argumentative essay topics on animal rights

Presentations made painless

• Get Premium

104 Animal Rights Essay Topic Ideas & Examples

Inside This Article

Animal rights is a topic of great importance in today's society. As our understanding of animals and their capabilities continues to grow, so does our responsibility to treat them with compassion and respect. Whether you are a student writing an essay or a concerned citizen looking to learn more about animal rights, here are 104 topic ideas and examples to inspire and inform your writing:

• The ethical implications of animal testing in scientific research.
• The impact of factory farming on animal welfare and the environment.
• The effectiveness of animal rights organizations in promoting change.
• The role of animal rights in the vegan and vegetarian movements.
• The relationship between animal cruelty and violence towards humans.
• The rights of animals in captivity, such as in zoos or aquariums.
• The controversy surrounding the use of animals in entertainment, such as circuses or rodeos.
• The moral dilemma of using animals for their fur or skin in the fashion industry.
• The legal protections for animals and their enforcement.
• The connection between animal rights and environmental conservation efforts.
• The role of pets in our society and their rights as sentient beings.
• The impact of hunting and trophy hunting on animal populations.
• The use of animals in medical research and the search for alternatives.
• The treatment of animals in the food industry, including slaughterhouses and fishing practices.
• The rights of endangered species and efforts to protect them.
• The psychological and emotional experiences of animals in different environments.
• The impact of climate change on animal habitats and their rights to survival.
• The role of animals in traditional and indigenous cultures, and their rights within those contexts.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in product testing, such as cosmetics or cleaning products.
• The role of animals in therapy and their rights to be treated with care and respect.
• The impact of animal agriculture on deforestation and habitat destruction.
• The rights of animals in educational institutions, such as in dissection practices.
• The role of animals in scientific advancements and the ethical boundaries that should be considered.
• The impact of animal trafficking and the illegal trade of exotic animals.
• The rights of animals in the entertainment industry, including in movies and TV shows.
• The connection between animal rights and feminism, and the intersectionality of these movements.
• The rights of animals in the tourism industry, including elephant rides or swimming with dolphins.
• The role of animals in sports and the ethical implications of their use.
• The impact of animal rights activism and the strategies used to promote change.
• The rights of animals in disaster situations and the importance of disaster management plans.
• The connection between animal abuse and domestic violence, and the need for intervention.
• The rights of animals in scientific experimentation, including the use of primates or rodents.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in circuses, including the training methods used.
• The impact of animal agriculture on water pollution and the rights of aquatic animals.
• The rights of animals in the pet trade, including puppy mills and exotic pet ownership.
• The connection between animal rights and indigenous rights, and the need for cultural sensitivity.
• The ethical implications of using animals for organ transplantation or medical advancements.
• The rights of animals in the fashion industry, including the use of fur or exotic skins.
• The impact of animal rights legislation on farming practices and the economy.
• The role of animals in human therapy and their rights to be treated with dignity and respect.
• The rights of animals in the military and the ethical considerations of using them in warfare.
• The connection between animal rights and children's education, and the importance of teaching empathy.
• The impact of animal rights on the tourism industry and the promotion of ethical travel.
• The rights of animals in the pet food industry and the regulations that should be in place.
• The ethical considerations of using animals for entertainment purposes, such as in theme parks.
• The connection between animal rights and climate justice, and the need for intersectional activism.
• The rights of animals in research institutions and the importance of ethical guidelines.
• The impact of animal rights on international trade and the need for global regulations.
• The role of animals in traditional medicine practices and the ethical implications involved.
• The rights of animals in the fashion accessories industry, such as in the production of leather goods.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in art and the boundaries that should be respected.
• The impact of animal rights on the pharmaceutical industry and the search for alternatives.
• The rights of animals in disaster response efforts and the importance of animal rescue teams.
• The connection between animal rights and environmental justice, and the need for collaboration.
• The rights of animals in the tourism industry, including in wildlife sanctuaries and safaris.
• The ethical implications of using animals for military experiments or weapons testing.
• The impact of animal rights on the food industry and the rise of plant-based alternatives.
• The role of animals in cultural traditions and the need for cultural sensitivity in animal rights.
• The rights of animals in the entertainment industry, including in commercials and advertisements.
• The connection between animal rights and social justice movements, such as Black Lives Matter.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in scientific education, such as dissection practices.
• The impact of animal rights on the pharmaceutical industry and the development of cruelty-free products.
• The rights of animals in disaster preparedness plans and the importance of evacuation protocols.
• The connection between animal rights and sustainable development goals, and the need for collaboration.
• The rights of animals in the fashion industry, including the use of animal-derived materials.
• The ethical implications of using animals for cosmetic testing and the search for alternatives.
• The impact of animal rights on the tourism industry and the promotion of ethical travel practices.
• The role of animals in cultural heritage and the importance of preserving their rights.
• The rights of animals in research institutions and the regulations that should be in place.
• The connection between animal rights and indigenous knowledge, and the need for cultural exchange.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in film and the boundaries that should be respected.
• The impact of animal rights on the pharmaceutical industry and the search for cruelty-free alternatives.
• The rights of animals in disaster response efforts and the importance of animal welfare organizations.
• The connection between animal rights and environmental sustainability, and the need for collective action.
• The rights of animals in the tourism industry, including in wildlife conservation projects.
• The ethical implications of using animals for military purposes, such as bomb detection dogs.
• The impact of animal rights on the restaurant industry and the rise of plant-based menus.
• The role of animals in religious practices and the need for religious tolerance in animal rights.
• The connection between animal rights and LGBTQ+ rights, and the need for intersectional activism.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in scientific education, such as in university laboratories.
• The impact of animal rights on the pharmaceutical industry and the development of cruelty-free medications.
• The rights of animals in disaster relief efforts and the importance of veterinary care.
• The connection between animal rights and sustainable agriculture, and the need for ethical farming practices.
• The ethical implications of using animals for cosmetic testing and the search for cruelty-free alternatives.
• The impact of animal rights on the tourism industry and the promotion of eco-friendly travel.
• The role of animals in cultural heritage and the importance of respecting their rights.
• The connection between animal rights and traditional knowledge, and the need for cultural exchange.
• The impact of animal rights on the pharmaceutical industry and the search for cruelty-free medications.
• The rights of animals in disaster response efforts and the importance of emergency veterinary care.
• The connection between animal rights and sustainable development, and the need for collaborative efforts.
• The rights of animals in the tourism industry, including in responsible wildlife tourism.
• The ethical implications of using animals for military purposes, such as search and rescue dogs.
• The impact of animal rights on the food industry and the rise of plant-based diets.
• The rights of animals in the entertainment industry, including in live performances and shows.
• The connection between animal rights and disability rights, and the importance of inclusion.
• The ethical considerations of using animals in scientific education, such as in school laboratories.
• The connection between animal rights and sustainable fashion, and the need for ethical clothing choices.

These topics provide a broad range of perspectives and issues within the field of animal rights. Whether you choose to focus on the ethical implications, legal protections, or the impact on various industries, there is no shortage of ideas to explore. Remember to conduct thorough research, consider different viewpoints, and present a well-balanced argument in your essay. Happy writing!

Want to create a presentation now?

Instantly Create A Deck

Let PitchGrade do this for me

Hassle Free

We will create your text and designs for you. Sit back and relax while we do the work.

Explore More Content

• Privacy Policy
• Terms of Service

© 2023 Pitchgrade

Animal Rights Essay: Topics, Outline, & Writing Tips

• 🐇 Animal Rights Essay: the Basics
• 💡 Animal Rights Essay Topics
• 📑 Outlining Your Essay
• ✍️ Sample Essay (200 Words)

🔗 References

🐇 animal rights essay: what is it about.

Animal rights supporters advocate for the idea that animals should have the same freedom to live as they wish, just as humans do. They should not be exploited or used in meat , fur, and other production. At long last, we should distinguish animals from inanimate objects and resources like coal, timber, or oil.

Interdisciplinary research has shown that animals are emotional and sensitive, just like we are.

Their array of emotions includes joy, happiness, embarrassment, resentment, jealousy, anger, love, compassion, respect, disgust, despair, and even grief.

However, animal rights legislation does not extend human rights to animals. It establishes their right to have their fundamental needs and interests respected while people decide how to treat them. This right changes the status of animals from being property to being legal entities.

The statement may sound strange until we recall that churches , banks, and universities are also legal entities. Their interests are legally protected by law. Then why do we disregard the feelings of animals , which are not inanimate institutions? Several federal laws protect them from human interference.

But the following statements are only some of the rules that could one day protect animal rights in full:

• Animals should not be killed by hunting.
• Animals’ habitats should allow them to live in freedom.
• Animals should not be bred for sale or any other purpose.
• Animals should not be used for food by industries or households.

Most arguments against the adoption of similar laws are linked to money concerns. Animal exploitation has grown into a multi-billion-dollar industry. The lives of many private farmers depend on meat production, and most people prefer not to change the comfortable status quo.

Animal Rights Argumentative Essay

An animal rights argumentative essay should tackle a problematic issue that people have widely discussed. While choosing ideas for the assignment, opt for the most debatable topics.

Here is a brief list of argumentative essay prompts on animal rights:

• The pros and cons of animal rights.
• Can humanity exist without meat production?
• Do animals have souls?
• Should society become vegan to protect animal rights?

As you see, these questions could raise controversy between interlocutors. Your purpose is to take a side and give several arguments in its support. Then you’ll have to state a counterargument to your opinion and explain why it is incorrect.

Animal Rights Persuasive Essay

An animal rights persuasive essay should clearly state your opinion on the topic without analyzing different points of view. Still, the purpose of your article is to persuade the reader that your position is not only reasonable but the only correct one. For this purpose, select topics relating to your opinion or formulated in questionary form.

For example:

• What is your idea about wearing fur?
• Do you think people would ever ban animal exploitation ?
• Is having pets a harmful practice?
• Animal factories hinder the development of civilization .

💡 53 Animal Rights Essay Topics

• Animal rights have been suppressed for ages because people disregard their mental abilities .
• Cosmetic and medical animal testing .
• Laws preventing unnecessary suffering of animals mean that there is some necessary suffering.
• Red fluorescent protein transgenic dogs experiment .
• Do you believe animals should have legal rights?
• Genetically modified animals and implications .
• Why is animal welfare important?
• Neutering animals to prevent overpopulation: Pros and cons.
• Animal testing: Arguments for and against .
• What is our impact on marine life ?
• Some animals cannot stay wild .
• Animal testing for medical purposes .
• We are not the ones to choose which species to preserve.
• Pavlov’s dog experiment .
• Keeping dogs chained outdoors is animal neglect.
• The use of animals for research .
• Animal dissection as a learning tool: Alternatives?
• More people beat their pets than we think.
• Duties to non-human animals .
• If we do not control the population of some animals, they will control ours.
• Animals in entertainment: Not entertaining at all.
• Animals in research, education, and teaching.
• Which non-animal production endangers the species?
• Is animal testing really needed?
• Why do some people think that buying a new pet is cheaper than paying for medical treatment of the old one?
• Animal experiments: benefits, ethics, and defenders.
• Can people still be carnivorous if they stop eating animals?
• Animal testing role .
• Marine aquariums and zoos are animal prisons.
• Animal experimentation: justification arguments .
• What would happen if we replace animals in circuses with people, keeping the same living conditions?
• The ethics of animal use in scientific research .
• Animal sports: Relics of the past.
• Animal testing ban: counterargument and rebuttal .
• Denial to purchase animal-tested cosmetics will not change anything.
• Animal research, its ineffectiveness and amorality .
• Animal rights protection based on their intellect level: It tells a lot about humanity.
• Debates of using animals in scientific analysis .
• How can we ban tests on rats and kill them in our homes at the same time?
• Animal testing in experiments .
• What is the level of tissue engineering development in leather and meat production?
• Equal consideration of interests to non-human animals .
• Animals should not have to be our servants .
• Zoos as an example of humans’ immorality .
• We should feed wild animals to help them survive.
• Animal testing in biomedical research .
• Abolitionism: The right not to be owned.
• Do you support the Prima facie rights theory?
• Psychologist perspective on research involving animal and human subjects .
• Ecofeminism: What is the link between animals’ and women’s rights ?
• No philosophy could rationalize cruelty against animals.
• Qualities that humans and animals share .
• Ancient Buddhist societies and vegetarianism: A research paper.

Need more ideas? You are welcome to use our free research topic generator !

📑 Animal Rights Essay Outline

An animal rights essay should be constructed as a standard 5-paragraph essay (if not required otherwise in the assignment). The three following sections provide a comprehensive outline.

Animal Rights Essay: Introduction

An introduction consists of:

• Background information,
• A thesis statement .

In other words, here you need to explain why you decided to write about the given topic and which position you will take. The background part should comprise a couple of sentences highlighting the topicality of the issue. The thesis statement expresses your plans in the essay.

For example: In this essay, I will explain why animal-based production harms the ecology.

Animal Rights Essay: Main Body

The main body is a place for you to argue your position . One paragraph equals one argument. In informative essays, replace argumentation with facts.

Start each section with a topical sentence consisting of a general truth. Then give some explanation and more specific points. By the way, at the end of this article, you’ll find a bonus! It is a priceless selection of statistics and facts about animal rights.

Animal Rights Essay: Conclusion

A conclusion restates your central ideas and thesis statement. Approach it as a summary of your essay, avoid providing new facts or arguments.

✍️ Animal Rights Essay Example (200 Words)

Why is animal welfare important? The term “animal welfare” evokes the pictures of happy cows from a milk advertisement. But the reality has nothing to do with these bright videos. Humane treatment of animals is a relative concept. This essay explains why animal welfare is important, despite that it does not prevent farms from killing or confining animals.

The best way to approach animal welfare is by thinking of it as a temporary measure. We all agree that the current state of the economy does not allow humanity to abandon animal-based production. Moreover, such quick decisions could make farm animals suffer even more. But ensuring the minimum possible pain is the best solution as of the moment.

The current legislation on animal welfare is far from perfect. The Animal Welfare Act of 1966 prevents cruelty against animals in labs and zoos. Meanwhile, the majority of suffering animals do not fall under its purview. For example, it says nothing about the vivisection of rats and mice for educational and research purposes, although the procedure is extremely painful for the creature. Neither does it protect farm animals.

Unfortunately, the principles of animal welfare leave too much room for interpretation. Animals should be free from fear and stress, but how can we measure that? They should be allowed to engage in natural behaviors, but no confined space would let them do so. Thus, the legislation is imprecise.

The problem of animal welfare is almost unresolvable because it is a temporary measure to prevent any suffering of domesticated animals. It has its drawbacks but allows us to ensure at least some comfort for those we unjustifiably use for food. They have the same right to live on this planet as we do, and animal farming will be stopped one day.

📊 Bonus: Statistics & Facts for Your Animal Rights Essay Introduction

Improve the quality of your essay on animal rights by working in the following statistics and facts about animals.

• According to USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service , about 4.6 billion animals — including hogs, sheep, cattle, chickens, ducks, lambs, and turkey — were killed and used for food in the United States last year (2015).
• People in the U.S. kill over 100 million animals for laboratory experiments every year, according to PETA .
• More than 40 million animals are killed for fur worldwide every year. About 30 million animals are raised and killed on fur farms, and nearly 10 million wild animals are hunted and killed for the same reasons — for their valuable fur.
• According to a report by In Defense of Animals , hunters kill more than 200 million animals in the United States yearly.
• The Humane Society of the United States notes that a huge number of cats and dogs — between 3 and 4 million each year — are killed in the country’s animal shelters. Sadly, this number does not include dogs or cats killed in animal cruelty cases.
• According to the ASPCA , about 7.6 million companion animals enter animal shelters in the United States yearly. Of this number, 3.9 Mil of dogs, and 3.4 Mil of cats.
• About 2.7 million animals are euthanized in shelters every year (1.4 million cats and 1.2 million dogs).
• About 2.7 million shelter animals are adopted every year (1.3 million cats and 1.4 million dogs).
• In total, there are approximately 70-80 million dogs and 74-96 million cats living as pets in the United States.
• It’s impossible to determine the exact number of stray cats and dogs living in the United States, but the number of cats is estimated to be up to 70 million.
• Many stray cats and dogs were once family pets — but they were not kept securely indoors or provided with proper identification.

Each essay on animals rights makes humanity closer to a better and more civilized world. Please share any thoughts and experience in creating such texts in the comments below. And if you would like to hear how your essay would sound in someone’s mind, use our Text-To-Speech tool .

• Why Animal Rights? | PETA
• Animal Rights – Encyclopedia Britannica
• Animal ethics: Animal rights – BBC
• Animal Health and Welfare – National Agricultural Library
• The Top 10 Animal Rights Issues – Treehugger
• Animal welfare – European Commission

Research Paper Analysis: How to Analyze a Research Article + Example

Film analysis: example, format, and outline + topics & prompts.

• Animal Rights Essays

Animal Rights Argumentative Essay

Animal rights have been a consistent subject of debate, with animal activists emphasizing the need to differentiate between animal rights and welfare. The government’s failure to lay down sufficient legislation to help in the protection of animals from human predation has made it difficult for several people to believe in animal rights. It is essential to note that animal rights do not concern putting animals over and above humans but instead on the rejection of speciesism and sentience. Humans utilize several ways to exploit animals, including hunting, fur, circuses, and animal products like eggs and meat. There is an urgent need to help in securing strategies that will free animals from human exploitation. Therefore, this paper seeks to analyze the reasons against animal exploitation and reinforce the probable methods to uphold animal rights.

Struggling with your HW?

Get your assignments done by real pros. Save your precious time and boost your marks with ease. Just fill in your HW requirements and you can count on us!

• Customer data protection
• 100% Plagiarism Free

There is a general feeling that the use of animals for both scientific and medical research results yields significant improvement in living standards and medical advancements. Thus, it is sensible for many to agree over the use of animals to test how healthy or harmful a newly discovered medicine is before giving it to the human species for consumption (Lin n.p). However, such tests and exposure to chemicals often result in the killing of thousands of animals for courses that in some instances turn unhelpful (Garner 21). Therefore, animals’ mere use for sciences’ sake is unacceptable since the animals’ suffering vastly outweighs the satisfaction of human curiosity (Lin n.p). It is thus unnecessary to justify animal exploitation on immoral grounds.

Animals cannot think and make rational decisions concerning what should take place in their lives. However, the determination of rights should not be based on intelligence grounds. Otherwise, conducting intelligence tests would be necessary for all humans for them to enjoy certain fundamental rights. Exploiting animals based on their inability to think and reason is unreasonable (Lin n.p). This form of reasoning would mean that babies with no intelligence and mentally challenged humans would have no rights.

Preservation of animal rights and dignity is an appreciation for their life since it develops significant status. Individuals who hold contrary arguments on animal rights protection tend to believe that human life is more critical than animal life (Lin n.p). Therefore, destroying animal life to preserve human life is justifiable. This is an ineffective criterion to determine the importance of having rights since such are usually subjective, and individuals often have selfish personal interests (Garner 9). Interestingly, an individual may find their home-bred animals more important than a stranger in the neighborhood with this scope. It should not allow the individual to kill or misuse animals just for the sake of prioritizing and ranking the importance.

Used our essay samples for inspiration ?

For more help, tap into our pool of professional writers and get expert essay editing services!

In conclusion, the concept that animals should have the ability to move freely without human interference and exploitation affirms the need for animal protection. With the ability to experience emotions, fear, pain, and happiness, the argument that the absence of cognitive abilities makes animals lesser than humans is baseless. Besides, arguments in favor of the protection of animals and giving more rights to animals does not mean putting them at the same level as humans, but attempts to show the value that animals have as a human source of food and labor objects. Therefore, upholding animals’ inherent value is critical for maintaining animals’ rights and ensuring the maintenance of a balanced and organized ecosystem where there is a significant minimization of human predation on animals.

Works Cited

• Garner, Robert, ed. Animal rights: The changing debate . Springer, 2016.
• Lin, Doris. What Are Animals Rights? 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.thoughtco.com/what-are-animal-rights-127600

Related Essays

Find Free Essays

We provide you with original essay samples, perfect formatting and styling

Request must contain at least 2 characters

Popular Topics

Samples by Essay Type

Cite this page

About our services

Type Argumentative

Topic Animal Rights

Level College

This sample is NOT ORIGINAL. Get 100% unique essay written under your req

• Only $11 per page
• Free revisions included

Studyfy uses cookies to deliver the best experience possible. Read more.

Studyfy uses secured cookies. Read more.

Animal Rights

About animal rights, narrow the topic.

• Articles & Videos
• MLA Citation This link opens in a new window
• APA Citation This link opens in a new window

• Do animals have rights?
• Is animal experimentation justified?
• Should animals be allowed to experience pain for medical research?
• Should animals be used for food?
• Is animal experimentation bad science?
• Should the fur industry be shut down?
• How should substances which may be harmful to human health, be tested?
• What is acceptable pain?
• What obligations do humans have to animals?
• Are there alternatives to using animals for research?
• Would the advances in treatments for diseases have been possible without using animals?
• Should technologies replace animal dissection in science classes?
• Next: Library Resources >>
• Last Updated: Feb 6, 2024 11:38 AM
• URL: https://libguides.broward.edu/animal_rights

Find anything you save across the site in your account

What Would It Mean to Treat Animals Fairly?

By Elizabeth Barber

A few years ago, activists walked into a factory farm in Utah and walked out with two piglets. State prosecutors argued that this was a crime. That they were correct was obvious: The pigs were the property of Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer in the country. The defendants had videoed themselves committing the crime; the F.B.I. later found the piglets in Colorado, in an animal sanctuary.

The activists said they had completed a “rescue,” but Smithfield had good reason to claim it hadn’t treated the pigs illegally. Unlike domestic favorites like dogs, which are protected from being eaten, Utah’s pigs are legally classified as “livestock”; they’re future products, and Smithfield could treat them accordingly. Namely, it could slaughter the pigs, but it could also treat a pig’s life—and its temporary desire for food, space, and medical help—as an inconvenience, to be handled in whatever conditions were deemed sufficient.

In their video, the activists surveyed those conditions . At the facility—a concentrated animal-feeding operation, or CAFO —pregnant pigs were confined to gestation crates, metal enclosures so small that the sows could barely lie down. (Smithfield had promised to stop using these crates, but evidently had not.) Other pigs were in farrowing crates, where they had enough room to lie down but not enough to turn their bodies around. When the activists approached one sow, they found dead piglets rotting beneath her. Nearby, they found two injured piglets, whom they decided to take. One couldn’t walk because of a foot infection; the other’s face was covered in blood. According to Smithfield, which denied mistreating animals, the piglets were each worth about forty-two dollars, but both had diarrhea and other signs of illness. This meant they were unlikely to survive, and that their bodies would be discarded, just as millions of farm animals are discarded each year.

During the trial, the activists reiterated that, yes, they entered Smithfield’s property and, yes, they took the pigs. And then, last October, the jury found them not guilty. In a column for the Times , one of the activists—Wayne Hsiung, the co-founder of Direct Action Everywhere—described talking to one of the jurors, who said that it was hard to convict the activists of theft, given that the sick piglets had no value for Smithfield. But another factor was the activists’ appeal to conscience. In his closing statement, Hsiung, a lawyer who represented himself, argued that an acquittal would model a new, more compassionate world. He had broken the law, yes—but the law, the jury seemed to agree, might be wrong.

A lot has changed in our relationship with animals since 1975, when the philosopher Peter Singer wrote “ Animal Liberation ,” the book that sparked the animal-rights movement. Gestation crates, like the ones in Utah, are restricted in the European Union, and California prohibits companies that use them from selling in stores, a case that the pork industry fought all the way to the Supreme Court—and lost. In a 2019 Johns Hopkins survey, more than forty per cent of respondents wanted to ban new CAFO s. In Iowa, which is the No. 1 pork-producing state, my local grocery store has a full Vegan section. “Vegan” is also a shopping filter on Sephora, and most of the cool-girl brands are vegan, anyway. Wearing fur is embarrassing.

And yet Singer’s latest book, “ Animal Liberation Now ,” a rewrite of his 1975 classic, is less a celebratory volume than a tragic one—tragic because it is very similar to the original in refrain, which is that, big-picture-wise, the state of animal life is terrible. “The core argument I was putting forward,” Singer writes, “seemed so irrefutable, so undeniably right, that I thought everyone who read it would surely be convinced by it.” Apparently not. By some estimates, scientists in the U.S. currently use roughly fifteen million animals for research, including mice, rats, cats, dogs, birds, and nonhuman primates. As in the seventies, much of this research tries to model psychological ailments, despite scientists’ having written for decades that more research is needed to figure out whether animals—and which kind of animals—provide a useful analogue for mental illness in humans. When Singer was first writing, a leading researcher created psychopathic monkeys by raising them in isolation, impregnating them with what he called a “rape rack,” and studying how the mothers bashed their infants’ heads into the ground. In 2019, researchers were still putting animals through “prolonged stress”—trapping them in deep water, restraining them for long periods while subjecting them to the odor of a predator—to see if their subsequent behavior evidenced P.T.S.D. (They wrote that more research was needed.) Meanwhile, factory farms, which were newish in 1975, have swept the globe. Just four per cent of Americans are vegetarian, and each year about eighty-three billion animals are killed for food.

It’s for these animals, Singer writes, “and for all the others who will, unless there is a sudden and radical change, suffer and die,” that he writes this new edition. But Singer’s hopes are by now tempered. One obvious problem is that, in the past fifty years, the legal standing of animals has barely changed. The Utah case was unusual not just because of the verdict but because referendums on farm-animal welfare seldom occur at all. In many states, lawmakers, often pressured by agribusiness, have tried to make it a serious crime to enter a factory farm’s property. The activists in Utah hoped they could win converts at trial; they gambled correctly, but, had they been wrong, they could have gone to prison. As in 1975, it remains impossible to simply petition the justice system to notice that pigs are suffering. All animals are property, and property can’t take its owner to court.

Philosophers have debated the standing of animals for centuries. Pythagoras supposedly didn’t eat them, perhaps because he believed they had souls. Their demotion to “things” owes partly to thinkers like Aristotle, who called animals “brute beasts” who exist “for the sake of man,” and to Christianity, which, like Stoicism before it, awarded unique dignity to humans. We had souls; animals did not. Since then, various secular thinkers have given this idea a new name—“inherent value,” “intrinsic dignity”—in order to explain why it is O.K. to eat a pig but not a baby. For Singer, these phrases are a “last resort,” a way to clumsily distinguish humans from nonhuman animals. Some argue that our ability to tell right from wrong, or to perceive ourselves, sets us apart—but not all humans can do these things, and some animals seem to do them better. Good law doesn’t withhold justice from humans who are elderly or infirm, or those who are cognitively disabled. As a utilitarian, Singer cites the founder of that tradition, the eighteenth-century philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who argued that justice and equality have nothing to do with a creature’s ability to reason, or with any of its abilities at all, but with the fact that it can suffer. Most animals suffer. Why, then, do we not give them moral consideration?

Singer’s answer is “speciesism,” or “bias in favor of the interests of members of one’s own species.” Like racism and sexism, speciesism denies equal consideration in order to maintain a status quo that is convenient for the oppressors. As Lawrence Wright has written in this magazine , courts, when considering the confinement of elephants and chimpanzees, have conceded that such animals evince many of the qualities that give humans legal standing, but have declined to follow through on the implications of this fact. The reason for that is obvious. If animals deserved the same consideration as humans, then we would find ourselves in a world in which billions of persons were living awful, almost unimaginably horrible lives. In which case, we might have to do something about it.

Equal consideration does not mean equal treatment. As a utilitarian, Singer’s aim is to minimize the suffering in the world and maximize the pleasure in it, a principle that invites, and often demands, choices. This is why Singer does not object to killing mosquitos (if done quickly), or to using animals for scientific research that would dramatically relieve suffering, or to eating meat if doing so would save your life. What he would not agree with, though, is making those choices on the basis of perceived intelligence or emotion. In a decision about whether to eat chicken or pork, it is not better to choose chicken simply because pigs seem smarter. The fleeting pleasure of eating any chicken is trounced by its suffering in industrial farms, where it was likely force-fed, electrocuted, and perhaps even boiled alive.

Still, Singer’s emphasis on suffering is cause for concern to Martha Nussbaum , whose new book, “ Justice for Animals ,” is an attempt to settle on the ideal philosophical template for animal rights. Whereas Singer’s argument is emphatically emotion-free—empathy, in his view, is not just immaterial but often actively misleading—Nussbaum is interested in emotions, or at least in animals’ inner lives and desires. She considers several theories of animal rights, including Singer’s, before arguing that we should adopt her “capabilities approach,” which builds on a framework developed by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen, and holds that all creatures should be given the “opportunity to flourish.” For decades, Nussbaum has adjusted her list of what this entails for humans, which includes “being able to live to the end of a human life of normal length,” “being able to have attachments to things and people outside ourselves,” and having “bodily integrity”—namely, freedom from violence and “choice in matters of reproduction.” In “Justice for Animals,” she outlines some conditions for nonhuman flourishing: a natural life span, social relationships, freedom of movement, bodily integrity, and play and stimulation. Eventually, she writes, we would have a refined list for each species, so that we could insure flourishing “in the form of life characteristic to the creature.”

In imagining this better world, Nussbaum is guided by three emotions: wonder, anger, and compassion. She wants us to look anew at animals such as chickens or pigs, which don’t flatter us, as gorillas might, with their resemblance to us. What pigs do, and like to do, is root around in the dirt; lacquer themselves in mud to keep cool; build comfy nests in which to shelter their babies; and communicate with one another in social groups. They also seek out belly rubs from human caregivers. In a just world, Nussbaum writes, we would wonder at a pig’s mysterious life, show compassion for her desire to exist on her own terms, and get angry when corporations get in her way.

Some of Nussbaum’s positions are more actionable, policy-wise, than others. For example, she supports legal standing for animals, which raises an obvious question: How would a pig articulate her desires to a lawyer? Nussbaum notes that a solution already exists in fiduciary law: in the event that a person, like a toddler or disabled adult, cannot communicate their decisions or make sound ones, a representative is appointed to understand that person’s interests and advocate for them. Just as organizations exist to help certain people advance their interests, organizations could represent categories of animals. In Nussbaum’s future world, such a group could take Smithfield Foods to court.

Perhaps Nussbaum’s boldest position is that wild animals should also be represented by fiduciaries, and indeed be assured, by humans, the same flourishing as any other creature. If this seems like an overreach, a quixotic attempt to control a world that is better off without our meddling, Nussbaum says, first, to be realistic: there is no such thing as a truly wild animal, given the extent of human influence on Earth. (If a whale is found dead with a brick of plastic in its stomach, how “wild” was it?) Second, in Nussbaum’s view, if nature is thoughtless—and Nussbaum thinks it is—then perhaps what happens in “the wild” is not always for the best. No injustice can be ignored. If we aspire to a world in which no sentient creature can harm another’s “bodily integrity,” or impede one from exploring and fulfilling one’s capabilities, then it is not “the destiny of antelopes to be torn apart by predators.”

Here, Nussbaum’s world is getting harder to imagine. Animal-rights writing tends to elide the issue of wild-animal suffering for obvious reasons—namely, the scarcity of solutions. Singer covers the issue only briefly, and mostly to say that it’s worth researching the merit of different interventions, such as vaccination campaigns. Nussbaum, for her part, is unclear about how we would protect wild antelopes without impeding the flourishing of their predators—or without impeding the flourishing of antelopes, by increasing their numbers and not their resources. In 2006, when she previously discussed the subject, she acknowledged that perhaps “part of what it is to flourish, for a creature, is to settle certain very important matters on its own.” In her new book, she has not entirely discarded that perspective: intervention, she writes, could result in “disaster on a large scale.” But the point is to “press this question all the time,” and to ask whether our hands-off approach is less noble than it is self-justifying—a way of protecting ourselves from following our ideals to their natural, messy, inconvenient ends.

The enduring challenge for any activist is both to dream of almost-unimaginable justice and to make the case to nonbelievers that your dreams are practical. The problem is particularly acute in animal-rights activism. Ending wild-animal suffering is laughably hard (our efforts at ending human suffering don’t exactly recommend us to the task); obviously, so is changing the landscape of factory farms, or Singer wouldn’t be reissuing his book. In 2014, the British sociologist Richard Twine suggested that the vegan isn’t unlike the feminist of yore, in that both come across as killjoys whose “resistance against routinized norms of commodification and violence” repels those who prefer the comforts of the status quo. Wayne Hsiung, the Direct Action Everywhere activist, was only recently released from jail, after being sentenced for duck and chicken rescues in California. On his blog, he wrote that one reason the prosecution succeeded was that, unlike in Utah, he and his colleagues were cast as “weird extremists.”

It’s easy to construct a straw-man vegan, one oblivious to his own stridency, privilege, or hypocrisy. Isn’t he driving deforestation with all his vegetables? (No, Singer replies, as the vast majority of soybeans are fed to farm animals.) Isn’t he ignoring food deserts or the price tag on vegan substitutes, which puts them out of the reach of poor families? (Nussbaum acknowledges that cost can be an issue, but argues that it only emphasizes the need for resourced people to eat as humanely as they can, given that the costs of a more ethical diet “will not come down until it is chosen by many.”) Anyone pointing out moral culpability will provoke, in both others and themselves, a certain defensiveness. Nussbaum spends a lot of time discussing her uneasiness with her choice to eat fish for nutritional reasons. (She argues that fish likely have no sense of the future, a claim that even she seems unsure about.) Singer is eager to intervene here, emphasizing that animal-rights activism should pursue the diminishment of suffering, not the achievement of sainthood. “We are more likely to persuade others to share our attitude if we temper our ideals with common sense than if we strive for the kind of purity that is more appropriate to a religious dietary law than to an ethical and political movement,” he writes. Veganism is a boycott, and, while boycotts are more effective the more you commit to them, what makes them truly effective is persuading others to join them.

Strangely, where Singer and Nussbaum might agree is that defining the proper basis for the rights of animals is less important, at least in the short term, than getting people not to harm them, for any reason at all. Those reasons might have nothing to do with the animals themselves. Perhaps you decide not to eat animals because you care about people: because you care that the water where you live, if it’s anything like where I live, is too full of CAFO by-products to confidently drink. Perhaps you care about the workers in enormous slaughterhouses, where the pay is low and the costs to the laborer high. Perhaps you believe in a God, and believe that this God would expect better of people than to eat animals raised and killed in darkness. Or perhaps someone you love happens to love pigs, or to love the idea that the world could be gentler or more just, and you love the way they see the future enough to help them realize it. Nussbaum, after all, became interested in animal rights because she loved a person, her late daughter, an attorney who championed legislation to protect whales and other wild animals until her death, in 2019. Nussbaum’s book is dedicated to her—and also, now, to the whales. ♦

New Yorker Favorites

Why facts don’t change our minds .

The tricks rich people use to avoid taxes .

The man who spent forty-two years at the Beverly Hills Hotel pool .

How did polyamory get so popular ?

The ghostwriter who regrets working for Donald Trump .

Snoozers are, in fact, losers .

Fiction by Jamaica Kincaid: “Girl”

Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker .

By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

By John J. Lennon

By Eric Lach

By Isaac Chotiner

By Amy Davidson Sorkin

📕 Studying HQ

150+ argumentative essay topics about animal abuse, bob cardens.

• July 31, 2022
• Essay Topics and Ideas , Samples

When it comes to argumentative essay writing, there are many different topics that you can choose from. However, one topic that always seems to be popular is animal abuse. Argumentative Essay Topics About Animal Abuse can be about anything related to animal abuse, Here are some good animal abuse essay topics and research topics you can write about

What You'll Learn

Argumentative Research Paper Topics About Animal Abuse with prompts

Ethics- use of animals in the process of testing non-medical products.

Essay prompt: poisoning, shocking, burning, and murdering animals has become a common practice for various companies producing non-medical products such as cosmetics, cleaning, storage, pharmacy, and office supplies among others, according to people for the ethical treatment of animals (PETA).

Delegate your Paper to an Expert

Owning exotic pets

Essay prompt: having pets could make the owners to experience enrichment and joy. There are so many benefits associated with keeping pet animals.

Argumentative essay thesis: owning exotic animals can cause an endangerment to the animal, to the owner, and to the community.

• Close reading: human-animal relations

Essay prompt: the utilitarian perspective involves the idea that animals are simply sources of food and have no added value.

• Argumentative essay about animal models in scientific research

Essay prompt: this paper argues that the use of animal models in scientific research is more beneficial compared to its drawbacks and that all animal experiments strictly adhere to the ethical principles of scientific research

• Aspca animal abuse and adoption
• Essay prompt: before human beings walked the face of the earth, there were already inhabitants that are years ahead of us, and these were animals. Animals have been through many natural phenomena and disasters, evolved, and adapted to what we know of them nowadays, but their fight for survival is still not over.
• Should animals be used for medical research
• Techniques of propaganda in animal farm
• Describe why animal research and testing ought to stop

Essay prompt: while there are benefits to humans from animal research, the researchers claim that they try to minimize pain and discomfort, but fail to show how they achieve this.

• Animal cruelty laws: suffering or premature death

Essay prompt: this paper discusses various animal cruelty laws that fight for animal rights to avert their suffering or premature death. Globally, animals have continuously become subjects of litigation.

• Developing spare parts for humans

Essay prompt: undergraduate essay: developing spare parts for humans. Animals are being experimented with and used to create tissues, organs and medicines for humans. Do you believe that using certain animals for this?

• Commercial animal farms: animal rights research assignment

Essay prompt: what do you think would happen to commercial animal farms if regan’s ideas are adopted?

• Subtle relationship between elephants and humans
• Treating animals humanely personal essay

Essay prompt: this article seeks to make the argument that animals deserve to be treated humanely because it is wrong to advance a single species at the expense of others, some fundamental rights extend to all species.

As you continue,  thestudycorp.com  has the top and most qualified writers to help with any of your assignments. All you need to do is  place an order  with us.

Argumentative Essay Topics About Animal Abuse

• What are the things one should consider before adopting a pet?
• Should the law be harsher for animal cruelty?
• Should the conditions in a farm factory be improved?
• Human lives are more important than living creatures’ ones
• Should hunting be banned?
• Should we propose alternatives to animal experiments?
• Animal rights as an indicator of a civilized society.
• Do animals have rights?
• Is it important to protect endangered animals?
• Can humans fully protect endangered species?
• Testing cosmetics products on living things should be banned
• Are some animals more beneficial to the ecosystem than others?
• Should animals be subjected to captivity?
• All of us need to respect living creatures and their role
• Should wild animals be kept in reserves?
• Should animals be used in research studies?
• Can animal testing be justified?
• The efforts of various international conventions on animal rights are irrelevant as they are incapable of checking injustice to animals.

Here are  130 + Best Research Topic About Nursing – Types & How To Choose A Nursing Research Topic

• Animal fashion needs to be banned globally
• Lots of people don’t really care about animals
• Can you keep animals caught in the wild as pets?
• Is taking animals to a zoo an inhumane act?
• Is it right to use animals for cosmetics testing?
• Many of the animal species are about to extinct because of the chemicals applied to them during the test.
• The dangers that farms expose animals to.
• Are developed countries less cruel towards animals compared to underdeveloped states?
• Is hunting for rhino’s horns leading to their extinction?
• Punishments for animal abuse are still too mild
• Should animal testing get banned for medicine?
• Is animal dissection a useful learning tool for students?
• Forest cutting has terrible consequences on wildlife
• The moral aspects of keeping animals in captivity for entertainment and commercial reasons.
• Should we ban animal fashion?
• Animals are subjected to human cruelty in various testing labs nowadays?
• What impact do people on wild animals?
• Explore the scope of animal rights; should animal rights be increased?
• Alternatives to animal experimentations
• Should we enforce rules to protect animals against inhumane cruelty on legal grounds?
• Is it right to give dairy cows drugs to boost their milk production?
• The punishment for poaching wild animals should be increased.
• International conventions on animals is completely irrelevant
• Are companion animals efficient for lonely people?
• Animal testing is a must but can be improved
• Is it right or acceptable to use higher animals like chimpanzees and monkeys in laboratory research?
• We should never take medicine if we must save animals from medical experiments
• Is animal health child’s play
• Do lab technicians subject animals to inhumane treatment in laboratory experiments?
• Should deer hunting be banned?
• Should animal keepers encourage the genetic modification of livestock
• Biotechnology poses serious threats to animals
• Which conditions should an aquarium have before immersing gold fish?
• What are some of the ways that people who live in cities tend to abuse their pets?
• Bullfighting: to be or not to be?
• Should animals be killed for food?
• How has the advancement of technology lead to increased animal cruelty
• Most of the animals spread infectious diseases once they are subjected to chemical tests in several experiments.
• Is the genetic modification of domestic animals potentially dangerous for humans?

These are just a few ideas to get you started – there are endless possibilities when it comes to writing about animal abuse. No matter what angle you take, make sure to back up your argument with evidence and reason, and be respectful of other people’s opinions. With a little effort, you can write an essay that will spark discussion and debate – and maybe even change some minds!

Writing on health, here’s a sample Argumentative Essay On Universal Healthcare

Animal Topics For Essays

• The tribal people harm animals for their meals and other needs in several ways.
• The advancement in technology and coming of the biotechnology in the past couple of decades pose a serious threat to animals.
• How expensive is veterinary care?
• Should people have exotic pets?
• The moral responsibility of eliminating animal abuse.
• Making policies to prevent animal cruelty is not enough, they should be enforced on the ground
• Are the wild animals reserves safe for all species?
• Living things shouldn’t be used for entertaining humans
• Should the government continue testing antibiotics on animals?
• Are animals facing cruelty in testing labs?
• Which ways are people in the city advancing animal cruelty
• Is it justifiable to sell products made from animals?
• Should the production of garments from mink be allowed?
• Should we ban use of primates in animal testing?
• Is it right to use animals for medical studies and scientific experiments?
• What methods are implemented on animals during induced helplessness tests?
• Is the factory farm treatment of animals an inhumane act?
• The principles of saving exotic animals from human intervention.
• Should there be a higher penalty for poaching?
• Can medics justify the concept of animal testing?
• Should euthanizing stray animals be banned? (Animal Topics For Essays)
• Animal cruelty
• Is hunting inhumane?
• Epidemiology and animal experimentation: which one is more successful?
• Why animal health should be properly maintained.
• Teaching kids to care for animals.
• Can humans improve the lives of captive animals?
• Are monkeys the most advanced animals?

Here’s a list of  Good Argumentative History Essay Topics

Veterinary Argumentative Essay Topics

• The dangerous effects of humans on beings’ life
• Developed countries are less cruel towards animals as compared to developing and underdeveloped nations.
• Is animal health just a way of making money?
• The challenges encompassing the adoption of pets.
• Is the tether of dogs outside an act of neglect and therefore inhumane?
• Particular species that must be used for testing and experimentation
• Do animals spread infections once subjected to chemical tests in laboratory experiments?
• Why performance animals are exposed to higher risks.
• Should stray animals be euthanized?
• People should not use animals for the purpose of entertainment
• Should foxes be domesticated?
• Apart from making strict rules for saving cruelty to animals, it is also important to enforce them on the real ground.
• Whaling should be outlawed globally.
• Should people pet exotic animals?
• Should pets be controlled to prevent overpopulation?

Find out more on  Argumentative Essay Topics About Social Media [Updated]

Animal Rights Essay Topics

• Opposing position: animals should be protected and death penalty

Essay prompt: there has been controversy on the use of animals in experiments and research, but the practice has been used over time and ethical principles adopted to minimize risks .

• Effect of global warming on certain species of animals (Animal Topics For Essays)

Essay prompt: today, the sea level has gone down, the temperature of the atmosphere has increased, and rains do not fall normally. All this is because of man-made things and unwanted human activities that have contributed to an increased level of global warming.

• Animal captivity: animals live in environments

Essay prompt: animals in captivity are on a daily basis, forced to endure conditions of physical as well as psychological pain. This hampers their development and changes the way they should live and develop.

• Animals should be used for medical research : should animals be used for medical research?
• Discuss the use of animals for sports and entertainment

You can also check out  150+ Top-Notch Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas

Essay prompt: the use of animals for entertainment has been a practice done for over twenty centuries dating back to the time of the gladiator and the coliseum.

• Using animals in psychological research (Animal Topics For Essays)

Essay prompt: the practice of using animals in research has been a common phenomenon for decades since findings from these studies have had a big impact on the development of medicine.

• Letting wild animals remain in the wild, and refraining people from supporting zoos

Essay prompt: conclusively, wild animals should not be kept captive, which is common in most parts of the world. Human beings are the superior species, which gives them the mandate to rule and protect other animals.

• Is it better for animals to not be kept in zoos

Essay prompt: the debate of whether keeping animals in a zoo or letting them wander in their natural habitat is a controversial issue. Notably, all the animals we see in zoos are wild animals.

• Why animals have no right research assignment paper (Argumentative Research Paper Topics About Animal Abuse)

Animal Topics For Research Papers

• Are factory farms responsible for the active spread of influenza diseases among chickens and other domestic animals?
• Humans should be banned from poaching
• Scientists should not use primates and sophisticated vertebrates in lab research
• Tribal people harm animals more for their personal needs
• Are zoos good or bad for animals?
• Is it lawful to keep ocean marine in captivity? (Animal Topics For Essays)
• The advancement of protection culture for fauna.
• Animals don’t have feelings
• What is the impact of water pollution on aquatic life?
• Animal fashion should be illegalized.
• We care for beasties selectively, and that’s a problem
• The ethical aspect of euthanizing stray animals.
• Global warming is destroying different animal ecosystems
• The relevance of conserving the giant panda
• Is animal testing for medical and cosmetic purposes morally justified?

Lastly here are bonus argumentative Essay Topics About Animal Abuse;

• Is it justifiable to sacrifice animals for religious purposes?
• Is companion animal good for people who are lonely?
• Should we report people who are cruel to animals?
• Should chimpanzees and monkeys be used in animal testing?
• Is chemical application on animals the reason for their quick extinction?
• Is it right to breed foxes into companion animals?
• The urgency of protecting endangered animals.
• Do humans have the responsibility to protect the animals they use for medical or experimental tests?
• Should people treat poisonous animals with kindness?
• Should people be afraid of animals?
• Are dolphins the friendliest animals? (Animal Topics For Essays)
• Should bullfighting be banned?
• You can wear leather or fur provided the animals were raised in humane conditions.
• Can the cross-breeding of animal be a sustainable business in the long-term?
• Should animals be respected?
• Trends and public opinion towards animal rights
• Are there conditions in the farm that foster the spread of avian influenza amongst chicken?
• Do you support tethering of dogs and other animals outside?
• Argumentative Research Paper Topics About Animal Abuse

Start by filling this short order form order.studyinghq.com

And then follow the progressive flow. 

Having an issue, chat with us here

Cathy, CS. 

New Concept ? Let a subject expert write your paper for You​

Have a subject expert write for you now, have a subject expert finish your paper for you, edit my paper for me, have an expert write your dissertation's chapter, popular topics.

Business StudyingHq Essay Topics and Ideas How to Guides Samples

• Nursing Solutions
• Study Guides
• Free Study Database for Essays
• Privacy Policy
• Writing Service 
• Discounts / Offers 

Study Hub: 

• Studying Blog
• Topic Ideas 
• How to Guides
• Business Studying 
• Nursing Studying 
• Literature and English Studying

Writing Tools  

• Citation Generator
• Topic Generator
• Paraphrasing Tool
• Conclusion Maker
• Research Title Generator
• Thesis Statement Generator
• Summarizing Tool
• Terms and Conditions
• Confidentiality Policy
• Cookies Policy
• Refund and Revision Policy

Our samples and other types of content are meant for research and reference purposes only. We are strongly against plagiarism and academic dishonesty. 

Contact Us:

📧 [email protected]

📞 +15512677917

2012-2024 © studyinghq.com. All rights reserved

Home — Essay Samples — Social Issues — Animal Rights — Thesis Statement For Animals Deserve Rights, And Their Rights

Thesis Statement for Animals Deserve Rights, and Their Rights

• Categories: Animal Rights Animal Welfare

About this sample

Words: 671 |

Published: Mar 5, 2024

Words: 671 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Table of contents

Thesis statement, history and debates, development and resolution.

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

• Expert in: Social Issues Environment

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1083 words

2 pages / 847 words

4 pages / 1783 words

3 pages / 1286 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Animal Rights

The question of whether zoos help or harm animals is a contentious and complex issue that has sparked widespread debate among animal rights advocates, conservationists, and the general public. On one hand, zoos are touted as [...]

Animal testing has been a common practice in scientific research and testing for decades. The use of animals, however, remains a highly controversial issue. Animal Research: The Ethics of Animal Experimentation. [...]

Animal research has long been a contentious issue, with proponents touting its benefits to scientific progress and detractors decrying its ethical implications. This essay explores both sides of the debate and offers a [...]

The practice of keeping animals in captivity, whether in zoos, aquariums, circuses, or other forms of confinement, has long been a subject of ethical debate and controversy. While some argue that captivity serves educational and [...]

The banning of pit bulls based on their breed is an unjust and ineffective approach to addressing dog-related incidents. It unfairly stigmatizes a specific breed, ignores the importance of individual responsibility, and fails to [...]

Zoos have been a topic of debate for many years, with some arguing that they play a crucial role in conservation efforts, while others believe that they are unethical and should be banned. This essay will explore the history of [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• IELTS Scores
• Life Skills Test
• Find a Test Centre
• Alternatives to IELTS
• General Training
• Academic Word List
• Topic Vocabulary
• Collocation
• Phrasal Verbs
• Writing eBooks
• Reading eBook
• All eBooks & Courses
• Sample Essays

Animal Rights Essay

This IELTS  animal rights essay  discusses the exploitation of animals by humans.

People who believe in animal rights think that they should not be treated cruelly, for example in experiments or for sport.

'To exploit' means to benefit from something in an unfair way. Take a look at the question:

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Discussing 'Two Opinions'

Animals should not be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans. Humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

In this essay you are being given two opposing opinions to discuss.

This is the first opinion:

• Animals should not be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans.

This is the second opinion:

• Humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

In this type of essay, you must look at both sides. In other words you need to discuss the arguments FOR animal rights and AGAINST .

You must also ensure you give YOUR opinion.

Organising the Essay

One way to organize an essay like this is to consider both opinions, then give your opinion in a final paragraph ( see this example ) or dedicate a whole final paragraph to your opinion ( see this example ).

Another way to write an essay like this is to also make one of the 'for' or 'against' opinions your opinion as well.

Look at the model animal rights essay below. The second body paragraph discusses the first opinion, but the topic sentence makes it clear that this paragraph is also representing the writers opinion as well:

However, I do not believe these arguments stand up to scrutiny.

This now means that in two body paragraphs you have covered all three parts of the question from the animal rights essay:

1. First opinion 2. Second opinion 3. Your opinion

The advantage of doing it this way rather than having a separate paragraph is that you do not need to come up with new ideas for a new paragraph.

If you have a separate paragraph with your opinion you may find you cannot think of any new ideas or you may end up repeating the same things as in your previous paragraphs.

IELTS Writing Example

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

Write at least 250 words.

Animal Rights Essay - Model Answer

Animals have always been used by humans in some form to satisfy their needs. However, while some people believe that animals should be treated in the same way humans are and have similar rights, others think that it is more important to use them as we desire for food and medical research. 

With regard to the exploitation of animals, people believe it is acceptable for several reasons. Firstly, they think that humans are the most important beings on the planet, and everything must be done to ensure human survival. If this means experimenting on animals so that we can fight and find cures for diseases, then this takes priority over animal suffering. Furthermore, it is believed by some that animals do not feel pain or loss as humans do, so if we have to kill animals for food or other uses, then this is morally acceptable.

However, I do not believe these arguments stand up to scrutiny. To begin, it has been shown on numerous occasions by secret filming in laboratories via animal rights groups that animals feel as much pain as humans do, and they suffer when they are kept in cages for long periods. In addition, a substantial amount of animal research is done for cosmetics, not to find cures for diseases, so this is unnecessary. Finally, it has also been proven that humans can get all the nutrients and vitamins that they need from green vegetables and fruit. Therefore, again, having to kill animals for food is not an adequate argument.

To sum up, although some people argue killing animals for research and food is ethical, I would argue there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that this is not the case, and, therefore, steps must be taken to improve the rights of animals.

(Words 290) 

<<< Back

Next >>>

More Discuss Two Opinion Essays:

IELTS Writing Example: What are the aims of a university education?

IELTS writing example essays. This is an essay on the aims of university education. In this essay, two opposing opinions need to be discussed. It is important to understand how to answer this type of question in the IELTS exam.

Influence of Scientists or Politicians Essay

Influence of Scientists or Politicians Essay- Model answer for IELTS. Who has had the most influence on our world? In this essay you have to discuss both sides.

Extraterrestrial Life Essay: Should we look for life on other planets?

This extraterrestrial life essay is an IELTS opinion essay where you have to discuss both sides of an issue then give your own opinion.

Child Development Essay: What factors influence a child's development?

Child Development Essay for IELTS. The essay is about the factors that affect the way that children develop. It provides you with a model answer and comments on the response to help you know how to improve your band score.

Sources for Stories Essay: Should parents read to their children?

This sources for stories essay asks for your opinion on the best way for children to get stories. Is it from parents reading to them or other ways?

Diet and Health Essay: Who is responsible for diet and health?

Diet and Health Essay for IELTS: This model examines the extent to which individuals or governments should be responsible for health. Read a model answer and useful comments about the essay which will help you to improve your IELTS Score.

Donating Money to Charity Essay: Where should the money go?

Donating Money to Charity Essay: IELTS model answer to an essay on the topic of giving locally or to national and international charities.

Formal and Informal Education Essay: What age should it start?

This formal and informal education essay is about whether it is best for children to begin their formal education at school when they are 7 rather than much younger.

Zoo Essay: Are zoos cruel or do they protect animals?

This is a recent zoo essay question from the IELTS test (June 2018). Essay about zoos have come up a few times in the IELTS test so it's worth studying same sample questions and sample essays about the topic.

Childcare Essay: Should family or carers look after young children?

Childcare Essay: In the essay you have to discuss two sides of an argument. The first is that it is better if pre-school children are looked after at home with relatives such as grandparents. The second opinion is that children should be looked after at childcare centres.

IELTS Essays: What is the best way to reduce crime?

IELTS essays online with comments by an IELTS instructor - A writing sample on the topic of reducing crime.

IELTS Essay Becoming Independent

This IELTS essay discussed whether people are becoming more independent than they were in the past. This is a question that has come up a few times in the test. This is discussion type essay as you have to discuss both sides of an argument and come to a conclusion.

Any comments or questions about this page or about IELTS? Post them here. Your email will not be published or shared.

Before you go...

Check out the ielts buddy band 7+ ebooks & courses.

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

• Click on the HTML link code below.
• Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.

Band 7+ eBooks

"I think these eBooks are FANTASTIC!!! I know that's not academic language, but it's the truth!"

Linda, from Italy, Scored Band 7.5

IELTS Modules:

Other resources:.

• All Lessons
• Band Score Calculator
• Writing Feedback
• Speaking Feedback
• Teacher Resources
• Free Downloads
• Recent Essay Exam Questions
• Books for IELTS Prep
• Useful Links

Recent Articles

Decreasing House Sizes Essay

Apr 06, 24 10:22 AM

Latest IELTS Writing Topics - Recent Exam Questions

Apr 04, 24 02:36 AM

IELTS Essay: English as a Global Language

Apr 03, 24 03:49 PM

Important pages

IELTS Writing IELTS Speaking IELTS Listening   IELTS Reading All Lessons Vocabulary Academic Task 1 Academic Task 2 Practice Tests

Connect with us

Copyright © 2022- IELTSbuddy All Rights Reserved

IELTS is a registered trademark of University of Cambridge, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia. This site and its owners are not affiliated, approved or endorsed by the University of Cambridge ESOL, the British Council, and IDP Education Australia.

Elimu Centre

Education Centre

Argumentative Essay Topics about Animals

Animal argumentative essay topics, argumentative topics about animals, topics on argumentative essay about animals, animal debate topics, argumentative essay topics on animal cruelty, argumentative essay topics on the rights of animals, argumentative essay on conservation of animal species.

Argumentative Essay Topics about Animals: For you to write a good argumentative topic about animals, you need to understand the topic at hand. Before you start writing your essay, you need to choose a good subject for your argumentative essay topic.

If you are in middle school, high school, university, or college this is the best place to start your research argumentative essays on animals.

Below is a list of argumentative essay topics about animals that you can choose from.

1. Should wild animals be sold and kept as pets?

2. Are zoos are good for animals?

3. What sort of animals should be used for experimentation and why?

4. Are there any ill consequences on the ecology of the earth if the critically endangered species get extinct from the food chain and web?

5. Should people abusing animals be reported to the authority? Who should bear the responsibility of reporting?

6. Is water pollution dangerous to aquatic life

7. Should there be harsher laws for animal cruelty?

8. Should there be a bigger consequence for poaching?

9. Should the punishment for poaching be increased?

10. Should the percentage be higher for the endangered list?

Read: Argumentative Essay Topics on Social Media

11. Veterinary care is very expensive

12. Trading products made from animals is a worthwhile venture

13. Think of some convincing alternatives to vivisection.

14. There is no need of respecting animals

15. Is the subjection of animals to chemical tests is alo harmful to a human beings?

16. The population explosion leads to deforestation and thus it snatches the habitat of the animals as well.

17. The major significance of environmental conservation can be seen in the result of saving animals from dying unnatural death.

18. The impact of human beings on wildlife

19. Biomagnifications are the biggest reason why many species are dying a natural death in the ecological environment.

20. Should whaling be globally outlawed?

21. Should we never take medicine if we want to save animals from experiments?

22. Should animals have more rights?

23. Should they be kept in captivity?

Read: Argumentative Essay Topics about Mental Health

1. Should ocean marine animals be kept in captivity?

2. Should animals be used for entertainment?

3. Should animals be used for scientific testing and medical studies?

4. Should animal fashion be banned?

5. Sacrificing animals for religion is ethical/moral?

6. Rhinos’ extinction from seeking their horns is unavoidable.

7. Research studies using animal participants are ethical.

8. Protecting the Giant Panda is ecologically important.

9. Protecting endangered animal species is important.

10. Primates and other sophisticated vertebrates should not be used in laboratory research.

11. Pets should be spayed and neutered to prevent overpopulation.

12. People should not be kind to poisonous animals.

13. Monkeys are the most intelligent animals among all mammals in the forest.

14. Medical animal testing is justifiable.

15. Medical animal testing is ethically wrong.

16. Killing animals for food is justified.

17. Keeping wild-caught exotic pets is inhumane.

Read: LGBT Argumentative Essay Topics

1. Keeping animals in zoos is inhumane.

2. It’s irrational to be afraid of spiders since most of them are harmless.

3. It is necessary and acceptable to use higher animals, such as monkeys and chimpanzees, in laboratory research.

4. It is difficult to maintain equilibrium on this earth if the animal species will keep on vanishing from the earth.

5. Is the cross-breeding of animals sustainable in the long term?

6. Is keeping animals in a zoo inhumane?

7. Is it okay to test antibiotics and cures on animals?

8. Is it okay for people to have exotic pets?

9. Is it necessary to do medical tests on living creatures?

10. Is it justified to kill animals for fun?

11. Is it ethical for people to have exotic pets such as Meerkats?

12. Is it ‘right’ to perform tests on other living creatures for our gains?

13. Is animal fashion ethical? Should it be made completely illegal?

14. Important factors to consider when adopting a pet.

Read: Argumentative Essay Topics On Religion

15. Hunting for sport is unethical and inhumane.

16. Hunting for sport is a normal, acceptable pass time.

17. How does the ecology gets disturbed when the animals playing their particular role in a given ecosystem become extinct from the earth?

18. How the ecological system on earth can be balanced well when the food chain and food web grow naturally?

19. How far should we go to protect endangered species?

20. How can we make vivisection less painful and/or stressful? Should we?

1. Foxes should be bred into companion animals.

2. Fish should not be kept in goldfish bowls without filters or temperature control.

3. Factory farm treatment of animals is inhumane.

4. Factory farm conditions are conducive to the spread of avian influenza among chickens and other domestic fowl.

5. Euthanizing stray animals is unethical.

6. Euthanizing stray animals is a humane solution.

7. Dolphins are friendly.

8. Do we have a responsibility to respect the creatures we test on?

9. Do cosmetics matter?

10. Do animals have feelings?

11. Deer hunting is legal.

12. Dairy cows should be given drugs to boost milk production.

1. Can we improve the lives of captive animals?

2. Bullfighting is fun and should be continued.

3. Are wildlife preserves healthy for various species?

4. Are there reasons for treating cats and dogs humanely?

5. Animals do not have any rights.

6. Animal testing is justifiable in some cases (e.g., medical), but not in others (e.g., cosmetics).

7. Animal testing is beneficial.

8. Animal health is a money-making venture.

9. Animal extinction through human action should be banned.

10. Animal cruelty must be banned.

11. Conserving some endangered animals is more important than conserving others, due to their respective ecological roles.

12. Companion animals can help lonely people.

13. Chaining or tethering dogs outside is unethical, inhumane, and a form of animal neglect.

Read: Words That Start with S to Describe Someone

1. The tribal people harm animals for their meals and other needs in several ways.

2. The efforts of various international conventions on animal rights are irrelevant as they are incapable of checking injustice to animals.

3. The advancement in technology and coming of the biotechnology in the past couple of decades pause a serious threat to animals.

4. People who are not following the norms created for saving animals from human cruelty are not punished at all.

5. Most animals spread infectious diseases once they are subjected to chemical tests in several experiments.

6. Many animal species are about to extinct because of the chemicals applied to them during the test.

7. Developed countries are less cruel towards animals as compared to developing and underdeveloped nations.

8. Apart from making strict rules for saving cruelty to animals, it is also important to enforce them on the real ground.

9. Animals are subjected to human cruelty in various testing labs nowadays.

Read: Summer Vacation Wishes for Students

1. There should be a provision for proper care of the animals which are wounded and struggling for survival.

2. Most of the animals die an unnatural death at the hand of humans which is a big slap on the conventions making animals laws.

3. Most of the animal rights conventions are showing their back when it comes to taking action against rich people harming animals.

4. Many times people who are making animal rights are involved in putting the lives of animals in danger.

5. It is very important to have international laws on saving animals from harmful human activities.

6. Developed countries are more inclined towards animal rights as compared to developing ones.

7. Certain traditional practices which are against the rights of animals should be banned across the length and breadth of the world.

8. Animal rights are valid in documents only as we cannot see them in practice against exploitation against them.

Read: Words of Encouragement for a Test

1. Animal species which are about to be extinct are also being exploited by the people and authorities are mute on the issue.

2. Conservation of animal species that are in the endangered category of species can be saved by giving artificial habitats to them.

3. It is almost impossible to make an animal species breed in an artificial environment.

4. Only critically endangered species are given attention in the conservation of animal species and not other species.

5. The actions that are being taken in favor of the conservation of animal species are a mere show-off.

6. The efforts taken so far to conserve the animal species by the experts of the arena are not successful to a great extent.

7. We can save the animals which are about to extinct by facilitating them in natural habitats and not in artificial habitats by preserving them.

8. We cannot see animal conservation in a single aspect as there are a lot of things to consider beyond giving them food and habitat.

Read: Illustration Essay Topics

Betty is a qualified teacher with a Bachelor of Education (Arts). In addition, she is a registered Certified Public Accountant. She has been teaching and offering part-time accounting services for the last 10 years. She is passionate about education, accounting, writing, and traveling.

Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay

Animal testing: introduction, animal testing: debatable questions, animal testing: conclusion.

Animal testing denotes the use of animals in medical experiments to unveil the potency, safety, toxicity, and viability of developed drugs. Concurrently, the phenomenon also applies to other biological experiments, which utilize animals as specimens. The method incorporates the administration of pharmaceutical compounds into biological systems (test animals).

This usually occurs for scientific purposes and medical developments. The process is debatable and has been disputed by animal activists, religious groups, and ethical communities who believe that the trend is immoral and inappropriate since animals cannot be compared with human beings (Panza & Potthast, 2010).

Animal testing usually involve vertebrates like rodents, cats, dogs, birds, and Guinea pigs among others. Since this is a disputable phenomenon, where one can argue for or against the act, this paper supports the aspects of animal testing with bountiful reasons based on its viability in investigating pharmacological compounds. Without animal testing, numerous drugs, which currently help the humankind, could have missed.

Since human beings cannot commence crude pharmaceutical investigations as test specimens, using test animals is significant in this context. It is advisable to execute scientific investigations elsewhere before introducing them into human beings. It is crucial to agree that animal testing might be unethical phenomenon as argued by some groups; nonetheless, it should continue following its merits and contributions to the humankind in the realms of drug investigations and scientific discoveries.

With regard to animal testing, debatable questions emerge. In this paper, “Should animal testing be abandoned due to ethical claims surrounding it?” forms the debated question. This question tries to unveil whether it is viable for biologists and medical scientists to cease from using animals for experimental investigations.

Despite the conventional use of these animals in numerous scientific experiments, it is still debatable on their viability and potency. Arguably, the animal testing phenomenon should continue with regard to scientific investigations.

The need for efficacy, safety, novelty, and certainty in the realms of drug-use require thorough investigative experiments, which can only materialize when test animals are incorporated. Firstly, some animal have systems that resemble those of human beings; thus, the ability to use such animals give a broader chance of executing an elaborate experimental investigation.

Using animals as representative of humans is a critical phenomenon when scrutinized critically. There are numerous individuals who have disputed this claim as stated in the research question. The desire to continue with the animal testing phenomenon has infuriated numerous activists who are against it (Panza & Potthast, 2010).

Nonetheless, it is evident and appropriate that this phenomenon should continue for further discoveries to be realized. It is questionable how further medical research will occur and how this will materialize without the use of test animals. This is an impossible phenomenon, which demands those who are arguing against animal testing to reconsider their stands.

Another issue is that human beings cannot be used as experimental animals. The drugs administered into humans must be of some quality, minimized toxicity, viable to use, potent, safe, and effective. This means that they have been investigated and approved by the concerned bodies after scientific investigations. If animal testing will be abandoned, no effective experimentation will occur on biological vessels.

Evidently, invitro (using experimental tubes) experimentations are slow and incomprehensive. This means that scientific investigations will delay and sometimes results might not occur. It is vital to consider that animal testing has helped significantly since its inception several decades ago. It has remained a viable, trusted, and considerable experimental design for pharmaceutical products and other scientific investigations.

Harrison & Hester (2006), which identifies alternative of animal testing, agrees that attaining an alternative of this trend is daunting and minimally achievable. Scientific considerations support this trend since there are limited alternatives to replace the method comprehensively (Harrison & Hester, 2006).

Those who are against animal testing claim that animals are not human beings and equating the two is inconsiderable. Evidently, animal are not exact copies of humans. There are numerous differences noticeable amidst the two factions. Additionally, they argue that what works best in a guinea pig (an experimental animal), might not exactly perform in humans.

The two factions (humans and test animals) are different hence the assumption that they can emulate each other is misled. Notably, this argument is understandable; however, as the situation stands, it is still appropriate to conduct animal testing to help in research investigations. Humans can hardly be used for crude or undeveloped researches as the ones done with test animals. This means that animal testing is still the best option.

According to Schmidt (2001), which discusses the aspects of animal testing, recognizes that it is important to infer that what is inconsumable for test animals is similarly consumable for humans. It is possible to note the adverse effects of drugs with animals, make appropriate changes in the composition of the tested drug, and later emerge with effective, safe, and potent compound worth human utilization.

Watson (2009), which describes the ethical issues related to animal testing, argues that some ethical claims behind the animal testing are baseless when compared to human lives saved daily due to animal testing executed to investigate proper and effective drugs. A mere claim that it is immoral to inject or administer unworthy compounds into an innocent animal while doing research is superfluous. This simply means that those who are against animal testing hardly want researches to be done using animals.

This is good and considerable; however, these very people hardly provide viable alternatives that can work better compared to the conventional animal testing provisions. Besides, they are also among those who gain from the findings and results achieved from such investigations. Evidently, almost all drugs currently used in the world at one point passed through animal testing to unveil their viability, safety, efficacy, toxicity levels, and other viable provisions demanded in this context.

Concurrently, it is inappropriate to abandon animal testing as claimed by the activists. The current discoveries on genetics, reproduction, developmental biology, and study of behaviors among others could have not materialized minus animal testing.

Additionally, there are other viable provisions that characterize the phenomenon besides the known pharmaceutical investigations which usually occur using test animals as stipulated before. In these mentioned fields, there are still considerable knowledge gaps that will necessitate further application of animal testing in order to unveil additional information.

This phenomenon can hardly occur minus animal testing since there will be no specimens for further research. The ethical claims fronted by the mentioned activists should cease from hindering further investigations (Watson, 2009). It is evident that discoveries made from animal testing are numerous and helpful to the human race as indicated earlier. The need for more investigations and application of animal testing will continue to exist following its viability, applicability, and reliability in the aspects of research.

The viewpoint that animals equally have moral rights is evident; however, it is disputable in this context since it acts as a hindrance to lucrative investigations and discoveries that are helpful to the humankind. Hayhurst (2000), which debates on animal rights, denotes that individuals who perceive animal as having rights are equally accurate in their opinions; nonetheless, they should also consider the merits of animal testing to their lives and beyond.

This relates to the ethical arguments posted with regard to this topic. It forms the center of argument from various people. It is crucial to denote that animal testing has numerous provisions worth noting in varying contexts. This relates to its viability and potency in unveiling the less investigated claims with regard to life. According to various sources, some arguments regarding the aspects of animal testing are invalid and misleading (Hayhurst, 2000). They simply emerge from undue compassion for animals.

This contributes to why this paper agrees with the continuity of animal testing. Precisely, its merits surpass its baseless flaws numerous times. It is recommendable to scrutinize these arguments before they derail the realities that encompass a given matter. It is crucial to consider such provisions following their viability in this context.

Additionally, those who argue against animal testing claim that such animals lack the capacity to express themselves hence can hardly show their pain, dissatisfaction, and suffering.

This is a critical claim; however, it is not enough to support the ban against animal testing. Conversely, scientists, medics, and biologists who use such animals apply moral aspects to their undertakings; hence, will barely intend to harm such experimental animals. Since such ethical observations are carried out within the mentioned experimental testing, it is considerable to continue with the animal testing phenomenon. Adjusting the conditions of these tests might equally help in upholding the ethical demands.

Another argument is that animal testing simplifies and speeds the experimental designs meant to make discoveries. This could have not been achievable minus such experimental trends. Testing developed research products on animals elicit the desired results with promptness. It is daunting and time consuming to develop therapeutic and diagnostic compounds from human beings. This relates to the aspects of delay claimed earlier.

Scientists will not be able to attain their demands in time. This might discourage them from continuing with investigations. Since the use of animal testing provides instant results, its application is widespread, applicable, and viable in numerous contexts. The aspects of safety indicated earlier in these claims equally contribute to the applicability of animal testing. It is improper to execute unsafe experiments or unverified drugs on humans.

The repercussions might be devastating than when it was applied on test animals (Schmidt, 2001). For example, developments and investigations on HIV drugs cannot occur on humans at their initial stages. It is advisable to develop them through animal testing before rendering them usable by humans. It is possible to adjust the composition of the given compound to unveil its viable concentrations. Emerging with instant results supports the application of animal testing and contributes massively in this context.

Animal testing is a helpful phenomenon in biological, medical, and other scientific investigations demanding its incorporation. The phenomenon is helpful, viable, and should be embraced despite the opposing opinions. Animal testing helps in developing effective, safe, viable, qualitative, and less toxic drugs. Following the merits of animal testing, its application and advancements should continue while observing ethical concerns.

Harrison, R. & Hester, R. (2006). Alternatives to Animal Testing . Ohio, OH: Cengage Learning.

Hayhurst, C. (2000). Animal testing: The animal rights debate . New York, NY: Rosen Pub. Group.

Panza, C. & Potthast, A. (2010). Ethics For Dummies . Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Schmidt, A. (2001). Animal testing in infectiology . Basel: Karger.

Watson, S. (2009). Animal testing: Issues and ethics . New York, NY: Rosen Pub.

• Chicago (A-D)
• Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2023, October 29). Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/

"Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." IvyPanda , 29 Oct. 2023, ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

IvyPanda . (2023) 'Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay'. 29 October.

IvyPanda . 2023. "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." October 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

1. IvyPanda . "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." October 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Animal Testing: Should Animal Testing Be Allowed? — Argumentative Essay." October 29, 2023. https://ivypanda.com/essays/animal-testing-argumentative-essay/.

• Argumentative Essay Writing
• Should Animals be Used in Research: Argumentative Essay
• Aspects of the Writing an Argumentative Essay
• An Argumentative Essay: How to Write
• Writing Argumentative Essay With Computer Aided Formulation
• Banning Violent Video Games Argumentative Essay
• Argumentative Paper on the Benefits of Free Range Livestock on Consumer Health Rather than Corn-Fed Livestock
• Has the Internet Positively or Negatively Impacted Human Society? Argumentative Essay
• Pros and Cons of Abortion to the Society Argumentative Essay
• Enhancement Drugs in Sports Should Be Banned: An Argumentative Paper
• Utilitarianism for Animals: Testing and Experimentation
• Burmese Pythons
• Grass Fed versus Grain and Corn Fed Animals
• Use of Animals in Biological Testing
• The Impact of Burmese Pythons on Florida’s Native Biodiversity