transfer vs assignment

Difference Between Assignment and Transfer

The difference between assignment and transfer is that assign means it's legal to transfer property or a legal right from one person to another. 3 min read updated on February 01, 2023

The difference between assignment and transfer is that assign means it's legal to transfer property or a legal right from one person to another, while transfer means it's legal to arrange for something to be controlled by or officially belong to another person.

When used as verbs, assign means to set apart or designate something for a purpose while transfer means to pass or move from one person, place, or thing to someone or someplace else. When used as nouns, assign means the assignee and transfer is the act of removing or conveying something from one person, thing, or place to another. Transfer generally refers to titles whereas assignment is used with obligations and rights.

Definitions of Assignment and Transfer

Assignment: Assignment is used in real estate law and contracts law. It covers the transfer of rights held by the assignor to the assignee.
Transfer: To remove or convey from one person or place to someone or somewhere else.

Distinction Between Assignment and Transfer

When distinguishing between assignment and transfer, take licenses, for example. Licenses are contracts that don't allow legal action for infringement. They fall under state law. Therefore, state law will decide whether the license is an obligation or right that can be transferred or assigned legally.

One way to distinguish this example is that an individual contract under an agreement cannot be assigned, like entitlement to grant back royalties . In addition, the contract cannot be transferred. You need to break it down and figure out what the actual issue is — the parties' intent. An additional distinction is when the contract holder is an entity and the business owners want to transfer a portion or all of their stock. This can be seen as an implied transfer of the whole contract. However, it would not likely be an assignment of the rights covered under this agreement.

Difference Between Assign and License

The key difference between assign and license is that with a license, the person who grants permission, known as the licensor, keeps an interest in the product being licensed . In an assignment, the assignor will transfer his or her rights to the product or property being assigned.

Another difference is that assignments must be in writing and a license can be executed without being written. Consider, for example, intellectual property such as patents. Patents can be licensed verbally in some instances, but assignments for patents must be in writing and filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office .

Assignments grant the assignee full ownership of a product or property. Therefore, an assignment will typically cost more to acquire than a license.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there ever situations in which a license can be transferred but is not assignable?

Yes, in the case of allowing an assignment to one of your affiliates, the assignor would still be liable for the performance of the agreement under general assignment law. In this situation, you would not typically permit a transfer, because in a transfer, the person transferring would not maintain any obligations related to performance. Don't rely solely on this general understanding, but still expressly detail your agreement on what a licensee can legally do.

How will transfer and assignment rights affect someone's ability to sublicense?

In theory, if a licensee has the authority to assign license rights to someone else, you could argue that it also provides the right to sublicense it. The issue here is that with a sublicense, the person sublicensing it keeps a license right, therefore effectively creating two licensees. With an assignment, only one right is assigned, and the assignee is the one who has possession of the license. With well-drafted licenses, the right to sublicense is not typically implied, as the licensor is the one who reserves all rights that are not expressly granted.

What is the effect of poorly drafted licenses?

A poorly drafted license could result in giving someone implied rights to also sublicense. An example is a software license that allows a licensee to access the software without clarifying any restrictions or clearly defining the word “use.” This means that, depending on what this software is supposed to do, someone could think the term “use” means the licensee has permission to grant a sublicense as part of their usage rights.

If you need help understanding the difference between assignment and transfer, you can post your legal need on UpCounsel's marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5 percent of lawyers to its site. Lawyers on UpCounsel come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and average 14 years of legal experience, including work with or on behalf of companies like Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb.

Hire the top business lawyers and save up to 60% on legal fees

Content Approved by UpCounsel

Assignment Law
Assignment and Novation Agreement: What You Need to Know
Legal Assignment
Assignment Legal Definition
Assignment Of Contracts
Assignment of Rights and Obligations Under a Contract
Partial Assignment of Contract
Assignment of Rights Example
What Is the Definition of Assigns
Transfer of Intellectual Property

Transfer And Assignment Agreement

Jump to section, what is a transfer and assignment agreement.

A transfer and assignment agreement is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions of the transfer of an employee from one company to another. It also includes the assignment of all rights and obligations, including any IP or confidential information. This document can be used to protect both the employee and the employer in case of any disputes. When negotiating a transfer and assignment agreement, it is important to consider all potential risks and liabilities.

Common Sections in Transfer And Assignment Agreements

Below is a list of common sections included in Transfer And Assignment Agreements. These sections are linked to the below sample agreement for you to explore.

Transfer And Assignment Agreement Sample

Reference : Security Exchange Commission - Edgar Database, EX-10.7 10 dex107.htm FORM OF SALE, TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT , Viewed April 26, 2022, View Source on SEC .

Who Helps With Transfer And Assignment Agreements?

Lawyers with backgrounds working on transfer and assignment agreements work with clients to help. Do you need help with a transfer and assignment agreement?

Post a project in ContractsCounsel's marketplace to get free bids from lawyers to draft, review, or negotiate transfer and assignment agreements. All lawyers are vetted by our team and peer reviewed by our customers for you to explore before hiring.

Meet some of our Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers

I have a Juris Doctorate degree from Mercer Law School, and I am an active member of the Georgia State Bar Association. I have spent the last eight years reviewing, drafting, editing, and negotiating hundreds of contracts on a monthly basis, working in-house for a Fortune 500 company. I am a results-driven, self-motivated, experienced contracts attorney with exceptional drafting, research and communication abilities.

Transactional attorney and corporate in house counsel for 15 years. Draft all types of contracts and employment agreements.

Drew Melville is a Florida and Massachusetts-licensed attorney with fourteen years' experience in real estate transactions, title insurance and land use. His practice includes all aspects of commercial real estate acquisitions, dispositions, financing, joint venture formation, leasing and land use approvals. Mr. Melville is a title agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, First American Title Insurance Company, and Stewart Title Guaranty Company. Mr. Melville's practice is national in scope, and he brings a creative and solution-oriented approach to his clients' diverse array of real estate investment and development activities in all real estate asset classes. These often include urban infill, adaptive reuse, affordable and workforce housing, historic preservation, sustainable building, brownfield or gray-field redevelopment and opportunity zones. Prior to starting his own firm, he was an in house counsel for the real estate development subsidiary of a large, diversified land and agribusiness company. To date, Mr. Melville has closed over $1.2 billion in commercial real estate transactions.

Florida Licensed Attorney & CFA® Charterholder Specializing in Immigration, Taxation, Aviation, Bankruptcy, Estate & Succession, and Business & Civil Litigation

Veritas Global Law, PLLC ("Veritas") is a law firm specializing in Life Sciences, Private Equity, M&A, technology transactions and general corporate law. Veritas frequently represents clients seeking cost a cost efficient, on-demand, general counsel in a variety of general corporate law matters, and a range of contracts including NDAs, MSAs, Software as a Service (Saas) agreements. Veritas also represents U.S. and non-U.S. private investment fund GPs and LPs across a broad range of activities with a particular emphasis on private equity, venture capital, secondary funds, distressed funds and funds of funds. Mr. Harris received his LL.M. from the University of California, Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law and served as an articles editor of the Berkeley Business Law Journal and was an active member of the Berkeley Center for Law Business and the Economy. Additionally, Mr. Harris also holds a J.D. from Boston College Law School, a M.B.A. from the Boston College Carroll School of Management, a B.A. from Hampton University in Political Science with a minor in Economics and Spanish and a certificate in financial valuation from the University of Oxford, Saïd Business School.

Samantha P.

Samantha earned her J.D. at the University of Hawaii, William S. Richardson School of Law and has been a member of the Hawaii State Bar Association since 2020. Samantha has worked as a Family Law attorney in Hawaii since 2020, and has represented clients on a variety of family law matters including: premarital agreements, pre- and post-judgement custody, parenting time and child support issues, pre- and post-divorce issues, interstate custody, and paternity issues. Samantha is a certified E-RYT 200 yoga instructor, taught yoga classes at the Modern Hotel in Waikiki throughout law school, and continues to teach yoga classes at various yoga studios in Honolulu to this day.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/james-swindle/

Find the best lawyer for your project

How it works.

Post Your Project

Get Free Bids to Compare

Hire Your Lawyer

Business lawyers by top cities

Austin Business Lawyers
Boston Business Lawyers
Chicago Business Lawyers
Dallas Business Lawyers
Denver Business Lawyers
Houston Business Lawyers
Los Angeles Business Lawyers
New York Business Lawyers
Phoenix Business Lawyers
San Diego Business Lawyers
Tampa Business Lawyers

Transfer And Assignment Agreement lawyers by city

Austin Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Boston Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Chicago Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Dallas Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Denver Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Houston Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Los Angeles Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
New York Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Phoenix Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
San Diego Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers
Tampa Transfer And Assignment Agreement Lawyers

related contracts

93a Demand Letter
Accounting Services Agreement
Accounts Receivable Purchase Agreement
Ad Agency Contract
Adhesion Contract
Advertising Services Agreement
Agency Agreement
Agency Contract

Want to speak to someone?

Get in touch below and we will schedule a time to connect!

Find lawyers and attorneys by city

Primary tabs

Assignment is a legal term whereby an individual, the “assignor,” transfers rights, property, or other benefits to another known as the “ assignee .” This concept is used in both contract and property law. The term can refer to either the act of transfer or the rights /property/benefits being transferred.

Contract Law

Under contract law, assignment of a contract is both: (1) an assignment of rights; and (2) a delegation of duties , in the absence of evidence otherwise. For example, if A contracts with B to teach B guitar for $50, A can assign this contract to C. That is, this assignment is both: (1) an assignment of A’s rights under the contract to the $50; and (2) a delegation of A’s duty to teach guitar to C. In this example, A is both the “assignor” and the “delegee” who d elegates the duties to another (C), C is known as the “ obligor ” who must perform the obligations to the assignee , and B is the “ assignee ” who is owed duties and is liable to the “ obligor ”.

(1) Assignment of Rights/Duties Under Contract Law

There are a few notable rules regarding assignments under contract law. First, if an individual has not yet secured the contract to perform duties to another, he/she cannot assign his/her future right to an assignee . That is, if A has not yet contracted with B to teach B guitar, A cannot assign his/her rights to C. Second, rights cannot be assigned when they materially change the obligor ’s duty and rights. Third, the obligor can sue the assignee directly if the assignee does not pay him/her. Following the previous example, this means that C ( obligor ) can sue B ( assignee ) if C teaches guitar to B, but B does not pay C $50 in return.

(2) Delegation of Duties

If the promised performance requires a rare genius or skill, then the delegee cannot delegate it to the obligor. It can only be delegated if the promised performance is more commonplace. Further, an obligee can sue if the assignee does not perform. However, the delegee is secondarily liable unless there has been an express release of the delegee. That is, if B does want C to teach guitar but C refuses to, then B can sue C. If C still refuses to perform, then B can compel A to fulfill the duties under secondary liability.

Lastly, a related concept is novation , which is when a new obligor substitutes and releases an old obligor. If novation occurs, then the original obligor’s duties are wiped out. However, novation requires an original obligee’s consent .

Property Law

Under property law, assignment typically arises in landlord-tenant situations. For example, A might be renting from landlord B but wants to another party (C) to take over the property. In this scenario, A might be able to choose between assigning and subleasing the property to C. If assigning , A would be giving C the entire balance of the term, with no reversion to anyone whereas if subleasing , A would be giving C for a limited period of the remaining term. Significantly, under assignment C would have privity of estate with the landlord while under a sublease, C would not.

[Last updated in May of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team ]

business law
landlord & tenant
property & real estate law
trusts, inheritances & estates
wex definitions

Difference between Transfer and Assignment

19 Feb 2022 · 4 mins read

A single word may have more than one meanings. One might wonder how complex language is and how confusing words are. Transfer and assignment are such similar terms interchangeably used yet different in legal sense. The article discusses the meaning, types of assignment and how it is different from that of transfers.

In simple terms, assignment means the sale of IP i.e., the transfer of complete ownership to the assignee including the right to exclude others from infringing it. To constitute an assignment, the terms and conditions of contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The agreement must be signed and written. The specific IP laws determine the features of such assignment in detail. In Copyright law partial assignment is also permitted under section 18, which requires to mention specifically the rights assigned. Also, it is necessary to mention the time period for which the assignment is made. In the absence of such time period, generally 5 years is taken as a limit. Assigner is the owner who assigns it to another person known as assignee.

Assignment is different from that of licensing in a way that the latter only parts with certain rights and the ownership rests with the person who is ready to give away the rights.

The following are some of the common types of assignment:-

Legal Assignment- When the transfer of existing registered IP is transferred, wherein the new owner acquires all rights, it is known as legal assignment.

Equitable Assignment- It occurs when before the registration, the assigner is willing to transfer it to the assignee. Once the registration is done the assignee can acquire all the rights. Although the assignee cannot register himself as the proprietor but can show interest in the IP through a notice.
Mortgage- It is the total or partial transfer of IP in return of a sum of money. Once the money is repaid, the IP is reinstated to its original owner.

On the other hand, transfer means to convey or remove from one person or place to another person. Transfer is of titles whereas the Assignment is for obligations and rights. 1

The term transfer is generally used for properties that can be possessed physically. For example, a car or house or those properties which can be represented by a legal instrument such as share

certificate.

Assign is generally associated with intangible properties such as a debt, or benefits arising from contracts for example rental income under a lease agreement. 2

An assignment is thus different from other type of transfers such as subrogation, novation, sublease etc. Assignment is basically the transfer all rights, interests, titles which the assigner conveys to assignee and the latter stands in the shoes of the assigner. 3

Though the difference between novation and assignment is narrower, one ought to know the difference. “ Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party. ” 4

And for the transfer of the property, the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applies. It extensively deals with various kinds of transfers. There are certain set rules for transfer of property. For instance, one needs to be of sound mind, not intoxicated, of legal age and must not be disqualified by law. The Act lists kinds of transfer such as lease, mortgage, exchange, gift and sale.

To sum up, though the words transfer and assignment is used interchangeably there is a difference between them. They are governed by different legislations and are used for different purposes. So one needs to be careful and understand all the legal provisions before transferring anything.

1 Difference between Assignment and transfer, UPCOUNSEL, (Nov 09, 2021, 5: 25 pm), https://www.upcounsel.com/difference-between-assignment-and-transfer . 2 Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court, 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).. 3 Knott v. McDonald’s Corp., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997). 4 Assignments: the basic law, STIMMEL LAW, (Nov 9, 2022, 5: 48 pm), https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/assignments-basic-law .

中文 ( Chinese (Simplified) )

Law.asia home

Follow law.asia.

Business law digest
Deal Highlights
Dispute digest
Market pulse
Practitioners’ perspectives
Correspondents

Transfer or assign?

A common – and often confusing – feature of English legal terminology is that two or more words are used to describe what appears to be the same noun, adjective or verb. So we see two or more words describing nouns, such as “goods and chattels” and “will and testament”; two or more words describing adjectives, such as “null and void”, “in full force and effect” and “fit and proper”; and two or more words describing actions, such as “give, devise and bequeath” and “sell, transfer and assign”.

Often referred to as synonym strings, this practice can be attributed to a couple of factors. The first factor is the subtle difference in the traditional legal meaning of words. For example, “will” was traditionally used in relation to real (or immovable) property, and “testament” was traditionally used in relation to personal (or movable) property. Along similar lines, “devise” was used in relation to the testamentary gift of real property and “bequeath” was used in relation to the testamentary gift of personal property.

In the context of modern contracts, many of these traditional legal distinctions are no longer relevant. For example, each of the words “representations” and “warranties” traditionally referred to different concepts and gave rise to different remedies. However, they still appear in contracts as a matter of convention, even where they refer to the same concept (see Lexicon in China Business Law Journal volume 1, issue 3, page 78, entitled Warranties and misrepresentations).

The second factor causing synonym strings is historical and linguistic in nature. After the Normans conquered England in 1066, Norman French or “law French” became the language of the law, together with Latin. The use of Latin and law French was subsequently prohibited by a statute in 1731, which introduced English as the language of the law and the courts.

Despite the adoption of English as the language of the law, many lawyers continued to use the French words alongside their English equivalents in contracts and other legal documents. For example, the English word “goods” was inserted in the phrase “goods and chattels” and the English word “give” was inserted in the phrase “give, devise and bequeath”.

In this column, we look at the use of the words “transfer” and “assign” in common law jurisdictions, and the equivalent terms in China. We will also look at the assignment of contractual rights under English law and PRC law.

In all common law jurisdictions, each of the words “transfer” and “assign” is commonly used to describe the act by which ownership of an asset is passed from one party to another. The asset might be a right or interest in relation to tangible property, such as a house or car, or a right or interest in relation to intangible property, such as a contractual right or claim.

Although the words are often used interchangeably, “transfer” has traditionally been used in connection with property that is capable of being physically possessed (e.g. a house or car) and property where ownership is represented by a legal instrument (e.g. a share certificate).

“Assign”, on the other hand, has traditionally been used in relation to intangible property rights, such as a debt or the benefits arising under a contract (e.g. the rental income under a lease agreement).

Assignment of debts, contractual rights under English law

From a public policy perspective, the transfer of an asset that is capable of being physically possessed is much less complicated than the assignment of an asset that consists of a claim or right under a contract.

This is because a tangible asset has a separate existence, which is not dependent on the acts or obligations of a third party. As long as the person in possession of the asset is also its owner and has clean title to the asset, no third parties will be adversely affected by the transfer.

In the case of the assignment of a debt or the benefits arising under a contract, however, the asset consists of a right to claim payment from a third party (i.e. the debtor or obligor).

The third party will be affected by the assignment, as it may be asked by the assignee to make payments to itself in place of the assignor. It will also be adversely affected if the assignment means that it loses the right to set off any payment obligations owing by the assignor against its own payment obligations.

Before the statutory development that occurred under the Judicature Act 1873, an assignment of a debt or contractual right was recognised in equity as an equitable assignment (see Lexicon in China Business Law Journal volume 3, issue 5, page 74, entitled Law or equity?).

Under an equitable assignment, the assignee could not enforce the debt or contractual right directly against the debtor or the obligor. However, it could require the assignor to sue the debtor or the obligor in the assignor’s name to recover payment on behalf of the assignee.

The Judicature Act (now section 136 of the Law of Property Act) introduced the concept of a legal assignment. Under a legal assignment, the assignee is able to step into the shoes of the assignor and claim payment directly from the debtor or the obligor if four conditions are satisfied: (1) the assignment is absolute (i.e. it is not part of a security arrangement); (2) the assignment is in writing; (3) the whole of the debt is assigned; and (4) written notice has been given to the debtor or the obligor. The relevant part of section 136 is set out below (note that a “legal thing in action” is a right that has no physical existence and can only be enforced through legal action).

第136条据法财产的法定转让 (1) 转让人以书面形式作出并亲笔签署（其意并非只是以押记形式作出）的债权或其他据法财产的绝对转让，如果转让人已就该项绝对转让向该等债权或据法财产的债务人、受托人或其他义务人给予明确的书面通知，则该绝对转让具有法律效力并且自上述通知之日起向受让人转移和转让以下权利： (a) 该等债权或据法财产的法律权利； (b) 该等债权或据法财产的所有法律或其他救济措施； (c) 无须转让人的同意而直接确认债务人已妥为清偿该等债务或据法财产 … 136 Legal assignments of things in action. (1) Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law … to pass and transfer from the date of such notice: (a) the legal right to such debt or thing in action; (b) all legal and other remedies for the same; and (c) the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor …

The above section – and its equivalent in other common law jurisdictions – is one of the most important statutory provisions in commerce, as it underpins the trade in financial assets and supports many financial transactions, such as securitisation.

There is, however, a complex question that has not been conclusively answered in many common law jurisdictions: what is the legal position if the contract creating the debt prohibits an assignment by the creditor or provides that an assignment of the debt will not be effective without the consent of the debtor?

If a creditor assigns a debt in breach of a contractual prohibition, there are three possible outcomes:

the assignment is wholly ineffective;
the assignment is ineffective against the debtor but effective between the assignor and the assignee; or
the assignment is wholly effective, both against the assignor and also the debtor (once written notice is given).

The question involves important issues of public policy, as it creates a conflict between two fundamental principles – namely, the principle of freedom of trade (under which the owners of financial assets should be able to sell them freely and without restriction) and the principle of freedom of contract (under which the parties to a contract should be free to determine their respective rights and obligations without undue interference from the law).

In England, the position is not settled.

The weight of legal opinion is in favour of treating the assignment as effective between the assignor and the assignee, but not between the assignee and the debtor. In the US, on the other hand, the law has decided in favour of freedom of trade by treating the assignment as fully effective. Article 9-138(4) of the Uniform Commercial Code provides that a term in any contract between a debtor and an assignor is ineffective if it prohibits the assignment of the debt or requires the debtor’s consent to an assignment.

As is the case in the English language, there are also several words in the Chinese language that describe the act by which tangible or intangible property rights are passed from one party to another.

These include “ 转让 ”, “ 转移 ” (or “ 移转 ” and “ 让与 ”). Some of the contexts in which these words are used are explained below.

“ 转让 ” and “ 转移 ” are often used interchangeably to refer to both the transfer of rights and the transfer of obligations from one party to another party.

See, for example, articles 84 and 88 of the PRC Contract Law, which respectively refer to the transfer of obligations and concurrent transfer of rights and obligations.

“ 转移 ” is often used to refer to the transfer of title. For example, article 130 of the PRC Contract Law provides that “a sales contract is a contract whereby the seller transfers title to the subject matter to the buyer, who pays the price”.

The term “ 让与 ” is often used to describe the assignment of contractual rights or the assignment of debts.

Assignment of debts or contractual rights under PRC law

Similar to article 136 of the Law of Property Act in England, articles 79 and 80 of the PRC Contract Law make provision for an assignment of contractual rights as follows:

第七十九条　债权人可以将合同的权利全部或者部分转让给第三人，但有下列情形之一的除外： (一）根据合同性质不得转让； (二）按照当事人约定不得转让； (三）依照法律规定不得转让。第八十条　债权人转让权利的，应当通知债务人。未经通知，该转让对债务人不发生效力。债权人转让权利的通知不得撤销，但经受让人同意的除外。 Article 79 An obligee may assign its rights under a contract in whole or in part to a third person, except in any of the following circumstances: (i) the rights are not capable of assignment in light of the nature of the contract; (ii) in accordance with the agreement between the parties, the rights may not be assigned; (iii) the law provides that the rights may not be assigned. Article 80 Where an obligee assigns its rights, it must notify the obligor. An assignment that is not notified is not binding upon the obligor. A notice of assignment of rights given by the obligee may not be revoked, except with the consent of the assignee.

Under article 79(ii), contractual rights may not be assigned if there is a prohibition against assignment in the contract. As a result, PRC law has taken the opposite position to the law in the US by providing that an assignment in breach of a contractual prohibition is wholly ineffective.

It will be interesting to see if PRC law becomes more flexible in the future and provides for a special set of rules in the case of commercial transactions.

If it does, it will be interesting to see whether it adopts a position similar to that in jurisdictions like England, where the assignment is effective between the assignor and the assignee, but not against the debtor, or a position similar to that in the US and France, where the assignment is wholly effective both against the assignor and the debtor (once written notice is given).

[/ihc-hide-content]

A former partner of Linklaters Shanghai, Andrew Godwin teaches law at Melbourne Law School in Australia, where he is an associate director of its Asian Law Centre. Andrew’s new book is a compilation of China Business Law Journal’s popular Lexicon series, entitled China Lexicon: Defining and translating legal terms. The book is published by Vantage Asia and available at law.asia.

Taiwan’s top 100 lawyers

Based on an extensive survey of in-house counsel and others, we reveal the top 100 lawyers in Taiwan

Vietnam: protecting intellectual property rights

Vietnam issues cybersecurity directive amid attacks

The A-List 2023-24: Rising Stars

100 young elite lawyers for China market

China Deals of The Year 2023

From blockbuster issuances to fiercely contested disputes, we proudly unveil the Deals of the Year 2023

The A-List 2023-24: Growth Drivers

Leaders of seven leading arbitration institutions review their development highlights and explore future landscape

CORRESPONDENTS

Renewable Energy Investment in South Africa

Precautions before investing in South African green energy

Challenges in reducing subscribed registered capital

How consumer, retail companies can capture compliance and profits

Brains trust: Adjudicating private fund e-contracts

CITIC Securities top in-house lawyers discuss validity issues and trial rules that adjudicators can follow

Back from the brink

China's increasingly mature bankruptcy regime has become a reliable tool for market self-correction

PRACTITIONERS' PERSPECTIVES

Compliance on notification threshold for anti-monopoly filing

Upgrading data breach prevention and response

Supervision of SOEs’ external investment by equity participation

Grounds for jurisdiction

Policy on advertising & sponsorship
Terms & conditions of use
Privacy Policy

Join our mailing list for legal news and alerts

Understanding an assignment and assumption agreement

Need to assign your rights and duties under a contract? Learn more about the basics of an assignment and assumption agreement.

Find more Legal Forms and Templates

by Belle Wong, J.D.

Belle Wong, is a freelance writer specializing in small business, personal finance, banking, and tech/SAAS. She ...

The assignment and assumption agreement

The basics of assignment and assumption, filling in the assignment and assumption agreement.

While every business should try its best to meet its contractual obligations, changes in circumstance can happen that could necessitate transferring your rights and duties under a contract to another party who would be better able to meet those obligations.

Person presenting documents to another person who is signing them

If you find yourself in such a situation, and your contract provides for the possibility of assignment, an assignment and assumption agreement can be a good option for preserving your relationship with the party you initially contracted with, while at the same time enabling you to pass on your contractual rights and duties to a third party.

An assignment and assumption agreement is used after a contract is signed, in order to transfer one of the contracting party's rights and obligations to a third party who was not originally a party to the contract. The party making the assignment is called the assignor, while the third party accepting the assignment is known as the assignee.

In order for an assignment and assumption agreement to be valid, the following criteria need to be met:

The initial contract must provide for the possibility of assignment by one of the initial contracting parties.
The assignor must agree to assign their rights and duties under the contract to the assignee.
The assignee must agree to accept, or "assume," those contractual rights and duties.
The other party to the initial contract must consent to the transfer of rights and obligations to the assignee.

A standard assignment and assumption contract is often a good starting point if you need to enter into an assignment and assumption agreement. However, for more complex situations, such as an assignment and amendment agreement in which several of the initial contract terms will be modified, or where only some, but not all, rights and duties will be assigned, it's a good idea to retain the services of an attorney who can help you draft an agreement that will meet all your needs.

When you're ready to enter into an assignment and assumption agreement, it's a good idea to have a firm grasp of the basics of assignment:

First, carefully read and understand the assignment and assumption provision in the initial contract. Contracts vary widely in their language on this topic, and each contract will have specific criteria that must be met in order for a valid assignment of rights to take place.
All parties to the agreement should carefully review the document to make sure they each know what they're agreeing to, and to help ensure that all important terms and conditions have been addressed in the agreement.
Until the agreement is signed by all the parties involved, the assignor will still be obligated for all responsibilities stated in the initial contract. If you are the assignor, you need to ensure that you continue with business as usual until the assignment and assumption agreement has been properly executed.

Unless you're dealing with a complex assignment situation, working with a template often is a good way to begin drafting an assignment and assumption agreement that will meet your needs. Generally speaking, your agreement should include the following information:

Identification of the existing agreement, including details such as the date it was signed and the parties involved, and the parties' rights to assign under this initial agreement
The effective date of the assignment and assumption agreement
Identification of the party making the assignment (the assignor), and a statement of their desire to assign their rights under the initial contract
Identification of the third party accepting the assignment (the assignee), and a statement of their acceptance of the assignment
Identification of the other initial party to the contract, and a statement of their consent to the assignment and assumption agreement
A section stating that the initial contract is continued; meaning, that, other than the change to the parties involved, all terms and conditions in the original contract stay the same

In addition to these sections that are specific to an assignment and assumption agreement, your contract should also include standard contract language, such as clauses about indemnification, future amendments, and governing law.

Sometimes circumstances change, and as a business owner you may find yourself needing to assign your rights and duties under a contract to another party. A properly drafted assignment and assumption agreement can help you make the transfer smoothly while, at the same time, preserving the cordiality of your initial business relationship under the original contract.

Assignments: The Basic Law

The assignment of a right or obligation is a common contractual event under the law and the right to assign (or prohibition against assignments) is found in the majority of agreements, leases and business structural documents created in the United States.

As with many terms commonly used, people are familiar with the term but often are not aware or fully aware of what the terms entail. The concept of assignment of rights and obligations is one of those simple concepts with wide ranging ramifications in the contractual and business context and the law imposes severe restrictions on the validity and effect of assignment in many instances. Clear contractual provisions concerning assignments and rights should be in every document and structure created and this article will outline why such drafting is essential for the creation of appropriate and effective contracts and structures.

The reader should first read the article on Limited Liability Entities in the United States and Contracts since the information in those articles will be assumed in this article.

Basic Definitions and Concepts:

An assignment is the transfer of rights held by one party called the “assignor” to another party called the “assignee.” The legal nature of the assignment and the contractual terms of the agreement between the parties determines some additional rights and liabilities that accompany the assignment. The assignment of rights under a contract usually completely transfers the rights to the assignee to receive the benefits accruing under the contract. Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court , 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950).

An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment in the underlying contract or lease. Where assignments are permitted, the assignor need not consult the other party to the contract but may merely assign the rights at that time. However, an assignment cannot have any adverse effect on the duties of the other party to the contract, nor can it diminish the chance of the other party receiving complete performance. The assignor normally remains liable unless there is an agreement to the contrary by the other party to the contract.

The effect of a valid assignment is to remove privity between the assignor and the obligor and create privity between the obligor and the assignee. Privity is usually defined as a direct and immediate contractual relationship. See Merchants case above.

Further, for the assignment to be effective in most jurisdictions, it must occur in the present. One does not normally assign a future right; the assignment vests immediate rights and obligations.

No specific language is required to create an assignment so long as the assignor makes clear his/her intent to assign identified contractual rights to the assignee. Since expensive litigation can erupt from ambiguous or vague language, obtaining the correct verbiage is vital. An agreement must manifest the intent to transfer rights and can either be oral or in writing and the rights assigned must be certain.

Note that an assignment of an interest is the transfer of some identifiable property, claim, or right from the assignor to the assignee. The assignment operates to transfer to the assignee all of the rights, title, or interest of the assignor in the thing assigned. A transfer of all rights, title, and interests conveys everything that the assignor owned in the thing assigned and the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor. Knott v. McDonald’s Corp ., 985 F. Supp. 1222 (N.D. Cal. 1997)

The parties must intend to effectuate an assignment at the time of the transfer, although no particular language or procedure is necessary. As long ago as the case of National Reserve Co. v. Metropolitan Trust Co ., 17 Cal. 2d 827 (Cal. 1941), the court held that in determining what rights or interests pass under an assignment, the intention of the parties as manifested in the instrument is controlling.

The intent of the parties to an assignment is a question of fact to be derived not only from the instrument executed by the parties but also from the surrounding circumstances. When there is no writing to evidence the intention to transfer some identifiable property, claim, or right, it is necessary to scrutinize the surrounding circumstances and parties’ acts to ascertain their intentions. Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998)

The general rule applicable to assignments of choses in action is that an assignment, unless there is a contract to the contrary, carries with it all securities held by the assignor as collateral to the claim and all rights incidental thereto and vests in the assignee the equitable title to such collateral securities and incidental rights. An unqualified assignment of a contract or chose in action, however, with no indication of the intent of the parties, vests in the assignee the assigned contract or chose and all rights and remedies incidental thereto.

More examples: In Strosberg v. Brauvin Realty Servs ., 295 Ill. App. 3d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1st Dist. 1998), the court held that the assignee of a party to a subordination agreement is entitled to the benefits and is subject to the burdens of the agreement. In Florida E. C. R. Co. v. Eno , 99 Fla. 887 (Fla. 1930), the court held that the mere assignment of all sums due in and of itself creates no different or other liability of the owner to the assignee than that which existed from the owner to the assignor.

And note that even though an assignment vests in the assignee all rights, remedies, and contingent benefits which are incidental to the thing assigned, those which are personal to the assignor and for his sole benefit are not assigned. Rasp v. Hidden Valley Lake, Inc ., 519 N.E.2d 153, 158 (Ind. Ct. App. 1988). Thus, if the underlying agreement provides that a service can only be provided to X, X cannot assign that right to Y.

Novation Compared to Assignment:

Although the difference between a novation and an assignment may appear narrow, it is an essential one. “Novation is a act whereby one party transfers all its obligations and benefits under a contract to a third party.” In a novation, a third party successfully substitutes the original party as a party to the contract. “When a contract is novated, the other contracting party must be left in the same position he was in prior to the novation being made.”

A sublease is the transfer when a tenant retains some right of reentry onto the leased premises. However, if the tenant transfers the entire leasehold estate, retaining no right of reentry or other reversionary interest, then the transfer is an assignment. The assignor is normally also removed from liability to the landlord only if the landlord consents or allowed that right in the lease. In a sublease, the original tenant is not released from the obligations of the original lease.

Equitable Assignments:

An equitable assignment is one in which one has a future interest and is not valid at law but valid in a court of equity. In National Bank of Republic v. United Sec. Life Ins. & Trust Co. , 17 App. D.C. 112 (D.C. Cir. 1900), the court held that to constitute an equitable assignment of a chose in action, the following has to occur generally: anything said written or done, in pursuance of an agreement and for valuable consideration, or in consideration of an antecedent debt, to place a chose in action or fund out of the control of the owner, and appropriate it to or in favor of another person, amounts to an equitable assignment. Thus, an agreement, between a debtor and a creditor, that the debt shall be paid out of a specific fund going to the debtor may operate as an equitable assignment.

In Egyptian Navigation Co. v. Baker Invs. Corp. , 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30804 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2008), the court stated that an equitable assignment occurs under English law when an assignor, with an intent to transfer his/her right to a chose in action, informs the assignee about the right so transferred.

An executory agreement or a declaration of trust are also equitable assignments if unenforceable as assignments by a court of law but enforceable by a court of equity exercising sound discretion according to the circumstances of the case. Since California combines courts of equity and courts of law, the same court would hear arguments as to whether an equitable assignment had occurred. Quite often, such relief is granted to avoid fraud or unjust enrichment.

Note that obtaining an assignment through fraudulent means invalidates the assignment. Fraud destroys the validity of everything into which it enters. It vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments. Walker v. Rich , 79 Cal. App. 139 (Cal. App. 1926). If an assignment is made with the fraudulent intent to delay, hinder, and defraud creditors, then it is void as fraudulent in fact. See our article on Transfers to Defraud Creditors .

But note that the motives that prompted an assignor to make the transfer will be considered as immaterial and will constitute no defense to an action by the assignee, if an assignment is considered as valid in all other respects.

Enforceability of Assignments:

Whether a right under a contract is capable of being transferred is determined by the law of the place where the contract was entered into. The validity and effect of an assignment is determined by the law of the place of assignment. The validity of an assignment of a contractual right is governed by the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the assignment and the parties.

In some jurisdictions, the traditional conflict of laws rules governing assignments has been rejected and the law of the place having the most significant contacts with the assignment applies. In Downs v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co ., 14 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1964), a wife and her husband separated and the wife obtained a judgment of separation from the husband in New York. The judgment required the husband to pay a certain yearly sum to the wife. The husband assigned 50 percent of his future salary, wages, and earnings to the wife. The agreement authorized the employer to make such payments to the wife.

After the husband moved from New York, the wife learned that he was employed by an employer in Massachusetts. She sent the proper notice and demanded payment under the agreement. The employer refused and the wife brought an action for enforcement. The court observed that Massachusetts did not prohibit assignment of the husband’s wages. Moreover, Massachusetts law was not controlling because New York had the most significant relationship with the assignment. Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the wife.

Therefore, the validity of an assignment is determined by looking to the law of the forum with the most significant relationship to the assignment itself. To determine the applicable law of assignments, the court must look to the law of the state which is most significantly related to the principal issue before it.

Assignment of Contractual Rights:

Generally, the law allows the assignment of a contractual right unless the substitution of rights would materially change the duty of the obligor, materially increase the burden or risk imposed on the obligor by the contract, materially impair the chance of obtaining return performance, or materially reduce the value of the performance to the obligor. Restat 2d of Contracts, § 317(2)(a). This presumes that the underlying agreement is silent on the right to assign.

If the contract specifically precludes assignment, the contractual right is not assignable. Whether a contract is assignable is a matter of contractual intent and one must look to the language used by the parties to discern that intent.

In the absence of an express provision to the contrary, the rights and duties under a bilateral executory contract that does not involve personal skill, trust, or confidence may be assigned without the consent of the other party. But note that an assignment is invalid if it would materially alter the other party’s duties and responsibilities. Once an assignment is effective, the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor and assumes all of assignor’s rights. Hence, after a valid assignment, the assignor’s right to performance is extinguished, transferred to assignee, and the assignee possesses the same rights, benefits, and remedies assignor once possessed. Robert Lamb Hart Planners & Architects v. Evergreen, Ltd. , 787 F. Supp. 753 (S.D. Ohio 1992).

On the other hand, an assignee’s right against the obligor is subject to “all of the limitations of the assignor’s right, all defenses thereto, and all set-offs and counterclaims which would have been available against the assignor had there been no assignment, provided that these defenses and set-offs are based on facts existing at the time of the assignment.” See Robert Lamb , case, above.

The power of the contract to restrict assignment is broad. Usually, contractual provisions that restrict assignment of the contract without the consent of the obligor are valid and enforceable, even when there is statutory authorization for the assignment. The restriction of the power to assign is often ineffective unless the restriction is expressly and precisely stated. Anti-assignment clauses are effective only if they contain clear, unambiguous language of prohibition. Anti-assignment clauses protect only the obligor and do not affect the transaction between the assignee and assignor.

Usually, a prohibition against the assignment of a contract does not prevent an assignment of the right to receive payments due, unless circumstances indicate the contrary. Moreover, the contracting parties cannot, by a mere non-assignment provision, prevent the effectual alienation of the right to money which becomes due under the contract.

A contract provision prohibiting or restricting an assignment may be waived, or a party may so act as to be estopped from objecting to the assignment, such as by effectively ratifying the assignment. The power to void an assignment made in violation of an anti-assignment clause may be waived either before or after the assignment. See our article on Contracts.

Noncompete Clauses and Assignments:

Of critical import to most buyers of businesses is the ability to ensure that key employees of the business being purchased cannot start a competing company. Some states strictly limit such clauses, some do allow them. California does restrict noncompete clauses, only allowing them under certain circumstances. A common question in those states that do allow them is whether such rights can be assigned to a new party, such as the buyer of the buyer.

A covenant not to compete, also called a non-competitive clause, is a formal agreement prohibiting one party from performing similar work or business within a designated area for a specified amount of time. This type of clause is generally included in contracts between employer and employee and contracts between buyer and seller of a business.

Many workers sign a covenant not to compete as part of the paperwork required for employment. It may be a separate document similar to a non-disclosure agreement, or buried within a number of other clauses in a contract. A covenant not to compete is generally legal and enforceable, although there are some exceptions and restrictions.

Whenever a company recruits skilled employees, it invests a significant amount of time and training. For example, it often takes years before a research chemist or a design engineer develops a workable knowledge of a company’s product line, including trade secrets and highly sensitive information. Once an employee gains this knowledge and experience, however, all sorts of things can happen. The employee could work for the company until retirement, accept a better offer from a competing company or start up his or her own business.

A covenant not to compete may cover a number of potential issues between employers and former employees. Many companies spend years developing a local base of customers or clients. It is important that this customer base not fall into the hands of local competitors. When an employee signs a covenant not to compete, he or she usually agrees not to use insider knowledge of the company’s customer base to disadvantage the company. The covenant not to compete often defines a broad geographical area considered off-limits to former employees, possibly tens or hundreds of miles.

Another area of concern covered by a covenant not to compete is a potential ‘brain drain’. Some high-level former employees may seek to recruit others from the same company to create new competition. Retention of employees, especially those with unique skills or proprietary knowledge, is vital for most companies, so a covenant not to compete may spell out definite restrictions on the hiring or recruiting of employees.

A covenant not to compete may also define a specific amount of time before a former employee can seek employment in a similar field. Many companies offer a substantial severance package to make sure former employees are financially solvent until the terms of the covenant not to compete have been met.

Because the use of a covenant not to compete can be controversial, a handful of states, including California, have largely banned this type of contractual language. The legal enforcement of these agreements falls on individual states, and many have sided with the employee during arbitration or litigation. A covenant not to compete must be reasonable and specific, with defined time periods and coverage areas. If the agreement gives the company too much power over former employees or is ambiguous, state courts may declare it to be overbroad and therefore unenforceable. In such case, the employee would be free to pursue any employment opportunity, including working for a direct competitor or starting up a new company of his or her own.

It has been held that an employee’s covenant not to compete is assignable where one business is transferred to another, that a merger does not constitute an assignment of a covenant not to compete, and that a covenant not to compete is enforceable by a successor to the employer where the assignment does not create an added burden of employment or other disadvantage to the employee. However, in some states such as Hawaii, it has also been held that a covenant not to compete is not assignable and under various statutes for various reasons that such covenants are not enforceable against an employee by a successor to the employer. Hawaii v. Gannett Pac. Corp. , 99 F. Supp. 2d 1241 (D. Haw. 1999)

It is vital to obtain the relevant law of the applicable state before drafting or attempting to enforce assignment rights in this particular area.

Conclusion:

In the current business world of fast changing structures, agreements, employees and projects, the ability to assign rights and obligations is essential to allow flexibility and adjustment to new situations. Conversely, the ability to hold a contracting party into the deal may be essential for the future of a party. Thus, the law of assignments and the restriction on same is a critical aspect of every agreement and every structure. This basic provision is often glanced at by the contracting parties, or scribbled into the deal at the last minute but can easily become the most vital part of the transaction.

As an example, one client of ours came into the office outraged that his co venturer on a sizable exporting agreement, who had excellent connections in Brazil, had elected to pursue another venture instead and assigned the agreement to a party unknown to our client and without the business contacts our client considered vital. When we examined the handwritten agreement our client had drafted in a restaurant in Sao Paolo, we discovered there was no restriction on assignment whatsoever…our client had not even considered that right when drafting the agreement after a full day of work.

One choses who one does business with carefully…to ensure that one’s choice remains the party on the other side of the contract, one must master the ability to negotiate proper assignment provisions.

Founded in 1939, our law firm combines the ability to represent clients in domestic or international matters with the personal interaction with clients that is traditional to a long established law firm.

Difference Between Negotiation and Assignment

On the other hand, assignment alludes to the transfer of ownership of the negotiable instrument, in which the assignee gets the right to receive the amount due on the instrument from the prior parties.

The most important difference between negotiation and assignment is that they are governed by different acts. To know more differences amidst the two types of transfers, take a read of the article below.

Content: Negotiation Vs Assignment

Comparison chart, definition of negotiation.

Negotiation can be described as the process in which the transfer of negotiable instrument, is made to any person, in order to make that person, the holder of the negotiable instrument. Therefore the negotiable instrument aims at transferring the title of the instrument to the transferee.

The term of negotiation for any person except maker, drawer or acceptor, until payment and in the case of the maker, drawer or acceptor, it should be until the due date. The two methods of negotiation are:

By delivery : Negotiation is possible by mere delivery, in the case of bearer instrument, but that should be voluntary in nature.
By endorsement and delivery : In the case of order instrument, there must be endorsement and delivery of the negotiable instrument. The delivery must be voluntary, with an intention of transferring the underlying asset, to the transferee to complete the negotiation.

Definition of Assignment

By the term assignment we mean, the transfer of contractual rights, ownership of property or interest, by a person, in order to realise the debt.

An assignment is a written transfer of rights or property, in which the assignor transfers the instrument to assignee with the aim of conferring the right on the assignee, by signing an agreement called assignment deed. Thus, the assignee is entitled to receive the amount due on the negotiable instrument, from the liable parties.

Key Differences Between Negotiation and Assignment

The primary differences between negotiation and assignment presented in the points below:

The transfer of the negotiable instrument, by a person to another to make that person the holder of it, is known as negotiation. The transfer of rights, by a person to another, for the purpose of receiving the debt payment, is known as assignment.
When it comes to regulation of negotiable instrument, negotiation governs the Negotiable Instrument, 1881, while the assignment is regulated by Transfer of Property Act, 1882.
Negotiation can be effected by mere delivery in case of bearer instrument and, endorsement and delivery in case of order instrument.
In the case of bearer instrument, the negotiation is done by mere delivery of the instrument, but in the case of bearer instrument, endorsement and delivery of the instrument must be effected. Conversely, the assignment is effected by written agreement to be signed by the transferor, both in the case of order and bearer instrument.
In negotiation, the consideration is presumed, whereas, in the case of assignment, the consideration is proved.
There is no requirement of transfer notice, in negotiation. On the contrary, notice of assignment is compulsory, so as to bind the debtor.
In negotiation, the transferee has the right to sue the third party in his/her own name. As against, in the assignment, the assignee does not have any right to sue the third party, in his/her own name.
In negotiation, there is no requirement of payment of stamp duty. Unlike, in the assignment, stamp duty must be paid.

In negotiation, the transfer of negotiable instrument, entitles the transferor, the right of a holder in due course. On the other extreme, in the assignment the title of the assignee, is a bit defective one, as it is subject to the title of assignor of the right.

You Might Also Like:

Girmay says

April 24, 2023 at 8:42 am

Your note is so good, and Like it.keep it up!.

Spotting issues with assignment clauses in M&A Due Diligence

Written by: Kira Systems

January 19, 2016

6 minute read

Although not nearly as complex as change of control provisions , assignment provisions may still present a challenge in due diligence projects. We hope this blog post will help you navigate the ambiguities of assignment clauses with greater ease by explaining some of the common variations. (And, if you like it, please check out our full guide on Reviewing Change of Control and Assignment Provisions in Due Diligence. )

What is an Assignment Clause?

First, the basics:

Anti-assignment clauses are common because without them, generally, contracts are freely assignable. (The exceptions are (i) contracts that are subject to statutes or public policies prohibiting their assignment, such as intellectual property contracts, or (ii) contracts where an assignment without consent would cause material and adverse consequences to non-assigning counterparties, such as employment agreements and consulting agreements.) For all other contracts, parties may want an anti-assignment clause that allows them the opportunity to review and understand the impact of an assignment (or change of control) before deciding whether to continue or terminate the relationship.

In the mergers and acquisitions context, an assignment of a contract from a target company entity to the relevant acquirer entity is needed whenever a contract has to be placed in the name of an entity other than the existing target company entity after consummation of a transaction. This is why reviewing contracts for assignment clauses is so critical.

A simple anti-assignment provision provides that a party may not assign the agreement without the consent of the other party. Assignment provisions may also provide specific exclusions or inclusions to a counterparty’s right to consent to the assignment of a contract. Below are five common occurrences in which assignment provisions may provide exclusions or inclusions.

Common Exclusions and Inclusions

Exclusion for change of control transactions.

In negotiating an anti-assignment clause, a company would typically seek the exclusion of assignments undertaken in connection with change of control transactions, including mergers and sales of all or substantially all of the assets of the company. This allows a company to undertake a strategic transaction without worry. If an anti-assignment clause doesn’t exclude change of control transactions, a counterparty might materially affect a strategic transaction through delay and/or refusal of consent. Because there are many types of change of control transactions, there is no standard language for these. An example might be:

In the event of the sale or transfer by [Party B] of all or substantially all of its assets related to this Agreement to an Affiliate or to a third party, whether by sale, merger, or change of control, [Party B] would have the right to assign any or all rights and obligations contained herein and the Agreement to such Affiliate or third party without the consent of [Party A] and the Agreement shall be binding upon such acquirer and would remain in full force and effect, at least until the expiration of the then current Term.

Exclusion for Affiliate Transactions

A typical exclusion is one that allows a target company to assign a contract to an affiliate without needing the consent of the contract counterparty. This is much like an exclusion with respect to change of control, since in affiliate transfers or assignments, the ultimate actors and responsible parties under the contract remain essentially the same even though the nominal parties may change. For example:

Either party may assign its rights under this Agreement, including its right to receive payments hereunder, to a subsidiary, affiliate or any financial institution, but in such case the assigning party shall remain liable to the other party for the assigning party’s obligations hereunder. All or any portion of the rights and obligations of [Party A] under this Agreement may be transferred by [Party A] to any of its Affiliates without the consent of [Party B].

Assignment by Operation of Law

Assignments by operation of law typically occur in the context of transfers of rights and obligations in accordance with merger statutes and can be specifically included in or excluded from assignment provisions. An inclusion could be negotiated by the parties to broaden the anti-assignment clause and to ensure that an assignment occurring by operation of law requires counterparty approval:

[Party A] agrees that it will not assign, sublet or otherwise transfer its rights hereunder, either voluntarily or by operations of law, without the prior written consent of [Party B].

while an exclusion could be negotiated by a target company to make it clear that it has the right to assign the contract even though it might otherwise have that right as a matter of law:

This Guaranty shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of [Party A]; provided, that no transfer, assignment or delegation by [Party A], other than a transfer, assignment or delegation by operation of law, without the consent of [Party B], shall release [Party A] from its liabilities hereunder.

This helps settle any ambiguity regarding assignments and their effects under mergers statutes (particularly in forward triangular mergers and forward mergers since the target company ceases to exist upon consummation of the merger).

Direct or Indirect Assignment

More ambiguity can arise regarding which actions or transactions require a counterparty’s consent when assignment clauses prohibit both direct and indirect assignments without the consent of a counterparty. Transaction parties will typically choose to err on the side of over-inclusiveness in determining which contracts will require consent when dealing with material contracts. An example clause prohibiting direct or indirect assignment might be:

Except as provided hereunder or under the Merger Agreement, such Shareholder shall not, directly or indirectly, (i) transfer (which term shall include any sale, assignment, gift, pledge, hypothecation or other disposition), or consent to or permit any such transfer of, any or all of its Subject Shares, or any interest therein.

“Transfer” of Agreement vs. “Assignment” of Agreement

In some instances, assignment provisions prohibit “transfers” of agreements in addition to, or instead of, explicitly prohibiting “assignments”. Often, the word “transfer” is not defined in the agreement, in which case the governing law of the contract will determine the meaning of the term and whether prohibition on transfers are meant to prohibit a broader or narrower range of transactions than prohibitions on assignments. Note that the current jurisprudence on the meaning of an assignment is broader and deeper than it is on the meaning of a transfer. In the rarer case where “transfer” is defined, it might look like this:

As used in this Agreement, the term “transfer” includes the Franchisee’s voluntary, involuntary, direct or indirect assignment, sale, gift or other disposition of any interest in…

The examples listed above are only of five common occurrences in which an assignment provision may provide exclusions or inclusions. As you continue with due diligence review, you may find that assignment provisions offer greater variety beyond the factors discussed in this blog post. However, you now have a basic understand of the possible variations of assignment clauses. For a more in-depth discussion of reviewing change of control and assignment provisions in due diligence, please download our full guide on Reviewing Change of Control and Assignment Provisions in Due Diligence.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more about what we do with these cookies in our privacy policy .

Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference 12 November 2020

Power Plant
Transfer of rights
Contribution

The English Technology and Construction Court has found that the assignment of a sub-contract from a main contractor to an employer upon termination of an EPC contract will, in the absence of express intention to the contrary, transfer both accrued and future contractual benefits.

In doing so, Mrs Justice O’Farrell has emphasised established principles on assignment and novation, and the clear conceptual distinction between them. While this decision affirms existing authority, it also highlights the inherent risks for construction contractors in step-in assignment arrangements.

"This decision shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position."

This preliminary issues judgment in the matter of Energy Works (Hull) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd & Others¹ , is the latest in a long series of decisions surrounding the Energy Works plant, a fluidised bed gasification energy-from-waste power plant in Hull². The defendant, MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd (“MW”), was engaged as the main contractor by the claimant and employer, Energy Works (Hull) Ltd (“EWHL”), under an EPC contract entered into in November 2015. Through a sub-contract, MW engaged Outotec (USA) Inc (“Outotec”) to supply key elements for the construction of the plant.

By March 2019, issues had arisen with the project. EWHL terminated the main contract for contractor default and, pursuant to a term in the EPC contract, asked MW to assign to it MW’s sub-contract with Outotec. The sub-contract permitted assignment, but MW and EWHL were unable to agree a deed of assignment. Ultimately, MW wrote to EWHL and Outotec, notifying them both that it was assigning the sub-contract to EWHL. EWHL subsequently brought £133m proceedings against MW, seeking compensation for the cost of defects and delay in completion of the works. The defendant disputed the grounds of the termination, denied EWHL’s claims, and sought to pass on any liability to Outotec through an additional claim under the sub-contract. Outotec disputed MW’s entitlement to bring the additional claim on the grounds that MW no longer had any rights under the sub-contract, because those rights had been assigned to EWHL.

The parties accepted that a valid transfer in respect of the sub-contract had taken place. However, MW maintained that the assignment only transferred future rights under the sub-contract and that all accrued rights – which would include the right to sue Outotec for any failure to perform in accordance with the sub-contract occurring prior to the assignment – remained with MW. In the alternative, MW argued that the transfer had been intended as a novation such that all rights and liabilities had been transferred. As a secondary point, MW also claimed eligibility for a contribution from Outotec under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 for their alleged partial liability³.

An assignment is a transfer of a right from one party to another. Usually this is the transfer by one party of its rights and remedies, under a contract with a counterparty, to a third party. However, importantly, the assignor remains liable for any obligations it owes under the contract. As an example, Party A can assign to Party C its right to receive goods under a contract with Party B, but it will remain liable to pay Party B for those goods. Section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1926 requires a valid statutory assignment to be absolute, in writing, and on notice to the contractual counterparty.

Key contacts

Rebecca Williams

Partner London

Mark McAllister-Jones

Counsel London

"In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights."

In this case, the precise scope of the transferred rights and the purported assignment of contractual obligations were in issue. Mrs Justice O’Farrell looked to the House of Lords’ decision in Linden Gardens⁴ to set out three relevant principles on assignment:

Subject to any express contractual restrictions, a party to a contract can assign the benefit of a contract, but not the burden, without the consent of the other party to the contract;
In the absence of any clear contrary intention, reference to assignment of the contract by parties is understood to mean assignment of the benefit, that is, accrued and future rights; and
It is possible to assign only future rights under a contract (i.e. so that the assignor retains any rights which have already accrued at the date of the assignment), but clear words are needed to give effect to such an intention.

Hence, in relation to MW’s first argument, it is theoretically possible to separate future and accrued rights for assignment, but this can only be achieved through “careful and intricate drafting, spelling out the parties’ intentions”. The judge held that, since such wording was absent here, MW had transferred all its rights, both accrued and future, to EWHL, including its right to sue Outotec.

Whereas assignment only transfers a party’s rights under a contract, novation transfers both a party’s rights and its obligations . Strictly speaking, the original contract is extinguished and a new one formed between the incoming party and the remaining party to the original contract. This new contract has the same terms as the original, unless expressly agreed otherwise by the parties.

Another key difference from assignment is that novation requires the consent of all parties involved, i.e. the transferring party, the counterparty, and the incoming party. With assignment, the transferring party is only required to notify its counterparty of the assignment. Consent to a novation can be given when the original contract is first entered into. However, when giving consent to a future novation, the parties must be clear what the terms of the new contract will be.

"Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.”"

A novation need not be in writing. However, the desire to show that all parties have given the required consent, the use of deeds of novation to avoid questions of consideration, and the use of novation to transfer ‘key’ contracts, particularly in asset purchase transactions, means that they often do take written form. A properly drafted novation agreement will usually make clear whether the outgoing party remains responsible for liabilities accrued prior to the transfer, or whether these become the incoming party’s problem.

As with any contractual agreement, the words used by the parties are key. Mrs Justice O’Farrell found that the use of the words “assign the sub-contract” were a strong indication that in this case the transfer was intended to be an assignment, and not a novation.

This decision reaffirms the established principles of assignment and novation and the distinction between them. It also shows the court’s desire to give effect to clear contractual provisions, particularly in complex construction contracts, even where doing so puts a party in a difficult position. Here, it was found that MW had transferred away its right to pursue Outotec for damages under the sub-contract, but MW remained liable to EWHL under the EPC contract. As a result, EWHL had the right to pursue either or both of MW and Outotec for losses arising from defects in the Outotec equipment, but where it chose to pursue only MW, MW had no contractual means of recovering from Outotec any sums it had to pay to EWHL. Mrs Justice O’Farrell stressed that “it is a matter for the parties to determine the basis on which they allocate risk within the contractual matrix.” A contractor in MW’s position can still seek from a sub-contractor a contribution in respect of its liability to the employer under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 (as the judge confirmed MW was entitled to do in this case). However, the wording of the Act is very specific, and it may not always be possible to pass down a contractual chain all, or any, of a party’s liability.

Commercially, contractors often assume some risk of liability to the employer without the prospect of recovery from a sub-contractor, such as where the sub-contractor becomes insolvent, or where the sub-contract for some reason cannot be negotiated and agreed on back-to-back terms with the EPC contract. However, contractors need to consider carefully the ramifications of provisions allowing the transfer of sub-contracts to parties further up a contractual chain and take steps to ensure such provisions reflect any agreement as to the allocation of risk on a project.

This article was authored by London Dispute Resolution Co-Head and Partner Rebecca Williams , Senior Associate Mark McAllister-Jones and Gerard Rhodes , a trainee solicitor in the London office.

[1] [2020] EWHC 2537 (TCC)

[2] See, for example, the decisions in Premier Engineering (Lincoln) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2484, reported in our article here , Engie Fabricom (UK) Ltd v MW High Tech Projects UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 1626 (TCC) and C Spencer Limited v MW High Tech Projects UK Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 331, reported in our article here .

[3] The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 allows that “ any person liable in respect of any damage suffered by another person may recover contribution from any other person liable in respect of the same damage whether jointly with him or otherwise .”

[4] Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85

Wednesday Briefing

A landmark climate ruling in Europe.

By Daniel E. Slotnik

A group of older women stand smiling in front of CNN and AFP microphones.

A European court made a significant climate ruling

Europe’s top human-rights court said the Swiss government had violated its citizens’ rights by failing to meet its climate targets . Experts said it was the first instance in which an international court had used human rights law to determine that governments were legally obligated to meet their climate goals.

A group of women, all 64 or older, argued that their health was at risk during heat waves related to global warming, and that by not doing enough to mitigate warming, Switzerland’s government had violated their rights.

“This is a landmark ruling, and it could trigger a wave of similar lawsuits in European countries,” David Gelles, the managing correspondent of our Climate Forward newsletter , told us.

Implications: The women’s lawsuit was the latest in a series of attempts to force governments in court to act against global warming.

“The European ruling isn’t likely to affect rulings in the U.S.,” David said. “But there are several big cases making their way through the U.S. court system, including one that could appear before the Supreme Court later this year.”

More climate news:

U.S.: Replacing existing power lines with state-of-the-art cables could roughly double the electrical grid’s capacity in much of the country.

Promises: A new study from the European Central Bank disputes the effectiveness of climate pledges made by bankers and investors.

Iran smuggles arms into West Bank, officials said

Iran is operating a clandestine smuggling route across the Middle East to deliver weapons to Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank , according to officials from the U.S., Israel and Iran.

The goal, as described by three Iranian officials, is to foment unrest against Israel by flooding the enclave with as many weapons as possible, without singling out a specific group for the largess. Analysts said most of the weapons were small arms, but Israeli officials said Iran was also smuggling antitank missiles and rocket-propelled grenades.

The covert operation is heightening concerns that Tehran wants to make the West Bank the next flashpoint in its shadow war with Israel. That conflict took on new urgency this month, with Iran having vowed to retaliate for an Israeli strike on an embassy compound that killed seven Iranian military commanders.

A divided South Korea headed to the polls

President Yoon Suk Yeol isn’t on the ballot in South Korea’s parliamentary elections today, but the vote could still decide his political fate .

The contest is largely between Yoon’s conservative People Power Party and the main opposition camp, the liberal Democratic Party, led by Lee Jae-myung, whom Yoon narrowly beat to win the presidency in 2022.

If his party suffers a major loss, Yoon could essentially become a lame duck for the rest of his single, five-year term, and could even face impeachment. Lee, who has faced bribery and other criminal charges in court, is equally desperate to score an electoral victory.

Political polarization runs so deep in South Korea that many voters either want Yoon impeached or Lee imprisoned.

England restricted gender care for children

The National Health Service in England started restricting gender treatments for children , making it the fifth European country to limit the use of medication in such cases.

England’s move is part of a broader shift in northern Europe, where health officials have been concerned by soaring demand for adolescent gender treatments in recent years. Several transgender advocacy groups in Europe have condemned the changes , saying that they infringe on civil rights and exacerbate the problems of overstretched health systems.

MORE TOP NEWS

Britain: David Cameron, the British foreign secretary, visited Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago to discuss military aid for Ukraine.

The Hague: Germany defended itself before the International Court of Justice against accusations that its arms sales to Israel were abetting genocide in Gaza.

Abortion: Arizona’s highest court upheld an 1864 law that bans nearly all abortions .

Diplomacy: Xi Jinping met with Russia’s foreign minister in Beijing to reaffirm ties and prepare for President Vladimir Putin’s expected visit to China.

Ireland: At 37, Simon Harris became the country’s youngest-ever prime minister .

Ukraine: A photograph of a mother and son killed in a drone attack in Odesa has become a symbol of the toll exacted on civilians by Russia’s war.

Champions League: Officials said they would tighten security for matches in Europe’s marquee soccer competition after ISIS-related groups called for violent attacks on the events.

U.S.: The parents of a Michigan teenager who killed four students were sentenced to 10 to 15 years in prison for involuntary manslaughter.

Bureaucracy: “Too much red tape” has become a major impediment to reviving Germany’s economy, the International Monetary Fund said in a report .

Chips: TSMC, Taiwan’s semiconductor giant, is turning a small Japanese farm town into a key node in Asia’s chip supply chain .

MORNING READ

Are you ready for the Jane Goodall Experience? “Dr. Jane’s Dream,” an immersive spectacle created by former Walt Disney Imagineers and African artisans to celebrate the groundbreaking English primatologist and environmental activist, is taking form in a cultural complex in Tanzania .

“What we’re trying to do,” said Joe Rohde, a designer who worked on the project, “is sort of take all the feelings and emotions that made Jane Goodall Jane Goodall and transfer that into a series of objects and encounters.”

Lives lived: Peter Higgs discovered the Higgs boson, also known as the “God particle,” which helps explain how other particles acquire mass. He died at 94 .

CONVERSATION STARTERS

Puff: The Italian volcano Mount Etna has been blowing perfect smoke rings .

I.R.L.: The eclipse pulled people away from their computers , with internet traffic down 40 percent in states in the totality’s path.

SPORTS NEWS

Two-point deduction: Explaining Everton’s second breach of profit and sustainability rules.

Premier League vs. Bundesliga: The coefficient battle for an extra Champions League spot.

The biggest stage: Joaquin Niemann’s fight to get to the Masters .

ARTS AND IDEAS

The international booker prize shortlist.

Six titles were nominated for this year’s International Booker Prize, the prestigious award for fiction translated into English. (The author and the translator split the prize money.)

The best-known nominee is Jenny Erpenbeck, a German novelist often mentioned as a contender for the Nobel Prize in Literature. Other authors include Itamar Vieira Junior, Selva Almada and Hwang Sok-yong.

Here’s more on the list .

RECOMMENDATIONS

Cook: Drumsticks are tucked in among basmati rice, herbs and spices in this chicken biryani .

Read: In her buzzy memoir, “Sociopath,” Patric Gagne is more committed to reveling in her naughtiness than demystifying the condition .

Listen: Tracks by Prince, Young Miko, the Black Keys and others are on our pop critics’ playlist .

Watch: “Madu” is one of the best children’s movies to stream right now .

Moisturize: Create a skin care routine for your body.

Play the Spelling Bee . And here are today’s Mini Crossword and Wordle . You can find all our puzzles here .

That’s it for today’s briefing. Thank you for spending part of your morning with us, and see you tomorrow. — Dan

Amelia Nierenberg contributed reporting.

You can reach Dan and the team at [email protected] .

Daniel E. Slotnik is a general assignment reporter on the Metro desk and a 2020 New York Times reporting fellow. More about Daniel E. Slotnik

IMAGES

Assignment Acceptance Transfer Delegation With Four Stages And Arrows
Sublease Vs. Assignment; the Effects and Obligations on New Owner
Difference between Transportation Problem vs Assignment Problem
What is knowledge transfer and why it’s important?
Legal briefing
Transfer of Landlord’s or Tenant’s Interest

VIDEO

heat transfer NPTEL Solution II assignment-5
TRANSFER OF ASSIGNMENT PRANK! 😅
SUFFICIENCY VS ASSIGNMENT II
Heart transfer role-play assignment
What’s the assignment?
Orim Meikle & The Rhema Experience Online: Vision

COMMENTS

Difference Between Assignment and Transfer
The difference between assignment and transfer is that assign means it's legal to transfer property or a legal right from one person to another, while transfer means it's legal to arrange for something to be controlled by or officially belong to another person. When used as verbs, assign means to set apart or designate something for a purpose ...
Assign vs Transfer: Common Misconceptions and Accurate Usage
Assign Vs Transfer. While assign and transfer are similar in that they both involve the transfer of property or rights from one party to another, there are some key differences between the two. The main difference is that in an assignment, the assignor transfers their rights to the assignee, but retains no interest in the assigned property.
Assign vs Transfer: Which Should You Use In Writing?
An assignment can occur in various forms, including written, verbal, or implied. A written assignment is a formal document that clearly outlines the terms of the transfer, while a verbal assignment occurs through spoken words. An implied assignment, on the other hand, is inferred from the conduct of the parties involved.
Distinction Between Assignment And Other Transfers
An assignment is the transfer of a property right, title, or interest under an agreement to some particular person. [i] However, in In re Ashford, 73 B.R. 37, 39 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 1987) every transfer of interest is not an assignment. It depends on the intention of the assignor. [ii] Therefore an assignment is different from other types of ...
Transfer And Assignment Agreement: Definition & Sample
A transfer and assignment agreement is a legal document that outlines the terms and conditions of the transfer of an employee from one company to another. It also includes the assignment of all rights and obligations, including any IP or confidential information. This document can be used to protect both the employee and the employer in case of ...
assignment
Assignment is a legal term whereby an individual, the "assignor," transfers rights, property, or other benefits to another known as the " assignee .". This concept is used in both contract and property law. The term can refer to either the act of transfer or the rights /property/benefits being transferred.
Difference between Transfer and Assignment
Transfer is of titles whereas the Assignment is for obligations and rights. 1. The term transfer is generally used for properties that can be possessed physically. For example, a car or house or those properties which can be represented by a legal instrument such as share. certificate.
Transfer vs Assignment
Once you receive the assignment in the post, be sure to sign it and send it back as soon as possible. (computing) An operation that assigns a value to a variable. As nouns the difference between transfer and assignment is that transfer is (uncountable) the act of conveying or removing something from one place, person or thing to another while ...
Transfer or assign? "转让"与"让与" English-Chinese Definition
The term " 让与 " is often used to describe the assignment of contractual rights or the assignment of debts. Assignment of debts or contractual rights under PRC law. Similar to article 136 of the Law of Property Act in England, articles 79 and 80 of the PRC Contract Law make provision for an assignment of contractual rights as follows:
Understanding an assignment and assumption agreement
The assignment and assumption agreement. An assignment and assumption agreement is used after a contract is signed, in order to transfer one of the contracting party's rights and obligations to a third party who was not originally a party to the contract. The party making the assignment is called the assignor, while the third party accepting ...
What's the difference between a mortgage assignment and an ...
Banks often sell and buy mortgages from each other. An "assignment" is the document that is the legal record of this transfer from one mortgagee to another. In a typical transaction, when the mortgagee sells the debt to another bank, an assignment is recorded, and the promissory note is endorsed (signed over) to the new bank.
Assign vs Transfer
Verb. ( transferr ) To move or pass from one place, person or thing to another. to transfer''' the laws of one country to another; to '''transfer suspicion. To convey the impression of (something) from one surface to another. to transfer drawings or engravings to a lithographic stone. To be or become transferred.
Don't Confuse Change of Control and Assignment Terms
Change of control and assignment terms actually address opposite ownership changes. If an assignment clause addresses change of control, it says what happens if a party goes through an M&A deal and no longer exists (or becomes a shell company). A change of control clause, on the other hand, matters when the party subject to M&A does still exist.
Assignment (law)
Assignment (law) Assignment [1] is a legal term used in the context of the laws of contract and of property. In both instances, assignment is the process whereby a person, the assignor, transfers rights or benefits to another, the assignee. [2] An assignment may not transfer a duty, burden or detriment without the express agreement of the assignee.
Assignments: The Basic Law
Ordinarily, the term assignment is limited to the transfer of rights that are intangible, like contractual rights and rights connected with property. Merchants Service Co. v. Small Claims Court, 35 Cal. 2d 109, 113-114 (Cal. 1950). An assignment will generally be permitted under the law unless there is an express prohibition against assignment ...
Assignation vs Assignment: Which Should You Use In Writing?
Use "assignment" when discussing a specific task or project given to an individual. For example: "The teacher handed out a challenging assignment to the students.". When referring to the transfer of rights or property, "assignment" is appropriate.
Difference Between Negotiation and Assignment (with Comparison Chart
Negotiation refers to the transfer of the negotiable instrument, by a person to another to make that person the holder of it. Assignment implies the transfer of rights, by a person to another, for the purpose of receiving the debt payment. Mere delivery in case of bearer instrument and, endorsement and delivery in case of order instrument.
Spotting issues with assignment clauses in M&A Due Diligence
"Transfer" of Agreement vs. "Assignment" of Agreement. In some instances, assignment provisions prohibit "transfers" of agreements in addition to, or instead of, explicitly prohibiting "assignments". Often, the word "transfer" is not defined in the agreement, in which case the governing law of the contract will determine the ...
The Loan Settlement Waterfall And Why "Legal Transfer/Assignment Only
Parties selecting "Legal Transfer Only" or "Assignment Only" (as applicable) will still be bound to settle the trade even if the required conditions to settlement in this manner are not met; except that settlement will instead move straight towards the Alternative Settlement Method, rather than falling back to participation.
PDF Transfer vs Reassignment
Transfer vs. Reassignment. Transfer: A transfer is when an employee moves to a vacant position in the same job class, or a different job class in the same pay grade (can be intra or inter‐agency). The vacant position must be posted on NEOGOV and the employee must be hired in accordance with DAS Administrative Rules. P1 type 088 Transfer is ...
Assignment and Novation: Spot the Difference
Assignment. An assignment is a transfer of a right from one party to another. Usually this is the transfer by one party of its rights and remedies, under a contract with a counterparty, to a third party. However, importantly, the assignor remains liable for any obligations it owes under the contract. As an example, Party A can assign to Party C ...
Wednesday Briefing
Daniel E. Slotnik is a general assignment reporter on the Metro desk and a 2020 New York Times reporting fellow. More about Daniel E. Slotnik Share full article