AMANDA (Windows, OS X, Linux)
A Glossary of Special Terms
Term | Meaning |
---|---|
EPUB | A standardized format for digital books. |
FTP | FTP stands for File Transfer Protocol. It is a protocol used to transfer files from one computer to another via a wired or wireless network. |
Gantt chart | A type of bar chart used for project schedules, in which the tasks to be completed are shown as bars on the vertical axis, and time is shown on the horizontal axis, with the width of a given bar indicating the length of a given task. This facilitates planning by automating the tracking of milestone schedules and dependencies. |
GTD | GTD stands for Getting Things Done. It is a productivity method created by productivity consultant David Allen that allows users to focus on those tasks that should be addressed in a given context and at the right timescale of planning, from current activities to life-long goals. |
IP | IP stands for Intellectual Property, such as inventions and work products that are often patented or copyrighted. |
Linux | Linux is a family of open-source operating systems created by Linus Torvalds in 1991, serving as an alternative to the commercial ones. |
MTA | MTA stands for Materials Transfer Agreement—contracts that govern the transfer of research materials (e.g., DNA plasmids, cell lines) across institutions. |
MySQL | MySQL is an open-source database management system, consisting of a server back end that houses the data and a front end that allows users to query the database in very flexible ways. |
OCR | OCR stands for Optical Character Recognition—a process by which text is automatically recognized in an image, for example, converting a FAX or photo of a document into an editable text file. |
PDF stands for Portable Document Format, which serves as a standard format for many different types of devices and operating systems to be able to display (and sometimes edit) documents. | |
PMID | PMID stands for PubMed ID—the unique identifier used in the PubMed database to refer to published papers. |
SFTP | SFTP stands for SSH File Transfer Protocol but is often also referred to as Secure File Transfer Protocol. Its purpose is to transfer data over a network, similarly to FTP, but with added security (encryption). |
SSH | SSH stands for Secure Shell. This allows a remote user to connect to the operating system of their computer via a terminal-like interface. |
SSD | SSD stands for Solid State Drive. An SSD is a type of storage device for a computer that uses flash memory instead of a spinning disk, as in a typical hard drive. Compared with spinning hard drives, these are smaller, require less power, generate less heat, are less likely to break during routine use, and, crucially, enable vastly faster read and write speeds. |
TB | TB stands for Terabyte—a unit of measuring file size on a computer. One terabyte is equivalent to one thousand gigabytes, one million megabytes, or one trillion bytes. |
VNC | VNC stands for Virtual Network Computing—a desktop sharing system that transmits video signal and commands from one computer to another, allowing a user to interact with a remote computer the same way as if it were the computer they were currently using. |
VPN | VPN stands for Virtual Private Network. A virtual private network allows connections to internet-based resources with high security (encryption of data). |
WYSIWYG | WYSIWYG stands for What You See Is What You Get. This refers to applications where the output of text or other data being edited appears the same on-screen as it will when it is a finished project, such as a sheet of paper with formatted text (Microsoft Word and Scrivener are such, whereas LaTeX is not). |
Windows | Windows refers to the operating system Microsoft Windows. It is one of the most common operating systems in use today and is compatible with the vast majority of applications and hardware. |
XML | XML stands for Extensible Markup Language. Extensible Markup Language is a markup language used to encode documents such that they are readable by both humans and a variety of software. |
Although there is a huge variety of different types of scientific enterprises, most of them contain one or more activities that can be roughly subsumed by the conceptual progression shown in Figure 1 . This life cycle progresses from brainstorming and ideation through planning, execution of research, and then creation of work products. Each stage requires unique activities and tools, and it is crucial to establish a pipeline and best practices that enable the results of each phase to effectively facilitate the next phase. All of the recommendations given below are designed to support the following basic principles:
The Life Cycle of Research Activity
Various projects occupy different places along a typical timeline. The life cycle extends from creative ideation to gathering information, to formulating a plan, to the execution for the plan, and then to producing a work product such as a grant or paper based on the results. Many of these phases necessitate feedback to a prior phase, shown in thinner arrows (for example, information discovered during a literature search or attempts to formalize the work plan may require novel brainstorming). This diagram shows the product (end result) of each phase and typical tools used to accomplish them.
These basic principles can be used as the skeleton around which specific strategies and new software products can be deployed. Whenever possible, these can be implemented via external administration services (i.e., by a dedicated project manager or administrator inside the group), but this is not always compatible with budgetary constraints, in which case they can readily be deployed by each principal investigator. The PIs also have to decide whether they plan to suggest (or insist) that other people in the group also use these strategies, and perhaps monitor their execution. In our experience, it is most essential for anyone leading a complex project or several to adopt these methods (typically, a faculty member or senior staff scientist), whereas people tightly focused on one project and with limited concurrent tasks involving others (e.g., Ph.D. students) are not essential to move toward the entire system (although, for example, the backup systems should absolutely be ensured to be implemented among all knowledge workers in the group). The following are some of the methods that have proven most effective in our own experience.
Several key elements should be pillars of your Information Technology (IT) infrastructure ( Figure 2 ). You should be familiar enough with computer technology that you can implement these yourself, as it is rare for an institutional IT department to be able to offer this level of assistance. Your primary disk should be a large (currently, ∼2TB) SSD drive or, better, a disk card (such as the 2TB SSD NVMe PCIe) for fast access and minimal waiting time. Your computer should be so fast that you spend no time (except in the case of calculations or data processing) waiting for anything—your typing and mouse movement should be the rate-limiting step. If you find yourself waiting for windows or files to open, obtain a better machine.
Schematic of Data Flow and Storage
Three types of information: data (facts and datasets), action plans (schedules and to-do lists), and work product (documents) all interact with each other in defining a region of work space for a given research project. All of this should be hosted on a single PC (personal computer). It is accessed by a set of regular backups of several types, as well as by the user who can interact with raw files through the file system or with organized data through a variety of client applications that organize information, schedules, and email. See Table 2 for definitions of special terms.
One key element is backups—redundant copies of your data. Disks fail—it is not a question of whether your laptop or hard drive will die, but when. Storage space is inexpensive and researchers' time is precious: team members should not tolerate time lost due to computer snafus. The backup and accessibility system should be such that data are immediately recoverable following any sort of disaster; it only has to be set up once, and it only takes one disaster to realize the value of paranoia about data. This extends also to laboratory inventory systems—it is useful to keep (and back up) lists of significant equipment and reagents in the laboratory, in case they are needed for the insurance process in case of loss or damage.
The main drive should be big enough to keep all key information (not primary laboratory data, such as images or video) in one volume—this is to facilitate cloning. You should have an extra internal drive (which can be a regular disk) of the same size or bigger. Use something like Carbon Copy Cloner or SuperDuper to set up a nightly clone operation. When the main disk fails (e.g., the night before a big grant is due), boot from the clone and your exact, functioning system is ready to go. For Macs, another internal drive set up as a Time Machine enables keeping versions of files as they change. You should also have an external drive, which is likewise a Time Machine or a clone: you can quickly unplug it and take it with you, if the laboratory has to be evacuated (fire alarm or chemical emergency) or if something happens to your computer and you need to use one elsewhere. Set a calendar reminder once a month to check that the Time Machine is accessible and can be searched and that your clone is actually updated and bootable. A Passport-type portable drive is ideal when traveling to conferences: if something happens to the laptop, you can boot a fresh (or borrowed) machine from the portable drive and continue working. For people who routinely install software or operating system updates, I also recommend getting one disk that is a clone of the entire system and applications and then set it to nightly clone the data only , leaving the operating system files unchanged. This guarantees that you have a usable system with the latest data files (useful in case an update or a new piece of software renders the system unstable or unbootable and it overwrites the regular clone before you notice the problem). Consider off-site storage. CrashPlan Pro is a reasonable choice for backing up laboratory data to the cloud. One solution for a single person's digital content is to have two extra external hard drives. One gets a clone of your office computer, and one is a clone of your home computer, and then you swap—bring the office one home and the home one to your office. Update them regularly, and keep them swapped, so that should a disaster strike one location, all of the data are available. Finally, pay careful attention (via timed reminders) to how your laboratory machines and your people's machines are being backed up; a lot of young researchers, especially those who have not been through a disaster yet, do not make backups. One solution is to have a system like CrashPlan Pro installed on everyone's machines to do automatic backup.
Another key element is accessibility of information. Everyone should be working on files (i.e., Microsoft Word documents) that are inside a Dropbox or Box folder; whatever you are working on this month, the files should be inside a folder synchronized by one of these services. That way, if anything happens to your machine, you can access your files from anywhere in the world. It is critical that whatever service is chosen, it is one that s ynchronizes a local copy of the data that live on your local machine (not simply keeps files in the cloud) —that way, you have what you need even if the internet is down or connectivity is poor. Tools that help connect to your resources while on the road include a VPN (especially useful for secure connections while traveling), SFTP (to transfer files; turn on the SFTP, not FTP, service on your office machine), and Remote Desktop (or VNC). All of these exist for cell phone or tablet devices, as well as for laptops, enabling access to anything from anywhere. All files (including scans of paper documents) should be processed by OCR (optical character recognition) software to render their contents searchable. This can be done in batch (on a schedule), by Adobe Acrobat's OCR function, which can be pointed to an entire folder of PDFs, for example, and left to run overnight. The result, especially with Apple's Spotlight feature, is that one can easily retrieve information that might be written inside a scanned document.
Here, we focus on work product and the thought process, not management of the raw data as it emerges from equipment and experimental apparatus. However, mention should be made of electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs), which are becoming an important aspect of research. ELNs are a rapidly developing field, because they face a number of challenges. A laboratory that abandons paper notebooks entirely has to provide computer interfaces anywhere in the facility where data might be generated; having screens, keyboards, and mice at every microscope or other apparatus station, for example, can be expensive, and it is not trivial to find an ergonomically equivalent digital substitute for writing things down in a notebook as ideas or data appear. On the other hand, keeping both paper notebooks for immediate recording, and ELNs for organized official storage, raises problems of wasted effort during the (perhaps incomplete) transfer of information from paper to the digital version. ELNs are also an essential tool to prevent loss of institutional knowledge as team members move up to independent positions. ELN usage will evolve over time as input devices improve and best practices are developed to minimize the overhead of entering meta-data. However, regardless of how primary data are acquired, the researcher will need specific strategies for transitioning experimental findings into research product in the context of a complex set of personal, institutional, and scientific goals and constraints.
The pipeline begins with ideas, which must be cultivated and then harnessed for subsequent implementation ( Altshuller, 1984 ). This step consists of two components: identifying salient new information and arranging it in a way that facilitates novel ideas, associations, hypotheses, and strategic plans for making impact.
For the first step, we suggest an automated weekly PubCrawler search, which allows Boolean searches of the literature. Good searches to save include ones focusing on specific keywords of interest, as well as names of specific people whose work one wants to follow. The resulting weekly email of new papers matching specific criteria complements manual searches done via ISI's Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed. The papers of interest should be immediately imported into a reference manager, such as Endnote, along with useful Keywords and text in the Notes field of each one that will facilitate locating them later. Additional tools include DevonAgent and DevonSphere, which enable smart searches of web and local resources, respectively.
Brainstorming can take place on paper or digitally (see later discussion). We have noticed that the rate of influx of new ideas is increased by habituating to never losing a new idea. This can be accomplished by establishing a voicemail contact in your cell phone leading to your own office voicemail (which allows voice recordings of idea fragments while driving or on the road, hands-free) and/or setting up Endnote or a similar server-synchronized application to record (and ideally transcribe) notes. It has been our experience that the more one records ideas arising in a non-work setting, the more often they will pop up automatically. For notes or schematics written on paper during dedicated brainstorming, one tool that ensures that nothing is lost is an electronic pen. For example, the Livescribe products are well integrated with Evernote and ensure that no matter where you are, anything you write down becomes captured in a form accessible from anywhere and are safe no matter what happens to the original notebook in which they were written.
Enhancing scientific thought, creative brainstorming, and strategic planning is facilitated by the creation of mind maps: visual representations of spatial structure of links between concepts, or the mapping of planned activity onto goals of different timescales. There are many available mind map software packages, including MindNode; their goal is to enable one to quickly set down relationships between concepts with a minimum of time spent on formatting. Examples are shown in Figures 3 A and 3B. The process of creating these mind maps (which can then be put on one's website or discussed with the laboratory members) helps refine fuzzy thinking and clarifies the relationships between concepts or activities. Mind mappers are an excellent tool because their light, freeform nature allows unimpeded brainstorming and fluid changes of idea structure but at the same time forces one to explicitly test out specific arrangements of plans or ideas.
Mind Mapping
(A and B) The task of schematizing concepts and ideas spatially based on their hierarchical relationships with each other is a powerful technique for organizing the creative thought process. Examples include (A), which shows how the different projects in our laboratory relate to each other. Importantly, it can also reveal disbalances or gaps in coverage of specific topics, as well as help identify novel relationships between sub-projects by placing them on axes (B) or even identify novel hypotheses suggested by symmetry.
(C) Relationships between the central nervous system (CNS) and regeneration, cancer, and embryogenesis. The connecting lines in black show typical projects (relationships) already being pursued by our laboratory, and the lack of a project in the space between CNS and embryogenesis suggests a straightforward hypothesis and project to examine the role of the brain in embryonic patterning.
It is important to note that mind maps can serve a function beyond explicit organization. In a good mapped structure, one can look for symmetries (revealing relationships that are otherwise not obvious) between the concepts involved. An obvious geometric pattern with a missing link or node can help one think about what could possibly go there, and often identifies new relationships or items that had not been considered ( Figure 3 C), in much the same way that gaps in the periodic table of the elements helped identify novel elements.
The input and output of the feedback process between brainstorming and literature mining is information. Static information not only consists of the facts, images, documents, and other material needed to support a train of thought but also includes anything needed to support the various projects and activities. It should be accessible in three ways, as it will be active during all phases of the work cycle. Files should be arranged on your disk in a logical hierarchical structure appropriate to the work. Everything should also be searchable and indexed by Spotlight. Finally, some information should be stored as entries in a data management system, like Evernote or DevonThink, which have convenient client applications that make the data accessible from any device.
Notes in these systems should include useful lists and how-to's, including, for example:
Each note can have attachments, which include manuals, materials safety sheets, etc. DevonThink needs a little more setup but is more robust and also allows keeping the server on one's own machine (nothing gets uploaded to company servers, unlike with Evernote, which might be a factor for sensitive data). Scientific papers should be kept in a reference manager, whereas books (such as epub files and PDFs of books and manuscripts) can be stored in a Calibre library.
A special case of static information is email, including especially informative and/or actionable emails from team members, external collaborators, reviewers, and funders. Because the influx of email is ever-increasing, it is important to (1) establish a good infrastructure for its management and (2) establish policies for responding to emails and using them to facilitate research. The first step is to ensure that one only sees useful emails, by training a good Bayesian spam filter such as SpamSieve. We suggest a triage system in which, at specific times of day (so that it does not interfere with other work), the Inbox is checked and each email is (1) forwarded to someone better suited to handling it, (2) responded quickly for urgent things that need a simple answer, or (3) started as a Draft email for those that require a thoughtful reply. Once a day or a couple of times per week, when circumstances permit focused thought, the Draft folder should be revisited and those emails answered. We suggest a “0 Inbox” policy whereby at the end of a day, the Inbox is basically empty, with everything either delegated, answered, or set to answer later.
We also suggest creating subfolders in the main account (keeping them on the mail server, not local to a computer, so that they can be searched and accessed from anywhere) as follows:
Incoming emails belonging to those categories (for example, an email from an NIH program officer acknowledging a grant submission, a collaborator who emailed a plan of what they will do next, or someone who promised to answer a specific question) should be sorted from the Inbox to the relevant folder. Every couple of weeks (according to a calendar reminder), those folders should be checked, and those items that have since been dealt with can be saved to a Saved Messages folder archive, whereas those that remain can be Replied to as a reminder to prod the relevant person.
In addition, as most researchers now exchange a lot of information via email, the email trail preserves a record of relationships among colleagues and collaborators. It can be extremely useful, even years later, to be able to go back and see who said what to whom, what was the last conversation in a collaboration that stalled, who sent that special protocol or reagent and needs to be acknowledged, etc. It is imperative that you know where your email is being stored, by whom, and their policy on retention, storage space limits, search, backup, etc. Most university IT departments keep a mail server with limited storage space and will delete your old emails (even more so if you move institutions). One way to keep a permanent record with complete control is with an application called MailSteward Pro. This is a front-end client for a freely available MySQL server, which can run on any machine in your laboratory. It will import your mail and store unlimited quantities indefinitely. Unlike a mail server, this is a real database system and is not as susceptible to data corruption or loss as many other methods.
A suggested strategy is as follows. Keep every single email, sent and received. Every month (set a timed reminder), have MailSteward Pro import them into the MySQL database. Once a year, prune them from the mail server (or let IT do it on their own schedule). This allows rapid search (and then reply) from inside a mail client for anything that is less than one year old (most searches), but anything older can be found in the very versatile MailStewardPro Boolean search function. Over time, in addition to finding specific emails, this allows some informative data mining. Results of searches via MailStewardPro can be imported into Excel to, for example, identify the people with whom you most frequently communicate or make histograms of the frequency of specific keywords as a function of time throughout your career.
With ideas, mind maps, and the necessary information in hand, one can consider what aspects of the current operations plan can be changed to incorporate plans for new, impactful activity.
A very useful strategy involves breaking down everything according to the timescales of decision-making, such as in the Getting Things Done (GTD) philosophy ( Figure 4 ) ( Allen, 2015 ). Activities range from immediate (daily) tasks to intermediate goals all the way to career-scale (or life-long) mission statements. As with mind maps, being explicit about these categories not only force one to think hard about important aspects of their work, but also facilitate the transmission of this information to others on the team. The different categories are to be revisited and revised at different rates, according to their position on the hierarchy. This enables you to make sure that effort and resources are being spent according to priorities.
Scales of Activity Planning
Activities should be assigned to a level of planning with a temporal scale, based on how often the goals of that level get re-evaluated. This ranges from core values, which can span an entire career or lifetime, all the way to tactics that guide day-to-day activities. Each level should be re-evaluated at a reasonable time frame to ensure that its goals are still consistent with the bigger picture of the level(s) above it and to help re-define the plans for the levels below it.
We also strongly recommend a yearly personal scientific retreat. This is not meant to be a vacation to “forget about work” but rather an opportunity for freedom from everyday minutiae to revisit, evaluate, and potentially revise future activity (priorities, action items) for the next few years. Every few years, take more time to re-map even higher levels on the pyramid hierarchy; consider what the group has been doing—do you like the intellectual space your group now occupies? Are your efforts having the kind of impact you realistically want to make? A formal diagram helps clarify the conceptual vision and identify gaps and opportunities. Once a correct level of activity has been identified, it is time to plan specific activities.
A very good tool for this purpose, which enables hierarchical storage of tasks and subtasks and their scheduling, is OmniFocus ( Figure 5 ). OmniFocus also enables inclusion of files (or links to files or links to Evernote notes of information) together with each Action. It additionally allows each action to be marked as “Done” once it is complete, providing not only a current action plan but a history of every past activity. Another interesting aspect is the fact that one can link individual actions with specific contexts: visualizing the database from the perspective of contexts enables efficient focus of attention on those tasks that are relevant in a specific scenario. OmniFocus allows setting reminders for specific actions and can be used for adding a time component to the activity.
Project Planning
This figure shows a screenshot of the OmniFocus application, illustrating the nested hierarchy of projects and sub-projects, arranged into larger groups.
The best way to manage time relative to activity (and to manage the people responsible for each activity) is to construct Gantt charts ( Figure 6 ), which can be used to plan out project timelines and help keep grant and contract deliverables on time. A critical feature is that it makes dependencies explicit, so that it is clear which items have to be solved/done before something else can be accomplished. Gantt charts are essential for complex, multi-person, and/or multi-step projects with strict deadlines (such as grant deliverables and progress reports). Software such as OmniPlanner can also be used to link resources (equipment, consumables, living material, etc.) with specific actions and timelines. Updating and evaluation of a Gantt chart for a specific project should take place on a time frame appropriate to the length of the next immediate phase; weekly or biweekly is typical.
Timeline Planning
This figure shows a screenshot of a typical Gantt chart, in OmniPlan software, illustrating the timelines of different project steps, their dependencies, and specific milestones (such as a due date for a site visit or grant submission). Note that Gantt software automatically moves the end date for each item if its subtasks' timing changes, enabling one to see a dynamically correct up-to-date temporal map of the project that adjusts for the real-world contingencies of research.
In addition to the comprehensive work plan in OmniFocus or similar, it is helpful to use a Calendar (which synchronizes to a server, such as Microsoft Office calendar with Exchange server). For yourself, make a task every day called “Monday tasks,” etc., which contains all the individual things to be accomplished (which do not warrant their own calendar reminder). First thing in the morning, one can take a look at the day's tasks to see what needs to be done. Whatever does not get done that day is to be copied onto another day's tasks. For each of the people on your team, make a timed reminder (weekly, for example, for those with whom you meet once a week) containing the immediate next steps for them to do and the next thing they are supposed to produce for your meeting. Have it with you when you meet, and give them a copy, updating the next occurrence as needed based on what was decided at the meeting to do next. This scheme makes it easy for you to remember precisely what needs to be covered in the discussion, serves as a record of the project and what you walked about with whom at any given day (which can be consulted years later, to reconstruct events if needed), and is useful to synchronize everyone on the same page (if the team member gets a copy of it after the meeting).
Writing, to disseminate results and analysis, is a central activity for scientists. One of the OmniFocus library's sections should contain lists of upcoming grants to write, primary papers that are being worked on, and reviews/hypothesis papers planned. Microsoft Word is the most popular tool for writing papers—its major advantage is compatibility with others, for collaborative manuscripts (its Track Changes feature is also very well implemented, enabling collaboration as a master document is passed from one co-author to another). But Scrivener should be seriously considered—it is an excellent tool that facilitates complex projects and documents because it enables WYSIWYG text editing in the context of a hierarchical structure, which allows you to simultaneously work on a detailed piece of text while seeing the whole outline of the project ( Figure 7 ).
Writing Complex Materials
This figure shows a screenshot from the Scrivener software. The panel on the left facilitates logical and hierarchical organization of a complex writing project (by showing where in the overall structure any given text would fit), while the editing pane on the right allows the user to focus on writing a specific subsection without having to scroll through (but still being able to see) the major categories within which it must fit.
It is critical to learn to use a reference manager—there are numerous ones, including, for example, Endnote, which will make it much easier to collaborate with others on papers with many citations. One specific tip to make collaboration easier is to ask all of the co-authors to set the reference manager to use PMID Accession Number in the temporary citations in the text instead of the arbitrary record number it uses by default. That way, a document can have its bibliography formatted by any of the co-authors even if they have completely different libraries. Although some prefer collaborative editing of a Google Doc file, we have found a “master document” system useful, in which a file is passed around among collaborators by email but only one can make (Tracked) edits at a time (i.e., one person has the master doc and everyone makes edits on top of that).
One task most scientists regularly undertake is writing reviews of a specific subfield (or Whitepapers). It is often difficult, when one has an assignment to write, to remember all of the important papers that were seen in the last few years that bear on the topic. One method to remedy this is to keep standing document files, one for each topic that one might plausibly want to cover and update them regularly. Whenever a good paper is found, immediately enter it into the reference manager (with good keywords) and put a sentence or two about its main point (with the citation) into the relevant document. Whenever you decide to write the review, you will already have a file with the necessary material that only remains to be organized, allowing you to focus on conceptual integration and not combing through literature.
The life cycle of research can be viewed through the lens of the tools used at different stages. First there are the conceptual ideas; many are interconnected, and a mind mapper is used to flesh out the structure of ideas, topics, and concepts; make it explicit; and share it within the team and with external collaborators. Then there is the knowledge—facts, data, documents, protocols, pieces of information that relate to the various concepts. Kept in a combination of Endnote (for papers), Evernote (for information fragments and lists), and file system files (for documents), everything is linked and cross-referenced to facilitate the projects. Activities are action items, based on the mind map, of what to do, who is doing what, and for which purpose/grant. OmniFocus stores the subtasks within tasks within goals for the PI and everyone in the laboratory. During meetings with team members, these lists and calendar entries are used to synchronize objectives with everyone and keep the activity optimized toward the next step goals. The product—discovery and synthesis—is embodied in publications via a word processor and reference manager. A calendar structure is used to manage the trajectory from idea to publication or grant.
The tools are currently good enough to enable individual components in this pipeline. Because new tools are continuously developed and improved, we recommend a yearly overview and analysis of how well the tools are working (e.g., which component of the management plan takes the most time or is the most difficult to make invisible relative to the actual thinking and writing), coupled to a web search for new software and updated versions of existing programs within each of the categories discussed earlier.
A major opportunity exists for software companies in the creation of integrated new tools that provide all the tools in a single integrated system. In future years, a single platform will surely appear that will enable the user to visualize the same research structure from the perspective of an idea mind map, a schedule, a list of action items, or a knowledge system to be queried. Subsequent development may even include Artificial Intelligence tools for knowledge mining, to help the researcher extract novel relationships among the content. These will also need to dovetail with ELN platforms, to enable a more seamless integration of project management with primary data. These may eventually become part of the suite of tools being developed for improving larger group dynamics (e.g., Microsoft Teams). One challenge in such endeavors is ensuring the compatibility of formats and management procedures across groups and collaborators, which can be mitigated by explicitly discussing choice of software and process, at the beginning of any serious collaboration.
Regardless of the specific software products used, a researcher needs to put systems in place for managing information, plans, schedules, and work products. These digital objects need to be maximally accessible and backed up, to optimize productivity. A core principle is to have these systems be so robust and lightweight as to serve as an “external brain” ( Menary, 2010 )—to maximize creativity and deep thought by making sure all the details are recorded and available when needed. Although the above discussion focused on the needs of a single researcher (perhaps running a team), future work will address the unique needs of collaborative projects with more lateral interactions by significant numbers of participants.
We thank Joshua Finkelstein for helpful comments on a draft of the manuscript. M.L. gratefully acknowledges support by an Allen Discovery Center award from the Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group (12171) and the Barton Family Foundation.
According to a study by the Project Management Institute (PMI), a significant 11.4% of business investments go to waste due to subpar project performance.
That’s why students need to study project management in college - to move the progress further and empower businesses to perform better. It is crucial for students as it equips them with essential skills, including organization, teamwork, problem-solving, and leadership, which are highly transferable and sought after in the professional world. It enhances their career prospects, teaches adaptability, and fosters a global perspective, preparing them for success in a diverse and rapidly evolving job market.
In this article, you will learn the definition of a project management research paper, discover 120 excellent topics and ideas, as well as receive pro tips regarding how to cope with such an assignment up to par.
Project management is the practice of planning, executing, controlling, and closing a specific project to achieve well-defined goals and meet specific success criteria. It involves efficiently allocating resources, including time, budget, and personnel, to ensure that a project is completed on time, within scope, and within budget while delivering the intended results or deliverables.
Project management encompasses various methodologies, tools, and techniques to ensure that projects are successfully initiated, planned, executed, monitored, and completed in an organized and systematic manner.
Students can learn project management in colleges and universities, online courses, professional associations, specialized schools, and continuing education programs. Despite the type of institution, most students rely on an essay writing service to ensure their academic progress is positive.
Need a standout essay on the latest project management trends? Our experienced writers are here to provide you with a meticulously researched and expertly written paper, ensuring you stay ahead in your academic journey.
Project management research papers are academic documents that explore various aspects of project management as a field of study. These papers typically delve into specific topics, issues, or questions related to project management and aim to contribute new knowledge or insights to the discipline. Project management research papers often involve rigorous analysis, empirical research, and critical evaluation of existing theories or practices within the field.
Key elements of a project management research paper include:
Project management research papers can cover various topics, from best practices in project management to emerging trends, challenges, and innovations in the field. They are a valuable resource for both academics and practitioners, offering insights that can inform project management practices and decision-making.
Selecting an appropriate topic for a project management research paper is crucial for the success of your research. Here are some tips to help you choose the right research topic:
By following these tips, you can select a project management research topic that is not only relevant and original but also feasible and well-aligned with your academic and career goals. Sounds challenging and time-consuming? Simply type ‘ write an essay for me ,’ and our experts will help you settle the matter.
Here is a list of the 50 best topics for a project management paper. These topics cover many project management areas, from traditional project management methodologies to emerging trends and challenges in the field. You can further refine and tailor these topics to match your specific research interests and objectives.
Here are 10 simple project management research ideas that can serve as a foundation for more in-depth research:
The Impact of Effective Communication on Project Success: Investigate how clear and efficient communication within project teams influences project outcomes.
Project Management Software Adoption and Its Effects: Examine the adoption of project management software tools and their impact on project efficiency and collaboration.
Factors Affecting Scope Creep in Project Management: Identify the key factors contributing to scope creep and explore strategies to prevent it.
The Role of Project Management Offices (PMOs) in Organizational Performance: Analyze the performance, improving project success rates and enhancing overall project management maturity.
Agile Project Management in Non-Software Industries: Study how Agile project management principles can be adapted and applied effectively in non-IT industries, such as manufacturing, healthcare, or construction.
Project Risk Management Strategies: Investigate the best practices and strategies for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks in project management.
Stakeholder Engagement in Project Success: Explore the significance of stakeholder engagement and its impact on project outcomes, including scope, quality, and stakeholder satisfaction.
Project Management in Small Businesses: Analyze the unique challenges and opportunities of project management in small businesses and startups, considering resource constraints and growth objectives.
Sustainability Practices in Project Management: Investigate how project managers can integrate sustainability principles into project planning and execution, with a focus on environmental and social responsibility.
Change Management in Project Transitions: Examine the role of change management in ensuring smooth transitions between project phases or methodologies, such as moving from Waterfall to Agile.
These research paper topics offer opportunities to explore diverse aspects of project management, from leadership and ethics to emerging technologies and global project dynamics.
Still can’t find an interesting topic? Maybe you’re in writer’s block. But we have a solution to this, too - a research paper writing service from real academic professionals!
Here are ten research project topics in business management. They encompass various aspects of business management, from leadership and diversity to sustainability and emerging trends in the business world.
These dissertation topics cover a range of critical issues and strategies in software project management, from risk management to AI integration and agile methodologies.
Remember that easy research paper topics might also be used to write a dissertation. Check them out as well!
Offering you ten research topics in construction project management, which delve into various aspects of construction project management, from sustainability and safety to technology adoption and stakeholder engagement.
Let’s gain insights into the key aspects and focus areas of each research paper topic in project administration. Researchers can further refine these 10 topics to address specific research questions and objectives.
Innovative Strategies for Effective Project Communication and Collaboration: This topic explores innovative communication and collaboration methods that enhance project team coordination and overall project success. It may include the use of technology, virtual tools, or novel approaches to foster effective communication.
Integrating Sustainability into Project Management Practices: This research examines how project managers can incorporate sustainability principles into project planning, execution, and decision-making, contributing to environmentally and socially responsible project outcomes.
The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Project Leadership and Team Dynamics: This topic delves into the significance of emotional intelligence in project leadership, focusing on how emotional intelligence influences team dynamics, motivation, and project performance.
Agile Project Management in Non-Traditional Industries: Opportunities and Challenges: It explores adopting Agile project management methodologies outside the software development domain, discussing the opportunities and challenges of applying Agile in industries like healthcare, manufacturing, or construction.
Crisis Management and Resilience in Project Administration: This topic investigates crisis management strategies and the development of project resilience to navigate unexpected disruptions, disasters, and unexpected events affecting project progress.
The Impact of Change Management in Successful Project Implementation: It examines the critical role of change management in ensuring smooth transitions between project phases, methodologies, or organizational changes, contributing to project success.
Ethical Decision-Making in Project Management: Balancing Objectives and Integrity: This research delves into the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes project managers face and explores frameworks for ethical behavior in project management.
Technology Integration and Digital Transformation in Project Administration: It discusses how the integration of technology, such as AI, IoT, and automation, is transforming project administration practices and improving efficiency and project outcomes.
Risk Management and Contingency Planning in Large-Scale Projects: This topic focuses on risk management strategies and the development of effective contingency plans to mitigate risks in complex, large-scale projects.
Project Governance and the Influence of Regulatory Compliance: It explores project governance structures, including the impact of regulatory compliance on project management, risk management, and decision-making processes. In case you need aid with complex senior year papers, consult capstone project writing services .
These research topics address various aspects of healthcare project management, from facility construction and technology implementation to quality improvement and crisis management. Researchers can explore these topics to contribute to the improvement of healthcare project outcomes and patient care.
When you find a topic - what’s next? Check out this guide on how to research a topic !
Project management is a dynamic and ever-evolving discipline, offering a rich landscape for research and exploration. Whether you are a student seeking captivating project management research topics or a seasoned professional looking to address real-world challenges, our list of topics provides a valuable starting point.
The key to successful research in project management lies in identifying a topic that aligns with your interests and objectives, allowing you to make meaningful contributions to the field while addressing the pressing issues of today and tomorrow. If you need support executing your research or project, you might consider the convenience of our online services. Simply request " do my project for me " and connect with experts ready to assist you in navigating the complexities of your project management tasks.
So, delve into these research topics, choose the one that resonates with your passion, and embark on a journey of discovery and advancement in the world of project management. If you feel stressed or overwhelmed with the workload at some point, pay for a research paper to gain a competitive edge and save valuable time.
Let our team of expert writers help you create a comprehensive and well-researched essay, tailored to your specific academic requirements!
Annie Lambert
specializes in creating authoritative content on marketing, business, and finance, with a versatile ability to handle any essay type and dissertations. With a Master’s degree in Business Administration and a passion for social issues, her writing not only educates but also inspires action. On EssayPro blog, Annie delivers detailed guides and thought-provoking discussions on pressing economic and social topics. When not writing, she’s a guest speaker at various business seminars.
is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.
Without established timelines or performance measures by which to track progress, it can feel like you are constantly racing against time and funding to produce results.
View Full Profile .
Learn about our Editorial Policies .
It’s easy to get caught up in a rat race when conducting scientific research. Basic research, often carried out in an academic-type setting (e.g., research university, government research lab), tends to be hypothesis-driven or exploratory in nature rather than product-driven as in industry. Thus a basic research project may not have clearly defined goals, and unexpected results may alter the course of action at any given time.
Without established timelines or performance measures by which to track progress, it can feel like you are constantly racing against time and funding to produce results. However, traditional project management methods can be adapted for research projects to make lab work more efficient and productive by defining deadline-driven project deliverables and milestones, performance measures to evaluate progress, and the resources needed to get there. This information can be captured in a project management plan that creates a road map to guide successful project implementation.
Get training in Making Data-driven Decisions and earn CEUs .
One of over 25 IACET-accredited courses in the Academy.
The case for research project management.
In the “ Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty ” report by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), project management is defined as “a series of flexible and iterative steps through which you identify where you want to go and a reasonable way to get there, with specifics of who will do what and when.”
Traditional project management methods have been standardized and successfully employed across a number of industries (e.g., construction management, software development) where projects have definitive timelines and product requirements. However, Kathy Huczko, a project management consultant, points out that basic research “focuses on gaining knowledge instead of driving for new product creation,” and thus traditional project management processes cannot be strictly followed.
Huczko underscores, “In industry, the project plan gets adjusted as learning occurs and is retargeted to the product the project is committed to producing. In conducting [basic research], the end result or product is not the significant part of the result; research is planned and conducted using the scientific method, intermediate products in the form of datasets and papers are produced, and the null hypothesis is true or not.” She continues, “Based on the progress and learning to date, the project may be replanned and take off in an entirely new direction. This major replanning would rarely be acceptable in industry but must be the accepted process in [basic] research.”
Further, Susan Singer, a Stanford certified project manager and consultant, writes in her article “ Project Management in the Research Environment ,” that “The higher levels of uncertainty—while customary, accepted, and even embraced in the scientific setting—would constitute unacceptable risk in most business settings.” Thus Singer advocates for research project management as a subdiscipline that can provide the tools and resources for researchers to better organize projects, but with flexibility in the planning process to evolve with the project as needed.
Lab and project management training has not traditionally been included in the curriculum for academic scientists but has been gaining traction in recent years. Institutions are starting to offer a variety of training options, from professional science master’s degrees to business management certifications for postdoctoral researchers.
By subscribing, you agree to receive email related to Lab Manager content and products. You may unsubscribe at any time.
These skills can also be learned on the job. Joshua Blodgett, assistant professor of biology at Washington University, honed his project management skills during a leadership role in a biotech start-up. He explains, “There was a lot of pressure to do project management well and [manage] everything that comes along with a multipart group that needs to execute on making a tangible product in a short time launch. That is industry; they need that product. There’s a sense of urgency that you might not normally have in dealing with a typical academic environment.”
Blodgett says once you learn these skills, there is no turning back, and he has successfully transferred these skills to his current academic role. As he explains, “My interactions with students and technicians are completely different than they would have been if I had taken a strictly academic path. I have an additional element of goal setting and organization that I insist on, and that directly comes from the goal setting and review process on a quarterly fashion from industry.” He continues, “That way of thinking around organization of experiments, having your outlines done, and then seeing a direct path to publication just makes you a more productive individual with not that much more effort.”
Related Article: 5 W's of Project Management
With the increasing trend in multi-institutional collaborations, funding agencies are also starting to require project management plans and budgeted project manager positions as part of collaborative proposals to ensure effective functioning of research teams. And as Singer references, “Eighty percent of high-performing projects are led by a certified project manager, yet barely half of projects actually employ one.” Therefore, it may be worth the investment to delegate project management responsibilities to a dedicated team member or consultant trained in these skills.
Overall, how does project management benefit academic researchers? As the HHMI report summarizes best, “While keeping creativity intact, project management can help reduce wasted effort, track progress (or lack of it) and respond quickly to deviations from important aims.” These factors can help researchers work smarter with available resources and better compete for funding by demonstrating a positive track record of project success.
At the core of project management is the balancing act among the triple constraints of time, funding, and scope, while ensuring high quality and performance. While time is usually the limiting factor in industry, the uncertain funding environment in academic research may constrain projects to a greater extent. Additionally, the products of basic research are more variable. As the HHMI report explains, “Put simply, project management means allocating, using, and tracking resources to achieve a goal in a desired time frame. In a scientific setting, goals may include publishing a paper, obtaining a research grant, completing a set of experiments, or even achieving tenure.”
Therefore, careful evaluation of project ideas for their potential return on investment is the first step in the project life cycle. Such factors to consider include whether the project will result in additional funding faster, whether the resources are available to conduct the project, and whether there is enough time to obtain project results (e.g., preliminary results) before other impending deadlines. An additional consideration is to evaluate whether the project’s scope aligns with the overall theme of the research lab and the missions of any sponsoring organizations (e.g., affiliated institutions, funding agencies).
Once a project is selected, thorough planning is required to document the key requirements in a project management plan. This high-level document identifies the primary goals, objectives, and activities (i.e., scope); sets the strategy for the project (e.g., performance measures, budget, timeline); and outlines expectations for how work (e.g., communication, data management, quality control) will be conducted by the research team.
Integral to this document is a project timeline that clearly defines milestones (e.g., major events) and deliverables (e.g., project outputs), with corresponding performance measures that will allow progress to be tracked on a regular basis. As Singer explains, “Although the [planning] process is involved and sometimes tedious, what is produced is an easily scanned road map that will inform the team and any entities to which it must report of exactly what the benchmarks are, when they’ll be met, and what steps and resources are necessary to get there.”
This information must subsequently be communicated to the research team and relevant stakeholders to create a culture of shared ownership toward research goals and open communication throughout the project life cycle. A kickoff meeting can be held initially, and then regular touch points are built in to communicate changes, report on progress, and troubleshoot any anticipated project delays. The project management plan should be reviewed on an at least annual basis to make minor revisions and updates as needed.
During the project implementation phase, continuous monitoring allows the researcher to regularly track progress toward the performance measures, anticipate any slowdowns in the process through risk analyses (i.e., “what-if ” scenarios), and take corrective actions as necessary to keep the project on task. Singer also explains that “you have to fail fast so that you can move on to the next possible solution that will accomplish the goal while not depleting the resources available to complete the project or necessitate more equipment, time, people, and/or money than were allocated from the start.”
Singer further emphasizes that this “process demands constant introspection and self-correction” throughout the project life cycle. As she explains, “You’re continuously looking back at your road map and asking, ‘Am I doing what I should be doing when I should be doing it? If not, why not? Are the things that matter being measured so that I can report the appropriate metrics when the time comes? Is my work tracking in such a way that my colleagues, who are reliant on my part of the project, will have the product or data necessary to do their work?’”
Blodgett applies a number of project management skills to ensure projects are following the critical path to completion. For example, when multiple lab members are working together on a project, he has them create an online spreadsheet with every step that affects each of the others in its own separate column, generating a Ganttstyle chart. As he mentions, “I use the online documents that track project progress, not so I can oversee every aspect but so I know where things are, and then the other person should know when things are coming.” He also outsources technical work as needed to prevent significant delays in project timelines.
As science can be unpredictable, the research project management process must remain flexible and adaptable to allow for new discoveries and lines of inquiry along the way. As the HHMI report concludes, “No matter how much you’ve invested in a project, it’s never too late to redirect or stop work altogether if you discover, for example, that another route is more promising than the main avenue of research, or a key premise was off base, or that someone publishes the work before you do.”
1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2006) Chapter 7: Project Management in Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty, Second Edition. http://www.hhmi.org/developing-scientists/making-right-moves
2. Kridelbaugh, D. (2016) “Managing from a Distance.” Lab Manager . http://www.labmanager.com/leadership-and-staffing/2016/03/managing-from-a-distance
3. Kridelbaugh, D. (2015) “Onboarding.” Lab Manager . http://www.labmanager.com/leadership-and-staffing/2015/07/onboarding
4. Kridelbaugh, D. (2016) “Open Communication.” Lab Manager . http:// www.labmanager.com/leadership-and-staffing/2016/03/open-communication
5. Project Management Institute (online). “Tools and Templates.” http://www.pmi.org/learning/tools-templates
6. Singer, S. (2010) “Project Management in the Research Environment.” Best Thinking. https://www.bestthinking.com/articles/science/applied_science/project-management-in-the-research-environment
7. Singer, S. (online) Susan Singer, SCPM. http://www.singerscpm.com/
Donna kridelbaugh, related topics.
CURRENT ISSUE - July/August 2024
Staying relevant through groundbreaking research
Click below to subscribe to Lab Manager Monitor eNewsletter!
Home Blog Project Management Top 170 Project Management Research Topics to Work in 2024
In the ever-evolving field of project management, staying ahead of the most recent research trends is essential for professionals who wish to enhance their skills and increase successful project outcomes. This article highlights the top ten project management research topics expected to impact the project management field in 2024 significantly.
Along with Project Management certification courses , this thorough list will be an invaluable tool for exploring the main research frontiers in the dynamic field of project management. Whether you are an aspiring project manager, an academic researcher, or an industry professional looking to optimize your project strategies, project management certifications will support your growth.
Project management research papers are academic documents that go deeply into a single topic or aspect of the field of project management. It is usually written by students, researchers, or professionals in the field of project management, and its goal is to add new knowledge, insights, or views to the field.
A research paper on project management will look at some aspects of project management, be it a theoretical framework, methodology, best practices, or case studies. It entails conducting a systematic investigation into the chosen topic, accumulating and analyzing relevant information, and drawing conclusions or making suggestions based on the findings. The study of the project management research topics 2024 will help budding project managers along with PMP certification training .
Here is a list of project management research topics, for writing your project research paper.
1 | Impact of Global Leadership in Leading to the Success of a Project |
2 | Effects of Cultural Diversity on Project Performance |
3 | Popular Leadership Style Used by Project Managers |
4 | Evaluate PMBOK Guidelines |
5 | Stakeholder Approach to Successful Adoption of Projects |
6 | Effect of Change Mobilization on Companies |
7 | Impact of Reward System on Boosting Productivity |
8 | Relation Between Leadership and Change Management |
9 | How to Develop Cost-effective Projects in Developed Nations? |
What is a Project Management Research Paper? |
The following are the top project management thesis topics in 2024. Let us look into key points and overview of each project management research proposal:
The following are the key points covered in the thesis on project management of “Impact of global leadership in leading to the success of a project”.
The influence of global leadership on the success of a project has become an increasingly vital subject of research in the discipline of project management. Project teams are becoming more diverse, multicultural, and geographically dispersed as organizations continue to expand their global operations. This trend has created an urgent need for effective global leadership to navigate the complexities and challenges of managing projects across multiple countries, cultures, and time zones.
This research topic, it is examined how cultural diversity affects project performance as well as how project managers may successfully lead a multicultural team to project success.
In today's globalized world, cultural diversity is more common than ever and has a big impact on project management. Project managers need to understand how cultural variations between the team, stakeholders, and clients might impact project performance.
The following are the key points discussed in the research paper “Popular leadership style used by project managers”.
The paper begins by emphasizing the significance of effective project management leadership and its influence on project outcomes. It emphasizes that project managers require not only technical expertise but also the ability to inspire and lead their teams to deliver results. The purpose of this study is to identify the most prevalent leadership styles employed by project managers and cast light on their effectiveness within the context of project management.
Overall, the project management research paper offers insightful insights into the most prevalent leadership styles employed by project managers. It provides a thorough comprehension of the significance of leadership in project management and emphasizes the effectiveness of transformational leadership in motivating high-performance teams. The findings are a valuable resource for project managers and other professionals who wish to improve their leadership skills and project outcomes.
The following are the key points in “Evaluate the PMBOK guidelines”.
This research paper tries to evaluate the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) guidelines, a widely accepted project management standard. The PMBOK provides a comprehensive framework and best practices for effectively managing projects. This study analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of the PMBOK guidelines, identifies areas for improvement, and proposes potential enhancements to increase its relevance and applicability in modern project management practices.
Delve into the most popular KnowledgeHut's Project Management Courses:
The following are the key points discussed in the research paper “Stakeholder Approach to Successful Adoption of Projects.”
This research paper begins with an overview of stakeholders and their significance in project management. It emphasizes that stakeholders include individuals, groups, and organizations that can influence a project or be influenced by it. The paper emphasizes the necessity of identifying, analyzing, and ranking stakeholders based on their interests, power, and influence while acknowledging the wide variety of stakeholders involved in any given project.
The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of adopting a stakeholder-based approach to project management for attaining successful project outcomes. It prioritizes the need for project managers to recognize stakeholders as essential collaborators and engage them actively throughout the project lifecycle. By considering the interests of stakeholders, managing their expectations, and maintaining open communication channels, projects can increase their likelihood of successful adoption and long-term sustainability.
The following are the key points discussed in the research paper “Effects of change mobilization in Companies.”
The "Effect of Change Mobilization in Companies" research paper investigates the influence of change mobilization on organizational performance and employee engagement. The study investigates the numerous strategies and approaches utilized by businesses to successfully carry out and oversee initiatives to change. The findings demonstrate a positive relationship between effective change mobilization and increased productivity, innovation, and employee satisfaction. The paper highlights the significance of leadership, communication, and employee participation in facilitating organizational change.
The following are the key points included in the project management research paper “Impact of a reward system on boosting productivity”.
The research paper investigates the effects of implementing a reward system on organizational productivity levels. The study investigates how incentives and recognition can positively impact employee motivation, engagement, and overall performance.
Overall, the research paper illuminates the significant influence of a reward system on increasing organizational productivity. It provides administrators and human resource professionals with valuable insights and recommendations that can be used to improve employee motivation and performance, leading to increased productivity and organizational success.
The following are the key points discussed in the research paper “Relation between Leadership and Change Management”:
This project management research topic examines the vital connection between leadership and change management in the context of project management. It attempts to examine how effective leadership influences the success of organizational change initiatives. Examining various leadership styles and their influence on change management processes, the study identifies the important factors that contribute to effective leadership in driving successful change.
The following are the key points discussed in the research paper “How to Develop Cost-effective Projects in Developed Nations”:
This research paper concentrates on the identification of strategies and methods to build cost-effective projects in developed nations. The study acknowledges the challenges project managers experience in high-cost environments and aims to provide practical insights and suggestions for achieving optimal project outcomes while minimizing costs. The paper synthesizes current research and case studies to highlight key contributors to cost-effectiveness and presents a framework for project management in developed nations.
The following are the key points included in the research paper “Analyze the Role of soft skills in project success rates”:
The "Analyze the Role of Soft Skills in Project Success Rates" research paper examines the significance of soft skills in determining project success rates. Soft skills are a collection of personal characteristics and interpersonal abilities that enable individuals to communicate, collaborate, and manage relationships in professional settings. This study seeks to investigate the effect of these abilities on project outcomes, shedding light on their contribution to project success.The paper begins with an introduction to the significance of soft skills in the contemporary workplace, emphasizing their increasing recognition alongside technical expertise. It emphasizes the growing complexity of initiatives and the need for effective teamwork, communication, and leadership skills to successfully navigate such complexity.
These topics cover a range of critical issues, tactics, risk management, AI integration, and agile methodologies in software project management.
These topics cover sustainability, safety, technology adoption, and stakeholder engagement in construction project management.
These topics cover various aspects of healthcare project management, facility construction, implementing technology, quality improvement, and crisis management.
A. project initiation .
A. finance and accounting .
It is suggested to get certified in PRINCE2 certification training for aspiring project managers, which will help them work on well-organized and logical project management topics for research papers. Here is a step-by-step guide to writing your research paper on project management:
These topics for research in project management provide an excellent roadmap for project management academicians and practitioners to follow as we move forward. By focusing on these areas, we can obtain valuable insights, foster innovation, and elevate the project management discipline to new heights. The discipline of project management, such as construction project management research topics and ideas, is in a constant state of evolution, and researchers need to explore new avenues and address new challenges. Along with getting trained in these project management research proposal topics, it is suggested to enroll in KnowledgeHut Project Management courses for beginners and get globally recognized accreditations.
Project management for research is the process of planning, coordinating, and carrying out research tasks in a way that helps reach certain goals within certain limits.
The questions that a study or research project is trying to answer are the research questions. Most of the time, this question is about a problem or issue that is answered in the study's result through the analysis and interpretation of data.
The latest emerging project topics are Hybrid Project Management, Artificial Intelligence (AI) And Automation, Rise in remote working, Advanced Resource and Project Management Software, and Projects and Organizational strategy.
Kevin D. Davis is a seasoned and results-driven Program/Project Management Professional with a Master's Certificate in Advanced Project Management. With expertise in leading multi-million dollar projects, strategic planning, and sales operations, Kevin excels in maximizing solutions and building business cases. He possesses a deep understanding of methodologies such as PMBOK, Lean Six Sigma, and TQM to achieve business/technology alignment. With over 100 instructional training sessions and extensive experience as a PMP Exam Prep Instructor at KnowledgeHut, Kevin has a proven track record in project management training and consulting. His expertise has helped in driving successful project outcomes and fostering organizational growth.
Avail your free 1:1 mentorship session.
Something went wrong
Name | Date | Fee | Know more |
---|
Webinar series on the principles of project management
Managing projects is a detailed and systematic process. Yet, the applications of this process vary across disciplines and teams. This webinar series will introduce how to troubleshoot, forecast, and problem solve using project management in various contexts while considering how these elements impact the work of teams. Each of the four independent sessions will be led by David Vincenti, PMP, a certified project management professional. This series will identify the principles of project management and how to apply templates and skills to your work and experiences in team settings. The last session will feature a panel of guest speakers who utilize successful project management strategies in their respective roles and professions. Those without official training in this area will gain skills and confidence in project management during this series.
This session explores approaches to developing a broad range of competencies integral to establishing and maintaining a successful research career. The series delves into the following competencies: team science, mentorship, project management, communication, leadership, and funding research. For more information and to access other resources and webinars in the series, please visit Boundary-Crossing Skills for Research Careers.
Vincenti has presented to academic and professional audiences on project management, professional development, and other topics, and has been recognized for his work with career planning for early-career technical professionals. He holds degrees in materials engineering and technology management from Stevens Institute of Technology.
Sarita Patil, MD: Assistant Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Assistant Physician, Massachusetts General Hospital
Jane Shim, BA : Clinical Research Coordinator, Food Allergy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
Neal Smith, MSc : Senior Computational Biologist, Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital
Yamini Virkud, MD, MA, MPH : Pediatric Allergist/Immunologist and Assistant Professor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Session 1: Defining the Work November 1, 2022 | 12:00pm ET This session introduces basic project management principles. You will learn the definition of a project, how to manage project scope, and how to draft the baseline of a project while considering how projects can be connected.
Session 2: Creating the Plan November 3, 2022 | 12:00pm ET In this session, you will learn to apply project planning terms and understand how to break a project into manageable parts, sequence tasks, and manage time while considering how these components affect your work and the work of your team members.
Session 3: Finalizing the Plan November 8, 2022 | 12:00pm ET In this session, you will explore project management principles further by calculating risks, managing a process, reviewing a project plan, and forecasting the execution and completion of a project while considering how these elements impact your work and the work of your team members.
Session 4: Panel Discussion November 10, 2022 | 12:00pm ET This culminating session features a panel discussion with four successful project management practitioners. The panelists will share their experiences in their respective roles and professions, and discuss how they engage in project management work within team settings.
50-minute sessions on Zoom
This series is designed for team members in the clinical and translational (c/t ) workforce who are familiar with project management but have no formal training. Attendees are welcome to attend on their own or with their team members.
We believe that the research community is strengthened by understanding how a number of factors including gender identity, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, culture, religion, national origin, language, disability, and age shape the environment in which we live and work, affect each of our personal identities, and impacts all areas of human health.
There are no eligibility requirements. Prior session attendees have included: PhD, MD, postdocs, junior faculty, and medical students.
Registration is currently closed. Please check back for future opportunities.
Are you urgently in need of top-class project management research topics for your upcoming exam? Keep reading for exclusive writing ideas.
Those who have handled a project management thesis before can witness that this is not a smooth affair. The creativity, level of research, and critical thinking necessary for developing such a paper require a mature student. The greatest hurdle comes in when you want to develop your research topic. Our professional writers have everything you need to write an award-winning paper. Scroll down to find out how?
It is an assignment that requires students to integrate the different processes to achieve a particular goal and deliverables. Project management is based on the principle that all tasks are special, and thus, you should not treat two tasks as the same.
In this type of assignment, students have to develop many coordination skills and fairness in dealing with various projects. Since various tasks differ in line with their functional procedures, you have to dig deeper to determine how each yields direct and proportional earnings in the end.
Does all these sound like rocket science to you? Well, the next few lines will make you understand this subject better.
There are different steps involved in writing a project management paper. These will contribute to the body paragraphs’ overall quality, length, and depth. The various practices involved in project management include:
Initiating Planning Executing Controlling Closing the work of a team
When you bring all these processes together, you can achieve a particular goal or specific success within the set time. That brings us to a critical component of project management – time!
Every project has a given time frame within which it is complete. It is the primary challenge as time constraints are always when unexpected issues arise. However, with practice, time will not be a factor anymore; it will be the motivation for completing a particular project.
If you don’t feel those skills are important to you, you can get custom dissertation help from our expert team.
For you to write a paper that will get the attention of your university teacher, there are various steps that you have to take. Remember that you have to demonstrate to your professor that you understand your topic and can significantly contribute to the topic at the end of the day.
Here is a step-by-step guide that will take you through the full process of project management writing:
Once you complete these steps, your writing will be like a walk in the park. You will express your ideas clearly and have a logical paper.
Now let’s explore some of the most sought after project management topics:
Scoring top grades is no longer a wish but a reality with these topics. If you wish to hire professional dissertation writers for your project management task, type ‘do my thesis,’ Our writers will come through for you. Our writing assistance is all you need to ace your project management paper today!
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment * Error message
Name * Error message
Email * Error message
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
As Putin continues killing civilians, bombing kindergartens, and threatening WWIII, Ukraine fights for the world's peaceful future.
Ukraine Live Updates
4665 Accesses
46 Citations
Explore all metrics
This paper studies the business process known as project management. This process has exhibited a remarkable growth in business interest over the last 15 years, as demonstrated by a 1000% increase in membership in the Project Management Institute since 1996. This growth is largely attributable to the emergence of many new diverse business applications that can be successfully managed as projects. The new applications for project management include IT implementations, research and development, new product and service development, corporate change management, and software development. The characteristics of modern projects are typically very different from those of traditional projects such as construction and engineering, which necessitates the development of new project management techniques. We discuss these recent practical developments. The history of project management methodology is reviewed, from CPM and PERT to the influential modern directions of critical chain project management and agile methods. We identify one important application area for future methodological change as new product and service development. A list of specific research topics within project management is discussed. The conclusions suggest the existence of significant research opportunities within project management.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Subscribe and save.
Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Rent this article via DeepDyve
Institutional subscriptions
agilemanifesto.org. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Available via DIALOG. http://agilemanifesto.org/
Amram, M. & Kulatilaka, N. (1999). Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
Google Scholar
Aumann, R. & Serrano, R. (2008). An economic index of riskiness. Journal of Political Economy, 116: 810–836
Article Google Scholar
Bertsimas, D. & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52: 35–53
Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
Brânzei, R., Ferrari, G., Fragnelli, V. & Tijs, S. (2002). Two approaches to the problem of sharing delay costs in joint projects. Annals of Operations Research, 109: 359–374
Brown, D.B. & Sim, M. (2009). Satisficing measures for analysis of risky positions. Management Science, 55: 71–84
Article MATH Google Scholar
Cai, X., Hall, N.G. & Zhang, F. (2012). Cooperation and contract design in project management. Working paper, Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Castro, J., Gómez, D. & Tejada, J. (2008). A polynomial rule for the problem of sharing delay costs in PERT networks. Computers & Operations Research, 35: 2376–2387
Cooper, R.G., Edgett, S.J. & Kleinschmidt, E.J. (2000). New problems, new solutions: making portfolio management more effective. Research-Technology Management, 43: 18–33
Corbett, C. & Muthulingam, S. (2007). Adoption of voluntary environmental standards: the role of signaling and intrinsic benets in the diffusion of the LEED green building standards. Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA
Dickinson, M.W., Thornton, A.C. & Graves, S. (2001). Technology portfolio management: optimizing interdependent projects over multiple time periods. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48: 518–527
Fox, G.E., Baker, N.R. & Bryant, L.J. (1984). Economic models for R&D project selection in the presence of project interactions. Management Science, 30: 890–902
Goh, J. & Hall, N.G. (2012). Total cost control in project management via satisficing. Working paper, revised for publication, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Goh, J. & Sim, M. (2010). Distributionally robust optimization and its tractable approximations. Operations Research, 58: 902–917
Goldratt, E.M. (1997). The Critical Chain. North River Press, Great Barrington, MA
Hall, N.G., Long, Z., Qi, J. & Sim, M. (2011). Managing underperformance risk in project portfolio selection. Working paper, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Huchzermeier, A. & Loch, C.H. (2001). Project management under risk: using the real options approach to evaluate exibility in R&D. Management Science, 47: 85–101
Hurwicz, L. (1972). On informationally decentralized systems. In: McGuire, C.B., Radner, R. (eds.), Decisions and Organization. North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Kellerer, H., Pferschy, U. & Pisinger, D. (2004). Knapsack Problems. Springer, Berlin, Germany
MATH Google Scholar
Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling, 10 th edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Kim, Y.W. & Ballard, G. (2000). Is the earned-value method an enemy of work flow? Working paper, Department of Civil and Environmental Enginering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Klastorin, T.D. (2004). Project Management: Tools and Trade-Offs, 1 st edition. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Kotnour, T. (2000). Organizational learning practices in the project management environment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17: 393–406
Lukas, J.A. (2008). Earned value analysis — Why it doesn’t work. AACE International Transactions, EVM.01.1-EVM.01.10
Markowitz, H.M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Wiley, New York
Myerson, R. (1979). Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica, 47: 61–73
MSDN Blogs. (2009). Architecture makes agile processes scalable. Available via DIALOG. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nickmalik/archive/2009/05/19/architecture-makes-agile-processesscalable.aspx . Cited May 19, 2012
objectmentor.com. (2012). Agile/XP object mentor success stories. Available via DIALOG. http://www.objectmentor.com/omSolutions/agile_customers.html
Parkinson, C.N. (1955). Parkinson’s law. Economist, November 19
Parkinson, C.N. (1958). Parkinson’s Law: The Pursuit of Progress. John Murray, London, UK
Patrick, F.S. (1998). Critical chain scheduling and buffer management: getting out from between Parkinson’s rock and Murphy’s hard place. Available via DIALOG. http://www.focusedperformance.com
Peleg, B. & Sudhölter, P. (2003). Introduction to the Theory of Cooperative Games. Kluwer, Boston, MA
Book Google Scholar
Pich, M.T., Loch, C.H. & De Meyer, A. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48: 1008–1023
Project Management Institute. (2008). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 4th edition
Raz, T., Barnes, R. & Dvir, D. (2003). A critical look at critical chain project management. Project Management Journal, 36: 24–32
Roy, A.D. (1952). Safety-first and the holding of assets. Econometrica, 20: 431–449
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. (2007). The urban environment. Available via DIALOG http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm70/7009/7009.pdf
Schindler, M. & Eppler, M.J. (2003). Harvesting project knowledge: a review of project learning methods and success factors. International Journal of Project Management, 21: 219–228
Schonberger, R.J. (1981). Why projects are always late: a rationale based on manual simulation of a PERT/CPM network. Interfaces, 11: 66–70
Smith, P.G. (2007). Flexible Product Development: Building Agility for Changing Markets. John Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
White, D. & Fortune, J. (2002). Current practice in project management: an empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20: 1–11
Wikipedia. (2011). Parkinson’s law. Available via DIALOG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson’s_Law
Wikipedia. (2012). Earned value management. Available via DIALOG. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earned_value_management
wwwF. (2010). Living planet report. Available via DIALOG. http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report
Download references
Authors and affiliations.
Department of Management Sciences Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA
Nicholas G. Hall
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Nicholas G. Hall .
Nicholas G. Hall is Professor of Management Sciences in the Fisher College of Business at The Ohio State University. He holds B.A., M.A. degrees in economics from the University of Cambridge, a professional qualification in accounting, and a Ph.D. (1986) from the University of California at Berkeley. His main research interests are in tactical operations issues, especially project management, scheduling and pricing, public policy and sports management problems. He is the author of over 70 refereed publications, and has given over 260 academic presentations, including 88 invited presentations in 20 countries, 6 conference keynote presentations and 6 INFORMS tutorials. A 2008 citation study ranked him 13th among 1,376 scholars in the operations management field. He is a Fellow of the Institute for Decision Making under Uncertainty of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. He won the Faculty Outstanding Research Award of the Fisher College of Business in 1998 and 2005.
Reprints and permissions
Hall, N.G. Project management: Recent developments and research opportunities. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 21 , 129–143 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5190-5
Download citation
Published : 16 June 2012
Issue Date : June 2012
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-012-5190-5
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Organization
Founded in 1968, the Guttmacher Institute is a global leader in advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights. Through a unique and interrelated program of high-quality research, evidence-based advocacy and strategic communications, the Institute works to generate new ideas, encourage enlightened public debate, and promote sound policy and program development; its overarching goal is to ensure the highest standard of sexual and reproductive health and rights for all people worldwide. The Institute is engaged in building a more inclusive, transparent and equitable organization.
Position summary
We are hiring three (3) Senior Research Associates (SRA) who are responsible for a variety of research and management tasks. Research tasks may include collection of quantitative data (often by overseeing fielding of surveys), collection of qualitative data, data processing and analysis, contributing to or leading the writing of articles and reports, and coordinating with staff in other divisions, particularly in getting products to publication. An SRA typically will serve as project manager (i.e., managerial lead) on one or more projects and may also serve as project principal (i.e., substantive lead) on projects or project components. SRAs on international projects will often work extensively with in-country partners.
SRAs contribute to training Research Associates, and often train and oversee Research Assistants.
A Senior Research Associate works with a substantial degree of independence, usually under the direction of a Senior Research Scientist or other senior research staff. Although an SRA carries out many of the same substantive and management tasks as a Research Associate, she or he must have additional qualifications and must take on additional responsibilities by virtue of greater experience and longer tenure.
Responsibilities
Senior Research Associate–specific responsibilities:
If staffer has Guttmacher tenure
Research tasks
Management tasks
Qualifications and skills
Salary and benefits
Starting salary at 103,745.39 to $165,875.40 commensurate with experience. This is a union position. The Guttmacher Institute practices a hybrid work schedule, requiring in-office attendance 8 days per month at our NYC location. We offer excellent benefits that include medical, dental, vision and life insurance; vacation, personal and sick time; paid parental leave; tuition reimbursement; commuting subsidy; and 401(k) with employer match. The Guttmacher Institute strives to provide the training and support staff need to be successful in their positions and to grow professionally. Guttmacher is an Equal Employment Opportunity Employer
The Guttmacher Institute seeks to foster a diverse, inclusive and equitable environment, where every employee’s unique talents are valued and recognized as an asset to the achievement of our mission. The Guttmacher Institute is an equal opportunity employer.
To apply, submit resume and cover letter here .
Please note that telephone inquiries will not be acknowledged. No agencies, please.
Guttmacher is an Equal Employment Opportunity employer
The Guttmacher Institute seeks to foster a diverse, inclusive and equitable work environment, where employees’ talents are valued and recognized as an asset to the achievement of our mission. We endeavor to make the application process accessible to all users. If you need assistance learning about or applying to our employment opportunities, please contact our human resources department at (212) 248-1111 or [email protected] .
Research output : Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
The authors of this article apply relevant project management concepts to international joint ventures (IJV) formation, in order to achieve business success. IJV formation is a common topic in the international management, strategic management, financial management, international marketing, international accounting, and international business law literatures. An IJV may be logically classified either as an equity or a contractual joint venture. The proposed model consists of three component parts. They are the IJV Project Framework for Analysis, the IJV Scope Statement, and the ProjectContract Process. The benefits of the model include its potential for increased and timely control of the IJV variables and its adaptability to all life-cycle phases and environmental challenges.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | |
Volume | 19 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1 1994 |
T1 - Project Managing: International Joint Venture Projects
AU - Konieczny, Steven J.
AU - Petrick, Joseph A.
PY - 1994/4/1
Y1 - 1994/4/1
N2 - The authors of this article apply relevant project management concepts to international joint ventures (IJV) formation, in order to achieve business success. IJV formation is a common topic in the international management, strategic management, financial management, international marketing, international accounting, and international business law literatures. An IJV may be logically classified either as an equity or a contractual joint venture. The proposed model consists of three component parts. They are the IJV Project Framework for Analysis, the IJV Scope Statement, and the ProjectContract Process. The benefits of the model include its potential for increased and timely control of the IJV variables and its adaptability to all life-cycle phases and environmental challenges.
AB - The authors of this article apply relevant project management concepts to international joint ventures (IJV) formation, in order to achieve business success. IJV formation is a common topic in the international management, strategic management, financial management, international marketing, international accounting, and international business law literatures. An IJV may be logically classified either as an equity or a contractual joint venture. The proposed model consists of three component parts. They are the IJV Project Framework for Analysis, the IJV Scope Statement, and the ProjectContract Process. The benefits of the model include its potential for increased and timely control of the IJV variables and its adaptability to all life-cycle phases and environmental challenges.
UR - https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/management/36
U2 - 10.1177/030630709401900305
DO - 10.1177/030630709401900305
M3 - Article
JO - Journal of General Management
JF - Journal of General Management
News and Events
Research and Programs
Work with Us
Explore our Library
Monday august 5, 2024, general plenary session (all program areas) – exhibit hall b.
U.S. Department of Energy Highlights Master of Ceremonies: Noah Deich, Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy
8:00 a.m. - 8:10 a.m. | Marianne Walck, Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
8:10 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | Geri Richmond, Under Secretary for Science and Innovation, U.S. Department of Energy |
8:25 a.m. - 8:40 a.m. | Brad Crabtree, Assistant Secretary for the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy |
Technical Thought Leaders Panel Moderator: Mark Ackiewicz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Carbon Management, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy
8:40 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. | Mark Ackiewicz, Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Office of Carbon Management, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy |
8:45 a.m. - 8:55 a.m. | |
8:55 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. | |
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | |
9:15 a.m. - 9:25 a.m. |
Enabling CCS Demos and Carbon Capture Large Pilot Scale Testing Moderator: Ron Munson
10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | Niall Mac Dowell, Imperial College London + Barclays Bank |
11:00 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Jeff Walker, OCED CCS Demos Gokul Vishwanathan, OCED Carbon Capture Large Pilots |
Enabling CCS Demos and Carbon Capture Large Pilot Scale Testing Moderator: Nicole Shamitko-Klingensmith
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Stephanie Brownstein and Kevin O'Brien, Net Zero Center of Excellence / University of Illinois |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Brice Freeman, MTR |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Capture Technology Engineering Scale at Technology Centre Mongstad (FE0031590) Marty Lail, RTI International |
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Nathan Dilport and Nathan Kirkconnell, Tampa Electric Company |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Capture FEED at Louisville Gas & Electric Cane Run Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant (FE0032223) Adam Berger, Electric Power Research Institute |
Enabling CCS Demos and Carbon Capture Large Pilot Scale Testing Moderator: Dylan Leary
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Capture System at Calpine’s Delta Energy Center (FE0032149) Andrew Awtry, ION Clean Energy |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Greg Ronczka and Sathish Krishnamoorthy, Heidelberg Materials US, Inc. |
Panel Discussion - Factors Influencing Financial Investment Decision for Large Pilots and Demonstrations Moderator: Lynn Brickett
4:50 p.m. - 5:45 p.m. | Bill Elliott, Bechtel David Greeson, Proven Project Development Group Martin Perez, OCED Nicole Saunders, Environmental Defense Fund Alexander Shelby, Barclays |
CDR Program Updates
10:30 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | Rory Jacobson, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management |
10:50 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | Dave Luebke, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Pre-Commercial DAC EPIC Prize Finalists Moderator: Elias Cain
11:00 a.m. - 11:05 a.m. | |
11:05 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | James Stanish, Activate Global, Inc. |
11:15 a.m. - 11:25 a.m. | |
11:25 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. | |
11:35 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | |
11:45 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. |
Lab/Bench-Scale DAC Research Moderator: Akhil Sathish
1:25 p.m. - 1:40 p.m. | Miao Yu, University at Buffalo |
1:40 p.m. - 1:55 p.m. | Contactor: Advanced Integrated Reticular Sorbent-Coated System to CO Using an Additively-Manufactured Contactor (FE0032126) David Moore, GE Vernova Advanced Research Center |
1:55 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. | Separation (FE0032128) Joo-Youp Lee, University of Cincinnati |
2:10 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | James Zhou, Susteon, Inc. |
2:25 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc |
2:40 p.m. - 2:55 p.m. | Anca Timofte, Holocene Climate Corporation |
2:55 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Laminate Structured Sorbents as an Advanced Direct Air Capture System (FE0032278) Christopher Jones, Georgia Institute of Technology |
Integrated Bench-Scale DAC Testing Moderator: Akhil Sathish
3:10 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Mustapha Soukri, RTI International |
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Andrew Tong and Arnold Toppo, Susteon, Inc. |
4:20 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Jonathan Bachman, SRI International |
4:40 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Xin Gao, University of Kentucky |
5:00 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc. |
Conversion Overview Moderator: Joe Stoffa
10:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Moderator: Joe Stoffa, NETL Panel Member 1: Gaurav Sant, Carbon Built Panel Member 2: Corrie Poland, Air Company Panel Member 3: Kevin Norfleet, Celanese |
11:30 a.m. -11:45 a.m. | Emily Connor, U.S. Department of Energy |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Doug Kauffman, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Reactive Capture Moderator: Gregory Imler
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | into Materials: Pathways for Producing CO -Negative Building Composites (FWP-78606) David Heldebrant, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | -Selective Polymer Layers and Electrocatalytic Conversion (FWP-1022482) Douglas Kauffman, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Capture and Conversion to Value-added Chemicals (FWP-FEAA421-FY22) Michelle Kidder, Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Capture and Conversion to Methanol through Precise Control of Co-Located Active Sites in Dual Functional Materials (FWP-FY21-RCC-LAB-CALL) Anh To and Dan Ruddy, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Simon Pang, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Conversion Moderator: Gregory Imler
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | into Materials: Expanding IC M for C and C Production (FWP-80562) Jothi Kothandaraman, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Robert Bell, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | m) of Natural Brines and Wastes to Enable Carbon-Negative Value-Added Products (FE0032258) Jason Trembly, Ohio University |
5:15 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | (SC0022839) Ian A Tonks, LoopCO /University of Minnesota |
5:40 p.m. - 6:05 p.m. | Feng Chen and Russell Hill, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science |
Regional Initiatives (Midwest/Northeast) Moderator: Mary Dailey
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Neeraj Gupta, Battelle Memorial Institute |
10:55 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | Michele Cooney, Pennsylvania Geological Survey |
11:15 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. | Ashley Douds, Indiana Geological and Water Survey at Indiana University and Gabriel Piser, Center for Rural Engagement at Indiana University |
11:35 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | Nathan Webb, Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois |
11:55 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. | Autumn Haagsma, Michigan Geological Survey |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (Midwest/Northeast) Moderator: Mary Dailey
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Nate Grigsby, Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Joel Sminchak and Beth Vanden Berg, Battelle Memorial Institute |
2:15 p.m. - 2:35 p.m. | Tim Vance, Battelle Memorial Institute |
2:35 p.m. - 2:55 p.m. | Ben Roth, Advanced Resources International, Inc |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Midwest/Northeast) Moderator: Andrea McNemar
2:55 p.m. - 3:15 p.m. | Chris Walker, BP Carbon Solutions LLC |
3:15 p.m. - 3:35 p.m. | Storage Hub (FE0032441) Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Midwest/Northeast) Moderator: Josh Hull
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Roland Okwen, Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois |
4:25 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. | Kendall Taft, Illinois State Geological Survey, University of Illinois |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: Chad Rowan
4:45 p.m. - 5:05 p.m. | Abigail Martin, NETL Support Contractor |
5:05 p.m. - 5:25 p.m. | Jennifer Bauer, National Energy Technology Laboratory and Kevin Dooley, U.S. Department of Energy |
Subsurface Stress Moderator: Kyle Smith
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Daniel Deng, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Storage Formations; Multiscale Analyses with CT Scanning (FWP-1022403) Dustin Crandall, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | Matteo Cusini, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Hao Zhang, Zanskar Geothermal & Minerals, Inc. |
Secure Storage Moderator: Melissa Ely
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Injection Using Wireless Autonomous Distributed Sensor Networks (FE0031856) Mohsen Ahmadian, University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Storage Site Selection (FE0032063) Yingcai Zheng, University of Houston |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Yves Guglielmi and Abdullah Cihan, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
Plume Detection and Storage Efficiency Moderator: Kyle Smith
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Injection (FWP-ESD14095) Julia Correa, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Storage in the Illinois Basin (FWP-ESD14095) Stanislav Glubokovskikh, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | with Seismic Ambient Noise and Scattered Earthquake Waves (FWP-ESD14095) Nori Nakata, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | David Alumbaugh, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Trevor Richards, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: Paige Morkner
10:30 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | Cat Schooley, NETL Support Contractor |
10:50 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | Chad Rowan, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
11:10 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Patrick Wingo, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
11:30 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Kelly Rose, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
11:50 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Jessica Sinclair, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: MacKenzie Mark-Moser
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | ver Kevin Kuhn, NETL Support Contractor |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Jack Sarle, NETL Support Contractor |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Dakota Zaengle, NETL Support Contractor |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | Paige Morkner, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
2:45 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Maneesh Sharma, NETL Support Contractor and Jen Bauer, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | Gabe Creason, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: Gabe Creason
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | -Locate (v2): A Living National Well Database Lucy Romeo and Jennifer Bauer, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
4:20 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Greg Lackey, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
4:40 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Devin Justman, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
DAC Test Center Workshop - Rooms 411/412
4:00 p.m. - 4:10 p.m. | Dave Luebke, Technical Director, National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) Direct Air Capture Center |
4:10 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Rajinder Singh, Deputy Group Leader and Scientist, Materials Synthesis and Integrated Devices |
4:20 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. | Edgar Lara-Curzio, Distinguished Scientist, Director of Fossil Energy Program, Director for Energy Transitions and Infrastructure Programs |
4:30 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Simon Pang, Associate Group Leader, Materials for Energy and Climate Group |
4:40 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Josh Schaidle, Laboratory Program Manager, Carbon Management |
4:50 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Frank Morton, Technology Development Manager |
5:00 p.m. - 5:10 p.m. | Elisabeth Mansfield, Research Chemist |
5:10 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. | Moderator: Dave Luebke, Technical Director, NETL Direct Air Capture Center Panelist: Grant Faber, Direct Air Capture Hubs Program Manager, U.S. DOE, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management Panelist: Kunlei Liu, Director, International Test Center Network, University of Kentucky Panelist: Thiago Fernandes De Aquino, Researcher, SATC (Brazil) Panelist: Bilha Ndirangu, CEO, Great Carbon Valley (Kenya) Panelist: Jasper Wong, Co-Founder and CTO, Airhive (United Kingdom) |
International Carbon Management Progress Panel Moderator: Philip Bainbridge, Chairman, Global CCS Institute
8:00 a.m. - 8:05 a.m. | Philip Bainbridge, Chairman, Global CCS Institute |
8:05 a.m. - 8:15 a.m. | |
8:15 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | |
8:25 a.m. - 8:35 a.m. | |
8:35 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. |
Community Engagement and Workforce Development Panel Moderator: April Augustine, Director, I.D.E.A.L. Workforce Programs, Idaho National Laboratory
9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. | April Augustine, Director, I.D.E.A.L. Workforce Programs, Idaho National Laboratory |
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | |
9:15 a.m. - 9:25 a.m. | |
9:25 a.m. - 9:35 a.m. | |
9:35 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. |
FEEDs Panel Discussion Moderator: Andrew Gilbert
10:30 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | Bob Slettehaugh, Keiwit Brian Faga, Sargent & Lundy |
Electric Generation FEED Studies Moderator: Krista Hill
11:10 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Mark Bordelon, Cleco Power |
11:30 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | John Sholes, GE Vernova |
11:50 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | Doug Carlson, Calpine |
11:55 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Gregory Hackett, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Industrial Capture FEED Studies Moderator: Mariah Young
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | Sara Odom, Electricore Inc. and Abigail Bonifacio, Air Liquide |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Abhijit Sarkar, Dastur International and Lindsey Turney, Air Liquide |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Nicole Patterson, 8 Rivers |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | |
2:45 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Vijay Gupta, RTI International |
3:05 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | Derick Dreyer, Holcim |
3:25 p.m. - 3:40 p.m. | Sally Homsy, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Industrial Decarbonization Panel Moderator: Mani Gavvalapalli
4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Krista Hill, NETL Mike Oconnor, OCED Celina Harris, IEDO |
Geographic Focus/Tools Moderator: Andrew Hlasko
5:00 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Melissa Stark - U.S. Department of Energy - FECM |
5:20 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | Ayaka Jones, U.S Department of Energy - FECM and Maneesh Sharma, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
NETL Research & Innovation Center Moderator: Dave Luebke
10:30 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | Sally Homsy, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
10:50 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | Jan Steckel, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
11:10 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Direct Air Capture Jack Findley, NETL Support Contractor |
11:30 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Qiuming Wang, NETL Support Contractor |
11:50 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Subhodeep Banerjee, NETL Support Contractor |
Integrated Bench-Scale DAC Testing Moderator: Zachary Roberts
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | with Building Air Handling Equipment (FWP-FEAA433) Kashif Nawaz, Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc. |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Direct Air Capture by Ion-Exchange Sorbent and Low-Grade Heat: Advanced Sorbent, Energy, and Performance (SC0022940) Robin Pham and Josh Charles, Advanced Cooling Technologies, Inc. |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | (SC0020795) Jonathan Peters, Susteon, Inc. |
2:45 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Direct Air Capture System (FE0031970) Neel Rangnekar and Alex Spiteri, IWVC, LLC |
3:10 p.m. - 3:35 p.m. | UP - Direct Air Capture Recovery of Energy for CCUS Partnership (FE0031961) Joshua Miles, AirCapture, LLC |
Pre-Commercial DAC Technology Prize Semifinalists Moderator: Elias Cain
4:00 p.m. - 4:05 p.m. | |
4:05 p.m. - 4:15 p.m. | Judith Lattimer, Giner Labs |
4:15 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Integrated with Resource Recovery: Creating Value from Legacy Emissions Efficiently Hassnain Asgar and Sravanth Gadikota, Carbon To Stone |
4:25 p.m. - 4:35 p.m. | |
4:35 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. | |
4:45 p.m. - 4:55 p.m. |
Consortia Overview & Mineralization Moderator: Naomi O'Neil
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Consortium Overview Ian Rowe, U.S. Department of Energy |
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Concrete: System Design, Product Development and Process Demonstration (FE0031915) Gaurav N. Sant, UCLA Institute for Carbon Management |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | Greg Cooney, Department of Energy |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Rouzbeh Savary, C-Crete Technologies |
Biological Uptake Moderator: Naomi O'Neil
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Rodney Corpuz, Global Algae Innovations |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Juergen Polle, MicroBio Engineering Inc. |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Hongzhou Yang and Rich Masel, Dioxide Materials |
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | (FE0032190) Maira R Ceron Hernandez, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | to High-Value Products (FE0032229) Kenneth F. Reardon, Colorado State University |
Biological Uptake Moderator: Kanchan Mondal
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Feng Chen and Russell Hill, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Matthew Posewitz, Colorado School of Mines |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Peter Chen, Colorado State University |
5:15 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | Zhen He, Washington University in St. Louis |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Plains) Moderator: Jake Smith
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Wes Peck, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center |
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | J. Fred McLaughlin and Scott Quillinan, University of Wyoming |
11:20 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. | Amanda Livers-Douglas, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center |
11:40 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. | Manika Prasad, Colorado School of Mines and Chris Cassle, Carbon America |
12:00 p.m. - 12:20 p.m. | Zunsheng Jiao and Fred McClaughlin, University of Wyoming |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (Plains) Moderator: Jake Smith
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Wes Peck, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center |
1:50 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. | Charles Nye, University of Wyoming |
Associated Storage (Plains) Moderator: Dawn Deel
2:10 p.m. - 2:35 p.m. | Storage Field (FE0031694) Steve Smith, University of North Dakota Energy and Environmental Research Center |
2:35 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. | -EOR and Associated Storage within the Residual Oil Zone Fairways of the Powder River Basin, Wyoming (FE0031738) Nick Jones, University of Wyoming |
NETL Research & Innovation Center Moderator: Dustin Crandall
3:00 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | Ge Jin, Colorado School of Mines |
Regional Initiatives (Plains) Moderator: Josh Hull
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Reduction Partnership Initiative to Accelerate Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Deployment (FE0031838) Kevin Connors, University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center |
4:25 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. | Erin Middleton and Jessi Eidbo, Carbon Solutions, LLC |
4:45 p.m. - 5:05 p.m. | Kevin Connors, University of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Research Center |
5:05 p.m. - 5:25 p.m. | Lily Jackson, University of Wyoming |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: Lucy Romeo
5:25 p.m. - 5:45 p.m. | Scott Pantaleone and Abigail Martin, NETL Support Contractors |
SMART Tools - Computational and Visualization Advances Moderator: Hema Siriwardane
10:30 a.m. - 10:40 a.m. | Hema Siriwardane, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
10:40 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Seyyed Hosseini and Hongsheng Wang, University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology |
10:55 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | Alexandre Tartakovsky, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
11:10 a.m. - 11:25 a.m. | Hongkyu Yoon, Sandia National Laboratory |
11:25 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. | Maruti Mudunuru and Ashton Kirol, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
11:40 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | Kayla Kroll and Chris Sherman, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
11:55 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Maruti Mudunuru, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Chris Sherman, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Patrick Wingo, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
SMART Tools - Field Application Moderator: Hema Siriwardane
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | Jared Schuetter, Battelle Memorial Institute |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Masahiro Nagao, Texas A&M University and Akhil Data-Gupta, Texas A&M University |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Injection Bailian Chen, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | Athanasios (Athos) Nathanail and Manika Prasad, Colorado School of Mines |
2:45 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Youzuo Lin, University of North Carolina |
3:05 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | David Alumbaugh, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
SMART Tools - Applications Moderator: Hema Siriwardane
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Siddharth Misra, Texas A&M University |
4:20 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Hyoungkeun Kim, NETL Support Contractor and Chung-Yan Shih, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
4:40 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | David Morgan and Chung-Yan Shih, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
5:00 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Jeff Burghardt and Wenjing Wang, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Regional Initiatives (Southeast) Moderator: Dawn Deel
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
10:55 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | Marcella McIntyre-Redden, Geological Survey of Alabama |
11:15 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. | Susan Hovorka, GCCC, BEG, JSG, University of Texas at Austin |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Southeast) Moderator: Paul Zandhuis
11:35 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | Andrew Chartrand, Timberlands Sequestration, LLC |
11:55 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. | Jalal Jalali, River Parish Seuestration, LLC |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Southeast) Moderator: Liz Wilson
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Storage Complex in Kemper County, Mississippi: Project EC02S (Phase III) (FE0031888) David Riestenberg, Advanced Resources International, Inc. |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (Southeast) Moderator: Liz Wilson
1:50 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. | Storage Hub (RHCSH)(FE0032446) Rebecca McGrew, Trifecta Renewable Solutions |
2:10 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. | Emissions Storage Sink (Project ACCESS) (FE0032447) Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
2:30 p.m. - 2:50 p.m. | Storage in Shelby County, Alabama (Project OASIS) (FE0032267) George Koperna, Advanced Resources International and Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
EDX disCO 2 ver - Unlocking CTS' Digital Future Moderator: Patrick Wingo
2:50 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Devin Justman, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
3:10 p.m. - 3:35 p.m. | Chad Rowan and Maneesh Sharma, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
NETL Research & Innovation Center Moderator: Colton Kohnke
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Colton Kohnke, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Secure Storage Moderator: Andrea McNemar
4:20 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. | Jonathan Ajo-Franklin, Rice University |
4:45 p.m. - 5:10 p.m. | Injection and Leakage in a Hydromechanically Reactivated Fault (FSC - Fault Slip and Chemistry Experiment) (FWP-FP00013650) Yves Guglielmi, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
5:45 p.m. – 7:45 p.m. Reception/Poster Session/Interactive Demo Session
Nathan Ellebracht, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
-phillic Block Copolymers with Intrinsic Microporosity for Post-combustion CO Capture (SC0020730) Ravi Prasad, Helios-NRG, LLC and Haiqing Lin, University of Buffalo |
Capture and Fixation (SC0022734) Xiansen Li, Thermisoln, LLC |
Andrew Hlasko and Aaron Fuller, U.S. Department of Energy |
Andrew Hlasko and Aaron Fuller, U.S. Department of Energy |
Andrew Hlasko and Aaron Fuller, U.S. Department of Energy |
Capture (FE0031730) Miao Yu, University of Buffalo |
Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycle Plants (FE0032218) Moumita Bhattacharya, RTI International |
Jesse Thompson, University of Kentucky |
Heather Nikolic, University of Kentucky Institute for Decarbonization and Energy Advancement |
Capture (FE0032216) Aravind Villava Rayer Rabindran, Susteon Inc. |
Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant (FWP-70814) Yuan Jiang, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Richard J Ciora Jr, Media and Process Technology Inc. |
Capture (FE0031722) Ravi Jain, InnoSepra, LLC |
Shiguang Li, GTI Energy |
Capture-Electrochemical Utilization Ali A. Rownaghi and Fateme Rezaei, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Chris Bertole, CORMETECH, Inc. |
Capture (PLASTIC4CO ) Albert Stella, GE Vernova Advanced Research |
Nehru Chevanan, Altex Technologies Corporation |
Cheick Dosso, Hector Pedrozo, and Grigorios Panagakos, Carnegie Mellon University |
Hector Pedrozo, Cheick Dosso, and Grigorios Panagakos, Carnegie Mellon University |
Dushyant Barpaga, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Lingyan Deng, NETL Support Contractor |
Jason A. F. Sherman, Carnegie Mellon University |
Douglas A. Allan and Anca Ostace, NETL Support Contractors |
Debangsu Bhattacharyya, West Virginia University |
Capture Levels for NGCC Power Plants Anuja Deshpande, NETL Support Contractor |
Capture Solvent Lingyan Deng, NETL Support Contractor |
Zhijie (Jay) Xu, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc. |
Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc. |
Ruishu Wright, National Energy Technology Laboratory and Matthew Brister, NETL Support Contractor |
Glenn Lipscomb, University of Toledo |
Jorge Izar-Tenorio, NETL Support Contractor |
Sarah Leptinsky, NETL Support Contractor |
Kshitij Patel, NETL Support Contractor |
Jonathan Martin, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
Omid Ghaffari Nik, CarbonCapture Inc |
Hari C. Mantripragada, NETL Support Contractor |
Ryan Hughes, NETL Support Contractor |
James Hoffman, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
James Niffenegger, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
Wei Liu, Molecule Works, Inc |
Wei Liu, Molecule Works, Inc |
Christopher McNary, NETL Support Contractor |
Chae Woon Jeong-Potter, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
Ali A. Rownaghi, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Jennifer Weidman and Victor A. Kusuma, NETL Support Contractor |
Jan Steckel, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Direct Air Capture John Findley, NETL Support Contractor |
(SCW1726) Anthony Varni, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Subhodeep Banerjee, NETL Support Contractor |
Priyadarshini, NETL Support Contractor |
Adsorbent Degradation: Insights from Experiements and Atomistic Simulations Carrie Farberow, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
Roksana Mahmud and Thomas Schmitt, NETL Support Contractors |
Douglas Allan, NETL Support Contractor |
Capture Ali Sekizkardes, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Elisabeth Mansfield, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) |
Daniel Addokwei Tetteh, NETL Support Contractor |
Magdalena Gill, NETL Support Contractor |
Shelby Isom, NETL Support Contractor |
Caleb Malay, NETL Support Contractor |
Casey White, NETL Support Contractor |
Injection and Storage (FE0032064) Christopher Smith, Advanced Hydrocarbon Stratigraphy |
Ashton Kirol and Ivani Patel, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Evgeniy Myshakin, NETL Support Contractor |
Maruti K. Mudunuru and Eusebius J. Kutsienyo, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Wenjing Wang, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Alexander Hanna and Ivani Patel, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Neyda Maymi, NETL Support Contractor |
Quin Miller, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Nabajit Lahiri, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Stephanie DiRaddo, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Xi Tan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Matt Vilante, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Todd Schaef, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Storage Volumes: Mt.Simon Sandstone of Indiana Ray Boswell, National Energy Technology Laboratory and Ashley Douds, Indiana Geological and Water Survey |
Storage under Geomechanics (DOE SMART Initiative) Fangning Zheng, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
Seunghwan Baek, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Storage (Subcontract No. P010220883 Task 27) Timothy R. Carr, Ebrahim Fathi, and Ikponmwosa Iyegbekedo, West Virginia University |
Susan Hovorka and Daniel Chen, University of Texas at Austin |
Saturation Using Deep Learning Models (89243318CFE000003) Hongsheng Wang, Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin |
Storage for the Illinois Basin Decatur Project Site using the NRAP/SMART Technoeconomic and Liability Evaluation for Storage (TALES) Model Derek Vikara, NETL Support Contractor |
William Harbert, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education |
Priya Ravi Ganesh, Battelle |
Paul Holcomb, NETL Support Contractor |
Hyoungkeun Kim, NETL Support Contractor |
Lianjie Huang, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
Jarrett Wise, NETL Support Contractor |
Jared Hawkins, Battelle Memorial Institute |
Adewale Amosu, New Mexico Tech |
Adewale Amosu, New Mexico Tech |
Chengping Chai, Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
Austin Mathews, NETL Support Contractor |
Kayla Kroll, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Yuan Tian, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Derek Vikara, NETL Support Contractor |
Storage Efficiency While Minimizing Impacts on Underground Sources of Drinking Water in the San Juan Basin (FE0031890) William Ampomah, Petroleum Recovery Research Center, New Mexico Tech |
Briana Schmidt, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Ryan Haagenson, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Mohamed Mehana, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
-EOR Field to Dedicated CO Storage (FWP-1025009) Guoxiang Liu, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Well Blowout Modeling: Leakage Rates, Cooling Effects and Phase Change (FWP-1025009) Pramoud Bhuvankar, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
Gabe Casanova, Advanced Resources International |
Donald DePaolo, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
Jacob Walter, Oklahoma Geological Survey |
Storage Project Using Bayesian Network Model for Decision Support (FWP-1025009) William Harbert, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education |
Jack Pashin, Oklahoma State University |
Trevor Richards, Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC), University of North Dakota |
Moises Velasco-Lozano, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
Capture and Conversion to Propylene via Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Propane over Cr2o3/ZSM-5@CaO Bifunctional Materials Khaled Baamran, NETL Support Contractor and Ali A. Rownaghi, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Electrolysis to Syngas (LLNL LDRD-22-S1-006) Aditya Prajapati, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
Capture Emissions Sophie Bazydola |
Ethan Antonio |
Kylie Brinza |
Production from Biomass and Plastic Waste Gasification using Machine Learning and Genetic Algorithm Max Edelstein |
Anne Marie Garner |
Christopher GE |
Rumeysa Gurler |
Helin Henstridge |
Jennifer Overklift |
Olivia Sward |
Thomas Venarde |
Nathalie Larios Chavez |
Sophia Morgan |
Samea Derrick |
Hayden Backus |
Demo Title | Presenter(s) | Affiliation(s) | Brief Description | Related Presentation | Related Poster |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONNECT Toolkit: Carbon Management Projects Database and Explorer | Maneesh Sharma | NETL Support Contractor | The Carbon Management Projects (CONNECT) Database and Explorer, developed by U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM), aims to provide a one-stop access to authoritative information on a portfolio of federal research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) projects that have been publicly announced to advance carbon management technologies. | CONNECT Toolkit: Carbon Management Projects Database and Explorer (Tuesday, Aug 6th, 5:20 p.m., Rooms 304-305) | n/a |
CO -Locate: A National Well Mapping Application (FWP-1611464) | Alec Dyer | NETL Support Contractor | The CO -Locate tool is an interactive web tool built using Esri’s Experience Builder web application, enabling stakeholders to interrogate and visualize 10’s of millions of well records and their attributes from the CO -Locate database. Users have the capability to quickly and easily filter well information based on age, true vertical depth, and status attributes as well as spatially filter by state and county. This demo will showcase the power of web-based data-visualization and evaluation capabilities via the EDX DisCO ver Platform to help stakeholders make informed decisions on Class II well reuse for carbon storage injection. | CO -Locate: A Living National Well Database (Monday, Aug 5th, 4:00 p.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
Rokbase for CTS Digital Rock Data Discovery (EDX4CCS) | Dustin Crandall | National Energy Technology Laboratory | Presentation of an online database and system that highlights the NETL Core Characterization efforts and combines online digital core resources. | n/a | Carbon Storage Core Characterization Efforts at NETL |
Updated CO -SCREEN Tool | Angela Goodman and Foad Haeri | National Energy Technology Laboratory & NETL Support Contractor | NETL has released version five of a user-friendly, sophisticated database that can be used to estimate the carbon dioxide (CO ) storage potential of underground geological environments, helping stakeholders make more informed decisions that could improve the efficiency, safety and long-term stability of CO storage operations. NETL’s updated CO -SCREEN tool, which stands for Carbon Dioxide Storage prospective Resource Estimation Excel analysis, now features additional storage efficiency factors. These factors are based on experimental measurements and reservoir simulations conducted on rock cores from storage reservoirs that were targeted for CO storage across the United States. The tool also no longer limits storage efficiency factors to open boundary conditions, where reservoir fluids are assumed to be managed. Users can now estimate CO storage based on both closed and semi-closed boundaries, which are found in reservoirs that are sealed or partially sealed and in which there is little to no CO migration. | n/a | n/a |
The Geospatial and Information Substitution and Anonymization Tool - GISA (FWP-1025007) | Patrick Wingo | National Energy Technology Laboratory | The Geospatial and Information Substitution and Anonymization Tool (GISA) is a multi-modal tool which assists with anonymizing large heterogeneous datasets. Modules within the tool assist with anonymizing location, filenames, and file content. Additionally, a natural language processing approach within one module of the tool assists with recommending and redacting identifying information within reports. | GISA - Protecting Stakeholder Spatial Data through an Advanced Anonymization Method (Monday, Aug 5th, 11:10 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
Locating Relevant Data: Data Previewer and Download Tool (FWP-1025007) | Dakota Zaengle | NETL Support Contractor | This tool is being developed to allow researchers and stakeholders to preview, identify and, download relevant files from large, heterogeneous datasets. | n/a | n/a |
SimCCS for CCTUS Infrastructure Decision Making (FWP-LANL-FE0-207-20-FY21) | Martin Ma | Los Alamos National Laboratory | Provide a demo of key modeling capabilities in SIM CCS for CCTUS infrastructure deployment | Sim CCS: Development and Applications (Wednesday, Aug 7th, 2:10 p.m., SOP Ballroom B) | n/a |
Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) | Catherine Schooley and Paige Morkner | NETL Support Contractor & National Energy Technology Laboratory | The Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) is an online web mapping tool designed to help users discover available public-sourced data to facilitate data exploration in support of Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Class VI Well Site permitting for the geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide. MapIT serves only as a data exploration tool to support characterization of geologic carbon storage sites. | Carbon Storage Site Mapping Inquiry Tool (MapIT) (Monday, Aug 5th, 10:30 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
Connect your CCUS Activities to others with Carbon Matchmaker | Jennifer Bauer | National Energy Technology Laboratory | Demonstration of the Carbon Matchmaker tool ( ) on how the tool can be used by attendees to identify their CCUS activities and connect with others. | Carbon Matchmaker: Connecting CCUS Activities and Stakeholders (Monday, Aug 5th, 5:05 p.m., SOP Ballroom B) | n/a |
CCS-EJ-SJ Database and Web Tool- What's New (FWP-1025007) | John M. Bocan | NETL Support Contractor | This demonstration will guide a user to access, view and acquire data from the CCS-EJ-SJ project so to enable one to make the best informed decisions via a new, interactive web application. | Dynamic CCS-EJ-SJ Database and Web Application - What's New (Monday, Aug 5th, 2:45 p.m., Rooms 306-307) | Community Sentiment Analysis with focus on CCS |
ML-Based Induced Seismicity Forecasting with ORION | Kayla Kroll and Chris Sherman | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | Interactive demonstration of the ORION tool applied to the Permian Basin | Induced Seismicity Risk Management and Recommended Practices for Fracture Pressure Determination (Thursday, Aug 8th, 11:00 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
Offshore GCS Data Collection and Web Application Demo (FWP-1022465) | Julia Mulhern | NETL Support Contractor | The Offshore Geologic Carbon Storage Data Collection Web Application is an interactive data collection which aggregates and disseminates publicly available data to support offshore geologic carbon storage (GCS) in the United States. This data collection can be leveraged by stakeholders to understand where GCS may be viable offshore, create GCS project analogs, and address challenges to GCS in offshore environments. | International Offshore Carbon Transport and Storage Inventory (Thursday, Aug 8th, 5:05 p.m., SOP Ballroom B) | n/a |
DisCO ver, a Common Operating Platform for the Next Generation of CO Systems (FWP-1025007) | Kevin Kuhn | NETL Support Contractor | This demonstration will focus on how EDX DisCO ver connects CTS users to CTS digital resources. | Increasing Access and Accelerating Innovation with EDX disCO ver (Monday, Aug 5th, 1:25 p.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
NETL's Smart CO Transport-Route Planning Tool (EDX4CCS Task 33)(FWP-1025007) | Stephen Leveckis | NETL Support Contractor | The tool identifies a pipeline route given a start and end point, using machine learning algorithms. | NETL's Smart CO Transport-Route Planning Tool: Mapping & Evaluating Corridors (Wednesday, Aug 7th, 3:10 p.m., SOP Ballroom B) | n/a |
VLE: Geologic Carbon Storage Virtual Learning with Application to Illinois Basin Decatur Project Utilizing the Unified Simulation and Data Module (SMART) | Maruti K. Mudunuru and Eusebius J. Kutsienyo | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | n/a | n/a | Virtual Learning Environment for Geological Carbon Storage Applications |
Model Explorer Demo (SMART) | Ashton Kirol | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | Model Explorer is an interactive tool to view geologic realizations and CO injection model data in 3D. The associated Area of Review is calculated and mapped within the interface for use in UIC class VI permitting. | n/a | Model Explorer: A Visualization and Analytics Interface for Geological Modeling and Class VI Permitting |
Unified Simulation Module – SMART | Wenjing Wang | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | USM offers a standardized workflow for data handling and surrogate ML model executions, enabling site operators to conduct efficient assessments and analyses throughout the carbon storage lifecycle. | n/a | Unified Simulation Module: A Data Handling Framework for Field and ML-based Data in Carbon Storage Applications |
Carbon Storage Technical Approach Database and Initial Data Availability Results Demo (FWP-1025007) | Araceli Lara | NETL Support Contractor | This demo will present initial findings from the Carbon Storage Technical Viability Approach (CS TVA) 1.0 database, showcasing data availability from the corresponding CS TVA matrix. It will emphasize the matrix components and the data required to meet the criteria for a technically viable carbon storage site. | Where are the Data? Automating a Workflow for Carbon Storage Data Gap Analyses (Monday, Aug 5th, 3:05 p.m., Rooms 306-307) | Carbon Storage Technical Viability Approach Matrix and Methods |
SMART Platform Page, STRIVE, and Coupling with Tools | Christopher Sherman, Patrick Wingo and Eusebius Kutsienyo | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, National Energy Technology Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | Demo of the initial SMART Platform, including the landing page, STRIVE, and interaction with tools. | n/a | n/a |
EDX Spatial Demo | Jacob Darrah | NETL Support Contractor | EDX Spatial is the official geospatial visualization, exploration, and discovery tool of the Energy Data Exchange (EDX); hosting thousands of earth-energy data files from public and Department of Energy (DOE) Fossil Energy Carbon Management (FECM) related sources. During the Demo, we will dive into the capabilities or EDX Spatial , div | n/a | n/a |
Integrated Computer Vision and Deep Learning Methodologies for Generation of the Final Baffle and Fracture Intensity Logs (SMART Phase 2 – Work Package 2C.2 - WVU Task Release 35, PI Carr, IDIQ P010220883) | Ebrahim Fathi and Tim Carr | West Virginia University | New machine-learning workflows that use borehole image logs from the Illinois Basin Decatur Project (IBDP) can improve identification and interpretative consistency of intra-formational baffles and barriers to flow. The workflows are also capable of recognizing fault and fracture flow paths. We have integrated spatial and temporal k-mean clustering and analysis of 3,400 recorded microseismic events located from the beginning and end of injection. The online dashboard tool is at: https://ibdp-workflow.streamlit.app/. | n/a | n/a |
Carbon Storage Planning Inquiry Tool (CS PlanIT) Demo (FWP-1025007) | Scott Pantaleone | NETL Support Contractor | The Carbon Storage Planning Inquiry Tool (CS PlanIt) v1.0 provides easy access to explore, query, and evaluate multiple data layers to support and accelerate carbon storage resource feasibility assessments and planning efforts. | Carbon Storage Planning Inquiry Tool (CS PlanIT): Providing Data and Insights for Accelerating Carbon Transport & Storage Deployment (Tuesday, Aug 6th, 2:50 p.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
Additional developments in Risk-based Adaptive Monitoring Plan (RAMP) | Veronika Vasylkivska | National Energy Technology Laboratory | I will present/support presentation of additional workflows developed with Risk-based Adaptive Monitoring Plan (RAMP) tool. This demo goes together with and supplements other demos of RAMP. | Developing a Risk-Based, Adaptive Monitoring Planning Tool (Thursday, Aug 8th, 11:25 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
CarbonSAFE Initiative Website | Damara Strong | NETL Support Contractor | The website provides detailed information covering the four phases of CarbonSAFE project development. | n/a | n/a |
Geospatial Analysis of Industrial Wastes for CO Mineralization (FE0032244) | Federico Fiorda | University of North Dakota | n/a | Geospatial Analysis of Industrial Wastes for CO Mineralization | |
ML-Based Microseismic Event Detection (DE-AC05-00OR22725) | Chengping Chai | Oak Ridge National Laboratory | We will present a machine learning based workflow that can process seismic data for fault planes. | n/a | ML-Based Fault and Fracture Imaging from Seismic Data for a Carbon Capture and Storage Site |
FECM/NETL CO Capture, Transport Storage (CTS) Cost Screening Tool (2024)(23CFE000075) | Travis Warner | NETL Support Contractor | The FECM/NETL CO Capture, Transport, and Storage (CTS) Cost Screening Tool (2024) identifies cost-optimal transport and storage (T&S) scenarios and their associated CTS costs from the perspective of a CO point source engaged in carbon capture and storage (CCS) or carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). User input categories include the cost basis year (2018 or 2023), CO source location, CO source type and capture technology, CO pipeline transport infrastructure, geologic CO storage options, and CCS incentive options. The tool leverages results databases derived from a variety of the National Energy Technology Laboratory’s publicly available T&S cost modeling tools and capture cost reports. The CTS Cost Screening Tool is Excel®-based and has an easy-to-use user interface and in-tool user’s guide. The tool allows for estimation of carbon management costs that update as users change inputs, allowing users to gain an intuitive sense of the cost drivers impacting single-project CCS and CCUS deployment. The tool is not yet publicly available but is expected to be released in fall 2024. | n/a | n/a |
NRAP Risk Register Tool (FWP-1025009) | Jennifer Frame | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | The NRAP Risk register tool that can be used to develop a risk register and risk matrix for carbon storage sites. It include a library of common risks associated with carbon storage sites that users can pull directly into their risk registers. Additionally, users have the ability to input additional risks that are unique to their respective sites. Output from this tool is anticipated to be suitable for use by operators for Risk Management Plans and in support of UIC Class VI permitting. | n/a | n/a |
Recent Updates to NRAP OpenIAM (FWP-1025009) | Paul Holcomb | NETL Support Contractor | An overview video of recent changes to NRAP OpenIAM, including workflows (with GUI), the multi-segmented wellbore AI component, and SALSA. | n/a | n/a |
Demonstration of the NRAP-Open-IAM (FWP-1025009) | Nathaniel Mitchell | NETL Support Contractor | I will provide an overview of the tool and show examples that highlight recent updates. | NRAP Task 2- New Developments in NRAP's Open-Source Integrated Assessment Model (NRAP-Open-IAM) to Assess and Manage Leakage Risk Potential (Thursday, Aug 8th, 10:35 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
State of Stress Analysis Tool (wSOSAT) (FWP-1025009) | Jeff Burghardt | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | The NRAP SOSAT is designed to assess subsurface subsurface stress conditions and geomechanical risks associated with fluid injection. The newly release web-version of SOSAT will be presented with examples of applications. | n/a | n/a |
NRAP Risk-based Adaptive Monitoring Planning (RAMP) Tool (FWP-1025009) | Xianjin Yang | Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | RAMP is a monitoring planning tool evaluates, designs and optimizes monitoring technologies for safe and cost-effective carbon storage. | Developing a Risk-Based, Adaptive Monitoring Planning Tool. (Thursday, Aug 8th, 11:25 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | A Risk-Based Adaptive Monitoring Planning Tool Based on Elastic-Wave Sensitivities for Cost-Effective Seismic Monitoring of Geologic Carbon Storage Site |
Demonstration of the NRAP/SMART TALES Model (FWP-1025009) | David Morgan | National Energy Technology Laboratory | The NRAP/SMART Technoeconomic and Liability Evaluation for Storage (TALES) Model will estimate the financial performance of a saline storage project if there are no adverse events and will also estimate the cost of responding to fluid leakage or induced seismic adverse events. TALES works with other NRAP and SMART tools such as Open-IAM, ORION, RAMP and the Unified Simulation Module. | NRAP Task 5: Developing Workflows and Computational Tools to Estimate the Project Costs of Managing Subsurface Risks (Thursday, Aug 8th, 11:50 a.m., Rooms 306-307) | NRAP Task 5: Preliminary Evaluation of the Cost of Responding to a Hypothetical Leakage Scenario Using the NRAP/SMART TALES Model and other NRAP Tools |
Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Leakage Evaluation and Remediation (CLEAR) Tool (FWP-1025009) | Md Lal Mamud | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Leakage Evaluation and Remediation (CLEAR) is a web-based screening and decision support tool designed to support the decision-making process related to remediating aquifers impacted by carbon dioxide and/or brine leakage from geologic carbon storage. CLEAR helps users determine which remediation techniques, such as Monitored Natural Attenuation (MNA) or Pump and Treat (P&T), will be effective and cost-efficient. It estimates the time and cost associated with any selected remediation technique the user selects for monitoring or extracting contaminants from the aquifer. This tool can eventually support the development of the Environmental Remediation Response (ERR) plan. | n/a | n/a |
Basin Scale IAM Application (FWP-1025009) | Julia de Toledo Camargo | Pacific Northwest National Laboratory | The basin scale IAM application shows how to assess well leakage risk at a basin given multiple GCS sites. | NRAP Task 6: Basin scale risk assessment. (Thursday, Aug 8th, 1:25 p.m.., Rooms 306-307) | n/a |
SMARTseis | Ting Chen | Los Alamos National Laboratory | SMARTseis is a seismic site characterization tool developed under SMART project. | n/a | n/a |
An Integrated Deep Learning Approach for Estimating the Source Locations of Microseismicity at the Illinois Basin-Decatur Project Site | Hongkyu Yoon | Sandia National Laboratories | This demo shows an integrated workflow from event detection out of raw continuous waveform data, phase picking, synthetic waveform generation, source location estimation, and clustering for fault plan construction. | n/a | An integrated machine learning framework for fault imaging from event detection, phase arrivals, and source plane construction using raw continuous waveform data |
CO Transport and Strorage Cost Modeling Tools | Alana Sheriff and Taylor Vactor | NETL Support Contractor | The FECM/NETL CO Transport Cost Model (CO _T_COM), FECM/NETL CO Saline Storage Cost Model (CO _S_COM), and FECM/NETL Offshore CO Saline Storage Cost Model (CO _S_COM_Offshore) can be used to complete various economic analyses associated with CCS such as regional CO break-even price supply curve analysis, specific project cost assessments, and source-sink matching cost evaluations. This session provides a high-level demonstration on how to perform a run with each model highlighting key inputs and noting results. | Offshore CO2 Storage Cost Modeling (FWP-1022435), (Thursday, Aug 8th, 4:45 p.m., SOP Ballroom B) Overview of the FECM/NETL CO2 Transport Cost Model (CO2_T_COM) (FWP-1022464) (Wednesday, Aug 7, 2:40 p.m., SOP Ballroom B), and Onshore CO2 Transport and Storage (FWP-1022435) (Thursday, Aug 8th, 2:40 p.m., Rooms 306=307) | n/a |
CSUB California Energy Research Center | Liaosha Song and Matthew Herman | California State University Bakersfield | The California Energy Research Center (CERC) at California State University, Bakersfield plays a critical role in shaping the future research landscape in energy related areas in Kern County and in translating research to education and community activities. With the recent investment of $83M from the State of California, a new Energy Innovation Building (EIB) is now under construction. The EIB will offer modernized space and facilities to enhance the capacity of CERC, which will serve as a regional hub to connect researchers, educators, energy-related industries, and government agencies. | ||
Power to the People - How Electrical Enginnering can Empower the Navajo Nation | Peter Romine | Navajo Technical University | Present the BSEE and MSEE programs at Navajo Tech. | n/a | Power to the People-How Electrical Engineering can Empower the Navajo Nation |
Community Benefits and Public Engagement Round Tables - Rooms 401/402
2:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | The CarbonSAFE Community Engagement Working Group, FECM staff, and general attendees of the NETL Carbon Management Project Review Annual Meeting. The workshop, hosted by FECM and NETL, will provide an update on community engagement activities and Community Benefits reporting under BIL. The workshop will then break out into roundtable discussions among attendees. The roundtable discussions will serve to facilitate discourse regarding effective community engagement and benefits, including challenges in planning, implementing, and reporting. The purpose of FECM/NETL’s update on community engagement activities and Community Benefits reporting under BIL is to inform CCS project teams and stakeholders of 1) the existing and upcoming initiatives intended to support communities in the accelerated growth of CCS, and 2) resources utilized in ensuring that community benefits are conducted in a manner that is equitable and responsible to all communities. The purpose of the roundtable discussions is to share best practices, lessons learned, and identify needs and knowledge gaps within DOE, CCS project leadership, and stakeholders across a variety of demographics. The intended outcome is to improve understanding of practices related to responsible carbon management, community benefits, and public engagement activities. Disclaimer: This is not a consensus reaching event. All are invited to share an “individual perspective” on each issue. Individual perspectives would be captured collated around these themes. |
Carbon Transport Special Session Exploring Alternative Approaches to Advancing New Carbon Transport Infrastructure Projects - Rooms 401/402
4:00 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. | The Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management seeks to be informed by individual perspectives shared by the audience about exploring alternative approaches to advance new carbon transport infrastructure projects. Moderator: Welcome and Introduction - Ground rules, audience instruction, and time management, etc. Open Discussion Subjects: Brief background information on the following three subjects will be presented with open discussion and audience individual perspectives shared about each. Moderator: Summary/Next Steps/Adjourn |
Changing Regulatory Landscape Panel Moderator: Nichole Saunders, Director & Senior Attorney, Energy Transition, Environmental Defense Fund
8:00 a.m. - 8:05 a.m. | Nichole Saunders, Director & Senior Attorney, Energy Transition, Environmental Defense Fund |
8:05 a.m. - 8:15 a.m. | |
8:15 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | |
8:25 a.m. - 8:35 a.m. | |
8:35 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. |
Carbon Transport Panel Moderator: Amanda Raddatz Bopp, Director, Carbon Transport and Storage Division, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy
9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. | Amanda Raddatz Bopp, Director, Carbon Transport and Storage Division, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, U.S. Department of Energy |
9:05 a.m. - 9:10 a.m. | |
9:10 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | |
9:15 a.m. - 9:20 a.m. | |
9:20 a.m. - 9:25 a.m. | |
9:25 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. |
Carbon Capture Testing Centers Panel Moderator: José Figueroa
10:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Ismail Shah, Technology Center Mongstad Lauren Burrows, NETL |
Power Generation Engineering-Scale Testing/Pilots Moderator: Dustin Brown
11:30 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Fred Closmann and Gary T. Rochelle, The University of Texas at Austin |
11:50 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Capture (FE0031946) Shiguang Li, GTI Energy |
Power Generation Engineering-Scale Testing/Pilots Modertor: Andy O'Palko
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | Nathan Fine, ION Clean Energy |
1:45 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. | Joseph Swisher, Electric Power Research Institute |
2:00 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Capture (FE0031588) Elisabeth Perea, SRI |
Industrial Engineering-Scale Testing/Pilots Moderator: Carl Laird
2:15 p.m. - 2:35 p.m. | Wenqin Li, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
2:35 p.m. - 2:55 p.m. | Scott McLemore, Chevron |
2:55 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Christopher Hoeger ad Kyler Stitt, Sustainable Energy Solutions, a Chart Company |
3:10 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | Heather Nikolic and Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky Institute for Decarbonization and Energy Advancement (UK IDEA) |
3:25 p.m. - 3:40 p.m. | Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research Inc. |
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Sara Hamilton, U.S. Department of Energy - FECM |
2614 Round 3 Kickoff - Engineering-Scale/Pilots (Power and Industrial)
4:25 p.m. - 4:55 p.m. | Ben Omell - NETL |
4:55 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Capture from Cement Gas (FE0032463) Yang Han, The Ohio State University |
5:00 p.m. - 5:05 p.m. | Capture to Glass Production Facility (FE0032460) Heather Nikolic and Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky Institute for Decarbonization and Energy Advancement (UK IDEA) |
5:05 p.m. - 5:10 p.m. | Osman Akpolat, GTI Energy |
5:10 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Jay Kniep, Membrane Technology and Research Inc. |
5:15 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Capture James Zhou, Susteon Inc. |
5:20 p.m. - 5:25 p.m. | Capture from Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Flue Gas (FE0032467) Yang Han, The Ohio State University |
SBIR Kickoff - AI Based Forecasting Models for Amine and Degradation Product Emissions Moderators: Katy Daniels/Sara Hamilton
5:25 p.m. - 5:50 p.m. | Lokendra Poudel, Polaron Analytics Capture Process (281397) Ponnuthurai Gokulakrishnan, Combustion Science & Engineering, Inc. Karthik Nithyanandam, Impact Innovations LLC Tyler Gaona, VISIMO Hong-Shig Shim, Reaction Engineering International Jian James Zou, Zenith Purification LLC |
Carbon Negative Shot Summit Moderator: Rory Jacobson
10:30 a.m. - 10:35 a.m. | Roger Aines, Senior Advisor for Carbon Removal, Office of the Under Secretary for Energy and Innovation |
10:35 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. | Rukmani Vijayaraghavan, Office of the Undersecretary for Science and Innovation |
10:45 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Joshua Schaidle, National Renewable Energy Laboratory |
DAC FEED Studies Moderator: Andrew Aurelio
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Leslie Gioja and Bajio Kaleecckal, University of Illinois - PRI - ISTC |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | Utilizing Chemical Plant Waste Heat (ChemFADAC) (FE0032157) Andrew Louwagie, AirCapture |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Brandon Webster, Battelle Memorial Institute |
CDR Market Panel Moderator: Noah Deich
1:25 p.m. - 1:30 p.m. | |
1:30 p.m. - 1:40 p.m. | |
1:40 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | |
1:50 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. | |
2:00 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. |
CDR Purchase Pilot Prize Semifinalists Moderator: Elias Cain
2:25 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. | |
2:30 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | |
2:40 p.m. - 2:50 p.m. | |
2:50 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. | |
3:00 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. |
Regional DAC Hubs - Feasibility Studies Moderator: Andrew Aurelio
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Kevin O'Brien and Chinmoy Baroi, Net-Zero Center of Excellence/University of Illinois |
4:20 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Hatuaon (Dudi) Ritonga, Aera Federal LLC |
4:40 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Daniel Pike, Rocky Mountain Institute |
5:00 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Jason Dietsch, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign |
5:20 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | Olivier Dubé, Climeworks |
NAS Report Presentation & Mineralization Moderator: Kara Zabetakis
10:30 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Emily A. Carter, Princeton University and Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | ) and Alkaline Solid Wastes to Carbon-Negative Cement for Precast Concrete Units (FE0032246) Xinhua Liang, Washington University |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | and Alkaline Solid Wastes into Carbon-Negative Supplementary Cementitious Materials for Co-Decarbonization of Multiple Sectors (FE0032395) Hongyan Ma, Missouri University of Science and Technology |
TBD & Mineralization Moderator: Kanchan Mondal
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Sara Hamilton, U.S. Department of Energy - FECM |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Capture and Mineralization with Inherent Recovery of High Value Metals (INSPIRE) (FE0032398) Greeshma Gadikota, Cornell University |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | ) Mineralization Technology for Coproduction of Value-Added Carbonate and Fertilizer Products (FE0032256) Yongqi Lu, University of Illinois |
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Mineralization Process to Convert Waste Cement Paste into High-Performance Supplementary Cementitious Materials (FE0032263) Jialai Wang, The University of Alabama |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Capture for Amorphous Calcium Carbonate (ACC) Production and Use in Lower Carbon Cement (FE0032399) Lance A. Scott and Raj Mosali, Calcify, LLC |
Biological Uptake and Catalytic Conversion Moderator: Michael Stanton
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Capture and Bioproducts Technology (FE0032103) Fred Harrington, Helios-NRG, LLC |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Rodney Corpuz, Global Algae Innovations |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Xiaonan Shan, University of Houston |
5:15 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | and H (FE0031909) Shiguang Li, GTI Energy |
5:40 p.m. - 6:05 p.m. | for Power to Jet Fuel and Energy Storage (SC0019791) KC Tran and Leslie Bromberg, MAAT Energy |
Transport Panel # 1: CO 2 Transport FEED Studies Moderator: Willian Aljoe
10:30 a.m. - 10:40 a.m. | Kevin Dooley, Carbon Transport Program Manager, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management |
10:40 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | National Network for Enhancing Carbon Transport Infrastructure Onshore/Offshore (CO NNECTION) Intermodal Transport Hubs (FE0032487) Jared Hawkins, Battelle Memorial Institute |
10:50 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | Kent Merrill, Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. |
11:00 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | Elena Subia Melchert, Energia Consulting LLC |
11:15 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Richard Middleton and Tracey Ziev, Carbon Solutions, LLC |
11:30 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. | Barge Transportation FEED Study for Gulf Coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama (FE0032499) Ethan Ngo, BKV dCarbon High West LLC |
11:40 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Kent Merrill, Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. |
11:50 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. | Transport Project (FE0032509) John Zuckerman, ZuCO Transport LLC |
12:00 p.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Tracey Ziev and Richard Middleton, Carbon Solutions LLC |
Transport Panel #2: Transport Project Financing Moderator: Sarah Leung
1:25 p.m. - 1:40 p.m. | Harry Warren, U.S. Department of Energy Loan Program Office |
1:40 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Robert Smith, Carbon Transport Program Manager, US. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management |
1:50 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. |
Transport Panel #3: Transport Modeling Updates Moderator: Robert Smith
2:10 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Bailian Chen, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
2:25 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Transportation Cost Model Corey Myers, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
2:40 p.m. - 2:55 p.m. | Transport Cost Model CO _T_COM) (FWP-1022464) David Morgan and Alana Sheriff, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
2:55 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Transport Pipeline Reuse Screening Tool Kirk Labarbara, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
3:10 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Transport-Route Planning Tool: Mapping & Evaluating Corridors Lucy Romeo, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Transport Panel # 4: Research, Development, and Demonstration Activities Moderator: Mark McKoy
4:00 p.m. - 4:10 p.m. | with Impurities Omer Dogan, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
4:10 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Pipeline with Water Dropout due to Upset Omer Dogan, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
4:20 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. | Isaac Gamwo, National Energy Technology Laboratory and Badie I. Morsi, University of Pittsburgh |
4:30 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | with Impurities in Pipelines and Injection Wells Cem Sarica, The University of Tulsa |
4:40 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Decompression in Pipeline and Well Blowouts Pramod Bhuvankar and Abdullah Cihan, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
4:50 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Robert Smith, Carbon Transport Program Manager, US. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (Basalts/Mafics) Moderator: Ashley Urosek
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Daniel Eakin and J.Fred McLaughlin, Center for Economic Geology Research, School of Energy Resources, University of Wyoming |
CO 2 Mineralization (Basalts/Mafics) Moderator: Nick Means
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Estibalitz Ukar, University of Texas at Austin |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | Donald DePaolo and Nicole Lautze, University of Hawaii |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Lisa Thompson, Arizona Geological Survey |
Plume Detection and Storage Efficiency Moderator: Nick Means
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | David Alumbaugh, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Todd Schaef, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Storage Technologies for Unconventional Subsurface Reservoirs (FWP-70066) Quin Miller, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
Secure Storage (Basalts/Mafic) Moderator: James Gardiner
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Acidified Brines (FWP-1022403) Dustin Crandall, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. |
Plume Detection and Storage Efficiency Moderator: James Gardiner
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Monitoring: Steps Towards the Optimization for Field Deployments (FWP-FEW0287) Tiziana Bond, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Rick Hammack, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
Workshop on Consistency in Geologic Data Collection and Reporting for Storage Resources Moderator: Mark McKoy
10:30 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. |
CO 2 Storage Resources Management System (SRMS) Workshop Moderator: Mary Dailey
1:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Storage Resources Management System (SRMS) Workshop |
CO 2 Storage Resources Management System (SRMS) Workshop Moderator: Mary Dailey and Gilly Rosen
3:45 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Storage Resources Management System (SRMS) Workshop |
Black & Veatch IgniteX CDR Showcase - Garrison Overlook - 4th Floor
5:00 p.m. - 7:00 p.m. | This is the Showcase Event for the IgniteX Startup Accelerator Program, a DOE Epic Prize recognized 12-week program that is specifically designed to empower and progress CDR focused start-ups. The first part of the event will include 10-minute presentations from each of the Startups (6 in total) and the second portion is intended for social/networking time. We hope to see you there! |
State Activities Panel Moderator: Jessica Moore, President, Association of American State Geologists
8:00 a.m. - 8:05 a.m. | Jessica Moore, President, Association of American State Geologists |
8:05 a.m. - 8:15 a.m. | |
8:15 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | |
8:25 a.m. - 8:35 a.m. | |
8:35 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. |
Land Considerations Panel Moderator: Ashleigh (Hildebrand) Ross, Vice President & Head of Commercial Development & Policy, Carbon America
9:00 a.m. - 9:05 a.m. | Ashleigh (Hildebrand) Ross, Vice President & Head of Commercial Development & Policy, Carbon America |
9:05 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | |
9:15 a.m. - 9:25 a.m. | |
9:25 a.m. - 9:35 a.m. | |
9:35 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. | |
9:45 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. |
SBIR Kickoff - Carbon Capture for Mobile Sources Moderator: Chet Liew
10:30 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | |
11:00 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | Mike Kass, Oak Ridge National Laboratory |
11:15 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Wei Liu, Molecule Works, Inc Malcolm Fabiyi, Optimabiome Capture from Ship Engine Flue Gas (281301) Aravind Rabindran, Susteon Inc. Caitlin Bien, Physical Sciences Inc. Jian James Zou, Zenith Purification LLC Jesse C. Kelly, Luna Labs Capture for Long-Range Marine Transport (281593) Joshua Charles, Advanced Cooling Technologies, Inc. Capture (SC0025105) Malcolm Fabiyi, Optimabiome Jorge M. Plaza, Carbon Ridge |
Development of Next-Generation Membrane-Based Capture Technologies for Low-Concentration Sources Moderator: Eric Grol
1:25 p.m. - 1:40 p.m. | Hans Wijmans, MTR, Inc. |
1:40 p.m. - 1:55 p.m. | Capture (FE0031598) Shiguang Li, GTI Energy |
1:55 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. | Juergen Biener, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Sangil Kim, University of Illinois at Chicago |
2:10 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Capture (FE0031736) Haiqing Lin, University of Buffalo, SUNY |
2:25 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Lingxiang Zhu, NETL Support Contractor |
2:40 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Membrane Technology Developers |
2614 Round 4 Kickoff - Decarbonization of Industrial Processes Using Oxygen-Based (Oxy-combustion and Chemical Looping) Approaches
4:00 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. | Ron Munson - NETL Mike Fasouletos - NETL |
4:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. | Capture (FE0032500) Liang-Shih Fan, The Ohio State University Duarte Magalhaes, The Washington University in St.Louis Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky Luke Neal, Catalytic and Redox Solutions LLC Fanxing Li, North Carolina State University and H O for Syngas Production and Oxidative Coupling of Methane for Producing Ethylene at Intermediate Temperatures (FE0032496) Chuancheng Duan, University of Utah Kathy Fagundo, Electricore Inc. and Nick Papanicolaou, Carmeuse Capture (GSR) James Harris, The University of Alabama |
Regional DAC Hubs - Feasibility Studies Moderator: Elliot Roth
10:30 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | Amy Linsebigler, GE Vernova Advanced Research Center |
10:50 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | John Flake, Louisiana State University |
11:10 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. | Louise Bedsworth, The Regents of the University of California |
11:30 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Kevin O'Brien and Les Gioja, Net-Zero Center for Excellence/University of Illinois |
11:50 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Mary Dhillon, Fervo Energy Company |
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | Esther Tempel, ASRC Energy Services, LLC |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Jennifer Dunn and Ke Xie, Northwestern University |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | Brian Ziems, Siemens Energy, Inc. |
Regional DAC Hubs - FEED Studies Moderator: Elliot Roth
2:45 p.m. - 3:10 p.m. | Joseph Swisher, Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. |
3:10 p.m. - 3:35 p.m. | Josh Stanislowski, Energy & Enviromental Research Center, University of North Dakota |
Regional DAC Hubs - FEED Studies Moderator: Zachary Roberts
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Patricia Loria and Saeb Besarati, CarbonCapture Inc. |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Benjamin Wernette, Southern States Energy Board, Matt Atwood, Aircapture and Dan Kulikowski, 8 Rivers |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Gary Dirks, Arizona State University |
Biological Uptake Moderator: Lei Hong
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Susie Dai, Texas A&M University |
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Uptake of Cellulose-Producing Algae from Cellulosic Ethanol Product (FE0032207) Wafa Maftuhin and Bryan Wong, University of California - Riverside |
11:20 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. | OH Looping with Membrane Absorber and Distributed Stripper for Enhanced Algae Growth (FE0031921) Brad Irvin and Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky |
11:45 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Utilization by Synergistic Integration with Power Plant and Wastewater Treatment Operations (FE0032098) Lance Schideman and Ryan Larimore, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |
Catalytic Pathway for Methanol Moderator: Richard Dunst
1:25 p.m. - 1:45 p.m. | to Methanol with Solid Polymer Electrolytes and Composite Electrodes in Stackable Zero-Gap Electrochemical Cells (CO emeoh) (FE0032414) Ryan Wartena and Matt Atwood, AirCapture |
1:45 p.m. - 2:05 p.m. | Shoujie Ren, E2H2NANO, LLC |
2:05 p.m. - 2:25 p.m. | Mustapha Soukri, RTI International |
2:25 p.m. - 2:45 p.m. | Gokhan Alptekin, TDA Research, Inc. |
2:45 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | ) (FE0032397) Jonathan Peters, Susteon, Inc. |
3:05 p.m. - 3:25 p.m. | and Solid-Oxide Co-Electrolysis of CO2 and H2O to Syn-Gas (Air2meoh) (FE0032413) Wei Jia, GE Vernova Advanced Research |
Catalytic Pathway for Methanol Moderator: Lei Hong
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Xingbo Liu, West Virginia University Research Corporation |
4:20 p.m. - 4:40 p.m. | Justin Flory, Arizona State University and Stafford Sheehan, Air Company |
4:40 p.m. - 5:00 p.m. | Marco Colin, University of Delaware |
5:00 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Electrolyzer, and Hydrogenation Reactor (FE0032415) Thomas Zawodzinski, University of Tennessee, Knoxville |
5:20 p.m. - 5:40 p.m. | Dustin McLarty, Washington State University |
Offshore Partnerships Moderator: Natalie Iannacchione
10:30 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | Jack Pashin, Oklahoma State University and Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
10:55 a.m. - 11:20 a.m. | Susan Hovorka, GCCC, BEG, JSG, University of Texas at Austin |
Regional Initiatives (Offshore) Moderator: Nick Means
11:20 a.m. - 11:40 a.m. | Neeraj Gupta and Joel Sminchak, Battelle Memorial Institute |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Offshore/Gulf of Mexico) Moderator: Natalie Iannacchione
11:40 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. | Chris Walker, BP Carbon Solutions LLC |
12:00 p.m. - 12:20 p.m. | Dave Riestenberg, Advanced Resources International and Timberly Ross, Tenaska |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Offshore/Gulf of Mexico) Moderator: Evelyn Lopez
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Kelly Watson, Magnolia Sequestration Hub, LLC |
1:50 p.m. - 2:10 p.m. | Angie Contreras, Bluebonnet Sequestration Hub, LLC |
2:10 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. | Michael Godec and Mollie Kish, Advanced Resources International, Inc. |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (Offshore/Gulf of Mexico) Moderator: Matt Kaminski
2:30 p.m. - 2:55 p.m. | Thomas A. Blasingame, Texas A&M University |
2:55 p.m. - 3:20 p.m. | Ben Wernette, Southern States Energy Board |
4:00 p.m. - 4:20 p.m. | Tip Meckel, Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology |
Offshore Topics Moderator: Evelyn Lopez
4:20 p.m. - 4:45 p.m. | Tip Meckel, Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology |
4:45 p.m. - 5:05 p.m. | MacKenzie Mark-Moser, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
5:05 p.m. - 5:20 p.m. | Julia Mulhern, NETL Support Contractor |
5:20 p.m. - 5:35 p.m. | Katherine Romanak, University of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (West/Northwest) Moderator: Johnathan Moore
10:30 a.m. - 10:50 a.m. | Storage Project in Sacramento Basin, California (FE0032450) Travis Hurst, Colorado School of Mines |
10:50 a.m. - 11:10 a.m. | Yin Zhang and Brent Sheets, University of Alaska Fairbanks |
Regional Initiatives (West/Northwest) Moderator: Johnathan Moore
11:10 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. | Robert Balch, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
11:35 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | Michael D. Vanden Berg and Gabriela St.Pierre, Utah Geological Survey |
CarbonSAFE Phase II (West/Northwest) Moderator: Paul Zandhuis
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Ting Xiao, University of Utah |
1:50 p.m. - 2:15 p.m. | Manoj Kumar Valluri, Advanced Resources International |
2:15 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Capture and Storage Project (FE0032239) Jordan Ciezobka, GTI Energy |
CO 2 Mineralization Moderator: Ashley Urosek
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Seunghee Kim, University of Nebraska-Lincoln |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Mineralization (FE0032244) Johannes van der Watt, University of North Dakota |
CO 2 Mineralization Moderator: Melissa Ely
4:00 p.m. - 4:25 p.m. | Storage in New Mexico and Surrounding Areas: Identification, Characterization, and Evaluation of In-Situ Mineralization Site/Complex (FE0032257) Sai Wang, Petroleum Recovery Research Center - New Mexico Tech |
4:25 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. | Bahareh Nojabaei, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University |
4:50 p.m. - 5:15 p.m. | Briana Schmidt, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP) Moderator: Brian Strazisar
10:30 a.m. - 10:35 a.m. | Brian Strazisar, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
10:35 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | Mohamend Mehana, Los Alamos National Laboratory |
11:00 a.m. - 11:25 a.m. | Kayla Kroll, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory |
11:25 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Erika Gasperikova, Lawrence Berkely National Laboratory |
11:50 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. | David Morgan and Chung-Yan Shih, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
1:25 p.m. - 1:50 p.m. | Injectors in the Same Basin Julia de Toledo Camargo, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory |
1:50 p.m. - 2:40 p.m. | Rajesh Pawar, Rajesh Pawar, US. Department of Energy Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management |
NETL Research & Innovation Center Moderator: Lucy Romeo
2:40 p.m. - 3:05 p.m. | Transport and Storage (FWP-1022435) Dave Morgan, National Energy Technology Laboratory |
3:05 p.m. - 3:30 p.m. | Wei Xiong, NETL Support Contractor |
Carbon Dioxide Removal: Enhanced Mineralization Special Session - Rooms 411-412
10:30 a.m. - 12:10 p.m. | Purpose/Objective: The Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management seeks feedback in the activities it seeks to pursue as part of a multi-year strategy on advancing enhanced mineralization (i.e. ex-situ and surficial), as well as enhanced rock weathering pathways, towards achieving the Carbon Negative Shot Goal. Agenda: |
CO2 Consortium Industry Day - Rooms 401-402
1:30 p.m. - 4:30 p.m. | Description: This workshop and listening session will provide an overview of the BETO/FECM joint office Consortium for electrochemical CO2 conversion and upgrading. The goal is to describe the consortium’s FY25-FY27 objectives and solicit feedback from industrial entities in the chemical production, CO2 production, capture, and/or conversion, and power distribution spaces. However, all in-person attendees are invited to attend. Participants are encouraged to answer key questions during the session using this online |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s UIC Class VI Permit Application Training Workshop - Rooms 411/412
1:30 p.m. - 5:30 p.m. | To register, click the link below: |
2024 ARPA-E FLECCS Phase 2 Annual Meeting
In order to participate in the 2024 ARPA-E FLECCS Phase 2 Annual Meeting, it is necessary to complete a separate registration process. To receive an invitation, kindly reach out to [email protected].
8:00 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | Jack Lewnard and Chris Vandervort, ARPA-E |
8:25 a.m. - 8:55 a.m. | Michael Caravaggio - EPRI |
8:55 a.m. - 9:25 a.m. | Jesse Jenkins - Princeton University |
9:25 a.m. - 10:05 a.m. | Dan Hancu, FECM and Michael O’Connor, OCED |
2024 ARPA-E FLECCS Phase 2 Annual Meeting - Project Performer Presentations
10:35 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | |
10:55 a.m. - 11:15 a.m. | |
11:15 a.m. - 11:35 a.m. | |
11:35 a.m. - 11:55 a.m. | |
11:55 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. | |
12:15 p.m. - 12:25 p.m. | Chris Vandervort, ARPA-E |
Marine CDR Concepts Moderator: Mike Bergen
8:00 a.m. - 8:15 a.m. | Kunlei Liu, University of Kentucky |
8:15 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. | Elizabeth Seber and Josh Charles, Advanced Cooling Technologies, Inc. |
8:30 a.m. - 8:45 a.m. | James Kelly, Ocean Energy USA, LLC |
8:45 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. | |
9:00 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | Allison Wilcox and Vahid Gohlami, Captura Corporation |
9:15 a.m. - 9:30 a.m. | Erika La Plante, University of California - Davis |
9:30 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. | Christopher Martin, University of North Dakota, Energy & Environmental Research Center |
Marine CDR Pilot Testing Moderator: Mike Bergen
10:35 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. | Gaurav Sant, University of California, Los Angeles |
BiCRS Pre-FEED Studies Moderator: Mike Bergen
11:00 a.m. - 11:25 a.m. | Kathy Fagundo, Electricore, Inc. and Nick Papanicolaou, Carmeuse |
11:25 a.m. - 11:50 a.m. | Timothy Gehring, NorthStar Clean Energy |
Regional Initiatives (Southwest) Moderator: Paul Zandhuis
8:00 a.m. - 8:20 a.m. | William Ampomah, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
8:20 a.m. - 8:40 a.m. | Fnu Suriamin, Oklahoma Geological Survey - University of Oklahoma |
8:40 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. | Priyank Jaiswal, Oklahoma State University |
9:00 a.m. - 9:20 a.m. | Luke Martin, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
CarbonSAFE Phase III (Southwest) Moderator: Vida Golubovic
9:20 a.m. - 9:40 a.m. | William Ampomah, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
9:40 a.m. - 10:05 a.m. | William Ampomah, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
Secure Storage (Southwest) Moderator: Vida Golubovic
10:35 a.m. - 10:55 a.m. | William Ampomah, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology |
Emissions Control Moderator: Heather Hunter
8:00 a.m. - 8:25 a.m. | Bahareh Nojabaei, Virginia Tech |
8:25 a.m. - 8:50 a.m. | Lawrence Anyim and Marco Hernandez, University of North Dakota |
8:50 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. | Santosh Rajbanshi, Kentucky State University |
9:15 a.m. - 9:40 a.m. | Mohsen Rabbani and Ehsan Vahidi, University of Nevada, Reno |
8:30 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. | To register, click the link below: |
The Interdisciplinary Science & Engineering Building project is managed by the Department of Campus Planning & Facilities Management at Case Western Reserve University. Learn more about the project below.
Per Case Western Reserve University’s 2019 Strategic Plan, the university seeks to achieve $600 million in annual research funding over the next decade. A new, five-story, 189,000-square-foot research building is proposed on the current site of Yost Hall, consistent with the 2015 Campus Master Plan. The building will include wet labs, dry labs—including shared core lab and technology platforms.
View the Live Webcam
Exterior Quad Elevation
Exterior Quad Oblique
Exterior MLK Elevation
Exterior Gateway
Interior Winter Garden Toward MLK
Interior Cafe Toward Stair
Interior Living Room Oblique
What is happening at Yost Hall?
As previously detailed in the daily, Yost Hall will become a construction site on Wednesday, Nov. 1. In the ensuing months, crews will complete the work necessary to remove the structure so that construction on the university’s new Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building (ISEB) can begin.
How will this work affect people in Yost Hall?
All of those who worked in Yost—including in the Department of Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics—have been relocated.
How will this work affect university parking along Martin Luther King Jr. Drive?
Lot 1B is now closed and will not re-open; that area is part of the ISEB project. All of those who used to park in the lot have been notified and offered alternative options. Some individuals who now park in Lot 1A may have to relocate temporarily to the Veale Garage; those individuals will be notified as soon as additional information becomes available.
How will this project affect pedestrians in that area of the Case Quad?
Campus Planning and Facilities Management (CPFM) will collaborate with the project contractor to provide adequate signage indicating where individuals can and cannot walk.
Will people still be able to access Tomlinson Hall—in particular the ground floor dining options?
Yes, Tomlinson offices and food services will continue to operate during the project.
Will the work affect labs in Wickenden Hall?
The CPFM team is working with lab managers in Wickenden to provide alternative access options for deliveries.
Will any trees be removed during this project?
Some trees will need to be removed to make space for the new building, a process that will begin in early November. The university is committed to planting a new tree on campus for each tree that is taken down.
When will the actual demolition of Yost Hall begin?
Demolition is scheduled to commence in late March/early April of 2024. In the meantime, contractors will be preparing the building and site for the removal of the building.
When will further updates be available?
Updates will be provided in the daily and on the CPFM website.
COMMENTS
Published Research. Since 1997, PMI has sponsored academic research projects. This knowledge enables stakeholders to make informed decisions and assess industry trends and challenges. It supports professional development, fosters a community that values continuous learning and innovation, and contributes to the overall advancement of knowledge ...
Project Management (PM) may be described as a set of. activities which enabl es successful implementation of a. project. In developm ent projects, the term "successful. implementation" usual ...
The objective of this document is to provide an educational project management guide for Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN) researchers to aid in their efforts in managing research projects. The aim is to introduce the concept of project management and help communicate the potential value project management can add to research projects.
As the leading community for project managers around the globe, PMI is committed to defining and developing the future of project management by supporting the work of scholars through research, teaching, and education programs. Join the Academic Network for updates and browse tools for educators, researchers, and academic programs below.
Effective planning and a management of resources are essential prerequisites required for proper research project management and the successful completion of research projects. However, one of the biggest challenges researchers face while accomplishing these tasks is that these projects usually have varying lengths and unpredictable outcomes ...
Project management is also a key transferable skill that you can utilize within academia or the broader workforce. Lets review five stages of a typical project management life cycle and how you might apply these fundamentals to your own research projects. Initiation During the initiation stage, you determine the scope and feasibility of a project.
Project management: the right discipline for managing research projects. A project - according to the PRINCE2 project management method - is defined as ''a temporary organisation that is created for the purpose of delivering one or more business products according to an agreed business case''. Having a method to manage this entity ...
Project management for academic research projects 15. to the two deliverables for a PM strategy applied to exploratory, complex and uncertain. projects: creati ve and diversified productivity ...
Session 1: Objectives. To understand the various components of research project management. (Part A) To make a practical assessment of your own approach to research project management. (Part B) To explore options for 'plugging any gaps' in your current approach.
Abstract. Project management is a valuable skill that helps you think about where you want your research project to go, what you need to get there, and how to minimise risks during the process. Unfortunately, most early career researchers do not get much training in research project management and are left to fend for themselves.
Project Management Journal® is the academic and research journal of the Project Management Institute and features state-of-the-art research, techniques, theories, and applications in project management. ... Digital Technologies in Built Environment Projects; Full List. Webinar series.
Introduction. Researchers, at all stages of their careers, are facing an ever-increasing deluge of information and deadlines. Additional difficulties arise when one is the Principal Investigator (PI) of those researchers: as group size and scope of inquiry increases, the challenges of managing people and projects and the interlocking timelines, finances, and information pertaining to those ...
Here is a list of the 50 best topics for a project management paper. These topics cover many project management areas, from traditional project management methodologies to emerging trends and challenges in the field. You can further refine and tailor these topics to match your specific research interests and objectives.
This book is an essential resource for academics managing a large and complex research project. It provides important practical insights into the processes that inform such research projects and delivers insights into the delicate balance between industry, stakeholder and academic needs. It gives practical advice about developing relationships ...
The Research Project Management Core (RPMC) provides project management support for non-clinical research projects. The RPMC is made up of project managers with a variety of skillsets and backgrounds who can be efforted out on short-term or long-term research projects at varying levels of effort. The expertise of the project managers in the ...
However, traditional project management methods can be adapted for research projects to make lab work more efficient and productive by defining deadline-driven project deliverables and milestones, performance measures to evaluate progress, and the resources needed to get there. This information can be captured in a project management plan that ...
Here is a list of project management research topics, for writing your project research paper. Sr. No. Top Project Management Research Topics. 1. Impact of Global Leadership in Leading to the Success of a Project. 2. Effects of Cultural Diversity on Project Performance. 3.
Session 1: Defining the Work. November 1, 2022 | 12:00pm ET. This session introduces basic project management principles. You will learn the definition of a project, how to manage project scope, and how to draft the baseline of a project while considering how projects can be connected. Session 2: Creating the Plan. November 3, 2022 | 12:00pm ET.
The Best Project Management Topics For Research. Compare and contrast the procedural and mechanical parts of a project. How to yield direct and proportional earnings from a project. Management of a project during the economic recession. Evaluate how COVID-19 restrictions impacted project management policies. The role of integrating people and ...
The paper also discusses four areas of research currently under way, which should add to the growing knowledge base in project management and help those charged with managing today's complex projects. Project management became part of my life in the late 1960s when I was asked to join a multidisciplinary team to study NASA's Apollo Program ...
project management and agile methods. We identify one important application area for future methodological change as new product and service development. A list of specific research topics within project management is discussed. The conclusions suggest the existence of significant research opportunities within project management.
We are hiring three (3) Senior Research Associates (SRA) who are responsible for a variety of research and management tasks. Research tasks may include collection of quantitative data (often by overseeing fielding of surveys), collection of qualitative data, data processing and analysis, contributing to or leading the writing of articles and reports, and coordinating with staff in other ...
T1 - Project Managing: International Joint Venture Projects. AU - Konieczny, Steven J. AU - Petrick, Joseph A. PY - 1994/4/1. Y1 - 1994/4/1. N2 - The authors of this article apply relevant project management concepts to international joint ventures (IJV) formation, in order to achieve business success.
Carbon Management Research Project Review Meeting Proceedings. Monday August 5, 2024. ... CONNECT Toolkit: Carbon Management Projects Database and Explorer (Tuesday, Aug 6th, 5:20 p.m., Rooms 304-305) n/a: CO 2-Locate: A National Well Mapping Application (FWP-1611464) Alec Dyer:
Project management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet project requirements. It's the practice of planning, organizing, and executing the tasks needed to turn a brilliant idea into a tangible product, service, or deliverable. Key aspects of project management include: Defining project ...
The Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering Building project, managed by the Department of Campus Planning and Facilities Management at Case Western Reserve University, ... the university seeks to achieve $600 million in annual research funding over the next decade. A new, five-story, 189,000-square-foot research building is proposed on the ...
Workfront offers robust project management capabilities, allowing managers to view team capacity, allocate resources to projects and tasks, and balance workloads across teams or individuals. It also provides tools for resource scheduling, capacity planning, and skill-based resource allocation.
Agile management emphasises iterative progress, frequent reassessments, and adaptive planning and proves invaluable for navigating the uncertainties and dynamic nature of large-scale projects. Risk management strategies: Proactive risk management is crucial for the successful completion of the project within budget. This involves identifying ...