environmental science cover letter

Clinical psychology

• Anxiety disorders
• Feeding and eating disorders
• Mood disorders
• Neuro-developmental disorders
• Personality disorders
• Affirmations
• Cover Letters
• Relationships
• Resignation & Leave letters

Psychotherapy

Personality.

Table of Contents

Cover letter for environmental scientist (5 samples)

As a BetterHelp affiliate, we may receive compensation from BetterHelp if you purchase products or services through the links provided.

The Optimistminds editorial team is made up of psychologists, psychiatrists and mental health professionals. Each article is written by a team member with exposure to and experience in the subject matter.  The article then gets reviewed by a more senior editorial member. This is someone with extensive knowledge of the subject matter and highly cited published material.

This blog post will show samples of “cover letters for an Environmental scientist.”

Samples of cover letters for an environmental scientist

To get an environmental scientist position , you need a well-written cover letter that showcases your passion for and dedication to the industry. When writing an environmental scientist cover letter, these are some of the essential things to include in your letter:

• Address the employer with a formal salutation. For example, “Dear/Hello (name of the recipient or hiring manager).”
• The next step is to state the position you are applying for and how you found the opening. 
• Write a short sentence about why you’re interested in the position.
• State your skills and work experience; ensure they are similar to the job position. When stating your skills, provide the accomplishment you have achieved. 
• Conclude your letter with a forward-looking statement. For example, “I look forward to discussing the position further.”

“Christina Esquino

1898 SW 38th Street

Homestead, FL

(305) 444-3282

[email protected]

March 25, 2021

Dear Dr. Allison Longwood,

I’m writing to apply for the position of environmental and botanical researcher at the Frost Botanical Center. I’m grateful to be considered for this opportunity, as I have always admired the Frost Center’s contributions to the field of environmental science. I am the current resident curator and liaison at the Hoffen University arboretum and the founder of a sustainable agroforestry nonprofit initiative in the Caribbean with seven years of experience in the field of environmental research. With the skills I’ve developed through these experiences, I hope to continue my efforts toward advancing ecological progress and environmental education at the Frost Center.

Over the last three years, I have served in my role at the Hoffen University arboretum. In this role, I’ve had the privilege of leading a full-scale botanical center. I was afforded the opportunity to play a key role in the development of the center by curating, planting, maintaining and organizing the 1000+ plant species present on the property. Not only has this position helped me develop strategic research tools in successfully cultivating hybridized and rare plants, but it has provided me with an in-depth education in the studies of horticulture, botany, ecological sciences and environmental sustainability.

In 2016, prior to starting my role at the arboretum, I began an agricultural sustainability initiative in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica after the island experienced a destructive hurricane that wiped out their farming infrastructure. With my background studying specialty coffee and its cultivation processes, I partnered with local leaders in Jamaica to develop a nonprofit initiative centered on fostering a sustainable reforestation initiative. Throughout my research processes, leadership and the extensive field work my team has completed, we have rebuilt the farmers’ agricultural infrastructure and enabled an environmentally sustainable source of income for their families.

In both of these aforementioned roles, I was able to carefully refine my diverse foundation of skills in research, problem-solving, communication, team management and sustainability consultation. Each of these roles necessitated a high level of organization, meticulous attention to detail and independent time management. I feel that I would be a strong asset to the Frost Botanical Center due to my past experiences, which have taught me the requisite skills to succeed in a fast-paced research and scientific environment.

Thank you for your time and consideration of my application—please contact me if you need any additional information. I look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes,

Dr. Christina Esquino”

“Dear Mr. Ramon Abbott:

As a highly innovative and results-driven Environmental Geologist and Project Geologist with a strong background in environmental consulting for major corporations, I am currently seeking to utilize my skills for your organization as Environmental Scientist.

With extensive experience conducting geologic data investigations, preparing subsurface investigation technical reports, corrective action plans, and site assessments, I feel confident in my ability to generate superior results for your organization. I am experienced in planning, phase scheduling, and project control. I have supervised field personnel and fieldwork including drilling, tank excavation, and soil/groundwater sampling.

Some of my key accomplishments include:

Served as Compliance Advisor for ConocoPhillips for gas station sites and bulk plants regarding environmental regulatory compliance, budgets, reports, maps, and data management in GeoTracker and LiveLink.

Championed projects including soil and groundwater sampling, well installation, soil vapor extraction, and air sparge well installation.

Resolved several compliance issues and process gaps including sampling frequency and groundwater monitoring through installation of vapor monitoring devices.

Identified $20K – $500K cost savings through maintaining 100% site compliance and eliminating the need for unnecessary work.

I possess extensive project management, writing, research, analysis, and communication skills. I am a performance driven individual with a passion for learning. I can quickly adapt and achieve goals in any environment. For a more detailed presentation of my skills and background, please review the enclosed resume. I look forward to speaking with you at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration.

Clark Myers”

“Dear Ms. Kristina Arredondo,

I am searching for a position in Environmental Science.

I have a bachelor’s degree in environmental science from Brown Mackie College and my courses included geology, biology, hazardous-waste management and chemistry. While completing my internship, I gained extensive fieldwork and some laboratory experience. My experience also includes using computer modeling and digital mapping to determine the extent of pollution in any given area and to predict how it will change in the future.

I have extensive knowledge of conservation, degradation and replenishment along with the ability to conduct studies, compile findings and to create documents recording all of the information collected. I have strong analytical and observational skills with the ability to determine the source of any problem detected and to determine how harmful it is to the environment. This way, it can be handled in a timely manner according to priority.

I possess excellent communication skills with the ability to present information in person through presentations or in writing detailing the results of all studies. I also have good interpersonal skills and a friendly personality that encourages teamwork, which helps to make the team more productive.

I am physically fit and able to do the fieldwork and I have the ability to travel with short notice and to work long hours to meet tight deadlines. I also have plans to continue my education to receive my master’s degree and it is my desire to help preserve and protect the earth’s air and water supplies by helping to develop new, effective ways to reduce pollution.

Please call (555)-555-5555 to arrange an interview.

Respectfully,

Yvette Murray

Resume Attached as MS Word Document”

“Dear hiring manager,

I am writing to express my interest in the Environmental Scientist position that is currently available with your company. I am a recent college graduate who earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Science in May 2013. My degree program has provided me with a solid background in the field of environmental science, which I believe will be an asset to you and your company.

I have been fortunate enough to gain experience in the field of environmental science while interning at United States EPA this past summer. During my time there, I was able to gain a better understanding of the inner workings of an environmental laboratory and how it relates to real-world environmental problems. This experience has allowed me to see the field of environmental science from a different perspective and has greatly expanded my knowledge on the subject.

My resume is attached to this application, which lists my qualifications and background in greater detail. I would like to thank you for taking the time out to review my application and qualifications, and I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.”

I am writing to express my interest in the Environmental Scientist position that is currently available with your company. I have a bachelor’s degree in environmental science and a master’s degree in applied science in environmental management, which I received from the University of Arizona in 2011. I also completed the SAGE program at the University of Wisconsin in 2012.

My career has been focused on working with government and non-profit organizations to develop and implement pollution prevention programs, conduct toxic waste clean-up operations, and provide environmental consulting services. I have extensive experience with federal, state, and local regulations as they relate to environmental consulting services and pollution prevention programs.

I have an outstanding work ethic and enjoy a good working relationship with co-workers, management, clients, and other personnel. I consider myself to be an independent thinker who is not easily influenced by others. I am extremely confident in my abilities as an Environmental Scientist and feel that I would be an asset to your company.

I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this position with you in person at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your time and consideration of my qualifications for this position.”

Frequently Asked Questions:

What is the role of an environmental scientist.

An environmental scientist conducts research to determine the impact of pollution on the ecosystem and implement strategies to prevent and control pollution.

How do you end a cover letter strongly?

Thank the recruiting manager, and choose a professional closing salutation such as, “Sincerely,” or “Best regards.”

If you like this blog post, please leave your comments and questions below.

https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/resumes-cover-letters/cover-letter-for-environmental-scientist

https://www.jobhero.com/cover-letter/examples/environmental/environmental-scientist

https://www.greatsampleresume.com/cover-letter/examples/environmental/science

Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Examples & Writing Tips

Was this helpful?

Related posts, cover letter for hse position (5 samples), cover letter for lunch monitor (5 samples), cover letter for dnata equipment operator(5 samples).

Resume Worded   |  Career Strategy

14 entry level environmental science cover letters.

Approved by real hiring managers, these Entry Level Environmental Science cover letters have been proven to get people hired in 2024. A hiring manager explains why.

Table of contents

• Entry Level Environmental Science
• Environmental Consultant
• Environmental Research Analyst
• Environmental Science Technician
• Environmental Compliance Specialist
• Junior Environmental Scientist
• Alternative introductions for your cover letter
• Entry Level Environmental Science resume examples

Entry Level Environmental Science Cover Letter Example

Why this cover letter works in 2024, quantifiable accomplishment.

Highlighting a specific accomplishment, like a 25% reduction in water usage, provides a tangible and impressive result that showcases your abilities and sets you apart from other candidates.

Impactful Internship Experience

Sharing your internship experience, along with the number of workshops organized and individuals reached, demonstrates your commitment to environmental education and ability to make a real impact on communities.

Showcase Significant Achievements

The way you've listed out your project details from your final year in university is really solid. You've clearly highlighted your role as a team leader, the nature of your project, and the impact it had, which speaks volumes about your analytical skills and understanding of environmental policies. So, always remember to show, not just tell, about your significant achievements.

Highlight Real-World Experience

You've done well to mention your internship experience, where you didn't just do routine tasks but made a substantial contribution by improving efficiency. It's vital to demonstrate real-world experience and concrete results, as it shows potential employers you're ready to hit the ground running.

Express Alignment with Company's Goals

Expressing your excitement about the role and the company's sustainable focus isn't just flattery. It's a smart move. It shows you understand the company's mission and see yourself contributing to it. This insight shows you're not just looking for any job, but this job at this company.

Showcasing Relevant Experience and Skills

Here, you're demonstrating your academic background and hands-on experience in a relevant field. This tells me you didn't just study this stuff, but you've also got real-world experience. It's great that you made such a significant impact at RW Tech Company. Your ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is a definite win and shows that you can bring value to our team.

Highlighting Specific Accomplishments

You're not just telling me what you did during your internship, but you're giving me tangible results. You were a part of a team that brought drinking water to three underprivileged communities - that's a big deal! This shows me that you're not just about theory, but about making real, positive changes in the world.

Matching Personal Passion with Company Mission

It's clear here that you're not just looking for any job. You see this role as an opportunity to be on the frontline of something you're passionate about. This tells me that you're likely to be motivated, engaged, and committed to our mission.

Expressing Gratitude and Eagerness

You're thanking me for considering your application, which is a nice touch. But you're also expressing your eagerness to discuss how your skills align with our needs. This shows that you're not just interested in getting a job, but in figuring out how you can contribute to our team.

Show real passion for environmental science

Your deep interest in the environment, described through personal experiences, makes your application feel genuine and engaging. It helps me see your long-term commitment to this field.

Highlight tangible achievements in environmental projects

Describing a specific project where you reduced waste and increased productivity proves your ability to deliver results. It's impressive when you can quantify your impact in such a clear way.

Align with the company's environmental mission

Expressing enthusiasm for the company’s goals shows you've done your homework and are truly interested in what they do. It makes us believe you could be a great fit for our team.

End with a polite and hopeful note

Closing your letter by thanking the reader and expressing eagerness to further discuss your application is both respectful and shows your genuine interest in the position.

Does writing cover letters feel pointless? Use our AI

Dear Job Seeker, Writing a great cover letter is tough and time-consuming. But every employer asks for one. And if you don't submit one, you'll look like you didn't put enough effort into your application. But here's the good news: our new AI tool can generate a winning cover letter for you in seconds, tailored to each job you apply for. No more staring at a blank page, wondering what to write. Imagine being able to apply to dozens of jobs in the time it used to take you to write one cover letter. With our tool, that's a reality. And more applications mean more chances of landing your dream job. Write me a cover letter It's helped thousands of people speed up their job search. The best part? It's free to try - your first cover letter is on us. Sincerely, The Resume Worded Team

Want to see how the cover letter generator works? See this 30 second video.

Connect your values to the company's mission

Talk about why the company's commitment to sustainability inspires you. It shows you’re looking for a job where you can make a difference.

Showcase real-world experience

Describe your hands-on experience and how it applies to the job you want. Mentioning specific projects makes your background more compelling.

Express eagerness to contribute

Make it clear that you’re not just looking for any job, but specifically this one. Share your excitement to use your skills in a team setting.

Emphasize alignment with the company’s goals

Explain why the company’s projects excite you. It’s important to show that your career goals align with the company's direction.

Reaffirm your interest in the role

Finish by thanking the reader and reiterating your interest in contributing to the company's mission. It shows politeness and professionalism.

Show your enthusiasm for the environmental science role

Starting your cover letter by expressing excitement for the job connects your personal passion with your professional goals.

Highlight your environmental science background

Discussing your academic and hands-on experience shows that you have a strong foundation and are ready to tackle real-world environmental challenges.

Demonstrate your value to the environmental team

By detailing specific skills like data analysis and report writing, you make it clear how you can contribute to the company’s projects.

Align your interests with the company’s mission

Expressing interest in the company’s projects and goals shows that you have done your research and see a fit between your career aspirations and the employer’s needs.

Close with gratitude and openness

Thanking the hiring manager for considering your application and expressing eagerness to discuss your qualifications further leaves a positive, respectful final impression.

Environmental Consultant Cover Letter Example

Demonstrate experience in the field.

It's great that you've pointed out your experience working in the field of environmental consulting. When you outline your professional experience and the skills you've developed, it gives potential employers a snapshot of what you could bring to their team.

Quantify Your Success

Quantifying your success, like how you've reduced your clients' environmental risks by 30%, gives your claims more credibility. It's not just about saying you're good at what you do, it's about proving it with hard facts and figures.

Highlight Relevant Skills

Highlighting your expertise in GIS and environmental modeling is a smart move. It shows that you have a solid technical foundation and that you are able to apply your academic knowledge to practical situations.

Assert Your Fit for the Role

Asserting your fit for the role, like you have, is not just about confidence, it's about being clear on why you believe you're the right candidate. When you link your past success and passion for sustainability to the role you're applying for, it communicates your potential for future success.

Environmental Research Analyst Cover Letter Example

Connecting personal passion with professional goals.

I see that you're passionate about the environment and that this passion drives your professional pursuits. This tells me that you're not just chasing a paycheck, but you truly care about the work you're doing. Your initiative at RW Tech Company shows that you're proactive and capable of making substantial environmental improvements.

Demonstrating Impact through Research

You mention your role at Green Innovations Lab and the positive results it yielded. This shows that you've got experience in research and data analysis, and that you can use these skills to make a meaningful difference in environmental policies.

Aligning Personal Goals with Job Opportunity

It’s evident that you view this role as a chance to further your career goal of using science to inform policy. This tells me you're not just looking for a job; you're looking for a role that aligns with your career aspirations and allows you to make a real-world impact.

Expressing Eagerness and Appreciation

By thanking me for considering your application and expressing your eagerness to discuss your experiences and vision, you're showing both gratitude and initiative. This tells me you're serious about this opportunity and keen to contribute to our mission.

Environmental Science Technician Cover Letter Example

Connect personal background to environmental science.

Your personal connection to nature, rooted in your upbringing, sets a strong foundation for your career in environmental science. It shows your passion is not just professional but also deeply personal.

Showcase technical skills and ability to interpret data

Discussing a project where you turned complex data into a solution highlights your technical proficiency and critical thinking skills. It's compelling when you can demonstrate how your work leads to real-world improvements.

Express excitement for renewable energy initiatives

By mentioning your enthusiasm for the company’s focus on sustainability, you're aligning your personal values with their mission. It indicates a strong mutual fit.

Thank them and show eagerness to contribute

Your polite closing, combined with a clear expression of your desire to join their efforts in environmental protection, wraps up your letter on a positive and forward-looking note.

Show enthusiasm for the role

Starting your letter by saying how excited you are about the job and the company sets a positive tone. It makes you seem like someone who will be happy and motivated at work, which is great for any role, including environmental science technicians.

Detail your project involvement

Describing a specific project you worked on, what you did, and what you learned shows you have hands-on experience. This is key for technical roles where practical skills are as important as theoretical knowledge.

Emphasize a strong work ethic

Mentioning your part-time job and what it entailed demonstrates your willingness to work hard and take on responsibility. This trait is essential for environmental science technicians who often work in varied and challenging conditions.

Align with the company's focus

When you talk about your interest in the company's specific areas of work, it suggests that your skills and interests match the job. This alignment can make you a particularly attractive candidate.

Close with an enthusiastic thank you

Ending your letter by thanking the employer for considering your application and expressing eagerness to discuss your qualifications further leaves a positive and professional impression.

Show genuine excitement for the environmental science technician role

Your opening line should convey real enthusiasm for the position you are applying for. It immediately sets a positive tone and shows you are not just looking for any job, but are passionate about this specific role.

Detail your hands-on experience

Talking about your direct experience, especially in tasks closely related to environmental science, shows you have practical skills, not just theoretical knowledge. It makes it easier for us to see how you can fit into our team and hit the ground running.

Connect with the company’s mission

When you mention what draws you to the company, especially its commitment to scientific excellence and range of services, it tells us you've done your homework. This connection demonstrates you're interested in contributing to our goals, not just getting a job.

Highlight your relevant skills and experience

Asserting your background in environmental science and your practical field experience emphasizes your capability to contribute significantly. It's crucial to make us believe that you're not just qualified but will be an asset to our projects.

Express your eagerness to join and contribute

Closing your cover letter by thanking us for the opportunity and expressing eagerness to discuss how you can contribute positions you as courteous and proactive. It leaves a lasting, positive impression and opens the door for further conversation.

Environmental Compliance Specialist Cover Letter Example

Show your environmental science passion.

Start by sharing your personal connection to the environment. This shows you care deeply about your work and aren't just looking for any job.

Highlight specific achievements

Give clear examples of how you've made a difference. Talk about your past success in numbers to show the real impact of your work.

Research the company's approach

Explain why this company is a great fit for you. It shows you've done your homework and are serious about wanting to work there.

Close with enthusiasm

End your cover letter by expressing excitement about the role. It leaves a positive, lasting impression.

Junior Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Example

Connect with the company's mission.

When you show that you know what the company does and share its goals, it makes you seem like a good team member. This is important for jobs in environmental science where passion and mission alignment matter a lot.

Highlight relevant project experience

Talking about specific projects where you successfully applied your skills shows you can do the job. This is especially true for junior environmental scientist roles that often require hands-on experience.

Express eagerness to apply skills

When you talk about how excited you are to use your skills to help the company, it shows you're ready to contribute and not just there to learn. This attitude is highly valued in team-focused roles.

Showcase specific interests

Pointing out areas of the job you're especially interested in helps the hiring manager see where you might fit best in the team. It's a smart move for technical jobs like environmental scientist positions.

End with a strong close

A polite thank you and a clear expression of your excitement about the possibility of joining the team round off the letter well. It leaves a good last impression, which is crucial.

Connect your degree to the company’s goals

Linking your educational background directly to the employer’s mission demonstrates that you have the relevant knowledge and are motivated to contribute to their success.

Showcase your project experience in environmental science

Mentioning specific projects and the skills you’ve gained from them, such as soil sampling and data analysis, highlights your hands-on experience and understanding of environmental solutions.

Emphasize the company’s approach and your admiration

Pointing out the aspects of the company that attract you, like its multidisciplinary approach, shows that you value and understand their way of working.

Share your strengths in environmental consulting

By stating your strong analytical skills and ability to work in a team, you align your personal qualities with what is often required in environmental consulting roles.

Express eagerness to discuss your fit with the team

Ending with a statement of gratitude and a readiness to talk more about how you can contribute showcases your professionalism and enthusiasm for the opportunity.

Alternative Introductions

If you're struggling to start your cover letter, here are 6 different variations that have worked for others, along with why they worked. Use them as inspiration for your introductory paragraph.

Cover Letters For Jobs Similar To Entry Level Environmental Science Roles

• Entry Level Environmental Science Cover Letter Guide
• Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Guide

Other Research & Science Cover Letters

• Research Assistant Cover Letter Guide

Thank you for the checklist! I realized I was making so many mistakes on my resume that I've now fixed. I'm much more confident in my resume now.

6 Cover Letter Tips for Recent Environmental Science Graduates (Template Included!)

1. always include a cover letter, even if it is optional.

Most job applications are submitted online nowadays, and not all application systems require a cover letter. You may be thrilled to not write one, but I urge you to submit a cover letter regardless.  Entry-level environmental science jobs will receive dozens (possibly hundreds…) of job applications, and you need to fully utilize every opportunity to stand out. In fact, when I was hired for my first consulting job, the hiring manager remarked that she was impressed by my cover letter and that it showcased good writing skills. My cover letter helped secure the interview and get the job offer. A well-written cover letter can elevate a good resume ad separate you from the pack. Furthermore, the last thing you want to do when you are applying for jobs is present yourself as lazy by neglecting the cover letter.

2. Customize your cover letter for each job

While in my resume tips I recommended only having a few different resumes prepared, for the cover letter, you should customize each and every one you submit. If possible, include details like the name of the hiring manager or company projects that attracted you to the job opening. Additionally, go line by line through the job posting’s preferred qualifications and try to address them, either by expanding on aspects of your resume or by introducing additional qualifications that didn’t fit on your resume. However, you want to avoid just rewording your resume. For example, if you have relevant skills developed by doing a research thesis in college, you can use the cover letter to discuss the research methods and conclusions and how they connect to the job. On the resume, you would then just list your thesis title, your advisor, and potentially add research methods/tools to your list of skills.

3. Make a persuasive and easily readable argument

The goal of a cover letter is to confidently lay out an argument for why you would be a great candidate for a particular job opening.  You want to focus on relating previous job experiences back to qualities the hiring manager is seeking. For me, this argument should include a quick introduction, which briefly summarizes your career objective and desire to work at the employer, as well as a strong conclusion. The conclusion can be an explanation of what you learned from your most significant job experiences, prioritizing experiences that obviously translate to the prospective employer. In between the introduction and conclusion, I recommend bullet points that break down specific qualities you possess that relate to the job posting’s preferred qualifications and job responsibilities, as discussed in the previous tip. I like bullet points because it allows hiring managers to scan through your cover letter more quickly. It is less intimidating to a reader than large blocks of text.

4. Keep your cover letter to one page

Here’s the kicker, as I mentioned previously, you want to customize your cover letter, detail relevant experiences, craft a persuasive argument for yourself, and maybe even use bullets to maximize readability… but your cover letter still needs to be one page. Like the resume, I recommend entry-level environmental science candidates only have one page cover letters because hiring managers are reviewing a large number of applications and may not take the time to read multiple pages. You want to make it easy for them to read your cover letter and remember you. Between your resume and cover letter, you should have plenty of room to hit the highlights of your experience and education. Hopefully, you can provide any further details in the interview.

5. Give it a modern touch and tone

In this modern age, you want to present something contemporary and clean. Employers are looking for fresh faces and fresh ideas, especially for entry-level jobs. So, you should avoid using clichés and generalities, like being a “go-getter” or “team player”, and instead, provide specific examples and experiences. You also want to ensure you have the correct tone. You should shoot for language that presents you as enthusiastic, competent, and confident; it’s not the time or place to be humble. However, you don’t want to go to any extremes or exaggerate your accomplishments, any reasonable manager will sense it and be turned off by arrogance or fabrications.

Also, as discussed previously, a one page resume with bulleted discussion points can contribute greatly towards this desired style. In the provided template, the cover letter is already broken down into a few sections: a header, a short introduction, a bullet point list for qualifications discussed in the job posting, a list for broader qualifications, and a conclusion that summarizes job experiences and wraps up the letter. This more abbreviated format takes the place of large blocks of text found in conventional cover letters.

6. Proofread, proofread, proofread!

As with the resume, get a second and third reviewer (or more) once you are done writing your cover letter. Employers will want their work products to be error free, so they expect nothing less in the cover letters of prospective employees. Each cover letter has to be free of simple mistakes.

This language and format in the template is most applicable to entry-level candidates, fresh out of college with their BA or BS in environmental science (or similar majors). Experienced professionals will be able to include more detailed language about past job responsibilities and adopt a different tone.

Now that you’ve got your cover letter figured out, make sure your resume is up to snuff!

Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Example

A cover letter is an initial step to applying for a job interview. Candidates skip sending across their cover letter though it’s a good practice. An Environmental Scientist Cover Letter has to display an ideal blend of the qualities required in a prospective candidate.

Our Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Sample is a perfect model to refer to while composing a cover letter of your own.

An Environmental Scientist is a highly informed professional who conducts a thorough study to identify the hazards to the environment and human beings. Upon analyzing, he devises preventive strategies and measures to reduce the risk to the maximum extent.

• Cover Letters

What to Include in a Environmental Scientist Cover Letter?

Roles and responsibilities.

A few of his responsibilities are as follows:

• Collect the relevant data from different sources .
• Assess the collected data on air, soil, and water pollution.
• Carry out experiments to understand the extent of impure discharge and document the observations.
• Formulate ways to minimize the hazards.
• O utline the environmental protection standards and regulations .
• Participate in project meetings and recommend effective suggestions to reduce the environmental impact from the scope of the project.
• Actively look into the matters of mishappenings.
• Offer assistance to the management in processes like staffing, completing the project within the allocated budget and timeframe, etc.

Education & Skills

Environmental scientist skills:.

• Remarkable verbal and written communication skills to impart environment-friendly practices and measures.
• Capable of analyzing large volumes of complex data to understand the overall environmental impact of the project.
• Superior research skills to research the ongoing project and its impact.
• A great problem-solving approach to devise workable solutions to tackle environmental issues.

Environmental Scientist Educational Requirements:

• Graduation in environmental science or relevant field of study.
• Postgraduate and doctorate in a related course (preferred).
• Certification from an accredited institution is advantageous.
• Computer literacy.

Environmental Scientist Cover Letter Example (Text Version)

Dear Mr./Ms.,

This application is in regards to demonstrating my fitness for the vacancy of an Environment Scientist role in your organization. With proven experience in the related field, I have advanced my knowledge and skills to excel in the job. Summarizing the areas of my contribution to the current organization:

• Prepare an environmental impact assessment report and present it before the management.
• Develop and ensure compliance with the company’s environment; protection rules and guidelines.
• Devise ways to improvise the company’s project management practices.
• Visit the site to analyze the progress of the ongoing project.
• Train the newly recruited employees about environment-friendly practices.
• Maintain the required environmental permits.

The resume accompanied with the application comprises my educational records and work history in a similar industry. I am hoping to speak to you further on how I can propel the department’s success through my skill set. I am grateful to you for considering me.

Sincerely, [Your Name]

Accommodate your passion for the job and the uniqueness of your candidacy in order to interest your employer to pay a glance at it. Compose a robust resume to complement your cover letter with the help of our Environmental Scientist Resume Sample .

Customize Environmental Scientist Cover Letter

Get hired faster with our free cover letter template designed to land you the perfect position.

Related Others Cover Letters

Resumes & Cover letters

Successful job applications  include a high-quality, error-free resume . The thinking goes: if you are not taking care with your resume, then what's to say you will take care with your work? Include a carefully-prepared cover letter that addresses the requirements of the internship and your unique qualifications for it, including your long-term goals, and personal interests.  Apply during early college career for less selective (often unpaid) internships to build the expertise necessary to qualify for more advanced (well-paid) internships later on. Do not spend time applying for internships you are clearly not ready for -- but do keep the information on file for next year's round of applications!  

Resume resources

• RESUME GUIDE AND TEMPLATE   -  created by Angela  :)  This can be used as a starting point for general guidelines and formatting, including what to include and how to list them
• Resume samples  - from the UMD Career Center
• How to Build a CV - how to successfully represent yourself, from How2Become.com
• The Muse also has a great resume template.

Cover letter resources

• Cover Letter Guide & Sample Cover Letter - from the UMD Career Center
• How to Write a Cover Letter: The All-Time Best Tips - from The Muse
• The Best Cover Letter Examples for Every Type of Job Seeker - from The Muse

Other job application resources

• Email correspondence  - from Virginia Tech
• Writing samples  - from American University
• How to ask a professor for a letter of recommendation  - from St. Olaf College
• Possible interview questions  - from the Univ of Michigan
• Professionalism  - presenting your best self, from the UMD Career Center

• Create a Cover Letter Now
• Create a Resume Now
• My Documents
• Examples of cover letters /

Environmental Scientist

Environmental Scientist Cover Letter

You have the skills and we have tricks on how to find amazing jobs. Get cover letters for over 900 professions.

• Anna Hmara - Career Expert

How to create a good cover letter for an environmental scientist: free tips and tricks

Writing a cover letter for resume is mandatory as it helps hiring specialists to sort through hundreds of applications and cherry-pick applicants who are able to follow instructions and demonstrate their fitness to the job. Here are six tips for you to navigate your way in the deep job-hunting sea. Read them up and you’ll know how to pen out a one of yours. For further information, refer to the environmental scientist cover letter example below to see how to format and lay out it.

Study the job posting. It has lots of useful information. For example, you’ll understand which qualifications and skills the prospective employer is looking for. By using the keywords from the job ad, you’ll underscore for the recruiter that you’re a perfect match.

Avoid being generic. It reduces your chances to land an interview and a job eventually. Better to craft a short text but pact with strength and engaging to the reader than to write a long cover letter full of clichés and overused words. Try to think of all your experience and condense it to a few paragraphs.

Keep your focus on the employer. It is crucial that you draft a cover letter thinking of the company’s needs. It will help you include specific examples of how the company will benefit from you.

Don’t overuse ‘I.’ Even by looking through your grammar constructions, you’ll stop focusing on self by eliminating excessive ‘I’ at the beginning of sentences. Otherwise you’ll go off as too self-centered.

Make sure to mention your top selling points. Do it in a more specific way. For example, if you want to say that your communication skills are great, say something to the effect, “I have had two years of public speaking experience.”

Don’t repeat your resume. Remember that the cover letter is a kind of appetizer that warms the reader up and suggests that you’re a great candidate. Don’t bore the recruiter with long lists of skills and places you worked in.

Sample cover letter for an environmental scientist position

The most effective way to digest the tips is to see their practical application. We have used all the important tips of the above units into a single an environmental scientist cover letter sample to demonstrate a winning document that can be created in GetCoverLetter editor.

Cora Sean Environmental Scientist 198 Meryl Avenue 8765-876-987 / [email protected] Denzel Williamson Recruiter of Agroholding Inc.

Dear Cora, As a highly skilled specialist with five years of experience in environmental science, I am writing to apply for the environmental scientist at Agroholding Inc. As requested, you can find more details in my resume and copies of certificates enclosed.

Initially I was trained as a Geologist and Soil and Plant Scientist. I had my internship at the South California Plant where I checked changes in the PH level of soils in the area, the composition of groundwater, and participated in investigations of soil contamination cases. Currently I take part in a short-term well and air sparge well installation project where I supervise soil and groundwater sampling and vapor monitor. Among my achievements is strict compliance with current environmental laws and regulations.

Upon meeting in person I will tell you in greater detail about my contribution to your company. Looking forward to hearing from you. Feel free to contact me anytime via email [email protected] or phone 7569847694.

Sincerely, Denzel.

This example is not commercial and has a demonstrative function only. If you need unique Cover Letter please proceed to our editor.

Do not waste on doubts the time that you can spend on composing your document.

How to save time on creating your cover letter for an environmental scientist

Our Get Cover Letter editor will help you make the process easy and fast. How it works:

Fill in a simple questionnaire to provide the needed information about yourself.

Choose the design of your cover letter.

Print, email, or download your cover letter in PDF format.

Why the Get Cover Letter is the best solution

The GetCoverLetter editor is open to any goals of applicants. Whether it be a presentation of a craft professional with a great list of achievements or even an environmental scientist without experience. Rest assured, the opportunities are equal for all the candidates.

Our formatting meets all the requirements with no grammar or stylistic mistakes to make your presentation spectacular.

Thanks to our research on industry requirements we know which applicants are always in demand and serve these criteria on a silver platter.

We know how any strengths can be valuable to employers so we offer you an extensive list to select from.

All the above and other benefits of using our editor are only one click away.

Templates of the best an environmental scientist cover letter designs

Any example of the document for an environmental scientist has a precise design per the requirements of the company or the general rules of business correspondence. In any case, the selection of templates in our editor will meet any expectations.

Or choose any other template from our template gallery

Overall rating 4.6

Overall rating 4.5

Get Cover Letter customer’s reviews

“The service is great. I was choosing among so many layouts and formats. GetCoverLetter.com is totally one of the greatest resources on the labor market.”

“In my mind I have always thought that writing a cover letter is simple as I know the steps. But when I sit down to it, it takes me ages to draft at least something. As soon as I saw an ad of this online constructor, I checked it out immediately and I knew right away, I was saved.”

“I’m entry level and I was freaked not being able to find proper employment in this economy. However, thanks to GetCoverLetter.com, my cover letter and resume looked fantastic, and I landed a job interview very quickly.”

Frequently Asked Questions

The more unique the knowledge you get, the more space for new questions. Do not be affraid to miss some aspects of creating your excellent cover letter. Here we took into account the most popular doubts to save your time and arm you with basic information.

• What should my an environmental scientist cover letter contain? The main purpose of a cover letter is to introduce yourself, mention the job you’re applying for, show that your skills and experience match the needed skills and experience for the job.
• How to properly introduce yourself in a cover letter? Greet the correct person to which your cover is intended for. Introduce yourself with enthusiasm.
• How many pages should my cover letter be? Your cover letter should only be a half a page to one full page. Your cover letter should be divided into three or four short paragraphs.
• Don't focus on yourself too much
• Don't share all the details of every job you've had
• Don't write a novel

You have finished your acquaintance with valuable tips and tricks. Now is the time to create your own perfect cover letter.

Other cover letters from this industry

Still not sure about this role for your qualifications? Browse more applications and expert advice on cover letter writing.

• Environmental Engineer

Submission guidelines

General information, types of papers, manuscript submission, statements & declarations, artwork and illustrations guidelines, supplementary information (si), editing services, authorship principles, competing interests, compliance with ethical standards, ethical responsibilities of authors, informed consent, research involving human participants, their data or biological material.

Research Data Policy

After Acceptance

Open Choice

Open access publishing

• Mistakes to avoid during manuscript preparation

Instructions for Authors

Note on preprint server: Please add a note to the manuscript cover letter declaring whether you have submitted your manuscript to a preprint server. Please add one of the following sentences: “I have submitted my manuscript to a preprint server before submitting it to Environmental Science and Pollution Research” or “I have not submitted my manuscript to a preprint server before submitting it to Environmental Science and Pollution Research”.

Peer-reviewed contributions:

• Research Articles (full papers)
• Short Original Communications and Discussion Articles
• Review Articles
• Research Communications

Please ensure that the length of your paper is in harmony with your research area and with the science presented.

All papers – excluding Editorials, Letters to the Editor, Conference Reports – are subject to peer-review by a minimum of two and a maximum of three experts.

While submitting your paper you will be asked for three potential reviewers. Indicating three reviewers is mandatory.

To have the best possible pre-requisition for the review process, please ask a native speaker to check the quality of the English, before you submit the complete paper.

Letters to the Editor

Please provide the following details within your manuscript:

• full title of the article you are commenting on
• corresponding author of the article you are commenting on
• DOI of the article that you are commenting on

The title of your letter should be structured as follows:

• Comments on “Title of the Article”
• Answer to “Comments on “Title of the Article”

Make sure to cite the article or comment you are referring to in the reference list of your letter.

Other contributions:

Apart from the strictly scientific contributions as research articles (short and full papers) and reviews, ESPR publishes:

• News & views from research and technology, legislation and regulation, hardware and software, education, literature, institutions, organizations, conferences.
• Commentary and editorials round out the journal’s contents.

ESPR does not accept papers dealing with the functioning of diesel and engines (only papers focused on emissions will be considered), nor dealing with tourism, pharmacology, and mechanical engineering related to wind/solar energy.

Submission of a manuscript implies: that the work described has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication anywhere else; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – at the institute where the work has been carried out. The publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.

Permissions

Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.

Online Submission

Please follow the hyperlink “Submit manuscript” and upload all of your manuscript files following the instructions given on the screen.

Source Files

Please ensure you provide all relevant editable source files at every submission and revision. Failing to submit a complete set of editable source files will result in your article not being considered for review. For your manuscript text please always submit in common word processing formats such as .docx or LaTeX.

The title page should include:

• The name(s) of the author(s)

- Please avoid acronyms in the title of your article

- For local studies, please indicate the name of the region and country in the title.

• The affiliation(s) and address(es) of the author(s)
• The e-mail address, telephone and fax numbers of the corresponding author

Please provide an abstract of about 10 to 15 lines.

Please provide 6 to 8 keywords which can be used for indexing purposes.

Text Formatting

Manuscripts should be submitted in Word.

• Use a normal, plain font (e.g., 10-point Times Roman) for text.
• Use italics for emphasis.
• Use the automatic page numbering function to number the pages.
• Do not use field functions.
• Use tab stops or other commands for indents, not the space bar.
• Use the table function, not spreadsheets, to make tables.
• Use the equation editor or MathType for equations.
• Save your file in docx format (Word 2007 or higher) or doc format (older Word versions).

Manuscripts with mathematical content can also be submitted in LaTeX. We recommend using Springer Nature’s LaTeX template .

Please use no more than three levels of displayed headings.

Abbreviations

Abbreviations should be defined at first mention and used consistently thereafter.

Footnotes can be used to give additional information, which may include the citation of a reference included in the reference list. They should not consist solely of a reference citation, and they should never include the bibliographic details of a reference. They should also not contain any figures or tables.

Footnotes to the text are numbered consecutively; those to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters (or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data). Footnotes to the title or the authors of the article are not given reference symbols.

Always use footnotes instead of endnotes.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc. should be placed in a separate section on the title page. The names of funding organizations should be written in full.

Cite references in the text by name and year in parentheses. Some examples:

• Negotiation research spans many disciplines (Thompson 1990).
• This result was later contradicted by Becker and Seligman (1996).
• This effect has been widely studied (Abbott 1991; Barakat et al. 1995a, b; Kelso and Smith 1998; Medvec et al. 1999, 2000).

Reference list

The list of references should only include works that are cited in the text and that have been published or accepted for publication. Personal communications and unpublished works should only be mentioned in the text.

Reference list entries should be alphabetized by the last names of the first author of each work. Please alphabetize according to the following rules: 1) For one author, by name of author, then chronologically; 2) For two authors, by name of author, then name of coauthor, then chronologically; 3) For more than two authors, by name of first author, then chronologically.

If available, please always include DOIs as full DOI links in your reference list (e.g. “https://doi.org/abc”).

Gamelin FX, Baquet G, Berthoin S, Thevenet D, Nourry C, Nottin S, Bosquet L (2009) Effect of high intensity intermittent training on heart rate variability in prepubescent children. Eur J Appl Physiol 105:731-738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-008-0955-8

Ideally, the names of all authors should be provided, but the usage of “et al” in long author lists will also be accepted:

Smith J, Jones M Jr, Houghton L et al (1999) Future of health insurance. N Engl J Med 965:325–329

Slifka MK, Whitton JL (2000) Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001090000086

South J, Blass B (2001) The future of modern genomics. Blackwell, London

Brown B, Aaron M (2001) The politics of nature. In: Smith J (ed) The rise of modern genomics, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 230-257

Cartwright J (2007) Big stars have weather too. IOP Publishing PhysicsWeb. http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/11/6/16/1. Accessed 26 June 2007

Trent JW (1975) Experimental acute renal failure. Dissertation, University of California

Always use the standard abbreviation of a journal’s name according to the ISSN List of Title Word Abbreviations, see

If you are unsure, please use the full journal title.

Specific Remarks

• Online documents:wikipedia documents are not acceptable as references.
• LanguageReferences should be in English with an appropriate title in English. If it’s in a different language the language should be indicatedZhu J, Wu F-C, Deng Q-J, Shao S-X, Mo C-L, Pan X-L, Li W, Zhang R-Y (2009) Environmental characteristics of water near the Xikuangshan antimony mine. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae 29:655-661 (in Chinese)

The following statements must be included in your submitted manuscript under the heading 'Statements and Declarations'. This should be placed after the References section. Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete.

Please describe any sources of funding that have supported the work. The statement should include details of any grants received (please give the name of the funding agency and grant number).

Example statements:

“This work was supported by […] (Grant numbers […] and […]). Author A.B. has received research support from Company A.”

“The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.”

Authors are required to disclose financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Interests within the last 3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing the work for submission) should be reported. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work.

“Financial interests: Author A and B declare they have no financial interests. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. Non-financial interests: Author D has served on advisory boards for Company M and Company N.”

“The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.”

Please refer to the “Competing Interests” section below for more information on how to complete these sections.

Author Contributions

Authors are encouraged to include a statement that specifies the contribution of every author to the research and preparation of the manuscript.

Example statement:

“All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Please refer to the “Authorship Principles ” section below for more information on how to complete this section.

• All tables are to be numbered using Arabic numerals.
• Tables should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order.
• For each table, please supply a table caption (title) explaining the components of the table.
• Identify any previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference at the end of the table caption.
• Footnotes to tables should be indicated by superscript lower-case letters (or asterisks for significance values and other statistical data) and included beneath the table body.

Electronic Figure Submission

• Supply all figures electronically.
• Indicate what graphics program was used to create the artwork.
• For vector graphics, the preferred format is EPS; for halftones, please use TIFF format. MS Office files are also acceptable.
• Vector graphics containing fonts must have the fonts embedded in the files.
• Name your figure files with "Fig" and the figure number, e.g., Fig1.eps.
• Definition: Black and white graphic with no shading.
• Do not use faint lines and/or lettering and check that all lines and lettering within the figures are legible at final size.
• All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide.
• Scanned line drawings and line drawings in bitmap format should have a minimum resolution of 1200 dpi.

Halftone Art

• Definition: Photographs, drawings, or paintings with fine shading, etc.
• If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves.
• Halftones should have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi.

Combination Art

• Definition: a combination of halftone and line art, e.g., halftones containing line drawing, extensive lettering, color diagrams, etc.
• Combination artwork should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi.
• Color art is free of charge for print and online publication.
• Color illustrations should be submitted as RGB.

Figure Lettering

• To add lettering, it is best to use Helvetica or Arial (sans serif fonts).
• Keep lettering consistently sized throughout your final-sized artwork, usually about 2–3 mm (8–12 pt).
• Variance of type size within an illustration should be minimal, e.g., do not use 8-pt type on an axis and 20-pt type for the axis label.
• Avoid effects such as shading, outline letters, etc.
• Do not include titles or captions within your illustrations.

Figure Numbering

• All figures are to be numbered using Arabic numerals.
• Figures should always be cited in text in consecutive numerical order.
• Figure parts should be denoted by lowercase letters (a, b, c, etc.).
• If an appendix appears in your article and it contains one or more figures, continue the consecutive numbering of the main text. Do not number the appendix figures, "A1, A2, A3, etc." Figures in online appendices [Supplementary Information (SI)] should, however, be numbered separately.

Figure Captions

• Each figure should have a concise caption describing accurately what the figure depicts. Include the captions in the text file of the manuscript, not in the figure file.
• Figure captions begin with the term Fig. in bold type, followed by the figure number, also in bold type.
• No punctuation is to be included after the number, nor is any punctuation to be placed at the end of the caption.
• Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs.
• Identify previously published material by giving the original source in the form of a reference citation at the end of the figure caption.

Figure Placement and Size

• Figures should be submitted within the body of the text. Only if the file size of the manuscript causes problems in uploading it, the large figures should be submitted separately from the text.
• When preparing your figures, size figures to fit in the column width.
• For large-sized journals the figures should be 84 mm (for double-column text areas), or 174 mm (for single-column text areas) wide and not higher than 234 mm.
• For small-sized journals, the figures should be 119 mm wide and not higher than 195 mm.

If you include figures that have already been published elsewhere, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format. Please be aware that some publishers do not grant electronic rights for free and that Springer will not be able to refund any costs that may have occurred to receive these permissions. In such cases, material from other sources should be used.

Accessibility

In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your figures, please make sure that

• All figures have descriptive captions (blind users could then use a text-to-speech software or a text-to-Braille hardware)
• Patterns are used instead of or in addition to colors for conveying information (color-blind users would then be able to distinguish the visual elements)
• Any figure lettering has a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1

Generative AI Images

Please check Springer’s policy on generative AI images and make sure your work adheres to the principles described therein.

Springer accepts electronic multimedia files (animations, movies, audio, etc.) and other supplementary files to be published online along with an article or a book chapter. This feature can add dimension to the author's article, as certain information cannot be printed or is more convenient in electronic form.

Before submitting research datasets as Supplementary Information, authors should read the journal’s Research data policy. We encourage research data to be archived in data repositories wherever possible.

• Supply all supplementary material in standard file formats.
• Please include in each file the following information: article title, journal name, author names; affiliation and e-mail address of the corresponding author.
• To accommodate user downloads, please keep in mind that larger-sized files may require very long download times and that some users may experience other problems during downloading.
• High resolution (streamable quality) videos can be submitted up to a maximum of 25GB; low resolution videos should not be larger than 5GB.

Audio, Video, and Animations

• Aspect ratio: 16:9 or 4:3
• Maximum file size: 25 GB for high resolution files; 5 GB for low resolution files
• Minimum video duration: 1 sec
• Supported file formats: avi, wmv, mp4, mov, m2p, mp2, mpg, mpeg, flv, mxf, mts, m4v, 3gp

Text and Presentations

• Submit your material in PDF format; .doc or .ppt files are not suitable for long-term viability.
• A collection of figures may also be combined in a PDF file.

Spreadsheets

• Spreadsheets should be submitted as .csv or .xlsx files (MS Excel).

Specialized Formats

• Specialized format such as .pdb (chemical), .wrl (VRML), .nb (Mathematica notebook), and .tex can also be supplied.

Collecting Multiple Files

• It is possible to collect multiple files in a .zip or .gz file.
• If supplying any supplementary material, the text must make specific mention of the material as a citation, similar to that of figures and tables.
• Refer to the supplementary files as “Online Resource”, e.g., "... as shown in the animation (Online Resource 3)", “... additional data are given in Online Resource 4”.
• Name the files consecutively, e.g. “ESM_3.mpg”, “ESM_4.pdf”.
• For each supplementary material, please supply a concise caption describing the content of the file.

Processing of supplementary files

• Supplementary Information (SI) will be published as received from the author without any conversion, editing, or reformatting.

In order to give people of all abilities and disabilities access to the content of your supplementary files, please make sure that

• The manuscript contains a descriptive caption for each supplementary material
• Video files do not contain anything that flashes more than three times per second (so that users prone to seizures caused by such effects are not put at risk)

How can you help improve your manuscript for publication?

Presenting your work in a well-structured manuscript and in well-written English gives it its best chance for editors and reviewers to understand it and evaluate it fairly. Many researchers find that getting some independent support helps them present their results in the best possible light. The experts at Springer Nature Author Services can help you with manuscript preparation—including English language editing, developmental comments, manuscript formatting, figure preparation, translation , and more.

Get started and save 15%

You can also use our free Grammar Check tool for an evaluation of your work.

Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review.

Chinese (中文)

您怎么做才有助于改进您的稿件以便顺利发表？

如果在结构精巧的稿件中用精心组织的英语展示您的作品，就能最大限度地让编辑和审稿人理解并公正评估您的作品。许多研究人员发现，获得一些独立支持有助于他们以尽可能美好的方式展示他们的成果。Springer Nature Author Services 的专家可帮助您准备稿件，具体包括 润色英语表述、添加有见地的注释、为稿件排版、设计图表、翻译 等。

开始使用即可节省 15% 的费用

您还可以使用我们的 免费语法检查工具 来评估您的作品。

请注意，使用这些工具或任何其他服务不是发表前必须满足的要求，也不暗示或保证相关文章定会被编辑接受（甚至未必会被选送同行评审）。

Japanese (日本語)

発表に備えて、論文を改善するにはどうすればよいでしょうか？

内容が適切に組み立てられ、質の高い英語で書かれた論文を投稿すれば、編集者や査読者が論文を理解し、公正に評価するための最善の機会となります。多くの研究者は、個別のサポートを受けることで、研究結果を可能な限り最高の形で発表できると思っています。Springer Nature Author Servicesのエキスパートが、 英文の編集、建設的な提言、論文の書式、図の調整、翻訳 など、論文の作成をサポートいたします。

今なら15％割引でご利用いただけます

原稿の評価に、無料 の文法チェック ツールもご利用いただけます。

これらのツールや他のサービスをご利用いただくことは、論文を掲載するための要件ではありません。また、編集者が論文を受理したり、査読に選定したりすることを示唆または保証するものではないことにご注意ください。

Korean (한국어)

게재를 위해 원고를 개선하려면 어떻게 해야 할까요?

여러분의 작품을 체계적인 원고로 발표하는 것은 편집자와 심사자가 여러분의 연구를 이해하고 공정하게 평가할 수 있는 최선의 기회를 제공합니다. 많은 연구자들은 어느 정도 독립적인 지원을 받는 것이 가능한 한 최선의 방법으로 자신의 결과를 발표하는 데 도움이 된다고 합니다. Springer Nature Author Services 전문가들은 영어 편집, 발전적인 논평, 원고 서식 지정, 그림 준비, 번역 등과 같은 원고 준비를 도와드릴 수 있습니다.

지금 시작하면 15% 할인됩니다.

또한 당사의 무료 문법 검사 도구를 사용하여 여러분의 연구를 평가할 수 있습니다.

이러한 도구 또는 기타 서비스를 사용하는 것은 게재를 위한 필수 요구사항이 아니며, 편집자가 해당 논문을 수락하거나 피어 리뷰에 해당 논문을 선택한다는 것을 암시하거나 보장하지는 않습니다.

These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to.

Authorship clarified

The Journal and Publisher assume all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.

The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. It is recommended that authors adhere to the guidelines for authorship that are applicable in their specific research field. In absence of specific guidelines it is recommended to adhere to the following guidelines*:

All authors whose names appear on the submission

1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work;

2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content;

3) approved the version to be published; and

4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

* Based on/adapted from:

ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors,

Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018

Disclosures and declarations

All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate).

The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. Work submitted for publication may have implications for public health or general welfare and in those cases it is the responsibility of all authors to include the appropriate disclosures and declarations.

Data transparency

All authors are requested to make sure that all data and materials as well as software application or custom code support their published claims and comply with field standards. Please note that journals may have individual policies on (sharing) research data in concordance with disciplinary norms and expectations.

Role of the Corresponding Author

One author is assigned as Corresponding Author and acts on behalf of all co-authors and ensures that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately addressed.

The Corresponding Author is responsible for the following requirements:

• ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors;
• managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication;*
• providing transparency on re-use of material and mention any unpublished material (for example manuscripts in press) included in the manuscript in a cover letter to the Editor;
• making sure disclosures, declarations and transparency on data statements from all authors are included in the manuscript as appropriate (see above).

* The requirement of managing all communication between the journal and all co-authors during submission and proofing may be delegated to a Contact or Submitting Author. In this case please make sure the Corresponding Author is clearly indicated in the manuscript.

Author contributions

In absence of specific instructions and in research fields where it is possible to describe discrete efforts, the Publisher recommends authors to include contribution statements in the work that specifies the contribution of every author in order to promote transparency. These contributions should be listed at the separate title page.

Examples of such statement(s) are shown below:

• Free text:

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Example: CRediT taxonomy:

• Conceptualization: [full name], …; Methodology: [full name], …; Formal analysis and investigation: [full name], …; Writing - original draft preparation: [full name, …]; Writing - review and editing: [full name], …; Funding acquisition: [full name], …; Resources: [full name], …; Supervision: [full name],….

For review articles where discrete statements are less applicable a statement should be included who had the idea for the article, who performed the literature search and data analysis, and who drafted and/or critically revised the work.

For articles that are based primarily on the student’s dissertation or thesis , it is recommended that the student is usually listed as principal author:

A Graduate Student’s Guide to Determining Authorship Credit and Authorship Order, APA Science Student Council 2006

Affiliation

The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may additionally be stated. Addresses will not be updated or changed after publication of the article.

Changes to authorship

Authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors at submission. Changes of authorship by adding or deleting authors, and/or changes in Corresponding Author, and/or changes in the sequence of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.

• Please note that author names will be published exactly as they appear on the accepted submission!

Please make sure that the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that addresses and affiliations are current.

Adding and/or deleting authors at revision stage are generally not permitted, but in some cases it may be warranted. Reasons for these changes in authorship should be explained. Approval of the change during revision is at the discretion of the Editor-in-Chief. Please note that journals may have individual policies on adding and/or deleting authors during revision stage.

Author identification

Authors are recommended to use their ORCID ID when submitting an article for consideration or acquire an ORCID ID via the submission process.

Deceased or incapacitated authors

For cases in which a co-author dies or is incapacitated during the writing, submission, or peer-review process, and the co-authors feel it is appropriate to include the author, co-authors should obtain approval from a (legal) representative which could be a direct relative.

Authorship issues or disputes

In the case of an authorship dispute during peer review or after acceptance and publication, the Journal will not be in a position to investigate or adjudicate. Authors will be asked to resolve the dispute themselves. If they are unable the Journal reserves the right to withdraw a manuscript from the editorial process or in case of a published paper raise the issue with the authors’ institution(s) and abide by its guidelines.

Confidentiality

Authors should treat all communication with the Journal as confidential which includes correspondence with direct representatives from the Journal such as Editors-in-Chief and/or Handling Editors and reviewers’ reports unless explicit consent has been received to share information.

Important note:

Please note that – contrary to the text above – according to the policy of ESPR, any addition/removal of authors or change in order list are prohibited during all the review process. The original authorship must remain the same during all the review process.

Authors are requested to disclose interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication. Interests within the last 3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing the work for submission) should be reported. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. This is not meant to imply that a financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research or compensation received for consultancy work is inappropriate.

Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. In addition, they should exclude themselves from handling manuscripts in cases where there is a competing interest. This may include – but is not limited to – having previously published with one or more of the authors, and sharing the same institution as one or more of the authors. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on the author list we recommend they declare this in the competing interests section on the submitted manuscript. If they are an author or have any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another Editor or member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer review. These submissions are subject to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. Editorial Board Members are welcome to submit papers to the journal. These submissions are not given any priority over other manuscripts, and Editorial Board Member status has no bearing on editorial consideration.

Interests that should be considered and disclosed but are not limited to the following:

Funding: Research grants from funding agencies (please give the research funder and the grant number) and/or research support (including salaries, equipment, supplies, reimbursement for attending symposia, and other expenses) by organizations that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript.

Employment: Recent (while engaged in the research project), present or anticipated employment by any organization that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript. This includes multiple affiliations (if applicable).

Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially; patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by publication of this manuscript.

It is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial interest becomes significant, any such figure is necessarily arbitrary, so one possible practical guideline is the following: "Any undeclared financial interest that could embarrass the author were it to become publicly known after the work was published."

Non-financial interests: In addition, authors are requested to disclose interests that go beyond financial interests that could impart bias on the work submitted for publication such as professional interests, personal relationships or personal beliefs (amongst others). Examples include, but are not limited to: position on editorial board, advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships; writing and/or consulting for educational purposes; expert witness; mentoring relations; and so forth.

Primary research articles require a disclosure statement. Review articles present an expert synthesis of evidence and may be treated as an authoritative work on a subject. Review articles therefore require a disclosure statement. Other article types such as editorials, book reviews, comments (amongst others) may, dependent on their content, require a disclosure statement. If you are unclear whether your article type requires a disclosure statement, please contact the Editor-in-Chief.

Please note that, in addition to the above requirements, funding information (given that funding is a potential competing interest (as mentioned above)) needs to be disclosed upon submission of the manuscript in the peer review system. This information will automatically be added to the Record of CrossMark, however it is not added to the manuscript itself. Under ‘summary of requirements’ (see below) funding information should be included in the ‘ Declarations ’ section.

Summary of requirements

The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a ‘Declarations’ section before the reference list under a heading of ‘Funding’ and/or ‘Competing interests’. Other declarations include Ethics approval, Consent, Data, Material and/or Code availability and Authors’ contribution statements.

Please see the various examples of wording below and revise/customize the sample statements according to your own needs.

When all authors have the same (or no) conflicts and/or funding it is sufficient to use one blanket statement.

Examples of statements to be used when funding has been received:

• Partial financial support was received from [...]
• The research leading to these results received funding from […] under Grant Agreement No[…].
• This study was funded by […]
• This work was supported by […] (Grant numbers […] and […]

Examples of statements to be used when there is no funding:

• The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
• No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
• No funding was received for conducting this study.
• No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Examples of statements to be used when there are interests to declare:

Non-financial interests: Author C is an unpaid member of committee Z.

Non-financial interests: Author A is on the board of directors of Y and receives no compensation as member of the board of directors.

Non-financial interests: none.

Non-financial interests: Author D has served on advisory boards for Company M, Company N and Company O.

Examples of statements to be used when authors have nothing to declare:

• The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
• The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
• All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
• The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Authors are responsible for correctness of the statements provided in the manuscript. See also Authorship Principles. The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject submissions that do not meet the guidelines described in this section.

To ensure objectivity and transparency in research and to ensure that accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct have been followed, authors should include information regarding sources of funding, potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial), informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals.

Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled “Compliance with Ethical Standards” when submitting a paper:

• Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
• Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. single or double blind peer review) as well as per journal subject discipline. Before submitting your article check the instructions following this section carefully.

The corresponding author should be prepared to collect documentation of compliance with ethical standards and send if requested during peer review or after publication.

The Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned guidelines. The author will be held responsible for false statements or failure to fulfill the above-mentioned guidelines.

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics ( COPE ) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*:

• The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
• The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling (‘self-plagiarism’).
• A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. ‘salami-slicing/publishing’).
• Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers.
• Results should be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image based manipulation). Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data.
• No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (‘plagiarism’). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.

Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

• Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate).
• Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. Excessive and inappropriate self-citation or coordinated efforts among several authors to collectively self-cite is strongly discouraged.
• Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person.
• Research that may be misapplied to pose a threat to public health or national security should be clearly identified in the manuscript (e.g. dual use of research). Examples include creation of harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disruption of immunity of vaccines, unusual hazards in the use of chemicals, weaponization of research/technology (amongst others).
• Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript.

*All of the above are guidelines and authors need to make sure to respect third parties rights such as copyright and/or moral rights.

Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded.

If there is suspicion of misbehavior or alleged fraud the Journal and/or Publisher will carry out an investigation following COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, there are valid concerns, the author(s) concerned will be contacted under their given e-mail address and given an opportunity to address the issue. Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journal’s and/or Publisher’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:

• If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.

- an erratum/correction may be placed with the article

- an expression of concern may be placed with the article

- or in severe cases retraction of the article may occur.

The reason will be given in the published erratum/correction, expression of concern or retraction note. Please note that retraction means that the article is maintained on the platform , watermarked “retracted” and the explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article.

• The author’s institution may be informed
• A notice of suspected transgression of ethical standards in the peer review system may be included as part of the author’s and article’s bibliographic record.

Fundamental errors

Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. The author(s) is/are requested to contact the journal and explain in what sense the error is impacting the article. A decision on how to correct the literature will depend on the nature of the error. This may be a correction or retraction. The retraction note should provide transparency which parts of the article are impacted by the error.

Suggesting / excluding reviewers

Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. When suggesting reviewers, authors should make sure they are totally independent and not connected to the work in any way. It is strongly recommended to suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process.

Please note: The suggested reviewers must not be from the same university nor laboratory and should not have shared authorship in previous publications.

All individuals have individual rights that are not to be infringed. Individual participants in studies have, for example, the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered, to what they have said during a study or an interview, as well as to any photograph that was taken. This is especially true concerning images of vulnerable people (e.g. minors, patients, refugees, etc) or the use of images in sensitive contexts. In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images.

Identifying details (names, dates of birth, identity numbers, biometrical characteristics (such as facial features, fingerprint, writing style, voice pattern, DNA or other distinguishing characteristic) and other information) of the participants that were studied should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and genetic profiles unless the information is essential for scholarly purposes and the participant (or parent/guardian if the participant is a minor or incapable or legal representative) gave written informed consent for publication. Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases. Detailed descriptions of individual participants, whether of their whole bodies or of body sections, may lead to disclosure of their identity. Under certain circumstances consent is not required as long as information is anonymized and the submission does not include images that may identify the person.

Informed consent for publication should be obtained if there is any doubt. For example, masking the eye region in photographs of participants is inadequate protection of anonymity. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort meaning.

Exceptions where it is not necessary to obtain consent:

• Images such as x rays, laparoscopic images, ultrasound images, brain scans, pathology slides unless there is a concern about identifying information in which case, authors should ensure that consent is obtained.

• Reuse of images: If images are being reused from prior publications, the Publisher will assume that the prior publication obtained the relevant information regarding consent. Authors should provide the appropriate attribution for republished images.

Consent and already available data and/or biologic material

Regardless of whether material is collected from living or dead patients, they (family or guardian if the deceased has not made a pre-mortem decision) must have given prior written consent. The aspect of confidentiality as well as any wishes from the deceased should be respected.

Data protection, confidentiality and privacy

When biological material is donated for or data is generated as part of a research project authors should ensure, as part of the informed consent procedure, that the participants are made aware what kind of (personal) data will be processed, how it will be used and for what purpose. In case of data acquired via a biobank/biorepository, it is possible they apply a broad consent which allows research participants to consent to a broad range of uses of their data and samples which is regarded by research ethics committees as specific enough to be considered “informed”. However, authors should always check the specific biobank/biorepository policies or any other type of data provider policies (in case of non-bio research) to be sure that this is the case.

Consent to Participate

For all research involving human subjects, freely-given, informed consent to participate in the study must be obtained from participants (or their parent or legal guardian in the case of children under 16) and a statement to this effect should appear in the manuscript. In the case of articles describing human transplantation studies, authors must include a statement declaring that no organs/tissues were obtained from prisoners and must also name the institution(s)/clinic(s)/department(s) via which organs/tissues were obtained. For manuscripts reporting studies involving vulnerable groups where there is the potential for coercion or where consent may not have been fully informed, extra care will be taken by the editor and may be referred to the Springer Nature Research Integrity Group.

Consent to Publish

Individuals may consent to participate in a study, but object to having their data published in a journal article. Authors should make sure to also seek consent from individuals to publish their data prior to submitting their paper to a journal. This is in particular applicable to case studies. A consent to publish form can be found

here. (Download docx, 36 kB)

The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a ‘Declarations’ section before the reference list under a heading of ‘Consent to participate’ and/or ‘Consent to publish’. Other declarations include Funding, Competing interests, Ethics approval, Consent, Data and/or Code availability and Authors’ contribution statements.

Sample statements for "Consent to participate" :

• Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
• Informed consent was obtained from legal guardians.
• Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.
• Verbal informed consent was obtained prior to the interview.

Sample statements for “Consent to publish” :

• The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication of the images in Figure(s) 1a, 1b and 1c.
• The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
• Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Sample statements if identifying information about participants is available in the article:

• Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.

Images will be removed from publication if authors have not obtained informed consent or the paper may be removed and replaced with a notice explaining the reason for removal.

Ethics approval

When reporting a study that involved human participants, their data or biological material, authors should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) and certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. If a study was granted exemption from requiring ethics approval, this should also be detailed in the manuscript (including the reasons for the exemption).

Retrospective ethics approval

If a study has not been granted ethics committee approval prior to commencing, retrospective ethics approval usually cannot be obtained and it may not be possible to consider the manuscript for peer review. The decision on whether to proceed to peer review in such cases is at the Editor's discretion.

Ethics approval for retrospective studies

Although retrospective studies are conducted on already available data or biological material (for which formal consent may not be needed or is difficult to obtain) ethics approval may be required dependent on the law and the national ethical guidelines of a country. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their country.

Ethics approval for case studies

Case reports require ethics approval. Most institutions will have specific policies on this subject. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their institution and seek ethics approval where needed. Authors should be aware to secure informed consent from the individual (or parent or guardian if the participant is a minor or incapable) See also section on Informed Consent .

If human cells are used, authors must declare in the manuscript: what cell lines were used by describing the source of the cell line, including when and from where it was obtained, whether the cell line has recently been authenticated and by what method. If cells were bought from a life science company the following need to be given in the manuscript: name of company (that provided the cells), cell type, number of cell line, and batch of cells.

It is recommended that authors check the NCBI database for misidentification and contamination of human cell lines. This step will alert authors to possible problems with the cell line and may save considerable time and effort.

Further information is available from the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC).

Authors should include a statement that confirms that an institutional or independent ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) approved the study and that informed consent was obtained from the donor or next of kin.

Research Resource Identifiers (RRID)

Research Resource Identifiers (RRID) are persistent unique identifiers (effectively similar to a DOI) for research resources. This journal encourages authors to adopt RRIDs when reporting key biological resources (antibodies, cell lines, model organisms and tools) in their manuscripts.

Organism: Filip1 tm1a(KOMP)Wtsi RRID:MMRRC_055641-UCD

Cell Line: RST307 cell line RRID:CVCL_C321

Antibody: Luciferase antibody DSHB Cat# LUC-3, RRID:AB_2722109

Plasmid: mRuby3 plasmid RRID:Addgene_104005

Software: ImageJ Version 1.2.4 RRID:SCR_003070

RRIDs are provided by the Resource Identification Portal . Many commonly used research resources already have designated RRIDs. The portal also provides authors links so that they can quickly register a new resource and obtain an RRID.

Standards of reporting

Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. Authors are recommended to adhere to the minimum reporting guidelines hosted by the EQUATOR Network when preparing their manuscript.

Exact requirements may vary depending on the journal; please refer to the journal’s Instructions for Authors.

Checklists are available for a number of study designs, including:

Randomised trials (CONSORT) and Study protocols (SPIRIT)

Observational studies (STROBE)

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and protocols (Prisma-P)

Diagnostic/prognostic studies (STARD) and (TRIPOD)

Case reports (CARE)

Clinical practice guidelines (AGREE) and (RIGHT)

Qualitative research (SRQR) and (COREQ)

Animal pre-clinical studies (ARRIVE)

Quality improvement studies (SQUIRE)

Economic evaluations (CHEERS)

The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a ‘Declarations’ section before the reference list under a heading of ‘Ethics approval’.

Examples of statements to be used when ethics approval has been obtained:

• All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of A (No. ...).

• This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of University B (Date.../No. ...).

• Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University C. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

• The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of D (Ethics approval number: ...).

Examples of statements to be used for a retrospective study:

• Ethical approval was waived by the local Ethics Committee of University A in view of the retrospective nature of the study and all the procedures being performed were part of the routine care.

• This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. We consulted extensively with the IRB of XYZ who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of XYZ.

• This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of University B approved this study.

Examples of statements to be used when no ethical approval is required/exemption granted:

• This is an observational study. The XYZ Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

• The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. This study was reviewed and deemed exempt by our XYZ Institutional Review Board. The BioBank protocols are in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

This journal operates a type 1 research data policy . The journal encourages authors, where possible and applicable, to deposit data that support the findings of their research in a public repository. Authors and editors who do not have a preferred repository should consult Springer Nature’s list of repositories and research data policy.

List of Repositories

General repositories - for all types of research data - such as figshare and Dryad may also be used.

Datasets that are assigned digital object identifiers (DOIs) by a data repository may be cited in the reference list. Data citations should include the minimum information recommended by DataCite: authors, title, publisher (repository name), identifier.

If the journal that you’re submitting to uses double-blind peer review and you are providing reviewers with access to your data (for example via a repository link, supplementary information or data on request), it is strongly suggested that the authorship in the data is also blinded. There are data repositories that can assist with this and/or will create a link to mask the authorship of your data.

Authors who need help understanding our data sharing policies, help finding a suitable data repository, or help organising and sharing research data can access our Author Support portal for additional guidance.

Upon acceptance, your article will be exported to Production to undergo typesetting. Shortly after this you will receive two e-mails. One contains a request to confirm your affiliation, choose the publishing model for your article, as well as to arrange rights and payment of any associated publication cost. A second e-mail containing a link to your article’s proofs will be sent once typesetting is completed.

Article publishing agreement

Depending on the ownership of the journal and its policies, you will either grant the Publisher an exclusive licence to publish the article or will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher.

Offprints can be ordered by the corresponding author.

Color illustrations

Publication of color illustrations is free of charge.

Proof reading

The purpose of the proof is to check for typesetting or conversion errors and the completeness and accuracy of the text, tables and figures. Substantial changes in content, e.g., new results, corrected values, title and authorship, are not allowed without the approval of the Editor.

After online publication, further changes can only be made in the form of an Erratum, which will be hyperlinked to the article.

Online First

The article will be published online after receipt of the corrected proofs. This is the official first publication citable with the DOI. After release of the printed version, the paper can also be cited by issue and page numbers.

Open Choice allows you to publish open access in more than 1850 Springer Nature journals, making your research more visible and accessible immediately on publication.

Article processing charges (APCs) vary by journal – view the full list

• Increased researcher engagement: Open Choice enables access by anyone with an internet connection, immediately on publication.

It is easy to find funding to support open access – please see our funding and support pages for more information.

*) Within the first three years of publication. Springer Nature hybrid journal OA impact analysis, 2018.

Funding and Support pages

Copyright and license term – CC BY

Open Choice articles do not require transfer of copyright as the copyright remains with the author. In opting for open access, the author(s) agree to publish the article under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Find more about the license agreement

To find out more about publishing your work Open Access in Environmental Science and Pollution Research , including information on fees, funding and licenses, visit our Open access publishing page .

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Environmental Cover Letter / Job Application Letter

Environment advisor sample cover letter in response to job ad, environment advisor sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environment advisor sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environment advisor sample cover letter - general purpose, environment advisor sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental and agricultural scientist sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental and agricultural scientist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental and agricultural scientist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental and agricultural scientist sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental and agricultural scientist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental coordinator sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental coordinator sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental coordinator sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental coordinator sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental coordinator sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental health and safety manager sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental health and safety manager sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental health and safety manager sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental health and safety manager sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental health and safety manager sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental health practitioner sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental health practitioner sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental health practitioner sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental health practitioner sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental health practitioner sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental manager sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental manager sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental manager sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental manager sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental manager sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental officer sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental officer sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental officer sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental officer sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental officer sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental planner sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental planner sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental planner sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental planner sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental planner sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental protection officer sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental protection officer sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental protection officer sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental protection officer sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental protection officer sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental scientist sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental scientist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental scientist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental scientist sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental scientist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental services coordinator sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental services coordinator sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental services coordinator sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental services coordinator sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental services coordinator sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental specialist sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental specialist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental specialist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental specialist sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental specialist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental superintendent sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental superintendent sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental superintendent sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental superintendent sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental superintendent sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental technician sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental technician sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental technician sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental technician sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental technician sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, senor environmental health practitioner sample cover letter in response to job ad, senor environmental health practitioner sample cover letter when you know the company or person, senor environmental health practitioner sample cover letter to recruitment agency, senor environmental health practitioner sample cover letter - general purpose, senor environmental health practitioner sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental assistant sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental assistant sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental assistant sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental assistant sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental assistant sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental compliance inspector sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental compliance inspector sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental compliance inspector sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental compliance inspector sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental compliance inspector sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental economist sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental economist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental economist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental economist sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental economist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental educator sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental educator sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental educator sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental educator sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental educator sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental restoration planner sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental restoration planner sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental restoration planner sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental restoration planner sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental restoration planner sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental estimator sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental estimator sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental estimator sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental estimator sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental estimator sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, forestry consultants sample cover letter in response to job ad, forestry consultants sample cover letter when you know the company or person, forestry consultants sample cover letter to recruitment agency, forestry consultants sample cover letter - general purpose, forestry consultants sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, geologist sample cover letter in response to job ad, geologist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, geologist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, geologist sample cover letter - general purpose, geologist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental operations manager sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental operations manager sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental operations manager sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental operations manager sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental operations manager sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, environmental regional manager sample cover letter in response to job ad, environmental regional manager sample cover letter when you know the company or person, environmental regional manager sample cover letter to recruitment agency, environmental regional manager sample cover letter - general purpose, environmental regional manager sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, toxicologist sample cover letter in response to job ad, toxicologist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, toxicologist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, toxicologist sample cover letter - general purpose, toxicologist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, waste management manager sample cover letter in response to job ad, waste management manager sample cover letter when you know the company or person, waste management manager sample cover letter to recruitment agency, waste management manager sample cover letter - general purpose, waste management manager sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, waste tracking specialist sample cover letter in response to job ad, waste tracking specialist sample cover letter when you know the company or person, waste tracking specialist sample cover letter to recruitment agency, waste tracking specialist sample cover letter - general purpose, waste tracking specialist sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, water treatment superintendent sample cover letter in response to job ad, water treatment superintendent sample cover letter when you know the company or person, water treatment superintendent sample cover letter to recruitment agency, water treatment superintendent sample cover letter - general purpose, water treatment superintendent sample cover letter - checking for vacancy, forestry supervisor sample cover letter in response to job ad, forestry supervisor sample cover letter when you know the company or person, forestry supervisor sample cover letter to recruitment agency, forestry supervisor sample cover letter - general purpose, forestry supervisor sample cover letter - checking for vacancy.

• ACS Publications

ACS Publishing Center

Author guidelines.

Last updated: December 29, 2023

Manuscript Submission Requirements Checklist

Journal scope, manuscript types, submit with fast format, document templates and format, acceptable software, file designations, and tex/latex, cover letter, manuscript text components, supporting information, research data policy, data requirements, language and editing services, preparing graphics, figure and illustration services, prior publication policy, editorial policies, providing potential reviewer names, manuscript transfer, proofs via acs direct correct, publication date and patent dates, asap publication, post-publication policies, sharing your published article.

Correspondence should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief at  [email protected]

• Cover letter
• Title: Titles should be clear and concise; they must match between manuscript file and electronic submission.
• Author list with affiliations: must match between electronic entry and manuscript file
• Manuscript File: Clean with no highlighting or comments and all changes accepted. Line numbers are not required.
• (Highly encouraged) Have a colleague in another field read as test for accessibility.
• Tables/Schemes/Figures: Text should be clear and legible, with fonts no smaller than 8 pt.
• Figures: must be labeled sequentially and match numbered references in article (manuscript and Supporting Information). Where appropriate, label all subsections by letter.
• Supporting Information (if any) must be included in the electronic submission.
• Table of Contents Graphic
• References: no specific format is required, but it must be sufficient to aid referees in their reviewing duties.

Environmental Science & Technology ( ES&T ) is an impactful environmental science and technology research journal that aims to be transformational and direction-setting publishing rigorous and robust papers for a multidisciplinary and diverse audience of scientists, policy makers and the broad environmental community.  For more than 50 years, ES&T has been a foundational focus for thought-leading, policy-changing contributions and will continue to serve as the home for significant, broadly relevant, and generalizable research that serves to inform decision-making.  The journal advances rigorous scholarship on complex environmental phenomena, particularly with respect to fate, transport, and transformation in natural and engineered systems, while simultaneously facilitating the solution of critical environmental problems. In addition to novelty and significance of research, ES&T considers the relevance of submitted manuscripts to its broad readership.

ES&T has been at the forefront of the environmental science and technology movement, serving the environmental community as a top-tier, respected, reliable, and pivotal venue for exceptional, world-class environmental research across a broad and diverse range of environmentally relevant topics.  Prospective authors are encouraged to review recent issues of ES&T to gain an understanding of the topics that are of greatest interest to the journal’s readers, and they are expected to establish in their cover letters the relevance of their submissions to the ES&T community.

Note : Due to the volume of manuscripts we receive, ES&T is unable to accept pre-submission inquiries.

Thematic Section Headings

Current ES&T topical categories for research articles are as follows:

• Biogeochemical Cycling
• Bioremediation and Biotechnology
• Data Science
• Ecotoxicology and Public Health
• Energy and Climate
• Occurrence, Fate, and Transport of Aquatic and Terrestrial Contaminants
• Occurrence, Fate, and Behavior of Contaminants in Indoor Air and Atmosphere
• Physico-Chemical Treatment and Resource Recovery
• Sustainable Systems

These categories are periodically reviewed and may be changed.

ES&T accepts the following manuscript types:  Research Articles, Features, Viewpoints, Reviews, Policy Analysis, Spotlights, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and Correspondence/Rebuttals.  A full description of each manuscript type is shown below:

Research Article

Research Articles (length limit: 7,000 word-equivalents). Research articles in ES&T must report original research that is expected to have a definable impact on the advancement of environmental chemistry, science, technology, and policy. ES&T welcomes rigorous scholarship on complex environmental processes and phenomena, particularly those affected by human activities. This includes chemical, biological, and physical phenomena in natural and engineered environmental systems, as well as mathematical and computational methods that are directly relevant to the understanding, protecting, restoring, and managing of the natural environment, including eliminating, minimizing, and mitigating human impacts. The journal also publishes articles that describe significant scientific advances or novel technologies for facilitating the solutions of critical environmental problems, including pollution remediation, control, prevention, and avoidance.   Papers in the area of ecotoxicology and human environmental health should provide novel information on effects of chemicals or lead to new insights into the mechanisms and processes underlying effects of chemicals and other stressors.   ES&T also encourages submission of studies that address challenges associated with the "Replacement, Reduction and Refinement" of animal studies. At submission, authors must provide a short synopsis statement (approximately 20 words), placed after the abstract, stating the environmental relevance and significance of their research work. Authors are also expected to provide an explanation in their cover letter why they believe the manuscript belongs in ES&T and why their research will interest our readers with an emphasis on the novelty and environmental relevance of the contribution. 

ES&T Expectations  

ES&T strives to publish novel research of scientific significance and high environmental importance. Insufficient novelty is common reason manuscripts are declined. Novelty is defined as new experimental data, new interpretations of existing data, or new analyses of environmental phenomena that provide important new insights into environmental processes. Significance is judged with respect to the breadth of impact of the reported findings. Manuscripts that report data of a routine nature or that address topics that are already well understood will not be considered. Whenever possible, research on new measurement technologies should include results with authentic environmental samples, and evaluations should be performed under environmentally realistic conditions. The expectations of manuscript novelty and quality are further described in the recent ES&T editorials ‘ Making Waves ’ and ‘ Evolving Today to Best Serve Tomorrow ’.

ES&T Minimum Requirements

• All studies must clearly articulate the environmental relevance of the study to the broad ES&T community.
• Studies should provide novel insights into relevant environmental processes or mechanisms, i.e., studies that only describe the outcomes of standard laboratory or field tests or commercially available products are not appropriate for publication in ES&T .
• An assessment of uncertainty or sensitivity analysis should be included in reported data where applicable, with adequate quality assurance/quality control reported. New analytical methods should be thoroughly developed and quality ensured.
• Manuscripts should include evaluations performed under environmentally realistic conditions and concentrations.  Concentrations should be reported as measured and not nominal.  Ensure that key variables are measured and reported if relevant, e.g., pH
• Manuscripts on toxicity and ecotoxicity should include positive and negative controls, and consider multiple concentrations relevant to environmental exposures and/or a time-course study.  Results should inform AOPs or mechanisms of action.
• The scope of the reported data in ambient monitoring studies must yield conclusions applicable to more than the particular site or time when the data were taken, i.e., findings should not be location specific representing a case study, but rather generalizable and/or transferable to other contexts.
• Studies on environmental contaminants should provide information that is clearly related to that compound’s fate, transport, transformation and/or effects in the environment.
• Manuscripts on adsorption should consider kinetics as well as isotherms.  First-principle models of mass transfer are preferred over purely empirical models.
• Manuscripts that emphasize chemical engineering, new catalysts synthesis or analytical chemistry must provide a concise argument that the research represents an advance that is of primary importance to the environmental field and include comparison to state-of-the-art approaches where appropriate.
• Manuscripts on novel materials (e.g., sorbents or catalysts) should demonstrate the materials have been tested under at least one environmental condition using relevant concentrations of target contaminant.
• Manuscripts on air quality and particulate matter should include adequate characterization of the particles relevant to the study.
• Articles describing advances in treatment technologies for remediation of contaminated environments or control of emissions should go beyond kinetics and treatability studies by exploring the mechanisms of the technology, or develop process models to describe the technique.
• If a manuscript proposes a new application, a general energy analysis or life-cycle assessment should be provided and compared against conventional methods.
• Articles that describe laboratory-scale studies should make meaningful and unbiased comparisons to existing approaches but should not make claims about the economics or relative advantages of the technology without pilot- or full-scale validation studies or properly validated models.

Manuscripts that report on initial findings of an urgent nature may be submitted to Environmental Science & Technology Letters ( ES&TL ).

Research articles are reviewed initially by the Executive Editor team. If appropriate, manuscripts are then assigned to an associate editor for review, who may then, if appropriate, send the manuscript for full peer review by other scientists who assess the significance, originality, and validity of the work. The Editor-in-Chief, executive editors, and associate editors, listed in the ES&T masthead, make final decisions about all research material published in ES&T .

Feature  

Feature articles (length limit: 5,000 word-equivalents) are written in a magazine or journalistic style rather than as a scientific article. This article type should provide a balanced examination of significant developments and issues affecting the environmental community. The assessment of timely topics from multiple perspectives—scientific, regulatory, technical—should provide readers with an authoritative and up-to-date understanding of the subject. Features will undergo peer review, with reviewers providing comments on the factual accuracy, clarity, and significance of the contribution. Prospective authors are encouraged to review already published Feature articles in ES&T to understand style and content. At submission, authors must provide a short synopsis statement (approximately 20 words), placed after the abstract, stating the environmental relevance and significance of their research work. Corresponding authors of accepted articles will also be requested to provide a short biography (up to 200 words) and headshot for inclusion at the end of the published article. Model release and copyright forms are required for author photographs and will be provided by the Journal office.

Viewpoint  

Viewpoints (length limit: 1,000 word-equivalents + author affiliations + 5 references + 1 single-frame figure with 50-word caption OR a 350-word table) are short opinion-style manuscripts, written in the style of an opinion piece in a newspaper or magazine.  They provide authors with a venue to comment on an issue of pressing importance to ES&T ’s readership. Viewpoint articles should express an opinion of a clear scientific nature, based on rigorous scientific research in an environmental discipline. They should not be wholly political or summary in nature. Viewpoints should not include new scientific data.  Viewpoints are not peer-reviewed but are reviewed internally by at least 2 members of the ES&T Editorial team. Corresponding authors of accepted articles will also be requested to provide a short biography (up to 200 words) and headshot for inclusion at the end of the published article. Model release and copyright forms are required for author photographs and will be provided by the Journal office. A TOC graphic is not required for this manuscript type.

Review manuscripts (length limit: 10,000 word-equivalents) are thoroughly documented, forward-looking comprehensive assessments of particular areas in the environmental science and technology research domain. Reviews should increase readers’ knowledge through discriminating analysis and insightful organization of the material. Reviews are not intended to consist of catalogues of prior research and must go beyond synthesis to include analysis. Factors considered when evaluating Reviews include the current and likely future importance of the field under review, thoroughness of the literature coverage, clarity of the presentation, and identification of future research needs.

Please note : Potential authors of Reviews must first submit a proposal and cover letter (via the ES&T submission site in the ACS Paragon Plus Environment). The proposal, to be uploaded as a single manuscript file, should include the following details:

• Proposed title
• Author names and affiliations
• Corresponding author’s email address, profile on institutional website (if available), and Google Scholar, Web of Science, or Scopus profile
• Abstract (length limit: 500 words)
• Topical outline (length limit: three pages), indicating the headings of sections and subsections, a brief discussion of the proposed content of each section, and key references for each section
• List of up to five of the authors’ papers related to the review topic
• List of key previous reviews on the subject in the past 10 years
• Justification for the need for another review on the topic targeting the broader readership of ES&T

An assigned editor will issue a decision on the proposal, and in exceptional cases may be sent for peer review. If approved, the authors will be invited to submit a full Review for further consideration. If the full review is favorably received by the assigned editor, the manuscript will then undergo peer review.

Perspective

Perspectives (length limit: 4,000 word-equivalents) are personal reviews of a field or area, and they are focused, rather than comprehensive. Perspective authors are asked to assess the current status of a chosen field with an emphasis toward identifying key progress being made and research that is needed to advance a sub-discipline, theory, or technology. Perspectives should be based on scientifically sound statements with sufficient references and scientific underpinning to substantiate the views expressed. At submission, authors must provide a short synopsis statement (approximately 20 words), placed after the abstract, stating the environmental relevance and significance of their research work. Perspectives will undergo peer review.  Perspective articles can be submitted directly through the ES&T submission site without prior approval. Corresponding authors of accepted articles will also be requested to provide a short biography (up to 200 words) and headshot for inclusion at the end of the published article. Model release and copyright forms are required for author photographs and will be provided by the Journal office.

Policy Analysis

Policy Analysis manuscripts (length limit: 7,000 word-equivalents) typically focus on the interface of science and engineering with public policy and provide new insight for understanding and managing human–environmental systems. Topics of particular interest include risk assessment, critical evaluations of environmental regulations, and environmental cost-benefit analyses. At submission, authors must provide a short synopsis statement (approximately 20 words), placed after the abstract, stating the environmental relevance and significance of their research work. Policy analysis articles will undergo peer review.

Spotlight articles (length limit: 800 word-equivalents + author affiliations + 5 references + 1 single-frame figure with 50-word caption OR a 350-word table) are short summary-style manuscripts to highlight a previously published paper in ES&T that has been influential in shaping global environmental policy and technology through its citation in policy papers, patents, or by receiving considerable international media attention. Spotlights should briefly describe the essence and context of the research article presented, and how the work has been influential. Spotlight articles do not undergo external peer reviewed, but they are reviewed by at least two members of the ES&T editorial team. Corresponding authors of accepted articles will be requested to provide a short biography (up to 200 words) and headshot for inclusion at the end of the published article.

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the Editor contributions (length limit: 500 word-equivalents + author affiliations + 250 words of references) provide comments on the following already-published journalistic article types only: Features, Viewpoints, and Editorials (Comments). Letters to the Editor should be submitted within two months of the publication date of the original material. The author(s) of the original material will be given an opportunity to reply. If appropriate, both articles will be published in the same issue. These articles are not peer reviewed.   

Please note:  Contributors wishing to comment on research content (this includes Research Articles, Policy Analysis, Reviews, Perspectives, Correspondence/Rebuttals, and Additions and Corrections), please submit a Correspondence/Rebuttal. 

Correspondence/Rebuttal

Correspondence/Rebuttal manuscripts (length limit: 1,000 word-equivalents each including citations) provide scholarly comment on papers appearing in the research section (Research Articles, Policy Analyses, Reviews, Perspectives, Correspondence/Rebuttals, and Additions and Corrections). Correspondence should be submitted within twelve months of the publication date of the original paper and must raise substantive scientific or technical questions. Well-justified exceptions to this timeframe will also be considered. Correspondence that consists mainly of opinion will not be considered. The author(s) of the original paper will be given an opportunity to prepare a response within one month of receiving the Correspondence.  Correspondence on previously published Correspondence will not be considered, and personal invective will not be tolerated. Correspondence/Rebuttal may undergo peer review at the determination of the assigned editor. The correspondence and the rebuttal will be published consecutively in the same issue.

Special Issues

ES&T has a required template that must be completed for all proposals for special issues. If you would like to propose a special issue, please contact the managing editor via email: [email protected] .

While this document will provide basic information on how to prepare and submit the manuscript as well as other critical information about publishing, we also encourage authors to visit the ACS Publishing Center for additional information on everything that is needed to prepare (and review) manuscripts for ACS journals and partner journals, such as

• Mastering the Art of Scientific Publication , which shares editor tips about a variety of topics including making your paper scientifically effective, preparing excellent graphics, and writing cover letters.
• Resources on how to prepare and submit a manuscript to ACS Paragon Plus, ACS Publications’ manuscript submission and peer review environment, including details on selecting the applicable Journal Publishing Agreement .
• Sharing your research with the public through the ACS Publications open access program.
• ACS Reviewer Lab , a free online course covering best practices for peer review and related ethical considerations. 
• ACS Author Lab , a free online course that empowers authors to prepare and submit strong manuscripts, avoiding errors that could lead to delays in the publication process.
• ACS Inclusivity Style Guide , a guide that helps researchers communicate in ways that recognize and respect diversity in all its forms.

Manuscript Preparation

All ACS journals and partner journals have simplified their formatting requirements in favor of a streamlined and standardized format for an initial manuscript submission. Read more about the requirements and the benefits these serves authors and reviewers here .

Manuscripts submitted for initial consideration must adhere to these standards:

• Submissions must be complete with clearly identified standard sections used to report original research, free of annotations or highlights, and include all numbered and labeled components.
• Figures, charts, tables, schemes, and equations should be embedded in the text at the point of relevance. Separate graphics can be supplied later at revision, if necessary.
• When required by a journal's structure or length limitations, manuscript templates should be used.
• References can be provided in any style, but they must be complete, including titles. For information about the required components of different reference types, please refer to the  ACS Style Quick Guide .
• Supporting Information must be submitted as a separate file(s).

The templates facilitate the peer review process by allowing authors to place artwork and tables close to the point where they are discussed within the text. Learn more about document templates here .

General information on the preparation of manuscripts may also be found in the ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication .

See the list of Acceptable Software and appropriate File Designations to be sure your file types are compatible with ACS Paragon Plus. Information for manuscripts generated from TeX/LaTeX is also available.

A cover letter must accompany every manuscript submission. During the submission process, you may type it or paste it into the submission system, or you may attach it as a file.

In your cover letter, please provide a rationale for publication in ES&T , making the environmental relevance clear. A substantial fraction of submissions to ES&T are not sent out for review because an editor concludes that the manuscript does not meet the journal’s standards for novelty, scientific merit, or environmental importance. The cover letter is your opportunity to convince the editor that this is not the case. Citations of previous related work published within ES&T also can be useful to the reviewing editor.

The cover letter should list the authors and their affiliations, give the manuscript title, and provide complete contact information for all authors. If you have a non-preferred editor, you may explain your reason for making the request in your cover letter.

Assume ES&T readers are professionals who are not necessarily experts in your particular field. Spell out all acronyms on first use in the abstract and in the body of the article. ES&T does not allow footnotes, with the exception of an author information footnote on the title page and table detail/definition footnotes.

The various sections of the manuscript are described in detail below:

• Title and Authorship
• Abstract, Keywords and Synopsis

Introduction

Materials and methods, results and discussion, abbreviations, acknowledgment, formulae and equations.

Use a brief, specific, and informative title. Keywords in titles assist in effective literature retrieval. If trade names are used, give generic names in parentheses.

List the full first name, middle initial(s), and last name of each author. Omit professional and official titles. An author’s affiliation should be based on where they were when the work was performed. When the present address of an author is different, include the new information in a footnote. In a paper with more than one author, the name of the corresponding author, to whom post-publication inquiries should be addressed, carries an asterisk (*). Provide an email address for the corresponding author.

Many funders and institutions require that institutional affiliations are identified for all authors listed in the work being submitted. ACS facilitates this requirement by collecting institution information during the manuscript submission process in ACS Paragon Plus (Step 3 in Paragon Plus: Authors & Institutions).

Include as co-authors all those who have made a substantial contribution to the work. Addition or deletion of an author(s) after submission of the manuscript requires justification from the corresponding author and is subject to editorial approval. Deceased persons who meet the criteria for inclusion as coauthors should be included, with an 'Author Information' note, indicating the date of death.

Abstract, Keywords, and Synopsis

A 150–200-word clear and concise abstract must accompany Research Articles, Review, Policy Analysis, and Perspective manuscripts. As a one-paragraph summary, describe the purpose, methods or procedures, significant new results, and implications. Define any abbreviations or acronyms used in the abstract. Include major quantitative data if they can be stated briefly, but do not include background material. Do not include reference numbers in the abstract.

For Features, include a shorter 3–5 sentence Abstract, written at a level comprehensible to the scientifically literate general public.  An abstract is not required for Viewpoint manuscripts.

Research Articles, Policy Analysis, Reviews, Perspectives and Features must be accompanied by 5–8 keywords. Authors are encouraged to include significant keywords that do not appear in the title to expand discoverability and aid the reader in literature retrieval. The keywords are published immediately before the text, following the abstract.

A synopsis is a succinct, simple, non-technical statement (~30 words) articulating the environmental context and environmental impact of your research or policy.  The synopsis is mandatory for Research Articles, Policy Analysis, Perspectives, and Features and must be present at submission. The synopsis should use complete sentences. The synopsis is NOT a repeat of the abstract or a description of the TOC/Abstract graphic.

Example of an  ES&T  synopsis:  ‘Minimal research exists on microplastics exposure from indoor air.  This study reports microplastics at higher concentrations in indoor air and dust compared to outdoors with implications for human health.’

The introduction should clearly and concisely explain the motivation for the work, its importance and originality, where it fits in the development of the field and why it should be of interest to ES&T readers. Discuss relationships of the study to previously published work, but do not reiterate or provide a complete literature survey. Current findings should not be included or summarized in this section. Introduction sections are typically around 500 words in length.

Describe pertinent and critical factors involved in the experimental work but avoid excessive description.  Details not essential for understanding the paper can be placed in Supporting Information (SI).  Specific experimental methods should be sufficiently detailed for others to repeat the experiments unequivocally.  List devices of a specialized nature or instruments that may vary in performance or affect the quality of the data obtained (e.g., spectroscopic resolution), including the vendor. If the procedures are already published, provide citations to previous publications and expand only on differences in the current work.   Authors must emphasize any unexpected, new, and/or significant hazards or risks associated with the reported work and this safety information must be included in the Materials and Methods section.

Be complete but concise.  Discuss your findings, postulate explanations for the data, elucidate models and compare your results with those of others.  Avoid irrelevant comparisons or contrasts, any speculation unsupported by the data presented and verbose discussion.  A separate conclusion is not to be used; any concluding statements are to be incorporated under Results and Discussion.

Specialized abbreviations may be used provided they are placed in parentheses after the word(s) at first point of use. Do not include a separate Abbreviations list. Use SI units and consult the ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication  for lists of SI units and preferred forms of commonly used abbreviations.

Include only essential credits to acknowledge financial or professional assistance to the conduct of research. Sources of financial support must be acknowledged. Omit academic and social titles.

Author Information

A section may be included, as needed, entitled “Author Information” to provide pertinent information on the authors, such as the names of authors who contributed equally to the article, or details of the date of death of a deceased author.

Literature references in ES&T must be numbered in order of appearance, and the corresponding numbers placed at the appropriate locations in the text as superscripted numerals. The accuracy of the References is the responsibility of the authors, who are encouraged to avoid references to works that have not been peer reviewed. DOI numbers are helpful but not mandatory unless they are the only identifying information available (e.g., for recently published articles).  Excessive self-citation is not permitted. Any references in publications that would be difficult for most reviewers to obtain or are unpublished should be uploaded into the ES&T Paragon Plus submission site as Information for ‘Review Only’.

Chemical formulas should be embedded in the text at the point of relevance and should correspond to the ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication . Chemical equations should be balanced and numbered consecutively along with mathematical equations. Mathematical arguments should be as brief as possible.

Components Described Elsewhere in these Guidelines

• TOC/Abstract Graphic

Funder Reporting Requirement

• Tables , Figures , and Chemical Structures

Web Enhanced Objects (WEO)

This information is provided to the reviewers during the peer-review process (for Review Only) and is available to readers of the published work (for Publication). Supporting Information must be submitted at the same time as the manuscript. See the list of Acceptable Software by File Designation and confirm that your Supporting Information is viewable .

If the manuscript is accompanied by any supporting information files for publication, these files will be made available free of charge to readers. A brief, nonsentence description of the actual contents of each file, including the file type extension, is required. This description should be labeled Supporting Information and should appear before the Acknowledgement and Reference sections.  Examples of sufficient and insufficient descriptions are as follows:

Examples of sufficient descriptions: “Supporting Information: 1 H NMR spectra for all compounds (PDF)” or “Additional experimental details, materials, and methods, including photographs of experimental setup (DOC)”.

Examples of insufficient descriptions: “Supporting Information: Figures S1-S3” or “Additional figures as mentioned in the text”.

When including supporting information for review only, include copies of references that are unpublished or in-press. These files are available only to editors and reviewers.

All ACS journals strongly encourage authors to make the research data underlying their articles publicly available at the time of publication.

Research data is defined as materials and information used in the experiments that enable the validation of the conclusions drawn in the article, including primary data produced by the authors for the study being reported, secondary data reused or analyzed by the authors for the study, and any other materials necessary to reproduce or replicate the results.

The ACS Research Data Policy provides additional information on Data Availability Statements, Data Citation, and Data Repositories.

Nomenclature

Use abbreviations and acronyms sparingly, and all usage should be defined at the first occurrence in the text. Whenever possible, use systematic nomenclature as recommended by IUPAC and IUBMB for chemical compounds and biomolecules, and SI units. The ACS and IUPAC websites have links to nomenclature recommendations. Usually, the chemical name or composition should be given in parentheses or in a reference at the first occurrence of such a name. Names of organisms should comply with genetic conventions, with genus and species names written in italics and spelled out in full on first appearance. Trademark names should be defined at the point of first use and registered trademark names should be capitalized whenever used. Registration marks are not required to ensure legal protection for the trademark. Trade and trivial names should not be capitalized.

Data Presentation

Data should be presented in a way that makes interpretation clear to the reader.

For more information on data presentation, see:

• Quantifying the Interactions between Biomolecules: Guidelines for Assay Design and Data Analysis
• Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm
• Reporting standards and availability of data, materials, code and protocols.
• MIQE guidelines for ddPCR and QPCR by Bustin et al. 2009 and Hugget et al. 2020 ; EMMI guidelines by Borchardt et al. 2021
• Best practice for 16S Microbiome studies

Biological Assays

Exposure protocols and methods must be referenced or described in sufficient detail to permit the experiments to be repeated by other investigators. This includes for example information on the preparation of the test materials, medium components, and duration of exposure. In addition, the applied dose or dose range should be given in a meaningful unit and the relevance of the applied dose should be substantiated. Doses and concentrations should be expressed as molar quantities (e.g., μmol/kg, mM, etc.), particularly when comparisons of potencies are made on compounds having large differences in molecular weights. The routes of administration of test compounds and vehicles should be indicated. Benchmarks should be included in form of appropriate positive or negative control substances or reference materials. Especially for studies on nanomaterials, assays should be checked for interference induced by nanomaterials, e.g., optical or chemical interference, masking of the analyte or other interference mechanisms by inclusion of appropriate controls. Also, for studies on nanomaterials, sterilization procedures and specification of dilution steps as well as the order of addition should be provided, and as far as possible, various measuring units related to dose (e.g., surface area, mass, particle number per surface area, volume, cell number) should be given to increase comparability with other studies. Data may be presented as numerical expressions or in graphical form. Statistical limits (statistical significance) for the biological data are usually required. If statistical limits cannot be provided, the number of determinations and some indication of the variability and reliability of the results should be given. References to statistical methods of calculation should be included.

Use of Human Subjects or Animals in Research

The American Chemical Society Publications rules and ethical guidelines provide mandatory standards of practice in experimental studies performed using biological samples obtained from animals or human subjects. Studies submitted for publication approval must present evidence that the described experimental activities have undergone local institutional review assessing safety and humane usage of study subject animals.

Research Involving Animals

An indication that all animal experiments have undergone ethical review and were carried out with appropriate permissions or licenses from national or institutional committees that cover the research must be provided. Relevant details listed in the latest version of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines should be given, especially the description of animals (e.g., source, sex, age, species, and strain), experimental design (e.g., number of groups, number of animals in each group, how animals were divided, and a flow chart of the study protocol) and procedures (e.g., drug or chemical formulation, dose, treatment time and frequency). The numbers of animals for each experiment used in the research should be clearly stated in the Materials and Methods section in manuscript and legends of relevant Tables and Figures. Justifications for the doses used in the research should be included, and where appropriate, the relationship between these doses and relevant environmental or human exposure or intake levels is encouraged to be provided.

Research Involving Human Subjects

Authors must provide a statement that study samples were obtained through the informed consent of the donors, or in lieu of that evidence, by the authority of the institutional board that licensed the use of such material. The institution’s name and approved IRB number must be listed in the paper. Details listed in the latest version of the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines and description of informed consent protocols must also be provided. Papers that include any aspect of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) or citizen science must include information on practices employed to protect vulnerable populations

Database Deposition

Advancing scientific discoveries can be enhanced when data and materials are made available and readily exchanged. ES&T  requires for all published articles that authors make materials, data, and protocols available to readers through deposition in a public database. A statement must appear in the submitted manuscript confirming submission of the data and indicating the data bank and any pertinent accession codes/ID.

To identify the repository that meets your particular needs, you may find FAIR Sharing Databases , Registry of Research Data Repositories , and Repository Finder helpful. Authors may also want to further investigate unstructured and/or large data repositories, such as Dryad Digital Repository , figshare , Open Science Framework , and Zenodo , or institutional repositories for depositing data. If there is no appropriate repository available, general publicly available repositories should be used.

In addition, ACS Publications’ figshare houses all Supporting Information within the HTML presentation of the paper and at acs.figshare.com . Authors also agree to make available to interested academic researchers for their own use any materials reported in the manuscript that are not otherwise obtainable. Any restrictions to the availability of materials or information must be stated at the time of submission. The ACS Math Style Sheet and NMR Guidelines are available on the ACS Publishing Center.

Sequence Data

DNA and RNA sequence data can be submitted to suitable public repositories such as GenBank , European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) , the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), dbSNP , dbVar , Database of Genomic Variants archive (DGVa) , MGnify , miRBase , NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) , and NCBI Trace Archives . Protein sequence data should be deposited with the Protein Identification Recourse at Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI), the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics , or UniProt .

Manuscripts that present microarray data should follow the MIAME (Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment) guidelines . Data should be submitted to suitable public repositories such as ArrayExpress , Database of Interacting Proteins (DIP) , dbGaP , Genomic Expression Archive (GEA) , Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) , IntAct Molecular Interaction Database , Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking (GNPS) , MassIVE , MetaboLights , Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) Archive , and ProteomeXchange .

For sequence data and microarray data, the relevant accession numbers should be available at the time that the revision is submitted and should be listed at the end of the Materials and Methods section in the revised version of the manuscript.

Proteomics Data

Proteomic experiments must meet the standards established by the Journal of Proteome Research. More information is available in the Publication Guidelines for the Analysis and Documentation of Peptide and Protein Identifications. Protein sequences should be handled in the same way as described above, and accession number and database source should be included.

Computer Codes

When computer codes are developed or used and are an essential part of a manuscript, sufficient detail must be given, either within the paper or in the SI. Types of languages that are used in the computer codes, compiler/interpreter, and operating system with a specific version must be provided or properly cited. Upon request, after appropriate material transfer agreements to restrict the use of the materials so as to protect the legitimate interests of the authors, codes and input data must be made available for others to validate the calculations. Regardless of whether the source code is open or closed source, it must be properly cited in the References.

Computational Chemistry Calculations

When computational chemistry calculations are performed, input data— including force field parameters, equations defining the model (or references to where such material is available in the open literature), methods and approaches, and basis sets—must be given either within the paper or in the SI. If the software used for calculations is generally available, it must be properly cited in the References. References to the methods upon which the software is based must also be provided.

When requested, the authors should also make a reasonable effort to provide samples of unusual materials unavailable elsewhere, including, but not limited to, clones, microorganism strains, antibodies, computer codes, etc., to other researchers, with appropriate material transfer agreements to restrict the field of use of the materials so as to protect the legitimate interests of the authors. Any restrictions to the availability of materials or information must be stated at the time of submission.

A well-written paper helps share your results most clearly. ACS Publications’ English Editing Service is designed to help scientists communicate their research effectively. Our subject-matter expert editors will edit your manuscript for grammar, spelling, and other language errors so your ideas are presented at their best. 

The quality of illustrations in ACS journals and partner journals depends on the quality of the original files provided by the authors. Figures are not modified or enhanced by journal production staff. All graphics must be prepared and submitted in digital format.

Graphics should be inserted into the main body whenever possible. Please see Appendix 2 for additional information.

Any graphic (figure chart, scheme, or equation) that has appeared in an earlier publication should include a credit line citing the original source. Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to re-use this material.

The impact of your research is not limited to what you can express with words. Tables and figures such as graphs, photographs, illustrations, diagrams, and other visuals can play a significant role in effectively communicating your findings. Our Artwork Editing  service generates publication-ready figures that conform to your chosen journal’s specifications. This includes changes to file type, resolution, color space, font, scale, line weights, and layout (to improve readability and professional appearance).

Preparing for Submission

Manuscripts, graphics, supporting information, and required forms, as well as manuscript revisions, must all be submitted in digital format through ACS Paragon Plus , which requires an ACS ID to log in. Registering for an ACS ID is fast, free, and does not require an ACS membership. Please refer to Appendix 1 for additional information on preparing your submission

ES&T considers only original work for publication that has not been previously published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Related work under consideration for publication in any medium must be cited in the manuscript and the Editor-in-Chief informed at the time of submission. In addition, an author must inform the Editor-in-Chief of prior dissemination of the content in print or electronic formats in the cover letter. Posting of pre-prints to a pre-print server such as ChemRxiv , bioR X iv, arXiv, or applicable repository for their discipline where a DOI is issued, before the manuscript is accepted for publication is considered acceptable but requires citing of the pre-print. Authors may revise the preprint version of their manuscript up until a final acceptance decision has been issued.  Please note the use of a pre-print server in the cover letter and provide a link to the preprint, and as appropriate, state how the manuscript has been adjusted/updated between deposition and submission.  All other prior/redundant publication is forbidden. Failure to alert ES&T in your cover letter to any prior publication of your submission may be viewed as an ethical violation. Upon publication in ES&T , authors are advised to add a link from the pre-print to the published paper via the Digital Object Identified (DOI) that is assigned to the published article. Some preprint servers, including ChemRxiv and bioR X iv, include this link for authors automatically after publication.

Theses/Dissertations

Authors submitting material that has been used in their thesis/dissertation must contact the Editor-in-Chief for approval. Authors will be asked to confirm that they alone hold the copyright to the work and to read and comply with the ACS dissertation policy and the conditions and procedures laid out in the ACS Journal Publishing Agreement (JPA). Authors will also need to make arrangements with their degree-granting institution (and any repositories to which their thesis/dissertation has been or will be posted) to either delay posting of the thesis/dissertation or remove the material from the Internet until the final paper is published by ES&T (i.e., the work is considered under embargo). Exceptions to this are if the thesis/dissertation has been posted in a data repository providing a DOI which is citable (see Prior Publication Policy).

Authors wishing to include published ES&T material in their thesis/dissertation should follow the guidelines of the ACS dissertation policy. They must contact the Editor-in-Chief for permission, and properly cite and link to the published ES&T article. Permission requests for all ACS Journal materials are handled through the RightsLink service. Please see the RightsLink instructions for complete details.

Proceedings of Conferences and Symposia

Authors cannot publish presentations in proceedings (paper or electronic) that are copyrighted (except by ACS) and then submit them to ES&T due to copyright concerns. If the proceedings are not copyrighted, publishing a short abstract without figures or tables is permissible. It is the responsibility of authors to notify ES&T of any abstracts that have been published in any form.

ES&T will consider for publication a paper or presentation that has been posted on a website available to the general public, provided that the site is the personal site of the author and is not connected to a commercial site. Authors must notify the journal at the time of submission if the material has been available on the Internet or equivalent electronic media and must remove the material from the site at the time of submission. When the paper is published, authors may provide an electronic link from that site to the ES&T homepage. If the website is a commercial site not owned by ACS, the authors are advised that consideration of the paper may be endangered.

Authors must confirm that they alone hold the copyright to the report. If a government or funding organization requires posting of a related report, please contact the Editor-in-Chief and provide specific details.

Quality Expectations

Clearly articulating the importance of your research and the quality of presentation of your manuscript will have an important impact on the ease with which it can undergo peer review and the impression it gives to reviewers of its overall quality. If your writing is rambling, fails to establish the purpose of the research, provides an incoherent discussion, puzzling figures, or inappropriate scales on graph axes, the technical merits of your research will be less easy to recognize. Please articulate clearly the purpose of your work, write concisely and with clarity, and provide well thought-out and clearly presented figures and tables with appropriate considerations of the magnitude of error. This will significantly increase the likelihood that we will publish your research.

Length Limits

The length limits for each article type are listed in the Article Types section. Article length can be determined by counting all text, excluding title page, references, and figure/table captions. Next, add 200 words for each small figure, scheme, or table that takes up part of a page. Large multipart figures, extensive tables, detailed maps, or chemical pathways taking up a page or more should be counted as 600 words. At the discretion of the assigned editor, some figures or tables may be counted as more than 600 words.

Manuscripts that exceed the length limit will be un-submitted (returned to the Draft section in ACS Paragon Plus) with a request to shorten, or they may be immediately rejected. To reduce length, make the Introduction and Discussion sections more concise. In addition, make appropriate use of Supporting Information, which is readily available to all readers of the manuscripts on the ES&T website.

Authors who believe that exceeding the length limit is essential must include a compelling argument in their cover letters. Ultimately, however, the decision about whether a manuscript that exceeds the recommended length is appropriate for review is made by the assigned editor.

Peer Review

All manuscripts submitted are reviewed and handled by the Editor-in-Chief  and/or Executive Editors, and/or assigned to one of the Associate Editors. The Editor-in-Chief/Executive Editors/Associate Editors and Editorial Assistants evaluate the content and format of the paper. Due to the large volume of submissions, a significant fraction of manuscripts submitted to ES&T are declined after review by an editor and are not sent for external review. Common reasons for declining manuscripts at this initial stage include insufficient novelty, lack of sufficient environmental relevance, failure to place the rationale for the study or the results in the context of existing literature, insufficient quality of the data, or problems with the manuscript presentation (length limits, inadequate English, figure quality).   

Manuscripts that meet editorial expectations are sent for external review to experts in the field. Associate editors select reviewers, monitor the progress of the review process, evaluate the comments of reviewers and forward them to the authors for their response, communicating ultimate acceptance or rejection to the corresponding author and carrying out a final check of accepted manuscripts.

Peer review is used to ensure the highest possible quality in published manuscripts.  Scientists with expertise in the subject matter are invited to evaluate the submission for its originality, validity, significance and impact on the field and suitability to the ES&T .  Typically three reviewers are selected per paper on the basis of the subject matter, available expertise and the Editor’s knowledge of the subject area.  Authors must also submit the names and addresses (including email addresses) of at least 4 potential reviewers who do not have conflicts of interest with the authors or manuscript content. Whenever possible, suggest academic email addresses rather than personal email addresses. However, the Editors are under no obligation to use specific individuals. Reviewers are requested to provide their assessment within two to three weeks.  Anonymous copies of the reviews and the Editor’s decision regarding the acceptability of the manuscript are sent to the corresponding author. If the reviewers’ evaluations of the manuscript disagree, of if reviewer’s and Editor’s comments are not satisfactorily addressed by the authors, the Editor may reject the manuscript or select additional reviewers to further assist in reaching a final decision on the manuscript.

The editors may exercise their prerogative to decline a manuscript after editorial review if that paper is judged to outside the scope of ES&T , is lacking in significance or impact, is poorly written or formatted, or is fragmentary and marginally incremental in its contribution.

Submitting Revised Manuscripts and Response to Reviewers

Following the peer review of your manuscript, the corresponding author may be requested to perform either a major or a minor revision of the manuscript in order to fully satisfy all peer review comments.  If you are submitting a revised manuscript (or an authorized resubmission of a manuscript that was already peer reviewed), you must submit point-by-point responses to each of the comments of the reviewers. We recommend that you copy the reviewer’s comment into the text immediately prior to your response. You should also upload, as ‘Information for Review Only’, a version of the manuscript with changes highlighted to allow the editor to easily discern the revisions that have been made.

Resubmission of Previously Declined Manuscripts to ES&T

If your manuscript is declined by ES&T , read the decision letter carefully. Manuscripts are often declined because the editor determines that the subject matter is not appropriate for ES&T or that the novelty or significance of the manuscript is insufficient. 

If you wish to submit a revised version of a declined manuscript to ES&T , you must first contact the associate editor who handled your original submission to request permission to resubmit. If you receive permission to resubmit, indicate in your cover letter that it is an authorized revision of a previously submitted manuscript, provide the original manuscript number, and state how the manuscript has changed. If the manuscript was reviewed, submit a detailed, point-by-point list of your responses to each of the comments of the reviewers or provide convincing reasons for declining to do so. The manuscript should be submitted online (see the Manuscript Submission section of this Guide, below), where it will receive a new manuscript number. During the submission process, mark “Yes” when asked if the manuscript has been previously submitted “in whole or in part.” Manuscripts that editors judge to be resubmissions, in whole or in part, of previously submitted manuscripts that do not comply with these rules will not be considered for publication. Moreover, failure to alert ES&T  to a resubmission, even in part, is an ethical violation.

Appeal Process

If your manuscript is declined by ES&T and the author believes an error has been made, you may appeal the decision directly to the editor who made it, providing a clear explanation for why you believe he or she should reconsider the decision. If the editor upholds the rejection, you may appeal the decision to the Editor-in-Chief ( [email protected] ). When outlining your appeal to the Editor-in-Chief, please include confirmation that you first asked the handling editor to reconsider the decision and then provide a clear explanation as to why you believe that the associate editor’s decision is unreasonable. The Editor-in-Chief’s decisions on appeals are final.

This same process should be used for appealing an editor’s denial of your request to resubmit a previously submitted manuscript.

Press Release and Request for an Embargo

If your institution plans to put out a press release if/when your paper is published, and this press release requires prior embargo (a hold in publication date) of the paper, please do the following: Once your paper is accepted, contact the managing editor ( [email protected] ) and the Journal Production office and notify them of the intended press release. They will coordinate publication of the paper to coincide with the press release.

Please suggest 4 reviewers. Authors are encouraged to avoid suggesting reviewers from the authors’ institutions. Do not suggest reviewers who may have a real or perceived conflict of interest . Whenever possible, suggest academic email addresses rather than personal email addresses.

If your submission is declined for publication by this journal, the editors might deem your work to be better suited for another ACS Publications journal or partner journal and suggest that the authors consider transferring the submission. Manuscript Transfer simplifies and shortens the process of submitting to another ACS journal or partner journal, as all the coauthors, suggested reviewers, manuscript files, and responses to submission questions are copied by ACS Paragon Plus to the new draft submission. Authors are free to accept or decline the transfer offer.

Note that each journal is editorially independent. Transferring a manuscript is not a guarantee that the manuscript will be accepted, as the final publication decision will belong to the editor of the next journal.

PRODUCTION AND PUBLICATION

Correction of the galley proofs is the responsibility of the Corresponding Author. The Corresponding Author of an accepted manuscript will receive e-mail notification and complete instructions when page proofs are available for review via ACS Direct Correct . Extensive or important changes on page proofs, including changes to the title or list of authors, are subject to review by the editor.

It is the responsibility of the Corresponding Author to ensure that all authors listed on the manuscript agree with the changes made on the proofs. Galley proofs should be returned within 48 hours in order to ensure timely publication of the manuscript.

Accepted manuscripts will be published on the ACS Publications Web site as soon as page proofs are corrected and all author concerns are resolved. The first date on which the document is published on the Web is considered the publication date.

Publication of manuscripts on the Web may occur weeks in advance of the cover date of the issue of publication. Authors should take this into account when planning their patent and intellectual property activities related to a document and should ensure that all patent information is available at the time of first publication, whether ASAP or issue publication.

All articles published ahead of print receive a unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, which is used to cite the manuscript before and after the paper appears in an issue. Additionally, any supplemental information submitted along with the manuscript will automatically be assigned a DOI and hosted on Figshare to promote open data discoverability and use of your research outputs.

Manuscripts will be published on the “ASAP Articles” page on the web as soon as page proofs are corrected and all author concerns are resolved. ASAP publication usually occurs within a few working days of receipt of page proof corrections, which can be several weeks in advance of the cover date of the issue.

The American Chemical Society follows guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) when considering any ethical concerns regarding a published article, Retractions, and Expressions of Concern.

Additions and Corrections

Additions and Corrections may be requested by the author(s) or initiated by the Editor to address important issues or correct errors and omissions of consequence that arise after publication of an article. All Additions and Corrections are subject to approval by the Editor, and should bring new and directly relevant information and corrections that fix scientific facts. Minor corrections and additions will not be published. Readers who detect errors of consequence in the work of others should contact the corresponding author of that work.

Additions and Corrections must be submitted as new manuscripts via ACS Paragon Plus by the Corresponding Author for publication in the “Addition/Correction” section of the Journal. The corresponding author should obtain approval from all coauthors prior to submitting or provide evidence that such approval has been solicited. The manuscript should include the original article title and author list, citation including DOI, and details of the correction.

Retractions

Articles may be retracted for scientific or ethical reasons and may be requested by the article author(s) or by the journal Editor(s), but are ultimately published at the discretion of the Editor. Articles that contain seriously flawed or erroneous data such that their findings and conclusions cannot be relied upon may be retracted in order to correct the scientific record. When an article is retracted, a notice of Retraction will be published containing information about the reason for the Retraction. The originally published article will remain online except in extraordinary circumstances (e.g. where deemed legally necessary, or if the availability of the published content poses public health risks).

Expressions of Concern

Expressions of Concern may be issued at the discretion of the Editor if:

• there is inconclusive evidence of research or publication misconduct by the authors;
• there is evidence that the findings are unreliable but the authors’ institution will not investigate the case;
• an investigation into alleged misconduct related to the publication either has not been, or would not be, fair and impartial or conclusive;
• an investigation is underway but a judgment will not be available for a considerable time.

Upon completion of any related investigation, and when a final determination is made about the outcome of the article, the Expression of Concern may be replaced with a Retraction notice or Correction.

At ACS Publications, we know it is important for you to be able to share your peer reviewed, published work with colleagues in the global community of scientists. As sharing on sites known as scholarly collaboration networks (SCNs) is becoming increasingly prevalent in today’s scholarly research ecosystem, we would like to remind you of the many ways in which you, a valued ACS author, can share your published work .

Publishing open access makes it easy to share your work with friends, colleagues, and family members. In addition, ACS Publications makes it easy to share your newly published research with ACS Articles on Request (see below). Don’t forget to promote your research and related data on social media, at conferences, and through scholarly communication networks. Increase the impact of your research using the following resources: Altmetrics , Figshare , ACS Certified Deposit

When your article is published in an ACS journal or partner journal, corresponding authors are provided with a link that offers up to 50 free digital prints of the final published work. This link is valid for the first 12 months following online publication, and can be shared via email or an author’s website. After one year, the access restrictions to your article will be lifted, and you can share the Articles on Request URL on social media and other channels. To access all your Articles on Request links, log in to your ACS Publishing Center account and visit the “My Published Manuscripts” page.

Article , journal , and commercial reprints are available to order.

Appendix 1: PREPARING FOR SUBMISSION

We’ve developed ACS’ publishing and editorial policies in consultation with the research communities that we serve, including authors and librarians. Browse our policies below to learn more.

Ethical Guidelines

ACS editors have provided Ethical Guidelines for persons engaged in the publication of chemical research—specifically, for editors, authors, and reviewers. Each journal also has a specific policy on prior publication .

OFAC Compliance

As a U.S.-based non-profit organization, the American Chemical Society (ACS) is required to comply with U.S. sanctions laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). While these laws and regulations permit U.S.-based publishers like ACS to engage in publishing-related activities with authors located in sanctioned regions in many cases, ACS may be prohibited under U.S. law from engaging in publishing-related activities in some cases, including, but not limited to, instances where an author or the institution with which an author is affiliated is located in a particular sanctioned region or has been designated by OFAC as a Specially Designated National (SDN) pursuant to certain U.S. sanctions programs. ACS reserves the right to refrain from engaging in any publishing-related activities that ACS determines in its sole discretion may be in violation of U.S. law.

Safety Considerations

Authors must emphasize any unexpected, new, and/or significant hazards or risks associated with the reported work. This information should be in the Experimental Section of a full article and included in the main text of a letter. Statement examples can be found in the Safety Statement Style Sheet  and additional information on communicating safety information from the  ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication is freely available here .

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

A statement describing any financial conflicts of interest or lack thereof is published in each ACS journal and partner journal article.

During the submission process, the Corresponding Author must provide a statement on behalf of all authors of the manuscript, describing all potential sources of bias, including affiliations, funding sources, and financial or management relationships, that may constitute conflicts of interest. If the manuscript is accepted, the statement will be published in the final article.

If the manuscript is accepted and no conflict of interest has been declared, the following statement will be published in the final article: “The authors declare no competing financial interest.”

In publishing only original research, ACS is committed to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism. ACS Publications uses CrossCheck's iThenticate software to screen submitted manuscripts for similarity to published material. Note that your manuscript may be screened during the submission process.

Further information about plagiarism can be found in Part B of the Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research . See also the press release regarding ACS' participation in the CrossCheck initiative.

Authorship, Author List, and Coauthor Notification

Authors are required to obtain the consent of all their coauthors prior to submitting a manuscript. The submitting author accepts the responsibility of notifying all coauthors that the manuscript is being submitted.

During manuscript submission, the submitting author must provide contact information (full name, email address, institutional affiliation, and mailing address) for all of the coauthors. Because all of the author names are automatically imported into the electronic Journal Publishing Agreement , the names must be entered into ACS Paragon Plus. (Note that coauthors are not required to register in ACS Paragon Plus.) Author affiliation should reflect where the work was completed, even if the author has since left that institution. Authors may include a note with a current address if their institution has changed since the work was completed.

To expedite the processing of your manuscript, please format your author and affiliation information according the guidelines in this link: https://pubsapp.acs.org/paragonplus/submission/author-address-information.pdf .

Criteria for authorship can be found in Part B of the Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research . Artificial intelligence (AI) tools do not qualify for authorship. The use of AI tools for text or image generation should be disclosed in the manuscript within the Acknowledgment section with a description of when and how the tools were used. For more substantial use cases or descriptions of AI tool use, authors should provide full details within the Methods or other appropriate section of the manuscript.

If any change in authorship is necessary after a manuscript has been submitted, confirmation is required that all of the authors (including those being added or removed) have been notified and have agreed to the change. To provide this confirmation, authors are asked to complete and sign an authorship change form and provide the completed form to the appropriate editorial office.

Authors with a single name:  If you, or any of your coauthors, have only one name, please follow these steps for proper submission to ACS Paragon Plus:

• First (Given) Name Field: Enter an asterisk (*) into the "First (Given) Name" field.
• Last (Family) Name Field: Enter your single name into the "Last (Family) Name" field.

If your paper is accepted, the asterisk (*) will be removed from the published version of the paper.

Patent Activities and Intellectual Property

Authors are responsible for ensuring that all patent activities and intellectual property issues are satisfactorily resolved prior to first publication (ASAP or in issue). Acceptance and publication will not be delayed for pending or unresolved issues of this nature.

Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID)

Authors submitting manuscript revisions are required to provide their own personal, validated ORCID iD before completing the submission, if an ORCID iD is not already associated with their ACS Paragon Plus user profiles. This ID may be provided during original manuscript submission or when submitting the manuscript revision. All authors are strongly encouraged to register for an ORCID iD, a unique researcher identifier. The ORCID iD will be displayed in the published article for any author on a manuscript who has a validated ORCID iD associated with ACS when the manuscript is accepted.

ORCID iDs should not be typed into the manuscript. ACS publishes only those ORCID iDs that have been properly verified and linked before the manuscript is accepted . After your ORCID iD is linked, it will be displayed automatically in all subsequently accepted manuscripts for any/all ACS journals. We do not publish ORCID iDs provided during proof review or via other communications after a manuscript is accepted for publication.

With an ORCID iD, you can create a profile of your research activities to distinguish yourself from other researchers with similar names, and make it easier for your colleagues to find your publications. If you do not yet have an ORCID iD, or you wish to associate your existing ORCID iD with your ACS Paragon Plus account, you may do so by clicking on “Edit Your Profile” from your ACS Paragon Plus account homepage and following the ORCID-related links. Learn more at www.orcid.org .

Copyright and Permissions

To obtain forms and guidelines for completing the Journal Publishing Agreement or obtaining permissions from copyright owners, and to explore a Copyright Learning Module for chemists, click here .

Authors are required to report funding sources and grant/award numbers. Enter ALL sources of funding for ALL authors in BOTH the Funder Registry Tool in ACS Paragon Plus and in your manuscript to meet this requirement.

Open Access Compliance

ACS offers options by which authors can fulfill the requirements for open access and deposition into repositories for funded research. Visit our ACS Open Science site to see how to fulfill requirements for specific funders  and to find out if you are eligible to publish under a Read + Publish agreement between ACS and your institution. You can also find out more about Open Access Compliance and ACS Open Science initiatives .

Diversity and Inclusion Statement

During manuscript submission, ACS journal authors have the option to submit a statement sharing information related to diversity and inclusion that is relevant for their paper. If supplying a diversity and inclusion statement, the corresponding author must provide this on behalf of all authors of the manuscript during the submission process. These statements include but are not limited to analysis of citation diversity and acknowledgment of indigenous land on which research was conducted. Statements expressing political beliefs are not permitted and may be removed by the journal office. All statements are subject to final review by the Editor.

• Citation Diversity Statement: The citation diversity statement should appear in the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript. ACS recommends including the following: (1) the importance of citation diversity, (2) the proportion of citations by gender and race/ethnicity for the first and last authors, (3) the method used to determine those proportions and its limitations, and (4) steps taken to by the authors to improve citation diversity in the article. We recognize that one limitation of the current methods is that it cannot account for intersex, non-binary, and transgender people, or Indigenous and mixed-race authors. (Adapted from BMES/Springer Guidelines )
• Land acknowledgment: The land acknowledgment statement should appear in the Acknowledgements section of the manuscript. The statement should link to the institutions’ formal land acknowledgments on which the research took place, if possible. Further guidance for creating these statements can be found here: https://nativegov.org/news/a-guide-to-indigenous-land-acknowledgment/ .

Appendix 2: Preparing Graphics

Digital graphics pasted into manuscripts should have the following minimum resolutions:

• Black and white line art, 1200 dpi
• Grayscale art, 600 dpi
• Color art, 300 dpi

Graphics must fit a one- or two-column format. Single-column graphics can be sized up to 240 points wide (3.33 in.) and double-column graphics must be sized between 300 and 504 points (4.167 in. and 7 in.). The maximum depth for all graphics is 660 points (9.167 in.) including the caption (allow 12 pts. For each line of caption text). Lettering should be no smaller than 4.5 points in the final published format. The text should be legible when the graphic is viewed full-size. Helvetica or Arial fonts work well for lettering. Lines should be no thinner than 0.5 point.

Color may be used to enhance the clarity of complex structures, figures, spectra, and schemes, etc., and color reproduction of graphics is provided at no additional cost to the author. Graphics intended to appear in black and white or grayscale should not be submitted in color.

Type of Graphics

Table of contents (toc)/abstract graphic.

Consult the Guidelines for Table of Contents/Abstract Graphics for specifications.

Our team of subject-matter experts and graphical designers can also help generate a compelling TOC graphic to convey your key findings. Learn more about our Graphical Abstract service .

A caption giving the figure number and a brief description must be included below each figure. The caption should be understandable without reference to the text. It is preferable to place any key to symbols used in the artwork itself, not in the caption. Ensure that any symbols and abbreviations used in the text agree with those in the artwork.

Charts (groups of structures that do not show reactions) may have a brief caption describing their contents.

Each table must have a brief (one phrase or sentence) title that describes the contents. The title should be understandable without reference to the text. Details should be put in footnotes, not in the title. Tables should be used when the data cannot be presented clearly in the narrative, when many numbers must be presented, or when more meaningful inter-relationships can be conveyed by the tabular format. Tables should supplement, not duplicate, information presented in the text and figures. Tables should be simple and concise.

Each scheme (sequences of reactions) may have a brief caption describing its contents.

Chemical Structures

Chemical structures should be produced with the use of a drawing program such as ChemDraw.

ES&T authors are encouraged to submit images to be considered for use on the journal’s front cover or Supplementary Covers at the time of the submission of their revised manuscript. If your article is accepted for publication, your artwork suggestion may also be selected for use on one of the journal’s covers. If your art is selected for front cover, ACS will send you information about how to request one complimentary 18” by 24” printed poster featuring your work. Images chosen for the front cover will be published at no cost to the author.

Cover image submissions should be eye-catching, imaginative, and original. Unpublished images are encouraged. The cover image should not resemble a graphical abstract or data figure, but rather should be an artistic and scientifically accurate representation of the manuscript.

Image files should be submitted as TIF, JPG, PNG, or EPS files (not PDF or PPT) with a resolution of at least 300 dpi for pixel-based images. Cover art should be 8.19 inches (20.8 cm) wide × 10.00 inches (25.4 cm) high, and submission of “layered” artwork is encouraged. The journal’s logo will obscure the top 3 inches (7.62 cm) of the image. Authors should submit the cover image, along with a short (less than 50 words), clear legend explaining the image, as supplementary files to ACS Paragon Plus with their revised manuscript.

If you wish to be considered only for the front cover which is published at no cost to the authors, and not a paid supplementary cover, please respond NO accordingly to the Supplementary Cover Art question in ACS Paragon Plus. For more information on the Supplementary Covers program, please see this webpage . All art submitted for consideration for a supplementary cover will also be considered for a front cover.

Web Enhanced Objects (WEO) | Approved Graphics Programs

The Web editions of ACS journals allow readers to view multimedia attachments such as animations and movies that complement understanding of the research being reported.

WEOs should be uploaded in ACS Paragon Plus with ‘Web Enhanced Object’ selected as the file designation. Consult the list of compatible WEO formats .

Approved Graphics Programs and Websites with Compliant Copyright Licenses for Commercial Use

To comply with copyright rules, the following websites and graphics programs have copyright license wording that is acceptable to allow commercial use of their images and created graphics.  It remains the responsibility of the author to obtain or purchase the correct copyright license agreement from the recommended vendors listed below.

• iStock (standard license)
• Frontier Media (authors own copyright and allow CC-BY license)
• Adobe (standard license)
• TurboSquid (royalty free license)
• Cinema4D (www.maxon.net)
• Freeimages.com
• Autodesk 3DS Max 2015 software
• Dreamstime.com
• Microsoft ClipArt
• Wordclouds.com
• openclipart.org (CC-BY - allows commercial use)
• Shutterstock (standard license)
• eLife Science (creative commons license)
• Megapixel (royalty free license)
• Protein Database
• Visual Molecular Dynamics (VMD)
• gettyimages.com
• QGIS software (uses GNU General Public licenses)
• "R" software (uses GNU General Public license)
• SVG Map v 1.5
• Avogadro Software
• 3D Sketchup Software
• Affinity Designer (v 1.7, Serif Europe Ltd.)
• dreamgenerator.com
• National Gallery of Art/NGA Images. With the launch of NGA Images, the National Gallery of Art in Washington, DC implements an open access policy for digital images of works of art that the Gallery believes to be in the public domain. Images of these works are now available free of charge for any use, commercial or non-commercial. Users do not need to contact the Gallery for authorization to use these images as long as credit is given to the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. The images are available for download at the NGA Images website ( images.nga.gov ).

1155 Sixteenth Street N.W. Washington, DC 20036

京ICP备13047075

Copyright © 2017 American Chemical Society

• Journals A–Z
• C&EN Archives
• ACS Legacy Archives

User Resources

• ACS Members
• Authors & Reviewers
• Website Demos
• Privacy Policy
• Mobile Site
• For Advertisers
• Institutional Sales
• Connect with ACS Publications

Environmental Educator Cover Letter Examples

Use these Environmental Educator cover letter examples to help you write a powerful cover letter that will separate you from the competition.

Environmental educators teach people about the environment and how they can protect it. They work in a variety of settings, including schools, museums, and nature preserves.

To get a job as an environmental educator, you need to write a cover letter that shows your passion for environmental education. Use these examples to write a cover letter that will help you get the job you want.

Formal/Professional Writing Style Example

With a strong background in environmental education and a passion for fostering a conscious connection between people and the natural world, I believe I am the ideal candidate for the Environmental Educator role within your organization.

I have over five years of experience in environmental education, working with diverse groups of people ranging from young children to adults. During my time as an Environmental Educator at XYZ Nature Center, I successfully developed and delivered engaging programs on a variety of topics, including conservation efforts, sustainability, and local ecosystems. My ability to create interactive experiences that effectively convey complex environmental concepts has been especially valuable in inspiring participants to take positive actions toward environmental stewardship.

Furthermore, I hold a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science, which has provided me with a solid foundation in ecological principles and understanding of environmental challenges faced today. My strong communication skills and commitment to staying up-to-date on current research have also enabled me to adapt my lesson plans to incorporate new findings and best practices.

In addition to my educational experience, I am proficient in utilizing various digital tools and social media platforms to expand public awareness about environmental topics. My ability to collaborate with other educators, community partners, and stakeholders has further enriched the impact of the programs I have led.

I am excited about the opportunity to join your organization and contribute to its mission of fostering a deeper connection and respect for our environment. I look forward to discussing how my experiences and qualifications can contribute to the success of your environmental education initiatives.

Thank you for considering my application.

[Your Name]

Entry-Level Writing Style Example

As a recent graduate of the University of Green Initiatives with a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Education, I am eager to apply my passion and knowledge in promoting environmental stewardship and fostering a deeper understanding of our natural world.

During my studies, I completed an internship with the EcoExplorers Association, where I developed and delivered engaging educational programs to children aged 6-12. This experience allowed me to utilize my creativity and strong communication skills while instilling an appreciation for the environment in young learners. I also gained experience working with diverse groups of children and adapting programs to meet the needs of various learning styles.

Additionally, I am an active volunteer with the Clean Earth Society, participating in regular cleanup events and assisting with community outreach initiatives. This involvement has sharpened my organizational and public speaking skills and fueled my motivation to educate others about the importance of environmental conservation.

I am excited about the opportunity to contribute my abilities and enthusiasm to your esteemed organization. I believe that my background in environmental education coupled with my genuine commitment to promoting sustainable practices make me an ideal candidate for this position.

Thank you for considering my application. I look forward to discussing my qualifications further and demonstrating how my passion for environmental education can benefit your organization.

Networking/Referral Writing Style Example

I was referred to this opportunity by my former professor and mentor, Dr. Jane Smith, who informed me of your organization’s commitment to inspiring and educating the public on environmental conservation and sustainability issues. As an avid proponent of environmental education and a strong believer in the power of community engagement, I am confident that my passion, skills, and background align perfectly with the objectives of your team.

During my time as a volunteer for the Green Earth Initiative, I successfully designed and implemented interactive educational workshops for youth and adults alike, focusing on topics such as waste reduction, recycling, and ecosystem conservation. Additionally, my degree in Environmental Science and strong background in public speaking have enabled me to effectively communicate complex environmental concepts to a wide range of audiences.

With my experience in developing engaging educational content and my dedication to environmental advocacy, I truly believe that I can make a significant impact in furthering your organization’s mission. I would be thrilled to contribute my wealth of knowledge and genuine enthusiasm as a member of your team.

Thank you for considering my application. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss how my experience and passion for environmental education can contribute to the continued success of your organization.

Sincerely, [Your Name]

Enthusiastic/Passionate Writing Style Example

As an avid advocate for environmental conservation and a lifelong learner, I am thrilled to have the opportunity to educate and inspire others to protect and appreciate our natural world. With a degree in Environmental Science and experience in both formal and informal learning environments, I am confident that my background and motivation make me the ideal candidate for this role.

During my time as an outdoor adventure guide, I found my true calling in fostering a love for the environment within the hearts of those I encountered. My ability to connect with diverse audiences, create engaging experiences, and cultivate meaningful relationships has fueled my dedication to environmental education. I have facilitated a wide range of programs, from leading hands-on activities for primary school students to organizing workshops for adults interested in sustainable living. I am particularly excited about your organization’s focus on connecting urban communities with their natural surroundings, as I believe that fostering such connections is vital for the future of our planet.

Not only do I possess the skills and experience necessary to excel in this position, but I also bring an unwavering commitment to conserving our environment that drives me wholeheartedly. I am eager to contribute my passion and expertise to your team, and I believe that, together, we can make a lasting impact on the lives of many, as well as the well-being of our planet.

Thank you for considering my application. I am looking forward to the opportunity to speak with you further about how I can enhance your organization’s mission and bring my enthusiasm for environmental education to life in this position.

Problem-Solving Writing Style Example

As a passionate advocate for environmental sustainability and education, I have closely followed your work in promoting eco-conscious habits and inspiring local communities to adopt greener lifestyles. I have noticed that while your organization has made significant strides in advocating for the environment, there is still a need to expand your reach and raise awareness about your initiatives in a more efficient and effective way.

With a deep understanding of the problems we face today due to climate change, pollution, and resource depletion, I believe that my background in environmental sciences and experiences in teaching and public speaking make me an ideal candidate to address these challenges for your organization.

During my tenure as an environmental educator in my previous role, I successfully implemented new curricula and extracurricular activities, resulting in increased student engagement and knowledge retention. I also have proven abilities in developing educational materials, utilizing social media to disseminate information, and organizing community events to promote sustainability.

In addition to education, I hold certifications in environmental management and have conducted workshops and training programs for various organizations. These experiences have enabled me to hone my communication and leadership skills, as well as my ability to cater to diverse audiences.

As your Environmental Educator, I plan to tackle the challenge of raising awareness about your initiatives by leveraging social media platforms, developing gripping educational content, and collaborating with local influencers to expand your network. I am confident that these strategies will drive interest and participation in your programs and further your organization’s goal of creating a more sustainable future for our planet.

Thank you for considering my application. I am eager to contribute to your organization’s success and discuss my qualifications further in a personal interview.

Storytelling/Narrative Writing Style Example

As I strolled down the sunlit path of my local park last summer, I couldn’t help but notice the group of children gathered around a guide, their eyes wide with fascination as they learned about the various plants and animals inhabiting the park. It was in that moment that I realized that my career in environmental education was not just a passion, but a calling.

As an experienced educator with a background in biology, I have dedicated the past five years to teaching and inspiring students to become environmental stewards. My unique approach to teaching combines hands-on learning with storytelling, bringing the wonders of nature to life for my students. I have had the pleasure of leading field trips, organizing community clean-up events, and even creating an after-school ecology club, all driven by my commitment to fostering a love for our planet in the hearts of young people.

My educational background includes a Bachelor’s degree in Environmental Science, as well as a Master’s degree in Education. This foundation has provided me with the knowledge and skills necessary to develop engaging and effective environmental curriculum, as well as the ability to adapt my teaching style to suit the needs of diverse learners.

I am confident that my passion for environmental education, combined with my experience and dedication to fostering a love for nature in others, make me an ideal candidate for the Environmental Educator position at your organization. I am eager to contribute my skills and enthusiasm to your team and to help shape the next generation of environmentally conscious citizens.

Thank you for considering my application. I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you further about how my experience and passion align with your organization’s mission.

Auto Body Estimator Cover Letter Examples

Intervention specialist cover letter examples, you may also be interested in..., grants manager cover letter examples & writing tips, hr director cover letter examples & writing tips, logistics supervisor cover letter examples, assistant district attorney cover letter examples.

Resume Builder

• Resume Experts
• Search Jobs
• Search for Talent
• Employer Branding
• Outplacement

Intern, Environmental Cover Letter

15 intern, environmental cover letter templates.

How to Write the Intern, Environmental Cover Letter

I submit this application to express my sincere interest in the intern, environmental position.

In my previous role, I was responsible for expertise and advice for the implementation and maintenance of the site’s QHSE management system (e.g., ISO 9001/14001/18001);.

I reviewed the requirements of the job opening and I believe my candidacy is an excellent fit for this position. Some of the key requirements that I have extensive experience with include:

• Willingness to travel, often for extended periods of time (1 to 2 weeks)
• CPR/First Aid and/or SCUBA certified
• An interest in ecology and passion for the outdoors
• Occasional lifting up to 25 lbs/Sitting, working at desk/personal computoer for extended periods of time/Primary work enviromnent is professional corporate office
• Familiar with environmental regulations including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, TASCA, EPCRA, Waste Management programs
• An understanding of the oil and gas or other industrial industries
• Capable of data entry using spreadsheet, word processing and standard office software
• Familiarity with GIS software

Thank you for considering me to become a member of your team.

Shae Walter

• Microsoft Word (.docx) .DOCX
• PDF Document (.pdf) .PDF
• Image File (.png) .PNG

Responsibilities for Intern, Environmental Cover Letter

Intern, environmental responsible for management assistance in maintaining ISO 14001 & ISO 18001 certified status and setting goals and targets for all EHS programs having significant impact.

Intern, Environmental Examples

Example of intern, environmental cover letter.

In response to your job posting for intern, environmental, I am including this letter and my resume for your review.

In the previous role, I was responsible for need based analytical data in an excel cross tab format to the requestor from Honeywell Databases.

Please consider my qualifications and experience:

• An individual with strong communication skills able to communicate effectively with a diverse spectrum of employees ranging from field operators to senior management
• Proficient utilizing MS Office Suites
• A Junior, Senior or Graduate level university student
• Majoring in either Chemical Engineering, Environmental Engineering or Civil
• Assists the Civil Engineering department with technical duties and projects as assigned
• Learn profession as duties are performed
• Concentration in an Environmental discipline preferred
• Enrolled in a Environmental Science or related program

Thank you in advance for reviewing my candidacy for this position.

Marion Lesch

I am excited to be applying for the position of intern, environmental. Please accept this letter and the attached resume as my interest in this position.

Previously, I was responsible for support to sustain the Environmental Administration System based on the ISO 14001: 2015 standard, including: the development, control of implementation and continuous improvement.

My experience is an excellent fit for the list of requirements in this job:

• Firm grasp on fundamental scientific concepts preferred
• Pursuing a Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science, Biology, Ecology, Environmental Studies, Forestry, Wildlife Biology, or related field
• Assuring compliance with site environmental permits
• Review/augment/develop training programs for employees to assist in compliance
• The willingness to work in an industrial environment (ie
• To be able to work effectively in both an individual and team environment
• The willingness to learn and remain flexible in various work assignments
• Value safe work practices and support an accident free work place

Ryan Satterfield

Previously, I was responsible for support with projects related to reduce environmental footprint/CO2 and Management System (ISO 14001:2015).

• Experience in an open pit mine (operationally) would be considered a significant asset
• Experience with software suite would be considered an asset
• Actively enrolled in a Civil / Environmental / Engineering program
• Assist with various reporting and inspection requirements
• Assist with tours, audits, and other community outreach programs
• Develope and update modeling spreadsheets
• Attend and participate in regulatory agency meetings and inspections
• Assist with any social media products

Thank you for taking your time to review my application.

Tatum Altenwerth

In the previous role, I was responsible for a monthly report to immediate supervisor regarding the site’s health and safety compliance to OSHA PSM ISO14001, OHSAS 18001, and sites goals and objectives.

Please consider my experience and qualifications for this position:

• Strong portfolio showing a range of skills
• An interest and understanding of various space planning methodologies
• Some knowledge of furnishings and equipment
• Knowledge of the range of design principles and aesthetics
• Confident in communication with a high level of verbal and written English
• Excellent communication (both written and verbal), mathematical, and organizational skills
• Familiarity with internet-based financial research resources for corporate information, SEC filings, competitive data and other data sources
• Good time management and decision-making skills

I really appreciate you taking the time to review my application for the position of intern, environmental.

Emerson Hansen

In the previous role, I was responsible for support to the Environmental Management System based on the ISO 14001: 2015 standard, including: development, control of the implementation and continuous improvement of said system.

• The intern will assist department employees in various engineering, chemical and environmental projects and duties
• Fluency with Microsoft Office software (Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access, ) is mandatory
• Have a grade average of "B" or higher
• Have an above average attendance record
• Rising Junior or Senior currently enrolled in College
• Chemical Engineering, Chemistry, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Science, BioSystems Engineering or similar major
• Project surveys Habitat, protected species
• UK driving license (preferable but not essential)

Thank you in advance for taking the time to read my cover letter and to review my resume.

River Block

Related Cover Letters

Create a Resume in Minutes with Professional Resume Templates

Create a Cover Letter and Resume in Minutes with Professional Templates

Create a resume and cover letter in minutes cover letter copied to your clipboard.