counterclaim in a persuasive essay

When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis and offer some reasoning, using evidence, that suggests why the thesis is true. When you counter-argue, you consider a possible argument against your thesis or some aspect of your reasoning. This is a good way to test your ideas when drafting, while you still have time to revise them. And in the finished essay, it can be a persuasive and (in both senses of the word) disarming tactic. It allows you to anticipate doubts and pre-empt objections that a skeptical reader might have; it presents you as the kind of person who weighs alternatives before arguing for one, who confronts difficulties instead of sweeping them under the rug, who is more interested in discovering the truth than winning a point.

Not every objection is worth entertaining, of course, and you shouldn't include one just to include one. But some imagining of other views, or of resistance to one's own, occurs in most good essays. And instructors are glad to encounter counterargument in student papers, even if they haven't specifically asked for it.

The Turn Against

Counterargument in an essay has two stages: you turn against your argument to challenge it and then you turn back to re-affirm it. You first imagine a skeptical reader, or cite an actual source, who might resist your argument by pointing out

a problem with your demonstration, e.g., that a different conclusion could be drawn from the same facts, a key assumption is unwarranted, a key term is used unfairly, certain evidence is ignored or played down;
one or more disadvantages or practical drawbacks to what you propose;
an alternative explanation or proposal that makes more sense.

You introduce this turn against with a phrase like One might object here that... or It might seem that... or It's true that... or Admittedly,... or Of course,... or with an anticipated challenging question: But how...? or But why...? or But isn't this just...? or But if this is so, what about...? Then you state the case against yourself as briefly but as clearly and forcefully as you can, pointing to evidence where possible. (An obviously feeble or perfunctory counterargument does more harm than good.)

The Turn Back

Your return to your own argument—which you announce with a but, yet, however, nevertheless or still —must likewise involve careful reasoning, not a flippant (or nervous) dismissal. In reasoning about the proposed counterargument, you may

refute it, showing why it is mistaken—an apparent but not real problem;
acknowledge its validity or plausibility, but suggest why on balance it's relatively less important or less likely than what you propose, and thus doesn't overturn it;
concede its force and complicate your idea accordingly—restate your thesis in a more exact, qualified, or nuanced way that takes account of the objection, or start a new section in which you consider your topic in light of it. This will work if the counterargument concerns only an aspect of your argument; if it undermines your whole case, you need a new thesis.

Where to Put a Counterargument

Counterargument can appear anywhere in the essay, but it most commonly appears

as part of your introduction—before you propose your thesis—where the existence of a different view is the motive for your essay, the reason it needs writing;
as a section or paragraph just after your introduction, in which you lay out the expected reaction or standard position before turning away to develop your own;
as a quick move within a paragraph, where you imagine a counterargument not to your main idea but to the sub-idea that the paragraph is arguing or is about to argue;
as a section or paragraph just before the conclusion of your essay, in which you imagine what someone might object to what you have argued.

But watch that you don't overdo it. A turn into counterargument here and there will sharpen and energize your essay, but too many such turns will have the reverse effect by obscuring your main idea or suggesting that you're ambivalent.

Counterargument in Pre-Writing and Revising

Good thinking constantly questions itself, as Socrates observed long ago. But at some point in the process of composing an essay, you need to switch off the questioning in your head and make a case. Having such an inner conversation during the drafting stage, however, can help you settle on a case worth making. As you consider possible theses and begin to work on your draft, ask yourself how an intelligent person might plausibly disagree with you or see matters differently. When you can imagine an intelligent disagreement, you have an arguable idea.

And, of course, the disagreeing reader doesn't need to be in your head: if, as you're starting work on an essay, you ask a few people around you what they think of topic X (or of your idea about X) and keep alert for uncongenial remarks in class discussion and in assigned readings, you'll encounter a useful disagreement somewhere. Awareness of this disagreement, however you use it in your essay, will force you to sharpen your own thinking as you compose. If you come to find the counterargument truer than your thesis, consider making it your thesis and turning your original thesis into a counterargument. If you manage to draft an essay without imagining a counterargument, make yourself imagine one before you revise and see if you can integrate it.

Gordon Harvey (adapted from The Academic Essay: A Brief Anatomy), for the Writing Center at Harvard University

Your version of Internet Explorer is either running in "Compatibility View" or is too outdated to display this site. If you believe your version of Internet Explorer is up to date, please remove this site from Compatibility View by opening Tools > Compatibility View settings (IE11) or clicking the broken page icon in your address bar (IE9, IE10)

Missouri S&T Missouri S&T

Future Students
Current Students
Faculty and Staff
writingcenter.mst.edu
Online Resources
Writing Guides
Counter Arguments

Writing and Communication Center

314 Curtis Laws Wilson Library, 400 W 14th St Rolla, MO 65409 United States
(573) 341-4436
[email protected]

Counter Argument

One way to strengthen your argument and demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the issue you are discussing is to anticipate and address counter arguments, or objections. By considering opposing views, you show that you have thought things through, and you dispose of some of the reasons your audience might have for not accepting your argument. Ask yourself what someone who disagrees with you might say in response to each of the points you’ve made or about your position as a whole.

If you can’t immediately imagine another position, here are some strategies to try:

Do some research. It may seem to you that no one could possibly disagree with the position you are taking, but someone probably has. Look around to see what stances people have and do take on the subject or argument you plan to make, so that you know what environment you are addressing.
Talk with a friend or with your instructor. Another person may be able to play devil’s advocate and suggest counter arguments that haven’t occurred to you.
Consider each of your supporting points individually. Even if you find it difficult to see why anyone would disagree with your central argument, you may be able to imagine more easily how someone could disagree with the individual parts of your argument. Then you can see which of these counter arguments are most worth considering. For example, if you argued “Cats make the best pets. This is because they are clean and independent,” you might imagine someone saying “Cats do not make the best pets. They are dirty and demanding.”

Once you have considered potential counter arguments, decide how you might respond to them: Will you concede that your opponent has a point but explain why your audience should nonetheless accept your argument? Or will you reject the counterargument and explain why it is mistaken? Either way, you will want to leave your reader with a sense that your argument is stronger than opposing arguments.

Two strategies are available to incorporate counter arguments into your essay:

Refutation:

Refutation seeks to disprove opposing arguments by pointing out their weaknesses. This approach is generally most effective if it is not hostile or sarcastic; with methodical, matter-of-fact language, identify the logical, theoretical, or factual flaws of the opposition.

For example, in an essay supporting the reintroduction of wolves into western farmlands, a writer might refute opponents by challenging the logic of their assumptions:

Although some farmers have expressed concern that wolves might pose a threat to the safety of sheep, cattle, or even small children, their fears are unfounded. Wolves fear humans even more than humans fear wolves and will trespass onto developed farmland only if desperate for food. The uninhabited wilderness that will become the wolves’ new home has such an abundance of food that there is virtually no chance that these shy animals will stray anywhere near humans.

Here, the writer acknowledges the opposing view (wolves will endanger livestock and children) and refutes it (the wolves will never be hungry enough to do so).

Accommodation:

Accommodation acknowledges the validity of the opposing view, but argues that other considerations outweigh it. In other words, this strategy turns the tables by agreeing (to some extent) with the opposition.

For example, the writer arguing for the reintroduction of wolves might accommodate the opposing view by writing:

Critics of the program have argued that reintroducing wolves is far too expensive a project to be considered seriously at this time. Although the reintroduction program is costly, it will only become more costly the longer it is put on hold. Furthermore, wolves will help control the population of pest animals in the area, saving farmers money on extermination costs. Finally, the preservation of an endangered species is worth far more to the environment and the ecological movement than the money that taxpayers would save if this wolf relocation initiative were to be abandoned.

This writer acknowledges the opposing position (the program is too expensive), agrees (yes, it is expensive), and then argues that despite the expense the program is worthwhile.

Some Final Hints

Don’t play dirty. When you summarize opposing arguments, be charitable. Present each argument fairly and objectively, rather than trying to make it look foolish. You want to convince your readers that you have carefully considered all sides of the issues and that you are not simply attacking or caricaturing your opponents.

Sometimes less is more. It is usually better to consider one or two serious counter arguments in some depth, rather than to address every counterargument.

Keep an open mind. Be sure that your reply is consistent with your original argument. Careful consideration of counter arguments can complicate or change your perspective on an issue. There’s nothing wrong with adopting a different perspective or changing your mind, but if you do, be sure to revise your thesis accordingly.

Reading Skills

Developing claims and counterclaims.

The Albert Team
Last Updated On: December 27, 2023

What We Review

Introduction

When you’re diving into a persuasive speech, article, or essay, there are two key things to look out for: the claim and the counterclaim. The claim is basically what the author believes and wants you to agree with. It’s their main point or argument about a topic. On the flip side, the counterclaim is the opposite stance. It’s a position that challenges or disagrees with the author’s claim.

Getting a grip on both claims and counterclaims is super important. Why? Because it helps you become more savvy when you read different nonfiction texts. You’ll be able to spot what the writer is arguing for (the claim) and what arguments might go against it (the counterclaim). Plus, it’s a great skill for when you start making your own arguments in essays or discussions. Understanding both sides of a topic makes your own arguments stronger and more balanced.

Understanding Claims

A claim is what the author or speaker is trying to convince you of, their main point or argument. But it’s not enough just to state a claim; it needs to be backed up with solid evidence and also be ready to face counterclaims (which are basically the opposite arguments).

There are different types of claims, and knowing them can help you understand and make better arguments:

Fact : This type of claim focuses on answering questions such as, “is it true,” “did it happen,” or “who is this person?”. For example, a sample fact claim could be: “Lebron James’ I Promise School in Akron, OH provides an effective model for meeting students’ needs on educational, physical, emotional, and social levels.”
Definition : This type of claim focuses on answering questions such as, “what does this term mean in this context?” For example, a sample definition claim could be: “Being someone’s friend on social media has an entirely different meaning than being in a real-life friendship.”
Value : This type of claim focuses on answering questions such as, “is this good or bad?” or “how do we define what is good or what is bad?” For example, a sample value claim could be: “Cell phones should not be allowed in high school because these devices detract from student performance and affect students’ emotional well-being.”
Cause : This type of claim answers questions such as, “what is the cause?” and “what is the effect?” For example, a sample cause claim could be: “By reintroducing home economics classes into high school curriculum, students will be more prepared for adult responsibilities and less dependent on their parents after they graduate high school.”
Comparison : This type of claim answers questions such as, “what can we learn from comparing these two topics?” For example, a comparison claim could be: “When placed side-by-side, Marvel and DC comic book universes reveal much closer similarities between one another than one would expect.”
Policy : This type of claim answers questions such as, “what type of policies would benefit this group?” or “how should various policies be enforced in different circumstances?” For example, a policy claim could be: “Employers must provide new mothers with one year of paid leave with a guarantee of employment following this period of absence.”

No matter how strong a claim sounds, it must have a firm foundation. Otherwise, it is easily toppled by opposing counterclaims. The foundation of an effective claim is sufficient and relevant supporting evidence. Be sure to include the rebuttal of counterclaims with further supporting evidence. Sufficient supporting evidence means the writer has enough evidence to support their claim. But be careful – too much information can make your main point hard to see. And always be ready to address counterclaims with more evidence. This makes your argument stronger and shows you’ve thought about all sides of the issue.

Developing Counterclaims

A counterclaim is an opposing argument that seeks to disprove or weaken another claim.

Just like there are many different kinds of claims, there are just as many variations of counterclaims. For example, if someone wanted to counter the “Fact Claim” above, “Lebron James’ I Promise School in Akron, OH provides an effective model for meeting students’ needs on educational, physical, emotional, and social levels,” they would use sufficient and relevant evidence to argue that “Lebron James’ I Promise School in Akron, OH does not provide an effective model for meeting students’ needs on educational, physical, emotional, and social levels.”

Dealing with different viewpoints, especially on sensitive topics, can be tough. It’s not always easy to listen to opinions that go against what you believe. But here’s the thing – understanding and considering these opposing perspectives can actually make your own argument stronger. It shows that you’re open-minded and have thought about the issue from all angles. Plus, it teaches a valuable lesson: it’s totally okay to agree to disagree. Not everyone will see things the way you do, and that’s alright. In the world of persuasive writing and speaking, being able to develop and understand counterclaims is a key skill that can really take your arguments to the next level.

In school, you might practice making claims and counterclaims on topics that don’t seem super important to you. But as you grow and start forming your own strong opinions on different subjects, you’ll see how this skill really comes into play in the real world.

One thing you’ll learn is that introducing opposite opinions can sometimes lead to disagreements or conflicts. That’s just part of life. But here’s the key: to be a really good communicator, whether in your personal life or in the workplace, it’s important to know how to peacefully coexist with people who have different views.

Understanding how to discuss and debate ideas respectfully is a super valuable skill. It helps you express your own thoughts clearly while also being open to hearing what others have to say. This doesn’t mean you have to change your opinions, but being able to consider different perspectives can make you a more thoughtful and well-rounded thinker. So, as you continue to shape your views on various topics, remember that being able to agree to disagree is a part of growing into a skilled and respectful communicator.

Practice Makes Perfect

In addition to the recommended activities above, Albert provides a wide range of texts for students to analyze and interpret. For emerging readers, check out our Short Readings course, which uses short passages to reinforce fundamental reading skills. Readers at all ability levels may enjoy our Leveled Readings course. It offers Lexile® leveled passages focused on a unifying essential question. This allows you to keep all students on the same page regardless of reading level. Learn more about the Lexile Framework here !

For authentic practice, check out our Essential Readings in Literature course. This course provides an overview of the core texts that American students often read in English class. Each text is broken down by skill, ensuring that students approach their reading from every angle.

With our easy-to-use interface and informative feedback, Albert.io is the perfect tool for reinforcing close reading skills and helping students develop a deeper understanding of the texts they encounter.

Interested in a school license?

AP® Score Calculators

Simulate how different MCQ and FRQ scores translate into AP® scores

AP® Review Guides

The ultimate review guides for AP® subjects to help you plan and structure your prep.

Core Subject Review Guides

Review the most important topics in Physics and Algebra 1 .

SAT® Score Calculator

See how scores on each section impacts your overall SAT® score

ACT® Score Calculator

See how scores on each section impacts your overall ACT® score

Grammar Review Hub

Comprehensive review of grammar skills

AP® Posters

Download updated posters summarizing the main topics and structure for each AP® exam.

Please log in to save materials. Log in

Concessions
Counterarguments
ESL Writing

The Argumentative Essay: The Language of Concession and Counterargument

Explanations and exercises about the use of counterarguments and concessions in argumentative essays.

The Argumentative Essay: The Language of Concession and Counterargument

We have already analyzed the structure of an argumentative essays (also known as a persuasive essay), and have read samples of this kind of essay. In this session we will review the purpose and structure of an argumentative essay, and will focus on practicing the grammar of sentences that present our argument while acknowledging that there is an opposing view point. In other words, we will focus on the grammar of concession and counterargument.

Purpose and structure of an argumentative essay

Take a few minutes to refresh your knowledge about the purpose and structure of argumentative / persuasive essays.

The Purpose of Persuasive Writing

The purpose of persuasion in writing is to convince, motivate, or move readers toward a certain point of view, or opinion. The act of trying to persuade automatically implies more than one opinion on the subject can be argued.

The idea of an argument often conjures up images of two people yelling and screaming in anger. In writing, however, an argument is very different. An argument is a reasoned opinion supported and explained by evidence. To argue in writing is to advance knowledge and ideas in a positive way. Written arguments often fail when they employ ranting rather than reasoning.

Most of us feel inclined to try to win the arguments we engage in. On some level, we all want to be right, and we want others to see the error of their ways. More times than not, however, arguments in which both sides try to win end up producing losers all around. The more productive approach is to persuade your audience to consider your opinion as a valid one, not simply the right one.

The Structure of a Persuasive Essay

The following five features make up the structure of a persuasive essay:

Introduction and thesis
Opposing and qualifying ideas
Strong evidence in support of claim
Style and tone of language
A compelling conclusion

Creating an Introduction and a thesis

The persuasive essay begins with an engaging introduction that presents the general topic. The thesis typically appears somewhere in the introduction and states the writer’s point of view.

Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative claim. For example, “The hourly minimum wage is not high enough for the average worker to live on.” This is probably a true statement, but persuasive arguments should make a positive case. That is, the thesis statement should focus on how the hourly minimum wage is low or insufficient.

Acknowledging Opposing Ideas and Limits to Your Argument

Because an argument implies differing points of view on the subject, you must be sure to acknowledge those opposing ideas. Avoiding ideas that conflict with your own gives the reader the impression that you may be uncertain, fearful, or unaware of opposing ideas. Thus it is essential that you not only address counterarguments but also do so respectfully.

Try to address opposing arguments earlier rather than later in your essay. Rhetorically speaking, ordering your positive arguments last allows you to better address ideas that conflict with your own, so you can spend the rest of the essay countering those arguments. This way, you leave your reader thinking about your argument rather than someone else’s. You have the last word.

Acknowledging points of view different from your own also has the effect of fostering more credibility between you and the audience. They know from the outset that you are aware of opposing ideas and that you are not afraid to give them space.

It is also helpful to establish the limits of your argument and what you are trying to accomplish. In effect, you are conceding early on that your argument is not the ultimate authority on a given topic. Such humility can go a long way toward earning credibility and trust with an audience. Audience members will know from the beginning that you are a reasonable writer, and audience members will trust your argument as a result. For example, in the following concessionary statement, the writer advocates for stricter gun control laws, but she admits it will not solve all of our problems with crime:

Although tougher gun control laws are a powerful first step in decreasing violence in our streets, such legislation alone cannot end these problems since guns are not the only problem we face.

Such a concession will be welcome by those who might disagree with this writer’s argument in the first place. To effectively persuade their readers, writers need to be modest in their goals and humble in their approach to get readers to listen to the ideas.

Text above adapted from: Writing for Success – Open Textbook (umn.edu) Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Argument, Concession/Acknowledgment and Refutation

We have already seen that as a writer of an argumentative essay, you do not just want to present your arguments for or against a certain issue. You need to convince or persuade your readers that your opinion is the valid one. You convince readers by presenting your points of view, by presenting points of view that oppose yours, and by showing why the points of view different from yours are not as valid as yours. These three elements of an argumentative essay are known as argument (your point of view), concession/acknowledgement/counterargument (admission that there is an opposing point of view to yours) and refutation (showing why the counterargument is not valid). Acknowledging points of view different from yours and refuting them makes your own argument stronger. It shows that you have thought about all the sides of the issue instead of thinking only about your own views.

Identifying argument, counterargument, concession and refutation

We will now look at sentences from paragraphs which are part of an argumentative essay and identify these parts. Read the four sentences in each group and decide if each sentence is the argument, the counterargument, the acknowledgement / concession or the refutation. Circle your choice.

Schools need to replace paper books with e-books.

argument counterargument acknowledgement refutation

Others believe students will get bad eyesight if they read computer screens instead of paper books.

There is some truth to this statement.

However, e-books are much cheaper than paper books.

The best way to learn a foreign language is to visit a foreign country.

Some think watching movies in the foreign language is the best way to learn a language.

Even though people will learn some of the foreign language this way,

it cannot be better than actually living in the country and speaking with the people every day.

Exercise above adapted from: More Practice Recognizing Counterarguments, Acknowledgements, and Refutations. Clyde Hindman. Canvas Commons. Public domain.

More Practice Recognizing Counterarguments, Acknowledgements, and Refutations | Canvas Commons (instructure.com)

Sentence structure: Argument and Concession

Read the following sentences about the issue of cell phone use in college classrooms. Notice the connectors used between the independent and the dependent clauses.

Although cell phones are convenient, they isolate people.

dependent clause independent clause

Cell phones isolate people, even though they are convenient.

independent clause dependent clause

In the sentences above, the argument is “cell phones isolate people”. The counterargument is “cell phones are convenient” and the acknowledgment/concession is expressed by the use of although / even though to make the concession of the opposing argument.

In addition, and most importantly, notice the following:

Which clause contains the writer’s argument? Which clause contains the concession?

The writer’s position is contained in the independent clause and the concession is contained in the dependent clause. This helps the writer to highlight their argument by putting it in the clause that stands on its own and leaving the dependent clause for the concession.

Notice that it doesn’t matter if the independent clause is at the beginning or at the end of the sentence. In both cases, the argument is “cell phones isolate people.”

Notice the difference between these two sentences:

Cell phones are convenient, even though they isolate people.

independent clause dependent clause

Cell phones isolate people, even though they are convenient.

independent clause dependent clause

This pair of sentences shows how the structure of the sentence reflects the point of view of the writer. The argument in the first sentence is that cell phones are convenient. The writer feels this is the important aspect, and thus places it in the independent clause. In the dependent clause, the writer concedes that cell phones isolate people. In contrast, in the second sentence the argument is that cell phones isolate people. The writer feels this is the important aspect and therefore puts this idea in the independent clause. The writer of this sentence concedes that cell phones are convenient, and this concession appears in the dependent clause.

Read the following pairs of sentences and say which sentence in the pair has a positive attitude towards technology in our lives.

Although technology has brought unexpected problems to society, it has become an instrument of progress.
Technology has brought unexpected problems to society, even though it has become an instrument of progress.

Technology is an instrument of social change, even though there are affordability issues.
There are affordability issues with technology, even though it is it is an instrument of social change.

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike

Maria Antonini de Pino – Evergreen Valley College, San Jose, California, USA

LIST OF SOURCES (in order of appearance)

Text adapted from: Writing for Success – Open Textbook (umn.edu)

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Exercise adapted from: More Practice Recognizing Counterarguments, Acknowledgements, and Refutations. Clyde Hindman. Canvas Commons. Public domain.

Here you’ll find lots of fresh topic ideas, amazing tips from experienced academic writers, and even essay samples. Follow us and boost your skills without any effort!

How To Write A Counterclaim That Will Win Arguments

When we argue, we often focus on our own perspective and the points that support it. But what about the opposing viewpoint? What if the other side has a valid counterclaim argument too? This is where counterclaims come into play.

A counterclaim is an argument made by the opposing side in a debate or legal case that challenges the main argument.

It is important to know how to write a counterclaim as it not only shows that you have considered other viewpoints, but it also strengthens your own argument by addressing potential weaknesses.

In this article, we will guide you through the process of writing a counterclaim, how to introduce a counterclaim, how to start a counterclaim paragraph, and where do you put a counterclaim in an essay. We will define what a counterclaim is and explain why it is important to include one in your argument. We will also provide tips and examples to help you create an effective counterclaim that will enhance the persuasiveness of your overall argument. Whether you are a student writing a persuasive essay or a lawyer presenting a case in court, this article will be useful to you. So, let’s dive in and learn how to write a strong counterclaim!

Understanding the opposing viewpoint, writing a counterclaim, how to write rebuttal, incorporating the counterclaim into the overall argument, examples of effective counterclaims.

Before you can write a counterclaim, you need to understand the opposing viewpoint. A counterclaim is an argument made by the opposing side that challenges the main argument. It is important to include a counterclaim because it shows that you have considered other viewpoints and strengthens your own argument by addressing potential weaknesses.

To write an excellent counterclaim, you need to research and analyze the opposing viewpoint. This means reading articles, essays, or other sources that present the opposing argument. Take notes on the main points of the argument and the evidence that supports it. It’s also important to think critically about the opposing argument and identify any weaknesses or flaws.

Once you have a good understanding of the opposing viewpoint, you can get an idea about how to start a counterclaim. Here are some guidelines to follow:

Present the opposing viewpoint in a clear and concise manner. Make sure you accurately represent the opposing argument and avoid misrepresenting or oversimplifying it. Use credible evidence to support the counterclaim. This can include statistics, studies, or expert opinions. Make sure your evidence is from reputable sources and is relevant to the counterclaim. Address potential counterarguments to the counterclaim. Anticipate any objections or questions the reader might have and address them in your argument. This shows that you have thought through your counterclaim thoroughly and have considered potential weaknesses. Use the counterclaim to highlight common ground between opposing viewpoints. In some cases, the counterclaim might reveal areas of agreement between opposing arguments. Use these areas of agreement to build a stronger argument overall.

Once you’ve researched and analyzed the opposing viewpoint, it’s time to write a counterclaim. This is where you present the opposing viewpoint in a clear and concise manner, using credible evidence to support the counterclaim. Here are some tips for writing a strong counterclaim:

Present the opposing viewpoint in a clear and concise manner When writing a counterclaim, it’s important to be clear and concise. You want to make sure that your reader understands the opposing viewpoint and how it challenges your own argument. Use simple language and avoid jargon or technical terms that might confuse your reader. Your counterclaim should be easy to follow and understand.
Use credible evidence to support the counterclaim Just like with your own argument, you want to use credible evidence to support your counterclaim. This could be in the form of statistics, studies, expert testimony, or other types of evidence that support the opposing viewpoint. Be sure to cite your sources properly and use only reliable sources of information. Your counterclaim will be stronger if you can back it up with credible evidence.
Address potential counterarguments to the counterclaim Finally, you want to address potential counterarguments to your counterclaim. This shows that you have considered the opposing viewpoint carefully and have thought about how to respond to potential challenges. Anticipate what objections someone might raise to your counterclaim and address them directly. This will make your counterclaim more persuasive and effective.

Once you have written your counterclaim, it’s important to anticipate potential responses from the opposing viewpoint and craft a rebuttal that effectively addresses them. To write a strong rebuttal, start by identifying the most compelling arguments against your counterclaim. Once you have identified these points, make sure to address them directly and provide evidence to support your stance. Keep in mind that your rebuttal should not merely repeat your original counterclaim, but should instead present new information that strengthens your argument. By mastering the art of writing counterclaims and rebuttals, you will be able to construct a well-rounded argument that can withstand even the toughest scrutiny.

A good counterclaim should not only challenge your own argument but also enhance the persuasiveness of your overall argument. Here are some characteristics of a good counterclaim:

It presents the opposing viewpoint in a clear and concise manner.
It uses credible evidence to support the counterclaim.
It addresses potential counterarguments to the counterclaim.
It shows how the counterclaim can be reconciled with your own viewpoint.
It strengthens the overall argument by highlighting common ground or challenging assumptions.

On the other hand, a bad counterclaim can weaken the overall argument or make it less persuasive. Here are some examples of bad counterclaims:

It is based on faulty or unreliable evidence.
It presents a strawman argument, misrepresenting the opposing viewpoint.
It does not address potential counterarguments or objections.
It is irrelevant to the main argument.
It is presented in a disrespectful or dismissive manner.

When incorporating the counterclaim into your overall argument, it’s important to structure and format it in a way that is easy for your reader to follow. One effective way is to present the counterclaim after you have presented your own argument. This way, the reader can see how the counterclaim challenges your own argument and how you respond to it. You can also use transitional phrases such as “however” or “on the other hand” to signal the shift from your own argument to the counterclaim.

Here’s an example of how to structure a counterclaim:

Paragraph 1: Introduction to your own argument Paragraph 2: Supporting evidence for your own argument Paragraph 3: Counterclaim presented in a clear and concise manner Paragraph 4: Evidence to support the counterclaim Paragraph 5: Addressing potential counterarguments to the counterclaim Paragraph 6: Reconciling the counterclaim with your own argument Paragraph 7: Conclusion that ties everything together

Incorporating a counterclaim into your argument can be challenging, but when done well, it can strengthen your overall argument and make it more persuasive. By following the tips and examples provided in this article, you can write a counterclaim that challenges your own argument while also enhancing its persuasiveness.

When writing an argument, it’s not always necessary to include a counterclaim. However, in certain situations, including a counterclaim can strengthen your overall argument and make it more persuasive. Here are some situations where it may be beneficial to include a counterclaim:

When Writing a Persuasive Essay If you’re writing a persuasive essay, it’s important to address the opposing viewpoint. Failing to do so can weaken your argument and make it seem less credible. Including a counterclaim shows that you’ve considered multiple perspectives and strengthens your argument by addressing potential weaknesses.
When Presenting a Legal Case In a legal case, it’s important to anticipate and address the arguments that the opposing side will present. Including a counterclaim in your argument shows that you’ve considered these opposing arguments and strengthens your case by addressing potential weaknesses.
When Writing a Research Paper In a research paper, it’s important to acknowledge and address potential weaknesses in your argument. Including a counterclaim can help you anticipate objections and strengthen your argument by addressing these potential weaknesses.

Get Help Writing Counterclaims

In conclusion, including a counterclaim in your argument is an effective way to strengthen it and make it more persuasive. By acknowledging the facts about opposing viewpoints and addressing potential weaknesses in your argument, you can demonstrate your critical thinking skills and show that you’ve considered multiple perspectives.

Writing a counterclaim can be challenging but is an essential part of constructing a well-rounded argument. By following the steps outlined in this blog, you can craft a strong counterclaim that effectively responds to opposing viewpoints. However, if you still find yourself struggling, don’t hesitate to seek assistance from a professional writing service. Our team of creative paper writers for hire is available online to provide custom essay writing help that is tailored to your specific class, college, or university requirements. Our experienced writers work tirelessly to ensure that your persuasive paper meets the highest standards of excellence and that you receive the best possible grade from your professor. Don’t let the fear of writing a counterclaim hold you back – with our assistance, you can confidently tackle any academic writing challenge that comes your way.

In summary, knowing how to write a counterclaim is an essential skill for anyone who wants to write compelling and persuasive arguments. Whether you’re a student writing a persuasive essay, a lawyer presenting a legal case, or a writer crafting an opinion piece, including a counterclaim can help you make a more persuasive and effective argument.

What is a counterclaim in writing?

A counterclaim is a written response to an argument or claim made by the opposing party in a legal or academic setting. It presents an opposing viewpoint or argument to the original claim.

Why is it important to write a counterclaim?

Writing counterclaims is important because it allows you to present a different perspective on the issue and to address potential weaknesses in your opponent’s argument. It also demonstrates your ability to think critically and to engage in productive debate.

How do you structure a counterclaim in writing?

A counterclaim should be structured like any other argumentative essay, with an introduction, body, and conclusion. The introduction should provide context for the counterclaim and state the opposing point of view. The body should present evidence and examples to support the counterclaim, while also addressing potential counterarguments. The conclusion should summarize the main points and reiterate the importance of the counterclaim.

What are some tips for writing an effective counterclaim?

To write an effective counterclaim, you should carefully analyze the opposing argument and identify its strengths and weaknesses. You should then craft a clear and concise counterargument that addresses these weaknesses and presents a compelling alternative perspective. You should also provide evidence to support your counterclaim and anticipate potential counterarguments, addressing them in your essay. Finally, you should make sure to proofread your work carefully and edit for clarity and coherence. You can also get some help with our persuasive essays help service.

Counterargument Definition

C ounterargument refers to an argument given in response to another argument that takes an alternative approach to the issue at hand.

C ounterargument may also be known as rebuttal or refutation .

Related Concepts: Audience Awareness ; Authority (in Speech and Writing) ; Critical Literacy ; Ethos ; Openness ; Researching Your Audience

Guide to Counterarguments in Writing Studies

Counterarguments are a topic of study in Writing Studies as

Rhetors engage in rhetorical reasoning : They analyze the rebuttals their target audiences may have to their claims , interpretations , propositions, and proposals
Rhetors may develop counterarguments by questioning a rhetor’s backing , data , qualifiers, and/or warrants
Rhetors begin arguments with sincere summaries of counterarguments
a strategy of Organization .

Learning about the placement of counterarguments in Toulmin Argument , Arisotelian Argument , and Rogerian Argument will help you understand when you need to introduce counterarguments and how thoroughly you need to address them.

Why Do Counterarguments Matter?

If your goal is clarity and persuasion, you cannot ignore what your target audience thinks, feels, and does about the argument. To communicate successfully with audiences, rhetors need to engage in audience analysis : they need to understand the arguments against their argument that the audience may hold.

Imagine that you are scrolling through your social media feed when you see a post from an old friend. As you read, you immediately feel that your friend’s post doesn’t make sense. “They can’t possibly believe that!” you tell yourself. You quickly reply “I’m not sure I agree. Why do you believe that?” Your friend then posts a link to an article and tells you to see for yourself.

There are many ways to analyze your friend’s social media post or the professor’s article your friend shared. You might, for example, evaluate the professor’s article by using the CRAAP Test or by conducting a rhetorical analysis of their aims and ethos . After engaging in these prewriting heuristics to get a better sense of what your friend knows and feels about the topic at hand, you may feel more prepared to respond to their arguments and also sense how they might react to your post.

Toulmin Counterarguments

There’s more than one way to counter an argument.

In Toulmin Argument , a counterargument can be made against the writer’s claim by questioning their backing , data , qualifiers, and/or warrants . For example, let’s say we wrote the following argument:

“Social media is bad for you (claim) because it always (qualifier) promotes an unrealistic standard of beauty (backing). In this article, researchers found that most images were photoshopped (data). Standards should be realistic; if they are not, those standards are bad (warrant).”

Besides noting we might have a series of logical fallacies here, counterarguments and dissociations can be made against each of these parts:

Against the qualifier: Social media does not always promote unrealistic standards.
Against the backing : Social media presents but does not promote unrealistic standards.
Against the data : This article focuses on Instagram; these findings are not applicable to Twitter.
Against the warrant : How we approach standards matters more than the standards themselves; standards do not need to be realistic, but rather we need to be realistic about how we approach standards.

In generating and considering counterarguments and conditions of rebuttal, it is important to consider how we approach alternative views. Alternative viewpoints are opportunities not only to strengthen and contrast our own arguments with those of others; alternative viewpoints are also opportunities to nuance and develop our own arguments.

Let us continue to look at our social media argument and potential counterarguments. We might prepare responses to each of these potential counterarguments, anticipating the ways in which our audience might try to shift how we frame this situation. However, we might also concede that some of these counterarguments actually have good points.

For example, we might still believe that social media is bad, but perhaps we also need to consider more about

What factors make it worse (nuance the qualifier)?
Whether or not social media is a neutral tool or whether algorithms take advantage of our baser instincts (nuance the backing )
Whether this applies to all social media or whether we want to focus on just one social media platform (nuance the data )
How should we approach social standards (nuance the warrant )?

Identifying counterarguments can help us strengthen our arguments by helping us recognize the complexity of the issue at hand.

Neoclassical Argument – Aristotelian Argument

Learn how to compose a counterargument passage or section.

While Toulmin Argument focuses on the nuts and bolts of argumentation, a counterargument can also act as an entire section of an Aristotelian Argument . This section typically comes after you have presented your own lines of argument and evidence .

This section typically consists of two rhetorical moves :

Examples of Counterarguments

By introducing counterarguments, we show we are aware of alternative viewpoints— other definitions, explanations, meanings, solutions, etc. We want to show that we are good listeners and aren’t committing the strawman fallacy . We also concede some of the alternative viewpoints that we find most persuasive. By making concessions, we can show that we are reasonable ( ethos ) and that we are listening . Rogerian Argument is an example of building listening more fully into our writing.

Using our social media example, we might write:

I recognize that in many ways social media is only as good as the content that people upload to it. As Professor X argues, social media amplifies both the good and the bad of human nature.

Once we’ve shown that we understand and recognize good arguments when we see them, we put forward our response to the counterclaim. In our response, we do not simply dismiss alternative viewpoints, but provide our own backing, data, and warrants to show that we, in fact, have the more compelling position.

To counter Professor X’s argument, we might write:

At the same time, there are clear instances where social media amplifies the bad over the good by design. While content matters, the design of social media is only as good as the people who created it.

Through conceding and countering, we can show that we recognize others’ good points and clarify where we stand in relation to others’ arguments.

Counterarguments and Organization

Learn when and how to weave counterarguments into your texts.

As we write, it is also important to consider the extent to which we will respond to counterarguments. If we focus too much on counterarguments, we run the risk of downplaying our own contributions. If we focus too little on counterarguments, we run the risk of seeming aloof and unaware of reality. Ideally, we will be somewhere in between these two extremes.

There are many places to respond to counterarguments in our writing. Where you place your counterarguments will depend on the rhetorical situation (ex: audience , purpose, subject ), your rhetorical stance (how you want to present yourself), and your sense of kairos . Here are some common choices based on a combination of these rhetorical situation factors:

If a counterargument is well-established for your audience, you may want to respond to that counterargument earlier in your essay, clearing the field and creating space for you to make your own arguments. An essay about gun rights, for example, would need to make it clear very quickly that it is adding something new to this old debate. Doing so shows your audience that you are very aware of their needs.
If a counterargument is especially well-established for your audience and you simply want to prove that it is incorrect rather than discuss another solution, you might respond to it point by point, structuring your whole essay as an extended refutation. Fact-checking and commentary articles often make this move. Responding point by point shows that you take the other’s point of view seriously.
If you are discussing something relatively unknown or new to your audience (such as a problem with black mold in your dormitory), you might save your response for after you have made your points. Including alternative viewpoints even here shows that you are aware of the situation and have nothing to hide.

Whichever you choose, remember that counterarguments are opportunities to ethically engage with alternative viewpoints and your audience.

The following questions can guide you as you begin to think about counterarguments:

What is your argument ? What alternative positions might exist as counterarguments to your argument?
How can considering counterarguments strengthen your argument?
Given possible counterarguments, what points might you reconsider or concede?
To what extent might you respond to counterarguments in your essay so that they can create and respond to the rhetorical situation ?
Where might you place your counterarguments in your essay?
What might including counterarguments do for your ethos ?

Recommended Resources

Sweetland Center for Writing (n.d.). “ How Do I Incorporate a Counterargument? ” University of Michigan.
The Writing Center (n.d.) “ All About Counterarguments .” George Mason University.
Lachner, N. (n.d.). “ Counterarguments .” University of Nevada Reno, University Writing and Speaking Center.
Jeffrey, R. (n.d.). “ Questions for Thinking about Counterarguments .” In M. Gagich and E. Zickel, A Guide to Rhetoric, Genre, and Success in First-Year Writing.
Kause, S. (2011). “ On the Other Hand: The Role of Antithetical Writing in First Year Composition Courses .” Writing Spaces Vol. 2.
Burton, G. “ Refutatio .” Silvae Rhetoricae.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.

Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1971). “The Dissociation of Concepts”; “The Interaction of Arguments,” in The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation (pp. 411-459, 460-508), University of Notre Dame Press.

Mozafari, C. (2018). “Crafting Counterarguments,” in Fearless Writing: Rhetoric, Inquiry, Argument (pp. 333-337), MacMillian Learning

Brevity - Say More with Less

Clarity (in Speech and Writing)

Coherence - How to Achieve Coherence in Writing

Flow - How to Create Flow in Writing

Inclusivity - Inclusive Language

The Elements of Style - The DNA of Powerful Writing

Suggested Edits

Please select the purpose of your message. * - Corrections, Typos, or Edits Technical Support/Problems using the site Advertising with Writing Commons Copyright Issues I am contacting you about something else
Your full name
Your email address *
Page URL needing edits *
Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Citation - Definition - Introduction to Citation in Academic & Professional Writing

Joseph M. Moxley

Explore the different ways to cite sources in academic and professional writing, including in-text (Parenthetical), numerical, and note citations.

Collaboration - What is the Role of Collaboration in Academic & Professional Writing?

Collaboration refers to the act of working with others or AI to solve problems, coauthor texts, and develop products and services. Collaboration is a highly prized workplace competency in academic...

Genre may reference a type of writing, art, or musical composition; socially-agreed upon expectations about how writers and speakers should respond to particular rhetorical situations; the cultural values; the epistemological assumptions...

Grammar refers to the rules that inform how people and discourse communities use language (e.g., written or spoken English, body language, or visual language) to communicate. Learn about the rhetorical...

Information Literacy - Discerning Quality Information from Noise

Information Literacy refers to the competencies associated with locating, evaluating, using, and archiving information. In order to thrive, much less survive in a global information economy — an economy where information functions as a...

Mindset refers to a person or community’s way of feeling, thinking, and acting about a topic. The mindsets you hold, consciously or subconsciously, shape how you feel, think, and act–and...

Rhetoric: Exploring Its Definition and Impact on Modern Communication

Learn about rhetoric and rhetorical practices (e.g., rhetorical analysis, rhetorical reasoning, rhetorical situation, and rhetorical stance) so that you can strategically manage how you compose and subsequently produce a text...

Style, most simply, refers to how you say something as opposed to what you say. The style of your writing matters because audiences are unlikely to read your work or...

The Writing Process - Research on Composing

The writing process refers to everything you do in order to complete a writing project. Over the last six decades, researchers have studied and theorized about how writers go about...

Writing Studies

Writing studies refers to an interdisciplinary community of scholars and researchers who study writing. Writing studies also refers to an academic, interdisciplinary discipline – a subject of study. Students in...

Featured Articles

Student engrossed in reading on her laptop, surrounded by a stack of books

Academic Writing – How to Write for the Academic Community

Professional Writing – How to Write for the Professional World

Authority – How to Establish Credibility in Speech & Writing

school Campus Bookshelves
menu_book Bookshelves
perm_media Learning Objects
login Login
how_to_reg Request Instructor Account
hub Instructor Commons
Download Page (PDF)
Download Full Book (PDF)
Periodic Table
Physics Constants
Scientific Calculator
Reference & Cite
Tools expand_more
Readability

selected template will load here

This action is not available.

9.7.3: Counter Argument Paragraphs

Last updated
Save as PDF
Page ID 20657

Athena Kashyap & Erika Dyquisto
City College of San Francisco via ASCCC Open Educational Resources Initiative

Counter-Argument Paragraphs

The purpose of a counter argument is to consider (and show that you are considering) perspectives other than your own. A counter-argument tears down other viewpoints; it does not build up your own, which you should do in separate paragraphs.

Placement of Counter-Arguments in an Essay

A counter argument can appear anywhere in the essay, but it most commonly appears:

As part of your introduction—before you propose your thesis—where the existence of a different view is the motive for your essay. This works if your entire essay will be a counter-argument and you are not building up your own argument.
As a section or paragraph just after your introduction, in which you lay out the expected reaction or standard position of opposing viewpoints before turning away to develop your own.
As a quick move within a paragraph, where you imagine a counter-argument not to your main idea but to the sub-idea that the paragraph is arguing or is about to argue.
As a section or paragraph just before the conclusion of your essay, in which you imagine what someone might object to in what you have argued. (However, this is really too late to be very effective in persuading someone to your position. It only shows you are considering other points of view.

Watch that you don't overdo it. A turn into counter argument here and there will sharpen and energize your essay, but too many such turns will have the reverse effect by obscuring your main idea or suggesting that you're ambivalent about your point of view. At the worst, it can sound like you are contradicting yourself. Writing a lead-in sentence with subordination or concession can help avoid this problem.

Example Counter-Argument

The following paragraph explains an opposing point of view to the writer's position in almost the whole paragraph. Words in bold italics explain the essential component of a counter-argument that a writer is doing in the following sentence(s).

The next paragraph is the counter-argument to the previous paragraph. Notice, however, that this count-argument does have some problems. The writer doesn't distinguish between public and private charter schools and also creates some logical fallacies in the process. Counter-arguments should be logically solid, cite sources, and argue logically.

At this point, the writer would then begin to argue their point of view with sub-claims and facts developed in a number of paragraphs to support their thesis.

If a writer is constructing an entire essay as a counter-argument, then the writer will need to fully develop multiple, well-supported arguments against the other point of view. The writer may also want to point out any logical flaws or other errors in the argument that they oppose.

Contributors and Attributions

Revision, Adaptation, and Original Content. Provided by: Libretexts. License: CC BY-SA 4.0: Attribution.

This page most recently updated on June 6, 2020.

Pennington Publishing Blog

Grammar/Mechanics
Literacy Centers
Spelling/Vocabulary
Study Skills
Uncategorized

Why Use an Essay Counterclaim?

Why use an essay counterclaim? Aren’t we always taught never to argue against our own thesis? Why give the enemy (the opposite point of view) ammunition (acknowledgement and evidence)?

The counterclaim can be defined as the opposing point of view to one’s thesis. It is also commonly known as the counterargument. A counterclaim is always followed by a refutation, which is often referred to as a rebuttal. The Common Core State Standards for grades 7-12 include the counterclaim in the argumentative essay (W. 1.0).

It’s all about scholarship and tactics: intellectual honesty and manipulation.

In argumentative essays the writer must prove his or her thesis according to the rules of the game, but the writer needs to know the rules so thoroughly that these rules can be used to work in the writer’s favor. I learned this lesson the hard way when I was a senior at the University of Southern California (Go Trojans!).

As a senior I took a seminar on independent research. At the suggestion of a professor, I dug into the Halévy Thesis: the thesis that the rise of religious revivals in Eighteenth Century England helped prevent a French-style revolution. I know. Pretty obscure. But for some reason the project really got me going: The thrill of academic discovery, the smell of the musty old book stacks, the cute library helper, etc.

Anyways, I became convinced that the Halévy Thesis was true. As a twenty-one year old I had discovered absolute truth . Not only did religious revival prevent violent revolution in England, it could also save our society today, cure the common cold, and solve the Middle East problem.

An effective counterclaim can…

show how a different conclusion can be drawn from facts.
show how an assumption many be unwarranted.
show how a key term has been misused.
show how evidence has been ignored or downplayed.
show how an alternative explanation might make more sense.
test your argument.
anticipate objections to your thesis.
help the writer weigh alternatives.
show how informed you the writer are about opposing arguments.
make the writer’s argument stronger.
show that the writer is reasonable and respectful of opposing views.

Some of the above points were adapted from the Harvard Writing Center. In addition to Why Use an Essay Counterclaim, writing teachers may also be interested in these related articles: Counterclaim and Refutation Sentence Frames , Where to Put the Essay Counterclaim , and What is the Essay Counterclaim?

TEACHING ESSAYS BUNDLE

The author’s TEACHING ESSAYS BUNDLE includes the three printable and digital resources students need to master the CCSS W.1 argumentative and W.2 informational/explanatory essays. Each no-prep resource allows students to work at their own paces via mastery learning. How to Teach Essays includes 42 skill-based essay strategy worksheets (fillable PDFs and 62 Google slides), beginning with simple 3-word paragraphs and proceeding step-by-step to complex multi-paragraph essays. One skill builds upon another. The Essay Skills Worksheets include 97 worksheets (printables and 97 Google slides) to help teachers differentiate writing instruction with both remedial and advanced writing skills. The Eight Writing Process Essays (printables and 170 Google slides) each feature an on-demand diagnostic essay assessment, writing prompt with connected reading, brainstorming, graphic organizer, response, revision, and editing activities. Plus, each essay includes a detailed analytical (not holistic) rubric for assessment-based learning.

Grammar/Mechanics , Literacy Centers , Study Skills , Writing argument essay , argumentative essay , common core writing standards , Counterarguments , Counterclaims , essay argument , essay introduction , essay strategies , Mark Pennington , Opposing Claims , rebut , Rebuttal , Refutation , refute , Teaching Essay Strategies

No comments yet.
No trackbacks yet.

Links to Programs and Resources

About the Author/Contact Us
Free Reading/ELA Assessments
Free Articles and Resources
Testimonials

Join the SOR Literacy Hub - Resource Sharing FB Group

https://www.facebook.com/groups/sorliteracyhub

Choose Your Test

Sat / act prep online guides and tips, how to write an a+ argumentative essay.

Miscellaneous

You'll no doubt have to write a number of argumentative essays in both high school and college, but what, exactly, is an argumentative essay and how do you write the best one possible? Let's take a look.

A great argumentative essay always combines the same basic elements: approaching an argument from a rational perspective, researching sources, supporting your claims using facts rather than opinion, and articulating your reasoning into the most cogent and reasoned points. Argumentative essays are great building blocks for all sorts of research and rhetoric, so your teachers will expect you to master the technique before long.

But if this sounds daunting, never fear! We'll show how an argumentative essay differs from other kinds of papers, how to research and write them, how to pick an argumentative essay topic, and where to find example essays. So let's get started.

What Is an Argumentative Essay? How Is it Different from Other Kinds of Essays?

There are two basic requirements for any and all essays: to state a claim (a thesis statement) and to support that claim with evidence.

Though every essay is founded on these two ideas, there are several different types of essays, differentiated by the style of the writing, how the writer presents the thesis, and the types of evidence used to support the thesis statement.

Essays can be roughly divided into four different types:

#1: Argumentative #2: Persuasive #3: Expository #4: Analytical

So let's look at each type and what the differences are between them before we focus the rest of our time to argumentative essays.

Argumentative Essay

Argumentative essays are what this article is all about, so let's talk about them first.

An argumentative essay attempts to convince a reader to agree with a particular argument (the writer's thesis statement). The writer takes a firm stand one way or another on a topic and then uses hard evidence to support that stance.

An argumentative essay seeks to prove to the reader that one argument —the writer's argument— is the factually and logically correct one. This means that an argumentative essay must use only evidence-based support to back up a claim , rather than emotional or philosophical reasoning (which is often allowed in other types of essays). Thus, an argumentative essay has a burden of substantiated proof and sources , whereas some other types of essays (namely persuasive essays) do not.

You can write an argumentative essay on any topic, so long as there's room for argument. Generally, you can use the same topics for both a persuasive essay or an argumentative one, so long as you support the argumentative essay with hard evidence.

Example topics of an argumentative essay:

"Should farmers be allowed to shoot wolves if those wolves injure or kill farm animals?"
"Should the drinking age be lowered in the United States?"
"Are alternatives to democracy effective and/or feasible to implement?"

The next three types of essays are not argumentative essays, but you may have written them in school. We're going to cover them so you know what not to do for your argumentative essay.

Persuasive Essay

Persuasive essays are similar to argumentative essays, so it can be easy to get them confused. But knowing what makes an argumentative essay different than a persuasive essay can often mean the difference between an excellent grade and an average one.

Persuasive essays seek to persuade a reader to agree with the point of view of the writer, whether that point of view is based on factual evidence or not. The writer has much more flexibility in the evidence they can use, with the ability to use moral, cultural, or opinion-based reasoning as well as factual reasoning to persuade the reader to agree the writer's side of a given issue.

Instead of being forced to use "pure" reason as one would in an argumentative essay, the writer of a persuasive essay can manipulate or appeal to the reader's emotions. So long as the writer attempts to steer the readers into agreeing with the thesis statement, the writer doesn't necessarily need hard evidence in favor of the argument.

Often, you can use the same topics for both a persuasive essay or an argumentative one—the difference is all in the approach and the evidence you present.

Example topics of a persuasive essay:

"Should children be responsible for their parents' debts?"
"Should cheating on a test be automatic grounds for expulsion?"
"How much should sports leagues be held accountable for player injuries and the long-term consequences of those injuries?"

Expository Essay

An expository essay is typically a short essay in which the writer explains an idea, issue, or theme , or discusses the history of a person, place, or idea.

This is typically a fact-forward essay with little argument or opinion one way or the other.

Example topics of an expository essay:

"The History of the Philadelphia Liberty Bell"
"The Reasons I Always Wanted to be a Doctor"
"The Meaning Behind the Colloquialism ‘People in Glass Houses Shouldn't Throw Stones'"

Analytical Essay

An analytical essay seeks to delve into the deeper meaning of a text or work of art, or unpack a complicated idea . These kinds of essays closely interpret a source and look into its meaning by analyzing it at both a macro and micro level.

This type of analysis can be augmented by historical context or other expert or widely-regarded opinions on the subject, but is mainly supported directly through the original source (the piece or art or text being analyzed) .

Example topics of an analytical essay:

"Victory Gin in Place of Water: The Symbolism Behind Gin as the Only Potable Substance in George Orwell's 1984"
"Amarna Period Art: The Meaning Behind the Shift from Rigid to Fluid Poses"
"Adultery During WWII, as Told Through a Series of Letters to and from Soldiers"

There are many different types of essay and, over time, you'll be able to master them all.

A Typical Argumentative Essay Assignment

The average argumentative essay is between three to five pages, and will require at least three or four separate sources with which to back your claims . As for the essay topic , you'll most often be asked to write an argumentative essay in an English class on a "general" topic of your choice, ranging the gamut from science, to history, to literature.

But while the topics of an argumentative essay can span several different fields, the structure of an argumentative essay is always the same: you must support a claim—a claim that can reasonably have multiple sides—using multiple sources and using a standard essay format (which we'll talk about later on).

This is why many argumentative essay topics begin with the word "should," as in:

"Should all students be required to learn chemistry in high school?"
"Should children be required to learn a second language?"
"Should schools or governments be allowed to ban books?"

These topics all have at least two sides of the argument: Yes or no. And you must support the side you choose with evidence as to why your side is the correct one.

But there are also plenty of other ways to frame an argumentative essay as well:

"Does using social media do more to benefit or harm people?"
"Does the legal status of artwork or its creators—graffiti and vandalism, pirated media, a creator who's in jail—have an impact on the art itself?"
"Is or should anyone ever be ‘above the law?'"

Though these are worded differently than the first three, you're still essentially forced to pick between two sides of an issue: yes or no, for or against, benefit or detriment. Though your argument might not fall entirely into one side of the divide or another—for instance, you could claim that social media has positively impacted some aspects of modern life while being a detriment to others—your essay should still support one side of the argument above all. Your final stance would be that overall , social media is beneficial or overall , social media is harmful.

If your argument is one that is mostly text-based or backed by a single source (e.g., "How does Salinger show that Holden Caulfield is an unreliable narrator?" or "Does Gatsby personify the American Dream?"), then it's an analytical essay, rather than an argumentative essay. An argumentative essay will always be focused on more general topics so that you can use multiple sources to back up your claims.

Good Argumentative Essay Topics

So you know the basic idea behind an argumentative essay, but what topic should you write about?

Again, almost always, you'll be asked to write an argumentative essay on a free topic of your choice, or you'll be asked to select between a few given topics . If you're given complete free reign of topics, then it'll be up to you to find an essay topic that no only appeals to you, but that you can turn into an A+ argumentative essay.

What makes a "good" argumentative essay topic depends on both the subject matter and your personal interest —it can be hard to give your best effort on something that bores you to tears! But it can also be near impossible to write an argumentative essay on a topic that has no room for debate.

As we said earlier, a good argumentative essay topic will be one that has the potential to reasonably go in at least two directions—for or against, yes or no, and why . For example, it's pretty hard to write an argumentative essay on whether or not people should be allowed to murder one another—not a whole lot of debate there for most people!—but writing an essay for or against the death penalty has a lot more wiggle room for evidence and argument.

A good topic is also one that can be substantiated through hard evidence and relevant sources . So be sure to pick a topic that other people have studied (or at least studied elements of) so that you can use their data in your argument. For example, if you're arguing that it should be mandatory for all middle school children to play a sport, you might have to apply smaller scientific data points to the larger picture you're trying to justify. There are probably several studies you could cite on the benefits of physical activity and the positive effect structure and teamwork has on young minds, but there's probably no study you could use where a group of scientists put all middle-schoolers in one jurisdiction into a mandatory sports program (since that's probably never happened). So long as your evidence is relevant to your point and you can extrapolate from it to form a larger whole, you can use it as a part of your resource material.

And if you need ideas on where to get started, or just want to see sample argumentative essay topics, then check out these links for hundreds of potential argumentative essay topics.

101 Persuasive (or Argumentative) Essay and Speech Topics

301 Prompts for Argumentative Writing

Top 50 Ideas for Argumentative/Persuasive Essay Writing

[Note: some of these say "persuasive essay topics," but just remember that the same topic can often be used for both a persuasive essay and an argumentative essay; the difference is in your writing style and the evidence you use to support your claims.]

KO! Find that one argumentative essay topic you can absolutely conquer.

Argumentative Essay Format

Argumentative Essays are composed of four main elements:

A position (your argument)
Your reasons
Supporting evidence for those reasons (from reliable sources)
Counterargument(s) (possible opposing arguments and reasons why those arguments are incorrect)

If you're familiar with essay writing in general, then you're also probably familiar with the five paragraph essay structure . This structure is a simple tool to show how one outlines an essay and breaks it down into its component parts, although it can be expanded into as many paragraphs as you want beyond the core five.

The standard argumentative essay is often 3-5 pages, which will usually mean a lot more than five paragraphs, but your overall structure will look the same as a much shorter essay.

An argumentative essay at its simplest structure will look like:

Paragraph 1: Intro

Set up the story/problem/issue
Thesis/claim

Paragraph 2: Support

Reason #1 claim is correct
Supporting evidence with sources

Paragraph 3: Support

Reason #2 claim is correct

Paragraph 4: Counterargument

Explanation of argument for the other side
Refutation of opposing argument with supporting evidence

Paragraph 5: Conclusion

Re-state claim
Sum up reasons and support of claim from the essay to prove claim is correct

Now let's unpack each of these paragraph types to see how they work (with examples!), what goes into them, and why.

Paragraph 1—Set Up and Claim

Your first task is to introduce the reader to the topic at hand so they'll be prepared for your claim. Give a little background information, set the scene, and give the reader some stakes so that they care about the issue you're going to discuss.

Next, you absolutely must have a position on an argument and make that position clear to the readers. It's not an argumentative essay unless you're arguing for a specific claim, and this claim will be your thesis statement.

Your thesis CANNOT be a mere statement of fact (e.g., "Washington DC is the capital of the United States"). Your thesis must instead be an opinion which can be backed up with evidence and has the potential to be argued against (e.g., "New York should be the capital of the United States").

Paragraphs 2 and 3—Your Evidence

These are your body paragraphs in which you give the reasons why your argument is the best one and back up this reasoning with concrete evidence .

The argument supporting the thesis of an argumentative essay should be one that can be supported by facts and evidence, rather than personal opinion or cultural or religious mores.

For example, if you're arguing that New York should be the new capital of the US, you would have to back up that fact by discussing the factual contrasts between New York and DC in terms of location, population, revenue, and laws. You would then have to talk about the precedents for what makes for a good capital city and why New York fits the bill more than DC does.

Your argument can't simply be that a lot of people think New York is the best city ever and that you agree.

In addition to using concrete evidence, you always want to keep the tone of your essay passionate, but impersonal . Even though you're writing your argument from a single opinion, don't use first person language—"I think," "I feel," "I believe,"—to present your claims. Doing so is repetitive, since by writing the essay you're already telling the audience what you feel, and using first person language weakens your writing voice.

For example,

"I think that Washington DC is no longer suited to be the capital city of the United States."

"Washington DC is no longer suited to be the capital city of the United States."

The second statement sounds far stronger and more analytical.

Paragraph 4—Argument for the Other Side and Refutation

Even without a counter argument, you can make a pretty persuasive claim, but a counterargument will round out your essay into one that is much more persuasive and substantial.

By anticipating an argument against your claim and taking the initiative to counter it, you're allowing yourself to get ahead of the game. This way, you show that you've given great thought to all sides of the issue before choosing your position, and you demonstrate in multiple ways how yours is the more reasoned and supported side.

Paragraph 5—Conclusion

This paragraph is where you re-state your argument and summarize why it's the best claim.

Briefly touch on your supporting evidence and voila! A finished argumentative essay.

Your essay should have just as awesome a skeleton as this plesiosaur does. (In other words: a ridiculously awesome skeleton)

Argumentative Essay Example: 5-Paragraph Style

It always helps to have an example to learn from. I've written a full 5-paragraph argumentative essay here. Look at how I state my thesis in paragraph 1, give supporting evidence in paragraphs 2 and 3, address a counterargument in paragraph 4, and conclude in paragraph 5.

Topic: Is it possible to maintain conflicting loyalties?

Paragraph 1

It is almost impossible to go through life without encountering a situation where your loyalties to different people or causes come into conflict with each other. Maybe you have a loving relationship with your sister, but she disagrees with your decision to join the army, or you find yourself torn between your cultural beliefs and your scientific ones. These conflicting loyalties can often be maintained for a time, but as examples from both history and psychological theory illustrate, sooner or later, people have to make a choice between competing loyalties, as no one can maintain a conflicting loyalty or belief system forever.

The first two sentences set the scene and give some hypothetical examples and stakes for the reader to care about.

The third sentence finishes off the intro with the thesis statement, making very clear how the author stands on the issue ("people have to make a choice between competing loyalties, as no one can maintain a conflicting loyalty or belief system forever." )

Paragraphs 2 and 3

Psychological theory states that human beings are not equipped to maintain conflicting loyalties indefinitely and that attempting to do so leads to a state called "cognitive dissonance." Cognitive dissonance theory is the psychological idea that people undergo tremendous mental stress or anxiety when holding contradictory beliefs, values, or loyalties (Festinger, 1957). Even if human beings initially hold a conflicting loyalty, they will do their best to find a mental equilibrium by making a choice between those loyalties—stay stalwart to a belief system or change their beliefs. One of the earliest formal examples of cognitive dissonance theory comes from Leon Festinger's When Prophesy Fails . Members of an apocalyptic cult are told that the end of the world will occur on a specific date and that they alone will be spared the Earth's destruction. When that day comes and goes with no apocalypse, the cult members face a cognitive dissonance between what they see and what they've been led to believe (Festinger, 1956). Some choose to believe that the cult's beliefs are still correct, but that the Earth was simply spared from destruction by mercy, while others choose to believe that they were lied to and that the cult was fraudulent all along. Both beliefs cannot be correct at the same time, and so the cult members are forced to make their choice.

But even when conflicting loyalties can lead to potentially physical, rather than just mental, consequences, people will always make a choice to fall on one side or other of a dividing line. Take, for instance, Nicolaus Copernicus, a man born and raised in Catholic Poland (and educated in Catholic Italy). Though the Catholic church dictated specific scientific teachings, Copernicus' loyalty to his own observations and scientific evidence won out over his loyalty to his country's government and belief system. When he published his heliocentric model of the solar system--in opposition to the geocentric model that had been widely accepted for hundreds of years (Hannam, 2011)-- Copernicus was making a choice between his loyalties. In an attempt t o maintain his fealty both to the established system and to what he believed, h e sat on his findings for a number of years (Fantoli, 1994). But, ultimately, Copernicus made the choice to side with his beliefs and observations above all and published his work for the world to see (even though, in doing so, he risked both his reputation and personal freedoms).

These two paragraphs provide the reasons why the author supports the main argument and uses substantiated sources to back those reasons.

The paragraph on cognitive dissonance theory gives both broad supporting evidence and more narrow, detailed supporting evidence to show why the thesis statement is correct not just anecdotally but also scientifically and psychologically. First, we see why people in general have a difficult time accepting conflicting loyalties and desires and then how this applies to individuals through the example of the cult members from the Dr. Festinger's research.

The next paragraph continues to use more detailed examples from history to provide further evidence of why the thesis that people cannot indefinitely maintain conflicting loyalties is true.

Paragraph 4

Some will claim that it is possible to maintain conflicting beliefs or loyalties permanently, but this is often more a matter of people deluding themselves and still making a choice for one side or the other, rather than truly maintaining loyalty to both sides equally. For example, Lancelot du Lac typifies a person who claims to maintain a balanced loyalty between to two parties, but his attempt to do so fails (as all attempts to permanently maintain conflicting loyalties must). Lancelot tells himself and others that he is equally devoted to both King Arthur and his court and to being Queen Guinevere's knight (Malory, 2008). But he can neither be in two places at once to protect both the king and queen, nor can he help but let his romantic feelings for the queen to interfere with his duties to the king and the kingdom. Ultimately, he and Queen Guinevere give into their feelings for one another and Lancelot—though he denies it—chooses his loyalty to her over his loyalty to Arthur. This decision plunges the kingdom into a civil war, ages Lancelot prematurely, and ultimately leads to Camelot's ruin (Raabe, 1987). Though Lancelot claimed to have been loyal to both the king and the queen, this loyalty was ultimately in conflict, and he could not maintain it.

Here we have the acknowledgement of a potential counter-argument and the evidence as to why it isn't true.

The argument is that some people (or literary characters) have asserted that they give equal weight to their conflicting loyalties. The refutation is that, though some may claim to be able to maintain conflicting loyalties, they're either lying to others or deceiving themselves. The paragraph shows why this is true by providing an example of this in action.

Paragraph 5

Whether it be through literature or history, time and time again, people demonstrate the challenges of trying to manage conflicting loyalties and the inevitable consequences of doing so. Though belief systems are malleable and will often change over time, it is not possible to maintain two mutually exclusive loyalties or beliefs at once. In the end, people always make a choice, and loyalty for one party or one side of an issue will always trump loyalty to the other.

The concluding paragraph summarizes the essay, touches on the evidence presented, and re-states the thesis statement.

How to Write an Argumentative Essay: 8 Steps

Writing the best argumentative essay is all about the preparation, so let's talk steps:

#1: Preliminary Research

If you have the option to pick your own argumentative essay topic (which you most likely will), then choose one or two topics you find the most intriguing or that you have a vested interest in and do some preliminary research on both sides of the debate.

Do an open internet search just to see what the general chatter is on the topic and what the research trends are.

Did your preliminary reading influence you to pick a side or change your side? Without diving into all the scholarly articles at length, do you believe there's enough evidence to support your claim? Have there been scientific studies? Experiments? Does a noted scholar in the field agree with you? If not, you may need to pick another topic or side of the argument to support.

#2: Pick Your Side and Form Your Thesis

Now's the time to pick the side of the argument you feel you can support the best and summarize your main point into your thesis statement.

Your thesis will be the basis of your entire essay, so make sure you know which side you're on, that you've stated it clearly, and that you stick by your argument throughout the entire essay .

#3: Heavy-Duty Research Time

You've taken a gander at what the internet at large has to say on your argument, but now's the time to actually read those sources and take notes.

Check scholarly journals online at Google Scholar , the Directory of Open Access Journals , or JStor . You can also search individual university or school libraries and websites to see what kinds of academic articles you can access for free. Keep track of your important quotes and page numbers and put them somewhere that's easy to find later.

And don't forget to check your school or local libraries as well!

#4: Outline

Follow the five-paragraph outline structure from the previous section.

Fill in your topic, your reasons, and your supporting evidence into each of the categories.

Before you begin to flesh out the essay, take a look at what you've got. Is your thesis statement in the first paragraph? Is it clear? Is your argument logical? Does your supporting evidence support your reasoning?

By outlining your essay, you streamline your process and take care of any logic gaps before you dive headfirst into the writing. This will save you a lot of grief later on if you need to change your sources or your structure, so don't get too trigger-happy and skip this step.

Now that you've laid out exactly what you'll need for your essay and where, it's time to fill in all the gaps by writing it out.

Take it one step at a time and expand your ideas into complete sentences and substantiated claims. It may feel daunting to turn an outline into a complete draft, but just remember that you've already laid out all the groundwork; now you're just filling in the gaps.

If you have the time before deadline, give yourself a day or two (or even just an hour!) away from your essay . Looking it over with fresh eyes will allow you to see errors, both minor and major, that you likely would have missed had you tried to edit when it was still raw.

Take a first pass over the entire essay and try your best to ignore any minor spelling or grammar mistakes—you're just looking at the big picture right now. Does it make sense as a whole? Did the essay succeed in making an argument and backing that argument up logically? (Do you feel persuaded?)

If not, go back and make notes so that you can fix it for your final draft.

Once you've made your revisions to the overall structure, mark all your small errors and grammar problems so you can fix them in the next draft.

#7: Final Draft

Use the notes you made on the rough draft and go in and hack and smooth away until you're satisfied with the final result.

A checklist for your final draft:

Formatting is correct according to your teacher's standards
No errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
Essay is the right length and size for the assignment
The argument is present, consistent, and concise
Each reason is supported by relevant evidence
The essay makes sense overall

#8: Celebrate!

Once you've brought that final draft to a perfect polish and turned in your assignment, you're done! Go you!

Be prepared and ♪ you'll never go hungry again ♪, *cough*, or struggle with your argumentative essay-writing again. (Walt Disney Studios)

Good Examples of Argumentative Essays Online

Theory is all well and good, but examples are key. Just to get you started on what a fully-fleshed out argumentative essay looks like, let's see some examples in action.

Check out these two argumentative essay examples on the use of landmines and freons (and note the excellent use of concrete sources to back up their arguments!).

The Use of Landmines

A Shattered Sky

The Take-Aways: Keys to Writing an Argumentative Essay

At first, writing an argumentative essay may seem like a monstrous hurdle to overcome, but with the proper preparation and understanding, you'll be able to knock yours out of the park.

Remember the differences between a persuasive essay and an argumentative one, make sure your thesis is clear, and double-check that your supporting evidence is both relevant to your point and well-sourced . Pick your topic, do your research, make your outline, and fill in the gaps. Before you know it, you'll have yourself an A+ argumentative essay there, my friend.

What's Next?

Now you know the ins and outs of an argumentative essay, but how comfortable are you writing in other styles? Learn more about the four writing styles and when it makes sense to use each .

Understand how to make an argument, but still having trouble organizing your thoughts? Check out our guide to three popular essay formats and choose which one is right for you.

Ready to make your case, but not sure what to write about? We've created a list of 50 potential argumentative essay topics to spark your imagination.

Courtney scored in the 99th percentile on the SAT in high school and went on to graduate from Stanford University with a degree in Cultural and Social Anthropology. She is passionate about bringing education and the tools to succeed to students from all backgrounds and walks of life, as she believes open education is one of the great societal equalizers. She has years of tutoring experience and writes creative works in her free time.

Student and Parent Forum

Our new student and parent forum, at ExpertHub.PrepScholar.com , allow you to interact with your peers and the PrepScholar staff. See how other students and parents are navigating high school, college, and the college admissions process. Ask questions; get answers.

Ask a Question Below

Have any questions about this article or other topics? Ask below and we'll reply!

Improve With Our Famous Guides

For All Students

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 160+ SAT Points

How to Get a Perfect 1600, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 800 on Each SAT Section:

Score 800 on SAT Math

Score 800 on SAT Reading

Score 800 on SAT Writing

Series: How to Get to 600 on Each SAT Section:

Score 600 on SAT Math

Score 600 on SAT Reading

Score 600 on SAT Writing

Free Complete Official SAT Practice Tests

What SAT Target Score Should You Be Aiming For?

15 Strategies to Improve Your SAT Essay

The 5 Strategies You Must Be Using to Improve 4+ ACT Points

How to Get a Perfect 36 ACT, by a Perfect Scorer

Series: How to Get 36 on Each ACT Section:

36 on ACT English

36 on ACT Math

36 on ACT Reading

36 on ACT Science

Series: How to Get to 24 on Each ACT Section:

24 on ACT English

24 on ACT Math

24 on ACT Reading

24 on ACT Science

What ACT target score should you be aiming for?

ACT Vocabulary You Must Know

ACT Writing: 15 Tips to Raise Your Essay Score

How to Get Into Harvard and the Ivy League

How to Get a Perfect 4.0 GPA

How to Write an Amazing College Essay

What Exactly Are Colleges Looking For?

Is the ACT easier than the SAT? A Comprehensive Guide

Should you retake your SAT or ACT?

When should you take the SAT or ACT?

Stay Informed

Get the latest articles and test prep tips!

Looking for Graduate School Test Prep?

Check out our top-rated graduate blogs here:

GRE Online Prep Blog

GMAT Online Prep Blog

TOEFL Online Prep Blog

Holly R. "I am absolutely overjoyed and cannot thank you enough for helping me!”

Houston Community College
Eagle Online

Judy Bouvier

Purdue Owl - Organizing Your Expository/Persuasive Essay

Welcome to the Purdue OWL

This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue (http://owl.english.purdue.edu/). When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice at bottom.

Organizing You Expository/Persuasive Essay

How can I effectively present my argument?

Use an organizational structure that arranges the argument in a way that will make sense to the reader. The Toulmin Method of logic is a common and easy to use formula for organizing an argument.

The basic format for the Toulmin Method is as follows:

Claim: The overall thesis the writer will argue for.

Data: Evidence gathered to support the claim.

Warrant (also referred to as a bridge): Explanation of why or how the data supports the claim, the underlying assumption that connects your data to your claim.

Backing (also referred to as the foundation): Additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to support the warrant.

Counterclaim: A claim that negates or disagrees with the thesis/claim.

Rebuttal: Evidence that negates or disagrees with the counterclaim.

Including a well thought out warrant or bridge is essential to writing a good argumentative essay or paper. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis they may not make a connection between the two or they may draw different conclusions.

Don't avoid the opposing side of an argument. Instead, include the opposing side as a counterclaim. Find out what the other side is saying and respond to it within your own argument. This is important so that the audience is not swayed by weak, but unrefuted, arguments. Including counterclaims allows you to find common ground with more of your readers. It also makes you look more credible because you appear to be knowledgeable about the entirety of the debate rather than just being biased or uniformed. You may want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic.

Claim: Hybrid cars are an effective strategy to fight pollution.

Data1: Driving a private car is a typical citizen's most air polluting activity.

Warrant 1: Because cars are the largest source of private, as opposed to industry produced, air pollution switching to hybrid cars should have an impact on fighting pollution.

Data 2: Each vehicle produced is going to stay on the road for roughly 12 to 15 years.

Warrant 2: Cars generally have a long lifespan, meaning that a decision to switch to a hybrid car will make a long-term impact on pollution levels.

Data 3: Hybrid cars combine a gasoline engine with a battery-powered electric motor.

Warrant 3: This combination of technologies means that less pollution is produced. According to ineedtoknow.org "the hybrid engine of the Prius, made by Toyota, produces 90 percent fewer harmful emissions than a comparable gasoline engine."

Counterclaim: Instead of focusing on cars, which still encourages a culture of driving even if it cuts down on pollution, the nation should focus on building and encouraging use of mass transit systems.

Rebuttal: While mass transit is an environmentally sound idea that should be encouraged, it is not feasible in many rural and suburban areas, or for people who must commute to work; thus hybrid cars

Additional Information on Organization and Content of the Expository/Persuasive Essay from Other Areas of Purdue OWL

The structure of the argumentative/expository/persuasive essay is held together by the following:

A clear, concise, and defined thesis statement that occurs in the first paragraph of the essay.

In the first paragraph of an argument essay, students should set the context by reviewing the topic in a general way. Next the author should explain why the topic is important (exigence) or why readers should care about the issue. Lastly, students should present the thesis statement. It is essential that this thesis statement be appropriately narrowed to follow the guidelines set forth in the assignment. If the student does not master this portion of the essay, it will be quite difficult to compose an effective or persuasive essay.

Clear and logical transitions between the introduction, body, and conclusion.

Transitions are the mortar that holds the foundation of the essay together. Without logical progression of thought, the reader is unable to follow the essay’s argument, and the structure will collapse. Transitions should wrap up the idea from the previous section and introduce the idea that is to follow in the next section.

Body paragraphs that include evidential support.

Each paragraph should be limited to the discussion of one general idea. This will allow for clarity and direction throughout the essay. In addition, such conciseness creates an ease of readability for one’s audience. It is important to note that each paragraph in the body of the essay must have some logical connection to the thesis statement in the opening paragraph. Some paragraphs will directly support the thesis statement with evidence collected during research. It is also important to explain how and why the evidence supports the thesis (warrant).

However, argumentative/expository/persuasive essays should also consider and explain differing points of view regarding the topic. Depending on the length of the assignment, students should dedicate one or two paragraphs of the essay to discussing conflicting opinions on the topic. Rather than explaining how these differing opinions are wrong outright, students should note how opinions that do not align with their thesis might not be well informed or how they might be out of date.

A conclusion that does not simply restate the thesis, but readdresses it in light of the evidence provided.

It is at this point of the essay that students may begin to struggle. This is the portion of the essay that will leave the most immediate impression on the mind of the reader. Therefore, it must be effective and logical. Do not introduce any new information into the conclusion; rather, synthesize the information presented in the body of the essay. Restate why the topic is important, review the main points, and review your thesis.

A Complete Argument

Perhaps it is helpful to think of an essay in terms of a conversation or debate with a classmate. If I were to discuss the cause of World War II and its current effect on those who lived through the tumultuous time, there would be a beginning, middle, and end to the conversation. In fact, if I were to end the argument in the middle of my second point, questions would arise concerning the current effects on those who lived through the conflict. Therefore, the argumentative essay must be complete, and logically so, leaving no doubt as to its intent or argument.

Typing Online From Home

how to write a counterclaim in an argumentative essay

Writing Strong Counterclaims for Argument Essays

Are you tired of writing argumentative essays that only present one side of the issue? Do you want to take your writing to the next level and address opposing viewpoints in a thoughtful and effective way? Look no further than incorporating a counterclaim into your essay.

Writing a counterclaim allows you to acknowledge alternative perspectives, strengthen your overall argument, and demonstrate critical thinking skills. In this article, we’ll guide you through the process of crafting a successful counterclaim in an argumentative essay. So get ready to expand your writing repertoire and impress your readers with your nuanced approach to persuasion.

First, let’s define what we mean by counterclaim. A counterclaim is an opposing viewpoint or argument that challenges or contradicts your main thesis statement. Including a counterclaim in your essay shows that you have considered multiple perspectives on the issue and evaluated their strengths and weaknesses. It also provides an opportunity for you to respond to potential objections or criticisms before they are even raised by your audience.

Writing a well-crafted counterclaim can elevate your argument from merely persuasive to truly compelling, so let’s dive into how to do it effectively.

Key Takeaways

Including a counterclaim in an argumentative essay is important as it acknowledges alternative perspectives, strengthens overall argument, and demonstrates critical thinking skills.
Reviewing and editing the essay should involve analyzing the effectiveness of the counterclaim, addressing objections to the thesis, providing relevant evidence, improving organization, and seeking feedback from trusted sources.
To ensure the counterclaim adds value to the argument and doesn’t distract from it, it should be relevant, support the thesis, and flow smoothly with the rest of the essay.
To strengthen the overall argument, clear and concise topic sentences for supporting paragraphs should be written, and specific examples or data should be used to back up claims.

Understand the Purpose of a Counterclaim

Don’t skip understanding the purpose of a counterclaim—it’s key to crafting a strong argumentative essay.

A counterclaim is an opposing viewpoint that challenges your main argument. It’s important because it shows that you have considered different perspectives and are not simply dismissing them. Identifying weaknesses in your own argument can also help you better support your position by addressing potential criticisms before they arise.

A well-written counterclaim can strengthen arguments by providing evidence and examples to refute the opposing viewpoint. This demonstrates that you have thoroughly researched the topic and are able to present multiple sides of the issue. It also shows that you’re confident in your stance and willing to engage with differing opinions.

Incorporating a counterclaim into your essay can also make it more persuasive by acknowledging any flaws in your argument and then refuting them with solid evidence. Your audience will be more likely to trust your perspective if they see that you’ve taken the time to consider alternative viewpoints and address potential weaknesses in your own argument.

Overall, including a counterclaim in an argumentative essay is crucial for building credibility, persuasiveness, and overall strength of the writing.

Research and Analyze Opposing Viewpoints

You’ll want to take the time to dive into opposing viewpoints, analyzing them thoroughly. This means exploring evidence and considering implications that may go against your argument. It’s important to understand where the opposition is coming from and what their thought process is.

By doing so, you can strengthen your own argument by addressing any weaknesses or flaws in your reasoning. When researching and analyzing opposing viewpoints, it’s crucial to remain objective and open-minded. Don’t let your emotions or personal beliefs get in the way of objectively evaluating arguments that contradict yours.

Look for credible sources with well-supported arguments, even if they don’t align with your own opinion. By doing this, you can gain a better understanding of why someone might disagree with you. By taking the time to research and analyze opposing viewpoints, you are able to write a strong counterclaim that addresses potential weaknesses in your argument.

When writing a counterclaim, it’s important to acknowledge the opposition’s point of view while also presenting evidence that supports your own stance. By doing so, you show credibility and an ability to see both sides of an issue – qualities that will make your overall argument more convincing and compelling for readers who are seeking innovative solutions.

Incorporate the Counterclaim into Your Essay

When incorporating a counterclaim into your argument, it’s essential to consider the opposing viewpoint and present evidence that supports your stance while acknowledging the other side. Effective placement of the counterclaim in your essay is crucial as it can significantly impact how your audience perceives your argument. By addressing objections head-on, you establish credibility and show that you have taken the time to evaluate both sides of the issue.

One way to effectively incorporate a counterclaim is by placing it after presenting your own argument. This allows you to build momentum with your own supporting evidence before introducing alternative perspectives. By doing so, you also create a clear contrast between your position and the opposing view. Addressing objections in this manner shows that you are confident in your stance and willing to engage with different viewpoints.

Another effective strategy for incorporating a counterclaim is by using transitional phrases such as “however”or “on the other hand”when introducing opposing views. This helps signal to readers that they are about to encounter an alternative perspective, allowing them to mentally prepare for possible challenges to their beliefs or assumptions. Furthermore, addressing objections demonstrates that you are not simply dismissing contrary opinions but instead giving them thoughtful consideration and responding accordingly.

By following these strategies for effective placement and addressing objections when incorporating a counterclaim in an argumentative essay, you can strengthen your overall case while demonstrating intellectual honesty and critical thinking skills. Remember, presenting multiple perspectives is not only respectful but also necessary for engaging in meaningful discourse on complex issues.

Use Transitional Phrases to Connect Ideas

Using transitional phrases can elevate the coherence and fluidity of your writing, connecting ideas seamlessly and guiding the reader through your thought process. Effective transitions help you establish a logical flow in your argumentative essay, improving its structure and making it easier for the reader to understand.

Here are four ways that transitional phrases can help connect ideas in an argumentative essay:

Introducing counterarguments – Transitional phrases such as “however,””on the other hand,”or “while some argue”can help you introduce a counterargument in your essay. This shows that you have considered different perspectives on the topic, making your argument more persuasive.
Emphasizing key points – Words like “moreover,””furthermore,”or “in addition”can be used to emphasize important points in your essay. These transitional phrases signal to the reader that more supporting evidence is coming, strengthening your argument.
Summarizing – Transitional words like “in conclusion”or “to sum up”indicate that you are wrapping up an idea or point before moving onto another one. Using these types of transitional phrases helps create a smooth transition from one paragraph to another.
Contrasting – The use of transitional words like “although,””nevertheless,”or “despite this”allows for effectively contrasting two opposing viewpoints. By highlighting differences between opposing arguments, readers gain a better understanding of why certain viewpoints are more valid than others.

Using effective transitions is crucial for creating a logical flow in an argumentative essay, making it easy for readers to follow along with your thought process. Be sure to incorporate these strategies into your writing whenever possible!

Review and Edit Your Essay

When reviewing and editing your essay, it’s important to ensure that the counterclaim you’ve included is relevant and supports your thesis. Make sure that it adds value to your argument and doesn’t distract from it.

Additionally, check for coherence and clarity throughout your essay to ensure that all of your ideas flow smoothly.

Finally, proofread for grammar and spelling errors so that your writing is polished and professional.

Ensure the counterclaim is relevant and supports your thesis

To ensure that your counterclaim is effective and strengthens your argument, make sure it directly relates to your thesis statement and supports it.

Analyze the effectiveness of the counterclaim by asking yourself if it addresses objections that someone might have to your thesis. Think about what someone who disagrees with you might say and try to anticipate their arguments. Then, address those arguments within your counterclaim.

In addition, make sure that the evidence you use in support of your counterclaim is relevant to both the counterclaim itself and your thesis as a whole. Use specific examples or data to back up your claims, rather than simply stating opinions or generalizations.

This will not only make for a more convincing argument but also help you avoid making unsupported claims that could weaken your overall position. Remember, a strong counterclaim should add depth and complexity to your essay’s main argument while ultimately reinforcing its central message.

Check for coherence and clarity

Ensuring coherence and clarity is vital for an impactful and persuasive essay, where every sentence flows seamlessly and the message is easy to comprehend. To achieve this, you must improve your organization by structuring your essay in a logical manner.

Start with an introduction that presents your thesis and provides context for the reader. Then, move on to supporting paragraphs that provide evidence for your claims. Make sure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that relates back to your thesis.

In addition, providing evidence is essential when writing a counterclaim in an argumentative essay. Your counterclaim should be backed up by facts and data that support your point of view. This will make it more convincing to the reader and strengthen your overall argument.

Be sure to cite sources appropriately so that your evidence is credible. By improving organization and providing strong evidence, you can write a counterclaim that effectively challenges opposing viewpoints while strengthening your own argument.

Proofread for grammar and spelling errors

Proofreading for grammar and spelling errors is crucial to ensuring a polished and professional piece of writing. As you write your counterclaim in an argumentative essay, it’s important to remember that even the smallest mistake can detract from the strength of your argument.

Avoid common mistakes such as homophones (words that sound alike but have different meanings) or incorrect verb tenses, which can make your writing confusing and difficult to understand.

After you’ve proofread your work, seek feedback from a trusted friend or colleague. A fresh set of eyes can catch errors that you may have missed, as well as provide suggestions for improving the clarity and coherence of your writing.

Don’t be afraid to ask for help- it’s always better to catch mistakes before submitting your work than risk losing credibility with your audience due to preventable errors. Remember: taking the time to proofread and seek feedback shows that you value both yourself and those who will be reading your work.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between a counterclaim and a rebuttal in an argumentative essay.

In an argumentative essay, a counterclaim is the opposing viewpoint to your thesis. A rebuttal is your response to the counterclaim. Counterclaims are important because they show you have considered multiple perspectives on the topic.

How many counterclaims should be included in an argumentative essay?

To persuade effectively, it’s important to include multiple counterclaims in an argumentative essay. Effective placement of these opposing views shows a well-rounded understanding of the topic and can strengthen your own argument.

Can a counterclaim be presented before the writer’s main argument, or should it always come after?

Want to address counterclaims effectively? Consider presenting them first. This approach grabs your reader’s attention and shows you’re open-minded. Plus, it gives you the chance to rebut early on and strengthen your argument.

How do you address a counterclaim that is particularly strong or difficult to refute?

When facing a strong counterclaim, don’t ignore it. Addressing it head-on can actually strengthen your argument. Consider strategies like acknowledging its validity, offering evidence to refute it, or finding common ground. Keep innovating!

Is it necessary to include a counterclaim in every argumentative essay, or are there situations where it might not be appropriate?

Including a counterclaim in your argumentative essay can benefit your overall argument by showing that you have considered differing perspectives. However, there may be situations where it is not necessary or alternative approaches may be more appropriate.

Congratulations! You now know how to write a strong counterclaim in your argumentative essay.

Remember, the purpose of a counterclaim is not to undermine your own argument, but rather to acknowledge and refute opposing viewpoints. Take time to research and analyze these opposing views before incorporating them into your essay.

To effectively connect your ideas, use transitional phrases such as “on the other hand”or “however.”This will help guide the reader through your argument and show that you have considered multiple perspectives.

As with any writing, make sure to review and edit your essay for clarity and coherence. A well-written counterclaim can add depth and credibility to your argument, so don’t be afraid to embrace opposing viewpoints.

How It Works
Prices & Discounts

A Comprehensive Guide to Claims and Counterclaims in ToK

Table of contents

Did you know that every argument in the world of Theory of Knowledge (ToK) revolves around claims and counterclaims? It's like a tennis match of ideas, where one side serves a claim, and the other returns with a counterclaim!

If you're a ToK student, you might be curious about what these terms mean, how to use them in your essays, or why they even matter in the first place. Don't worry, you're not alone, and you've come to the right place.

[CHECK] IB ToK Essay Samples by Our Writers

In this blog post, we'll dive into the fascinating world of claims and counterclaims in ToK. We'll explore widely recognized examples, understand why they're crucial for building strong arguments, and even share some handy tips to apply them in your studies.

So grab your intellectual racket, and let's get ready to play some ToK tennis!

The Tennis Match of Ideas: What Are Claims and Counterclaims?

Just as tennis players engage in a thrilling back-and-forth on the court, claims and counterclaims form a dynamic rally in the intellectual game of Theory of Knowledge (ToK). But what exactly are these terms, and why are they so important in ToK? Let's dive into the match and explore these fundamental concepts!

Understanding the Serve: What is a Claim?

A claim is like the opening serve in a tennis match. It's the starting point, the main idea, or the argument you're putting forward. In a ToK essay, it's what you want your readers to believe. Think of it as saying, "Here's what I think, and here's why!"

The Return Serve: What is a Counterclaim?

Now, imagine your opponent in tennis hits the ball back with a clever twist. That's a counterclaim! It's an opposing idea or rebuttal to your claim. In your ToK arguments, a counterclaim says, "Wait a minute, have you considered this?" It challenges your initial thought and offers a different perspective.

The Rally: Balancing Claims and Counterclaims

Just like in tennis, where a thrilling rally can make the game exciting, balancing claims and counterclaims in ToK keeps the intellectual game alive. It adds depth to your arguments and ensures that you're not just talking to yourself on the court. By considering different angles, you're engaging in a real conversation with your readers, showing them that you've thought about the topic from various sides.

So there you have it - the serve, the return, and the rally. That's how claims and counterclaims work in ToK. They're not just fancy words; they're essential tools in the exciting game of exploring knowledge.

The Perfect Rally: Importance of Balancing Claims and Counterclaims

In the fast-paced game of tennis, balance and coordination are essential to keep the rally going. Similarly, in the world of Theory of Knowledge (ToK), the balance between claims and counterclaims is crucial for a rich and thoughtful exploration of ideas. Why is this balance so important, and how does it impact our understanding? Let's delve into this exciting rally and find out!

Playing Fair: Why Balance Matters

In tennis, if one player always serves and the other just returns, the game would be pretty dull, right? The same goes for ToK. Having only claims without counterclaims (or vice versa) is like playing a one-sided game. It's not as engaging, and it doesn't reflect the complexity of real-world knowledge.

Critical Thinking: The Champion's Skill

By carefully considering both claims and counterclaims, you're training your mind to think critically. It's like practicing different shots in tennis to become a better player. In ToK, you learn to look at an argument from different angles, weigh the evidence, and decide what really makes sense. It's a champion's way of thinking, and it helps you avoid blind spots in your understanding.

Avoiding Biases: The Unforced Errors of Thinking

Ever seen a tennis player make a simple mistake that costs them a point? That's an unforced error. In ToK, biases are the unforced errors of thinking. If you stick only to your claims without considering counterclaims, you might miss something important or even make a wrong judgment. Balancing both helps you see the whole court and play a smarter game.

Winning the Game: Building Strong Arguments

In the end, balancing claims and counterclaims helps you build strong, convincing arguments. It's like playing a strategic tennis match where you use different shots, think ahead, and adapt to your opponent's moves. In your ToK essays, this balance helps you create a well-rounded view that respects different perspectives and wins the intellectual game.

So, next time you're writing a ToK essay, remember to play the perfect rally with claims and counterclaims. It's not just about winning; it's about understanding, growing, and enjoying the thrilling game of ideas.

The Top Serves: Examples of Claims in ToK

In tennis, a strong serve can set the pace and direction of the game. Similarly, in Theory of Knowledge (ToK), claims serve as the starting points that guide the direction of your argument. But what do these claims look like, and how do they shape the intellectual game? Let's explore some widely recognized examples, like observing different styles of serving in a tennis match!

Claim Example 1 : Knowledge Through Perception

Imagine you're standing on the tennis court, feeling the sun on your face, hearing the ball bounce, and seeing the crowd cheer. That's knowledge through perception! One widely recognized claim in ToK is that our senses provide us direct knowledge of the world. It's like saying, "I can see it, so I know it's true!"

Claim Example 2 : Knowledge Through Reason

Now, think of a tennis coach explaining the physics of a perfect serve. They're using logic and reason to understand how things work. Another common claim in ToK is that reason alone can lead to certain knowledge. It's not about what you see or feel, but what you can prove through logical thinking.

Analyzing the Claims : Why They Matter

So why do these examples matter in ToK? Well, they're like different styles of serving in tennis. Some players rely on power, while others focus on technique. Similarly, some knowledge claims depend on sensory experience, while others rely on reason. Understanding these different "serves" helps you appreciate the diversity and complexity of knowledge in ToK.

In the game of ToK, claims are your opening moves, your serves, your starting points. They set the direction for your arguments and invite your readers to join the rally of ideas. By exploring different claims, you become a more versatile and thoughtful player in the exciting game of understanding our world.

The Return of Ideas: Examples of Counterclaims in ToK

In the game of tennis, the serve may start the rally, but it's the return that truly engages the players in a dynamic exchange. Similarly, in the intellectual match of Theory of Knowledge (ToK), counterclaims respond to claims and add depth and excitement to the conversation. But what exactly are counterclaims, and why are they as essential as claims in ToK? Let's look at some examples to understand these clever returns in the game of ideas!

Counterclaim Example 1 : The Limits of Perception

Remember that claim about knowledge through perception? The feeling of the sun, the sound of the ball, the sight of the crowd? Well, here's a twist: What if your senses deceive you? Ever seen a mirage on a hot day or misheard someone's words? The counterclaim here challenges the idea that our senses always provide accurate knowledge. It's like a tricky return shot in tennis that makes you think twice!

Counterclaim Example 2 : Reason Isn't Everything

And what about that claim that reason alone leads to certain knowledge? Think of a tennis player who relies only on physics and ignores their intuition or the feel of the game. They might miss something essential. Similarly, the counterclaim against pure reason argues that logic isn't everything. Emotions, intuition, and personal experience also play a vital role in understanding the world.

Understanding the Counterclaims : Playing the Full Game

These counterclaims are not just opposition for the sake of opposition. They are essential parts of the ToK dialogue, the return shots that keep the rally going. By challenging the initial claims, counterclaims add depth, provoke thought, and make the exploration of knowledge more engaging and real.

So, as you step into the ToK arena, don't just serve your claims. Be ready for the return, embrace the counterclaims, and enjoy the full game of ideas. It's a thrilling match that goes beyond winning and losing. It's about growing, learning, and embracing the complexity and beauty of knowledge.

Your ToK Game Plan: Applying Claims and Counterclaims in Your Studies

Every seasoned tennis player has a game plan, a strategy that helps them navigate through the match. In Theory of Knowledge (ToK), your understanding and application of claims and counterclaims form your intellectual game plan. How can you effectively use these concepts in your studies? What strategies can help you ace this challenging subject? Let's dive into your ToK playbook and explore how you can win the game of ideas!

Training Your Serve : Working with Claims

Starting with a strong claim is like practicing your tennis serve. It sets the tone and gets the game rolling. Here's how you can work on your ToK claims:

Find Your Focus: Choose a specific area of knowledge you're passionate about, just like picking your favorite tennis shot.
Support with Evidence: Back up your claims with solid evidence, like a well-practiced serve supported by proper form and technique.
Stay Open to Challenges: Be ready for counterclaims, just as a tennis player anticipates the return.

Mastering the Return : Handling Counterclaims

Counterclaims are the exciting returns that make the ToK game thrilling. Here's how you can master them:

Consider Different Perspectives: Look for different angles and views, just like watching your opponent's movements in tennis.
Question Your Assumptions: Challenge your own claims, like practicing against a tough opponent to improve your game.
Blend Claims and Counterclaims: Weave them together for a rich argument, like combining different shots in a winning rally.

Avoiding Common Mistakes : The Unforced Errors

ToK is a complex game, and it's easy to make mistakes. Here are some tips to avoid the unforced errors:

Don't Oversimplify: Treat ToK like the sophisticated game it is; don't reduce it to simple black-and-white arguments.
Embrace Complexity: Accept that claims and counterclaims might both have value, just like different playing styles in tennis.
Stay Curious and Critical: Keep questioning and exploring, like a tennis player always looking to learn and grow.

Conclusion : Your Match Point in ToK

Claims and counterclaims are the heart of ToK, the serves and returns that make the intellectual game alive and exciting. By understanding, practicing, and playing with these concepts, you can win your match in ToK, not just in grades but in the more profound game of understanding our fascinating world.

So, we've had a thrilling match exploring claims and counterclaims in the exciting game of ToK. We've looked at widely recognized examples, understood their importance, and even found ways to apply them in our studies. It's been a game of ideas, challenges, and growth - a true intellectual tennis match.

But what if you need a doubles partner to help you ace your ToK essay? Someone who knows the game, understands the rules, and can help you play your best?

That's where Writers Per Hour comes into play. Our team of experienced ToK essay writers knows the game inside and out. We're here to help you craft well-balanced arguments, support your claims with solid evidence, and anticipate those tricky counterclaims.

Whether you need assistance with a particular claim or guidance on your entire ToK essay, we're ready to join your game. Together, we can make your ToK journey not just successful but enjoyable and enlightening.

Don't play the ToK game alone. Let Writers Per Hour be your trusted partner, and let's win this match together!

I hope the conclusion resonates with your readers and successfully promotes your service. Please let me know if there are any revisions or adjustments you'd like!

Additional Sources

Looking to delve deeper into the world of ToK? Here are some valuable resources to enhance your understanding and skills:

From Writers Per Hour Blog :

How to Write a ToK Exhibition Essay : A comprehensive guide to crafting an impressive ToK exhibition essay.
How to Write a ToK Essay : Step-by-step guidance on writing a standout ToK essay.

External Sources :

TED-Ed: How to Build a Strong Argument: Engaging video lesson on constructing persuasive arguments, relevant to crafting claims and counterclaims.

These resources will provide you with a wealth of information and insights, whether you're new to ToK or looking to refine your existing knowledge and skills.

Share this article

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Assistance!

Crafted from Scratch for You.

Ensuring Your Work’s Originality.

Transform Your Draft into Excellence.

Perfecting Your Paper’s Grammar, Style, and Format (APA, MLA, etc.).

Calculate the cost of your paper

Get ideas for your essay

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Publications
Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

Advanced Search
Journal List
Elsevier Sponsored Documents

The persuasive essays for rating, selecting, and understanding argumentative and discourse elements (PERSUADE) corpus 1.0

This paper introduces the Persuasive Essays for Rating, Selecting, and Understanding Argumentative and Discourse Elements (PERSUADE) corpus.The PERSUADE corpus is large-scale corpus of writing with annotated discourse elements. The goal of the corpus is to spur the development of new, open-source scoring algorithms that identify discourse elements in argumentative writing to open new avenues for the development of automatic writing evaluation systems that focus more specifically on the semantic and organizational elements of student writing

• We introduce the PERSUADE corpus.
• The corpus contains over 25,000 essays with annotated discourse elements.
• The PERSUADE corpus can be used to assess writing quality.

1. Introduction

Writing is an essential skill for college and career success. Still, many students struggle to produce writing that meets college and career standards (NCES, 2012). One way to help students improve their writing is to provide students with more opportunities to write and receive feedback on their writing ( Graham & Perin, 2007 ). However, assigning more writing to students places a burden on teachers to generate timely feedback. One potential solution is the use of automated writing evaluation (AWE) systems, which can evaluate student writing and provide feedback independently. These kinds of systems can encourage students to write and revise more frequently and reduce the amount of time that teachers spend grading ( Strobl et al., 2019 ).

The feedback algorithms found in AWE systems rely on corpora of essays that have been generally hand-coded by raters for specific elements related to writing. These elements may include holistic scores of writing quality ( Shermis, 2014 ), analytic scores of quality that focus on specific text elements like organization, grammar, or vocabulary use ( Crossley & McNamara, 2010 ), or annotations of argumentative elements like claims ( Stab & Gurevych, 2017 ). However, large corpora that are annotated for argumentative elements are non-existent, thus making it difficult for AWE systems to provide accurate and reliable feedback on important elements of writing success.

Here, we introduce the Persuasive Essays for Rating, Selecting, and Understanding Argumentative and Discourse Elements (PERSUADE) corpus. The PERSUADE corpus is an open-source corpus comprising over 25,000 essays annotated for argumentative and discourse elements and relationships between these elements. In addition, the PERSUADE corpus includes detailed demographic information for the writers.

Our goal in releasing the corpus is to spur the development of new, open-source scoring algorithms that identify discourse elements in argumentative writing. Because the PERSUADE corpus also includes detailed demographic information, developed algorithms can also be assessed for potential bias to ensure they do not favor one population over another. Once developed, algorithms can be included in AWE systems to provide more pinpointed feedback to writers about their use of argumentative and discourse elements. Such feedback would open new avenues for the development of AWE systems that focus more specifically on the semantic and organizational elements of student writing.

The PERSUADE corpus was pulled from a larger corpus of student writing (N = ~500,000). The PERSUADE corpus comprises two sub-corpora consisting of source-based essays (n = 12,875) and independent essays (n = 13,121). Source-based writing requires the student to refer to a text while independent writing excludes this requirement. The source-based set was derived from seven unique writing prompts and related sources. The writing reflects students in grades 6 through 10. The independent set reflects writing where background knowledge of the topic was not a requirement, and no sources were required to produce the texts. The independent sub-corpus was collected from students in grades 8 through 12, and the collection was derived from eight unique writing prompts. All prompts and sources are available within the PERSUADE corpus.

The PERSUADE corpus was limited to essays with a minimum of 150 words of which 75% had to be correctly spelled American English words. These filters were used to ensure appropriate coverage of argumentative and discourse elements in the texts as well as to ensure the essays contained enough language from which to develop natural language processing (NLP) features to inform algorithm development ( Crossley, 2018 ). Additionally, the filters help to confirm that the essays were written in English and that the essays did not contain a large amount of gibberish. Descriptive statistics for number of words, number of sentences, and number of paragraphs per essay are reported in Table 1 .

Descriptive statistic for PERSUADE corpus.

The PERSUADE corpus was selected to reflect a range of writing from diverse student populations that was representative of the writing population in the United States. All essays in the PERSUADE corpus are linked to information on the student’s gender and race/ethnicity. A subset of the corpus (n = 20,759) also contains data on student eligibility for federal assistance programs such as free or reduced-price school lunch, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs, which we broadly define as economic disadvantage. A large sub-sample of the essays in the corpus also includes information on English Language Learner status (n = 24,787) and disability status (n = 24,828). The racial, gender, and economic composition of the corpus collection closely resembles the U.S. secondary public school population using data from the National Center for Education Statistics as a benchmark. Descriptive statistics on demographic representation in terms of economic disadvantage and race/ethnicity are reported in Fig. 1 , Fig. 2 , Fig. 3 , Fig. 4 .

Economic composition of PERSUADE corpus authors, text-dependent essays.

Economic composition of PERSUADE corpus authors, independent essays.

Racial/ethnic composition of PERSUADE corpus authors, text-dependent essays.

Racial/ethnic composition of PERSUADE authors, independent essays.

Each essay in the PERSUADE corpus was human annotated for argumentative and discourse elements as well as relationships between argumentative elements. The corpus was annotated using a double-blind rating process with 100% adjudication such that each essay was independently reviewed by two expert raters and adjudicated by a third expert rater. All ratings were completed by an educational consulting firm in the United States and by raters with at least two years of experience. Prior to norming, raters received anti-bias training and anti-bias strategy instruction that was designed to address issues of bias that occur during scoring and are inherent to the use of standardized rubrics ( Warner, 2018 ). Raters used an annotation platform provided by a third-party commercial partner that allowed raters to highlight text segments of an essay, assign a discourse element category to each segment, and provide effectiveness ratings and hierarchical relations for that segment. Raters were trained on each prompt separately and on independent and source-based essays separately. Raters were provided with bridge sets for each prompt that included essays of varying quality. Ratings were spot-checked throughout the process to ensure rater accuracy.

The annotation rubric was developed to identify and evaluate discourse elements commonly found in argumentative writing. The rubric was developed in-house and went through multiple revisions based on feedback from two teacher panels as well as feedback from a research advisory board comprising experts in the fields of writing, discourse processing, linguistics, and machine learning. The discourse elements chosen for this rubric come from Nussbaum, Kardash, and Graham (2005) and Stapleton and Wu (2015) . Both annotation schemes are adapted or simplified versions of the Toulmin argumentative framework (1958). Elements scored and brief descriptions for the elements are provided below.

Lead. An introduction that begins with a statistic, a quotation, a description, or some other device to grab the reader’s attention and point toward the thesis.

Position. An opinion or conclusion on the main question.

Claim . A claim that supports the position.

Counterclaim. A claim that refutes another claim or gives an opposing reason to the position.

Rebuttal. A claim that refutes a counterclaim.

Evidence. Ideas or examples that support claims, counterclaims, rebuttals, or the position.

Concluding Statement. A concluding statement that restates the position and claims.

Relationships between the argumentative elements are illustrated through a hierarchical organization inspired by Rhetorical Structure Theory ( Mann & Thompson, 1988 ) and general tree structures. The purpose of the relationships is to examine organization and coherence among argumentative elements at the text level. Each argumentative element is marked as a parent, child, or sibling of another element. For example, a claim that supports a position is annotated as the child of the position. Supporting evidence for the claim is annotated as a child of the claim. If two pieces of evidence are provided for a claim, they will both be labeled children of the claim and siblings of one another. An overview of these relationships is depicted in Fig. 5 .

Prototypical Diagram for Relations Among Argumentation Elements.

2. Learning objectives and related research

Argumentation can be viewed as a logical appeal that involves stating claims and offering support to justify or refute beliefs to influence others ( Newell, Beach, Smith, & VanDerHeide, 2011 ). The ability to persuade with good argumentation skills lies at the core of critical thinking and has long been valued in personal, professional, and academic contexts. Given the important role of argumentation in students’ cognitive development and academic learning, the K-12 Common Core State Standards (2010) highlights the cultivation of argumentation skills in writing instruction and stipulates that students need to achieve proficiency in using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence to support claims. However, many students in the U.S. struggle to construct a solid argument in writing due to its cognitively demanding nature. According to the 2012 NAEP Writing Report Card, only about 25% of students' argumentative essays were competent. Thus, systematic analysis of the arguments in students' essays informed through in-depth understanding of informal reasoning and written argumentation affords tremendous pedagogical values.

Identifying the generic elements that compose an argument is the starting point for analyzing arguments in students' essays. Although argument has been interpreted and conceptualized differently depending on specific sets of theoretical assumptions ( Newell et al., 2011 ), research has generally indicated that Toulmin (1958) model of informal argument and its variations are effective in capturing the type of organizational structures in students' argumentative writing (e.g., Knudson, 1992 ). Toulmin's model of argument revolves around three key elements: a claim , or the assertion to be argued for, data that provide the supportive evidence (empirical or experiential) for the claim, and a warrant that explains how the data support the claim. To capture the different aspects related to the nature of human reasoning, Toulmin also added three other argument elements: backing that affords justifications for the warrant, qualifiers to signal the strength of the argument, and rebuttals that denote exceptions to the elements of the argument.

Whereas Toulmin's model lends itself well to the analysis and construction of single claims, it is less helpful to deal with the structure of arguments at the macro level ( Wingate, 2012 ). Therefore, modified versions of Toulmin’s model have been developed to attend to the macrostructure of written argumentation. For instance, Nussbaum et al. (2005) adapted Toulmin's model to feature an opinion or a conclusion on the main question ( final claim ) which is usually supported by one or more reasons ( primary claims ) or claims ( rebuttals ) refuting some potentially opposing opinions ( counterclaims ). Nussbaum et al. also included into the model supporting reasons or examples used to back up the stated claims. Similarly, Qin and Karabacak (2010) used a coding scheme based on Toulmin's model that comprised six elements: claim , data , counterargument claim , counterargument data , rebuttal claim , and rebuttal data to identify argument elements in argumentative essays.

There are many problems with relying solely on prototypical argumentative discourse schema like those laid out by Toulmin. One problem is that such approaches are not based on theories of text analysis and may thus lack construct relevancy ( Azar, 1999 ). Additionally, discourse schemas do not show relations at the text level, giving the impression that essays are static and making it difficult to understand how argumentative elements can shape an entire text ( Freeman, 2011 ). To address these problems, Mann and Thompson (1988) developed Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST) which helps to arrange and connect parts of a text type to construct a whole. RST does this by focusing on relationships between discourse elements to demonstrate how a whole text functions. Specifically, discourse elements are connected through a small set of rhetorical relations that break texts into segments and develops relationships between segments to connect them coherently ( Azar, 1999 ). Azar concluded that RST was a useful tool for modeling argumentative text that complemented Toulmin’s approach. Green (2010) also adopted RST to model argumentative texts by using hierarchical trees to identify how evidence can link a claim with its argument and how a background relationship can link evidence with its warrant.

3. Connections

There are few currently available corpora that focus on assessing argumentation in persuasive writing and none that include rhetorical features like leads or concluding summaries. While existing corpora provide annotations for argumentative elements, the corpora are small, do not contain detailed argumentative features, do not focus on argumentative relationships, and do not contain demographic information.

The two best known corpora annotated for argumentative elements were released by Stab and Gurevych, 2014 , Stab and Gurevych, 2017 . Their initial corpus released in 2014 was small and consisted of 90 essays. The argument components annotated include major claims , claims , and premises . Major claims referred to sentences that directly expressed the general stance of the author that was supported by additional arguments. Claims were the central component of an argument, and premises were reasons that supported the claims. Stab and Gurevych also annotated the relationships between premises and major claims or claims in terms of whether they supported the claims or not. A follow up corpus followed the same annotation procedure and was released in 2017. This corpus contained 402 argumentative essays written by students (including the original 90 essays in the 2014 corpus). Both corpora were publicly released in order to increase access to annotated instances of argumentation in essays.

4. Limitations and future steps

The PERSUADE corpus was the foundation for the Feedback Prize competition hosted by Kaggle, an online community of data scientists. The Feedback Prize sought to develop machine learning models to best classify discourse elements in the PERSUADE corpus. Over 2000 teams participated, and the twelve top teams shared $160,000 in prize money. The winning model reported a classification accuracy for argumentative and discourse elements of just over 75%. All winning algorithms and the training portion of the PERSUADE corpus are freely available on the Feedback Prize Kaggle website (https://www.kaggle.com/c/feedback-prize-2021).

As a large-scale, open-sourced corpus of annotated discourse elements, the PERSUADE is unparalleled. However, it does have limitations. For instance, the corpus only focuses on 6–12th grade writers, leaving out younger writers developing proficiency and older, more proficient writers. The corpus also has a limited number of prompts (N = 15) and the current release of the PERSUADE corpus does not include quality ratings for the discourse elements or the essay as a whole. Lastly, the corpus only focuses on independent and integrated writing tasks (i.e., argumentative essays). Argumentative essays are overrepresented in secondary schools and first-year composition courses, especially when compared to the types of writing (e.g., explanatory writing) that students are exposed to in their post-secondary courses ( Aull and Ross, 2020 , Aull, 2019 ). In this sense, the PERSUADE corpus may lead to increased generalizations about the narrowness of academic writing that favors argumentation over other types of persuasion. This may be compounded if models to classify argument types based on PERSUADE are incorporated into AWE systems as planned. AWE systems, which have wide uptake, have the potential to further popularize the notion that academic writing is best represented through argumentation. Thus, future corpora would benefit from the inclusion of writing samples from compare-and-contrast essays, research reports, and analysis papers.

While the PERSUADE corpus was designed for machine learning, it is available to anyone, and we envision it will be used by writing researchers interested in both qualitative and quantitative methodologies. We also presume that the PERSUADE corpus could be used for other pedagogical applications including student-centered assessment, the development of heuristics for explicit genre knowledge, descriptive feedback in peer-reviews, and other uses developed by classroom teachers and writing program administrators.

Our next steps are to collect quality ratings for the individual discourse elements and the essays. We will then host additional Kaggle competitions to develop algorithms to predict discourse element quality and holistic essay score. Once those competition are completed, the entire PERSUADE corpus will be released publicly on Kaggle and other websites.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, and Schmidt Futures for their support.

Scott Crossley is a professor of Applied Linguistics and Computer Sciences at Georgia State University. His primary research focus is on natural language processing and the application of computational tools and machine learning algorithms in language learning, writing, and text comprehensibility. His main interest area is the development and use of natural language processing tools in assessing writing quality and text difficulty.

Some FAQs related to our essay writer service

Charita Davis

How do essay writing services work?

In the modern world, any company is trying to modernize its services. And services for writing scientific papers are no exception. Therefore, now it is very easy to order work and does not take time:

First, you need to choose a good site that you can trust. Read their privacy policies, guarantees, payment methods and of course reviews. It will be a big plus that examples of work are presented on the online platform.
Next, you need to contact a manager who will answer all the necessary questions and advise on the terms of cooperation. He will tell you about the acceptable writing deadlines, provide information about the author, and calculate the price of the essay.
After that, you sign the contract and during the indicated days stay in touch with the employee of the company.
Then you receive the file, read it attentively and transfer a certain amount to the company's bank card. After payment, the client downloads the document to his computer and can write a review and suggestions.

On the site Essayswriting, you get guarantees, thanks to which you will be confident and get rid of the excitement. The client can ask any questions about the writing and express special preferences.

Customer Reviews

Finished Papers

Constant customer Assistance

Margurite J. Perez

Finished Papers

We never disclose your personal information to any third parties

Bennie Hawra

Earl M. Kinkade

Jam Operasional (09.00-17.00)

+62 813-1717-0136 (Corporate) +62 812-4458-4482 (Recruitment)

Customer Reviews

Connect with the writers

Once paid, the initial draft will be made. For any query r to ask for revision, you can get in touch with the online chat support available 24X7 for you.

IMAGES

Example of a counter argument in persuasive essay
What Is A Counterclaim In An Argumentative Essay Examples
How to Write a Counterclaim Paragraph Part 1
Claim, Counterclaim, Rebuttal Paragraph Writing Guide with Practice
Counterclaim example essay
How To Write A Counterclaim: Guideline For Success

VIDEO

Persuasive Essay
Persuasive Essay Tahirah Mero
Persuasive Essay
Presentation of Research-Persuasive Essay Outline
Writing a Counterclaim
Subject Taster: Philosophy

COMMENTS

Counterargument
Some counterarguments will directly address your thesis, while other counterarguments will challenge an individual point or set of points elsewhere in your argument. For example, a counterargument might identify. a problem with a conclusion you've drawn from evidence. a problem with an assumption you've made. a problem with how you are ...
Parts of an Argumentative Essay
The 4 parts of an argumentative essay are the claim, counterclaim, reasoning, and evidence. The claim is the author's argument that they are attempting to prove in the essay.
Counterargument
Counterargument. When you write an academic essay, you make an argument: you propose a thesis and offer some reasoning, using evidence, that suggests why the thesis is true. When you counter-argue, you consider a possible argument against your thesis or some aspect of your reasoning. This is a good way to test your ideas when drafting, while ...
Counter Arguments
Counter Argument. One way to strengthen your argument and demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the issue you are discussing is to anticipate and address counter arguments, or objections. By considering opposing views, you show that you have thought things through, and you dispose of some of the reasons your audience might have for not ...
Developing Claims and Counterclaims
Introduction. When you're diving into a persuasive speech, article, or essay, there are two key things to look out for: the claim and the counterclaim. The claim is basically what the author believes and wants you to agree with. It's their main point or argument about a topic. On the flip side, the counterclaim is the opposite stance.
How to Write an Argumentative Essay
Make a claim. Provide the grounds (evidence) for the claim. Explain the warrant (how the grounds support the claim) Discuss possible rebuttals to the claim, identifying the limits of the argument and showing that you have considered alternative perspectives. The Toulmin model is a common approach in academic essays.
The Argumentative Essay: The Language of Concession and Counterargument
The persuasive essay begins with an engaging introduction that presents the general topic. The thesis typically appears somewhere in the introduction and states the writer's point of view. Tip. Avoid forming a thesis based on a negative claim. For example, "The hourly minimum wage is not high enough for the average worker to live on."
How To Write A Counterclaim: Mastering The Art Of Persuasion
Here's an example of how to structure a counterclaim: Paragraph 1: Introduction to your own argument. Paragraph 2: Supporting evidence for your own argument. Paragraph 3: Counterclaim presented in a clear and concise manner. Paragraph 4: Evidence to support the counterclaim.
Counterarguments
Guide to Counterarguments in Writing Studies. Counterarguments are a topic of study in Writing Studies as. a form of invention. Rhetors engage in rhetorical reasoning: They analyze the rebuttals their target audiences may have to their claims, interpretations, propositions, and proposals. a part of Toulmin Argument.
9.7.3: Counter Argument Paragraphs
Counter-Argument Paragraphs. The purpose of a counter argument is to consider (and show that you are considering) perspectives other than your own. A counter-argument tears down other viewpoints; it does not build up your own, which you should do in separate paragraphs.
Where to Put the Essay Counterclaim
The counterclaim is the opposing point of view to one's thesis and is also known as the counterargument. The counterclaim is always accompanied by a refutation, sometimes referred to as a rebuttal. The Common Core State Standards include the counterclaim in Writing Standards 1.0 for grades 7-12. These Standards reference the organization of ...
Why Use an Essay Counterclaim?
The counterclaim can be defined as the opposing point of view to one's thesis. It is also commonly known as the counterargument. A counterclaim is always followed by a refutation, which is often referred to as a rebuttal. The Common Core State Standards for grades 7-12 include the counterclaim in the argumentative essay (W. 1.0).
Discover How to Write a Counterclaim Paragraph & Defend with ...
In this video, I show you how to straighten your argument by acknowledging the counterclaim and defending it with a rebuttal. As you write an argumentative e...
How to Write an A+ Argumentative Essay
An argumentative essay attempts to convince a reader to agree with a particular argument (the writer's thesis statement). The writer takes a firm stand one way or another on a topic and then uses hard evidence to support that stance. An argumentative essay seeks to prove to the reader that one argument —the writer's argument— is the ...
Purdue Owl
Counterclaim: A claim that negates or disagrees with the thesis/claim. Rebuttal: Evidence that negates or disagrees with the counterclaim. Including a well thought out warrant or bridge is essential to writing a good argumentative essay or paper.
Writing Strong Counterclaims for Argument Essays
Writing a well-crafted counterclaim can elevate your argument from merely persuasive to truly compelling, so let's dive into how to do it effectively. Key Takeaways Including a counterclaim in an argumentative essay is important as it acknowledges alternative perspectives, strengthens overall argument, and demonstrates critical thinking skills.
PDF TEACHER'S NOTES Counter-Argument and Refutation
to include in a persuasive essay. Procedure Give each student a copy of the three-page worksheet. First, students read a short passage explaining the purpose of a counter-argument and refutation. Students then read a paragraph that includes a counter-argument and a refutation and identify and paraphrase both the writer's view and the opposing view.
Counter Argument Example Sentence Starters for Essays
Starting your essay by making a counterclaim in writing from the very first sentence may seem daunting, but you will find that it often provides a profound impact to the argumentative strength of your opposing claim. ... How to write a persuasive essay easily, with the best persuasive essay examples together with counter arguments to get the ...
Claims & Counterclaims: ToK Essay Guide
How to Write a ToK Essay: Step-by-step guidance on writing a standout ToK essay. External Sources : TED-Ed: How to Build a Strong Argument: Engaging video lesson on constructing persuasive arguments, relevant to crafting claims and counterclaims.
The persuasive essays for rating, selecting, and understanding
This paper introduces the Persuasive Essays for Rating, Selecting, and Understanding Argumentative and Discourse Elements (PERSUADE) corpus.The PERSUADE corpus is large-scale corpus of writing with annotated discourse elements. ... Counterclaim. A claim that refutes another claim or gives an opposing reason to the position. Rebuttal. A claim ...
What Is A Counterclaim In A Persuasive Essay
A good essay writing service should first of all provide guarantees: confidentiality of personal information; for the terms of work; for the timely transfer of the text to the customer; for the previously agreed amount of money. The company must have a polite support service that will competently advise the client, answer all questions and ...
Persuasive Essay Counterclaim
Persuasive Essay Counterclaim, Owl Purdue Writing A Research Paper, Ortiz Cofer Essay, Tucker Barkley Resume, Pay For My Top Persuasive Essay On Hillary Clinton, Ge Oil And Gas Case Study, Argumentative Research College Essay With Citations Our best editors will run additional screenings to check the quality of your paper.
What Is A Counterclaim In A Persuasive Essay
It won't be cheap but money isn't the reason why students in the U.S. seek the services of premium writers. The main reason is that the writing quality premium writers produce is figuratively out of this world. An admission essay, for example, from a premium writer will definitely get you into any college despite the toughness of the ...

Missouri S&T Missouri S&T

Writing and Communication Center

Counter Argument

Refutation:

Accommodation:

Some Final Hints

Reading Skills

Introduction

Understanding Claims

Developing Counterclaims

Practice Makes Perfect

Interested in a school license?​

AP® Score Calculators

AP® Review Guides

Core Subject Review Guides

SAT® Score Calculator

ACT® Score Calculator

Grammar Review Hub

AP® Posters

The Argumentative Essay: The Language of Concession and Counterargument

The Argumentative Essay: The Language of Concession and Counterargument

Sentence structure: Argument and Concession

How To Write A Counterclaim That Will Win Arguments

Table of Contents

Get Help Writing Counterclaims

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Table of Contents

Counterargument Definition

Guide to Counterarguments in Writing Studies

Why Do Counterarguments Matter?

Toulmin Counterarguments

Neoclassical Argument – Aristotelian Argument

Examples of Counterarguments

Counterarguments and Organization

Recommended Resources

Brevity - Say More with Less

Clarity (in Speech and Writing)

Coherence - How to Achieve Coherence in Writing

Flow - How to Create Flow in Writing

Inclusivity - Inclusive Language

The Elements of Style - The DNA of Powerful Writing

Suggested Edits

Other Topics:

Citation - Definition - Introduction to Citation in Academic & Professional Writing

Collaboration - What is the Role of Collaboration in Academic & Professional Writing?

Information Literacy - Discerning Quality Information from Noise

Rhetoric: Exploring Its Definition and Impact on Modern Communication

The Writing Process - Research on Composing

Writing Studies

Featured Articles

Academic Writing – How to Write for the Academic Community

Professional Writing – How to Write for the Professional World

Authority – How to Establish Credibility in Speech & Writing

9.7.3: Counter Argument Paragraphs

Counter-Argument Paragraphs

Placement of Counter-Arguments in an Essay

Example Counter-Argument

Contributors and Attributions

Pennington Publishing Blog

Links to Programs and Resources

Join the SOR Literacy Hub - Resource Sharing FB Group

Recent Articles

Choose Your Test

What Is an Argumentative Essay? How Is it Different from Other Kinds of Essays?

Argumentative Essay

Persuasive Essay

Expository Essay

Analytical Essay

A Typical Argumentative Essay Assignment

Good Argumentative Essay Topics

Argumentative Essay Format

Paragraph 1: Intro

Paragraph 2: Support

Paragraph 3: Support

Paragraph 4: Counterargument

Paragraph 5: Conclusion

Paragraph 1—Set Up and Claim

Paragraphs 2 and 3—Your Evidence

Paragraph 4—Argument for the Other Side and Refutation

Paragraph 5—Conclusion

Interested in a school license?