case presentation in conference

We use essential cookies to make Venngage work. By clicking “Accept All Cookies”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Manage Cookies

Cookies and similar technologies collect certain information about how you’re using our website. Some of them are essential, and without them you wouldn’t be able to use Venngage. But others are optional, and you get to choose whether we use them or not.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

These cookies are always on, as they’re essential for making Venngage work, and making it safe. Without these cookies, services you’ve asked for can’t be provided.

Show cookie providers

• Google Login

Functionality Cookies

These cookies help us provide enhanced functionality and personalisation, and remember your settings. They may be set by us or by third party providers.

Performance Cookies

These cookies help us analyze how many people are using Venngage, where they come from and how they're using it. If you opt out of these cookies, we can’t get feedback to make Venngage better for you and all our users.

• Google Analytics

Targeting Cookies

These cookies are set by our advertising partners to track your activity and show you relevant Venngage ads on other sites as you browse the internet.

• Google Tag Manager
• Infographics
• Daily Infographics
• Template Lists
• Graphic Design
• Graphs and Charts
• Data Visualization
• Human Resources
• Beginner Guides

Blog Business

How to Present a Case Study like a Pro (With Examples)

By Danesh Ramuthi , Sep 07, 2023

Okay, let’s get real: case studies can be kinda snooze-worthy. But guess what? They don’t have to be!

In this article, I will cover every element that transforms a mere report into a compelling case study, from selecting the right metrics to using persuasive narrative techniques.

And if you’re feeling a little lost, don’t worry! There are cool tools like Venngage’s Case Study Creator to help you whip up something awesome, even if you’re short on time. Plus, the pre-designed case study templates are like instant polish because let’s be honest, everyone loves a shortcut.

Click to jump ahead: 

What is a case study presentation?

What is the purpose of presenting a case study, how to structure a case study presentation, how long should a case study presentation be, 5 case study presentation examples with templates, 6 tips for delivering an effective case study presentation, 5 common mistakes to avoid in a case study presentation, how to present a case study faqs.

A case study presentation involves a comprehensive examination of a specific subject, which could range from an individual, group, location, event, organization or phenomenon.

They’re like puzzles you get to solve with the audience, all while making you think outside the box.

Unlike a basic report or whitepaper, the purpose of a case study presentation is to stimulate critical thinking among the viewers. 

The primary objective of a case study is to provide an extensive and profound comprehension of the chosen topic. You don’t just throw numbers at your audience. You use examples and real-life cases to make you think and see things from different angles.

The primary purpose of presenting a case study is to offer a comprehensive, evidence-based argument that informs, persuades and engages your audience.

Here’s the juicy part: presenting that case study can be your secret weapon. Whether you’re pitching a groundbreaking idea to a room full of suits or trying to impress your professor with your A-game, a well-crafted case study can be the magic dust that sprinkles brilliance over your words.

Think of it like digging into a puzzle you can’t quite crack . A case study lets you explore every piece, turn it over and see how it fits together. This close-up look helps you understand the whole picture, not just a blurry snapshot.

It’s also your chance to showcase how you analyze things, step by step, until you reach a conclusion. It’s all about being open and honest about how you got there.

Besides, presenting a case study gives you an opportunity to connect data and real-world scenarios in a compelling narrative. It helps to make your argument more relatable and accessible, increasing its impact on your audience.

One of the contexts where case studies can be very helpful is during the job interview. In some job interviews, you as candidates may be asked to present a case study as part of the selection process.

Having a case study presentation prepared allows the candidate to demonstrate their ability to understand complex issues, formulate strategies and communicate their ideas effectively.

The way you present a case study can make all the difference in how it’s received. A well-structured presentation not only holds the attention of your audience but also ensures that your key points are communicated clearly and effectively.

In this section, let’s go through the key steps that’ll help you structure your case study presentation for maximum impact.

Let’s get into it. 

Open with an introductory overview 

Start by introducing the subject of your case study and its relevance. Explain why this case study is important and who would benefit from the insights gained. This is your opportunity to grab your audience’s attention.

Explain the problem in question

Dive into the problem or challenge that the case study focuses on. Provide enough background information for the audience to understand the issue. If possible, quantify the problem using data or metrics to show the magnitude or severity.

Detail the solutions to solve the problem

After outlining the problem, describe the steps taken to find a solution. This could include the methodology, any experiments or tests performed and the options that were considered. Make sure to elaborate on why the final solution was chosen over the others.

Key stakeholders Involved

Talk about the individuals, groups or organizations that were directly impacted by or involved in the problem and its solution. 

Stakeholders may experience a range of outcomes—some may benefit, while others could face setbacks.

For example, in a business transformation case study, employees could face job relocations or changes in work culture, while shareholders might be looking at potential gains or losses.

Discuss the key results & outcomes

Discuss the results of implementing the solution. Use data and metrics to back up your statements. Did the solution meet its objectives? What impact did it have on the stakeholders? Be honest about any setbacks or areas for improvement as well.

Include visuals to support your analysis

Visual aids can be incredibly effective in helping your audience grasp complex issues. Utilize charts, graphs, images or video clips to supplement your points. Make sure to explain each visual and how it contributes to your overall argument.

Pie charts illustrate the proportion of different components within a whole, useful for visualizing market share, budget allocation or user demographics.

This is particularly useful especially if you’re displaying survey results in your case study presentation.

Stacked charts on the other hand are perfect for visualizing composition and trends. This is great for analyzing things like customer demographics, product breakdowns or budget allocation in your case study.

Consider this example of a stacked bar chart template. It provides a straightforward summary of the top-selling cake flavors across various locations, offering a quick and comprehensive view of the data.

Not the chart you’re looking for? Browse Venngage’s gallery of chart templates to find the perfect one that’ll captivate your audience and level up your data storytelling.

Recommendations and next steps

Wrap up by providing recommendations based on the case study findings. Outline the next steps that stakeholders should take to either expand on the success of the project or address any remaining challenges.

Acknowledgments and references

Thank the people who contributed to the case study and helped in the problem-solving process. Cite any external resources, reports or data sets that contributed to your analysis.

Feedback & Q&A session

Open the floor for questions and feedback from your audience. This allows for further discussion and can provide additional insights that may not have been considered previously.

Closing remarks

Conclude the presentation by summarizing the key points and emphasizing the takeaways. Thank your audience for their time and participation and express your willingness to engage in further discussions or collaborations on the subject.

Well, the length of a case study presentation can vary depending on the complexity of the topic and the needs of your audience. However, a typical business or academic presentation often lasts between 15 to 30 minutes. 

This time frame usually allows for a thorough explanation of the case while maintaining audience engagement. However, always consider leaving a few minutes at the end for a Q&A session to address any questions or clarify points made during the presentation.

When it comes to presenting a compelling case study, having a well-structured template can be a game-changer. 

It helps you organize your thoughts, data and findings in a coherent and visually pleasing manner. 

Not all case studies are created equal and different scenarios require distinct approaches for maximum impact. 

To save you time and effort, I have curated a list of 5 versatile case study presentation templates, each designed for specific needs and audiences. 

Here are some best case study presentation examples that showcase effective strategies for engaging your audience and conveying complex information clearly.

1 . Lab report case study template

Ever feel like your research gets lost in a world of endless numbers and jargon? Lab case studies are your way out!

Think of it as building a bridge between your cool experiment and everyone else. It’s more than just reporting results – it’s explaining the “why” and “how” in a way that grabs attention and makes sense.

This lap report template acts as a blueprint for your report, guiding you through each essential section (introduction, methods, results, etc.) in a logical order.

Want to present your research like a pro? Browse our research presentation template gallery for creative inspiration!

2. Product case study template

It’s time you ditch those boring slideshows and bullet points because I’ve got a better way to win over clients: product case study templates.

Instead of just listing features and benefits, you get to create a clear and concise story that shows potential clients exactly what your product can do for them. It’s like painting a picture they can easily visualize, helping them understand the value your product brings to the table.

Grab the template below, fill in the details, and watch as your product’s impact comes to life!

3. Content marketing case study template

In digital marketing, showcasing your accomplishments is as vital as achieving them. 

A well-crafted case study not only acts as a testament to your successes but can also serve as an instructional tool for others. 

With this coral content marketing case study template—a perfect blend of vibrant design and structured documentation, you can narrate your marketing triumphs effectively.

4. Case study psychology template

Understanding how people tick is one of psychology’s biggest quests and case studies are like magnifying glasses for the mind. They offer in-depth looks at real-life behaviors, emotions and thought processes, revealing fascinating insights into what makes us human.

Writing a top-notch case study, though, can be a challenge. It requires careful organization, clear presentation and meticulous attention to detail. That’s where a good case study psychology template comes in handy.

Think of it as a helpful guide, taking care of formatting and structure while you focus on the juicy content. No more wrestling with layouts or margins – just pour your research magic into crafting a compelling narrative.

5. Lead generation case study template

Lead generation can be a real head-scratcher. But here’s a little help: a lead generation case study.

Think of it like a friendly handshake and a confident resume all rolled into one. It’s your chance to showcase your expertise, share real-world successes and offer valuable insights. Potential clients get to see your track record, understand your approach and decide if you’re the right fit.

No need to start from scratch, though. This lead generation case study template guides you step-by-step through crafting a clear, compelling narrative that highlights your wins and offers actionable tips for others. Fill in the gaps with your specific data and strategies, and voilà! You’ve got a powerful tool to attract new customers.

Related: 15+ Professional Case Study Examples [Design Tips + Templates]

So, you’ve spent hours crafting the perfect case study and are now tasked with presenting it. Crafting the case study is only half the battle; delivering it effectively is equally important. 

Whether you’re facing a room of executives, academics or potential clients, how you present your findings can make a significant difference in how your work is received. 

Forget boring reports and snooze-inducing presentations! Let’s make your case study sing. Here are some key pointers to turn information into an engaging and persuasive performance:

• Know your audience : Tailor your presentation to the knowledge level and interests of your audience. Remember to use language and examples that resonate with them.
• Rehearse : Rehearsing your case study presentation is the key to a smooth delivery and for ensuring that you stay within the allotted time. Practice helps you fine-tune your pacing, hone your speaking skills with good word pronunciations and become comfortable with the material, leading to a more confident, conversational and effective presentation.
• Start strong : Open with a compelling introduction that grabs your audience’s attention. You might want to use an interesting statistic, a provocative question or a brief story that sets the stage for your case study.
• Be clear and concise : Avoid jargon and overly complex sentences. Get to the point quickly and stay focused on your objectives.
• Use visual aids : Incorporate slides with graphics, charts or videos to supplement your verbal presentation. Make sure they are easy to read and understand.
• Tell a story : Use storytelling techniques to make the case study more engaging. A well-told narrative can help you make complex data more relatable and easier to digest.

Ditching the dry reports and slide decks? Venngage’s case study templates let you wow customers with your solutions and gain insights to improve your business plan. Pre-built templates, visual magic and customer captivation – all just a click away. Go tell your story and watch them say “wow!”

Nailed your case study, but want to make your presentation even stronger? Avoid these common mistakes to ensure your audience gets the most out of it:

Overloading with information

A case study is not an encyclopedia. Overloading your presentation with excessive data, text or jargon can make it cumbersome and difficult for the audience to digest the key points. Stick to what’s essential and impactful. Need help making your data clear and impactful? Our data presentation templates can help! Find clear and engaging visuals to showcase your findings.

Lack of structure

Jumping haphazardly between points or topics can confuse your audience. A well-structured presentation, with a logical flow from introduction to conclusion, is crucial for effective communication.

Ignoring the audience

Different audiences have different needs and levels of understanding. Failing to adapt your presentation to your audience can result in a disconnect and a less impactful presentation.

Poor visual elements

While content is king, poor design or lack of visual elements can make your case study dull or hard to follow. Make sure you use high-quality images, graphs and other visual aids to support your narrative.

Not focusing on results

A case study aims to showcase a problem and its solution, but what most people care about are the results. Failing to highlight or adequately explain the outcomes can make your presentation fall flat.

How to start a case study presentation?

Starting a case study presentation effectively involves a few key steps:

• Grab attention : Open with a hook—an intriguing statistic, a provocative question or a compelling visual—to engage your audience from the get-go.
• Set the stage : Briefly introduce the subject, context and relevance of the case study to give your audience an idea of what to expect.
• Outline objectives : Clearly state what the case study aims to achieve. Are you solving a problem, proving a point or showcasing a success?
• Agenda : Give a quick outline of the key sections or topics you’ll cover to help the audience follow along.
• Set expectations : Let your audience know what you want them to take away from the presentation, whether it’s knowledge, inspiration or a call to action.

How to present a case study on PowerPoint and on Google Slides?

Presenting a case study on PowerPoint and Google Slides involves a structured approach for clarity and impact using presentation slides :

• Title slide : Start with a title slide that includes the name of the case study, your name and any relevant institutional affiliations.
• Introduction : Follow with a slide that outlines the problem or situation your case study addresses. Include a hook to engage the audience.
• Objectives : Clearly state the goals of the case study in a dedicated slide.
• Findings : Use charts, graphs and bullet points to present your findings succinctly.
• Analysis : Discuss what the findings mean, drawing on supporting data or secondary research as necessary.
• Conclusion : Summarize key takeaways and results.
• Q&A : End with a slide inviting questions from the audience.

What’s the role of analysis in a case study presentation?

The role of analysis in a case study presentation is to interpret the data and findings, providing context and meaning to them. 

It helps your audience understand the implications of the case study, connects the dots between the problem and the solution and may offer recommendations for future action.

Is it important to include real data and results in the presentation?

Yes, including real data and results in a case study presentation is crucial to show experience,  credibility and impact. Authentic data lends weight to your findings and conclusions, enabling the audience to trust your analysis and take your recommendations more seriously

How do I conclude a case study presentation effectively?

To conclude a case study presentation effectively, summarize the key findings, insights and recommendations in a clear and concise manner. 

End with a strong call-to-action or a thought-provoking question to leave a lasting impression on your audience.

What’s the best way to showcase data in a case study presentation ?

The best way to showcase data in a case study presentation is through visual aids like charts, graphs and infographics which make complex information easily digestible, engaging and creative. 

Don’t just report results, visualize them! This template for example lets you transform your social media case study into a captivating infographic that sparks conversation.

Choose the type of visual that best represents the data you’re showing; for example, use bar charts for comparisons or pie charts for parts of a whole. 

Ensure that the visuals are high-quality and clearly labeled, so the audience can quickly grasp the key points. 

Keep the design consistent and simple, avoiding clutter or overly complex visuals that could distract from the message.

Choose a template that perfectly suits your case study where you can utilize different visual aids for maximum impact. 

Need more inspiration on how to turn numbers into impact with the help of infographics? Our ready-to-use infographic templates take the guesswork out of creating visual impact for your case studies with just a few clicks.

Related: 10+ Case Study Infographic Templates That Convert

Congrats on mastering the art of compelling case study presentations! This guide has equipped you with all the essentials, from structure and nuances to avoiding common pitfalls. You’re ready to impress any audience, whether in the boardroom, the classroom or beyond.

And remember, you’re not alone in this journey. Venngage’s Case Study Creator is your trusty companion, ready to elevate your presentations from ordinary to extraordinary. So, let your confidence shine, leverage your newly acquired skills and prepare to deliver presentations that truly resonate.

Go forth and make a lasting impact!

How To Present A Great Case Conference

During residency, you must choose a case to  present  to your colleagues or  faculty  in a formal setting. Many of you will be flying by the seat of your pants without instruction on how to do so. So, how do you select which case from the past week, month, or year? What features make up an excellent case for discussion at a case conference? And what exactly should you discuss during the presentation? These questions and more I will answer as we discuss how to present a great case conference.

Which Case Should I Choose?

On any given day, you will encounter multiple cases that have the potential to become excellent cases for a conference. Some studies may have confounded you or your faculty. Other times, your attending may love a case for some reason. Then, your attending may want a classic case of a particular disease entity. In these situations, how do you pick among all the possibilities?

Typically, I look for cases on a particular theme I want to address. Even better, the study may have addressed several points that created interesting discussions or controversies. Then, I check to see if the case runs through multiple imaging modalities. What do I mean by that? The best cases show a particular diagnosis in many different ways. For instance, say you are interested in showing lung cancers at this specific time. So, a perfect case would be a lung nodule on plain film that the hilum may partially hide. Then in the same study, you have a CT scan showing the mass abutting the hilum with subtle adenopathy within the mediastinum. And perhaps you also have a PET-CT scan demonstrating additional hypermetabolic nodes present on the scan and a hidden osseous hypermetabolic lesion in a vertebral body. Cases that show a finding or related findings in multiple modalities reinforce the subject matter well.

How To Prepare For The Discussion

So, you’ve found this extraordinary case. First, make sure that you can describe the findings appropriately. If you have less experience, you may want to run it by a faculty member or senior resident to confirm that you are conveying the description correctly.

Next, like any good physician, you should read on the topics extensively. In the case I described above, you need to read about lung cancer diagnosis, staging, and treatment basics. Additionally, you should learn how the radiological diagnosis affects the management of the patient. For instance, how does the presence of hypermetabolic nodes and a vertebral body lesion affect the outcome of the patient? Ultimately, you want the listeners to perceive you as the expert on this topic for the presentation.

Moreover, you want to be able to answer almost any question thrown at you. In other words, go to town! By reviewing the topic extensively, in essence, you are not only going to improve the discussion and your ability to answer questions, but also you are studying for the boards at the same time.

What Should You Discuss At The Case Conference?

The lung nodule example above lends itself well to discussing the findings on each of the modalities, the differential diagnosis, the final diagnoses, and the pathophysiology behind the final diagnoses. Furthermore, the topic will lead to basic management principles like how vertebral lesions change treatment.

I would first review the findings similar to the standard logical approach of taking cases. And then, I would discuss the differential diagnosis and the management in that order, just as if you were taking a case during a faculty presentation. If you want to make the case conference a bit more spicy and controversial, you can discuss whether the case met the ACR appropriateness criteria for the symptoms given. Usually, you will get multiple opinions from different attendings if the ordering physician approaches the workup correctly. It would help if you strived to guide the discussion to ensure it follows an appropriate path. With a case like this, the debate can ensue for a while!

Case Conference As A Tool For Learning

You primarily need to remember the end goal whenever you create a conference. In a typical case conference setting, the presenter should want the audience to learn a few essential points by the end of the discussion. Too much information will overload the learner. Likewise, too little information may not reinforce the concepts. So, try to strike a balance after discussing the specific case.

In the end, you should view case conferences as a tool for learning, not as a burden. They are opportunities to learn a topic in great detail and the art of presenting. Moreover, each presentation you perform builds upon the knowledge that you have. I still remember the case conferences I created when I was a resident. Just like I did, if you prepared appropriately, you will use the strategies and information you learned from your case conferences when you become a faculty member yourself many years from now!

About Barry Julius

My name is Barry Julius, MD and I am the founder and chief editor of the website. I have been practicing as the associate radiology residency director at Saint Barnabas Medical Center since 2009. Through many years of on-the-job training, I have gained significant insight regarding all things radiology resident related. Over this time, I have noticed a significant lack of organized online resources for many common radiology residency issues unrelated to the typical medical education and scientific side of radiology. Therefore, I have created a credible, reliable, and informative site that is dedicated to radiology residents, students, program directors, and physicians interested in other radiology residency topics. The emphasis is on day-to-day residency information that is not covered on most educational sites. Topics will include surviving a radiology residency, radiology residency learning materials/books, financial tips, jobs, among other subjects that residents and other visitors may be afraid to ask or unable to find out.

You also might be interested in

Should First Year Residents Give Interdisciplinary Conferences?

Interdisciplinary meetings at many hospitals tend to be working clinical[...]

The Program Director Interview Welcome Presentation: More Than Meets The Eye?

    As part of the radiology residency interview trail,[...]

Passed The Radexam Precall Quiz? You May Still Not Be Ready To Take Call!

Ask ten different program directors on how they decide if[...]

Kindle Version

Paperback version.

Latest Posts

• Perception Of The General Public Of Radiologists Versus Reality
• What Character Traits Make A Great Lead Radiology Technologist?
• Good Radiologists Are Like Car Salespeople- Make Them An Offer They Can’t Refuse!
• How Much Detailed Description Belongs In Your Report As A Resident?
• What To Do With A Large Windfall During Residency

Subscribe To Our Newsletter And Get A Free Copy Of The New Attending Physician Guidebook!

Join our mailing list for free to receive weekly articles and advice on how to succeed in radiology residency, the best ways to apply, how to have a successful radiology career, and more. Also, get a copy of the free ebook Called The New Attending Physician Guidebook: How To Search For The Right Job And What To Do Once You Start. 

You have Successfully Subscribed!

• Applicant Advice
• Ask The Residency Director
• Foreign Resident Issues
• Medical School Issues
• Miscellaneous
• Resident Advice
• Resident Career
• Resident Exercise
• Resident financial
• Resident Surveys
• Resident Work Issues
• Sponsored Posts
• Uncategorized

© 2024 — radsresident.com. All rights reserved.

Blog Categories

Type and press Enter to search

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

Join our mailing list for free to receive weekly articles and advice on how to succeed in radiology residency, the best ways to apply, how to have a successful radiology career, and more. Also, get a copy of the free ebook Called The New Attending Physician Guidebook: How To Search For The Right Job And What To Do Once You Start.

Pin It on Pinterest

Home Blog Business Conference Presentation Slides: A Guide for Success

Conference Presentation Slides: A Guide for Success

In our experience, a common error when preparing a conference presentation is using designs that heavily rely on bullet points and massive chunks of text. A potential reason behind this slide design mistake is aiming to include as much information as possible in just one slide. In the end, slides become a sort of teleprompter for the speaker, and the audience recalls boredom instead of an informative experience.

As part of our mission to help presenters deliver their message effectively, we have summarized what makes a good conference presentation slide, as well as tips on how to design a successful conference slide.

Table of Contents

What is a conference presentation

Common mistakes presenters make when creating conference presentation slides, how can a well-crafted conference presentation help your professional life, how to start a conference presentation, how to end a conference presentation, tailoring your message to different audiences, visualizing data effectively, engaging with your audience, designing for impact, mastering slide transitions and animation, handling time constraints, incorporating multimedia elements, post-presentation engagement, crisis management during presentations, sustainability and green presentations, measuring presentation success, 13 tips to create stellar conference presentations, final thoughts.

The Britannica Dictionary defines conferences as 

A formal meeting in which many people gather in order to talk about ideas or problems related to a particular topic (such as medicine or business), usually for several days.

We can then define conference presentations as the combination of a speaker, a slide deck , and the required hardware to introduce an idea or topic in a conference setting. Some characteristics differentiate conference presentations from other formats.

Time-restricted

Conference presentations are bounded by a 15-30 minute time limit, which the event’s moderators establish. These restrictions are applied to allow a crowded agenda to be met on time, and it is common to count with over 10 speakers on the same day.

To that time limit, we have to add the time required for switching between speakers, which implies loading a new slide deck to the streaming platform, microphone testing, lighting effects, etc. Say it is around 10-15 minutes extra, so depending on the number of speakers per day during the event, the time available to deliver a presentation, plus the questions & answers time.

Delivery format

Conferences can be delivered in live event format or via webinars. Since this article is mainly intended to live event conferences, we will only mention that the requirements for webinars are as follows:

• Voice-over or, best, speaker layover the presentation slides so the speaker interacts with the audience.
• Quality graphics.
• Not abusing the amount of information to introduce per slide.

On the other hand, live event conferences will differ depending on the category under which they fall. Academic conferences have a structure in which there’s a previous poster session; then speakers start delivering their talks, then after 4-5 speakers, we have a coffee break. Those pauses help the AV crew to check the equipment, and they also become an opportunity for researchers to expand their network contacts. 

Business conferences are usually more dynamic. Some presenters opt not to use slide decks, giving a powerful speech instead, as they feel much more comfortable that way. Other speakers at business conferences adopt videos to summarize their ideas and then proceed to speak.

Overall, the format guidelines are sent to speakers before the event. Adapt your presentation style to meet the requirements of moderators so you can maximize the effect of your message.

The audience

Unlike other presentation settings, conferences gather a knowledgeable audience on the discussed topics. It is imperative to consider this, as tone, delivery format, information to include, and more depend on this sole factor. Moreover, the audience will participate in your presentation at the last minute, as it is a common practice to hold a Q&A session. 

Mistake #1 – Massive chunks of text

Do you intend your audience to read your slides instead of being seduced by your presentation? Presenters often add large amounts of text to each slide since they need help deciding which data to exclude. Another excuse for this practice is so the audience remembers the content exposed.

Research indicates images are much better retained than words, a phenomenon known as the Picture Superiority Effect ; therefore, opt to avoid this tendency and work into creating compelling graphics.

Mistake #2 – Not creating contrast between data and graphics

Have you tried to read a slide from 4 rows behind the presenter and not get a single number? This can happen if the presenter is not careful to work with the appropriate contrast between the color of the typeface and the background. Particularly if serif fonts are used.

Use online tools such as WebAIM’s Contrast Checker to make your slides legible for your audience. Creating an overlay with a white or black transparent tint can also help when you place text above images.

Mistake #3 – Not rehearsing the presentation

This is a sin in conference presentations, as when you don’t practice the content you intend to deliver, you don’t have a measure of how much time it is actually going to take. 

PowerPoint’s rehearse timing feature can help a great deal, as you can record yourself practising the presentation and observe areas for improvement. Remember, conference presentations are time-limited , don’t disrespect fellow speakers by overlapping their scheduled slot or, worse, have moderators trim your presentation after several warnings.

Mistake #4 – Lacking hierarchy for the presented content

Looking at a slide and not knowing where the main point is discouraging for the audience, especially if you introduce several pieces of content under the same slide. Instead, opt to create a hierarchy that comprehends both text and images. It helps to arrange the content according to your narrative, and we’ll see more on this later on.

Consider your conference presentation as your introduction card in the professional world. Maybe you have a broad network of colleagues, but be certain there are plenty of people out there that have yet to learn about who you are and the work you produce.

Conferences help businesspeople and academics alike to introduce the results of months of research on a specific topic in front of a knowledgeable audience. It is different from a product launch as you don’t need to present a “completed product” but rather your views or advances, in other words, your contribution with valuable insights to the field.

Putting dedication into your conference presentation, from the slide deck design to presentation skills , is definitely worth the effort. The audience can get valuable references from the quality of work you are able to produce, often leading to potential partnerships. In business conferences, securing an investor deal can happen after a powerful presentation that drives the audience to perceive your work as the very best thing that’s about to be launched. It is all about how your body language reflects your intent, how well-explained the concepts are, and the emotional impact you can drive from it.

There are multiple ways on how to start a presentation for a conference, but overall, we can recap a good approach as follows.

Present a fact

Nothing grabs the interest of an audience quicker than introducing an interesting fact during the first 30 seconds of your presentation. The said fact has to be pivotal to the content your conference presentation will discuss later on, but as an ice-breaker, it is a strategy worth applying from time to time.

Ask a question

The main point when starting a conference presentation is to make an impact on the audience. We cannot think of a better way to engage with the audience than to ask them a question relevant to your work or research. It grabs the viewer’s interest for the potential feedback you shall give to those answers received.

Use powerful graphics

The value of visual presentations cannot be neglected in conferences. Sometimes an image makes a bigger impact than a lengthy speech, hence why you should consider starting your conference presentation with a photo or visual element that speaks for itself.

For more tips and insights on how to start a presentation , we invite you to check this article.

Just as important as starting the presentation, the closure you give to your conference presentation matters a lot. This is the opportunity in which you can add your personal experience on the topic and reflect upon it with the audience or smoothly transition between the presentation and your Q&A session.

Below are some quick tips on how to end a presentation for a conference event.

End the presentation with a quote

Give your audience something to ruminate about with the help of a quote tailored to the topic you were discussing. There are plenty of resources for finding suitable quotes, and a great method for this is to design your penultimate slide with an image or black background plus a quote. Follow this with a final “thank you” slide.

Consider a video

If we say a video whose length is shorter than 1 minute, this is a fantastic resource to summarize the intent of your conference presentation. 

If you get the two-minute warning and you feel far off from finishing your presentation, first, don’t fret. Try to give a good closure when presenting in a conference without rushing information, as the audience wouldn’t get any concept clear that way. Mention that the information you presented will be available for further reading at the event’s platform site or your company’s digital business card , and proceed to your closure phase for the presentation.

It is better to miss some of the components of the conference than to get kicked out after several warnings for exceeding the allotted time.

Tailoring your conference presentation to suit your audience is crucial to delivering an impactful talk. Different audiences have varying levels of expertise, interests, and expectations. By customizing your content, tone, and examples, you can enhance the relevance and engagement of your presentation.

Understanding Audience Backgrounds and Expectations

Before crafting your presentation, research your audience’s backgrounds and interests. Are they professionals in your field, students, or a mix of both? Are they familiar with the topic, or must you provide more context? Understanding these factors will help you pitch your content correctly and avoid overwhelming or boring your audience.

Adapting Language and Tone for Relevance

Use language that resonates with your audience. Avoid jargon or technical terms that might confuse those unfamiliar with your field. Conversely, don’t oversimplify if your audience consists of experts. Adjust your tone to match the event’s formality and your listeners’ preferences.

Customizing Examples and Case Studies

Incorporate case studies, examples, and anecdotes that your audience can relate to. If you’re speaking to professionals, use real-world scenarios from their industry. For a more general audience, choose examples that are universally relatable. This personal touch makes your content relatable and memorable.

Effectively presenting data is essential for conveying complex information to your audience. Visualizations can help simplify intricate concepts and make your points more digestible.

Choosing the Right Data Representation

Select the appropriate type of graph or chart to illustrate your data. Bar graphs, pie charts, line charts, and scatter plots each serve specific purposes. Choose the one that best supports your message and ensures clarity.

Designing Graphs and Charts for Clarity

Ensure your graphs and charts are easily read. Use clear labels, appropriate color contrasts, and consistent scales. Avoid clutter and simplify the design to highlight the most important data points.

Incorporating Annotations and Explanations

Add annotations or callouts to your graphs to emphasize key findings. Explain the significance of each data point to guide your audience’s understanding. Utilize visual cues, such as arrows and labels, to direct attention.

Engaging your audience is a fundamental skill for a successful presentation for conference. Captivate their attention, encourage participation, and foster a positive connection.

Establishing Eye Contact and Body Language

Maintain eye contact with different audience parts to create a sense of connection. Effective body language, such as confident posture and expressive gestures, enhances your presence on stage.

Encouraging Participation and Interaction

Involve your audience through questions, polls, or interactive activities. Encourage them to share their thoughts or experiences related to your topic. This engagement fosters a more dynamic and memorable presentation.

Using Humor and Engaging Stories

Incorporate humor and relatable anecdotes to make your presentation more enjoyable. Well-timed jokes or personal stories can create a rapport with your audience and make your content more memorable.

The design of your conference presentation slides plays a crucial role in capturing and retaining your audience’s attention. Thoughtful design can amplify your message and reinforce key points. Take a look at these suggestions to boost the performance of your conference presentation slides, or create an entire slide deck in minutes by using SlideModel’s AI Presentation Maker from text .

Creating Memorable Opening Slides

Craft an opening slide that piques the audience’s curiosity and sets the tone for your presentation. Use an engaging visual, thought-provoking quote, or intriguing question to grab their attention from the start.

Using Visual Hierarchy for Emphasis

Employ visual hierarchy to guide your audience’s focus. Highlight key points with larger fonts, bold colors, or strategic placement. Organize information logically to enhance comprehension.

Designing a Powerful Closing Slide

End your presentation with a compelling closing slide that reinforces your main message. Summarize your key points, offer a memorable takeaway, or invite the audience to take action. Use visuals that resonate and leave a lasting impression.

Slide transitions and animations can enhance the flow of your presentation and emphasize important content. However, their use requires careful consideration to avoid distractions or confusion.

Enhancing Flow with Transitions

Select slide transitions that smoothly guide the audience from one point to the next. Avoid overly flashy transitions that detract from your content. Choose options that enhance, rather than disrupt, the presentation’s rhythm.

Using Animation to Highlight Points

Animate elements on your slides to draw attention to specific information. Animate text, images, or graphs to appear as you discuss them, helping the audience follow your narrative more effectively.

Avoiding Overuse of Effects

While animation can be engaging, avoid excessive use that might overwhelm or distract the audience. Maintain a balance between animated elements and static content for a polished presentation.

Effective time management is crucial for delivering a concise and impactful conference presentation within the allocated time frame.

Structuring for Short vs. Long Presentations

Adapt your content and pacing based on the duration of your presentation. Clearly outline the main points for shorter talks, and delve into more depth for longer sessions. Ensure your message aligns with the time available.

Prioritizing Key Information

Identify the core information you want your audience to take away. Focus on conveying these essential points, and be prepared to trim or elaborate on supporting details based on the available time.

Practicing Time Management

Rehearse your presentation while timing yourself to ensure you stay within the allocated time. Adjust your delivery speed to match your time limit, allowing for smooth transitions and adequate Q&A time.

Multimedia elements, such as videos, audio clips, and live demonstrations, can enrich your presentation and provide a dynamic experience for your audience.

Integrating Videos and Audio Clips

Use videos and audio clips strategically to reinforce your points or provide real-world examples. Ensure that the multimedia content is of high quality and directly supports your narrative.

Showcasing Live Demonstrations

Live demonstrations can engage the audience by showcasing practical applications of your topic. Practice the demonstration beforehand to ensure it runs smoothly and aligns with your message.

Using Hyperlinks for Additional Resources

Incorporate hyperlinks into your presentation to direct the audience to additional resources, references, or related content. This allows interested attendees to explore the topic further after the presentation.

Engaging with your audience after your presentation can extend the impact of your talk and foster valuable connections.

Leveraging Post-Presentation Materials

Make your presentation slides and related materials available to attendees after the event. Share them through email, a website, or a conference platform, allowing interested individuals to review the content.

Sharing Slides and Handouts

Provide downloadable versions of your slides and any handouts you used during the presentation. This helps attendees revisit key points and share the information with colleagues.

Networking and Following Up

Utilize networking opportunities during and after the conference to connect with attendees who are interested in your topic. Exchange contact information and follow up with personalized messages to continue the conversation.

Preparing for unexpected challenges during your presenting at a conference can help you maintain professionalism and composure, ensuring a seamless delivery.

Dealing with Technical Glitches

Technical issues can occur, from projector malfunctions to software crashes. Stay calm and have a backup plan, such as having your slides available on multiple devices or using printed handouts.

Handling Unexpected Interruptions

Interruptions, such as questions from the audience or unforeseen disruptions, are a normal part of live presentations. Address them politely, stay adaptable, and seamlessly return to your prepared content.

Staying Calm and Professional

Maintain a composed demeanor regardless of unexpected situations. Your ability to handle challenges gracefully reflects your professionalism and dedication to delivering a successful presentation.

Creating environmentally friendly presentations demonstrates your commitment to sustainability and responsible practices.

Designing Eco-Friendly Slides

Minimize the use of resources by designing slides with efficient layouts, avoiding unnecessary graphics or animations, and using eco-friendly color schemes.

Reducing Paper and Material Waste

Promote a paperless approach by encouraging attendees to access digital materials rather than printing handouts. If print materials are necessary, consider using recycled paper.

Promoting Sustainable Practices

Advocate for sustainability during your presentation by discussing relevant initiatives, practices, or innovations that align with environmentally conscious values.

Measuring the success of your conference presentation goes beyond the applause and immediate feedback. It involves assessing the impact of your presentation on your audience, goals, and growth as a presenter.

Collecting Audience Feedback

After presenting at a conference, gather feedback from attendees. Provide feedback forms or online surveys to capture their thoughts on the content, delivery, and visuals. Analyzing their feedback can reveal areas for improvement and give insights into audience preferences.

Evaluating Key Performance Metrics

Consider objective metrics such as audience engagement, participation, and post-presentation interactions. Did attendees ask questions? Did your content spark discussions? Tracking these metrics can help you gauge the effectiveness of your presentation in conveying your message.

Continuous Improvement Strategies

Use the feedback and insights gathered to enhance your future presentations. Identify strengths to build upon and weaknesses to address. Continuously refine your presentation skills , design choices, and content to create even more impactful presentations in the future.

Tip #1 – Exhibit a single idea per slide

Just one slide per concept, avoiding large text blocks. If you can compile the idea with an image, it’s better that way.

Research shows that people’s attention span is limited ; therefore, redirect your efforts in what concerns presentation slides so your ideas become crystal clear for the spectators.

Tip #2 – Avoid jargon whenever possible

Using complex terms does not directly imply you fully understand the concept you are about to discuss. In spite of your work being presented to a knowledgeable audience, avoid jargon as much as possible because you run the risk of people not understanding what you are saying.

Instead, opt to rehearse your presentation in front of a not-knowledgeable audience to measure the jargon volume you are adding to it. Technical terms are obviously expected in a conference situation, but archaic terms or purely jargon can be easily trimmed this way.

Tip #3 – Replace bulleted listings with structured layouts or diagrams

Bullet points are attention grabbers for the audience. People tend to instantly check what’s written in them, in contrast to waiting for you to introduce the point itself. 

Using bullet points as a way to expose elements of your presentation should be restricted. Opt for limiting the bullet points to non-avoidable facts to list or crucial information. 

Tip #4 – Customize presentation templates

Using presentation templates is a great idea to save time in design decisions. These pre-made slide decks are entirely customizable; however, many users fall into using them as they come, exposing themselves to design inconsistencies (especially with images) or that another presenter had the same idea (it is extremely rare, but it can happen).

Learning how to properly change color themes in PowerPoint is an advantageous asset. We also recommend you use your own images or royalty-free images selected by you rather than sticking to the ones included in a template.

Tip #5 – Displaying charts

Graphs and charts comprise around 80% of the information in most business and academic conferences. Since data visualization is important, avoid common pitfalls such as using 3D effects in bar charts. Depending on the audience’s point of view, those 3D effects can make the data hard to read or get an accurate interpretation of what it represents.

Tip #6 – Using images in the background

Use some of the images you were planning to expose as background for the slides – again, not all of them but relevant slides.

Be careful when placing text above the slides if they have a background image, as accessibility problems may arise due to contrast. Instead, apply an extra color layer above the image with reduced opacity – black or white, depending on the image and text requirements. This makes the text more legible for the audience, and you can use your images without any inconvenience.

Tip #7 – Embrace negative space

Negative space is a concept seen in design situations. If we consider positive space as the designed area, meaning the objects, shapes, etc., that are “your design,” negative space can be defined as the surrounding area. If we work on a white canvas, negative space is the remaining white area surrounding your design.

The main advantage of using negative space appropriately is to let your designs breathe. Stuffing charts, images and text makes it hard to get a proper understanding of what’s going on in the slide. Apply the “less is more” motto to your conference presentation slides, and embrace negative space as your new design asset.

Tip #8 – Use correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation

You would be surprised to see how many typos can be seen in slides at professional gatherings. Whereas typos can often pass by as a humor-relief moment, grammatical or awful spelling mistakes make you look unprofessional. 

Take 5 extra minutes before submitting your slide deck to proofread the grammar, spelling, and punctuation. If in doubt, browse dictionaries for complex technical words.

Tip #10 – Use an appropriate presentation style

The format of the conference will undoubtedly require its own presentation style. By this we mean that it is different from delivering a conference presentation in front of a live audience as a webinar conference. The interaction with the audience is different, the demands for the Q&A session will be different, and also during webinars the audience is closely looking at your slides.

Tip #11 – Control your speaking tone

Another huge mistake when delivering a conference presentation is to speak with a monotonous tone. The message you transmit to your attendees is that you simply do not care about your work. If you believe you fall into this category, get feedback from others: try pitching to them, and afterward, consider how you talk. 

Practicing breathing exercises can help to articulate your speech skills, especially if anxiety hinders your presentation performance.

Tip #12 – On eye contact and note reading

In order to connect with your audience, it is imperative to make eye contact. Not stare, but look at your spectators from time to time as the talk is directed at them.

If you struggle on this point, a good tip we can provide is to act like you’re looking at your viewers. Pick a good point a few centimeters above your viewer and direct your speech there. They will believe you are communicating directly with them. Shift your head slightly on the upcoming slide or bullet and choose a new location.

Regarding note reading, while it is an acceptable practice to check your notes, do not make the entire talk a lecture in which you simply read your notes to the audience. This goes hand-by-hand with the speaking tone in terms of demonstrating interest in the work you do. Practice as often as you need before the event to avoid constantly reading your notes. Reading a paragraph or two is okay, but not the entire presentation.

Tip #13 – Be ready for the Q&A session

Despite it being a requirement in most conference events, not all presenters get ready for the Q&A session. It is a part of the conference presentation itself, so you should pace your speech to give enough time for the audience to ask 1-3 questions and get a proper answer.

Don’t be lengthy or overbearing in replying to each question, as you may run out of time. It is preferable to give a general opinion and then reach the interested person with your contact information to discuss the topic in detail.

Observing what others do at conference events is good practice for learning a tip or two for improving your own work. As we have seen throughout this article, conference presentation slides have specific requirements to become a tool in your presentation rather than a mixture of information without order.

Employ these tips and suggestions to craft your upcoming conference presentation without any hurdles. Best of luck!

1. Conference PowerPoint Template

Use This Template

2. Free Conference Presentation Template

Like this article? Please share

Presentation Approaches, Presentation Skills, Presentation Tips Filed under Business

Related Articles

Filed under Design • April 23rd, 2024

How to Create the Perfect Handouts for a Presentation

Learn how to create effective handouts for presentations and the recommended structure for handouts with this guide.

Filed under Google Slides Tutorials • April 19th, 2024

How to Find Trash on Google Slides

Don’t worry if you accidently delete a presentation file. Learn how to find trash on Google Slides with this guide.

Filed under Business • April 10th, 2024

Discovering Coaching Presentation Tools

Discover the best PPT templates to use as coaching presentation tools with this article. Tools explained + examples.

Leave a Reply

Connection denied by Geolocation Setting.

Reason: Blocked country: Russia

The connection was denied because this country is blocked in the Geolocation settings.

Please contact your administrator for assistance.

• Log In Username Enter your ACP Online username. Password Enter the password that accompanies your username. Remember me Forget your username or password ?
• Privacy Policy
• Career Connection
• Member Forums

© Copyright 2024 American College of Physicians, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 190 North Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572 800-ACP-1915 (800-227-1915) or 215-351-2600

If you are unable to login, please try clearing your cookies . We apologize for the inconvenience.

Presenting a Clinical Vignette: Deciding What to Present

If you are scheduled to make a presentation of a clinical vignette, reading this article will improve your performance. We describe a set of practical, proven steps that will guide your preparation of the presentation. The process of putting together a stellar presentation takes time and effort, and we assume that you will be willing to put forth the effort to make your presentation successful. This and subsequent articles will focus on planning, preparation, creating visual aids (slides), and presentation skills. The intent of this series of articles is to help you make a favorable impression and reap the rewards, personal and professional, of a job well done.

The process begins with the creation of an outline of the topics that might be presented at the meeting. Your outline should follow the typical format and sequence for this type of communication: history, physical examination, investigations, patient course, and discussion. This format is chosen because your audience understands it and uses it every day. If you have already prepared a paper for publication, it can be a rich source of content for the topic outline.

To get you started, we have prepared a generic outline to serve as an example. Look over the generic outline to get a sense of what might be addressed in your presentation. We realize that the generic outline will not precisely fit all of the types of cases; nevertheless, think about the larger principle and ask yourself, "How can I adapt this to my situation?" In order to help you visualize the type of content you might include in the outline, an example of a topic outline for a clinical vignette is presented.

Introduction

The main purpose of the introduction is to place the case in a clinical context and explain the importance or relevance of the case. Some case reports begin immediately with the description of the case, and this is perfectly acceptable.

1. Describing the clinical context and relevance

i. Ergotism is characterized by intense, generalized vasoconstriction of small and large blood vessels. ii. Ergotism is rare and therefore difficult to diagnose. iii. Failure to diagnose can lead to significant morbidity.

Case Presentation

The case report should be chronological and detail the history, physical findings, and investigations followed by the patient's course. At this point, you may wish to include more details than you might have time to present, prioritizing the content later.

i. A 34-year-old female smoker has chronic headaches, dyspnea, and burning leg pain. ii. Clinical diagnosis of mitral valve stenosis is made. iii. She returns in one week because of burning pain in the legs. iv. One month after presentation, cardiac catheterization demonstrates severe mitral valve stenosis. v. Elective mitral valve commisurotomy is scheduled, but the patient is admitted to hospital early because of increased burning pain in her feet and a painful right leg.

2. Physical Examination

i. Normal vital signs. ii. No skin findings. iii. Typical findings of mitral stenosis, no evidence of heart failure. iv. Cool, pulseless right leg. v. Normal neurological examination.

3. Investigations

i. Normal laboratory studies. ii. ECG shows left atrial enlargement. iii. Arteriogram of right femoral artery shows subtotal stenosis, collateral filling of the popliteal artery, and pseudoaneurysm formation.

4. Hospital Course

i. Mitral valve commisurotomy is performed, as well as femoral artery thombectomy, balloon dilation, and a patch graft repair. ii. On the fifth postoperative day, the patient experienced a return of burning pain in the right leg. The leg was pale, cool, mottled, and pulseless. iii. The arteriogram of femoral arteries showed smooth segmental narrowing and bilateral vasospasm suggesting large-vessel arteritis complicated by thrombosis. iv. Treatment was initiated with corticosteroids, anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, and oral vasodilators. v. The patient continued to deteriorate with both legs becoming cool and pulseless. vi. Additional history revealed that the patient abused ergotamine preparations for years (headaches). She used 12 tables daily for the past year and continued to receive ergotamine in hospital on days 2, 6, and 7. vii. Ergotamine preparations were stopped, intravenous nitroprusside was begun, and she showed clinical improvement within 2 hours. Nitroprusside was stopped after 24 hours, and the symptoms did not return. viii. The remainder of hospitalization was uneventful.

The main purpose of the discussion section is to articulate the lessons learned from the case. It should describe how a similar case should be approached in the future. It is sometimes appropriate to provide background information to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with the patient's presentation, findings, investigations, course, or therapy.

1. Discussion

i. The most common cause of ergotism is chronic poisoning found in young females with chronic headaches. ii. Manifestations can include neurological, gastrointestinal, and vascular (list each in a table). iii. Ergotamine poisoning induces intense vasospasm, and venous thrombosis may occur from direct damage to the endothelium. iv. Vasospasm is due primarily to the direct vasoconstrictor effects on the vascular smooth muscle. v. Habitual use of ergotamine can lead to withdrawal headaches leading to a cycle of greater levels of ingestion. vi. In addition to stopping ergotamine, a direct vasodilator is usually prescribed. vii. Lesson 1: Physicians should be alert to the potential of ergotamine toxicity in young women with chronic headaches that present with neurological, gastrointestinal, or ischemic symptoms. viii. Lesson 2: The value of a complete history and checking the medication list.

Creating a topic outline will provide a list of all the topics you might possibly present at the meeting. Since you will have only ten minutes, you will prioritize the topics to determine what to keep and what to cut.

How do you decide what to cut? First, identify the basic information in the three major categories that you simply must present. This represents the "must-say" category. If you have done your job well, the content you have retained will answer the following questions:

What happened to the patient? What was the time course of these events? Why did management follow the lines that it did? What was learned?

After you have identified the "must-say" content, identify information that will help the audience better understand the case. Call this the "elaboration" category. Finally, identify the content that you think the audience would like to know, provided there is enough time, and identify this as the "nice-to-know" category.

Preparing a presentation is an iterative process. As you begin to "fit" your talk into the allotted time, certain content you originally thought of as "elaboration" may be dropped to the "nice-to-know" category due to time constraints. Use the following organizational scheme to efficiently prioritize your outline.

Prioritizing Topics in the Topic Outline

1. Use your completed topic outline.

2. Next to each entry in your outline, prioritize the importance of content.

3. Use the following code system to track your prioritization decisions:

A = Must-Say B = Elaboration C = Nice-to-Know

4. Remember, this is an iterative process; your decisions are not final.

5. Review the outline with your mentor or interested colleagues, and listen to their decisions.

Use the Preparing the Clinical Vignette Presentation Checklist to assist you in preparing the topic outline.

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• West J Emerg Med
• v.22(1); 2021 Jan

The Challenging Case Conference: A Gamified Approach to Clinical Reasoning in the Video Conference Era

Associated data.

The development of clinical reasoning abilities is a core competency of emergency medicine (EM) resident education and has historically been accomplished through case conferences and clinical learning. The advent of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has fundamentally changed these traditional learning opportunities by causing a nationwide reliance on virtual education environments and reducing the clinical diversity of cases encountered by EM trainees.

We propose an innovative case conference that combines low-fidelity simulation with elements of gamification to foster the development of clinical reasoning skills and increase engagement among trainees during a virtual conference. After a team of residents submits a real clinical case that challenged their clinical reasoning abilities, a different team of residents “plays” through a gamified, simulated version of the case live on a video conference call. The case concludes with a facilitated debriefing led by a simulation-trained faculty, where both the resident teams and live virtual audience discuss the challenges of the case. Participants described how the Challenging Case Conference improved their perceptions of their clinical reasoning skills. Audience members reported increased engagement compared to traditional conferences. Participants also reported an unexpected, destigmatizing effect on the discussion of medical errors produced by this exercise. Residency programs could consider implementing a similar case conference as a component of their conference curriculum.

Physicians commonly learn clinical reasoning through “whole-case” format conferences in which a presenter chronologizes a patient’s presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. However, these conferences may lack characteristics that improve the acquisition of clinical reasoning abilities, such as active learner involvement, uncertainty of clinical practice, and multiple diagnostic or therapeutic choices. 1 – 4

Alternatives to traditional case conferences may rely on group gatherings that are no longer possible in the era of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). 2 , 4 – 6 Furthermore, emergency departments nationwide are reporting a decline in the number and diversity of non-COVID-19 cases, increasing trainee’s reliance on supplemented clinical reasoning experiences to meet Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core competencies. 7 , 8 Teaching clinical reasoning to trainees who are spatially distant can be challenging because audience engagement is difficult during video conferencing, active participation is limited, and financial and technological barriers make virtual simulation difficult. 9

Gamification—the application of characteristics of games for health professions education—is a modern teaching modality that provides learners with active learning opportunities and improves clinical problem-solving. 10 , 11 Despite similarities with commercial, tabletop role-playing games, gamification has not been widely adopted for teaching clinical reasoning in low-fidelity simulation settings. Here we provide a description of a novel case conference format that uses the gamification of low-fidelity simulation to teach clinical reasoning skills to a large audience of virtual participants.

Broadly, we sought to develop a curriculum for the virtual conference format that would foster development of clinical reasoning skills. By gamifying serial-cue, low-fidelity simulations we additionally aimed to improve engagement in clinical case conferences for a spatially distant audience of learners during our weekly residency conference.

CURRICULUM DESIGN

The Challenging Case Conference consists of three parts: a standardized case submission; a live tabletop simulation; and a subsequent debrief discussion with virtual facilitation.

Prior to the conference, a team of residents submits a real case that challenged their clinical reasoning skills. Case submissions include all relevant diagnostic results, and residents are encouraged to highlight several elements of the case that challenged their clinical reasoning abilities. This submission also includes a brief case conclusion that summarizes their experiences with the case. All clinical data is reviewed by the case facilitator to ensure all patient identifiers have been removed prior to inclusion in the conference.

Next, a different team of 3–5 residents, with no knowledge of the case, “plays” through a simulated tabletop version of the case live on a video conference call during our weekly resident didactics. This team was comprised of members across all four postgraduate years, meeting in person and in virtual attendance. Akin to a mock oral boards case, this case flow is facilitated by a chief resident familiar with serial-cue tabletop simulation and gaming techniques.

Whenever participants ask to perform interventions during the case, they are instructed to roll a set of dice. On a roll of 10–12, the action is successful (the patient gets intubated); on a roll of 7–9, success comes with an unexpected consequence (intravenous access was obtained, but only with a small bore catheter); on a roll of 1–6, the action is unsuccessful (the patient became hypotensive). Vital signs are provided to the team and virtual audience through Simpl (a commercially available simulated cardiac monitor, www.simplsim.com ). All de-identified lab and imaging results are housed in a Dropbox ( www.dropbox.com ) folder. As team-members ask for diagnostic studies during the play of the case, a facilitator puts a hyperlink to the Dropbox file correlating with their request (chest radiograph, urinalysis, etc.) in the virtual chat room, making the data available to both team members and the audience ( Figure 1 ).

Screenshot of the Zoom application during the case simulation. Resident participants (center screen) play through a simulated case on a live video broadcast, with real-time simulated clinical data overlayed on the video stream (bottom left corner) for audience members (top left) to view. A scrolling, real-time chat feed (right) is visible to audience and participants alike.

The resident team working through the clinical case can see the virtual chatroom, where other trainees and faculty can remotely comment on the case as it unfolds. At the conclusion of the case, simulation-trained faculty lead a debriefing with the team that submitted the case and the simulation participants. The two teams discuss the various challenges present in the case and engage in a real-time discussion with the virtual audience.

This educational methodology was chosen to combine the strengths of gamification, serial-cue case discussions, and low-fidelity simulation while minimizing the known obstacles imposed by the virtual environment. The moment-to-moment uncertainty that is theorized to improve clinical reasoning skills in a serial-cue case approach is naturally complemented by the gamified uncertainty of dice probabilities. 3 , 7

IMPACT/EFFECTIVENESS

During a recent conference, this exercise took 43 minutes, involved a virtual audience of 89 trainees and faculty, and had 52 distinct comments in the chatroom. Chat comments were largely real-time clinical reasoning pearls, questions about the case, and suggestions to participants. Following the case debriefing, 11 minutes of spontaneous faculty discussion ensued, which covered themes ranging from diagnostic decision- making and airway management to systems-level patient safety issues and foundational medical knowledge.

We interviewed a convenience sample of volunteer attendees directly following this conference, which included three simulation participants, five resident audience members, and three residency program administrators. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a standardized set of questions ( Appendix 1 ) designed to explore perceptions of the curriculum from multiple sources. Transcribed responses underwent a basic thematic analysis to reveal several key trends. All simulation participants felt that the tabletop simulation improved their clinical reasoning ability in ways that mimicked real clinical encounters. They reported that the dice element both added a level of unpredictability, which helped model the actual practice of emergency medicine (EM) and also added a level of excitement absent from typical mock oral boards-type tabletop simulations. All three residents initially endorsed anxiety participating in front of a live virtual audience, but agreed that this anxiety dissipated during the exercise. Interestingly, all participants described a normalization phenomenon, wherein openly acknowledging challenges with the clinical reasoning in the simulation and real case produced an honest, stigma-free discussion of medical errors.

Audience members agreed that they were more engaged throughout the case simulation than during traditional case conferences due to the format and gamification. Two junior trainees reported that the gamification allowed them to witness participants work through uncertainty in real time, which informed their developing practice. Residency program administrators noted increased faculty engagement and discussion when compared to historical case conferences. Finally, interviewees suggested using an alternative to Dropbox to view diagnostic results to limit interruptions in the case flow and to use more gamification throughout the simulation.

The Challenging Case Conference uses elements of low-fidelity simulation and serious games to increase perceptions of clinical reasoning skills for a virtual audience of EM trainees, while also increasing perceptions of virtual participation.

Supplementary Information

Section Editor: Abra Fant, MD

Full text available through open access at http://escholarship.org/uc/uciem_westjem

Conflicts of Interest : By the West JEM article submission agreement, all authors are required to disclose all affiliations, funding sources and financial or management relationships that could be perceived as potential sources of bias. No author has professional or financial relationships with any companies that are relevant to this study. There are no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.

Change Password

Your password must have 6 characters or more:.

• a lower case character, 
• an upper case character, 
• a special character 

Password Changed Successfully

Your password has been changed

Create your account

Forget yout password.

Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password

Forgot your Username?

Enter your email address below and we will send you your username

If the address matches an existing account you will receive an email with instructions to retrieve your username

• March 15, 2024 | VOL. 77, NO. 1 CURRENT ISSUE pp.1-42

The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has updated its Privacy Policy and Terms of Use , including with new information specifically addressed to individuals in the European Economic Area. As described in the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, this website utilizes cookies, including for the purpose of offering an optimal online experience and services tailored to your preferences.

Please read the entire Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. By closing this message, browsing this website, continuing the navigation, or otherwise continuing to use the APA's websites, you confirm that you understand and accept the terms of the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use, including the utilization of cookies.

Thoughts on Clinical Case Conferences

• Hanoch Yerushalmi , Ph.D.

Department of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Science, University of Haifa, Israel

Search for more papers by this author

Introduction

One of the central clinical activities of experienced psychoanalytic therapists and novice clinicians alike is the discussion of clinical cases. Case conferences are important yet complex, and are likely to form a turning point in the development of the clinician and/or treatment presented. Some clinicians view clinical case conferences as a kind of court room in which their work may be judged; others view it as an opportunity to escape the loneliness of the clinical work, experienced by many; while others still hope it will fulfill their wish for acknowledgement by the analytic community. Nonetheless, such narcissistic fantasies about case conferences may often lead to disappointment on the part of the therapist presenting the case.

Case conferences involve an extremely complex interaction that often turns out to be frustrating and intimidating both for the presenters and for the participants. The presenter may even feel traumatized, as he or she discloses intimate feelings, thoughts, and attitudes experienced during the course of analytic work. In such an event, participation can even delay development and professional growth as an analytic therapist. Indeed, at times, presenting at a case conference can be experienced as a low point in the therapist’s professional life. Similarly, group discussion in a case conference can also be a damaging experience for the other participants, who may feel embarrassed or guilty of being misunderstanding or aggressive towards the presenter. These dangers make it highly important to examine the structure of case conferences, to understand their complexity and to evaluate how both the presenter and the participants can make the most out of it.

Herein, I intend to examine the construction and attribution of meaning by participants in case conferences and to assess to what extent these reflect current epistemological understanding and perception. Specifically, this article will evaluate ways of attributing meaning and constructing interpretation to transferential-counter-transferential events that seem both transformative and constitutive and that reflect vicissitudes in the analytic clinical process.

In most case conferences, therapists present their clinical work to colleagues in their professional community, be it as part of a discussion group within an institute, a meeting amongst colleagues set up for this purpose, or a working group within a public clinic. In many cases, a clinician’s motivation to present clinical work stems from a desire to receive recognition from peers for development as a professional and to share responsibility of therapeutic work. The presentation and discussion of a clinical case, wherever it takes place, is performed with the aims of assisting in the development both of the psychoanalytic therapist as a professional and the treatment he/she has chosen to present through better understanding of the analytic process, its components, and its development. Within the group setting, the course of the treatment is described in an attempt to fully portray the array of transference and countertransference events within it. This includes a depiction of the verbal and nonverbal contributions of both participants in the analytic encounter. From the listener’s responses to each other, their interpersonal communication, and the intersubjective field created between them, meaning of the transferential-counter-transferential events and the patient’s life narrative is derived and used as a therapeutic tool. This “meaning” is presented as a hypothesis regarding the development of the treatment, the intrapsychic structures of the patient and his/her relationship pattern. In the clinical discussion, participants are invited to raise their own hypotheses regarding these structures, patterns and processes from their perspective as external observers. At times participants agree with each other, while at others, they may disagree. Nonetheless, the diversity of opinions allows the presenter to examine his/her work from a variety of perspectives, to get to know new and different aspects of his/her interaction with the patient, and to set and work towards clearer analytic goals.

The success of such a conference, however, is dependent upon the level of knowledge and experience of its participants, as well as their willingness to present their opinions openly and frankly, and to consider different possible perspectives from which to provide meaning for the development of the treatment—all of which are not easy tasks. Furthermore, success is also dependent upon participants’ ability to form a basic common theoretical language that will allow them to examine the similarities and differences between the different standpoints raised.

For every analytic therapist that has presented in such a case conference, the experience of standing in front of a group of fellow clinicians judging his/her personal clinical work may turn out to be threatening and overwhelming, and the attempt to reach an open dialogue and to feel effective in the assistance offered to the presenter may be highly complex for every participant. At times it seems as if clinical case conferences are an almost impossible situation. Hence many analytic therapists, experienced and inexperienced alike, consider presenting in case conferences to be overwhelming, damaging, and even traumatic. Some describe this experience as a social and professional encounter in which they feel helpless and misunderstood, with their clinical decisions and insights coming under attack. Even if there is no particular aggressive component within the group process, simply the attribution of new, deep and intricate meaning by an outside observer to the presenter’s work, places the presenter in the position of one that has neither thought deeply nor considered the analytic processes thoroughly. Therefore, and because of the significance and centrality of this analytic activity, it seems crucial to evaluate its components and to improve our understanding of these working groups.

The ability to reach a fruitful and effective dialogue in case presentations is partly dependent upon the working environment, the quality of the relationships among the members of the discussion group, their norms and attitudes toward one another, their way of communication, and so forth. Yet, this article argues there is also a structural component that accompanies a case conference beyond the specific characteristics of one group and the individuals that compose it. This component is related to the fact that the principles regarding the construction and attribution of clinical meaning within psychoanalytic case conferences have remained unchanged for many years and have not developed in the same way that they have developed in clinical theory . The attribution of meaning to transferential and counter-transferential events and to personal narratives of patients, has developed and has been assimilated within most current analytic approaches ( Mitchell, 1998 ); the interpretations given to analytic interactions within case presentations have not gone through the same epistemological changes that have been accepted by many in the psychoanalytic community for interpretations within analysis. This may be attributed to the fact that a case conference forms a highly competitive space that does not enable participants to delve freely into the presenter’s subjective experience of the therapeutic intersubjective encounter. It shall be argued herein that this contributes to the paralysis and stagnation experienced in case conferences and leaves participants without the ability to work through these difficulties within as in psychoanalytic therapeutic framework.

Construction and Attribution of Meaning Within the Clinical Discussion

In a Clinical Conference, group members discuss a clinical case attribute and propose alternative meanings to the development of the analytic encounter presented, the structures organizing the patient’s world, and the schemas the patient formed regarding him/herself and significant others.

A principal part of these proposals is based upon the understanding of central transference and countertransference events that embody most of the clinical understanding of the case. The structures of meaning suggested by group members are derived from their theoretical understanding, their knowledge and clinical experience, and their own subjective organization of the world. Even if there is no significant disparity in their theoretical beliefs, it is clear that the perspectives proposed do not always agree with those of other members of the group or the presenter. Nonetheless, an accepted, consensual, version is often formed—a joint narrative that can be agreed upon—providing meaning that can be accepted by most of the participants. This narrative takes into consideration the patient’s associations, the therapist’s impression of the patient’s nonverbal messages, and the therapist’s reaction to all of these. It also takes into consideration the conference participants’ countertransference to the case and that of the therapist, implied from the way the treatment is presented. All of these are gathered and ordered into meaningful structures that describe the organization of the patient’s experiences and the analytic process experienced by the patient and therapist.

It is important to mention that a group discussion within a case conference differs in its essence from a supervisory encounter, in which the supervisor accompanies the ongoing development of the treatment. Within clinical supervision, through an ongoing empathic process, the supervisor gradually gets to know the intersubjective context of the treatment, the nuances of transference and countertransference, and the analytic thera-pist’s opinions and perspectives. This takes place as the supervisor gets to know the therapist-supervisee’s personality and strives to instill confidence in the supervisory relationship. In this way, the supervisory situation is completely different from that of a group discussion within a clinical case conference. In a clinical case conference, the treatment is presented once or twice, with members of the group having a partial understanding of the interpersonal and intersubjective processes taking place. The personal sense of security of participant and presenter can be more easily compromised than in an on-going supervision. Because of the additional time, in a continuous case seminars the process will resemble that of a supervision as the group is able to explore empathically and in depth the intersubjective environment of the analytic therapy discussed.

The clinical structures of meaning attributed to a case are also greatly influenced by the wider cultural context of the professional and scientific community, as explained by Molad (2001) :

Meta-cultural influences use cultural discourse, derived from academic and social trends in philosophy, literature, and politics, to offer current different “readings” of the “subject”: Multicultural discourse, mainly feminism, is of central influence; Post-colonial theory aims at creating new “voices” and re-organizing power relations; Post-modern discourse expresses ontological doubt about the essential nature of the “subject”, and an episte-mological critique of the way we come to think of power-structures; Citizenship discourse derives from emigration, trans-nationalism, community relations and models of political participation and History discourse, based on individual—even micro-historical—readings (p. 229).

Indeed, each of these influences, alongside clinicians’ personality structures, contributes to the context in which the patient and therapist inputs are interpreted. However, beyond the wider social context, there is the specific cultural context in which the clinician functions, which further structures the understanding of clinical-analytic processes. In this sense, a clinical group discussion seems to include a greater cultural influence than does individual supervision because the group has room for more voices brought by members who represent different cultural backgrounds.

The structure of meaning given to individuals’ actions and reactions is largely determined through the affect expressed in them ( Lyons-Ruth, 1999 ). Moreover, meaning is structured by the observer’s mental representations of others’ intentional states that are considered responsible for behavior—just as interpretation of literature requires the discovery of the author’s intentions in writing the text ( Wakenfield, 1990 ). Interpretation, according to Wakenfield (1990) , is the attempt to use language to describe the real content of an intentional state, and both the intentional state and its mental representation are clearly dependent upon the context in which they appear.

However, it is important to emphasize that context and all its layers may be the most important factor influencing the attribution of meaning to transference and countertransference events. Indeed, individuals draw conclusions and attribute specific meaning to verbal and nonverbal responses, messages and communication, dreams and associations, against a contextual background in which the phenomenon they wish to interpret emerges.

Boesky (2005) explains the importance of context in the attribution of meaning to associative material raised in analysis. He explains that the intellectual ability to infer meaning from raw associative material is related to contextualizing criteria that are usually at least partly conscious or preconscious. These criteria guide what the therapist filters from his/her patient’s communication, the emphasis he/she places on one aspect, and the de-emphasis on another. The therapist combines the emphasized components of the patient’s string of associations with his/her own internalized theoretical ideas to attribute meaning and draw conclusions about the patient. It can be assumed that Boesky’s depiction of the attribution of clinical meaning to a patient’s communication by his/her therapist can also accurately describe a group’s attribution of meaning to transferential—countertransferential events appearing in a presented analytic treatment. Thus, in a discussion group, varying conscious and subconscious criteria structure the clinical context and elicit interpretations regarding the development of the treatment.

Nonetheless, even if these working assumptions about participants in case conferences are accurate, the participants still have to struggle to gain sufficient knowledge of the specific clinical context of significant analytic interactions and to accurately identify those crucial mutative moments in analysis that indicate the analytic context embodied in the transference– countertransference relationship and the system of mutual enactments-re-enactments between patient and therapist. Participants have to gain enough knowledge on the interpersonal and intersubjective reality of significant clinical interactions by means of a thorough enquiry of the context .

It seems that participants often do not thoroughly consider the essence of the specific clinical context in which the critical and transformative events in the treatment take place. These events are those usually described as “clinical facts,” and inform of significant turning points in the treatment and are indicative, more than anything else, of the development of the analytic process. The reason for this lack of consideration is not a lack of good will or commitment to the clinical discussion, but only that it requires an active attempt by participants to reconstruct these events and an empathic and deep exploration of the presenter-therapist’s perceptions. In this article I argue that without such meticulous examination of the personal and intersubjective clinical context of the transference and countertransference issues surrounding these transformative events, it is difficult to create meaning that is relevant and useful for understanding them. Moreover, my experience from many case conferences shows that even if in their clinical work analytic therapists have internalized the importance of the interpersonal and intersubjective contexts for clinical understanding, they struggle to implement these principles in the interactions characterizing clinical discussion.

The importance of the clinical interpersonal and intersubjective context for the understanding of the treatment processes is widely accepted. It is supported by the principles and beliefs of two-person psychology, which has been accepted by many of the psychoanalytic community. Two-person psychology is a concept introduced into psychoanalytic literature by Balint (1950) , Rickman (1957) , and Ghent (1989) , amongst others, which shows that interpersonal relations are those elements that construct the intrapersonal world. Spezzano (1996) summarizes the principle behind the two-person psychology as follows:

[T]he analyst and analysand maximize their understanding about the patient’s unconscious psychology by listening to the whole of what they create together in the analytic dialogue (p. 620).

In other words, only an understanding of the context of the unique analytic encounter, as a whole, can clarify the unconscious world of the patient. There is no doubt that such an acquaintance with the complex dialogue, the messages conveyed, and the nuances of the different perceptions, is intrinsically accessible only for its participants: the patient and therapist. The only direct way to get to know it from the outside, by other practitioners, is through empathically inviting the therapist to its exploration within secure and known boundaries.

Experience from case conferences shows that, in most cases, participants do not openly and empathically invite the presenter to deal with and thoroughly describe the context in which the analytic encounter took place or the surrounding crucial transference-countertransference events. We usually do not inquire what meaning a specific dialogue between therapist and patient presented had for the analytic therapist at that point in time of his/her life and professional development. Our wish for factual accuracy and for a “realistic” description of events leaves the therapist’s subjective depiction of the interaction and experience with the patient unattended to. This empty space is then filled with the group participants’ perceptions and interpretations regarding the meaning of intersubjective analytic developments.

At this point, I would like to present an example relevant to the discussion above.

In a clinical case conference, a therapist presented her treatment of a young woman suffering from severe mood swings with suicidal ideation when feeling misunderstood and threatening to those around her. The patient had a strong avoidance of sexual relations and suffered from overwhelming anxiety at any opportunity of fulfilling her sexual needs. The case was filled with events of approaching and distancing between patient and therapist and with the mutual testing of boundaries and trust between them. The therapist chose to present this case, wanting advice about a problem she faced in the treatment. Although she did not view basic problem in the analytic relationship as threatening to the treatment, she was concerned regarding its repercussions.

The presenting therapist detailed an important session in which the patient asked the therapist to read a letter she had written but did not feel comfortable to convey verbally. In the letter, the patient described a sexual fantasy centered round the therapist. The fantasy led the patient to masturbate—something that she had avoided in the past, as it usually aroused feelings of disgust and dirtiness. The therapist described how the patient failed to arrive at the next scheduled session, telephoning at the intended start time, and explaining that she felt a need not to attend, and wishing to continue analysis only after a short break, should the therapist agree.

Participants in the case conference raised varying hypotheses, all of which gradually converged towards a consensual opinion that the patient suffered from anxiety following the reading of the letter. They further proposed that it was the very act of the therapist reading the letter (as opposed to discussing the difficulty verbally) that aroused the patient’s anxiety. Thus, the group members agreed that the therapist did not prevent transferring their interaction to a level of acting out, and this that contributed to the patient’s next manifestation of acting out—avoiding the next analytic session and forcing a temporary termination of the treatment. The group maintained that transferring the communication to actions instead of words, prevented working through the anxiety that overwhelmed the patient and led to her need for emotional regulation, which she expressed through avoiding sessions.

The therapist left the case conference with a heavy feeling that she was unable to explain until much later. She felt misunderstood and believed the group dealt with only one aspect of the episode and overlooked the meaning these events had for her. After not being able to let go of what had taken place in the conference, she gradually came to understand that in her presentation she had not managed to convey her own impressions and convictions: The moment of reading of the patient’s letter was one of great intimacy and true engagement between her and her patient. The therapist considered the session to be a seminal moment in the treatment, in which the patient tried to convey a sense of closeness with the therapist and security in the idea that she would not get hurt by revealing her fantasy. It was a moment in which she, herself, also felt extremely close to the patient, and considered this feeling to have perhaps played a part in enabling the patient to demonstrate on her part such an act of rapprochement. The therapist was gradually convinced that the patient’s announcement of a temporary break in the treatment was in response to the sense of closeness between them, which may have frightened the patient and led her to search for a way to regulate the threateningly close relationship. The therapist was certain that once she met with the patient to discuss this reaction, there would be a significant change and improvement in the patient. Thus, the context of these transference and countertransference events, of the patient’s request to read the letter and the actual reading of it, had an alternate meaning—one of reaching out, of forming a connection between them.

In this example, the participants in the discussion group could have behaved differently. Together with the therapist, they might have examined how the therapist viewed the intersubjective context of reading the letter, how she felt the about atmosphere between her and the patient, how she felt about the messages of closeness or threats in the patient/therapist interactions, and what her associative process was, to the best of her recollection. The participants could have helped much more if, instead of attributing meaning from an external position to the specific and unique context, they had made a genuine attempt to understand the essence and meaning of the context for the therapist. It is important to mention that although part of the role of such discussion groups is, of course, to point out the therapist’s “blind spots” and unconscious components that interfere with the analytic process, this should not be the immediate goal. Without empathic and accepting exploration of the context in which the dialogue took place, from its intrinsic point of view, the proposed hypotheses regarding “blind spots” are not beneficial, since the goal is not to expose the “truth,” but to clarify a fuller intersubjective reality within the analytic relationship and thus to advance the analytic relationship .

Experience shows that case conferences have often remained in their traditional format with the working method often relying on irrelevant and uninformed ways of organizing and structuring clinical meaning. Although within psychoanalytic literature case conferences are often quoted as serious professional forums in which analytic processes are highlighted and core issues examined, the structure of case conferences, and the ways in which such important professional discourse is conducted, has rarely been discussed. In fact, until today, case conferences rely on the same format developed in the fall of 1902 in Freud’s waiting room, where four colleagues met to discuss his work. These “case conferences” led to the establishment of the first psychoanalytic community, which met on Wednesdays for an evening called the “Psychological Wednesday Society” ( Jones, 1955 ). Yet, in contrast to the many recent changes that have taken place in the way that psychoanalytic therapists view therapeutic discourse, parallel changes have not taken place in the way they view and conduct clinical discussions regarding psychoanalytic treatments.

A Change in Approach

A substantial part of participants’ contributions to clinical discussions is often based on stringent and attentive listening to the associative material of the patient as provided by the presenter and the therapist’s reported associations at the time of the clinical analytic encounter. Such attention leads to the development of clinical inferences based upon the attempt to construct logical “bridges” of clinical data and a continuum of clinical impressions, personal experience, and theoretical understanding. This form of clinical analytic attention is, in its essence, no different from the day-to-day analytic activity performed by each of the participants in the case conference, as detailed by Arlow (1979) :

[Attending to] —material in context appearing in related sequence, multiple representations of the same theme, repetition in similarity, and a convergence of the data into one comprehensible hypothesis constitute the specific methodological approach in psychoanalysis used to validate insights obtained in an immediate, intuitive fashion in the analytic interchange (p. 202).

For a long time, these were the recommendations for analytic activity that were adopted and used in case presentations as well. Participants in such a professional encounter brought with them their clinical knowledge and expertise, as well as their familiar professional tools for the organization of meaning, and thus they created the traditional format seen in many clinical case conferences.

However, the way we listen to, attend to, and identify conscious and subconscious messages conveyed by the patient, and the methods by which we allocate meaning to each of these within analysis has significantly changed. Today, we are still advised to be attentive to all the nuances of the patient’s expressions in the way described above, yet at the same time we study the “analytic third” ( Ogden, 1994 ). Thus, at the center of our analytic attention we place the field formed as a result of the encounter between two subjectivities, that of the therapist and that of the patient. We increasingly tend to believe that clinical insights are part of the coconstructed narrative, created by the ongoing interaction between patient and therapist and the shared meanings they arrived at together. Knowledge about the patient’s emotional life and the perception of his/her world develops as each of the participants brings his/her own personality and the meaning structures he/she attributes in the world to this interaction ( Molad, 2001 ). The way in which each organizes his/her external and internal worlds meets that of the other and creates an intersubjective reality unique to their encounter.

Further to the changes in the clinical analytic focus, there have also been epistemological-theoretical changes that have influenced the attribution of meaning by analytic therapists within the analytic process. A range of theoreticians— Dilthey (1926) , Sherwood (1969) , Ricoeur, (197), Leavy (1980) , Stolorow, Atwood & Brandchaft (1994) —expressed the idea that psychoanalysis does not belong to the natural sciences, but is in fact a hermeneutical science. These authors argue that human sciences, and amongst them psychoanalysis, should observe the object of their investigation from within, and not externally, so as to construct its interpretation. In order to understand analytic material it is necessary to search for thematic moulds that repeat themselves in different areas of the patient’s life and experience, whereby the repetition is a kind of reflection of experimental replication seen in the natural sciences. These authors propose to adopt the hermeneutic approach, developed as a method for the interpretation of religious scripts, into the human sciences.

According to the hermeneutic approach in psychoanalysis, the attribution of meaning to a transference and countertransference event within the analytic interaction is primarily achieved by constructing the context in which this event took place, and understanding it from an intrinsic point of view. This event then “joins” others to which meaning has been attributed, and together, they better explain and deepen the assessment of the context in which all of these events occurred. Deepening the understanding of the context enables a richer and wider attribution of meaning to any new transference-countertransference event. This circular thought process is called the “Hermeneutical Circle.” The “circle” is based on an empathic psychoanalytic exploration of the patient’s reactions and messages that appear in the clinical interaction. Each of these is attributed with meaning from the wider context of the analytic relationship, the patient’s narrative of his/her life, and the social and cultural context in which the analytic dialogue takes place. The validity of each insight is determined by its coherence and consistence with other insights regarding the analysis as a whole.

The meaning structures obtained during such a psychoanalytic exploration always appear within the psychological field created between the two subjectivities. The boundaries and size of the field are determined by the limits of the mutual influence of the two participants on the analytic dialogue. Conclusions drawn from this exploration process need to be dependent upon the intersubjective context in which they appear and its boundaries. The intersubjective psychoanalytic field of exploration is created by the interplay between transference and countertransference manifestations. The therapist needs always to be aware that each of his/her ideas regarding the patient’s experiences is dependent and limited by his/her own personal world perspective.

If we accept these changes in the attribution of meaning for transference and countertransference events within the analytic treatment, we need to consider what relevance they may have for clinical case conferences, and how they can be used productively in that context. It seems highly unlikely that case conferences relying on traditional epistemological analytic approaches will not match or meet the needs of an analytic process implementing hermeneutical principles. Therefore, the present paper suggests examining how it may be possible to conduct an analytic case conference while using current and updated analytic insights.

Components of Case Conferences Relying On the Current Perspectives

The hermeneutical circles described above reflect upon one another, and form a foundation from which participants can derive their interventions and reactions. This foundation provides the participants a way to understand and attribute meaning to analytic processes that are not founded upon ’objective’ universal clinical or theoretical knowledge.

The participants’ ability to create such a rich and complex work pattern is likely to have a further advantage—it may act as a work role model for the presenting therapist, thus also having educational value. Learning through identification with behaviors and thought patterns, rather than through the mental understanding of issues, is often a deeper and usually more transformative type of learning, which is likely to also advance the presenter as a therapist and the analytic treatment.

The present article proposes guidelines for effective teamwork in case conferences based upon epistemological changes that have taken place in psychoanalytic therapy. The guidelines emphasize the intersubjective and interpersonal contexts of both the case conference and the analytic relationship described in it, and thus, enable an understanding of the transference-countertransference events and the patient’s narrative of his/her life. As presented in this article, these contexts are likely to form hermeneutical circles with the presenter’s narrative of the clinical process and to help in the attribution of meaning to the analytic clinical material presented.

The model proposed is more consistent and fitting to the current clinical analytic perceptions, which step away from the “objective” understanding of clinical analytic processes. It attributes significant weight to the subjectivity of the presenting therapist. Indeed, the proposed model suggests a format much closer to the current language of many of contemporary analytic therapists in its understanding of transferential-countertransferential occurrences. Nonetheless, it requires a change from the model widely used today in case conferences, and it seems that convincing analytic therapists and group supervisors to create such a change in their familiar and routine behavior patterns is not an easy task.

One of the problems likely to contribute to a difficulty in creating such a change is conference participants’ apprehension of losing the authority of the discussion group. For many therapists, case conferences confirm their clinical abilities and professional achievements. To no less an extent, the discussion group also enables therapists to be influential in their community. Indeed, traditionally, clinical case conferences formed a professional forum for the founding of professional perceptions of reality and the instilling of knowledge that allows for firm analytic insights. Group concurrence usually acted as confirmation for the presenter’s knowledge or lack of relative knowledge, which was the source of the group’s authority. Therefore, the model proposed is likely to undermine this source of strength and authority of case conferences in their present form, and thus may elicit anxiety about change. Nonetheless, changes in scientific authority, and psychoanalytic therapeutic authority, in particular are likely to be reflected in psychoanalytic therapists’ perception of their therapeutic actions and impact ( Mitchell, 1998 ).

The authority of a group of colleagues participating in a case conference according to the model proposed here is not a result of the group composed of “objective” participants or of those less biased than the presenter and thus representing distinct, factual, and scientific knowledge. In fact, according to this model, the group does not necessarily have more knowledge about psychological processes or the patient’s relationship patterns than the presenting analytic therapist, and the universal clinical or theoretical knowledge of the group is not necessarily more appropriate or relevant either. The authority of such a group, according to this model, arises primarily from a different type of knowledge: the knowledge of how to hold an open dialogue that allows for genuine sharing and mutual influence between presenter and participants in the attribution of meaning to clinical material. This format undoubtedly focuses on cooperation and contributes to the consolidation of subjective knowledge, intrinsic to the unique clinical situation in which the analytic therapists play a part. Moreover, the authority of such a working group is also based on the fact that it represents a variety of opinions, as opposed to the one voice of a colleague or supervisor. The range of opinions, each representing a different perspective, is capable of creating richer and deeper clinical meaning than that of only one point of view.

Why does a range of opinions provide greater validation or authority? Because in psychoanalytic therapy we believe in the presence of many causes of behavior and motivation and of different forms of organizing human experience, that appear simultaneously and influence the individual’s opinions. Ogden (1989) explains, for example, that there are three forms of simultaneous experience, each one representing a different developmental pole of object relations and each in paradox with the other. Each form of experience is generated by one of three positions: the paranoid-schizoid, the depressive positions, and the autistic–contiguous position (which has, according to Ogden, an equal organizing significance). The three positions are characterized by specific types of defence, forms of object relatedness, quality of anxiety, and degree of subjectivity. Each of these forms of experience defines, delineates, and maintains the other, nears it and at the same time always stays parallel to it. If we accept this hypothesis regarding human experience, then the presence of numerous participants, each representing a particular perspective regarding the analytic process, is likely to enable a fuller and wider understanding of the patient’s experience, thus ensuring therapeutic authority.

Nonetheless, it is necessary to draw attention to the fact that groups often have the tendency to reduce the number of opinions voiced, converging towards agreement on the opinion expressed by those with the greatest level of influence. Thus, at times, opinions raised in a group will reflect more interpretative and conventional positions than independent and separate ones, which are often more genuine and sensitive. Nonetheless, it seems that having numerous points of view representing the discussion group usually allows for a deeper and more flexible understanding of the interpersonal and intersubjective analytic therapy reality. Such multiplicity provides the discussion group with significant authority, power, and influence.

I do not suggest that eliciting a change in traditional behavior patterns that have gained ceremonial significance will be easy. It is hard to expect analytic therapists, both senior and junior alike, to give up their familiar group roles, even if these are not always easy or convenient. Set and habitual roles often become part of participants’ professional identity and form some of the power that they take upon themselves and are allocated by their colleagues. Thus, for example, certain individuals choose to repeatedly represent a theoretical position and “delegate” themselves as representatives of that position within the case conference. Therefore, the demand to relieve participants of this habitual role and moreover, to choose a new and unfamiliar one, is likely to be too great and difficult for participants.

It is important to state that case conferences are used by members of the analytic community for more than the clarification of an analytic process or the contribution of the patient and therapist to the transference and countertransference events in the treatment. Clinical discussion provides us, as professionals, with an opportunity to meet others in the community, which is composed of individuals similar to us or looking for existential-professional meaning similar to ours. Within the clinical case conference we examine our reflection in the many mirrors present in the conference room, and at the same time, we ourselves provide mirroring for the significant parts of others. We examine the validity of our opinions, our own personal-professional development, and measure how it fits in amongst our colleagues. The encounter with colleagues, whether as individuals or in a group, often allows us to come out of the solitary confinement in which we often feel caged—confinement that is not physical, but often symbolic, in which there is no dialogue with our peers.

Therefore, it is hugely important to make the group encounter of a case conference a public field in which every participating individual can influence and mold, can tune in to others, and absorb significant messages that shall help him/her understand his/her own world. In this way, instead of case conferences being experienced (as they often are) as threatening and narcissistic situations, they shall be considered shaping and developing encounters.

Lyons-Ruth, K. ( 1999 ). The two-person unconscious: Intersubjective dialogue, enactive relational representation, and the emergence of new forms of relational organization . Psychoanalytical Inquiry , 19:576–617. Crossref ,  Google Scholar

Arlow, J. ( 1979 ). The genesis of interpretation . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association , 27 (Suppl.):193–206. Medline ,  Google Scholar

Balint, M. ( 1950 ). Changing therapeutic aims and techniques in psychoanalysis . International Journal of Psychoanalysis , 31: 117–124 Google Scholar

Boesky, D. ( 2005 ). Psychoanalytic controversies contextualized . Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association , 53:835–863. Crossref , Medline ,  Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. ( 1926 ). Meaning in history . London: Allen & Unwin, 1961 . Google Scholar

Ghent, E. ( 1989 ). Credo: The dialectics of one-person and two-person psychologies . Contemporary Psychoanalysis , 25:169–209 Crossref ,  Google Scholar

Jones, E. ( 1955 ). Sigmund Freud Life and Work, Volume Two: Years of Maturity 1901-1919 , 1–507 Google Scholar

Leavy, S. ( 1980 ). The Psychoanalytic Dialogue . New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar

Mitchell, S.A. ( 1998 ). The analyst’s knowledge and authority . Psychoanalytic Quarterly , 67,1–31. Crossref , Medline ,  Google Scholar

Molad, G.J. ( 2001 ). Mutual training of developmental trajectories: The shaping of dialogue . International Forum of Psychoanalysis , 10, 227–234. Crossref ,  Google Scholar

Ogden, T. H. ( 1994 ). The analytic third: Working with intersubjective clinical facts . International Journal of Psychoanalysis , 75:3–19 Medline ,  Google Scholar

Ogden, T.H. ( 1989 ). The Primitive Edge of Experience . Lanham, ND: Jason Aronson. Google Scholar

Rickman, J. ( 1957 ). Selected Contributions to Psychoanalysis . New York: Basic Books Google Scholar

Ricoeur , ( 1970 ). Freud and Philosophy . New Haven: Yale University Press. Google Scholar

Sherwood, M. ( 1969 ). The Logic of Explanation in Psychoanalysis . New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar

Spezzano, C. ( 1996 ). The three faces of two-person psychology: Development, ontology, and epistemology . Psychoanalytic Dialogue , 6:599–622. Crossref ,  Google Scholar

Stolorow, R.D., Atwood, G.E., & Brandchaft, B. ( 1994 ). The Intersubjective Perspective. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Google Scholar

Tuckett, D. ( 1993 ). Some thoughts on the presentation and discussion of the clinical material in psychoanalysis . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis , 74, 1175–1189. Medline ,  Google Scholar

Wakenfield,J. ( 1990 ). Hermenneutics and empiricism: Commentary on Donald . In S.B. MesserL.A. SassR.L. Woolfolk (Eds.), Hermeneutics and Psychological Theory: Interpretive Perspectives on Personality, Psychotherapy and Psychopathology . New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar

Winnicott, D.W. ( 1945 ). Primitive Emotional Development . International Journal of Psycho-Analysis , 26,137–143. Medline ,  Google Scholar

• Cited by None

Researched by Consultants from Top-Tier Management Companies

Powerpoint Templates

Icon Bundle

Kpi Dashboard

Professional

Business Plans

Swot Analysis

Gantt Chart

Business Proposal

Marketing Plan

Project Management

Business Case

Business Model

Cyber Security

Business PPT

Digital Marketing

Digital Transformation

Human Resources

Product Management

Artificial Intelligence

Company Profile

Acknowledgement PPT

PPT Presentation

Reports Brochures

One Page Pitch

Interview PPT

All Categories

Top 7 Medical Case Presentation Templates with Samples and Examples

Sarojit Hazra

How does information expand beyond essential recollection? Facts alone can diminish in value over time. Context and implementation are crucial to form deep connections and roots. Here comes the role of case studies for clinical personnel in the medical field.

In the always-growing healthcare industry, medical case presentation is essential as it is a suggestion for new researchers. A medical case study is a report where a medical practitioner shares a patient's case. It comprises every detail related to patients. It is beneficial for describing a new medical condition, management options, or treatment for diseases.

Medical case presentations contribute significantly to the evolution of medical knowledge and research.

Case study analysis is essential for every business or industry, like the medical industry. It helps in managing the twists and turns of the industry. Want to take some ideas? Have a look at SlideTeam’s blog Case Analysis Templates .

Let us highlight some significant benefits of medical case presentation:

• Case study presentations are extremely good at depicting realistic clinical frameworks.
• It helps to enhance student participation alongside the joy of learning.
• These are ideal for sharing the latest information on the clinical landscape.
• It promotes critical thinking.
• It can also make better clinical outcomes.

If you are in the healthcare sector, another important tool is the medical dashboard. For a deeper insight, quickly take a look at Medical dashboard Templates .

Each of the slides is 100% editable and customizable. The 100% customizable nature of the templates allows you to edit your presentations. The content-ready slides give you the much-needed structure. Below, let’s explore a wide array of ready to use, content ready medical case presentation templates fit for your organization.

Template 1: Case Study on Blockchain Application in Healthcare: Medical Staff Credential Verification

Blockchain is becoming a potential solution to verify medical credentials. Though these are open to the public, they can be restricted through permissions. Are you finding it difficult to understand and implement? SlideTeam introduces this PPT Template that highlights how to operationalize medical staff verification process using blockchain technology. It explains that healthcare-based systems can also be used to verify the credentials of medical staff. Solutions-based blockchain to track the experiences of medical professionals. The PPT slides are designed with suitable icons, designs, graphs and other relevant material. Grab it quickly and draft your case study as per the client’s requirements.

Click to Download

Template 2: Cost Benefits IOT Digital Twins Implementation Use Cases in the Medical Domain

This PPT template is designed to focus on the use cases in the medical domain, including research and development, diagnosis, surgery, medical equipment, etc. The slide offers a brief description of the mentioned use cases to understand the scenario better. Use it as an essential tool and captivate your audience. Get it Now!

Template 3: Major Use Cases for Tracking Medical Assets Asset Tracking and Management IoT 

Want to simplify medical complexities? The asset tracking solution is here to accompany you. It enables the medical sector to locate patients, clinicians, and medications more accurately and quickly. IoT development has made this task much more accessible by guiding you through every significant aspect of a medical asset-tracking solution. Introducing our slide exhibiting use cases of medical tools that can be tracked with IoT technology . Medical assets, including medical tools, medical equipment tracking, medications , etc., are shown in the layout with their use cases and impacts. Each topic is depicted in separate tables with appropriate icons.

Template 4: AIoT Healthcare Applications in Medical Imaging

AIoT is making the medical sector smarter and wiser to improve data management and human-machine interaction. When AIoT is applied to healthcare, enables virtual monitoring and accurate diagnosis of patients to develop a personalized patient experience. Here, we introduce our premium PPT Templates showcasing applications of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) in radiology. You can provide detailed information about remote diagnosis , personalized treatment , and real-time monitoring. Adapt it now to increase your presentation threshold and educate your audience.

Template 5: Case Study of Leading Medical Devices Manufacturing Organization

An array of disruptive themes is shaping the medical device industry, and cloud computing is one of them. Soon, cloud computing will have a more significant impact on this industry. So, for your convenience, we are presenting our slide covering a case study of blue cloud with lending medical devices manufacturing organization. It covers significant topics like client objective, problem, our solution, and results chronologically. Consisting of three essential stages, this template is excellent for educating and enticing your audience.

Template 6: IoT Technology Use Case for Medical Treatment

IoT, or the Internet of Things, is gaining significance across industries, and the medical sector is no exception. It has taken medical treatment to a new level. This custom-built PowerPoint Template exhibits the use of IoT technology in domains of the healthcare industry. It provides a digital solution for patient treatment. The key elements are primary care, acute care, virtual hospital, etc., which are depicted along with descriptions, benefits, and additional comments. Each illustration is highlighted, colored and has a relevant icon for instantaneous identification. 

Template 7: IoT Medical Healthcare Technology Use Cases

The transformation of healthcare into digital healthcare has resulted in the rise of IoMT, or medical IoT . It refers to connected devices in medical healthcare and has become one of the fastest-growing industries in the IoT market. It would help if you dived deeper to manage, monitor, and preserve IoT devices in medical healthcare. This PPT presentation demonstrates uses of IoT Medical Healthcare Technology in monitoring patient health. Moreover, the slide includes remote patient monitoring, reduced waiting time, identifying chronic diseases, and drug management. Download this template design and present your case study with ultimate professionalism.

HEALTH CONSULTATION WILL BE QUICKER, SAFER AND SECURE

Case studies have a great history as an educational tool for clinicians. These are highly beneficial for nurturing deeper insights and learning. Access to such visually appealing and comprehensively presented Top 7 Medical Case Presentation Templates enables medical professionals to quickly present their patients' case studies. Be it tracking of medical assets, application of IoT in the clinical field, IoT medical healthcare technology uses, and so on, these templates serve as essential equipment in implementing all.

P.S. For perfection and success, you should dig into SlideTeam's fantastic blog, Medical Report Templates .

Related posts:

• How to Design the Perfect Service Launch Presentation [Custom Launch Deck Included]
• Quarterly Business Review Presentation: All the Essential Slides You Need in Your Deck
• [Updated 2023] How to Design The Perfect Product Launch Presentation [Best Templates Included]
• 99% of the Pitches Fail! Find Out What Makes Any Startup a Success

Liked this blog? Please recommend us

Top 10 Training Framework Templates with Examples and Samples

Top 5 Product Strategy Framework Templates with Samples and Examples

This form is protected by reCAPTCHA - the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Digital revolution powerpoint presentation slides

Sales funnel results presentation layouts

3d men joinning circular jigsaw puzzles ppt graphics icons

Business Strategic Planning Template For Organizations Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Future plan powerpoint template slide

Project Management Team Powerpoint Presentation Slides

Brand marketing powerpoint presentation slides

Launching a new service powerpoint presentation with slides go to market

Agenda powerpoint slide show

Four key metrics donut chart with percentage

Engineering and technology ppt inspiration example introduction continuous process improvement

Meet our team representing in circular format

How to Write a Conference Abstract

• Finding Conferences
• Abstract Preparation
• How to Write a Scientific or Research Abstract

What is a Case Report Abstract?

Author information, writing a title, introduction, case presentation.

• How to Write a Quality Improvement Project Abstract
• Writing Tips
• Reasons for Rejection

Medical and clinical case reports (or “clinical vignettes”) are integral in recording unusual and rare cases of diseases, disorders, and injuries. They provide not only the details of a given case, but also briefly include background and establish the wider significance of a case in the medical literature.

• You should aim for completeness; Use full names and formal credentials; department and institution worked. The author information usually does NOT count against the total word count but be sure you check the instructions.
• There may be a limit on how many authors can be on the submission.
• The first author is the one who conceived the study and did most of the work; will be the person who presents. Sometimes you have to be a member of an association to submit an abstract, so check for those rules as well.
• Full disclosure on sponsors.
• Check how your abstract is being reviewed. Is it blind? You may see instructions like, To ensure blinded peer-review, no direct references to the author(s) or institution(s) of origin should be made anywhere in the title, body, tables or figures.

Your best strategy in writing a title: Write the abstract first.  Then pull out 6-10 key words or key phrases found in the abstract, and string them together into various titles. Brainstorm lots of keywords to help find the best mix.

• Ideally 10-12 words long
• Title should highlight the case​
• Avoid low-impact phrases like ‘effect of... ‘ or ‘influence of…’; Do not include jargon or unfamiliar acronyms
• 2-4 sentences long
• Give clinical context
• Explain the relevance or importance of this case.  Describe whether the case is unique. If not, does the case have an​ unusual diagnosis, prognosis, therapy or harm? Is the case an unusual presentation of a common condition? Or an unusual complication of a disease or management?​
• Describe the instructive or teaching points that add value to this case. Does it demonstrate a cost-effective approach to management or​alternative diagnostic/treatment strategy? Does it increase awareness of a rare condition? 
• 8-10 sentences long
• Use standard presentation format
• Present the information chronologically​
• Patient history; physical examination; investigations tried; clinical course
• Describe the history, examination and investigations adequately. Is the cause of the patient's illness clear-cut? What are other plausible explanations?​
• Describe the treatments adequately. Have all available therapeutic options been considered? Are outcomes related to treatments? Include the patient’s progress and outcome
• 3-4 sentences long
• ​Review the uniqueness of this case. Explain the rationale for reporting the case. What is unusual about the case? Does it challenge prevailing wisdom?​
• Review any relevant literature. Describe how this case is different from those previously reported​
• Impart any lessons learned. In the future, could things be done differently in a similar case
• Case report abstract example
• << Previous: How to Write a Scientific or Research Abstract
• Next: How to Write a Quality Improvement Project Abstract >>
• Last Updated: Feb 14, 2024 8:15 AM
• URL: https://guides.temple.edu/howtowriteaconferenceabstract

Temple University

University libraries.

See all library locations

• Library Directory
• Locations and Directions
• Frequently Called Numbers

Need help? Email us at [email protected]

Oral & Maxillofacial Diagnostics

International Oral Diseases Case Presentation Conference 2024

Welcome to the International Oral Diseases Case Presentation Conference 2024

When: 3-5 May 2024 Where: Virtual Event – Access from Anywhere in the World on vFairs

REGISTER NOW

Social media kit, sponsorship opportunities, unlocking knowledge, fostering collaboration.

Join us for the third edition of the groundbreaking International Oral Diseases Case Presentation Conference (IODCPC), a fully virtual event designed to bring together the brightest minds in oral and maxillofacial diagnostics. Over two dynamic days, we’ll delve into the rare cases, latest diagnostic guidelines, innovative practices, and collaborative solutions to optimize diagnosis and care in oral and maxillofacial diseases.

Who Should Attend

Equal opportunity access, our partners, iodcpc24- news, why attend:, who should attend.

Healthcare Professionals interested in oral health

Registration

Secure your spot at the forefront of oral and maxillofacial pathology. Early bird registration is now closed. Register now to take advantage of this unique learning and networking opportunity. As a registered attendee, you’ll enjoy full access to the conference venue, a complimentary copy of the proceedings book, and the ability to watch the proceedings for up to 15 days after the conference. Plus, we’ll provide you with a participation certificate to showcase your attendance. Register now!

You will receive a registration link by email from V-fair after 48 working hours.

International – regular

International- Student

India- Regular

INDIA – Student

Equal Opportunity Access – Special Registration

At Oral Pathology 360, we believe in empowering every professional and student in the field of oral and maxillofacial diagnostics to advance their knowledge and career, regardless of their circumstances. This special rate is part of our commitment to inclusivity and accessibility.

Eligibility Criteria: This rate is intended for individuals who are:

• Experiencing financial hardship.
• Residing in conflict-affected areas.
• Facing employment challenges.
• Students or professionals in countries with economic constraints.
• Pay only 50% of the Regular/Student cost.
• Full access to all conference sessions.
• Confidential registration is displayed as “Student” or “Regular”.

Apply : Complete a brief application form to request this special rate. Your privacy and confidentiality are assured.

Deadline : Applications must be submitted by April 27th, 2024 .

Questions? Contact us at [email protected] for assistance.

Call for Sponsors

We invite you to explore a spectrum of sponsorship opportunities that align with your brand’s values and support a movement toward transformative healthcare.

Strategic Partnership

Shape our event with the Diagnostics Connect Program. Join us to connect with potential sponsors in publishing, imaging, and laboratory technology and services, earn rewards, and make an impact.

Iodcpc24- social media kit.

Social Media Kit & Customizable Badges! We are thrilled to provide a digital social media kit with everything you need to spread the word and showcase your involvement. Both badges come with customizable options, allowing you to add your name, the topic you’re presenting on, or anything else you’d like to highlight about your participation.

This kit features:

I Am Attending” Badge : Perfect for attendees who want to tell the world about their participation

I Am Presenting” Badge : Tailored for our speakers to highlight their role and sessions

We take pride in our partnerships-.

Abstract Submission is closed

Case presentations are an essential yet often forgotten component of learning. We are excited to have them take the center in our annual case presentation conference. We encourage all attendees to submit their most interesting and challenging cases and case series for presentation and look forward to a lively and informative discussion.

Presentation in the IODCPC24 provides several unique benefits:

Check last year’s book here..

Monthly Case Conference Presentations: 

These monthly conferences consist of a 15-20 minute discussion of a geriatric medicine topic followed by one or two patient cases presented by ​staff from primary care clinics. Geriatric specialists provide ​the brief didactic and the panel for the case discussion. Each panel includes a geriatrician, geriatric psychiatrist, pharmacist, social worker and primary care liaison (community services representative). Only the didactic components are posted to protect patient confidentiality. Submit a case for review.

Upcoming Presentations Thursday, May 2, 2024 – Brandi Flagg, MD and Nubia Quiros – “Sharing  What Matters as patients complete Advance Care Planning” Thursday, June 6, 2024 – Jane Potter, MD – “Collaborating in Care of Older Patients under the Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Program: What did we do, and did it make a difference?”

Archived Presentations and Resources:

Additional Presentations

Got any suggestions?

We want to hear from you! Send us a message and help improve Slidesgo

Top searches

Trending searches

teacher appreciation

11 templates

cybersecurity

6 templates

spring season

34 templates

archaeology

45 templates

46 templates

23 templates

Case Report Presentation templates

Free medical google slides themes and powerpoint templates to present a concise, organized clinical case report. customize them with the easy-to-edit graphic resources included, and create an effective presentation..

Cycle Diagrams Theme for a Case Report

Download the "Cycle Diagrams Theme for a Case Report" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for...

Enteral Nutrition Case Report

Download the "Enteral Nutrition Case Report" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for healthcare professionals to...

Premium template

Unlock this template and gain unlimited access

Clinical Case 02-2023

Clinical cases are an important reference in the medical community, since they are a trustworthy source of information for doctors. This SlidesGo template will help you explain all the data in an interesting way.

Clinical Case 01-2023

Present your clinical case to the medical community with this dynamic and engaging presentation by Slidesgo. Who said science can’t be creative and fun?

Clinical Case in Neurology

Neurology is one of the most complex branches there is in the field of medicine. Dealing with all sorts of disorders and conditions related to the nervous system, clinical cases can often be complicated and as such require a deeper analysis for better understanding. This medical presentation template for neurology...

Immunological Disorders Case Report

Download the "Immunological Disorders Case Report" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for healthcare professionals to...

Vein Diseases: Obstructive Venous Syndrome - Clinical Case

Download the "Vein Diseases: Obstructive Venous Syndrome - Clinical Case" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity...

Clinical Case 04-2023

When trying to prevent diseases, information is key, and if it’s reliable, all the better. With this new free medical template, you can show the results of a clinical case, including the symptoms, the patient monitoring, the treatment and all the important data. Its design will help you grab your...

Pain Clinical Case

This clinical case template has some geometrical aspects that help you organize your content, but what really helps is the inclusion of tables, infographics, maps and other slides to review the patient history, the case timeline and other essential data.

Clinical Case 03-2023

Clinical cases are very important and serve as a good source of reliable information, since they present a detailed report of things such as symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of a patient. This new free medical template by Slidesgo will help you with the hard task of creating an effective presentation...

Side Effects of Candidiasis Case Report

Download the "Side Effects of Candidiasis Case Report" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for healthcare...

Maternal Stroke Clinical Case

Download the "Maternal Stroke Clinical Case" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for healthcare professionals to...

Clinical Case 05-2023

We know how useful clinical case presentations are within the medical community. This new free template by Slidesgo will help you create an effective presentation and impress your audience.

Clinical Case 06-2023

Slidesgo is back with a new free medical template, perfect for a presentation about a clinical case. The design is very appealing, so these slides are a nice tool to provide a lot of useful information for doctors and researchers.

Pastel Blue Clinical Case

If you are a doctor and you are working on a clinical case, we have a proposal that will be great for you to present the results of your research. The main color is pastel blue, which is related to health and trust. In addition, we have included many photos...

Fetal Monitoring Case Report

Download the "Fetal Monitoring Case Report" presentation for PowerPoint or Google Slides. A clinical case is more than just a set of symptoms and a diagnosis. It is a unique story of a patient, their experiences, and their journey towards healing. Each case is an opportunity for healthcare professionals to...

Clinical Case 07-2019

Here at Slidesgo we’re increasing our catalogue of medical presentation templates with this new design, fresh from the operating room. It’s so original and professional it will help you focus on the important data you need to show to other doctors and physicians.

Rare Disease Clinical Case

2020 is quite special because it’s a leap year, but what could happen on February 29 that makes it particular? It’s when Rare Disease Day is held, whose goal is to raise awareness for lesser-known diseases. The design of our free clinical case presentation template focuses on this topic.

• Page 1 of 29

New! Make quick presentations with AI

Slidesgo AI presentation maker puts the power of design and creativity in your hands, so you can effortlessly craft stunning slideshows in minutes.

Register for free and start editing online

Case Study 5.7: Conference Presentation Templates

Conferences organizers and professional organizations are increasingly experimenting with practices to encourage authors to create accessible conference materials and publications. These developments may again be of interest to librarians who often archive conference materials. Some of these practices may be useful to IR managers seeking to collaborate with conference leads and authors on integrating accessibility into their planning and practice.

Debbie Krahmer, Colgate University, pointed to examples of this work taking place in the Code4Lib and Digital Library Federation (DLF) communities. Code4Lib supplied conference attendees with guidelines on creating accessible presentations and a Google Group staffed with volunteers to answer questions and address concerns. The DLF has similarly published a guide to creating accessible and interactive online presentations , which includes instructions on how to work with accessible PowerPoint templates. Included as well is the recommendation to retain and share original PowerPoint files rather than converting to PDF, which is notoriously challenging to remediate for accessibility.

Nathan Tallman, Penn State University Libraries, also described work at the National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA) to improve the accessibility of both documents and conference presentations. The NDSA Communication and Publications Working Group circulated a publications template designed for accessibility and annotated to explain accessibility choices to authors. This template accompanies an “ NDSA Style Guide ” that similarly includes discussions of accessibility.

Krahmer noted that conference presenters seem to respond well to accessibility guidance. They speculated that authors will take these measures in stride because, when proposing to present at conferences, presenters are highly invested in sharing their ideas. Krahmer remarked as well that accessibility advocates in the Code4Lib community have helped normalize accessibility practices and that conference culture is also an important factor for ensuring more accessible conference materials.

Overall, the NDSA, DLF, and Code4Lib examples illustrate how outreach to conference organizers and presenters may be an effective strategy for both improving conference accessibility and populating repositories with born-accessible content.

Share This Book

• Increase Font Size

Division of Hematology Presents: "Decoding Peripheral Blood Smears" Soheir Adam, MD; "A Case of Delayed Bleeding after Tonsillectomy" Ayanna Baptiste, MD

Event sponsored by: