ecotourism case study

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• My Account Login
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 31 May 2023

Eco-tourism, climate change, and environmental policies: empirical evidence from developing economies

• Yunfeng Shang 1 ,
• Chunyu Bi 2 ,
• Xinyu Wei 2 ,
• Dayang Jiang 2 ,
• Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5446-7093 3 , 4 &
• Ehsan Rasoulinezhad   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7726-1757 5  

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications volume  10 , Article number:  275 ( 2023 ) Cite this article

8873 Accesses

8 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

• Environmental studies

Developing ecotourism services is a suitable solution to help developing countries improve the status of sustainable development indicators and protect their environment. The primary purpose of this paper is to find out the effects of green governance variables and carbon dioxide emissions on ecotourism for 40 developing economies from 2010 to 2021. The results confirmed a uni-directional causal relationship between the green governance indicator and the inflation rate of the ecotourism indicator. In addition, with a 1% improvement in the green governance index of developing countries, the ecotourism of these countries will increase by 0.43%. In comparison, with a 1% increase in the globalization index of these countries, ecotourism will increase by 0.32%. Moreover, ecotourism in developing countries is more sensitive to macroeconomic variables changes than in developed economies. Geopolitical risk is an influential factor in the developing process of ecotourism. The practical policies recommended by this research are developing the green financing market, establishing virtual tourism, granting green loans to small and medium enterprises, and government incentives to motivate active businesses.

Similar content being viewed by others

The economic commitment of climate change

The carbon dioxide removal gap

Frequent disturbances enhanced the resilience of past human populations

Introduction.

The challenge of climate change has become a primary threat to living on the Earth in the last centuries (Rasoulinzhad and Taghizadeh-Hesary, 2022 ). Many meetings of the countries at the regional and international level are held on the topics of environment and climate change. Regardless of environmental issues, population growth, and the lack of control of greenhouse gas emissions, industrialization has been the most crucial cause of the climate change crisis. Chao and Feng ( 2018 ) address human activity as the leading cause of climate change and express that this challenge is a potential threat to living on Earth. Woodward ( 2019 ) argued that climate change threats include the rise in global temperature, the melting of polar ice caps, and unprecedented disease outbreaks. Therefore, urgent policies and solutions are essential to control and lower the risk of global change. One of the signs of climate change is the increase in the average temperature of the Earth’s surface. Figure 1 shows the temperature data from 1910 to 2021 for the four continents of Asia, Europe, Africa, and North America.

Source: Authors from NOAA ( https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series ).

The data in Fig. 1 shows that the air temperature has increased significantly over the past century, which has been more prominent in Asia and Europe. In 2021, we saw a decrease in temperature changes due to the spread of the Corona disease and a decrease in the rate of greenhouse gas emissions. However, the role of the Asian continent in increasing the global temperature has been more than other continents due to its large population and excessive consumption of fossil fuels.

During the past decades, the world’s countries have tried to formulate and implement various environmental policies collectively in the form of agreements or separately to fight environmental threats. Regarding international agreements, such things as the Paris Agreement of 2015, the Kyoto Protocol of 1997, the Montreal Protocol of 1987, and the Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer in 1985 can be addressed whose primary purpose is to integrate the goals and motivation of the international community to the world’s environmental threats. However, a group of earlier studies, such as Zheng et al. ( 2017 ), Takashima ( 2018 ), and Roelfsema et al. ( 2022 ), emphasized the inefficiency of these global agreements, especially after the left the USA from the Paris Agreement on 1 June 2017. The most important cause of this inefficiency has been the need for more motivation of countries to fulfill their international obligations towards environmental issues. However, many governments consider the threat of climate change only within their geographical boundaries and have tried to formulate and implement green policies to advance their environmental protection goals. These policies include green financial policies (green taxes, green subsidies), monetary policies (such as green loans and green financing), and cultural and social policies in line with sustainable development. The ultimate goal of these green policies is a green economy, an environmentally friendly economy, a zero carbon economy, or a sustainable economy. Lee et al. ( 2022 ) define the green economy as a broad concept comprising green industry, agriculture, and services. Centobelli et al. ( 2022 ) express that environmental sustainability should be more attention in the service sector owing to its penetration into social life and interactions.

Tourism and travel-related services are among countries’ main parts of the service sector. By creating the flow of tourists, tourism services can lead to capital transfer, job creation, cultural exchange (globalization), and increasing welfare in the country hosting the tours. According to the Yearbook of Tourism Statistics published by the World Tourism Organization, international tourism has increased from 522.2 billion US dollars in 1995 to nearly 1.86 trillion US dollars in 2019. This increase shows the importance of tourism services in generating income for countries, especially in the era of Corona and post-corona. Casado-Aranda et al. ( 2021 ) express that tourism services can be a central driver of economic growth recovery in post COVID era. Jeyacheya and Hampton ( 2022 ) argue that tourism can make high incomes for host countries leading to job creation and economic flourishing in destination cities for tourists.

An important issue mentioned in the corona era and relies on the post-corona era is the revitalizing of green economic growth. An important issue mentioned in the corona era and relying on the post-corona era is the revitalizing green economic growth (Bai et al., 2022 ; Werikhe, 2022 ), an opportunity that countries should pay more attention to in order to rebuild their economic activities. In other words, countries should plan their return to economic prosperity with environmental issues in mind. To this end, the issue of tourism finds a branch called Ecotourism or sustainable tourism which has environmental concerns and tries to help countries to improve environmental protection policies. Ecotourism is an approach based on environmental criteria, which is opposed to over-tourism (a type of tourism that disrupts the protection of the environment and destroys natural resources). The International Ecotourism Society defines Ecotourism as an efficient way to conserve the environment and improve local people’s well-being. It can be said that Ecotourism, along with various economic advantages (income generation, job creation, globalization, poverty alleviation), will bring environmental protection to the world’s countries, achieving the goals of green economic growth recovery and sustainable development. Xu et al. ( 2022 ) consider Ecotourism as one of the essential components of achieving sustainable development in the post-corona era.

Ecotourism in developing countries has more priorities compared to developed economies. Firstly, developing countries are often countries with financial problems of the government, and the governments in these countries need more capital to advance sustainable development goals. Therefore, developing ecotourism services can be a suitable solution to help these countries improve the status of sustainable development indicators and protect their environment. Second, due to the spread of the Corona disease, developing countries have experienced numerous bankruptcy in the tourism services sector. Therefore, promoting ecotourism in these countries is of great importance in the post-corona era. Third, developing countries have a high share in the emission of greenhouse gases in the world due to their high dependence on fossil fuels and the lack of advanced green technologies. Fourth, due to bureaucratic processes, high cost, and lack of market transparency, greenwashing may happen in developing economies’ ecotourism industry, meaning that a company serving ecotourism services makes its activities seem more sustainable and ethical than they are. The term “greenwashing” can harshly impact the future development path of the ecotourism industry in developing economies. According to the reasons mentioned above, developing ecotourism in developing countries can be an essential factor in controlling and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in these countries.

This paper tries to contribute to the existing literature from the following aspects:

Calculating the ecotourism index for selected countries based on the criteria for measuring sustainable tourism stated by the World Tourism Organization in the United Nations. Considering that there is no specific index for ecotourism, the calculation of ecotourism in this article will be innovative.

Measuring the green governance index as a proxy for environmental policies for selected countries based on the Environment Social and Governance (ESG) data.

Selecting a sample of 40 developing countries from different geographical regions to calculate the interconnections between ecotourism, green governance, and climate change

Making a further discussion to address the role of uncertainty and the developing level of countries in the relationship between ecotourism and explanatory variables.

The main results confirm the existence of a uni-directional causal relationship running from the green governance indicator and inflation rate to the ecotourism indicator. In addition, with a 1% improvement in the green governance index of developing countries, the ecotourism of these countries will increase by 0.43%. A 1% increase in the globalization index of these countries accelerates ecotourism by 0.32%.

Moreover, ecotourism in developing countries is more sensitive to macroeconomic variables changes than in developed economies. Geopolitical risk is an influential factor in the developing process of ecotourism. The practical policies recommended by this research are developing the green financing market, establishing virtual tourism, granting green loans to small and medium enterprises, and government incentives to motivate active businesses.

The paper in continue is organized as follows: section “Literature review” provides a short literature review to determine the gaps this research seeks to fill. Section “Data and model specification” argues data and model specification. The following section represents empirical results. Section “Discussion” expresses discussion, whereas the last section provides conclusions, policy implications, research limitations, and recommendations to research further.

Literature review

This part of the article analyzes and classifies the previous literature on ecotourism and sustainable development in a rational and structured way. The importance of tourism in economic growth and development has been discussed in previous studies. However, the study of the effect of tourism on climate change has received little attention. Especially the relationship between sustainable tourism, climate change, and environmental policies is a problem that has yet to receive the attention of academic experts.

A group of previous studies has focused on the place of tourism in economic development and growth. Holzner ( 2011 ) focused on the consequences of tourism development on the economic performance of 134 countries from 1970 to 2007. They found out that excessive dependence on tourism income leads to Dutch disease in the economy, and other economic sectors need to develop to the extent of the tourism sector. In another study, Sokhanvar et al. ( 2018 ) investigated the causal link between tourism and economic growth in emerging economies from 1995 to 2014. The main results confirmed that the linkage is country-dependent. Brida et al. ( 2020 ) studied 80 economies from 1995 to 2016 to determine how tourism and economic development are related. The paper’s conclusions highlighted tourism’s-positive role in economic activities.

Another group of previous studies has linked tourism to sustainability targets. Sorensen and Grindsted ( 2021 ) expressed that nature tourism development has a positive and direct impact on achieving sustainable development goals of countries. In a new study, Li et al. ( 2022 ) studied the impacts of tourism development on life quality (as one of the sustainable development goals defined by the UN in 2015) in the case of Japan. They found that tourism development positively impacts the quality of life of age groups in the country. Ahmad et al. ( 2022 ) explored the role of tourism in the sustainability of G7 economies from 2000–2019. The primary findings revealed the positive impact of tourism arrivals on sustainable economic development. Zekan et al. ( 2022 ) investigated the impact of tourism on regional sustainability in Europe. They concluded that tourism development increases transport, leading to increased carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, tourism development causes environmental pollution.

Tourism that can pay attention to environmental issues is called “ecotourism.” Many new studies have studied different dimensions of ecotourism. Lu et al. ( 2021 ) expanded the concept of the ecotourism industry. The significant results expressed that smart tourist cities are essential for efficient ecotourism in countries. Thompson ( 2022 ) expressed the characteristics of ecotourism development through survey methodology. The results confirmed the importance of transparent regulations, government support, and social intention to promote ecotourism. In another study, Heshmati et al. ( 2022 ) employed the SWOT analysis method to explore the critical success factors of ecotourism development in Iran. They found that legal documentation and private participation are major influential factors in promoting ecotourism in Iran. In line with the previous research, Hosseini et al. ( 2021 ) tried to explore the influential factors in promoting ecotourism in Iran by employing a SWOT analysis. They depicted that attracting investors is essential to enhance ecotourism projects in Iran. Hasana et al. ( 2022 ) reviewed research to analyze the earlier studies about ecotourism. The conclusions expressed that ecotourism is necessary for environmental protection. However, it is a challenging plan for the government, and they should carry out various policies toward ecotourism development. Kunjuraman et al. ( 2022 ) studied the role of ecotourism on rural community development in Malaysia. The significant results confirmed that ecotourism could transfer-positive impacts.

Several earlier studies have concentrated on the characteristics of ecotourism in different developed and developing economies. For example, Ruhanen ( 2019 ) investigated the ecotourism status in Australia. The paper concluded that the country could potentially make a larger share of ecotourism to the entire local tourism industry. Jin et al. ( 2022 ) studied the role of local community power on green tourism in Japan. They concluded that the concept of agricultural village activity and regional support positively influences the development of green tourism in Japan as a developed economy. Choi et al. ( 2022 ) sought to find aspects of ecotourism development in South Korea. The preliminary results confirmed the importance of green governance and efficient regulation to promote a sustainable tourism industry. Baloch et al. ( 2022 ) explored the ecotourism specifications in the developing economy of Pakistan. They found that Pakistan’s ecotourism needs government support and the social well-being of the visited cities. Sun et al. ( 2022 ) studied ecotourism in China. They concluded that there is imbalanced development of ecotourism among Chinese provinces due to the need for more capital to invest in all ecotourism projects throughout the Chinese cities. Tajer and Demir ( 2022 ) analyzed the ecotourism strategy in Iran. They concluded that despite various potentials in the country, insufficient capital, lack of social awareness, and political tension are the major obstacles to promoting a sustainable tourism industry in Iran.

Another group of earlier studies has drawn attention to promoting eco-tourism in the post COVID era. They believe that the corona disease has created an excellent opportunity to pay more attention to environmental issues and that countries should move towards sustainable development concepts such as sustainable (eco) tourism in the post-corona era. Soliku et al. ( 2021 ) studied eco-tourism in Ghana during the pandemic. The findings depicted the vague impacts of a pandemic on eco-tourism. Despite the short-term negative consequence of the pandemic on eco-tourism, it provides various opportunities for developing this sector in Ghana. Hosseini et al. ( 2021 ) employed the Fuzzy Dematel technique to find solutions for promoting eco-tourism during COVID-19. They found out that planning to increase the capacity of eco-tourism and incentive policies by governments can help promote the eco-tourism aspect under the pandemic’s consequences. Abedin et al. ( 2022 ) studied the consequence of COVID-19 on coastal eco-tourism development. The primary findings confirmed the negative impacts of a pandemic on the development of eco-tourism.

A review of previous studies shows that tourism can positively impact green growth and sustainable development. Sustainable tourism can be used as a policy to deal with the threat of climate change. This issue needs more attention in the corona and post-corona eras. Because in the post-corona era, many countries have sought to revive green economic growth, and ecotourism can be one of the tools to achieve it. As observed, a detailed study of the relationship between climate change, ecotourism, and environmental policies has yet to be done. Therefore, this research will address and fill this literature gap.

Data and model specification

Data description.

The paper seeks to find the relationship between climate change, ecotourism, and environmental policy for the panel of 40 developing economies from different regions from 2010 to 2021 (480 observations). The sample size could have been more extensive due to the lack of information on some variables. However, there are 480 observations in the data analysis of the data panel; therefore, the number of samples selected is acceptable.

To determine the proxies for main variables, CO2 emissions per capita are selected as the proxy for climate change. Many earlier studies (e.g., Espoir et al., 2022 ) have employed this variable as an appropriate variable representing the status of climate change. Regarding ecotourism, the World Tourism Organization proposed some measurements of sustainable tourism, and also following Yusef et al. ( 2014 ), the entropy weight method is employed to calculate a multi-dimensional ecotourism indicator comprising per capita green park area (square meters), gross domestic tourism revenue (US dollars), the ratio of good air quality (%), green transport, renewable water resources (km3) and deforestation rate (%). It is a novel ecotourism indicator that can show the ecotourism status in countries.

In addition, the green governance index is calculated as a proxy for environmental policy. Principally, the Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) data from World Bank are gathered to calculate this variable. With the improvement of the Green Governance Index, the quality of environmental policies will also increase, and vice versa. With the adverseness of the Green Governance Index, the efficiency of environmental policies will decrease.

Regarding control variables, the inflation rate as an influential factor in tourism flows is selected. The importance of this variable to promoting/declining tourism flows has been drawn to attention by some earlier studies, such as Liu et al. ( 2022 ). The inflation rate can raise the total cost of travel, causing a reduction in tourism flows, while any reduction in the inflation rate can increase the intention of tourists to travel. In addition, the KOF globalization index provided by the KOF Swiss Economic Institute is another control variable. A country with a higher degree of globalization means more readiness to accept tourists from countries with different cultures and religions.

Model specification

According to the variables mentioned above, 40 examined developing countries from 2010 to 2021, the panel co-integration model can be written as Eq. 1 :

ETOR indicates the ecotourism index, while CO2, GGI, INF, and GLOB denote Carbon dioxide emissions per capita, green governance index, inflation rate, and globalization index, respectively. i is 1,2,…,40 and shows examined developing economies, while t is time and contains 2010, 2011,..,2021.

Prior to the estimation of coefficients of Eq. 1 , the panel unit root tests are employed to find out whether the series is stationary. To this end, three tests of LLC (Levin et al., 2002 ), Breitung’s test ( 2000 ), and the PP-Fisher test (Philips and Perron, 1988 ). If all the variables are stationary at the first level of difference (I(1)), a panel co-integration test can be conducted to explore whether the model is spurious. To this end, Kao’s co-integration test ( 1999 ) and Pedroni’s residual co-integration test ( 2004 ) are conducted. If the co-integration relationship exists among variables, the panel causality test can be run to determine the causal linkages among variables. In this paper, the two steps of Engle and Granger (1987)‘s test, which is based on the error correction model (ECM) is used as Eqs. 2 – 6 :

In the above Equations, Δ is the first differences of variables, while θ and ECT represent the fixed country effect and error correction term.

The next step is the long-run panel co-integration estimations. To this end, Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) and Dynamic OLS (DOLS) as robustness checks are conducted, which are two famous panel co-integration estimators (Rasoulinezhad, 2018 ). The FMOLS estimator has various advantages. It allows serial correlation, endogeneity, and cross-sectional heterogeneity (Erdal and Erdal, 2020 ).

Empirical results

In this section, we will implement the experimental research model. The purpose of implementing an econometric model based on panel data is to find the effects of green governance variables and carbon dioxide emissions on ecotourism. As the first step, the panel unit root tests are conducted. The results are reported in Table 1 as follows:

According to Table 1 , all three-panel unit root tests depict that all series are non-stationary at the level and become stationary after a first difference. Next, the panel co-integration tests are conducted, and their results are represented in Tables 2 and 3 :

The two-panel co-integration tests’ findings confirm the presence of co-integration linkages among variables.

The panel causality test studies the short-term and long-term causal relationship among variables. Table 4 reports the results of the panel causality check as follows:

According to Table 4 , there is a uni-directional causal relationship between the green governance indicator and the inflation rate of the ecotourism indicator. At the same time, there is a bi-directional causal relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and ecotourism indicators, confirming the existence of the feedback effect. In addition, there is only short-term causality from the green governance indicator to carbon dioxide emissions. In contrast, ecotourism and the globalization index have a uni-directional causal linkage. In the short term, improving ecotourism can cause globalization and reduce carbon emissions in developing economies. Regarding the long-term causality, it can be concluded that the ECT of ecotourism, green governance index, and globalization index are statistically significant. These three variables are major adjustment variables when the system departs from equilibrium.

In the last stage, the long-run estimations are done through FMOLS and DOLS estimators. Table 5 lists the results of the estimations by these two-panel co-integration estimators:

Based on FMOLS estimation, it can be concluded that the Green Governance index has a positive and significant coefficient in such a way that with a 1% improvement in the green governance index of developing countries, the ecotourism of these countries will increase by 0.43%. By improving the state of green governance, the quality of formulated and implemented green policies in these countries will increase, improving the conditions of ecotourism development. This finding aligns with Agrawal et al. ( 2022 ) and Debbarma and Choi ( 2022 ), who believe that green governance is essential to sustainable development. In the case of carbon dioxide emissions, the coefficient of this variable is not statistically significant. In other words, the variable of carbon dioxide emissions per capita has no significant effect on ecotourism in developing countries. The inflation rate has a significant negative effect on ecotourism. With a 1% increase in the general prices of goods and services in developing countries, ecotourism will decrease by 0.34%. This finding aligns with Rahman ( 2022 ), who showed a negative relationship between inflation and sustainable development in their research. An increase in inflation means an increase in the total cost of a tourist’s trip to the destination country, inhibiting the growth of tourist services.

Regarding the globalization variable, this variable has a significant positive effect on the ecotourism of developing countries. With a 1% increase in the globalization index of these countries, ecotourism will increase by 0.32%. Globalization means more interaction with the world’s countries, acceptance of different cultures and customs, more language learning in society, more acceptance of tourism, and development of tourist services in the country. This finding is consistent with the results of Akadiri et al. ( 2019 ), who confirmed that globalization is one of the crucial components in tourism development.

The DOLS estimator was also used to ensure the obtained findings’ validity. The results of this method are shown in Table 5 . The signs of the coefficients are consistent with the results obtained by the FMOLS method. Therefore, the validity and reliability of the obtained coefficients are confirmed.

In this section, we will briefly discuss the relationship between ecotourism and climate change and the environmental policy considering the uncertainty and the relationship between variables in developed and developing countries.

Consideration of uncertainty

Uncertainty as a primary reason for risk has become a research issue in recent decades. Uncertainty can make the future unpredictable and uncontrollable, affecting economic decision-making. Regarding tourism, the impacts of uncertainty have been drawn to attention by several earlier studies (e.g., Dutta et al., 2020 ; Das et al., 2020 ; and Balli et al., 2019 ; Balli et al., 2018 ). In general, uncertainty in the tourism industry reflects tourists’ concerns and consumption habits in the way that by increasing uncertainty, it is expected that tourists make sense of risks and postpone their tourism activities, and vice versa; in the sphere of certainties, the various risks are clear, and tourists can make rational decisions for their tourism plans and activities. In order to explore the impacts of uncertainties on eco-tourism of the examined developing economies, the geopolitical risk index (GPR) as a proxy for economic policy uncertainty index is gathered and added as a control variable to Eq. 1 . The estimations results by FMOLS are reported in Table 6 as follows.

According to Table 6 , the uncertainty (geopolitical risk) has a negative coefficient meaning that with a 1% increase in geopolitical risk, the eco-tourism industry in the examined developing countries decreases by approximately 0.69%. The signs of coefficients of other variables align with the earlier findings, represented in Table 5 . In addition, the magnitude of the impact of geopolitical risk is larger than the impacts of other variables highlighting the importance of lower geopolitical risk in these economies to reach sustainable tourism targets.

Difference in developed and developing economies

Considering the different structures and financial power of these two groups of countries, the relationship between the variables mentioned in these two groups is expected to be different. In the previous section, the results for the group of developing countries showed that the Green Governance index has a positive and significant coefficient. In the case of carbon dioxide emissions, the coefficient of this variable is not statistically significant. The inflation rate has a significant negative effect on ecotourism. Regarding the globalization variable, it can be mentioned that this variable has a significant positive effect on the ecotourism of developing countries. In order to analyze the relationship between variables in the developed countries, the top 10 countries with the highest HDI in 2021 are selected (Switzerland (0.962), Norway (0.961), Iceland (0.959), Hong Kong (0.952), Australia (0.951), Denmark (0.948), Sweden (0.947) and Ireland (0.945)). The selected variables, explained in section “Data and model specification”, are collected from 2010 to 2021. The panel unit root tests confirmed that all series are non-stationary at the level and become stationary after a first difference. In addition, the presence of co-integration linkages among variables is revealed by the panel co-integration test. The panel co-integration estimator of FMOLS is employed to study the long-term relationship among variables. The findings are reported in Table 7 as follows:

According to the estimated coefficients, the green governance indicator positively and statistically significantly impacts ecotourism in the examined developed economies. However, the magnitude of the impact of this variable is more considerable for developing countries because these countries have more imbalances in markets and regulations. Therefore, the presence of good green tourism can have a more positive effect on advancing the goal of ecotourism. Contrary to the findings of developing countries, carbon dioxide emission in developed countries has a negative and significant effect, meaning that with an increase of 1% in carbon dioxide in developed countries, the level of ecotourism becomes more unfavorable by 0.034%. Moreover, inflation and globalization variables have significant negative and positive coefficients, respectively. However, the magnitudes of these two variables’ coefficients are also higher in developing countries. Ecotourism in developing countries is more sensitive to changes in macroeconomic variables such as green governance, globalization, and inflation.

Another difference between eco-tourism in developed and developing economies may be interpreted through the term “greenwashing,” introduced by Westerveld in 1986 (Maichum et al., 2016 ). In developing countries, due to the economic structure, limited knowledge, bureaucratic process, lack of legal eco-certification, and imperfect competition, a company involved in the eco-tourism industry makes an unsubstantiated claim to deceive consumers into accepting the company’s services are in line with environmental protection policies. Hence, green governance in developing countries should have another role in regulating the eco-tourism market to lower the threat of greenwashing in eco-tourism services.

Conclusions and policy recommendations

Concluding remarks.

The findings of econometric modeling revealed the relationship between environmental policies, climate change, and ecotourism. Based on the findings of the econometric model, the following conclusions can be presented:

A uni-directional causal relationship runs from the green governance indicator and inflation rate to the ecotourism indicator, which means that any changes in green governance and inflation rate cause changes in ecotourism, which is vital for developing economies where governance and inflation rate are two crucial issues.

There is a bi-directional causal relationship between carbon dioxide emissions and ecotourism indicators, confirming the existence of the feedback hypothesis, expressing that in developing economies, any policies related to ecotourism cause changes in CO2 emissions and vice versa.

There is only short-term causality from the green governance indicator to carbon dioxide emissions, whereas there is a uni-directional causal linkage from ecotourism to the globalization index. In other words, in the short term, improving ecotourism can cause globalization and reduce carbon emissions in developing economies.

By improving green governance in developing economies, the quality of formulated and implemented green policies in these countries will increase, improving the conditions of ecotourism development.

An increase in the inflation rate raises the total cost of a tourist’s trip to developing economies, inhibiting the growth of eco-tourist services.

Globalization means more interaction with the world’s countries, acceptance of different cultures and customs, more language learning in society, more acceptance of tourism, and development of tourist services in developing countries.

Policy implications

In order to achieve the promotion of ecotourism in developing countries, the implementation of integrated and effective strategic and practical policies is of great importance. According to the concluding remarks mentioned, practical policies are presented as follows for enhancing ecotourism in developed countries. The development of ecotourism requires the improvement of various infrastructures and mechanisms, which depends on the implementation of projects related to ecotourism in developing countries. Because most countries do not have enough financial power to invest in such projects, developing the green financing market can be one of the critical practical solutions. The green financing tool can increase the investment risk and return on investment in such projects, and as a result, the participation of the private sector in these projects will increase. With information and communication technology development, virtual tourism can solve many environmental issues related to human physical presence. Virtual tourism is one of the branches of tourism services that provide people with destinations, places of interest, and tourist attractions with full quality but in virtual form. Another practical policy is granting green loans to small and medium enterprises active in ecotourism. Despite the organizational agility, these companies do not have the significant financial power to develop different sectors of ecotourism; therefore, the cooperation of the banking industry of developing countries by providing green loans (with low-interest rates) can motivate small and medium-sized companies in the field of activities related to ecotourism. Government incentives to motivate businesses active in ecotourism and government deterrent policies (green tax) from businesses active in the field of tourism to lead them to increase the share of ecotourism in their activities can be a proper operational strategy. In developing countries, the role of government and green governance is vital in advancing the goals of ecotourism. By improving the level of its green governance, the government can create efficient policies, regulations, and social tools to create motivation and desire to accept ecotourism, an essential and undeniable issue in developing societies. Creating a guarantee fund for ecotourism companies in developing countries is another practical policy to support these companies financially. Guarantee funds can be established with the participation of the people of ecotourism destinations in order to strengthen the financial strength of ecotourism companies in these destinations.

Limitations and recommendations to further research

This research had a practical and innovative contribution to the literature on ecotourism in developing countries. The findings obtained from the econometric model analysis provided appropriate practical and strategic policies to the policymakers of countries interested in the development of ecotourism. However, access to data related to the ecotourism index and sustainable development of developing countries due to the lack of community in a specific database is considered one of the critical limitations of this research. This limitation caused many developing countries to be excluded from the research sample, which may have created a deviation in the research. Adding more countries to the test sample in future research is suggested to obtain complete and accurate results. Also, due to the outbreak of the Corona pandemic at the end of 2019 and the Russia-Ukraine war since the beginning of 2022, it is suggested that these two variables be included in the econometric model as an illusion in order to analyze their effects on the ecotourism of the countries of the world. Using other econometric methods, such as artificial neural networks, is suggested to model ecotourism in different countries. Complex modeling by taking into account trends and trends to predict the relationship between variables in the future will be an essential step in formulating effective programs in ecotourism.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abedin Z, Handayani W, Zaky E, Faturrahman A (2022) Perceived risk and attitude’s mediating role between tourism knowledge and visit intention during the COVID-19 pandemic: implementation for coastal-ecotourism management. Heliyon 8(10):e10724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10724

Article   Google Scholar  

Agrawal A, Brandhorst S, Jain M, Liao C, Pradhan N, Solomon D (2022) From environmental governance to governance for sustainability. One Earth 5(6):615–621

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Ahmad N, Youjin L, Hdia M (2022) The role of innovation and tourism in sustainability: why is environment-friendly tourism necessary for entrepreneurship? J Clean Prod 379(Part 2):134799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134799

Akadiri S, Alola A, Akadiri A (2019) The role of globalization, real income, tourism in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Turkey. Sci Total Environ 687:423–432

Article   ADS   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Bai X, Wang K, Tran T, Sadiq M, Trung L, Khudoykulov K (2022) Measuring China’s green economic recovery and energy environment sustainability: econometric analysis of sustainable development goals. Econ Anal Policy 75:768–779

Balli F, Shahzad SJH, Uddin GS (2018) A tale of two shocks: what do we learn from the impacts of economic policy uncertainties on tourism? Tour Manag68:470–475

Balli F, Uddin GS, Shahzad SJH (2019) Geopolitical risk and tourism demand in emerging economies. Tour Econ 25(6):997–1005

Baloch Q, Shah S, Iqbal N, Sheeraz M, Asadullah M, Mahar S, Khan A (2022) Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism. Environ Sci Pollut Res https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w

Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed.). Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics. vol. 15. JAI Press, Amsterdam. pp. 161–178

Brida J, Gomez D, Segarra V (2020) On the empirical relationship between tourism and economic growth. Tour Manag 81:104131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104131

Casado-Aranda L, Fernandez J, Bastidas-Manzano A (2021) Tourism research after the COVID-19 outbreak: insights for more sustainable, local and smart cities. Sustain Cities Soc 73:103126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103126

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Esposito E (2022) Environmental sustainability in the service industry of transportation and logistics service providers: systematic literature review and research directions. Transp Res Part D Trans Environ 53:454–470

Chao Q, Feng A (2018) Scientific basis of climate change and its response. Glob Energy Interconnect 1(4):420–427

Google Scholar  

Choi Y, Oh C, Chon J (2022) Applying the resilience principles for sustainable ecotourism development: a case study of the Nakdong Estuary, South Korea. Tour Manag 83:104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104237

Das D, Dutta A, Bhadra A, Uddin GS (2020) Role of presidential uncertainties on the hotel industry. Ann Tour Res 81:102762

Debbarma J, Choi Y (2022) A taxonomy of green governance: a qualitative and quantitative analysis towards sustainable development. Sustain Cities Soc 79:103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103693

Dutta A, Mishra T, Uddin GS, Yang Y (2020) Brexit uncertainty and volatility persistence in tourism demand. Curr Issue Tour 24(16):2225–2232

Erdal H, Erdal G (2020) Panel FMOLS model analysis of the effects of livestock support policies on sustainable animal presence in Turkey. Sustainability 12:3444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083444

Espoir D, Mudiangombe B, Bannor F, Sunge R, Tshitaka J (2022) CO2 emissions and economic growth: Assessing the heterogeneous effects across climate regimes in Africa. Sci Total Environ 804:150089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150089

Hasana U, Swain S, George B (2022) A bibliometric analysis of ecotourism: a safeguard strategy in protected areas. Region Sustain 3(1):27–40

Heshmati M, Gheitury M, Shadfar S (2022) Factors affecting possibility of ecotourism development and sustaining natural resources using SWOT approach in west Iran. Int J Geoheritage Parks 10(2):173–183

Holzner M (2011) Tourism and economic development: the beach disease. Tour Manag32(4):922–933

Hosseini S, Paydar M, Keshteli M (2021) Recovery solutions for ecotourism centers during the Covid-19 pandemic: utilizing Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy VIKOR methods. Exp Syst Appl 185:115594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115594

Hosseini S, Paydar M, Triki C (2021) Implementing sustainable ecotourism in Lafour region, Iran: applying a clustering method based on SWOT analysis. J Clean Prod 329:129716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129716

Jeyacheya J, Hampton M (2022) Pathway choice and post-Covid tourism: Inclusive growth or business as usual? World Dev Sustain 1:100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2022.100024

Jin C, Takao M, Yobuta M(2022) Impact of Japan’s local community power on green tourism. Asia Pacific J Region Sci 6:571–591

Kao C (1999) Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J Economet 90(1):1–44

Article   MathSciNet   MATH   Google Scholar  

Kunjuraman V, Hussin R, Aziz R (2022) Community-based ecotourism as a social transformation tool for rural community: a victory or a quagmire. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 39:100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2022.100524

Lee C, Wang C, Ho S (2022) The dimension of green economy: Culture viewpoint. Econ Anal Policy 74:122–138

Levin A, Lin CF, Chu CS (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J Economet 108(1):1–24

Li J, Ridderstaat J, Yost E (2022) Tourism development and quality of life interdependence with evolving age-cohort-based population. Tour Manag 93:104621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104621

Liu A, Kim Y, Song H (2022) Toward an accurate assessment of tourism economic impact: a systematic literature review. Ann Tour Res Empirical Insight 3(2):100054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2022.100054

Lu C, Huang J, Chen C, Shu M, Hsu C, Bapu T (2021) An energy-efficient smart city for sustainable green tourism industry. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 47:101494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101494

Maichum K, Parichatnon S, Peng KC (2016) Application of the extended theory of planned behavior model to investigate purchase intention of green products among Thai consumers. Sustainability 8:1077

Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economet Theory 20(3):597–625

Phillips PCB, Perron P (1988) Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika. 75(2):335–346

Rahman M (2022) The effect of taxation on sustainable development goals: evidence from emerging countries. Heliyon 8(9):e10512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10512

Rasoulinezhad E (2018) A new evidence from the effects of Russia’s WTO accession on its foreign trade. Eur Econ Rev 8(1):73–92

Rasoulinezhad E, Taghizadeh-Hesary F (2022) Role of green finance in improving energy efficiency and renewable energy development. Energy Efficiency 15(2):14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10021-4

Roelfsema M, Soest H, Elzen M, Coninck HH, Kuramochi T, Harmsen M, Dagnomilis I, Hohne N, Vuuren D (2022) Developing scenarios in the context of the Paris Agreement and application in the integrated assessment model IMAGE: a framework for bridging the policy-modelling divide. Environ Sci Policy 135:104–116

Article   CAS   Google Scholar  

Ruhanan L (2019) The prominence of eco in ecotourism experiences: an analysis of post-purchase online reviews. J Hosp Tour Manag 39:110–116

Sokhanvar A, Ciftcioglu S, Javid E (2018) Another look at tourism-economic development nexus. Tour Manag Perspect 26:97–106

Soliku O, Kyiire B, Mahama A, Kubio C (2021) Tourism amid COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and implications for building resilience in the eco-tourism sector in Ghana’s Savannah region. Heliyon 7(9):e07892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07892

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Sorensen F, Grindsted T (2021) Sustainability approaches and nature tourism development. Ann Tour Res 91:103307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103307

Sun Y, Ding W, Yang G (2022) Green innovation efficiency of China’s tourism industry from the perspective of shared inputs: Dynamic evolution and combination improvement paths. Ecol Indica 138:108824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108824

Tajer E, Demir S (2022) Ecotourism strategy of UNESCO city in Iran: applying a new quantitative method integrated with BWM. J Clean Prod 376:134284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134284

Takashima N (2018) International environmental agreements between asymmetric countries: a repeated game analysis. Jpn World Econ 48:38–44

Thompson B (2022) Ecotourism anywhere? The lure of ecotourism and the need to scrutinize the potential competitiveness of ecotourism developments. Tour Manag 92:104568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104568

Werikhe A (2022) Towards a green and sustainable recovery from COVID-19. Curr Res Environ Sustain 4:100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100124

Woodward A (2019) Climate change: disruption, risk and opportunity. Glob Trans 1:44–49

Xu L, Ao C, Liu B, Cai Z (2022) Cotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends. Environ Dev Sustain https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02190-0

Yusef N, Rahman F, Jamil M, Iranmanesh M (2014) Measuring the quality of ecotourism services: case study–based model validation. Sage Open, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014538270

Zekan B, Weismayer C, Gunter U, Schuh B, Sedlacek S (2022) Regional sustainability and tourism carrying capacities. J Clean Prod 339:130624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130624

Zheng H, Dai H, Lai H, Wang W (2017) U.S. withdrawal from the Paris agreement: reasons, impacts, and China’s response. Adv Clim Change Rese 8(4):220–225

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

School of Hospitality Administration, Zhejiang Yuexiu University, Zhejiang, China

• Yunfeng Shang

School of Economics, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin, China

Chunyu Bi, Xinyu Wei & Dayang Jiang

School of Global Studies, Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan

Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary

TOKAI Research Institute for Environment and Sustainability (TRIES), Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan

Faculty of World Studies, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Ehsan Rasoulinezhad

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yunfeng Shang , Dayang Jiang or Ehsan Rasoulinezhad .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Additional information.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Shang, Y., Bi, C., Wei, X. et al. Eco-tourism, climate change, and environmental policies: empirical evidence from developing economies. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 10 , 275 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01777-w

Download citation

Received : 11 November 2022

Accepted : 18 May 2023

Published : 31 May 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01777-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

This article is cited by

Spatial effects of green finance development in chinese provinces under the context of high-quality energy development.

• Fangbin Qian

Economic Change and Restructuring (2024)

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Advertisement

Sustainability of a local government-instituted ecotourism development: Tayak adventure, nature and wildlife Park in Rizal, Laguna, Philippines

• Published: 23 March 2021
• Volume 23 , pages 16145–16162, ( 2021 )

Cite this article

• Bing Baltazar C. Brillo   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9659-9147 1 &
• Aileen C. Simondac-Peria 2  

820 Accesses

5 Citations

Explore all metrics

Ecotourism development is a strategy of the Philippine Government. The existence of untapped natural resources and cultural/heritage assets has impeded the expansion of ecotourism. This situation is exacerbated by the literary deficit where a specific aspect has mainly been overlooked—the maintainability of small/medium-scale enterprises once already put in place. Against this backdrop, the study explores and understands the sustainability of TANAW Park's Ecotourism Enterprise of Rizal Municipality. Using a case study design, the article delineates the circumstances to fathom out the local ecotourism development. Firstly, the leadership is the top-down driven in the initiative, but in maintaining, the bottom-up manner is more significant. Secondly, the financial issue is complicated, so ideal is continuing the government agencies and integrating the commercial businesses. Thirdly, the Holy Week events are a single-month focal point, thus regularly extending the supplementary activities can increase revenue. Fourthly, TANAW Park is strategical if connected to the critical neighbouring towns and nearby resources. Lastly, TANAW Park's strengths lie in the presence of the unusual intermixing of assets, and the weaknesses are the risks of becoming a "white elephant project." In whole, TANAW Park is a noteworthy and tangible contribution to the local government and the people of Rizal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Source: Google Earth)

Similar content being viewed by others

Buen vivir, degrowth and ecological swaraj: alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy.

Planning for the Expansion of Phuthaditjhaba CBD Through UN Sustainable Development Goals

Understanding ecological civilization in China: From political context to science

*Exchange rate (2020): 1 PHP = 0.0206009 USD.

Acott, T. G., La Trobe, H. L., & Howard, S. H. (1998). An evaluation of deep ecotourism and shallow ecotourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 6 (3), 238–253.

Article   Google Scholar  

Aguila, G., & Ragot, R. (2014). Ecotourism industry in IlijanBatangas City, Philippines: Assessing its effects as a basis of proposed tourism development plan. Quarterly Journal of Business Studies, 1 (1), 24–35.

Google Scholar  

Alampay, R. B. (2005). The challenge of sustainable tourism development in the Philippines. In R. B. Alampay (Ed.), Sustainable tourism: Challenges for the Philippines . PASCN and PIDS.

Alampay, R.B. & Libosada, C. (2003). Development of a classification framework on ecotourism initiatives in the Philippines. PASCN Discussion Paper No. 2003-04, Makati City, Philippines.

Alampay, R. B., & Libosada, C. (2005). A framework for classifying ecotourism initiatives in the Philippines. In R. B. Alampay (Ed.), Sustainable Tourism: Challenges for the Philippines . Philippine-APEC Study Center Network and the Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Aldaba, R. 2012. Small and medium enterprises' (SMEs) access to finance: Philippines. The PIDS Discussion Paper Series, Makati City, Philippines.

Anastacio, N. J., & Brillo, B. B. (2020). The potentials for ecotourism development of Tikub lake: The obscure small lake of Tiaong, Quezon, Philippines. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 17 (4), 53–58.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2015a). ASEAN tourism strategic plan 2016–2025 . ASEAN.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2015b). Tourist arrivals in ASEAN . ASEAN.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2017). ASEAN tourism marketing strategy 2017–2020 . ASEAN.

Bagadion, B., & Juan, N. (2015). Transforming protected areas into effective and sustainable ecotourism destinations: Lessons from the ground. BIMP-EAGA Journal for Sustainable Tourism Development, 4 (1), 1–9.

Bansil, P. D., Capellan, S. A., Castillo, R., Quezon, C., & Sarmiento, D. M. (2015). Local community assessment on the economic, environmental and social aspects of ecotourism in Lobo, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3 (4), 132–139.

Batangrizal. (2011a). Biking heaven: Tayak hill . Retrieved from https://batangrizal.wordpress.com/2011/03/09/biking-heaven/ .

Batangrizal. (2011b). Promoting Rizal, Laguna’s municipal landmarks . Retrieved from https://batangrizal.wordpress.com/2011/03/27/promoting-rizal-lagunas-municipal-landmarks/ .

Batangrizal. (2011c). Promoting Rizal, Laguna thru Philippine daily inquirer . Retrieved from https://batangrizal.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/promoting-rizal-laguna-thru-philippine-daily-inquirer/ .

Benur, A., & Bramwell, B. (2015). Tourism product development and product diversification in destinations. Tourism Management, 50, 213–224.

Boquet, Y. (2017). It’s more fun in the Philippines? The Challenges of Tourism. In Y. Boquet (Ed.), The Philippine Archipelago . Springer.

Brillo, B. B. (2008). Path dependence, increasing returns and Filipino labor migration policy. Crossroads: The ASA Journal, 8 (1), 24–61.

Brillo, B. B. (2010). The politics of the anti-money laundering act of the Philippines: An assessment of R.A. 9160 and R.A. 9194. Asian Social Science, 6 (8), 109–125.

Brillo, B. B. (2014). Shifting economic regimes for retail in the Philippines: External impetus amidst the workings of domestic politics. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 24 (5), 516–530.

Brillo, B. B. (2016). An assessment of the development of a transboundary small lake: Calibato lake, San Pablo City and Rizal, Laguna, Philippines. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 13 (2), 55–67.

Brillo, B. B. (2016). The case of Yambo lake, San Pablo City, Nagcarlan and Rizal, Laguna Philippines. The Social Sciences, 11 (23), 5693–5702.

Brillo, B. B. (2016). Development of a small lake: Ecotourism enterprise for Pandin lake, San Pablo City, Philippines. Lakes & Reservoirs: Research & Management, 21 (4), 284–292.

Brillo, B. B. (2016). Urban lake governance and development in the Philippines: The case of Sampaloc lake, San Pablo City. Taiwan Water Conservancy Journal, 64 (3), 66–81.

Brillo, B. B. (2017). Intricacies, challenges and implications: The governance of Tadlaclake, Los Banos, Laguna. Philippines. International Journal of Water, 11 (4), 376–394.

Brillo, B. B., Quinones, E., & Lapitan, A. (2017). Restoration, development and governance of Dagatan lake, San Antonio, Quezon, Philippines. Taiwan Water Conservancy Journal, 65 (1), 44–54.

Brillo, B. B., Anastacio, N. J., Dicolen, E., & Baconguis, R. (2017). Governance and development of Tikub lake, Tiaong, Quezon, Philippines. Taiwan Water Conservancy Journal, 65 (4), 1–13.

Brillo, B. B. (2020). The status, governance and development of Gunao lake: The little-known lake of Dolores, Quezon, Philippines. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 17 (1), 27–33.

Bureau of Local Government Finance (BLGF). (2019). Blgf indicators for the 2019 seal of good local governance assessment of the Department of the Interior and Local Government . Retrieved from http://blgf.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/FY-2019-SGLG_20-IRA-Utilization_Municipality-1.pdf and http://blgf.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2018/08 .

Calanog, L., Reyes, D. P., & Eugenio, V. (2012). Making ecotourism work: A manual on establishing community-based ecotourism enterprise (CBEE) in the Philippines . Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).

Carter, R. W. (2004). Implications of sporadic tourism growth: extrapolation from the case of Boracay Island, The Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 9 (4), 383–404.

Castillo, R., Dimaano, P., Macaspac, E., Asilo, N., & Amaro, J. (2014). Ecotourism in Mount Maculot as assessed by the host community: Basis for sustainable development. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 15 (1), 416–428.

Cheong, S.-M., & Miller, M. L. (2000). Power and tourism: A Foucauldian observation. Annals of Tourism Research, 27 (2), 371–390.

Competitiveness Bureau (DTI-CB). (2019). Rankings of Cities and Municipalities are based on the sum of their scores on 4 Pillars: Economic Dynamism, Government Efficiency, Infrastructure and Resiliency . Retrieved from https://cmci.dti.gov.ph/pages/rankings/ .

Commission on Audit (COA). (2019a). CY 2018 annual financial report: Local government volume 1 . Retrieved from https://www.coa.gov.ph/local-government-units-lgus/category/7851-2018 .

Commission on Audit (COA). (2019b). CY 2018 annual audits reports: Municipality of Rizal . Retrieved from https://www.coa.gov.ph/index.php/local-government-units/2018/category/7625-municipalities .

Cruz, R. 2003. Towards sustainable tourism development in the Philippines and other Asean countries: An examination of programs and practices of national tourism organizations. PASCN Discussion Paper No. 2003–06, Makati City, Philippines.

Crotty, M. (2004). Foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process . Sage.

Cular, A. G. (2015). Ecotourism and value adding: Source of livelihood among the villagers in Basey Samar, Eastern Visayas. Philippines. The Social Sciences, 10 (6), 826–831.

Dela Santa, E. (2015). The evolution of Philippine tourism policy implementation from 1973 to 2009. Tourism Planning & Development, 12 (2), 155–175.

Dela Santa, E. (2018). Power and politics in tourism policy and planning in the Philippines. In Y. Wang, A. Shakeela, A. Kwek, & C. Khoo-Lattimore (Eds.), Managing Asian destinations . Perspectives on Asian Tourism: Springer.

Dela Santa, E., & Saporsantos, J. (2016). Philippine tourism act of 2009: Tourism policy formulation analysis from multiple streams. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 8 (1), 53–70.

Department of Health (DOH). (2018). Population projections by Region, Province, Cities and Municipalities, 2018–2022 . Retrieved from https://www.doh.gov.ph/node/15619 .

Department of Tourism (DOT). 2011. The national tourism development plan: Strengthening the Philippines strategic planning process. 6th UNWTO Executive Training Program, Bhutan.

Department of Tourism (DOT). 2012. Ecotourism toward inclusive growth. Global Eco-Asia Pacific Tourism Conference, Queensland, Australia.

Department of Tourism (DOT). (2014). Tourism guidebook for local government units toward inclusive growth . Office of Tourism Planning.

Department of Tourism (DOT). (2018). National tourism development plan, 2016–2022 . Retrieved from https://itsmorefunincentralluzon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/NTDP-2016-2022_Executive-Summary.pdf .

Dion, D., II., Garcia, Y., & Bello, A. (2016). Optimizing the welfare benefits from ecotourism: The case of Calatagan Mangrove Forest Conservation Park. Journal of Economics, Management and Agricultural Development, 2 (1), 117–134.

Dwiggins, D. (2011). Guerrilla interview with Lorenzo Cornista . Retrieved from https://zenas5.wixsite.com/sailorsindiana/about1-cb87 .

Elixhauser, S., Snelder, D., Minter, T., & Persoon, G. (2003). Ecotourism in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park: Potentials and realities. In J. Ploeg, E. Bernardo, & A. Masipiquena (Eds.), The Sierra Madre mountain range: global relevance, local realities . Cagayan Valley Programme on Environment and Development (CVPED).

Garrod, B. (2003). Local participation in the planning and management of ecotourism: A revised model approach. Journal of Ecotourism, 2 (1), 33–53.

Guerrero, A. M. (2000). Philippine ecodestinations . Anvil Publishing Inc.

Henderson, J. (2011). Tourism development and politics in the Philippines. Tourismos: An International Multidisciplinary Journal of Tourism, 6 (2), 159–173.

Hernandez, J. (1982). For the love of freedom: Japanese occupation . The American Legion and Veterans Federation of the Philippines.

Holik, A. (2016). Relationship of economic growth with tourism sector. JEJAK: JurnalEkonomi Dan Kebijakan, 9 (1), 16–33.

Inquirer. (2014). US checks town’s claim to war history . Retrieved from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/659192/us-checks-towns-claim-to-war-history .

Jalani, J. (2012). Local people’s perception on the impacts and importance of ecotourism in Sabang, Palawan, Philippines. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 247–254.

Libosada, C. (1998). Ecotourism in the Philippines . Bookmark Inc.

Maguigad, V. M. (2013). Tourism planning in archipelagic Philippines: A case review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 7, 25–33.

Manalo, J. J. (2017). Development through sustainable tourism and effective policy implementation: Practices of Puerto Princesa City, Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5 (1), 41–48.

Manalo, J. J. (2017). Relevance of sustainable tourism in the Philippines: Case of Boracay Island and Puerto Princesa City. International Journal of Information Research and Review, 4 (1), 3558–3562.

Medlik, S. (2003). Dictionary of travel, tourism and hospitality . Routledge.

Municipality of Rizal. (2019). Carrying capacity for Tanaw de Rizal Park . Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/438351255/Carrying-Capacity-for-TANAW-de-Rizal-Park .

National Ecotourism Steering Committee & Ecotourism Technical Working Group (NESC-ETWG). (2002). National ecotourism strategy . DOT and DENR.

National Ecotourism Steering Committee & Ecotourism Technical Working Group (NESC-ETWG). (2014). National ecotourism strategy and action plan 2013–2022 . DOT and DENR.

Okazaki, E. (2008). A community-based tourism model: Its conception and use. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16 (5), 511–529.

Oracion, E., & Hiponia, M. (2009). Nature and people matter conservation and ecotourism in Balanan Lake. Negros Oriental. Philippine Studies, 57 (1), 105–136.

Orale, R. (2014). Status and potentials of ecotourism sites in Samar Philippines. The Countryside Development Research Journal, 2 (1), 101–112.

Overseas Fieldwork Report (OFR). (2016). Laguna province, the Philippines . Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.

Pedrana, M. (2013). Local economic development policies and tourism: An approach to sustainability and culture. Regional Science Inquiry Journal, 5 (1), 91–99.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). (2015). Total population by Province, City . Municipality and Barangay.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). 2016. Contribution of tourism to the economy is 10.1 percent in. (2015). PSO . Quezon City.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). 2017. Contribution of tourism to the economy is 10.7 percent in. (2016). PSO . Quezon City.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). 2018. Contribution of tourism to the economy is 12.2 percent in. (2017). PSO . Quezon City.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). 2019a. Contribution of tourism to the Philippine economy is 12.7 percent in. (2018). PSO . Quezon City.

Philippine Statistics Office (PSO). (2019b). Philippine standard geographic code (PSGC): Municipalities in the province of Laguna. PSO, Quezon City, Philippines . Retrieved from https://psa.gov.ph/classification/psgc/?q=psgc/citimuni/043400000 .

Pine, R., Alava, M.N. & Yaptinchay, A.A. (2007). Challenges and lessons learned in setting-up a community-based whale shark ecotourism program: The case in Donsol, Philippines. In: T.R. Irvine and J.K. Keesing (Eds.) The First International Whale Shark Conference . CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Perth, Australia.

Ploeg, J. & Taggueg, J. 2003. Ecotourism as a potential strategy for the integration of conservation and development in the Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park. In: J. Ploeg, E. Bernardo and A. Masipiquena (Eds.) The Sierra Madre Mountain Range: Global Relevance, Local Realities . Cagayan Valley Programme on Environment and Development (CVPED), Tuguegarao City, Philippines.

Quicoy, A., & Briones, N. (2009). Beach carrying capacity assessment of coastal ecotourism in Calatagan, Batangas, Philippines. Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 12 (2), 11–27.

Quiros, A. (2007). Tourist compliance to a Code of Conduct and the resulting effects on whale shark (Rhincodontypus) behavior in Donsol, Philippines. In T. R. Irvine & J. K. Keesing (Eds.), The First International Whale Shark Conference . CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.

Republic Act (RA) 7160. (1991). The local government code.

Republic Act (RA) 9593. (2009). Tourism act.

Ramos, F. (2015). Status of selected ecotourism destinations in Palawan: Basis for proposed responsible ecotourism guidelines. The Macrotheme Review, 4 (1), 102–141.

Reich, M. (2002). The politics of reforming health policies . Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/12731117.

Roxas, F. (2015). How sustainable tourism works? A presentation to the global network week: A management course on sustainable tourism . Asian Institute of Management.

Roy, H. 2010. Ecotourism potential of the Bacman geothermal production field in Sorsogon City, Philippines. In: Proceedings World Geothermal Congress , Bali, Indonesia.

Sicat, G. (2019). Tourism as a driver of growth and employment . Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/business/2019/01/09/1883377/tourism-driver-growth-and-employment

Sinha, C. (2012). Sustainable tourism: Concepts and case studies in the Philippines: Caring for Nature . Culture and People.

Sinha, C. (2012b). Philippine sustainable tourism initiatives: Issues and challenges. In P. Sloan, C. Simons-Kaufman, & W. Legrand (Eds.), Sustainable hospitality and tourism as motors for development: Case studies from developing regions of the world . Routledge, London, United Kingdom.

Small and Medium Enterprise Development Council (SMEDC). (2003). Resolution no. 1, series of 2003. DTI, Makati City, Philippines.

Summer, A., & Tribe, M. (2008). International development studies: Theories and methods in research and practice . Sage.

Tongson, E., & Dygico, M. (2004). User fee system for marine ecotourism: The Tubbataha Reef experience. Coastal Management Journal, 32 (1), 17–23.

Tóth, G., & Dávid, L. (2010). Tourism and accessibility: An integrated approach. Applied Geography, 30 (4), 666–677.

United Nations-World Commission on Environment and Development (UN-WCED). (1987). Our common future . Oxford University Press.

United Nations Environment Programme-World Tourism Organisation (UNEP-WTO). (2005). Making tourism more sustainable: A guide for policy makers . UNEP-WTO.

United Nations-World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO). (2011). Handbook on tourism product development . UNWTO Publications.

United Nations-World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO). (2013). Sustainable tourism for development: Guidebook . UNWTO.

United Nations-World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO). (2017). Who we are . UNWTO Publications.

Weaver, D. B. (2001). Ecotourism as mass tourism: Contradiction or reality? Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42 (2), 104–112.

Wood, M. E. (2002). Ecotourism: Principles, practices & policies for sustainability . UNEP.

World Economic Forum (WEF). (2019). The travel & tourism competitiveness report 2019 . WEF, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TTCR_2019.pdf .

World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). (2017). Travel and tourism: Economic impact 2016 Philippines . United Kingdom.

World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). (2018). Travel and tourism: Economic impact 2017 Philippines . United Kingdom.

World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC). (2019). Travel and tourism: Economic impact 2018 Philippines . United Kingdom.

Wu, T., & Wu, H. C. (2019). Tourism and economic growth in Asia: A bootstrap multivariate panel Granger causality. International Journal of Tourism Research, 21 (1), 87–96.

Yu, K. D. (2012). An economic analysis of the Philippines tourism industry. DLSU Business & Economic Review, 22 (1), 119–128.

CAS   Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Institute for Governance and Rural Development, College of Public Affairs and Development, University of the Philippines Los Ban͂os, Laguna, Philippines

Bing Baltazar C. Brillo

College of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines

Aileen C. Simondac-Peria

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Baltazar C. Brillo .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Brillo, B.B.C., Simondac-Peria, A.C. Sustainability of a local government-instituted ecotourism development: Tayak adventure, nature and wildlife Park in Rizal, Laguna, Philippines. Environ Dev Sustain 23 , 16145–16162 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01336-w

Download citation

Received : 03 July 2020

Accepted : 11 March 2021

Published : 23 March 2021

Issue Date : November 2021

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01336-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Ecotourism Development
• Local Government
• Philippines
• Rizal Municipality
• Sustainability
• Tayak Hill Adventure
• Nature and Wildlife (TANAW) Park
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

• 0 Shopping Cart

Ecotourism – Case Study

Case Study of Ecotourism in Kenya – The Kimana Project Three-quarters of wildlife in Kenya can be found outside of the National Parks. A large amount of the land outside of Kenya’s National Parks is owned by the Masai Mara. Three tented camps have been set up on Masai land in Kimana, located between the migration route from the Amboseli and Tsavo National Parks and is run by local people. They pay the Masai rent for the use of their land.

Latest Blog Entries

Related Topics

Use the images below to explore related GeoTopics.

Previous Topic Page

Topic home, share this:.

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
• Click to print (Opens in new window)

Please Support Internet Geography

If you've found the resources on this site useful please consider making a secure donation via PayPal to support the development of the site. The site is self-funded and your support is really appreciated.

Search Internet Geography

Top posts and pages.

Pin It on Pinterest

• Click to share
• Print Friendly

To read this content please select one of the options below:

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes, how to unlock the benefits of ecotourism: a case study of karpaz, north cyprus.

Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes

ISSN : 1755-4217

Article publication date: 2 May 2022

Issue publication date: 1 July 2022

This research was motivated by the strong desire of the researchers to make an impact on the protection and conservation of the environment and to make recommendations to enhance sustainable ecotourism development in the Karpaz peninsula, North Cyprus. The aim of the research was first to assess the current challenges faced by those involved in ecotourism and sustainable practices and secondly to develop solutions for these challenges.

Design/methodology/approach

Qualitative applied research was used with the objective of combining the concerns of local entrepreneurs with the knowledge of the members of the ecotourism associations and organisations to raise public awareness, empower locals, bring social change and improve the lives of the local community. Twenty in-depth interviews were conducted with ecotourism entrepreneurs, members of the Ecotourism Association, the Ecotourism Movement and the Karpaz Ecotourism Cooperative.

The results showed that the main challenges faced were a lack of finance, a lack of support from the local and national governments and a lack of knowledge regarding ecotourism and sustainable development amongst members of the local community. The solutions are educating the local community about agri-ecotourism, putting pressure on local and national governments to support agri-ecotourism, getting other tourism associations such as tour operators on their side and setting up farming cooperatives for farmers.

Originality/value

The value and originality of this study lie in the use of applied research approach with its social agenda of finding solutions which can be developed from the new knowledge which arises from the study.

• Agri-ecotourism
• Sustainable development
• Social capital
• Eco-markets
• North Cyprus

Acknowledgements

The data for this paper came from a larger project.

Yorganci, I. and Emin, E. (2022), "How to unlock the benefits of ecotourism: a case study of Karpaz, North Cyprus", Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes , Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-03-2022-0038

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles

We’re listening — tell us what you think, something didn’t work….

Report bugs here

All feedback is valuable

Please share your general feedback

Join us on our journey

Platform update page.

Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

Questions & More Information

Answers to the most commonly asked questions here

Winter is here! Check out the winter wonderlands at these 5 amazing winter destinations in Montana

• Travel Guide
• Sustainability

Ecotourism Costa Rica Case Study: Who Benefits?

Published: November 14, 2023

Modified: December 28, 2023

by Jyoti Vanness

• Central & South America
• Travel Destinations

Introduction

Ecotourism has become a buzzword in the travel industry, with travelers increasingly seeking out destinations that prioritize sustainability and environmental conservation. One country that has made significant strides in developing and promoting ecotourism is Costa Rica.

Renowned for its breathtaking biodiversity and commitment to environmental protection, Costa Rica has positioned itself as a leading destination for eco-conscious travelers. From lush rainforests and diverse wildlife to immaculate beaches and stunning volcanoes, the country offers a plethora of natural wonders for visitors to explore.

In this article, we will delve into the concept of ecotourism and discuss why Costa Rica serves as an excellent case study for examining the benefits and challenges associated with this form of sustainable travel.

At its core, ecotourism involves responsible travel to natural areas that conserve the environment, sustain the well-being of local communities, and provide educational and enjoyable experiences for visitors. It goes beyond traditional tourism by incorporating principles of conservation, community empowerment, and environmental stewardship.

Costa Rica, with its commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development, has emerged as a prime example of how ecotourism can positively impact a country’s economy, society, and natural resources.

Throughout this article, we will explore the economic, social, and environmental benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica. We will also discuss the challenges and criticisms that this form of tourism faces in the country, shedding light on the complexities of balancing tourism growth with environmental preservation.

Join us on this journey as we uncover the fascinating world of ecotourism in Costa Rica and examine the question: Who truly benefits from this unique approach to travel and conservation?

Definition of Ecotourism

Ecotourism is a form of tourism that focuses on sustainable travel experiences, promoting the conservation of natural resources and the well-being of local communities. It encompasses responsible travel practices that minimize negative impacts on the environment while providing educational and enriching experiences for visitors.

Ecotourism goes beyond traditional tourism by emphasizing the importance of environmental conservation, cultural preservation, and community empowerment. It aims to create a positive and symbiotic relationship between tourists, local communities, and the natural environment.

The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) defines ecotourism as “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of local people, and involves interpretation and education.” This definition highlights the three pillars of ecotourism: environmental sustainability, community development, and visitor education.

The environmental sustainability aspect of ecotourism involves minimizing the ecological impacts of tourism activities. This can be achieved through practices such as reducing water and energy consumption, managing waste effectively, and protecting fragile ecosystems and wildlife habitats. Ecotourism encourages tourists to appreciate and respect the natural beauty and biodiversity of the destinations they visit.

Community development is another essential component of ecotourism. It focuses on empowering local communities by involving them in decision-making processes, providing economic opportunities, and preserving their cultural heritage. Ecotourism initiatives often collaborate with local communities to ensure that they directly benefit from tourism-related activities, such as hospitality, guiding, and the sale of local products.

Visitor education plays a crucial role in promoting ecological awareness and sustainability. Ecotourism seeks to educate tourists about the natural and cultural significance of the destinations they visit, as well as the importance of responsible travel practices. By providing educational experiences, ecotourism encourages tourists to become ambassadors for conservation and advocates for sustainable tourism.

Overall, the concept of ecotourism is centered around the idea of promoting a harmonious and mutually beneficial relationship between tourists, host communities, and the environment. It seeks to create a positive impact on local economies, empower communities, and protect natural habitats for future generations.

Overview of Costa Rica

Costa Rica, a small country located in Central America, is often referred to as a “natural paradise” due to its incredible biodiversity and stunning landscapes. Situated between the Caribbean Sea and the Pacific Ocean, Costa Rica is home to a wide array of ecosystems, including rainforests, cloud forests, mangroves, beaches, and volcanoes.

Despite its size, Costa Rica boasts an astounding 5% of the world’s biodiversity, making it one of the most biodiverse countries on the planet. It is estimated that the country is home to around 500,000 species, including over 12,000 different plant species, 850 bird species, 250 mammal species, and countless reptiles, amphibians, and insects.

The country’s commitment to environmental conservation is evident through its extensive system of national parks, reserves, and protected areas, which cover around 25% of its land. Costa Rica was one of the first countries to recognize the value of its natural resources and has been at the forefront of sustainable development for several decades.

Costa Rica’s emphasis on sustainability has garnered international recognition. It has been named the “Greenest Country in the World” by the Happy Planet Index and consistently ranks highly on the Environmental Performance Index.

In addition to its natural beauty, Costa Rica also offers a rich cultural heritage. The country is home to various indigenous communities, each with its own traditions, languages, and customs. Visitors have the opportunity to learn about and engage with these vibrant cultures through community-based tourism initiatives.

Costa Rica’s tourism industry has experienced significant growth in recent years. It has become a popular destination for eco-conscious travelers seeking immersive experiences in nature and opportunities for adventure activities like hiking, zip-lining, and wildlife observation.

With its commitment to sustainability, Costa Rica has taken the lead in promoting and developing ecotourism. The government has implemented policies and initiatives to encourage the growth of sustainable tourism practices, including the Certification for Sustainable Tourism (CST) program, which recognizes and rewards businesses that operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner.

Overall, Costa Rica’s remarkable natural beauty, dedication to environmental conservation, and thriving ecotourism industry make it an ideal case study for examining the benefits and challenges associated with sustainable travel. As we delve deeper into the topic, we will explore how ecotourism has positively impacted the country’s economy, society, and environment.

Ecotourism Development in Costa Rica

Costa Rica has been at the forefront of ecotourism development, setting an example for the world with its commitment to environmental stewardship and sustainable tourism practices. The country’s journey towards becoming an ecotourism hotspot can be traced back to the 1970s when it made a conscious decision to prioritize the conservation of its natural resources.

Recognizing the potential of its rich biodiversity and pristine environments, Costa Rica began investing in the creation of national parks and protected areas. Today, the country boasts an impressive network of over 30 national parks, wildlife refuges, and biological reserves, which offer visitors unparalleled opportunities to experience and appreciate its natural wonders.

The ecotourism industry in Costa Rica has grown exponentially over the years, with a significant increase in the number of eco-lodges, nature-based tour operators, and community-based tourism initiatives. These businesses strive to provide authentic and sustainable experiences that showcase the country’s unique ecosystems while promoting conservation and benefiting local communities.

The government of Costa Rica has played a crucial role in promoting and regulating ecotourism development. It has implemented policies and initiatives that incentivize businesses to adopt sustainable practices, such as the Certification for Sustainable Tourism (CST) program mentioned earlier. This certification program assesses the sustainability performance of tourism businesses, recognizing those that meet specific criteria related to environmental, social, and cultural sustainability.

In addition to government efforts, Costa Rican communities have been actively involved in the development of ecotourism. Many local communities have started their own initiatives, offering visitors the chance to experience their culture, traditions, and way of life. This community-based approach ensures that the benefits of tourism are distributed more equitably and help empower local populations.

Ecotourism in Costa Rica not only focuses on land-based activities but also encourages responsible marine tourism. The country’s extensive coastline is home to vibrant coral reefs, marine biodiversity, and numerous protected marine areas. Visitors can engage in activities such as snorkeling, scuba diving, and sea turtle conservation projects, all while respecting the fragile marine ecosystems.

Overall, the development of ecotourism in Costa Rica has not only enhanced the country’s reputation as a nature lover’s paradise but has also provided numerous economic and social benefits. Through sustainable tourism practices, Costa Rica has successfully demonstrated that it is possible to generate revenue from tourism while preserving the environment and supporting local communities.

Economic Benefits of Ecotourism

Ecotourism has brought significant economic benefits to Costa Rica, contributing to the country’s overall growth and development. The sustainable tourism practices and emphasis on conservation have created a strong and thriving ecotourism industry, which has become a major source of revenue for the country.

One of the key economic benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica is job creation. The growth of the tourism industry has led to the creation of employment opportunities in various sectors, from hospitality and tour guiding to ecotourism management and conservation efforts. Local communities have been able to capitalize on the demand for eco-friendly accommodations, eco-tours, and other nature-based experiences, providing livelihoods for many individuals and supporting small businesses.

Furthermore, ecotourism has stimulated entrepreneurship and the development of local businesses. Many small-scale eco-lodges, restaurants, and tour operators have emerged, often owned and operated by members of the local communities. These enterprises not only contribute to the diversification of the tourism industry but also help to retain economic benefits within the communities themselves.

The revenue generated from ecotourism activities also has a trickle-down effect on the economy. Money spent by visitors on accommodations, meals, transportation, and souvenirs circulates within the local economy, supporting local suppliers and service providers. This multiplier effect creates additional economic opportunities and helps to stimulate the growth of other sectors, such as agriculture and handicrafts.

In addition to direct economic benefits, ecotourism generates revenue for environmental conservation. The funds collected from entrance fees to national parks and protected areas, as well as through conservation initiatives, contribute to the preservation of Costa Rica’s natural habitats and the protection of its biodiversity. These resources are then reinvested in maintaining the integrity of these ecosystems, improving visitor infrastructure, and supporting research and educational programs.

Moreover, the success of ecotourism has positioned Costa Rica as a top travel destination for nature enthusiasts, attracting a steady stream of international visitors. This has resulted in increased tourism revenues, as travelers are willing to pay a premium for authentic and sustainable experiences. The monetary value placed on Costa Rica’s natural beauty and eco-conscious approach has created a competitive advantage and captured the attention of discerning travelers.

Overall, the economic benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica have been significant, creating jobs, fostering entrepreneurship, and stimulating economic growth. By incorporating sustainability into its tourism practices, Costa Rica has transformed its natural resources into a valuable economic asset, ensuring a prosperous future for both the tourism industry and the local communities it supports.

Social Benefits of Ecotourism

Ecotourism in Costa Rica has not only brought economic prosperity but has also had a profound impact on the social well-being of local communities. It has fostered community empowerment, cultural preservation, and improved quality of life for many individuals.

One of the key social benefits of ecotourism is the empowerment of local communities. Through community-based tourism initiatives, local residents have been given the opportunity to actively participate in the tourism industry. They have become guides, hosts, and entrepreneurs, showcasing their culture, traditions, and way of life to visitors. This active involvement not only generates income but also helps to preserve and celebrate the unique cultural heritage of the communities.

Ecotourism has also provided educational opportunities for residents of these communities. As tourists seek immersive and educational experiences, local community members have the chance to share their knowledge and expertise, serving as interpreters and educators. This exchange of knowledge enhances cultural understanding and promotes respect for diverse cultures and traditions.

Furthermore, ecotourism has played a vital role in raising awareness about environmental conservation among both locals and visitors. Through guided tours and interpretive programs, visitors learn about the importance of protecting the environment and the actions they can take to minimize their impact. Local communities, in turn, develop a sense of environmental stewardship, as they witness firsthand the benefits of preserving their natural resources for future generations.

Another significant social benefit of ecotourism is the fostering of a sense of pride and identity within local communities. By showcasing their natural and cultural heritage, communities are able to reinforce their own worth and uniqueness. This recognition and appreciation from visitors bolsters community pride and self-esteem, strengthening social cohesion.

Additionally, the interaction between visitors and local communities can promote cross-cultural exchange and understanding. Tourists have the opportunity to engage with locals, learn about their way of life, and gain a deeper appreciation for different cultures. This cultural exchange encourages tolerance, empathy, and a sense of global citizenship.

Moreover, ecotourism has provided opportunities for the preservation of traditional practices and crafts. Many local artisans have been able to revive and sustain traditional handicrafts, such as weaving, pottery, and woodworking, which are then showcased and sold to tourists. This preservation of cultural heritage helps to maintain traditions, generate income, and provide a sense of pride and continuity within the community.

Overall, the social benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica extend beyond economic gains. Through community empowerment, cultural preservation, and educational opportunities, ecotourism has positively impacted the social fabric of local communities, fostering a sense of pride, preserving traditions, and promoting cross-cultural understanding.

Environmental Benefits of Ecotourism

Ecotourism in Costa Rica has had profound environmental benefits, playing a significant role in the conservation and protection of the country’s rich natural resources. By promoting sustainable practices and raising awareness about environmental issues, ecotourism has contributed to the preservation of Costa Rica’s unique ecosystems.

One of the key environmental benefits of ecotourism is the conservation of biodiversity. Costa Rica is home to an astounding array of plant and animal species, many of which are endangered or threatened. Ecotourism prioritizes the protection of these species and their habitats, ensuring that visitors have minimal impact on delicate ecosystems. By adopting responsible travel practices, such as staying on designated trails, minimizing waste, and respecting wildlife, visitors can experience the natural wonders of Costa Rica without causing harm to the environment.

Another important environmental benefit of ecotourism is the preservation and restoration of natural areas. Many ecotourism initiatives invest in the restoration and rehabilitation of degraded environments, such as reforesting areas that have been deforested or rehabilitating coastal habitats. These efforts not only enhance the beauty and integrity of the landscapes but also provide essential habitats for wildlife and contribute to the overall health of ecosystems.

Ecotourism also supports and funds the establishment and management of protected areas. The revenue generated from entrance fees and tourist activities in national parks and reserves helps to maintain and protect these areas. These funds are used for conservation efforts, such as patrolling against illegal activities, conducting research, and implementing sustainable management practices. They also support educational programs and infrastructure development, providing visitors with an informative and enjoyable experience while minimizing negative impacts on the environment.

Furthermore, ecotourism encourages sustainable resource management. By showcasing the value of intact ecosystems, it promotes the sustainable use of natural resources, such as water, energy, and land. Eco-lodges and other nature-based accommodations often employ environmentally friendly practices, such as water and energy conservation measures, waste management strategies, and the use of renewable energy sources. These initiatives minimize the ecological footprint of tourism and serve as examples of sustainable practices that can be replicated in other areas.

Ecotourism also plays a role in raising awareness about environmental issues and promoting environmental education. Through guided tours, educational programs, and interpretive materials, visitors gain a deeper understanding of the importance of environmental conservation. This education fosters a sense of responsibility and empowers tourists to make informed choices that minimize their impact on the environment, both during their visit and in their everyday lives.

Overall, the environmental benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica are far-reaching. By prioritizing the conservation and sustainable use of natural resources, ecotourism has helped to safeguard Costa Rica’s rich biodiversity, support the establishment of protected areas, promote sustainable resource management, and raise environmental awareness among visitors and local communities.

Challenges and Criticisms of Ecotourism in Costa Rica

While ecotourism has brought numerous benefits to Costa Rica, it is not without its challenges and criticisms. It is important to recognize and address these issues to ensure the long-term sustainability and effectiveness of ecotourism practices in the country.

One of the main challenges of ecotourism in Costa Rica is the potential for negative environmental impacts. Despite efforts to promote responsible travel practices, some tourists may engage in activities that harm the environment, such as improper disposal of waste, disturbance of wildlife, or damage to fragile ecosystems. Balancing the desire to attract tourists with the need for environmental protection requires continued education and enforcement of sustainable practices.

Another challenge is the potential for the commodification of culture and the loss of authenticity. Commercialization and the demand for cultural experiences can sometimes lead to the exploitation of local traditions and customs, turning them into commodified spectacles for tourist consumption. It is crucial to strike a balance that respects and celebrates local cultures while preserving their integrity and authenticity.

Infrastructure development can also pose challenges to ecotourism in Costa Rica. As tourism grows, there is a need for increased infrastructure, such as accommodations, transportation, and recreational facilities. However, poorly planned or excessive infrastructure development can result in the degradation of natural habitats, increased pollution, and loss of biodiversity. Careful management and sustainable infrastructure planning are necessary to minimize these negative impacts.

Furthermore, the economic benefits of ecotourism may not always reach the local communities who bear the burden of hosting tourists. There is a need to ensure that the revenue generated from ecotourism is distributed equitably and contributes to the overall well-being of the local population. This can be achieved through community empowerment, providing opportunities for local businesses, and supporting initiatives that preserve and celebrate local cultures.

There are also concerns about the risk of over-tourism in popular ecotourism destinations in Costa Rica. Increased visitor numbers can place stress on fragile ecosystems and disrupt the natural balance of these areas. Proper management strategies, including visitor limits, trail restrictions, and seasonality control, are necessary to mitigate the potential negative effects of over-tourism.

Critics argue that ecotourism in Costa Rica has become commercialized and focused more on profit than conservation. Some businesses may use the label of “ecotourism” as a marketing tool without genuinely prioritizing sustainable practices. Greenwashing, where businesses falsely claim to be environmentally friendly, can mislead tourists and undermine the credibility of genuine ecotourism efforts.

Finally, climate change poses a significant challenge to the sustainability of ecotourism in Costa Rica. Rising temperatures, changing rainfall patterns, and extreme weather events can threaten ecosystems and impact wildlife habitats. Adaptation and mitigation strategies are necessary to ensure the long-term viability of ecotourism in the face of these environmental challenges.

Awareness and active management of these challenges and criticisms are vital for the continued success of ecotourism in Costa Rica. Through collaboration and commitment, stakeholders can address these issues and work towards a more sustainable and responsible approach to ecotourism in the country.

Costa Rica serves as an exemplary case study for the positive impacts and challenges of ecotourism. Over the years, the country has successfully harnessed the power of sustainable tourism to conserve its natural resources, empower local communities, and boost its economy.

Through the development of eco-friendly accommodations, nature-based tourism initiatives, and community-based tourism projects, Costa Rica has created numerous job opportunities and entrepreneurial ventures for its residents. Local communities have been able to showcase their cultural heritage and benefit from the revenue generated by ecotourism activities.

The environmental benefits of ecotourism in Costa Rica are undeniable. The preservation of biodiversity, restoration of natural areas, and funds allocated for the management of protected areas have contributed to the conservation of the country’s fragile ecosystems. Additionally, by promoting sustainable practices and environmental education, ecotourism has raised awareness about the importance of environmental stewardship among both tourists and locals.

However, the challenges and criticisms associated with ecotourism in Costa Rica should not be overlooked. Environmental impacts, cultural commodification, infrastructure development, equitable distribution of benefits, over-tourism, greenwashing, and the impacts of climate change all pose challenges that require ongoing attention and management.

Despite these challenges, it is clear that ecotourism has had a transformative impact on Costa Rica, positioning it as a global leader in sustainable travel. By tackling these challenges head-on and continuously improving sustainable practices, Costa Rica can continue to reap the benefits of ecotourism while mitigating its negative impacts.

In conclusion, the success of ecotourism in Costa Rica demonstrates that by prioritizing environmental conservation, promoting community empowerment, and fostering educational experiences, sustainable tourism can be a powerful catalyst for positive change. Costa Rica serves as an inspiration and a model for other countries, showing that it is possible to create a thriving tourism industry while protecting the natural beauty and cultural heritage that make our world truly special. As travelers and stakeholders, it is our responsibility to support and promote sustainable tourism practices, ensuring that ecotourism continues to be a force for environmental preservation and social progress.

1. The International Ecotourism Society. (2021). What is ecotourism? Retrieved from https://ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism/

2. World Travel & Tourism Council. (2021). Travel & Tourism Economic Impact 2021: Costa Rica. Retrieved from https://www.wttc.org/economic-impact/country-analysis/country-profiles-2021/#C

3. Castillo, R. R. (2019). Ecotourism in Costa Rica: A review of its economic, environmental, and social impacts. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 27(3), 940-950.

4. Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise? Island Press.

5. Lindberg, K., & Hawkins, D. (Eds.). (1993). Ecotourism: A Guide for Planners and Managers (Vol. 1). The Ecotourism Society.

6. McNamara, K., & Honey, M. (2020). Costa Rica and ecotourism development: A critical analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(4), 519-535.

7. Spenceley, A. (Ed.). (2012). Responsible Tourism: Critical Issues for Conservation and Development. Earthscan.

8. Weaver, D. B. (2008). Ecotourism (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

9. World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2021). Tourism Highlights 2021 Edition. Retrieved from https://www.unwto.org/publication/tourism-highlights-2021-edition

10. World Travel & Tourism Council. (2021). Costa Rica: The Greenest Country in the World. Retrieved from https://www.wttc.org/content/files/2021/reports/Country%20Profiles%202021/CostaRica2020.pdf

Note: The above references are for informative purposes only. It is recommended to consult additional sources for comprehensive research on the topic.

• Privacy Overview
• Strictly Necessary Cookies

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.

GeographyCaseStudy.Com

Detailed resources for pre-university Geography students

Case study: Ecotourism in Kenya

By Matt Burdett, 27 January 2018

On this page, we look at ecotourism in Kenya as one case study of sustainable tourism in one low-income country.

Ecotourism in Kenya

Kenya has a wide range of ecotourism activities, including cultural (indigenous peoples) and environmental (hiking and adventure tourism, and wildlife safaris). For example (Kenya Travel Tips, 2018):

• About 7.5% of the country is designated for wildlife conservation
• There are 23 National Parks and 28 National Reserves, plus six marine reserves
• Wide range of wildlife including lions, elephants, zebras and over 1070 bird species
• 536 kilometers of coastline, which is largely sandy beaches
• Six World Heritage Sites

Tourism is a major industry in Kenya. However, it is very difficult to ascertain detailed figures on ecotourism, although there are some figures about tourism in general. The Kenya National Bureau of Statistics collects detailed information about tourism. The number of international visitors has been largely stable for several years there has been a slight decrease:

• Reported Visitor Departures by Purpose, 2009 – 2016. Source: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2017.

The number of tourists visiting the Game Parks and National Reserves actually decreased during the same period, as shown below. This corresponds with the slight decrease in overall holiday visitors during the same period, but it is not evenly distributed among the parks with some, such as the Nairobi National Park, experiencing an increase.

These visitors contribute an estimated US$1 billion per year to the Kenyan economy, which is roughly 10% of gross domestic product. Tourism is the biggest industry in Kenya, employing 9.3% of workers (Kenya Tourism Board, 2016).

National scale ecotourism

Responsibility for tourism in Kenya is under the Kenya Tourist Board. It has a sustainability committee which works on four principles (Kenya Tourism Board, 2016):

• Environmental conservation
• Education and empowerment
• Social responsibility
• Culture and heritage preservation

The Kenya Tourist Board introduced an ‘Eco-rating Scheme’ in 2002 for accommodation providers (such as hotels) and in 2015 this was expanded to tour operators with the ‘Travel Life’ rating scheme. There are now over 100 eco-rated facilities in Kenya. There are also annual awards given for the most sustainable practices.

These advances are in line with Vision 2030, Kenya’s national development plan. Tourism is the lead sector in the plan to achieve a transformation of the national economy (Kenya Tourism Board, 2016).

Kenya’s plans for tourism rely on five pillars to avoid greenwashing . ‘Greenwashing’ is a term “used to describe the act of misleading consumers regarding the environmental practices of a company or the environmental benefits of a product or service” (Greenpeace, n.d.). The five pillars are:

• Pillar 1 – Leveraging the Might of Giants / Benchmarking. This means that Kenya looks abroad at similar policies to learn lessons, such as looking at Ecotourism Australia, and CAST in the Caribbean
• Pillar 2 – Broad & Inclusive Sustainability Guidelines. Reference to the Sustainable Development Goals.
• Pillar 3 – Education & Specialization. Includes support for three major tourism conferences held annually in Kenya.
• Pillar 4 – Recognition of Champions. Eco-rating Schemes and other awards.
• Pillar 5- Partnership / Integration. Includes stakeholder agreement and recognition.

Local scale sustainable tourism: The Maasai Mara National Reserve

• Maasai Mara National Reserve, Kenya. Source: Key45, 2003.

The Maasai Mara National Reserve was first established in 1961. Since then it has earned a reputation as one of the best ecotourism destinations in the world. Ecotourism is encouraged by tour companies and accommodation providers.

Cottars Safari Service

Cottars is one of the oldest tourism companies in Kenya, having been first registered in 1919. It is an award winning ecotourism company that makes efforts to be sustainable. It operates in the area around the Maasai Mara National Reserve.

• When visitors come to the area and use Cottars, they are expressly charged a lease fee for wildlife conservation. Some of this revenue is shared with local communities and also used to help develop the 6,000 acre Olderikesi Wildlife Conservancy on the edge of the Reserve as a way to expand the area under conservation.
• Cottars employs accredited guides to ensure they are in harmony with the environment and culture of the area; many of these guides are from the local area.
• Tourists are encouraged to bring a few items with them from their home country that can support local people, such as school supplies for the Olpalagilagi Primary School for a total of 200 students.
• Cottars takes tourists to visit the local Maasai villages which helps to provide a market for traditional products such as beads, which helps local people economically.
• Financial and legal support was provided to local communities to fight for land rights, resulting in the legal ownership of the Olderkesi Group Ranch in 2010.
• Combines with groups such as Bridging the Gap; a bridge was built across the Sand River, preventing an average of six deaths per year and allowing local people to access social amenities.

(Sources: Cottars, 2015; Cottars.com, 2012)

Olarro Lodge

• Olarro Lodge, Kenya. Source: Sunsafaris.com

Olarro Lodge is a rural hotel about halfway between Nairobi and Lake Victoria, near the border with Tanzania. In January 2015, it won the coveted Gold Eco-rating Certification from Ecotourism Kenya. It is about 5 km from the Maasai Mara nature reserve, and is within the Olarro Conservancy. The conservancy is a 7,500 acre area which is owned by around 150 local Maasai landowners. To ensure the principles of ecotourism are successfully implemented, the Lodge has made several alterations to be more sustainable.

• Solar power is produced on-site with 150 solar panels
• Two wind turbines add to the electrical supply
• Water is heated with 17 solar water heaters, which can heat around 600 liters of water each
• Signage encourages visitors to save electricity
• Energy saving light bulbs are found throughout the hotel
• Water is sourced from a natural spring within the conservancy, and rainwater is harvested from rooftops of the buildings and stored in three 100,000 litre underground tanks
• Waste water is treated on-site and used to provide irrigation for the hotel’s lawns
• Guests are encouraged to behave more sustainably by being educated about these features on their arrival

• Olarro Lodge, Kenya. Source: Karanja and Shabanji, 2015.

Cottars, C., 2015. Cottars Strive for Excellence in Sustainable Tourism. In Naturals Magazine number 06. https://ecotourismkenya.org/resource-centre/downloads/#toggle-id-7 Accessed 27 January 2018.

Cottars.com, 2012. Cottar’s Conservation, Community, Culture & Commerce. http://www.cottars.com/conservation-community Accessed 27 January 2018.

Greenpeace, n.d. Greenwashing. https://stopgreenwash.org/history Accessed 27 January 2018.

Karanja and Shabanji, 2015. Replicable Best Practices At Olarro Lodge. In Naturals Magazine number 06. https://ecotourismkenya.org/resource-centre/downloads/#toggle-id-7 Accessed 27 January 2018.

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, 2017. Statistical Abstract 2017. https://www.knbs.or.ke/publications/ Accessed 27 January 2018.

Kenya Tourism Board, 2016. Sustainable Tourism Report 2016 http://ktb.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/KTB-Sustainable-Tourism-Report-2016.pdf Accessed 27 January 2018.

Kenya Travel Tips, 2018. Tourism in Kenya. https://www.kenyatraveltips.com/tourism-in-kenya/ Accessed 27 January 2018.

Key45, 2003. Gnus and zebras in the Maasai Mara park reserve in Kenya. Wildebeest and zebra migration in Maasai Mara. Sourced from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GnusAndZebrasInMaraMaasai.jpg Accessed 27 January 2018.

Sunsafaris.com, n.d. https://www.sunsafaris.com/safari/kenya/Maasai-mara/olarro-lodge.html Accessed 27 January 2018.

Case study: Ecotourism in Kenya: Learning activities

• Why is Kenya a suitable destination for ecotourism? [4]
• Outline the changes in tourism numbers in Kenya in recent years. [3]
• Outline the national approach taken to ecotourism in Kenya. [5]
• Suggest how the Maasai Mara National Reserve can be considered in keeping with ecotourism principles. [6]
• Do you consider tourists to the Olarro Lodge are ecotourists? Explain your answer. [4]
• Overall, do you think ecotourism can bring benefits to people in Kenya? Why? [8]

Other tasks

Conduct research into another remote tourist destination that offers ecotourism, such as the Kuna Yala of Panama. Compare the efforts made by both destinations and suggest which is the more sustainable form of ecotourism.

Share this:

• Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
• Subscribe Subscribed
• Copy shortlink
• Report this content
• View post in Reader
• Manage subscriptions
• Collapse this bar

Site Search

• How to Search
• Advisory Group
• Editorial Board
• OEC Fellows
• History and Funding
• Using OEC Materials
• Collections
• Research Ethics Resources
• Ethics Projects
• Communities of Practice
• Get Involved
• Submit Content
• Open Access Membership
• Become a Partner

Case: Ecotourism

This case explores a variety of ethical issues concerning ecotourism. The setting is a fictitious lodge in Botswana's Okavango Delta, a UNESCO World Heritage site. Mini-vignettes offer three perspectives. Nuru is a poor Botswanan who lives near the lodge and would like to be involved in its activities. Rachel, the lodge's new manager, has just come to the position from working as a field biologist specializing in African elephants with Conservation International (CI), a non-profit dedicated to worldwide conservation of ecosystems.

This biodiversity case is part of a larger collection of Life and Environmental Science ethics education resource sets on ethics of emerging biotechnologies, big data in the life sciences, human enhancement, and biodiversity. Doctoral students from Arizona State University’s Center for Biology and Society developed the resources under the direction of Karin Ellison and Joseph Herkert between 2014 and 2019.

Okavango Game Lodge lies on the outskirts of the world-famous Okavango Delta in Botswana, Africa. A UNESCO World Heritage site, this delta is unique because it floods during the dry season in what would be an otherwise arid landscape. Thus, the flooded delta draws a remarkable number of wildlife from all over southern Africa, including cheetahs, rhinoceros, lions, zebras, giraffes, and elephants.

When the lodge was built in 1980, environmental impact was a minor concern. In recent years, however, the lodge has shifted its focus to eco-tourism, or tourism that is directed toward enjoying the natural environment while supporting conservation efforts. The redirection came in part from the realization that the lodge depends on the delta’s wildlife as a draw for tourists. In addition, lodge managers were intrigued by a national certification program that provides incentives and guidelines for the development of eco-tourism lodges (Botswana Tourism Organisation 2013).

Nuru lives in a small village near the Okavango Game Lodge. Her people, the Hambukushu, are one of the many groups indigenous to the area, each with a distinct culture and language. The Hambukushu are known for their mixed economy of agriculture, fishing, hunting, and pastoralism (Bock 1998).  Nuru is an accomplished blanket weaver, and she also works with her husband and their four children on their small sorghum farm. Despite these means of income, Nuru and her family are living below the poverty line in Botswana, like most of their neighbors. Nuru, her family, and the community are excited by the expansion of ecotourism in the area because of the potential for increased job opportunities and development.

As required by Botswana’s government for any ecotourism venture, the village must elect a Community Trust, a board of trustees who mediate between the village and the lodge to ensure equitable distribution of benefits. Several large-share landowners step up to the plate; they are well-known in the community, all older men, long-time residents, and among the most affluent. Many of them own larger parcels of land closer to the center of town or near new roads and see the potential to develop shops, restaurants, and services that benefit from the influx of tourists.

Nuru’s small farm lies several kilometers from the lodge, the town, and the newest roads, and thus does not benefit from such development. But the Community Trust notifies her that as part of the Okavango Game Lodge’s ecotourism initiative, Nuru and other community members are invited to sell their handmade crafts in the Craft Market during the high visitation season, May through December. Nuru also notices that members of her own community who already have lucrative jobs as shop owners, small-hoteliers, or safari-managers (most often men) are securing jobs at the Okavango Game Lodge in the kitchens, as waiters, and as cleaners.

One day, Nuru sees a job posting for safari guides and wildlife educators at the lodge. Although she has no formal training, Nuru has been living and farming in the delta region her whole life, so she decides she has the know-how to perform the job duties. This could be her first chance at a steady income to support her family.

The lodge’s manager, Rachel Jacobs, is a South African biologist with a lifelong passion for wildlife. She completed her bachelor’s degree in Conservation Biology and her master’s degree in Wildlife Ecology and became a field biologist with a focus on African elephants with Conservation International (CI), a non-profit dedicated to worldwide conservation of ecosystems. After 5 years working throughout many southern African countries with CI, she learned that Okavango Game Lodge was seeking a new manager to direct an eco-tourism overhaul of their safari and educational programs, as well as their facilities.

She applied for and accepted the job, seeing it as the perfect opportunity to apply her passion for wildlife and conservation in the hotel and game-lodge industry that she believes is too often at the heart of many human-wildlife conflicts. In her work with CI, she often confronted lodges and hotels over issues with over-exposed wildlife, development, and pollution. Safari and trophy hunting programs would sometimes allow guests to come too close, too often to wildlife. And lodge facilities come with a host of infrastructure projects that increase the flow of visitors, and thus also increase amounts of waste and pollution, further development, and wildlife exposure.

Upon arriving to the lodge, Rachel immediately went to work on initiatives to help the lodge reach their new environmental and sustainability goals. However, she was presented with two concerns.

First, to initiate and sustain improvements, Rachel would like to secure investments from American developers. With such investments, the lodge could employ electric vehicles and solar-powered boats, build the infrastructure to recycle grey-water, and manage their own waste recycling plant. Through these efforts, they could cut their waste footprint by as much as 85%. But to recruit top investors, Rachel would need to agree to share a margin of the lodge’s profits with the investors, cutting from the revenue that could otherwise enter the local economy.

In addition, Rachel faces a hiring conundrum. To improve the lodge’s wildlife conservation and educational programming, Rachel would like to hire more safari guides and wildlife educators. As she pages through applications, she recognizes some old friends. A handful of her colleagues from university and CI have applied to be safari guides and wildlife educators, and Rachel believes their world-class expertise could inspire and impress guests of the lodge. But she also notes a dozen applications from members of the nearby Hambukushu village. One application, Nuru’s, catches Rachel’s eye as the only woman from the village who has applied to a be a safari guide. Nuru could be the first woman villager employed in such a position. This excites Rachel, but still, can Nuru’s application compete with an expert hire from Conservation International? In general, she wonders, would village members know enough to lead safaris? The lodge already hosts a twice weekly fair for village members to sell crafts to tourists, and several village members work in the kitchens and in housekeeping. Perhaps that is enough.

Mahendra, an animal behavior specialist who studies elephants, hails from Massachusetts, United States. In addition to being a well-known expert in elephant behavior and social structures, he is an avid traveler and photographer. Mahendra is planning a trip to one of his regular field sites, the Okavango Delta. In fact, the largest population of elephants in the world (~130,000) migrate to the flooded plains each year (UNESCO 2017). This July, he will be bringing his wife and teenage daughter for the first time so he will be staying in a hotel or lodge rather than his usual “roughin’ it” conditions. As Mahendra begins to plan his trip, he reviews his accommodation options.

First, there is an affordable option. Sanctuary Inn is in the town of Maun, the closest city to the delta. The Inn is staffed and owned by long-time residents of Maun. They provide breakfast and modest amenities at a rate less than half what the large game lodges charge. Mahendra would need to take a daily car or jumper-plane to field sites, but he could probably afford more days in the field staying at a cheaper inn.

Dreaming, Mahendra also looks up rates at the Royal Safari Camp. This one is located right in the heart of the delta. As with any lodge in such a location, you can see wildlife up-close-and-personal, sometimes daily! Work would be right on his doorstep. The price is steep, but the amenities are similar to a four- or five-star hotel in Boston. That would be the best of both worlds, and his family prefers this option.

Finally, Mahendra views the Okavango Game Lodge. Mahendra notices that the lodge is Green and Green+ certified by the Botswanan government, indicating that conservation and sustainability are priorities for the lodge. They also host a “Craft Market.” Local men and women line the road leading up to the lodge, selling baskets, bracelets, woven clothing, and other local goods and souvenirs. The lodge is located on the delta, so the prices are high. But the lodge has more rustic accommodations, so rates are not so steep as at the Royal Safari Camp. In any case, Mahendra would have easy access to field sites as well as the opportunity to cross paths with fellow elephant expert turned eco-lodge manager, Rachel Jacobs.

Discussion Questions:

• How are benefits to the community distributed among different households, including Nuru’s? Is that distribution equitable?
• How can the village achieve more equitable distribution of benefits of ecotourism? Can the lodge help? How?
• Summarize the competing interests Rachel must consider in her management of the lodge. Which should she prioritize? How does her background potentially influence her priorities? Might Rachel be problematically biased against “experiential knowledge” ( vs. knowledge that accompanies advanced degrees)?
• Should Rachel accept the money from foreign investors to achieve her sustainability and conservation goals? Why or why not?
• Should Rachel hire Nuru as a safari guide and wildlife educator? Why or why not?
• Where should Mahendra stay for his trip to the Okavango Delta, and why?
• What ethical, logistical, and other concerns are relevant to his decision?
• In an ecotourism project, how should environmental and social-developmental goals be combined? Are there trade-offs between affording new sustainability measures vs. development goals? Justify your position drawing on the experiences of each character above.
• When involving the community, should the lodge accept existing local gender and wealth hierarchies or should they address the inequities they perceive? Explain your response by citing examples from the case. 

Bibliography:

Aciksoz, S., P. Bollukcu, and D. Celik. 2016. “Ecotourism and Ethics in Protected Areas: Bartin-Sogutlu Village.” Oxidation Communications 39: 3621-3636.

Acott, T. G., H. L. La Trobe, and S. H. Howard. 1998. “An Evaluation of Deep Ecotourism and Shallow Ecotourism.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2: 238-253.

Bock, J. 1998. “Economic Development and Cultural Change among the Okavango Delta Peoples of Botswana” Botswana Notes and Records 30: 27-44.

Botswana Tourism Organisation. 2013. “Eco Certification System.” Accessed June 24, 2017.  http://www.botswanatourism.co.bw/eco-certification-system  

Botswana Tourism Organisation. 2013b. “Eco Certification Criteria.” Accessed June 24, 2017 http://www.botswanatourism.co.bw/eco-certification-criteria  

Ceballos-Lascuráin, H. 1996. Tourism, ecotourism, and protected areas: The state of nature-based tourism around the world and guidelines for its development . Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

CIA (Central Intelligence Agency). 2017. “Africa: Botswana.” World Fact Book. Accessed July 8, 2017. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bc.html

Clifton, J., and A. Benson. 2006. “Planning for sustainable ecotourism: the case for Research Ecotourism in Developing Country Destinations.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 14: 238-254.

Gilbert, N. 2010. “c.” Nature News , May 6. http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100506/full/news.2010.222.html

He, G., X. Chen, W. Liu, S. Bearer, S. Zhou, L. Y. Cheng, H. Zhang, Z. Ouyang, and J. Liu. 2008. “Distribution of Economic Benefits from Ecotourism: A Case Study of Wolong Nature Reserve for Giant Pandas in China.” Environmental Management 42: 1017-1025.

Holden, A. 2003. “In need of a new environmental ethics for tourism?” Annals of Tourism Research 30: 94-108.

Jones, S. 2005. “Community-based ecotourism: The significance of social capital.” Annals of Tourism Research 32: 303-324.

Lenao, M., and B. Basupi. 2016. “Ecotourism development and female empowerment in Botswana: A review.” Tourism Management Perspectives 18: 51-58.

Mbaiwa, J. E. 2015. “Ecotourism in Botswana: 30 years later.” Journal of Ecotourism 14: 204-222.

Scheyvens, R. 1999. “Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities.” Tourism Management 20: 245-249.

Stark, J. C. 2002. “Ethics and ecotourism: connections and conflicts.” Philosophy and Geography 5: 101-113.

Stem, C. J., J. P. Lassoie, D. R. Lee, D. D. Deshler, and J. W. Schelhas. 2003. “Community Participation in Ecotourism Benefits: The Link to Conservation Practices and Perspectives.” Society and Natural Resources 16: 387-413.

Stevens, P. W., and R. Jansen. 2002. Botswana National Ecotourism Strategy. Gaborone: Government of Botswana.

The Nature Conservancy. 2017. “Eco-Trips and Travel.” Accessed June 30. https://www.nature.org/greenliving/what-is-ecotourism.xml

TIES (The International Ecotourism Society). 2017. “What is Ecotourism?” Accessed June 25. http://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism

TIES. 2015. “TIES Announces Ecotourism Principles Revision.” The International Ecotourism Society. Accessed July 5. http://www.ecotourism.org/news/ties-announces-ecotourism-principles-revision

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). 2017. “Okavango Delta.” Accessed July 6. http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1432

Vanhove, M.P.M., A-J. Rochette, and L. J. de Bisthoven. 2017. “Joining science and policy in capacity development for monitoring progress toward the Aichi Biodiversity Targets in the global South.” Ecological Indicators 73: 694-697.

Wilson, J. 2014. “The first all-female guiding team in Africa – Our Chobe Angels.” Out and About, Chobe Game Lodge . April 24. Accessed July 1. http://www.chobegamelodge.co.bw/blog/first-female-guiding-team-africa-chobe-angels/

World Travel and Tourism Council. 2015. Travel and Tourism, Economic Impact 2015: Botswana. Available at: https://www.wttc.org/-/media/files/reports/economic%20impact%20research/countries%202015/botswana2015.pdf London, UK

The International Ecotourism Society:  http://www.ecotourism.org

The Nature Conservancy: https://www.nature.org/greenliving/what-is-ecotourism.xml

Botswana Ecotourism Certification System: http://www.botswanatourism.co.bw/eco-certification-system

The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions of Karin Ellison, OEC - Life and Environmental Sciences Editor, and Joseph Herkert, OEC Engineering Editor. They provided valuable input in selecting the topic and crafting the resource.

Ecotourism There is no one definition of "ecotourism," but the common thread through most definitions is that ecotourism should be nature-based tourism that has both environmental and socio-economic benefits. The International Ecotourism Society defines ecotourism as: "...responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment, sustains the well-being of the local people, and involves interpretation and education" (TIES 2015; TIES 2017). With a focus on conservation of the environment, empowerment of the local communities, and interpretation for a greater understanding of nature, TIES paints ecotourism as a win-win-win. Similarly, the World Conservation Union (IUCN) defines ecotourism as: "Environmentally responsible travel to natural areas, in order to enjoy and appreciate nature (and accompanying cultural features, both past and present) that promote conservation, have a low visitor impact, and provide for beneficially active socio-economic involvement of local peoples" (Ceballos-Lascuráin 1996, 20). The Nature Conservancy argues that ecotourism should be sensitive to biodiversity as well as appreciating the local cultures. They also highlight that there should be "local participation in decision-making." (The Nature Conservancy 2017).

Although ecotourism, in theory, is a win-win-win for the environment, the local community, and the tourism industry (hoteliers and tourists), there can be situations in which one or more parties are unduly burdened. For example, any kind of tourism to environmentally and culturally sensitive areas can be detrimental when visitors come in large numbers (Stem et al. 2003), leading to increased waste and habitat disturbance. Any benefits (e.g., revenue for protected areas and local communities, education for travelers and locals, etc.) must be weighed against potential negative impacts.

Ecotourism and Ethics Environmental ethics asks us to reflect on humanity's responsibility toward the environment. What are those responsibilities? How ought we behave toward nature? (Holden 2003). It is appropriate to evaluate ecotourism practices in these terms to see if promises of environmental stewardship and motivations are true in practice. Just as there are competing definitions of ecotourism, there are also competing claims as to what constitutes the most ethical motivations and practices. For example, some environmental ethicists argue that true ecotourism is non-consumptive, and thus non-utilitarian, and eco-centric (nature-centered); they view all organisms as having intrinsic value (Reviewed in Aciksoz et al. 2016; TIES 2015). Others argue that all ecotourism is inherently utilitarian, viewing nature as a commodity to sell accommodations (Stark 2002; Holden 2003). Holden claims that transitions toward ecotourism (such as in the hypothetical Okavango Game Lodge case) are often anthropocentric (human-centered); lodges transition only when they notice that other modes of tourism destroy the environment that draws human visitors in the first place (2003). In Holden's view, a lodge manager is concerned with environmental well-being only so far as it contributes to the health of their eco-tourism business. Finally, what are an eco-lodge's responsibilities to the local community? There are experts who believe that eco-tourism practices must be in harmony with not only the natural environment, but also the human environment (Aciksoz et al. 2016; Mbaiwa 2015; Stark 2002).

Some find it is helpful to frame ecotourism practices as "deep" or "shallow," with the acknowledgement that such classifications are fluid and gradated (Acott et al. 1998). Deep-ecotourism practitioners are guided by a deeply intrinsic value of the natural world. They are ecocentric, and encourage first-hand experiences with nature and culture. Shallow-ecotourism is more utilitarian; a healthy environment is valued as a driver of visitation. Such a framework acknowledges the array of motivations and practices you might find among eco-tourism projects, but the terms "deep" and "shallow" are normative, and thus it would be more neutral so simply use the labels "ecocentric" and "anthropocentric" ecotourism, again with the understanding that the classifications are fluid and gradated.

Ecotourism in the Delta The Okavango Delta, one of the largest inland deltas in Africa, lies in northwest Botswana, a sparsely populated country in southern Africa with just over 2.2 million residents across a territory the size of France (CIA 2017). This UNESCO World Heritage Site floods during the dry season, transforming the brown, arid landscape into a lush, nutrient-rich oasis, providing water for countless animals and plants during the arid winters (UNESCO 2017). This wetland system is largely untouched by human development, with restrictions on permanent settlements.

In the last two decades, the national government in Botswana has become dedicated to ensuring that the massive tourism industry has a small footprint on the delta it depends on (Botswana Tourism Organisation 2013). Note that such motivations for a national ecotourism program are indicative of anthropocentric ecotourism; the government has a utilitarian value of nature as being crucial to maintaining levels of tourism. (This makes sense, as travel and tourism contributed to 8.5% of the nation's GDP in 2014 with projected increases around 5% per year through 2025 (World Travel and Tourism Council 2015).) However, such values and motivations may not be replicated on the local scale.

In 2002, as part of the Botswana National Ecotourism Strategy, the national government launched an Ecotourism Certification System, "designed to encourage and support responsible environmental, social, and cultural behavior by tourism businesses and make sure they provide a quality, eco-friendly product to consumers." According to this certification system, ecotourism must be sensitive to natural and cultural heritage with opportunities for biodiversity conservation and economic development. Thus, development initiatives for local communities are required to be integrated at the outset of all certified ecotourism projects (Stevens and Jansen 2002). Through this program, lodges and hotels are expected to minimize negative impacts on their social, cultural, and environmental surroundings, ensure equitable distribution of benefits to their host communities, invest part of their revenue in conservation, provide educational programming for guests and locals, and provide a "quality" experience to guests.

Case Overview In this case, each character experiences some of the benefits; we will explore later whether those benefits are distributed fairly. In short, we see that Nuru and the Hambukushu community are benefitting from an influx of revenue that contribute to new infrastructure, job opportunities, and tourist patrons of shops and restaurants. Nuru is employed by the craft market and has also applied for a position as a safari guide and wildlife educator. Rachel feels fulfilled in carrying out her personal conservation mission by changing practices and programming at the lodge. She also knows that certification with the national government will bring more guests and more revenue to support her initiatives. Mahendra has options; if he values cultural, social, and environmental sustainability he can choose an eco-lodge that fits that ethic. And he may also benefit through enhanced research opportunities with the lodge due to proximity to his field sites. Finally, the delta environment is likely to benefit from more sustainable tourism practices that can protect the area from waste, pollution, and unsustainable uses of resources. While each character and the environment derive some benefit, there are also tradeoffs and tensions.

Nuru According to the definitions of ecotourism above, one component of a successful ecotourism venture is that it is economically beneficial (such as providing income and employment opportunities) to the local community. And more broadly, biodiversity is often defended as a resource of food and income for the world's poorest people (Gilbert et al. 2010). However, a review of several studies presented at a meeting of the Zoological Society of London in 2010, found that evidence linking conservation projects (including ecotourism ventures) with poverty alleviation is only anecdotal. Those locals who do benefit are most often the affluent members of the community (Gilbert et al. 2010).

For example, in a case study in Wolong Nature Reserve, China, He et al. (2008) found there was significant inequality among rural stakeholders; those who were closer to roads and further from the reservation reaped the benefits both of direct tourism and indirect infrastructure improvements. Also, He et al. found that the nonpermanent souvenir shops are run by the less affluent locals, while the year-round permanent shops were run by community elites. And when rural residents are employed, it is often in low-skill, low-wage jobs (cleaners, waiters, cooks) (He et al. 2008; Lenao and Basupi 2016).

J. E. Mbaiwa, an expert on and scholar of ecotourism in Botswana, found that across the last 30 years, ecotourism ventures in Botswana have often been successful, but only when certain socio-economic and political dynamics are at play (Mbaiwa 2015). Specifically, villages tend to benefit most when an active and fair Community Trust implements ecotourism projects in the community (Mbaiwa 2015). Community Trusts are government prerequisites for any ecotourism projects in Botswana; they are registered legal entities comprised of adults who have lived in the village for more than five years.

In Nuru's village the Board of Trustees are affluent, male members of the society. Many of them own large parcels of land close to main roads and the village center. Thus, the distribution of revenue and other indirect benefits like infrastructure improvements may be skewed toward such members of society. In addition, jobs and entrepreneurial opportunities are most available to those members of Nuru's village who are already trained to take such positions or who have the land and facilities necessary to start a restaurant or shop. While a job at the Craft Market provides nice supplemental income, Nuru will find that her business is sensitive to seasonality (the delta is most popular May through December). A job at the lodge could provide better security and income, as well as opportunities for upward mobility into management positions.

To improve the distribution of benefits to rural, less affluent members of her village, perhaps Nuru should run to be elected to the trust. Her voice could represent those with similar struggles. In addition, the lodge could help by initiating a training program to build foreign language, hospitality, and entrepreneurial skills. A real-life example, the Chobe Game Lodge located in Botswana's Chobe National Park implemented the first female safari guide training program in an effort to provide more equitable job opportunities (Wilson 2014). It is worth noting that in Botswana, societies are traditionally patriarchal, and women tend to be excluded from some opportunities (Lenao and Basupi 2016; Jones 2005). However, the country has started to pass legislation aimed toward removing or counteracting prior discrimination (Lenau and Basupi 2016). Still, initiatives to improve opportunities for women should be done in a way that will not be construed as imposing western gender norms.

Rachel Given Rachel's background as a biologist, CI employee, and her new focus on making Okavankgo Game Lodge a sustainable eco-lodge, it is highly possible that she holds an ecocentric ethic. She accepted the manager position to reduce the negative impacts of the lodge on the environment, not because the lodge depends on the environment for business (though it does), but because she has seen in her prior career the damage lodges' can cause to the environment and animals she has harbored a life-long passion for. This ethic stands in contrast to the utilitarian view of ecotourism held by the national government and certification program.

Rachel's passion for the environment drives her to seek foreign investments that will initiate and maintain several sustainability measures at the lodge, but such investors will request that revenue be shared. Her ethical viewpoint and passion may lead her to accept the compromise, meaning she may be blind to the potential damage such agreements could do to the local economy. Thus, in one sense, accepting foreign investments could suit her ecocentric ethic, but to others with a more anthropocentric leaning worldview, Rachel could be entering an unethical deal. For example, according to our definitions of ecotourism above, "ecotourism ventures should only be considered 'successful' if local communities have some measure of control over them and if they share equitably in the benefits emerging from ecotourism activities" (Scheyvens 1999). But it is also possible that Rachel could justify her foreign investments in terms of benefits to the local community. Increased investments could lead to better facilities that attract more guests and thus more revenue. Rachel could grant control over revenue, and related investments, to the local Community Trust.

In addition, Rachel's focus on western standards of scientific expertise may make her more likely to hire her CI colleagues as opposed to Nuru, because she knows she can trust her old friends to espouse and practice her same ecocentric worldview. And logistically, her CI colleagues would require less training; most speak many foreign languages, are experienced in education, and all have expertise in ecology and conservation. She might also realize, however, that she could balance the hiring process by hiring one or two of her CI colleagues to then train several local hires, including Nuru.

Is it possible to be ecocentric and still be concerned about the local community? Ethical worldviews come in gradients. Rachel may realize that she can still achieve her goals without foreign investments, albeit more slowly. First, in a conversation with the Community Trust, she might find that many of her raw materials and food can be sourced locally, meaning lower costs, a boost to the local economy, and a more authentic culinary experience for guests. She could also take advantage of the tax incentives for sourcing and employing locally -- a budget saver.

And perhaps her ecocentric ethic means she hopes the she can inspire both guests and locals to have a better appreciation for nature. One way to get the local community excited about her projects, is to involve them. She could have them arrange a cultural education program to supplement environmental education (Stem et al. 2003). She might also initiate a training program to build entrepreneurial skills in the community, because although direct employment with ecotourism has been found unlikely to influence conservation perspectives, indirect benefits such as education opportunities and infrastructural improvements can have a positive influence on conservation perspectives (Stem et al 2003). Plus, Rachel would be building the capacity of the local community to participate in the educational and tourism market. In other words, she would be contributing to their economic empowerment (venues for regular income), psychological well-being (potential for building optimistic futures), social empowerment (keeping revenue local to contribute to community groups, health clinics, etc.) and political empowerment (allowing community voices to guide development) (Scheyvens 1999).

Mahendra Where Mahendra decides to stay will depend on his world view, as well as how he weighs that against logistical concerns. If Mahendra is a strong ecocentric, he will certainly want to support the Okavango Game Lodge as the only ecotourism option. However, if he does not have a strong ecocentric ethic he may be more concerned with either (a) saving money or (b) keeping his family comfortable, in which case we would stay at the Sanctuary Inn or the Royal Safari Camp respectively. The Okavango Game Lodge does get logistical bonus points for being conveniently close to his field site. Also, depending on Mahendra's awareness of and concern for local and indigenous communities, he might be either pleased that the lodge sponsors a Craft Market or disappointed by the Craft Market as the lodge's only (current) meager attempt at community engagement and support.

Considering that Mahendra knows of Rachel's background as a fellow elephant biologist, Mahendra might consider reaching out to her to initiate a community science program. Perhaps he could become a regular patron of the Okavango Game Lodge, implementing a training and employment program for locals and lodge guests who are interested in partaking in elephant research. This would be considered "research ecotourism," providing research opportunities for visitors and locals that focus on the delta region's biology (in this case, specific to elephant biology) (Clifton and Benson 2006). Additionally, employing community members to help with "mapping, measuring, and monitoring" could increase local capacity to self-employ or seek employment as safari guides, wildlife educators, or ecologists. This could also be seen as part of a broader call to increase biodiversity knowledge and knowledge acquisition skills in developing countries (Vanhove et al. 2017).

Conclusion The Botswana government's "Ecotourism" certification level is defined as follows:

Ecotourism: This level upholds the principles of ecotourism, as stated in the Botswana National Ecotourism Strategy (2002) and defines those facilities that have met all the principles of ecotourism. The level reflects the facilities' commitment to and involvement with local communities in tourism development, nature conservation, environmental management and interpretation of the surrounding environment to the guests. (Botswana Tourism Organisation 2013b)

In this case, there are trade-offs between affording new sustainability measures vs. achieving developmental goals, particularly if Rachel's ecocentric ethic drives her to compromise with foreign investors and leads her to hire only her CI colleagues. However, if Rachel wishes to achieve the final "Ecotourism" certification level, she will need to balance her goals with community engagement and development. So "success" in this case is a balancing act for the lodge and the community.

It is worth noting that "success" depends on your environmental ethic. Those who tend toward anthropocentric will want to see environmental goals balanced with developmental goals. Someone who is strongly ecocentric, like Rachel, might be willing to compromise developmental goals in order to move more quickly with sustainability and environmental initiatives. It's also worth noting that community involvement with ecotourism doesn't necessarily change the terms in which locals see the forest so much as it keeps them too busy with new jobs to conduct old, potentially "harmful" activities, such as converting protected land to agriculture (e.g., Stem et al. 2003). Should ecotourism project managers like Rachel be satisfied to simply keep people preoccupied? Then, questions remain: If people had time, would they hunt? It tourism levels dropped, would the forest lose its value? So perhaps Rachel should push for "loftier goals," such as a greater respect for nature or a shared ecocentric ethic. But how could she go about achieving that? And what does it mean to respect nature? There are different interpretations, and utilitarian values don't necessarily equate with "disrespect."

Rachel needs to develop a greater understanding of the community's own environmental ethic before she decides to impose her own. A good practice would be to offer involvement and training with the eco-lodge wherever she can, especially to underrepresented members of the local community. Most importantly, balancing community development needs, local traditions and values, and sustainable development, is not amenable to one-off solutions; rather it requires careful and continuous attention.

Related Resources

Submit Content to the OEC   Donate

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. 2055332. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Ecotourism: A Case Study

Ecotourism is about uniting conservation, communities, and sustainable travel. This means that tourists who participate in ecotourism activities want reassurance that their host follows defined ecotourism principles. By Des Langkilde.

Table of Contents

Ecotourism Definitions

In his book ‘Ecotourism: An Academic Definition’ (1999 p.43) David A. Fennell defines ecotourism as “… a sustainable form of natural resource-based tourism that focuses primarily on experiencing and learning about nature, and which is ethically managed to be low-impact, non-consumptive, and locally oriented (control, benefits, and scale). It typically occurs in natural areas, and should contribute to the conservation or preservation of such areas.”

The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) defines Ecotourism as “Responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people.”

In a nutshell, the principles that define ecotourism include destinations that:

• Minimise human impact on the environment;
• Build environmental and cultural awareness and respect;
• Provide positive experiences for both visitors and hosts;
• Ensure direct financial benefits for conservation and empowerment for local people; and
• Raise sensitivity to the host countries’ political, environmental, and social climate.

Case Study: Grootbos Private Nature Reserve

A visit to Grootbos provides a prime example of Ecotourism Principles in action – it’s more than just five-star accommodation and eco-adventures; it’s about making a real and effective contribution to the unique natural environment of the Walker Bay region and its people.

From the beginning, Grootbos has been committed to the conservation of the region’s biodiversity as well as the upliftment of the local community.

Back in 1991, when Heiner and Eva Lutzeyer purchased a 123 hectare farm on the mountain slopes overlooking Walker Bay between the villages of Stanford and Gansbaai, little did they realise that their enterprising sons Michael and Tertius would succeed in establishing what has become a pristine botanical treasure trove, wildlife sanctuary, international 5-star eco-lodge and a world leader in luxury ecotourism.

Over the years, Grootbos staff have cleared all alien vegetation from the property, restored damaged areas, and now manage the land in accordance with strict ecological principles. The rehabilitation and development of this 2500 hectare property are well chronicled in the book ‘ Field Guide to the Flora of Grootbos Nature Reserve and the Walker Bay region ‘ by Sean Privett and Heiner Lutzeyer. Of the 9 250 species of flowering plants to be found in the UNESCO protected Cape Floristic Region, 760 species are found within Grootbos, of which six are totally new to science, and found only in this particular part of the reserve.

The friendly and knowledgeable guides at Grootbos take pride in sharing their love for nature and the outdoors, and they know Grootbos and its surrounds like the palm of their hand and display an eagerness to share its many secrets with guests.

Their humorous commentary and intriguing tales aim to convey science and history through stories that bring the landscape to life. Coming from different backgrounds, cultures and schooling, each guide adds an individual quality and flair to the Grootbos experience – a personal touch and friendliness beyond mere service.

In terms of empowering local people and associated non-profit programmes, Grootbos employs in excess of 150 full-time staff, some 80 per cent of whom are from local disadvantaged communities.

In conclusion, if I were a lodge owner, a hotel general manager, or a tourist attraction/destination manager looking to apply ecotourism principles into my business operations, I’d certainly look at tapping into the Grootbos Foundation’s expertise for assistance.

For more information, visit www.grootbosfoundation.org or www.grootbos.com

Tourism Tattler

Related articles.

An Insight Into Fashion Tourism

Adventure Tourism: SCUBA Diving

Avitourism in South Africa

Voluntourism: keeping it sustainable.

Privacy Overview

• Today's news
• Reviews and deals
• Climate change
• 2024 election
• Fall allergies
• Health news
• Mental health
• Sexual health
• Family health
• So mini ways
• Unapologetically
• Buying guides

Entertainment

• How to Watch
• My Portfolio
• Latest News
• Stock Market
• Premium News
• Biden Economy
• EV Deep Dive
• Stocks: Most Actives
• Stocks: Gainers
• Stocks: Losers
• Trending Tickers
• World Indices
• US Treasury Bonds
• Top Mutual Funds
• Highest Open Interest
• Highest Implied Volatility
• Stock Comparison
• Advanced Charts
• Currency Converter
• Basic Materials
• Communication Services
• Consumer Cyclical
• Consumer Defensive
• Financial Services
• Industrials
• Real Estate
• Mutual Funds
• Credit cards
• Balance Transfer Cards
• Cash-back Cards
• Rewards Cards
• Travel Cards
• Personal Loans
• Student Loans
• Car Insurance
• Morning Brief
• Market Domination
• Market Domination Overtime
• Opening Bid
• Stocks in Translation
• Lead This Way
• Good Buy or Goodbye?
• Fantasy football
• Pro Pick 'Em
• College Pick 'Em
• Fantasy baseball
• Fantasy hockey
• Fantasy basketball
• Download the app
• Daily fantasy
• Scores and schedules
• GameChannel
• World Baseball Classic
• Premier League
• CONCACAF League
• Champions League
• Motorsports
• Horse racing
• Newsletters

New on Yahoo

• Privacy Dashboard

Yahoo Finance

Eco tourism case study: the role of corporates, tourism bodies and governments, with focus on brazil, mexico and indonesia.

Dublin, May 13, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Eco Tourism - Case Study" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering. This case study looks at the increasing interest behind the niche tourism segment of eco-tourism. It discusses the concept of eco-tourism, motivations behind eco-tourism, eco-tourism in the media and the role of travel industry players and tourism bodies.

The case study also discusses the negative side of eco-tourism and the impacts it may have as well as the potential benefits associated with eco-tourism. Finally, this case study looks at types of eco-destinations and explores key destinations around the world. Report Scope

Eco Tourism lowers carbon footprints by consuming less energy when traveling. By choosing Eco Tourism, travelers can contribute to environmental sustainability and sustainable travel practices. According to the the analyst Q3 2021 consumer survey "In general, what type of holidays do you typically take?" out of 22,499 global respondents, 19% of respondents (4,273 respondents) said that they prefer to choose Eco Tourism holiday types.

According to the the analyst survey, "How often while traveling do you consider an "eco-friendly" destination?" Out of 50 respondents, 38% of respondents (19 respondents) said that they prefer to choose eco-friendly destinations, of which 14% said they always prefer eco-friendly destinations and 24% said they often choose eco-friendly destinations.

The emergence of social media as a method of communication has brought about a worldwide paradigm shift in how people observe, interact with, and exchange information. The evolution of social media as a new technology has changed the way in which the tourism industry works to some extent, which in turn has significantly influenced the Eco Tourism industry.

According to the the analyst business commitment towards ESG poll, of 357 respondents, 50.1% said that they feel companies treat ESG as a marketing exercise, followed by 31.9% of respondents who said that some companies take ESG seriously. This skepticism shows the importance of transparency and showcasing clear results of sustainability efforts.

Key Topics Covered:

Overview of Eco Tourism industry

Main findings

Growing Eco Tourism industry demand

Eco-friendly Accommodation

Eco Tourism in the Media

The Role of Corporates, Tourism Bodies and Governments

Types of Eco Tourism

Key Eco tourism Destinations: Brazil

Key Eco Tourism Destinations: Mexico

Key Eco Tourism Destinations: Indonesia

Eco Tourism Projects

Opportunities in Eco Tourism industry

Challenges in Eco Tourism industry

Key Report Benefits

Gain an understanding of eco-tourism.

Recognize the range of the potential negatives and associated benefits of eco-tourism.

Gain an understanding of eco-tourism motivations.

Gain an understanding of the role of the media, travel industry players and tourism bodies.

Company Coverage:

Elsa's Kopje

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/of1etf

About ResearchAndMarkets.com ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Promoting Ecotourism: A Case Study on Sagada, Philippines

Related Papers

I am just starting to gather data. I have not yet started making abstracts for my own research. these article is authored by someone else. it is another reference.

Ramon B A Alampay

The Philippines, through tourism, aspires to become a stronger player in the integrated travel industry of today. Yet, the country realizes that in order to do so, it must conserve, protect and strengthen the cultural, historical and natural resources upon which the Philippines draws its unique competitive advantages. All these in a manner that can be sustained for the benefit and enjoyment of future generations of Filipinos. This book, a collection of research papers funded by the Philippine APEC Study Center Network (PASCN), reflects the scope and complexity of sustainable tourism development. The various papers also mirror the complexity of sustainable tourism development and hint at the multidisciplinary approach that this mode of tourism needs to succeed. Each paper applies a different disciplinary framework to its particular tourism problem: economics, sociology, anthropology, environmental science, management science, human resources development, and others. Each paper also provides a unique academic angle on sustainability and tourism.

www.cdrj.ssu.edu.ph

Ronald Orale

Samar is the third largest island in the Philippines blessed with worldclass, less known ecotourism destination like highly diverse forest/reefs, gigantic caves, waterfalls, beaches, etc. Tourist arrival share attributed mostly to the private sector remains very low because of poor intervention especially from the local government. Private-led initiatives to promote Samar’s world-class sites are relatively successful, bringing in tourists from all over the world. Samar’s ecotourism sites are rated by these tourists higher in terms of panoramic appeal but poor in terms of accessibility; support structure, services and facilities compared to the more known and government-supported destinations in the Philippines. Samar Island towns are one of the poorest in the Philippines. Increasing tourist arrival through improved government intervention will result into a better economic activity which will potentially reduce the poverty level in the three provinces of Samar.

Rowena Abat - Parducho

The 7,107 islands of the Philippines make it one of the most frequently visited places by tourists in Asia and the Pacific. This paper attempted to review existing literatures on how ecotourism serves as a strategy for nation building, as well as establish the need for more conscious efforts to make its contributions sustainable.

Mary Jean Abello-Camarin

Tourism is said to be a fragmented industry or group of industries, composed primarily of competing businesses which have no collective strategy, leading to a complex and fragmented area for development of government policy (Noel Scott, 2012). Such nature of tourism requires a more focused regional tourism planning approach that significantly responds to sustainable tourism products (Buhalis and Costa, 2006). This study delved into the crafting of a tourism development framework for Caraga Region as a planning approach to ensure sustainability of its predominantly nature-based tourism assets. The five Provincial Local Governments of Caraga were rated through a survey on the implementation level of tourism-related initiatives. Results revealed that the tourism-related initiatives’ implementation has bearing to the tourist arrivals of the provinces from 2010-2014. The problems encountered in the implementation of the initiatives were rooted on balancing market-led and supply-led development approaches that will both deliver satisfying tourist’s experience and preserve the integrity of tourism resources. Tourism therefore must not be done in isolation (United Nations World Tourism Organization, 2011) to achieve this. Patterned to the integrative tourism development model of Getz, the study concluded that Caraga Region’s tourism development framework must be anchored on responsible governance, infrastructure development, green tourism product development, human resource development and peace and security. Key Words: Caraga Region tourism development framework, tourism development, tourism

ziyad zarkasi

Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research

Jazztin Jairum Manalo

Sustainable tourism has been considered by many local governments as part of their initiatives for economic upliftment. It is one of the major sources of income through the use of their tourist attraction without compromising the natural resources situated within. The enactment and effective implementation of the local government’s policy have achieved a promising efficient outcome for sustainable tourism.. The city of Puerto Princesa had a long history considering its transformation from an environmentally degraded city into one of the major ecotourism sites around the world. Thus, this paper presents the case of Puerto Princesa and its practices as well as economic development by practicing sustainable tourism and effective policy implementation. The City Ordinance No. 163-91 and 640 has improved the lives of the communities by practicing cleanliness and effective waste management their surrounding and tourist destinations. Economic development and benefits from sustainable tourism reflects the city of Puerto Princesa as a role model for Local Government Units. The passing of City Ordinances on Cleanliness drive have played an important role in effective waste management of the city. The key role of having a strong political will in the local government has strongly maintained its best practices for two decades up to the present.

Jay-r B Cabayan Jr.

Gessa Mae Abriol

RELATED PAPERS

Vee Jay Dalisay

CMR Bulilan

Celyrah B Castillo

AGRICULTURAL TRAVEL AND TOURISM

Tamara Ratz

Bob Capistrano

Vahid Ghasemi

Varslee Jeb T . Vargas

Bhea Marie Roxas

Michele J Dulay

Asian Journal of Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities

manilyn leonardo

Sven Gross , Louisa Klemmer

Gracia Bacz

Historically Digitized

Ricardo Sandalo , Mayo Grace Caoili Amit

Danna Carla Dela Cruz

Muhamad Salehudin

PANGASINAN Extention Office

International Conference for Tourism and Business

RYAN T LIBA

Ed John Dela Cruz

Freya Higgins-Desbiolles

International Journal of Information Research & Review

Jonatan Gomez Punzon

Christian D Soler

12th Philippine Network of Educators on Environment (PNEE) International Conference and Scientific Meeting

Jofer Asilum

Alexis Fillone , Nicanor Jr. Roxas , Jan Baldo

Towards Sustainable Development in Southeast Asia: From Forest Management to Eco-tourism

Nestor Castro

Maria Luisa Gonzales

FORUM PROCEEDINGS

Carmela Bosangit

R.W. (Bill) Carter , Sokhom Thok

Gülpınar AKBULUT ÖZPAY

Awangku Hassanal Bahar Pengiran Bagul

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024