Show that you understand the current state of research on your topic.
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your work.
One trick to get started is to think of your proposal’s structure as a shorter version of your thesis or dissertation , only without the results , conclusion and discussion sections.
Download our research proposal template
Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We’ve included a few for you below.
Like your dissertation or thesis, the proposal will usually have a title page that includes:
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
To guide your introduction , include information about:
Professional editors proofread and edit your paper by focusing on:
See an example
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives . This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
? or ? , , or research design? | |
, )? ? | |
, , , )? | |
? |
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Last but not least, your research proposal must include correct citations for every source you have used, compiled in a reference list . To create citations quickly and easily, you can use our free APA citation generator .
Some institutions or funders require a detailed timeline of the project, asking you to forecast what you will do at each stage and how long it may take. While not always required, be sure to check the requirements of your project.
Here’s an example schedule to help you get started. You can also download a template at the button below.
Download our research schedule template
Research phase | Objectives | Deadline |
---|---|---|
1. Background research and literature review | 20th January | |
2. Research design planning | and data analysis methods | 13th February |
3. Data collection and preparation | with selected participants and code interviews | 24th March |
4. Data analysis | of interview transcripts | 22nd April |
5. Writing | 17th June | |
6. Revision | final work | 28th July |
If you are applying for research funding, chances are you will have to include a detailed budget. This shows your estimates of how much each part of your project will cost.
Make sure to check what type of costs the funding body will agree to cover. For each item, include:
To determine your budget, think about:
If you want to know more about the research process , methodology , research bias , or statistics , make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
Methodology
Statistics
Research bias
Once you’ve decided on your research objectives , you need to explain them in your paper, at the end of your problem statement .
Keep your research objectives clear and concise, and use appropriate verbs to accurately convey the work that you will carry out for each one.
I will compare …
A research aim is a broad statement indicating the general purpose of your research project. It should appear in your introduction at the end of your problem statement , before your research objectives.
Research objectives are more specific than your research aim. They indicate the specific ways you’ll address the overarching aim.
A PhD, which is short for philosophiae doctor (doctor of philosophy in Latin), is the highest university degree that can be obtained. In a PhD, students spend 3–5 years writing a dissertation , which aims to make a significant, original contribution to current knowledge.
A PhD is intended to prepare students for a career as a researcher, whether that be in academia, the public sector, or the private sector.
A master’s is a 1- or 2-year graduate degree that can prepare you for a variety of careers.
All master’s involve graduate-level coursework. Some are research-intensive and intend to prepare students for further study in a PhD; these usually require their students to write a master’s thesis . Others focus on professional training for a specific career.
Critical thinking refers to the ability to evaluate information and to be aware of biases or assumptions, including your own.
Like information literacy , it involves evaluating arguments, identifying and solving problems in an objective and systematic way, and clearly communicating your ideas.
The best way to remember the difference between a research plan and a research proposal is that they have fundamentally different audiences. A research plan helps you, the researcher, organize your thoughts. On the other hand, a dissertation proposal or research proposal aims to convince others (e.g., a supervisor, a funding body, or a dissertation committee) that your research topic is relevant and worthy of being conducted.
If you want to cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator.
McCombes, S. & George, T. (2023, November 21). How to Write a Research Proposal | Examples & Templates. Scribbr. Retrieved September 2, 2024, from https://www.scribbr.com/research-process/research-proposal/
Other students also liked, how to write a problem statement | guide & examples, writing strong research questions | criteria & examples, how to write a literature review | guide, examples, & templates, "i thought ai proofreading was useless but..".
I've been using Scribbr for years now and I know it's a service that won't disappoint. It does a good job spotting mistakes”
Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests..., provide feedback.
We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation .
UCL LaTeX thesis templates.
Folders and files.
Name | Name | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
59 Commits | ||||
Ucl latex thesis templates.
This is a skeletal thesis template with a class and .sty file that you can use separately if you'd prefer.
To change the thesis type from PhD to MRes or MPhil, look for the setting in Main.tex .
The class needs some updating and could use a lot of commenting, and these are being worked on, but the files are perfectly usable right now with pdfLaTeX or lualatex. The repo is tested after each push with lualatex on Travis.
If you have suggestions for improvements, please do submit an issue, drop me a line ( [email protected] ), or throw me a pull request.
This work was previously available to be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License (>=1.3), however, I realised that that doesn't make a lot of sense for a template.
Therefore, all files except ucl_thesis.cls are released into the public domain under CC-0-1.0, as described in the COPYING file.
The classfile ucl_thesis.cls may be distributed and/or modified under the conditions of the LaTeX Project Public License, either version 1.3 of this license or (at your option) any later version. The latest version of this license is in http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt and version 1.3 or later is part of all distributions of LaTeX version 2005/12/01 or later.
This work has the LPPL maintenance status `maintained'.
The Current Maintainer of this work is I. Kirker.
This work consists of all files listed in MANIFEST.md .
Citation links.
If you see this error while compiling:
and then get links that don't work in the PDF, try un-commenting the line below in MainPackages.tex even if you don't use that style of citation.
If you're already comfortable with programming on the command-line, you can use whatever plain text editor you'd like.
If you're new to LaTeX, though, or want something to help you keep your files together, you may want TeXMaker or LyX (both available for Windows, Linux, or OS X), or TeXShop (for OS X).
TeXShop and TeXMaker are both oriented around helping you write plaintext .tex files, while LyX is more aimed at presenting a structured document with some of the formatting rendered, to make it a little less abstract to work with.
If you want something quick that runs entirely through a browser, so you don't even have to set up your own LaTeX installation, UCL also has a subscription for Overleaf , a service that does that. You'll have to register using your UCL email address to use the subscription. It's also good for working with someone else on a document, with live shared editing.
If you're using this from the Linux command-line, the Makefile defines a few things to make it easier to build the LaTeX document. If not, you can happily ignore it.
PNG and JPEG images work perfectly well, as do PDF files (including vector graphics). Vector graphics in PDFs will remain as vectors. Remember to produce higher-resolution images than you'd use online -- 300 or 600 dpi are typical print qualities, rather than the 72 dpi standard for websites. If you don't have control over this setting directly from whatever you're using to produce your images, a good rule of thumb is that you should aim to generate them 3 and a bit times larger on screen than you want them to be on paper.
In the Main.tex file there are a list of \include statements. If you add an \includeonly statement to match those with one or more of the same labels, it'll just produce the content for those sections. (Labels, references, figures, and table numbers will be consistent as if you'd generated the whole document.)
Yes, but they only differed by 4 characters each, so it seemed silly to maintain them each separately. Change the setting in the Main.tex file to get the one you need.
Reference books.
When applying for a research grant or scholarship, or, just before you start a major research project, you may be asked to write a preliminary document that includes basic information about your future research. This is the information that is usually needed in your proposal:
Most agencies that offer scholarships or grants provide information about the required format of the proposal. It may include filling out templates, types of information they need, suggested/maximum length of the proposal, etc.
Research proposal formats vary depending on the size of the planned research, the number of participants, the discipline, the characteristics of the research, etc. The following outline assumes an individual researcher. This is just a SAMPLE; several other ways are equally good and can be successful. If possible, discuss your research proposal with an expert in writing, a professor, your colleague, another student who already wrote successful proposals, etc.
How to apply.
Made by Dimitrios Kanoulas
Detailed Walkthrough + Free Proposal Template
If you’re getting started crafting your research proposal and are looking for a few examples of research proposals , you’ve come to the right place.
In this video, we walk you through two successful (approved) research proposals , one for a Master’s-level project, and one for a PhD-level dissertation. We also start off by unpacking our free research proposal template and discussing the four core sections of a research proposal, so that you have a clear understanding of the basics before diving into the actual proposals.
If you’re working on a research proposal for a dissertation or thesis, you may also find the following useful:
PS – If you’re working on a dissertation, be sure to also check out our collection of dissertation and thesis examples here .
Research proposal example: frequently asked questions, are the sample proposals real.
Yes. The proposals are real and were approved by the respective universities.
As we discuss in the video, every research proposal will be slightly different, depending on the university’s unique requirements, as well as the nature of the research itself. Therefore, you’ll need to tailor your research proposal to suit your specific context.
You can learn more about the basics of writing a research proposal here .
You can access our free proposal template here .
Yes. There is no cost for the proposal template and you are free to use it as a foundation for your research proposal.
For self-directed learners, our Research Proposal Bootcamp is a great starting point.
For students that want hands-on guidance, our private coaching service is recommended.
This post is an extract from our bestselling short course, Research Proposal Bootcamp . If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this .
I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a PhD in Management at Altantic International University. I checked on the coaching services, but it indicates that it’s not available in my area. I am in South Sudan. My proposed topic is: “Leadership Behavior in Local Government Governance Ecosystem and Service Delivery Effectiveness in Post Conflict Districts of Northern Uganda”. I will appreciate your guidance and support
GRADCOCH is very grateful motivated and helpful for all students etc. it is very accorporated and provide easy access way strongly agree from GRADCOCH.
Proposal research departemet management
I am at the stage of writing my thesis proposal for a masters in Analysis of w heat commercialisation by small holders householdrs at Hawassa International University. I will appreciate your guidance and support
please provide a attractive proposal about foreign universities .It would be your highness.
comparative constitutional law
Kindly guide me through writing a good proposal on the thesis topic; Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Financial Inclusion in Nigeria. Thank you
Kindly help me write a research proposal on the topic of impacts of artisanal gold panning on the environment
I am in the process of research proposal for my Master of Art with a topic : “factors influence on first-year students’s academic adjustment”. I am absorbing in GRADCOACH and interested in such proposal sample. However, it is great for me to learn and seeking for more new updated proposal framework from GRADCAOCH.
Kindly help me write a research proposal on the effectiveness of junior call on prevention of theft
kindly assist me in writing the proposal in psychology education
Please,Kindly assist my in my phd thesis writing on personal and socio cultural factors as determinate of family planning adoption
I’m interested to apply for a mhil program in crop production. Please need assistance in proposal format.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser .
Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.
Juan Camilo Herrera
DEBATE! Is there a regional ius commune in Latin America? / Panel 155, page 106. The term Ius Constitutionale Commune en América Latina (ICCAL) is an initiative coined by scholars who have been documenting, conceptualizing, and comparing the develo¬pment of Latin American public law for more than a deca¬de. It encompasses themes that transcend national borders and legal fields, involving constitutional law, administrative law, general public international law, regional integration law, fundamental rights, and investment law. For its critics, however, this project is the latest expression of competing agendas within the Latin American legal space. Its suppo¬sed strong Eurocentric and judicial inclination may present a normative straitjacket to the pluralist historiographies of the region, thus neglecting constructions from below. Mo¬reover, conceptual, epistemological and democratic limits may blind the ICCAL project and hinder it from presenting a full account of Latin America‘s public law(s). Chair: J.H.H Weiler Presenters: Arturo Villagran: A Human Rights´ Tale of Competing Narratives Ximena Soley: Struggles within the Human Rights Field: The Matter of Real and Supposed Competing Narratives Alejandro Rodiles: The ICCLA Project: Latin American Public Law or Global Public Law in Latin America? Juan C. Herrera: Transformative Constitutionalism: An Original Latin American Understanding of Public Law ______________________________________________________________________________________ What do we mean by “Transformative Constitutionalism“ in Latin America? / Panel 190, page, 125. Over the past decades, Latin America has gradually beco¬me a key player for the present and future of public law. Particularly the regionalization of constitutional law and the internationalization of constitutional law that are occurring in this region demonstrate relevant elements for comparative studies between regional and domestic systems. In our panel we will discuss some of the key de¬velopments that shape the emergence of an original Latin American path. This path consists of elements from various legal orders that are united by a common thrust, namely transformative constitutionalism, and linked to the pro¬ject of a Ius Constitutionale Commune en América Latina (ICCAL). This enterprise links national and regional case law related to the American Convention on Human Rights, other inter-American legal instruments, the corresponding guarantees of national constitutions and the constitutional clauses that open domestic legal orders to international law and regional integration law. Chair: Armin von Bogdandy Presenters: Sabrina Ragone: Latin American Transformative Constitutionalism Through the Prism of European Constitutionalism Cecilia Medina Quiroga: The Battle of Rights and Transformative Constitutionalism Javier Couso: Transformative Constitutionalism: Evaluating Constitutional Strategies to Materialize Social Justice in Latin America Juan C. Herrera: The Taxonomies of the Latin American Corpus Iuris or How National Constitutions in the Region Open some Windows and Doors in favor of Regional Integration ______________________________________________________________________________________ Primero ríos, después montañas y ahora la Amazonía: Derechos de la naturaleza en perspectiva comparada / Panel 110, page, 81. In the last few decades, challenges that may reconfigure our relationship with our environment and the “things“ that are part of it have burst onto the scene. Recent legis¬lative and case-law precedents have recognized the legal rights of the Whanganui River and Taranaki Mountain in New Zealand, the Ganges River in India, the Atrato River and the Amazon region in Colombia. This tendency arises from an “ecocentric“ approach that is based on a funda¬mental premise: humans do not possess the relationship with the earth - instead, humans are the ones who belong to the planet, not in terms of property, but as one part of the whole. In this panel we want to interrogate key featu¬res of the legal person model adopted in each of the men¬tioned cases and explore the challenges posed by those features in the local context - the efficacy of the models adopted to protect nature as legal entity - new approaches to the protection of the planet from climate change with strategic litigation cases. Chair: Juan C. Herrera Presenters: Felipe Clavijo-Ospina: Nature rights in perspective: beyond the ecocentric theory and the biocultural rights (Derechos de la naturaleza en perspectiva: más allá de la teoría ecocéntrica y los derechos bioculturales) Tatiana Alfonso: Who is going to help us now? Challenges of implementation in the new environmental rights (¿Y ahora quién podrá ayudarnos?. Los desafíos que plantea la implementación de los nuevos derechos de la naturaleza) Juan C. Herrera: Hacking the Law: Do “things“ have rights?“ (“Hackeando el sistema jurídico: ¿tienen derechos las “cosas“?) Natalia Castro: Climate change litigation and protection of collective entities (Litigio en cambio climático y protección de entidades colectivas) Juan Ubajoa: The legal personality of nature and its elements versus the constitutional duty to protect the environment (La personalidad jurídica de la naturaleza y de sus elementos versus el deber constitucional de proteger el medio ambiente)
VI Conference of the International Society of Public Law (ICON-S): Public Law in Times of Change?
Ranieri L Resende
The analysis is focused on the national blockade of truckers which strongly affected Brazil between 21 and 31 May 2018, and its direct repercussions on the regulatory agency‘s behavior. To solve this crisis, significant part of the government‘s bargaining involved the participation of the National Agency of Terrestrial Transport (ANTT), which was responsible for the regulation of the minimal pricing policy for freight transportation throughout the country. However, the highly unstable regulations adopted by the Agency in just a few days have demonstrated the fragile autonomy of the entity, as well as revealed its de facto quasi-regulatory performance. The same perspective seems applicable to other Brazilian agencies, when analyzed the aggressive institutional pattern adopted by the Presidency, the Ministry and the Judiciary on regulatory issues, in order to weaken the agencies‘ independence and legitimacy.
Wolff, Jonas 2015: Beyond the Liberal Peace: Latin American inspirations for post-liberal peacebuilding, in: Peacebuilding 3: 3, 279-296.
Jonas Wolff
Critics of liberal peacebuilding have started to move beyond mere criticism and think about what hybrid or post-liberal peacebuilding might mean. This article aims at contributing to this debate by bringing contemporary experiences in that are usually not reflected in the peace-building literature. Since the turn of the century, political changes in a series of South Ameri-can countries, including most notably in the case of Bolivia, have led scholars to identify trends towards post-liberal ways of organizing and exercising political rule. The context in which these processes occur is, of course, very different from the so-called post-conflict so-cieties usually studied by peacebuilding scholars. Yet, precisely because of these differences, conditions for a locally driven search for post-liberal democracy are much better in Latin America. In this sense, while the attempt to move beyond liberal peacebuilding does certainly not need yet another template to be implemented worldwide, these experiences might well serve as important inspirations in the ongoing search for locally grown, hybrid variants of a post-liberal peace.
The research is focused on the adjudicatory nature of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and its model of deliberation. In principle, identifying a large amount of individual opinions and their argumentative use could intuitively support the conclusion that the Inter-American Court‘s decision-making process is institutionally outlined by aggregating the content of separate opinions. In order to confirm or refute this perception, the importance of individual opinions is analyzed through the quantitative performance of each category of judge (ad hoc and regular), as well as each type of adjudicative activity (judgments and advisory opinions). The quantitative data is also useful to better understand the explicit assimilation of separate opinions to the core reasoning of future cases. As a result, it has been possible to identify relevant aspects applicable to the main problem of whether individual opinions really matter to the Inter-American Court‘s decision-making process.
Albert H.Y. Chen
The ideas and practices of written constitutions and constitutionalism that originated in the West in the 18th century were first imported into China in the late 19th century. There were three eras of constitution-making in modern Chinese history: the last decade of Qing imperial rule (1901-11), the republican era (1911-1949), and the communist era (1949-). The establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in the Mainland in 1949 inaugurated a new era of constitution-making under the Soviet Union’s influence. However, even today, the discussion of “constitutionalism” (xianzheng) is still discouraged by the PRC regime, although the concepts of the (socialist) Rule of Law and human rights have been affirmed by constitutional amendments in 1999 and 2004 respectively. Part I of this paper will first review the historical evolution of constitutions in the modern world, and then consider the concepts and theories of constitutions and constitutionalism in the contemporary world. Part II introduces the historical and ideological contexts of constitutional developments in modern China, and describes the operation of the Chinese constitutional system. Part III considers the present state and future prospects of constitutionalism in China. Finally, part IV concludes the chapter.
Alexandru-Ionuț Drăgulin
Max Planck Encyclopedia of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press)
Gábor Attila Tóth
For a later analysis, see also my Constitutional Markers of Authoritarianism, https://www.academia.edu/37557701/Constitutional_Markers_of_Authoritarianism
Claudio G Couto
Alberto Coddou
El presente trabajo es una primera version de un capítulo que forma parte de mi tesis de doctorado. Se pide a los lectores no difundir ni citar el texto sin mi permiso. Cualquier comentario adicional pueden enviarlo al correo electrónico [email protected] The present work is a first draft of chapter that will be included in my PhD thesis. Please do not circulate or cite without permission. Any comments are welcome ([email protected])
Daniel Antonio Garcia Huerta
The aim of this Working Paper is to assess the relevance of the hegemonic constitutional perspective on human rights. It argues that, detached from other social and political considerations, it is not effective in securing its own standards for humanity. A constitution alone cannot transform society by means of legal commands and discourses. It demands a more thorough involvement and transformation of social and political structures for effect. While most of the literature on the field has been focused on the constitutionalisation of rights, particularly after the boom of international human rights law, this paper aims to explore what follows the constitutional incorporation and social implementation of rights. To do that, this analysis will look critically to the process of constitutional inclusion and assess whether it has had a positive or negative impact on rights implementation and social transformation. For a better understanding of the relationship between rights and constitution, three different theories will be drawn on: social, political, and legal schools of thought. One of the goals of this work is to reject a hierarchical approach to rights and constitutions, on the one hand, and the democratic polity on the other, and to refocus the question more holistically how human rights are, or ought to be, about social transformation.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.
Writing a data management plan is an excellent way to identify and plan for your data management and sharing activities both during the project and then once the project is complete. There is no set format as to what a data management plan has to contain, but some funding agencies may provide a template if it is to be submitted as part of a grant application. UCL offers a generic data management plan template which is available here:
There is also a Moodle module which covers the data management plan process and provides an overview of the information you need to include. The course uses the above template, so you can work through the material it to fill in the template as you progress.
The library data management team will provide feedback on your data management plan before you submit it as part of a funding proposal.
This call for proposals seeks applications for funding to the next round of the Reach Alliance.
The call opens on Friday, 30th August, and will close on Friday, 4th October 2024.
Funding of up to £20k is available to support a team of 3-5 UCL students, mentored by 1 or 2 PIs, to lead an 18-month research project responding to an urgent challenge of reaching the hardest to reach.
The Reach Alliance is a consortium of global universities - with partners in the United Kingdon, Australia, Singapore, Ghana, South Africa, Mexico, and Canada - developing the leaders we need to solve urgent local challenges of the hard to reach – those under-served for geographic, administrative, or social reasons. To date, the Reach Alliance has trained over 330 undergraduate and graduate students, engaged 52 faculty mentors across seven countries and launched over 80 case study reports covering innovative interventions in 35 countries.
The Reach Alliance was created in 2015 by the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy, in partnership with Mastercard’s Center for Inclusive Growth.
UCL joined the Alliance in 2021 alongside the University of Oxford and Tecnológico de Monterrey, as part of its strategic partnership with the University of Toronto. The University of Melbourne, Ashesi University, Singapore Management University and University of Cape Town joined in 2022.
Working in interdisciplinary teams of 3-5, Reach’s globally minded students use research methods to identify innovative solutions to climate, public health, and economic challenges. The UNs’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide inspiration and a guiding framework. Research is conducted in collaboration with local communities and with guidance from university faculty members, building capacity and skills among Reach's student researchers.
Funding is provided by Global Engagement in UCL to support the research notably to fund field research trips where students conduct primary data collection. Teams then analyse the data to produce a 6,000-8,000 word published report called case study ( all four previous UCL Reach case studies can be found here ). Critically, funding also supports student and faculty travel to the annual Reach Research Conference ( see here for 2023 Reach Conference summary video featuring UCL Reach researchers ), as well as other knowledge translation events where students disseminate their actionable research insights.
As the Reach Alliance’s founding institution, the University of Toronto continues to serve as home base for the network.
Each partnering university assembles its own teams of students and faculty mentors and provides research and administrative support. As home base, the University of Toronto plays a central role in managing and developing the Reach Alliance model and methodology and provides significant additional support (the equivalent of a further £10k for each project team) over the research period through:
Further information on the outputs and outcomes of Reach at UCL to date can be found at Annex 1 .
This funding call seeks applications from a PI or two co-PIs (called mentors under the Reach programme), from different faculties, working on an urgent challenge of reaching the hardest to reach - those under-served for geographic, administrative, or social reasons - to lead the next Reach Alliance research team at UCL.
UCL encourages the selection of case studies that are embedded in local communities in the UK but can be situated in the wider global context provided by the Alliance. International case studies are allowed but travel costs need to be included in the project budget and cannot replace attendance at the annual conference. The research itself can cover any challenge relevant to the Sustainable Development Goals. The following examples of previous case studies from UCL and partners of the Alliance may help to provide a sense of how this has been approached through the platform to date.
The mentor(s) is required to provide a general abstract of the research challenge to be addressed by their students and plan to select 3-5 students to conduct the 18-month project. This research focus usually complements some of the current PI’s research. Given the relatively short timeframe, research questions that benefit from pre-approved ethics/low risk ethics are encouraged. It is also recommended that the PI benefits from an existing relationship with a partner organisation related to that research activity to facilitate contacts and fieldwork by the students.
The selection of the students will be at the discretion of the successful PI(s) and the application will need to explain how the students would be selected the students before the end of the calendar year 2024.
The students can be hand-picked or recruited through an application process, and GE’s recommendation is for PhD Students involvement. Undergraduate students not in their final year may also be considered where the case for their inclusion is strong, as continuous involvement across 18 months needs to be ensured. Teams may be composed of students from different levels of study.
Though previous teams have run successfully with Master’s students, GE does not recommend the inclusion of master’s students given that the project crosses two academic years.
4th October 2024: deadline for applications
Mid-October: successful mentor and project selected
October-December 2024: students’ selection
January-March 2025: preparation work and literature review
March-May 2025: ethics approval if needed
May-July 2025: fieldwork and writing
31st July 2025: deadline of spending for the first part of the funding
August-October 2025: finalisation of the case study.
November-December 2025: Reach Conference attendance (case study has to be published by the Reach Conference in November 2025 and representation of the team/part of the team at the conference is expected)
January-July 2026: outreach and impact activities.
31st July 2026: deadline of spending for the second part of the funding
GE will provide a total of £20K across two financial years, with £5K in financial year 1 to primarily cover research costs + £15K in financial year 2 to primarily cover travel costs. Please note that funding from financial year 1 cannot be rolled over into year 2 and needs to be expended within that timeline (by July 31st).
The overall funding covers the research costs and the travel costs of the team and mentor to conferences and relevant events and field trips. Day to day management of the funding is the responsibility of the mentor and their team; students are expected to draft a budget in their first month of the project under the mentors’ guidance.
The Reach Alliance at the University of Toronto provides a continuous series of training and leadership activities for the students, as well as opportunities to present the research findings at the annual Reach Research Conference . UCL students and faculty are also participating members of the global Reach network, including researchers from the seven other participating universities around the world. The Reach Alliance provides substantial communications and knowledge translation support, including a professional in-house research communications designer and senior content editor, contributing to many high-quality research deliverables ( Reach related research deliverables found here ).
The UCL mentor/ lead is responsible for the selection of the students and the research question to be explored, as well as research project management with administrative support and management of the funds provided by their home department, similarly to other GE provided grants. The mentor is expected to: Provide availability for a standing meeting on a biweekly basis with students and respond to emails in a timely manner (2-3 business days).
Please click on the link below to access the application form and questions.
Applications will be assessed by the UCL GE and the Reach Team central team, with the successful applicant to be notified in mid-October.
For any questions about the call for proposal and the Reach programme at UCL, please contact Clément Leroy, Senior Global Engagement Manager: [email protected] or directly on MS Teams.
For the latest news about UCL’s international activity, partnerships and opportunities, subscribe to our mailing list .
Funding from ucl rige.
GE's funding streams are part of UCL Research, Innovation & Global Engagement (RIGE)'s wider funding calls. Find out more about the other funding calls under UCL RIGE here .
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
In 2014, 50% of global cereal production came from just four countries: China, USA, India and Russia (The World Bank, 2016). By 2050, an increased population and changes to diets mean that food production is likely to have to increase by 60% to meet demand (Bruinsma, 2009). A recent OECD/FAO study projected cereal production to increase by 14% ...
Research proposals usually need to go through several drafts. Show your internal and external supervisors a draft early enough so that you can incorporate their comments into a revised draft before submission. Review of the proposal. The proposal will be read by one of the academic staff, and will be discussed at a proposals review meeting in ...
larly research to date on your topic. Wh. t is the current state of your field? How would your research contri. e to the advancement of your field? 5) A description of your theoretical framework and methodological approach, including an explanation of. hy this is best suited to your topic.6) A brief statement on your.
Research proposal examples. Writing a research proposal can be quite challenging, but a good starting point could be to look at some examples. We've included a few for you below. Example research proposal #1: "A Conceptual Framework for Scheduling Constraint Management".
The research process for your dissertation requires a different approach from that you'll have used during your taught modules. ... Research and Writing Skills for Dissertations and Projects is a UCL Moodle course available to all UCL students and looks at the skills associated with researching and writing an extended piece of work. Module 4 ...
This guide is primarily aimed at taught postgraduate students, but may also be of interest to final year undergraduates. It highlights the extensive online library collections and services available to you, and also directs you to other academic support services that may be useful when undertaking your dissertation or research project.
UCL LaTeX Thesis Templates. This is a skeletal thesis template with a class and .sty file that you can use separately if you'd prefer. To change the thesis type from PhD to MRes or MPhil, look for the setting in Main.tex. The class needs some updating and could use a lot of commenting, and these are being worked on, but the files are perfectly ...
It may include filling out templates, types of information they need, suggested/maximum length of the proposal, etc. Research proposal formats vary depending on the size of the planned research, the number of participants, the discipline, the characteristics of the research, etc. The following outline assumes an individual researcher.
Research Proposal. PhD applications at UCL require a research proposal. This needs to demonstrate: 1) your ideas about a novel problem and its solution, 2) your knowledge of related work, and 3) your scientific writing. If accepted, the actual PhD might be slightly modified based on feedback and interaction with supervisors and colleagues.
Research Proposal Example/Sample. Detailed Walkthrough + Free Proposal Template. If you're getting started crafting your research proposal and are looking for a few examples of research proposals, you've come to the right place. In this video, we walk you through two successful (approved) research proposals, one for a Master's-level ...
UCL (University College London) is London's leading multidisciplinary university, with 8,000 staff and 25,000 students. mphil-phd_degree_outline_research_proposal_template.docx | Department of Political Science - UCL - London's Global University
A comprehensive research proposal is one of the most important parts of your PhD application, as it explains what you plan to research, what your aims and objectives are, and how you plan to meet those objectives. Below you will find a research proposal template you can use to write your own PhD proposal, along with examples of specific sections.
Your dissertation or research project will almost certainly require a search for literature on your topic, whether to identify selected research, to undertake a literature review or inform a full systematic review. ... This guide provides information on systematic review processes and support available from UCL Library Services. Further help ...
those areas in which the research is likely to have the clearest impact. Supervisors can provide guidance and there are sessions about the impact statement by UCL's Impact Team. s part of the Doctoral Skills Development Programme (DSDP) - see below.The Impact Statement should be placed immedi. in the thesis, before the table of contents ...
The 1,500 word research proposal is an important element of your application to doctoral study, whether full-time or part-time. It offers you the opportunity to outline the research you intend to conduct, including how you plan to go about it, and how your research might make a contribution to a theoretical or empirical evidence base.
The Award Services European Research and Innovation Office (ERIO) team provides a pre-award service for helping academics construct, edit and submit collaborative European Union (EU) grant proposals. European Proposal Services. You should also review the Award Services First steps - Prepare a funding proposal page for further advice.
Ph.D. Proposal Rocio Ferro-Adams (January 2019) (2,652 words) For consideration of ESRC Funding and Scholarship. UCL Research Studentships which open from 31 January 2019 I am a UK Student applying for a Ph.D. in the Americas Department. Full-time (three-year programme).
The Library holds a copy of most research degree theses completed by students registered at UCL. Print copies of research theses are catalogued by author in Explore; electronic versions are in many cases available on open access in UCL Discovery. The Library does not normally have copies of UCL: MA, MSc, MRes, LLM theses; Diploma theses
A good PhD proposal should do the following things, probably in the following order: 1. W ha t. E xplain w ha t his to rical p roblem (s) you w ant to und e rstan d . i.e. W h a t a re your research objectives, and what else do we need to know to understand why you re framing the historical problem as you are?
Sample Research Proposals. You will find here two examples of proposals for postgraduate research from the Department of Social Policy and Criminology. They both give good indication of the sorts of things that need to be included. The first, on fathering after divorce or separation, represents first thoughts on the proposed topic, but sets out ...
Proposals should be 1,000-1,500 words long, with a title, an overview of existing scholarship related to the research aims and objectives, specific research questions and a indication of the methodology to be employed. We recommend that you apply in the autumn to start the programme the following September.
There is no set format as to what a data management plan has to contain, but some funding agencies may provide a template if it is to be submitted as part of a grant application. UCL offers a generic data management plan template which is available here: Data Management Plan template word document (download)
UCL is consistently ranked as one of the top ten universities in the world (QS World University Rankings 2010-2022) and is No.2 in the UK for research power (Research Excellence Framework 2021). annex_11.2_initial_assessment_template_and_guidance_202425.doc | Academic Manual - UCL - University College London
Applications will be assessed by the UCL GE and the Reach Team central team, with the successful applicant to be notified in mid-October. Apply now. Contact. For any questions about the call for proposal and the Reach programme at UCL, please contact Clément Leroy, Senior Global Engagement Manager: [email protected] or directly on MS Teams.