example of a rogerian essay

Now that you have had the chance to learn about Rogerian arguments, it's time to see what a Rogerian argument might look like. Below, you'll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA 7 th edition guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements.. Click the image below to open a PDF of the sample paper.

Here are some tips to help you craft a compelling and effective Rogerian essay: 1. Understand the Rogerian approach: Take the time to familiarize yourself with the principles of the Rogerian method, which emphasizes empathy, understanding, and finding common ground with your opponent. 2.

Rogerian Argument. The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. Developed by psychotherapist Carl Rogers and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging ...

Rogerian Argument Example Essay. Now that you have had the chance to learn about Rogerian arguments, it's time to see what a Rogerian argument might look like. Below, you'll see a sample argumentative essay, written according to APA formatting guidelines, with a particular emphasis on Rogerian elements.

Updated on October 01, 2019. Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic listening.

Rogerian Essay Example. December 13, 2021 / jakesullivan. The Rogerian argument model is one of the most well-known and widely-used argumentative structures. It was created by thе American psychologist, Carl Rogers, in the 1950s. It was a response to the so-called "trolley problem" - a controversial problem concerning the control of the ...

for the essay. Five-Part Structure 1) Introduction: Engage with your opponent (the other side). Show your good-willed intentions by ... • It is essential to create an effective Rogerian Argument thesis. Include in your ... your own viewpoint with a summary of the already-presented evidence from your introduction. Example thesis: While ...

A Rogerian essay example can be helpful in understanding how to present an opposing view without bias. Transition. In the Rogerian argument structure, the transition section plays a critical role in the essay. This section is where the writer moves from position 1 to position 2 while highlighting the common goals and goals that both viewpoints ...

Similarly to the Problem Solving structure, the Rogerian argument is structured the same but with more information. Using multiple sources, and not just two essays, it neutrally explains both sides of an argument along with the points they have in common and a possible compromise. INTRODUCTION: The introduction follows the general essay structure.

Commented [A2]: This thesis statement is a "middle-ground" thesis and works well in a Rogerian argument. Not all Rogerian arguments will require a thesis statement in the introduction, but if one is provided, it should focus on finding the middle ground in the argument. three, five, eight, and 10" (Hovde, 2013).

2. Write the introduction. Attract the reader with a catchy beginning. Then you need to depict the problem (or issue) and how it affects both you and your readers. Give background information on the issue and add as many details as you can to make a full picture of the discussed issue. Don't criticize or use bias.

The Rogerian essay closes not by asking readers to give up their own positions on the problem but by showing how the reader would benefit from moving toward the writer's position. In other words, the final section of the Rogerian argument lays out possible ways to compromise or alternative solutions to the problem that would benefit both reader ...

Sample Rogerian Argument papers. Below you will find two examples of Rogerian arguments written by students. Neither is perfect, but both earned an "S" grade. As you read through them, look for common ground, the statement of the opponent's position, and where the POP comes. See if you can find compromise or solutions that embrace both sides.

The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground. Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers (pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This type of argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to ...

Examples of Rogerian Argument in Literature. "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Martin Luther King Jr.: King acknowledges the fears of white moderates while advocating for civil rights. "A Modest Proposal" by Jonathan Swift: Swift uses satire to find common ground on addressing poverty and overpopulation in Ireland.

The following are the basic parts of a Rogerian Argument: 1. Introduction: Introduce the issue under scrutiny in a non-confrontational way. Be sure to outline the main sides in the debate. Though there are always more than two sides to a debate, Rogerian arguments put two in stark opposition to one another. Crucially, be sure to indicate the ...

As opposed to the traditional 5-paragraph essay, which has three main points as the body paragraphs, the Rogerian essay focuses on trying to work out the main arguments of each side. The first body paragraph should focus on one side of the argument, and the second paragraph should focus on the other side. It doesn't matter which side you ...

Rogerian argument is a type of argumentative writing that aims to find a middle ground between opposing viewpoints. Writing a Rogerian argument essay requires careful consideration of both sides of an issue and an effort to find common ground. Examples of Rogerian argument essays often deal with controversial topics such as gun control ...

Follow this outline and example to form a Rogerian argument essay. Rogerian arguments are named for the psychologist who developed the technique, Carl Rogers. Rogers' research on human socialization suggested that traditional debate format, Aristotelian, was doomed to cause more conflict than it solved. With Roger's format, you can persuade an audience without agreeing to terms you ...