jakarta, Indonesia, 3–5 September 2018; pp. 454–459. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wiradinata, T. Mobile payment services adoption: The role of perceived technology risk. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Orange Technologies, Nusa Dua, Indonesia, 23–26 October 2018. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ting, H.; Yacob, Y.; Liew, L.; Lau, W.M. Intention to use mobile payment system: A case of developing market by ethnicity. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016 , 224 , 368–375. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Riskinanto, A.; Kelana, B.; Hilmawan, D.R. The moderation effect of age on adopting E-payment technology. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2017 , 124 , 536–543. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Luna, I.R.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F.; Sánchez-Fernández, J.; Muñoz-Leiva, F. Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018 , 146 , 931–944. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kalinic, Z.; Marinkovic, V.; Molinillo, S.; Liébana-Cabanillas, F. A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019 , 49 , 143–153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kelana, B.; Riskinanto, A.; Hilamawan, D.R. The acceptance of E-payment among Indonesian millennials. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Sustainable Information Engineering and Technology, Malang, Indonesia, 24–25 November 2017; pp. 348–352. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Armey, L.E.; Lipow, J.; Webb, N.J. The impact of electronic financial payments on crime. Inf. Econ. Policy 2014 , 29 , 46–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Dahlberg, T.; Guo, J.; Ondrus, J. A critical review of mobile payment research. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2015 , 14 , 265–284. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lin, C.Y.; Su, F.P.; Lai, K.K.; Shih, H.C.; Liu, C.C. Research and development portfolio for the payment FinTech company—The perspectives of patent statistics. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, Taichung, Taiwan, 13–15 August 2018; pp. 98–102. [ Google Scholar ]
• Omarini, A.E. Fintech and the future of the payment landscape: The mobile wallet ecosystem—A challenge for retail banks? Int. J. Financ. Res. 2018 , 9 , 97–116. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Moon, W.Y.; Kim, S.D. A payment mediation platform for heterogeneous fintech schemes. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Xi’an, China, 3–5 October 2016; pp. 511–516. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ogbanufe, O.; Kim, D.J. Comparing fingerprint-based biometrics authentication versus traditional authentication methods for e-payment. Decis. Support Syst. 2018 , 106 , 1–14. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kang, J. Mobile payment in Fintech environment: Trends, security challenges, and services. Hum. Cent. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2018 , 8 , 32. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Lai, W.C. Measured near field communication antenna for Fintech innovation. In Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics, Taipei, Taiwan, 7–9 May 2018; pp. 1–3. [ Google Scholar ]
• Liu, J.; Kauffman, R.J.; Ma, D. Competition, cooperation, and regulation: Understanding the evolution of the mobile payments technology ecosystem. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2015 , 14 , 372–391. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heredia Salazar, R. Apple pay & digital wallets in Mexico and the United States: Illusion or financial revolution? Mex. Law Rev. 2017 , 1 , 29. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Iman, N. Is mobile payment still relevant in the fintech era? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018 , 30 , 72–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chiu, I.H.Y. A new era in fintech payment innovations? A perspective from the institutions and regulation of payment systems. Law Innov. Technol. 2017 , 9 , 190–234. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Abdullah, E.M.E.; Rahman, A.A.; Rahim, R.A. Adoption of financial technology (Fintech) in mutual fund/unit trust investment among Malaysians: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2018 , 7 , 110–118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Belanche, D.; Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C. Artificial intelligence in FinTech: Understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2019 , 119 , 1411–1430. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alexeev, V.; Urga, G.; Yao, W. Asymmetric jump beta estimation with implications for portfolio risk management. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2019 , 62 , 20–40. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Peng, J.; Yu, Z. Big data platform architecture under the background of financial technology—In the insurance industry as an example example. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference 2018 on Big Data Engineering and Technology, Chengdu, China, 25–27 August 2018; pp. 31–35. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kumari, A.; Kumar Sharma, A. Infrastructure financing and development: A bibliometric review. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2017 , 16 , 49–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, R.S.T. COSMOS trader—Chaotic neuro-oscillatory multiagent financial prediction and trading system. J. Financ. Data Sci. 2019 , 5 , 61–82. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Faloon, M.; Scherer, B. Individualization of robo-advice. J. Wealth Manag. 2017 , 20 , 30–36. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Day, M.-Y.; Lin, J.-T.; Chen, Y.-C. Artificial intelligence for conversational robo-advisor. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), Barcelona, Spain, 28–31 August 2018; pp. 1057–1064. [ Google Scholar ]
• Serrano, W. Fintech model: The random neural network with genetic algorithm. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018 , 126 , 537–546. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jung, D.; Dorner, V.; Weinhardt, C.; Pusmaz, H. Designing a robo-advisor for risk-averse, low-budget consumers. Electron. Mark. 2018 , 28 , 367–380. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stoeckli, E.; Dremel, C.; Uebernickel, F. Exploring characteristics and transformational capabilities of InsurTech innovations to understand insurance value creation in a digital world. Electron. Mark. 2018 , 28 , 287–305. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Marafie, Z.; Lin, K.J.; Zhai, Y.; Li, J. Proactive fintech: Using intelligent IoT to deliver positive insurtech feedback. In Proceedings of the 2018 20th IEEE International Conference on Business Informatics, Vienna, Austria, 11–14 July 2018; pp. 72–81. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, Y.; Chitawa, U.S.; Guo, G.; Wang, X.; Tan, Z.; Wang, S. A reputation model for aggregating ratings based on beta distribution function. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering, Beijing, China, 6–9 July 2017; pp. 77–81. [ Google Scholar ]
• Ferreira, F.; Pereira, L. Success factors in a reward and equity based crowdfunding campaign. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation, Stuttgart, Germany, 17–20 June 2018; pp. 1–8. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Huang, T.; Zhao, Y. Revolution of securities law in the Internet Age: A review on equity crowd-funding. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2017 , 33 , 802–810. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Maier, E. Supply and demand on crowdlending platforms: Connecting small and medium-sized enterprise borrowers and consumer investors. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016 , 33 , 143–153. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zetzsche, D.; Preiner, C. Cross-border crowdfunding: Towards a single crowdlending and crowdinvesting market for Europe. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 2018 , 19 , 217–251. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Barbi, M.; Mattioli, S. Human capital, investor trust, and equity crowdfunding. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2019 , 49 , 1–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mamonov, S.; Malaga, R. Success factors in Title III equity crowdfunding in the United States. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018 , 27 , 65–73. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Anshari, M.; Almunawar, M.N.; Masri, M.; Hamdan, M. Digital marketplace and FinTech to support agriculture sustainability. Energy Procedia 2019 , 156 , 234–238. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wonglimpiyarat, J. Challenges and dynamics of FinTech crowd funding: An innovation system approach. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 2018 , 29 , 98–108. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, W.; Mahmood, A.; Sismeiro, C.; Vulkan, N. The evolution of equity crowdfunding: Insights from co-investments of angels and the crowd. Res. Policy 2019 , 48 , 103727. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Lee, S. Evaluation of mobile application in user’s perspective: Case of P2P lending apps in FinTech industry. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2017 , 11 , 1105–1115. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Contreras Pinochet, L.H.; Diogo, G.T.; Lopes, E.L.; Herrero, E.; Bueno, R.L.P. Propensity of contracting loans services from FinTech’s in Brazil. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2019 , 37 , 1190–1214. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rosavina, M.; Rahadi, R.A.; Kitri, M.L.; Nuraeni, S.; Mayangsari, L. P2P lending adoption by SMEs in Indonesia. Qual. Res. Financ. Mark. 2019 , 11 , 260–279. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fang, X.; Wang, B.; Liu, L.; Song, Y. Heterogeneous traders, the leverage effect and volatility of the Chinese P2P market. J. Manag. Sci. Eng. 2018 , 3 , 39–57. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Leong, C.; Tan, B.; Xiao, X.; Tan, F.T.C.; Sun, Y. Nurturing a FinTech ecosystem: The case of a youth microloan startup in China. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2017 , 37 , 92–97. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, B.; Zhou, J. Information collection for fraud detection in P2P financial market. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences 189, Beijing, China, 25–27 May 2018; p. 06006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Anugerah, D.P.; Indriani, M. Data Protection in financial technology services: Indonesian legal perspective. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Makassar, Indonesia, 25–26 October 2017. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yunus, U. A comparison peer to peer lending platforms in Singapore and Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series ; IOP Publishing: Medan, Indonesia, 2019; Volume 1235, p. 012008. [ Google Scholar ]
• Buchak, G.; Matvos, G.; Piskorski, T.; Seru, A. Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. J. Financ. Econ. 2018 , 130 , 453–483. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Tao, Q.; Dong, Y.; Lin, Z. Who can get money? Evidence from the Chinese peer-to-peer lending platform. Inf. Syst. Front. 2017 , 19 , 425–441. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Hsueh, S.C.; Kuo, C.H. Effective matching for P2P lending by mining strong association rules. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Business Engineering, Sapporo, Japan, 17–19 August 2017; pp. 30–33. [ Google Scholar ]
• Fermay, A.H.; Santosa, B.; Kertopati, A.Y.; Eprianto, I.M. The development of collaborative model between fintech and bank in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on E-commerce, E-Business and E-Government, Hong Kong, 13–15 June 2018; pp. 1–6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Suryono, R.R.; Marlina, E.; Purwaningsih, M.; Sensuse, D.I.; Sutoyo, M.A.H. Challenges in P2P lending development: Collaboration with tourism commerce. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering, ICOMITEE 2019, Jember, Indonesia, 16–17 October 2019; pp. 129–133. [ Google Scholar ]
• Yu, T.; Shen, W. Funds sharing regulation in the context of the sharing economy: Understanding the logic of China’s P2P lending regulation. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2019 , 35 , 42–58. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jagtiani, J.; Lemieux, C. Do fintech lenders penetrate areas that are underserved by traditional banks? J. Econ. Bus. 2018 , 100 , 43–54. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Anresnani, D.S.; Widodo, E.; Syairuddin, B. modelling integration of system dinamics and game theory for of financial technology peer to peer lending industry. In Proceedings of the International Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Conference, Malang, Indonesia, 30–31 August 2018; p. 07006. [ Google Scholar ]
• Huang, R.H. Online P2P lending and regulatory responses in China: Opportunities and challenges. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 2018 , 19 , 63–92. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Nugraha, A.P.; Rolando; Puspasari, M.A.; Syaifullah, D.H. Usability Evaluation for User Interface Redesign of Financial Technology Application. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Medan City North Sumatera, Indonesia, 16 October 2018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Jonker, N. What drives the adoption of crypto-payments by online retailers? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2019 , 35 , 100848. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Todorof, M. FinTech on the dark web: The rise of cryptos. In Era Forum ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 20. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brownsword, R. Regulatory fitness: Fintech, funny money, and smart contracts. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 2019 , 20 , 5–27. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Du, W.D.; Pan, S.L.; Leidner, D.E.; Ying, W. Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2019 , 28 , 50–65. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Niu, B.; Ren, J.; Zhao, A.; Li, X. Lender trust on the P2P lending: Analysis based on sentiment analysis of comment text. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 3293. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ Green Version ]
• Fang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhiyuan, F. Study on P2P E-finance platform system: A case in China. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on E-Business Engineering, Guangzhou, China, 5–7 November 2014; pp. 331–337. [ Google Scholar ]
• Wang, J.G.; Xu, H.; Ma, J. Financing the Underfinanced: Online Lending in China ; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 9783662465257. [ Google Scholar ]
• Pohan, N.W.A.; Budi, I.; Suryono, R.R. Borrower sentiment on P2P lending in Indonesia based on Google Playstore reviews. In Proceedings of the Sriwijaya International Conference on Information Technology and Its Applications (SICONIAN 2019), Palembang, Indonesia, 16 November 2019; pp. 17–23. [ Google Scholar ]
• Suryono, R.R.; Budi, I. P2P Lending sentiment analysis in Indonesian online news. In Proceedings of the Sriwijaya International Conference on Information Technology and Its Applications (SICONIAN 2019), Palembang, Indonesia, 16 November 2019; pp. 39–44. [ Google Scholar ]
• Kursh, S.R.; Gold, N.A. Adding FinTech and blockchain to your curriculum. Bus. Educ. Innov. J. Contents 2016 , 8 , 6–12. [ Google Scholar ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Suryono, R.R.; Budi, I.; Purwandari, B. Challenges and Trends of Financial Technology (Fintech): A Systematic Literature Review. Information 2020 , 11 , 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590

Suryono RR, Budi I, Purwandari B. Challenges and Trends of Financial Technology (Fintech): A Systematic Literature Review. Information . 2020; 11(12):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590

Suryono, Ryan Randy, Indra Budi, and Betty Purwandari. 2020. "Challenges and Trends of Financial Technology (Fintech): A Systematic Literature Review" Information 11, no. 12: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11120590

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

• Open access
• Published: 18 June 2021

Financial technology and the future of banking

• Daniel Broby   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-0766 1  

Financial Innovation volume  7 , Article number:  47 ( 2021 ) Cite this article

50k Accesses

62 Citations

5 Altmetric

Metrics details

This paper presents an analytical framework that describes the business model of banks. It draws on the classical theory of banking and the literature on digital transformation. It provides an explanation for existing trends and, by extending the theory of the banking firm, it illustrates how financial intermediation will be impacted by innovative financial technology applications. It further reviews the options that established banks will have to consider in order to mitigate the threat to their profitability. Deposit taking and lending are considered in the context of the challenge made from shadow banking and the all-digital banks. The paper contributes to an understanding of the future of banking, providing a framework for scholarly empirical investigation. In the discussion, four possible strategies are proposed for market participants, (1) customer retention, (2) customer acquisition, (3) banking as a service and (4) social media payment platforms. It is concluded that, in an increasingly digital world, trust will remain at the core of banking. That said, liquidity transformation will still have an important role to play. The nature of banking and financial services, however, will change dramatically.

Introduction

The bank of the future will have several different manifestations. This paper extends theory to explain the impact of financial technology and the Internet on the nature of banking. It provides an analytical framework for academic investigation, highlighting the trends that are shaping scholarly research into these dynamics. To do this, it re-examines the nature of financial intermediation and transactions. It explains how digital banking will be structurally, as well as physically, different from the banks described in the literature to date. It does this by extending the contribution of Klein ( 1971 ), on the theory of the banking firm. It presents suggested strategies for incumbent, and challenger banks, and how banking as a service and social media payment will reshape the competitive landscape.

The banking industry has been evolving since Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena opened its doors in 1472. Its leveraged business model has proved very scalable over time, but it is now facing new challenges. Firstly, its book to capital ratios, as documented by Berger et al ( 1995 ), have been consistently falling since 1840. This trend continues as competition has increased. In the past decade, the industry has experienced declines in profitability as measured by return on tangible equity. This is partly the result of falling leverage and fee income and partly due to the net interest margin (connected to traditional lending activity). These trends accelerated following the 2008 financial crisis. At the same time, technology has made banks more competitive. Advances in digital technology are changing the very nature of banking. Banks are now distributing services via mobile technology. A prolonged period of very low interest rates is also having an impact. To sustain their profitability, Brei et al. ( 2020 ) note that many banks have increased their emphasis on fee-generating services.

As Fama ( 1980 ) explains, a bank is an intermediary. The Internet is, however, changing the way financial service providers conduct their role. It is fundamentally changing the nature of the banking. This in turn is changing the nature of banking services, and the way those services are delivered. As a consequence, in order to compete in the changing digital landscape, banks have to adapt. The banks of the future, both incumbents and challengers, need to address liquidity transformation, data, trust, competition, and the digitalization of financial services. Against this backdrop, incumbent banks are focused on reinventing themselves. The challenger banks are, however, starting with a blank canvas. The research questions that these dynamics pose need to be investigated within the context of the theory of banking, hence the need to revise the existing analytical framework.

Banks perform payment and transfer functions for an economy. The Internet can now facilitate and even perform these functions. It is changing the way that transactions are recorded on ledgers and is facilitating both public and private digital currencies. In the past, banks operated in a world of information asymmetry between themselves and their borrowers (clients), but this is changing. This differential gave one bank an advantage over another due to its knowledge about its clients. The digital transformation that financial technology brings reduces this advantage, as this information can be digitally analyzed.

Even the nature of deposits is being transformed. Banks in the future will have to accept deposits and process transactions made in digital form, either Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) or cryptocurrencies. This presents a number of issues: (1) it changes the way financial services will be delivered, (2) it requires a discussion on resilience, security and competition in payments, (3) it provides a building block for better cross border money transfers and (4) it raises the question of private and public issuance of money. Braggion et al ( 2018 ) consider whether these represent a threat to financial stability.

The academic study of banking began with Edgeworth ( 1888 ). He postulated that it is based on probability. In this respect, the nature of the business model depends on the probability that a bank will not be called upon to meet all its liabilities at the same time. This allows banks to lend more than they have in deposits. Because of the resultant mismatch between long term assets and short-term liabilities, a bank’s capital structure is very sensitive to liquidity trade-offs. This is explained by Diamond and Rajan ( 2000 ). They explain that this makes a bank a’relationship lender’. In effect, they suggest a bank is an intermediary that has borrowed from other investors.

Diamond and Rajan ( 2000 ) argue a lender can negotiate repayment obligations and that a bank benefits from its knowledge of the customer. As shall be shown, the new generation of digital challenger banks do not have the same tradeoffs or knowledge of the customer. They operate more like a broker providing a platform for banking services. This suggests that there will be more than one type of bank in the future and several different payment protocols. It also suggests that banks will have to data mine customer information to improve their understanding of a client’s financial needs.

The key focus of Diamond and Rajan ( 2000 ), however, was to position a traditional bank is an intermediary. Gurley and Shaw ( 1956 ) describe how the customer relationship means a bank can borrow funds by way of deposits (liabilities) and subsequently use them to lend or invest (assets). In facilitating this mediation, they provide a service whereby they store money and provide a mechanism to transmit money. With improvements in financial technology, however, money can be stored digitally, lenders and investors can source funds directly over the internet, and money transfer can be done digitally.

A review of financial technology and banking literature is provided by Thakor ( 2020 ). He highlights that financial service companies are now being provided by non-deposit taking contenders. This paper addresses one of the four research questions raised by his review, namely how theories of financial intermediation can be modified to accommodate banks, shadow banks, and non-intermediated solutions.

To be a bank, an entity must be authorized to accept retail deposits. A challenger bank is, therefore, still a bank in the traditional sense. It does not, however, have the costs of a branch network. A peer-to-peer lender, meanwhile, does not have a deposit base and therefore acts more like a broker. This leads to the issue that this paper addresses, namely how the banks of the future will conduct their intermediation.

In order to understand what the bank of the future will look like, it is necessary to understand the nature of the aforementioned intermediation, and the way it is changing. In this respect, there are two key types of intermediation. These are (1) quantitative asset transformation and, (2) brokerage. The latter is a common model adopted by challenger banks. Figure  1 depicts how these two types of financial intermediation match savers with borrowers. To avoid nuanced distinction between these two types of intermediation, it is common to classify banks by the services they perform. These can be grouped as either private, investment, or commercial banking. The service sub-groupings include payments, settlements, fund management, trading, treasury management, brokerage, and other agency services.

How banks act as intermediaries between lenders and borrowers. This function call also be conducted by intermediaries as brokers, for example by shadow banks. Disintermediation occurs over the internet where peer-to-peer lenders match savers to lenders

Financial technology has the ability to disintermediate the banking sector. The competitive pressures this results in will shape the banks of the future. The channels that will facilitate this are shown in Fig.  2 , namely the Internet and/or mobile devices. Challengers can participate in this by, (1) directly matching borrows with savers over the Internet and, (2) distributing white labels products. The later enables banking as a service and avoids the aforementioned liquidity mismatch.

The strategic options banks have to match lenders with borrowers. The traditional and challenger banks are in the same space, competing for business. The distributed banks use the traditional and challenger banks to white label banking services. These banks compete with payment platforms on social media. The Internet heralds an era of banking as a service

There are also physical changes that are being made in the delivery of services. Bricks and mortar branches are in decline. Mobile banking, or m-banking as Liu et al ( 2020 ) describe it, is an increasingly important distribution channel. Robotics are increasingly being used to automate customer interaction. As explained by Vishnu et al ( 2017 ), these improve efficiency and the quality of execution. They allow for increased oversight and can be built on legacy systems as well as from a blank canvas. Application programming interfaces (APIs) are bringing the same type of functionality to m-banking. They can be used to authorize third party use of banking data. How banks evolve over time is important because, according to the OECD, the activity in the financial sector represents between 20 and 30 percent of developed countries Gross Domestic Product.

In summary, financial technology has evolved to a level where online banks and banking as a service are challenging incumbents and the nature of banking mediation. Banking is rapidly transforming because of changes in such technology. At the same time, the solving of the double spending problem, whereby digital money can be cryptographically protected, has led to the possibility that paper money will become redundant at some point in the future. A theoretical framework is required to understand this evolving landscape. This is discussed next.

The theory of the banking firm: a revision

In financial theory, as eloquently explained by Fama ( 1980 ), banking provides an accounting system for transactions and a portfolio system for the storage of assets. That will not change for the banks of the future. Fama ( 1980 ) explains that their activities, in an unregulated state, fulfil the Modigliani–Miller ( 1959 ) theorem of the irrelevance of the financing decision. In practice, traditional banks compete for deposits through the interest rate they offer. This makes the transactional element dependent on the resulting debits and credits that they process, essentially making banks into bookkeeping entities fulfilling the intermediation function. Since this is done in response to competitive forces, the general equilibrium is a passive one. As such, the banking business model is vulnerable to disruption, particularly by innovation in financial technology.

A bank is an idiosyncratic corporate entity due to its ability to generate credit by leveraging its balance sheet. That balance sheet has assets on one side and liabilities on the other, like any corporate entity. The assets consist of cash, lending, financial and fixed assets. On the other side of the balance sheet are its liabilities, deposits, and debt. In this respect, a bank’s equity and its liabilities are its source of funds, and its assets are its use of funds. This is explained by Klein ( 1971 ), who notes that a bank’s equity W , borrowed funds and its deposits B is equal to its total funds F . This is the same for incumbents and challengers. This can be depicted algebraically if we let incumbents be represented by Φ and challengers represented by Γ:

Klein ( 1971 ) further explains that a bank’s equity is therefore made up of its share capital and unimpaired reserves. The latter are held by a bank to protect the bank’s deposit clients. This part is also mandated by regulation, so as to protect customers and indeed the entire banking system from systemic failure. These protective measures include other prudential requirements to hold cash reserves or other liquid assets. As shall be shown, banking services can be performed over the Internet without these protections. Banking as a service, as this phenomenon known, is expected to increase in the future. This will change the nature of the protection available to clients. It will change the way banks transform assets, explained next.

A bank’s deposits are said to be a function of the proportion of total funds obtained through the issuance of the ith deposit type and its total funds F , represented by α i . Where deposits, represented by Bs , are made in the form of Bs (i  =  1 *s n) , they generate a rate of interest. It follows that Si Bs  =  B . As such,

Therefor it can be said that,

The importance of Eq. 3 is that the balance sheet can be leveraged by the issuance of loans. It should be noted, however, that not all loans are returned to the bank in whole or part. Non-performing loans reduce the asset side of a bank’s balance sheet and act as a constraint on capital, and therefore new lending. Clearly, this is not the case with banking as a service. In that model, loans are brokered. That said, with the traditional model, an advantage of financial technology is that it facilitates the data mining of clients’ accounts. Lending can therefore be more targeted to borrowers that are more likely to repay, thereby reducing non-performing loans. Pari passu, the incumbent bank of the future will therefore have a higher risk-adjusted return on capital. In practice, however, banking as a service will bring greater competition from challengers and possible further erosion of margins. Alternatively, some banks will proactively engage in partnerships and acquisitions to maintain their customer base and address the competition.

A bank must have reserves to meet the demand of customers demanding their deposits back. The amount of these reserves is a key function of banking regulation. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision mandates a requirement to hold various tiers of capital, so that banks have sufficient reserves to protect depositors. The Committee also imposes a framework for mitigating excessive liquidity risk and maturity transformation, through a set Liquidity Coverage Ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio.

Recent revisions of theory, because of financial technology advances, have altered our understanding of banking intermediation. This will impact the competitive landscape and therefor shape the nature of the bank of the future. In this respect, the threat to incumbent banks comes from peer-to-peer Internet lending platforms. These perform the brokerage function of financial intermediation without the use of the aforementioned banking balance sheet. Unlike regulated deposit takers, such lending platforms do not create assets and do not perform risk and asset transformation. That said, they are reliant on investors who do not always behave in a counter cyclical way.

Financial technology in banking is not new. It has been used to facilitate electronic markets since the 1980’s. Thakor ( 2020 ) refers to three waves of application of financial innovation in banking. The advent of institutional futures markets and the changing nature of financial contracts fundamentally changed the role of banks. In response to this, academics extended the concept of a bank into an entity that either fulfills the aforementioned functions of a broker or a qualitative asset transformer. In this respect, they connect the providers and users of capital without changing the nature of the transformation of the various claims to that capital. This transformation can be in the form risk transfer or the application of leverage. The nature of trading of financial assets, however, is changing. Price discovery can now be done over the Internet and that is moving liquidity from central marketplaces (like the stock exchange) to decentralized ones.

Alongside these trends, in considering what the bank of the future will look like, it is necessary to understand the unregulated lending market that competes with traditional banks. In this part of the lending market, there has been a rise in shadow banks. The literature on these entities is covered by Adrian and Ashcraft ( 2016 ). Shadow banks have taken substantial market share from the traditional banks. They fulfil the brokerage function of banks, but regulators have only partial oversight of their risk transformation or leverage. The rise of shadow banks has been facilitated by financial technology and the originate to distribute model documented by Bord and Santos ( 2012 ). They use alternative trading systems that function as electronic communication networks. These facilitate dark pools of liquidity whereby buyers and sellers of bonds and securities trade off-exchange. Since the credit crisis of 2008, total broker dealer assets have diverged from banking assets. This illustrates the changed lending environment.

In the disintermediated market, banking as a service providers must rely on their equity and what access to funding they can attract from their online network. Without this they are unable to drive lending growth. To explain this, let I represent the online network. Extending Klein ( 1971 ), further let Ψ represent banking as a service and their total funds by F . This state is depicted as,

Theoretically, it can be shown that,

Shadow banks, and those disintermediators who bypass the banking system, have an advantage in a world where technology is ubiquitous. This becomes more apparent when costs are considered. Buchak et al. ( 2018 ) point out that shadow banks finance their originations almost entirely through securitization and what they term the originate to distribute business model. Diversifying risk in this way is good for individual banks, as banking risks can be transferred away from traditional banking balance sheets to institutional balance sheets. That said, the rise of securitization has introduced systemic risk into the banking sector.

Thus, we can see that the nature of banking capital is changing and at the same time technology is replacing labor. Let A denote the number of transactions per account at a period in time, and C denote the total cost per account per time period of providing the services of the payment mechanism. Klein ( 1971 ) points out that, if capital and labor are assumed to be part of the traditional banking model, it can be observed that,

It can therefore be observed that the total service charge per account at a period in time, represented by S, has a linear and proportional relationship to bank account activity. This is another variable that financial technology can impact. According to Klein ( 1971 ) this can be summed up in the following way,

where d is the basic bank decision variable, the service charge per transaction. Once again, in an automated and digital environment, financial technology greatly reduces d for the challenger banks. Swankie and Broby ( 2019 ) examine the impact of Artificial Intelligence on the evaluation of banking risk and conclude that it improves such variables.

Meanwhile, the traditional banking model can be expressed as a product of the number of accounts, M , and the average size of an account, N . This suggests a banks implicit yield is it rate of interest on deposits adjusted by its operating loss in each time period. This yield is generated by payment and loan services. Let R 1 depict this. These can be expressed as a fraction of total demand deposits. This is depicted by Klein ( 1971 ), if one assumes activity per account is constant, as,

As a result, whether a bank is structured with traditional labor overheads or built digitally, is extremely relevant to its profitability. The capital and labor of tradition banks, depicted as Φ i , is greater than online networks, depicted as I i . As such, the later have an advantage. This can be shown as,

What Klein (1972) failed to highlight is that the banking inherently involves leverage. Diamond and Dybving (1983) show that leverage makes bank susceptible to run on their liquidity. The literature divides these between adverse shock events, as explained by Bernanke et al ( 1996 ) or moral hazard events as explained by Demirgu¨¸c-Kunt and Detragiache ( 2002 ). This leverage builds on the balance sheet mismatch of short-term assets with long term liabilities. As such, capital and liquidity are intrinsically linked to viability and solvency.

The way capital and liquidity are managed is through credit and default management. This is done at a bank level and a supervisory level. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision applies capital and leverage ratios, and central banks manage interest rates and other counter-cyclical measures. The various iterations of the prudential regulation of banks have moved the microeconomic theory of banking from the modeling of risk to the modeling of imperfect information. As mentioned, shadow and disintermediated services do not fall under this form or prudential regulation.

The relationship between leverage and insolvency risk crucially depends on the degree of banks total funds F and their liability structure L . In this respect, the liability structure of traditional banks is also greater than online networks which do not have the same level of available funds, depicted as,

Diamond and Dybvig ( 1983 ) observe that this liability structure is intimately tied to a traditional bank’s assets. In this respect, a bank’s ability to finance its lending at low cost and its ability to achieve repayment are key to its avoidance of insolvency. Online networks and/or brokers do not have to finance their lending, simply source it. Similarly, as brokers they do not face capital loss in the event of a default. This disintermediates the bank through the use of a peer-to-peer environment. These lenders and borrowers are introduced in digital way over the internet. Regulators have taken notice and the digital broker advantage might not last forever. As a result, the future may well see greater cooperation between these competing parties. This also because banks have valuable operational experience compared to new entrants.

It should also be observed that bank lending is either secured or unsecured. Interest on an unsecured loan is typically higher than the interest on a secured loan. In this respect, incumbent banks have an advantage as their closeness to the customer allows them to better understand the security of the assets. Berger et al ( 2005 ) further differentiate lending into transaction lending, relationship lending and credit scoring.

The evolution of the business model in a digital world

As has been demonstrated, the bank of the future in its various manifestations will be a consequence of the evolution of the current banking business model. There has been considerable scholarly investigation into the uniqueness of this business model, but less so on its changing nature. Song and Thakor ( 2010 ) are helpful in this respect and suggest that there are three aspects to this evolution, namely competition, complementary and co-evolution. Although liquidity transformation is evolving, it remains central to a bank’s role.

All the dynamics mentioned are relevant to the economy. There is considerable evidence, as outlined by Levine ( 2001 ), that market liberalization has a causal impact on economic growth. The impact of technology on productivity should prove positive and enhance the functioning of the domestic financial system. Indeed, market liberalization has already reshaped banking by increasing competition. New fee based ancillary financial services have become widespread, as has the proprietorial use of balance sheets. Risk has been securitized and even packaged into trade-able products.

Challenger banks are developing in a complementary way with the incumbents. The latter have an advantage over new entrants because they have information on their customers. The liquidity insurance model, proposed by Diamond and Dybvig ( 1983 ), explains how such banks have informational advantages over exchange markets. That said, financial technology changes these dynamics. It if facilitating the processing of financial data by third parties, explained in greater detail in the section on Open Banking.

At the same time, financial technology is facilitating banking as a service. This is where financial services are delivered by a broker over the Internet without resort to the balance sheet. This includes roboadvisory asset management, peer to peer lending, and crowd funding. Its growth will be facilitated by Open Banking as it becomes more geographically adopted. Figure  3 illustrates how these business models are disintermediating the traditional banking role and matching burrowers and savers.

The traditional view of banks ecosystem between savers and borrowers, atop the Internet which is matching savers and borrowers directly in a peer-to-peer way. The Klein ( 1971 ) theory of the banking firm does not incorporate the mirrored dynamics, and as such needs to be extended to reflect the digital innovation that impacts both borrowers and severs in a peer-to-peer environment

Meanwhile, the banking sector is co-evolving alongside a shadow banking phenomenon. Lenders and borrowers are interacting, but outside of the banking sector. This is a concern for central banks and banking regulators, as the lending is taking place in an unregulated environment. Shadow banking has grown because of financial technology, market liberalization and excess liquidity in the asset management ecosystem. Pozsar and Singh ( 2011 ) detail the non-bank/bank intersection of shadow banking. They point out that shadow banking results in reverse maturity transformation. Incumbent banks have blurred the distinction between their use of traditional (M2) liabilities and market-based shadow banking (non-M2) liabilities. This impacts the inter-generational transfers that enable a bank to achieve interest rate smoothing.

Securitization has transformed the risk in the banking sector, transferring it to asset management institutions. These include structured investment vehicles, securities lenders, asset backed commercial paper investors, credit focused hedge and money market funds. This in turn has led to greater systemic risk, the result of the nature of the non-traded liabilities of securitized pooling arrangements. This increased risk manifested itself in the 2008 credit crisis.

Commercial pressures are also shaping the banking industry. The drive for cost efficiency has made incumbent banks address their personally costs. Bank branches have been closed as technology has evolved. Branches make it easier to withdraw or transfer deposits and challenger banks are not as easily able to attract new deposits. The banking sector is therefore looking for new point of customer contact, such as supermarkets, post offices and social media platforms. These structural issues are occurring at the same time as the retail high street is also evolving. Banks have had an aggressive roll out of automated telling machines and a reduction in branches and headcount. Online digital transactions have now become the norm in most developed countries.

The financing of banks is also evolving. Traditional banks have tended to fund illiquid assets with short term and unstable liquid liabilities. This is one of the key contributors to the rise to the credit crisis of 2008. The provision of liquidity as a last resort is central to the asset transformation process. In this respect, the banking sector experienced a shock in 2008 in what is termed the credit crisis. The aforementioned liquidity mismatch resulted in the system not being able to absorb all the risks associated with subprime lending. Central banks had to resort to quantitative easing as a result of the failure of overnight funding mechanisms. The image of the entire banking sector was tarnished, and the banks of the future will have to address this.

The future must learn from the mistakes of the past. The structural weakness of the banking business model cannot be solved. That said, the latest Basel rules introduce further risk mitigation, improved leverage ratios and increased levels of capital reserve. Another lesson of the credit crisis was that there should be greater emphasis on risk culture, governance, and oversight. The independence and performance of the board, the experience and the skill set of senior management are now a greater focus of regulators. Internal controls and data analysis are increasingly more robust and efficient, with a greater focus on a banks stable funding ratio.

Meanwhile, the very nature of money is changing. A digital wallet for crypto-currencies fulfills much the same storage and transmission functions of a bank; and crypto-currencies are increasing being used for payment. Meanwhile, in Sweden, stores have the right to refuse cash and the majority of transactions are card based. This move to credit and debit cards, and the solving of the double spending problem, whereby digital money can be crypto-graphically protected, has led to the possibility that paper money could be replaced at some point in the future. Whether this might be by replacement by a CBDC, or decentralized digital offering, is of secondary importance to the requirement of banks to adapt. Whether accommodating crytpo-currencies or CBDC’s, Kou et al. ( 2021 ) recommend that banks keep focused on alternative payment and money transferring technologies.

Central banks also have to adapt. To limit disintermediation, they have to ensure that the economic design of their sponsored digital currencies focus on access for banks, interest payment relative to bank policy rate, banking holding limits and convertibility with bank deposits. All these developments have implications for banks, particularly in respect of funding, the secure storage of deposits and how digital currency interacts with traditional fiat money.

Open banking

Against the backdrop of all these trends and changes, a new dynamic is shaping the future of the banking sector. This is termed Open Banking, already briefly mentioned. This new way of handling banking data protocols introduces a secure way to give financial service companies consensual access to a bank’s customer financial information. Figure  4 illustrates how this works. Although a fairly simple concept, the implications are important for the banking industry. Essentially, a bank customer gives a regulated API permission to securely access his/her banking website. That is then used by a banking as a service entity to make direct payments and/or download financial data in order to provide a solution. It heralds an era of customer centric banking.

How Open Banking operates. The customer generates data by using his bank account. A third party provider is authorized to access that data through an API request. The bank confirms digitally that the customer has authorized the exchange of data and then fulfills the request

Open Banking was a response to the documented inertia around individual’s willingness to change bank accounts. Following the Retail Banking Review in the UK, this was addressed by lawmakers through the European Union’s Payment Services Directive II. The legislation was designed to make it easier to change banks by allowing customers to delegate authority to transfer their financial data to other parties. As a result of this, a whole host of data centric applications were conceived. Open banking adds further momentum to reshaping the future of banking.

Open Banking has a number of quite revolutionary implications. It was started so customers could change banks easily, but it resulted in some secondary considerations which are going to change the future of banking itself. It gives a clear view of bank financing. It allows aggregation of finances in one place. It also allows can give access to attractive offerings by allowing price comparisons. Open Banking API’s build a secure online financial marketplace based on data. They also allow access to a larger market in a faster way but the third-party providers for the new entrants. Open Banking allows developers to build single solutions on an API addressing very specific problems, like for example, a cash flow based credit rating.

Romānova et al. ( 2018 ) undertook a questionnaire on the Payment Services Directive II. The results suggest that Open Banking will promote competitiveness, innovation, and new product development. The initiative is associated with low costs and customer satisfaction, but that some concerns about security, privacy and risk are present. These can be mitigated, to some extent, by secure protocols and layered permission access.

Discussion: strategic options

Faced with these disruptive trends, there are four strategic options for market participants to con- sider. There are (1) a defensive customer retention strategy for incumbents, (2) an aggressive customer acquisition strategy for challenger banks (3) a banking as a service strategy for new entrants, and (4) a payments strategy for social media platforms.

Each of these strategies has to be conducted in a competitive marketplace for money demand by potential customers. Figure  5 illustrates where the first three strategies lie on the tradeoff between money demand and interest rates. The payment strategy can’t be modeled based on the supply of money. In the figure, the market settles at a rate L 2 . The incumbent banks have the capacity to meet the largest supply of these loans. The challenger banks have a constrained function but due to a lower cost base can gain excess rent through higher rates of interest. The peer-to-peer bank as a service brokers must settle for the market rate and a constrained supply offering.

The money demand M by lenders on the y axis. Interest rates on the y axis are labeled as r I and r II . The challenger banks are represented by the line labeled Γ. They have a price and technology advantage and so can lend at higher interest rates. The brokers are represented by the line labeled Ω. They are price takers, accepting the interest rate determined by the market. The same is true for the incumbents, represented by the line labeled Φ but they have a greater market share due to their customer relationships. Note that payments strategy for social media platforms is not shown on this figure as it is not affected by interest rates

Figure  5 illustrates that having a niche strategy is not counterproductive. Liu et al ( 2020 ) found that banks performing niche activities exhibit higher profitability and have lower risk. The syndication market now means that a bank making a loan does not have to be the entity that services it. This means banks in the future can better shape their risk profile and manage their lending books accordingly.

An interesting question for central banks is what the future Deposit Supply function will look like. If all three forms: open banking, traditional banking and challenger banks develop together, will the bank of the future have the same Deposit Supply function? The Klein ( 1971 ) general formulation assumes that deposits are increasing functions of implicit and explicit yields. As such, the very nature of central bank directed monetary policy may have to be revisited, as alluded to in the earlier discussion on digital money.

The client retention strategy (incumbents)

The competitive pressures suggest that incumbent banks need to focus on customer retention. Reichheld and Kenny ( 1990 ) found that the best way to do this was to focus on the retention of branch deposit customers. Obviously, another way is to provide a unique digital experience that matches the challengers.

Incumbent banks have a competitive advantage based on the information they have about their customers. Allen ( 1990 ) argues that where risk aversion is observable, information markets are viable. In other words, both bank and customer benefit from this. The strategic issue for them, therefore, becomes the retention of these customers when faced with greater competition.

Open Banking changes the dynamics of the banking information advantage. Borgogno and Colangelo ( 2020 ) suggest that the access to account (XS2A) rule that it introduced will increase competition and reduce information asymmetry. XS2A requires banks to grant access to bank account data to authorized third payment service providers.

The incumbent banks have a high-cost base and legacy IT systems. This makes it harder for them to migrate to a digital world. There are, however, also benefits from financial technology for the incumbents. These include reduced cost and greater efficiency. Financial technology can also now support platforms that allow incumbent banks to sell NPL’s. These platforms do not require the ownership of assets, they act as consolidators. The use of technology to monitor the transactions make the processing cost efficient. The unique selling point of such platforms is their centralized point of contact which results in a reduction in information asymmetry.

Incumbent banks must adapt a number of areas they got to adapt in terms of their liquidity transformation. They have to adapt the way they handle data. They must get customers to trust them in a digital world and the way that they trust them in a bricks and mortar world. It is no coincidence. When you go into a bank branch that is a great big solid building great big facade and so forth that is done deliberately so that you trust that bank with your deposit.

The risk of having rising non-performing loans needs to be managed, so customer retention should be selective. One of the puzzles in banking is why customers are regularly denied credit, rather than simply being charged a higher price for it. This credit rationing is often alleviated by collateral, but finance theory suggests value is based on the discounted sum of future cash flows. As such, it is conceivable that the bank of the future will use financial technology to provide innovative credit allocation solutions. That said, the dual risks of moral hazard and information asymmetries from the adoption of such solutions must be addressed.

Customer retention is especially important as bank competition is intensifying, as is the digitalization of financial services. Customer retention requires innovation, and that innovation has been moving at a very fast rate. Until now, banks have traditionally been hesitant about technology. More recently, mergers and acquisitions have increased quite substantially, initiated by a need to address actual or perceived weaknesses in financial technology.

The client acquisition strategy (challengers)

As intermediaries, the challenger banks are the same as incumbent banks, but designed from the outset to be digital. This gives them a cost and efficiency advantage. Anagnostopoulos ( 2018 ) suggests that the difference between challenger and traditional banks is that the former address its customers problems more directly. The challenge for such banks is customer acquisition.

Open Banking is a major advantage to challenger banks as it facilitates the changing of accounts. There is widespread dissatisfaction with many incumbent banks. Open Banking makes it easier to change accounts and also easier to get a transaction history on the client.

Customer acquisition can be improved by building trust in a brand. Historically, a bank was physically built in a very robust manner, hence the heavy architecture and grand banking halls. This was done deliberately to engender a sense of confidence in the deposit taking institution. Pure internet banks are not able to do this. As such, they must employ different strategies to convey stability. To do this, some communicate their sustainability credentials, whilst others use generational values-based advertising. Customer acquisition in a banking context is traditionally done by offering more attractive rates of interest. This is illustrated in Fig.  5 by the intersect of traditional banks with the market rate of interest, depicted where the line Γ crosses L 2 . As a result of the relationship with banking yield, teaser rates and introductory rates are common. A customer acquisition strategy has risks, as consumers with good credit can game different challenger banks by frequently changing accounts.

Most customer acquisition, however, is done based on superior service offering. The functionality of challenger banking accounts is often superior to incumbents, largely because the latter are built on legacy databases that have inter-operability issues. Having an open platform of services is a popular customer acquisition technique. The unrestricted provision of third-party products is viewed more favorably than a restricted range of products.

The banking as a service strategy (new entrants)

Banking from a customer’s perspective is the provision of a service. Customers don’t care about the maturity transformation of banking balance sheets. Banking as a service can be performed without recourse to these balance sheets. Banking products are brokered, mostly by new entrants, to individuals as services that can be subscribed to or paid on a fee basis.

There are a number banking as a service solutions including pre-paid and credit cards, lending and leasing. The banking as a service brokers are effectively those that are aggregating services from others using open banking to enable banking as a service.

The rise of banking as a service needs to be understood as these compete directly with traditional banks. As explained, some of these do this through peer-to-peer lending over the internet, others by matching borrows and sellers, conducting mediation as a loan broker. Such entities do not transform assets and do not have banking licenses. They do not have a branch network and often don not have access to deposits. This means that they have no insurance protection and can be subject to interest rate controls.

The new genre of financial technology, banking as a service provider, conduct financial services transformation without access to central bank liquidity. In a distributed digital asset world, the assets are stored on a distributed ledger rather than a traditional banking ledger. Financial technology has automated credit evaluation, savings, investments, insurance, trading, banking payments and risk management. These banking as a service offering are only as secure as the technology on which they are built.

The social media payment strategy (disintermediators and disruptors)

An intermediation bank is a conceptual idea, one created solely on a social networking site. Social media has developed a market for online goods and services. Williams ( 2018 ) estimates that there are 2.46 billion social media users. These all make and receive payments of some kind. They demand security and functionality. Importantly, they have often more clients than most banks. As such, a strategy to monetize the payments infrastructure makes sense.

All social media platforms are rich repositories of data. Such platforms are used to buy and sell things and that requires payments. Some platforms are considering evolving their own digital payment, cutting out the banks as middlemen. These include Facebook’s Diem (formerly Libra), a digital currency, and similar developments at some of the biggest technology companies. The risk with social media payment platform is that there is systemic counter-party protection. Regulators need to address this. One way to do this would be to extend payment service insurance to such platforms.

Social media as a platform moves the payment relationship from a transaction to a customer experience. The ability to use consumer desires in combination with financial data has the potential to deliver a number of new revenue opportunities. These will compete directly with the banks of the future. This will have implications for (1) the money supply, (2) the market share of traditional banks and, (3) the services that payment providers offer.

Further research

Several recommendations for research derive from both the impact of disintermediation and the four proposed strategies that will shape banking in the future. The recommendations and suggestions are based on the mentioned papers and the conclusions drawn from them.

As discussed, the nature of intermediation is changing, and this has implications for the pricing of risk. The role of interest rates in banking will have to be further reviewed. In a decentralized world based on crypto currencies the central banks do not have the same control over the money supply, This suggest the quantity theory of money and the liquidity preference theory need to be revisited. As explained, the Internet reduces much of the friction costs of intermediation. Researchers should ask how this will impact maturity transformation. It is also fair to ask whether at some point in the future there will just be one big bank. This question has already been addressed in the literature but the Internet facilities the possibility. Diamond ( 1984 ) and Ramakrishnan and Thakor ( 1984 ) suggested the answer was due to diversification and its impact on reducing monitoring costs.

Attention should be given by academics to the changing nature of banking risk. How should regulators, for example, address the moral hazard posed by challenger banks with weak balance sheets? What about deposit insurance? Should it be priced to include unregulated entities? Also, what criteria do borrowers use to choose non-banking intermediaries? The changing risk environment also poses two interesting practical questions. What will an online bank run look like, and how can it be averted? How can you establish trust in digital services?

There are also research questions related to the nature of competition. What, for example, will be the nature of cross border competition in a decentralized world? Is the credit rationing that generates competition a static or dynamic phenomena online? What is the value of combining consumer utility with banking services?

Financial intermediaries, like banks, thrive in a world of deficits and surpluses supported by information asymmetries and disconnectedness. The connectivity of the internet changes this dynamic. In this respect, the view of Schumpeter ( 1911 ) on the role of financial intermediaries needs revisiting. Lenders and borrows can be connected peer to peer via the internet.

All the dynamics mentioned change the nature of moral hazard. This needs further investigation. There has been much scholarly research on the intrinsic riskiness of the mismatch between banking assets and liabilities. This mismatch not only results in potential insolvency for a single bank but potentially for the whole system. There has, for example, been much debate on the whether a bank can be too big to fail. As a result of the riskiness of the banking model, the banks of the future will be just a liable to fail as the banks of the past.

This paper presented a revision of the theory of banking in a digital world. In this respect, it built on the work of Klein ( 1971 ). It provided an overview of the changing nature of banking intermediation, a result of the Internet and new digital business models. It presented the traditional academic view of banking and how it is evolving. It showed how this is adapted to explain digital driven disintermediation.

It was shown that the banking industry is facing several documented challenges. Risk is being taken of balance sheet, securitized, and brokered. Financial technology is digitalizing service delivery. At the same time, the very nature of intermediation is being changed due to digital currency. It is argued that the bank of the future not only has to face these competitive issues, but that technology will enhance the delivery of banking services and reduce the cost of their delivery.

The paper further presented the importance of the Open Banking revolution and how that facilitates banking as a service. Open Banking is increasing client churn and driving banking as a service. That in turn is changing the way products are delivered.

Four strategies were proposed to navigate the evolving competitive landscape. These are for incumbents to address customer retention; for challengers to peruse a low-cost digital experience; for niche players to provide banking as a service; and for social media platforms to develop payment platforms. In all these scenarios, the banks of the future will have to have digital strategies for both payments and service delivery.

It was shown that both incumbents and challengers are dependent on capital availability and borrowers credit concerns. Nothing has changed in that respect. The risks remain credit and default risk. What is clear, however, is the bank has become intrinsically linked with technology. The Internet is changing the nature of mediation. It is allowing peer to peer matching of borrowers and savers. It is facilitating new payment protocols and digital currencies. Banks need to evolve and adapt to accommodate these. Most of these questions are empirical in nature. The aim of this paper, however, was to demonstrate that an understanding of the banking model is a prerequisite to understanding how to address these and how to develop hypotheses connected with them.

In conclusion, financial technology is changing the future of banking and the way banks intermediate. It is facilitating digital money and the online transmission of financial assets. It is making banks more customer enteric and more competitive. Scholarly investigation into banking has to adapt. That said, whatever the future, trust will remain at the core of banking. Similarly, deposits and lending will continue to attract regulatory oversight.

Availability of data and materials

Diagrams are my own and the code to reproduce them is available in the supplied Latex files.

Adrian T, Ashcraft AB (2016) Shadow banking: a review of the literature. In: Banking crises. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 282–315

Allen F (1990) The market for information and the origin of financial intermediation. J Financ Intermed 1(1):3–30

Article   Google Scholar  

Anagnostopoulos I (2018) Fintech and regtech: impact on regulators and banks. J Econ Bus 100:7–25

Berger AN, Herring RJ, Szegö GP (1995) The role of capital in financial institutions. J Bank Finance 19(3–4):393–430

Berger AN, Miller NH, Petersen MA, Rajan RG, Stein JC (2005) Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. J Financ Econ 76(2):237–269

Bernanke B, Gertler M, Gilchrist S (1996) The financial accelerator and the flight to quality. The review of economics and statistics, pp1–15

Bord V, Santos JC (2012) The rise of the originate-to-distribute model and the role of banks in financial intermediation. Federal Reserve Bank N Y Econ Policy Rev 18(2):21–34

Google Scholar  

Borgogno O, Colangelo G (2020) Data, innovation and competition in finance: the case of the access to account rule. Eur Bus Law Rev 31(4)

Braggion F, Manconi A, Zhu H (2018) Is Fintech a threat to financial stability? Evidence from peer-to-Peer lending in China, November 10

Brei M, Borio C, Gambacorta L (2020) Bank intermediation activity in a low-interest-rate environment. Econ Notes 49(2):12164

Buchak G, Matvos G, Piskorski T, Seru A (2018) Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. J Financ Econ 130(3):453–483

Demirgüç-Kunt A, Detragiache E (2002) Does deposit insurance increase banking system stability? An empirical investigation. J Monet Econ 49(7):1373–1406

Diamond DW (1984) Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Rev Econ Stud 51(3):393–414

Diamond DW, Dybvig PH (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J Polit Econ 91(3):401–419

Diamond DW, Rajan RG (2000) A theory of bank capital. J Finance 55(6):2431–2465

Edgeworth FY (1888) The mathematical theory of banking. J Roy Stat Soc 51(1):113–127

Fama EF (1980) Banking in the theory of finance. J Monet Econ 6(1):39–57

Gurley JG, Shaw ES (1956) Financial intermediaries and the saving-investment process. J Finance 11(2):257–276

Klein MA (1971) A theory of the banking firm. J Money Credit Bank 3(2):205–218

Kou G, Akdeniz ÖO, Dinçer H, Yüksel S (2021) Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach. Financ Innov 7(1):1–28

Levine R (2001) International financial liberalization and economic growth. Rev Interna Tional Econ 9(4):688–702

Liu FH, Norden L, Spargoli F (2020) Does uniqueness in banking matter? J Bank Finance 120:105941

Pozsar Z, Singh M (2011) The nonbank-bank nexus and the shadow banking system. IMF working papers, pp 1–18

Ramakrishnan RT, Thakor AV (1984) Information reliability and a theory of financial intermediation. Rev Econ Stud 51(3):415–432

Reichheld FF, Kenny DW (1990) The hidden advantages of customer retention. J Retail Bank 12(4):19–24

Romānova I, Grima S, Spiteri J, Kudinska M (2018) The payment services directive 2 and competitiveness: the perspective of European Fintech companies. Eur Res Stud J 21(2):5–24

Modigliani F, Miller MH (1959) The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment: reply. Am Econ Rev 49(4):655–669

Schumpeter J (1911) The theory of economic development. Harvard Econ Stud XLVI

Song F, Thakor AV (2010) Financial system architecture and the co-evolution of banks and capital markets. Econ J 120(547):1021–1055

Swankie GDB, Broby D (2019) Examining the impact of artificial intelligence on the evaluation of banking risk. Centre for Financial Regulation and Innovation, white paper

Thakor AV (2020) Fintech and banking: What do we know? J Financ Intermed 41:100833

Vishnu S, Agochiya V, Palkar R (2017) Data-centered dependencies and opportunities for robotics process automation in banking. J Financ Transf 45(1):68–76

Williams MD (2018) Social commerce and the mobile platform: payment and security perceptions of potential users. Comput Hum Behav 115:105557

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are no acknowldgements.

There was no funding associated with this paper.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Centre for Financial Regulation and Innovation, Strathclyde Business School, Glasgow, UK

Daniel Broby

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

The author confirms the contribution is original and his own. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Broby .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

I declare I have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Broby, D. Financial technology and the future of banking. Financ Innov 7 , 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00264-y

Download citation

Received : 21 January 2021

Accepted : 09 June 2021

Published : 18 June 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00264-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Cryptocurrencies
• P2P Lending
• Intermediation
• Digital Payments

JEL Classifications

FinTech and Financial Inclusion

• First Online: 31 August 2024

Cite this chapter

• Babak Naysary 3 &
• Amine Tarazi 4  

Financial inclusion has become a global priority, aiming to provide individuals and communities with access to affordable and appropriate financial services. However, despite ongoing efforts, a significant portion of the world’s population remains financially excluded. One of the main socioeconomic challenges of the past decade, particularly for low- and middle-income economies, is the financial exclusion caused mainly due to high credit and transaction cost and distance barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime
• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Durable hardcover edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abdulhakeem, S. A., & Hu, Q. (2021). Powered by blockchain technology, DeFi (Decentralized Finance) Strives to increase financial inclusion of the unbanked by reshaping the world financial system. Modern Economy, 12 (01), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2021.121001

Article   Google Scholar  

Agarwal, S., Alok, S., Ghosh, P., & Gupta, S. (2020a). Financial inclusion and alternate credit scoring for the millennials: Role of big data and machine learning in FinTech (pp. 1–38).

Google Scholar  

Agarwal, S., Qian, W., & Tan, R. (2020b). Household finance: A functional approach (pp. 1–352). Springer Singapore.

Al Mawali, N. R., Al Lawati, A. M., & Ananda, S. (2021). Fourth industrial revolution and business dynamics: Issues and implications (pp. 1–325). Springer Singapore.

Alrabei, A. M., Al-Othman, L. N., Al-Dalabih, F. A. N., Taber, T. A., Ali, B. J. A., & Amareen, S. M. (2022). The impact of mobile payment on the financial inclusion rates. Information Sciences Letters , 11 (4), 1033–1044. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/110404

Anderson, B., & Hardin, J. M. (2014). Credit scoring in the age of big data. Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization, 15 (7), 549–557. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch049

Anisa, N. (2021). FinTech Peer to Peer lending as approach to encourage economic inclusion for rural communities in Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal , 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3846900

Beck, T., Senbet, L., & Simbanegavi, W. (2012, June). Financial inclusion and innovation in Africa: An overview (Policy Research Working Paper 6088 Abstract). https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/eju031

Berentsen, A., & Markheim, M. (2019). Munich personal RePEc archive Peer-to-Peer lending, joint liability and financial inclusion with altruistic investors Peer-to-Peer lending, joint liability and financial inclusion with altruistic investors . 94963 .

Berentsen, A., & Markheim, M. (2021). Peer-to-peer lending and financial inclusion with altruistic investors. International Review of Finance, 21 (4), 1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12333

Bianchi, M., & Briere, M. (2021). Robo-advising for small investors. SSRN Electronic Journal , 1–35. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3751620

Boitan, I. A. (2016). Crowdlending and financial inclusion—Evidence from EU countries. Economic Alternatives, 4 , 418–432.

Buckland, J. (2012). Hard choices: Financial exclusion, fringe banks, and poverty in Urban Canada . University of Toronto Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=rIzxrdsrjQAC

Butticè, V., & Vismara, S. (2022). Inclusive digital finance: The industry of equity crowdfunding. Journal of Technology Transfer, 47 (4), 1224–1241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09875-0

Cámara, N., Research, B., & Tuesta, D. (2017, September). Measuring financial inclusion: A multidimensional index. Bank of Morocco–CEMLA–IFC Satellite Seminar at the ISI World Statistics Congress on financial inclusion .

Caplan, M. A., Birkenmaier, J., & Bae, J. (2021). Financial exclusion in OECD countries: A scoping review*. International Journal of Social Welfare, 30 (1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12430

Capponi, A., & Lehalle, C.-A. (Eds.). (2023). Robo-advising: Less AI and more XAI? Augmenting algorithms with humans-in-the-loop. In Machine learning and data sciences for financial markets: A guide to contemporary practices (pp. 33–59). Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/machine-learning-and-data-sciences-for-financial-markets/roboadvising-less-ai-and-more-xai-augmenting-algorithms-with-humansintheloop/71F1C1C2082552E4D70BA43561461B0B

Carbó, S., Gardener, E. P. M., & Molyneux, P. (2005). Financial exclusion in the UK. In Financial exclusion (pp. 14–44). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230508743_3

Chen, Y. J., & Chen, Y. M. (2022). Forecasting corporate credit ratings using big data from social media. Expert Systems with Applications , 207 (October 2021), 118042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118042

Chinaka, M., Johnson, S., Kurtz, R. A., Verdi, R. S., & Cert, E. Y. A. (2014). Blockchain technology-applications in improving financial inclusion in developing economies. Case study for small scale agriculture in Africa. by Signature redacted Signature redacted (B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering).

Choudhury, S. R., & Bagchi, D. (2016). Financial exclusion—A paradox in developing countries. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance Ver. I , 7 (3), 2321–5933. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0703014045

Chung, S., Kim, K., Lee, C. H., & Oh, W. (2023). Interdependence between online peer-to-peer lending and cryptocurrency markets and its effects on financial inclusion. Production and Operations Management, 32 (6), 1939–1957. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13950

Collard, S., Kempson, E., & Whyley, C. (2001). Tackling financial exclusion: An area-based approach . 52.

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Klapper, L. (2012). Measuring financial inclusion: The global Findex database (Policy Research Working Paper 6025).

Diniz, E., Birochi, R., & Pozzebon, M. (2012). Triggers and barriers to financial inclusion: The use of ICT-based branchless banking in an Amazon county. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (5), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.07.006

di Prisco, D., & Strangio, D. (2021). Technology and financial inclusion: A case study to evaluate potential and limitations of blockchain in emerging countries. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management , 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1944617

Division, P. (2004, September). Policy level response to financial exclusion in developed economies: Lessons for developing countries Elaine Kempson, Adele Atkinson and Odile Pilley The Personal Finance Research Centre University of Bristol September 2004 Report commissioned by Finance. Personal Finance , 1–49.

Donovan, K. (2011). Mobile money for financial inclusion . In Information and communications for development 2012: Maximizing mobile . The World Bank.

Eid, N., & Yang, J. (2018, August). Online financial inclusion and its implications for borrowers: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer lending. SSRN Electronic Journal . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3243499

Endress, T. (2023). Business and management in Asia: Digital innovation and sustainability . Springer Nature Singapore.

Etim, A. S. (2012). Ehrbeck et al. Jack & Suri , 1–13.

Fungáčová, Z., & Weill, L. (2015). Understanding financial inclusion in China. China Economic Review, 34 , 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2014.12.004

Guégan, D., & Hassani, B. (2018). Regulatory learning: How to supervise machine learning models? An application to credit scoring. Journal of Finance and Data Science, 4 (3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfds.2018.04.001

Impact, S. (2012). Measuring financial exclusion in Australia . The Centre for Social Impact of National Australia Bank.

Jenik, I., Timothy, L., & Nava, A. (2017, March). Crowdfunding and financial inclusion . CGAP.

Jiang, J., Liao, L., Lu, X., Wang, Z., & Xiang, H. (2021). Deciphering big data in consumer credit evaluation. Journal of Empirical Finance , 62 (August 2020), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.01.009

Kata, R., Walenia, A., & Pyrkos, D. S. (2016). Financial exclusion of the rural population in Poland. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development , 9 (4). https://doi.org/10.17306/jard.2015.74

Kim, M., Zoo, H., Lee, H., & Kang, J. (2018). Mobile financial services, financial inclusion, and development: A systematic review of academic literature. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84 (5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12044

Kirana, M. Y., & Havidz, S. A. H. (2020, August). Financial literacy and mobile payment usage as financial inclusion determinants. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2020 , 905–910.

Konya, S., Küçüksucu, M., & Karaçor, Z. (2021). Panel Estimation of high-technology export determinants: Evidence from fast-growing countries. In M. H. Bilgin, H. Danis, E. Demir, & S. Vale (Eds.), Eurasian Economic Perspectives: Proceedings of the 29th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference (pp. 245–259). Springer International Publishing.

Lee, C. C., Chen, P. F., & Chu, P. J. (2023). Green recovery through financial inclusion of mobile payment: A study of low- and middle-income Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 77 , 729–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.12.012

Lichtfous, M., Yadav, V., & Fratino, V. (2018). Can blockchain accelerate financial inclusion globally? Deloitte Inside Magazine , 19 .

Manta, A. (2019). Financial inclusion and gender barriers for rural women. International Journal of Management , 10 (5), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.34218/IJM.10.5.2019.006

Maskara, P. K., Kuvvet, E., & Chen, G. (2021). The role of P2P platforms in enhancing financial inclusion in the United States: An analysis of peer-to-peer lending across the rural–urban divide. Financial Management, 50 (3), 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12341

Muhammad, T., Ngah, B. B., & Obad, A.-S. F. M. (2022). Financial exclusion in Northern Nigeria: A lesson from the developed countries. AFEBI Islamic Finance and Economic Review , 7 (01), 45. https://doi.org/10.47312/aifer.v7i01.565

Mukherjee, S., & Sood, K. (2020). Triggers and barriers of financial inclusion: A country-wise analysis. Asian Economic and Financial Review , 10 (9), 970–988. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2020.109.970.988

Mulia Rachman, K., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2022). Influence of Robo advisory in investment decision. Journal of Digital Innovation Studies , 1 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24198/digits.v1i1.37806

Ngendakumana, L., & Mashahanya, T. (2019). Causes of financial exclusion of micro, small to medium enterprises operating in Victoria falls, Zimbabwe. Academic Research International, 10 (4), 29–37.

Ohnesorge, J. (2018). A primer on blockchain technology and its potential for financial inclusion (Vol. 7, pp. 246–250).

Onay, C., & Öztürk, E. (2018). A review of credit scoring research in the age of Big Data. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26 (3), 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-06-2017-0054

Óskarsdóttir, M., Bravo, C., Sarraute, C., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2019). The value of big data for credit scoring: Enhancing financial inclusion using mobile phone data and social network analytics. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 74 , 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.004

Ozili, P. K. (2020). Financial inclusion in Nigeria: Determinants, challenges and achievements. SSRN Electronic Journal, 99173 . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557244

Philippon, T. (2019). Nber working paper series on FinTech and financial inclusion . National Bureau of Economic Research.

Ren, B., Li, L., Zhao, H., & Zhou, Y. (2018). The financial exclusion in the development of digital finance—A study based on survey data in the Jingjinji Rural Area. Singapore Economic Review, 63 (1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590818500017

Savita, S. (2013). Financial inclusion in India: Do microfinance institutions address access barriers? ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 2 (1), 60–74.

Schuetz, S., & Venkatesh, V. (2020). Blockchain, adoption, and financial inclusion in India: Research opportunities. International Journal of Information Management , 52 (February 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.009

Slimani, A., & Ziky, M. (2021). Crowdfunding and financial inclusion: A systematic literature review and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Economy, 3 (4), 25–37.

Tan, G. K. S. (2020). Robo-advisors and the financialization of lay investors. Geoforum, 117 , 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.09.004

Tassabehji, R., & Isherwood, A. (2014). The case of crowdfunding in financial inclusion: A survey. Strategic Change, 23 , 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc

Ulwodi, D. W., & Muriu, P. W. (2017). Barriers of financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development , 8 (14), 66–81. www.Iiste.Org

Winn, J. K. (2015). Mobile payments and financial inclusion: Kenya, Brazil, and India as case studies (Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2015C29).

Wu, Y., & Pan, Y. (2021). Application analysis of credit scoring of financial institutions based on machine learning model. Complexity, 2021 . https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9222617

Xing, F., Cambria, E., & Welsch, R. (2019). Intelligent asset management strategy (p. 163).

Yasir, A., Ahmad, A., Abbas, S., Inairat, M., Al-Kassem, A. H., & Rasool, A. (2022). How artificial intelligence is promoting financial inclusion? A study on barriers of financial inclusion. 2022 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security, ICBATS 2022 , 1–6.

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Birmingham City University, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK

Babak Naysary

Economics Department, University of Limoges, Limoges, France

Amine Tarazi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Babak Naysary or Amine Tarazi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Naysary, B., Tarazi, A. (2024). FinTech and Financial Inclusion. In: The Digital Finance Era. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3970-7_8

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3970-7_8

Published : 31 August 2024

Publisher Name : Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

Print ISBN : 978-981-97-3969-1

Online ISBN : 978-981-97-3970-7

eBook Packages : Business and Management Business and Management (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Research proposal draft for review

Related Papers

János Kálmán

Prior to the Global Financial Crisis, financial innovation was driven by so many factors, but the Global Financial Crisis changed the regulatory pendulum, which has swung to deeper regulation and also changed the way we thinking about financial innovation. The financial innovation – with its bright and destructive outcomes – is an integral part of the competition in the financial market. But the race is such that the regulatory authorities are in a rather disadvantaged position if we just thinking of the old fashion regulatory paradigm. In this context, the question is what – new – legal institutions – such as regulatory sandbox – could provide financial stability and a proper legal regulation to unregulated financial products and services.

Henry Ibeachu

The study and survey of financial inclusion is useful for both policy makers and bank service providers to make strategic decisions. This dissertation attempts to provide a snap shot of the extent of financial inclusion i.e. the level and expansion of access and capability of the Nigerian public in finance utilization. It identifies the main types, causes and factors that motivate or hinder financial inclusion. The research states the drive of financial inclusion and bank outreaching as a strategic move of financial providers (banks) to seek out strategic customers. It shows financial inclusion as a growth strategy for banking institutions. It also assessed the capability of the Nigerian banking industry with the use of Porter’s diamond model. This provided a plain look at the general strength of the industry. With the use of questionnaires administration and several other data collection methods, the research compared the results from Nigeria and the UK. This was to generally assess the expansion of financial inclusion of Nigerian from benchmarking a more highly included economy.

Texila International Journal , Folasade Femi-Lawal

Globally, Financial Inclusion (FI) and Digital Financial Services (DFS) have become a life-blood and key driver of socioeconomic growth and development on the backdrop that economies are dependent on financial services to attain advancement. The paper explored the role of Mobile Money Services (MMS), also known as DFS in enhancing access to financial services. The research was driven by the increasing mobile network spread, the under-served, ubiquity/ penetration of mobile devices amongst both the poor and low-income earners, factors affecting FI, fees which are disincentive to users, introduction of cashless Nigeria by the Central Bank of Nigeria as well as the emergence of Mobile Money Services in 2009. An in-depth analysis of MMS in driving FI and paradigm shift in traditional payment systems was embarked on and focused on issues associated with services provided MMS Operators viz transaction fees, transaction value and count; stakeholders within the ecosystem, user experience and security of funds, policy and regulation on financial services delivery as well as inclusive participation of the government, regulatory bodies and infrastructure providers. The findings showed that while the MMS have a huge potential to drive DFS in Nigeria, it would require deliberate actions by all stakeholders to establish an appropriate solution capable of transforming the economy and also the contribution of MMS to FI in reducing the financially excluded is critical to the nation. Advancing this therefore, the government and other critical stakeholders would need to create a framework that will enhance access to financial services.

Texila International Journal

Over the years, the evolution of and use of mobile phones and other mobile devices such as tablets has offered society the opportunity to access financial services such as mobile money. Mobile money allows one to transfer money or make payments with their mobile phone, in the comfort of their location and in a simple, fast, convenient and affordable way. This research sought to determine the effect of the evolution of mobile money services on traditional banking in Ghana. The article showed that mobile money is a viable tool for financial inclusion, it has improved efficiency of transactions, it has initiated some changes in traditional banking and has a generally positive impact on traditional banking in Ghana. Keywords: Mobile Phone, Mobile Money Transfer, Financial Inclusion, Mobile Money Subscribers, Ghanaian Economy, Threats, Business Activity, Payment Systems.

Deni Balogun

The paper presents a multidimensional analysis of ERPS‘s adoption. It evaluates characteristics of ERPSs as determinants of user acceptance and, through a survey, identified which are most important to Nigerian consumers.On the other hand, a critical analysis of existing ERPS infrastructure was undertaken based on international frameworks and guidelines provided by theCPSS, PSDG and the SADC — scanning authoritative sources for actions set in motion by Nigerian regulators to mitigate inherent bottlenecks. Finally, this paper provides recommendations by fusing discoveries from user perceptions of ERPSs and identified Infrastructural constrictions.

Igor Britchenko

The main aim of the given research is to develop an appropriate approach for creation of information FinTech platform with the EU standards compliance mainly for SMEs in order to support innovativeness of SMEs, improve their access to finance and simplify different financial processes. The authors defined the main features of FinTech platforms underlining types of FinTech, its participants and the most influential factors. The main trends of FinTech platforms development in the EU countries, such as the level of investment, impact of EU FinTech platforms on the global scale, features of investments into B2B FinTech, were determined. It was considered that in Ukraine, some positive changes in legislation were adopted, but the challenges like lack of finance, slow adoption of innovations in the financial market, not sufficient clarity of legislation remain among the main constraints for further development of FinTech platforms in Ukraine. The conducted analysis on the level of FinTech types performance by Ukrainian platforms showed only the great share of digital payments and money transfers, while other modern innovative FinTech instruments should not be underestimated for proper FinTech application in Ukraine. For this purpose, the authors have developed the Information Platform on Support for SMEs’ Innovations that consolidates interests of both SMEs and scientists. To determine both the SMEs’ opinion about the necessity of a particular Internet platform for them and the types of services that could be provided by the sme-sci.com platform, the authors conducted a survey in which 374 medium-sized and 380 small businesses took part. The results of the survey that are presented in the article confirm the necessity of the Information Platform on Support for SMEs’ Innovations and demand for it from the SMEs. Finally, the result of the research proves that such a unique informational platform as sme-sci. com that will serve as an interactive field for exchanging ideas and information of both representatives of scientific and business world is of great importance.

Sola Obanisola

Many people condemned the “Usuriousness” of interest rates on the enterprise sectors’ loan that are granted by Commercial Banks. Stakeholders discuss the challenges facing the entrepreneurial Finance lopsidedly. They preferentially considered the demand side ahead of the supply side. Commercial Banks often consider a ban on lending to the enterprise sector given the challenges they face with entrepreneurial enterprise sector or MSME’s financing. The introductory statements double as the justification for purpose and importance of this dissertation – “Entrepreneurial Finance: Challenges and Opportunities facing Nigerian Commercial Banks. – A case study of First Bank Nigeria LTD.” Given the timeframe for the research/dissertation, the study was a case study of FBN Nigeria LTD. An online survey was administered to 70 staff of the Bank working at the Bank’s Head Office. 39 of these completed the survey. The researcher also interviewed Heads of Units Heads of units. The research identified Commercial Bank’s need for liquidity, credit risk, crowding-out effect, as a result of the excessive government borrowing and the institutional environments as challenges facing Commercial Banks. The dissertation mentioned diversification of the Commercial Banks’ loan portfolios as an opportunity that the Banks need to explore. The ability of the Commercial Banks to key into these attendant opportunities would grow the country’s GDP and by extension its economy. Finally, the study recommends proprietary lending as the “lending technology” that would eliminate or reduce the challenges of entrepreneurial Finance and avail the Banks the attendant opportunities that come with it.

Aam S L A M E T Rusydiana

Financial technology in Indonesia is an untapped market opportunity. As the world's largest population Muslim country, the prospects for Islamic fintech in Indonesia seem very bright. This study tries to answer what problems, foundations and key ecosystem or stakeholders are involved in the development of Islamic fintech in Indonesia using Interpretive Structural Model (ISM) approach. The core problems faced in the development of Islamic financial technology industry are: Lack of policy instruments guarding the fintech work process, and availability of human resources for fintech.

Emeszetceeres Seven

Adebisi Adesola

This study examines the cash-less economic system so as to assess the relationship between Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and the implementation of cash-less policy. Nigeria has continued to evolve in different realms of transactions from the commodity money (trade by barter) to the cash-less realm. The economy is being reformed, institutions are being reshaped and legislations are being reexamined so as to reposition the nation to take its rightful position in the international community. In order to achieve the primary objective of the study, the study used structured questionnaire as a means of data collection from 120 respondents randomly selected. The data was analyzed using simple percentage procedure, and the collated data tested using chi-square technique. Study revealed that there exist a significant relationship between ICT and cash-less policy implementation in the Nigerian financial environment. Based on the findings it was recommended that the federal government of Nigeria should collaborate with all the states ICT centers and other private institutions to provide mass ICT education for the computer illiterates and banks should invest more in e-banking technology in order to enhance public awareness which would in turn encourage cash-less economy in Nigeria.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024