what is physical education

• More from M-W
• To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In

physical education

Definition of physical education

Did you know.

The Importance (Linguistic and Otherwise) of Physical Education

Physical education has existed since ancient times, but it wasn’t until several hundred years ago that the term itself (abbreviated as phys ed or PE ) came into being. Its earliest known use comes, oddly enough, from a 1748 book titled Critical Reflections on Poetry, Painting, and Music : “Cannot some years prove more favorable than others to the physical education of children. . . ?” A few decades after these words were published, gymnasiums opened across Europe, especially in Germany, where gymnastics associations (or turnvereins ) fostered physical health as well as civic involvement and cultural enrichment. Thanks in part to immigration, these clubs, and European enthusiasm for athletics in general, spread to the U.S. During the 19th century, American educators adopted European methods of teaching physical training, and both the word physical education and the phenomenon it represents became well established in this country.

Examples of physical education in a Sentence

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'physical education.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

1748, in the meaning defined above

Dictionary Entries Near physical education

physical double star

physical environment

Cite this Entry

“Physical education.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/physical%20education. Accessed 28 Apr. 2024.

Kids Definition

Kids definition of physical education, more from merriam-webster on physical education.

Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about physical education

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Word of the day.

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Popular in Grammar & Usage

More commonly misspelled words, commonly misspelled words, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), absent letters that are heard anyway, how to use accents and diacritical marks, popular in wordplay, the words of the week - apr. 26, 9 superb owl words, 'gaslighting,' 'woke,' 'democracy,' and other top lookups, 10 words for lesser-known games and sports, your favorite band is in the dictionary, games & quizzes.

• Pete Charrette

What is Physical Education? A Comprehensive Overview for Physical Educators

Welcome to a comprehensive exploration of physical education—a dynamic and essential field. As a retired educator with experience across the spectrum from elementary to university levels, I've witnessed firsthand the transformative power of physical education. This extensive guide is designed for both seasoned and aspiring physical educators, aiming to delve into the multifaceted aspects of this discipline and its impact on physical, emotional, and social well-being.

The Vital Role of Physical Education

Physical education stands as a cornerstone in the holistic development of students. Far from being just a supplemental part of the school curriculum, it plays a crucial role in fostering overall health and wellness. In this guide, we will explore the fundamental principles of physical education, how it evolves through different educational stages, and its lasting impact on individuals and communities.

At its core, physical education is not merely about learning sports or engaging in physical activities; it's about instilling a lifelong appreciation for health and fitness. It serves as a platform for students to develop physical skills, understand the importance of teamwork, and recognize the value of maintaining an active lifestyle. Our journey through this guide will reaffirm why physical education is an integral part of lifelong learning and wellness.

The Essence of Physical Education

Physical education stands as an integral component of comprehensive education, extending far beyond traditional notions of games and sports. It's an educational journey that emphasizes enhancing physical fitness, developing motor skills, and fostering a lifelong love for physical activity. This section explores what physical education truly encompasses and why it's a vital part of any educational program.

Physical Education Curriculum: Foundations and Goals

What is Physical Education : Physical education is an academic discipline that teaches students how to enhance their physical, mental, and social well-being through physical activity. As defined by SHAPE America, physical education is "the instructional practice of educating students in physical fitness, health, and wellness." This field is not just about teaching sports; it encompasses a balanced blend of skill development, knowledge enrichment, and active participation. The aim is to nurture well-rounded individuals who understand the importance of health and fitness in their lives.

Enhancing Physical Capabilities: Through various exercises and sports, physical education encourages students to build strength, endurance, and flexibility. This development of physical capabilities is a key aspect of the curriculum, equipping students with the skills needed for a physically active lifestyle.

Fostering Social and Emotional Growth: Physical education classes are designed to promote teamwork, leadership, and cooperation, contributing significantly to the social and emotional development of students. These interpersonal skills are as crucial as physical abilities, shaping how students interact and function within their communities.

Promoting Lifelong Fitness: Instilling the importance of regular physical activity for health and wellness is a fundamental objective of physical education. The goal of a physical education teacher is to foster habits that students will carry throughout their lives, acknowledging the role of physical fitness in overall well-being.

Components of a High-Quality Physical Education Program

Creating a successful physical education program involves more than just defining its objectives; it requires the right combination of activities, instruction, and engagement.

Diverse and Inclusive Activities: High-quality programs cater to a variety of skill levels and interests, ensuring every student finds physical activities they enjoy. This inclusivity not only enhances participation but also helps students discover new interests and talents.

Educated and Engaged Instructors: The role of qualified, passionate physical education teachers is vital. Their expertise and enthusiasm greatly impact student engagement and learning outcomes, effectively bringing the physical education curriculum to life.

Regular and Consistent Participation: Emphasizing consistent participation is crucial for developing lifelong physical activity habits. Regular engagement in physical education programs ensures students have ample opportunities to practice and improve their skills.

Physical education, as a multifaceted field, plays a pivotal role in the holistic development of students. By focusing on physical capabilities, emotional growth, and lifelong fitness habits, educators can create enriching and effective physical education experiences. These are essential for developing and implementing physical education curricula that resonate with and benefit all students.

Physical Education Across Different Educational Stages

The approach to physical education evolves significantly as students progress through their educational journey. From the playful exploration in elementary schools to the more structured and strategic environment of middle and high schools, physical education adapts to meet the changing needs and capabilities of students.

Elementary School Focus: Building Foundations

In elementary schools, the primary focus of physical education is to lay the groundwork for physical development and to foster an early love for physical movement.

Developing Basic Motor Skills: This stage is critical for introducing and refining essential motor skills such as running, jumping, and throwing. These foundational skills are crucial for students' physical development and future engagement in more complex activities.

Instilling a Love for Physical Movement: Creating a positive and fun environment is key to developing an early enthusiasm for physical activity, which can lead to a lifelong commitment to fitness and health.

Introducing Team Concepts: Even at this early stage, the concept of teamwork and cooperation in physical activities is introduced, helping young students understand the importance of working together and social interaction in sports.

Activities in elementary physical education are designed to be fun and engaging, introducing students to basic sport skills and healthy habits. These early experiences are essential to help children develop motor skills and shape their attitudes towards physical fitness and overall well-being.

Middle and High School: Evolving Needs and Goals

As students enter middle school, physical education becomes more structured, focusing on teamwork, strategy, and advanced motor skills development.

Structured Physical Education in Middle School: The curriculum in middle school builds on the skills learned in elementary school, introducing more complex sports and physical activities. This phase is crucial for enhancing students’ physical capabilities and understanding of teamwork and strategy.

Preparing for Lifelong Fitness in High School: High school programs are designed to prepare students for lifelong physical activity. The focus is on maintaining physical fitness, integrating comprehensive health education, and promoting sportsmanship. These objectives help high school students in a physical education class understand the importance of a healthy lifestyle and the role of physical activity in their overall well-being.

Emphasizing Personal and Social Responsibility: In both middle and high school, there is a significant emphasis on personal and social responsibility, teaching students the value of respecting others, following rules, and understanding the impact of their actions in a physical education setting.

In both middle and high school, physical education plays a pivotal role in students' physical and social development. It helps in preparing them for an active and healthy life beyond the school setting.

The Role of Physical Educators

The impact of physical educators on the quality and effectiveness of physical education programs cannot be overstated. This section highlights the critical roles, qualifications, and responsibilities of physical education teachers, emphasizing how they shape the experiences and motivation of their students.

Qualifications and Responsibilities of Physical Educators

Physical educators play a multifaceted role in the development of students. Their responsibilities extend beyond teaching sports or physical activities; they are mentors, motivators, and key influencers in promoting student motivation, physical education programming, and academic performance.

Educator Profiles: Shaping Student Experiences:

Diverse Roles: Physical education teachers serve various roles – from instructors and coaches to mentors and role models. Their approach to teaching can significantly influence students' attitudes towards physical fitness and overall well-being.

Impact on Motivation: The enthusiasm and commitment of these educators play a crucial role in engaging students and fostering a positive environment for learning and physical development.

Qualifications and Training: Ensuring Effective Teaching:

Essential Credentials: A solid educational background, typically including a bachelor's degree in physical education or a related field, is essential. Many educators also pursue specialized certifications in specific sports or fitness areas.

Professional Development: Ongoing training and professional development are crucial for physical educators to stay updated with the latest teaching methods, health and fitness trends, and educational technology.

The Influence of Physical Educators on Physical and Academic Performance

Physical educators play a crucial role in shaping both the physical and academic performance of their students. Their influence goes beyond teaching sports or physical activities; they are key figures in promoting holistic development and creating a positive learning atmosphere. This section explores how physical educators contribute to both physical prowess and academic achievement.

Holistic Development

The approach taken by health and physical educators is integral to the comprehensive development of students, encompassing physical, cognitive, and social aspects.

Improving Physical Skills:

Direct Impact: Regular physical activity in sport and physical education improves fitness, coordination, and overall physical health.

Skill Transfer: Many of the motor skills and physical abilities taught in daily physical education classes are foundational and beneficial across various aspects of life.

Enhancing Cognitive Abilities:

Brain Health Benefits: Physical activity has been shown to boost brain function, enhancing learning, memory, and concentration.

Academic Correlation: Studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between physical fitness and academic performance, highlighting the cognitive benefits of regular physical activity.

Social Skills Development:

Teamwork and Communication: Physical education classes provide opportunities for students to develop teamwork and communication skills.

Confidence and Leadership: Engaging in sports and physical activities can boost self-esteem and leadership abilities, contributing to social and personal growth.

Creating a Positive Learning Environment

Physical educators are instrumental in establishing a learning environment that supports both physical and academic achievements.

Promoting Active Participation:

Engagement in Learning: Encouraging active participation in physical activities also fosters a more engaged attitude towards learning in general.

Enjoyment in Education: When students enjoy physical education, this positive attitude can spill over into other academic areas.

Fostering Teamwork and Personal Growth:

Collaborative Skills: Lessons in physical education often require students to work together, building skills that are valuable in academic and life situations.

Emotional and Mental Well-being: A supportive physical education environment contributes to the emotional and mental well-being of students, which is crucial for academic success.

Physical educators have a profound impact on the overall development of students, influencing not only their physical abilities but also their academic performance and personal growth. By providing holistic education and creating a positive and supportive learning environment, physical educators play a vital role in preparing students for success in all areas of life.

Evaluating Success in Physical Education

Understanding and measuring the success of physical education programs is crucial for ensuring that they meet educational objectives and effectively contribute to the holistic development of students. This section discusses the various methods and standards used to assess the effectiveness of these programs, highlighting how they can enhance the physical, mental, and social well-being of students.

Student Assessment Methods in Physical Education

Effective evaluation in physical education encompasses various assessment methods, each targeting different aspects of student learning and development.

Skill-Based Assessments:

Purpose: To evaluate students’ proficiency in a range of physical skills and activities, from basic motor skills to complex sport-specific techniques.

Implementation: Utilizing tests and practical demonstrations to assess skill levels and progress in various physical disciplines.

Knowledge Tests:

Objective: Focusing on students' understanding and knowledge of health and fitness concepts.

Approach: Written tests, quizzes, or interactive discussions to assess comprehension of health education, fitness principles, and safety in sports.

Behavioral Observations:

Goal: Monitoring and evaluating students' participation, cooperation, attitude, and sportsmanship during physical education classes.

Method: Continuous observation and feedback to track and encourage positive behavioral changes and active participation.

Educational Standards and Benchmarks

Adhering to established standards and benchmarks is essential for maintaining the quality and relevance of physical education programs.

National and State Standards:

Alignment: Ensuring the physical education curriculum aligns with recognized standards set by organizations like SHAPE America.

Benefits: Provides a framework for developing a comprehensive and effective physical education program.

Customized School District Standards:

Development: Creating standards tailored to the specific needs and demographics of the various school districts.

Importance: Addresses unique local requirements and cultural aspects, enhancing the relevance and impact of the physical education program.

Continuous Improvement:

Process: Regularly reviewing and updating the curriculum and teaching methods based on assessment results and changing educational standards.

Outcome: Ensures the physical education program remains current, effective, and responsive to student needs and educational trends.

By implementing these assessment methods and adhering to educational standards, physical education programs can provide a quality education that significantly contributes to the overall development of students.

Q&A Section - Engaging with Common Queries and Concerns

In this section, we address some of the most common questions about physical education. These Q&As aim to provide clarity on various aspects of physical education, ranging from its impact on student health to the specifics of successful programs. This engaging format helps to demystify the field for educators, students, and parents alike.

Frequently Asked Questions About Physical Education

Q1: How does physical education contribute to overall student health?

A: Physical education plays a vital role in promoting a healthy lifestyle. It not only enhances physical fitness but also contributes to mental health and academic performance, making it an essential component of overall student well-being.

Q2: What are the key components of a successful physical education program?

A: The foundation of a successful physical education program lies in a well-rounded curriculum, qualified and passionate educators, and a focus on promoting lifelong fitness and well-being.

Q3: Can physical education influence a student's academic performance?

A: Absolutely. Regular physical activity has been linked to improved concentration, better memory retention, and overall enhanced cognitive function, which can positively impact academic performance.

Q4: How important are physical education classes for early childhood development?

A: In early childhood, physical education is crucial for developing basic motor skills, social interaction skills, and establishing a foundation for a healthy, active lifestyle.

Q5: What role does physical education play in mental health?

A: Physical education significantly benefits mental health by reducing stress, anxiety, and depression, while boosting self-esteem and improving overall mood.

Q6: How can physical education be made more inclusive for all students?

A: Inclusivity in physical education can be achieved by offering a variety of activities that cater to different interests and abilities, adapting activities for students with different needs, and creating a supportive, non-competitive environment.

Q7: What are the long-term benefits of engaging in physical education during school years?

A: Long-term benefits include maintaining a healthy weight, reducing the risk of chronic diseases, developing good exercise habits, and fostering a positive attitude towards physical activity.

Q8: How does physical education contribute to social development in students?

A: Physical education fosters social development by teaching teamwork, sportsmanship, and communication skills, all of which are important for building relationships and functioning effectively in social settings.

Q9: What strategies can physical educators use to motivate students?

A: Strategies include setting achievable goals, offering diverse and fun activities, providing positive feedback and encouragement, and creating an environment where all students feel valued and successful.

Q10: How do physical education programs adapt to the varying needs of different age groups?

A: Programs adapt by tailoring activities and teaching methods to suit the developmental stages and interests of different age groups, ensuring that the content is age-appropriate and engaging.

Q11: Can physical education aid in the development of leadership skills?

A: Yes, it can. Physical education provides opportunities for students to take on leadership roles, manage teams, and develop decision-making skills, all of which are valuable for building leadership qualities.

Q12: What is the impact of physical education on obesity prevention in children?

A: Physical education plays a critical role in obesity prevention by promoting regular physical activity, teaching about healthy lifestyle choices, and instilling fitness habits from an early age.

Q13: How do physical education programs address the needs of students with disabilities?

A: These programs adapt by offering modified activities, using assistive devices, and providing individualized instruction to ensure that students with disabilities can participate fully and safely.

Q14: What strategies can be used to engage reluctant students in physical education?

A: Strategies include offering a variety of activities to cater to different interests, creating a non-threatening environment, providing individualized goals, and emphasizing the fun aspect of physical activity.

Q15: What is the role of technology in modern physical education?

A: Technology in physical education can enhance learning and engagement through interactive fitness apps, online resources, and tools that track and analyze physical performance.

These questions and answers shed light on the multifaceted nature of physical education and its profound impact on students. By understanding these key aspects, educators and stakeholders can better appreciate and advocate for quality physical education programs that contribute significantly to the physical, mental, and social well-being of students.

Physical Education Beyond the Classroom - Extending the Reach of Physical Education

Physical education's influence extends far beyond the walls of the classroom, playing a crucial role in shaping lifestyle habits and attitudes towards fitness and health. This section explores how the principles taught in physical education classes are applied in daily life through sports and extracurricular activities and the overall impact on lifestyle.

Sports and Extracurricular Activities

The lessons learned in physical education classes find practical applications in sports and various extracurricular activities, reinforcing the principles taught in school.

Application in Sports:

Skill Utilization: The physical and motor skills developed in physical education are directly applicable in sports, allowing students to excel and enjoy various athletic pursuits.

Teamwork and Sportsmanship: Participation in sports emphasizes teamwork, leadership, and sportsmanship, skills nurtured in physical education settings.

Extracurricular Engagement:

Extended Learning: Extracurricular activities provide students with additional opportunities to apply what they’ve learned and further develop their physical skills.

Diverse Activities: Engaging in a range of activities, from dance to martial arts, expands students' experiences and encourages the exploration of different forms of physical activity.

Lifestyle Impact

Physical education plays a pivotal role in encouraging active living beyond the school setting, impacting students' lifestyle choices and habits.

Promoting Active Lifestyles:

Habit Formation: The habits developed in physical education classes often translate into a lifelong commitment to physical activity.

Health Awareness: Students learn the importance of staying physically active and making healthy choices, which has a lasting impact on their overall health and well-being.

Fitness Education Beyond School:

Knowledge Application: The knowledge gained about fitness and health in physical education classes guides students in making informed choices about their physical activities and lifestyle.

Community Involvement: Engaging in community sports teams, local fitness programs, and other physical activities outside school encourages a broader application of physical education principles.

Community Programs and Physical Education

The principles of physical education play a significant role in community health initiatives, extending their reach and impact beyond the school environment.

Community Health Initiatives:

Incorporating Physical Education Concepts: Community programs frequently adopt physical education strategies to encourage regular physical activity and overall fitness among participants.

Extending Educational Reach: These initiatives expand the scope of physical education, fostering broader community awareness and involvement in health and fitness activities.

Promoting Community Involvement:

Engagement and Participation: Community health programs provide opportunities for individuals to engage in physical activities, reinforcing the concepts learned in physical education classes.

Enhancing Community Health: By promoting regular exercise and wellness activities, these programs contribute significantly to the overall health of the community.

Family Engagement in Physical Activities

Family involvement in physical activities is crucial for fostering a culture of health and wellness that resonates through all stages of life.

Strengthening Family Bonds:

Joint Physical Activities: Encouraging families to participate in physical activities together not only strengthens familial bonds but also instills a collective commitment to a healthy lifestyle.

Shared Health Goals: Engaging in family-oriented fitness activities allows for shared experiences and goals, promoting a unified approach to health and wellness.

Role of Physical Educators:

Providing Insights and Resources: Physical educators are instrumental in guiding families on how to integrate physical activities into their daily routines.

Encouragement and Support: Educators can offer encouragement and support, helping families find suitable activities that cater to all ages and ability levels, thereby fostering a lifelong commitment to physical health and fitness.

Physical education extends its influence beyond academic learning, playing a significant role in shaping active, healthy lifestyles. The skills, knowledge, and attitudes fostered in physical education classes empower students to engage in sports, extracurricular activities, and make health-conscious decisions in their daily lives. The integration of physical education into community programs and family life is essential for building a society that values and prioritizes health and fitness. By promoting a physically active lifestyle, physical education contributes to the holistic well-being of individuals, both within and outside the school environment.

Final Thoughts

Reflecting on the broad spectrum of physical education, it becomes evident how deeply this field touches every aspect of personal development and community well-being. As a seasoned physical education professional with experience across all educational levels, I have witnessed the transformative power of this discipline firsthand. Physical education is not just a subject confined to the boundaries of a school's gymnasium; it is a vital component of holistic education, shaping the physical, mental, and social health of individuals. My journey, marked by numerous articles and insights into specific issues within this field, has been a testament to the depth and diversity of physical education.

This comprehensive overview underscores the foundational aspects of physical education, which are critical for current educators and invaluable for those preparing to embark on this fulfilling career path. It serves as a reminder of the importance of physical education in fostering lifelong habits of health and fitness, the role of educators in shaping these experiences, and the far-reaching impact of these principles beyond the classroom. In essence, physical education is a conduit for lifelong wellness, community engagement, and personal growth. As we continue to navigate and contribute to this dynamic field, let us remember its profound ability to enrich lives and build healthier, more active communities.

FREE Visual for Your Learning Space!

Do you need a FREE and practical way to highlight 10 important, life-altering outcomes that stem from a quality physical education program? If so, Cap'n Pete's Power PE has you covered!

Fill out the form below to download a FREE Why Physical Education visual that you can use to reference when working with your students. The PE Poster: Why Physical Education? (in 5 color schemes) serves as a practical instructional graphic you can use to showcase 10 important benefits of PE that students, classroom teachers, parents and administrators can see as they enter or exit your learning area. The statements are brief, yet POWERFUL!

Do you need physical education and health resources to help with your teaching?

Cap'n Pete's Power PE.com is an online platform that offers tools, information, and resources to help future and current physical education instructors better implement physical education in their learning environments. The site includes an informational blog that provides practical strategies for developing and maintaining a physical education program of excellence. This platform also furnishes over 750 resources for physical education and health, such as PE activities, games, field day materials, templates, visuals, posters, sign packages, PowerPoint presentations, and much more!

Cap'n Pete's Power PE TPT Store Cap'n Pete's Power PE on Teachers Pay Teachers is a vibrant and resource-rich digital store, designed to empower physical education and health

teachers with innovative and effective teaching tools. With over 30 years of experience in the field, I, Pete Charrette, have meticulously developed and curated more than 925 diverse resources. These include engaging PE activities, comprehensive games, field day materials, and practical templates, alongside visually striking posters and sign packages. Each resource, crafted with the insights gained from my extensive teaching and training experience, aims to enhance the learning experience in physical education classes. My store serves as a one-stop shop for educators seeking to inspire and motivate their students through dynamic and well-structured physical education programs."

• Professional Topics
• Beyond the Gym
• The PE Community

Related Posts

Physical Education and Childhood Obesity: Empowering a Healthier Generation

Understanding the New SHAPE America Physical Education Standards for 2024

Run, Walk, Thrive: How to Implement a Mileage Club at Your School

Recent Posts

18 Top PE Activities for Dynamic Physical Education Classes

Mastering the Dynamics of PE Classroom Management: A Comprehensive Guide

PE Games for Elementary Students: 6 Dynamic Physical Education Games to Transform Your Classes

Physical Education Advocacy Amplified: Elevating Your Voice

Energizing Education: The Power of Brain Breaks in the Classroom; Includes 12 Practical Activities

Engaging At-Home PE Activities for Effective Distance Learning in Physical Education

Adopt-a-Gym: Enhancing Physical Education for Underfunded Schools

Best Physical Education Equipment Providers 2024: Your Complete Resource

PE Stations: 15 Fun Ideas for Active Engagement in Elementary Physical Education Classes

Exploring the Role of AI in Physical Education: Enhancing Efficiency and Effectiveness in Teaching PE

Cultivating Positive Character Traits for Students in Physical Education: Shaping Tomorrow's Leaders

The site navigation utilizes arrow, enter, escape, and space bar key commands. Left and right arrows move across top level links and expand / close menus in sub levels. Up and Down arrows will open main level menus and toggle through sub tier links. Enter and space open menus and escape closes them as well. Tab will move on to the next part of the site rather than go through menu items.

• Physical Education

Physical education (PE) is a required academic subject that teaches participation in lifelong, health-enhancing physical activity. In PE, students learn to work as a team, develop healthy personal fitness habits, and set fitness goals now and throughout their lives. PE is not recess, or a before- or after-school sports club.

• A regular class scheduled during the school day.
• Taught by a certified, licensed DOE teacher.
• Instruction on a wide range of skills, not just sports .
• Based on a curriculum, with established learning standards (for more information, see the New York City K-5 Physical Education Scope and Sequence and the New York City Grades 6-12 Physical Education Scope and Sequence ).

Under NY State law, all students in grades kindergarten–12, including students with disabilities, must have Physical Education (PE) as part of their education.

Summary of Requirements

You can find complete requirements and information about the curriculum for each grade level on the Physical Education Requirements page.

Elementary School

• Students must participate in PE throughout elementary school.
• Kindergarten–grade three students must participate every day.
• Grade four–six students must participate at least three times per week.

Middle School

Middle school students must participate in PE every semester throughout middle school, 90 minutes per week.

High School

• High school students must participate in PE throughout high school.
• All high school students must earn four credits in PE in order to graduate.
• Students must attend and participate for at least 180 minutes per week for seven semesters, or 90 minutes per week for eight semesters

PE and Learning

Research shows that:

• Daily physical activity and PE can improve academic achievement.
• Students who are physically fit do better on tests.
• Physically active students have better attention spans, classroom behavior, and attendance.
• PE can improve the school climate.

PE at Your School

On the InfoHub Physical Education Reporting page , you can find information about your school's PE programs from previous years, such as:

• How often PE was provided per week
• The number of certified PE teachers
• Physical education space
• Other PE programs

Students with Disabilities: Adapted PE

New York State law requires students with disabilities to have Physical Education (PE) as part of their education. Many can be in a regular PE class, sometimes with support or changes to the activities and equipment so that they can succeed. Others may need to receive PE in a smaller class. In Adapted Physical Education (APE), PE teachers change activities, games, and sports so that all students can take part safely. By law, only a certified PE teacher may teach APE. Students who require APE have Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) that outline their needs. More information about IEPs can be found on the Special Education page . If you think your child needs APE, you can ask your child’s school for an evaluation.

NYC FITNESSGRAM

NYC FITNESSGRAM is an annual fitness assessment for students in grades kindergarten-twelve that helps students and their families develop personal goals for lifelong fitness. Students complete the assessments in Physical Education class. NYC FITNESSGRAM is not a graded test, and the results are confidential.

You can view your child’s NYC FITNESSGRAM results and more information about NYC FITNESSGRAM on your NYC Schools Account .

You can also ask your child’s PE teacher to print out your child’s report. PE teachers can help you understand:

• How the test was administered
• What the results mean
• How your student can make a personal plan for staying healthy and fit

Contact the Parent Coordinator at your school for help reaching your child’s PE teacher. You may also want to share your child’s NYC FITNESSGRAM report with your health care provider. The NYC FITNESSGRAM reports can help start conversations about eating habits and levels of physical activity needed for good health.

What is on the NYC FITNESSGRAM assessment?

• Grades K-3: Students are measured for height and weight only.
• Grades 4-12: Students are measured for height and weight, and complete five fitness activities that assess strength, endurance, flexibility, and aerobic capacity.
• To learn more about NYC FITNESSGRAM, email [email protected] .

Move-to-Improve

We encourage elementary schools to use a free program called Move-to-Improve to get students out of their seats and moving more during the school day. Research shows that:

• Physically active students do better in school
• Daily physical activity can help students focus and behave better in class
• Physical activity helps students to be healthy

How Does Move-to-Improve Work?

Elementary school teachers use Move-to-Improve to add physical activity into their classroom lessons. During a math lesson, students might do an aerobic activity to compare two numbers. During an English Language Arts lesson, they might practice yoga movements to identify certain words. Any kindergarten–grade five student can participate in Move-to-Improve activities, no matter what their physical ability.

The Move-to-Improve activities build on what students learn in physical education and in their other subjects. Teachers can receive training to use Move-to-Improve with their students.

• Watch clips showing Move-to-Improve in action .
• See a video of how teachers are trained in Move-to-Improve .
• Listen to and download the  Move-to-Improve World Beats NYC album

You can email [email protected] to learn more about making Move-to-Improve a regular part of your child’s school.

• Civics for All
• Computer Science
• English Language Arts
• Health Education
• Social Studies

Free Student Meals

See what's on the menu

Transportation

See Modernization Plan

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it's official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings
• Browse Titles

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment; Food and Nutrition Board; Institute of Medicine; Kohl HW III, Cook HD, editors. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Oct 30.

Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School.

• Hardcopy Version at National Academies Press

5 Approaches to Physical Education in Schools

Key messages.

• Because it is guaranteed to reach virtually all children, physical education is the only sure opportunity for nearly all school-age children to access health-enhancing physical activities.
• High-quality physical education programs are characterized by (1) instruction by certified physical education teachers, (2) a minimum of 150 minutes per week (30 minutes per day) for children in elementary schools and 225 minutes per week (45 minutes per day) for students in middle and high schools, and (3) tangible standards for student achievement and for high school graduation.
• Students are more physically active on days on which they have physical education.
• Quality physical education has strong support from both parents and child health professional organizations.
• Several models and examples demonstrate that physical education scheduled during the school day is feasible on a daily basis.
• Substantial discrepancies exist in state mandates regarding the time allocated for physical education.
• Nearly half of school administrators (44 percent) reported cutting significant time from physical education and recess to increase time spent in reading and mathematics since passage of the No Child Left Behind Act.
• Standardized national-level data on the provision of and participation, performance, and extent of engagement in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity are insufficient to allow assessment of the current status and trends in physical education in the United States.
• Systematic research is needed on personal, curricular, and policy barriers to successful physical education.
• The long-term impact of physical education has been understudied and should be a research priority to support the development of evidence-based policies.

Physical education is a formal content area of study in schools that is standards based and encompasses assessment based on standards and benchmarks. It is defined in Chapter 1 as “a planned sequential K-12 standards-based program of curricula and instruction designed to develop motor skills, knowledge, and behaviors of healthy active living, physical fitness, sportsmanship, self-efficacy, and emotional intelligence.” As a school subject, physical education is focused on teaching school-aged children the science and methods of physically active, healthful living ( NASPE, 2012 ). It is an avenue for engaging in developmentally appropriate physical activities designed for children to develop their fitness, gross motor skills, and health ( Sallis et al., 2003 ; Robinson and Goodway, 2009 ; Robinson, 2011 ). This chapter (1) provides a perspective on physical education in the context of schooling; (2) elaborates on the importance of physical education to child development; (3) describes the consensus on the characteristics of quality physical education programs; (4) reviews current national, state, and local education policies that affect the quality of physical education; and (5) examines barriers to quality physical education and solutions for overcoming them.

• PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF SCHOOLING

Physical education became a subject matter in schools (in the form of German and Swedish gymnastics) at the beginning of the 19th century ( Hackensmith, 1966 ). Its role in human health was quickly recognized. By the turn of the 20th century, personal hygiene and exercise for bodily health were incorporated in the physical education curriculum as the major learning outcomes for students ( Weston, 1962 ). The exclusive focus on health, however, was criticized by educator Thomas Wood (1913 ; Wood and Cassidy, 1930 ) as too narrow and detrimental to the development of the whole child. The education community subsequently adopted Wood's inclusive approach to physical education whereby fundamental movements and physical skills for games and sports were incorporated as the major instructional content. During the past 15 years, physical education has once again evolved to connect body movement to its consequences (e.g., physical activity and health), teaching children the science of healthful living and skills needed for an active lifestyle ( NASPE, 2004 ).

Sallis and McKenzie (1991) published a landmark paper stating that physical education is education content using a “comprehensive but physically active approach that involves teaching social, cognitive, and physical skills, and achieving other goals through movement” (p. 126). This perspective is also emphasized by Siedentop (2009) , who states that physical education is education through the physical. Sallis and McKenzie (1991) stress two main goals of physical education: (1) prepare children and youth for a lifetime of physical activity and (2) engage them in physical activity during physical education. These goals represent the lifelong benefits of health-enhancing physical education that enable children and adolescents to become active adults throughout their lives.

Physical Education as Part of Education

In institutionalized education, the main goal has been developing children's cognitive capacity in the sense of learning knowledge in academic disciplines. This goal dictates a learning environment in which seated learning behavior is considered appropriate and effective and is rewarded. Physical education as part of education provides the only opportunity for all children to learn about physical movement and engage in physical activity. As noted, its goal and place in institutionalized education have changed from the original focus on teaching hygiene and health to educating children about the many forms and benefits of physical movement, including sports and exercise. With a dramatic expansion of content beyond the original Swedish and German gymnastics programs of the 19th century, physical education has evolved to become a content area with diverse learning goals that facilitate the holistic development of children ( NASPE, 2004 ).

To understand physical education as a component of the education system, it is important to know that the education system in the United States does not operate with a centralized curriculum. Learning standards are developed by national professional organizations such as the National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE) and/or state education agencies rather than by the federal Department of Education; all curricular decisions are made locally by school districts or individual schools in compliance with state standards. Physical education is influenced by this system, which leads to great diversity in policies and curricula. According to NASPE and the American Heart Association (2010), although most states have begun to mandate physical education for both elementary and secondary schools, the number of states that allow waivers/exemptions from or substitutions for physical education increased from 27 and 18 in 2006 to 32 and 30 in 2010, respectively. These expanded waiver and substitution policies (discussed in greater detail later in the chapter) increase the possibility that students will opt out of physical education for nonmedical reasons.

Curriculum Models

Given that curricula are determined at the local level in the United States, encompassing national standards, state standards, and state-adopted textbooks that meet and are aligned with the standards, physical education is taught in many different forms and structures. Various curriculum models are used in instruction, including movement education, sport education, and fitness education. In terms of engagement in physical activity, two perspectives are apparent. First, programs in which fitness education curricula are adopted are effective at increasing in-class physical activity ( Lonsdale et al., 2013 ). Second, in other curriculum models, physical activity is considered a basis for students' learning skill or knowledge that the lesson is planned for them to learn. A paucity of nationally representative data is available with which to demonstrate the relationship between the actual level of physical activity in which students are engaged and the curriculum models adopted by their schools.

Movement Education

Movement has been a cornerstone of physical education since the 1800s. Early pioneers (Francois Delsarte, Liselott Diem, Rudolf von Laban) focused on a child's ability to use his or her body for self-expression ( Abels and Bridges, 2010 ). Exemplary works and curriculum descriptions include those by Laban himself ( Laban, 1980 ) and others (e.g., Logsdon et al., 1984 ). Over time, however, the approach shifted from concern with the inner attitude of the mover to a focus on the function and application of each movement ( Abels and Bridges, 2010 ). In the 1960s, the intent of movement education was to apply four movement concepts to the three domains of learning (i.e., cognitive, psychomotor, and affective). The four concepts were body (representing the instrument of the action); space (where the body is moving); effort (the quality with which the movement is executed); and relationships (the connections that occur as the body moves—with objects, people, and the environment; Stevens-Smith, 2004 ). The importance of movement in physical education is evidenced by its inclusion in the first two NASPE standards for K-12 physical education ( NASPE, 2004 ; see Box 5-7 later in this chapter).

Standards for a Physically Educated Person. SOURCE: NASPE, 2004.

These standards emphasize the need for children to know basic movement concepts and be able to perform basic movement patterns. It is imperative for physical educators to foster motor success and to provide children with a basic skill set that builds their movement repertoire, thus allowing them to engage in various forms of games, sports, and other physical activities (see also Chapter 3 ).

Sport Education

One prevalent physical education model is the sport education curriculum designed by Daryl Siedentop ( Siedentop, 1994 ; Siedentop et al., 2011 ). The goal of the model is to “educate students to be players in the fullest sense and to help them develop as competent, literate, and enthusiastic sportspersons” (2011, p. 4, emphasis in original). The model entails a unique instructional structure featuring sport seasons that are used as the basis for planning and teaching instructional units. Students are organized into sport organizations (teams) and play multiple roles as team managers, coaches, captains, players, referees, statisticians, public relations staff, and others to mimic a professional sports organization. A unit is planned in terms of a sports season, including preseason activity/practice, regular-season competition, playoffs and/or tournaments, championship competition, and a culminating event (e.g., an awards ceremony or sport festivity). Depending on the developmental level of students, the games are simplified or modified to encourage maximum participation. In competition, students play the roles noted above in addition to the role of players. A sport education unit thus is much longer than a conventional physical education unit. Siedentop and colleagues (2011) recommend 20 lessons per unit, so that all important curricular components of the model can be implemented.

Findings from research on the sport education model have been reviewed twice. Wallhead and O'Sullivan (2005) report that evidence is insufficient to support the conclusion that use of the model results in students' developing motor skills and fitness and learning relevant knowledge; some evidence suggests that the model leads to stronger team cohesion, more active engagement in lessons, and increased competence in game play. In a more recent review, Hastie and colleagues (2011) report on emerging evidence suggesting that the model leads to improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness (only one study) and mixed evidence regarding motor skills development, increased feeling of enjoyment in participation in physical education, increased sense of affiliation with the team and physical education, and positive development of fair-play values. The only study on in-class physical activity using the model showed that it contributed to only 36.6 percent activity at the vigorous- or moderate-intensity levels ( Parker and Curtner-Smith, 2005 ). Hastie and colleagues caution, however, that because only 6 of 38 studies reviewed used an experimental or quasi-experimental design, the findings must be interpreted with extreme caution. The model's merits in developing motor skills, fitness, and desired physical activity behavior have yet to be determined in studies with more rigorous research designs.

Fitness Education

Instead of focusing exclusively on having children move constantly to log activity time, a new curricular approach emphasizes teaching them the science behind why they need to be physically active in their lives. The curriculum is designed so that the children are engaged in physical activities that demonstrate relevant scientific knowledge. The goal is the development and maintenance of individual student fitness. In contrast with the movement education and sport education models, the underlying premise is that physical activity is essential to a healthy lifestyle and that students' understanding of fitness and behavior change result from engagement in a fitness education program. The conceptual framework for the model is designed around the health-related components of cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular strength and endurance, and flexibility. A recent meta-analysis ( Lonsdale et al., 2013 ) suggests that physical education curricula that include fitness activities can significantly increase the amount of time spent in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity.

Several concept-based fitness education curriculum models exist for both the middle school and senior high school levels. They include Fitness for Life: Middle School ( Corbin et al., 2007 ); Personal Fitness for You ( Stokes and Schultz, 2002 ); Get Active! Get Fit! ( Stokes and Schultz, 2009 ); Personal Fitness: Looking Good, Feeling Good ( Williams, 2005 ); and Foundations of Fitness ( Rainey and Murray, 2005 ). Activities in the curriculum are designed for health benefits, and the ultimate goal for the student is to develop a commitment to regular exercise and physical activity. It is assumed that all children can achieve a health-enhancing level of fitness through regular engagement in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity.

Randomized controlled studies on the impact of a science-based fitness curriculum in 15 elementary schools showed that, although the curriculum allocated substantial lesson time to learning cognitive knowledge, the students were more motivated to engage in physical activities than students in the 15 control schools experiencing traditional physical education ( Chen et al., 2008 ), and they expended the same amount of calories as their counterparts in the control schools ( Chen et al., 2007 ). Longitudinal data from the study reveal continued knowledge growth in the children that strengthened their understanding of the science behind exercise and active living ( Sun et al., 2012 ). What is unclear, however, is whether the enthusiasm and knowledge gained through the curriculum will translate into the children's lives outside of physical education to help them become physically active at home.

To incorporate standards and benchmarks into a fitness education model, a committee under the auspices of NASPE (2012) developed the Instructional Framework for Fitness Education in Physical Education. It is suggested that through this proposed comprehensive framework, fitness education be incorporated into the existing physical education curriculum and embedded in the content taught in all instructional units. The entire framework, highlighted in Box 5-1 , can be viewed at http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/publications/upload/Instructional-Framework-for-Fitness-Education-in-PE-2012-2.pdf (accessed February 1, 2013).

Instructional Framework for Fitness Education in Physical Education. Technique: Demonstrate competency in techniques needed to perform a variety of moderate to vigorous physical activities. Technique in developing cardiovascular fitness.

Emergence of Active Gaming in Fitness Education

Today, active gaming and cell phone/computer applications are a part of physical activity for both youth and adults. Accordingly, fitness education in school physical education programs is being enhanced through the incorporation of active video games, also known as exergaming. Examples of active gaming programs with accompanying equipment include Konami Dance Dance Revolution (DDR), Nintendo Wii, Gamebikes, Kinect XBOX, Xavix, and Hopsports. These active games have been incorporated into school wellness centers as high-tech methods of increasing student fitness levels to supplement the traditional modes for attaining vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity ( Greenberg and Stokes, 2007 ).

Bailey and McInnis (2011) compared selected active games with treadmill walking and found that each game—DDR, LightSpace (Bug Invasion), Nintendo Wii (Boxing), Cyber Trazer (Goalie Wars), Sportwall, and Xavix (J-Mat)—raised energy expenditure above that measured at rest. Mean metabolic equivalent (MET) values for each game were comparable to or higher than those measured for walking on a treadmill at 3 miles per hour. Graf and colleagues (2009) , studying boys and girls aged 10-13, found that both Wii boxing and DDR (level 2) elicited energy expenditure, heart rate, perceived exertion, and ventilatory responses that were comparable to or greater than those elicited by moderate-intensity walking on a treadmill. Similar results were found by Lanningham-Foster and colleagues (2009) among 22 children aged 10-14 and adults in that energy expenditure for both groups increased significantly when playing Wii over that expended during all sedentary activities. Staiano and colleagues (2012) explored factors that motivated overweight and obese African American high school students to play Wii during school-based physical activity opportunities. They found greater and more sustained energy expenditure over time and noted that players' various intrinsic motivations to play also influenced their level of energy expenditure. Mellecker and McManus (2008) determined that energy expenditure and heart rate were greater during times of active play than in seated play. Fawkner and colleagues (2010) studied 20 high school–age girls and found that dance simulation games provided an opportunity for most subjects to achieve a moderate-intensity level of physical activity. The authors conclude that regular use of the games aids in promoting health through physical activity. Haddock and colleagues (2009) conducted ergometer tests with children aged 7-14 and found increased oxygen consumption and energy expenditure above baseline determinations. Maddison and colleagues (2007) , studying children aged 10-14, found that active video game playing led to significant increases in energy expenditure, heart rate, and activity counts in comparison with baseline values. They conclude that playing these games for short time periods is comparable to light- to moderate-intensity conventional modes of exercise, including walking, skipping, and jogging. Mhurchu and colleagues (2008) also conclude that a short-term intervention involving active video games is likely to be an effective means of increasing children's overall level of physical activity. Additionally, Sit and colleagues (2010) , studying the effects of active gaming among 10-year-old children in Hong Kong, found the children to be significantly more physically active while playing interactive games compared with screen-based games.

Exergaming appears to increase acute physical activity among users and is being used in school settings because it is appealing to students. Despite active research in the area of exergaming and physical activity, however, exergaming's utility for increasing acute and habitual physical activity specifically in the physical education setting has yet to be confirmed. Further, results of studies conducted in nonlaboratory and nonschool settings have been mixed ( Baranowski et al., 2008 ). Moreover, any physical activity changes that do occur may not be sufficient to stimulate physiologic changes. For example, White and colleagues (2009) examined the effects of Nintendo Wii on physiologic changes. Although energy expenditure was raised above resting values during active gaming, the rise was not significant enough to qualify as part of the daily 60 minutes or more of vigorous-or moderate-intensity exercise recommended for children.

While collecting data on the effects of Nintendo Wii on 11-year-olds in New Zealand, White and colleagues (2009) found that active video games generated higher energy expenditure than both resting and inactive screen watching. They determined, however, that active gaming is a “low-intensity” physical activity. Therefore, it may be helpful in reducing the amount of sedentary behavior, but it should not be used as a replacement for more conventional modes of physical activity. Sun (2012) found that active gaming can increase student motivation to engage in physical activity, but the motivation may decrease as a result of prolonged exposure to the same games. This study also found that exergaming lessons provided less physical activity for children than regular conventional physical education. For inactive children, however, the exergaming environment is conducive to more active participation in the game-based physical activities than in conventional physical education ( Fogel et al., 2010 ). Finally, Sheehan and Katz (2012) found that among school-age children the use of active gaming added to postural stability, an important component of motor skills development.

From the research cited above, as well as ongoing research being conducted by the Health Games Research Project funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, active gaming is promising as a means of providing young children an opportunity to become more physically active and helping them meet the recommended 60 or more minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity per day. Different types of games may influence energy expenditure differentially, and some may serve solely as motivation. Selected games also appear to hold greater promise for increasing energy expenditure, while others invite youth to be physically active through motivational engagement. The dynamic and evolving field of active gaming is a promising area for future research as more opportunities arise to become physically active throughout the school environment.

Other Innovative Programs

While several evidence-based physical education programs—such as the Coordinated Approach to Child Health (CATCH) and Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids (SPARK)—are being implemented in schools, many innovative programs also have been implemented nationwide that are motivating and contribute to skills attainment while engaging youth in activities that are fun and fitness oriented. These programs include water sports, involving sailing, kayaking, swimming, canoeing, and paddle boarding; adventure activities such as Project Adventure; winter sports, such as snow skiing and snowshoeing; and extreme sports, such as in-line skating, skateboarding, and cycling.

Differences Among Elementary, Middle, and High Schools

Instructional opportunities vary within and among school levels as a result of discrepancies in state policy mandates. Although the time to be devoted to physical education (e.g., 150 minutes per week for elementary schools and 225 minutes per week for secondary schools) is commonly included in most state mandates, actual time allocation in school schedules is uncertain and often left to the discretion of local education officials.

With respect to content, in both elementary and secondary schools, physical activity is an assumed rather than an intended outcome except in the fitness education model. The goals of skill development and knowledge growth in physical education presumably are accomplished through participation in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity. Data are lacking, however, to support the claim that physical activity offered to further the attainment of skills and knowledge is of vigorous or moderate intensity and is of sufficient duration for children to reap health benefits.

Children in Nontraditional Schools

Research on physical education, physical activity, and sports opportunities in nontraditional school settings (charter schools, home schools, and correctional facilities) is extremely limited. Two intervention studies focused on charter schools addressed issues with Mexican American children. In the first ( Johnston et al., 2010 ), 10- to 14-year-old children were randomly assigned to either an instructor-led intervention or a self-help intervention for 2 years. The instructor-led intervention was a structured daily opportunity for the students to learn about nutrition and to engage in structured physical activities. The results indicate that the children in the instructor-led intervention lost more weight at the end of the intervention than those in the self-help condition. In the second study ( Romero, 2012 ), 11- to 16-year-old Mexican American children from low-income families participated in a 5-week, 10-lesson, hip-hop dance physical activity intervention. In comparison with data collected prior to the intervention, the children reported greater frequency of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity, lower perceived community barriers to physical activity, and stronger self-efficacy for physical activity. Collectively, the results of these two studies suggest that a structured physical activity intervention can be effective in enhancing and enriching physical activity opportunities for Mexican American adolescents in charter schools.

Research on physical activity among home-schooled children is also limited. The only study found was published in 2004 ( Welk et al., 2004 ). It describes differences in physical fitness, psychosocial correlates of physical activity, and physical activity between home-schooled children and their public school counterparts aged 9-16. No significant differences were found between the two groups of children on the measures used, but the researchers did note that the home-schooled children tended to be less physically active.

Research on physical education and physical activity in juvenile correction institutions is equally scarce. Munson and colleagues (1985 , 1988 ) conducted studies on the use of physical activity programs as a behavior mediation intervention strategy and compared its impact on juvenile delinquents' behavior change with that of other intervention strategies. They found that physical activity did not have a stronger impact than other programs on change in delinquent behavior.

Fitness Assessment

All states except Iowa have adopted state standards for physical education. However, the extent to which students achieve the standards is limited since no accountability is required.

An analysis of motor skills competency, strategic knowledge, physical activity, and physical fitness among 180 4th- and 5th-grade children demonstrated that the physical education standards in force were difficult to attain ( Erwin and Castelli, 2008 ). Among the study participants, fewer than a half (47 percent) were deemed motor competent, 77 percent demonstrated adequate progress in knowledge, only 40 percent were in the Healthy Fitness Zone on all five components of the Fitnessgram fitness assessment, and merely 15 percent engaged in 60 or more minutes of physical activity each day. Clearly most of the children failed to meet benchmark measures of performance for this developmental stage. This evidence highlights the need for additional physical activity opportunities within and beyond physical education to enhance opportunities for students to achieve the standards.

Relationships among these student-learning outcomes were further decomposed in a study of 230 children ( Castelli and Valley, 2007 ). The authors determined that aerobic fitness and the number of fitness test scores in the Healthy Fitness Zone were the best predictors of daily engagement in physical activity relative to factors of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), motor skills competency, and knowledge. However, in-class engagement in physical activity was best predicted by aerobic fitness and motor skills competence, suggesting that knowledge and skills should not be overlooked in a balanced physical education curriculum intended to promote lifelong physical activity.

As an untested area, student assessment in physical education has been conducted on many indicators other than learning outcomes. As reported in a seminal study ( Hensley and East, 1989 ), physical education teachers base learning assessment on participation (96 percent), effort (88 percent), attitude (76 percent), sportsmanship (75 percent), dressing out (72 percent), improvement (68 percent), attendance (58 percent), observation of skills (58 percent), knowledge tests (46 percent), skills tests (45 percent), potential (25 percent), and homework (11 percent). These data, while several years old, show that most learning assessments in physical education fail to target relevant learning objectives such as knowledge, skills, and physical activity behavior. The development of teacher-friendly learning assessments consistent with national and/or state standards is sorely needed.

Fitness assessment in the school environment can serve multiple purposes. On the one hand, it can provide both teacher and student with information about the student's current fitness level relative to a criterion-referenced standard, yield valid information that can serve as the basis for developing a personal fitness or exercise program based on current fitness levels, motivate students to do better to achieve a minimum standard of health-related fitness where deficiencies exist, and possibly assist in the identification of potential future health problems. On the other hand, an overall analysis of student fitness assessments provides valuable data that can enable teachers to assess learner outcomes in the physical education curriculum and assess the present curriculum to determine whether it includes sufficient fitness education to allow students to make fitness gains throughout the school year. Fitness assessment also provides a unique opportunity for schools to track data on students longitudinally. The ultimate goal of assessing student fitness in the school environment should be to educate students on the importance of maintaining a physically active lifestyle throughout the life span.

When administering fitness assessments in the school setting, caution is essential to ensure confidentiality of the results. The results and their interpretation should be shared with students and parents/guardians to have the greatest impact. To ensure the greatest benefits from fitness assessment, NASPE (2010) developed a position statement on “Appropriate Uses of Fitness Measurement.” Table 5-1 outlines appropriate and inappropriate practices related to fitness testing in schools and other educational settings.

Appropriate and Inappropriate Practices Related to Fitness Testing in Schools and Other Educational Settings.

When fitness assessment becomes part of a quality physical education program, teaching and learning strategies will guide all students to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to maintain and improve their personal health-related fitness as part of their commitment to lifelong healthy lifestyles. Teachers who incorporate fitness education as a thread throughout all curricula will make the greatest impact in engaging and motivating students to participate in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity in order to maintain and/or improve their personal health-related fitness. For example, the development of the Presidential Youth Fitness Program with the use of a criterion-referenced platform provides students with the educational benefits of fitness assessment knowledge (see Box 5-2 ). The emergence of one national fitness assessment, Fitnessgram, along with professional development and recognition protocols, further supports fitness education in the school environment.

Presidential Youth Fitness Program. The Presidential Youth Fitness Program, launched in September 2012, is a comprehensive program that provides training and resources to schools for assessing, tracking, and recognizing youth fitness. The program promotes (more...)

Online Physical Education

Online physical education is a growing trend. Fully 59 percent of states allow required physical education credits to be earned through online courses. Only just over half of these states require that the online courses be taught by state-certified physical education teachers. Daum and Buschner (2012) report that, in general, online physical education focuses more on cognitive knowledge than physical skill or physical activity, many online courses fail to meet national standards for learning and physical activity guidelines, and teachers are not concerned about students' accountability for learning.

Although online courses differ from traditional in-school physical education courses in the delivery of instruction, the standards and benchmarks for these courses must mirror those adopted by each individual state, especially when the course is taken to meet high school graduation requirements. NASPE (2007a , p. 2) recommends that all physical education programs include “opportunity to learn, meaningful content, appropriate instruction, and student and program assessment.” If an online physical education program meets these standards, it may be just as effective as a face-to-face program. Online physical education can be tailored to each student's needs, and it helps students learn how to exercise independently. The full NASPE position statement on online physical education can be found at http://www.ncpublic-schools.org/docs/curriculum/healthfulliving/resources/onlinepeguidelines.pdf (accessed February 1, 2013). The physical education policy of one online school, the Florida Virtual School, is presented in Box 5-3 .

Florida Virtual School's Physical Education Policy. Sections 1001.11(7) and 1003.453(2) of the Florida Statutes require that every school district have a current version of its Physical Education Policy on the district website. This document satisfies (more...)

Online physical education provides another option for helping students meet the standards for physical education if they lack room in their schedule for face-to-face classes, need to make up credit, or are just looking for an alternative to the traditional physical education class. On the other hand, online courses may not be a successful mode of instruction for students with poor time management or technology skills. According to Daum and Buschner (2012) , online learning is changing the education landscape despite the limited empirical research and conflicting results on its effectiveness in producing student learning. Through a survey involving 45 online high school physical education teachers, the authors found that almost three-fourths of the courses they taught failed to meet the national guideline for secondary schools of 225 minutes of physical education per week. Most of the courses required physical activity 3 days per week, while six courses required no physical activity. The teachers expressed support, hesitation, and even opposition toward online physical education.

Scheduling Decisions

Lesson scheduling is commonly at the discretion of school principals in the United States. The amount of time dedicated to each subject is often mandated by federal or state statutes. Local education agencies or school districts have latitude to make local decisions that go beyond these federal or state mandates. Often the way courses are scheduled to fill the school day is determined by the managerial skills of the administrator making the decisions or is based on a computer program that generates individual teacher schedules.

Successful curriculum change requires supportive scheduling (see Kramer and Keller, 2008 , for an example of curriculum reform in mathematics). More research is needed on the effects of scheduling of physical education. In one such attempt designed to examine the impact of content and lesson length on calorie expenditure in middle school physical education, Chen and colleagues (2012) found that a lesson lasting 45-60 minutes with sport skills or fitness exercises as the major content would enable middle school students to expend more calories than either shorter (30–40 minutes) or longer (65–90 minutes) lessons. The evidence from such research can be used to guide allocation of the recommended weekly amount of physical education (150 minutes for elementary schools, 225 minutes for secondary schools) to achieve optimal health benefits for youth. Additional discussion of scheduling is provided later in this chapter in the section on solutions for overcoming the barriers to quality physical education.

• IMPORTANCE OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION TO CHILD DEVELOPMENT

As discussed in Chapter 3 , there is a direct correlation between regular participation in physical activity and health in school-age children, suggesting that physical activity provides important benefits directly to the individual child ( HHS, 2008 ). Physical activity during a school day may also be associated with academic benefits ( Chapter 4 ) and children's social and emotional well-being ( HHS, 2008 ; Chapter 3 ). Physical education, along with other opportunities for physical activity in the school environment (discussed in Chapter 6 ), is important for optimal health and development in school-age children. It may also serve as a preventive measure for adult conditions such as heart disease, high blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes.

Little has been learned about the short- and long-term effectiveness of physical education in addressing public health issues ( Pate et al., 2011 ). Because the learning objectives of physical education have not included improvement in health status as a direct measure, indirect measures and correlates have been used as surrogates. However, some promising research, such as that conducted by Morgan and colleagues (2007) , has demonstrated that students are more physically active on days when they participate in physical education classes. Further, there is no evidence of a compensatory effect such that children having been active during physical education elect not to participate in additional physical activity on that day. Accordingly, quality physical education contributes to a child's daily accumulation of physical activity and is of particular importance for children who are overweight or who lack access to these opportunities in the home environment ( NASPE, 2012 ).

Unlike other physical activity in school (e.g., intramural or extramural sports), physical education represents the only time and place for every child to learn knowledge and skills related to physical activity and to be physically active during the school day. It also is currently the only time and place for all children to engage in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity safely because of the structured and specialist-supervised instructional environment. It is expected that children will use the skills and knowledge learned in physical education in other physical activity opportunities in school, such as active recess, active transportation, and intramural sports. For these reasons, physical education programming has been identified as the foundation on which multicomponent or coordinated approaches incorporating other physical activity opportunities can be designed and promoted.

Coordinated approaches in one form or another have existed since the early 1900s, but it was not until the 21st century that physical education was acknowledged as the foundation for these approaches. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2010) , the National Association of State Boards of Education ( NASBE; 2012 ), and NASPE (2004 , 2010 ) all support this view because physical education provides students with the tools needed to establish and maintain a physically active lifestyle throughout their life span. As discussed in Chapter 3 , research on motor skills development has provided evidence linking physical skill proficiency levels to participation in physical activity and fitness ( Stodden et al., 2008 , 2009 ). Exercise psychology research also has identified children's perceived skill competence as a correlate of their motivation for participation in physical activity ( Sallis et al., 2000 ). When school-based multicomponent interventions include physical activities experienced in physical education that are enjoyable and developmentally appropriate, such coordinated efforts are plausible and likely to be effective in producing health benefits ( Corbin, 2002 ). Accordingly, two of the Healthy People 2020 ( Healthy People 2020, 2010 ) objectives for physical activity in youth relate to physical education: “PA-4: Increase the proportion of the Nation's public and private schools that require daily physical education for all students ” and “PA-5: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education.” 1

The importance of physical education to the physical, cognitive, and social aspects of child development has been acknowledged by many federal, state, and local health and education agencies. Many private entities throughout the country likewise have offered their support and recommendations for strengthening physical education. For example, the Institute of Medicine (2012a), in its report Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention: Solving the Weight of the Nation , points to the need to strengthen physical education to ensure that all children engage in 60 minutes or more of physical activity per school day. Similarly, the National Physical Activity Plan (2010) , developed by a group of national organizations at the forefront of public health and physical activity, comprises a comprehensive set of policies, programs, and initiatives aimed at increasing physical activity in all segments of schools. The plan is intended to create a national culture that supports physically active lifestyles so that its vision that “one day, all Americans will be physically active and they will live, work, and play in environments that facilitate regular physical activity” can be realized. To accomplish this ultimate goal, the plan calls for improvement in the quantity and quality of physical education for students from prekindergarten through 12th grade through significant policy initiatives at the federal and state levels that guide and fund physical education and other physical activity programs. Specifically, the plan prescribes seven specific tactics presented in Box 5-4 .

National Physical Activity Plan: Strategy 2. The National Physical Activity Plan's Strategy 2 is as follows: Strategy 2: Develop and implement state and school district policies requiring school accountability for the quality and quantity of physical (more...)

Medical professional associations, such as the American Cancer Society (ACS), American Diabetes Association (ADA), and American Heart Association (AHA), have long acknowledged the importance of physical education and have endorsed policies designed to strengthen it. A position statement on physical education from the ACS Cancer Action Network, ADA, and AHA (2012) calls for support for quality physical education and endorses including physical education as an important part of a student's comprehensive, well-rounded education program because of its positive impact on lifelong health and well-being. Further, physical education policy should make quality the priority while also aiming to increase the amount of time physical education is offered in schools.

Recently, private-sector organizations—such as the NFL through its Play60 program—have been joining efforts to ensure that youth meet the guideline of at least 60 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity per day. One such initiative is Nike's (2012) Designed to Move: A Physical Activity Action Agenda , a framework for improving access to physical activity for all American children in schools. Although the framework does not focus exclusively on physical education, it does imply the important role of physical education in the action agenda (see Box 5-5 ).

Nike's Designed to Move: A Physical Activity Action Agenda. Universal access: Design programs that are effective for every child, including those who face the most barriers to participating in physical activity. Age appropriate: Physical activities and (more...)

Finally, in response to First Lady Michelle Obama's Let's Move initiative, the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance (AAHPERD) launched the Let's Move In School initiative, which takes a holistic approach to the promotion of physical activity in schools. The purpose of the initiative is to help elementary and secondary schools launch the Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP), which is focused on strengthening physical education and promoting all opportunities for physical activity in school. The CSPAP in any given school is intended to accomplish two goals: (1) “provide a variety of school-based physical activity opportunities that enable all students to participate in at least 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity each day” and (2) “provide coordination among the CSPAP components to maximize understanding, application, and practice of the knowledge and skills learned in physical education so that all students will be fully physically educated and well-equipped for a lifetime of physical activity” ( AAHPERD, 2012 ). The five CSPAP components, considered vital for developing a physically educated and physically active child, are physical education, physical activity during school, physical activity before and after school, staff involvement, and family and community involvement ( AAHPERD, 2012 ). Schools are allowed to implement all or selected components.

An AAHPERD (2011) survey indicated that 16 percent of elementary schools, 13 percent of middle schools, and 6 percent of high schools (from a self-responding nationwide sample, not drawn systematically) had implemented a CSPAP since the program was launched. Although most schools sampled (90 percent) provided physical education, the percentage declined through middle school and high school, such that only 44 percent of high schools provided physical education to seniors. In most schools (92 percent), classes were taught by teachers certified to teach physical education.

More than 76 percent of elementary schools provided daily recess for children, and 31 percent had instituted a policy prohibiting teachers from withholding children from participating in recess for disciplinary reasons. In 56 percent of elementary schools that had implemented a CSPAP, physical activity was encouraged between lessons/classes; in 44 percent it was integrated into academic lessons; and in 43 percent the school day started with physical activity programs.

The percentage of schools that offered intramural sports clubs to at least 25 percent of students declined from 62 percent of middle schools to 50 percent of high school for males, and from 53 to 40 percent, respectively, for females. Interscholastic sports were offered in 89 percent of high schools. Among them, approximately 70 percent involved at least 25 percent of the male student population participating and 58 percent involved at least 25 percent of the female student population participating. Sixty-five percent of high schools had “cut” policies, which could limit the enrollment of students in interscholastic sports.

• CHARACTERISTICS OF QUALITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS

As noted, a high-quality physical education program can help youth meet the guideline of at least 60 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity per day. This increase in physical activity should be balanced with appropriate attention to skill development and to national education standards for quality physical education (see Box 5-6 ). In a recent literature review, Bassett and colleagues (2013) found that physical education contributes to children achieving an average of 23 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity daily. However, the time spent in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity could be increased by 6 minutes if the physical education curriculum were to incorporate a standardized curriculum such as SPARK (discussed in detail below) ( Bassett et al., 2013 ). Thus, it is possible for physical education to contribute to youth meeting at least half (30 minutes) of their daily requirement for vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity. To help children grow holistically, however, physical education needs to achieve other learning goals when children are active. To this end, physical education programs must possess the quality characteristics specified by NASPE (2007b , 2009b , c ) (see Box 5-6 ). Designing and implementing a physical education program with these characteristics in mind should ensure that the time and curricular materials of the program enable students to achieve the goals of becoming knowledgeable exercisers and skillful movers who value and adopt a physically active, healthy lifestyle.

NASPE's Characteristics of a High-Quality Physical Education Program. All students are required to take physical education. Instructional periods total 150 minutes per week (elementary schools) and 225 minutes per week (middle and secondary schools).

Findings from research on effective physical education support these characteristics as the benchmarks for quality programs. In an attempt to understand what effective physical education looks like, Castelli and Rink (2003) conducted a mixed-methods comparison of 62 physical education programs in which a high percentage of students achieved the state physical education learning standards with programs whose students did not achieve the standards. Comprehensive data derived from student performance, teacher surveys, and onsite observations demonstrated that highly effective physical education programs were housed in cohesive, long-standing departments that experienced more facilitators (e.g., positive policy, supportive administration) than inhibitors (e.g., marginalized status as a subject matter within the school). Further, effective programs made curricular changes prior to the enactment of state-level policy, while ineffective programs waited to make changes until they were told to do so. The teachers in ineffective programs had misconceptions about student performance and, in general, lower expectations of student performance and behavior.

Examples of Evidence-Based Physical Education Curricular Programs

Two large-scale intervention studies—SPARK and CATCH—are discussed in this section as examples of how programs can be structured to increase vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity in physical education classes.

The aim of SPARK, a research-based curriculum, is to improve the health, fitness, and physical activity levels of youth by creating, implementing, and evaluating programs that promote lifelong wellness. Each SPARK program “fosters environmental and behavioral change by providing a coordinated package of highly active curriculum, on-site teacher training, extensive follow-up support, and content-matched equipment focused on the development of healthy lifestyles, motor skills and movement knowledge, and social and personal skills” ( SPARK, 2013 ).

Research supports the use of SPARK as a platform for improving the quality of physical activity instruction in schools. The SPARK curriculum has demonstrated the ability to improve student activity levels, increase the number of minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity for students, and provide sustainable and positive change in a school district ( Myers-Schieffer and Thomas, 2012 ). In one study, researchers found that “the children were positive about this specific curriculum. This is gratifying because one of the goals of the program was to engender positive feeling in the students toward physical activity” ( McKenzie et al., 1994 , p. 213). In another study, a SPARK intervention is credited with exposing students to an increase in motor skills drills, which in turn led to a higher level of manipulative motor skills acquisition ( McKenzie et al., 1998 ). As a result of improved activity levels, students who participated in the SPARK curriculum improved their times in the 1-mile run and sit-up tests ( Sallis et al., 1997 ). Finally, System for Observing Fitness Instruction Time (SOFIT) classroom observations revealed that students in SPARK classes increased their time spent in vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity per class from 17.8 to up to 40.2 minutes compared with students in non-SPARK classes, who engaged in 17.8 minutes of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity per class. Teachers involved in the SPARK intervention offered increased levels of fitness promotion and provided students with an increased amount of general instruction and increased minutes of attention per week ( McKenzie et al., 1997 ; Myers-Schieffer and Thomas, 2012 ).

The CATCH program teaches children in grades K-8 how to be healthy throughout their lifetimes through a coordinated approach that involves engaging the community, families, and educators to work together. The goal of CATCH is to impact children's health behaviors positively, improve the school health environment, and influence and change school health policies and practices in order to reduce and eliminate health risk factors and risk-related behaviors of students ( Perry et al., 1990 ). CATCH significantly increases the physical activity levels of students during physical education class and provides a wide range of learning experiences for students of all abilities.

CATCH began as a clinical trial from 1991 to 1994 in four regional sites: Tulane University in New Orleans; the University of California, San Diego; the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis; and the University of Texas in Houston. The participants were elementary school children in grades 3 through 5 and included children from multiethnic backgrounds. Upon completion of the main trial, CATCH had succeeded in producing positive and lasting changes in children's behaviors, including decreasing fat consumption and increasing physical activity ( Luepker et al., 1996 ). The changes were maintained for 3 years postintervention ( Nader et al., 1999 ).

National Standards

Because physical education is part of the curriculum in schools, its quality should be judged only by whether and to what extent children have learned and benefited from it. In a landmark document on learning goals, Moving into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education , NASPE (2004) proposes six student learning standards specifying both conceptual and behavioral characteristics that a physically educated person must possess and display (see Box 5-7 ). These characteristics encompass knowledge, skill, behavior, and confidence critical to the development and maintenance of health and to the enjoyment of a physically active, healthful lifestyle.

Certified Physical Education Specialists as the Main Teaching Force

If standards are the gauge for quality, teachers make the difference in a particular school in terms of the extent to which students can achieve the standards. Research has made clear that certified physical education specialists can provide more and longer opportunities for students to meet physical activity guidelines compared with classroom teachers trained to teach physical education ( McKenzie et al., 2001 ). Moreover, when teachers are taught strategies to encourage vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity in physical education class, a significant increase in physical activity can be expected ( Lonsdale et al., 2013 ). The role of certified physical education specialists in health-enhancing physical education has become increasingly critical ( McKenzie, 2007 ). The evidence is unequivocal regarding the need for a continued effort to train physical education specialists and the need for schools to continue to employ them as the main teaching force designing and implementing health-enhancing physical education programs to the fullest extent.

Aside from serving as the instructional leader for physical education, physical education specialists can serve as expert resources for classroom teachers in the implementation of classroom physical activity breaks and recess (discussed in detail in Chapter 6 ). Their expertise in age-appropriate physical activity helps ensure that students are participating in activities that are fun and engaging. Additionally, as the catalyst for a healthy school environment, the physical education specialist can assist in the design and delivery of intramural programs provided before and after school, as well as serve as a community outreach specialist for onsite activity partnerships. For physical education specialists interested in a more formal role as a physical activity leader at their school, NASPE has developed a director of physical activity certification program.

It is a commonly held notion of society that to maintain the quality of education, schools should hire teachers certified to teach in the subject matter areas in which they are licensed. Unfortunately, in the United States, not all physical education classes are taught by certified physical education specialists. Indeed, 68 percent of elementary schools allow classroom teachers (generalists) to teach physical education ( NASPE, 2012 ). Certification or licensure of middle/junior high school and high school physical education teachers is required in only 82 percent and 90 percent of states ( NASPE, 2012 ), respectively. Only 37 states (72 percent) have a requirement for professional development and continuing education hours/credit for physical education teachers to maintain or renew their certification, with renewal time ranging from 3 to 5 years ( NASPE, 2012 ). Twenty-eight states (55 percent) allow temporary/emergency certificates to teach physical education that are valid for 1 to 3 years ( NASPE, 2012 ). The basic requirements for emergency certification include a bachelor's degree in teaching or in any area except physical education. Only 31 states (60 percent) support physical education teachers going through the national board certification process, and only New York requires each school district to have a licensed physical education specialist serving as a physical education coordinator ( NASPE, 2012 ).

Preservice Education for Teachers

Teaching physical education to children effectively and safely requires specific knowledge about children and their physical/mental development, body composition (anatomy) and functions (physiology and biomechanics), and motor skills development and acquisition. In addition, teaching physical education requires substantial knowledge and skill in pedagogy—the science and art of teaching. Box 5-8 lists the NASPE standards for beginning physical education teachers who have completed a bachelor's teacher training program and those who have completed advanced (master's-level) training.

National Association for Sport and Physical Education Standards for Beginning Physical Education Teachers. Scientific and theoretical knowledge: Physical education teacher candidates know and apply discipline-specific scientific and theoretical concepts (more...)

These standards are accompanied by measurement rubrics (unacceptable, acceptable, and target, with target being exemplary) developed jointly by NASPE and the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) for evaluating physical education teacher education programs across the country (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico). NCATE identified a total of 133 physical education teacher education programs as “nationally recognized.” The committee was unable to determine how many programs nationwide have met the minimum standards (not at the nationally recognized level) or locate reliable information on the total number of physical education teacher education programs. A Web search using the term “physical education” resulted in two different but relatively reliable statistics: 720 ( College Board, 2013 ) and 1,945 ( Peterson's, 2013 ). But the data sources did not distinguish between physical education teaching majors and other kinesiology concentrations (e.g., sports medicine, exercise physiology/fitness). Statistics on the number of physical education teacher education programs and their quality based on the NASPE standards are needed.

The current wave of effort to curb physical inactivity among youth has begun to influence teacher education programs. According to a national survey study ( Kulinna et al., 2010 ), current teacher candidates believe that helping K-12 students become physically active and fit is the first priority of physical education, followed by helping them actualize their own goals, develop motor skills, and become responsible. These data appear to suggest that physical education teacher education programs are beginning to turn from a traditionally sports- and skills-centered model to a more comprehensive, physical activity– and health-centered model. This change is important in that the role of both current and future physical education teachers extends beyond merely teaching their classes to advancing public health goals ( McKenzie, 2007 ).

In many universities, however, teacher education programs in physical education have either been reduced or eliminated because of the decline in physical education requirements, which has resulted in a decrease in the number of physical education teachers being employed. Concomitantly, physical education teacher education programs are experiencing an unprecedented crisis. A recent report indicates that, in school year 2008–2009, only 23 doctorate-granting kinesiology departments offered doctoral programs that were training future teacher educators ( Boyce and Rikard, 2011a ). A total of 140 doctoral students were receiving training offered by 114 professors (including part-time), and 11 percent of those professors were planning to retire. Boyce and Rikard (2011a) report that in the past 13 years, 479 doctoral students graduated as physical education teacher educators—36.8 each year on average—89 percent of whom were able to find positions in colleges and universities. During the same period, 61 positions were open, only 39 of which were filled (64 percent), with an applicant pool of 38 candidates with earned degrees and 13 who completed the doctoral course-work but did not complete the dissertation research ( Boyce and Rikard, 2011b ). Clearly there is a shortage of physical education teacher educators in higher education institutions. Because of a lack of national tracking data on physical education graduates, the extent to which the teacher educator shortage has impacted and will impact the need to supply quality physical education teachers to the nation is unclear.

Professional Development

In all educational settings, professional development for teachers and administrators is a continuous process of acquiring new knowledge and skills that relate to an educator's profession or academic subject area, job responsibilities, or work environment. Professional development is essential for improving classroom instruction and student achievement ( Ball and Cohen, 1999 ; Cohen and Hill, 2000 ). Through a variety of delivery methods, professional development activities may include credit or noncredit courses, classroom or online venues, workshops, seminars, teleconferences, and webinars, with the ultimate goal of improving the delivery of instruction to enhance student achievement.

Yoon and colleagues (2007) assert that a strong link exists among professional development, teacher learning and practice, and student achievement. Figure 5-1 , which aligns with the research on effective professional development ( Kennedy, 1998 ; Loucks-Horsley and Matsumoto, 1999 ; Cohen and Hill, 2000 ; Garet et al., 2001 ; Fishman et al., 2003 ; Guskey and Sparks, 2004 ), illustrates how (1) professional development enhances teacher knowledge and skills, (2) better knowledge and skills improve classroom teaching, and (3) improved teaching raises student achievement.

Logic model of the impact of professional development on student achievement.

The most impactful statement of government policy on the preparation and professional development of teachers was the 2002 reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act ( Whitehurst, 2002 ), known as the No Child Left Behind Act. While Title I of the act places highly qualified teachers in the classroom, Title II addresses the same goal by funding professional development for teachers. The importance of quality professional development is well documented in the act.

Professional development, according to the No Child Left Behind Act, should be offered to improve teachers' knowledge of the subject matter they teach, strengthen their classroom management skills, advance their understanding and implementation of effective teaching strategies, and build their capabilities to address disparities in education. The act states that high-quality professional development programs should have the characteristics listed in Box 5-9 .

Characteristics of a High-Quality Professional Development Program. It is sustained, intensive, and content-focused to have a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction and teacher performance. It is aligned with and directly related to state (more...)

Although there is a substantial literature on professional development, only a few high-quality studies relate teachers' professional development experiences to student outcomes. Recommendations for high-quality professional development tend to emphasize the importance of intense, content-focused experiences, as well as opportunities for peer collaboration and structured induction experiences for new teachers. Wiley and Yoon (1995) and Kennedy (1998) suggest that teaching practice and student achievement are likely to improve when professional development is focused on academic content and curriculum that are aligned with standards-based reform.

Kulinna (2012) used Guskey and Sparks' (2004) Model of Teacher Change to determine whether students' physical activity and BMI changed after their teacher underwent a 1-year professional development program. Significant increases in students' physical activity levels were found, but no significant changes in BMI. Looking at the effect of professional development on changes in behavior among physical education teachers, Martin and colleagues (2008) found that, following a variety of professional development experiences and follow-up sessions, teachers showed increases in their efficacy in attaining motor skills objectives, physical activity and fitness knowledge objectives, and personal and social objectives. These results lend support to the value of professional development in enhancing teachers' perceptions of self-efficacy for teaching the curriculum. McCaughtry and colleagues (2006) explored the factors that make teacher professional development successful and what success might mean in terms of teachers' instructional practices and feelings about change. Results indicated that after teachers completed professional development the resources they gained enabled them to improve their instruction by teaching more content, maximizing student learning opportunities, teaching diverse learners, teaching to development, and increasing classroom safety.

Learning Forward (formerly known as the National Staff Development Council) provides research-based guidelines to assist districts in aligning local professional development programs with qualitative standards. Its Standards for Professional Learning were revised in 2011 and are guided by the relationship between professional learning and student results (see Box 5-10 ). According to Learning Forward (2012) :

Standards for Professional Learning. Learning communities: Professional learning that increases educator effectiveness and results for all students occurs within learning communities committed to continuous improvement, collective responsibility, and (more...)

• When professional learning is standards based, it has greater potential to change what educators know, are able to do, and believe.
• When educators' knowledge, skills, and dispositions change, they have a broader repertoire of effective strategies to use in adapting their practices to meet performance expectations and students' learning needs.
• When educator practices improve, students have a greater likelihood of achieving results.
• When student results improve, the cycle repeats for continuous improvement.
• Professional learning standards provide a foundation on which to design professional learning experiences at the district or school level that will assist educators in acquiring the necessary knowledge, skills, and tools.

As a recognized means of providing physical education teachers with the tools necessary to enhance student achievement, quality professional development should be provided on a regular basis with follow-up support, along with a method for determining its effectiveness in meeting both curricular and pedagogical standards. Furthermore, to enhance the fitness achievement of students, school-based professional development should provide instruction on the integration of fitness testing into a curriculum and should include training in protocols, the interpretation and communication of results, and the setting and achievement of fitness goals and recommendations for developing healthy living habits for both students and their parents ( IOM, 2012a ).

• POLICIES THAT AFFECT THE QUALITY OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Instructional opportunities for physical activity and physical education are mandated by most states. In comparison with data prior to 2006, more states have developed mandates for physical education at both the elementary and secondary school levels. However, most mandates lack a specified time allocation that ensures meeting the NASPE recommendation of 150 and 225 minutes per week for elementary and secondary schools, respectively ( McCullick et al., 2012 ), despite the fact that physical education has been considered a cornerstone for developing schoolwide multicomponent interventions to address the issue of physical inactivity in schools. Some obstacles to the implementation of quality physical activity are listed in Box 5-11 .

Obstacles to Implementation of Quality Physical Education. Class periods dedicated to physical education are declining at all school levels. Existing discrepancies between policy and implementation with respect to specific time allocation contribute to (more...)

According to Title IX of the No Child Left Behind Act (Part A Sec 9101–11), core academic subjects include “English, reading or language arts, mathematics, science, foreign languages, civics and government, economics, arts, history, and geography.” If physical education were designated as a core academic subject, it would receive much-needed policy attention that would enhance its overall quality with respect to content offerings, instruction, and accountability. In support of the inclusion of physical education as a core subject, Senator Tom Udall (D-NM) reintroduced the Promoting Health for Youth Skills in Classrooms and Life (PHYSICAL) Act on February 27, 2013, to support and encourage the health and well-being of elementary and secondary school students.

With physical education not being considered a core subject, and amid growing concern regarding the increase in childhood obesity and physical inactivity, several national studies and reports have emphasized the importance of implementing state statutes, laws, and regulations both mandating time requirements for physical education and monitoring compliance. Yet although several national governmental, nongovernmental, private industry, and public health organizations have recommended specific day and time/minute requirements for physical education, no standardized state policy has emerged.

Analysis of State Statutes and Administrative Codes

In the United States, school policies on curriculum and school-based activities are determined by local education agencies according to state laws governing educational activities. Decisions about what to teach, who will teach it, and what level of resources will be provided are made by the state, county or district, and school administration. To better understand the status of state statutes, administrative codes, and policies impacting physical education in schools, the committee analyzed NASBE's State School Health Policy Database ( NASBE, 2012 ; www.nasbe.org/healthy_schools [accessed February 1, 2013]). Of importance to this analysis is the distinction made between state statutes and administrative codes, which accords with the definition proffered by Perna and colleagues (2012) : “At the state level, the 2 primary official public policy levers referred to as ‘codified law’ used for developing school-based physical education policy are 1) statutory laws (laws enacted by the given State legislature); and 2) administrative laws (rule and regulations by state executive branch agencies, such as the Department of Education)” (p. 1594). A second point to note is that in descriptions of physical education graduation requirements, it is impossible to differentiate among “credit,” “Carnegie unit,” and “course” so as to determine the exact time requirements for graduation.

Using the NASBE database, the committee performed an overall analysis of policies on physical education and physical activity of the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The analysis revealed that 45 states (88 percent) mandate physical education; 22 states (23 percent) require it with mandatory minutes, while 25 states (49 percent) have no mandatory minutes and 4 (0.07 percent) leave the required number of minutes up to local decision makers. A majority of states allow for waivers or substitutions for physical education (see the discussion below). Fitness assessment is required in 15 states (29 percent), and other curricular assessments are required in 4 states (0.07 percent). Twenty-six states (53 percent) require physical education grades to be included in a student's grade point average. Forty-three states (84 percent) require some degree of physical education for high school graduation, with a range of 0.5 to 3.75 credits. One state (0.02 percent) requires K-12 physical education but does not require 4 years of physical education for high school graduation.

Although no federal policies requiring physical education presently exist, the above evidence shows that the majority of states require physical education. However, the number of days and time required vary greatly by state and local school district, as does the amount of physical education required for high school graduation. Given the reduced time for physical activity in school through recess, and absent the implementation of stronger policies, schools have not only the opportunity but also the responsibility to nurture in youth the skills, knowledge, and confidence to develop and maintain a healthy lifestyle. The consensus among states indicated by the mandates for physical education summarized above, together with the discrepancies in specific policies, may suggest the need for general guidelines or a federal-level mandate that can serve to guide a collective effort to address the prevalence of childhood inactivity and obesity.

Policies That Support Physical Education

In addition to policies that directly require offering physical education in schools, other policies support physical education opportunities in schools. In 2004 the U.S. government issued a mandate, under the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004, requiring school districts that receive funds under this act to establish local school wellness policies. These policies were to include provisions for physical activity and healthy eating, thus expanding schools' responsibility for providing physical activity to school-age children. The enactment of this mandates made schools “the central element in a community system that ensures that students participate in enough physical activity to develop healthy lifestyles” ( Pate et al., 2006 , p. 1215). Several government agencies and organizations have recommended embedding a specific number of days and minutes of physical education into each school's or district's wellness policy. Although school districts are required to include goals for physical activity in their local school wellness policies, they are not required to address physical education specifically.

Policies That Hinder Physical Education

Some policies have contributed to the substantial reduction in the opportunities for school-age children to be physically active, such as by shortening or eliminating physical education classes. These reductions can be attributed to budget cuts and increased pressure for schools to meet academic standards imposed by the federal government.

No Child Left Behind Act

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires that states develop assessment and accountability measures to verify performance improvements in the subject areas of reading and mathematics (P.L. No. 107-110, Section 115). Specifically, federal funding is now dependent on schools making adequate progress in reading and mathematics. No Child Left Behind requires all public schools receiving federal funding to administer statewide standardized annual tests for all students. Schools that receive Title I funding through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 must make adequate yearly progress in test scores (e.g., each year 5th graders must do better on standardized tests than the previous year's 5th graders). If required improvements are not made, schools are penalized through decreased funding. If a school produces poor results for 2 consecutive years, improvement plans must be developed for the school. If a school does not make adequate progress for 5 consecutive years, a full restructuring of the school is mandated.

Under the act, physical education, music, and art are considered “nonessential” subjects and are not a main focus of the school learning environment. In response to the act, schools have devoted more time in the school day to instruction in reading and mathematics. Since the act was passed, 62 percent of elementary schools and 20 percent of middle schools have increased instructional time in reading/language arts and mathematics ( Center on Education Policy, 2008 ). Unfortunately, 44 percent of school administrators reported that these increases in instructional time for reading and mathematics were achieved at the expense of time devoted to physical education, recess, art, music, and other subjects ( Center on Education Policy, 2007 , 2008 ) (see Table 5-2 ).

Changes in Time Allocation in Elementary Schools Since 2001–2002.

The emphasis on high-stakes testing and pressure for academic achievement in the core subjects has had unintended consequences for other subjects throughout the school day. In developing master schedules, school site administrators have been forced to make difficult decisions regarding the allotment of time for “nonessential” subjects. The average reduction in instructional time in these “nonessential” subjects has been 145 minutes per week. As discussed earlier, however, no evidence suggests that physical education and physical activity have a negative effect on student achievement or academic outcomes ( CDC, 2010 ). On the contrary, positive academic-related outcomes (e.g., improved on-task classroom behavior, cognitive development, academic performance) have been associated with physical education and physical activity (see Chapter 4 ).

The Center on Education Policy (2007) conducted an analysis of 2006–2007 survey data from 349 school districts on the amount of time devoted to specific subjects to determine the impact of the No Child Left Behind Act. Shifts in instructional time toward English language arts and mathematics and away from other subjects were relatively large in a majority of school districts that made these types of changes. Sixty-two percent of districts reported increasing time in elementary schools in English language arts and/or mathematics since 2001–2002. A higher proportion of urban districts (76 percent) than rural districts (54 percent) reported such increases.

Districts that increased instructional time for English language arts and/or mathematics did so by 43 percent on average. Districts that also reduced instructional time in other subjects reported total reductions of 32 percent, on average. Eight of 10 districts that reported increasing time for English language arts did so by at least 75 minutes per week, and more than half (54 percent) did so by 150 minutes or more per week. Among districts that reported adding time for mathematics, 63 percent added at least 75 minutes per week, and 19 percent added 150 minutes or more per week.

Most districts that increased time for English language arts or mathematics also reported substantial cuts in time for other subjects or periods, including social studies, science, art and music, physical education, recess, and lunch. Among the districts that reported both increasing time for English language arts or mathematics and reducing time in other subjects, 72 percent indicated that they reduced the time for one or more of these other subjects by a total of at least 75 minutes per week. For example, more than half (53 percent) of these districts cut instructional time by at least 75 minutes per week in social studies, and the same percentage (53 percent) cut time by at least 75 minutes per week in science ( Center on Education Policy, 2007 ).

Districts that reported an increase in instructional time for elementary school English language arts spent an average of 378 minutes per week on this subject before No Child Left Behind was enacted. After the act became law, they spent 520 minutes per week. The average increase for English language arts was 141 minutes per week, or a 47 percent increase over the level prior to the act ( Center on Education Policy, 2007 ; see district survey items 18 and 19 in Table IT-18A). Table 5-3 shows the specific amounts of time cut from various subjects in districts that reported decreases.

Time Cut from Subjects or Periods in Districts Reporting Decreases in Instructional Time.

Districts with at least one school identified as “in need of improvement” under the act were far more likely than districts not in need of improvement to decrease time in certain subjects so as to devote more time to English language arts and mathematics (78 versus 57 percent). For example, 51 percent of districts with a school in need of improvement reported decreased time in social studies, compared with 31 percent of districts with no school in need of improvement ( Center on Education Policy, 2007 ).

Exemptions from Physical Education Requirements

The 2012 Shape of the Nation Report includes documentation of the multiple reasons students may be exempt from physical education classes. Thirty-three states permit school districts or schools to allow students to substitute other activities for physical education. The most common substitutions are Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC), inter-scholastic sports, marching band, cheerleading, and community sports. Twenty-eight states allow schools and school districts to grant exemptions/waivers from physical education time or credit requirements. Reasons for exemptions/waivers include health, physical disability, religious belief, and early graduation; six states leave the reasons to the local schools or school districts. Although it would seem reasonable that some substitution programs such as JROTC or cheerleading might accrue physical activity comparable to that from physical education, these programs do not necessarily offer students opportunities to learn the knowledge and skills needed for lifelong participation in health-enhancing physical activities. Research on the impact of exemptions/waivers from physical education is lacking. No evidence currently exists showing that students receive any portion of the recommended 60 minutes or more of vigorous- or moderate-intensity physical activity through substituted activities sanctioned by their schools.

• BARRIERS TO QUALITY PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SOLUTIONS

Barriers other than the policies detailed above hinder efforts to improve and maintain high-quality physical education. This section reviews these barriers, along with some solutions for overcoming them.

Morgan and Hanson (2008) classify barriers that hinder schools from implementing quality physical education programs as either institutional (outside the teacher's control) or teacher related (arising from teacher behavior). Table 5-4 lists institutional and teacher-related as well as student-related barriers identified by various authors.

Barriers to the Delivery of Physical Education and Physical Activity Programs to Primary and Secondary School Students.

Dwyer and colleagues (2003) examined Toronto teachers' perspectives on why children were not engaged in daily physical education. They identified three categories of barriers: lower priority for physical education relative to other subjects, lack of performance measures for physical activity, and lack of sufficient infrastructure. Jenkinson and Benson (2010) surveyed 270 secondary school physical education teachers in Victoria, Australia, and asked them to rank order the barriers they perceived to providing quality physical education. The results are shown in Table 5-5 . The institutional barriers listed in this table are similar to those identified for U.S. schools in Table 5-4 .

Physical Education Teachers' Ranking of Barriers to Providing Quality Physical Education (PE) in Victorian State Secondary Schools.

Jenkinson and Benson (2010) also presented teachers with a list of barriers to student participation in physical education and physical activity in three categories: institutional, teacher-related, and student-related. The teachers were asked to rank the top five barriers they perceived. Results are presented in Table 5-6 .

Perceived Barriers to Student Participation in Physical Education and Physical Activity in Victorian State Secondary Schools: Physical Education Teachers' Ranking (from most [“5”] to least [“1”] influential).

Finally, Gallo and colleagues (2006) found that the greatest process barriers to assessing students in physical education were grading students on skill levels and abilities; time constraints; class size; and record keeping, especially when assessing students on skills, cognitive knowledge, and fitness.

Two key barriers to physical education identified in the studies summarized above are staffing and funding. These barriers reflect a lack of support structure in schools for quality physical education.

As noted earlier in this chapter, physical education is short staffed. State mandates have placed pressure on schools to preserve instructional resources for the high-stakes tested core subject areas at the expense of non-core subjects. For example, when a state mandates a maximum class size of 20 students per teacher in all core subjects, with noncompliance resulting in some form of penalty, an elementary school with an average of 25 students per teacher is forced to hire additional teachers in these subjects to meet the state mandate. Consequently, the school must shrink its teaching force in noncore subjects, such as physical education, to balance its budget. If noncore classes are to be preserved, their class sizes must increase, with fewer teachers serving more students. As a result, it becomes difficult to implement a quality program, and physical education teachers perceive their programs as being undervalued.

According to the Government Accountability Office report K-12 Education: School-Based Physical Education and Sports Programs ( GAO, 2012 ), school officials cite budget cuts and inadequate facilities as major challenges to providing physical education opportunities for students. Budget cuts have affected schools' ability to hire physical education teachers, maintain appropriate class sizes, and purchase sufficient equipment. As noted earlier, lack of equipment and limited access to facilities are cited as top barriers in the study by Jenkinson and Benson (2010) (see Tables 5-5 and 5-6 ). Limited budgets have a negative impact on a school's ability to purchase enough physical education equipment to engage all students in increasingly large class sizes and cause physical education teachers to abandon quality evidence-based physical education programs and resort to large-group games and “throw out the ball” activities. Students disengaged as a result of such practices may prefer sedentary activities to more active lifestyles. A NASPE (2009a) survey found that the median physical education budget for physical education programs nationally was $764 per school ($460 per elementary school, $900 per middle school, and $1,370 per high school).

Solutions for Overcoming the Barriers

For many adolescents who have few opportunities to be active outside of the school day, quality physical education becomes the only option for physical activity. For students in large urban communities, physical education classes serve as a safe environment in which to be physically active under adult supervision in a structured environment. For students with disabilities in particular, physical education classes are one of the only outlets for physical activity. For these reasons, it is crucial to overcome the above barriers to quality physical education. Some school districts have found ways to do so and provide robust physical education programs.

The barrier of limited time during the school day can be overcome through creative scheduling that makes use of every minute of the day in a constructive manner. For example, Miami-Dade County Public Schools is the fourth largest school district in the United States, in a large urban minority-majority community with large budgetary shortfalls and attention in schools being diverted to academic requirements. Yet the district has always had daily physical education in its elementary schools taught by a certified physical education teacher. This is accomplished by scheduling physical education during the classroom teacher's planning time. In addition, students receive school board–mandated recess for either 20 minutes two times per week or 15 minutes three times per week. Figures 5-2 and 5-3 show examples of elementary school teacher schedules that demonstrate how 150 minutes of time for physical education can be incorporated successfully into any master schedule.

Example of a schedule demonstrating time for 150 minutes per week of physical education. NOTE: Sample is taken from a teacher schedule in a traditional elementary school. SOURCE: Large Urban Public School District, Miami-Dade County Public Schools.

Example of a schedule demonstrating time for 150 minutes per week of physical education. NOTES: Sample is taken from a teacher schedule in a combination special education and disabilities (SPED)/Spanish-language elementary class. PE = physical education; (more...)

Other positive examples, identified in the report Physical Education Matters ( San Diego State University, 2007 ), include successful case studies from low-resource California schools. The report acknowledges, however, that advancing such opportunities will require policy changes at the state, district, and local levels. These changes include securing grant funds with which to implement high-tech physical education wellness centers, staff commitment to professional development, administrative support, physical education being made a priority, community support, use of certified physical education teachers, and district support. Identifying the need to reform physical education guided by evidence-based findings, the report concludes that (1) curriculum matters, (2) class size matters, (3) qualified teachers matter, (4) professional development matters, and (5) physical environment matters. If programs are to excel and students are to achieve, delivery of the curriculum must be activity based; class sizes must be commensurate with those for other subject areas; highly qualified physical education specialists, as opposed to classroom teachers, must be hired to deliver instruction; professional development in activity-focused physical education must be delivered; and school physical education facilities, such as playing fields and indoor gym space and equipment, must be available.

A separate report, Physical Education Matters: Success Stories from California Low Resource Schools That Have Achieved Excellent Physical Education Programs ( San Diego State University, 2007 ), notes that when funding from a variety of grant resources, including federal funding, became available, schools were able to transition to high-quality programs using innovative instructional strategies. Those strategies included wellness centers and active gaming, which engaged students in becoming more physically active. Administrative support was found to be a key factor in turning programs around, along with staff commitment and professional development. Having certified physical education teachers and making physical education a priority in the schools were other key factors. External factors further strengthened programs, including having school district support, having a physical education coordinator, and using state standards to provide accountability. Additional ways to overcome the barriers to quality physical education include scheduling time for physical education, ensuring reasonable class size, providing nontraditional physical education activities, making classes more active and fun for all students, and acknowledging the importance of role modeling and personal investment and involvement in participation in physical activity among staff.

Still another way to overcome the barriers to quality physical education is to assist administrative decision makers and policy makers in understanding the correlation between physical education and academic achievement (see Chapter 4 ). The report Active Education: Physical Education, Physical Activity and Academic Performance by Active Living Research ( Trost, 2009 ) cites evidence that “children who are physically active and fit tend to perform better in the classroom and that daily physical education does not adversely affect academic performance. Schools can provide outstanding learning environments while improving children's health through physical education.” The findings reported include the following (p. 6):

• “In some cases, more time in physical education leads to improved grades and standardized test scores.”
• “Physically active and fit children tend to have better academic achievement.”
• “Evidence links higher levels of physical fitness with better school attendance and fewer disciplinary problems.”
• “There are several possible mechanisms by which physical education and regular physical activity may improve academic achievement, including enhanced concentration skills and classroom behavior.”
• “Additional research is needed to determine the impact of physical activity on academic performance among those children who are at highest risk for obesity in the United States, including black, Latino, American Indian and Alaska Native, and Asian-American and Pacific Islander children, as well as children living in lower-income communities.”

Physical education is a formal content area of study in schools, it is standards based, and it encompasses assessment according to standards and benchmarks. Select curriculum-based physical education programs have been described in this chapter to show the potential of high-quality physical education in developing children into active adults. Such models provide the only opportunity for all school-age children to access health-enhancing physical activities. Curriculum models for physical education programs include movement education, which emphasizes the importance of fundamental motor skills competence as a prerequisite for engagement in physical activity throughout the life span; sport education, which emphasizes helping students become skillful players in lifetime sports of their choosing; and fitness education, which imparts physical fitness concepts to students, including the benefits and scientific principles of exercise, with the goal of developing and maintaining individual fitness and positive lifestyle change. The emergence of a technology-focused fitness education curriculum and the new Presidential Youth Fitness Program offer further motivational opportunities for students to engage in lifelong physical activities.

Because quality physical education programs are standards based and assessed, they are characterized by (1) instruction by certified physical education teachers, (2) a minimum of 150 minutes per week for elementary schools and 225 minutes per week for middle and high schools, and (3) tangible standards for student achievement and for high school graduation. Quality professional development programs are an essential component for both novice and veteran teachers to ensure the continued delivery of quality physical education.

An analysis of datasets from NASPE, NASBE, and Bridging the Gap reveals that the implementation of supportive physical education policies varies from state to state and from school to school. Since passage of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, several studies and reports have identified a decline in physical education resulting from the shifting of time to academic subjects. Because physical education is not a high-stakes tested content area, the implementation of supportive policies often is hindered by other education priorities. Although the above analysis indicates that 30 states (74.5 percent) mandate physical education, most policies do not require specific amounts of instructional time, and more than half allow for waivers or exemptions. In addition, an unintended consequence of the No Child Left Behind Act has been disparities in access to physical education and physical activity opportunities during the school day for Hispanic students and those of lower socioeconomic status. In high school, relying on students to elect physical education after meeting the minimum required credit hours (one credit in all states but one) appears to be unfruitful.

Strengthening of school physical education has received support from the public, health agencies, and parents. Parents recently surveyed expressed favorable views of physical education. Specifically:

• A majority of parents (54–84 percent) believe that physical education is at least as important as other academic subjects ( CDC, 2010 ).
• Ninety-one percent believe that there should be more physical education in schools (Harvard School of Public Health, 2003).
• Seventy-six percent think that more school physical education could help control or prevent childhood obesity ( NASPE, 2009a ).
• Ninety-five percent believe that regular daily physical activity helps children do better academically and should be a part of the school curriculum for all students in grades K-12 ( NASPE, 2003 ).

Additionally, many public and private organizations have proposed initiatives aimed at developing a comprehensive school-based strategy centered on curriculum physical education. As the largest institution where children spend more than half of their waking hours on school days, schools can play a pivotal role in increasing students' physical activity levels by providing access for all to quality physical education, along with physical activities throughout the school environment, the subject of Chapter 7 .

• AAHPERD (American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance). 2011 Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) survey report. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2011.
• AAHPERD. Let's move in school. 2012. [April 15, 2012]. www ​.aahperd.org/letsmoveinschool .
• Abels KW, Bridges JM. Teaching movement education: Foundations for active lifestyles. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers; 2010.
• ACS (American Cancer Society) CAN (Cancer Action Network), ADA (American Diabetes Association), and AHA (American Heart Association). Physical education in schools—both quality and quantity are important: A statement on physical education from the American Cancer Society and Cancer Action Network (ACS CAN), the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and the American Heart Association (AHA). Dallas, TX: AHA; 2012.
• Bailey B, McInnis K. Energy cost of exergaming: A comparison of the energy cost of 6 forms of exergaming. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2011; 165 (7):597. [ PubMed : 21383255 ]
• Ball DL, Cohen DK. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional development. In: Darling-Hammond L, Sykes G, editors. In Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice, San Francisco, CA: ERIC; 1999. pp. 30–32. (Jossey-Bass education series).
• Baranowski T, Buday R, Thompson DI, Baranowski J. Playing for real: Video games and stories for health-related behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008; 34 (1):74–82. [ PMC free article : PMC2189579 ] [ PubMed : 18083454 ]
• Barroso CS, McCullum-Gomez C, Hoelscher DM, Kelder SH, Murray NG. Self-reported barriers to quality physical education by physical education specialists in Texas. Journal of School Health. 2005; 75 (8):313–319. [ PubMed : 16179081 ]
• Bassett DR, Fitzhugh EC, Heath GW, Erwin PC, Frederick GM, Wolff DL, Welch WA, Stout AB. Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013; 44 (2):108–113. [ PubMed : 23332325 ]
• Boyce B, Rikard GL. Characteristics of PETE doctoral level institutions: Descriptions of programs, faculty and doctoral students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2011a; 30 (2):103–115.
• Boyce B, Rikard GL. A comparison of supply and demand for PETE professionals in higher education in the United States. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2011b; 30 (2):116–128.
• Boyle SE, Jones GL, Walters SJ. Physical activity among adolescents and barriers to delivering physical education in Cornwall and Lancashire, UK A qualitative study of heads of P.E. and heads of schools. BMC Public Health. 2008; 8 (1):273. [ PMC free article : PMC2518562 ] [ PubMed : 18673562 ]
• Castelli D, Rink JE. A comparison of high and low performing secondary physical education programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2003; 22 (5):512.
• Castelli DM, Valley JA. The relationship of physical fitness and motor competence to physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2007; 26 (4):358–374.
• CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). The association between school based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2010.
• Center on Education Policy. Choices, changes, and challenges: Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy; 2007.
• Center on Education Policy. A call to restructure restructuring: Lessons from the No Child Left Behind Act in five states. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy; 2008.
• Chen A, Martin R, Sun H, Ennis CD. Is in-class physical activity at risk in constructivist physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2007; 78 (5):500–509. [ PMC free article : PMC4477689 ] [ PubMed : 18274221 ]
• Chen A, Martin R, Ennis CD, Sun H. Content specificity of expectancy beliefs and task values in elementary physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2008; 79 (2):195–208. [ PMC free article : PMC4477638 ] [ PubMed : 18664044 ]
• Chen A, Sun H, Zhu X, Ennis CD. Influences of personal and lesson factors on caloric expenditure in physical education. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2012; 1 (1):49–56.
• Cohen D, Hill H. Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. The Teachers College Record. 2000; 102 (2):294–343.
• College Board. College search. 2013. [March 18, 2013]. https://bigfuture ​.collegeboard ​.org/college-search .
• Corbin CB. Physical activity for everyone: What every physical educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2002; 21 (2):128–144.
• Corbin C, Le Masurier G, Lambdin D. Fitness for life: Middle school. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007.
• Dagkas S, Stathi A. Exploring social and environmental factors affecting adolescents' participation in physical activity. European Physical Education Review. 2007; 13 (3):369–384.
• Daum DN, Buschner C. The status of high school online physical education in the United States. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2012; 31 (1):86–100.
• DeCorby K, Halas J, Dixon S, Wintrup L, Janzen H. Classroom teachers and the challenges of delivering quality physical education. Journal of Educational Research. 2005; 98 (4):208–221.
• Dwyer JJ, Allison KR, Barrera M, Hansen B, Goldenberg E, Boutilier MA. Teachers' perspective on barriers to implementing physical activity curriculum guidelines for school children in Toronto. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2003; 94 (6):448–452. [ PMC free article : PMC6980039 ] [ PubMed : 14700245 ]
• Erwin HE, Castelli DM. National physical education standards: A summary of student performance and its correlates. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2008; 79 (4):495–505. [ PubMed : 19177951 ]
• Fawkner SG, Niven A, Thin AG, MacDonald MJ, Oakes JR. Adolescent girls' energy expenditure during dance simulation active computer gaming. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2010; 28 (1):61–65. [ PubMed : 20013462 ]
• Fishman BJ, Marx RW, Best S, Tal RT. Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2003; 19 (6):643–658.
• FLVS (Florida Virtual School). Florida Virtual School physical education policy. 2013. [March 13, 2013]. http://www ​.flvs.net/myFLVS ​/student-handbook ​/Pages/Policies/PEPolicy.aspx .
• Fogel VA, Miltenberger RG, Graves R, Koehler S. The effects of exergaming on physical activity among inactive children in a physical education classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2010; 43 (4):591–600. [ PMC free article : PMC2998252 ] [ PubMed : 21541146 ]
• Gallo AM, Sheehy DA, Patton K, Griffin L. Assessment benefits and barriers: What are you committed to. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2006; 77 (8):46–50.
• GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). K-12: School-based physical education and sports programs. Washington, DC: GAO; 2012.
• Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal. 2001; 38 (4):915–945.
• Graf DL, Pratt LV, Hester CN, Short KR. Playing active video games increases energy expenditure in children. Pediatrics. 2009; 124 (2):534–540. [ PMC free article : PMC8329994 ] [ PubMed : 19596737 ]
• Greenberg J, Stokes R. Developing school site wellness centers. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2007.
• Guskey T, Sparks D. Linking professional development to improvements in student learning. Guyton EM, Dangel JR, editors. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt; 2004. [April 1, 2013]. pp. 233–247. (In Research linking teacher preparation and student performance: Teacher education yearbook, Vol. XII). http://ies ​.ed.gov/ncee ​/edlabs/regions/southwest ​/pdf/rel_2007033.pdf .
• Hackensmith CW. History of physical education. New York: Harper & Row; 1966.
• Haddock BL, Siegel SR, Wikin LD. The addition of a video game to stationary cycling: The impact on energy expenditure in overweight children. Open Sports Sciences Journal. 2009; 2 :42. [ PMC free article : PMC2784676 ] [ PubMed : 19946380 ]
• Hastie PA, de Ojeda DM, Luquin AC. A review of research on sport education: 2004 to the present. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2011; 16 (2):103–132.
• Healthy People 2020. Healthy People 2020: Physical activity objectives. 2010. [March 14, 2013]. http://www ​.healthypeople ​.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020 ​/overview.aspx?topicid=33 .
• Hensley L, East W. Measurement concepts in physical education and exercise science. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1989. Testing and grading in the psychomotor domain.
• HHS (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: HHS; 2008.
• IOM (Institute of Medicine). Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: Solving the weight of the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012a. [ PMC free article : PMC3648752 ] [ PubMed : 22983849 ]
• IOM. Fitness measures and health outcomes in youth. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012b. [ PubMed : 25187939 ]
• Jenkinson KA, Benson AC. Barriers to providing physical education and physical activity in Victorian state secondary schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 2010; 35 (8):1.
• Johnston CA, Tyler C, McFarlin BK, Poston WSC, Haddock CK, Reeves RS, Foreyt JP. Effects of a school-based weight maintenance program for Mexican-American children: Results at 2 years. Obesity. 2010; 18 (3):542–547. [ PubMed : 19661957 ]
• Kennedy M. Form and substance of inservice teacher education. Madison: National Institute for Science Education, University of Wisconsin; 1998. (Research Monograph No. 13).
• Kramer SL, Keller R. An existence proof: Successful joint implementation of the IMP curriculum and a 4 × 4 block schedule at a suburban U.S. high school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2008; 39 (1):2–8.
• Kulinna PH. Increasing physical activity: A comprehensive professional development effort. Biomedical Human Kinetics. 2012; 4 :6–11.
• Kulinna PH, Brusseau T, Ferry M, Cothran D. Preservice teachers' belief systems toward curricular outcomes for physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2010; 81 (2):189–198. [ PubMed : 20527304 ]
• Laban R. The mastery of movement. Plymouth: Macdonald & Evans; 1980.
• Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, Jensen TB, Mitre N, Levine JA. Activity promoting games and increased energy expenditure. Journal of Pediatrics. 2009; 154 (6):819. [ PMC free article : PMC2683894 ] [ PubMed : 19324368 ]
• Learning Forward. Standards for professional learning: Standards list. 2012. [March 19, 2013]. http://www ​.learningforward ​.org/standards/standards-list# ​.UUhuMKK7mXw .
• Logsdon B, Barrett K, Logsdon B. Physical Education for Children. 1984. Movement—the content of physical education; pp. 295–355.
• Lonsdale C, Rosenkranz RR, Peralta LR, Bennie A, Fahey P, Lubans DR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in school physical education lessons. Preventive Medicine. 2013; 56 (2):152–161. [ PubMed : 23246641 ]
• Loucks-Horsley S, Matsumoto C. Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics. 2010; 99 (5):258–271.
• Luepker RV, Perry CL, McKinlay SM, Nader PR, Parcel GS, Stone EJ, Webber LS, Elder JP, Feldman HA, Johnson CC, Kelder SH, Wu M. CATCH Collaborative Group. Outcomes of a field trial to improve children's dietary patterns and physical activity. The child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health. CATCH collaborative group. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996; 275 (10):768–776. [ PubMed : 8598593 ]
• Maddison R, Mhurchu CN, Jull A, Jiang Y, Prapavessis H, Rodgers A. Energy expended playing video console games: An opportunity to increase children's physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2007; 19 (3):334. [ PubMed : 18019591 ]
• Martin JJ, Mccaughtry N, Hodges-Kulinna P, Cothran D. The influences of professional development on teachers' self-efficacy toward educational change. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2008; 13 (2):171–190.
• McCaughtry N, Martin J, Kulinna PH, Cothran D. What makes teacher professional development work? The influence of instructional resources on change in physical education. Journal of In-Service Education. 2006; 32 (2):221–235.
• McCullick BA, Baker T, Tomporowski PD, Templin TJ, Lux K, Isaac T. An analysis of state physical education policies. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2012; 31 (2):200–210.
• McKenzie TL. The preparation of physical educators: A public health perspective. Quest. 2007; 59 (4):346–357.
• McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Sallis JF. Assessing children's liking for activity units in an elementary school physical education curriculum. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1994; 13 (3):206–215.
• McKenzie TL, Sallis JF, Kolody B, Faucette FN. Long-term effects of a physical education curriculum and staff development program: SPARK. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1997; 68 :280–291. [ PubMed : 9421840 ]
• McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Sallis JF, Faucette E. Effects of a physical education program on children's manipulative skills. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 1998; 17 :327–341.
• McKenzie TL, Stone EJ, Feldman HA, Epping JN, Yang M, Strikmiller PK, Lytle LA, Parcel GS. Effects of the catch physical education intervention: Teacher type and lesson location. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2001; 21 (2):101–109. [ PubMed : 11457629 ]
• Mellecker RR, McManus AM. Energy expenditure and cardiovascular responses to seated and active gaming in children. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2008; 162 (9):886. [ PubMed : 18762609 ]
• Mhurchu CN, Maddison R, Jiang Y, Jull A, Prapavessis H, Rodgers A. Couch potatoes to jumping beans: A pilot study of the effect of active video games on physical activity in children. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2008; 5 (1):8. [ PMC free article : PMC2254648 ] [ PubMed : 18257911 ]
• Morgan CF, Beighle A, Pangrazi RR. What are the contributory and compensatory relationships between physical education and physical activity in children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2007; 78 (5):407–412. [ PubMed : 18274212 ]
• Morgan P, Bourke S. Non-specialist teachers' confidence to teach PE: The nature and influence of personal school experiences in PE. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2008; 13 (1):1–29.
• Morgan PJ, Hansen V. Classroom teachers' perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2008; 79 (4):506–516. [ PubMed : 19177952 ]
• Mowling CM, Brock SJ, Eiler KK, Rudisill ME. Student motivation in physical education breaking down barriers. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2004; 75 (6):40–45.
• Munson WW. Effects of leisure education versus physical activity or informal discussion on behaviorally disordered youth offenders. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 1988; 5 (4):305–317.
• Munson WW, Baker SB, Lundegren HM. Strength training and leisure counseling as treatment for institutionalized juvenile delinquents. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly. 1985; 2 (1):65–75.
• Myers-Schieffer T, Thomas KT. Fifteen years of promise in school-based interventions: A meta-analysis. Kinesiology Reviews. 2012; 1 :155–169.
• Nader PR, Stone EJ, Lytle LA, Perry CL, Osganian SK, Kelder S, Webber LS, Elder JP, Montgomery D, Feldman HA, Wu M, Johnson C, Parcel GS, Luepker RV. Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: The CATCH cohort. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 1999; 153 (7):695–704. [ PubMed : 10401802 ]
• NASBE (National Association of State Boards of Education). State School Health Policy Database. 2012. [May 1, 2013]. http://www ​.nasbe.org/healthy_schools/hs .
• NASPE (National Association for Sport and Physical Education). Parents' view of children's health and fitness: A summary of results. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2003.
• NASPE. Physical activity for children: A statement of guidelines for children ages 5-12. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2004.
• NASPE. Moving into the future: National standards for physical education. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2004.
• NASPE. Initial guidelines for online physical education: Position paper. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2007a.
• NASPE. Position statement: What constitutes a highly qualified physical education teacher. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2007b.
• NASPE. Physical education trends in our nation's schools: A survey of practicing K-12 physical education teachers. Port Washington, NY: Roslow Research Group; 2009a.
• NASPE. School physical education program checklist—how does your program rate. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2009b.
• NASPE. NASPE resource brief: Quality physical education. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2009c.
• NASPE. Opportunity to learn: Guidelines for elementary, middle, and high school physical education. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2010.
• NASPE. Instructional framework for fitness education in physical education. Guidance document. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2012.
• NASPE and AHA. Shape of the nation report: Status of physical education in the USA. Reston, VA: AAHPERD; 2010.
• National Physical Activity Plan. National Physical Activity Plan. Columbia, SC: The National Physical Activity Plan; 2010. [February 1, 2013]. http://www ​.nationalactivityplan.org .
• Nike. Designed to move: A physical activity agenda. Beaverton, OR: Nike; 2012.
• Parker MB, Curtner-Smith M. Health-related fitness in sport education and multi-activity teaching. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2005; 10 (1):1–18.
• Pate RR, Davis MG, Robinson TN, Stone EJ, McKenzie TL, Young JC. Promoting physical activity in children and youth: A leadership role for schools. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Physical Activity Committee) in collaboration with the Councils on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation. 2006; 114 (11):1214–1224. [ PubMed : 16908770 ]
• Pate RR, Mitchell JA, Byun W, Dowda M. Sedentary behaviour in youth. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011; 45 (11):906–913. [ PubMed : 21836174 ]
• Perna FM, Oh A, Chriqui JF, Mâsse LC, Atienza AA, Nebeling L, Agurs-Collins T, Moser RP, Dodd KW. The association of state law to physical education time allocation in US public schools. American Journal of Public Health. 2012; 102 (8):1594–1599. [ PMC free article : PMC3464828 ] [ PubMed : 22594746 ]
• Perry CL, Stone EJ, Parcel GS, Ellison RC, Nader PR, Webber LS, Luepker RV. School-based cardiovascular health promotion: The Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health (CATCH). Journal of School Health. 1990; 60 (8):406–413. [ PubMed : 2255198 ]
• Peterson's. Physical education colleges. 2013. [March 18, 2013]. http://www ​.petersons ​.com/college-search/SearchResults ​.aspx?q= ​%22physical%20education%22&c=UG .
• Presidential Youth Fitness Program. Presidential Youth Fitness Program: Promoting health and activity for America's youth. 2013. [March 1, 2013]. http://www ​.presidentialyouthfitnessprogram.org/index.shtml .
• Rainey DL, Murray TD. Foundations of personal fitness. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
• Robinson LE. Effect of a mastery climate motor program on object control skills and perceived physical competence in preschoolers. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2011; 82 (2):355–359. [ PubMed : 21699116 ]
• Robinson LE, Goodway JD. Instructional climates in preschool children who are at risk. Part I: Object-control skill development. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2009; 80 (3):533–542. [ PubMed : 19791639 ]
• Romero AJ. A pilot test of the Latin active hip hop intervention to increase physical activity among low-income Mexican-American adolescents. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2012; 26 (4):208–211. [ PubMed : 22375569 ]
• Sallis JF, McKenzie TL. Physical education's role in public health. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 1991; 62 (2):124–137. [ PubMed : 1925034 ]
• Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Alcaraz JE, Kolody B, Faucette N, Hovell MF. The effects of a 2-year physical education program (SPARK) on physical activity and fitness in elementary school students: Sports, play and active recreation for kids. American Journal of Public Health. 1997; 87 (8):1328–1334. [ PMC free article : PMC1381094 ] [ PubMed : 9279269 ]
• Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Taylor WC. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2000; 32 (5):963–975. [ PubMed : 10795788 ]
• Sallis JF, McKenzie TL, Conway TL, Elder JP, Prochaska JJ, Brown M, Zive MM, Marshall SJ, Alcaraz JE. Environmental interventions for eating and physical activity: A randomized controlled trial in middle schools. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2003; 24 (3):209–217. [ PubMed : 12657338 ]
• Salvy SJ, Roemmich JN, Bowker JC, Romero ND, Stadler PJ, Epstein LH. Effect of peers and friends on youth physical activity and motivation to be physically active. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2009; 34 (2):217–225. [ PMC free article : PMC3202936 ] [ PubMed : 18617572 ]
• San Diego State University. Physical education matters: Success stories from California low resource schools that have achieved excellent P.E. programs. Los Angeles: The California Endowment; 2007.
• San Diego State University. Physical education matters: A full report from The California Endowment. Los Angeles, CA: The California Endowment; 2008.
• Sheehan DP, Katz L. The impact of a six week exergaming curriculum on balance with grade three school children using Wii Fit Plus. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport. 2012; 11 (3):5–22.
• Sherar LB, Gyurcsik NC, Humbert ML, Dyck RF, Fowler-Kerry S, Baxter-Jones A. Activity and barriers in girls (8–16 years old) based on grade and maturity status. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2009; 41 (1):87. [ PubMed : 19092703 ]
• Siedentop DL. Sport education: Quality PE through positive sport experiences. Chicago, IL: Human Kinetics; 1994.
• Siedentop DL. Introduction to physical education, fitness, and sport. 8th. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
• Siedentop DL, Hastie PA, Van der Mars H. Complete guide to sport education. Chicago, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
• Sit CH, Lam JW, McKenzie TL. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2010. Children's use of electronic games: Choices of game mode and challenge levels. epub ahead of print. [ PMC free article : PMC2905688 ] [ PubMed : 20652069 ]
• SPARK (Sports, Play, and Active Recreation for Kids). What is SPARK. 2013. [March 14, 2013]. http://www ​.sparkpe.org/what-is-spark .
• Staiano A, Abraham A, Calvert S. Motivating effects of cooperative exergame play for overweight and obese adolescents. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 2012; 6 (4):812. [ PMC free article : PMC3440152 ] [ PubMed : 22920807 ]
• Stevens-Smith D. Teaching spatial awareness to children. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance. 2004; 75 (6):52.
• Stodden DF, Goodway JD, Langendorfer SJ, Roberton MA, Rudisill ME, Garcia C, Garcia LE. A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest. 2008; 60 (2):290–306.
• Stodden D, Langendorfer S, Roberton MA. The association between motor skill competence and physical fitness in young adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2009; 80 (2):223–229. [ PubMed : 19650387 ]
• Stokes R, Schultz S. Personal fitness for you. Winston-Salem, NC: Hunter Textbooks; 2002.
• Stokes R, Schultz SL. Get active! Get fit! Winston-Salem, NC: Hunter Textbooks; 2009.
• Sun H. Exergaming impact on physical activity and interest in elementary school children. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2012; 83 (2):212–220. [ PubMed : 22808707 ]
• Sun H, Chen A, Zhu X, Ennis CD. Curriculum matters: Learning science-based fitness knowledge in constructivist physical education. Elementary School Journal. 2012; 113 (2):215–229. [ PMC free article : PMC4530802 ] [ PubMed : 26269659 ]
• Trost S. Active education: Physical education, physical activity and academic performance. San Diego, CA: Active Living Research, San Diego State University; 2009.
• Wallhead T, O'Sullivan M. Sport education: Physical education for the new millennium. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2005; 10 (2):181–210.
• Welk GJ, Schaben JA, Shelley M. Physical activity and physical fitness in children schooled at home and children attending public schools. Pediatric Exercise Science. 2004; 16 (4):310–323.
• Weston A. The making of American physical education. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1962.
• White K, Kilding AE, Schofield G. Energy expenditure and enjoyment during Nintendo ® Wii active video games: How do they compare to other sedentary and physical activities. New Zealand: AUT University, Center for Physical Activity and Nutrition (CPAN); 2009.
• Whitehurst GJ. Research on teacher preparation and professional development; A paper presented at the White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers; Washington, DC. Mar 5, 2002.
• Wiley DE, Yoon B. Teacher reports on opportunity to learn: Analyses of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System (CLAS). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1995; 17 (3):355–370.
• Williams CS. Personal fitness: Looking good/feeling good. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt; 2005.
• Wood TD. The ninth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (part 1). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1913.
• Wood TD, Cassidy RF. The new physical education: A program of naturalized activities for education toward citizenship. New York: Macmillan; 1930.
• Xiang P, Lowry S, McBride R. The impact of a field-based elementary physical education methods course on preservice classroom teachers' beliefs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2002; 21 :145–161.
• Yoon KS, Duncan T, Lee SWY, Scarloss B, Shapley K. Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest; 2007. [April 1, 2013]. (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007, No. 033). http://ies ​.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs .

Available online at http://www ​.healthypeople ​.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020 ​/pdfs/PhysicalActivity.pdf (accessed February 1, 2013).

• Cite this Page Committee on Physical Activity and Physical Education in the School Environment; Food and Nutrition Board; Institute of Medicine; Kohl HW III, Cook HD, editors. Educating the Student Body: Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Oct 30. 5, Approaches to Physical Education in Schools.
• PDF version of this title (4.4M)

In this Page

Related information.

• PMC PubMed Central citations
• PubMed Links to PubMed

Recent Activity

• Approaches to Physical Education in Schools - Educating the Student Body Approaches to Physical Education in Schools - Educating the Student Body

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Connect with NLM

National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894

Web Policies FOIA HHS Vulnerability Disclosure

Help Accessibility Careers

• Skip to Nav
• Skip to Main
• Skip to Footer

Why PE matters for student academics and wellness right now

Please try again

This story about PE teachers was produced by The Hechinger Report , a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and innovation in education. Sign up for Hechinger’s newsletter .

Amanda Amtmanis, an elementary physical education instructor in Middletown, Connecticut, handed out cards with QR codes to a class of third graders, and told them to start running.

The kids sprinted off around the baseball field in a light drizzle, but by the end of the first lap, a fifth of a mile, many were winded and walking. They paused to scan the cards, which track their mileage, on their teacher’s iPad and got some encouragement from an electronic coach — “Way to run your socks off!” or “Leave it all on the track!”

A boy in a red Nike shirt surged ahead, telling Amtmanis his goal was to run 5 miles. “Whoa, look at Dominic!” another boy exclaimed.

“We don’t need to compare ourselves to others,” Amtmanis reminded him.

The third graders finished a third lap, alternating running and walking, and were about to start on a scavenger hunt when the rain picked up, forcing them inside. Amtmanis thanked her students for their willingness to adjust — a skill many of them have practiced far more often than running these past 18 months.

The full impact of the pandemic on kids’ health and fitness won’t be known for some time. But it’s already caused at least a short-term spike in childhood obesity Rates of overweight and obesity in 5- through 11-year-olds rose nearly 10 percentage points in the first few months of 2020.

Amtmanis’ “mileage club,” which tracks students’ running, both in and out of school, and rewards them with Pokémon cards when they hit certain targets, is an example of how PE teachers around the country are trying to get kids back in shape.

But inclement weather isn’t the only thing PE teachers are up against as they confront what might be called “physical learning loss.” Physical education as a discipline has long fought to be taken as seriously as its academic counterparts. Even before the pandemic, fewer than half the states set any minimum amount of time for students to participate in physical education, according to the Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE), which represents PE and health instructors.

Now, as schools scramble to help kids catch up academically, there are signs that PE is taking a back seat to the core subjects yet again. In some California schools, administrators are shifting instructional minutes from PE to academic subjects — or canceling class altogether so PE teachers can sub for classroom teachers; in others, they’re growing class sizes in the gym, so they can shrink them in the classroom.

Meanwhile, innovative instructors like Amtmanis, who has worked in her district for more than 20 years, are struggling to get their ideas off the ground. Over the summer, the principal of Macdonough Elementary, one of two schools where Amtmanis teaches, approved her request to participate in another running program called The Daily Mile, in which kids walk or run 15 minutes a day during school hours.

Daily running breaks “boost attentiveness, which has positive effects on academics,” Amtmanis argued.

But two weeks into the school year, not a single teacher had bought into the idea.

“The issue is their packed schedule,” Amtmanis said.

Last year, many schools conducted gym class remotely, with students joining in from their bedrooms and living rooms.

The online format presented several challenges. Many students lacked the equipment, space, or parental support to participate fully. And many instructors grappled with how to teach and assess motor skills and teamwork online.

Though instructors found creative ways to keep students moving — substituting rolled-up socks for balls, and “disguising fitness” in scavenger hunts and beat-the-teacher challenges — they still fretted that online gym wasn’t giving students the same benefits as in-person classes.

Compounding their concern was the fact that many students were also missing out on recess and extracurricular sports.

In a March 2021 survey conducted by the Cooper Institute, maker of the popular FitnessGram assessments, close to half the PE teachers and school and district administrators responding said their students were “significantly less” physically active during their schools’ closure than before it.

Schools that reopened last year faced their own set of challenges, including bans on shared equipment that made even a simple game of catch impossible. Schools that were open for in-person learning were also much more likely to cut back on PE instructional time, or eliminate it altogether, the survey found.

The consequences of these reductions in physical activity are hard to quantify, especially since many schools suspended fitness testing during the pandemic and have yet to resume it, but some PE teachers say they’re seeing more kids with locomotor delays and weaker stamina than normal.

“The second graders are like first graders, and some are even like kindergarteners,” said Robin Richardson, an elementary PE instructor in Kentucky. They can jump and hop, she said, but they can’t leap. They’re exhausted after 20 seconds of jumping jacks.

An unusually high number of Richardson’s first graders can’t skip or do windmills. Some lack the spatial awareness that’s essential to group games.

“They don’t know how to move without running into each other,” she said.

Other instructors are seeing an increase in cognitive issues, such as difficulty paying attention or following directions, particularly among kids who remained remote for most or all of last year.

Kyle Bragg, an elementary PE instructor in Arizona, has seen kids sitting with their backs to him, staring off into space when he’s talking. “I say ‘Knees, please,’ so they spin around to face me,” he said.

And some PE teachers say their students’ social-emotional skills have suffered more than their gross motor skills. “They forgot how to share; how to be nice to each other; how to relate to each other,” said Donn Tobin, an elementary PE instructor in New York.

PE has a key role to play in boosting those skills, which affect how kids interact in other classes, said Will Potter, an elementary PE teacher in California.

“We’re uniquely situated to handle the social-emotional needs that came out of the pandemic, in a way classroom teachers are not,” Potter said.

Amtmanis, for her part, worries about her students’ mental health. She sees the little signs of strain daily — the kid who got upset because he couldn’t pick his group, for example, and the one who was distressed that his Mileage Club card had gotten mixed up in the front office.

“Their emotional reserves are low,” she said.

Yet not all instructors are reporting drops in their students’ fitness and skill development. Teachers in some middle- and upper-income districts said they haven’t noticed much of a change at all. In some communities, families seemed to spend more time outdoors.

“We saw the skyrocketing sale of bicycles, we saw families going for walks,” said Dianne Wilson-Graham, executive director of the California Physical Education and Health Project.

But in Title I schools like Macdonough, where more than half the students are low-income, some kids didn’t even have access to a safe place to exercise or play during school closures.

“Not only are they not in soccer leagues, but sometimes they don’t even have a park,” Amtmanis said.

Amtmanis came up with the idea of doing the Daily Mile after spring fitness tests revealed drops in her students’ strength, flexibility and endurance.

But many schools still aren’t sure how much physical learning loss their students have experienced as a result of the pandemic. Most schools pressed pause on fitness testing last year, and some elementary-school instructors are reluctant to restart it. They say the tests aren’t valid with young children, even in ordinary times, and argue the time they take could be better spent on Covid catch-up.

Andjelka Pavlovic, director of research and education for the Cooper Institute, said its tests are scientifically proven to be valid for students who are 10 and up, or roughly starting in fourth grade.

Fitness testing requirements vary by state, county or even district. Some states specify how often students must be tested; others leave it largely to the teacher.

Bragg, the Arizona teacher, said he has put testing “on the backburner” because “right now it’s not at the forefront of what’s important.”

Richardson said she is avoiding testing because she doesn’t want to use up precious instructional time or demoralize her students. “I want my kids to enjoy movement,” she said. If they perform poorly on the tests, “they may not feel as strong.”

In Connecticut, where schools are required to test fourth graders’ fitness annually, Amtmanis approached testing cautiously last year. She didn’t want to embarrass her students, so she made it into a series of games.

Instead of Sit-and-Reach, they had a “flexibility contest,” in which kids broke into teams for tag then had to perform stretches if they were tagged. She measured the distances stretched with curling ribbon, tied the ribbons together, and attached a balloon to the end. The team whose balloon soared the highest won fidget putty.

Pushups became a Bingo game, with the center space representing pushups.

“My goal was to get through it without ever using the words ‘fitness” or ‘testing,’” she said.

As the pandemic drags on, some instructors are taking a similar approach to fitness remediation and acceleration.

Bragg likes a warmup called “ Touch Spots ,” in which first graders listen as the instructor reads off the name of a color, then run and touch a corresponding dot on the floor. It works on reaction time, cardiovascular endurance, spatial awareness and sequencing — but the kids don’t know that.

“Students are having so much fun that they don’t realize how much fitness they are doing,” Bragg said.

Differentiation — tailoring instruction to meet individual students’ needs — has become even more essential, with former remote learners often lagging behind their in-person peers, Bragg said.

When playing catch, for example, he offers his students different sized balls — the smaller ones are more challenging.

Potter, the California teacher, spent the first two weeks of school teaching his students how to connect with their partners, stressing the importance of eye contact and body language.

“When you’re on Zoom, you look at the camera to make eye contact,” he said. “It’s a very different environment.”

Bragg reminds his students how to include kids who are standing on the sidelines, modeling excited body language and tone of voice. Lately, he’s noticed that kids who were remote last year are being excluded from groups.

“Social interaction needs to be practiced, just like how to throw a ball,” he said.

Richardson, the Kentucky PE teacher, is trying to build up her students’ stamina gradually, through progressively longer intervals of exercise.

But she works in a school with pods, so she sees each group of kids for five consecutive days, every third week. The two weeks in between, she has to hope that teachers will provide recess and “movement breaks.” She’s trying to get them to give kids breaks “when they get glassy-eyed and frustrated.”

Recently, Richardson was at a staff training session at which depleted teachers were “popping candy in the back.” When she raised her hand and requested a break in the training, her colleagues cheered. She told them to remember how they felt when their students return to the building.

“I always say, ‘If your bum is numb, your brain is the same,’” she said.

Convincing classroom teachers to set aside more time for movement can be challenging, though. As students return from months of online learning, teachers are under enormous pressure to get them caught up academically.

Kate Cox, an elementary and middle-school PE teacher in California, wishes schools would “realize what they’re missing when they cut PE because of learning loss in other areas.” Physical education is “readying their minds and bodies to be more successful in other areas,” Cox said.

Terri Drain, the president of SHAPE, argued that schools fail students when they treat physical learning loss as less serious than its academic counterpart.

“In the primary grades, children develop fundamental motor skills, such as throwing, catching, running, kicking and jumping,” she said. Unless schools commit to helping kids catch up, “the impacts of this ‘missed learning’ will be lifelong.”

In Connecticut, Amtmanis hasn’t given up on convincing teachers to carve out time for the Daily Mile. She recently sent them a list of suggestions on how to fit 15 minutes of running into the day, including by incorporating it as an active transition between academic blocks.

“While it may seem like there aren’t minutes to spare,” she wrote, “the energizing effect of the active transition should result in more on-task behavior and more efficient working.”

In the meantime, Amtmanis plans to keep using the mileage club to motivate her students to run and to monitor their progress.

“I don’t want to call attention to the fact that not everyone is fit,” she said. “This is an unobtrusive way to keep the data.”

Promoting Quality Physical Education Policy

What is qpe.

Quality physical education (QPE) is distinct from physical education. The main differences relate to frequency, variety, inclusivity and value content. Quality physical education is about peer-led learning and rounded skill development which can enhance educational and employability outcomes.

It is also about whole body health which includes physical and psycho-social wellbeing. QPE supports students to develop the physical, social and emotional skills which define healthy, resilient and socially responsible citizens. QPE is a core component of UNESCO’s new sport programme, Fit for Life .

Why is it important?

Physical activity declined by 41% during the pandemic. Physical inactivity already contributed to 5 million premature deaths annually pre-COVID.

Mental health has worsened amongst students over the course of the pandemic according to 70% of 450 teachers and 95% of 12 young leaders polled by UNESCO

UNESCO data indicates that 89% of 117 countries report that PE is the same for girls and boys. In addition, 82% of PE teachers have seen COVID-19 negatively impact participation, particularly amongst girls and children with disabilities.

The QPE tools

How we & partners are driving positive change.

UNESCO developed a QPE resource package in partnership with the European Commission , International Bureau of Education , International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE) , International Olympic Committee (IOC) , Nike , the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) , UNICEF , and the World Health Organization (WHO) ,  which benefitted from the input of more than 50 organizations and individual experts, from all world regions.

This package includes:

Qpe policy project, driving the change in-country.

The QPE Policy Project was implemented, using the QPE resource package, to practically support countries to revise national physical education (PE) policies to be inclusive and child-centered . The project was implemented between 2016 and 2018 in four pilot countries: Fiji, Mexico, South Africa and Zambia .

“Participating in the Quality Physical Education Policy Project gave Zambia a strategic opportunity to strengthen and systematize cooperation between national sport, education and health ministries. This was the first time these inter-connections between sport, education and health policies have featured explicitly in a national policy document.”

The QPE Policy Project has been described as “one of the most remarkable and significant global initiatives in Physical Education of the last century” by independent experts.

All countries engaged in the pilot developed new policy instruments to support quality provision and achieved high levels of stakeholder cooperation which significantly enhanced the inclusivity of the process.

Global, multi-stakeholder partnerships are necessary to achieve sustainable development. The outcomes of the QPE policy project reflect the success of this partnership compact approach to sport-policy design. We hope it is used as a model to strengthen inclusive and participatory approaches in other sectors also.

• In Fiji , 1,390 students, 330 teachers and 990 parents from 197 schools were engaged in the development of a series of consultations and workshops. This resulted in Fiji’s first ever PE policy.
• In South Africa , 27 researchers were engaged in a high-quality desk review and national situation analysis which drew on 9 provincial reports. These documents “provide an excellent basis for future policy development and policy revision exercises”.
• In Mexico , process highlights include inter-ministerial collaboration and the systematic engagement of diverse stakeholder groups including the Ministries, international organisations and representatives of more than 30 civil society organizations, universities, academic experts in a range of disciplines related to physical education, health and education. This resulted in an inter-ministerial QPE policy strategy in Mexico.
• In Zambia , a National Stakeholders Workshop was held targeting national media engagement in the project, as well as a broad cross-section of other stakeholder groups. This resulted in an inclusive QPE Policy Implementation framework in Zambia.
• Drawing on interventions in pilot countries and recommendations from QPE resources, Kazakhstan and Kenya embarked in the policy revision process on a self-funded basis culminating in the adoption of a new, inclusive physical education policy.

Fit for Life will expand the scope and scale of the existing work undertaken in QPE.

Data-driven approach

With inputs from a compact of international partners, UNESCO administers a unique QPE survey and compendium of indicators to assess quality physical education policy and practice, and to address basic data gaps on PE.

The Ministerial-level QPE survey captures data at the policy level from its Member States, and the School-level QPE survey collects data from physical education teachers on PE provision.

The 2021 edition of the survey gathered data from 117 countries and 2101 PE teachers around the world, and was implemented in partnership with the International Federation of Physical Education and Sport (FIEPS).

To evaluate the specific impacts of the pandemic on PE provision, as well as on the physical and mental health of students and teachers, a COVID-19 top-up dataset gathered insights from 450 PE teachers globally. Complementing the survey data, 12 young leaders were engaged in an action-oriented focus group to discuss findings and propose solutions.

Findings from the survey and focus group will operationalised via Fit for Life .

How can YOU get involved?

Join UNESCO and international champions in promoting and disseminating resources and data #Active4Life #QPEforLife #FitForLife

Collaborate with UNESCO to advance knowledge, share data and good practice, support a specific project within the Fit for Life flagship

Provide critical funding to support advocacy and activity implementation

For more information please contact Nancy McLennan

Related items

• Social and human sciences
• Gender equality
• Guidelines and tools
• Policy Advice
• Programme implementation
• Physical education
• Girls education
• Educational quality
• Quality of life
• Skills development
• Health policy
• Mental health
• Social inequality
• See more add

What is Physical Education? Meaning, Define, Objective, Importance

The objective of physical education classes is to acquaint understudies with the essential components of exercise that will prompt a sound way of life. Understudies can get exercise and increment their psychomotor capacities by playing an assortment of conventional games like ball and soccer, and by partaking in practice exercises, for example, lifting loads and high impact exercise.

In this article, we have explained what is physical education, its history, objectives, and fact about career opportunities in physical education.

► What is Physical Education?

Physical Education is a learning cycle that spotlights information, perspectives, and practices that are basic for understudies to embrace a way of life of wellbeing and wellness.

Through these cycles, understudies figure out how to accomplish day-by-day actual work and customized degrees of wellness, foster actual abilities, and accomplish information for carrying on with a sound life.

Probably the best open door to impact the country’s well-being and increment active work is to turn into an actual teacher.

Educators can emphatically affect both the quality and amount of an understudy’s life as they are shown the essential abilities that are expected to take on an existence of well-being and wellness.

◉ Physical Education Meaning

• Physical education is a process that uses physical activity as a means to help people acquire skills, fitness, knowledge, and attitudes that contribute to their optimal development and well-being.
• Physical education is a short-term statement of specific outcomes that build cumulatively to reach a goal.
• Physical Education contributes to the development of the whole person.

◉ Definition of Physical Education

“Physical education is an education of and through human movement where many of educational objectives are achieved by means of big muscle activities involving sports, games, gymnastic, dance and exercise.”

“Physical education is an integral part of the total education learning process and has as its aims the development of physically, mentally, socially and emotionally fit citizens, through the medium of physical activities that have been selected and planned to achieve specific outcomes.”

Physical education is the sum of those experiences which come to the individual through movements. – Oberteuffer

Physical education is the sum of man’s physical activities selected as to kind and conducted as to outcomes. – J.F. Williams & C.L. Brownell

Physical education is that phase of the whole field of education that deals with big muscle activities – J.B. Nash

Physical education is the sum of changes in the individual caused by experiences centering on motor activity. – Cassidy

Physical education is education. It is the education through physical activities for the development of the total personality of the child to its fullness and perfection in body, mind, and spirit. – (Central Advisory Board of Physical Education and Recreation, India)

► History of Physical Education

The historical backdrop of Physical education traces back to antiquated Greece, where contest and power were natural. During this time, physical education ended up being significant because it was a need in preparing both Greek warriors and competitors.

For kids, Physical education would start when they were around seven years of age, with the objective being to ultimately have them be well-gifted in exercises like boxing, and chariot races, from there, the sky is the limit.

For this to occur, they expected to comprehend their body and what went into active work, hence body and mind health education assumed an enormous part in the movement of the Greek society.

By the mid-nineteenth century, physical education would be advanced in the United States. The thinking was like that of what the Greeks were involved in, which was to both teach and train troopers for the inevitable fight.

Notwithstanding, throughout the natural process of everything working out, actual instruction would form into something considerably more amazing.

Schools the nation over would start to treat wellbeing-related themes more seriously, both on the jungle gym and in the homeroom, and courses designated toward actual improvement would be offered more consideration.

Universities would follow after accordingly also, and schools all around the United States would ultimately offer an assortment of courses that would assist with developing the actual capacity, give a genuine comprehension of the human body, and increment certainty in America’s childhood.

Initially, actual instruction programs in the United States saw young ladies generally associated with vaulting, while the young men would participate in harsher exercises.

Nonetheless, over the long haul, both male and female people would become instructed on components like body piece, adaptability, nourishment, and perseverance.

► Objectives of Physical Education

Following are the main objectives of physical education:

• Physical development
• Mental development
• Social development
• Neuro Muscular Co-ordination
• Emotional development
• Improvement of Health

✔ 1. Physical development

Development of organ frameworks like the Circulatory framework, sensory system, strong framework, stomach-related framework, and so on.

✔ 2. Mental development

Physical exercises require readiness of the brain, profound focus, and determined development. This goal is connected with the psychological advancement of a person.

✔ 3. Social development

This goal is connected 1o the advancement of social attributes, which are fundamental for better change throughout everyday life. It is a superior hotspot for accomplishing the characteristics. Co-activity, fair play sportsmanship, 1olerance, and compassion.

✔ 4. Neuro Muscular Co-ordination

This goal is focused on a superior connection between the sensory system. Instruction gives plentiful open doors to actual neuromuscular coordination.

✔ 5. Emotional development

The enthusiastic improvement of an individual is likewise one of the significant targets of actual schooling. Each individual has different kinds of feelings viz. Joy, trust envy, contempt misery, dread, sorrow, outrage, wonder, desire, forlornness, and so forth.

✔ 6. Improvement of Health

This creates solid related propensities through wellbeing instruction. This likewise gives schooling about the counteraction of transferable illnesses.

► Importance of Physical Education

• Support sportsmanship in all parts of rivalry.
• Broaden every understudy’s dining experience and satisfaction.
• Make energy for dynamic amusement and game.
• Help understudies in arriving at their actual potential in an assortment of wearing conditions.
• Actual schooling is helpful for both the bodies and psyches of understudies.
• By being more dynamic, understudies will likewise benefit by having the option to more readily keep away from injury, they will have more certainty, and they can see work on psychological wellness.
• It’s vital to teach understudies the advantages of the jungle gym and in-school active work and educate them on issues connected with the human body and other wellbeing-related issues to provide them with a superior comprehension of how their body functions.

► Types of Physical Education

Physical education is classified into many activities including mental and physical exercises. Physical activity simply means the movement of the body that uses energy.

The three main types of physical activities are as follows;

• Muscle & Bone strengthening

◉ 1. Aerobic activities : Benefits your heart and lungs Running Walking Swimming Cycling Dancing

◉ 2. Muscle & Bone strengthening : Improve your muscles and bones by Push-ups, curl-ups weight lifts Climbing stairs Digging in the Garden or field

◉ 3. Stretching : Improves your flexibility of joints Yoga Different stretching exercises

► Facts about Physical education as a Career

• Educational Requirement
• Licensure/Certification
• Career Outlook

◉ Educational Requirement

Actual instruction educators are expected to have an unhitched male’s or alternately graduate degree in actual training, contingent upon the school locale.

These projects can show you the essential exercises of actual schooling classes and the science behind active work. You’ll likewise have the option to get a lot of commonsense understudy showing experience, which is expected to acquire an education permit.

By and large, graduate degree programs in actual schooling contain more inside and out instruction hypotheses and science parts than four-year college education programs. Classes might incorporate mishap avoidance, kinesiology, and assessment of actual wellness

◉ Licensure/Certification

To work in a government-funded school as an actual training instructor, you should be authorized. Licensure fluctuates by state, however, ordinarily expects you to hold a four-year certification in a field of schooling and complete a particular number of long stretches of directed understudy instructing.

You should likewise breeze through an overall showing accreditation assessment and one in your particular field of study. Educators should likewise finish proceeding with instructions to keep up with their permits, as indicated by the U.S. Agency of Labor Statistics (BLS).

◉ Career Outlook

The BLS predicts just a 4% development in the number of occupations for secondary school, center teachers, and primary teachers from 2019-2029.

Accessible open doors do differ by branch of knowledge and area. More positions might be accessible in country and metropolitan schools than in rural areas.

Also Read : What is Career Planning?

► Conclusion

Youngsters are becoming overweight because of the way that they don’t partake in sports activities or know the significance of physical education.

Since kids are becoming overweight guardians need to have their kids take an interest in physical activities from birth because P. Education will be educated to their kids when they begin going to class.

Educators that show physical education will show understudies how to deal with themselves appropriately.

This is significant because when somebody is taught regard to the significance of their well-being then it will make them carry on with a solid way of life.

So, guardians, educators, and different grown-ups need to stress the importance of Physical Edu. in schools.

Related Posts

Scope of Psychology

Scope of Environmental Studies

Physical activity in nature helps prevent several diseases, including depression and type 2 diabetes

Physical activity in natural environments prevent almost 13,000 cases of non-communicable diseases a year in England and save treatment costs of more than £100m, new research from the University of Exeter has found.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the most common non-communicable diseases -- including heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and chronic lung disease -- cause 74 percent of global mortality. Non communicable diseases, also known as chronic diseases, are not passed from person to person and deaths attributed to these diseases are increasing in most countries.

Physical inactivity is associated with a range of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, type-2 diabetes, cancers, and mental health outcomes. In their Global Status Report on Physical Activity 2022, the WHO estimated 500 million new cases will occur globally between 2020 and 2030 should physical activity remain at today's levels, incurring more than £21b a year in treatment costs.

Natural environments support recreational physical activity, with this new study focusing particularly on places such as beaches and coast, countryside, and open spaces in towns and cities like parks. Using data including a representative cross-sectional survey of the English population, researchers at the University of Exeter have estimated how many cases of six non-communicable diseases -- major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes, ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke, colon cancer, and breast cancer -- are prevented through nature-based recreational physical activity.

Speaking about the findings, published in Environment International, Dr James Grellier from the University of Exeter Medical School said: "We believe this is the first time an assessment like this has been conducted on a national scale and we've almost certainly underestimated the true value of nature-based physical activity in terms of disease prevention. Although we have focused on six of the most common non-communicable diseases, there are several less common diseases that can be prevented by physical activity, including other types of cancer and mental ill health. It's important to note that our estimates represent annual costs. Since chronic diseases can affect people for many years, the overall value of physical activity at preventing each case is certainly much higher."

Increasing population levels of physical activity is an increasingly important strategic goal for public health institutions globally. The WHO recommends that adults aged 18 to 64?should do at least 150 to 300 minutes of moderate intensity aerobic physical activity (or at least 75 to 150?minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity) per week to maintain good health. However, globally 27.5 percent of adults do not meet these recommendations.

In 2019, 22-million adults in England aged 16 years or older visited natural environments at least once a week. At reported volumes of nature-based physical activity, Exeter researchers estimate this prevented 12,763 cases of non-communicable diseases, creating annual healthcare savings of £108.7m.

Population-representative data from the Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment survey were used to estimate the weekly volume of nature-based recreational physical activity by adults in England in 2019. Researchers used epidemiological dose-response data to calculate incident cases of six non-communicable diseases prevented through nature-based physical activity, and estimated associated savings using published costs of healthcare, informal care, and productivity losses. It's estimated the healthcare cost of physical inactivity in England in 2019 is approximately £1b.

Dr James Grellier from the University of Exeter Medical School said: "For people without the access, desire, or confidence to take part in organised sports or fitness activities, nature-based physical activity is a far more widely available and informal option. We believe that our study should motivate decision-makers seeking to increase physical activity in the local population to invest in natural spaces, such as parks, to make it easier for people to be physically active."

• Diseases and Conditions
• Sports Medicine
• Chronic Illness
• Mental Health
• Intelligence
• K-12 Education
• Air pollution
• Head injury
• Legionnaires' disease
• Malignant melanoma
• Sudden infant death syndrome
• Whooping cough
• Double blind
• Spanish flu

Story Source:

Materials provided by University of Exeter . Original written by Tom Seymour. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.

Journal Reference :

• James Grellier, Mathew P. White, Siân de Bell, Oscar Brousse, Lewis R Elliott, Lora E Fleming, Clare Heaviside, Charles Simpson, Tim Taylor, Benedict W Wheeler, Rebecca Lovell. Valuing the health benefits of nature-based recreational physical activity in England . Environment International , 2024; 187: 108667 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108667

Cite This Page :

Explore More

• New Circuit Boards Can Be Repeatedly Recycled
• Collisions of Neutron Stars and Black Holes
• Advance in Heart Regenerative Therapy
• Bioluminescence in Animals 540 Million Years Ago
• Profound Link Between Diet and Brain Health
• Loneliness Runs Deep Among Parents
• Food in Sight? The Liver Is Ready!
• Acid Reflux Drugs and Risk of Migraine
• Do Cells Have a Hidden Communication System?
• Mice Given Mouse-Rat Brains Can Smell Again

Trending Topics

Strange & offbeat.

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

What federal education data shows about students with disabilities in the U.S.

Public K-12 schools in the United States educate about 7.3 million students with disabilities – a number that has grown over the last few decades. Disabled students ages 3 to 21 are served under the federal  Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) , which guarantees them the right to free public education and appropriate special education services.

For Disability Pride Month , here are some key facts about public school students with disabilities, based on the latest data from the  National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) .

July is both Disability Pride Month and the anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act. To mark these occasions, Pew Research Center used federal education data from  the National Center for Education Statistics  to learn more about students who receive special education services in U.S. public schools.

In this analysis, students with disabilities include those ages 3 to 21 who are served under the federal  Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) . Through IDEA, children with disabilities are guaranteed a “free appropriate public education,” including special education and related services.

The 7.3 million disabled students in the U.S. made up 15% of national public school enrollment during the 2021-22 school year. The population of students in prekindergarten through 12th grade who are served under IDEA has grown in both number and share over the last few decades. During the 2010-11 school year, for instance, there were 6.4 million students with disabilities in U.S. public schools, accounting for 13% of enrollment.

The number of students receiving special education services temporarily dropped during the coronavirus pandemic – the first decline in a decade. Between the 2019-20 and 2020-21 school years, the number of students receiving special education services decreased by 1%, from 7.3 million to 7.2 million. This was the first year-over-year drop in special education enrollment since 2011-12.

The decline in students receiving special education services was part of a 3% decline in the overall number of students enrolled in public schools between 2019-20 and 2020-21. While special education enrollment bounced back to pre-pandemic levels in the 2021-22 school year, overall public school enrollment remained flat.

These enrollment trends may reflect some of the learning difficulties and health concerns students with disabilities and their families faced during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic , which limited or paused special education services in many school districts.

Many school districts struggle to hire special education professionals. During the 2020-21 school year, 40% of public schools that had a special education teaching vacancy reported that they either found it very difficult to fill the position or were not able to do so.

Foreign languages (43%) and physical sciences (37%) were the only subjects with similarly large shares of hard-to-fill teaching vacancies at public schools that were looking to hire in those fields.

While the COVID-19 pandemic called attention to a nationwide teacher shortage , special education positions have long been among the most difficult for school districts to fill .

The most common type of disability for students in prekindergarten through 12th grade involves “specific learning disabilities,” such as dyslexia.  In 2021-22, about a third of students (32%) receiving services under IDEA had a specific learning disability. Some 19% had a speech or language impairment, while 15% had a chronic or acute health problem that adversely affected their educational performance. Chronic or acute health problems include ailments such as heart conditions, asthma, sickle cell anemia, epilepsy, leukemia and diabetes.

Students with autism made up 12% of the nation’s schoolchildren with disabilities in 2021-22, compared with 1.5% in 2000-01.  During those two decades, the share of disabled students with a specific learning disability, such as dyslexia, declined from 45% to 32%.

The percentage of students receiving special education services varies widely across states. New York serves the largest share of disabled students in the country at 20.5% of its overall public school enrollment. Pennsylvania (20.2%), Maine (20.1%) and Massachusetts (19.3%) serve the next-largest shares. The states serving the lowest shares of disabled students include Texas and Idaho (both 11.7%) and Hawaii (11.3%).

Between the 2000-01 and 2021-22 school years, all but 12 states experienced growth in their disabled student populations. The biggest increase occurred in Utah, where the disabled student population rose by 65%. Rhode Island saw the largest decline of 22%.

These differences by state are likely the result of inconsistencies in how states determine which students are eligible for special education services and challenges in identifying disabled children.

The racial and ethnic makeup of the nation’s special education students is similar to public school students overall, but there are differences by sex.  About two-thirds of disabled students (65%) are male, while 34% are female, according to data from the 2021-22 school year. Overall student enrollment is about evenly split between boys and girls.

Research has shown that decisions about whether to recommend a student for special education may be influenced by their school’s socioeconomic makeup, as well as by the school’s test scores and other academic markers.

Note: This is an update of a post originally published April 23, 2020.

Katherine Schaeffer is a research analyst at Pew Research Center

Most Americans think U.S. K-12 STEM education isn’t above average, but test results paint a mixed picture

About 1 in 4 u.s. teachers say their school went into a gun-related lockdown in the last school year, about half of americans say public k-12 education is going in the wrong direction, what public k-12 teachers want americans to know about teaching, what’s it like to be a teacher in america today, most popular.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Age & Generations
• Coronavirus (COVID-19)
• Economy & Work
• Family & Relationships
• Gender & LGBTQ
• Immigration & Migration
• International Affairs
• Internet & Technology
• Methodological Research
• News Habits & Media
• Non-U.S. Governments
• Other Topics
• Politics & Policy
• Race & Ethnicity
• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

Teacher arrested, accused of using AI to falsely paint boss as racist and antisemitic

A Maryland high school teacher was arrested after he allegedly used artificial intelligence to create phony audio, planting racist and antisemitic words into the voice of his boss, authorities said Thursday.

Dazhon Darien, a physical education teacher and the athletic director at Pikesville High School, was accused of falsifying the voice of principal Eric Eiswert in January, authorities said.

"We now have conclusive evidence that the recording was not authentic," Baltimore County Police Chief Robert McCullough told reporters in Towson. "It’s been determined the recording was generated through the use of artificial intelligence technology."

Darien was charged with disrupting school activities and other counts.

"As you could imagine, this has been a very difficult time for [the] Pikesville High School community, principal Eiswert and his family," Baltimore County Public Schools Superintendent Myriam Rogers said.

A judge signed on Wednesday afternoon an arrest warrant for Darien, who was caught Thursday morning at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport.

Darien was scheduled to fly to Houston when security questioned whether he had properly packed his gun for travel, McCullough said.

Darien's name was run through police records, and the warrant showed up, leading to his arrest, McCullough added.

McCullough stopped short of saying whether Darien was seeking to flee.

Darien was also charged with theft, retaliation against a witness and stalking.

He and Eiswert had been at odds over “work performance challenges” with Darien’s contract possibly “not being renewed next semester,” according to the arrest warrant.

"Through their investigation, detectives allege that Mr. Darien, who was athletic director at the high school, made the recording to retaliate against the principal, who had launched an investigation into the potential mishandling of school funds," McCullough said.

Eiswert had been following up on a $1,916 payment Darien allegedly authorized for an assistant girls soccer coach, who the head coach and players said never assisted the team, police said.

Eiswert had also reprimanded Darien for terminating a coach without his approval, police said.

Eiswert was widely admonished when the viral audio seemed to capture him spewing hateful rhetoric, mocking Black and Jewish people.

The voice initially believed to have been Eiswert's said Black students were unable to "test their way out of a paper bag," according to the court document.

"The recording went on to make disparaging comments about Jewish individuals and two teachers ... who 'should have never been hired' at the school," the warrant said.

Eiswert has always insisted that the recording, which was sent to Darien and two other teachers the night of Jan. 16, was fake.

The audio spread quickly on social media and "had profound repercussions," causing "significant disruptions for the PHS staff and students," according to the arrest warrant.

Eiswert has been on paid administrative leave since the recording went viral.

District appointees have run the school since Eiswert's departure, and the temporary administrators will stay on the job through the end of the school year, Rogers said.

"We will work with principal Eiswert and the Pikesville community concerning next year," Rogers added.

Investigators linked the email [email protected], which was used to send the audio, to an internet service provider registered to Darien's grandmother, according to the warrant.

The recovery phone number for the Google account had a 213 area code, registered to Darien, a Southern California native, police said.

A forensic analyst contracted by the FBI also found that the recording "contained traces of AI-generated content with human editing after the fact," the arrest warrant said.

Darien was shown to have used the Baltimore County Public Schools' network to access OpenAI tools and Microsoft Bing Chat services on Dec. 18 and 19 and Jan. 15, a day before the audio clip was sent out, police said.

Darien and his family could not immediately be reached for comment Thursday.

The school district will seek to fire Darien, Rogers said.

Eiswert could not be immediately reached for comment on Thursday.

A rep for the principal’s union said he’s relieved that “responsible people are being held accountable,” but is worried that harm caused by the fake audio could be long-lasting.

“I continue to be concerned about the damage these actions have caused for Principal Eiswert, his family, the students and staff of Pikesville High School, and the Black and Jewish community members,” Council of Administrative and Supervisory Employee executive director Billy Burke said in a statement. “I hope there is deliberate action to heal the trauma caused by the fake audio and that all people can feel restored.”

David K. Li is a senior breaking news reporter for NBC News Digital.

High Quality Physical Education

Appropriate actions must be taken in four main areas to ensure a high quality physical education program:

• Curriculum.
• Policies and environment.
• Instruction.
• Student assessment.

Policy and environmental actions that support high quality physical education require the following:

• Adequate instructional time (at least 150 minutes per week for elementary school students and 225 minutes per week for middle and high school students).
• All classes be taught by qualified physical education specialists.
• Reasonable class sizes.
• Proper equipment and facilities.

Instructional strategies that support high quality physical education emphasize the following:

• The need for inclusion of all students.
• Adaptations for students with disabilities.
• Opportunities to be physically active most of class time.
• Well-designed lessons.
• Out-of-school assignments to support learning.
• Not using physical activity as punishment.

Regular student assessment within a high quality physical education program features the following:

• The appropriate use of physical activity and fitness assessment tools.
• Ongoing opportunities for students to conduct self-assessments and practice self-monitoring of physical activity.
• Communication with students and parents about assessment results.
• Clarity concerning the elements used for determining a grading or student proficiency system.

A curriculum is a sequential system for delivering learning experiences to students. A physical education curriculum is the framework that provides guidance for teaching skills and providing physical activity instruction.

A high quality physical education curriculum will be based on the national standards in the document Moving Into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education ,1 which describes what a physically educated student should know and be able to do. It emphasizes meaningful content, which includes the following:

• Instruction in a variety of motor skills designed to enhance child and adolescent development.
• Fitness education and assessment that allows for understanding and improvement of physical well-being.
• Development of cognitive concepts related to motor skills and fitness.
• Opportunities to improve social and cooperative skills.
• Opportunities to increase the value placed on physical activity for health, enjoyment, self expression, and confidence.

Appropriate sequencing of learning activities is critical to developing a high quality physical education curriculum. Appropriate sequencing involves the following:

• Ensuring that motor skills, physical activity, and fitness assessments are age and developmentally appropriate.
• Methods of teaching motor and movement skills that ensure that basic skills lead to more advanced skills.
• Plans to appropriately monitor, reinforce, and prepare for student learning.

The effectiveness of school physical education is enhanced when it is implemented as an integral part of Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) and when physical education outcomes are reinforced by other components of a school health program.

• National Association of Sport and Physical Education. Moving into the Future: National Standards for Physical Education . 2nd ed. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education; 2004.

Healthy Youth

To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address:

Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
• Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
• You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
• CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.