titles for rogerian argument essay

50 Rogerian Essay Topics

Not all essay writing is designed to press the point of an argument with no regard for the other side. In fact, when it comes to writing a Rogerian essay, the goal is to find a way to bring both sides of an issue together. This essay writing style is named for American psychologist Carl Rogers, who developed a non-confrontational approach to counseling and psychotherapy. Unfortunately, this type of essay can be challenging to write for many reasons, including:

You have to be able to see both sides of the issue, even if you don’t agree with either.
You’re not trying to score points or win an argument; you’re looking for common ground.
It can be difficult to stay impartial.

For students struggling with this type of assignment, we’ve created a detailed guide breaking down the fundamentals of Rogerian essay writing and included 50 Rogerian essay topics to help get the creative juices flowing.

Fundamentals of Rogerian Essay Writing

A Rogerian essay’s tone and writing style will differ from the more aggressive style of an argumentative essay. In a Rogerian essay, the writer starts by acknowledging that there is another side to the issue at hand and that valid points can be made for it. They then build on this common ground to further explore the issue. This means that students will need to do more research and pay closer attention to the other side of the problem.

The fundamental structure of a Rogerian essay is:

Introduce the issue at hand, making sure to mention that there are two sides to it.
Acknowledge the validity of the other side’s argument while also stating your own position.
Present your solution to the issue, making sure that it considers both sides of the debate.
Discuss any potential objections to your solution and how you would address them.
Summarize your argument and reiterate that common ground has been found.

The Introduction: Start by Stating the Issue

Your Rogerian essay will begin with an introduction in which you state the issue at hand. It’s essential to make sure that you mention that there are two sides to this issue so that your audience knows what they’re getting into. For example, if you’re writing about whether or not the government should fund Planned Parenthood, you might start your essay with something like this:

“There has been much debate surrounding the government’s role in funding Planned Parenthood. Some argue that the government has a responsibility to provide this kind of health care to its citizens, while others believe that doing so would be an endorsement of abortion. In this essay, I will attempt to find common ground between these two sides and explore a potential solution to the issue.”

Presenting Both Sides of the Argument: The Body paragraphs

Now that you’ve stated the issue at hand and acknowledged that there are two sides, it’s time to start exploring these sides in more detail. In the body paragraphs of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

Present each side of the issue fairly and impartially.
Discuss the points that each side is trying to make.
Point out any areas where the two sides agree with each other.
Explore the implications of each side’s position.

For example, if you’re writing about the government funding Planned Parenthood, your body paragraphs might look something like this:

“Those who argue in favor of government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so because it is a health care provider and that all citizens have a right to health care. They also point out that Planned Parenthood offers a variety of services beyond abortion, including cancer screenings and STD testing. Those who oppose government funding for Planned Parenthood typically do so on the grounds that they believe it should not be an endorsement of abortion. They also argue that other health care providers can offer the same services as Planned Parenthood.”

“It is important to note that both sides of this debate agree that all citizens have a right to health care. They also both agree that Planned Parenthood offers valuable services. Where they disagree is on the question of whether or not the government should be involved in funding this organization.”

Finding a Solution: The Conclusion

In the conclusion of your Rogerian essay, you will want to:

Present your solution to the issue.
Discuss any possible objections to your solution and how you would address them.

For example, if you’re writing about government funding for Planned Parenthood, your conclusion might look something like this:

“I believe that the government should provide funding for Planned Parenthood. I think that this is the best solution because it would allow all citizens to have access to the health care services that they need. It would also be an endorsement of the important work that Planned Parenthood does. However, I recognize that some object to this solution because it would be an endorsement of abortion. To address this concern, I would point out that the government already funds various organizations that provide abortions, such as hospitals. I believe that funding Planned Parenthood would simply be an extension of this policy.”

With the wiring guide above, you should be feeling a little more confident in your ability to write a Rogerian essay. However, if you are struggling to come up with a topic, here are 50 potential Rogerian essay topics to get you started:

Rogerian Essay Topics About Social Issues

Should the government do more to combat climate change?
Should the death penalty be abolished?
Do gun laws need to be stricter?
Is police brutality a problem in the United States?
What can be done to reduce the number of mass shootings in the United States?
Do we need to reform our immigration system?
Does the welfare state do more harm than good?
Should the government do more to protect the environment?
Do zoos do more harm than good?
Is animal testing ethical?
Should the drinking age be lowered?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Education

Is homeschooling a viable form of education?
How can we improve the education system in the United States?
Is college worth the cost?
Should the government do more to make college affordable?
Should students be required to take physical education classes?
Are standardized tests an effective measure of student achievement?
Should the use of computers in classrooms be limited?
How can we ensure all students have access to quality education?
Should schools do more to teach students about different cultures?
Should creationism be taught in schools?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Technology

Is too much reliance on technology a bad thing?
Should we be concerned about the amount of time we spend on our phones?
How can we balance our use of technology and our need for face-to-face interaction?
Is social media making us more lonely?
Should there be limits on the use of social media?
Is the internet making us less intelligent?
How can we make sure our kids are using technology responsibly?
Should there be more regulation of the internet?
Is technology changing the way we think?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Health Care

Do we need to reform our healthcare system?
How can we ensure everyone has access to quality health care?
Should the government do more to combat the obesity epidemic?
What can be done to reduce the number of cases of heart disease?
How can we make sure our aging population is healthy and happy?
What can be done to reduce the number of suicides in the United States?
Should the government do more to combat mental health issues?
Is our current approach to treating addiction effective?
What can be done to reduce the number of cancer cases?
How can we improve the quality of care in nursing homes?

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family and Relationships

Is divorce a problem in the United States?
How can we make sure all families have access to quality child care?
What can be done to reduce the number of teenage pregnancies?
Should parents be more involved in their children’s education?
How can we make sure all children are raised in a loving home?
What can be done to reduce the number of divorces?
Should single parents receive more support from the government?
How can we ensure all families have access to quality health care?
What role does religion play in family life?
Are families getting stronger or weaker in the United States?

These 50 Rogerian essay topics should help you get started on your next essay. Whichever one you pick, be sure to argue both sides of the issue in a way that is fair, balanced, and respectful of your opponent’s point of view.

160 Process Analysis Essay Topics
135 US History Essay Topics
170 Comparative Essay Topics
125 Analytical Essay Topics
170 Ethics Essay Topics

Testimonials

Skip to primary navigation
Skip to main content
Skip to primary sidebar
Skip to footer

25 Good Rogerian Argument Topic Ideas

Rogerian argument is known to be an effective problem-solving method and is often written as an essay. Choosing a topic for it can thus be difficult. This Buzzle article gives you a list of Rogerian argument topics for you to write on.

Did You Know?

A psychologist named Carl Rogers created this form of argument. It is used in many philosophy models to solve problems considering both sides of the argument.

Rogerian argument is one of the three types of arguments. The other two are Toulmin argument and the Classical argument, which are actually contradictory to the Rogerian theory. Rogerian argument is an argument where the both sides win because of the careful approach and persuasion. It is mainly useful in psychological arguments, rather than in logical or scientific arguments. Such an argument is supposed to lead to an appropriate solution by listening to and considering both the sides. And writing it can be a task in itself because it shouldn’t offend the reader or the audience. It should start with a common ground between the two and then should move on to explain the writer’s perspective. The views and opinions should be supported with proper reasoning as to why you’re saying that.

Choosing a topic for the Rogerian argument is an important part hence, choose it wisely. Take a topic of your interest which will help you in doing in-depth research on it. Below are some topics that you could use.

Rogerian Argument Topics

● Should smoking be allowed in public places? ● Is our election process fair to everyone? ● Research on animals, should it be encouraged? ● The taxation system: fair or unfair? ● Is euthanasia fair or unfair? ● Should marijuana be used in medicine? ● Do the cameras enforced by law invade privacy? ● Handgun ownership: threat or right? ● Should the legal age for drinking be lowered or raised? ● What is the right age to vote? Should it be raised or lowered? ● Is Internet censorship required? ● Same-sex marriages should be legal/illegal ● The two-child policy: Right or wrong? ● Technology: Are we too dependent on it? ● The discrimination in hierarchy of jobs: good or bad? ● Are the famous people paid more than needed? ● Are scores in school enough to evaluate a child’s progress? ● Marketing to children: right or wrong? ● Fighting video games influence children: right or wrong? ● Are single-sex schools better than co-ed? ● Does religion cause war? ● Is cheating becoming common? ● Is torture acceptable? ● Is unemployment related to crimes? ● Is our educational system affordable?

Note: Rogerian argument topics can be controversial hence, take utmost care not to hurt someone’s feelings.

Like it? Share it!

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Further insights.

Who Are The Most Romantic Literary Figures of All Time?

Privacy Overview

Purdue Online Writing Lab Purdue OWL® College of Liberal Arts

Rogerian Argument

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice.

Copyright ©1995-2018 by The Writing Lab & The OWL at Purdue and Purdue University. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.

The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging positive aspects of each party’s argument to arrive at a mutually-beneficial solution to an issue.

You may already use Rogerian argument in your everyday life to negotiate with your friends, family, and/or romantic partners. For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment. Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method.

While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic (concerned primarily with winning), the Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature (a conversation between two or more parties with the goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution). Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. It’s also great for day-to-day conflict resolution at home or in the workplace.

However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, it may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable to compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith (e.g., they care only about winning). It may also lead to sub-optimal solutions if your opponent’s position is demonstrably wrong, since in this case you may nevertheless be forced to sacrifice some of your (ostensibly superior) goals order to accommodate your opponent’s (inferior) ones.

In “Rhetoric: Discovery and Change” (1970), Young, Becker, and Pike describe the primary aims of the Rogerian argument as follows:

to convey to the reader that he is understood,
to delineate the area within which he believes the reader's position to be valid, and
to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and good will) and aspirations (the desire to discover a mutually acceptable solution).

The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties. If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented.

While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, not steps. You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure. The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand.

Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.

A successful Rogerian argument will likely include the following:

Introduction (addressing the topic to be discussed and/or the problem to be solved)
Opposing position (showing that you understand your opposition’s viewpoints/goals)
Context for opposing position (showing that you understand the situations in which their viewpoint is valid)
Your position (introducing/addressing your viewpoint as it differs from the reader’s)
Context for your position (objectively showing the reader the context(s) under which your position is valid)
Benefits (appeal to the opposition by showing how they would benefit by adopting elements of your position)

Below, we’ve provided an example Rogerian argument that follows the formula above. In this example, we will take the position that technology (e.g., laptops and tablets) should be allowed in writing classes while also considering the opinion of the opposition, who argue that such technology is more of a distraction than a helpful tool. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom.

Introduction

Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention. We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the implications closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.

Opposing position

Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. These might include the notions that it’s distracting for the individual, the class, and the instructor, and is often used to avoid the lesson and instead play games or go on social media.

Context for opposing position

Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we are fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions. We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction.

Your Position

Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker. We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive.

Context for your position

Here, we can provide examples that run contrary to the ones we used for the context of our opposition’s position. For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial. We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies.

Here, we would use the points we’ve established throughout the argument to appeal to our opposition and find some productive middle ground that benefits both parties. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures. We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning. We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities. This way, students will likely be paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish. However, once a class moves from lecture to activity (whether group or individual), students should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information. Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for these activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students.

100+ Rogerian Essay Topics

The domain of essay writing is rich with various formats, each serving a unique purpose. One such fascinating and thoughtful style is the Rogerian essay, often considered a middle ground in arguments. Unlike traditional persuasive essays, Rogerian essays focus on acknowledging and understanding opposing views, creating a space for compromise and mutual understanding.

Table of Contents

What is a Rogerian Essay?

A Rogerian essay stems from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers, the man behind the concept of ‘client-centered therapy.’ This essay style goes beyond the conventional win-lose argumentative strategies. Instead, it emphasizes understanding the opponent’s standpoint, recognizing its validity, and finding a common ground that allows for the reconciliation of opposing views. Essentially, the writer seeks a ‘win-win’ solution, nurturing empathy and cooperation rather than division and refutation.

Quick Guide: Choosing the Right Rogerian Essay Topic

Selecting an effective Rogerian essay topic is pivotal for the essay’s success. The key is finding a subject that represents genuinely differing perspectives, where common ground can be discovered. Here’s a quick guide:

Understand the Spectrum: Choose a topic with at least two clear, opposing viewpoints that are equally arguable.
Passion with Balance: Select an issue you are passionate about—but also willing to consider the opposing stance with empathy.
Complexity Matters: Opt for a topic complex enough to explore differing viewpoints yet not so polarized that finding common ground is impossible.
Research Potential: Ensure ample resources are available for research from both sides of the argument.
Relevance: Consider your audience and choose a relevant topic that resonates with them on a personal or societal level.

Compelling Rogerian Essay Topics Lists

Finding the right topic can be a journey. Below, we’ve compiled a list of intriguing topics to help you start:

Human Rights and Social Issues

The implications of same-sex marriages: societal viewpoints
Police brutality: Examining Systemic challenges and reforms
Capital punishment: ethical considerations versus societal security

Healthcare Debates

The vaccination debate: personal freedom and public health
Euthanasia: the right to die with dignity versus moral implications
Mental health: individual responsibility or societal issue?

Environmental Concerns

Climate change: economic advancement and environmental protection
Renewable energy: feasibility and economic implications
Animal rights: survival ethics versus humane treatment

Technology and Privacy

Internet censorship: security needs versus freedom of speech
Artificial intelligence: loss of jobs versus technological advancement
Data privacy: personal rights and national security concerns

Education Discourses

Standardized testing: measurement of ability or performance pressure?
Online education: the future of learning or an ineffective substitute?
College tuition: free education versus quality and value

Political and Economic Debates

Immigration policies: human rights and national boundaries
Globalization: cultural exchange versus national identity erosion
Universal basic income: economic empowerment or dependency?

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas

Gun control: individual rights versus public safety
Abortion: women’s rights versus ethical implications
Legalization of marijuana: medical use versus potential abuse

Cultural and Society Interactions

Social media: connectivity benefits versus mental health issues
Body image: individual expression versus societal standards
Cultural appropriation: appreciation or exploitation?

Cultural Dynamics

Traditional vs. Western Medicine: Benefits and Limitations
Home-schooling vs. Traditional Education: A Balance of Freedom and Structure
Multilingualism: Cultural Preservation vs. Globalization
Religion in Schools: Ethical Learning vs. Forced Indoctrination
East vs. West Cultural Norms: Pros and Cons of Different Societal Values

Science and Nature

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Advancements in Agriculture vs. Natural Purity
Animal Experimentation: Scientific Progress vs. Animal Rights
Space Exploration: Pursuit of Knowledge vs. Earthly Investments
Stem Cell Research: Medical Breakthroughs vs. Ethical Concerns
Conservation vs. Development: Balancing Nature and Progress

Health and Lifestyle

Vegetarianism: Health Benefits vs. Ethical Implications
Yoga vs. Traditional Exercise: Mental Wellness and Physical Fitness
Organic vs. Conventional Farming: Health Benefits and Economic Viability
Meditation and Modern Stress: New Age Solution or Ancient Wisdom?
Holistic Healing vs. Western Medicine: Complementary or Contradictory?

Media and Entertainment

Streaming vs. Traditional TV: Flexibility vs. Scheduled Programming
Online vs. Offline Reading: Digital Convenience or Tangible Experience?
Reality TV: Entertainment Value vs. Ethical Implications
Music Genres: Cultural Expression or Generational Divide?
Video Games: Cognitive Development vs. Violence and Addiction

Politics and Governance

Democracy vs. Authoritarianism: Freedom vs. Stability
Welfare State: Social Responsibility vs. Individual Accountability
Public vs. Private Healthcare: Accessibility vs. Quality
Lobbying: Political Expression vs. Undue Influence
Globalism vs. Nationalism: Shared Goals or Individual Identity?

Social Interactions and Relationships

Online Dating: Modern Convenience or Loss of Genuine Connection?
Social Networking: Building Bridges or Creating Isolation?
Work-Life Balance: Career Aspirations vs. Personal Fulfillment
Parenting Styles: Discipline vs. Freedom
Age vs. Youth: Experience and Wisdom vs. Innovation and Energy

Ethics and Morality

Artificial Intelligence Rights: Machines vs. Sentience
Censorship: Protection vs. Freedom of Speech
Genetic Engineering: Human Evolution or Playing God?
Civil Disobedience: Morality vs. Rule of Law
Charities: Altruism vs. Personal Gain

Economics and Commerce

Global Trade: Economic Growth vs. Local Industry Support
Cryptocurrency: Future of Finance or Bubble?
Consumerism: Economic Drive vs. Ethical Implications
Traditional vs. Online Retail: Experience vs. Convenience
Renewable Energy: Environment vs. Economic Costs

Technological Advancements

Augmented Reality vs. Real-World Experience: Enhancement or Detachment?
Driverless Cars: Safety Efficiency vs. Job Displacement Concerns
Digital Learning Tools: Innovative Education or Over-reliance on Technology?
Robotics in Healthcare: Efficiency vs. Human Touch and Care
Biometric Data: Security vs. Privacy Concerns

Travel and Exploration

Space Tourism: Futuristic Adventure vs. Earthly Priorities
Backpacking vs. Luxury Travel: Authentic Experience or Comfort?
Ecotourism: Environmental Awareness or Commercial Exploitation?
Solo vs. Group Travel: Independence or Shared Experiences?
Urban vs. Rural Tourism: Cultural Hubs or Serene Retreats?

Arts and Expression

Modern Art vs. Classical Art: Expression Evolution or Degradation?
Digital vs. Physical Books: Convenience or Sensory Experience?
Mainstream vs. Indie Music: Popularity or Authenticity?
Professional vs. Fan Fiction: Originality or Creative Expansion?
Theater vs. Cinema: Raw Performance or Visual Spectacle?
Urban Farming: Sustainability or Impracticality?
Fast Fashion vs. Sustainable Fashion: Affordability or Environmental Responsibility?
Zero Waste Movement: Realistic Lifestyle or Extreme Measure?
Ocean Cleanup Initiatives: Human Responsibility or Nature’s Resilience?
Plant-based Diets: Health and Environmental Concerns vs. Dietary Diversity

Your Next Step: Expert Assistance is Just a Click Away!

Understanding and integrating two sides of an argument requires skill, patience, and practice. If you feel overwhelmed, remember professional help is readily available. Our experienced essay writers at WriteOnDeadline are experts in crafting well-balanced, thoroughly researched, and compelling Rogerian essays. Elevate your essay by clicking here and accessing personalized, professional writing services designed to meet your specific needs!

Useful References

The Writing Center | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL)
Carl R. Rogers – Client-Centered Therapy | Simply Psychology

415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas

18 January 2024

last updated

Rogerian essay topics often delve into contentious issues, encouraging a balanced exploration of divergent perspectives. They may explore hot-button issues, like climate change, gun control, or immigration, always prioritizing empathetic understanding over rigid debate. Other topics can touch on social phenomena, like the impact of digital devices on mental health or the influence of video games on youth behavior. Cultural topics, examining norms, biases, and the effects of globalization, are also prevalent. The main purpose of these topics is not only to assert one’s viewpoint as the absolute truth but also to engage in a respectful, enlightening exchange of ideas. In turn, a good Rogerian essay topic can also discuss the complexities of educational reforms, healthcare systems, or artificial intelligence ethics, always encouraging nuanced discussion that illuminates common ground and cultivates mutual respect amidst differing viewpoints.

Best Rogerian Essay Topics

Influence of Technology on Modern Education
Adoption of Vegan Diets for Healthier Living
Expanding Renewable Energy Use to Combat Climate Change
Growth of Cryptocurrency in the Global Economy
Comparing Traditional and Digital Art Mediums
Examining Pros and Cons of Distance Learning
Prospects of Space Exploration for Human Civilization
Analyzing Therapeutic Use of Psychedelics
Scrutinizing Surveillance: Privacy vs. Security
Proliferation of Artificial Intelligence: A Blessing or a Curse
Resolving Cultural Conflicts Through Mutual Understanding
Evaluating the Influence of Social Media on Mental Health
Evolving Gender Roles in Contemporary Society
Debating Efficacy of Vaccines vs. Natural Immunity
Envisioning Universal Basic Income’s Effect on Society
Deliberating Genetic Modification in Agriculture
Integration of Virtual Reality in Everyday Life
Advancing Stem Cell Research for Medical Treatment
Revisiting Historical Facts and Interpretations
Deciphering Complexities of Quantum Computing
Contemplating the Existence of Extraterrestrial Life
Transitioning Toward Circular Economy: A Sustainable Choice
Revolutionizing Healthcare With Telemedicine
Improving Public Transport for Carbon-Neutral Cities

Easy Rogerian Topics

Assessing Ethical Dimensions of Animal Testing
Exploring Opportunities and Risks of Gene Editing
Emphasizing Holistic Development in Education System
Regulating Online Censorship: Freedom vs. Security
Mitigating Challenges of the Aging Population
Pursuing Sustainability in Fashion Industry
Confronting Implications of Overpopulation
Navigating Through Mental Health Stigmas
Enhancing Sports Performance With Technology
Addressing Disparities in Global Wealth Distribution
Transforming Societies With Women’s Empowerment
Understanding Neuromarketing: Manipulation or Effective Strategy
Adapting to the Impact of Automation on the Workforce
Exploring Intersectionality in Social Justice Movements
Analyzing the Effects of Tourism on Local Cultures
Demystifying Myths of Nuclear Energy
Negotiating Ethical Boundaries of Cloning
Outlining the Role of Play in Child Development
Reforming Prison Systems for Better Rehabilitation
Reimagining Urban Planning for Climate Resilience
Deconstructing Stereotypes in Mass Media
Illuminating the Role of Meditation in Stress Management
Weighing Pros and Cons of Monarchy and Democracy
Probing Influence of Music on Cognitive Development
Balancing Nationalism and Globalization in Modern World
Overcoming Biases in Artificial Intelligence
Effects of Multilingualism on Cognitive Abilities
Evaluating the Impacts of Single-Use Plastics on the Environment
Necessity of Mental Health Awareness in Schools
Augmenting Reality: Pros and Cons of AR in Education

Interesting Rogerian Topics

Decoding the Influence of Parenting Styles on Child Behavior
Benefits and Risks of Genetically Modified Foods
Roles of Community Gardens in Urban Environments
Impact of Microplastics on Aquatic Ecosystems
Accessibility and Importance of Clean Water in Developing Nations
Enhancing Accessibility in Public Spaces for Disabled Individuals
Significance of Indigenous Knowledge in Conservation Efforts
Assessing the Influence of Celebrity Culture on Youth
Potential of Vertical Farming in Urban Landscapes
Understanding the Phenomenon of Fast Fashion
Roles of Art Therapy in Mental Health Treatment
Influence of Binge-Watching on Social Behavior
Importance of Cybersecurity in the Digital Age
Roles of Music Therapy in Rehabilitation Programs
Impacts of Deforestation on Climate Change
Consequences of Child Labor on Society and Economy
Roles of Microfinance in Alleviating Poverty
Impacts of Gamification on Learning Outcomes
Importance of Data Privacy in the Internet Age
Influence of Classical Literature on Modern Society
Roles of Green Architecture in Sustainable Development
Decoding the Impact of Westernization on Non-Western Cultures
Evaluating the Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Business Success
Importance of Biodiversity Conservation for Human Survival
Roles of E-sports in Modern Entertainment Culture

Rogerian Argument Topics

Roles of Automation in Job Market Stability
Legalization of Recreational Marijuana: Pros and Cons
Adoption of Renewable Energy: A Solution to Climate Change
Universal Healthcare: Economic Burden or Moral Obligation?
Animal Rights in Industrialized Farming
Impacts of Video Games on Adolescent Behavior
GMO Foods: Threat or Solution to Global Hunger
Parental Involvement in Child’s Educational Success
Remote Work’s Effects on Employee Productivity
Zero-Waste Lifestyle: Sustainable or Unrealistic?
Homeschooling Versus Traditional Schooling
Death Penalty: A Necessary Deterrent or Inhumane Practice?
Influence of Violent Films on Society’s Aggression
Veganism as a Solution to Health and Environmental Concerns
Implications of Genetically Modified Organisms on Ecosystems
Capitalism Versus Socialism: Economic and Social Impacts
Gun Control: Safety Measures or Infringement on Rights?
Immigration Policies: National Security or Humanitarian Crisis?
Digital Privacy: Personal Protection or Hinderance to Law Enforcement?
Abortion Rights: Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?
Euthanasia: Compassionate Option or Ethical Dilemma?
Body Cameras on Police: Accountability or Invasion of Privacy?
Technological Dependency: Progress or Problem?

Rogerian Persuasive Topics

Exploring the Balance Between Privacy and National Security
The Role of Technology in Enhancing Education Quality
Advantages and Drawbacks of Autonomous Vehicles
Influence of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health
Potential Consequences of Extensive Genetically Modified Food Consumption
Considerations Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide
Climate Change: Evaluating Its Anthropogenic Causes
Implications of Universal Basic Income Implementation
Potential Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence
Digital Surveillance: Protection or Intrusion?
Animal Testing: Necessity vs. Cruelty
Impacts of Vegetarianism on Health and Environment
Fossil Fuels vs. Renewable Energy: An Economic Perspective
Stem Cell Research: Balancing Ethics and Progress
Mandatory Vaccinations: Public Health vs. Personal Liberty
Space Exploration: Is It Worth the Investment?
Regulation of Cryptocurrency: Necessity or Hindrance?
Unregulated Internet: Freedom or Chaos?
Responsible Tourism: Balancing Local Culture and Economic Growth
Immigration Policies: Humanitarian Concerns and National Security
Human Cloning: Ethical Implications and Potential Benefits
Gun Control: Balancing Public Safety and Constitutional Rights

Rogerian Essay Topics on Social Issues

The Impact of Global Warming on Coastal Regions
Achieving Gender Parity in the Workplace
Overcoming Poverty: Empowering Individuals for Social Transformation
Enhancing Mental Health Support Systems Within Educational Institutions
Promoting Renewable Energy Adoption for a Sustainable Future
Nurturing Inclusive Learning Environments for Students With Disabilities
Combating Food Insecurity: Establishing Accessible Nutritional Programs
Fostering Cross-Cultural Understanding in a Pluralistic Society
Promoting Ethical Practices in the Fashion and Apparel Industry
Resolving the Water Crisis: Sustainable Solutions for All Communities
Reducing Income Inequality Through Equitable Taxation Policies
Bridging the Digital Divide: Ensuring Universal Internet Connectivity
Combating Human Trafficking: Safeguarding Vulnerable Populations
Addressing Affordable Housing for Every Citizen
Supporting LGBTQ+ Rights: Cultivating an Inclusive Society
Ensuring Access to Quality Healthcare in Underserved Areas
Preventing Cyberbullying: Fostering Safer Online Environments
Encouraging Responsible Consumption to Mitigate Climate Change
Improving Prison Rehabilitation Programs for Successful Reintegration
Combating Substance Abuse: Adopting Holistic Recovery Approaches
Focusing on Civic Education to Foster Active Citizenship
Understanding Small Enterprises for Economic Growth
Solving Gun Violence Through Comprehensive Firearms Regulation

Education Rogerian Essay Topics

Nurturing Creativity and Critical Thinking Skills in Education
Promoting Inclusivity and Diversity Within Educational Institutions
Cultivating Effective Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
The Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Education
Empowering Students Through Student-Centered Learning Approaches
Enhancing Early Childhood Education for Lifelong Success
Addressing the Achievement Gap: Strategies for Equal Opportunities
Implementing Project-Based Learning for Real-World Applications
The Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Educational Attainment
Rethinking Standardized Testing: Alternative Assessment Methods
Supporting Special Education Students: Individualized Approaches
The Influence of Arts Education on Overall Academic Performance
Integrating Multiculturalism in the Curriculum
Parental Involvement: A Key to Student Achievement
Promoting Environmental Awareness in Education for a Sustainable Future
Benefits of Physical Education in Holistic Development
Fostering Digital Literacy Skills for the 21st-Century Learner
Effects of Assignments on Student Learning and Well-Being
Early Intervention Programs: A Path to Educational Success
Addressing Learning Disabilities: Strategies for Support and Achievement
The Impact of Teacher Training and Professional Development
Building Resilience and Perseverance in Students for Academic Success
Promoting Global Citizenship in Education for a Connected World
The Role of Education in Cultivating Responsible Citizenship

Technology Rogerian Essay Topics

Enhancing Communication Through Social Media Platforms
The Future of Autonomous Vehicles
Harnessing Renewable Energy Sources for Sustainable Development
Analyzing the Role of Big Data in Healthcare
Implications of 3D Printing in Manufacturing
The Evolution of E-Commerce and Its Economic Effects
Psychological Effects of Video Games
Unleashing the Potential of Blockchain Technology
Robotics’ Roles in Enhancing Healthcare Services
Cybersecurity: Protecting Data in a Digitized World
Influence of Smart Devices on Human Behavior
Augmented Reality’s Use in Marketing and Advertising
Cloud Computing’s Impact on Business Operations
Ethical Considerations in Genetic Engineering
Artificial Intelligence’s Roles in Enhancing Education
Social Impacts of Online Streaming Platforms
Advancements in Nanotechnology and Their Applications
Effects of Social Media on Mental Health
Integrating Wearable Technology in Healthcare
Future of Space Exploration and Colonization
Algorithms’ Role in Decision-Making Processes
Rise of Voice Assistants and Virtual Personalities
The Intersection of Technology and Sustainability
Exploring the Potential of Quantum Computing

Rogerian Essay Topics on Health Care

Promoting Healthy Aging and Longevity in the Elderly Population
Implementing Effective Strategies for Obesity Prevention and Management
The Importance of Patient-Centered Care in Healthcare Systems
Advancements in Precision Medicine and Personalized Healthcare
Strategies for Promoting Health Literacy among Patients
Ethical Considerations in Organ Transplantation and Allocation
Fostering Cultural Competence in Healthcare Delivery
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Decision-Making
Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections Through Effective Measures
The Role of Nursing in Enhancing Quality Healthcare Delivery
Improving Palliative Care Services for Terminally Ill Patients
Addressing the Opioid Crisis: Strategies for Pain Management
Social Determinants of Health: Implications for Healthcare Outcomes
Ensuring Health Equity in Access to Healthcare Services
Innovations in Remote Patient Monitoring Technology
Healthcare Policy: Ensuring Affordable and Accessible Care
Integrating Complementary and Alternative Approaches Into Healthcare
Ethical Considerations of Genetic Testing and Counseling in Healthcare
Public Health Initiatives: Promoting Disease Prevention and Well-Being
Promoting Health Literacy among Adolescent Populations
Enhancing Healthcare Workforce Diversity and Cultural Competence
Exploring the Global Impact of Medical Tourism on Healthcare Systems
Benefits and Challenges of Universal Healthcare Coverage

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family & Relationship

Building Trust and Trustworthiness in Intimate Relationships
Nurturing Emotional Intelligence for Healthier Family Dynamics
Fostering Mutual Respect in Parent-Child Relationships
Balancing Independence and Interdependence in Sibling Relationships
Promoting Equality and Gender Equity in Family Structures
Cultivating Empathy in Intergenerational Relationships
Embracing Diversity and Cultural Differences Within Family Units
Enhancing Emotional Intimacy Through Active Listening in Romantic Relationships
Addressing Addiction and Its Impact on Family Dynamics
Understanding the Role of Boundaries in Healthy Family Relationships
Exploring the Impact of Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships
Promoting Mental Health and Well-Being in Family Settings
Navigating Blended Families: Challenges and Solutions
Examining the Influence of Technology on Family Relationships
Exploring the Significance of Rituals and Traditions in Family Life
Supporting Aging Parents and Elderly Relatives With Empathy and Care
Nurturing Resilience in Children for Healthy Development
Examining the Effects of Domestic Violence on Family Dynamics
Supporting LGBTQ+ Family Members: Acceptance and Understanding
Promoting Positive Co-Parenting Strategies After Separation or Divorce
Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Relationships With Family
Fostering Emotional Safety in Parenting Styles
Understanding the Role of Extended Family in Child Rearing
Embracing Work-Life Balance for Stronger Family Connections
Promoting Healthy Attachment in Parent-Child Relationships

Rogerian Essay Topics on Education Reforms

Fostering Creativity and Innovation in the Classroom
Addressing the Achievement Gap in Underprivileged Schools
Rethinking Standardized Testing in Educational Assessment
Supporting Teachers’ Professional Development and Well-Being
Integrating Technology for Effective Learning in Schools
Reducing Class Sizes for Improved Student Engagement
Strengthening Early Childhood Education Programs
Empowering Students’ Voices and Agency in Decision-Making
Enhancing Cultural Competence in the Curriculum
Promoting Environmental Education and Sustainability
Addressing Bullying and Promoting Safe School Environments
Reducing Homework Load for Student Well-Being
Improving School Infrastructure and Facilities
Implementing Comprehensive Sex Education in Schools
Encouraging Parental Involvement in Education
Bridging the Digital Divide in Underserved Communities
Promoting Multilingual Education for Language Diversity
Integrating Social and Emotional Learning in Schools
Supporting Gifted and Talented Education Programs
Strengthening Career Counseling and Guidance Services
Focusing on Teacher-Student Relationships for Academic Success
Promoting Financial Literacy Education in Schools
Fostering Global Citizenship Education for a Connected World
Addressing Mental Health in Schools Through Comprehensive Programs
Understanding Experiential Learning Opportunities for Students
Using Ethical Education for Responsible Citizenship

Globalization Rogerian Essay Topics

Ethical Dilemmas in a Globalized World
Effects of Global Economic Integration on Traditional Industries
Power Dynamics in the Era of Globalization
Globalization and the Spread of Western Ideals
Influence of Globalization on Education Systems
Rise of Multinational Corporations in a Globalized Economy
Sovereignty Challenges in the Context of Global Economic Integration
Government’s Roles in Regulating Global Trade
Addressing the Digital Divide in a Globalized Society
Cultural Homogenization and Global Economic Integration
Consumerism in the Age of Globalization
Globalization’s Impacts on Healthcare Systems
Language Shifts in a Globalized World
Globalization and Income Inequality
Transformation of Food Systems in a Globalized Economy
Globalization’s Influence on Entertainment and Media
Decline of Traditional Crafts in the Globalized Era
Globalization’s Contribution to Climate Change
Displacement of Indigenous Communities in a Globalized World
Development Challenges in the Era of Globalization
Gender Equality in the Globalized Society
Protecting Cultural Heritage in the Face of Globalization
Political Instability in the Context of Global Economic Integration

Rogerian Essay Topics About Gender & Sexuality

Evaluating the Effects of Gender-Based Violence on Society
Rethinking Traditional Gender Roles in the Workplace
Examining the Intersectionality of Gender and Race
Addressing the Challenges Faced by Transgender Individuals in Healthcare
The Importance of Inclusive Language in Promoting Gender Equality
Challenging Heteronormativity in Society
Examining the Influence of Religion on LGBTQ+ Acceptance
Understanding the Gender Pay Gap: Causes and Solutions
Effects of Gender Socialization on Children’s Development
Analyzing the Relationship Between Gender and Mental Health
The Role of Masculinity in Shaping Men’s Health Issues
Exploring Non-Binary Gender Identities and Experiences
Examining the Representation of LGBTQ+ Characters in Media
Promoting Supportive Environments for LGBTQ+ Youth
Rethinking Consent Education: A Gender-Inclusive Approach
Understanding the Stigma and Discrimination Faced by LGBTQ+ Seniors
Exploring Gendered Expectations in Romantic Relationships
Promoting Comprehensive Sexual Education for All Genders
The Impact of Gender-Based Expectations on Career Choices
Examining the History and Evolution of LGBTQ+ Rights Movements
The Intersection of Gender and Disability: Challenges and Advocacy
Analyzing the Role of Gender in Political Representation
Rethinking Gender Equality in Sports: Breaking Barriers
The Importance of Intersectional Approaches to Gender and Sexuality

Rogerian Essay Topics About Animal Rights

Animal Welfare in Scientific Research and Experimentation
The Moral Dilemma of Animal Agriculture
Animal Rights and the Ethics of Hunting
Animal-Assisted Therapy: Enhancing Human Well-Being With Animal Companions
Animal Genetic Engineering: Implications and Ethical Concerns
Ethical Fashion: Animal Rights and the Fur and Leather Industry
Cruelty-Free Cosmetics: Ensuring Ethical Standards in the Beauty Industry
Marine Parks and Animal Rights: Examining Captivity and Conservation
Indigenous Cultures and the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Animal Rights Activism: Strategies for Effective Advocacy
Responsible Pet Ownership: Promoting Animal Welfare and Rights
Responsible Wildlife Tourism: Respecting Animals in Their Natural Habitat
Endangered Species Conservation: Protecting Animals on the Brink
Animal Rights Laws: Challenges and the Need for Enforcement
Animal Rehabilitation: Providing Refuge and Care for Injured Animals
Ethics in Sports and Entertainment: The Use of Animals for Human Amusement
Advancements in Biomedical Research: Ethical Implications for Animal Subjects
Animal-Assisted Therapy: Harnessing the Healing Power of Animals
Traditional Entertainment vs. Animal Welfare: The Circus Industry Debate
Whaling Industry: Conservation Efforts and Ethical Dilemmas
Animal Sanctuaries: Rescuing and Protecting Vulnerable Animals
Animal Rights Organizations: Achievements and Ongoing Challenges
Ethical Considerations in Pharmaceutical Testing: The Welfare of Animal Subjects

Gun Control Rogerian Essay Topics

Exploring Alternative Approaches to Firearms Control
Ensuring Second Amendment Rights and Public Safety
Achieving a Balance: Individual Freedom and Gun Ownership
Psychological Factors and Firearm Ownership Regulations
Media’s Impacts on Public Perception of Guns
Education’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
Developing Comprehensive Background Check Systems
Community-Based Solutions for Firearms Control
Addressing Mental Health in Gun Violence Prevention
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Assault Weapons Bans
Firearms Ownership and Self-Defense in a Changing Society
Ethical Considerations in Policies on Firearms Control
Combating Illegal Firearms Trafficking
Enhancing Firearm Safety Measures and Responsible Storage
Cultural Perspectives on Firearms Control and Ownership
Gun Control and Its Implications for Civil Liberties
Firearms Control as a Public Health Issue
Technological Advancements in Enhancing Gun Safety
Assessing the Influence of Lobbying Groups on Firearms Policies
International Perspectives on Firearms Control
Exploring the Link Between Gun Control and Domestic Violence
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Gun-Free Zones
Balancing State and Federal Authority in Firearm Regulations
Law Enforcement’s Roles in Preventing Gun Violence
Historical Contexts and Legislation on Firearms Control
Youth Access to Firearms and Preventive Measures

Business Rogerian Essay Topics

Analyzing the Role of Leadership in Promoting Organizational Innovation
Exploring Sustainable Business Models for Environmental Conservation
Evaluating the Effects of Ethical Consumerism on Business Operations
Addressing the Gender Pay Gap in the Corporate Sector
Fostering Effective Communication Strategies in Virtual Work Environments
Examining the Benefits of Workplace Diversity for Business Performance
Enhancing Employee Engagement Through Empowerment and Inclusion
Implementing Green Initiatives for Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Business Efficiency
Promoting Work-Life Balance for Employee Well-Being and Productivity
Embracing Change Management for Successful Business Transformation
Explaining the Influence of E-Commerce on Traditional Retail Industries
The Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Financial Fraud
Addressing the Importance of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership
Developing Effective Marketing Strategies for Small Businesses
Evaluating the Implications of Data Privacy Regulations on Business Practices
Enhancing Customer Experience Through Personalization and Customization
Assessing the Benefits and Challenges of Remote Work Arrangements
The Impact of Globalization on Local Business Communities
Promoting Entrepreneurship as a Driver of Economic Growth
Understanding the Role of Corporate Culture in Organizational Success
Expanding on the Benefits of Cross-Functional Collaboration in Business
Focusing on the Mental Health Challenges in the Workplace
Addressing the Role of Corporate Ethics in Building Trust With Stakeholders
Implementing Cybersecurity Measures to Protect Business Data

Rogerian Essay Topics About Culture & Society

Balancing Immigration Policies: Security and Compassion
Exploring Cultural Appropriation: Boundaries and Respect
Education’s Roles in Shaping Cultural Identity
Coexistence and Religious Freedom in Diverse Societies
Global Responsibility: Environmental Sustainability
Pop Culture’s Impacts on Societal Values
Combating Mental Health Stigma: Raising Awareness and Acceptance
Technological Advancements: Shaping Society’s Future
Multiculturalism and Integration: Challenges and Opportunities
Empowering Individuals Through Political Activism
Modern Society’s Evolving Family Structures
Art’s Roles in Reflecting and Shaping Culture
Navigating Media Bias in the Era of Misinformation
Cultural Identity in a Globalized World
LGBTQ+ Rights: Progress, Challenges, and Aspirations
Consumerism’s Societal and Environmental Impacts
Traditional Rituals: Significance in Contemporary Culture
Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology Access and Social Equality
Embracing Workplace Diversity for Inclusive Progress
Fashion’s Influence on Cultural Expression
Social Justice Movements: Catalysts for Change
Sports’ Roles in Cultivating Cultural Identity
Civic Engagement: Strengthening Democracy and Society
Addressing the Needs of an Aging Society
Cultural Relativism vs. Universal Human Rights

To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles

277 feminism topics & women’s rights essay topics, 447 position paper topics & essay ideas.

The Rogerian Method: A Practical Guide to Effective Persuasion

People have studied and practiced the art of persuasion for centuries. As a result, they have developed various methods of conventional persuasive structures and techniques to present arguments. One such method is the Rogerian argument. A Rogerian way of argumentation aims to identify comparable perspectives between opposing viewpoints. This article will explore the Rogerian argument model and its application in essay writing, including its use in a rhetorical analysis essay.

The Rogerian argument is based on the principles of Rogerian communication, named after psychologist Carl Rogers. It seeks to understand the opposition of the audience. A Rogerian argument assumes that each party in a debate has similar moral qualities and can work together to find an acceptable solution. The Rogerian argument method is different from a traditional argument approach. The classical argument sets up a composition that aims to persuade the audience. In the case of the Rogerian argument, the author prioritizes shared interests and works towards finding a mutual solution. By acknowledging the validity of each point, the writer creates a productive dialogue.

In conclusion, the Rogerian argument method provides a unique and effective approach to writing essays. It prioritizes finding shared interests and shared priorities. By focusing on dialogue, cooperation, and compromise, the Rogerian strategy attempts to find overlapping interests. It does so by identifying mutually beneficial objectives and goals. With the right guidance from argumentative essay writers , you can use Rogerian argumentation in your essay. And also promote rhetoric discovery and change.

In the following sections, we will define the Rogerian argument model and explain its structure in detail. It offers tips on how to use it effectively in essay writing, including how to write a Rogerian essay in writing classes.

Definitions of the Rogerian Model

In this section, we will define Rogerian argument model. This method of argumentation seeks to establish mutual objectives between opinions. Psychologist Carl Rogers is the namesake of Rogerian rhetoric. The argument method involves three main parts: preface, body, and conclusion.

Emotionally charged topics need even more attention to audience analysis. You should approach such topics with sensitivity and respect. Take the time to understand the audience or reader’s perspective accurately. By doing so, writers can tailor their arguments to appeal to the reader’s values and beliefs. This can lead to a more productive and respectful dialogue, which will increase the likelihood of finding valid solutions.

The body of the argument paper is where the Rogerian approaches shine. By acknowledging the major barrier, the writer earns the trust of the audience. This approach helps to build a bridge between the two positions.

The conclusion of the Rogerian argument should highlight the two shared values and priorities. It should also propose an alternative solution that accommodates both viewpoints. Following the Rogerian argumentative essay outline can help writers effectively use this technique and promote constructive conflict resolution.

A Rogerian argument is a powerful tool for building bridges between the opposition. Additionally, rhetorical devices tend to be less aggressive than traditional or classical argument. In the next section, we will discuss the structure of the essay in more detail.

Finished papers

Customer reviews

Structure of Essay with Rogerian Method Argumentation

The structure of a Rogerian argument composition is distinct from that of a conventional argumentative essay. The argument begins with the foreword. Here the writer acknowledges the opposition to establish credibility. The conventional structure argumentative essay presents an opposing position, with the writer trying to persuade the audience to adopt their view. In contrast, a Rogerian essay aims to find similar perspectives between opposing viewpoints.

The structure has six main parts: Rogerian argument begins with an introduction. Then comes position 1, transition, position 2, reconciliation, and conclusion. This structure helps the writer to present the opposition fairly and objectively. In this type of writing, the writer also shows readiness to compromise in search of shared interests. In the next sections, we will explore each part of the Rogerian argument example.

Introduction

In a Rogerian argument, the intro is an important stage. The writer not only presents the topic but also acknowledges the other side to establish credibility. This section should also create a sense of goodwill and a willingness to find mutual objectives, setting the tone for the rest of the essay. The Rogerian approach in the introduction sets the stage for the writer’s intention to find a valid acceptable solution together, rather than merely winning an argument. This approach helps to avoid creating an adversarial relationship between the writer and the reader. It also leads to a more productive dialogue.

In the next section, Position 1 of the Rogerian argument, the writer presents the first opposing position or argument. This section should be presented fairly and objectively, without any bias. The writer should explain the opponent’s position thoroughly. For example, by providing supporting evidence for their point. This section is critical because it demonstrates that the writer has taken the time to understand the opposition accurately and can present it effectively to the reader. A Rogerian essay example can be helpful in understanding how to present an opposing view without bias.

In the Rogerian argument structure, the transition section plays a critical role in the essay. This section is where the writer moves from position 1 to position 2 while highlighting the common goals and goals that both viewpoints have in common, which can facilitate finding a valid solution and ultimately help to find the middle ground. By focusing on overlapping values, the writer makes it easier to bridge the gap between opposing positions and find the middle between them. The transition section is an essential part of the Rogerian argument, emphasizing the importance of identifying and acknowledging the overlapping interests and goals of both parties.

In the next section of the Rogerian argument composition, Position 2, the other side or argument is introduced. In this section, you write counterargument in essay. Present the opposing viewpoint fairly and objectively, just like position 1. The writer should explain the position in detail and provide supporting evidence for their argument. This approach ensures that the writer gives equal attention and consideration to both oppositions, which is key to creating a more productive dialogue and finding a valid solution. By acknowledging and addressing both sides of the issue, the writer can build trust and understanding of the reader’s perspective and promote a more collaborative approach to problem-solving.

Reconciliation

In the reconciliation section of a Rogerian essay, the writer aims to bring the two opposing viewpoints closer together. This section is where the writer identifies and highlights the overlapping interests, perspectives, and goals that both viewpoints have in common. By highlighting the mutual objectives between the two positions, the writer creates an atmosphere of goodwill and cooperation in the reconciliation section of the essay. In this paragraph, the writer presents an example of a solution that could be acceptable to both parties. This approach is critical because it shows that the writer is willing to work towards finding a mutual solution for both parties rather than trying to win an argument.

The conclusion should summarize the main points and emphasize the converging opinions and overlapping interests between the two positions. It should also underline the benefits of working towards a mutual solution and demonstrate that the writer is willing to compromise. Overall, The Rogerian argument method is an effective tool for finding solutions that satisfy both parties by prioritizing common goals and finding a middle ground.

The Rogerian argument method provides a unique and effective approach to writing essays. By focusing on finding overlapping perspectives and shared priorities, the writer can build a strong case that is both persuasive and respectful of opposing viewpoints. This approach encourages dialogue and cooperation between opposing parties, leading to a more productive and beneficial outcome for all involved. The Rogerian argument method can promote rhetoric discovery and change.

If you are struggling with writing an argumentative essay using the Rogerian approach, consider seeking help from a professional writer or tutor who can write your argumentative essay for you, or even buy argumentative essays online. To find appropriate topics for a Rogerian essay, consider one that you are passionate about.

Tips on How to Use Rogerian Argumentation in Essay

In the Rogerian essay example, it’s crucial to understand the method’s purpose and structure and know how to write a Rogerian argument effectively. Here are some tips on how to use Rogerian argumentation effectively in an essay:

Acknowledge the Opposition. While using the Rogerian argument method, acknowledge the opposition. This helps you to establish credibility with the audience. The Rogerian approach in the introduction sets the stage for the writer’s intention to find a mutually acceptable solution than merely winning an argument.
Find middle ground. The writer should focus on identifying and acknowledging the overlapping interests. This approach makes it easier to bridge the gap between opposing stances and find a shared point. The writer should suggest an example of a solution that could be acceptable to both parties. The author should also emphasize the importance of finding a mutual solution between the opposing views of the reader.
Be collaborative . Seek common ground and explore the context of the opposing position respectfully and constructively. The writer’s position should be accompanied by a differing opinion.
Consensus Building. Emphasizing consensual beliefs and goals is a crucial aspect of the Rogerian argument. Incorporating opponents’ positions and presenting them impartially support finding common ground. By highlighting an example of a solution, a willing writer shows they are not merely giving lip service to finding an acceptable solution.
Shared solutions. Understand the context in which the opposing viewpoints were formed. By doing so, you can better comprehend how to write a Rogerian argument essay example in your writing classroom. The goal is not to attack or belittle the reader’s position. Instead, you have to find common ground and propose acceptable solutions. Avoid using inflammatory language, as it may make it harder to establish goodwill. Instead, argue, and remain calm and respectful. And focus on the areas of agreement between the two positions. This approach will help build trust with the willing reader and foster productive dialogue.

In a Rogerian essay example, finding overlapping perspectives is the main goal. By considering the reader’s perspective, custom essay writers create a dialogue toward a solution. This way, they tailor their arguments to appeal to the reader’s values and beliefs. It resulted in a persuasive and respectful essay.

To conclude, the Rogerian argument method let essays prioritize shared points. The Rogerian style mostly focuses on finding a compromise and a common ground. As such, it can help resolve conflicts and find answers or alternative solutions. If you find the Rogerian method overwhelming, ask professionals to write your argumentative essay for you. With the right guidance, you can effectively use Rogerian argumentation in your essay. And also promote rhetoric discovery and change.

How To Write A Good Compare And Contrast Essay: Topics, Examples And Step-by-step Guide

How to Write a Scholarship Essay

How to Write the Methods Section for a Research Paper: Effective Writing Guide
Explaining Appeal to Ignorance Fallacy with Demonstrative Examples

Improve your writing with our guides

Definition Essay: The Complete Guide with Essay Topics and Examples

Critical Essay: The Complete Guide. Essay Topics, Examples and Outlines

Get 15% off your first order with edusson.

Connect with a professional writer within minutes by placing your first order. No matter the subject, difficulty, academic level or document type, our writers have the skills to complete it.

100% privacy. No spam ever.

Argument Essay

Rogerian argument.

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise on a controversial issue.

If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives:

1. Introduce the author and work Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first sentence:

Here is an example:

In Dwight Okita’s “In Response to Executive Order 9066,” the narrator addresses an inevitable by-product of war – racism.

The first time you refer to the author, refer to him or her by his or her full name. After that, refer to the author by last name only. Never refer to an author by his or her first name only.

2. Provide the audience a short but concise summary of the work to which you are responding Remember, your audience has already read the work you are responding to. Therefore, you do not need to provide a lengthy summary. Focus on the main points of the work to which you are responding and use direct quotations sparingly. Direct quotations work best when they are powerful and compelling.

3. State the main issue addressed in the work Your thesis, or claim, will come after you summarize the two sides of the issue.

The Introduction

The following is an example of how the introduction of a Rogerian argument can be written. The topic is racial profiling.

In Dwight Okita’s “In Response to Executive Order 9066,” the narrator — a young Japanese-American — writes a letter to the government, who has ordered her family into a relocation camp after Pearl Harbor. In the letter, the narrator details the people in her life, from her father to her best friend at school. Since the narrator is of Japanese descent, her best friend accuses her of “trying to start a war” (18). The narrator is seemingly too naïve to realize the ignorance of this statement, and tells the government that she asked this friend to plant tomato seeds in her honor. Though Okita’s poem deals specifically with World War II, the issue of race relations during wartime is still relevant. Recently, with the outbreaks of terrorism in the United States, Spain, and England, many are calling for racial profiling to stifle terrorism. The issue has sparked debate, with one side calling it racism and the other calling it common sense.

Once you have written your introduction, you must now show the two sides to the debate you are addressing. Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Summarize each side, then provide a middle path. Your summary of the two sides will be your first two body paragraphs. Use quotations from outside sources to effectively illustrate the position of each side.

An outline for a Rogerian argument might look like this:

Introduction

Since the goal of Rogerian argument is to find a common ground between two opposing positions, you must identify the shared beliefs or assumptions of each side. In the example above, both sides of the racial profiling issue want the U.S. A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side, and tries to accommodate both. Again, using the racial profiling example above, both sides desire a safer society, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race; an effective start would be to use more screening technology on public transportation. Once you have a claim that disarms the central dispute, you should support the claim with evidence, and quotations when appropriate.

Quoting Effectively

Remember, you should quote to illustrate a point you are making. You should not, however, quote to simply take up space. Make sure all quotations are compelling and intriguing: Consider the following example. In “The Danger of Political Correctness,” author Richard Stein asserts that, “the desire to not offend has now become more important than protecting national security” (52). This statement sums up the beliefs of those in favor of profiling in public places.

The Conclusion

Your conclusion should:

Bring the essay back to what is discussed in the introduction
Tie up loose ends
End on a thought-provoking note

The following is a sample conclusion:

Though the debate over racial profiling is sure to continue, each side desires to make the United States a safer place. With that goal in mind, our society deserves better security measures than merely searching a person who appears a bit dark. We cannot waste time with such subjective matters, especially when we have technology that could more effectively locate potential terrorists. Sure, installing metal detectors and cameras on public transportation is costly, but feeling safe in public is priceless.

Permission granted from Michael Franco at Writing Essay 4: Rogerian Argument

Rogerian Argument. Authored by : Robin Parent. Provided by : Utah State University English Department. Project : USU Open CourseWare Initiative. License : CC BY-NC-SA: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

English Composition II - ENGL 1213

Choosing An Issue
Find eBooks
Find Articles
Search Tips
Write It, Cite It
Ask a Librarian
The Research Proposal
The Annotated Bibliography
Essay 1 - The Classical Argument

Requirements

Method of organization, writing prompt.

Essay 3 - The Toulmin Essay Argument

The purpose of Essay 2 is to construct a Rogerian Argument. Students will use research skills and rhetorical analysis to investigate conflicting viewpoints on an issue with state or national impact. By addressing conflicting viewpoints fairly, accurately, and empathetically, the result of a Rogerian Argument is a compromise-based solution that reduces the conflict and resolves at least pare of the issue. Rogerian argument skills can be used in academic writing, interpersonal communications, and professional environments.

The essay should include the folllowing:

3 to 4 pages (double-spaced), not including the Works Cited page
In-text citations in the body of the essay
Works Cited page with your credible sources
A minimum of 4 sources

To complete this assignment, you should:

Utilize invention techniques : Before writing the essay, begin identifying your issue through a series of invention techniques, including but not limited to the following: brainstorming, listing, clustering, questioning, and conducting preliminary research.
Plan and organize your essay : After the invention process, it is important to begin planning the organizational pattern for the essay. Planning includes identifying your thesis, establishing main ideas (or topic sentences) for each paragraph, supporting each paragraph with appropriate evidence, and creating ideas for the introductory and concluding paragraphs.
Draft and revise your essay : Once you have completed the planning process, write a rough draft of your essay. Next, take steps to improve, polish, and revise your draft before turning it in for a final grade. The revision process includes developing ideas, ensuring the thesis statement connects to the main ideas of each paragraph, taking account of your evidence and supporting details, checking for proper use of MLA citation style, reviewing source integration, avoiding plagiarism, and proofreading for formatting and grammatical errors.
Submit a polished, academic level essay.
An introduction paragraph that provides history and context for the issue and provides an overview of the controversy surrounding it.
A body paragraph that accurately and objectively explains the viewpoint of Side A.
A body paragraph that empathetically validates strong aspects of the viewpoint of Side A.
A body paragraph that accurately and objectively explains the viewpoint of Side B.
A body paragraph that empathetically validates strong aspects of the viewpoint of Side B.
One or more body paragraphs to achieve the following: concede the imperfection of Side B; identify aspect(s) of Side B that benefit both sides; propose a productive and feasible compromise based on common goals or values.
A conclusion paragraph that concisely reviews the strongest points of both sides, identifies common goals and/or values, and reminds both sides that the proposed compromise satisfies at least part of the common goal.

Use the same topic you wrote about for your Classical Argument Essay. With an objective mindset, your assignment is to consider the goals and values of at least two viewpoints on the topic by conducting further research. Your research should focus on the state- or national-level impact of the issue. This activity will help you develop a holistic understanding of the issue and the source of the conflict between viewpoints. Your goal in the essay is to objectively describe multiple viewpoints on the topic, then to present a feasible solution of compromise that helps to reduce the conflict and moves towards a resolution of the issue.

<< Previous: Essay 1 - The Classical Argument
Next: Essay 3 - The Toulmin Essay Argument >>
Last Updated: Mar 1, 2024 4:41 PM
URL: https://libguides.occc.edu/comp2

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

IV. Types of Argumentation

4.5 Rogerian Argument

Terri Pantuso

As discussed in the previous section, for Toulmin, argumentation is an attempt to justify a statement or a set of statements and focuses solely upon proving those statements. But what happens when you can concede that your opponent has a valid point? Because we are complex creatures, humans oftentimes find themselves strongly opposed to something that later changes for them once they are presented with different evidence. While many arguments can seemingly be based upon emotions alone, when presented with logical evidence to refute our position we may experience a crisis of conscience. Is it possible to hold firmly to one belief yet concede that the opposing side has merit? There is a way if you utilize the Rogerian method for argumentation.

Carl Rogers (1902-1987) was an American psychologist and clinical therapist who utilized a humanistic (client-centered) approach to psychology. When applied to argumentation, the Rogerian method makes use of examining counterarguments as enhancements, or concessions, rather than viewing them as completely oppositional. According to Lunsford et al., “Rogers argued that people involved in disputes should not respond to each other until they [can] fully, fairly, and even sympathetically state the other person’s position.” [1] Rogers’ non confrontational methods, when applied to argumentation in rhetoric, suggests that the most personal feelings are also the most common and, therefore, are the most likely to be understood.

One benefit to utilizing a Rogerian approach in composition studies is that it encourages the writer/arguer to build a bridge towards oppositional positions. This does not mean that you abandon your own position, and it does not mean that your position is weak. Rather, a Rogerian approach provides alternative perspectives for considering a given position as well as methods for responding to counterarguments that might seem to refute your major premise .

Much like the Toulmin method, the Rogerian method relies upon claims that can be supported with evidence (data). How the Rogerian method differs is in the concession where, if there is a strong, valid argument that refutes your claim, you concede that argument might be a valid point in a different context. Or, perhaps you concede that a portion of your opponent’s argument is valid for your position, yet point out how the circumstances differ, therefore making your position the most logical, strongest one for your given topic. While the goal remains to persuade your reader/audience to view your position as valid, when utilizing the Rogerian method you build common ground to other possibilities and demonstrate that counterviews are not entirely wrong.

When used in argumentation, the Rogerian method allows for a dialogue to occur surrounding an issue. By examining counterarguments to your claims, you are able to view your position/ thesis from a different point of view. Understanding all (or most) of the points surrounding your given topic will strengthen your own position as you will create a more fully informed essay.

Andrea Lunsford, John J. Ruszkiewicz, and Keith Walters, Everything’s an Argument, 8th ed. (Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2018), 139. ↵

A human-centered approach or perspective to an issue.

The basic assumptions or understanding on which an argument is based or from which conclusions are drawn. A major premise is a statement of universal truth or common knowledge. A minor premise is a statement related to a major premise but concerns a specific situation.

A statement, usually one sentence, that summarizes an argument that will later be explained, expanded upon, and developed in a longer essay or research paper. In undergraduate writing, a thesis statement is often found in the introductory paragraph of an essay. The plural of thesis is theses .

Rogerian Argument: Definition and Examples

An Introduction to Punctuation
Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia
M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester
B.A., English, State University of New York

Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric , Rogerian argumentation , Rogerian persuasion , and empathic listening .

Whereas traditional argument focuses on winning , the Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution.

The Rogerian model of argument was adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by the composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" (1970).

Aims of Rogerian Argument

The authors of "Rhetoric: Discovery and Change" explain the process this way:

"The writer who uses the Rogerian strategy attempts to do three things: (1) to convey to the reader that he is understood, (2) to delineate the area within which he believes the reader's position to be valid, and (3) to induce him to believe that he and the writer share similar moral qualities (honesty, integrity, and good will) and aspirations (the desire to discover a mutually acceptable solution). We stress here that these are only tasks, not stages of the argument. Rogerian argument has no conventional structure; in fact, users of the strategy deliberately avoid conventional persuasive structures and techniques because these devices tend to produce a sense of threat, precisely what the writer seeks to overcome....

"The goal of Rogerian argument is to create a situation conducive to cooperation; this may well involve changes in Format of Rogerian Argument.

When presenting your case and the case of the other side, the style is flexible with how you set up your information and how long you spend on each section. But you do want to be balanced—spending an inordinate amount of time on your position and only giving lip service to the other side, for example, defeats the purpose of using the Rogerian style. The ideal format of a written Rogerian persuasion looks something like this (Richard M. Coe, "Form and Substance: An Advanced Rhetoric." Wiley, 1981):

Introduction : Present the topic as a problem to solve together, rather than an issue.
Opposing position : State the opinion of your opposition in an objective manner that's fair and accurate, so the "other side" knows that you understand its position.
Context for the opposing position : Show the opposition that you understand under what circumstances its position is valid .
Your position : Present your position objectively. Yes, you want to be convincing, but you want the opposition to see it with clarity and fairly as well, just as you presented its position earlier.
Context for your position : Show the opposition contexts in which your position is also valid.
Benefits : Appeal to the opposition and show how elements of your position could work to benefit its interests.

You use one type of rhetoric when discussing your position with people who already agree with you. To discuss your position with the opposition, you need to tone that down and break it into objective elements, so the sides can more easily see areas of common ground. Taking the time to state the opposing side's arguments and contexts means the opposition has less reason to get defensive and stop listening to your ideas.

Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument

In the 1970s and into the early 1990s, some debate existed about whether women should use this conflict-solving technique.

"Feminists are divided on the method: some see Rogerian argument as feminist and beneficial because it appears less antagonistic than traditional Aristotelian argument. Others argue that when used by women, this type of argument reinforces the 'feminine' stereotype, since historically women are viewed as nonconfrontational and understanding (see especially Catherine E. Lamb's 1991 article 'Beyond Argument in Freshman Composition' and Phyllis Lassner's 1990 article 'Feminist Responses to Rogerian Argument')." (Edith H. Babin and Kimberly Harrison, "Contemporary Composition Studies: A Guide to Theorists and Terms." Greenwood, 1999)

5 Steps to Writing a Position Paper
Tips on How to Write an Argumentative Essay
Argument (Rhetoric and Composition)
Preparing an Argument Essay: Exploring Both Sides of an Issue
How to Write a Persuasive Essay
Writing an Opinion Essay
Persuasion and Rhetorical Definition
AP English Exam: 101 Key Terms
Propositions in Debate Definition and Examples
How to Write and Structure a Persuasive Speech
Definition and Examples of Analysis in Composition
Use Social Media to Teach Ethos, Pathos and Logos
Quoting Out of Context Fallacy
Definition and Examples of Evidence in Argument
Socratic Dialogue (Argumentation)

Homework Help
Essay Examples
Citation Generator
Writing Guides
Essay Title Generator
Essay Outline Generator
Flashcard Generator
Plagiarism Checker
Paraphrasing Tool
Conclusion Generator
Thesis Statement Generator
Introduction Generator
Literature Review Generator
Hypothesis Generator
Rogerian Argument Essays

Rogerian Argument Essays (Examples)

23+ documents containing “rogerian argument” .

Filter by Keywords:(add comma between each)

Freedom speech guarantees freedom extend disturbing funeral.

Freedom speech guarantees freedom extend disturbing funeral (Armed Forces funerals) support claim, acknowledge claim opponent, find common ground . There is presently much controversy regarding the concept of freedom of speech and the fact that people are often denied the right to speak when they want to express themselves. Even with this, there are a series of situations when one's right to express his or her position needs to be denied on the basis of common sense. It would surely be absurd to claim that freedom of speech should not be present in every setting regardless of circumstances. However, people should carefully analyze a situation and decide whether or not it would be right for them to speak in a particular environment. Freedom of speech is in some cases rendered ineffective because of a series of reasons that make it possible for individuals to understand that it is more important….

Works cited:

Brouwer, D.l C. And Hess, A. "Making Sense of 'God Hates Fags' and 'Thank God for 9/11': A Thematic Analysis of Milbloggers' Responses to Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church," Western Journal of Communication 71.1 (2007)

Conery, B. "Supreme Court upholds protests at military funerals as free speech," Retrieved February 12, 2012, from the Washington Times Website: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/2/supreme-court-oks-church-protest-military-funerals/?page=all

Kingsbury, A. "Supreme Court Weighs Free Speech Limits in Military Funeral Case," Retrieved February 12, 2012, from the U.S. News Website: http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/10/06/supreme-court-weighs-free-speech-limits-in-military-funeral-case

Liptak, A. "Justices Rule for Protesters at Military Funerals," Retrieved February 12, 2012, from the NY Times Website: http://www.nytimes.com /2011/03/03/us/03scotus.html?pagewanted=all

Imposition Abolition or Return of the Death

imposition, abolition or return of the death penalty has been an unsettling issue among the world's peace-loving nations over the years in the universal desire to control criminality and promote maximum peace and security in human society. Although strictly imposed in ancient times, capital punishment has been, in recent years, openly and indignantly questioned and condemned by certain organizations and abolished in some countries for certain reasons. These reasons we will consider and attempt to reconcile, as far as possible, with those that favor it. Those that oppose the death penalty contend that it is racist, anti-poor, condemns even innocent prisoners to death, does not deter serious crimes, and a cruel and unusual punishment. They maintain that more than 75% of those in the federal death row are non-whites (Campaign to End the Death Penalty 2002) and statistics conclusively show that the death penalty makes being lack a crime. More….

BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Haag, Ernest van den. The Ultimate Punishment: a Defense.

Harvard Law Review, Association, 1986

2. Hood, Roger. The Death Penalty: a Worldwide Perspective, a revised edition.

Oxford: Clarendon Press: 1996

Analyzing Yalom's if Rape Were Legal

Psychoanalysis The opening phase of dynamic psychotherapy helps the therapist to understand why the patient is seeking treatment; what kind of triggers to current problems are present; and house troubled the patient is in terms of both physical and psychological health (text p. 41). Yalom (1989) allows for several sessions of introductory therapy, also in keeping with the psychodynamic model. At this introductory phase, the therapist gets an idea of what treatment options to present and how to proceed. Yalom (1989) also determines the frequency of the treatment in the introductory phase (text p. 41). The core way that the relationship between Yalom (1989) and Carlos exemplifies psychodynamic therapy is in regards to the transference neurosis, which intensifies in therapy (text p. 53). However, transference is worked through as a core element of the therapeutic process. In the case with Carlos, neurotic transference is exemplified most clearly in the way Carlos….

Corsini & Wedding (n.d.). Textbook.

Yalom (1989), I.D. (1989). "2 - If Rape Were Legal..." In Love's Executioner and Other Tales of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic, 1989. 59-78.

Why Likeability Is Essential for Success

Management Likeability: A Factor in Managerial Success A 2007 survey in which 90,000 employees from all over the world were interviewed revealed that only 20% of those questioned were attempting to perform to their utmost abilities in the workforce. The remaining 80% were reported to be disengaged (Bhargava). hat was the cause of the overwhelmingly lackluster workplace attitudes? A number of researchers have identified the root of the cause in a failure of leadership to personally interact and form bonds of human sympathy with subordinates (Bhargava; Pink; Holmes). Indeed, Daniel Pink has shown in his best-selling work Drive that leaders who demonstrate likeability in the workplace actually have a higher success rate in motivating teams in the long run. Likeable managers establish workplace cultures that provide a necessary foundation for attracting, forming and keeping autonomous, masterful and purpose-driven employees in their workplace environment. This paper will show how likeability is a factor….

Works Cited

Avolio, B.J., Walumbwa, F.O., Weber, T.J. "Leadership: Current Theories,

Research, and Future Directions." Annual Review of Psycholog, 60 (2009): 421-29. Print.

Bhargava, Rohit. Likeonomics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Print.

Elkind, Peter; McLean, Bethany. Enron: the Smartest Guys in the Room. NY: Penguin,

Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants the

Therefore, the state is daily loosing important revenue that could help improve the financial situation of different Departments such as health care, social services, and even immigration policies. However, without this source of money, the federal budget would be forced to allocate funds from other destinations. Thirdly, there is also the issue of workers' rights. In this sense, it is a rather well-known fact the idea that illegal workers are often exploited by employers by giving them wages that are below the normal tariffs. However, the inclusion of illegal workers as legal immigrants would grant them the rights each worker in the United States has. More precisely, "in past decades, labor unions often saw immigrant workers as the enemy, accusing them of depressing wages and breaking strikes. ut the executive council of the AFL-CIO adopted a more sympathetic approach, contending that too often U.S. immigration rules have enabled employers to….

Bibliography

Coalition for the future American worker. An Amnesty by Any Other Name is Still an Amnesty. N.d. 10 March 2008 http://www.americanworker.org/amnesty_handout2.htm

Greenhouse, Steven. "Unions Urge Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants Legalized workers would be easier for labor to organize." San Francisco Chronicle. 2000. 10 March 2008 http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/021700-02.htm

Isidore, Chris. Skilled worker shortage hurts U.S. Employers would be hiring more if they could just find the skilled workers they need. 2007. 10 March 2008. http://money.cnn.com/2007/01/04/news/economy/jobs_outlook/index.htm

Same Sex Marriage There Are

ell, if the Bible is the word of God…why would you expect a Christian pastor to believe anything else?" (ABC News). He was reminded that candidate Barack Obama told him prior to the election that he (Obama) opposed same sex marriage. The ABC interviewer (Jake Tapper) asked arren if he is concerned that Obama might change his position. "I can't control what other people believe. I just know what the Bible says," he answered. In author David E. Newton's book, Same-Sex Marriage: A Reference Handbook, the author points out that while many who oppose same-sex marriage based on the Bible, there are references in the Bible that mention "other types of marriage" (Newton, 2010, 35). Of the eight types of marriage, this paper will mention several. Jacob had two wives, Leah and Rachel (Genesis 29: 1030); Esau had three wives in the Bible, Adah, Aholibamah, and Bashemath (Genesis 36: 2-3).….

Barbaro, Michael. (2011). Bloomberg States Case, Emphatically and Personally, for Same-Sex

Marriage. The New York Times. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://www.nytimes.com .

Newton, David E. (2010). Same-Sex Marriage: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA:

ABC-CLIO Books.

Medicate Kids With ADHD Answer Is Yes

medicate kids with ADHD? Answer is Yes Children with ADHD have basic behavioural problems and are uncontrollable. In such cases the care givers face a big problem and often are victims. Having an ADHD child at home is being tied up to the child, and to prevent the parent getting mental problems some methods have to be resorted to keep the balance. In 1991 the amount of children treated with medication was negligible because medication itself was not available and was in the test stage. But now the scenario is different. More and more children have been diagnosed with the symptoms of ADHD and they are also in schools. That today 6-9% of pre-school children have severe psychiatric disorders is a fact. (Barkley, 41) The alarming situation therefore has called for research in the area and has produced some of the best solutions in the form of medication. It is not….

Yalom Analysis The case surrounds Carlos, a man in his late 30s with a growing tumor that will not respond to radiation or chemotherapy. Carlos has been fighting this cancer for about a decade, but it is now to the point in which medical science can do no more for him. Carlos was referred to therapy by his oncologist, and responded somewhat to individual therapy but became combative and confrontational in group therapy. Carlos is a classic narcissist and misogynist. He has few friends, is estranged from his children, and is, at best cynical and sarcastic. However, through individual therapy, Carlos was able to come to some conclusions about the walls he built around himself, and the tremendous insecurity he harbored; typically using sex and sarcasm to cover up his need to belong. He eventually revealed that he had come up with two insights about himself and his relationship to the….

Corsini, R., Wedding, D. (2011). Current Psychotherapies, 9th ed. Mason, OH: Cenage.

Yalom, I. (1989). Love's Executioner & Other Tales of Psychotherapy. New York: Harper

Stem Cell Ethics Debating the Ethics of

Stem Cell Ethics Debating the Ethics of Stem Cells The term 'stem cells' can mean different things to different people. For some, it conjures images of medical miracles providing solutions for heart disease, diabetes, and dementia. For others, it terrifies with a future filled with cloned humans. Still others cringe at the thought of mass producing cultured human embryos for the sole purpose of providing organs and tissues for a paying public. As with most complex issues, news media coverage tends to exaggerate easily understood concepts at the expense of the overall truth and the public accordingly remains ignorant of the subtleties surrounding this debate. This seems to add fuel the emergence of polarized camps and a shrinking of a common middle ground. To better define this middle ground, this essay will discuss both sides of this debate and argue instead that the vast majority of people would likely support an intermediate….

Antiniou, Michael. "The Case Against & #8230;" Nature Medicine 7.4 (2001): 397-399. Web. The author argues that the use of embryonic stem cells for research and medicine poses significant ethical and moral issues that cannot be overcome. Of particular concern is the potential for reproductive cloning, a door that the author believes was opened when the UK government approved the use of embryonic stems cells for research and medicine.

Blow, Nathan. "In Search of Common Ground." Nature 451.7180 (2008): 855-858. Web. The author presents several issues facing researchers who work with stem cells and discusses why they are important to advancing this field of research. Of primary concern is developing standard protocols for producing stem cells and creating the necessary protocols and reagents that will allow the therapeutic use of stem cells in humans.

Leeb, C., Jurga, M., McGuckin, C., Forraz, N., Thallinger, C., Moriggl, R. et al. "New Perspectives in Stem Cell Research: Beyond Embryonic Stem Cells." Cell Proliferation 44.1 (2011): 9-14. Web. The focus of this article is the promises and limitations of embryonic, adult, and induced pluripotent stem cells, from the perspective of scientists working in this field. The ethical decisions concerning the use of embryonic stem cells are only mentioned in passing.

Power, Carl and Rasko, E.J. "Promises and Challenges of Stem Cell Research for Regenerative Medicine." Annals of Internal Medicine 155.10 (2011): 706-713. Web. The authors discuss in detail the three main types of stem cell technologies: embryonic, adult, and induced pluripotent. Ethical issues are mentioned occasionally, but not discussed.

Small but Successful Systems Integrator

This skill will help am in all areas of his life. The counseling protocol I will introduce am to these ideas by using a mixture of Rogerain non-directive counseling with behavioral and cognitive techniques, as well as Gestalt by placing am in the other's shoes. It seems to me that although am's confidence needs working on, the best route to rectify his self-esteem is by focusing on the problem and having am address it in a practical incremental way. Discussion with team My plan of action will be open-ended listening where I will encourage them to share their reactions about am. I will involve am in these meetings so am can discuss his concerns with his colleagues resulting in each gaining a perspective and understanding of the other's situation and feelings. I will encourage all participants to be as concrete and as open as possible so that all concerns get brought to the table.….

Callister, RR & Wall, JA Jr. (1995). Conflict and its management Journal of Management. 21.3 p515.

Chesler, M.A., Crowfoot, J.E. & Bryant, B.I. (1978). Power training: An alternative path to conflict management. California Management Review, 21(2): 84-90.

Derr, C.B. (1978). Managing organizational conflict: Collaboration, bargaining, power approaches. California Management Review, 21: 76-83.

Goleman, D.(1995) Emotional Intelligence, Bantam, USA

Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Nursing Can Be

Theoretical Foundations of Nursing: Nursing can be described as a science and practice that enlarges adaptive capabilities and improves the transformation of an individual and the environment. This profession focuses on promoting health, improving the quality of life, and facilitating dying with dignity. The nursing profession has certain theoretical foundations that govern the nurses in promoting adaptation for individuals and groups. These theoretical foundations include theories, theory integration, reflection, research and practice, and assimilation. Grand Nursing Theory: There are several grand nursing theories that were developed by various theorists including the Science of Unitary Human Beings by Martha ogers, Sister Callista oy's Adaptation Model, and Systems Model by Betty Neuman. Sister Callista oy's Adaptation Model is based on the consideration of the human being as an open system. She argues that the system reacts to environmental stimuli via cognator and regulator coping techniques for individuals. On the other hand, the stabilizer and innovator….

References:

American Sentinel (2012). 5 Steps for Nurses to Stay Updated with Health Care Changes.

Retrieved September 4, 2013, from http://www.nursetogether.com/5-steps-for-nurses-to-stay-updated-with-health-care-changes

Andershed, B. & Olsson, K. (2009). Review of Research Related to Kristen Swanson's Middle-range Theory of Caring. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 23, 598-610.

"Application of Theory in Nursing Process." (2012, January 28). Nursing Theories: A

Psychotherapies if Rape Were Legal This Is

Psychotherapies If ape were legal This is a story about a cancer patient who objectifies women and his life changes drastically for the better after his therapist takes an aggressive stance in one of the personal therapy sessions after a disturbing incident in his group therapy session. This paper reviews the relationship between the patient and the therapist by analyzing their dynamic through the following psychotherapies: Dynamic, Person-Centered, EBT and Alderian. Dynamic Psychodynamic psychologists research human habits by trying to find the unseen meanings in things that individuals think, do or state. This needs them to collect huge quantities of qualitative information about individuals, which is typically done with using the specific case-study technique. The topic of the case history is typically an individual who is dealing with a mental ailment and who is being treated with psychoanalysis. The professional gathers details from things the individual states or finishes treatment (consisting of cost-free association….

Gergen, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Korobov, N. (2000). Social constructionist 'theory hope': The impasse from theory to practice. Culture and Psychology, 6, 365-373.

Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (1997). The social-cognitive construction of psychotherapeutic change: Bridging social constructionism and cognitive constructivism. Review of General Psychology, 1, 375-378.

Sammons, A. (2007). Psychodynamic approach: the basics. Psychodynamic Psychology.

Non-Directive Communication Theories of Communication

The Rogerian Model This is a theory of communication introduced by psychologist Carl Rogers (Lee 2011). It is founded on trust and emphasizes common goals. This theory proposes that an argument or situation should begin with a brief and objective definition of the problem. Rogers believes that communication will be more effective if trust exists. The nurse or therapist should make a neutral analysis of the patient's position so in order to show understanding of his views. She should also establish and present a neutral analysis of her own position. She should then analyze the goals and values they have in common. Their problem situation should construct a proposed solution that recognizes the interests of both sides, rather than one of them dominating and winning the problem situation (Lee). Motivational Interview This is a client-centered, directive method meant to encourage the patient's intrinsic motivation to change by discovering and handling imbalances (Lussier 2007).….

Bozarth, G.O. 2011, 'How to use person-centered therapy for mental health,' eHow:

[Online] Available at http://www.ehow.com/how_2092776_use-person-centred-therapy-mental.html

Lee, L.W. 2011, 'What is the Rogerian model?, ' eHow [Online] Available at http://www.ehow.com/facts_7264316_rogerian-model.html

Lussier, Marie Therese 2007, 'The motivational interview in practice,' 53 (12) Canadian

XBRL Adoption at Hmrc and

Within these findings are many insights and differences in opinion as to the benefits and caveats of XBL adoption. In the a case of HMC, privacy issues are a key factor in the reason for their partial adoption of XBL, rather than the full adoption undertaken by CH. The interviewees were from varied backgrounds and included three from HMC and four from CH. They included persons from many different facets of the project. They included interviews from accountancy, the Manager of Online Services, a Technical Architect, and a Process Advisor. These interviewees represent technical personnel who are directly involved in the project implementation. The list of interviewees also included senior management, including the Head of Development, Senior Project Manager, and Business Systems Analyst. The interviewees represent diversity in opinions among those in various phases of the project. They represent numerous disciplines that are involved as well. Each professional was concerned….

Keeling, D. (2009). HTML - XML - XBRL - iXBRL - what's it all about-AccountancyAge. August 17, 2009. http://keelinguncorked.accountancyage.com/2009/08/html-xml-xb.html

Client Presentation Year-Old Beth Presented

Has there been any parent contact at the school, prior to, during or after the bullying incident? 3. What are the school guidance counselor's clinical impressions as to the present problem? Underlying issue? 4. What are some of Beth's strengths? 5. Has she been willing to talk in the past about things that may be bothering her? Does she have suicidal ideations? Her response to friend leaving? Lack of friends at the school? Process Issues for Consideration The process issues that need to be considered if the child counselor has determined it is beneficial to engage Beth in services include presenting behaviors, attitude and affect. Beth may be much more willing to discuss these issues vs. beginning with something possibly more difficult such as addressing her parent's divorce. The child counselor will also need to address the comments Beth has made regarding herself to determine if there is a risk of self-injury, or a….

Allison, P. & Furstenberg, F, Jr. (1989). How marital dissolution affects children: Variations by age and sex. Developmental Psychology, 25, 540-549.

Amato, P. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990's: An update of the Amato and Keith

(1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 355-370.

Amato, P., & Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-

Family and Marriage

Criminal Justice

imposition, abolition or return of the death penalty has been an unsettling issue among the world's peace-loving nations over the years in the universal desire to control criminality…

Research Paper

Business - Management

Women's Issues - Sexuality

ell, if the Bible is the word of God…why would you expect a Christian pastor to believe anything else?" (ABC News). He was reminded that candidate Barack Obama…

medicate kids with ADHD? Answer is Yes Children with ADHD have basic behavioural problems and are uncontrollable. In such cases the care givers face a big problem and often…

Yalom Analysis The case surrounds Carlos, a man in his late 30s with a growing tumor that will not respond to radiation or chemotherapy. Carlos has been fighting this cancer…

Stem Cell Ethics Debating the Ethics of Stem Cells The term 'stem cells' can mean different things to different people. For some, it conjures images of medical miracles providing solutions for…

This skill will help am in all areas of his life. The counseling protocol I will introduce am to these ideas by using a mixture of Rogerain non-directive counseling with…

Health - Nursing

Psychotherapies If ape were legal This is a story about a cancer patient who objectifies women and his life changes drastically for the better after his therapist takes an aggressive stance…

Ghost Writing

The Rogerian Model This is a theory of communication introduced by psychologist Carl Rogers (Lee 2011). It is founded on trust and emphasizes common goals. This theory proposes that an…

Research Proposal

Engineering

Within these findings are many insights and differences in opinion as to the benefits and caveats of XBL adoption. In the a case of HMC, privacy issues are…

Has there been any parent contact at the school, prior to, during or after the bullying incident? 3. What are the school guidance counselor's clinical impressions as to the…

English (EN) - Composition: Rogerian Essay

English Composition Home
EN101 Information Literacy Toolkit
EN102 Information Cycle
EN Course Handouts & Activities
EN Careers & Education
Citing Sources This link opens in a new window
Librarian Evaluation This link opens in a new window

What is a Rogerian Essay?

Some English instructors will assign a Rogerian Essay for class. A Rogerian Essay explores both sides of an issue and suggests a compromise, synthesis or solution. It's sometimes referred to as a "common ground" argument paper.

A Rogerian Essay outline may look like this*:

Introduce the problem and show why you and your intended audience are affected by the problem.
Lay down the common beliefs, ideas and arguments between you and your listeners (if you are speaking) or readers (if you are writing a position paper).
Reveal the position that you are holding without saying that your position is better than the opposing belief.
Show instances where and when your position is valid and how your position differs from the opposing belief.
State your thesis .

*from the Tips for Essays and Research Papers website

Rogerian Essay Example and Topic Ideas

Sample of a Rogerian Essay
List of topics for the Rogerian Essay

Rogerian Essay Research

Opposing Viewpoints in Context This link opens in a new window Opposing Viewpoints in Context is an online resource covering social issues. This cross-curricular research tool supports science, social studies, current events, and language arts classes.
Points of View Reference Center This link opens in a new window This is a great database to help you understand the pro's and con's of different debatable topics. It's also a handy place to see a list of really interesting topics if you need paper topic ideas and don't know where to start.
Research Library This link opens in a new window ProQuest Research Library provides access to a wide range of popular academic subjects from business and political science to literature and psychology. The database includes more than 4,070 titles, nearly 2,800 in full text, from 1971 forward. It includes a diversified mix of scholarly journals, trade publications, magazines, and newspapers.

Video Explanation of Rogerian Argument

Last Updated: Feb 5, 2024 11:12 AM
URL: https://subjectguides.grcc.edu/englishcomposition

an Excelsior University site

Rogerian Argument

Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers (pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This type of argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to find common ground with others.

Here is a summary of the basic strategy for a Rogerian argument, and the infographic on the following page should be helpful as well.

In your essay, first, introduce the problem .
Acknowledge the other side before you present your side of the issue. This may take several paragraphs.
Next, you should carefully present your side of the issue in a way that does not dismiss the other side. This may also take several paragraphs.
You should then work to bring the two sides together . Help your audience see the benefits of the middle ground. Make your proposal for the middle ground here, and be sure to use an even, respectful tone. This should be a key focus of your essay and may take several paragraphs.
Finally, in your conclusion, remind your audience of the balanced perspective you have presented and make it clear how both sides benefit when they meet in the middle.

For a visual representation of this type of argument, check out the Rogerian infographic on the next page.

Write | Read | Educators

Grumble... Applaud... Please give us your feedback!

Argument & Critical Thinking »
Organizing Your Argument »
Rogerian Argument »

UK Office: +44 2081 447946
US Office: +1 (253) 235 4136

Custom Writing

Essay writers for hire, essay writing help online, write my essay, other essay services, how to place an order:.

Select your academic level and the number of pages and pick a desired deadline
Then press “Order Now”
Add your instructions
Choose writer’s category
Make a payment
Get your paper before the deadline

Assignment services

Online assignment writing service, assignment help, coursework paper writing, assignment writing services, buy assignment online, coursework writing service, research paper services, research proposal writing service, term papers writing services, research paper help, pay for research papers, academic research paper service, research papers writing services, buy a research paper, college papers for sale, annotated bibliography help, thesis services, thesis report writing services, thesis editing services, thesis writing services, phd services, phd writing services, phd proposal writing service, buy phd thesis, phd research and literature review, phd thesis editing, dissertation services, dissertation writing services, buy dissertation online, custom dissertation writing help service, dissertation proposal services, write my dissertation, dissertation editing services, dissertation literature review writing, dissertation consultation services, dissertation survey help, mba dissertation writing services, mba essay writing, mba dissertation editing, mba assignment help, mba thesis writing help, mba personal statement writing, law services, law dissertation writing services, law coursework writing services, bvc/bptc writing service – bvc/bptc opinion & drafting writing, law essay writing services, law assignment writing services, law report writing service, all subjects, university application help, college admission writing service, cover letter writing, college application help service, personal statement writing help service, resume writing help, bursary and scholarships application help, ucas application help, buy essay papers canada, buy essay papers uae, buy essay papers saudi arabia, buy essay papers new zealand, buy essay papers usa, buy essay papers uk, buy essay papers qatar, buy essay papers australia, buy essay papers ireland.

Sample Essays
Our Guarantee

Free Writing Tools

AI Essay Writer

It’s so easy to contact us

Just send us an email, give us a phone call or you can visit our professional and friendly UK team for an excellent level of service delivery. An easier way is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page

+44 20 8144 7946
+1 (253) 235 4136
24/7 Live Support

How to place an order

If you have any questions and want to find more about our services, kindly check our information

How to Write a Rogerian Argument Essay – Step-by-Step Guide

peachyessay
January 13, 2021
Blogs , Essay Writing Guideline

Composing a Rogerian Argument essay can be challenging if you don’t know how to go about it. In view of therapist Carl Rogers ’ work, a Rogerian argument centers on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This kind of contention can be amazingly enticing and can help you, as an essayist, comprehend your own biases and how you may attempt to find a middle ground with others.

What is a Rogerian Essay?

A Rogerian essay is a piece that presents a debatable subject utilizing an impartial language. Rogerian articles assist students with understanding issues from different perspectives.

A Rogerian contention permits you to locate a common ground between your insights and your audience.

A Rogerian style exposition aims to find a middle ground whenever there is an incredible possibility that the audience won’t concur with you regardless of how well you uphold your contentions. Discovering common grounds with your audience on the issue and afterward introducing your contention side can be a compelling strategy.

Purpose of a Rogerian essay

The fundamental objective of a Rogerian article is to ease pressure in a circumstance where individuals with conflicting suppositions appear not to concur with one another. It expects to perceive the differences between different sides of an issue and find common ground.

When to Use a Rogerian Argument

A Rogerian argument works best when the article subject is one where individuals have solid, restricting positions. Examples would incorporate troublesome subjects, such as firearm control or abortion. Since Rogerian contentions depend on listening to the resistance and offering thought to those worries, this essay attempts to quiet a group of people who might be against your assessment.

Rogerian Essay Structure

The structure of a Rogerian contention is unique in relation to that of a classical argument because the opinions of the resistance are presented in the exposition and given due thought. Your thesis will show up after you have demonstrated that you comprehend the contentions of the individuals who have an alternate position.

Introduction

From the earliest starting point of your article, recognize that there is another side to the argument, and it is different from your own. Give a reasonable evaluation of the opposition in your presentation.

Acknowledgment of the Opposition

This piece of your paper builds trust since it shows that you also discover value in it in addition to acknowledging the opposite side of the contention. Express the parts of the opposition in which you find some legitimacy.

State Your Thesis

Whenever you have indicated that you are mulling over your resistance, you should express your own point of view. Your thesis is the position you are taking with respect to the paper’s subject.

Backing Your Thesis

Clarify why your thesis is substantial. The research you have done on the side of your position ought to show up here. While expressing your thesis should be done in one paragraph, supporting the theory will likely need a few paragraphs. This part builds support for your perspective and shows that you have delved into your subject and discovered resources to endorse the side you have taken.

Concluding Your Rogerian Essay

The conclusion in a Rogerian argument paper structure ought to represent why your situation in this contention would be useful and would resolve the issue. All in all, despite the fact that you have conceded that the opposite side of the contention has merit, you need to finish up by indicating why your proposal is the better choice . If your position can’t totally take care of the issue, as is regularly the situation when expounding on a disputable issue, concede that. Express that while your thoughts will help, more work should be finished.

Read more: Best Tips on Writing a Lab Report

Key Things to Consider when Writing a Rogerian Essay

Rogerian argument definition.

A Rogerian Argument is an exceptional technique for conversation through which the opponent expresses their perspectives certainly and completely, without saving any part of it. Their objective, however, isn’t to persuade the rival, yet rather to have the conversation so as to stand closer to reality or closer to a specific position.

However, a Rogerian Argument is to be utilized in issues that are not objective in nature. Such a conversation can’t be held with respect to how the solar framework is heliocentric because this is a reality past any debate – it must be opposed through experiments, not by opinions. Thusly, the Rogerian Argument is to be utilized in spheres that are subjective, such as political, social, monetary, strict, etc.

The essence of the Rogerian Argument

The essence of the Rogerian Argument is found in its impression of individual experience as essential for having an appropriate and fruitful conversation. Individual experience frequently drives individuals to various angles; consequently, it is imperative to comprehend the experience of the other. Rather than putting pressure just on the coherent side of the conversation, Rogers leans towards allowing a chance for the two rivals to share their perspective and qualities, after which they would have the option to understand each other better.

A Rogerian Argument comprises of three fundamental parts: the first is the stage when you present the perspective on your adversary – that is, in the event that you start first, you should introduce the other’s perspective and not your own. The subsequent part is communicating your own opinion, and the last part is contrasting the two positions and discovering similarities between them.

Exposition of the opponent’s view

You need to realize that your adversary’s perspective ought to be introduced as unbiasedly as could be expected under the circumstances. You need to observe the following standards:

Be straightforward to your adversary and present their view as though it were your view; present the basic points upon this view is established. That is, don’t go a lot into detail; you ought to rather list and describe them; refer to a composed source where the assessment of your adversary is plainly communicated. This is important to compare whether your account of your opponent’s standpoint is valid.

It is advisable to find out about the perspective of your opponent before having the conversation. It is likewise prescribed to address your rival to explain their thoughts. If you can’t do it, then it is smarter to depend on what your opponent has composed

Exposition of your own view

If you need to compose a decent work you ought to have the responses to the following questions

What is actually the point you need to address?

What is your perspective – in short (2 sentences)?

What are the two primary contentions making your statement of view?

What are the contentions repudiating your perspective?

As you see, it is very critical to figure the theme decisively. At that point, it will be anything but difficult to define your own angle. Keep in mind: when the point is enigmatically planned, a genuine conversation is inconceivable.

Things to avoid in writing a Rogerian Argument

There are a few things you need to stay away from at any expense while building up your Rogerian contention.

These are as per the following:

Stay away from individual assaults, (for example, i.e.: “Just ignorant people can trust in what Y says”).
Evade any distortion of your rival’s thesis (to introduce it just incompletely to repudiate it without any problem).
Try not to attempt to persuade the reader or the adversary. Your assignment is to look for an answer to the issue.
Do not arrive at an agreement simply because you are worn out on talking about it. The agreement must be normal, undeniable.
Use impartial language, and avoid demonstrating subjective sentiments, communicating your feelings, and utilizing moral classes.

Rogerian Argument Example

Here is a Rogerian example.

Exiles from Syria: to take them or to reject them

Context of the issue: During the Civil War in Syria since 2011 a huge number of individuals have fled from the nation and have searched for refuge in Europe, Canada, and the United States. At present, a discussion is held with respect to the issue: should the United States take displaced people from Syria?

Section 1: Opponent’s view

The theory uncovered by Mr. Y can be summed up as follows: The United States ought not to furnish Syrians with refuge because the vast majority of them are dangerous. Some of them have a place with militant psychological associations; others express compassion toward revolutionary Islam and fanaticism. Their essence in this nation will reinforce the fear-based oppressor organization and undermine America’s security. Just a predetermined number of outcasts from Syria could be acknowledged, generally ladies and youngsters, as well as trained experts, such as doctors and teachers.

Section 2: Your view

Exiles escaping from the battle in Syria ought to be taken in the United States since they need assistance and backing. They could be accommodated in a special center for displaced people, and furthermore prepared to get a new line of work in the United States. The majority of the refugees are ordinary individuals with a typical life. They didn’t escape to organize terrorism, yet they rather flee from the psychological militants who are presently in charge of certain pieces of Syria.

Section 3: Looking for an arrangement and basic focuses

The likenesses shared by the two perspectives are the following: first, there are terrorists in the world planning assaults in America; and second, probably some number of refugees could be taken in America. Presently, the issue is the way to characterize who has the privilege to haven: only doctors, instructors, and others with college degrees; or generally ladies and youngsters; or all Syrians who are affirmed to be genuine exiles to be taken in America. The main point could likewise be tended to by the two propositions: a portion of the Syrian exiles are also scared of terrorists, consequently, they could assist with battling psychological warfare.

You can uphold this data by adding citations – extracts from messages composed by your opponents, just as articles, monographs, opinions presented on forums, etc. You need to help your theses with data, insights, or any reliable information (e.g. percentage of terrorists among the refugees from Syria).

Rogerian Essay topics

Great Rogerian topics are the ones that have a few perspectives and can be contended from a proposing and opposing side. Here are the acceptable subjects for composing a Rogerian exposition.

Beauty products ought to be tested on creatures
The public authority should ban public smoking
Contraceptives ought to be given in schools to forestall youngster pregnancy
Euthanizing is the best thing to do for a terminally ill patient
Marijuana ought to be utilized as a type of medication
Would it be advisable for us to censor the web?
Should a two-kid strategy be executed to diminish overpopulation?
Fierce computer games make youngsters vicious
Are single-sex schools in a way that is better than co-ed schools?
Are the current methods of testing youngsters powerful in checking their advancement?

How would you start a Rogerian exposition?

When composing a Rogerian exposition, the critical things to remember are your primary concerns for your contention and the contradicting views. To begin your Rogerian paper, you should investigate your subject and completely get it. This will assist you with formalizing the main points for your contention and identify any restricting perspectives. In doing this, you will likewise have the option to basically dissect these perspectives and draft your thoughts for them.

How to write the introduction for a Rogerian argument

When composing a Rogerian article, you will need to include the following in your introduction.

You need an extraordinary quote or fact identified with your Rogerian contention point that will catch your peruser’s eye and make them need to understand more.
Incorporate an assertion about your theme and offer to understand your perspectives on it.
End with your thesis statement and some background on what will be discussed later.

How do you write the thesis for a Rogerian essay?

For your Rogerian article thesis statement, you should express your main point in the form of a thesis statement. Ensure that you show your perspective and propose an answer to the issue .

How do you write the conclusion for a Rogerian argument?

To write a conclusion for a Rogerian exposition, you should do the following.

Give a synopsis of the main points and contentions in your article
Be clear and succinct in giving your perspectives just as the contradicting ones.
Express an answer that is a good common ground between your contentions and the contradicting ones.

Tips for Writing a Rogerian Essay

Composing a Rogerian contention isn’t so complicated as different expositions. The only contrast is that you have to present the other gathering’s opinion and investigate it. Here are the means by which you will start.

Select a Topic

The primary activity is finding a good topic that can be talked about well. A good topic ought to be expansive, and it ought to permit you to discover data rapidly. You can begin by conceptualizing or consider any dubious issues you have perused or found out about in the news. It is savvy to evaluate groundbreaking thoughts that have not yet been depleted to make your paper intriguing.

Gather Information

Search for applicable data to back up the conclusions. Give facts and go further to clarify the reasons why the two assertions contrast. You can discover data on online stages, magazines, diaries, course books, etc. Remember to cite sources if you are composing someone else are content.

Make an Outline

It is fundamental to have a layout that will control you when you are composing. Arrange your main points based on how you will talk about them. If you have no clue about how to go about it, you can check the Rogerian contention exposition model on the web. It will assist you with having a thought of how to define your paper.

Share Brief and Present your Opinion

This is the time you give a short clarification of your aim. Make the readers comprehend that you are not composing to oppose an opinion but arrive at a middle ground. Likewise, express your perspectives about the issue, don’t argue out the points in this part. That is for the body segment of the paper.

Present the Other Party’s Strong Argument

After you have introduced your assessment, you would now be able to express the other party’s view. While composing this part, you should be sharp. Find all the facts to discuss the correct thing because the other party might accuse you of hiding information that supports their argument.

Show how the conflicting arguments differ

Investigate the two opinions and compose on how they contrast from one another. If you can’t present the points clearly, then the Rogerian paper won’t sound good to the reader.

Point out meeting points

When you are nearly toward the finish of the paper, you should introduce and clarify what is common about clashing opinions. It is a crucial point since it accomplishes a joint effort between the two parties.

Integrate your Ideas and Put a Standard Agreement

As you finish up, join your overall thoughts in the paper, and don’t be one-sided. Your determination ought to have a decent closure regardless of whether you totally disagree with the other assessment. You ought to be impartial and show regard for the other party’s opinions.

Utilize a Neutral Tone

The correct tone will make your Rogerian contention paper appear to be positive. Your readers will feel that your aims are clear, and in all probability, they will concur with what you are expounding on.

Keep away from False Notations

It isn’t right to give wrong proclamations when composing a Rogerian Essay. Try not to misinterpret or misrepresent anything, however, give realities as they seem to be, and no one will debate your article.

Keep the Balance

Adjusting your contentions is another interesting fundamental point. It’s not good to lean just on one side as the other party will feel you’re not communicating their conclusions as they need it. Give a positive thought for a positive idea and the other way around.

Useful Links:

Essay services, assignment services, mba services, by subjects, give your grades a boost, top academic writers ready, to help with your research proposal, connect with us.

Just ask our team to write your assignment and then sit back and relax. We’ll get it done.

Safe & Trusted

Your Peachy Essay purchase is secure and we're rated 4.5/5

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed!

We're here to answer any questions you have about our services

Quick Links

Peachy Essay provides model essays for tutoring and learning purposes only. At the end of the day, it’s the students responsibility to do their own research and work. And therefore, submit their own work. We are a strong believer in academic integrity and have a “zero tolerance policy” on plagiarism. Therefore, all our works will be submitted with a FREE Turnitin plagiarism report.

school Campus Bookshelves
menu_book Bookshelves
perm_media Learning Objects
login Login
how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
hub Instructor Commons
Download Page (PDF)
Download Full Book (PDF)
Periodic Table
Physics Constants
Scientific Calculator
Reference & Cite
Tools expand_more
Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

8.2: Rogerian Argument

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 5408
Lumen Learning

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise on a controversial issue.

If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives:

1. Introduce the author and work Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first sentence:

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\):

In Dwight Okita’s “In Response to Executive Order 9066,” the narrator addresses an inevitable by-product of war – racism.

The first time you refer to the author, refer to him or her by his or her full name. After that, refer to the author by last name only. Never refer to an author by his or her first name only.

3. State the main issue addressed in the work Your thesis, or claim, will come after you summarize the two sides of the issue.

The Introduction

The following is an example of how the introduction of a Rogerian argument can be written. The topic is racial profiling.

In Dwight Okita’s “In Response to Executive Order 9066,” the narrator — a young Japanese-American — writes a letter to the government, who has ordered her family into a relocation camp after Pearl Harbor. In the letter, the narrator details the people in her life, from her father to her best friend at school. Since the narrator is of Japanese descent, her best friend accuses her of “trying to start a war” (18). The narrator is seemingly too naïve to realize the ignorance of this statement, and tells the government that she asked this friend to plant tomato seeds in her honor. Though Okita’s poem deals specifically with World War II, the issue of race relations during wartime is still relevant. Recently, with the outbreaks of terrorism in the United States, Spain, and England, many are calling for racial profiling to stifle terrorism. The issue has sparked debate, with one side calling it racism and the other calling it common sense.

An outline for a Rogerian argument might look like this:

Introduction

Quoting Effectively

The Conclusion

Your conclusion should:

Bring the essay back to what is discussed in the introduction
Tie up loose ends
End on a thought-provoking note

Example \(\PageIndex{2}\):

Permission granted from Michael Franco at Writing Essay 4: Rogerian Argument

Harris County Public Library

Lone Star College-CyFair

LSC-CyFair Library (building #3) is open with limited capacity and services.

LSC-CyFair Library Guides

ENGL 1302 Oberle

ROGERIAN ARGUMENTS
TOULMIN ARGUMENTS
Start with background information
Scholarly vs popular sources
Finding scholarly and popular sources in library databases
APA STYLE This link opens in a new window
CONTACT THE LIBRARY
Events & Programs
Services & Resources
Your Rogerian Assignment
Researching the Rogerian Assignment
Understanding Rogerian Argument

Research-Based Rogerian Argument Assignment:

For paper #4, you will be writing a grammatically correct, clearly organized essay that uses Rogerian Argument to explore and then state a position on a controversial social, ethical, intellectual, or historical issue. As a writer, your reason for creating this paper is to persuade your readers to compromise and/or change their position so that they agree (at least in some ways) with your position.

In following Rogerian Argument, your paper, in the following order, should:

Introduction.

Begin with an introduction that establishes why your topic is important historically, ethically, socially, or intellectually (in other words, establish why a reader should be interested in your topic and how this topic affects people in general, no matter what their particular opinions on the topic might be). At this point in the paper, you are not yet stating your own opinion on the topic; you are simply explaining why the topic is an important one.

Body Paragraphs

2. In one or more paragraphs, explore and discuss the beliefs and ideas related to the most important opposing point of view to your own opinion. In other words, explain the most significant reason why some people disagree with your point of view. Remember that, in this portion of the paper, you are not disproving or disagreeing with the opposing point of view. You are also not yet stating your own opinion. Instead, you are simply explaining, in a fair and non-biased manner, what the opposing point of view believes.

3. In one or more paragraphs, explain what might be valid about the opposing point of view’s beliefs. Explain, for example, under what circumstances the opposing point of view makes the most sense. Again, remember that, in this portion of the paper, you are not disproving or disagreeing with the opposing point of view. You are also not yet stating your own opinion. Instead, you are simply explaining, in a fair and non-biased manner, under what conditions the opposing point of view has the most valid and useful beliefs.

4. In one or more paragraphs, state your own opinion on the issue, explaining what your position shares in common, in terms of values and goals, with the opposing point of view. Remember that, instead of arguing that your opinion is better or more correct than the opposing point of view, you are seeking to establish common ground. Demonstrating understanding of the opposing point of view, you are seeking to explain the values and goals that both points of view (yours and the opposition’s) share.

5. In one or more paragraphs, explain under what conditions your own point of view makes the most sense. This is where your essay’s thesis will become more apparent; at this point, you should state your opinion on the issue being discussed. You should also state and fully explain the reasons that support this opinion

6. In one or more paragraphs, offer a compromise with the opposing point of view. If your beliefs and the beliefs of the opposing point of view can be reconciled in some way, or if you can offer a fair compromise or an alternative between your beliefs and the beliefs of the opposition, then you should explain this resolution, focusing on why this resolution will be mutually beneficial for both sides. If absolutely no reconciliation, compromise, or alternative is possible, then you should fairly and respectfully explain why the best solution is for the opposition to accept your point of view.

7. In the concluding paragraph, state your thesis, not only expressing your opinion and summarizing the reasons that support this opinion but also reiterating how the opposing point of view will benefit from compromising with (or agreeing with at least portions of) your position. As you close the paper, leave readers with a reason to care about the issue you have just discussed.

The Research-Based Rogerian Argument Essay requires you to use a minimum of six sources:

Your research paper should:

Follow APA guidelines for format (see LSH pages 200-03 for an explanation of APA format, and see LSH pages 204-07 for a sample paper formatted according to APA guidelines--you need to follow the margins, spacing, page numbering, running head, and titling shown on these pages, and you do not need to include an abstract or headings)

Cite from at least six research sources

At least five of these sources must be scholarly (such as journal articles, books, or government documents)

No more than one of these sources may be popular (such as newspaper or magazine articles)

None of these sources may be an Internet site, and

These sources should come from the library or from the library’s online research databases , not from Internet search engines like Google.

Follow APA guidelines for in-text citations (see LSH page 170 and pages 173-78)

Include an APA-style list of references (see LSH pages 171-72 and pages 179-200)

Use the library's online research databases to find all your sources, scholarly and popular.

CyFair Library Databases This page organizes all of our databases. Try some of the most popular at the top of the page, or scroll down and open a menu to explore databases in that subject area.

For help using the research databases, start on the Finding Research Sources page in this guide:

Cflibguides.lonestar.edu/engl1302/oberle/research, you can also browse the database help videos we post to the student research help section of our youtube channel: , cyflib.info/youtube, if you have questions or trouble using the databases, contact the library or email bronwyn at bronwyn.sutherland @lonestar.edu . , try some of these resources to better understand rogerian arguments: .

What is Rogerian Argument? YouTube video (2:13) Quick, low-tech, casual video with a great explanation of Rogerian argument. From the University of South Florida.
Rogerian Argument: Excelsior OWL Excelsior College's guide to Rogerian Argument.
10 Steps to Writing a Rogerian Argument Infographic: Excelsior OWL Prefer visuals instead of a wall of text? Try Excelsior OWL's "10 Steps to Writing a Rogerian Argument" infographic.
Sample Rogerian Argument Paper A sample Rogerian Argument paper, annotated with helpful hints to writing one. Note that this paper is written in APA 7th edition, and you are using APA 6th for Prof. Oberle.
Rogerian Argument: Purdue OWL Purdue OWL's guide to Rogerian Argument.
<< Previous: TOULMIN ARGUMENTS
Next: FINDING RESEARCH SOURCES >>
Last Updated: Mar 10, 2023 8:08 AM
URL: https://cflibguides.lonestar.edu/engl1302/oberle

LSC-CyFair Library (building #3) is open with limited capacity and services.

Lone Star College-CyFair Branch

9191 Barker Cypress Road

Cypress, TX 77433

Option 1: Hours & Address
Option 2: Circulation
Option 3: Kids Corner
Option 4: Adult Services
Option 5: Student/Faculty Services

Text 832.463.0478

Email [email protected]

Chat Online: cflib.info/chat

One-to-One Consultation Schedule a video/phone meeting with a Librarian.

Library Hours

LSC-CyFair Weekly/Monthly Hours

LSC-CyFair Holiday Hours

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

26 The Rogerian Argument

Kirsten DeVries

The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise or common ground about an issue. If, as stated in the beginning of the chapter, academic or rhetorical argument is not merely a two-sided debate that seeks a winner and a loser, the Rogerian argument model provides a structured way to move beyond the win-lose mindset. Indeed, the Rogerian model can be employed to deal effectively with controversial arguments that have been reduced to two opposing points of view by forcing the writer to confront opposing ideas and then work towards a common understanding with those who might disagree.

Figure 3.9 “Carl Ransom Rogers”

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument:

1. Introduction : Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way. Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate. Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the overall purpose of the essay: to come to a compromise about the issue at hand. If this intent is not stated up front, the reader may be confused or even suspect manipulation on the part of the writer, i.e., that the writer is massaging the audience just to win a fight. Be advised that the Rogerian essay uses an inductive reasoning structure, so do not include your thesis in your introduction. You will build toward the thesis and then include it in your conclusion. Once again, state the intent to compromise, but do not yet state what the compromise is.

2. Side A : Carefully map out the main claim and reasoning for the opposing side of the argument first. The writer’s view should never really come first because that would defeat the purpose of what Rogers called empathetic listening , which guides the overall approach to this type of argument. By allowing the opposing argument to come first, you communicate to the reader that you are willing to respectfully consider another’s view on the issue. Furthermore, you invite the reader to then give you the same respect and consideration when presenting your own view. Finally, presenting the opposition first can help those readers who would side against you to ease into the essay, keeping them invested in the project. If you present your own ideas first, you risk polarizing those readers from the start, which would then make them less amenable to considering a compromise by the end of the essay. You can listen to Carl Rogers himself discuss the importance of empathy on YouTube (https://youtu.be/2dLsgpHw5x0, transcript here ).

3. Side B : Carefully go over your side of the argument. When mapping out this side’s claim and support, be sure that it parallels that of Side A. In other words, make sure not to raise entirely new categories of support, or there can be no way to come to a compromise. Make sure to maintain a non-confrontational tone; for example, avoid appearing arrogant, sarcastic, or smug.

4. The Bridge : A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find common ground between the two sides. There should be at least one point of agreement. This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition’s agreement that you also support or an admittance to a shared set of values even if the two sides come to different ideas when employing those values. This phase of the essay is crucial for two reasons: finding common ground (1) shows the audience the two views are not necessarily at complete odds, that they share more than they seem, and (2) sets up the compromise to come, making it easier to digest for all parties. Thus, this section builds a bridge from the two initial isolated and opposite views to a compromise that both sides can reasonably support.

5. The Compromise : Now is the time to finally announce your compromise, which is your thesis. The compromise is what the essay has been building towards all along, so explain it carefully and demonstrate the logic of it. For example, if debating about whether to use racial profiling, a compromise might be based on both sides’ desire for a safer society. That shared value can then lead to a new claim, one that disarms the original dispute or set of disputes. For the racial profiling example, perhaps a better solution would focus on more objective measures than race that would then promote safety in a less problematic way.

Figure 3.10 “Rogerian Argument”

Sample Writing Assignment 5

Find a controversial topic, and begin building a Rogerian argument. Write up your responses to the following:

The topic or dilemma I will write about is…
My opposing audience is…
My audience’s view on the topic is…
My view on the topic is…
Our common ground–shared values or something that we both already agree on about the topic–is…
My compromise (the main claim or potential thesis) is…

Share This Book

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Sociology of Media and Communication — Rogerian Argument

Essays on Rogerian Argument

Rogerian argument essay topics and outline examples, essay title 1: bridging the divide: finding common ground in the gun control debate.

Thesis Statement: Using the Rogerian argument approach, this essay seeks to promote constructive dialogue and explore potential compromises in the polarized debate over gun control in the United States.

Introduction
Presenting Differing Perspectives on Gun Control
Identifying Shared Concerns and Values
Exploring Common-Sense Solutions and Policy Recommendations
Fostering Constructive Dialogue and Collaboration

Essay Title 2: Rogerian Diplomacy: Resolving International Conflicts Through Dialogue

Thesis Statement: The Rogerian argument approach can serve as a valuable tool in diplomatic negotiations, and this essay examines its application in resolving international conflicts, emphasizing peaceful dialogue over aggression.

Examples of Historical International Conflicts
Understanding the Interests and Concerns of Opposing Parties
Facilitating Mediation and Diplomatic Solutions
Success Stories and the Importance of Diplomatic Engagement

Essay Title 3: Bridging the Generation Gap: Rogerian Communication in Family Dynamics

Thesis Statement: Employing Rogerian communication techniques within family dynamics can foster better understanding, empathy, and cooperation between generations, reducing conflict and strengthening familial bonds.

Identifying Interpersonal Conflicts and Misunderstandings in Families
Applying Rogerian Principles of Communication
Building Empathy and Enhancing Communication Skills
Case Studies of Improved Family Relationships

Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Letter from Birmingham Jail: Rogerian Argument

Marvel vs dc: compare and contrast analysis of comics, the solutions to help elderly drivers keep their licenses, made-to-order essay as fast as you need it.

Each essay is customized to cater to your unique preferences

+ experts online

An Argument in Favor of Paying Football Players at The University of Alabama

Relevant topics.

Effects of Social Media
Social Media
Social Networking

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

60 Rogerian Essay Topics

Table of Contents

The Rogerian style of writing is one that requires you to start and discuss an argument without leaning on either side. It is a unique argumentative style of writing that attempts to find a middle ground for debatable subjects. We are always glad to help you write such an essay. We have free advice, sample topics, and ideas you can use in your homework.

Advice on How to Select the Best Rogerian Essay Topic? From Experts

To get an appropriate subject matter to write about, you must consider the following:

The issue for discussion must be debatable;
You should have access to sufficient resources;
Gather facts on both sides of the argument;
Be able to establish a common ground on both sides;
You must not polarize the subject while discussing it.

If your professor needs a Rogerian essay, do not panic. Below is a list of 30 great topics that you can consider using.

Here Is a List of Rogerian Essay Topics for College Level Students

You can use the arguments below to compose your essay. The highlight can also give you the right direction of thinking.

Legalizing the smoking of marijuana
Testing of human drugs on animals
College students and gun ownership
Enactment of same-sex marriages laws
Year-round learning in institutions of higher education
Age of voting for national elections in the US
Banning smoking in public areas
Sex education and pregnancies among teenagers
Lowering the legal drinking age in the US
Implementation of 2-child policy in highly populated countries
The harshness of American police on minority groups
Armed security for schools in war-torn countries
Banning of tobacco advertisements
Embracing multicultural education in America.
Teenagers make rational decisions when alone
Abolishment of the death penalty in all countries
Ethics of marketing to children
Swimming is the best sporting activity
Legalization of steroids in sports
Technology limits human creativity
Censorship of the internet
Online friends versus imaginary ones
The Pro-life abortion argument
Significance of intermarriages in diversity
Importance of cloning in medicine
Graffiti and vandalism
Various parenting techniques for kids aged 13 and below
Life without art: Pros and Cons
Today’s music vs. 80’s songs
Use of phones in high schools

Rogerian Essay Topics for College Students: TOP-10

Do you think that marijuana should be legalized? How would it change the United States?
Would changing the drinking age have an impact on society? For better or for worse?
Should smoking be banned in public areas?
Should citizens be allowed to carry guns on college campuses?
What do you think about limiting the number of children one can have to control the population?
Discuss the censorship of Donald Trump and its impact on American citizens.
Is social media dangerous?
How has social media changed friendship?
Should abortion be legalized globally?
Should there be an age limit on allowing children to use cell phones?

20 Rogerian Argument Essay Topics

The debate over gun control in the United States
The pros and cons of legalizing marijuana
The effectiveness of abstinence-only sex education programs
The impact of social media on mental health
The ethical implications of animal testing
The role of government in regulating the internet and social media
The benefits and drawbacks of homeschooling
The debate over climate change and environmental policy
The impact of technology on human interaction and relationships
The effectiveness of the death penalty as a form of punishment
The role of religion in politics and public policy
The debate over the use of nuclear energy
The impact of globalization on job security and income inequality
The pros and cons of mandatory military service
The debate over the legalization of assisted suicide and euthanasia
The impact of the gig economy on workers’ rights and job security
The debate over the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture
The role of free speech in public discourse and political debates
The impact of artificial intelligence and automation on employment and the economy
The debate over the use of affirmative action in college admissions.

20 More Good Rogerian Essay Topics

The debate over the use of standardized testing in schools
The role of the government in providing healthcare
The effectiveness of alternative medicine in treating illnesses
The impact of social media on political polarization and public opinion
The pros and cons of capital punishment as a form of justice
The debate over the use of nuclear weapons
The impact of immigration on the economy and job market
The role of affirmative action in promoting diversity and equality
The impact of automation and robotics on the future of work
The debate over the use of military drones
The role of the government in regulating the fast food industry
The impact of artificial intelligence on education and learning
The pros and cons of homeschooling versus public schooling
The role of religion in promoting social justice and human rights
The debate over the use of the death penalty for juvenile offenders
The impact of income inequality on society and the economy
The role of social media in promoting democracy and civic engagement
The debate over the use of alternative energy sources
The impact of mass media on body image and self-esteem
The role of government in regulating the use of personal data and privacy online.

Find Great Examples of Rogerian Essay Questions Below

At times, teachers throw some argumentative problems in a bid to stir up heated discussions among the students. However, some of these queries are supposed to ignite a debating mood that looks for an agreement between two opposing sides. Answers to Rogerian questions are not supposed to have a bias. They are supposed to lean onto both sides of the debate. Below is a list of some examples:

In matters of life, should schools teach evolution or religion theory?
Is the president supposed to be above the law?
Do you think education is overly commercialized today?
Should we eat more vegetables or animal food?
Are immigrants a blessing or a curse to a country?
Is the government justified to tax tobacco and alcoholic products highly?
Would lowering the age of consent increase promiscuity among teens?
Are body-worn cameras by police invade privacy laws?
Is President Trump racist?
Are electric vehicles a complete solution to the pollution menace?

Get Free Rogerian Essay Ideas from Experts

We have years of experience writing these types of papers. Below is a list of concepts that can help you understand Rogerian arguments:

Playing the lottery should be abolished. This has two sides, banning it will reduce government revenue and charity work.
It is healthy to drink coffee daily. While this beverage has health benefits, it is associated with side effects such as anxiety and insomnia.
Giving teens condoms prevents early pregnancies. They are good contraceptives but will encourage promiscuity.
Watching TV is informative. We learn a lot from television while, at the same time, it can instill criminal mentalities
The length of paternity leave should be increased. One can argue that fathers, unlike mothers, play a little role in the first few days after the birth of a child.

Sometimes it’s difficult to draft a good essay of the style. We are here to help. Can’t find enough time to compose such a paper? Talk to the best essay writers right now. Click on the “order” button give us the instructions and relax.

Entertainment
Environment
Information Science and Technology
Social Issues

Home Essay Samples Government Gun Control

Gun Control: Rogerian Argument On The Anti-violence Campaign

Table of contents, gun politics, pro-gun view, public policy view, barack obama, literature review.

*minimum deadline

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below

Totalitarianism
Leon Trotsky
George Washington

Related Essays

Need writing help?

You can always rely on us no matter what type of paper you need

*No hidden charges

100% Unique Essays

Absolutely Confidential

Money Back Guarantee

By clicking “Send Essay”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement. We will occasionally send you account related emails

You can also get a UNIQUE essay on this or any other topic

Thank you! We’ll contact you as soon as possible.

IMAGES

How to Organize a Paper: The Rogerian Method
Practice Outlining a Rogerian Argument Essay by Writerhetoric
018 Essay Example Rogerian Argument Persuasive Outline Doc Of Paper
The Rogerian Argument
Rogerian Argument Essay Example, HD Png Download , Transparent Png
Ethical Rogerian Argument Thesis Outline Assignment Instructions

VIDEO

Rogerian Argument- zero tolerance policy
Rogerian Argument Discussion Post Example
Rogerian Presentation Winter 2024
Rogerian Argument and Essay by Pricelia Primareta (122011233151), Argumentative Writing
2. Lost and The Rogerian Counsellor
Structuring Arguments

COMMENTS

50 Rogerian Essay Topics
A Rogerian essay's tone and writing style will differ from the more aggressive style of an argumentative essay. In a Rogerian essay, the writer starts by acknowledging that there is another side to the issue at hand and that valid points can be made for it. They then build on this common ground to further explore the issue. This means that ...
25 Good Rogerian Argument Topic Ideas
Rogerian argument is one of the three types of arguments. The other two are Toulmin argument and the Classical argument, which are actually contradictory to the Rogerian theory. Rogerian argument is an argument where the both sides win because of the careful approach and persuasion. It is mainly useful in psychological arguments, rather than in ...
Rogerian Argument
Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging ...
100+ Rogerian Essay Topics and Ideas
A Rogerian essay stems from the principles of psychologist Carl Rogers, the man behind the concept of 'client-centered therapy.' This essay style goes beyond the conventional win-lose argumentative strategies. ... Understanding and integrating two sides of an argument requires skill, patience, and practice. If you feel overwhelmed, remember ...
Sample Rogerian Argument
Below, you'll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA 7 th edition guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements. Click the image below to open a PDF of the sample paper. In the sample, the strategies and techniques the author used have been noted for you.
415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas
415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas. Rogerian essay topics often delve into contentious issues, encouraging a balanced exploration of divergent perspectives. They may explore hot-button issues, like climate change, gun control, or immigration, always prioritizing empathetic understanding over rigid debate.
The Rogerian Argument Essay: A Practical Guide to Effective Persuasion
The Rogerian approach in the introduction sets the stage for the writer's intention to find a valid acceptable solution together, rather than merely winning an argument. This approach helps to avoid creating an adversarial relationship between the writer and the reader. It also leads to a more productive dialogue.
Rogerian Argument
The Rogerian argument, inspired by the influential psychologist Carl Rogers, aims to find compromise on a controversial issue. If you are using the Rogerian approach your introduction to the argument should accomplish three objectives: 1. Introduce the author and work. Usually, you will introduce the author and work in the first sentence: Here ...
Essay 2
The purpose of Essay 2 is to construct a Rogerian Argument. Students will use research skills and rhetorical analysis to investigate conflicting viewpoints on an issue with state or national impact. By addressing conflicting viewpoints fairly, accurately, and empathetically, the result of a Rogerian Argument is a compromise-based solution that ...
How to Write a Rogerian Essay with Help from Roger Rabbit
As opposed to the traditional 5-paragraph essay, which has three main points as the body paragraphs, the Rogerian essay focuses on trying to work out the main arguments of each side. The first body paragraph should focus on one side of the argument, and the second paragraph should focus on the other side. It doesn't matter which side you ...
4.5 Rogerian Argument
Understanding all (or most) of the points surrounding your given topic will strengthen your own position as you will create a more fully informed essay. Pantuso, Terri, Sarah LeMire, and Kathy Anders, eds. Informed Arguments: A Guide to Writing and Research. Rev. 2nd ed. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2022.
How to Write a Rogerian Essay: Complete Guide and Sample Essay
2. Write the introduction. Attract the reader with a catchy beginning. Then you need to depict the problem (or issue) and how it affects both you and your readers. Give background information on the issue and add as many details as you can to make a full picture of the discussed issue. Don't criticize or use bias.
Rogerian Argument: Definition and Examples
Updated on October 01, 2019. Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening .
Rogerian Argument Essays (Examples)
The child counselor will also need to address the comments Beth has made regarding herself to determine if there is a risk of self-injury, or a…. View our collection of rogerian argument essays. Find inspiration for topics, titles, outlines, & craft impactful rogerian argument papers.
Subject Guides: English (EN)
A Rogerian Essay explores both sides of an issue and suggests a compromise, synthesis or solution. It's sometimes referred to as a "common ground" argument paper. A Rogerian Essay outline may look like this*: ... The database includes more than 4,070 titles, nearly 2,800 in full text, from 1971 forward. ...
Rogerian Argument
This type of argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to find common ground with others. Here is a summary of the basic strategy for a Rogerian argument, and the infographic on the following page should be helpful as well. In your essay, first, introduce the problem.
How to Write a Rogerian Argument Essay
Composing a Rogerian Argument essay can be challenging if you don't know how to go about it. In view of therapist Carl Rogers' work, a Rogerian argument centers on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This kind of contention can be amazingly enticing and can help you, as an essayist, comprehend your own biases and how you may attempt to find a middle ground with others.
8.2: Rogerian Argument
Permission granted from Michael Franco at Writing Essay 4: Rogerian Argument This page titled 8.2: Rogerian Argument is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Lumen Learning via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon ...
ROGERIAN ARGUMENTS
Research-Based Rogerian Argument Assignment: For paper #4, you will be writing a grammatically correct, clearly organized essay that uses Rogerian Argument to explore and then state a position on a controversial social, ethical, intellectual, or historical issue. As a writer, your reason for creating this paper is to persuade your readers to ...
The Rogerian Argument
4. The Bridge: A solid Rogerian argument acknowledges the desires of each side and tries to accommodate both. In this part, point out the ways in which you agree or can find common ground between the two sides. There should be at least one point of agreement. This can be an acknowledgement of the one part of the opposition's agreement that ...
Essays on Rogerian Argument
Rogerian Argument Essay Topics and Outline Examples Essay Title 1: Bridging the Divide: Finding Common Ground in the Gun Control Debate. Thesis Statement: Using the Rogerian argument approach, this essay seeks to promote constructive dialogue and explore potential compromises in the polarized debate over gun control in the United States.
60 Best Rogerian Essay Topics [2024 Updated]
Here Is a List of Rogerian Essay Topics for College Level Students. You can use the arguments below to compose your essay. The highlight can also give you the right direction of thinking. Legalizing the smoking of marijuana. Testing of human drugs on animals. College students and gun ownership. Enactment of same-sex marriages laws.
Gun Control: Rogerian Argument On The Anti-violence Campaign
The core public policy arguments can be put under three main justifications yet unlike pro-gun arguments these justifications constitute a unity, meaning that the adoption of one argument while rejecting or ignoring the other is not an existing way of conduct.
How to Write an Argumentative Essay
Persuasive essays: Argumentative essays: Choose a position and present only the evidence that supports it: Choose a position but also show other opinions (rebuttal) You provide evidence and can also be a bit emotional to convince the reader: You stay unbiased and show only specific data, facts, reasons, and evidence

50 Rogerian Essay Topics

Fundamentals of Rogerian Essay Writing

The Introduction: Start by Stating the Issue

Presenting Both Sides of the Argument: The Body paragraphs

Finding a Solution: The Conclusion

Rogerian Essay Topics About Social Issues

Rogerian Essay Topics About Education

Rogerian Essay Topics About Technology

Rogerian Essay Topics About Health Care

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family and Relationships

Related Posts

Categories:

Recent posts:

Testimonials

25 Good Rogerian Argument Topic Ideas

Did You Know?

Rogerian Argument Topics

Get Updates Right to Your Inbox

Privacy Overview

Rogerian Argument

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

Introduction

Opposing position

Context for opposing position

Your Position

Context for your position

100+ Rogerian Essay Topics

What is a Rogerian Essay?

Quick Guide: Choosing the Right Rogerian Essay Topic

Compelling Rogerian Essay Topics Lists

Human Rights and Social Issues

Healthcare Debates

Environmental Concerns

Technology and Privacy

Education Discourses

Political and Economic Debates

Legal and Ethical Dilemmas

Cultural and Society Interactions

Cultural Dynamics

Science and Nature

Health and Lifestyle

Media and Entertainment

Politics and Governance

Social Interactions and Relationships

Ethics and Morality

Economics and Commerce

Technological Advancements

Travel and Exploration

Arts and Expression

Your Next Step: Expert Assistance is Just a Click Away!

Useful References

415 Rogerian Essay Topics & Good Ideas

Best Rogerian Essay Topics

Easy Rogerian Topics

Interesting Rogerian Topics

Rogerian Argument Topics

Rogerian Persuasive Topics

Rogerian Essay Topics on Social Issues

Education Rogerian Essay Topics

Technology Rogerian Essay Topics

Rogerian Essay Topics on Health Care

Rogerian Essay Topics About Family & Relationship

Rogerian Essay Topics on Education Reforms

Globalization Rogerian Essay Topics

Rogerian Essay Topics About Gender & Sexuality

Rogerian Essay Topics About Animal Rights

Gun Control Rogerian Essay Topics

Business Rogerian Essay Topics

Rogerian Essay Topics About Culture & Society

To Learn More, Read Relevant Articles

The Rogerian Method: A Practical Guide to Effective Persuasion

Definitions of the Rogerian Model

Structure of Essay with Rogerian Method Argumentation

Introduction

Reconciliation

Tips on How to Use Rogerian Argumentation in Essay

Related posts:

How to Write a Scholarship Essay

Improve your writing with our guides

Definition Essay: The Complete Guide with Essay Topics and Examples